Next Article in Journal
Grain Yield Formation and Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency of Different Winter Wheat Varieties under Rainfed Conditions in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain
Previous Article in Journal
Response of Soil and Plant Nutrients to Planting Years in Precious Ancient Camellia tetracocca Plantations
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 13
Issue 3
10.3390/agronomy13030913
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Combining a Mutant Allele of FAD2-1A with HD Improves the ω-6/ω-3 Ratio in Soybeans

by
Hwayeop Kim
1,†,
Hyun Jo
1,2,† and
Jeong-Dong Lee
1,3,*
1
Department of Applied Biosciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea
2
Upland-Field Machinery Research Center, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Integrative Biology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Agronomy 2023, 13(3), 913; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030913
Submission received: 25 February 2023 / Revised: 17 March 2023 / Accepted: 17 March 2023 / Published: 19 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Topic Advanced Breeding Technology for Plants)
Versions Notes

Abstract

The intake of foods with unbalanced ω-6/ω-3 ratios causes various health problems. Commodity soybeans generally have a ω-6/ω-3 ratio of 6–7:1. The recommended ratio in terms of health benefits is <4:1. This study aimed to identify the appropriate combination of mutant alleles that can reduce the ω-6/ω-3 ratio using three segregating soybean populations. F2 individuals from each population were genotyped for three different alleles of microsomal delta-12 fatty acid desaturase 2 enzyme (FAD2-1A) and an allele of homeodomain-like transcriptional regulator (HD) genes, and their five major fatty acids were assessed. F2 seeds carrying both fad2-1a and hd had slightly different ω-6/ω-3 ratios according to the different fad2-1a alleles. The fad2-1aDEL, fad2-1aS117N, and fad2-1aW293STOP alleles combined with a hd allele resulted in ω-6/ω-3 ratios with a range of 1.9–2.7:1, 2.7–3.9:1, and 2.6–3.6:1 in soybean seeds, respectively. This study revealed that the induction of mutations in FAD2-1ADEL and HD was the most efficient strategy to improve the ω-6/ω-3 ratio and elevate the ω-3 fatty acid concentrations in soybean seeds. These results provide useful information in soybean breeding programs to release a new soybean cultivar with a lower ω-6/ω-3 ratio and elevated ω-3 fatty acids, which can be a beneficial ingredient for soybean-based foods.

1. Introduction

Soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] are cultivated in many countries because of their seed compositions with ~40% protein and ~20% oil [1]. Soybeans are used not only as animal feed and a source of oil but also as an ingredient in healthy soybean-based foods, such as soybean paste, soybean sprout, soy sauce, tofu, and soy milk. Soybeans contain 11% palmitic acid, 4% stearic acid, 23% oleic acid, 54% linoleic acid (ω-6), and 8% α-linoleic acid (ω-3). Among these fatty acids (FAs), ω-6 and ω-3 are important FAs that humans must consume from foods, as mammals do not express enzymes for FA biosynthesis which insert double bonds at positions 3 and 6 from the methyl end of the carbon chain. Thus, humans and animals cannot synthesize ω-3 and ω-6 FAs by themselves [2,3,4]. The ω-3 FAs in plants or crops mostly exists as α-linolenic acid which is a precursor of EPA and DHA. Many studies have demonstrated the health benefits of ω-3 FAs, such as in the context of coronary heart disease and brain development [5,6,7,8,9,10,11].
Previous studies have revealed that an unbalanced consumption of a ω-6/ω-3 ratio can cause cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, lung diseases, and cancer [12,13,14]. Therefore, a balanced intake of ω-6/ω-3 FAs is important for human health. In fact, the intake ratio of ω-6 and ω-3 FAs was ~1:1 for Homo sapiens in the past [15]. Currently, the World Health Organization announced that the recommended ω-6/ω-3 ratio for human diets is <4:1 [16]. Because of westernized eating habits, individuals consume a severely disproportionate ω-6/ω-3 ratio, i.e., ~10–20:1 [15]. Commodity soybean oil contains an ω–6/ω-3 ratio of approximately 6–7:1. Therefore, it is necessary to adjust this ratio to <4:1 in soybean seeds for health benefits and their consumption as food.
Previous studies have shown that the microsomal delta-12 FA desaturase 2 (FAD2) and microsomal ω-3 FA desaturase (FAD3) genes are specifically involved in FA biosynthesis, especially that of unsaturated FAs, in plants. Mutations in either FAD2-1A (Glyma.10g278000 in W82.a2.v1) or FAD2-1B (Glyma.20g111000) increase the oleic acid concentration by ~30–40% while decreasing that of ω-6 FAs [17,18,19,20,21,22]. The PE529 EMS mutant line, which carries a nonsense mutation in FAD2-1A (fad2-1aW293STOP), produces about 45% oleic acid [18], whereas the M23 line with a deletion of FAD2-1A (fad2-1aDEL) produces about 46% oleic acid [22] and the 17D line with a missense mutation (fad2-1S117N) produces about 35% oleic acid [17]. In addition, PI283327, with a missense mutation in FAD2-1B, produces about 30% oleic acid [19,20,21]. Regarding ω-3 FAs, mutations occurring in the homeodomain-like transcriptional regulator (HD, Glyma.05g221500) gene, a transcription factor-encoding gene that may affect the expression level of FAD3 in soybeans, increase the levels of ω-3 FAs by up to 14% [23].
The ω-6/ω-3 ratio in cultivated soybeans is ~6–7:1 [24,25]. However, the ω-3 FA level in wild soybeans (Glycine soja Sieb. and Zucc.) is almost two-fold higher than that in cultivated soybeans, resulting in a ω-6/ω-3 ratio of ~4:1 [24,25,26,27,28]. Several studies have reported quantitative trait loci (QTLs) that control ω-3 FA production in wild soybeans; in wild soybean lines such as Hidaka4, PI483463, and ZYD00463, multiple QTLs were found to be associated with ω-3 FAs, as assessed through genetic analyses [27,29,30]. These studies suggest that the high levels of ω-3 FAs in wild soybeans are controlled by polygenes. A previous study proposed that the ω-6/ω-3 ratio in soybean seeds was improved via the utilization of the FAD2-1ADEL allele together with ω-3 FA QTLs from wild soybeans [28]. In addition, Jo et al. [23] reported that a new system for lower ω-6/ω-3 ratios could be developed using two alleles from either fad2-1aS117N or fad2-1b with hd from EMS-mutated G. max. These systems can produce a lower ω-6/ω-3 ratio accompanied by elevated ω-3 FAs in soybean seeds.
The concentration of oleic acid in soybean genotypes containing mutated FAD2-1 was increased at the expense of ω-6 FAs, resulting in a lower ratio of ω-6 to ω-3 FAs in soybean seeds [21,31]. In addition, elevating ω-6 FAs in soybean seeds is another strategy that can be used to decrease the ω-6/ω-3 ratio. To develop a new soybean cultivar with a lower ω-6/ω-3 ratio and elevated ω-3 FAs, the interaction of different allele combinations must be determined and optimized. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the ω-6/ω-3 ratio in soybean seeds with different combinations of three fad2-1a mutant alleles combined with the hd allele to determine the optimal allele combinations to produce an improved ω-6/ω-3 ratio with an elevated ω-3 FA concentration. We developed three different populations that segregated different alleles of FAD2-1A and an hd allele.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Experimental Environment

To assess ω-6/ω-3 ratios, three different segregating soybean populations were developed, and the parental lines were crossed at the affiliated field of Kyungpook National University (KNU), Gunwi, Republic of Korea (36°06′45″ N, 128°38′34″ E) during the summer of 2021. The original source of the fad2-1aW293STOP allele was the PE529 line [18]. The S08-14719 line is a high-oleic-acid genotype that produces ~80% oleic acid and carries the fad2-1aDEL allele from M23 and fad2-1b allele from PI283327 [19]. Hosim is a high-oleic-acid cultivar that combines the fad2-1aS117N allele from 17D with the fad2-1b allele [32]. The JD17-20-2-39 breeding line has an elevated ω-3 FA level and is the source of a mutant allele of the homeodomain-like transcriptional regulator (HD) gene from the PE2166 line [23]. We developed populations 1, 2, and 3 from PE529 and JD17-20-2-39, S08-14719 and JD17-20-2-39, and Hosim and JD17-20-2-39, respectively (Table 1). Each population yielded an F1 seed during the autumn of 2021. F2; seeds were produced in the greenhouse of the KNU, Daegu, Republic of Korea (35°53′42″ N, 128°36′45″ E) during the winter of 2021–2022. In this experiment, 96, 305, and 380 F₂ seeds of PE529 × JD17-20-2-39, S08-14719 × JD17-20-2-39, and Hosim × JD17-20-2-39 were used for genotype and phenotype determinations.

2.2. FA Analysis and Genomic DNA Extraction

FA profiles of each F₂ seed were determined using gas chromatography (GC) with the Agilent Series 7890A capillary gas chromatographer (Agilent Technologies Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA) equipped with an ionization detector. Soybean oil was extracted from crushed seeds and then, those seeds were placed in 700 µL of an extracting solution (chloroform/hexane/methanol [8:5:2, v/v]) for 12 h, and 75 µL of a methylation reagent consisting of methanol methoxide/petrolether/ethyl ether [1:5:2, v/v] was added to ~200 µL of extracted solution from previous step. Subsequently, a total of 1 mL of solution was obtained by adding ~725 µL of hexane. The peaks of each FA including, palmitic, stearic, oleic, ω-6, and ω-3 FAs were separated using a DB-FFAP capillary Agilent column (30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 µm; Agilent Technologies Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA). The peak areas of each FA were determined according to standard curves of a FA solution (Fame #16, Restek). We isolated genomic DNA from the F2 seeds of each population according to the manufacturer’s protocol of the HiGene Genomic DNA Prep Kit (BioFACT Co., Daejeon, Republic of Korea).

2.3. Development of the HD Genotyping Assay

The SimpleProbe was designed using the LightCycler Probe Design Software 2.0 (version 1, Roche Applied Sciences, Penzberg, Germany) based on the position of mutation. The SNP position of HD was determined in our previous study [23]. The HD genotyping assay was performed using a 2:5 asymmetric mixture of 0.2 µM forward primer (5′–TGTTTGTGAAGCTCAAATGTTCT–3′) and 0.5 µM reverse primer (5′–CTTCACAATTTCCGGAGACG–3′). Moreover, we used 20 µM 5′–Fluorescein-SPC-AGAAACCTATCCATTTGCAACCTTGG-phosphate–3′ SimpleProbe. The total reaction volume was 20 μL, including genomic DNA, forward and reverse primers, SimpleProbe, titanium taq polymerase buffer, and titanium taq polymerase (BD Biosciences, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed on a Roche LightCycler 480 II using a melting curve analysis at 95 °C for 3 min, 60 °C for 20 s, 72 °C for 20 s, and melting temperatures of 45–75 °C. The homozygous allele of HD gene showed a peak at 64°C. The homozygous hd allele showed a peak at 57 °C. The heterozygous alleles of a HD gene produced peaks at both temperatures of 57 °C and 64 °C.

2.4. FAD2-1AW293STOP Genotyping Assay

The FAD2-1AW293STOP genotype analysis [18] was performed using a 5:2 asymmetric mixture of 0.5 µM forward (5′–CCGTGTTGCAACCCTGAAAG–3′) and 0.2 µM reverse (5′–ACCATGATCGCAACAAGCTG–3′) primers. We also used the 5′–Fluorescein-SPC-CCAAAGCTCCCTTCAGCCAG-phosphate–3′ SimpleProbe. The PCR was performed on a Roche LightCycler 480 II using a melting curve analysis at 95 °C for 3 min, 60 °C for 20 s, 72 °C for 20 s, and melting temperature from 50 °C to 72 °C to measure fluorescence at every 0.1 °C. The single nucleotide matches or inconsistencies with the SimpleProbe were identified by incorporating fluorescence extinction at different melting temperatures. The homozygous allele of FAD2-1A gene showed a peak at 64 °C. The homozygous fad2-1aW293STOP alleles produced a peak at 57 °C. The heterozygous alleles of a FAD2-1AW293STOP gene showed peaks at both temperatures of 57 °C and 64 °C.

2.5. FAD2-1ADEL Genotyping Assay

The FAD2-1ADEL genotype analysis [19] was performed using a 1:1:1:1 primer mixture as follows: 5′–ATCTTTAGATTTTTCACTACCTGGTTTAAAATTGAGGGATTG–3′, 5′–CTTTGCTAGACCCTGTGTCAAAGTATAAAC–3′, 5′–AACGTGAATGGGAATAGTTGC–3′, and 5′–GTATTCGATCTGCGAATGCC–3′. We used 2.5 µM Eva Green. The analysis was performed on a Roche LightCycler 480 II using a melting curve analysis at 95 °C for 5 min, 64 °C for 20 s, 72 °C for 20 s, and melting temperatures from 70 °C to 85 °C to measure fluorescence at every 0.1 °C. The homozygous allele of FAD2-1ADEL showed a peak at 77 °C. The homozygous fad2-1aDEL alleles produced two peaks at 79 °C and 82 °C. All peaks at three temperatures were showed for heterozygous alleles of FAD2-1ADEL.

2.6. FAD2-1AS117N Genotyping Assay

The FAD2-1AS117N genotype analysis [20] was performed using a 5:1 asymmetric mixture of 0.5 µM forward primer (5′–CCAAGGTTGCCTTCTCACTGGT–3′) and 0.2 µM reverse primer (5′–TAGGCCACCCTATTGTGAGTGTGAC–3′). Moreover, we used 20 µM 5′–Fluorescein-SPC-GTACTTGCTGAAGGCATGGTGA-phosphate–3′ SimpleProbe. The PCR was performed on a Roche LightCycler 480 II using a melting curve analysis at 95 °C for 3 min, 65 °C for 20 s, 72 °C for 30 s, and melting temperatures from 50 °C to 68 °C. The homozygous functional allele of FAD2-1AS117N showed a peak at 62 °C. The homozygous fad2-1aS117N alleles produced a peak at 54 °C, and heterozygous alleles showed peaks at both temperatures of 54 °C and 62 °C.

2.7. FAD2-1B Genotyping Assay

The FAD2-1B genotype analysis [19,20,21] was performed using a 5:2 asymmetric mixture of 0.5 µM forward primer (5′–GGTTCTCCAAGGTTGCATTCTTACT–3′) and 0.2 µM reverse primer (5′–AGGGTTGTTCAGGTACTTGGTGT–3′). Moreover, we used 20 µM 5′–Fluorescein-SPC-AGTCCCTTATTTCTCATGGAAAATAAGC-phosphate–3′ SimpleProbe. The PCR was performed on a Roche LightCycler 480 II using a melting curve analysis at 95 °C for 3 min, 60 °C for 20 s, 72 °C for 20 s, and a melting curve from 50 °C to 68 °C to measure fluorescence at every 0.1 °C. The homozygous allele of FAD2-1B was detected at 62.5 °C, marked with a peak. Homozygous fad2-1b alleles produced a peak at 56.5 °C, and heterozygous alleles showed peaks at both temperatures.

3. Results

To improve the ω-6/ω-3 ratio of soybean seeds, three different fad2-1a alleles were combined with a single hd mutant allele to produce three different segregating populations. For population 1, 96 F2 seeds were produced to segregate the FAD2-1AW293STOP and HD alleles from a cross between the PE529 and JD17-20-2-39 lines. Plants from the JD17-20-2-39 breeding line were found to carry a mutant HD allele, and the soybean seeds from these plants contained 16.6 ± 1.2% ω-3 FA. The phenotypic distribution of each FA is presented in Figure S1. The F2 seeds contained 31.1–60.7% ω-6 FA and 7.9–17.8% ω-3 FA. The average FA levels in the 96 F2 seeds in population 1 were as follows: 9.8% palmitic acid, 3.8% stearic acid, 25.0% oleic acid, 50.2% ω-6 FA, and 11.1% ω-3 FA. In the F2 individuals, eight individual plants were wild-type homozygous for the FAD2-1AW293STOP and HD alleles (AAHH), seven were homozygous for the FAD2-1AW293STOP and hd alleles (AAhh), five were homozygous for the fad2-1aW293STOP and HD alleles (aaHH), and four were homozygous for the fad2-1aW293STOP and hd alleles (aahh; Table 2). In the F2 seeds of population 1, the ω-6 FA concentrations in AAHH, AAhh, aaHH, and aahh plants were 55.0 ± 1.8%, 59.3 ± 0.9%, 37.3 ± 4.5%, and 42.1 ± 5.6%, respectively. In addition, the ω-3 FA concentrations in AAHH, AAhh, aaHH, and aahh plants were 9.3 ± 0.8%, 13.8 ± 0.6%, 9.3 ± 0.5%, and 13.6 ± 0.2%, respectively. Interestingly, an F2 seed carrying a heterozygous FAD2-1AW293STOP allele and a homozygous mutant allele of HD (Aahh) exhibited the highest ω-3 FA concentration in population 1 (Table 2). The ω-6/ω-3 ratios in the AAHH, AAhh, aaHH, and aahh plants were 5.9 ± 0.5:1, 4.3 ± 0.3:1, 4.0 ± 0.5:1, and 3.1 ± 0.4:1, respectively. The lowest ω-6/ω-3 ratio was 3.1 ± 0.4:1 in the aahh genotype group in population 1.
In population 2, F2 seeds were genotyped for the FAD2-1ADEL, FAD2-1B, and HD alleles (Figure S2 and Table 3). The F2 seeds of population 2 were classified into seven genotypic categories: those with all wild-type alleles (A1A1BBHH); those with a functional FAD2-1ADEL allele, functional FAD2-1B allele, and mutant HD allele (A1A1BBhh); those with a functional FAD2-1ADEL allele, fad2-1b allele, and functional HD allele (A1A1bbHH); those with a functional FAD2-1ADEL allele, fad2-1b allele, and hd allele (A1A1bbhh); those with a fad2-1aDEL allele, functional FAD2-1B, and hd allele (a1a1BBhh); those with a fad2-1aDEL allele, a fad2-1b allele, and HD (a1a1bbHH); and those with all mutant alleles (a1a1bbhh; Table 3). The FA profile of the F2 seeds in the genotypic group A1A1bbhh was as follows: 12.1%–19.9% oleic acid and 13.6–18.4% ω-3 FAs, whereas that of the a1a1BBhh group was 22.8%–32.1% oleic acid and 16.4–21.7% ω-3 FAs. Two mutant types (a1a1BBhh and A1A1bbhh) exhibited an FA profile with an ω-6/ω-3 ratio of <4.0 (Table 3). The comparison of the a1a1BBhh and A1A1bbhh genotypic groups revealed that the F2 seeds with the a1a1BBhh genotype had a lower ω-6/ω-3 ratio than the seeds with the A1A1bbhh genotype. The ω-6/ω-3 ratio in the a1a1bbhh genotypic group was approximately 0.3 ± 0.1:1, which was the lowest ω-6/ω-3 ratio among all seven different genotypic categories, followed by F2 seeds with a1a1bbHH (ω-6/ω-3 ratio of 0.4 ± 0.1:1) and a1a1BBhh (ω-6/ω-3 ratio of 2.2 ± 0.3:1) genotypes.
In population 3, 380 F2 seeds were genotyped for FAD2-1AS117N, FAD2-1B, and HD alleles; moreover, a FA analysis was performed (Figure S3 and Table 4). The phenotypic distribution of the FA profile is shown in Figure S3. The average FA levels in the 380 F2 seeds in population 3 were as follows: 9.9% palmitic acid, 3.1% stearic acid, 34.4% oleic acid, 42.0% ω-6 FAs, and 10.6% ω-3 FAs. After excluding F2 seeds that were heterozygous for the evaluated alleles, a total of 45 F2 seeds were homozygous for the FAD2-1AS117N, FAD2-1B, and HD alleles (Table 4). The F2 seed genotype A2A2bbhh had an average of 21.4% oleic acid, 53.0% ω-6 FAs, and 13.3% ω-3 FAs, whereas the average FA concentration in the a2a2BBhh genotypic group was 35.5% oleic acid, 39.8% ω-6 FAs, and 16.4% ω-3 FAs (Table 4). The comparison of the genotypes revealed that the A2A2bbhh, a2a2BBhh, and a2a2BBhh genotypes had lower ω-6/ω-3 ratios of 3.1 ± 0.7:1. The F2 seeds in the A2A2BBhh genotypic group exhibited the highest ω-3 FA levels, at an average of 15.2%.

4. Discussion

Because soybeans are an important oil crop, most soybean researchers have been interested in decreasing ω-3 FA concentrations for the improvement of oxidative stability in soybean oil. However, soybeans are consumed directly in both fermented and nonfermented forms in many Asian countries and it can be a source of plant-based ω-3 FAs. Studies have demonstrated that intake of ω-6 and ω-3 FAs prevents inflammation, cardiovascular disease, and Alzheimer’s disease [33,34]. Individuals consume these FAs at a severely disproportionate ω-6/ω-3 ratio (~10:1 to ~20:1) [15]. The WHO recommends an ω-6/ω-3 ratio of <4:1. Normal soybean seeds contain an ω-6/ω-3 ratio of 6:1–7:1. Therefore, it is necessary to adjust the ω-6/ω-3 ratio to <4:1 and to elevate ω-3 FA in soybean-based foods.
Soybeans with genotypes containing mutated FAD2-1 have increased oleic acid and decreased ω-6 FA, resulting in a lower ω-6/ω-3 ratio in these soybean seeds [21,31]. In addition, increasing the ω-3 FA level in soybean seeds is another strategy for improving the ω-6/ω-3 ratio. Previous studies have established a seed-development system using wild soybeans as a genetic source for elevating ω-3 FA concentrations. However, nine estimated QTLs were found to be involved in the increase of ω-3 FA concentrations in the PI483463 wild soybean [27]. Using PI483463 plants as donor of genomic loci to increase ω-3 FAs and lower the ω-6/ω-3 ratio in soybean seeds was proposed using either of the fad2-1aDEL from M23 or fad2-1b from PI283327 combined with elevated ω-3 loci from wild soybeans [28]. Kulkarni et al. [28] demonstrated ω-6/ω-3 ratios of 2.5:1–3.9:1 via the use of the wild soybean, PI483463. The present study revealed that plants with the a1a1BBhh genotype carrying fad2-1aDEL and hd alleles in population 2 produced an ω-6/ω-3 ratio of 2.2:1 and an ω-3 FA concentration of 18.6%, which was significantly higher than that produced by the A1A1BBhh genotypic group (15.0%) in population 2 (Table 3).
The higher ω-3 concentrations detected in wild soybeans may be attributed to the different genes that control ω-3 biosynthesis [27,35]. Recently, a new system was established with PE2166, containing about 14% ω-3 FAs with mutations caused by EMS treatment of Pungsannamul [23]. The mutation in HD regulates the expression of FAD3A, resulting in an increase in ω-3 FA concentrations. Jo et al. [23] demonstrated the improvement of the ω-6/ω-3 ratio via the use of two genes, i.e., the fad2-1aS117N and hd mutant alleles, resulting in the production of an approximately 3.3:1 ω-6/ω-3 ratio in seeds. A similar result was obtained for the a2a2BBhh genotypic group in population 3, which produced an ω-6/ω-3 ratio of 3.1:1 and an increased concentration of ω-3 FA (13.3%) in soybean seeds (Table 4).
Our previous study discovered a new allele of FAD2-1A in the PE529 EMS-mutant line that yielded >40% oleic acid (fad2-1aW293STOP) [18]. However, we reported that F2 seeds with a homozygous fad2-1aW293STOP, functional FAD2-1B and HD alleles in the three segregating populations produced 40.3%, 46.6%, and 30.4% oleic acid, respectively [18]. In addition, the PE529 line produced oleic acid concentrations of 49.1% and 43.4% in two growing years in a row, respectively. In the present study, the aaHH genotype yielded an oleic acid concentration of 37.3% (Table 2). Many studies have investigated the effects of environmental factors and temperature on FA profiles across various soybean genotypes because of the unstable production of FAs [36,37,38,39,40,41]. The instability of oleic acid may affect the ω-6/ω-3 ratio in soybean seeds. Thus, it is important to understand the stability of the FA profiles in genotypes containing the fad2-1aW293STOP allele together with the hd allele in different growing environments for further research.
To date, 12 different fad2-1a mutant alleles have been identified in natural germplasms and mutagenized populations, producing oleic acid at concentrations ranging from 27 to 37% [18,42,43,44,45]. Several studies demonstrated that combinations of different fad2-1a mutant alleles combined with a fad2-1b mutant allele produced >70% oleic acid concentration, but produced slightly different oleic acid concentrations [19,20,31,42]. To determine the most effective strategy for a lower ω-6/ω-3 ratio, the aahh, a1a1hh, and a2a2hh genotypes from three different populations were compared in terms of the ω-6/ω-3 ratio and ω-3 FA concentrations in soybean seeds. This study is the first time that the aahh, and a2a2hh genotypes combination has been explored for ω-6/ω-3 ratios and seed ω-3 FA concentrations in soybean seeds. Among these genotypic groups, the highest ω-3 concentration in soybean seeds was observed in the a1a1hh group, which carried a deletion of the FAD2-1A allele from M23. In addition, the ω-6/ω-3 ratio of the a1a1hh genotypic group in population 2 was 2.2, which was lower than that observed for the aahh genotypic group (3.1) in population 1 and the a2a2hh genotypic group (2.1) in population 3. Regarding the ω-3 FA concentrations, the a1a1hh genotypic group (18.6%) produced an approximately 5% higher level of this FA than that produced by the aahh (13.6%) and a2a2hh (13.3%) genotypic groups. This study reported that the induction of mutations in FAD2-1ADEL and HD in soybean seeds is the most efficient strategy for improving the ω-6/ω-3 ratio and increasing the ω-3 FA concentrations. These results provide information that can be useful for developing novel soybean cultivars with a lower ω-6/ω-3 ratio and elevated ω-3 FA concentration, which can be a beneficial ingredient for soybean-based foods to enhance human health.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy13030913/s1, Figure S1: Distribution of fatty acids for F₂ seeds of population 1 (PE529 × JD17-20-2-39). C1 means Pungsannamul, P1 means PE529, and P2 means JD17-20-2-39, and the average value of each check line is displayed; Figure S2: Distribution of fatty acids for F₂ seeds of population 2 (S08-14719 × JD17-20-2-39). C1 means Pungsannamul, C2 means PI283327, P1 means S08-14719, and P2 means JD17-20-2-39, and the average value of each check line is displayed; Figure S3: Distribution of fatty acids for F₂ seeds of population 3 (Hosim × JD17-20-2-39). C1 means Pungsannamul, C2 means PI283327, P1 means Hosim, and P2 means JD17-20-2-39, and the average value of each check line is displayed.

Author Contributions

H.K. and H.J. contributed equally to the study. Conceptualization, J.-D.L.; formal analysis, H.K. and H.J.; investigation and methodology, H.K.; writing—original draft preparation, H.K. and H.J.; writing—review and editing, H.J. and J.-D.L.; supervision, J.-D.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by a project to train professional personnel in biological materials by the Ministry of Environment and was supported by the Korea Basic Science Institute (National Research Facilities and Equipment Center) grant funded by the Ministry of Education (2021R1A6C101A416).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the personnel from the Plant Genetics and Breeding Laboratory at Kyungpook National University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hymowitz, T.; Shurtleff, W.R. Debunking soybean myths and legends in the historical and popular literature. Crop Sci. 2005, 45, 473–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Burr, G.O.; Burr, M.M. A new deficiency disease produced by the rigid exclusion of fat from the diet. J. Biol. Chem. 1929, 82, 345–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Semplicini, A.; Valle, R. Fish oils and their possible role in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Pharmacol. Ther. 1994, 61, 385–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Din, J.N.; Newby, D.E.; Flapan, A.D. Omega 3 fatty acids and cardiovascular disease—Fishing for a natural treatment. Br. Med. J. 2004, 328, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. De Lorgeril, M.; Salen, P. New insights into the health effects of dietary saturated and omega-6 and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. BMC Med. 2012, 10, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Innes, J.K.; Calder, P.C. Omega-6 fatty acids and inflammation. Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes Essent. Fatty Acids 2018, 132, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Innis, S.M. Dietary omega 3 fatty acids and the developing brain. Brain Res. 2008, 1237, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kang, J.X. The Importance of Omega-6/Omega-3 Fatty Acid Ratio in Cell Function. In Omega-6/Omega-3 Essential Fatty Acid Ratio: The Scientific Evidence; Simopoulos, A.P., Cleland, L.G., Eds.; Karger: Basel, Switzerland, 2003; Volume 92, pp. 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Leaf, A.; Kang, J.X.; Xiao, Y.F.; Billman, G.E. Clinical prevention of sudden cardiac death by n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and mechanism of prevention of arrhythmias by n-3 fish oils. Circulation 2003, 107, 2646–2652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Simopoulos, A.P. The importance of the ratio of omega-6/omega-3 essential fatty acids. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2002, 56, 365–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Simopoulos, A.P. Importance of the Omega-6/Omega-3 Balance in Health and Disease: Evolutionary Aspects of Diet. In Healthy Agriculture Healthy Nutrition Healthy People; Simopouulos, A.P., Koletzko, B., Eds.; Karger: Basel, Switzerland, 2011; pp. 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Harris, W.S.; Assaad, B.; Poston, W.C. Tissue omega-6/omega-3 fatty acid ratio and risk for coronary artery disease. Am. J. Cardiol. 2006, 98, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Simopoulos, A.P. Omega-6/omega-3 essential fatty acid ratio and chronic diseases. Food Rev. Int. 2004, 20, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Simopoulos, A.P. The importance of the omega-6/omega-3 fatty acid ratio in cardiovascular disease and other chronic diseases. Exp. Biol. Med. 2008, 233, 674–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chaves, H.; Singh, R.B.; Khan, S.; Wilczynska, A.; Takahashi, T. High omega-6/omega-3 fatty acid ratio diets and risk of noncommunicable diseases: Is the tissue, the main issue? In The Role of Functional Food Security in Global Health; Singh, R.B., Watson, R.R., Takahashi, T., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 217–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fabian, C.J.; Kimler, B.F.; Hursting, S.D. Omega-3 fatty acids for breast cancer prevention and survivorship. Breast Cancer Res. 2015, 17, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dierking, E.C.; Bilyeu, K.D. New sources of soybean seed meal and oil composition traits identified through TILLING. BMC Plant Biol. 2009, 9, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Jo, H.; Woo, C.; Norah, N.; Song, J.T.; Lee, J.D. Novel allele of FAD2-1A from an EMS-Induced mutant soybean line (PE529) produces elevated levels of oleic acid in soybean oil. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pham, A.T.; Lee, J.D.; Shannon, J.G.; Bilyeu, K.D. Mutant alleles of FAD2-1A and FAD2-1B combine to produce soybeans with the high oleic acid seed oil trait. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pham, A.T.; Lee, J.D.; Shannon, J.G.; Bilyeu, K.D. A novel FAD2-1A allele in a soybean plant introduction offers an alternate means to produce soybean seed oil with 85% oleic acid content. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2011, 123, 793–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Pham, A.T.; Shannon, J.G.; Bilyeu, K.D. Combinations of mutant FAD2 and FAD3 genes to produce high oleic acid and low linolenic acid soybean oil. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2012, 125, 503–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Takagi, Y.; Rahman, S.M. Inheritance of high oleic acid content in the seed oil of soybean mutant M23. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1996, 92, 179–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jo, H.; Kim, M.; Cho, H.; Ha, B.K.; Kang, S.; Song, J.T.; Lee, J.D. Identification of a potential gene for elevating ω-3 concentration and its efficiency for improving the ω-6/ω-3 ratio in soybean. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 3836–3847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Asekova, S.; Chae, J.H.; Ha, B.K.; Dhakal, K.H.; Chung, G.; Shannon, J.G.; Lee, J.D. Stability of elevated αlinolenic acid derived from wild soybean (Glycine soja Sieb. & Zucc.) across environments. Euphytica 2014, 195, 409–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dhakal, K.H.; Lee, J.D.; Jeong, Y.S.; Kim, H.S.; Shannon, J.G.; Hwang, Y.H. Stability of linolenic acid in seed oil of soybean accessions with elevated linolenic acid concentration. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2013, 11, 80–85. [Google Scholar]
  26. Chae, J.H.; Ha, B.K.; Chung, G.; Park, J.E.; Park, E.; Ko, J.M.; Shannon, J.G.; Song, J.T.; Lee, J.D. Identification of environmentally stable wild soybean genotypes with high alpha-linolenic acid concentration. Crop Sci. 2015, 55, 1629–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ha, B.K.; Kim, H.J.; Velusamy, V.; Vuong, T.D.; Nguyen, H.T.; Shannon, J.G.; Lee, J.D. Identification of quantitative trait loci controlling linolenic acid concentration in PI483463 (Glycine soja). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2014, 127, 1501–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kulkarni, K.P.; Kim, M.; Song, J.T.; Bilyeu, K.D.; Lee, J.D. Genetic improvement of the fatty acid biosynthesis system to alter the ω-6/ω-3 ratio in the soybean seed. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2017, 94, 1403–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shibata, M.; Takayama, K.; Ujiie, A.; Yamada, T.; Abe, J.; Kitamura, K. Genetic relationship between lipid content and linolenic acid concentration in soybean seeds. Breed. Sci. 2008, 58, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  30. Yao, Y.; You, Q.; Duan, G.; Ren, J.; Chu, S.; Zhao, J.; Li, X.; Zhou, X.; Jiao, Y. Quantitative trait loci analysis of seed oil content and composition of wild and cultivated soybean. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Hoshino, T.; Takagi, Y.; Anai, T. Novel GmFAD2-1b mutant alleles created by reverse genetics induce marked elevation of oleic acid content in soybean seeds in combination with GmFAD2-1a. Breed. Sci. 2010, 60, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lee, J.D.; Kim, M.; Kulkarni, K.P.; Song, J.T. Agronomic traits and fatty acid composition of high–oleic acid cultivar Hosim. Plant Breed. Biotechnol. 2018, 6, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  33. Serhan, C.N.; Chiang, N.; Van Dyke, T.E. Resolving inflammation: Dual anti-inflammatory and proresolution lipid mediators. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 8, 349–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Swanson, D.; Block, R.; Mousa, S.A. Omega-3 fatty acids EPA and DHA: Health benefits throughout life. Adv. Nutr. 2012, 3, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pantalone, V.R.; Rebetzke, G.J.; Burton, J.W.; Wilson, R.F. Genetic regulation of linolenic acid concentration in wild soybean Glycine soja accessions. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1997, 74, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dornbos, D.L.; Mullen, R.E. Soybean seed protein and oil concentrations and fatty acid composition adjustments by drought and temperature. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1992, 69, 228–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hou, G.; Ablett, G.R.; Pauls, K.P.; Rajcan, I. Environmental effects on fatty acid levels in soybean seed oil. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2006, 83, 759–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Howell, R.W.; Collins, F.I. Factors Affecting Linolenic and Linoleic Acid Concentration of Soybean Oil1. Agron. J. 1957, 49, 593–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rennie, B.D.; Tanner, J.W. Fatty acid composition of oil from soybean seeds grown at extreme temperatures. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1989, 66, 1622–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wilson, R.F. Seed Composition. In Soybeans: Improvement, Production, and Uses, 3rd ed.; Shibles, R.M., Harper, J.E., Wilson, R.F., Shoemaker, R.C., Eds.; American Society of Agronomy, Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 2004; Volume 16, pp. 621–677. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wolf, R.B.; Cavins, J.F.; Kleiman, R.; Black, L.T. Effect of temperature on soybean seed constituents: Oil, protein, moisture, fatty acids, amino acids and sugars. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 1982, 59, 230–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Combs, R.; Bilyeu, K. Novel alleles of FAD2-1A induce high levels of oleic acid in soybean oil. Mol. Breed. 2019, 39, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bilyeu, K.; Škrabišová, M.; Allen, D.; Rajcan, I.; Palmquist, D.E.; Gillen, A.; Mian, R.; Jo, H. The interaction of the soybean seed high oleic acid oil trait with other fatty acid modifications. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2018, 95, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Thapa, R.; Carrero-Colon, M.; Crowe, M.; Gaskin, E.; Hudson, K. Novel FAD2–1A alleles confer an elevated oleic acid phenotype in soybean seeds. Crop Sci. 2016, 56, 226–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Nan, H.; Lu, S.; Fang, C.; Hou, Z.; Yang, C.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, B.; Kong, F. Molecular breeding of a high oleic acid soybean line by integrating natural variations. Mol. Breed. 2020, 40, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Nomenclature, FAD2-1A, FAD2-1B and HD allele status, and soybean population information.
Table 1. Nomenclature, FAD2-1A, FAD2-1B and HD allele status, and soybean population information.
NameGenotypeFatty Acid ProfileNoteReference
FAD2-1A
(Glyma.10g278000)		FAD2-1B
(Glyma.20g111000)		HD
(Glyma.05g221500)
PE529fad2-1aW293STOPFAD2-1BHDElevated oleic acidParent 1 (P1)Jo et al. [18]
S08-14719fad2-1aDELfad2-1bHDHigh oleic acidParent 2 (P2)Pham et al. [19]
Hosimfad2-1aS117Nfad2-1bHDHigh oleic acidParent 3 (P3)Lee et al. [32]
JD17-20-2-39FAD2-1AFAD2-1BHdElevated ω-3Parent 4 (P4)Jo et al. [23]
Population 1FAD2-1A/fad2-1aW293WTOP HD/hd P1 × P4
Population 2FAD2-1A/fad2-1aDEL HD/hd P2 × P4
Population 3FAD2-1A/fad2-1aS117N HD/hd P3 × P4
FAD2-1A indicates functional microsomal delta-12 fatty acid desaturase 2 gene which is similar to Williams 82 reference sequence for Glyma.10g278000. fad2-1aW293STOP, fad2-1aDEL, and fad2-1aS117N indicate the mutant alleles of FAD2-1A. FAD2-1B indicates functional microsomal delta-12 fatty acid desaturase 2 gene which is similar to the reference sequence for Glyma.20g111000. fad2-1b indicates the mutant alleles of FAD2-1B. HD indicates functional homeodomain-like transcriptional regulator which is similar to the reference sequence for Glyma.05g1221500. hd indicates the mutant alleles of HD.
Table 2. Variation of fatty acids concentrations and ω-6/ω-3 ratio by genotypic groups in population 1 from a cross of PE529 and JD17-20-2-39.
Table 2. Variation of fatty acids concentrations and ω-6/ω-3 ratio by genotypic groups in population 1 from a cross of PE529 and JD17-20-2-39.
IDGenotypic GroupsFatty Acid Concentration (%)
Palmitic AcidStearic AcidOleic AcidLinoleic Acid
(ω-6)		α-Linolenic Acid
(ω-3)		ω-6/ω-3
PungsannamulAAHH (n = 13)11.8 ± 0.4 f2.9 ± 0.3 a19.7 ± 2.3 cd55.6 ± 1.9 efg10.0 ± 0.8 abc5.6 ± 0.5 ef
PE529aaHH (n = 13)9.0 ± 0.8 a4.1 ± 0.6 bc42.2 ± 4.9 h33.7 ± 4.2 a11.0 ± 0.6 c3.0 ± 0.3 a
JD17-20-2-39AAhh (n = 13)11.2 ± 0.4 e2.4 ± 0.2 a11.6 ± 1.0 a58.2 ± 0.8 gh16.6 ± 1.2 f3.5 ± 0.3 b
F2 seedAAHH (n = 8)10.6 ± 1.2 d5.0 ± 0.8 d20.0 ± 2.9 cd55.0 ± 1.8 ef9.3 ± 0.8 a5.9 ± 0.5 f
AAHh (n = 7)10.5 ± 0.4 cd4.0 ± 0.8 bc19.1 ± 1.2 c55.9 ± 1.4 fg10.4 ± 1.0 bc5.4 ± 0.6 de
Aahh (n = 7)9.9 ± 0.4 bc2.8 ± 0.2 a14.2 ± 0.6 ab59.3 ± 0.9 h13.8 ± 0.6 d4.3 ± 0.3 c
AaHH (n = 9)10.5 ± 0.9 cd4.5 ± 0.5 cd23.2 ± 3.2 e52.0 ± 2.3 d9.7 ± 0.7 ab5.4 ± 0.3 de
AaHh (n = 27)9.9 ± 0.6 bc4.0 ± 0.6 bc22.4 ± 1.8 de53.2 ± 1.7 de10.5 ± 0.9 bc5.1 ± 0.4 d
Aahh (n = 11)9.5 ± 0.4 ab2.8 ± 0.4 a15.3 ± 2.6 b57.6 ± 1.5 fgh14.8 ± 1.8 e3.9 ± 0.5 bc
aaHH (n = 5)9.4 ± 0.4 ab4.3 ± 0.3 c39.6 ± 4.6 gh37.3 ± 4.5 b9.3 ± 0.5 a4.0 ± 0.5 c
aaHh (n = 18)9.1 ± 0.4 a3.7 ± 0.4 b38.5 ± 3.9 g38.0 ± 3.6 b10.6 ± 0.8 bc3.6 ± 0.4 b
aahh (n = 4)9.1 ± 0.3 a2.8 ± 0.3 a32.5 ± 5.8 f42.1 ± 5.6 c13.6 ± 0.2 d3.1 ± 0.4 a
AA: wild-type FAD2-1A allele, aa: nonsense mutation of FAD2-1A allele from PE529, HH: wild-type HD allele, hh: mutant HD allele. The concentration of each fatty acid at the 5% level determined by Duncan’s multi-range test is not significantly different if indicated by the same letter. PE529 is a line that includes fad2-1aSTOP [18]. JD17-20-2-39 (hh) was derived from Pungsannamul × PE2166/Daepung [23]. PE2166 is a line containing 14% linolenic acid as a mutation caused by EMS treatment of Pungsannamul, and Daepung is a Korean soybean cultivar containing a normal linolenic acid concentration [23].
Table 3. Variation of fatty acids concentrations and ω-6/ω-3 ratio by genotypic groups in population 2 from a cross of S08-14719 and JD17-20-2-39.
Table 3. Variation of fatty acids concentrations and ω-6/ω-3 ratio by genotypic groups in population 2 from a cross of S08-14719 and JD17-20-2-39.
IDGenotypic GroupsFatty Acid Concentration (%)
Palmitic AcidStearic AcidOleic AcidLinoleic Acid
(ω-6)		α-Linolenic Acid
(ω-3)		ω-6/ω-3
PungsannamulA1A1BBHH
(n = 13)		11.8 ± 0.4 f2.9 ± 0.3 a19.7 ± 2.3 cd55.6 ± 1.9 efg10.0 ± 0.8 abc5.6 ± 0.5 ef
S08-14719a1a1bbHH (n = 13)7.9 ± 0.3 a3.1 ± 0.3 cd80.4 ± 1.2 e2.4 ± 0.9 a6.3 ± 0.9 a0.4 ± 0.1 a
PI283327A1A1bbHH (n = 13)11.0 ± 0.3 b4.5 ± 0.2 e27.1 ± 2.6 d47.0 ± 2.0 c10.4 ± 0.6 c4.5 ± 0.2 e
JD17-20-2-39A1A1BBhh (n = 13)11.2 ± 0.4 e2.4 ± 0.2 a11.6 ± 1.0 a58.2 ± 0.8 gh16.6 ± 1.2 f3.5 ± 0.3 b
F2 seedA1A1BBHH (n = 4)12.7 ± 0.8 d3.0 ± 1.1 cd20.2 ± 3.5 c52.7 ± 4.1 d11.3 ± 0.7 c4.7 ± 0.6 e
A1A1BBhh (n = 2)13.4 ± 2.3 d2.0 ± 0.8 a12.2 ± 2.3 a57.5 ± 2.4 ef15.0 ± 1.6 d3.9 ± 0.6 d
A1A1bbHH (n = 7)11.9 ± 0.5 c3.5 ± 0.4 d26.8 ± 3.9 d47.0 ± 3.3 c10.7 ± 1.1 c4.4 ± 0.6 e
A1A1bbhh (n = 11)11.7 ± 1.0 bc2.3 ± 0.5 ab16.5 ± 2.5 b53.0 ± 2.5 d16.3 ± 1.5 e3.3 ± 0.4 c
a1a1BBhh (n = 6)11.0 ± 1.2 b2.9 ± 0.9 bc26.1 ± 3.7 d40.8 ± 3.3 b18.6 ± 2.3 f2.2 ± 0.3 b
a1a1bbHH (n = 8)8.2 ± 0.5 a3.3 ± 0.5 cd80.6 ± 1.4 e2.2 ± 0.4 a5.6 ± 0.3 a0.4 ± 0.1 a
a1a1bbhh (n = 5)8.2 ± 0.3 a1.8 ± 0.7 a78.6 ± 1.5 e2.4 ± 0.4 a8.4 ± 0.9 b0.3 ± 0.1 a
A1A1: wild-type FAD2-1A allele, a1a1: deletion of FAD2-1A allele from M23, BB: wild-type FAD2-1B allele, bb: missense FAD2-1B allele from PI283327, HH: wild-type HD allele, hh: mutant HD allele. The concentration of each fatty acid at the 5% level determined by Duncan’s multi-range test was not significantly different if indicated by the same letter. S08-14719 is a line that includes fad2-1aDEL from M23 and fad2-1bP137R from PI283327 [19]. JD17-20-2-39 (hh) was derived from Pungsannamul × PE2166/Daepung. PE2166 is a line containing 14% linolenic acid as a mutation caused by EMS treatment of Pungsannamul, and Daepung is a Korean soybean cultivar containing a normal linolenic acid concentration [23].
Table 4. Variation of fatty acids concentrations and ω-6/ω-3 ratio by genotypic groups in population 3 from a cross of Hosim and JD17-20-2-39.
Table 4. Variation of fatty acids concentrations and ω-6/ω-3 ratio by genotypic groups in population 3 from a cross of Hosim and JD17-20-2-39.
IDGenotypic GroupsFatty Acid Concentration (%)
Palmitic AcidStearic AcidOleic AcidLinoleic Acid
(ω-6)		α-Linolenic Acid
(ω-3)		ω-6/ω-3
PungsannamulA2A2BBHH
(n = 13)		11.8 ± 0.4 f2.9 ± 0.3 a19.7 ± 2.3 cd55.6 ± 1.9 efg10.0 ± 0.8 abc5.6 ± 0.5 ef
Hosima2a2bbHH (n = 13)7.7 ± 0.1 ab2.8 ± 0.1 bc79.5 ± 0.7 h3.6 ± 0.4 a6.4 ± 0.4 a0.6 ± 0.1 a
PI283327A2A2bbHH (n = 13)11.0 ± 0.3 ef4.5 ± 0.2 f27.1 ± 2.6 d47.0 ± 2.0 c10.4 ± 0.6 c4.5 ± 0.2 e
JD17-20-2-39A2A2BBhh (n = 13)11.2 ± 0.4 e2.4 ± 0.2 a11.6 ± 1.0 a58.2 ± 0.8 gh16.6 ± 1.2 f3.5 ± 0.3 b
F2 seedA2A2BBHH (n = 1)10.6 ± 0.04.1 ± 0.025.0 ± 0.050.8 ± 0.09.4 ± 0.05.4 ± 0.0
A2A2BBhh (n = 8)10.2 ± 1.3 de2.7 ± 0.4 bc16.4 ± 3.7 b55.4 ± 1.4 de15.2 ± 2.4 e3.7 ± 0.5 cd
A2A2bbHH (n = 4)10.2 ± 1.9 de4.0 ± 0.6 e32.8 ± 8.9 e45.0 ± 7.4 c8.0 ± 0.8 b5.6 ± 0.6 f
A2A2bbhh (n = 8)9.6 ± 0.6 cd2.8 ± 0.2 bc21.4 ± 2.3 c53.0 ± 2.2 d13.3 ± 1.0 d4.0 ± 0.3 d
a2a2BBHH (n = 6)10.1 ± 2.4 de3.6 ± 0.9 de40.3 ± 12.7 f36.6 ± 10.3 b9.2 ± 1.2 bc4.0 ± 1.0 cd
a2a2BBhh (n = 3)8.7 ± 0.7 bc2.8 ± 0.6 bc35.5 ± 2.2 e39.8 ± 0.3 b13.3 ± 2.5 d3.1 ± 0.7 b
a2a2bbHH (n = 6)8.4 ± 1.9 ab3.5 ± 0.7 d77.3 ± 3.6 gh4.3 ± 1.6 a6.5 ± 0.9 a0.7 ± 0.2 a
a2a2bbhh (n = 9)7.6 ± 0.8 a1.8 ± 0.4 a74.8 ± 2.4 g6.4 ± 2.2 a9.3 ± 1.2 bc0.7 ± 0.2 a
A2A2: wild-type FAD2-1A allele, a2a2: missense FAD2-1A allele with fad2-1aS117N from 17D, BB: wild-type FAD2-1B allele, bb: missense FAD2-1B allele from PI283327, HH: wild-type HD allele, hh: mutant HD allele. The concentration of each fatty acid at the 5% level determined by Duncan’s multi-range test was not significantly different if indicated by the same letter. Hosim is a line that includes fad2-1aS117N from 17D and fad2-1bP137R from PI283327 [17,19]. JD17-20-2-39 (hh) was derived from Pungsannamul × PE2166/Daepung. PE2166 is a line containing 14% linolenic acid due to a mutation caused by EMS treatment of Pungsannamul, and Daepung is a Korean soybean cultivar containing a normal linolenic acid concentration [23].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, H.; Jo, H.; Lee, J.-D. Combining a Mutant Allele of FAD2-1A with HD Improves the ω-6/ω-3 Ratio in Soybeans. Agronomy 2023, 13, 913. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030913

AMA Style

Kim H, Jo H, Lee J-D. Combining a Mutant Allele of FAD2-1A with HD Improves the ω-6/ω-3 Ratio in Soybeans. Agronomy. 2023; 13(3):913. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030913

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Hwayeop, Hyun Jo, and Jeong-Dong Lee. 2023. "Combining a Mutant Allele of FAD2-1A with HD Improves the ω-6/ω-3 Ratio in Soybeans" Agronomy 13, no. 3: 913. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030913

APA Style

Kim, H., Jo, H., & Lee, J.-D. (2023). Combining a Mutant Allele of FAD2-1A with HD Improves the ω-6/ω-3 Ratio in Soybeans. Agronomy, 13(3), 913. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030913

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop