Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Responses of Potato Cultivars to Potato Spindle Tuber Viroid and to Mixed Viroid/Viral Infection
Next Article in Special Issue
Anthropogenic Contribution and Migration of Soil Heavy Metals in the Vicinity of Typical Highways
Previous Article in Journal
Annual Ryegrass (Lolium rigidum), Wild Oats (Avena spp.) and Sowthistle (Sonchus oleraceus) Are the Most Commonly Occurring Weeds in New South Wales Cropping Fields
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mapping of Soil pH Based on SVM-RFE Feature Selection Algorithm
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Land Use on the Mineralization of Organic Matter in Ultisol

1
Hubei Academy of Tobacco Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China
2
College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
3
Shanxi Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecological Protection and Native Grass Germplasm Innovation, College of Grassland Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2022, 12(12), 2915; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12122915
Submission received: 21 September 2022 / Revised: 25 October 2022 / Accepted: 26 October 2022 / Published: 23 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Sustainability in the Anthropocene)

Abstract

:
Soil organic matter mineralization changed by land-use types is still not clearly understood. In this study, soils from typical land-use types including adjacent plantations of bamboo (Bam), camphor (Cam), and tea (Tea) were chosen to systematically investigate the role of organic carbon components and microbial community compositions in the organic matter mineralization in Ultisol. The mineralization of organic matter followed the sequence Bam < Cam < Tea. The higher carbon contents of labile pools were in the Cam and the Tea than that in the Bam. The carbon content of dissolved organic matter (DOM) showed the order Bam < Cam < Tea, whereas the complexity of chemical structure in DOM followed the opposite trend. The land-use types significant shifted the bacterial and fungal communities, and the relative abundances of bacterial or fungal phyla of Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, Firmicutes, and Basidiomycota were significantly different among the land-use types. The multivariate regression tree results showed that the total organic carbon and/or the C/N ratio were dominant factors in influencing the bacterial and fungal communities. Moreover, the redundancy analysis results demonstrated that the communities of bacteria and fungi in Bam, Cam, and Tea were tightly linked to the C/N ratio, the pH and the labile pool I carbon, and the DOM, respectively. The Pearson’s correlation results revealed that the mineralization of organic matter was significantly correlated with the organic carbon components, but generally not the microbial community compositions, which implied that the organic carbon components were perhaps the major determinant in controlling the organic matter mineralization in Ultisol.

1. Introduction

Soil organic matter mineralization is closely correlated with carbon dynamics, nutrient cycling, and climate change. Land-use types, such as plant species and associated with management practices, have generally changed the soil organic matter mineralization [1,2,3,4,5]. For example, the poplar plantations decreased the soil organic matter mineralization compared with the croplands [3]. Lin et al. demonstrated that soil organic matter mineralization was reduced when the land use was converted from broadleaf forests to moso bamboo plantations [4]. Therefore, it is very important to clearly understand the influence of land-use types on the soil organic matter mineralization.
Soil organic matter mineralization changed by the land-use types has generally been ascribed to the variations of organic carbon components and microbial community compositions [1,2,3,4,5]. For instance, the reduced soil organic matter mineralization rate with the conversion of broadleaf forests to bamboo plantations was closely linked to the decreased soil labile organic carbon fractions such as water-soluble organic carbon, readily oxidizable organic carbon, and O-alkyl carbon [4]. Zheng et al. observed that the soil organic matter mineralization rate in the croplands, higher than the poplar plantations, was positively related with the bacterial abundance and the relative abundances of Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes, while negatively correlated to the fungal abundance [3]. However, the majority of these studies only emphasized the role of organic carbon components or microbial community compositions in the soil organic matter mineralization.
Organic carbon components play various roles in the soil organic matter mineralization. Labile pools of soil organic carbon were shown to be the easily degradable substrate compared with the recalcitrant pool [6,7,8]. Dissolved organic matter (DOM), especially with a simple chemical structure, can facilitate the soil organic matter mineralization [9,10,11]. The breakdown of soil organic matter is restricted at the high C/N ratio [1,12].
The microbial community compositions have multiple influences on the soil matter mineralization. Fast-growing copiotrophic bacteria such as Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria were reported to have higher metabolic capacities for decomposing soil organic matter than that of slow-growing oligotrophic bacteria such as Acidobacteria and Chloroflexi [3,5,7,8,13,14]. In the fungal community, Ascomycota can degrade cellulose, while Basidiomycota can play critical role in cellulose and lignin decomposition [15,16,17]. Moreover, Zygomycetes can utilize the easily acquired sugars from the fresh substrate [18].
Ultisol is widely distributed across subtropical and tropical zones of southern China. Ultisol suffers from strong weathering and leaching and has unique characteristics such as high contents of clay and Fe/Al and low contents of organic matter and nutrients [7,10]. Therefore, it is very important to clearly understand the roles of both organic carbon components and microbial community compositions in the organic matter mineralization of Ultisol.
In this study, the soils from typical land-use types including adjacent single-species plantations of bamboo, camphor, and tea were chosen to systematically investigate the effects of both organic carbon components and microbial community compositions on the organic matter mineralization in the Ultisol. We hypothesized that (i) the organic matter mineralization, the organic carbon components, and the microbial community compositions were different among the land-use types; (ii) the land-use types changed the soil organic matter mineralization mainly by the organic carbon components rather than the microbial community compositions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site Description and Soil Sample Collection

The research site was located in Xianning County (30°01′ N, 114°21′ E), Hubei province, China. The study area is categorized as having a subtropical climate with a mean annual temperature of 16.8 °C and a mean annual precipitation of 1300 mm. The soil type is Ultisol derived from Quaternary red clay [19]. In this area, the adjacent single-species plantations of bamboo (Bam, Bambusoideae), camphor (Cam, Cinnamomum camphora), and tea (Tea, Camellia sinensis) selected for this study were the typical land-use types over 50 years. The bamboo plantation has been moderately disturbed because of the occasional harvesting of bamboo stems and shoots. The camphor plantation is in the nearly natural state and has experienced hardly any human disturbance throughout the period. A total of 1500 kg ha−1 compound fertilizer (N-P2O5-K2O: 20%-8%-8%) has been applied to the tea plantation and the branches are pruned and deposited as a surface mulch every year.
Three independent plots (20 m × 20 m) of each land-use type were randomly selected for soil sampling. The soils from ten randomly selected points (about 30 cm from the plant stand) were collected from the 0–20 cm layer by 5 cm diameter auger and mixed homogenously to form a composite sample in each plot. The soil samples were placed in sterile plastic bags and immediately transported to the laboratory in an iced cooler box. Visible roots and rocks were removed, and the soils were sieved through 2 mm to prepare into three parts. The first part was air-dried to measure soil basic properties and organic carbon components. The second part was stored at 4 °C to determine organic matter mineralization and enzyme activities. The last part was stored at −80 °C for microbial community analysis.

2.2. Basic Properties of Soils

Total organic carbon (TOC) and total nitrogen (TN) contents were determined using the methods of Walkley–Black and Kjeldahl [20,21], respectively. In brief, the content of TOC was measured by potassium dichromate oxidation followed by titration with ferrous sulfate. Moreover, the content of TN was determined by the continuous steps of sulfuric acid digestion, sodium hydroxide distillation, boric acid uptake, and diluted acid titration. Soil pH was measured by using a digital pH meter with soil/water ratio of 1:2.5 (w/v).

2.3. Mineralization of Soil Organic Matter

The mineralization of soil organic matter followed the method of Xu et al. [7]. Briefly, 150 g of dry-equivalent soils was moistened to 60% of the water-holding capacity and aerobically incubated at 25 °C in the dark for 121 days in 1250 mL flasks. Before the incubation, the soils were pre-incubated under the same conditions for 5 days to stabilize the microbial activity [2]. The soils were maintained at a constant moisture by adding sterile distilled water in the incubation period. The caps of flasks were opened to replenish oxygen with the exception of regular CO2 collection. The CO2 released from soils was collected by syringes from the headspace of flasks and was measured on 1, 2, 4, 7, 11, 16, 22, 29, 37, 46, 56, 86, 101, and 121 days by a gas chromatograph (Agilent, G7890A, Wilmington, DE, USA). The CO2 released from soils was regularly collected from the headspace of flasks and was measured using a gas chromatograph (Agilent, G7890A, Wilmington, DE, USA). The single exponential model was used to fit the cumulative curves of CO2-C release over time [22]:
Ct = C0 [1 − exp (−k × t)]
where Ct (mg CO2-C kg−1) is the cumulative amount of mineralized organic carbon at the time of t (d), C0 (mg CO2-C kg−1) is the size of potentially mineralizable organic carbon pool, and k (d−1) is the mineralization rate constant of organic carbon.

2.4. Organic Carbon Pools and Dissolved Organic Matter of Soils

Soil organic carbon pools were classified by the two-step acid hydrolysis method [6]. Briefly, 0.5 g of soils was hydrolyzed with 20 mL of 2.5 M H2SO4 and maintained at 105 °C for 30 min. The organic carbon in hydrolysate was defined as the labile pool I carbon (LP I-C). The remaining residue was continued to hydrolyze with 2 mL of 13 M H2SO4 at room temperature overnight, and then the acid was diluted to 1 M and maintained at 105 °C for 3 h. The organic carbon in this hydrolysate was recognized as the labile pool II carbon (LP II-C). The above hydrolysates were obtained by centrifuging at 10,000 rpm for 30 min and then filtering through a 0.45-μm membrane filter. The organic carbon in the hydrolysates was determined by a TOC analyser (Vario TOC, Elementar, Germany). The organic carbon in the last residue was determined as the recalcitrant pool carbon (RP-C), calculated as the difference between the total organic carbon and the labile pool carbon.
Soil dissolved organic matter (DOM) was extracted by deionized water with a solid to water ratio of 1:5 (w/v) [10]. The carbon concentration of DOM was measured by a TOC analyser (Vario TOC, Elementar, Germany). The chemical structure of DOM was evaluated by using a fluorescence spectrophotometer (Jasco, FP-6500, Tokyo, Japan) [10,11]. In order to normalize fluorescence intensity (FI), all of the DOMs were adjusted by deionized water to the same carbon concentration before the spectroscopic measurement. The fluorescence excitation–emission matrices (EEMs) of DOM were recorded over the emission wavelength range of 300–550 nm at an excitation wavelength of 250–450 nm with a 5 nm increment. The structural difference of DOM among the land-use types was inferred by the location and/or normalized FI of the fluorophore in EEMs [23,24].

2.5. Microbial Communities and Enzyme Activities of Soils

Soil microbial communities were determined by high-throughput sequencing. The DNA of soils was extracted by a FastDNA Spin Kit for Soil (Mpbio, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The quantity and quality of final DNA were checked using a Nanodrop-2000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). The bacterial 16S rRNA and fungal ITS genes were amplified by using primers of 338F-806R and ITS1F-2043R, respectively [14]. The purified amplicons were pooled in equimolar and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq PE300 platform (Illumina Inc.; San Diego, CA, USA). The generated raw sequences were quality-filtered by Trimmomatic and merged together by FLASH. The operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were clustered with a 97% similarity cutoff by using UPARSE. The observed OTUs, Chao 1, and Shannon indexes were calculated to describe the diversity of the microbial community. The shifts in microbial communities were visualized by the principal co-ordinates analysis (PCoA) ordination plot based on the Bray–Curtis distances. The bacterial and fungal taxonomy were assigned by using an RDP classifier against the SILVA and UNITE databases, respectively. The activities of cellulase and phenol oxidase were assayed as described by Guan [25].

2.6. Statistical Analysis

A one-way ANOVA was conducted followed by the Duncan test to analyze significant differences (p < 0.05) among the land-use types. A permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) was implemented to estimate the effects of land-use types on the bacterial and the fungal communities. Multivariate regression tree (MRT) analysis was performed to determine the dominant environment factors in influencing the bacterial and fungal communities. Redundancy analysis (RDA) was applied to assess the relationships between the environment factors and the bacterial and the fungal communities. Pearson’s correlation analysis was carried out to evaluate the relationship between the organic matter mineralization and the organic carbon components as well as the microbial community compositions. These analyses were employed in R 4.0 software associated with vegan and mvpart packages.

3. Results

3.1. Basic Properties of Soils under the Land-Use Types

The contents of total organic carbon (TOC) in Bam, Cam, and Tea soils were 9.67, 12.70, and 13.29 g kg−1, respectively (Table 1). The total nitrogen (TN) contents in Bam, Cam, and Tea soils were 0.94, 1.42, and 1.45 g kg−1, respectively (Table 1). Both the contents of TOC and TN were significantly different among the land-use types (Table 1). Moreover, the ratio of carbon to nitrogen (C/N) followed the order Cam < Tea < Bam, and the difference was significant (Table 1). The Cam had the highest soil pH, while the lowest soil pH was observed in the Tea (Table 1).

3.2. Mineralization of Soil Organic Matter under the Land-Use Types

The cumulative amount of soil organic matter mineralization within 121 days of incubation was significantly different among the land-use types, and the cumulative CO2-C released from Bam, Cam, and Tea soils was 523.9, 953.6, and 1015.9 mg kg−1, respectively (Figure 1b). Moreover, the size (C0) and proportion (C0/TOC) of potentially mineralizable organic carbon pool showed the sequence Bam < Cam < Tea (Table 2).

3.3. Organic Carbon Pools and Dissolved Organic Matter of Soils under the Land-Use Types

The organic carbon content of the labile pool I (LP I-C) in Bam, Cam, and Tea soils was 3.43, 4.35, and 4.15 g kg−1, respectively (Table 3). The labile pool II carbon (LP II-C) content in Bam, Cam, and Tea soils was 1.83, 2.37, and 2.34 g kg−1, respectively (Table 3). The content of recalcitrant pool (RP-C) followed the order Bam < Cam < Tea (Table 3). All of the contents of organic carbon pools were significantly different among the land-use types (Table 3).
The content of soil DOM in Bam, Cam, and Tea was 92.99, 96.48, and 123.79 mg C kg−1, respectively (Table 3). The fluorophore of DOM in Bam, Cam, and Tea soils was located at 370 ex/427 em, 355 ex/405 em. and 350 ex/402 em of excitation/emission wavelength pairs, respectively (Figure 2). These locations of fluorophore showed that the humic acid-like organics were dominant in DOM from each land-use type [26]. Moreover, the normalized fluorescence intensity (FI) of fluorophore followed the sequence Bam < Cam < Tea (Figure 2). The fluorophore at the long wavelength pair with low FI was probably due to the complex structure of DOM with the high degree of conjugation and high molecular weight [10,23,24]. On the other hand, the fluorophore at the short wavelength pair with high FI was perhaps attributed to the simple structure of DOM with the low degree of polycondensation and low molecular weight [10,23,24]. Thus, the structural complexity of DOM was increased as the order Tea < Cam < Bam.

3.4. Microbial Communities and Enzyme Activities of Soils under the Land-Use Types

The bacterial OTUs, Chao 1, and Shannon indexes in Cam soil were higher than that in Bam and Tea soils, and the difference was significant among the land-use types (Table 4). The PCoA plots and PERMANOVA results revealed the clear variations in bacterial community among the land-use types (Figure 3a). The dominant phyla of soil bacteria in the three land-use types included Proteobacteria, Chloroflexi, Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, and Firmicutes, which accounted for 24.1–27.8%, 23.1–25.7%, 14.5–26.9%, 11.6–20.5%, and 2.9–9.3% of the bacterial sequences, respectively (Figure 4a). The slightly higher relative abundances of Proteobacteria and Chloroflexi were observed in the Cam soil than that in Bam and Tea soils (Figure 4c). The relative abundances of Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, and Firmicutes were significantly different among the land-use types (Figure 4c). Moreover, the Bam, Cam, and Tea soils contained the highest relative abundance of Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, and Firmicutes, respectively (Figure 4c).
The Bam soil with higher OTUs, Chao 1, and Shannon indexes of fungal community than that in Cam and Tea soils, and the land-use types significantly changed the fungal diversity (Table 4). The PCoA plots and PERMANOVA results revealed the clear variations in fungal community among the land-use types (Figure 3b). The dominant phyla of soil fungi in the three land-use types were Zygomycota, Ascomycota, and Basidiomycota, which accounted for 40.3–57.6%, 20.7–24.1%, and 0.5–12.9% of the fungal sequences, respectively (Figure 4b). A slightly higher relative abundance of Zygomycota was found in Tea soils than that of Bam and Cam soils, while the Cam soil had a slightly higher relative abundance of Ascomycota than that of the Bam and Tea soils (Figure 4d). The Tea soil contained significantly higher relative abundances of Basidiomycota than that of Bam and Cam soils (Figure 4d).
The activities of cellulase and phenol oxidase were significantly different and followed the sequence Bam < Cam < Tea (Table 3).

3.5. Relationships between Soil Properties, Organic Carbon Components, Microbial Community Compositions, and Mineralization

The MRT analysis explained 82.98% of the variation in the bacterial community (Figure 5a). The Bam was separated from the other treatments by the TOC content (</≥11.2 g kg−1) in the first split, which interpreted 65.29% of the variance (Figure 5a). The TOC content (</≥13.04 g kg−1) further separated the Cam and the Tea in the second split, which defined 17.69% of the variance (Figure 5a). The MRT analysis explained 83.02% of the variance in the fungal community (Figure 5b). The Bam associated with higher C/N (≥9.68) were separated from the other treatments in the first split, clarifying 44.36% of the variance (Figure 5b). The TOC content (</≥13.04 g kg−1) in the second split then separated the Cam and the Tea, identifying 38.66% of the variance (Figure 5b).
The first two axes of the RDA accounted for 82.02% and 84.49% of the total variance in the bacterial and the fungal communities, respectively (Figure 6). Moreover, both the bacterial and the fungal communities from Bam, Cam, and Tea were positively correlated with the C/N ratio, the pH, and the LP I-C and the DOM, respectively (Figure 6).
The mineralization of organic matter showed significant relationships with the contents of TOC, TN, LP I-C, LP II-C, DOM, the C/N ratio, and the cellulase activity, but a nonsignificant correlation with the microbial community compositions with the exception of Gemmatimonadetes (Table 5).

4. Discussion

4.1. Influences of the Land-Use Types on the Soil Organic Carbon Components

In the present study, the labile pools in soil organic carbon (LP I-C and LP II-C) followed the sequence Bam < Tea ≤ Cam, and the recalcitrant pool in soil organic carbon was in the order Bam < Cam < Tea (Table 3). Different from our results, Wang and Zhong found that the labile and recalcitrant pools of organic carbon in the surface soil were similar among the four monoculture forests [1]. However, Lin et al. noted that the broadleaf forest had more of the soil labile organic carbon fraction (O-alkyl C) compared with the bamboo plantations [4]. The dissimilarity among the above studies is possibly related to the variations in vegetation species, environmental conditions, and management practices [4,27].
LP I-C consists of polysaccharides such as hemicellulose and starch, and LP II-C predominantly contains cellulose [6,9]. The components of soil organic carbon are potentially influenced by the input of litter-fall and root from different plantations [28]. The broadleaf litter-fall with a low C/N ratio is easily decomposed and is probably an important source of labile fractions in the Cam soil [18,28]. The fertilization in the Tea perhaps stimulates the root activity and promotes the large amounts of labile exudates into the soil [10]. Moreover, the mulch of regular pruning in the tea plantation could contribute to the high soil organic matter. Ultisol belongs to strongly weathered soil and has a limited capacity for organic matter accumulation, especially in the more disturbed bamboo plantation.
DOM is the important and typical labile component in soil organic carbon. The Cam and the Tea showed more contents of DOM in soils than that in the Bam (Table 3), the variation was similar to the contents of LP I-C and LP II-C among the land-use types. Similarly, Lin et al. suggested that the contents of water-soluble organic carbon decreased when broadleaf forests were converted to moso bamboo plantations in two soil layers [4]. High precipitation in this area could stimulate DOM leaching, particularly in the more disturbed bamboo plantation. Importantly, the complex of chemical structure of DOM was in the sequence Tea < Cam < Bam (Figure 2). The Cam and the Tea provided more plant materials, which would leach abundant DOMs with simple structures compared with the Bam, because the DOM from plant materials mostly showed low molecular complexity and humification indices [10]. Furthermore, the higher activities of enzymes (Table 4) perhaps resulted in more input of DOMs with simple structure in the Cam and the Tea than that in the Bam [11]. These results implied that the Cam and the Tea contained more, and simpler labile organic carbon components compared with the Bam.

4.2. Influences of the Land-Use Types on the Soil Microbial Communities

Our study revealed clear shifts in both bacterial and fungal communities among the land-use types (Figure 3). The MRT results indicated that the TOC content and/or the C/N ratio were the important factors in separating the microbial community among the land-use types (Figure 5). Indeed, the soil organic carbon components are the critical determinant of microbial communities [17,29], and microbial category can be classified into functional groups based on their response to organic carbon components and soil environment [13,30,31].
The RDA results further suggested that the microbial communities of Bam, Cam, and Tea were dominantly influenced by the C/N ratio, the LP I-C and the soil pH, and the DOM, respectively (Figure 6). The high relative abundance of Actinobacteria was in the Bam soil, which could be due to the high soil C/N ratio (Figure 4c and Figure 6a). Urbanová et al. reported the high abundance of Actinobacteria in litters with high C/N ratios [32]. Moreover, Actinobacteria are able to utilize more recalcitrant organic matter by their hypha penetration [33]. The high relative abundance of Proteobacteria, Chloroflexi, Acidobacteria, and Ascomycota were from the Cam soil, which was perhaps attributed to the high LP I-C content and/or the high soil pH (Figure 4c,d and Figure 6). In fact, Proteobacteria (such as Alpha-, Beta-, and Gamma-Proteobacteria) exhibit copiotrophic attributes and are more abundant in soils with large amounts of available carbon [3,5,7,13,14]. Acidobacteria can show the diverse use of polysaccharides including hemicellulose, cellulose, xylan, and chitin [16,34]. Liu et al. and Li et al. observed that some Acidobacteria subgroups were more abundant in soils with a higher organic carbon content [29,35]. Additionally, Rousk et al. and Liu et al. reported that Chloroflexi phylum and some subgroups of Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria phyla tended to be positively related to soil pH [31,35]. Ascomycota perhaps predominate in cellulose-rich (primary component of labile pools) soils [16,17]. The high relative abundance of Firmicutes, Zygomycota, and Basidiomycota were in the Tea soil, which was probably ascribed to the high DOM content (Figure 4c,d and Figure 6). Indeed, Firmicutes generally prefer a copiotrophic soil environment with easily acquired organic carbon [2,17]. Some species such as Zygomycetes in the Zygomycota phylum could be favored by the readily available sugars and adequate nutrients of fresh substrate [2,18]. Ren et al. showed that the restored ecosystem could promote the fast growth of Basidiomycota by the utilization of an easily degradable fraction of residues [5].

4.3. Influences of the Land-Use Types on the Mineralization of Soil Organic Matter

Our study suggested that the mineralization of soil organic matter significantly increased in the sequence Bam < Cam < Tea (Figure 1b). The mineralization of soil organic matter showed a significantly positive relationship with the contents of TOC, TN, LP I-C, LP II-C and DOM, and the activity of cellulase, whereas it revealed a significantly negative relationship with the C/N ratio (Table 5). The labile organic carbon, especially the DOM with simple chemical structure, could provide small and available substrate and potentially promote the microbial metabolism and CO2 production [2,5,6,9,10,11]. Soil with a high nitrogen content and a low C/N ratio tends to accelerate the degradation of organic matter [1,12]. Cellulase is primarily involved in the decomposition of cellulose in soil [36]. The soil organic polymers broken down by the enzymes can supply small, dissolved, and available organic components for microorganisms [7].
However, the mineralization of soil organic matter generally showed nonsignificant relationships with the microbial community compositions (Table 5). These results implied that organic carbon components played a more important role than microbial community compositions in the mineralization of organic matter influenced by the land-use types in the Ultisol. Indeed, the influence of microbes on the mineralization of soil organic matter generally depends on the organic substrate [2,7,8,10]. Therefore, the higher contents of carbon and nitrogen, the lower C/N ratio, and the higher cellulase activity in the Cam and the Tea largely stimulated the greater mineralization of soil organic matter compared with the Bam.

5. Conclusions

The soil organic matter mineralization showed the order Bam < Cam < Tea. The Cam and Tea contained higher contents of labile organic carbon and a simpler chemical structure of DOM than that in the Bam. The microbial communities were significantly different among the land-use types. The relative abundances of Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, Firmicutes, and Basidiomycota exhibited significant difference among the land-use types. The microbial communities were dominantly controlled by the TOC content and/or the C/N ratio. The microbial communities of Bam, Cam, and Tea displayed close correlations with the C/N ratio, the pH and LP I-C, and the DOM, respectively. Land-use types changed the organic matter mineralization mainly by the organic carbon components rather than the microbial community compositions in the Ultisol.

Author Contributions

P.X.; S.M.; X.R.; S.L. and C.Y. supervised and designed the project; P.X. performed the experiment and collected data; P.X. and J.Z. helped in data formal analysis and preparation of the manuscript; J.Z. and C.Y. reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science and Technology Project in Hubei Tobacco Company (Grant No. 027Y2021-009), the Basic Research Program of Shanxi Province (Grant No. 202103021223128), the Research projects of Shanxi Province’s doctoral graduates and postdoctoral researchers working in Shanxi Province (Grant No. SXBYKY2022026), and the Science and Technology Innovation Fund of Shanxi Agricultural University (Grant No. 2021BQ62).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, Q.; Zhong, M. Composition and mineralization of soil organic carbon pools in four single-tree species forest soils. J. For. Res. 2016, 27, 1277–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Xiao, H.; Li, Z.; Dong, Y.; Chang, X.; Deng, L.; Huang, J.; Nie, X.; Liu, C.; Liu, L.; Wang, D.; et al. Changes in microbial communities and respiration following the revegetation of eroded soil. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 2017, 246, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zheng, J.; Chen, J.; Pan, G.; Wang, G.; Liu, X.; Zhang, X.; Li, L.; Bian, R.; Cheng, K.; Zheng, J. A long-term hybrid poplar plantation on cropland reduces soil organic carbon mineralization and shifts microbial community abundance and composition. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 111, 94–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lin, Z.; Li, Y.; Tang, C.; Luo, Y.; Fu, W.; Cai, X.; Li, Y.; Yue, T.; Jiang, P.; Hu, S.; et al. Converting natural evergreen broadleaf forests to intensively managed moso bamboo plantations affects the pool size and stability of soil organic carbon and enzyme activities. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2018, 54, 467–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ren, C.; Wang, T.; Xu, Y.; Deng, J.; Zhao, F.; Yang, G.; Han, X.; Feng, Y.; Ren, G. Differential soil microbial community responses to the linkage of soil organic carbon fractions with respiration across land-use changes. For. Ecol. Manag. 2018, 409, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rovira, P.; Vallejo, V.R. Labile and recalcitrant pools of carbon and nitrogen in organic matter decomposing at different depths in soil: An acid hydrolysis approach. Geoderma 2002, 107, 109–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xu, P.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, J.; Shi, L.; Fu, Q.; Chen, J.; Hu, H.; Huang, Q. Influence mechanisms of long-term fertilizations on the mineralization of organic matter in Ultisol. Soil Tillage Res. 2020, 201, 104594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xu, P.; Wu, J.; Wang, H.; Han, S.; Zhu, J.; Fu, Q.; Geng, M.; Hu, H.; Huang, Q. Long-term partial substitution of chemical fertilizer with green manure regulated organic matter mineralization in paddy soil dominantly by modulating organic carbon quality. Plant Soil 2021, 468, 459–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jiang, L.; Zhu, J.; Qi, Y.; Fu, Q.; Hu, H.; Huang, Q. Increasing molecular structural complexity and decreasing nitrogen availability depress the mineralization of organic matter in subtropical forest soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2017, 108, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, P.; Zhu, J.; Fu, Q.; Chen, J.; Hu, H.; Huang, Q. Structure and biodegradability of dissolved organic matter from Ultisol treated with long-term fertilizations. J. Soils Sediments 2018, 18, 1865–1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xu, P.; Zhu, J.; Wang, H.; Shi, L.; Zhuang, Y.; Fu, Q.; Chen, J.; Hu, H.; Huang, Q. Regulation of soil aggregate size under different fertilizations on dissolved organic matter, cellobiose hydrolyzing microbial community and their roles in organic matter mineralization. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 755, 142595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, Q.; Wang, S.; Fan, B.; Yu, X. Litter production, leaf litter decomposition and nutrient return in Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations in south China: Effect of planting conifers with broadleaved species. Plant Soil 2007, 297, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fierer, N.; Bradford, M.A.; Jackson, R.B. Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology 2007, 88, 1354–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Liu, Y.R.; Delgado-Baquerizo, M.; Wang, J.T.; Hu, H.W.; Yang, Z.; He, J.Z. New insights into the role of microbial community composition in driving soil respiration rates. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2018, 118, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Baldrian, P.; Valášková, V. Degradation of cellulose by basidiomycetous fungi. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2008, 32, 501–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Baldrian, P.; Kolařík, M.; Štursová, M.; Kopecký, J.; Valášková, V.; Větrovský, T.; Žifčáková, L.; Šnajdr, J.; Rídl, J.; Vlček, Č.; et al. Active and total microbial communities in forest soil are largely different and highly stratified during decomposition. ISME J. 2012, 6, 248–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Li, Y.; Nie, C.; Liu, Y.; Du, W.; He, P. Soil microbial community composition closely associates with specific enzyme activities and soil carbon chemistry in a long-term nitrogen fertilized grassland. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 654, 264–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, J.; Song, Y.; Ma, T.; Raza, W.; Li, J.; Howland, J.G.; Huang, Q.; Shen, Q. Impacts of inorganic and organic fertilization treatments on bacterial and fungal communities in a paddy soil. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 112, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Soil Survey Staff. Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 12th ed.; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service: Washington, DC, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  20. Walkley, A.; Black, I.A. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934, 37, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kjeldahl, J. Neue methode zur bestimmung des stickstoffs in organischen körpern. Fresen. J. Anal. Chem. 1883, 22, 366–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, Q.; Wang, S.; He, T.; Liu, L.; Wu, J. Response of organic carbon mineralization and microbial community to leaf litter and nutrient additions in subtropical forest soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2014, 71, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Senesi, N.; Miano, T.M.; Provenzano, M.R.; Brunetti, G. Characterization, differentiation and classification of humic substances by fluorescence spectroscopy. Soil Sci. 1991, 152, 259–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. D’Orazio, V.; Traversa, A.; Senesi, N. Forest soil organic carbon dynamics as affected by plant species and their corresponding litters: A fluorescence spectroscopy approach. Plant Soil 2013, 374, 473–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Guan, S. Soil Enzymes and Their Methodology; Agricultural Press: Beijing, China, 1986. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  26. Chen, W.; Westerhoff, P.; Leenheer, J.A.; Booksh, K. Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 5701–5710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Fang, X.; Zhang, J.; Meng, M.; Guo, X.; Wu, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhao, K.; Ding, L.; Shao, Y.; Fu, W. Forest-type shift and subsequent intensive management affected soil organic carbon and microbial community in southeastern China. Eur. J. For. Res. 2017, 136, 689–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, H.; Liu, S.R.; Mo, J.M.; Wang, J.X.; Makeschin, F.; Wolff, M. Soil organic carbon stock and chemical composition in four plantations of indigenous tree species in subtropical China. Ecol. Res. 2010, 25, 1071–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, D.; Chen, L.; Xu, J.; Ma, L.; Olk, D.C.; Zhao, B.; Zhang, J.; Xin, X. Chemical nature of soil organic carbon under different long-term fertilization regimes is coupled with changes in the bacterial community composition in a Calcaric Fluvisol. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2018, 54, 999–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fontaine, S.; Mariotti, A.; Abbadie, L. The priming effect of organic matter: A question of microbial competition? Soil Biol. Biochem. 2003, 35, 837–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rousk, J.; Baath, E.; Brookes, P.C.; Lauber, C.L.; Lozupone, C.; Caporaso, J.G.; Knight, R.; Fierer, N. Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil. ISME J. 2010, 4, 1340–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Urbanová, M.; Šnajdr, J.; Baldrian, P. Composition of fungal and bacterial communities in forest litter and soil is largely determined by dominant trees. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2015, 84, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dang, P.; Yu, X.; Le, H.; Liu, J.; Shen, Z.; Zhao, Z. Effects of stand age and soil properties on soil bacterial and fungal community composition in Chinese pine plantations on the Loess Plateau. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0186501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Ward, N.L.; Challacombe, J.F.; Janssen, P.H.; Henrissat, B.; Coutinho, P.M.; Wu, M.; Xie, G.; Haft, D.H.; Sait, M.; Badger, J.; et al. Three genomes from the phylum Acidobacteria provide insight into the lifestyles of these microorganisms in soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 2046–2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Liu, J.; Sui, Y.; Yu, Z.; Shi, Y.; Chu, H.; Jin, J.; Liu, X.; Wang, G. High throughput sequencing analysis of biogeographical distribution of bacterial communities in the black soils of northeast China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2014, 70, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sinsabaugh, R.L.; Antibus, R.K.; Linkins, A.E. An enzymic approach to the analysis of microbial activity during plant litter decomposition. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1991, 34, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Cumulative amount of soil organic matter mineralization over incubation days (a) and within 121 days of incubation (b) in bamboo (Bam), camphor (Cam), and tea (Tea) plantations. The different letters adjacent to the bars were statistically different at p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Cumulative amount of soil organic matter mineralization over incubation days (a) and within 121 days of incubation (b) in bamboo (Bam), camphor (Cam), and tea (Tea) plantations. The different letters adjacent to the bars were statistically different at p < 0.05.
Agronomy 12 02915 g001
Figure 2. Fluorescence excitation–emission matrices (EEMs) of soil DOM from bamboo (a), camphor (b), and tea (c) plantations. Contour lines based on DOM-normalized fluorescence intensity (FI) values. Arrows showing the location and normalized FI value of the fluorophore.
Figure 2. Fluorescence excitation–emission matrices (EEMs) of soil DOM from bamboo (a), camphor (b), and tea (c) plantations. Contour lines based on DOM-normalized fluorescence intensity (FI) values. Arrows showing the location and normalized FI value of the fluorophore.
Agronomy 12 02915 g002
Figure 3. Principal co-ordinates analysis (PCoA) ordination plots of soil bacterial (a) and fungal (b) communities from bamboo (Bam), camphor (Cam), and tea (Tea) plantations.
Figure 3. Principal co-ordinates analysis (PCoA) ordination plots of soil bacterial (a) and fungal (b) communities from bamboo (Bam), camphor (Cam), and tea (Tea) plantations.
Agronomy 12 02915 g003
Figure 4. Relative abundances of soil bacterial (a) and fungal (b) phyla, and the dominant bacterial (c) and fungal (d) phyla in bamboo (Bam), camphor (Cam), and tea (Tea) plantations. The same letters were not statistically different at p < 0.05.
Figure 4. Relative abundances of soil bacterial (a) and fungal (b) phyla, and the dominant bacterial (c) and fungal (d) phyla in bamboo (Bam), camphor (Cam), and tea (Tea) plantations. The same letters were not statistically different at p < 0.05.
Agronomy 12 02915 g004
Figure 5. Multivariate regression tree (MRT) of soil bacterial (a) and fungal (b) communities from bamboo (Bam), camphor (Cam), and tea (Tea) plantations. TOC, total organic carbon; C/N, ratio of carbon to nitrogen.
Figure 5. Multivariate regression tree (MRT) of soil bacterial (a) and fungal (b) communities from bamboo (Bam), camphor (Cam), and tea (Tea) plantations. TOC, total organic carbon; C/N, ratio of carbon to nitrogen.
Agronomy 12 02915 g005
Figure 6. Redundancy analysis (RDA) of soil bacterial (a) and fungal (b) communities from bamboo (Bam), camphor (Cam), and tea (Tea) plantations. TOC, total organic carbon; TN, total nitrogen; C/N, ratio of carbon to nitrogen; LP I-C, labile pool I of soil organic carbon; LP II-C, labile pool II of soil organic carbon; RP-C, recalcitrant pool of soil organic carbon; DOM, dissolved organic matter.
Figure 6. Redundancy analysis (RDA) of soil bacterial (a) and fungal (b) communities from bamboo (Bam), camphor (Cam), and tea (Tea) plantations. TOC, total organic carbon; TN, total nitrogen; C/N, ratio of carbon to nitrogen; LP I-C, labile pool I of soil organic carbon; LP II-C, labile pool II of soil organic carbon; RP-C, recalcitrant pool of soil organic carbon; DOM, dissolved organic matter.
Agronomy 12 02915 g006
Table 1. Basic properties of soils from bamboo (Bam), camphor (Cam), and tea (Tea) plantations.
Table 1. Basic properties of soils from bamboo (Bam), camphor (Cam), and tea (Tea) plantations.
TOC (g kg−1)TN (g kg−1)C/NpH
Bam9.67 c0.94 c10.26 a4.55 b
Cam12.70 b1.42 b8.93 c4.85 a
Tea13.29 a1.45 a9.16 b4.29 c
TOC, total organic carbon; TN, total nitrogen; C/N, ratio of carbon to nitrogen. Values with the same letters within a column were not statistically different at p < 0.05.
Table 2. Mineralization parameters of soil organic matter in bamboo (Bam), camphor (Cam), and tea (Tea) plantations.
Table 2. Mineralization parameters of soil organic matter in bamboo (Bam), camphor (Cam), and tea (Tea) plantations.
Fitting ParametersC0/TOC (%)
C0 (mg CO2-C kg−1)k (d−1)R2
Bam568.50.01800.9965.88
Cam1181.30.01260.9979.30
Tea1595.30.00810.99712.00
C0, potentially mineralizable organic carbon pool; k, mineralization rate constant of organic carbon.
Table 3. Labile and recalcitrant pools of soil organic carbon, and soil dissolved organic matter in bamboo (Bam), camphor (Cam), and tea (Tea) plantations.
Table 3. Labile and recalcitrant pools of soil organic carbon, and soil dissolved organic matter in bamboo (Bam), camphor (Cam), and tea (Tea) plantations.
LP I-C (g kg−1)LP II-C (g kg−1)RP-C (g kg−1)DOM (mg C kg−1)
Bam3.43 c1.83 b4.40 c92.99 b
Cam4.35 a2.37 a5.98 b96.48 b
Tea4.15 b2.34 a6.80 a123.79 a
LP I-C, labile pool I of soil organic carbon; LP II-C, labile pool II of soil organic carbon; RP-C, recalcitrant pool of soil organic carbon; DOM, dissolved organic matter. Values with the same letters within a column were not statistically different at p < 0.05.
Table 4. Soil bacterial and fungal diversities and enzyme activities in bamboo (Bam), camphor (Cam), and tea (Tea) plantations.
Table 4. Soil bacterial and fungal diversities and enzyme activities in bamboo (Bam), camphor (Cam), and tea (Tea) plantations.
Bacteria DiversityFungi DiversityCellulasePhenol Oxidase
OTUsChao 1ShannonOTUsChao 1Shannon(mg Glucose g−1 72 h−1)(mg Purple Pyrogallol g−1 2 h−1)
Bam1009 b1314 b5.08 c244 a292 a2.79 a0.23 b0.29 b
Cam1256 a1533 a5.99 a225 a299 a2.33 c0.38 a0.31 b
Tea1021 b1221 c5.73 b158 b192 b2.51 b0.42 a0.36 a
Values with the same letters within a column were not statistically different at p < 0.05.
Table 5. Pearson’s correlation between soil organic matter mineralization and soil properties, organic carbon components as well as microbial community compositions. Significant difference at p < 0.05 is given in bold.
Table 5. Pearson’s correlation between soil organic matter mineralization and soil properties, organic carbon components as well as microbial community compositions. Significant difference at p < 0.05 is given in bold.
rp
TOC0.996<0.001
TN0.993<0.001
C/N−0.951<0.001
pH−0.0730.852
LP I-C0.935<0.001
LPII-C0.9040.001
DOM0.6670.050
Cellulase0.8510.004
Phenol oxidase0.6410.063
Acidobacteria0.4380.238
Actinobacteria−0.5580.119
Chloroflexi−0.1410.718
Firmicutes0.2610.497
Gemmatimonadetes0.7420.027
Planctomycetes0.0370.925
Proteobacteria0.1920.621
Verrucomicrobia−0.6440.061
Ascomycota0.1090.780
Basidiomycota0.1470.706
Zygomycota0.2230.564
TOC, total organic carbon; TN, total nitrogen; C/N, ratio of carbon to nitrogen; LP I-C, labile pool I of soil organic carbon; LP II-C, labile pool II of soil organic carbon; DOM, dissolved organic matter.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, P.; Ma, S.; Rao, X.; Liao, S.; Zhu, J.; Yang, C. Effects of Land Use on the Mineralization of Organic Matter in Ultisol. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2915. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12122915

AMA Style

Xu P, Ma S, Rao X, Liao S, Zhu J, Yang C. Effects of Land Use on the Mineralization of Organic Matter in Ultisol. Agronomy. 2022; 12(12):2915. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12122915

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Peidong, Shihao Ma, Xiongfei Rao, Shipeng Liao, Jun Zhu, and Chunlei Yang. 2022. "Effects of Land Use on the Mineralization of Organic Matter in Ultisol" Agronomy 12, no. 12: 2915. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12122915

APA Style

Xu, P., Ma, S., Rao, X., Liao, S., Zhu, J., & Yang, C. (2022). Effects of Land Use on the Mineralization of Organic Matter in Ultisol. Agronomy, 12(12), 2915. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12122915

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop