Physico-Chemical Properties of Soybean Meal-Based Adhesives Reinforced by Ethylene Glycol Diglycidyl Ether and Modified Nanocrystalline Cellulose
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.2. Modification of NCC (MNCC)
2.3. Preparation of Modified SM-Based Adhesives
2.4. General Test Methods
2.5. Preparation of Three-Ply Plywood Samples
2.6. Shear Strength and Water Resistance
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. The Modification of the NCC
3.2. FTIR Analysis
3.3. Thermal Stability Analysis of SM-Based Adhesive
3.4. SEM Analysis
3.5. Dry Strength and Wet Shear Strength Measurement
4. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Pizzi, A. Recent developments in eco-efficient bio-based adhesives for wood bonding: Opportunities and issues. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2006, 20, 829–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tejado, A.; Pena, C. Physico-chemical characterization of lignins from different sources for use in phenol–formaldehyde resin synthesis. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 1655–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, Z.; Xi, X. Soy-based adhesive cross-linked by phenol-formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde. Polymers 2017, 9, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.K.; Schutyser, M.A. The potential of electrospraying for hydrophobic film coating on foods. J. Food Eng. 2012, 108, 410–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frihart, C.R.; Coolidge, T. High bonding temperatures greatly improve soy adhesive wet strength. Polymers 2016, 8, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, F.; Tang, D.L. Biodegradable soy protein isolate-based materials: A review. Biomacromolecules 2011, 12, 3369–3380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, J.; Gu, K. Development and evaluation of new curing agents derived from glycerol for formaldehyde-free soy-based adhesives in wood composites. Holzforschung 2013, 67, 659–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Z. (Ed.) Bio-Based Wood Adhesives: Preparation, Characterization, and Testing; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017; pp. 5–9. [Google Scholar]
- Nordqvist, P.; Lawther, M. Adhesive properties of wheat gluten after enzymatic hydrolysis or heat treatment—A comparative study. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2012, 38, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deka, H.; Wang, T. Novel biocomposites from biobased epoxy and corn-based distillers dried grains (DDG). J. Poly. Environ. 2015, 23, 425–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nishinari, K.; Fang, Y. Soy proteins: A review on composition, aggregation and emulsification. Food Hydrocoll. 2014, 39, 301–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, Z.; Kong, X. Effects of rutin incorporation on the physical and oxidative stability of soy protein-stabilized emulsions. Food Hydrocoll. 2014, 41, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, H.; Ford, C. Soy and cottonseed protein blends as wood adhesives. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2016, 85, 324–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, G.; Li, N. Physicochemical properties of soy protein adhesives modified by 2-octen-1-ylsuccinic anhydride. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2013, 46, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jang, Y.; Huang, J. A new formaldehyde-free wood adhesive from renewable materials. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2011, 31, 754–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Q.; Shi, S. Improved plywood strength and lowered emissions from soybean meal/melamine urea-formaldehyde adhesives. For. Prod. J. 2011, 61, 688–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, D.; Qin, T. A soy flour-based adhesive reinforced by low addition of MUF resin. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2011, 25, 323–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, R.; Choudhary, V. Enzymatically-modified soy protein part 2: Adhesion behaviour. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2004, 18, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, K.; Shi, S. Nanoclay filled soy-based polyurethane foam. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2011, 119, 1857–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, J.; Shi, S. Kenaf bast fibers—Part II: Inorganic nanoparticle impregnation for polymer composites. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2011, 2011, 736474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Q.; Malm, E. Nanostructured biocomposites based on bacterial cellulosic nanofibers compartmentalized by a soft hydroxyethylcellulose matrix coating. Soft Matter. 2009, 5, 4124–4130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alexandrescu, L.; Syverud, K.; Belosi, F. Nanofibers against nanoparticles: Cellulosic nanofibers for nanoparticle aerosol filtration, concepts, achievements, and perspectives. In Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society; ACS: Washington, DC, USA, 2012; Volume 243. [Google Scholar]
- Cranston, E.; Gray, D. Morphological and optical characterization of polyelectrolyte multilayers incorporating nanocrystalline cellulose. Biomacromolecules 2006, 7, 2522–2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khalili, S.; Jafarkarimi, M. Creep analysis of fibre reinforced adhesives in single lap joints—Experimental study. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2009, 29, 656–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Q.; Li, J. Soybean meal-based adhesive reinforced with cellulose nano-whiskers. Bioresources 2012, 7, 5622–5633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalita, E.; Nath, B. High quality fluorescent cellulose nanofibers from endemic rice husk: Isolation and characterization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 122, 308–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Santos, R.; Neto, W. Cellulose nanocrystals from pineapple leaf, a new approach for the reuse of this agro-waste. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2013, 50, 707–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, Y.; Amer, H. Dry, hydrophobic microfibrillated cellulose powder obtained in a simple procedure using alkyl ketene dimer. Cellulose 2016, 23, 1189–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Z.; Zhang, Y. The effects of thermal-acid treatment and crosslinking on the water resistance of soybean protein. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2015, 74, 122–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghosh, D.; Netravali, A. A soy flour based thermoset resin without the use of any external crosslinker. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 3243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, F.; McKenna, T. A study of the preparation and mechanism of the ambient temperature curing of acrylic latex with epoxy resins. Polymer 1997, 38, 6157–6165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swain, S.; Rao, K. Biodegradable polymers: IV. Spectral, thermal, and mechanical properties of cross-linked soy protein concentrate. Polym. Int. 2005, 54, 739–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Li, C. Properties of soybean-flour-based adhesives enhanced by attapulgite and glycerol polyglycidyl ether. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2014, 59, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swain, S.; Rao, K. Biodegradable polymers; Part II. Thermal degradation of biodegradable plastics cross-linked from formaldehyde-soy protein concentrate. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2005, 79, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Luo, J. Soybean meal-based wood adhesive enhanced by ethylene glycol diglycidyl ether and diethylenetriamine. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2015, 74, 613–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, J.; Li, X. Effects of polyisocyanate on properties and pot life of epoxy resin cross-linked soybean meal-based bioadhesive. Appl. Polym. 2016, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barari, B.; Omrani, E. Mechanical, physical and tribological characterization of nano-cellulose fibers reinforced bio-epoxy composites: An attempt to fabricate and scale the ‘Green’ composite. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 147, 282–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, S.; Xia, C. Soy protein isolate-based films reinforced by surface modified cellulose nanocrystal. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2016, 80, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Li, J. A SEP united crosslinked network in a SM wood adhesive and its performance. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 45158–45165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Adhesives | Dry strength (MPa) | Wood failure (%) |
---|---|---|
A (MSM adhesive) | 1.30 ± 0.12 | 5–10 |
B (MSM/NCC adhesive) | 1.38 ± 0.14 | 10–20 |
C (MSM/MNCC adhesive) | 1.84 ± 0.23 | 100 |
© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Li, X.; Chen, M.; Zhang, J.; Gao, Q.; Zhang, S.; Li, J. Physico-Chemical Properties of Soybean Meal-Based Adhesives Reinforced by Ethylene Glycol Diglycidyl Ether and Modified Nanocrystalline Cellulose. Polymers 2017, 9, 463. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9090463
Li X, Chen M, Zhang J, Gao Q, Zhang S, Li J. Physico-Chemical Properties of Soybean Meal-Based Adhesives Reinforced by Ethylene Glycol Diglycidyl Ether and Modified Nanocrystalline Cellulose. Polymers. 2017; 9(9):463. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9090463
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Xiaona, Mingsong Chen, Jizhi Zhang, Qiang Gao, Shifeng Zhang, and Jianzhang Li. 2017. "Physico-Chemical Properties of Soybean Meal-Based Adhesives Reinforced by Ethylene Glycol Diglycidyl Ether and Modified Nanocrystalline Cellulose" Polymers 9, no. 9: 463. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9090463