Next Article in Journal
Development and Application of a PCR-Based Molecular Marker for the Identification of High Temperature Tolerant Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) Genotypes
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Pre-Harvest Factors on Postharvest Quality of Fresh-Cut and Baby Leafy Vegetables
Previous Article in Journal
An SNP-Based High-Density Genetic Linkage Map for Tetraploid Potato Using Specific Length Amplified Fragment Sequencing (SLAF-Seq) Technology
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of ULO and NA Storage on Changes in the Quality of Apple Fruit (Malus domestica Borkh.) during Shelf Life
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 10
Issue 1
10.3390/agronomy10010115
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Salicylic Acid and Putrescine to Reduce Post-Harvest Storage Problems and Maintain Quality of Murcott Mandarin Fruit

by
Hassan A. Ennab
1,
Mervat A. El-Shemy
2 and
Shamel M. Alam-Eldein
3,*
1
Citrus Research Department, Horticulture Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Giza 12619, Egypt
2
Fruit Handling Research Department, Horticulture Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Giza 12619, Egypt
3
Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2020, 10(1), 115; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10010115
Submission received: 18 December 2019 / Revised: 8 January 2020 / Accepted: 10 January 2020 / Published: 13 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Postharvest Storage Techniques and Quality Evaluation of Fruits and Vegetables)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Natural products have been used to improve citrus fruit quality and storability, which increase the fruit marketing period and exportation to distant markets. This study was conducted to evaluate the role of salicylic acid and putrescine on reducing post-harvest loss and maintaining the quality of stored Murcott mandarin. Fruit were harvested at 297–300 days from full bloom, and five 5-min dipping treatments were applied; salicylic acid (200 and 400 ppm), putrescine (50 and 100 ppm), and the control. One group of fruit was stored at 5 ± 1 °C and 90–95% relative humidity (RH), and the other group was stored at 23 ± 1 °C and 60–70% RH for 45 days. Quality attributes were recorded at harvest, 15, 30, and 45 days of storage. Weight loss and decay were significantly decreased with the application of salicylic acid and putrescine. Both materials were also effective maintaining fruit firmness, total soluble solids (TSS), acidity, TSS: acid ratio, and ascorbic acid during storage. Salicylic acid, especially at 400 ppm was more effective to reduce weight loss and decay, and to maintain fruit quality in comparison to putrescine treatments. It could be concluded that salicylic acid and putrescine are effectively delaying post-harvest deterioration rate and extending the storage period of Murcott mandarin fruit with acceptable quality.

1. Introduction

The oldest known budded Murcott mandarin tree was found in Florida, USA, in 1922, and named after Charles Murcott Smith [1]. It is also known as Smith Tangerine, Honey Murcott [2], or Honey Tangerine [3]. It is a hybrid of Citrus reticulata Blanco × Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck, Rutaceae family [4]. Trees are moderate in size and vigor with alternate bearing often occurring. Fruit is medium in size (2.5–3 inches in diameter) with reddish orange, fairly thin, and smooth peel. Flesh color is dark orange, and juice content is high with excellent TSS: acid ratio for fresh fruit market, but low storability [3]. The Mediterranean climate of Egypt is suited for citrus production. Mandarins, tangerines, clementines, and satsumas account for about one-fourth of the total citrus production in Egypt. Total cultivated area is about 46,036 ha with a total annual production of 1,038,753 t; average yield is 22.6 t/ha [5]. Murcott mandarin is a favorable fruit to the consumer, and the cultivated area is increasing rapidly in Egypt. Fruit mature from January to the end of March; making them the latest maturing mandarins type fruit with almost no competition with other fruit types and high remunerative value [6]. However, post-harvest physiological disorders, decay, and weight loss negatively affect fruit shelf life and marketability [7], especially with late-season harvested fruit in March. Burns and Baldwin [8] reported that the pattern of peel growth is different from that of the pulp. While late-season harvest refers to more pulp maturity and higher TSS: acid ratio, peel maturity refers to its susceptibility to injury, which ultimately reflected on fruit storability and marketability [9]. Therefore, proper storage is necessary to extend the marketing period and reduce market pressure at the peak harvest season [10]. The application of some natural compounds and cold storage can reduce post-harvest loss, maintain fruit quality, and extend shelf life [11].
Salicylic acid (2-hydroxybenzoic acid, C7H6O3), a phenolic compound, natural growth regulator, and antioxidant in vascular plants [12] stimulates many physiological processes that control plant growth and development such as nutrients uptake, membrane permeability, enzymes activity, and disease-resistance mechanisms [13]. Salicylic acid improves fruit quality and storability, and has a toxicity effect on fungi during storage [14]. In addition, it can delay fruit ripening, probably through inhibition of ethylene biosynthesis [15]. It also enhances fruit firmness, reduces chilling injury, delays membrane lipid peroxidation of fruit, and maintains fruit quality during cold storage [16,17]. Post-harvest treatment with 2 mM salicylic acid significantly reduced fruit rot and maintained peel turgidity with no effect on the inner quality of stored satsuma mandarins. This effect might be attributed to the accumulation of H2O2 and defense-related metabolites, such as ornithine, threonine, and polymethoxylated flavones [18]. Pre-harvest spray of 8 mM salicylic acid effectively reduced fruit decay and chilling injury, slightly improved fruit firmness, and maintained TSS and acids content of cold stored ‘Lane late’ sweet orange, suggesting that salicylic acid has an anti-senescent effect [19].
Polyamines are natural compounds with aliphatic nitrogen structure, found in all living organisms, and play an important role in many physiological processes related to plant growth and development, including mitosis division, embryogenesis, floral initiation and development, fruit development, maturation and ripening, plant senescence, in addition to plant response to environmental stresses [20,21,22]. The common polyamines found in plant cells are putrescine, spermidine and spermine [23]. Putrescine is the main product in polyamine biosynthesis, and a synthetic precursor of spermidine and spermine [24]. Spermine plays an important role in oxidative balance and amino acids biosynthesis to cope with oxidative damages associated with cell senescence [25]. Polyamines affect fruit firmness, weight loss, ethylene production, and soluble solids and acids content [26,27]. Post-harvest vacuum infiltration of putrescine notably delayed color change, increased fruit firmness, and resulted in a reduction of post-harvest mechanical damages of lemon [28] due to lower abscisic acid concentration [29]. Putrescine has also reduced weight loss and increased fruit firmness in apricot [30] and plum [31]. Plum fruit treated with 1 mM putrescine showed a delay and/or a reduction in ethylene biosynthesis, associated with higher fruit firmness, lower TSS and acids content, reduced weight loss, and delayed color change; thereby extended storage life [32]. Putrescine increased fruit quality and storage life of litchi [33], strawberry [34], pomegranate [35], mango [36], and grapes [37].
Citrus fruit in general have good keeping quality, because of the low respiration rate of the fruit. High storage temperature increases fungal decay, water loss, fruit softening, and deterioration in vitamin C [38]. Cold storage extends fruit shelf life through reducing the respiration rate and ethylene production (particularly in climacteric fruit), inhibiting the rate of biological deterioration. In addition, cold temperature reduces the incidence of fruit decay [39]. In general, the optimal storage conditions for mandarins are 5 °C and 90–95% RH for 2–6 weeks [40]. Murcott mandarins were resistant to microbial infection, but highly subjected to chilling injury and weight loss when stored at 6 °C for 2 months, followed by 14 °C for 2 weeks [41]. Murcott fruit had better flavor quality when stored for 6 weeks at 5 °C compared to those stored at 20 °C [42]. Grierson and Ben-Yehoshua [43] found that 6–7 °C extends the storage life of ‘Coorg’ mandarins to 8 weeks. However, long storage periods may cause some physiological disorders, for example storing ‘Ponkan’ mandarins at 5 °C for 3 months caused severe chilling injury followed by decay, which almost led to total fruit loss, but high TSS percentage. Fruit stored at 10 °C showed less storage period with light chilling injuries and slight off flavors. The least storage losses and best fruit quality were noticed at 15 °C, but the storage period was shorter. The shortest storage period associated with higher percentage of decay and weight loss was observed at 20 °C, but the remaining intact fruit still had acceptable quality [44]. The maintenance of an optimal temperature with high RH (90–95%) is the best scenario for citrus fruit storage. Other factors like fruit post-harvest sanitation, pre-cooling, and air velocity inside the storage room are important factors to maintain fruit shelf life [45]. Citrus species and varieties vary in their optimal storage temperature. The majority of citrus cultivars favor low temperature levels during prolonged storage, while some other cultivars like ‘Fortune’ and ‘Nova’ mandarins, ‘Navelate’ oranges, lemons, and grapefruits are sensitive to low temperature below 9 °C [46]. Maintaining RH at 85–95% during storage is important to avoid water loss and softening if humidity is low, and decay if humidity is high [47]. Ventilation is also important to eliminate CO2 and other volatile components with some remarkable reduction in fruit decay [48].
To reduce post-harvest loss, this research aimed to evaluate the effect of post-harvest dipping treatments with salicylic acid and putrescine on fruit quality and storability of Murcott mandarin fruit grown under the Egyptian conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

This study was carried out on Murcott mandarin fruit taken from 10-years old trees growing in the experimental farm of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate (31°30′85″ N, 30°80′39″ E), Egypt. Trees were budded on Volkamer lemon, Citrus volkameriana Ten & Pasq rootstock, and planted at 4 × 4 m spacing in clay soil (59.65% clay, 18.79% silt, 21.57% sand, 1.10% organic matter, 1.85 dSm-1 electrical conductivity (EC), and pH = 7.76) with flood irrigation system. Trees were uniform in growth, vigor, size, productivity, and appeared healthy with no observed symptoms of nutrient deficiency. Trees varied in their nature of alternate bearing within the same experimental farm, therefore fruit were not collected from the same trees during both seasons; only those observing on-year and good fruit yield were chosen for fruit collection (approximately 360 kg fruit/season). All trees received the same cultural practices with no growth regulators or pesticides. Trees were subjected to the following fertilization program; 0.5 kg/tree superphosphate (37% P2O5) applied once a year in December, 4.5 kg/tree ammonium sulphate (20.5% N) applied three times a year in February, May and late June, 1.25 kg/tree potassium sulphate (48% K2O) applied twice a year in March and late June.
Fruit harvest took place on 14 March 2018 and 11 March 2019 at horticultural maturity stage (i.e., full color and average TSS = 12.30 ± 0.15%), which was about 297–300 days from full bloom, according to Arras and Usai [41]. Fruit samples were randomly collected from the four directions (N, E, S, and W) and three levels (top, medium, and bottom) of the tree. Fruit were uniform in size (average diameter = 7.20 ± 0.10 cm), color, and free of physical injuries, sunburn, blemishes, bruises, and pathogen and insect attacks. Fruit were directly transported to the Post-harvest Laboratory at Sakha Horticulture Research Station, Agricultural Research Center, Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, for cleaning and dipping treatments. Fruit were washed with tap water with no pesticides or waxing treatments. Fruit were divided into five groups, 72 kg fruit each, and one group was assigned for one of the following 5-min dipping treatments at room temperature; distilled water (control), salicylic acid (Product of Aljoumhoria Chemicals Inc., Cairo, Egypt) at 200 and 400 ppm, and putrescine (Imported from Germany by Techno Gene Inc., Doki, Giza, Egypt) at 50 and 100 ppm. Afterward, fruit were left to dry for one hour at room temperature, and then each group was divided into two equal groups of 36 kg; one group to be stored at 5 ± 1 °C and 90–95% RH, while the second group to be at room temperature (23 ± 1°C) and 60–70% RH for 45 days. Each group was divided into four subgroups of 9 kg, which were divided into three replicates (3 kg each ≈ 16 fruit) packed in one layer inside a corrugated box. One subgroup (9 kg) was used for harvest day analysis, and the remaining three subgroups (27 kg) were used for evaluation and analysis every 15 days during storage (9 kg each). Ventilation of storage room was carried out for 5 min every 15 days of storage.
Fruit weight (g) was calculated at harvest and every 15 days during storage using a bench-top digital scale Model PC-500 (Doran scales, Inc., Batavia, IL, USA). The percentage of weight loss was calculated according to the following equation [49]:
([Fruit weight at harvest − Fruit weight during storage] ÷ Fruit weight at harvest) × 100
The decayed fruit were weighted every 15 days of storage, and the percentage of decay was calculated according to El-Kady et al. [49], as follows:
(Weight of decayed fruit ÷ Initial fruit weight) × 100.
Average fruit firmness (N) was measured on two sides of five fruit [49] using a hand-held Shimpo digital force gauge, Model FGV-50XY fitted with 10 mm diameter plunger tip (Shimpo company, Wilmington, NC, USA). Total soluble solids (TSS) concentration was measured with a hand-held refractometer Model RA-130 (KEM Kyoto Electronics Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), according to Mazumdar and Majumder [50]. Total acidity was estimated as citric acid/100 mL of juice using 2,6-dichlorophenol indophenol, according to the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) [51]. Data of TSS and total acidity was used to calculate TSS: acid ratio. Ascorbic acid content was estimated as mg/100 mL juice using 2,6-dichlorophenol indophenol, according to Rangana [52].
The experiment was arranged in complete randomized design of 5 treatments × 4 evaluation times × 3 replicates at two different temperatures. Data of each storage temperature were individually analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) [53], and means were compared using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) at p ≤ 5% [54].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Weight Loss (%)

Fruit weight loss is basically related to water loss [55], and this essentially due to transpiration, which accounts for 90% of total weight loss [56], and initially comes from the peel [57]. Valencia oranges stored for 2 months at 20 °C and 50–75% RH showed a reduction of 9.5% in peel weight, but 2.1% in pulp weight [56]. Water loss adversely affects the quality and limits the economic post-harvest life of fruit [58]. Oranges start showing shrinkage at weight loss of 2.5%, and become unsalable at 5% of the original weight [59]. Therefore, maintaining fruit in cold and humid conditions significantly affects stomatal behavior, and reduces the rate of water loss during storage [60]. High temperature causes peel shriveling and drying, and ultimately results in dull appearance, softening, and peel senescence [61]. Abscisic acid (ABA) level is correlated with storage temperature, for instance, fruit stored at 12 °C showed a higher rate of water loss associated with an increase in ABA, in comparison to those stored at 2–5 °C [62].
The results in Table 1 show that the percentage of weight loss generally increased with extended storage period at both cold and room temperature in 2018 and 2019 seasons. Similar results were reported on Murcott mandarins stored at 5–10 °C when compared to those stored at 22–25 °C [63]. Results also revealed that application of salicylic acid and putrescine significantly reduced weight loss in comparison to the control at both temperatures, and salicylic acid was more effective in this regard. The most pronounced effect was noticed with fruit dipped in 400 ppm salicylic acid. The application of 400 ppm salicylic acid effectively reduced weight loss of stored ‘Oregon Spur’ apple [64]. In this respect, 400 ppm salicylic acid-treated fruit showed an average weight loss of two seasons equal to 1.6% in comparison to 2.9% for the control at cold temperature, while these values recorded 4.1% and 7.9% at room temperature, respectively (Table 1).
These results support the previous findings on the role of salicylic acid and cold storage reducing respiration rate and weight loss of Ponkan mandarin [27] and guava [65]. ‘Ponkan’ mandarins treated with 400 ppm SA, and stored at 8–10 °C and 75–90% for three months recorded 3.5% weight loss [27]. The combined application of salicylic acid and putrescine significantly decreased weight loss of stored apricot [66], plum [67], and peach fruit [68]. This might be due to a reduction in respiration rate and changes in cell wall properties related to water permeability [69]. Reduction of weight loss in putrescine-treated pear fruit [70] can be attributed to the conjugation of polyamines to phospholipids and protein components of cell membranes, resulting in stabilization and consolidation of cell integrity and membrane permeability [71].

3.2. Firmness (N)

The word “firmness” in citrus fruit is an indication of fruit turgidity and peel thickness [72]. Fruit firmness decreases with maturation, because the pulp tends to pull away from the peel late in the season, especially in mandarins, in addition to the excessive development of the albedo in late-bloom varieties [73]. The lower the temperature in winter, the thicker the peel of the fruit [74]. In climacteric fruit, the reduction in fruit firmness with maturation is mostly related to the dissolution of the pectic components of the cell wall [75], but this is not a dominant reason in citrus fruit softening. Although, citrus fruit is rich in pectin, its dissolution into soluble pectin with maturation is very slow; however, it is a rapid process in certain mandarin cultivars. In general, the concentration of cellulose, hemicellulose, and pectic substances in mature citrus fruit peel is very low [76], but the concentration of malonic acid is high [77]. In addition, the polysaccharide components of the cell walls of flavedo decrease with maturation [78]. On the other hand, the cells of albedo tissue become small with low cytoplasmic content and metabolic activity, large intercellular spaces, and weak cell wall, which break easily with maturation [79]. Citrus fruit softening after harvest is mainly related to water loss from the peel [80], which increases with maturation and senescence [58]. Fruit softening is also associated with pathogens that invade the peel and secrete cell-wall degrading enzymes [81]. Application of growth regulators and storage at low temperature and high humidity ultimately reduce water loss and retain peel turgidity [58].
Like weight loss (Table 1), the reduction in fruit firmness with prolonged storage period was more noticeable at room temperature (Table 2). Similarly, salicylic acid and putrescine effectively reduced fruit softening in comparison to the control at both temperatures in 2018 and 2019 seasons. Salicylic acid was more effective than putrescine in this respect, and the most noticeable effect was related to the application of 400 ppm salicylic acid. For instance, two-seasons average firmness of 400 ppm salicylic acid-treated fruit and control was 0.303 and 0.270 N at cold temperature, whereas these values were 0.286 and 0.240 N at room temperature, respectively (Table 2). Putrescine effectively maintained fruit firmness of lemon [29] and plum [32] during cold storage. Putrescine maintains fruit firmness through making cross-linkage with the carboxyl groups of the pectin in the cell wall leading to a strengthened cell wall. It also decreases the activity of cell wall degrading enzymes, such as pectin methyl esterase, pectin esterase, and polygalacturonase [82]. Salicylic acid was more effective than putrescine in maintaining fruit firmness during storage (Table 2), and both showed anti-senescent effect due to reduction in endogenous ethylene production [83] that protects cell wall structure [84] and maintains cell turgor pressure [37].

3.3. Decay (%)

Fruit susceptibility to post-harvest diseases accelerates with maturation and senescence, because peel becomes less firm; thereby less force is required to invade the peel by the pathogens [85]. Mechanical injuries at harvest and during handling are the main sites of peel invasion by the wound-invading Penicillium and Geotrichum [61]. Cold storage associated with high humidity is important for maintaining the resistance of the peel and fruit calyx against pathogens infection [81]. Moreover, low temperature obviously retards pathogens growth on infected fruit; however, disease symptoms will appear a few days after transferring the infected fruit to ambient temperature [86]. Generally, decay is the main post-harvest problem in warm and humid climates like Florida, whereas fruit shrinkage and softening are the major problems in arid climates like Egypt [38].
Fruit decay generally increases with increased temperature and duration of storage. Fruit dipping in salicylic acid and putrescine was effective in reducing fruit decay in comparison to untreated fruit (Table 3). In this regard, salicylic acid was more effective than putrescine at both storage temperatures during both seasons. At cold temperature, no decay was noticed with both salicylic acid concentrations for the entire period of storage, while decay started by the 30 days of storage with other treatments. At room temperature, the most pronounced reduction in decay was noticed with 400 ppm salicylic acid treatment; however, the presence of fruit decay started by 30 days of storage with all treatments in both seasons. It could also be noticed that average decay percentage of two seasons in salicylic acid-treated fruit was zero, whereas this percentage was 19% for the untreated fruit at cold storage. However, at room temperature, this percentage was about 23% and 69% at room temperature, respectively (Table 3). These results are consistent with previous reports on ‘Ponkan’ mandarins treated with 400 ppm SA, and stored at 8–10 °C and 75–90% for three months with a total decay of 2% [27].
Salicylic acid significantly reduced fruit decay of stored mandarins and sweet oranges due to enhancing the activity of antioxidant enzymes and improving resistance to fungal attack, the accumulation of H2O2 and defense-related metabolites like ornithine, threonine and polymethoxylated flavones [18], and the anti-senescent effect that maintains fruit firmness, which eventually reduced microbial attack [19]. Pre-harvest treatment of salicylic acid reduced post-harvest chilling injury and fungal diseases in melon [87], mango [88], and apple [63]. On the other hand, putrescine reduced ABA concentration and fruit senescence [29], and led to increased fruit firmness and reduced post-harvest mechanical damages and decay in lemon [28]. Putrescine has also enhanced fruit resistance to chilling injury and decay, and prolonged the storage period of peach [68] and pear [70].

3.4. TSS, Acidity, and TSS: Acid Ratio

Results in Table 4 confirm the anti-senescence role of salicylic acid [19] and putrescine [32] on stored Murcott mandarins compared to the control at both storage temperatures during both seasons. The increase in TSS throughout the storage period was less in treated fruit than the control. In this regard, salicylic acid was more effective, and the least TSS was noticed in 400 ppm salicylic acid-treated fruit. The average of two seasons showed that the increase in TSS of 400 ppm salicylic acid-treated fruit after 45 days storage at cold temperature was 12.8% compared to 12.1% at harvest, whereas those values recorded 15.1% and 12.3% for the control fruit, respectively. It is also noticeable that TSS values were higher at room temperature in both seasons.
On the other hand, Table 5 indicates that acid content was also maintained at the highest level throughout storage with 400 ppm salicylic acid-treated fruit stored at cold temperature during both seasons. However, fruit stored at room temperature maintained high acid content with all treatments with almost no significant differences among treatments throughout the storage period. These results are consistent with previous findings of salicylic acid-treated apples [84] and putrescine-treated strawberry [89] and apricots [90]. Their effect is mainly due to reduction in respiration rate and the catabolism of sugars and acids content, associated with fruit ripening process [15,91]. Sugars constitute about 75–76% of the TSS in citrus fruit [92]. Higher content of acids at harvest increased the keeping quality of lemon and mandarin fruit [93]. Salicylic acid increases polyamines level in ‘Ponkan’ mandarin, reduces the degradation of antioxidants system in ‘Cara’ orange [94], and inhibits ethylene production in pear [95]. Putrescine effectively maintains the levels of TSS and acidity due to the reduction in respiration rate [82] and ethylene synthesis [35].
Citrus TSS: acid ratio increases very slightly during storage due to acids catabolism in respiration [96], and this explains results of Table 6. Fruit stored at room temperature had higher values of TSS: acid ratio than those stored at cold temperature. Salicylic acid- and putrescine-treated fruit showed lower TSS: acid ratio than the control at both temperatures in both seasons. These results were previously confirmed on putrescine-treated strawberry [90]. Data also revealed that salicylic acid was slightly more effective than putrescine at cold temperature, but no significant differences were noticed at room temperature (Table 6). The increase in TSS: acid ratio with prolonged storage period was mainly due to using more acids than sugars in respiration [65].

3.5. Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C)

As an organic acid, ascorbic acid followed the same trend as acidity (Table 6) declining with prolonged storage (Table 7) due to acid consumption as substrates in respiration [97]. However, this trend was slower with all dipping treatments, which maintained the level of ascorbic acid higher than that of the control throughout storage at both temperatures in both seasons. The most pronounced effect was noticed with the application of 400 ppm salicylic acid, for instance the average of both seasons indicated that fruit treated with 400 ppm salicylic acid and stored at cold temperature showed a reduction of 12.2% after 45 days of storage compared to 23.3% for the control fruit. Ishaq et al. [91] reported that ascorbic acid content is gradually decreased during storage. Salicylic acid [84] and putrescine [78] had a significant influence on maintaining the level of ascorbic acid during storage. Ascorbic acid is an important quality factor in citrus fruit, and it is very sensitive to oxidation during storage in comparison to other acids. Oxidation led to the conversion of dehydroascorbate to diketogulonate. This effect can be inhibited with putrescine, which reduces or delays the activity of ascorbate oxidase, and consequently maintains ascorbic acid [91]. Similar results have been reported in mango [36] and apricot [30]. Salicylic acid inactivates ascorbate peroxidase [98], and increases ascorbic acid in apples during storage [64]. A positive effect of salicylic acid on TSS and ascorbic acid content has been reported in strawberry fruit [99].

4. Conclusions

Results indicated that fruit dipping in salicylic acid or putrescine was effective in maintaining the quality of Murcott mandarin fruit during storage, in terms of reducing weight loss and decay, and maintaining fruit firmness, TSS: acid ratio and vitamin C at acceptable levels that extend fruit storability and marketability chances. The best results were achieved with 400 ppm salicylic acid-treated fruit stored at cold temperature (5 ± 1 °C). Fruit storage at cold temperature was ceased after 45 days, because extending the storage period may result in more weight loss and decay, as well as fruit softening, which may lead to more mechanical damage during handling and marketing of the fruit [40]. Moreover, by the end of the 45-day storage period in late May, Murcott mandarin fruit become the latest maturing mandarins type fruit in Egypt with almost no competition with other fruit types, except bananas and late oranges, in addition to high remunerative value. Extending the cold storage period until late June will minimize the importance of storage due to the increase in fruit weight loss, decay, and softening, which will be reflected in actual crop loss, in addition to the higher competition with other fruit types available at market by this time of the year, such as early grapes, apricots, and watermelons. It is also suggested stopping storage at room temperature after 15 days due to the subsequent high percentage of decay (≈30%), and even the weight loss of the remaining fruit was about 5%, which makes them unsaleable [59]. The future prospective of this research may extend to cover other quality control parameters of Murcott mandarins, such as enzymes activity, phytohormones, and flavour components. It may also include research at the molecular level to differentiate between pulp and peel maturity, and identify the optimal harvest period based on peel maturity to reduce post-harvest injuries.

Author Contributions

H.A.E. and S.M.A.-E.; formal analysis, H.A.E., M.A.E.-S. and S.M.A.-E.; investigation, H.A.E., M.A.E.-S. and S.M.A.-E.; methodology, H.A.E. and M.A.E.-S.; project administration, H.A.E., M.A.E.-S. and S.M.A.-E.; resources, H.A.E.; writing—original draft, S.M.A.; writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully thank the field staff of the experimental farm, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University and the laboratory staff of the Post-harvest Laboratory, Sakha Horticulture Research Station, Agricultural Research Center, Kafr El-Sheikh for their excellent technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ziegler, L.W.; Wolfe, H.S. Citrus Growing in Florida; University of Florida Press: Gainesville, FL, USA, 1961; p. 248. [Google Scholar]
  2. Morse, P.C., Jr. “History, Propagation and Distribution of the Murcott (Smith Tangerine)”; Florida Tangerine Cooperative: Gainesville, FL, USA, 1957. [Google Scholar]
  3. Futch, S.H.; Jackson, L.K. Murcott (Honey Tangerine); The Horticultural Sciences Department Series HS174; UF/IFAS Extension: Gainesville, FL, USA, 2003; p. 2. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hodgson, R.W. Horticultural varieties of citrus. In The Citrus Industry, 2nd ed.; Reuther, W., Webber, H.J., Batchelor, L.D., Eds.; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1967; Volume I, History, World Distribution, Botany, and Varieties; pp. 431–592. [Google Scholar]
  5. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). FAO Statistics; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2017; Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC/visualize (accessed on 1 December 2019).
  6. Samra, N.R.; Shalan, A.M.; Eltair, B.T. Efficacy of different edible coatings in improving “Murcott tangor” fruit qualities during chilled and ambient storage. J. Plant Prod. Mansoura Univ. 2014, 5, 1283–1302. [Google Scholar]
  7. Nunes, M.C.N. Impact of environmental conditions on fruit and vegetable quality. Stewart Postharvest Rev. 2008, 4, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  8. Burns, J.K.; Baldwin, E.A. Glycosidase activities in grapefruit flavedo, albedo and juice vesicles during maturation and senescence. Physiol. Plant. 1994, 90, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alam-Eldein, S.M.; Rouseff, R.L.; Albrigo, L.G. Characterization of citrus peel maturation to reduce postharvest storage problems in Florida. Int. J. Agric. Food Res. 2017, 6, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  10. Liu, F.W. Development and Application of Citrus Storage Technologies with Concurrent Consideration of Fruit Quality Preservation, Energy Use, and Costs. In Proceedings of the AARDO Workshop on Technology on Reducing Post-harvest Losses and Maintaining Quality of Fruits and Vegetables, Taipei, Taiwan, 3–9 October 2010; pp. 26–47. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kader, A.A. Postharvest technology of horticultural crops. Ethiop. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2013, 1, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  12. Abdelal, H.R. Acetyl salicylic acid as a promising fungicide for controlling certain fungi. Egypt. J. Phytopathol. 1983, 13, 19–22. [Google Scholar]
  13. Vazirimehr, M.R.; Rigi, K. Effect of salicylic acid in agriculture. Int. J. Plant Anim. Environ. Sci. 2014, 4, 291–296. [Google Scholar]
  14. Barakat, M.R.; Mohsen, A.T.; Mohamed, A.A. Effect of some natural oils and salicylic acid on fruit quality of Valencia orange during storage. J. Hort. Sci. Ornamen. Plants. 2015, 7, 66–70. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lolaei, A.; Kaviani, B.; Rezaei, M.A.; Raad, M.K.; Mohammad, R. Effect of pre- and postharvest treatment of salicylic acid on ripening of fruit and overall quality of strawberry (Fragaria ananasa Duch cv. Camarosa) fruit. Ann. Biol. Res. 2012, 3, 4680–4684. [Google Scholar]
  16. Tareen, M.J.; Abbasi, N.A.; Hafiz, I.A. Effect of salicylic acid treatments on storage life of peach fruits cv. ‘Flordaking’. Pak. J. Bot. 2012, 44, 119–124. [Google Scholar]
  17. Awad, R.M. Effect of post-harvest salicylic acid treatments on fruit quality of peach cv. “Florda prince” during cold storage. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2013, 7, 920–927. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhu, F.; Chen, J.; Xiao, X.; Zhang, M.; Yun, Z.; Zeng, Y.; Xu, J.; Cheng, Y.; Deng, X. Salicylic acid treatment reduces the rot of postharvest citrus fruit by inducing the accumulation of H2O2, primary metabolites and lipophilic polymethoxylated flavones. Food Chem. 2016, 207, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ahmad, S.; Singh, Z.; Khan, A.S.; Iqbal, Z. Preharvest applications of salicylic acid maintain the rind textural properties and reduce fruit rot and chilling injury of Sweet orange during cold storage. Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 2013, 50, 559–569. [Google Scholar]
  20. Reis, R.S.; Vale, E.M.; Heringer, A.S.; Al, E. Putrescine induces somatic embryo development and proteomic changes in embryogenic callus of sugarcane. J. Proteomics 2016, 130, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Mustafavi, S.H.; Badi, H.N.; Sekara, A.; Al, E. Polyamines and their possible mechanisms involved in plant physiological processes and elicitation of secondary metabolites. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2018, 40, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, D.; Shao, Q.; Yin, L.; Younis, A.; Zheng, B. Polyamine function in plants: Metabolism, regulation on development, and roles in abiotic stress responses. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 9, 1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sawhney, R.K.; Tiburcio, A.F.; Altabella, T.; Galston, A.W. Polyamines in plants: An overview. J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2003, 2, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  24. Xu, C.; Wu, X.; Zhang, H. Impact of D-Arg on drought resistance and endogenous polyamines in mycorrhizal Pinus massoniana. J. Nanjing For. Univ. 2009, 33, 019–023. [Google Scholar]
  25. Masson, P.H.; Takahashi, T.; Angelini, R. Molecular mechanisms underlying polyamine functions in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Gonzalez-Aguilar, G.A.; Zacarias, L.; Perez-Amador, M.A.; Carbonell, J.; Lafuente, M.T. Polyamine content and chilling susceptibility are affected by seasonal changes in temperature and by conditioning temperature in cold-stored ‘Fortune’ mandarin fruit. Physiol. Plant. 2000, 108, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zheng, Y.; Zhang, Q. Effects of polyamines and salicylic acid on postharvest storage of ‘Ponkan’ mandarin. Acta Hort. 2004, 632, 317–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Martinez-Romero, D.; Valero, D.; Serrano, M.; Martinez-Sanchez, F.; Riquelme, F. Effects of post-harvest putrescine and calcium treatments on reducing mechanical damage and polyamines and abscisic acid levels during lemon storage. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1999, 79, 1589–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Valero, D.; Martinez, R.D.; Serrano, M.; Riquelme, F. Influence of postharvest treatment with putrescine and calcium on endogenous polyamines, firmness, and abscisic acid in lemon (Citrus lemon L. Burm cv. Verna). J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 2102–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Davarynejad, G.H.; Zarei, M.; Ardakani, E.; Nasrabadi, M.E. Influence of putrescine application on storability, postharvest quality and antioxidant activity of two Iranian apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cultivars. Not. Sci. Biol. 2013, 5, 212–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Yousef, A.R.M.; Abd El-Razek, E.; Emam, H.S.; Ahmed, D.M.M. Pre-storage application of putrescine to improve fruit quality, color parameters and extending shelf life of ‘Hollywood’ plum (Prunus salicina L.). Middle East J. Agric. Res. 2014, 3, 1135–1144. [Google Scholar]
  32. Serrano, M.; Martinez-Romero, D.; Guillen, F.; Valero, D. Effect of exogenous putrescine in improving shelf life of four plum cultivars. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2003, 30, 259–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jiang, Y.M.; Chen, F. A study on polyamine change and browning of fruit during cold storage of litchi (Litchi chinensis). Postharvest Biol. Technol. 1995, 5, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zokaei, K.M.R.; Asna, A.M.; Ershadi, A.; Ahmadi, A. Effect of exogenous putrescine on postharvest life of strawberry (Fragaria ananassa) fruit, cultivar Selva. Agric. Res. 2006, 6, 15–25. [Google Scholar]
  35. Barman, K.; Ram, A.; Pal, R.K. Putrescine and carnauba wax pretreatments alleviate chilling injury, enhance shelf life and preserve pomegranate fruit quality during cold storage. Sci. Hortic. 2011, 130, 795–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Razzaq, K.; Khan, A.S.; Malik, A.U.; Shahid, M.; Ullah, S. Role of putrescine in regulating fruit softening and antioxidative enzyme systems in ‘Samar Bahisht Chaunsa’ mango. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2014, 96, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mirdehghan, S.H.; Rahimi, S. Pre-harvest application of polyamines enhances antioxidants and table grape (Vitis vinifera) quality during postharvest period. Food Chem. 2016, 196, 1040–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Grierson, W.; Miller, W.M. Storage of Citrus Fruits. In Fresh Citrus Fruits; Wardowski, W.F., Miller, W.M., Hall, D.J., Grierson, W., Eds.; Florida Science Source, Inc.: Longboat Key, FL, USA, 2006; pp. 547–581. [Google Scholar]
  39. Kader, A.A. Increasing Food Availability by Reducing Postharvest Losses of Fresh Produce. In Proceedings of the 5th International Postharvest Symposium, Verona, Italy, 6–11 June 2004; pp. 2169–2176. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kader, A.A. Modified atmospheres during transport and storage. In Posharvest Technology of Horticultural Crops; Kader, A.A., Ed.; University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resource: Oakland, CA, USA, 2002; pp. 135–144. [Google Scholar]
  41. Arras, G.; Usai, M. Response of Murcott mandarins to storage temperature. Adv. Hort. Sci. 1991, 5, 99–103. [Google Scholar]
  42. Obenland, D.; Collin, S.; Sievert, J.; Arpaia, M.L. Mandarin flavor and aroma volatile composition are strongly influenced by holding temperature. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2013, 82, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Grierson, W.; Ben-Yehoshua, S. Storage of citrus fruit. In Fresh Citrus Fruit; Wardowski, W.F., Nayg, S., Grierson, W., Eds.; AVI, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1986; pp. 479–507. [Google Scholar]
  44. Liu, F.W.; Pan, C.H.; Hsueh, S.M.; Hung, T.H. Influences of maturity at harvest and storage temperature on the storability of ‘Ponkan’ mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco). J. Chin. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1998, 44, 239–253. [Google Scholar]
  45. Strano, M.C.; Altieri, G.; Admane, N.; Genovese, F.; Di Renzo, G.C. Advance in Citrus Postharvest Management: Diseases, Cold Storage and Quality Evaluation. In Citrus Pathology; Gill, H., Garg, H., Eds.; Open Access Book; IntechOpen Limited: London, UK, 2017; Available online: https://www.intechopen.com/books/citrus-pathology/advance-in-citrus-postharvest-management-diseases-cold-storage-and-quality-evaluation (accessed on 27 November 2019). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Lafuente, M.T.; Zacarias, L.; Sala, J.M.; Sanchez-Ballesta, M.T.; Gosalbes, M.J.; Marcos, J.F.; Gonzalez-Candelas, L.; Lluch, Y.; Granell, A. Understanding the basis of chilling injury in citrus fruit. Acta Hortic. 2005, 682, 831–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ben-Yehoshua, S. Transportation, water stress and gas exchange. In Postharvest Biology of Vegetables; Wiechmann, J., Ed.; Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1987; pp. 113–170. [Google Scholar]
  48. Norman, S.M.; Houck, L.G. The role of volatiles in storage of citrus fruits. Proc. Int. Soc. Citric. 1977, 1, 238–242. [Google Scholar]
  49. El-Kady, M.; Samra, N.R.; El-Eryan, E.E. Physiological studies on storage life of apple fruits. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ. 2007, 32, 2773–2786. [Google Scholar]
  50. Mazumdar, B.C.; Majumder, K. Methods on Physico-Chemical Analysis of Fruits; College of Agriculture, Calcutta University: Calcutta, India, 2003; pp. 108–109. [Google Scholar]
  51. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Washington, DC, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  52. Rangana, S.H. Manual of Analysis of Fruit and Vegetable Products; Tata McGraw-Hill publishing Company Limited: New Delhi, India, 1977; p. 634. [Google Scholar]
  53. Snedecor, G.W.; Cochran, W.G. Statistical Methods, 7th ed.; Iowa State University Press: Ames, IA, USA, 1990; p. 593. [Google Scholar]
  54. Duncan, D.B. Multiple ranges and multiple F. test. Biometries 1955, 11, 1–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Albrigo, L.G.; Ismail, M.A. Shipment and storage of Florida grapefruit using unipack film barriers. Proc. Int. Soc. Citric. 1981, 2, 714–717. [Google Scholar]
  56. Ben-Yehoshua, S. Gas exchange, transpiration and the commercial deterioration in storage of orange fruit. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1969, 94, 524–528. [Google Scholar]
  57. Kaufmann, M.R. Water potential components in growing citrus fruits. Plant Physiol. 1970, 46, 145–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Kawada, K.; Albrigo, L.G. Effects of film packaging, in-carton air filters, and storage temperatures on the keeping quality of Florida grapefruit. Proc. Fla. Sta. Hort. Soc. 1979, 92, 209–212. [Google Scholar]
  59. Grierson, W.; Wardowski, W.F. Relative humidity effects on the postharvest life of fruits and vegetables. HortScience 1978, 13, 22–28. [Google Scholar]
  60. Levy, Y. Effect of evaporative demand on water relations of Citrus limon. Anal. Bot. 1980, 46, 695–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. El-Otmani, M. Growth regulator improvement of postharvest quality. In Fresh Citrus Fruits; Wardowski, W.F., Miller, W.M., Hall, D.J., Grierson, W., Eds.; Florida Service Source, Inc.: Longboat Key, FL, USA, 2006; pp. 67–104. [Google Scholar]
  62. Lafuente, M.T.; Martinez-Tellez, M.A.; Zacarias, L. Abscisic acid in the response of ‘Fortune’ mandarins to chilling. Effect of Maturity and high-temperature conditioning. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1997, 73, 494–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Fahmy, M.A.; Abd El-Razek, A.M.; Sultan, M.Z.; Abd-Alhafeez, A.A.; Elnaggar, I.A. Influence of storage temperature on quality and storability of Murcott tangor (Citrus Reticulata × Citrus Sinensis (L.) Osbeck) fruits. Nat. Sci. 2018, 16, 150–154. [Google Scholar]
  64. Krishna, H.; Das, B.; Attri, B.L.; Kumar, A.; Ahmed, N. Interaction between different pre-harvest and postharvest treatments on shelf life extension of ‘Oregon Spur’ apple. Fruits 2012, 67, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Amanullah, S.; Sajid, M.; Qamar, M.B.; Ahmad, S. Postharvest treatment of salicylic acid on guava to enhance the shelf life at ambient temperature. Int. J. Biosci. 2017, 10, 92–106. [Google Scholar]
  66. Martinez-Romero, D.; Serrano, M.; Carbonell, A.; Burgos, L.; Riquelme, F.; Valero, D. Effect of postharvest putrescine treatment on extending shelf life and reducing mechanical damage in apricot. J. Food Sci. 2002, 67, 1706–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Davarynejad, G.H.; Zarei, M.; Nasrabadi, M.E.; Ardakani, E. Effects of salicylic acid and putrescine on storability, quality attributes and antioxidant activity of plum cv. ‘Santa Rosa’. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 2053–2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Zaghloul, A.E.; El-Hadidy, J.A.; Abo Ogiela, H.M. Effect of putrescine application on fruit quality of Florida Prince and Early Grande peaches during cold Storage. Alex. J. Agric. Sci. 2016, 61, 587–596. [Google Scholar]
  69. Rajkumar, M.; Karuppaiah, P.; Kandasamy, R. Effect of calcium and gibberellic acid on postharvest behaviour of papaya cv. Co2. Ind. J. Hortic. 2005, 62, 327–331. [Google Scholar]
  70. Hosseini, M.S.; Fakhar, Z.; Babalar, M.; Askari, M.A. Effect of pre-harvest putrescine treatment on quality and postharvest life of pear cv. Spadona. Adv. Hort. Sci. 2017, 31, 11–17. [Google Scholar]
  71. Shu, S.; Yuan, Y.; Chen, J.; Sun, J.; Zhang, W.; Tang, Y.; Zhong, M.; Guo, S. The role of putrescine in the regulation of proteins and fatty acids of thylakoid membranes under salt stress. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 14390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Baldwin, E.A. Citrus fruit. In The Biochemistry of Fruit Ripening; Seymour, G.B., Taylor, J.E., Tucker, G.A., Eds.; Chapman and Hall: New York, NY, USA, 1993; pp. 107–149. [Google Scholar]
  73. Grierson, W. Anatomy and Physiology. In Fresh Citrus Fruits; Wardowski, W.F., Miller, W.M., Hall, D.J., Grierson, W., Eds.; Florida science source, Inc.: Longboat Key, FL, USA, 2006; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  74. Wutscher, H. Influence of night temperatures and day length on fruit shape of grapefruit. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1976, 101, 573–575. [Google Scholar]
  75. Huber, D.J. The role of cell wall hydrolases in fruit softening. Hort. Rev. 1983, 5, 169–219. [Google Scholar]
  76. Eaks, I.L.; Sinclair, W.B. Cellulose-hemi-cellulose fractions in the alcohol-insoluble solid of Valencia orange peel. J. Food Sci. 1980, 45, 985–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Monselise, S.P. Growth regulators used to extend the picking season of grapefruits. In Proceedings of the International Citrus Congress, Orlando, FL, USA, 1–8 May 1977; pp. 393–398. [Google Scholar]
  78. Muramatsu, N.; Takahara, T.; Ogata, T.; Kojima, K. Changes in rind firmness and cell wall polysaccharides during citrus fruit development and maturation. HortScience 1999, 34, 79–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Coggins, C.W., Jr. Gibberellin research on citrus rind aging problems. In Proceedings of the First International Citrus Symposium, Riverside, CA, USA, 16–26 March 1968; pp. 1177–1185. [Google Scholar]
  80. Spiegel-Roy, P.; Goldschmidt, E.E. Biology of Citrus; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  81. Eckert, J.W.; Eaks, I.L. Postharvest disorders and diseases of citrus fruits. In The Citrus Industry; Reuther, W., Calavan, E.C., Carman, G.E., Eds.; University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resource: Oakland, CA, USA, 1989; pp. 179–260. [Google Scholar]
  82. Valero, D.; Martinez, R.D.; Serrano, M. The role of polyamines in the improvement of the shelf life of fruits. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2002, 13, 228–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Nissen, P. Stimulation of somatic embryogenesis in carrot by ethylene: Effects of modulators of ethylene biosynthesis and action. Physiol. Plant. 1994, 92, 397–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kazemi, M.; Aran, M.; Zamani, S. Effect of salicylic acid treatments on quality characteristics of apple fruits during storage. Am. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 6, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Coggins, C.W., Jr.; Scora, R.W.; Lewis, L.N.; Knapp, C.F. Gibberellin-delayed senescence and essential oil changes in the Navel orange rind. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1969, 17, 807–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Smilanick, J.L.; Brown, G.E.; Eckert, J.W. The biology and control of postharvest diseases. In Fresh Citrus Fruits; Wardowski, W.F., Miller, W.M., Hall, D.J., Grierson, W., Eds.; Florida Science Source, Inc.: Longboat Key, FL, USA, 2006; pp. 353–355. [Google Scholar]
  87. Huang, Y.; Deverall, B.J.; Tang, W.H.; Wang, W.; Wu, F.W. Foliar application of acibenzolar-S-methyle and protection of postharvest Rock melons and hami melon from disease. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2000, 106, 651–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zainuri, J.D.C.; Wearing, A.H.; Coates, L.; Terry, L. Effects of phosphonate and salicylic acid treatments on anthracnose disease development and ripening of ‘Kensington Pride’ mango fruit. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2001, 41, 805–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Khosroshahi, M.R.Z.; Ershadi, E.M.A. Effect of exogenous putrescine on post-harvest life of strawberry (Fragaria ananassa Duch.) fruit, cultivar ‘Selva’. Sci. Hortic. 2007, 114, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Khosroshahi, M.R.Z.; Ershadi, E.M.A. Effect of exogenous putrescine treatment on the quality and storage life of peach (Prunus persica L.) fruit. Int. J. Postharvest Technol. Innovation. 2008, 1, 278–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ishaq, S.; Rathore, H.A.; Majeed, S.; Awan, S.; Shah, S.Z.A. The studies on the physico-chemical and organoleptic characteristics of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) produced in Rawalakot, Azad Jammu and Kashmir during storage. Pak. J. Nutr. 2009, 8, 856–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Ting, S.V.; Attaway, J.A. Citrus fruits. In The Biochemistry of Fruits and Their Products; Hulme, A.C., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1971. [Google Scholar]
  93. Schiffman-Nadel, M.; Cohen, E. Factors affecting keeping quality of lemons in storage. Int. Citrus Congr. 1973, 456–458. [Google Scholar]
  94. Huang, R.; Xia, R.; Lu, Y.; Hu, L.; Xu, Y. Effect of pre-harvest salicylic acid spray treatment on post-harvest antioxidant in the pulp and peel of ‘Cara cara’ navel orange (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck). J. Sci. Food Agric. 2008, 88, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Leslie, C.A.; Romani, R.J. Inhibition of ethylene biosynthesis by salicylic acid. Plant Physiol. 1988, 88, 833–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Rana, G.S.; Sing, K. Studying on extending postharvest life of sweet orange fruits. Crop Res. 1992, 5, 154–157. [Google Scholar]
  97. Del Caro, A.; Piga, A.; Vacca, V.; Agabbio, M. Changes of flavonoids, vitamin C and antioxidants capacity in minimally processed citrus segments and juices during storage. Food Chem. 2004, 84, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Rao, M.V.; Paliyath, G.; Ormrod, D.P.; Murr, D.P.; Watkins, C.B. Influence of salicylic acid on H2O2 production, oxidative stress, and H2O2-metabolizing enzymes. Plant Physiol. 1997, 115, 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Karlidag, H.; Yildirim, E.; Turan, M. Exogenous applications of salicylic acid affect quality and yield of strawberry grown under antifrost heated greenhouse conditions. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2009, 172, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Effect of salicylic acid (SA) and putrescine (Put) on weight loss (%) of Murcott mandarin fruit at 15, 30, and 45 days of storage during 2018 and 2019 seasons.
Table 1. Effect of salicylic acid (SA) and putrescine (Put) on weight loss (%) of Murcott mandarin fruit at 15, 30, and 45 days of storage during 2018 and 2019 seasons.
Treatments20182019
5 ± 1 °C and 90–95% RH
0153045Mean0153045Mean
Control03.29 a3.85 a5.17 a3.08 a03.39 a3.78 a4.12 a 2.82 a
SA 200 ppm02.01 d2.18 d3.48 d1.92 d02.11 c2.28 c2.38 d1.69 c
SA 400 ppm01.83 e1.90 e3.32 e1.77 e01.80 e2.02 d2.16 e1.50 d
Put. 50 ppm02.29 b2.87 b4.05 b2.30 b02.43 b2.75 b2.98 b2.04 b
Put. 100 ppm02.08 c2.49 c3.68 c2.06 c01.93 d2.28 c2.53 c1.69 c
Mean02.30 c2.66 b3.94 a--02.33 c2.62 b2.83 a--
23 ± 1 °C and 60–70% RH
Control06.43 a10.15 a14.48 a7.77 a07.11 a10.71 a14.53 a8.09 a
SA 200 ppm05.17 d6.53 d6.65 d4.59 d05.31 d5.45 d5.70 d4.11 d
SA 400 ppm04.91 e6.11 e6.25 e4.32 e04.98 e5.26 e5.43 e3.92 e
Put. 50 ppm05.53 b6.85 b7.10 b4.87 b05.70 b5.81 c6.03 b4.38 b
Put. 100 ppm05.31 c6.62 c6.91 c4.71 c05.59 c5.88 b5.96 c4.36 c
Mean05.47 c7.25 b8.28 a--05.74 c6.62 b7.53 a--
Means followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) at p ≤ 0.05.
Table
Table 2. Effect of salicylic acid (SA) and putrescine (Put) on firmness (N) of Murcott mandarin fruit at harvest and 15, 30, and 45 days of storage during 2018 and 2019 seasons.
Table 2. Effect of salicylic acid (SA) and putrescine (Put) on firmness (N) of Murcott mandarin fruit at harvest and 15, 30, and 45 days of storage during 2018 and 2019 seasons.
Treatments20182019
5 ± 1 °C and 90–95% RH
0153045Mean0153045Mean
Control0.311 d0.268 d0.247 e0.226 d0.263 e0.319 c0.289 c0.260 c0.240 d0.277 c
SA 200 ppm0.314 b0.296 ab0.266 c0.249 b0.281 b0.338 ab0.309 b0.279 b0.250 c0.294 b
SA 400 ppm0.316 a0.304 a0.284 a0.265 a0.292 a0.348 a0.328 a0.309 a0.270 a0.314 a
Put. 50 ppm0.312 cd0.279 c0.259 d0.231 d0.271 d0.328 bc0.299 bc0.274 b0.255 bc0.289 b
Put. 100 ppm0.313 bc0.287 bc0.272 b0.237 c0.277 c0.319 c0.304 b0.279 b0.260 b0.290 b
Mean0.313 a0.287 b2.66 c0.242 d--0.330 a0.306 b0.280 c0.255 d--
23 ± 1 °C and 60–70% RH
Control0.311 d0.259 d0.201 c0.180 d0.238 d0.319 c0.267 d0.207 e0.178 e0.243 e
SA 200 ppm0.314 b0.290 a0.274 a0.196 c0.269 b0.338 ab0.289 b0.270 b0.240 b0.284 b
SA 400 ppm0.316 a0.281 b0.280 a0.245 a0.279 a0.348 a0.298 a0.279 a0.250 a0.294 a
Put. 50 ppm0.312 cd0.274 c0.245 b0.181 d0.253 c0.328 bc0.269 d0.240 d0.221 d0.265 d
Put.100 ppm0.313 bc0.287 bc0.255 b0.225 b0.268 b0.319 c0.275 c0.250 c0.230 c0.269 c
Mean0.313 a0.276 b0.251 c0.206 d--0.330 a0.279 b0.249 c0.223 d--
Means followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different using DMRT at p ≤ 0.05.
Table
Table 3. Effect of salicylic acid (SA) and putrescine (Put) on decay (%) of Murcott mandarin fruit at 15, 30, and 45 days of storage during 2018 and 2019 seasons.
Table 3. Effect of salicylic acid (SA) and putrescine (Put) on decay (%) of Murcott mandarin fruit at 15, 30, and 45 days of storage during 2018 and 2019 seasons.
Treatments20182019
5 ± 1 °C and 90–95% RH
0153045Mean0153045Mean
Control000.35 a0.40 a0.19 a000.33 a0.42 a0.19 a
SA 200 ppm000.00 d0.00 d0.00 d000.00 d0.00 d0.00 d
SA 400 ppm000.00 d0.00 d0.00 d000.00 d0.00 d0.00 d
Put. 50 ppm000.21 b0.29 b0.13 b000.23 b0.31 b0.14 b
Put. 100 ppm000.15 c0.20 c0.09 c000.18 c0.22 c0.10 c
Mean000.14 b0.18 a--000.15 b0.19 a--
23 ± 1 °C and 60–70% RH
Control001.28 a1.47 a0.69 a001.31 a1.45 a0.69 a
SA 200 ppm000.40 c0.65 c0.26 c000.35 d0.63 d0.25 c
SA 400 ppm000.31 d0.57 d0.22 d000.29 e0.48 e0.19 d
Put. 50 ppm000.65 b0.70 c0.34 b000.68 b0.77 c0.36 b
Put. 100 ppm000.60 b0.78 b0.35 b000.60 c0.88 b0.37 b
Mean000.65 b0.83 a--000.65 b0.84 a--
Means followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different using DMRT at p ≤ 0.05.
Table
Table 4. Effect of salicylic acid (SA) and putrescine (Put) on TSS (%) of Murcott mandarin fruit at harvest and 15, 30, and 45 days of storage during 2018 and 2019 seasons.
Table 4. Effect of salicylic acid (SA) and putrescine (Put) on TSS (%) of Murcott mandarin fruit at harvest and 15, 30, and 45 days of storage during 2018 and 2019 seasons.
Treatments20182019
5 ± 1 °C and 90–95% RH
0153045Mean0153045Mean
Control12.15 ab12.68 a13.18 a13.48 d12.87 b12.48 a13.08 a13.45 ab14.87 a13.47 a
SA 200 ppm12.13 b12.47 c12.97 c13.67 c12.81 c12.38 b12.8 7 c13.37 b14.07 d13.17 c
SA 400 ppm12.05 c12.25 d12.79 d13.49 d12.65 d12.21 c12.65 d13.18 c13.88 e12.98 d
Put. 50 ppm12.21 a12.57 b13.07 b13.87 a12.93 a12.11 d12.97 b13.47 a14.27 b13.21 b
Put. 100 ppm12.20 a12.51 c13.01 bc13.81 b12.88 b12.17 cd12.91 bc13.41 ab14.21 c13.18 bc
Mean12.14 d12.49 c13.00 b13.66 a--12.27 d12.89 c13.37 b14.26 a--
23 ± 1 °C and 60–70% RH
Control12.15 bc12.87 a13.57 a15.07 b13.42 a12.48 a13.48 a14.19 a15.68 a13.97 a
SA 200 ppm12.13 c12.66 c13.36 c14.26 d13.10 c12.38 b13.02 d13.98 c14.87 d13.56 c
SA 400 ppm12.05 d12.44 d13.11 d14.08 e12.92 d12.21 c12.97 d13.73 d14.69 e13.40 d
Put. 50 ppm12.21 a12.76 b13.46 b14.40 c13.21 b12.11 d13.37 b14.08 b15.07 b13.66 b
Put. 100 ppm12.20 ab12.70 bc13.40 bc15.40 a13.43 a12.17 cd13.27 c14.02 bc15.01 c13.61 b
Mean12.15 d12.67 c13.38 b14.54 a--12.27 d13.22 c14.00 b15.06 a--
Means followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different using DMRT at p ≤ 0.05.
Table
Table 5. Effect of salicylic acid (SA) and putrescine (Put) on acidity (%) of Murcott mandarin fruit at harvest and 15, 30, and 45 days of storage during 2018 and 2019 seasons.
Table 5. Effect of salicylic acid (SA) and putrescine (Put) on acidity (%) of Murcott mandarin fruit at harvest and 15, 30, and 45 days of storage during 2018 and 2019 seasons.
Treatments20182019
5 ± 1 °C and 90–95% RH
0153045Mean0153045Mean
Control1.22 b0.89 e0.77 e0.63 c0.88 e1.25 a0.92 c0.80 e0.66 e0.91 d
SA 200 ppm1.20 c1.08 b0.97 b0.86 a1.03 b1.21 ab1.11 a1.00 b0.89 b1.05 b
SA 400 ppm1.25 a1.11 a1.00 a0.89 a1.06 a1.24 a1.14 a1.03 a0.92 a1.08 a
Put. 50 ppm1.24 a1.01 d0.91 d0.79 b0.99 d1.17 b1.14 a0.93 d0.81 d1.01 c
Put. 100 ppm1.20 c1.04 c0.94 c0.83 ab1.00 c1.20 ab1.04 b0.97 c0.86 c 1.02 c
Mean1.22 a1.02 b0.91 c0.80 d--1.21 a1.07 b0.94 c0.82 d--
23 ± 1 °C and 60–70% RH
Control1.22 b0.73 b0.62 c0.52 b0.77 c1.25 a0.70 c0.59 b0.48 b0.76 c
SA 200 ppm1.20 c0.93 a0.82 b0.71 a0.92 b1.21 ab0.90 b0.79 a0.68 a0.90 ab
SA 400 ppm1.25 a0.96 a0.85 a0.74 a0.95 a1.24 a0.93 a0.82 a0.71 a0.93 a
Put. 50 ppm1.24 a0.96 a0.85 a0.74 a0.95 a1.17 b0.93 a0.82 a0.71 a0.91 ab
Put. 100 ppm1.20 c0.93 a0.83 b0.72 a0.92 ab1.20 ab0.89 b079 a0.69 a0.89 b
Mean1.22 a0.90 b0.79 c0.69 d--1.21 a0.87 b0.76 c0.65 d--
Means followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different using DMRT at p ≤ 0.05.
Table
Table 6. Effect of salicylic acid (SA) and putrescine (Put) on TSS: acid ratio of Murcott mandarin fruit at harvest and 15, 30, and 45 days of storage during 2018 and 2019 seasons.
Table 6. Effect of salicylic acid (SA) and putrescine (Put) on TSS: acid ratio of Murcott mandarin fruit at harvest and 15, 30, and 45 days of storage during 2018 and 2019 seasons.
Treatments20182019
5 ± 1 °C and 90–95% RH
0153045Mean0153045Mean
Control9.96 ab14.24 a17.12 a21.40 a15.68 a9.98 ab14.22 a16.81 a22.53 a15.89 a
SA 200 ppm10.10 a11.55 c13.37 cd15.89 cd12.73 d10.23 a11.60 c13.37 c15.62 d12.71 c
SA 400 ppm9.63 c11.03 d12.80 d15.16 d12.16 e9.85 b11.10 c12.79 d15.09 d12.21 d
Put. 50 ppm9.84 bc12.45 b14.41 b17.57 b13.57 b10.35 a11.38 c14.49 b17.63 b13.46 b
Put. 100 ppm10.17 a12.02 b13.84 bc16.63 bc13.17 c10.14 ab12.41 b13.82 c16.52 c13.22 b
Mean9.94 d12.25 c14.31 b17.33 a--10.10 d12.14 c14.25 b17.47 a--
23 ± 1 °C and 60–70% RH
Control9.96 ab18.41 a21.89 a29.56 a19.95 a9.98 bc19.26 a24.05 a32.73 a21.50 a
SA 200 ppm10.10 a13.61 b16.30 b20.13 b15.26 bc10.23 ab14.46 bc17.71 b21.91 b16.08 b
SA 400 ppm9.63 c12.96 b15.42 c19.03 b14.26 d9.84 c13.94 d16.75 b20.70 b15.31 c
Put. 50 ppm9.84 bc13.35 b15.83 bc19.46 b14.62 cd10.35 a14.38 cd17.18 b21.26 b15.79 bc
Put. 100 ppm10.17 a13.65 b16.14 b21.04 b15.34 b10.14 abc14.91 b17.75 b21.76 b16.14 b
Mean9.94 d14.40 c17.12 b21.92 a--10.11 d15.39 c18.69 b23.67 a--
Means followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different using DMRT at p ≤ 0.05.
Table
Table 7. Effect of salicylic acid (SA) and putrescine (Put) on Ascorbic acid (mg/100 mL juice) of Murcott mandarin fruit at harvest and 15, 30, and 45 days of storage during 2018 and 2019 seasons.
Table 7. Effect of salicylic acid (SA) and putrescine (Put) on Ascorbic acid (mg/100 mL juice) of Murcott mandarin fruit at harvest and 15, 30, and 45 days of storage during 2018 and 2019 seasons.
Treatments2018 Season2019 Season
5 ± 1 °C and 90–95% RH
0153045Mean0153045Mean
Control39.26 bc37.11 b34.68 d30.45 e35.38 c37.44 cd33.62 d31.54 c28.36 d32.74 d
SA 200 ppm40.67 a38.35 a37.57 b35.99 b38.14 a36.28 d35.21 c34.01 b33.17 b34.67 bc
SA 400 ppm40.34 ab38.82 a38.15 a36.52 a38.46 a41.71 a39.25 a37.90 a35.49 a38.59 a
Put. 50 ppm37.90 d35.52 c34.78 d32.40 d35.15 c39.42 b35.80 bc32.27 c30.19 c34.42 c
Put. 100 ppm38.77 cd36.64 b35.89 c34.18 c36.37 b38.15 bc36.67 b34.31 b31.08 c35.05 b
Mean39.39 a37.28 b36.21 c33.90 d--38.60 a36.11 b34.00 c31.65 d--
23 ± 1 °C and 60–70% RH
Control39.26 bc31.64 c28.61 c23.57 d30.77 d37.44 cd31.35 b26.38 c22.00 d29.29 c
SA 200 ppm40.67 a34.97 b31.88 b29.45 b34.24 b36.28 d34.02 a30.28 ab29.90 a32.62 b
SA 400 ppm40.34 ab37.38 a35.17 a31.39 a36.07 a41.71 a33.31 a31.48 a29.91 a34.10 a
Put. 50 ppm37.90 d33.42 bc31.55 b28.77 b32.91 c39.42 b32.80 a29.93 b26.55 c32.17 b
Put. 100 ppm38.77 cd33.51 bc29.17 c27.33 c32.20 c38.15 bc33.13 a30.15 ab27.82 b32.31 b
Mean39.39 a34.18 b31.28 c28.10 d--38.60 a32.92 b29.64 c27.24 d--
Means followed by the same letter within a column are not significantly different using DMRT at p ≤ 0.05.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ennab, H.A.; El-Shemy, M.A.; Alam-Eldein, S.M. Salicylic Acid and Putrescine to Reduce Post-Harvest Storage Problems and Maintain Quality of Murcott Mandarin Fruit. Agronomy 2020, 10, 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10010115

AMA Style

Ennab HA, El-Shemy MA, Alam-Eldein SM. Salicylic Acid and Putrescine to Reduce Post-Harvest Storage Problems and Maintain Quality of Murcott Mandarin Fruit. Agronomy. 2020; 10(1):115. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10010115

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ennab, Hassan A., Mervat A. El-Shemy, and Shamel M. Alam-Eldein. 2020. "Salicylic Acid and Putrescine to Reduce Post-Harvest Storage Problems and Maintain Quality of Murcott Mandarin Fruit" Agronomy 10, no. 1: 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10010115

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop