Next Article in Journal
Foliar and Soil Treatments of Brassica napus That Elicit Antibiosis in Brevicoryne brassicae
Previous Article in Journal
The Assessment of the Bioeconomy and Biomass Sectors in Central and Eastern European Countries
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Management Systems for Biannual Seed Crop of Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) Grown at Various Nitrogen Fertilization: II. Second-Production Year Characterized by Considerable Crop Lodging and Limited Seed Shattering before Direct Combine-Harvesting

1
Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska cesta 25, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia
2
Bc Institute for Breeding and Production of Field Crops, Dugoselska 7, 10 370 Dugo Selo, Croatia
3
Department of Sustainable Agriculture and Herbology, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Trieda Andreja Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra-Chrenová, Slovakia
4
Institute of Agroecology and Plant Production, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Grunwaldzki Sq. 24 A, 50-375 Wrocław, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2022, 12(4), 881; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040881
Submission received: 30 January 2022 / Revised: 30 March 2022 / Accepted: 4 April 2022 / Published: 5 April 2022

Abstract

:
Multiyear production of Italian ryegrass seed crop is of interest. The impact of management systems on the second-production year of biannual crop was evaluated at various nitrogen fertilization (0, 60, 120, and 180 kg ha−1). Management systems of single-purpose crops were with (SeedPGR-crop) and without (Seed-crop) plant growth regulator (PGR) application. The dual-purpose crops incorporated early (EF-seed-crop) and late (LF-seed-crop) spring forage cut followed by seed harvest. The Seed-crop obtained a maximum yield (1631 kg ha−1) at 120 kg N ha−1, which decreased by 23% at the highest fertilization. This yield loss was associated with early (before heading) and severe lodging that brought about reduced aboveground biomass and lower harvest index due to the increased growth of vegetative tillers. The single-purpose crops had a similar number of reproductive tillers, seed weight, and seed shed; however, the SeedPGR-crops produced larger yields than the Seed-crops at all fertilization levels indicating the positive impact of PGR application on harvest index regardless of lodging intensity. Despite less lodging and lower seed shattering, the dual-purpose crops yielded less than the single-purpose crops primarily due to the reduction in the number of spikelets per ear and florets per spikelet in various ear sections of early- and late-formed ears. Seed yields of the dual-purpose crops were maximized (around 1200 kg ha−1) at 180 kg N ha−1. The LF-seed-crop had the lightest seeds and the smallest seed germination, but fertilization tended to improve these quality traits. The SeedPGR-crop was the best performing management system yielding above 2200 kg ha−1 at the two highest N levels, allowing greater flexibility in fertilization.

1. Introduction

Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) is one of the most productive and valuable grass species in field forage cropping. It is usually divided into short-lived annual or biennial (Westerwolds) cultivars and cultivars able to persist for several years, with the latter being widely used by Croatian farmers. In the humid regions of the USA (central Pennsylvania), a study conducted on two highly productive commercial dairy farms in [1] found that tetraploid Italian ryegrass persisted well for 4 years in a mixture with lucerne (Medicago sativa L.). Consequently, the authors pointed out that “annual” nomenclature commonly used for Italian ryegrass in the USA could be misleading. Under favourable growing conditions of the Willamette Valley in Oregon, Lolium perenne L. seed production fields can maintain economically viable production for 3 or 4 years [2,3]. Multiyear seed production of Italian ryegrass crop is also of interest for growers, but previous research focused on the first-production year only (e.g., [4,5,6]). Thus, research on best management practices and operations in multiyear cropping systems for seed production of Italian ryegrass is warranted.
Rainfall coupled with winds favour lodging and seed shattering of Italian ryegrass crop, which is commonly observed in farmer fields in north-western Croatia. Lodging is ubiquitous for ryegrasses and [7] reported that the severity of lodging in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) was remarkably similar among nine environments in Oregon’s Willamette Valley, characterised by conditions that ranged from drought to excessive precipitation. Previous research [8] found that the seed yield of a Lolium perenne crop, supported mechanically to prevent lodging, was higher than that of a lodged crop. An abundant supply of water and N following lodging facilitate light penetration to lower buds in Lolium perenne seed grass, and consequently, a flush of new tillers during this period [9]. They are generally unwanted in seed production because they compete with developing seed for assimilate. Furthermore, the growth of new tillers (secondary regrowth) may lead to difficulties in harvesting such as seed yield losses due to no-cutting of lodged stems, and increased moisture of threshed material. Various management strategies such as the application of plant growth regulator (PGR) and early spring grazing or forage cut have demonstrated great potential in reducing the incidence of lodging in grass seed yields [6,10]. However, spring cutting for forage removes the first-formed tillers and leaves seed crop to be produced by late-formed tillers of lower yield and quality. The tolerance of perennial ryegrass to management systems incorporating grazing and/or cutting in early spring and N application is well-documented. For example, Hill and Watkin [11] showed that the application of N to grazed plots fully overcame the depression in ear length found in unfertilized plots. However, limited information is available about the effect of spring cutting dates for forage on seed yield from secondary growth in Italian ryegrass crop. Inclement weather is usually the main reason for Croatian farmers to delay the date of the first forage cut in spring.
In addition to lodging, a second undesirable feature of Italian ryegrass is its inability to retain seed until the time of harvest. Thus, Italian ryegrass is commonly direct combined at higher seed moisture content compared to perennial ryegrass [12]. The main characteristic of grass seed production is brought about by prolonged periods of tillering and by a considerable range in the size and position of the tillers at harvest. Adverse weather conditions just before harvest and differences in maturity (moisture content) between seeds of the same ear or between plants are the major factors accounting for large seed losses due to shattering. In Lolium perenne [13], seed shedding is unlikely to be the major factor in seed yield losses through shattering because the terminal floret in each spikelet (those which have the lowest actual percentage of florets which set seed) are the first to shed their seeds. However, in glasshouse conditions, Lombardy populations of Lolium multiflorum had lost approximately 30% of their seed at seed moisture concentration of 43%, which increases to 40% at a moisture concentration of just under 40% [14]. In a companion paper [15], it was found that the first-year crop of Italian ryegrass may shed large amounts of seeds (up to 800 kg ha−1) before harvest by direct combining. The main objective of this study was to assess the impact of various management systems (single- and dual-purpose crops) and N fertilization rates on the performance of second-year seed crop of Italian ryegrass.

2. Materials and Methods

The management systems consisted of the single-purpose (pure-seed) and the dual-purpose (combined forage-seed) crops. The single-purpose crops consisted of system management without (Seed-crop) and with (SeedPGR-crop) PGR (trinexapac-ethyl) application. The dual-purpose crops had early (EF-seed-crop) and late (LF-seed-crop) spring forage cut followed by seed harvest. Nitrogen fertilization was applied at the total rates of 0, 60, 120, and 180 kg ha−1. A second-year crop of Italian ryegrass was grown during the growing season of 2012/2013 with weather data presented in Table 1 at the Maksimir experimental field (45°49′ N, 16°2′ E, 123 m above sea level) on silt loam soil (Eutric Cambisol) with trial design, management practices, and operations for the first-production year crop described earlier [15]. There was almost no herbage regrowth following the seed harvest of the first-crop year, and, therefore, no data are presented. In October of 2012, plots were defoliated to a height of 7 cm to remove early autumn vegetative growth (cleaning cut). Plots were freed of weeds, diseases, and pests throughout experimentation.
Granular N fertilization, as calcium ammonium nitrate (27% N), was top broadcast in split applications with dates of application and corresponding crop growth stages shown in Table 2. Plant growth regulator Moddus EC 250 (trinexapac-ethyl) was applied with backsprayer at a dose of 1.0 L ha−1 (250 g a.i. L−1) at ZCK 32–33 [16] in the SeedPGR-crop (Table 2). The spray volume used in the PGR application was 200 L ha−1. For plots with forage cut management, the early spring forage cut date was during stem elongation stage (ZCK 32–33) on 3 May 2013, while the late forage cut was on 14 May 2013 when plants were at the beginning of heading (ZCK 52–53). Plants were cut at a height of 7 cm and forage and dry matter yields were determined by sampling the central 6 rows of the plot on each day of cutting. Growing degree days among various crop growth stages were calculated from the data of a weather station located 300 m from the experimental site using a base temperature of 0 °C.
The total number of ears per unit area was based on the sample that was taken 10 days after full anthesis (ZCK 65) from each plot at a 30 cm length of two adjacent rows where all tillers were cut off at ground level. The total number of ears in each sample was recorded, and, afterward, the sample was divided into the vegetative (unproductive) tillers (no ears), early-formed reproductive (fertile) tillers, and late-formed reproductive tillers (greenheads). The difference between the late-formed reproductive tillers (greenheads) and the early-formed reproductive tillers was that the former had ears that have not yet begun anthesis (ZCK 61), while the latter ears were in a more developed stage. In the early- and late-formed reproductive tillers, the following analyses were carried out: measurement of the stem length to the ear; counting the number of visible nodes on the stem, number of spikelets per ear; and the number of florets per spikelet in the lower, middle, and upper section of ear. Paired spikelets from the lower, middle, and upper sections of each ear were selected for the determination of the number of florets per spikelet at these positions within the ear.
One week after anthesis, two tin containers (15.0 cm in width, 60.0 cm in length, and 5.0 cm in depth) with an overall surface area of 1800 cm2 were placed on the ground between the adjacent central rows of each plot to determine the weight of shed seed. Containers were removed at harvest and the weight of shed seed and the seed moisture content were determined. Crop lodging severity was assessed visually and scored as a percentage of plot lodged where 0 is not lodged (plants are fully upright) and 100% is the most severe lodging (plants are lying flat on the ground). Lodging was scored daily until harvest. The six 30 cm sections in the row of each plot were clipped at ground level on harvest days to determine the above-ground biomass and harvest index. The plants were clipped during morning hours with minimal disturbance to maximally prevent the shattering of seed from ears. The harvest index was calculated as the ratio of clean seed yield to above-ground biomass.
The crop was harvested by direct combining when seed moisture content reached approximately 40–45%. Mature grain was harvested with a small plot combine (Wintersteiger, Ried im Innkreis, Austria) with drum speed and concave settings to simulate commercial farm practice. Direct combining is not usually advisable at moisture concentrations above 400 g kg−1, but seed crop of tetraploid Italian ryegrass can be successfully combined directly, starting at around 45%, as long as combine drum speeds are adjusted correctly [17]. At the harvest, only 6 central rows were harvested from the middle of each plot, and plants at the 0.3 m length were cut and removed from both ends of plots to avoid the border effect. Harvest dates are given in Table 2. After harvest, samples were taken for determination of seed moisture content for harvested and shed seed. Natural seed yield was dried at room temperature for several weeks and then cleaned of impurities to determine clean seed weight (yield). In this paper, seed yield and seed shattering are expressed with 14% moisture content. Seed moisture contents were determined after drying at 60 °C for 48 h. No measurable seed production was achieved in the third-crop year so that data are not presented, and the field experiment was discontinued.
A thousand seeds’ weight was determined by twice counting 200 seeds and then weighed. Germination was determined approximately 90 days after harvest in accordance with the International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) rules [18] by placing 100 seeds to imbibe on a moist germination paper. After a chilling treatment for five days at 5 °C, the seeds were germinated at 20 °C. The final seedling count was made after 14 days.
A two-factorial experiment (management systems and N fertilization) was conducted on biannual Italian ryegrass crops for seed production. The field trial was arranged in a strip-plot design with four replicates. The crop management treatments were randomized to the main plots within replicates. Nitrogen fertilization was assigned to the sub-plots. The data were analysed using Mixed Model procedures in SAS/STAT Software [19]. The analysis of variance was computed with crop management and N fertilization was considered fixed. The means separation was calculated using the Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) test at p ≤ 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Forage Yields in the Dual-Purpose Crops

Forage yields in the dual-purpose crops were significantly affected by N fertilization and management systems (data not shown). Forage dry matter yield averaged 1864 kg ha−1 in the EF-seed-crop, while the LF-seed-crop produced a much larger forage yield (2936 kg ha−1). Thus, the mean growth rate of herbage dry matter was 136 kg ha−1 between cutting dates on 3 and 14 May (Table 2). Forage yields averaged 1175 kg ha−1 in unfertilized plots and increased with N fertilization to an average of 3270 kg ha−1 at the highest N level. A significant management system × N fertilization interaction indicated that the dual-purpose crops showed various responses to N fertilization rates for forage yields (Figure 1).

3.2. Reproductive and Vegetative Tillers

The number of early-formed reproductive (fertile) tillers was not affected by the management system and averaged 271 per square meter. In contrast, all measured traits of early-formed ears were significantly affected by the management system (Table 3). Early-formed ear-bearing tillers from the single-purpose crops were similar in most traits, but the stem and ear lengths significantly decreased following PGR application. Compared to the single-purpose crops, early-formed reproductive tillers from the dual-purpose crops had fewer stem nodes and, consequently, smaller stem heights. In addition, early-formed ears in the dual-purpose crops had smaller ear lengths, fewer spikelets per ear, and lower numbers of florets in all sections of ears in comparison to fertile tillers in the single-purpose crops. However, early-formed tillers in the EF-seed-crop achieved stem heights and ear lengths similar to the SeedPGR-crop.
Early-formed ears (Table 3) from unfertilized plots had, on average stem height of 47.7 cm with 3.12 nodes, and ears 21.8 cm long consisting of 21.5 spikelets with 4.5, 5.7, and 5.2 florets in the basal, middle and top ear sections, respectively. Higher N fertilization consistently (slightly or significantly) increased the production characteristics of early-formed fertile tillers except for the spikelet number (Table 3). A significant management system × N fertilization interaction existed for stem height only. This interaction was mainly because stem height tended to increase with N fertilization rate up to 120 kg ha−1 and then levelled off or slightly decreased under most management systems, while it continued to increase up to the highest N rate in the LF-seed-crop (data not shown).
The Seed-crop had the largest density of late-formed ears (on average 292 per square meter), which was higher than in the SeedPGR-crop (241 per square meter). Both dual-purpose crops had a lower density of late-formed ears in comparison to the single-purpose crops (Table 4). Late-formed ears’ responses to management systems closely followed those found for early-formed ones. Thus, late-formed ears in the Seed-crop had the tallest stems (Table 3) as well as the longest ears, which were longer than in the SeedPGR-crop. However, stem node number, spikelets per ear, and the number of florets in various ear sections of late-formed ears were did not differ in the single-purpose crops. Compared to the single-purpose crops, late-formed tillers in the dual-purpose crops had significantly shorter stems with fewer nodes as well as shorter ears with fewer spikelets per ear and fewer florets per spikelets in various ear sections.
Late-formed fertile tillers from unfertilized plots had, on average, a stem height of 41.5 cm with 2.92 nodes, and ears 15.4 cm long with 18.2 spikelets and 2.3, 3.5, and 3.4 florets per spikelets in the basal, middle, and top ear sections. Nitrogen fertilization improved most ear production traits, with a rate of 60 kg N ha−1 producing the greatest increments (Table 3). Contrary to early-formed ear responses, N fertilization significantly affected the number of spikelets in ears of late-formed fertile tillers (Table 3). In comparison to unfertilized plots, stem height of late-formed ears significantly increased with the lowest N rate only, and then levelled off. The absence of management system × N fertilization interaction indicated that stem height responses to N fertilization were consistent under all management systems for late-formed ears.
The Seed-crop developed more vegetative tillers than the SeedPGR-crop (Table 4). The dual-purpose crops consistently had fewer vegetative tillers than single-purpose crops with the smallest number of vegetative tillers counted on plants in the LF-seed-crop. Nitrogen fertilization increased the number of vegetative tillers, but a significant management system × N fertilization interaction existed (Table 4). This interaction was because the number of vegetative tillers consistently increased with higher N fertilization rates on plants in the single-purpose crops, while it was unaffected by N fertilization in the dual-purpose crops (data not shown). In addition, plants in the single-purpose crops had a similar number of vegetative tillers in unfertilized plots and plots fertilized with 60 kg ha−1 of N, whereas the Seed-crop developed more vegetative tillers than the SeedPGR-crop at higher N rates.

3.3. Crop Lodging, Seed Shattering, and Seed Moisture Content

The highest incidence of lodging at harvest was observed in the Seed-crop and averaged 69.8%. The application of PGR in the SeedPGR-crop significantly reduced lodging intensity compared to unsprayed plots in the Seed-crop (Table 4). The lowest lodging was found in the dual-purpose crops and averaged 24.1% in the EF-seed-crop and 17.5% in the LF-seed-crop. As expected, the incidence of lodging at harvest increased with a higher N fertilization rates (Table 4). Across management systems, no lodging was observed in unfertilized plots, whereas it averaged 10.7%, 14.8%, and 29.5% at N fertilization rates of 60, 120, and 180 kg ha−1, respectively. A significant management system × N fertilization interaction existed because the dual-purpose crops lodged at the highest N fertilization only, while the single-purpose crops lodged already at lower N fertilization rates. The incidence of lodging in the Seed-crop averaged 85.6%, 96.2%, and 97.5% at the N rates of 60, 120, and 180 kg ha−1, respectively. In contrast, the SeedPGR-crop lodged only at the two highest N rates, averaging 65.5% at 120 kg N ha−1 and 79.5% at 180 kg N ha−1. The onset of lodging in the single-purpose crops was observed in early May, while at the highest N rate of 180 kg N ha−1 considerable crop lodging was observed on 13 May in the Seed-crop and on 18 May in the SeedPGR-crop (Table 2). At 120 kg N ha−1, the Seed-crop also lodged >50% on 13 May (data not shown), but a similar lodging rate was not observed before 12 June in the SeedPGR-crop; thus, the onset of considerable lodging was delayed for more than 4 weeks following PGR application.
Similar to lodging responses, seed shattering was significantly affected by management systems and N fertilization. The single-purpose crop shattered more seeds than the dual-purpose crops (Table 4). In addition, seed shattering significantly increased with higher N fertilization rate. However, a management system × N fertilization interaction indicated that seed shattering responses to N fertilization differed in various management systems. This interaction was mainly because seed shattering slightly or significantly increased with higher N fertilization under all management systems except in the Seed-crop (Table 4). At the highest N rate, plants in the Seed-crop shattered slightly smaller amounts of seeds compared to shed seed at 120 kg N ha−1.
Despite various harvesting dates among management systems (Table 2), all crops were harvested within the optimum window for seed moisture content (Table 4). The highest seed moisture content was measured at the highest N fertilization regardless of the management system. However, in the LF-seed-crop, seed moisture content did not differ across N fertilization.

3.4. Above-Ground Biomass, Harvest Index, Seed Yield and Seed Quality

At harvest, the largest average above-ground biomass (8140 kg ha−1) was produced in the Seed-crop. The SeedPGR-crop had lower average above-ground biomass (7172 kg ha−1), while the dual-purpose crops had the smallest values of 4566 kg ha−1 in the EF-seed-crop and 4356 kg ha−1 in the LF-seed-crop. A management system × N fertilization interaction existed because dry matter production consistently increased with N fertilization in the dual-purpose crops only, whereas in the single-purpose crops it was improved with N rate up to 120 kg ha−1 and then declined at the highest N fertilization (Table 4). The dual-purpose crops had the smallest harvest index, which averaged 13.6% in the LF-seed-crop and 14.7% in the EF-seed-crop. The Seed-crop had, on average, a slightly higher value (15.6%), whereas the SeedPGR-crop obtained the highest harvest index (20.4% on average). Similar to dry matter production responses, the harvest index consistently increased with higher N fertilization in the dual-purpose crops only, while it declined at the highest N fertilization in the single-purpose crops (Table 4).
A significant management system × N fertilization interaction indicated that seed yield responses to N fertilization varied among management systems. Seed yields ranged from 269 kg ha−1 for the unfertilized plots in the LF-seed-crop to 2373 kg ha−1 in the SeedPGR-crop grown at 120 kg N ha−1. In unfertilized plots, the dual-purpose crops produced smaller seed yields than the single-purpose crops (Figure 2). Nitrogen fertilization up to 120 kg ha−1 produced yield increments in the Seed-crop, which then significantly declined at the highest N fertilization. Similar to responses in the Seed-crop, seed yields improved with an N rate up to 120 kg ha−1 in the SeedPGR-crop and then slightly reduced at the highest N fertilization. Consequently, the SeedPGR-crop produced larger seed yields than the Seed-crop at all fertilization levels. Contrary to the single-purpose crops responses, N fertilization consistently increased seed yields in the dual-purpose crops. At the highest N fertilization, both dual-purpose crops achieved seed yields similar to that in the Seed-crop grown at the same N level.
The dual-purpose crops did not differ in average 1000-seed weights, which were significantly smaller than those in the single-purpose crops (Table 4). Seed weights tended to increase with higher N fertilization rates. The LF-seed-crop had the lightest seeds and the smallest average germination rate. However, a significant management system × N fertilization interaction existed because the LF-seed-crop had seed germination similar to other management systems at the highest N fertilization rate, whereas it was significantly lower at less intensive N fertilization. Thus, the smallest germination rate of 79.8% had seeds produced under unfertilized plot in the LF-seed-crop.

4. Discussion

A companion paper [15] showed that the first-year crop of Italian ryegrass shattered large amounts of seeds before the directly combined harvest during June and July of 2012, depending on the management system. In no-till cropping systems, Maia et al. [20] found that Italian ryegrass seed banks had a low persistence rate, and its viability in the soil was variable. However, under favourable conditions, shattered seed may germinate, and voluntary seedlings can develop into a very dense stand in the next season (i.e., second-year crop). In our research, seeds shattered on the soil surface failed to germinate before October 2012, and voluntary seedlings with one or two developed leaves (ZCK 11–12) were observed in the early November of 2012. This delayed germination of shed seed might have been due to seed dormancy. Previous research [21] reported a high level of post-harvest dormancy for Italian ryegrass as germination counts taken 3 months after harvest were significantly higher than those taken earlier and there were no differences among various cultivars or harvesting dates. In addition, it is known that the establishment of cool-season grasses is the least effective using the oversowing method (e.g., [22]), which is comparable to natural seed shattering (self-seeding) in a multiyear crop of Italian ryegrass for seed production. In pastures of the southern Great Plains of the United States, between 885 and 5650 ears m−2 are required for annual ryegrass to achieve a minimum rate of 500 established seedlings m−2 through self-seeding [23]. In our companion paper [15], the density of reproductive tillers of the first-year crop averaged 664 per square meter only. In addition, delayed germination of shattered seed could have been associated with unfavourable weather conditions following the harvest of first-year crop. Low precipitation coupled with warm temperatures during August and early- and mid-September (Table 1) might delay the germination of shattered seed until the first autumn rain in late September. However, voluntary seedlings from shed seed were killed by low temperatures (up to −16 °C with no snow cover) during December of 2012. Although ryegrasses are not as winter-hardy as many other grasses, no visible freezing was observed on old plants established from standard sowing practice in the previous year. Thus, it appears that post-harvest seed dormancy coupled with the lack of soil moisture delayed germination and these late-emerging voluntary seedlings did not have sufficient time to harden for winter survival. Winter kill of voluntary seedlings was probably associated with their growing point above the soil surface. In Atlantic Canada [22], it was found that the poor persistence of Italian ryegrass due to winter kill may limit its commercial production after the establishment year. Using an artificial freezing test (glycol freezing tank), Eagles et al. [24] reported that the lethal temperatures for the hardened whole plant of Lolium multiflorum at ZCK 12–13 were from −9.2 °C to −9.8 °C, depending on tested cultivars. As expected, forage yields were higher in the LF-seed-crop when compared to the EF-seed-crop due to the later spring cutting date for the former (Table 2). Forage yield increments associated with higher N fertilization rates were consistent in the LF-seed-crop (Figure 1). However, forage yields did not differ between the two highest N rates in the EF-seed-crop; clearly indicating that factor other than N fertilization was more limiting for vegetative crop growth.
In contrast to the first-year crop responses [15], a significant management system × N fertilization interaction existed for seed yield and most measured traits so that discussion is focused on interaction effects. Italian ryegrass grown under various system managements had to be directly combined at various harvest dates, but seed moisture content was within the optimum window (Table 3) and averaged 44.6%. The large seeds are more susceptible to mechanical damage at harvest and therefore require lower drum speed. In the LF-seed-crop, seed moisture content was similar at all N levels probably because of the hottest weather conditions around harvest (Table 1), which facilitate high daily moisture loss. Moisture content can be expected to fall by 1 to 3% per day in good conditions [14]. The SeedPGR-crop had higher seed moisture content than the Seed-crop at all fertilization levels (Table 3), which we could not compare to the findings of other researchers. In most field experiments with Italian ryegrass for seed production, the crop is either hand-harvested [10,22] or cut with a forage plot harvester [6,7,21,25], put in jute bags, and dried. A seed moisture concentration of approximately 40% is quoted by [26] as suitable for cutting Italian ryegrass for later picking up by combine when seed moisture drops to about 12%.
Unfertilized plots yielded 868 kg ha−1 in the Seed-crop (Figure 2) that had no lodging at harvest (Table 4) and seed shattering was relatively low (64 kg ha−1). In Atlantic Canada, Westerwolds ryegrass without applied N did not produce seed crop [22]. Despite an associate increase in lodging and seed shattering, the application of N fertilization rate of 60 kg ha−1 significantly increased yield in the Seed-crop (Figure 2). This yield increment was primarily due to more early- and late-formed fertile tillers (ears) per unit area, which had more spikelets per ear and florets per spikelet in various ear sections (Table 3), as well as increased seed weight (Table 4). The improved number of fertile tillers following spring application of N fertilizer is well-documented. For example, it is stated that the seed yield of forage grasses depend strongly on the number of ears and that early-formed tillers are largely responsible for producing fertile ears [27]. In our research, early-formed inflorescences consistently had more spikelets per ear and flowers per spikelet when compared to late-formed ones (Table 3). Seed weight increases in lodged perennial ryegrass crop were previously reported [4], which is similar to our findings.
Seed-crop yielded maximally (1631 kg ha−1) at 120 kg N ha−1, which was primarily associated with the highest density of reproductive tillers (702 per square meter) and the largest above-ground biomass (11,526 kg ha−1). In contrast, Elgersma [28] reported that the seed yield of nine cultivars of perennial ryegrass was not associated with the ear number or total matter yield of the seed crop. However, Koeritz et al. [29] found that vegetative biomass production was positively correlated with seed yield in perennial ryegrass except for situations where lodging was severe. In Serbia, the maximum seed yield (1095 kg ha−1) of the first-year Italian ryegrass crop was produced at a relatively low N fertilization of 50 kg ha−1 [5]. In Belgium, seed yields increased between 0, 60, and 90 kg N ha−1, but no differences were found between 90, 120, and 150 kg N ha−1 [6]. In comparison to 120 kg N ha−1, the highest N fertilization brought about a significant yield reduction by 26% (380 kg ha−1) in the Seed-crop (Figure 2). There were no differences in seed shedding at the two highest N fertilization (Table 4), and, consequently, yield reduction in the Seed-crop at the highest N rate was attributed to severe and early occurring lodging (Table 2). Seed yield responses to lodging in grass crops are sometimes difficult to interpret because lodging may often occur on several occasions with varying degrees of severity during the growing season. Moreover, the effects of lodging depend on the growth stage of the crop at the time of lodging, and on subsequent weather conditions. Lolium perenne crops receiving recommended amounts of N for optimum seed yield usually begin to lodge at about the first ear emergence, and lodging is usually severe by anthesis [30]. Following a couple of rainy days with strong winds, the onset of lodging in our experiment was also just before heading (Table 2), when plots fertilized with 180 kg N ha−1 completely lodged (97.3%). This early-season lodging resulted in shading and thus, the above-ground biomass at harvest was significantly smaller in the Seed-crop grown at 180 kg N ha−1 compared to Seed-crop at 120 kg N ha−1 (Table 4). It was suggested that the physiological explanation of lodging effects on yield lies in its effects on crop growth rate because the less-favourable distribution of light reduces post-lodging crop growth rate. For example, the decrease in final total dry weight resulting from lodging was found on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by [31] with these reductions being equal to or more than the reductions in grain yield. In our study, Italian ryegrass crop lodged before heading failed to right itself, though some small degree of re-erection of the upper part of culms with such early lodging was observed (data not shown). Interestingly, the reduction in above-ground biomass in the Seed-crop at the highest N fertilization was found despite the abundant growth of new vegetative tillers (Table 4), and, consequently, the Seed-crop had the largest number of vegetative tillers at harvest. Other authors such as [32] found that the growth of new tillers after the onset of anthesis had no effect on seed yield in perennial ryegrass. However, in our study, high number of vegetative tillers in the Seed-crop grown at 180 kg N ha−1 resulted in the smallest proportion of ear-bearing tillers in the total tiller number (46.5%) and low harvest index (12.5%). Thus, vegetative growth most likely competed with reproductive growth for the supply of assimilates, resulting in decreased seed yields. In perennial ryegrass, Koeritz et al. [29] found that lodging reduced harvest index. In addition, the loss of seed yield due to lodging is likely to be greater when normal farmer field-harvesting procedures are used, because our small plot combine-harvester gathered most lodged ears in our field experiment. Compared with N rate of 120 kg ha−1, earlier and more severe lodging in the Seed-crop occurring at the highest N fertilization had no effect on the number of reproductive tillers and the 1000-seed weight (Table 4), which indicated that differences in seed yields were associated with seed number per unit area. In wheat crop, Fisher and Stapper [31] found that kernel-number reductions were greater with lodging commencing at or before anthesis, while kernel-weight reductions were greater with later lodging. This pattern supports the idea that the reductions in seed number with early-occurring lodging were mainly due to reductions in photoassimilate supply. Previous research [33] reported that partitioning to seed in perennial ryegrass and consequent seed filling is not dependent on the mobilization of water-soluble carbohydrates from the internodes to developing seed, and in fact, storage in the spike is sufficient to fill all available seeds. This is in accordance with our findings because higher lodging severity brought about by more intensive N fertilization had no negative effect on seed weights (Table 4).
For unfertilized plots of the single-purpose crops, the application of PGR largely decreased above-ground biomass but produced slightly higher seed yields (Figure 2) compared to unsprayed plots of the Seed-crop primarily due to differences in harvest index (Table 4). The greatest yield increment with increasing N fertilization in the SeedPGR-crop was with the N rate of 60 kg ha−1 (Figure 2). Plants treated with PGR consistently had shorter stems and smaller ears on both early- and late-formed reproductive tillers (Table 3), and ear length was reduced much in the same way as stem length. Ear rachis was shortened causing a reduction in the distance between spikelets along the rachis, but the number and size of the spikelets were not affected by PGR application. Thus, the beneficial modification of the crop canopy thru reduced stem and ear length following PGR application most likely allowed more efficient partitioning of dry matter to seed yield. In perennial ryegrass, neither [7] nor [34] found an effect of PGR on dry matter production regardless of application rate, but similarly to our findings, the latter research work reported that seed yield increases following PGR application were due to its positive impact on harvest index.
The SeedPGR-crop produced the highest seed yield of 2373 kg ha−1 at 120 kg N ha−1 (Figure 2), which was 45% larger than the Seed-crop at the same N fertilization, and despite the fact that the latter had larger aboveground biomass at harvest (Table 4). This highest yielding SeedPGR-crop had relatively high lodging severity at harvest, but the onset of lodging occurred almost a month later (on 7 June) in comparison to the Seed-crop at the same fertilization level. These results suggest that delayed lodging was the main reason for enhanced yield in the SeedPGR-crop. In addition, the number of vegetative tillers at 120 kg N ha−1 was much smaller in the SeedPGR-crop compared to the unsprayed plants of the Seed-crop (Table 4). Plants in the SeedPGR-crop developed less vegetative tillers most probably because of lower lodging intensity coupled with the suppressive effect of PGR on forming and growth of new tillers. Consequently, the maximum harvest index of 22.9% was measured in the SeedPGR-crop at 120 kg N ha−1 and achieved in stand density of 581 fertile tillers per square meter, of which 300 were early-formed and 281 were late-formed ones (greenheads). There is a wide range over which numbers of fertile tillers, spikelets per ear, and fertile florets per spikelet can compensate to attain maximum seed yields, and our results indicate that large tiller populations may not be a necessary prerequisite for large seed yields of Italian ryegrass crop. For annual ryegrass, total tillers ranged from 1790 to 4830 per square meter, while fertile tillers ranged from 110 to 2020 per square meter in the research reported by [10]. In Lolium perenne, the number of fertile tillers per square meter may range from 1765 to 3100 in crops for seed production [7].
Cutting of grasses in the field, with proper timing and height of defoliation, stimulates tillering from buds previously suppressed and in perennial ryegrass, secondary tillers arising from the decapitated tillers produced a greater proportion of mature fertile tillers than secondary tillers arising simultaneously from intact tillers [35]. However, the dual-purpose crops consistently produced a lower tiller number than the single-purpose crops (Table 4). Compared to the single-purpose crops, plants from the dual-purpose crops also had smaller and less productive early- and late-formed fertile ears (Table 3). Almost half a century ago, Herron [36] reported a decrease in spike length, spikelets pre-spike, and florets per spikelet when Italian ryegrass crop grazing was extended from mid-April to early May in Oregon. The decrease in size and productivity of the ears in the dual-purpose crops (Table 3) was most likely related to less favourable growing conditions (longer day length and higher temperatures) during their development and growth (Table 1 and Table 2), as found in perennial ryegrass by [37]. Seed weight also significantly decreased in the dual-purpose crops compared to the single-purpose ones (Table 4), which we associated with the reduced number of days for grain filling (Table 2). In contrast, the seed weight of annual ryegrass was not affected by grazing treatments in a study [10]. However, spring cutting for forage removes the first-formed tillers and leaves seed crop to be produced from tillers of lower yield and quality. Consequently, the dual-purpose crops produced smaller seed yields than the single-purpose crops at all N fertilization levels (Figure 2) even though they had lower seed shattering and lodging intensity at harvest (Table 4). The smallest seed yield of 269 kg ha−1 was produced in unfertilized plots of the LF-seed-crop, which was associated with the smallest above-ground production (2004 kg ha−1), and consequently, the lowest harvest index (9.5%). In contrast to the single-purpose crop responses, the dual-purpose crops consistently increased seed yields with higher N fertilization primarily by means of an improved number of reproductive tillers and heavier seed weight. Ear length consistently increased with increasing N fertilization for early- and late-formed reproductive tillers in the dual-purpose crops (Table 3). Higher N rates failed to increase spikelet number on early-formed ears but tended to increase it on late-formed ones. The smallest number of vegetative tillers was counted in both the EF-seed-crop and LF-seed-crop (Table 4), which had limited and late-occurring (Table 2) lodging at the highest N rate only. The development of new vegetative organs (tillers) occurs at the same time as flowering and seed formation processes in grass crops. It was suggested that the development of tillers from axillary buds in Westerwolds ryegrass is inhibited by auxin translocated from adjacent reproductive tillers and, therefore, the development of late-formed tillers is suppressed during the flowering of non-lodged crop [38]. In addition to smaller lodging occurrence, the reduction in the number of vegetative tillers in the dual-purpose crops in our research could be also associated with a shorter post-anthesis period (Table 2) and less favourable (hotter) weather conditions (Table 1). At the highest N fertilization, the dual-purpose crops succeeded to yield similarly to the Seed-crop grown at the same N level (Figure 2). In a companion paper [15], it was shown that under the conditions of late-season and limited lodging, seed-yields of the first-year Italian ryegrass crop consistently increased with higher N fertilization rates regardless of management systems. Therefore, maximum seed yields in the dual-purpose crops most likely have not been achieved so total N fertilization rates higher than 180 kg ha−1 could be recommended for combined forage-seed crop management.
Across management systems, the single-purpose crops had the heaviest seed weight and seed germination (Table 4). The dual-purpose crops had significantly lighter seeds than the single-purpose crops, which was primarily associated with the reduced number of days for seed filling (Table 2). Anthesis to harvest period lasted about 3 weeks in the dual-purpose crops, which was one week shorter compared to the single-purpose crops. In Wales, Hides et al. [21] reported that the seed weight of Italian ryegrass populations increased up to 32 days after anthesis. In tetraploid Italian ryegrass [39], the research results showed that increasing seed weight, both between and within commercial seed lots is important because of increased seedling growth, emergence at 5 and 10 °C, and vigour. The highest germination rates were found in the single-purpose crops grown at the N fertilization of 120 kg ha−1, which averaged 94.0% in the Seed-crop and 95.5% in the SeedPGR-crop. Seeds originating from the LF-seed-crop had the lowest germination (Table 4). Seed germination was unaffected by N fertilization in the single-purpose crops as well as in the EF-seed-crop. However, unfertilized plots in the LF-seed-crop produced a 1000-seed weight of 3.45 g and a germination rate of 79.8% only. Unfertilized plots in the EF-seed-crop had seeds of similar weight but with significantly higher germination (90.8%). In Oregon [10], it was reported that seed germination of annual ryegrass ranged from 86 to 97%. Previous research [40] showed that it seemed likely that some viable but immature and low-weight seeds of perennial ryegrass contained insufficient food reserves to maintain their viability after three months’ storage. However, increasing N fertilization resulted in heavier seeds as well as in higher germination rate (Table 4), and the LF-seed-crop grown at the highest N fertilization produced seeds that germinated similarly to those from other management systems.

5. Conclusions

Italian ryegrass was directly combined from late June in the single-purpose crops to mid-July in the LF-seed-crop, with seed moisture content at harvest within the optimum window (44.7% on average). Seed-yield responses to N fertilization were affected by management systems with yields ranging from 269 kg ha−1 in the unfertilized plot of the LF-seed-crop to 2373 kg ha−1 in the SeedPGR-crop grown at 120 kg N ha−1. In unfertilized plots of the single-purpose crops that did not lodge and had low seed shattering, the SeedPGR-crop had smaller stems and shorter ears, and consequently, smaller above-ground biomass, but produced slightly higher seed yields than Seed-crop due to an improved harvest index. Despite increasing lodging and seed shedding, the Seed-crop improved yields with N fertilization up to 120 kg ha−1 due to improved number of early- and late-formed ears, more spikelets per ear, and florets per spikelet, and heavier seeds. Severe lodging at the highest N fertilization brought about reductions in aboveground biomass and harvest index, which in turn, decreased yield in the Seed-crop. The SeedPGR-crop produced larger yields than the Seed-crop at all N fertilization levels, and these yield increments were associated with improved harvest index regardless of lodging intensity. The SeedPGR-crop produced the largest yields at the two highest N fertilization levels allowing greater flexibility in N fertilization. Despite reductions in lodging and seed shattering at harvest, the dual-purpose crops produced seed yields smaller than the single-purpose crops because of the decreases in seed production characteristics of early- and late-formed ears. Seed yields in the dual-purpose crops consistently improved with increasing N fertilization indicating that the highest N fertilization used was probably insufficient to achieve maximum yield. The LF-seed-crop had the lightest seeds as well as the smallest seed germination, but these seed quality traits improved with N fertilization. Findings reported here and in the companion paper [15] facilitate the selection of best management systems for seed production in biannual Italian ryegrass crop grown at various N fertilization.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.S. and M.K.; methodology, Z.S. and M.K.; software, Z.S., D.J., Š.T. and A.M.-L.; formal analysis, Z.S., A.J.-R. and A.M.-L.; investigation, Z.S., M.K., Š.T. and D.J.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.S., M.K. and D.J.; writing—review and editing, A.M.-L., A.J.-R. and Š.T.; visualization, Z.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data for this study are reported in this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Stjepan Svečnjak for his technical assistance. The publication was supported by the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Zagreb Faculty of Agriculture.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jung, G.A.; Shaffer, J.A. Component yields and quality of binary mixtures of lucerne and perennial, Italian or short rotation hybrid ryegrass. Grass Forage Sci. 1993, 48, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Canode, C.L. Grass seed production as influenced by cultivation, gapping, and postharvest residue management. Agron. J. 1972, 64, 148–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hart, J.M.; Anderson, N.P.; Hulting, A.G.; Chastain, T.G.; Mellbye, M.E.; Young, W.C.; Silberstein, T.B. Postharvest Residue Management for Grass Seed Production in Western Oregon. Oregon State University. 2012. Available online: https://catalog.extension.oregonstate.edu/em9051 (accessed on 16 August 2017).
  4. Griffith, S.M. Changes in dry matter, carbohydrate and seed yield resulting from lodging in three temperate grass species. Ann. Bot. 2000, 85, 675–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Simić, A.; Vučković, S.; Sokolović, D.; Stanisavljević, R.; Mandić, V.; Duronić, G. Response of Italian ryegrass seed crop to spring nitrogen application in the first harvest year. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 6826–6831. [Google Scholar]
  6. Vleugels, T.; Rijckaert, G.; Gislum, R. Seed yield response to N fertilization and potential of proximal sensing in Italian ryegrass seed crops. Field Crops Res. 2017, 211, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chastain, T.G.; Young III, W.C.; Silberstein, T.B.; Garbacik, C.J. Performance of trinexapac-ethyl on Lolium perenne seed crops in diverse lodging environments. Field Crops Res. 2014, 157, 104–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hampton, J.G.; Clemence, T.G.A.; Hebblethwaite, P.D. The effect of lodging on 14C-assimilate distribution after anthesis in Lolium perenne cv S24, grown for seed. Grass Forage Sci. 1987, 42, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hebblethwaite, P.D.; Ivins, J.D. Nitrogen studies in Lolium perenne grown for seed I. Level of application. J. Br. Grassl. Soc. 1977, 32, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Young III, W.C.; Chilcote, D.O.; Youngberg, H.W. Annual ryegrass seed yield response to grazing during early stem elongation. Agron. J. 1996, 88, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hill, M.J.; Watkin, B.R. Seed production studies on perennial ryegrass, timothy, and prairie grass. I. Effect of tiller age on tiller survival, ear emergence, and seedhead components. J. Br. Grassl. Soc. 1975, 30, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gwynne, W.G. Grassland Practice No. 8. Harvesting Grass Seed; Short Term Leaflet, No. 158; Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food: London, UK, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  13. Burbidge, A.; Hebblethwaite, P.; Ivins, J. Lodging studies in Lolium perenne grown for seed: 2. Floret site utilization. J. Agric. Sci. 1978, 90, 269–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Raja Harun, R.M.; Bean, E.W. Seed development and shedding in North Italian ecotypes of Lolium multiflorum. Grass Forage Sci. 1979, 48, 181–188. [Google Scholar]
  15. Svečnjak, Z.; Jareš, D.; Milanović-Litre, A.; Pacanoski, Z.; Uher, D.; Dujmović Purgar, D. Management Systems for Biannual Seed Crop of Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) Grown at Various Nitrogen Fertilization: I. First-Production Year Characterized by Limited Crop Lodging and High Seed Shattering before Direct Combine-Harvesting. Agronomy 2022, 12, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zadoks, J.C.; Chang, T.T.; Konzak, C.F. A decimal code for growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 1974, 14, 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Roberts, H.M. Harvesting tetraploid ryegrass for seed. Grass Forage Sci. 1971, 26, 59–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. ISTA. International Rules for Seed Testing; International Association for Seed Testing: Zurich, Switzerland, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  19. SAS Institute. SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements through Rel. 6.12; SAS Inst.: Cary, NC, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  20. Maia, F.C.; Maia, M.D.E.S.; Bekker, R.M.; Berton, R.P.; Caetano, L.S. Lolium multiflorum seeds in the soil: I. Soil seed bank dynamics in no till system. Rev. Bras. Sementes 2007, 29, 100–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Hides, D.H.; Kute, C.A.; Marshall, A.H. Seed development and seed yield potential of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) populations. Grass Forage Sci. 1993, 48, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kunelius, H.T.; McRae, K.B.; Dürr, G.H.; Fillmore, S.A.E. Seed and herbage production of Westerwolds ryegrass as influenced by applied nitrogen. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2004, 84, 791–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bartholomew, P.W.; Williams, R.D. Establishment of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) by self-seeding as affected by cutting date and degree of herbage removal in spring in pastures of the southern Great Plains of the United States. Grass Forage Sci. 2009, 64, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Eagles, C.F.; Williams, J.; Louis, D.V. Recovery after freezing in Avena sativa L., Lolium perenne L. & L. multiflorum Lam. New Phytol. 1993, 123, 477–483. [Google Scholar]
  25. Rijckaert, G.A. Effects of trinexapac-ethyl (Moddus) in seed crops of Italian ryegrass and timothy. Bioforsk Fokus 2007, 2, 231–235. [Google Scholar]
  26. Silberstein, T.B.; Mellbye, M.E.; Chastain, T.G.; Young, W.C., III. Response of seed yield to swathing time in annual and perennial ryegrasss. In 2004 Seed production Research at Oregon State University USDA-ARS Co-Operating; Young, W.C., III, Ed.; Oregon State University Extension Service: Corvallis, OR, USA, 2005; pp. 27–30. [Google Scholar]
  27. Langer, R.H.M. Growth of the grass plant in relation to seed production. In Herbage: Seed Production; Grasslands Research and Practice Series, No. 1; Lancashire, J.A., Ed.; New Zealand Grassland Association: Palmerston North, New Zealand, 1980; pp. 6–11. [Google Scholar]
  28. Elgersma, A. Seed yield related to crop development and to yield components in nine cultivars perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Euphytica 1990, 49, 141–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Koeritz, E.J.; Watkins, E.; Ehlke, N.J. A split application approach to nitrogen and growth regulator management for perennial ryegrass seed production. Crop Sci. 2013, 53, 1762–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hebblethwaite, P.D. Irrigation and nitrogen studies in s. 23 ryegrass grown for seed: 1. Growth, development, seed yield components and seed yield. J. Agric. Sci. 1977, 88, 605–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fisher, R.A.; Stapper, A. Lodging effects on high yielding crops of irrigated semi-dwarf wheat. Field Crops Res. 1987, 17, 245–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Warringa, J.W.; Kreuzer, A.D.H. The effect of new tiller growth on carbohydrates, nitrogen and seed yield per ear in Lolium perenne L. Ann. Bot. 1996, 78, 749–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Trethewey, J.A.K.; Rolston, M.P. Carbohydrate dynamics during reproductive growth and seed yield limits in perennial ryegrass. Field Crops Res. 2009, 112, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Borm, G.E.L.; van den Berg, W. Effects of the application rate and time of the plant growth regulator trinexapac-ethyl in seed crops of Lolium perenne L. in relation to spring nitrogen rate. Field Crops Res. 2008, 105, 182–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hebblethwaite, P.D.; Clemence, T.G.A. Effect of autumn and spring defoliation and defoliation method on seed yield of Lolium perenne. In Proceedings of the 14th International Grassland Congress, Lexington, KY, USA, 15–24 June 1981; pp. 257–260. [Google Scholar]
  36. Herron, G.R. Influence of Grazing and Nitrogen Fertilization on Winter Growth, Seed and Straw Production of Lolium multiflorum Lam. Master’s Thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ryle, G.J.A. Effects of day length and temperature on ear size in S. 24 perennial ryegrass. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1965, 55, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Clifford, P.E. Tiller bud suppression in reproductive plants of Lolium multifiorum Lam. cv. Westerwoldicum. Ann. Bot. 1977, 41, 601–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hampton, J.G. Effect of seed and seed lot 1000-seed weight on vegetative and reproductive yields of ‘Grasslands Moata’ tetraploid Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). N. Z. J. Exp. Agr. 1986, 14, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Hill, M.J.; Watkin, B.R. Seed production studies on perennial ryegrass, timothy, and prairie grass. II. Changes in physiological components during seed development and time and method of harvesting for maximum seed yield. J. Br. Grassl. Soc. 1975, 30, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effect of nitrogen fertilization on the forage yield in the dual-purpose crops of Italian ryegrass at early (EF-seed-crop) and late (LF-seed-crop) spring cutting dates. LSD (0.05) = 498 kg ha−1 for comparing means within the same management system, LSD (0.05) = 517 kg ha−1 for comparing means within the same N fertilization, LSD (0.05) = 423 kg ha−1 for comparing means across management system and N fertilization.
Figure 1. Effect of nitrogen fertilization on the forage yield in the dual-purpose crops of Italian ryegrass at early (EF-seed-crop) and late (LF-seed-crop) spring cutting dates. LSD (0.05) = 498 kg ha−1 for comparing means within the same management system, LSD (0.05) = 517 kg ha−1 for comparing means within the same N fertilization, LSD (0.05) = 423 kg ha−1 for comparing means across management system and N fertilization.
Agronomy 12 00881 g001
Figure 2. Seed yields of second-year Italian ryegrass crop grown under various management systems and nitrogen (N) fertilization rates. LSD (0.05) = 189 kg ha−1, 162 kg ha−1, and 197 kg ha−1 for comparing means within the same management system and N fertilization rate, and across management system and N fertilization, respectively.
Figure 2. Seed yields of second-year Italian ryegrass crop grown under various management systems and nitrogen (N) fertilization rates. LSD (0.05) = 189 kg ha−1, 162 kg ha−1, and 197 kg ha−1 for comparing means within the same management system and N fertilization rate, and across management system and N fertilization, respectively.
Agronomy 12 00881 g002
Table 1. Monthly mean temperatures and total rainfall during the growing season of 2012–2013.
Table 1. Monthly mean temperatures and total rainfall during the growing season of 2012–2013.
MonthTemperatureTotal Rainfall
mm
Min.Max.
°C
August16.231.710
September12.524.3120
October7.617.285
November6.012.9112
December−1.84.866
January−1.34.2129
February−0.54.685
March0.99.1122
April7.118.356
May11.121.394
June14.225.349
July16.329.433
Table 2. Summary of management, ZCK growth stages, and weather conditions for the second production year of biannual Italian ryegrass grown for seed production.
Table 2. Summary of management, ZCK growth stages, and weather conditions for the second production year of biannual Italian ryegrass grown for seed production.
Management System
Seed-cropSeedPGR-cropEF-seed-cropLF-seed-crop
First N top-dressing (50% rate)10 April
(ZCK 22–24)
Second N top-dressing (50% rate)3 May
(ZCK 32–34)
3 May
(ZCK 32–34)
3 May14 May
Plant growth regulator application3 May
(ZCK 32–34)
Early spring forage cut3 May
(ZCK 32–34)
Late spring forage cut14 May
(ZCK 56–60)
Heading (ZCK 55–57) date †14 May15 May5 June18 June
1 April—heading GDD ‡, °C639658
Cutting date—heading GDD, °C502578
Anthesis (ZCK 65–67) date †28 May29 May16 June23 June
Heading—anthesis GDD, °C215216212139
Lodging (>50%) date †13 May18 May25 June5 July
Harvesting date26 June26 June5 July15 July
Anthesis—harvest, days29281922
Anthesis—harvest GDD, °C574559419449
Rain after anthesis, mm60602352
† in plots fertilized with 180 kg N ha−1, ‡ GDD, growing degree days.
Table 3. Characteristics of early- and late-formed reproductive tillers of Italian ryegrass as affected by the management system and N fertilization.
Table 3. Characteristics of early- and late-formed reproductive tillers of Italian ryegrass as affected by the management system and N fertilization.
Early-Formed Ears Late-Formed Ears (Greenheads)
Stem HeightVisible Stem NodeEar LenghtSpikelet per EarFlowers per Basal SpikeletFlowers per Mid SpikeletFlowers per Top Spikelet Stem HeightVisible Stem NodeEar LenghtSpikelet per EarFlowers per Basal SpikeletFlowers per Mid SpikeletFlowers per Top Spikelet
cmno.cmno.no.no.no. cmno.cmno.no.no.no.
Management system (MS)
Seed-crop78.53.9932.124.17.28.56.8 71.03.8424.522.34.15.54.9
SeedPGR-crop60.73.9525.224.87.88.86.6 55.23.7118.521.14.15.75.1
EF-seed-crop58.63.3224.321.16.06.95.9 50.43.2217.217.62.54.03.7
LF-seed-crop47.63.3021.518.76.77.46.0 40.13.1415.517.33.14.64.2
LSD (0.05)3.50.101.32.51.00.11.1 4.720.311.071.171.00.70.6
Nitrogen fertilization (N)
None47.73.1921.821.54.55.75.2 41.52.9215.418.22.33.53.4
60 kg ha−160.73.6326.121.86.77.96.2 56.03.4918.919.23.55.04.7
120 kg ha−168.13.7827.222.77.78.56.5 59.43.6620.520.13.95.54.9
180 kg ha−168.83.9727.922.88.69.57.5 59.83.8420.920.94.15.85.1
LSD (0.05)3.90.242.2n.s0.60.50.7 4.570.201.580.100.80.70.7
MS × N*n.sn.sn.sn.sn.sn.s n.sn.sn.sn.sn.sn.sn.s
* n.s., significant at p = 0.05 and not significant by Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) test, respectively.
Table 4. Seed shedding, above-ground biomass, harvest index, yield components, and other traits of the second-year Italian ryegrass crop grown under various management systems and nitrogen (N) fertilization rates.
Table 4. Seed shedding, above-ground biomass, harvest index, yield components, and other traits of the second-year Italian ryegrass crop grown under various management systems and nitrogen (N) fertilization rates.
Management SystemN RateSeed SheddingAbove-Ground BiomassHarvest IndexLodgingSeed Moisture ContentEarly-Formed EarsLate-Formed EarsTotal EarsVegetative TillersFertile to Total Tillers Ratio1000-Seed WeightSeed Germination
kg ha−1kg ha−1kg ha−1%%%no. m−2no. m−2no. m−2no. m−2%g%
Seed-crop064447914.90.043.91542153699679.43.4189.8
60195801816.685.641.827124051013179.63.9591.5
12031211,52617.896.244.333836570234467.14.2094.0
180270853712.597.545.532535067577746.54.3092.3
SeedPGR-crop048241119.80.046.514414228513867.43.6190.3
60158712420.81.044.327922150014277.93.8292.3
12019310,06622.965.545.130028158123171.64.2795.5
180384908618.379.547.132131964045058.74.4491.5
EF-seed-crop033237812.70.042.515211726919857.63.3590.8
6035396013.70.045.12529835017566.73.4990.8
12080549015.71.246.530220450616775.23.7290.3
180132643816.895.047.552122574623376.23.9790.5
LF-seed-crop01720049.50.043.3905214214250.03.4579.8
6047356614.30.043.519814634415169.53.6285.5
12056524915.52.543.327317945217871.73.7983.5
180107650615.167.543.941917959819075.94.0191.3
LSD (0.05) † 109n.s.4.0314.82.0685n.s.n.s.15415.60.204.2
LSD (0.05) ‡ 104 4.1815.02.2781 17216.00.204.0
LSD (0.05) ¥ 107 4.6815.62.4884 17515.80.184.4
†, ‡, ¥ For comparing means within the same management system, N fertilization rate, and across management system and N fertilization, respectively; n.s.—non-significant management system × N fertilization interaction.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Svečnjak, Z.; Kovačević, M.; Jareš, D.; Týr, Š.; Jama-Rodzeńska, A.; Milanović-Litre, A. Management Systems for Biannual Seed Crop of Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) Grown at Various Nitrogen Fertilization: II. Second-Production Year Characterized by Considerable Crop Lodging and Limited Seed Shattering before Direct Combine-Harvesting. Agronomy 2022, 12, 881. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040881

AMA Style

Svečnjak Z, Kovačević M, Jareš D, Týr Š, Jama-Rodzeńska A, Milanović-Litre A. Management Systems for Biannual Seed Crop of Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) Grown at Various Nitrogen Fertilization: II. Second-Production Year Characterized by Considerable Crop Lodging and Limited Seed Shattering before Direct Combine-Harvesting. Agronomy. 2022; 12(4):881. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040881

Chicago/Turabian Style

Svečnjak, Zlatko, Martina Kovačević, Dario Jareš, Štefan Týr, Anna Jama-Rodzeńska, and Ana Milanović-Litre. 2022. "Management Systems for Biannual Seed Crop of Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) Grown at Various Nitrogen Fertilization: II. Second-Production Year Characterized by Considerable Crop Lodging and Limited Seed Shattering before Direct Combine-Harvesting" Agronomy 12, no. 4: 881. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040881

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop