Next Article in Journal
Complex Spectroscopic Study for Fusarium Genus Fungi Infection Diagnostics of “Zalp” Cultivar Oat
Next Article in Special Issue
Pilot Cultivation of the Local Endemic Cretan Marjoram Origanum microphyllum (Benth.) Vogel (Lamiaceae): Effect of Fertilizers on Growth and Herbal Quality Features
Previous Article in Journal
Phenotypic and DNA Marker-Assisted Characterization of Russian Potato Cultivars for Resistance to Potato Cyst Nematodes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hybrids Development between Greek Salvia Species and Their Drought Resistance Evaluation along with Salvia fruticosa, under Attapulgite-Amended Substrate

by
Maria Papafotiou
1,*,
Aikaterini N. Martini
1,
Eleonora Papanikolaou
1,
Eleftherios G. Stylias
2 and
Anastasios Kalantzis
2
1
Laboratory of Floriculture and Landscape Architecture, Department of Crop Science, School of Plant Science, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 118 55 Athens, Greece
2
Kalantzis Plants, Agioi Saranta, 190 07 Marathon, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2021, 11(12), 2401; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11122401
Submission received: 16 October 2021 / Revised: 16 November 2021 / Accepted: 22 November 2021 / Published: 25 November 2021

Abstract

:
Aiming to obtain Salvia hybrids with ornamental value and high drought resistance, for xeriscaping, crossbreeding was made with Greek Salvia species. S. fruticosa and S. officinalis when used as seed parent were successfully crossed with S. pomifera ssp. pomifera, S. ringens and S. tomentosa, while when used as pollen parent it only succeeded between S. fruticosa and S. tomentosa. The growth of S. fruticosa and the four hybrids, S. officinalis × S. pomifera, S. officinalis × S. tomentosa, S. officinalis × S. ringens and S. fruticosa × S. ringens, selected for their ornamental traits, was evaluated under limited irrigation and modification of the substrate with attapulgite clay. The hybrids S. officinalis × S. ringens and S. officinalis × S. tomentosa developed a compact plant shape and most lateral shoots, desirable characteristics for potted plants and xeriscaping. All hybrids, especially S. officinalis × S. pomifera and S. officinalis × S. tomentosa, survived water stress better than S. fruticosa. Modification of the substrate with attapulgite, under limited irrigation, caused a decrease in the above ground/root biomass ratio in some hybrids and in S. fruticosa increased the dry weight of the root indicating increased drought resistance.

1. Introduction

The genus Salvia, being the largest of the Lamiaceae family, with about 900 species, includes many species used as ornamental, culinary and/or medicinal plants [1]. Salvia species native in eastern Mediterranean regions are drought resistant, perennial, evergreen sub-shrubs being part of the macchia shrubland. In Greece, 30 Salvia taxa (species and subspecies) are found [2], two of which, Salvia fruticosa and S. officinalis, are commercially known. Greek Salvia species being drought resistant could be ideal plants for use as ornaments, in arid and semi-arid regions, particularly in xeriscaping. Xeriscaping, a landscape or gardening process that reduces or eliminates the need for irrigation, has gained worldwide acceptance in recent years, especially in areas where access to irrigation water is limited. Native plants are ideal for use in xeriscaping, since they have low irrigation and cultivation requirements, a great adaptability to different soil and climatic conditions, high ornamental value, as well as a contribution to the preservation of the character of the landscape [3,4,5,6,7]. Greek Salvia species could be also useful as landscape or garden plants, to promote bee-friendly landscaping, an international movement in support of combating pollinator population decline worldwide [8,9], as the natural vegetation attracts a large number and variety of species of insects—pollinators [10]. Drought resistant Salvia species could also be valuable for use on extensive type urban green roofs [11,12], where certain species of Salvia with culinary or medicinal uses could simultaneously serve urban agriculture.
S. fruticosa Mill. (S. triloba L.), Greek sage, is a shrub found in the Central Greece, the Peloponnese and the Aegean islands (Table 1), growing mainly in bushy rocky areas, often on coastal cliffs, at altitudes 1–700 m [13,14]. The leaves of S. fruticosa have a high oil content. In Greece, the plant has a long tradition of use, since the antiquity, depicted in a Minoan fresco circa 1400 BCE at Knossos on the island of Crete [15] (Table 1). It is widely used for the preparation of an herbal tea (faskomilo), and S. fruticosa accounts for 50–95% of the dried sage sold in North America [16].
S. officinalis L. (Dalmatian sage, or common sage or sage) is a strongly aromatic shrub (Table 1) that prefers garrigue, stony pastures, scrub, rocky places, which has been naturalized in many places throughout the world [14,17]. It is found in Northern Greece and the Ionian islands (Table 1). Known since the antiquity for its medicinal and culinary properties, it is one of the most important species of the genus Salvia worldwide, as it is cultivated in many varieties as medicinal and ornamental.
Both the above species are used in xeriscaping, however S. fruticosa although it grows naturally in southern areas compared to S. officinalis, often it faces surviving problems that are attributed to limited water supply, particularly on extensive green roofs, to the contrary of S. officinalis that shows a higher drought resistance [12,18].
Table 1. Description and properties of the five Greek Salvia species used in interspecific crosses.
Table 1. Description and properties of the five Greek Salvia species used in interspecific crosses.
Salvia SpeciesPlant HeightLeafFlowerDistributionUses/Other Properties
Salvia fruticosa, Greek sage up to 120 cm tall and wide silvery, covered with hairs, often with 1–2 pairs of small lobes below the main one lilac, pink or sometimes white (1.6–2.5 cm long) in early spring [14]Endemic to the eastern Mediterranean, including southern Italy, North Africa and the Canary Islands. In Greece, in the Central country, the Peloponnese and the Aegean islands [13]In Greece, traditionaly used as a medicinal, culinary and melliferous plant since the antiquity [15]. Widely used for the preparation of an herbal tea
Salvia officinalis, common sageup to 60 cm tall and widegreenish above but white felted beneath, rough, oblong to elliptical, margin finely toothedviolet-blue, pink or white (2.0–3.5 cm long) in May–July [14,17]Widespread on the Apennines and eastern Adriatic coast [14,17]. In North and Eastern Greece and in the Ionian islandsMedicinal and culinary use, since the antiquity and medieval. Most important Salvia species worldwide, cultivated in many varieties as medicinal and ornamental
Salvia pomifera ssp. pomiferaup to 100 cm tall and wide grayish, hairy, oblong to linear-oblong, rounded or subcordate at basepink or violet in spring to early summer of intense color on elegantly curving inflorescences [19]Grows in Crete and in the Peloponnese [13]The leaves are used in cooking and are rich in essential oil valuable in food industry [20]
Salvia ringensup to 30 cm tall and wide dark green, pinnatisect or pinnate with 3–6 pairs of small lateral segments, appressed-hairytall (60 cm), branching flowering stems with 2–4 large (about 3.8 cm long) violet-blue flowers during late spring through summer [17]South and Eastern parts of Balkan Peninsula, including North and Central Greece [17] A hardy herbaceous plant resistant to low temperatures. Not used as a medicinal or culinary herb
Salvia tomentosa, Balsamic Sageup to 80 cm tall and wide grey-green with a rounded or heart-shaped base usually violet with reddish-brown calyces in late spring or early summer [14,21]Southern Europe (mostly Balkan Peninsula and Crimea) and part of Western Asia (Anatolia and Near East) [22]. In Greece: North-Eastern and Eastern Aegean Islands [2] Drought tolerance. Not used as a medicinal or culinary herb.
Other perennial Salvia species native in Greece with interesting morphological characteristics include S. pomifera spp. pomifera, S. ringens and S. tomentosa (Table 1).
Salvia pomifera is an endemic species of the Eastern Mediterranean, existing in South Greece and the Aegean islands and the subspecies S. pomifera ssp. pomifera (Table 1) grows in dry, sunny places with phrygian vegetation and on rocky hillsides in Crete and in the Peloponnese [13,19]. Its leaves are rich in essential oil valuable in food industry [20].
Salvia ringens Sibth. & Sm. is a hardy low vegetation herbaceous plant (Table 1) spreading north to the highlands of Macedonia and Epirus, in Mount Olympus at altitudes up to 1900 m and in Central Greece, in areas with macchia vegetation, forest glades and streams between 490 m and 1300 m. It is resistant to low temperatures.
Salvia tomentosa Miller (S. grandiflora), Balsamic Sage (Table 1), is similar to S. officinalis, found in areas of macchia vegetation and on limestone slopes [21,22], in the North-Eastern and Central Greece and the North-Eastern and Eastern Aegean Islands [2].
The floriculture industry is constantly seeking to introduce new varieties to the market. Thus, hybrids between the above Greek Salvia species could exploit diversity of leaf shape, aroma, flower color and inflorescence shape of all species (Table 1), abundant early flowering of S. fruticosa, low compact plant shape and large flowers of S. ringens, adaptability to wet conditions and resistance to low temperatures of S. tomentosa, drought and cold resistance of S. officinalis, and provide new products with interesting characteristics either as potted or landscape plants. Artificial hybrids between S. fruticosa and S. officinalis are known and commercially exploited [23], while evidence for natural hybridization between them was also reported [24]. Low crossability has been reported for S. tomentosa with S. officinalis and S. fruticosa [25].
Attapulgite clay is a mixture of clay and non-clay minerals with its primary clay mineral being Palygorskite, a hydrous magnesium aluminosilicate. It is an inexpensive and readily available material that is widely used as a carrier due to its large specific surface area and high thermal stability [26,27]. As it can absorb heavy metals there have been reports on its use on wastewater treatment and for soil remediation [28,29,30,31]. In addition, attalulgite has been found to promote root length of Brassica chinesis [32] and enhance drought tolerance of sweet potato under water stress [33], when added in the substrate.
In order to introduce new drought-resistant species in the floricultural industry intended for use in the urban landscape of arid/semiarid areas, in the present study the possibility of interspecific crossbreeding of five Greek sage species with interesting floricultural characteristics and drought resistance was studied. Then, the growth of the produced hybrids that showed interesting ornamental traits and of S. fruticosa was tested under water stress and substrate modified with attapulgite. The latter was tested for its effectiveness in promoting plant growth under limited water supply.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Mother Plant Growth and Pollination Conditions

Five Salvia species native to Greece, i.e., S. fruticosa, S. officinalis, S. pomifera ssp pomifera, S. ringens and S. tomentosa, were chosen to incorporate a wide range of growth habit, flower color, time and duration of flowering, leaf aroma, as well as cold and drought resistance (Table 1). One genotype per species was used, obtained from cuttings collected from mature native plants grown in selected regions in Greece with high genetic variability. All plants were potted singly and grown in a greenhouse of the company Kalantzis Plants (Marathon, Attica, Greece) from October 2018 through March 2019, as well as from October 2019 through March 2020, where a minimum temperature of 18 °C was maintained. From April through September 2019 and 2020, all plants were transferred to an insect-enclosed net greenhouse for the crosses. Plants began to bloom from March and flowered simultaneously up May. In the year 2019 S. fruticosa plants did not flower.
Clones of S. fruticosa and S. officinalis were crossed with the clones of the other three species, S. pomifera, S. ringens and S. tomentosa, and each clone was used both as a pollen and seed parent for all crossings, following the methodology suggested by Tychonievich and Warner [34] for other Salvia species. For each interspecific cross combination, at least 100 flowers were pollinated each year. Pollinations were conducted from April through May 2019 during the morning hours and replicated during the same period in 2020. Seed parent flowers were emasculated the day before anthesis. Once the style had fully elongated, pollen was applied to the stigma directly from the dehiscing anther of the pollen parent. Pollinated flowers were observed for complete seed development. Salvia floral morphology is such that the developing seeds are exposed to view, and any growth of the developing seed is easily observed. Crosses were rated successful if mature, viable seed was produced. To determine the level of self-fertility of S. fruticosa and S. officinalis 50 flowers were self-pollinated as described for the crosspollinations, although without emasculation. After pollination, seeds were observed and harvested as described for the interspecific crosses. All mature seeds produced by success full crosses were harvested 4-6 weeks after crossings and stored in paper bags at room temperature for one month. All seeds were then sown under intermittent mist with bottom heat to observe germination, excepting seeds from second year crosses of S. officinalis, as a sufficient number of hybrids had produced from the first year.
Following, seedlings were grown in the greenhouse. Besides, seeds of self-crosses were sown to estimate number of seedling production, but seedlings were not grown further. Following, all hybrids were reproduced through stem cuttings and were maintained in the greenhouse. Although evaluation of hybrids was in an initial stage, four hybrids with desirable characteristics, from different crossings, were selected for further experimentation, in the present study, concerning their resistance to drought.

2.2. Hybrids Growth

For the establishment of the experiment to test growth and drought resistance of Salvia hybrids, rooted cuttings of four selected hybrids of Greek sage species, produced by the crosses S. officinalis × S. pomifera, S. officinalis × S. ringens, S. officinalis × S. tomentosa and S. fruticosa × S. ringens, were used. Terminal cuttings, about 10 cm long, were collected in March 2021 from 8-month old mother plants, produced by the company Kalantzis Plants and maintained in the greenhouse (37°58′53.94″ N, 23°42′25.01″ E) at the Agricultural University of Athens. Cutting base was treated with rooting powder Rhizopon (0.5% w/w IBA in talcum, PHYTORGAN SA, Kifisia, Greece) and placed for rooting on a peat (TS 2, White peat potting substrate with adjusted pH up to 5.5 to 6.5, Klasmann-Delimann Gmbh, Geeste, Germany) and perlite (particles diameter 1 to 5 mm, Perloflor, ISOCON S.A., Athens, Greece) mixture 1:1 (v/v), in the mist (spraying 15 s per 30 min; substrate temperature 22 °C) for two weeks, followed by transfer on a light shaded location of the greenhouse for another 2 weeks.
In early April, four-week-old rooted cuttings were transplanted singly in plastic pots, 14 cm in diameter, which contained 1 L of peat-perlite mixture 2:1 (v/v), supplemented or not with 25 g/L attapulgite (AGLEV® SI 200, GEOHELLAS, Greece) and were placed in the greenhouse. Climatic conditions during the experiment are shown in Scheme 1. Physical characteristics of attapulgite were moisture 10%, granulometry 0.25–1.18 mm and density 0.72 g/cm3. Its chemical composition was SiO2 55.9%, A12O3 6.92%, MgO 12.95%, Fe2O3 11.9%, CaO 0.32%, Na2O 0.1 % and K2O 0.43%. Plants were fertilized monthly with 2 g/L water soluble fertilizer (20-20-20 plus, HUMOFERT, Metamorfosi, Greece). In each pot, 100 ml of fertilizer was applied.
Two irrigation frequencies were applied, i.e., (i) when the moisture content of the substrate was 20–23% v/v (normal irrigation) and (ii) when the moisture content of the substrate was 8–13% v/v (sparse irrigation). In the first month of cultivation, the plants under normal irrigation were irrigated every 3–4 days and under sparse irrigation every 5 days, while in the following months every 2 and 3–4 days, respectively. Irrigation frequencies were determined during the first two weeks of cultivation, by daily measurements of the substrate moisture. Symptoms of wilting (leaf wilting and slight twisting at the top) of 1/3 of the plants and dry substrate surface in all pots determined the sparse irrigation frequency, while the dry substrate surface in 1/3 of the pots determined the normal irrigation frequency. Substrate moisture measurements (% v/v) were obtained using a handheld time domain reflectometry moisture meter (HH2; Delta-T devices, Cambridge, UK) with a dielectric soil moisture sensor (WET-2; Delta-T devices) inserted from the surface that measured 65 mm in depth and 45 mm in width.
Plant growth was evaluated after a three-month culture, from April to July 2021, recording plant height (from pot rim to the highest plant point), lateral shoot number and length, and fresh and dry weight of the above ground part and the root system of the plant.

2.3. Salvia fruticosa Growth

Rooted cuttings of S. fruticosa were also produced following the same procedure as for hybrid cuttings, but they were collected one month later from mother plants almost 3 years old. In mid-May, four-week-old rooted cuttings were transplanted singly in plastic pots, 14 cm in diameter, which contained 1 L of peat-perlite mixture 2:1 (v/v), supplemented with various concentrations of attapulgite, 0 (control) or 6.25 or 12.5 or 25 g/L, that were equivalent to 0 or 1 or 2 or 4 teaspoons per pot, respectively. They were placed in the greenhouse too, under the climatic conditions presented in Scheme 1. Plants of S. fruticosa received the same fertlization and irrrigation as the hybrids. Total number of irrigations was 38 and 27 in normal and sparse irrigation, respectively. This experiment lasted from May to August 2021, and the above mentioned growth parameters for hybrids were estimated as well.
Based on personal observation that hybrids grown in the substrate that contained attapulgite seemed less stressed during a heat wave than those grown without attapulgite, extra measurements were taken in the S. fruticosa experiment (that was terminated one month later than the experiment with the hybrids) regarding the determination of substrate moisture during different climatic conditions, in order to reveal the rate and the level of moisture reduction in the root area. So, substrate moisture (%) was recorded using a handheld time domain reflectometry moisture meter (see above), during a heat wave, from 2 to 3 August 2021, as well as during a period with normal summer temperatures, from 12 to 15 August 2021 (Scheme 1). During the first period, plants were irrigated normally every day and sparsely every second day, while during the second period irrigation frequency was every second day and every four days for normal and sparse irrigation, respectively.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The completely randomized design was used. The significance of the results was tested by one- or two- or three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and treatment means were compared by Student’s t test at p ≤ 0.05 (JMP 13.0 software, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA, 2013).

3. Results

3.1. Interspecific Crosses and Hybrids Production

Interspecific crosses of S. officinalis with S. pomifera ssp. pomifera, S. ringens and S. tomentosa, which were conducted during two successive years, in spring 2019 and 2020, showed that crosses were successful only when S. officinalis was used as seed parent and unsuccessful when it was used as pollen parent. Interspecific crossability was successful at much lower percentage (lower that 10%) compared to self-crossing of S. officinalis that was quite high (80%) (Table 2). Regarding interspecific crosses of S. fruticosa with S. pomifera ssp. pomifera, S. ringens and S. tomentosa, when S. fruticosa was used as seed parent, crosses with S. ringens and S. tomentosa were more successful than those with S. pomifera. When S. fruticosa was used as pollen parent, only the cross S. tomentosa × S. fruticosa was feasible and successful at quite high percentage (53%). Self-crossing of S. fruticosa was the most successful (92%) (Table 2).
During the two years of crossings, more than 30 hybrids were produced, which were transferred to the greenhouse facilities in order to be evaluated in terms of their development and the desired characteristics (easy propagation by cuttings and cultivation inside a greenhouse, fast growth, early and intense flowering, small plant size). Four of the hybrids stood out during the initial evaluation stages. The following basic characteristics give to the selected hybrids particular ornamental value (detailed data are not presented in the present article):
S. officinalis × S. pomifera produces a few long lateral shoots and seems to have intermediate characteristics of its parents in plant height, leaf color and shape, as well as in leaf aroma. Both of its parents are strongly aromatic plants and this hybrid has a pleasant distinctive aroma, which is slightly closer to the aroma of S. pomifera. It didn’t flower during the first year.
S. officinalis × S. ringens has inherited from S. ringens the segmented leaves and the long flowering stems. It is taller than S. ringens and produces many lateral shoots, while its segmented leaves are unique and particularly decorative, but they have very light aroma, as S. ringens does. Flowering stems are about 40 cm long with more flowers than those of S. ringens. Flower color is light violet-blue.
S. officinalis × S. tomentosa is a compact plant that produces numerous lateral shoots with grey-green leaves smaller than those of S. officinalis. It also forms many flowering stems with light pink flowers that look more like those of S. officinalis. Moreover, it has a lighter aroma than that of S. officinalis.
S. fruticosa × S. ringens looks like S. fruticosa in height and shape, but it has intensely hairy segmented leaves, which have very light aroma like that of S. ringens. Its flowering stems are longer (about 80 cm) than those of S. fruticosa, while flowers are more sparsely arranged, characteristics inherited from S. ringens. Flower color is light purple.

3.2. Hybrids Growth

All Salvia hybrids grew successfully in all treatments during the three months of the growing period. Three-way ANOVA at the end of the culture period (Table 3) showed interaction of the three experimental factors only in the lateral shoot mean and total length. The type of hybrid affected strongly plant height (main shoot length), lateral shoot number and above ground fresh and dry weight. S. officinalis × S. ringens and S. officinalis × S. tomentosa were the shortest hybrids with large number of laterals, while S. officinalis × S. pomifera had long main shoot and the smallest number of laterals and S. fruticosa × S. ringens equally long main shoot but large number of laterals that had the smallest length. Sparse irrigation reduced plant height and above ground fresh and dry weight and attapulgite amendment to the substrate reduced lateral shoot number, above ground fresh and dry weight, roots fresh weight and the ratio above ground/roots fresh weight (Table 3).
Hybrid growth was then examined comparatively regarding the effect of hybrid type and irrigation frequency separately in each substrate (two-way anova, Table 4 and Table 5).

3.2.1. Peat-Perlite 2:1 (v/v)

Evaluating the drought resistance of hybrids when grown in the substrate without attapulgite (Table 4), it was found that both S. ringens hybrids although had root fresh and dry weight reduced under sparse irrigation, none growth parameter concerning foliage was affected, and thus the above ground/root fresh and dry weight ratio was increased, having the highest value in S. officinalis × S. ringens among all hybrids. To the contrary, S. officinalis × S. pomifera and S. officinalis × S. tomentosa had some restriction of shoot elongation under sparse irrigation; however, it was not expressed in the above ground fresh and dry weight and their root dry weight was not affected. Under normal irrigation, S. fruticosa × S. ringens had the highest of all hybrids root fresh and dry weight, and along with S. officinalis × S. pomifera presented the lowest above ground/root dry weight ratio (Table 4 and Figure 1).

3.2.2. Peat-Perlite 2:1 (v/v) plus 25 g/L Attapulgite

When attapulgite was used in the substrate (Table 5), under sparse irrigation, both S. ringens hybrids had root fresh and dry weight, as well as total lateral shoot length reduced and S. officinalis × S. ringens had the above ground fresh weight reduced, as well. S. officinalis × S. pomifera presented similar above ground and root growth as those in the substrate without attapulgite (Table 4 and Table 5 and Figure 1), while S. officinalis × S. tomentosa had none of growth parameters measured reduced when sparse irrigation was applied, apart from the ratios above ground/root fresh and dry weight. Under normal irrigation, S. fruticosa × S. ringens had the highest of all hybrids root fresh and dry weight, and along with S. officinalis × S. pomifera presented the lowest above ground/root dry weight ratio (Table 5).

3.3. Salvia fruticosa Growth

Studying growth of S. fruticosa cultivated under various concentrations of attapulgite and irrigated with the same frequencies (normal, sparse) as the hybrids, a significant number of plant loses was recorded. Plant losses reached 8% in most treatments, except for plants grown on substrates containing the two highest concentrations (12.5 and 25.0 g/L) of attapulgite and irrigated sparsely, in which losses reached 17%.
As regards the effect of the experimental factors, irrigation frequency affected all growth parameters, apart from root fresh weight, while attapulgite concentration affected only parameters concerning plant biomass (Table 6).
Plants irrigated normally were taller (not in all treatments statistically significant) and had greater axillary shoot total length, irrespectively attapulgite concentration, while there were no differences in axillary shoot number (Table 6 and Figure 2). Both fresh and with attapulgite at concentrations shown dry weight of canopy were favored by normal irrigation. However, when sparse irrigation was applied, the addition of attapulgite at 6.25 or 12.5 g/L increased canopy fresh and dry weight compared to higher attapulgite concentration (25.0 g/L) or the control. Roots fresh weight was the only parameter that was not affected by irrigation frequency and along with roots dry weight, they were greater at 25g/L attapulgite (Table 6).
Studying the effect of attapulgite on the substrate moisture under two different climatic conditions showed that during a heat wave, in the beginning of August 2021 (Figure 1), when plants were irrigated every day (normal irrigation) and every second day (sparse irrigation), the substrates that contained attapulgite had relatively higher moisture percent compared to the control, but this was statistically significant only at 25 g/L attapulgite (Scheme 2a). During a period with normal summer temperatures, in the middle of August 2021 (Scheme 1), plants were irrigated every second day (normal irrigation) and every four days (sparse irrigation). At the first day after irrigation, the moisture content of substrates irrigated normally was higher than those irrigated sparsely, especially in the substrates with 0 or 6.25 g/L attapulgite, while at the second day there were no differences among treatments (Scheme 2b). During the following two days, recording of moisture continued only in the substrates that were sparsely irrigated and showed that the substrates with 12.5 or 25 g/L attapulgite have preserved higher moisture percent than those with 0 or 6.25 g/L attapulgite (Scheme 2b).

3.4. Flowering

Regarding flowering, less than 40–50% of the S. officinalis × S. ringens and S. fruticosa × S. ringens plants in each treatment flowered, forming only one inflorescence (one flowering shoot) per plant, whereas more than 80% of the S. officinalis × S. tomentosa plants flowered forming about two inflorescence (two flowering shoots) per plant. No plant of S. fruticosa and S. officinalis × S. pomifera flowered (data not shown).

4. Discussion

4.1. Interspecific Crosses and Hybrids Production

The five Mediterranean Salvia species native to Greece, S. fruticosa, S. officinalis, S. pomifera ssp pomifera, S. ringens and S. tomentosa, belong to the Salvia officinalis group that consists of eight to ten perennial species, which are distributed in the Mediterranean Basin and the Near East [25]. In the present work, they were used for the development of new interspecific hybrids, for commercial ornamental use, and were selected to incorporate a wide range of characteristics concerning growth habit, flower color, time and duration of flowering, leaf aroma, as well as resistance to cold and drought [14,17].
Although the species from central and southern Greece (S. fruticosa and S. pomifera ssp. pomifera) flower earlier (April–early May) in nature compared to the other three species from northern Greece (May–early June), plants of all species flowered simultaneously in the greenhouse, from the beginning of March, due to the minimum temperature of 18 °C that was maintained in the greenhouse. This allowed us to proceed to all desired crosses.
S. fruticosa, S. officinalis and S. pomifera have the same number of chromosomes, 2n = 14 [35], while S. tomentosa has 2n = 16 and S. ringens 2n = 12 [36], although the genus Salvia is thought as highly tolerant of aneuploidy in its hybrids and thus different chromosome numbers in this genus are not a barrier to the formation of hybrids [34].
S. officinalis and S. fruticosa genotypes used showed high, to very high in the case of S. fruticosa, self-pollination ability, similarly to previous report [25]. Interspecific crosses of S. officinalis with S. pomifera ssp. pomifera, S. ringens and S. tomentosa were successful, though with very low crossability (5.6–6.4%) and only when S. officinalis was used as seed parent. Putievsky et al. [25] also reported extremely low crossability between S. tomentosa and S. officinalis (2%) and in their work S. officinalis acted as a pollen parent due to delayed flowering of S. tomentosa. Thus, it appears that crosses between S. officinalis and S. tomentosa are possible regardless of which species acts as the seed parent. The very low crossability probably did not allow the present work to yield hybrids when S. officinalis was acting as a pollen parent.
Crosses of S. fruticosa with S. pomifera ssp. pomifera (8% success) and S. ringens (19% success) succeeded only when S. fruticosa was used as seed parent. Only crosses of S. fruticosa with S. tomentosa were successful both when S. fruticosa was used as seed (28% success) or pollen parent (53% success) and with much higher crossabiltity. Previous successful crossbreeding (21%) with S. tomentosa acting as seed parent and S. fruticosa as pollen parent has been reported, where delayed flowering of S. tomentosa did not allow acting as pollen parent for S. fruticosa [25]. The tested sage species, although having low crossability in most crosses, are still closely related. They appear to be reproductively isolated primary by geographical and ecological barriers and by different flowering periods, rather than from genetic barriers [25].
A significant number of the hybrid seeds did not germinate; however, more than 30 hybrids were produced and four stood out during the early stages of evaluation for ornamental value and ease of greenhouse cultivation and were further tested in the present work for their drought resistance.

4.2. Salvia Hybrids and S. fruticosa Growth and Drought Resistance

S. officinalis × S. ringens was a short plant indicating that its height was affected mostly by S. ringens that is a low herbaceous sage, while S. fruticosa × S. ringens was a tall plant indicating predominance of S. fruticosa concerning this characteristic. S. officinalis × S. tomentosa unlike both the parental species was a short plant, a result that is not uncommon in hybridization, while S. officinalis × S. pomifera was a tall plant probably due to S. pomifera, which is the tallest sage species we used. This hybrid produced few long shoots that is not a positive horticultural trait. However, it has a very pleasant aroma. All hybrids that were produced where tested for their morphology after applying pruning too, before selecting these (four) that we used for further experimentation on drought resistance. Appling pruning at an early growth stage, which is a routine horticultural practice for ornamentals, resulted in a compact plant shape in all hybrids. In this work, we do not present in detail the selection process of hybrids; we focus on their behavior towards drought resistance.
All four Salvia hybrids grew successfully in all treatments contrary to S. fruticosa that presented 8–17% (depending on treatment) plant losses even under normal irrigation frequency that is applied in commercial floriculture greenhouses. S. fruticosa when cultured on an extensive green roof could not tolerate lack of irrigation for a long period [12], although in nature is a very drought resistant plant [15]. Probably the plant in nature develops deep roots that provide sufficient water, from deeper soil layers, to survive prolonged periods of drought, something that cannot happen in a pot or a green roof system.
Water stress reduced the above ground and root growth of S. fruticosa, while in hybrids S. officinalis × S. pomifera and S. officinalis × S. tomentosa, although it induced some restriction of shoot elongation, this was not expressed in the above ground fresh and dry weight and their root biomass was not affected, indicating a higher drought resistance compared to S. fruticosa. Growth is a plant response to water stress and a reliable criterion for assessing the degree of drought and drought resistance of plants. Decreases in plant height are common under drought stress [37], and as the main reason for this is considered that the lack of water leads to clogging of vascular tissue and reduction of cell elongation [38].
Water deficiency has been reported to reduce plant height and plants yield components (above ground and leaf fresh and dry weight) in S. fruticosa [39] and S. officinalis [40,41]. Regarding other Labiatae species, in Lavandula latifolia, Mentha piperita and Thymus capitatus, the above ground fresh weight was reduced by drought stress, whereas in Salvia sclarea, Salvia lavandutifolia and Thymus mastichina it remained unaffected. As regards the above ground dry weight, only in L. latifolia there was a significant reduction under water deficit conditions [42]. The effect of water stress in roots was not estimated in none of the abovementioned studies.
S. officinalis × S. tomentosa and S. officinalis × S. ringens, under normal irrigation, had the largest above ground/root dry weight ratio, which under water stress remained unchanged in the former, while in S. officinalis × S. ringens was significantly increased, indicating a possible higher long-term sensitivity of this hybrid to water stress. Both S. ringens hybrids presented a significant reduction of root biomass under restricted irrigation, although their above ground biomass was not reduced. When the substrate contained attapulgite, although S. ringens hybrids still had their root biomass reduced under water restriction, the above ground/root dry weight ratio did not change, due to simultaneous reduction in shoot elongation, possibly providing better equilibrium of plants in case of limited water supply. Enhanced root growth in plants is fundamental to improve substrate water exploration and drought tolerance and there are numerous reports about the importance to enlarge root-to-shoot ratios in order to obtain drought tolerant genotypes and improve yield under water stress in various crops [43,44,45].
Attapulgite was also beneficial for S. officinalis × S. tomentosa, as in its presence the plant growth related parameters were not reduced when sparse irrigation was applied, and the above ground/root fresh and dry weight ratios were reduced, indicating a stronger root system capable of supporting the plant under water restriction. Although research on the effect of attapulgite on growth of various crops is limited, in sweet potato plants the application of attapulgite in the soil has been reported to enhance drought tolerance [33]. Possibly a lower than the 25.0 g/L concentration of attapulgite could be more beneficial to hybrids growth, based on the results of the experiment with S. fruticosa, which showed that attapulgite at 6.25 or 12.5 g/L increased above-ground fresh and dry weight compared to the 25.0 g/L and the control, although also in S. fruticosa the 25.0 g/L promoted root growth under limited irrigation. Attapulgite had a beneficial effect on retaining moisture in the substrate and therefore could be added to the substrate in xeriscaping and extensive green roofs enhancing the plants’ drought resistance.
Most hybrids flowered at rather low percentage (40–80%) and intense (one inflorescence per plant), whereas plants of S. fruticosa and S. officinalis × S. pomifera did not flower at all. This is probably because cuttings were collected from mother plants that were only 8 months old and thus might have not reach full maturity. Alternatively, it is possible that stems should reach a certain length before they flower. In case of S. fruticosa, although mother plants were almost 3 years old, they had never been left to flower because of continuous collection of cuttings every 3 months. Although delayed flowering is an undesirable trait for ornamental crops, if improved Salvia cultivars were asexually propagated directly from adult hybrid populations, this could lead to faster flowering of the plants produced.

5. Conclusions

Crossability among the five selected Salvia species native to Greece and the eastern Mediterranean was low in most crosses; however, a number of interspecific hybrids with desirable ornamental traits and increased drought resistance were developed. S. officinalis × S. ringens and S. officinalis × S. tomentosa developed a compact plant shape and most lateral shoots, although pruning to enhance lateral shoot sprouting was not applied. All hybrids survived water stress better than S. fruticosa, especially S. officinalis × S. pomifera and S. officinalis × S. tomentosa.
The addition of attapulgite in the substrate, under limited irrigation, induced in some hybrids reduction of the above ground/root biomass ratio and in S. fruticosa increased the root dry weight indicating increased drought resistance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.P., A.N.M. and A.K.; methodology, M.P., A.N.M. and E.G.S.; software, M.P. and A.N.M. validation, M.P. and A.N.M., E.G.S., A.K. and E.P.; formal analysis, A.N.M.; investigation, M.P., A.N.M., E.G.S. and E.P.; resources, M.P. and A.K.; data curation, A.N.M., E.G.S. and E.P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.P. and A.N.M.; writing—review and editing, M.P. and A.N.M.; visualization, A.N.M.; supervision, M.P.; project administration, M.P.; funding acquisition, M.P. and A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has been co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund of the European Union and Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, under the call RESEARCH—CREATE—INNOVATE (Project code:T1EDK-04923, Project: SALVIA-BREED-GR).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Kamatou, G.P.P.; Viljoen, A.M.; Steenkamp, P. Antioxidant, antiinflammatory activities and HPLC analysis of South African Salvia species. Food Chem. 2010, 119, 684–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dimopoulos, P.; Raus, T.; Bergmeier, E.; Constantinidis, T.; Iatrou, G.; Kokkini, S.; Strid, S.; Tzanoudakis, D. Vascular Plants of Greece: An Annotated Checklist; Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum: Berlin, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bayramoğlu, E.; Demirel, Ö. Xerophytic landscape. In Environment and Ecology at the Beginning of 21st Century; Efe, R., Bizzarri, C., Cürebal, İ., Nyusupova, N., Eds.; St. Kliment Ohridski University Press: Sofia, Bulgaria, 2015; pp. 180–189. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kanellou, Ε.; Papafotiou, M.; Economoy, G.; Paraskevopoulou, A.; Kartsonas, E. Response of sowed herbaceous forb mixtures suitable for aesthetic improvement and vegetation management at archaeological sites of the Mediterranean region. Ecol. Eng. 2021, 167, 106256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Martinetti, L.; Tosca, A.; Spoleto, P.; Valaguss, M.; Gatt, A. Evaluation of water stress tolerance of some species suitable for extensive green roofs. Acta Hortic. 2018, 1215, 113–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Papafotiou, M.; Pergialioti, N.; Papanastasatos, E.A.; Tassoula, L.; Massas, I.; Kargas, G. Effect of Substrate Type and Depth and the Irrigation Frequency on Growth of Semiwoody Mediterranean species in Green Roofs. Acta Hortic. 2013, 990, 481–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tassoula, L.; Papafotiou, M.; Liakopoulos, G.; Kargas, G. Water use efficiency, growth and anatomic-physiological parameters of Mediterranean xerophytes as affected by substrate and irrigation on a green roof. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj Napoca 2021, 49, 12283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Stathers, R. The Bee and the Stockmarket—An Overview of Pollinator Decline and Its Economic and Corporate Significance. Schroders 2014, 15. Available online: https://www.schroders.com/en/sysglobalassets/staticfiles/schroders/sites/global/pdf/the_bee_and_the_stockmarket.pdf (accessed on 15 April 2021).
  9. Goulson, D.; Nicholls, Ε.; Botías, C.; Rotheray, E.L. Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers. Science 2015, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Salisbury, A.; Armitage, J.; Bostock, H.; Perry, J.; Tatchell, M.; Thompson, K. Enhancing gardens as habitats for flower-visiting aerial insects (pollinators): Should we plant native or exotic species? J. Appl. Ecol. 2015, 52, 1156–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Raimondo, F.; Trifilo, P.; Gullo, M.A.L.; Andri, S.; Savi, T.; Nardini, A. Plant performance on Mediterranean green roofs: Interaction of species-specific hydraulic strategies and substrate water relations. AoB Plants 2015, 7, plv007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kokkinou, I.; Ntoulas, N.; Nektarios, P.A.; Varela, D. Response of native aromatic and medicinal plant species to water stress on adaptive green roof systems. Hortscience 2016, 51, 608–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Thanos, C.A.; Doussi, M.A. Ecophysiology of seed germination in endemic labiates of Crete. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 1995, 43, 227–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Blamey, M.; Grey-Wilson, C. Mediterranean Wild Flowers; Harper Collins Publishers: London, UK, 1993; pp. 401–402. [Google Scholar]
  15. Clebsch, B.; Barner, C.D. The New Book of Salvias; Timber Press: Portland, OR, USA, 2003; pp. 125–127. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hanson, B. Designing an Herb Garden; Brooklyn Botanic Garden: Brooklyn, NY, USA, 2004; p. 58. [Google Scholar]
  17. Tutin, T.G.; Heywood, V.H.; Burges, N.A.; Moore, D.M.; Valentine, D.H.; Walters, S.M.; Webb, D.A. Flora Europaea, Volume 3 Diapenstaceae to Myoporaceae; Cambridge University Press: Great Britain, UK, 1972; pp. 188–190. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bettaieb, I.; Zakhama, N.; Aidi Wannes, W.; Kchouk, M.E.; Marzouk, B. Water deficit effects on Salvia officinalis fatty acids and essential oils composition. Sci. Hortic. 2009, 120, 271–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Karousou, R.; Hanlidou, E.; Kokkini, S. II Botany, 2. The sage plants of Greece: Distribution and infraspecific variation. In Sage: The Genus Salvia; Kintzios, S.E., Ed.; Harwood Academic Publishers: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000; p. 39. [Google Scholar]
  20. Karousou, R.; Vokou, D.; Kokkini, S. Distribution and essential oils of Salvia pomifera subsp. pomifera (Labiatae) on the island of Crete (S Greece). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1998, 26, 889–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hedge, I. Salvia Linnaeus. In Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands; Davis, P.H., Ed.; Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh, UK, 1982; Volume 7, pp. 188–192. [Google Scholar]
  22. Guner, A.; Ozhatay, N.; Ekim, T.; Baser, K.H.C. Supplement II. In Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands; Edinburg University Press: Edinburg, UK, 2000; Volume 11. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dudai, N.; Lewinsohn, E.; Larkov, O.; Katzir, I.; Ravid, U.; Chaimovitsh, D.; Diah, S.; Putievsky, E. Dynamics of Yield Components and Essential Oil Production in a Commercial Hybrid Sage (Salvia officinalis × Salvia fruticosa cv. Newe Ya’ar No. 4). J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 4341–4345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Radosavljević, I.; Bogdanović, S.; Celep, F.; Filipović, M.; Satovic, Z.; Surina, B.; Liber, Z. Morphological, genetic and epigenetic aspects of homoploid hybridization between Salvia officinalis L. and Salvia fruticosa Mill. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Putievsky, E.; Ravid, U.; Diwan-Rinzler, N.; Zohary, D. Genetic affinities and essential oil composition of Salvia officinalis L., S. fruticosa Mill., S. tomentosa and their hybrids. Flavour Fragr. J. 1990, 5, 121–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, D.; Du, Y.; Zhu, H.; Deng, Y. Synthesis and characterization of a microfibrous TiO2–CdS/palygorskite nanostructured material with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity. Appl. Clay Sci. 2014, 87, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Quan, G.; Zhang, J.; Guo, J.; Lan, Y. Removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution bynanoscale zero-valent iron grafted on acid-activated Attapulgite. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2014, 225, 1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dong, L.; Lin, L.; Li, Q.; Huang, Z.; Tang, X.; Wu, M.; Li, C.; Cao, X.; Scholz, M. Enhanced nitrate-nitrogen removal by modified attapulgite-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron treating simulated groundwater. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 213, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H. Removal of rhodamine B with Fe-supported bentonite as heterogeneous photo-Fenton catalyst under visible irradiation. Appl. Catal. 2015, 178, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liang, X.; Han, J.; Xu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Wang, L.; Tan, X. In situ field-scale remediation of Cd polluted paddy soil using sepiolite and palygorskite. Geoderma 2014, 235, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, X.; Zhong, D.; Hou, H.; Gu, Q.; Yang, R.; Chen, J.; Yang, J.; Wang, L. Catalyticdegradation of PNP and stabilization/solidification of Cd simultaneously in soil using microwave-assisted Fe-bearing attapulgite. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 304, 747–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xu, C.; Qi, J.; Yang, W.; Chen, Y.; Yang, C.; He, Y.; Wang, J.; Lin, A. Immobilization of heavy metals in vegetable-growing soils using nano zero-valent iron modified attapulgite clay. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 686, 476–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ren, G.; Wang, F.; Huang, Y.; Fan, R.; Wang, B.; Chen, X. Effects of attapulgite clay on growth and physiological metabolism of sweetpotato. J. Huaiyin Inst. Technol. 2018, 3. Available online: https://oversea.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFDLAST2018&filename=JSHY201803008&uniplatform=NZKPT&v=gYrP8wQtAurH8H9UmD8uIIx6BUILEgmzgv%25mmd2BU8r8ZLbWcIDGKDhALuUGABsp1GIlg (accessed on 10 April 2021).
  34. Tychonievich, J.; Warner, R.M. Interspecific crossability of selected Salvia species and potential use for crop improvement. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2011, 136, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Kintzios, S.E. (Ed.) Genetic Improvement of Cultivated Species of the Genus Salvia. In Sage: The Genus Salvia; Harwood Academic Publishers: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2000; p. 32. ISBN 90-5823-005-8. [Google Scholar]
  36. Petrova, A.; Vladimirov, V. Chromosome atlas of the Bulgarian vascular plants. Phytol. Balc. 2020, 26, 217–427. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang, W.; Vinocur, B.; Altman, A. Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: Towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta 2003, 218, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Abdalla, M.M.; El-Khoshiban, N.H. The influence of water stress on growth relative water content, photosynthetic pigments, some metabolic and hormonal contents of two Triticum aestivum cultivars. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 2007, 3, 2062–2074. [Google Scholar]
  39. Chrysargyris, A.; Laoutari, S.; Litskas, V.D.; Stavrinides, M.C.; Tzortzakis, N. Effects of water stress on lavender and sage biomass production, essential oil composition and biocidal properties against Tetranychus urticae (Koch). Sci. Hortic. 2016, 213, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sabry, R.M.; Kandil, M.A.M.; Ahmed, S.S. Growth and quality of sage (Salvia officinalis), parsley (Petroselinum crispum) and nasturtium (Tropaeolum majus) as affected by water deficit. Middle East J. Agric. Res. 2016, 5, 286–294. [Google Scholar]
  41. Soltanbeigi, A.; Yıldız, M.; Dıraman, H.; Terzi, H.; Sakartepe, E.; Yıldız, E. Growth responses and essential oil profile of Salvia officinalis L. influenced by water deficit and various nutrient sources in the greenhouse. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. García-Caparrós, P.; Romero, M.J.; Llanderal, A.; Cermeño, P.; Lao, M.T.; Segura, M.L. Effects of Drought Stress on Biomass, Essential Oil Content, Nutritional Parameters, and Costs of Production in Six Lamiaceae Species. Water 2019, 11, 573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Idrissi, O.; De Keyser, E.; De Riek, J.; Houasli, C.; Van Damme, P.; Udupa, S.M. Genetic variability for root and shoot traits in a lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) recombinant inbred line population and their association with drought tolerance. Eucaliptica 2015, 204, 693–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mathew, I.; Shimelis, H.; Mwadzingeni, L.; Zengeni, R.; Mutema, M.; Chaplot, V. Variance components and heritability of traits related to root: Shoot biomass allocation and drought tolerance in wheat. Euphytica 2018, 214, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mwenye, O.J.; Van Rensburg, L.; Van Biljon, A.; Van der Merwe, R. Seedling shoot and root growth responses among soybean (Glycine max) genotypes to drought stress. In Soybean—Biomass, Yield and Productivity; Kasai, M., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; p. 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Climatic conditions, i.e., temperature (a) and relative humidity (b) inside the glass greenhouse where the experiment was conducted, during the experimental period from 8 April 2021 until 20 August 2021.
Scheme 1. Climatic conditions, i.e., temperature (a) and relative humidity (b) inside the glass greenhouse where the experiment was conducted, during the experimental period from 8 April 2021 until 20 August 2021.
Agronomy 11 02401 sch001
Figure 1. Typical above ground and root system of the marked hybrids of Greek sage species, after having grown for three months in greenhouse conditions (A: without and B: with 25 g/L attapulgite/normal irrigation, C: without and D: with 25 g/L attapulgite/sparse irrigation). Size bars = 10.0 cm.
Figure 1. Typical above ground and root system of the marked hybrids of Greek sage species, after having grown for three months in greenhouse conditions (A: without and B: with 25 g/L attapulgite/normal irrigation, C: without and D: with 25 g/L attapulgite/sparse irrigation). Size bars = 10.0 cm.
Agronomy 11 02401 g001
Figure 2. Typical canopy and roots of S. fruticosa, after having grown for three months in greenhouse conditions in a peat-perlite 2:1 (v/v) substrate containing marked concentrations (g/L) of attapulgite (* sparse irrigation). Size bars = 10.0 cm.
Figure 2. Typical canopy and roots of S. fruticosa, after having grown for three months in greenhouse conditions in a peat-perlite 2:1 (v/v) substrate containing marked concentrations (g/L) of attapulgite (* sparse irrigation). Size bars = 10.0 cm.
Agronomy 11 02401 g002
Scheme 2. Effect of attapulgite concentration (g/L) and irrigation frequency on moisture of the substrate used for Salvia fruticosa cultivation under greenhouse conditions, (a) during a heat wave or (b) during a period with normal summer temperatures. (^: normal irrigation; different shades of gray indicate different concentrations of attapulgite)
Scheme 2. Effect of attapulgite concentration (g/L) and irrigation frequency on moisture of the substrate used for Salvia fruticosa cultivation under greenhouse conditions, (a) during a heat wave or (b) during a period with normal summer temperatures. (^: normal irrigation; different shades of gray indicate different concentrations of attapulgite)
Agronomy 11 02401 sch002
Table 2. Interspecific crosses and self-pollinations of Greek sage species (average data of 2019 and 2020 crosses).
Table 2. Interspecific crosses and self-pollinations of Greek sage species (average data of 2019 and 2020 crosses).
CrossPollinations NumberSuccessful Crosses (%)Total Seed Number Seedling Number *
S. officinalis × self50804029
S. officinalis × S. ringens5025.7277
S. officinalis × S. pomifera5315.6306
S. officinalis × S. tomentosa3896.4245
S. ringens × S. officinalis200000
S. pomifera × S. officinalis200000
S. tomentosa × S. officinalis200000
S. fruticosa × self50924839
S. fruticosa × S. ringens10019194
S. fruticosa × S. pomifera100881
S. fruticosa × S. tomentosa10028280
S. ringens × S. fruticosa100000
S. pomifera × S. fruticosa100000
S. tomentosa × S. fruticosa1005316011
Seedling number *: results of one year.
Table 3. The effect of the experimental factors, i.e., hybrid type (S. officinalis × S. pomifera, S. officinalis × S. ringens, S. officinalis × S. tomentosa, S. fruticosa × S. ringens), irrigation frequency (normal, sparse) and substrate type (with 25 g/L attapulgite, without attapulgite) on above ground and root system growth parameters of sage interspecific hybrids.
Table 3. The effect of the experimental factors, i.e., hybrid type (S. officinalis × S. pomifera, S. officinalis × S. ringens, S. officinalis × S. tomentosa, S. fruticosa × S. ringens), irrigation frequency (normal, sparse) and substrate type (with 25 g/L attapulgite, without attapulgite) on above ground and root system growth parameters of sage interspecific hybrids.
3-Way ANOVAPlant Height (cm)Lateral Shoot NumberLateral Shoot Mean Length
(cm)
Lateral Shoot Total Length
(cm)
Above Ground
f.w. (g)
Roots f.w. (g)Above Ground f.w./Roots f.w.Above Ground d.w. (g)Roots
d.w. (g)
Above Ground d.w./Roots d.w.
S. officinalis × S. pomifera32.8 a z4.4 b11.549.422.3 c15.41.58.4 c3.52.5
S. officinalis × S. ringens27.0 b7.7 a10.173.231.4 a10.43.211.6 a3.04.2
S. officinalis × S. tomentosa26.9 b8.4 a9.681.627.8 b10.02.99.3 b2.63.6
S. fruticosa × S. ringens32.4 a8.5 a8.976.627.5 b15.51.99.6 b3.72.7
without attapulgite30.0 a7.7 a10.275.928.1 a13.2 a2.5 a10.1 a3.3 a3.5
with 25 g/L attapulgite29.5 a6.8 b9.964.526.4 b12.4 b2.3 b9.4 b3.1 a3.0
normal irrigation31.9 a7.6 a10.475.728.5 a13.52.410.3 a3.43.3
sparse irrigation27.6 b6.9 a9.664.625.9 b12.12.49.2 b3.03.2
Significance §
Fhybrid****--**--**--
FattapulgiteNS*--*****NS-
Firrigation**NS--**--**--
Fhybrid x attapulgiteNSNS--NSNSNSNSNSNS
Fhybrid x irrigationNSNS--NS****NS****
Fattapulgite x irrigationNSNS--NSNSNSNSNS**
Fhybrid x attapulgite x irrigationNSNS**NSNSNSNSNSNS
z Mean comparison in columns within each main factor with Student’s t test at p ≤ 0.05; means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at p ≤ 0.05. § NS or * or **, non-significant at p ≤ 0.05 or significant at p ≤ 0.05 or p ≤ 0.01, respectively.
Table 4. Comparative evaluation of growth of four new interspecific hybrids of Greek sage species regarding resistance to water deficiency, after three months of greenhouse culture on peat: perlite 2:1 (v/v).
Table 4. Comparative evaluation of growth of four new interspecific hybrids of Greek sage species regarding resistance to water deficiency, after three months of greenhouse culture on peat: perlite 2:1 (v/v).
Hybrid TypeIrrigation
Frequency
Plant Height (cm)Lateral Shoot NumberLateral Shoot Mean Length
(cm)
Lateral Shoot Total Length
(cm)
Above Ground
f.w. (g)
Root f.w. (g)Above Ground f.w./Roots f.w.Above Ground d.w. (g)Root
d.w. (g)
Above Ground d.w./Root d.w.
S. officinalis × S. pomiferanormal36.9 a 4.6 c12.8 a53.8 cd24.7 cd14.2 bc1.8 de9.4 bc3.5 b2.7 cde
sparse30.2 bc4.3 c10.2 b44.4 d20.7 d15.0 b1.4 e8.1 c3.2 b2.5 e
S. officinalis × S. ringensnormal27.5 cd9.0 ab10.1 b87.4 ab34.6 a12.9 cd2.7 c12.9 a3.4 b3.8 b
sparse27.0 cd7.6 b10.6 b75.0 bc33.0 ab8.3 f4.1 a12.1 a2.4 c5.8 a
S. officinalis × S. tomentosanormal30.1 bc10.3 a10.2 b105.1 a29.0 bc8.5 f3.5 b9.4 bc2.6 c3.7 b
sparse24.6 d8.1 b9.1 b73.5 bc26.2 c10.9 e2.5 c9.0 bc2.6 c3.6 bcd
S. fruticosa × S. ringensnormal32.8 ab8.7 ab8.7 b78.4 b28.5 c17.3 a1.7 e10.4 b4.1 a2.6 de
sparse30.7 bc9.2 ab9.8 b89.4 ab27.7 c12.3 de2.3 cd9.8 b3.2 b3.1 bcde
Significance §
Fhybrid *********-****--
Firrigation **NSNSNS*-NS**--
Finteraction NSNSNSNSNS**NSNS**
Fone-way ANOVA *******************
Mean values (n = 10) in each column followed by the same lower-case letter do not differ significantly at p ≤ 0.05 by Student’s t test. § NS or * or **, non-significant at p ≤ 0.05 or significant at p ≤ 0.05 or p ≤ 0.01, respectively.
Table 5. Comparative evaluation of growth of four new interspecific hybrids of Greek sage species regarding resistance to water deficiency, after three months of greenhouse culture on peat: perlite 2:1 (v/v) with 25 g/L attapulgite.
Table 5. Comparative evaluation of growth of four new interspecific hybrids of Greek sage species regarding resistance to water deficiency, after three months of greenhouse culture on peat: perlite 2:1 (v/v) with 25 g/L attapulgite.
Hybrid TypeIrrigation
Frequency
Plant Height (cm)Lateral Shoot NumberLateral Shoot Mean Length
(cm)
Lateral Shoot Total Length
(cm)
Above Ground
f.w. (g)
Roots f.w. (g)Above Ground f.w./Roots f.w.Above Ground d.w. (g)Roots
d.w. (g)
Above Ground d.w./Roots d.w.
S. officinalis × S. pomiferanormal36.0 a 4.2 c11.6 a48.3 c22.3 de15.5 bc1.5 de8.4 cd3.5 b2.4 d
sparse28.0 cd4.5 c11.6 a50.9 c21.3 e16.7 ab1.3 e7.8 d3.5 b2.2 d
S. officinalis × S. ringensnormal29.1 bcd8.0 ab10.8 ab78.2 a33.0 a11.8 de2.9 ab12.1 a3.4 b3.8 ab
sparse24.3 d6.2 bc8.9 bc52.0 c25.1 cd8.4 g3.2 a9.3 bc2.7 c3.6 ab
S. officinalis × S. tomentosanormal28.3 cd7.4 ab9.9 ab72.4 ab29.1 b9.4 fg3.4 a10.0 b2.5 c4.1 a
sparse24.7 d7.9 ab9.3 bc75.4 ab26.7 bc11.2 ef2.4 bc9.0 bcd2.9 c3.2 bc
S. fruticosa ×
S. ringens
normal34.6 ab8.8 a9.3 bc81.9 a26.9 bc18.6 a1.5 de9.5 bc4.2 a2.3 d
sparse31.3 abc7.4 ab7.6 c56.6 bc26.7 bc13.8 cd2.0 cd8.7 bcd3.4 b2.6 cd
Significance §
Fhybrid ******----**--
Firrigation **NS*----**--
Finteraction NSNSNS*******NS***
Fone-way ANOVA ********************
Mean values (n = 10) in each column followed by the same lower-case letter do not differ significantly at p ≤ 0.05 by Student’s t test. § NS or * or **, non-significant at p ≤ 0.05 or significant at p ≤ 0.05 or p ≤ 0.01, respectively.
Table 6. Effect of attapulgite concentration (g/L) and irrigation frequency on growth of Salvia fruticosa, after three months of greenhouse culture on peat: perlite 2:1 (v/v).
Table 6. Effect of attapulgite concentration (g/L) and irrigation frequency on growth of Salvia fruticosa, after three months of greenhouse culture on peat: perlite 2:1 (v/v).
Attapulgite Concentration (g/L)Irrigation
Frequency
Plant Height (cm)Lateral Shoot NumberLateral Shoot Mean Length
(cm)
Lateral Shoot Total Length
(cm)
Above Ground
f.w. (g)
Roots f.w. (g)Above Ground f.w./Roots f.w.Above Ground d.w. (g)Roots
d.w. (g)
Above Ground d.w./Roots d.w.
0.0normal36.1 ab 7.0 a15.8 abc108.4 a36.4 ab9.2 d4.1 ab10.5 a2.6 bc4.2 ab
sparse33.8 abc6.1 a14.3 c85.9 b28.9 d9.2 d3.2 cd6.7 c2.1 e3.4 cd
6.25normal36.8 a7.2 a16.5 abc112.8 a39.7 a9.5 cd4.4 a11.4 a2.4 cde4.8 a
sparse32.6 bc6.6 a13.9 c89.7 b33.3 bc9.5 cd3.7 bc8.4 b2.1 de4.2 ab
12.5normal37.0 a6.5 a18.4 a112.1 a36.8 ab10.4 bcd3.6 bc10.8 a2.6 abc4.2 ab
sparse33.3 abc5.8 a15.3 bc87.9 b30.5 cd11.5 abc2.8 de7.8 b2.5 bcd3.2 cd
25.0normal37.3 a6.6 a17.4 ab114.5 a37.7 a12.1 ab3.3 cd10.8 a3.0 a3.7 bc
sparse31.6 c5.3 a14.2 c74.8 b28.0 d12.8 a2.3 e7.5 bc2.9 ab2.7 d
Significance §
Fattapulgite NSNSNSNS**********
Firrigation *********NS*******
Finteraction NSNSNSNSNSNSNSNSNSNS
Fone-way ANOVA *NS***************
Mean values (n = 11–12) in each column followed by the same lower-case letter do not differ significantly at p ≤ 0.05 by Student’s t test. § NS or * or **, non-significant at p ≤ 0.05 or significant at p ≤ 0.05 or p ≤ 0.01, respectively.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Papafotiou, M.; Martini, A.N.; Papanikolaou, E.; Stylias, E.G.; Kalantzis, A. Hybrids Development between Greek Salvia Species and Their Drought Resistance Evaluation along with Salvia fruticosa, under Attapulgite-Amended Substrate. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2401. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11122401

AMA Style

Papafotiou M, Martini AN, Papanikolaou E, Stylias EG, Kalantzis A. Hybrids Development between Greek Salvia Species and Their Drought Resistance Evaluation along with Salvia fruticosa, under Attapulgite-Amended Substrate. Agronomy. 2021; 11(12):2401. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11122401

Chicago/Turabian Style

Papafotiou, Maria, Aikaterini N. Martini, Eleonora Papanikolaou, Eleftherios G. Stylias, and Anastasios Kalantzis. 2021. "Hybrids Development between Greek Salvia Species and Their Drought Resistance Evaluation along with Salvia fruticosa, under Attapulgite-Amended Substrate" Agronomy 11, no. 12: 2401. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11122401

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop