Next Article in Journal
Adaptive Responses to Nitrogen and Light Supplies of a Local Varieties of Sweet Pepper from the Abruzzo Region, Southern Italy
Next Article in Special Issue
Identification and Genomic Characterization of Pathogenic Bacillus altitudinis from Common Pear Trees in Morocco
Previous Article in Journal
De Novo SNP Discovery and Genotyping of Iranian Pimpinella Species Using ddRAD Sequencing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bacillus Co-Inoculation Alleviated Salt Stress in Seedlings Cucumber
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 11
Issue 7
10.3390/agronomy11071341
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exogenous Salicylic Acid Improves Chilling Tolerance in Maize Seedlings by Improving Plant Growth and Physiological Characteristics

by
Qian Zhang
†,
Dongmei Li
†,
Qi Wang
,
Xiangyu Song
,
Yingbo Wang
,
Xilang Yang
,
Dongling Qin
,
Tenglong Xie
and
Deguang Yang
*
College of Agriculture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Agronomy 2021, 11(7), 1341; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071341
Submission received: 7 May 2021 / Revised: 23 June 2021 / Accepted: 29 June 2021 / Published: 30 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Resilience to Biotic and Environmental Stresses in Horticultural Crops)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Maize (Zea mays L.) is a chilling-sensitive plant. Chilling stress in the early seedling stage seriously limits the growth, development, productivity and geographic distribution of maize. Salicylic acid (SA) is a plant growth regulator involved in the defenses against abiotic and biotic stresses as well as in plant development. However, the physiological mechanisms underlying the effects of foliar applied SA on different maize inbred lines under chilling stress are unclear. Two inbred lines, cold-sensitive cv. C546 and cold-tolerant cv. B125, were used to study the effects of SA on the growth and physiology of maize seedlings. The results showed that the application of SA at 50 mg/L on the leaves of maize seedlings under 4 °C decreased the relative electrolyte conductivity (REC) and the malondialdehyde (MDA) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) (H2O2 and O2−) content due to increased superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity; SA also improved photosynthesis in the seedlings through increased chlorophyll content, enhanced Pn and Gs, and decreased Ci. SA application also increased the proline content and the relative water content (RWC) in the maize seedlings, thereby improving their osmotic adjustment capacity. The increase rate caused by SA of plant height and dry weight in C546 were 10.5% and 5.4% higher than that in B125 under 4 °C. In conclusion, SA promotes maize seedling growth and physiological characteristics, thus enhancing chilling resistance and the effect of SA on the chilling resistance of cold-sensitive cv. was stronger than that on cold-tolerant cv. at the low temperature.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, global frequent extreme climates and related abiotic stress conditions, such as extreme temperature, drought, waterlogging, salinity, and heavy metals, greatly affect plant growth and development, and influence crop yield and quality. Plants are organisms that cannot escape from adverse environment stress, but only endure. Therefore, plants suffer damage and change during stress, including accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as H2O2, O2−, and HO−, destruction of structure and function of membrane and chloroplast, reduction in photosynthesis and stomatal conductance [1,2,3,4,5]. However, the damage caused by abiotic stress is alleviated and eliminated by internal defense system in plants, through increasing the accumulation of hormones, such as ABA, methyl jasmonate (MeJAs), salicylic acid (SA) and other osmoprotectants, such as calcium ion (Ca2+), proline (Pro) and betaine [1,3,6,7].
Maize (Zea mays L.) is one of the most important cereal crops and is used as animal feed, food, and industrial raw material. To increase production to meet the high demand for maize, it has recently been sown in cooler geographical zones. However, maize is native to the tropics, where the plants are very sensitive to chilling [8]. The capacity for maize biomass production decreases in the range 10–15 °C, and these temperatures can even result in irreversible damage; plant death occurs if the plants are exposed below 4 °C for a long period [9]. Low temperatures below 10 °C often occur during seed germination or the seedling stage in early spring. Therefore, cold stress seriously inhibits the growth and development in the seedlings stage of maize, leading to a decline in grain yield and quality [10,11]. Many studies have reported that plants undergo complex physiological and biochemical changes under cold stress [12,13], such as the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in subcellular compartments and damage to the cell membrane and photosynthetic systems [14,15].
Salicylic acid (SA) is a phenolic phytohormone that is widely present in plants and is considered to be an endogenous signaling substance [7,16]. It play a vital role as a signaling molecule to regulate the defense system of plants against biotic and abiotic stresses; it also plays roles in plant growth and development, mineral absorption and transportation, flowering, photosynthesis and transpiration [17,18,19]. Klara [20] reported that abiotic stress promotes the accumulation of free SA and SA glucoside in wheat plants, which shows that SA is involved in regulating the stress response in wheat. Many studies have shown that the exogenous of SA can induce crops to tolerate a variety of abiotic stresses, such as heat, cold, drought, salinity, water, and toxic heavy metal stress [21,22]. The application of SA induced the chilling tolerance of in wheat with the concentration of 100 μM, in dendrobium officinale (1.5 mM) and in brassica napus (200 μM) [7].
Cold stress remains one of the most destructive abiotic stress factors that significantly affect the maize production and distribution in Northeast China (the Golden Maize Belt). It is important and urgent to find a solution to the cold tolerance of maize. The breeding or cultivation technology are not time-effective or efficient. The quest remains for eco-friendly, cost-effective, and reproducible alternatives, such as exogenous SA, which is inexpensive and easy to apply. Therefore, the application of exogenous SA to improve the cold resistance of crops, could be implemented effectively and more extensively [1]. However, the effects of exogenous SA on cold tolerance in maize are limited reported, especially, the concentration. The researches of the physiological mechanisms underlying the response to exogenous SA in maize inbred lines are also few. Our previous research, where 5 concentrations of SA 0, 25, 50, 100, and 150 mg/L had been set, found that the optimal concentration is 50 mg/L (only published in Chinese) [23]. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to investigate the effects of 50 mg/L SA on the growth and physiological characteristics of two maize inbred lines under cold stress and identify which inbred line was more sensitive to exogenous SA. This study will provide novel prospect into the application and breeding work of SA-induced cold tolerance in maize.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Crop Materials and Experimental Design

We used two maize inbred lines, C546 (cold-sensitive) and B125 (cold-tolerant), for this research. The seed materials were received from Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences.
SA (molecular formula: C7H6O3, molecular weight: 138) was purchased from Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Technology and Services Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Nitroblue tetrazolium, guaiacol, thiobarbituric acid, Coomassie brilliant blue G-250, and other reagents were purchased locally.
In the experiment, we tested the SA concentration of 50 mg/L (the optimal concentration, determined based on the results of a previous experiment), and deionized water as the control treatment (CK), on the same two maize inbred lines. Four treatments were implemented at random, with eight replicates per treatment. The four healthy seeds from each replication were sown in soil in plastic tubs (21 cm diameter × 20 cm height). When the maize seedlings had grown three leaves, each plant was sprayed with 10 mL of the SA solution. Deionized water was sprayed as the control treatment. One day after spraying, the maize seedlings were moved into a growth chamber which had a light intensity of 800 mol/m2/s, a day/night cycle of 14 h/10 h, relative humidity of 80% and a temperature of 4 °C, for 2 days. Then, the plants were sampled and examined.

2.2. Experimental Measurements

2.2.1. Photosynthetic Characteristics

The photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), and intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) of the third complete leaf were determined from 9:30 to 11:00 in the lab, using a portable photosynthesis apparatus (GFS-3000, WALZ, Germany) under a steady light intensity of 800 μmol/m2/s, a relative humidity of 80% and a CO2 concentration of 380 ppm. The area of chamber head was 4 cm2, and temperature in the cuvette was 25 °C.

2.2.2. Relative electrolyte conductivity

The third leaf of the plant was sampled and cleaned. Samples from the leaves were collected with a punch and then placed into triangular bottles with 20 mL re-distilled water for 15 h. The solution was measured using a conductivity meter (FE30, MET). The relative electrolyte conductivity (REC) was calculated according to Zhang [23].

2.2.3. Relative Water Content

Leaf samples were cleaned, and the weight (fresh wt.) was recorded. The leaves were placed into triangular bottles with sufficient distilled water for 12 h. Then, the blade surface of each leaf was dried, and the leaf weight was recorded (turgid wt.). Each leaf was then baked at 80 °C for 24 h, and the leaf weight was recorded (dry wt.). The relative water content (RWC) of the leaves was determined according to Lutts [24].

2.2.4. Proline Content

The proline content was determined using Bates’s method [25], and 0.1 g of tissue was homogenized in 10 mL of 3% aqueous sulfosalicylic acid for 10 min followed by filtration. Two milliliters of the filtrate were mixed with 2 mL of acid ninhydrin and 2 mL of glacial acetic acid for 1 h at 90 °C. The developed color was extracted in 4 mL toluene and the intensity of the reaction mixture was determined spectrophotometrically at wavelengths of 520 nm.

2.2.5. Indicators of Oxidative Damage

To measure the MDA content, 2 mL of enzyme solution and 2 mL of 0.67% thiobarbituric acid (TBA) were mixed together, heated in a water bath at 100 °C for 30 min, cooled, and then centrifuged. The absorbance of the supernatant was measured at wavelengths of 450 nm, 532 nm, and 600 nm [26].
The O2− formation rate was determined according to the method of Elstner [27]. First, 0.5 mL of the reaction mixture was combined with 0.5 mL α-naphthylamine solution and 0.5 mL sulfanilic acid solution and shaken until evenly mixed. After being placed at room temperature for 20 min, the optical density of the mixture was determined at wavelengths of 530 nm with a UV-visible spectrophotometer (PERSEE, T6).
The H2O2 content was determined according to the method of Jana [28]. Then, 0.3 g leaf tissue was homogenized with 3 mL of 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.5). The homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000× g for 25 min. The supernatant was brought to 3 mL with phosphate buffer. The 3 mL extracted solution was mixed with 1 mL of 0.1% titanium sulphate in 20% H2SO4 (v/v), and the mixture was centrifuged at 6000× g for 15 min. To determine the H2O2 content, the intensity of the yellow color of the supernatant was measured at wavelengths of 410 nm. The H2O2 content was calculated from a standard curve prepared from hydrogen peroxide of known concentration.

2.2.6. Antioxidant Enzyme Activity

Approximately 0.5 g of fresh maize leaves was finely ground in liquid nitrogen.
The SOD activity was determined according to the method of Giannopolitis [29]. The enzyme solution of 20 μL was mixed with 3 mL of the SOD reaction solution. The enzyme solution and control treatments were placed in 74 μmol/m2/s light for 30 min. The absorbance values were recorded at 560 nm.
The POD activity was determined according to the method of Hernandez [30]. The enzyme solution was mixed with 3 mL of the POD reaction solution. The absorbance values were recorded once every 30 s at 470 nm.
The CAT activity was determined according to the method of Sohn [31] with minor modifications as the ability of CAT to consume an amount of H2O2. Changes in the absorbance of the reaction solution at 240 nm were recorded for 5 min. One unit of CAT activity was defined as an absorbance change of 0.01 units per minute.
The APX activity was determined according to the method of Kang [32]. The homogenate of 3 mL reaction mixture was then centrifuged at 10,000× g for 20 min. The oxidation of ascorbate was followed by a decrease in the absorbance at 240 nm.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

All data were analyzed using the general linear model procedure (GLM) in SPSS 17. Comparisons were made using Duncan’s Multiple Range test (p < 0.05). The data are shown as the mean ± SE of three replicates.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of SA on the Growth and Biomass of the Maize Seedlings

The seedling height and root length were significantly influenced by the temperature, inbred line, and SA treatment (p < 0.001). The plant height and root length decreased by 8.4% and 13.7%, respectively, in B125 and by 21.2% and 14.1%, respectively, in C546 at 4 °C compared to those at 25 °C (Table 1). C546 was more sensitive to cold than B125, especially its aboveground parts. At the low temperature, SA significantly affected the growth of the inbred lines; however, it had no significant effect on growth at 25 °C. The effect of SA on plant height was stronger in C546 than in B125 at 4 °C. The plant height of the SA-treated seedlings increased by 19.2% in the former and by 8.7% in the latter compared with that of the non-SA seedlings. In both inbred lines, SA treatment increased the root length to the same extent (13.0% and 13.3%).
The seedling dry weight (DW) and root DW were significantly affected by the temperature, inbred line, and SA treatment (p < 0.001). The seedling DW and root DW decreased by 20.3% and 24.17%, respectively, in B125 and by 21.7% and 27.7%, respectively, in C546 at 4 °C compared to those at 25 °C (Table 1). At both 4 °C and 25 °C, SA significantly affected the biomass of the inbred lines. SA increased the seedling DW and root DW more in C546 (26.6% and 37.4%) than in B125 (21.8% and 31.3%) at 4 °C.

3.2. Effect of SA Treatment on the Cell Membrane Permeability and MDA Content

Figure 1A shows that the REC of seedlings significantly increased at 4 °C compared to that at 25 °C. A significant difference was observed between the two inbred lines (p < 0.001). The REC of C546 was higher than that of B125. SA affected the REC significantly and to different extents in the two inbred lines. SA application decreased REC by 52.0% and f 23.5% in C546 and B125 at the low temperature.
The MDA content was significantly affected by the temperature, inbred line and SA treatment and showed significant two-factor interactions (p < 0.001). Figure 1B shows that the MDA content of seedlings significantly increased at 4 °C compared to 25 °C. The MDA content was significantly higher in C546 than that in B125 at the low temperature. The MDA content decreased by 29.8% and 34.0% in C546 and B125, respectively, in response to SA compared to the SA-free treatment at 4 °C. In particular, the MDA content of B125 remained the same between the low temperature and the normal temperature due to SA application.

3.3. Effects of SA Treatment on the Relative Water Content and Proline Content of Maize Seedlings

The RWC was affected by the temperature and the SA treatment (p < 0.001). RWC decreased significantly, by 54.6% in B125 and by 64.0% in C546, at 4 °C without the SA treatment (Figure 2A). There was no significant difference in the average RWC over all treatments for C546 and B125. SA significantly increased the RWC of both inbred lines at 4 °C but not that at 25 °C. The effect of SA on the RWC was greater in C546 (120.1%) than in B125 (98.3%) at 4 °C.
The proline content was affected by the temperature, inbred line, and SA treatment (p < 0.001). It significantly increased, by 20.3% in B125 and by 16.3% in C546, at 4 °C without the SA treatment (Figure 2B). The average proline content over all treatments was higher in B125 than in C546. SA significantly increased the proline content of both inbred lines at both temperatures. The effect of SA on the proline content was greater in C546 (81.4%) than in B125 (76.5%) at 4 °C.

3.4. Effects of SA Treatment on Maize Seedling Photosynthesis

Pn decreased in both inbred lines at the low temperature, especially in C546, which was more sensitive to cold than B125 (Figure 3A). SA significantly influenced the Pn at the low temperature (p < 0.001), and there was a significant interaction effect of SA and the inbred line (p < 0.001). A greater increase in Pn in response to SA compared to the SA-free control was observed in C546 (40.3%) than in B125 (20.0%) at 4 °C. SA had no significant effect on Pn at 25 °C.
The change trend in Gs was similar to that in Pn. Gs was significantly affected by the temperature, maize inbred line and SA treatment, and their interaction effects were significant (p < 0.001). Gs decreased from 25 °C to 4 °C, especially in C546 (Figure 3B). At 25 °C, SA had no significant effect on Gs, while SA significantly influenced Gs at 4 °C. The effect of SA on Gs was stronger in C546 than in B125 at 4 °C.
Ci was significantly affected by the temperature and SA (p < 0.001) but not by the maize inbred line (p > 0.05). Ci increased from 25 °C to 4 °C (Figure 3C). SA significantly influenced Ci at 4 °C but not that at 25 °C. There was no significant difference in Ci between the SA treatment at 4 °C and the SA-free control at 25 °C.
The chlorophyll content was significantly affected by temperature and SA, and the effect of their interaction was significant (p < 0.001). The chlorophyll content decreased from 25 °C to 4 °C (Figure 3D). SA significantly increased the chlorophyll content at 4 °C but not that at 25 °C. The effect of SA on chlorophyll content was stronger in C546 (56.1%) than in B125 (50.6%) at 4 °C. There was no significant difference in chlorophyll content between the SA treatment at 4 °C and the SA-free control at 25 °C.

3.5. Effects of SA Treatment on the ROS Content of Maize Seedlings

Figure 4A shows that the H2O2 content of seedlings significantly increased at 4 °C compared to 25 °C. The H2O2 content was higher in C546 than in B125 at the low temperature. The H2O2 content decreased by 16.4% in C546 and by 15.8% in B125 under the SA treatment compared to the SA-free treatment at 4 °C.
The changing trend in O2− production rate was similar to that for H2O2. The O2− production rate was significantly affected by the temperature, inbred line, and SA treatment (p < 0.001). Figure 4B shows that the O2− production rate significantly increased at 4 °C compared to 25 °C. The O2− production rate decreased by 21.9% in C546 and by 28.0% in B125 under the SA treatment compared to the SA-free treatment at 4 °C.

3.6. Effects of SA Treatment on Antioxidant Enzyme System

SOD activity was significantly affected by the temperature, inbred line and SA treatment (p < 0.001). The effects of two-way interactions of factors were significant (p < 0.001). Figure 5A shows that SOD activity was significantly increased by cold stress. The increase in SOD activity in C546 (92.8%) was greater than that in B125 (67.8%) at the low temperature. The application of SA induced a significant increase in SOD activity at 4 °C compared to that in the SA-free control.
POD activity was significantly influenced by the temperature, inbred line and SA treatment (p < 0.001). Figure 5B shows that the POD activity significantly increased under cold stress. The increase in POD activity in C546 (160.1%) was greater than that in B125 (108.2%) at the low temperature. SA significantly increased the POD activity at 4 °C compared with that in the non-SA treatment. SA had similar effects on POD activity in both inbred lines at 4 °C.
CAT activity was significantly influenced by the temperature, inbred line and SA treatment (p < 0.001). Figure 5C shows that the CAT activity significantly increased under cold stress. SA significantly increased the CAT activity at 4 °C but not 25 °C.
The changing trend in APX activity was similar to that for CAT. APX activity was significantly influenced by the temperature, inbred line, and SA treatment (p < 0.001). Figure 5D shows that the APX activity significantly increased under cold stress. SA significantly increased the APX activity at 4 °C but not 25 °C.

4. Discussion

Cold stress seriously affected the growth of different maize inbred lines in the seedling stage. Application of SA at 50 mg/L on the leaves of maize seedlings under 4 °C, promoted the seedling and root growth, resulting in enhanced chilling resistance. SA decreased the REL, the MDA content and H2O2 and O2− content due to increased superoxide SOD, POD, CAT, and APX activity; SA also increased chlorophyll content, enhanced Pn and Gs, and decreased Ci. Through increasing the proline content and RWC, SA improved the osmotic adjustment capacity of seedlings. In addition, the effect of SA on the chilling resistance of C546 (cold-sensitive cv.) was stronger than that on B125 (cold-tolerant cv.) at the low temperature.

4.1. Growth and Physiological Changes in Maize Seedlings under Chilling Stress

Chilling stress has been recognized as an environmental factor that limits plant growth and agricultural production [33]. Short and low-biomass seedlings as well as small and yellowing leaves were observed under cold stress due to the inhibition of resource uptake processes [34]. Different organs respond differently to low temperatures. The root is an important organ with which plants absorb water and nutrients and carry out material transformation and storage. Root growth directly affects the growth and morphology of the aboveground part of the plant. Soil temperatures that are too low will inhibit root growth, resulting in short and unhealthy plants [35,36]. The shoot tip is also very sensitive to low temperatures, and this sensitivity can have a negative impact on the leaf mass and growth rate [37]. In this study, it was found that the plant height, root length and biomass of the seedlings of the two maize inbred lines were significantly affected by low temperatures; these findings were similar to previous results [38,39]. The decreases in root growth and weight were greater than the decreases in seedling and shoot growth and weight. This suggests that the roots are more sensitive to chilling stress than other plant organs at the early growth stage.
Physiological changes occur in plants under cold stress, including primary direct and indirect damage to cell membranes. Cell membrane damage, which is the basic mechanism of low temperature stress, occurs due to the accumulation of MDA and the production of excessive ROS, such as O2− and H2O2 which are the critical component of stress response regulation in crop plants, including maize and Maclura pomifera [40,41]. The primary cellular ROS generation sites are chloroplasts, mitochondria, peroxisomes, apoplast, and plasma membranes [42]. Therefore, ROS have harmful effects such as plant membrane peroxidation and intracellular electrolyte leakage, which eventually destroy the structure and function of cell membranes [43]. MDA causes the cell membrane to produce membrane lipid peroxides [44]. Li reported that the production of ROS and MDA also made the relative electrolyte conductivity (REC) increase under cold and oxidative stress. This phenomenon was also observed in our study. In this research, the MDA content and relative electrolyte conductivity (REC) in the seedlings gradually increased under chilling stress. The results also indicated that the production rate of O2− and the content of H2O2 in the seedlings increased significantly under chilling stress. Therefore, the increase in MDA and REC may have been due to the increase in the production rate of O2− and the content of H2O2, which would in turn lead to cell membrane integrity loss and metabolic disturbances. These findings support previous work in tomato, which showed increases in the MDA and H2O2 contents and the production rate of O2− [45]. To reduce the accumulation of ROS and cellular oxidative damage, plants have a highly efficient antioxidant system for scavenging ROS to improve their cold tolerance [46]. In plants, the antioxidant defense system and ROS accumulation maintains a steady-state balance [43]. The antioxidant enzyme system includes SOD, POD, CAT, and APX. The results showed that the activity of the antioxidant enzymes SOD, POD, CAT, and APX in the two maize cultivars was significantly increased after the chilling stress treatment; this result is similar to the results of previous studies [38].
Maize is a typical C4 plant in which photosynthesis is sensitive to low-temperature stress [47]. Chloroplasts are the main organs for photosynthesis in plants and are one of the most cold-sensitive organs in plants. Therefore, low temperatures can damage the structure and function of chloroplasts, the net photosynthetic rate, and the gas exchange [14,39]. Bhusal confirmed that especially Pn and Gs increased due to the heavy leaf and the increase of the Chlorophyll content. This helps the leaf to capture a higher amount of light, and consequently more Chlorophyll promotes the higher of Pn [48]. Chen also reported that the increase of chlorophyll content also enhanced the net photosynthetic rate of maize to improve salt stress tolerance [47]. The results showed that the chlorophyll content decreased from 25 °C to 4 °C in this study. The change trends in Pn and Gs were similar to that in the chlorophyll content, while Ci showed a different trend at the low temperature. The same results were obtained in the study of Sun [38], who found that the Pn, Gs, and Tr of maize seedlings decreased at low temperatures, while the Ci increased. Aniszewski [49] and Ashraf [50] showed that the absorption of CO2 and Pn decreases significantly or even stops when the temperature is below an optimum temperature because of plants exchanging gas through stomatal regulation to alleviate the negative effects on their photosynthetic processes. Jiang also reported that phytochromes modulated cold and freezing tolerance, and therefore the photosynthesis is closely related to low temperature [51]. Pn is often invoked as a reference indicator for plants responding to cold stress.
Under chilling stress, plant cells lose water, which leads to a water deficit; this results in osmotic stress, and the RWC of the cell decreases. The RWC of plant cells is an important indicator of the physiological water status in plant tissues [21]. This experiment also found that RWC significantly decreased, by 50–64%, in the two inbred lines of maize at 4 °C. This result is consistent with the research by Aroca [35]. To adapt to osmotic stress, plants adopt an active adjustment method through their own defense system to increase the accumulation of osmotic adjustment substances, such as proline (Pro), which has been considered as a signaling substance regulating mitochondrial functions by activating ROS detoxification pathway [41]. Many studies have shown that plants can actively accumulate free proline under osmotic stress to increase the concentration of the cytosol, reduce osmotic potential, and increase their water retention capacity as stress adaptations [9,13,52,53]. This experiment also found that the content of free proline in maize leaves increased significantly under chilling stress. This is consistent with the results of research by Chen [53].

4.2. Effects of SA on Growth and Physiological Development

The phytohormone SA is involved in defenses against biotic and abiotic stresses as well as in plant development [54,55]. Exogenously supplied SA affects numerous aspects of plant growth and development, including seed germination, vegetative growth, root initiation and growth, fruit yield, senescence, stomatal closure, photosynthesis, and respiration [1,56]. Cold temperatures promote the accumulation of endogenous free SA and glucosyl SA in wheat and grapes [57], suggesting that SA is involved in the regulation of cold responses [56]. In this study, the application of SA was found to increase the growth and biomass of seedlings under chilling stress. The plant height, root length and dry weight of the two inbred lines were increased by the application of 50 mg/L SA. These results corroborate the findings of Szalai [9]. Farooq [4] clarified that 0.5 mM SA reduced damage to plants and promoted maize seedling growth under low-temperature conditions.
In general, low concentrations of SA may improve the antioxidant capacity of plants. Miura and Tada [56] reported that low SA concentrations stimulate the low-level accumulation of ROS as secondary signals for activating biological processes such as, e.g., enhancing the activity of cellular protective enzymes, including APX, CAT, SOD, POD, guaiacol peroxidase (GPX), and glutathione reductase (GR) [58]. Wang [59] found that the hydroponic application of SA or aspirin both alleviated the accumulation of H2O2. In our study, the H2O2 content and O2− production rate decreased and the antioxidant enzyme (APX, CAT, SOD and POD) activity increased in two inbred lines with an SA treatment of 50 mg/L compared to those in an SA-free treatment at 4 °C. Malan [60] also reported that SA promoted the activity of antioxidant enzymes under chilling stress, thereby eliminating excess ROS. Farooq [4] found that the application of SA reduced the REL and MDA content of plant leaves as well as cell membrane peroxidation. Bandurska [61] found that SA improved the RWC in leaves by increasing the proline content. Both these results are consistent with our results, in which the SA treatment significantly increased the RWC of both inbred lines only at 4 °C and increased the proline content in both inbred lines at both temperatures.
Chilling stress can significantly reduce the Pn of plants, and SA can increase the Pn under stress conditions by increasing the chlorophyll content, affecting stomatal closure [62]. Low temperatures caused a decrease in the Pn of maize seedling leaves. Rivas-San Vicente and Plasencia [63] explained that the chlorophyll content of the maize seedling leaves decreased and the stomatal resistance of the leaves increased, which led to an increase in the intercellular carbon dioxide concentration. This study showed that the application of exogenous SA significantly alleviated the inhibitory effect of chilling stress on Pn, increased Gs and significantly reduced Ci in maize seedlings.

5. Conclusions

Cold stress seriously inhibits the growth and development of maize in northeast China and other high latitudes. Through this research, we confirmed the indicator related cold stress, including REC, MDA content, Pn and Gs, and H2O2 content and O2− production rate. The application of 50 mg/L SA to the leaves of maize seedlings improves maize chilling resistance due to promoted growth, protects membrane function and structure, and improves the photosynthesis system and osmotic adjustment capacity of the two inbreeds. We also find the effect of SA on the chilling resistance of cold-sensitive cv. was stronger than that on cold-tolerant cv. at the low temperature. Therefore, to study exogenous SA and chilling stress together, by regulating different genes involved in assimilation and metabolic pathways, will be very interesting and important, based on the transcriptome results. Our study will provide novel insight into the application and breeding work of SA-induced chilling resistance in maize.

Author Contributions

D.Y. and Q.Z. designed the experiments and obtained funding for the research. Q.Z. and D.L. contributed to compiling and analyzing the data and wrote the manuscript. D.L., Q.W., X.Y., X.S., Y.W. and D.Q. conducted statistical analysis and performed the experimental analyses. T.X. and D.Y. participated in the data analysis and supervised the writing of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31501251), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFD0300103), Young Talents (19QC02) and Academic Elite (20XG25) of Northeast Agricultural University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, Z.; Wu, P.; Zhang, W.; Yang, Z.; Liu, H.; Ahammed, G.J.; Cui, J. Calcium is involved in exogenous NO-induced enhancement of photosynthesis in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedlings under low temperature. Sci. Hortic. Amst. 2020, 261, 108953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bhusal, N.; Lee, M.; Han, A.R.; Han, A.; Kim, H.S. Responses to drought stress in Prunus sargentii and Larix kaempferi seedlings using morphological and physiological parameters. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2020, 465, 118099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tian, L.X.; Li, J.; Bi, W.S.; Zuo, S.Y.; Li, L.J.; Li, W.L.; Sun, L. Effects of waterlogging stress at different growth stages on the photosynthetic characteristics and grain yield of spring maize (Zea mays L.) under field conditions. Agr. Water Manag. 2019, 218, 250–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Farooq, M.; Hussain, M.; Wakeel, A.; Siddique, K.H.M. Salt stress in maize: Effects, resistance mechanisms and management. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 35, 461–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Viehweger, K. How plants cope with heavy metals. Bot. Stud. 2014, 55, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Alhaithloul, H.A.; Soliman, M.H.; Ameta, K.L.; El-Esawi, M.A.; Elkelish, A. Changes in ecophysiology, osmolytes, and secondary metabolites of the medicinal plants of mentha piperita and catharanthus roseus subjected to drought and heat stress. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Arif, Y.; Sami, F.; Siddiqui, H.; Bajguz, A. Salicylic acid in relation to other phytohormones in plant: A study towards physiology and signal transduction under challenging environment. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 175, 104040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sowinski, P.; Rudzinska-Langwald, A.; Adamczyk, J.; Kubica, I.; Fronk, J. Recovery of maize seedling growth, development and photosynthetic efficiency after initial growth at low temperature. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 162, 67–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Szalai, G.; Majlath, I.; Pal, M.; Gondor, O.K.; Rudnoy, S.; Olah, C.; Vankova, R.; Kalapos, B.; Janda, T. Janus-faced nature of light in the cold acclimation processes of maize. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Louarn, G.; Chenu, K.; Fournier, C.; Andrieu, B.; Giauffret, C. Relative contributions of light interception and radiation use efficiency to the reduction of maize productivity under cold temperatures. Funct. Plant Biol. 2008, 35, 885–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Moradtalab, N.; Weinmann, M.; Walker, F.; Hoglinger, B.; Ludewig, U.; Neumann, G. Silicon improves chilling tolerance during early growth of maize by effects on micronutrient homeostasis and hormonal balances. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bajguz, A.; Hayat, S. Effects of brassinosteroids on the plant responses to environmental stresses. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2009, 47, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ding, Y.; Shi, Y.; Yang, S. Advances, and challenges in uncovering cold tolerance regulatory mechanisms in plants. New Phytol. 2019, 222, 1690–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Sharma, A.; Kumar, V.; Shahzad, B.; Ramakrishnan, M.; Sidhu, G.P.S.; Bali, A.S.; Handa, N.; Kapoor, D.; Yadav, P.; Khanna, K. Photosynthetic response of plants under different abiotic stresses: A review. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 39, 509–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wise, R.R.; Naylor, A.W. Chilling-enhanced photooxidation: The peroxidative destruction of lipids during chilling injury to photosynthesis and ultrastructure. Plant Physiol. 1987, 83, 272–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Klessig, D.F.; Choi, H.W.; Dempsey, D.A. Systemic acquired resistance and salicylic acid: Past, present, and future. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2018, 31, 871–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Atkinson, N.J.; Urwin, P.E. The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: From genes to the field. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 3523–3543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Cui, H.; Gobbato, E.; Kracher, B.; Qiu, J.; Bautor, J.; Parker, J.E. A core function of EDS1 with PAD4 is to protect the salicylic acid defense sector in Arabidopsis immunity. New Phytol. 2017, 213, 1802–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Ullah, C.; Tsai, C.J.; Unsicker, S.B.; Xue, L.; Reichelt, M.; Gershenzon, J.; Hammerbacher, A. Salicylic acid activates poplar defense against the biotrophic rust fungus Melampsora larici-populina via increased biosynthesis of catechin and proanthocyanidins. New Phytol. 2019, 221, 960–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kosová, K.; Prášil, I.T.; Vítámvás, P.; Dobrev, P.; Motyka, V.; Floková, K.; Novák, O.; Turečková, V.; Rolčik, J.; Pešek, B.; et al. Complex phytohormone responses during the cold acclimation of two wheat cultivars differing in cold tolerance, winter Samanta and spring Sandra. J. Plant Physiol. 2012, 169, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kohli, S.K.; Handa, N.; Sharma, A.; Gautam, V.; Arora, S.; Bhardwaj, R.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Wijaya, L.; Ahmad, P. Combined effect of 24-epibrassinolide and salicylic acid mitigates lead (Pb) toxicity by modulating various metabolites in Brassica juncea L. seedlings. Protoplasma 2017, 255, 11–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, Z.; Yu, J.; Peng, Y.; Huang, B. Metabolic pathways regulated by abscisic acid, salicylic acid and gamma-aminobutyric acid in association with improved drought tolerance in creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera). Physiol. Plant. 2017, 159, 42–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Yu, Q.; Ma, Y.; Gu, W.; Yang, D. Physiological changes associated with enhanced cold resistance during maize (Zea mays) germination and seedling growth in response to exogenous calcium. Crop Pasture Sci. 2020, 71, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lutts, S.; Kinet, J.M.; Bouharmont, J. NaCl-induced senescence in leaves of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars differing in salinity resistance. Ann. Bot. 1996, 78, 389–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bates, L.S.; Waldren, R.P.; Teare, I.D. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 1973, 39, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Heath, R.L.; Packer, L. Photo peroxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1968, 125, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Elstner, E.F.; Heupel, A. Inhibition of nitrite formation from hydroxylammoniumchloride: A simple assay for superoxide dismutase. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 70, 616–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jana, S.; Choudhuri, M.A. Glycolate metabolism of three submersed aquatic angiosperms during ageing. Aquat. Bot. 1982, 12, 345–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Giannopolitis, C.N.; Ries, S.K. Superoxide dismutases: I. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiol. 1977, 59, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hernández, J.A.; Jiménez, A.; Mullineaux, P.; Sevilla, F. Tolerance of pea (Pisum sativum L.) to long-term salt stress is associated with induction of antioxidant defenses. Plant Cell Environ. 2000, 23, 853–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sohn, Y.G.; Lee, B.H.; Kang, K.Y.; Lee, J.J. Effects of NaCl stress on germination, antioxidant responses, and proline content in two rice cultivars. J. Plant Biol. 2005, 48, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kang, H.M.; Saltveit, M.E. Activity of enzymatic antioxidant defense systems in chilled and heat shocked cucumber seedling radicles. Physiol. Plant. 2001, 113, 548–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mauch-Mani, B.; Mauch, F. The role of abscisic acid in plant pathogen interactions. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005, 8, 409–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ploschuk, E.L.; Bado, L.A.; Salinas, M.; Wassner, D.F.; Windauer, L.B.; Insausti, P. Photosynthesis and fluorescence responses of Jatropha curcas to chilling and freezing stress during early vegetative stages. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2014, 102, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Aroca, R.; Tognoni, F.; Irigoyen, J.J.; Sánchez-Díaz, M.; Pardossi, A. Different root low temperature response of two maize genotypes differing in chilling sensitivity. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2001, 39, 1067–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rymen, B.; Fiorani, F.; Kartal, F.; Vandepoele, K.; Inzé, D.; Beemster, G.T.S. Cold nights impair leaf growth and cell cycle progression in maize through transcriptional changes of cell cycle genes 1[W][OA]. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 1429–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Stone, P.; Sorensen, I.; Jamieson, I. Effect of soil temperature on phenology, canopy development, biomass and yield of maize in a cool-temperate climate. Field Crop. Res. 1999, 63, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sun, Y.; He, Y.; Irfan, A.R.; Liu, X.; Yu, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, D. Exogenous Brassinolide Enhances the Growth and Cold Resistance of Maize (Zea mays L.) Seedlings under Chilling Stress. Agronomy 2020, 10, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Sebastian, N.; Erika, H.; Christian, K. Critically low soil temperatures for root growth and root morphology in three alpine plant species. Alp. Bot. 2016, 126, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Bhuyan, M.H.M.B.; Zulfiqar, F.; Raza, A.; Mohsin, S.M.; Al Mahmud, J.; Fujita, M.; Fotopoulos, V. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in plants under abiotic stress: Revisiting the crucial role of a universal defense regulator. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Khaleghi, A.; Naderi, R.; Brunetti, C.; Maserti, B.E.; Salami, S.A.; Babalar, M. Morphological, physiochemical and antioxidant responses of Maclura pomifera to drought stress. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, M.; Lin, L.; Zhang, Y.; Sui, N. ZmMYB31, a R2R3-MYB transcription factor in maize, positively regulates the expression of CBF genes and enhances resistance to chilling and oxidative stress. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2019, 46, 3937–3944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kellogg, E.W.; Fridovich, I.S. Superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, and singlet oxygen in lipid peroxidation by a xanthine oxidase system. J. Biol. Chem. 1975, 250, 8812–8817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gong, H.; Zhu, X.; Chen, K.; Wang, S.; Zhang, C. Silicon alleviates oxidative damage of wheat plants in pots under drought. Plant Sci. 2005, 169, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, Y.; Zhou, M.; Gong, X.; Liu, C.; Hong, M.; Wang, L.; Hong, F. Influence of lanthanides on the antioxidative defense system in maize seedlings under cold stress. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2011, 142, 819–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Chen, Y.E.; Mao, J.J.; Sun, L.Q.; Huang, B.; Ding, C.B. Exogenous melatonin enhances salt stress tolerance in maize seedlings by improving antioxidant and photosynthetic capacity. Physiol. Plant. 2018, 164, 349–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Bhusal, N.; Bhusal, S.J.; Yoon, T. Comparisons of physiological and anatomical characteristics between two cultivars in bi-leader apple trees (Malus × domestica Borkh.). Sci. Hortic. 2018, 231, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Aniszewski, T.; Drozdov, S.N.; Kholoptseva, E.S.; Kurets, V.K.; Obshatko, L.A.; Popov, E.G.; Talanov, A.V. Effects of light and temperature parameters on net photosynthetic carbon dioxide fixation by whole plants of five lupin species (Lupinus albus L., Lupinus angustifoliu L., Lupinus luteus L., Lupinus mutabilis Sweet. Lupinus polyphyllus Lindl.). Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B-Soil Plant Sci. 2001, 51, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ashraf, M.; Harris, P.J.C. Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview. Photosynthetica 2013, 51, 163–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jiang, B.C.; Shi, Y.T.; Peng, Y.; Jia, Y.X.; Yan, Y.; Dong, X.J.; Hui, L.; Dong, J.; Li, J.; Gong, Z.Z.; et al. Cold-Induced CBF–PIF3 Interaction Enhances Freezing Tolerance by Stabilizing the phyB Thermosensor in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant. 2020, 13, 894–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chen, H.; Jiang, J.G. Osmotic adjustment and plant adaptation to environmental changes related to drought and salinity. Environ. Rev. 2010, 18, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chen, Y.; Jiang, J.; Chang, Q.; Gu, C.; Song, A.; Chen, S.; Dong, B.; Chen, F. Cold acclimation induces freezing tolerance via antioxidative enzymes, proline metabolism and gene expression changes in two chrysanthemum species. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2014, 41, 815–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ahmad, I.; Basra, S.M.A.; Wahid, A. Exogenous application of ascorbic acid, salicylic acid and hydrogen peroxide improve the productivity of hybrid maize at low temperature stress. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2014, 16, 1560–8530. [Google Scholar]
  55. Bari, R.; Jones, J.D. Role of plant hormones in plant defence responses. Plant Mol. Biol. 2009, 69, 473–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Miura, K.; Tada, Y. Regulation of water, salinity, and cold stress responses by salicylic acid. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Wan, S.B.; Tian, L.; Tian, R.R.; Pan, Q.H.; Zhan, J.C.; Wen, P.F.; Chen, J.Y.; Zhang, P.; Wang, W.; Huang, W.D. Involvement of phospholipase D in the low temperature acclimation-induced thermo tolerance in grape berry. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2009, 47, 504–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Shi, Q.; Bao, Z.; Zhu, Z.; Ying, Q.; Qian, Q. Effects of different treatments of salicylic acid on heat tolerance, chlorophyll fluorescence, and antioxidant enzyme activity in seedlings of cucumis sativa L. Plant Growth Regul. 2006, 48, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, Y.; Hu, J.; Qin, G.; Cui, H.; Wang, Q. Salicylic acid analogues with biological activity may induce chilling tolerance of maize (Zea mays) seeds. Botany 2012, 90, 845–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Malan, C.; Greyling, M.M.; Gressel, J. Correlation between Cu Zn superoxide dismutase and glutathione reductase, and environmental and xenobiotic stress tolerance in maize inbreds. Plant Sci. 1990, 69, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bandurska, H.; Ski, A.S. The effect of salicylic acid on barley response to water deficit. Acta Physiol. Plant 2005, 27, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mateo, A.; Funck, D.; Mu Hlenbock, P.; Kular, B.; Mullineaux, P.M.; Karpinski, A.S. Controlled levels of salicylic acid are required for optimal photosynthesis and redox homeostasis. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 1795–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Rivas-San Vicente, M.; Plasencia, J. Salicylic acid beyond defence: Its role in plant growth and development. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 3321–3338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Agronomy 11 01341 g001 550
Figure 1. Effects of SA treatment on relative electrolyte conductivity (A) and malondialdehyde content (MDA) (B) in C546 and B125 maize seedlings. The plants were treated at 4 °C for 2 days. The different letters indicate significant differences between different SA concentrations under two temperatures within the same inbred line at p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Effects of SA treatment on relative electrolyte conductivity (A) and malondialdehyde content (MDA) (B) in C546 and B125 maize seedlings. The plants were treated at 4 °C for 2 days. The different letters indicate significant differences between different SA concentrations under two temperatures within the same inbred line at p < 0.05.
Agronomy 11 01341 g001
Agronomy 11 01341 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of SA treatment on relative water content (A) and proline content (B) in C546 and B125 maize seedlings. The plants were treated at 4 °C for 2 days. The different letters indicate significant differences between different SA concentrations under two temperatures within the same inbred line at p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Effects of SA treatment on relative water content (A) and proline content (B) in C546 and B125 maize seedlings. The plants were treated at 4 °C for 2 days. The different letters indicate significant differences between different SA concentrations under two temperatures within the same inbred line at p < 0.05.
Agronomy 11 01341 g002
Agronomy 11 01341 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of SA treatment on photosynthesis in C546 and B125 maize seedlings. (A) Pn, (B) Gs, (C) Ci, and (D) chlorophyll content. The plants were treated at 4 °C for 2 days. The different letters indicate significant differences between different SA concentrations under two temperatures within the same inbred line at p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Effects of SA treatment on photosynthesis in C546 and B125 maize seedlings. (A) Pn, (B) Gs, (C) Ci, and (D) chlorophyll content. The plants were treated at 4 °C for 2 days. The different letters indicate significant differences between different SA concentrations under two temperatures within the same inbred line at p < 0.05.
Agronomy 11 01341 g003
Agronomy 11 01341 g004 550
Figure 4. Effects of SA treatment on H2O2 content (A) and O2− production rate (B) in C546 and B125 maize seedlings. The plants were treated at 4 °C for 2 days. The different letters indicate significant differences between different SA concentrations under two temperatures within the same inbred line at p < 0.05.
Figure 4. Effects of SA treatment on H2O2 content (A) and O2− production rate (B) in C546 and B125 maize seedlings. The plants were treated at 4 °C for 2 days. The different letters indicate significant differences between different SA concentrations under two temperatures within the same inbred line at p < 0.05.
Agronomy 11 01341 g004
Agronomy 11 01341 g005 550
Figure 5. Effects of SA treatment on antioxidative enzyme activities in C546 and B125 maize seedlings. (A) SOD activity, (B) POD activity, (C) CAT activity, and (D) APX activity. The plants were treated at 4 °C for 2 days. The different letters indicate significant differences between different SA concentrations under two temperatures within the same inbred line at p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Effects of SA treatment on antioxidative enzyme activities in C546 and B125 maize seedlings. (A) SOD activity, (B) POD activity, (C) CAT activity, and (D) APX activity. The plants were treated at 4 °C for 2 days. The different letters indicate significant differences between different SA concentrations under two temperatures within the same inbred line at p < 0.05.
Agronomy 11 01341 g005
Table
Table 1. Effects of SA on the growth and biomass of seedlings in two inbred lines at different temperatures.
Table 1. Effects of SA on the growth and biomass of seedlings in two inbred lines at different temperatures.
Inbred LinesTemperature (°C)SA (mg/L)Plant Height (cm)Root Length (cm)Seedling DW (mg)Root DW (mg)
B12525022.4 ± 0.5 a22.6 ± 1.6 ab130.4 ± 5.4 b61.5 ± 1.4 b
5023.8 ± 0.7 a25.0 ± 1.2 a152.7 ± 4.1 a71.0 ± 1.9 a
4020.5 ± 0.6 b19.5 ± 0.7 c103.7 ± 3.6 c46.3 ± 1.8 c
5022.3 ± 0.4 a22.1 ± 1.4 b126.3 ± 3.9 b60.8 ± 4.5 b
C54625025.0 ± 0.5 ab24.1 ± 0.7 ab138.6 ± 5.2 b84.8 ± 2.8 b
5027.6 ± 0.8 a26.7 ± 1.2 a166.8 ± 7.9 a98.4 ± 6.3 a
4019.7 ± 0.8 c20.7 ± 0.3 c108.5 ± 3.4 c61.3 ± 1.6 c
5023.5 ± 0.7 b23.4 ± 0.5 b137.4 ± 4.1 b84.2 ± 3.0 b
DW—dry weight. The values show the mean ± SE. The values marked with different letters indicate significant differences between different SA concentrations within the same inbred line in each column at p < 0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Q.; Li, D.; Wang, Q.; Song, X.; Wang, Y.; Yang, X.; Qin, D.; Xie, T.; Yang, D. Exogenous Salicylic Acid Improves Chilling Tolerance in Maize Seedlings by Improving Plant Growth and Physiological Characteristics. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1341. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071341

AMA Style

Zhang Q, Li D, Wang Q, Song X, Wang Y, Yang X, Qin D, Xie T, Yang D. Exogenous Salicylic Acid Improves Chilling Tolerance in Maize Seedlings by Improving Plant Growth and Physiological Characteristics. Agronomy. 2021; 11(7):1341. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071341

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Qian, Dongmei Li, Qi Wang, Xiangyu Song, Yingbo Wang, Xilang Yang, Dongling Qin, Tenglong Xie, and Deguang Yang. 2021. "Exogenous Salicylic Acid Improves Chilling Tolerance in Maize Seedlings by Improving Plant Growth and Physiological Characteristics" Agronomy 11, no. 7: 1341. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071341

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop