# SANS from Salt-Free Aqueous Solutions of Hydrophilic and Highly Charged Star-Branched Polyelectrolytes

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}

^{4}

^{5}

^{*}

^{†}

## Abstract

**:**

_{1}*, is related to a position order between star cores and scales as q

_{1}* ∝ c

^{1/3}. The second, of abscissa q

_{2}*, is also observed in the scattering function of a semi-dilute solution of NaPSS linear polyelectrolytes. In the dilute regime (c < c*, non-overlapping stars), peak abscissa does not depend on concentration c and is just an intramolecular characteristic associated with the electrostatic repulsion between arms of the same star. In the semi-dilute regime, due to the star interpenetration, the scattering function – through the peak position, reflects repulsion between arms of the same star or of different stars. The c threshold between these distinct c-dependencies of q

_{2}* in the dilute and semi-dilute regimes is estimated as c*. Just as simple is the measurement of the geometrical radius R of the star obtained from the q

_{1}* value at c* through the relation 2R = 2π/q

_{1}*. By considering NaPSS stars of the same functionality with different degrees of polymerization per arm N

_{a}, we find R scaling linearly with N

_{a}, suggesting an elongated average conformation of the arms. This is in agreement with theoretical predictions and simulations. Meanwhile the value of q

_{2}* measured in the dilute regime does not allow any inhomogeneous counterion distribution inside the stars to be revealed.

## 1. Introduction

^{−1}scattering behavior) for the PSS arms and proposed picturing the micelle as an urchin. This was supported by remarkable Monte-Carlo simulations [10], which can be compared with those of Molecular Dynamics [11,12,13] as well as scaling theory [14]. Later, in SANS experiments from polystyrene-poly(acrylic acid) PS-PA micelles, W. Groenewegen et al. measured separately the PS and PA partial correlation functions [15]. From the radius obtained for the PA-shell, they could study the extension of the PA sequence according to the PA degree of ionization. In all these cases in which the star architecture is obtained through a micellization, the aggregation number and the radius of the core of the micelle have to be considered as additional parameters. On the opposite side, NaPA and CsPA stars synthesized and studied by SAXS a few years after by D. Moinard et al. had a negligible core since they were made of four arms [16]. As a result, they mostly showed a scattering behavior relatively close to that of linear PEs.

_{1}*, is related to a position order between star cores. It could be interpreted in terms of a privileged distance due to electrostatic repulsion, or close packing above the critical overlap concentration, c*. The second, at higher q value, q

_{2}*, is similar to the broad halo observed in the scattering pattern of a semi-dilute salt-free aqueous solution of linear [17,18,19,20,21] associated with a correlation hole of electrostatic origin [22,23,24]. The distinct concentration dependence of q

_{2}* in the dilute, where it stays constant, and in the semi-dilute regimes, where it increases with c due to the interpenetration between arms of all vicinal stars, provides a way to estimate the critical overlap concentration c*. This simple and direct picture was however complicated by the fact that in reference [6], the arms of the NaPSS stars were not completely sulfonated (sulfonation degrees in the range 0.63 < τ

_{S}< 0.78). As a consequence PSS arms were actually copolymers, poly(styrene-co-styrene sulfonate) that have an amphiphilic character which modifies the q* values in linear chain solutions [25,26,27,28]. This is due to the fact that they tend to adopt a so-called pearl necklace conformation, i.e., a combination of string-like and pearl-like parts all along the chemical sequence, of sizes depending on τ

_{S}, as predicted by theory [29,30] and confirmed by scattering and simulations [25,26,27,28,31]. Incomplete sulfonation of stars made some conclusions [6] less refined as they could have been in a pure hydrophilic PE case, in particular about the arm length and the effect of counterion spatial distribution.

_{s}close to 100%). Though this may appear only a slight improvement, we show that it is more than that: we have now ideal model systems. They enable small angle scattering experiments quite simple to interpret via very well defined geometric information, to yield a solid ground to test a theoretical description, which would then be a support for understanding more complex systems found in applications.

## 2. Experimental

#### 2.1. Materials

_{DVB}is defined as the ratio of the number of DVB monomers to the total number of monomers. To remove residual PS linear chains and reduce the width of the f-distribution, some PS stars were fractionated by further size exclusion chromatography (SEC). The same technique was also applied to obtain the molar mass distributions of both arms and stars, respectively. Such coupled measurements lead to mean functionalities <f> and variances σ

^{2}of f-distributions [7,33].

^{-1}) followed by freeze-drying. Their characterization was carried out by elemental analysis. In this way, the degree of sulfonation τ

_{s}, defined as the ratio of the number of sulfonated units to the total number of units (DVB core excluded), and the weight fraction of water content τ

_{w,}were determined for each NaPSS star. In addition, static light scattering experiments were performed on NaPSS stars in dilute aqueous solutions with added salt (NaCl) in order to verify that the sulfonation process did not disturb the star shape of the initial PS samples. A PS star is referred to as Sx, in order to identify a star (S) architecture and a rough estimate of the arm degree of polymerization (x ≈ <N

_{a}>

_{N}). For the related NaPSS star, −Sy is added to the initial PS star reference in order to specify the sulfonated character (S) and the arm degree of sulfonation (y = τ

_{s}(%)). Table 1 lists the characteristics of the different samples used in this study. We note that the high degrees of sulfonation used in this study (τ

_{s}= 91% and 94%) were achieved through a second sulfonation according to the same procedure.

_{2}O (Eurisotop CE-Saclay 99.9% D) at 50 °C for 1 h, then let stand for at least two days prior to the measurements. Concentrations are then evaluated from measured solute and solvent masses, taking into account the weight fraction of water content of dried NaPSS stars and using the tabulated partial molar volumes [7,36,37].

#### 2.2. SANS Measurements

^{−1}. Those on D22 used two configurations (D = 1.5 and 15 m with λ = 6 Å) leading to the q-range 0.004 < q < 0.544 Å

^{−1}. q is the magnitude of the scattering vector, defined by the wavelength of the incident beam λ and the angle between incident and scattered beams θ such that q = (4π/λ)·sin(θ/2). The scattered intensity was recorded by: a multidetector with 30 concentric rings of 1 cm width, on PACE; a 2-dimensional

^{3}He gas detector, on D22. PE solutions were held in circular and calibrated quartz cells of distinct thickness 1, 2.5, or 5 mm according to their concentration. Multiple scattering was then negligible. Also, the cells were mounted in a temperature-controlled sample holder. Most of the measurements were done at 20 °C, but a few others at 25 and 65 °C.

_{2}O. Finally, the normalization to the unit incident flux was carried out through either the direct measurement of the number of incident neutrons (PACE) or the scattering of H

_{2}O 1mm thick (D22). In this way, the differential cross section per unit volume ∑(q) of each solution is obtained in absolute units (cm

^{−1}). It is the sum of a coherent cross section term containing all the information needed to describe the structure of the solution, I(q), and a background term, ∑

^{B}, which has to be removed from ∑(q) to obtain I(q). ∑

^{B}involves the scattering of the solvent and the incoherent scattering of the macromolecules (macro-ion plus counterions for a PE). For PE solutions, it can be readily replaced by the scattered intensity of a specific mixture of D

_{2}O and H

_{2}O solvent molecules. The D

_{2}O volume fraction of the equivalent D

_{2}O-H

_{2}O mixture is then assessed via a method described in references [7,27,28,38].

_{Av}= I(q,c)/<K>

^{2}cN

_{Av}

^{−1}) corresponds to the quantity I(q) defined above when measured at a given concentration c, <K>

^{2}(cm

^{2}) to the squared contrast factor between the polymer unit and the solvent (see Equation (2) below); S(q,c) (cm

^{−3}), to the scattering function of the polymer per unit volume; c (mol·cm

^{−3}), to the polymer concentration of the solution (mole of repeating unit par unit volume); N

_{Av}(mol

^{−1}), to Avogadro’s number.

_{DVB}· K

_{DVB}+ (1 − τ

_{DVB}) · K

_{PS}

_{DVB}and K

_{PS}(cm) are the “contrast lengths” of the elementary scatterers DVB (C

_{10}H

_{10}) and PS unit (C

_{8}H

_{8}) in deuterated THF, respectively. For aqueous solutions of NaPSS stars, <K> can be estimated from the relation:

_{DVB}· K

_{DVB}+ (1 − τ

_{DVB}) · τ

_{S}. K

_{PSS}

^{−}+ (1 − τ

_{DVB}) · (1 − τ

_{S}) · K

_{PS}

_{DVB}, K

_{PSS}

^{−}and K

_{PS}are now the contrast lengths of the elementary scatterers DVB (C

_{10}H

_{10}), PSS

^{−}repeat unit (C

_{8}H

_{7}SO

_{3}

^{−}) and PS repeat unit (C

_{8}H

_{8}) in D

_{2}O, respectively. These contrast lengths are computed from the coherent scattering lengths and partial molar volumes listed in the literature [7,36,37,41]. They depend on temperature via the related changes in the solvent molar volume. Indeed, the dilatation coefficients for the volume of both kinds of unit are much lower than the ones of simple liquids [42]. So, only the T-dependence of the D

_{2}O molar volume must be taken into account in the calculation of the contrast lengths. The fraction of H

_{2}O content of dried NaPSS stars was also accounted for. It leads to an additional slight c-dependence of the contrast lengths.

^{+}counterions in D

_{2}O is indeed much lower than the one of PSS

^{−}units in D

_{2}O. We will not detail here how that actually results from the hydrophilic character of Na

^{+}counterions and the so-called electrostriction effect (negative partial volume) [7,36,37]. We just keep in mind this advantage of SANS for PE solutions: it allows measuring of the scattering function of the macro-ions (the chains), provided the counterions are sufficiently hydrophilic. The situation is different for SAXS where the counterion contribution to the scattering signal cannot usually be neglected [6]. As shown elsewhere [43], this leads to some ambiguous and therefore undesirable shift in the position q* of the “PE peak” associated with linear PE solutions. As a consequence, the power law q* ∝ c

^{1/2}, predicted for the semi-dilute solutions of linear and hydrophilic PE within the isotropic model, is observed in a large concentration range only if the macro-ion partial scattering function is measured. If the counterion contribution to the scattering signal is no longer negligible, the c

^{1/2}scaling law is no longer perfectly obeyed. This is another difference and advantage of the present study, which uses SANS with respect to that reported in Ref. [6] that used SAXS.

## 3. Results and Discussion

#### 3.1. Results: Effects of Concentration c and Arm Degree of Polymerization N_{a}

_{a}>

_{N}(noted N

_{a}hereafter) are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2.

_{1}* and q

_{2}* with q

_{1}* < q

_{2}*, vary differently with concentration. In a region of low c (Figure 1a), (identified as the dilute regime (c < c*)), q

_{1}* varies with c, while q

_{2}* remains constant. Conversely, at high c (Figure 1b), namely in a concentration range c > c* corresponding to the semi-dilute regime, both maxima are shifted to larger and larger q values. The related variations are however distinct. This difference in c-dependence of the two maxima is also clear-cut when the arm degree of polymerization N

_{a}of the stars that have almost the same functionality is varied (Figure 2a). For the same concentration c above the critical overlap concentration c*, the second maximum is at the same position q

_{2}*, for N

_{a}= 96 and N

_{a}= 280, while the position as well as the shape of the first maximum varies. Its position, q

_{1}*, decreases while its height lowers as N

_{a}is increased. The differences in the two curves for c constant and two values of N

_{a}are parent of those at N

_{a}constant and two concentrations in Figure 2b: the curve for the largest concentration with N

_{a}= 96 is similar to the one for the largest N

_{a}= 280 at the lowest c. In both cases, the lowering of the height of the low q maximum indicates that the concentration fluctuations are reduced and/or more screened: this can be interpreted as due to a dispersion state of higher interpenetration of the stars. We can also emphasize that the amplitude changes of both maxima, in the semi-dilute regime, are correlated. The first one thus disappears for the benefit of the second one as concentration increases, and reciprocally. That suggests some composite structure for c > c*, made of two distinct media which overlap each other [4,5,6,7].

#### 3.2. First Discussions: Using the Variations of the Maxima Positions q_{1}* and q_{2}* with Concentration c to Attribute Them to Defined Distances (“Indexation”)

_{1}* (open circles and open squares) almost scales as c

^{1/3}on the whole explored concentration range, with different front factors for the two stars S100-S91 and S300-S94, i.e., for the two distinct N

_{a}values (the two lines are shifted in Figure 3a). This c-dependence is different from the one found for the polyelectrolyte peak of linear NaPSS polyelectrolytes in the semi-dilute regime, which is close to c

^{1/2}(dotted line in Figure 3a). The exponent 1/3 suggests that the first maximum corresponds to a position order in three dimensions. q

_{1}* is then related to a mean distance between objects in a 3d liquid- or crystalline-like structure (scaling laws for simple cubic, bcc, and fcc lattices are presented in Figure 3b). From this point of view, it is noticeable that scattering functions of parent PS stars in THF, a good solvent, show similar maxima with identical positions q* for the same concentration (Figure 3a; q* for S100, full circles, is identical to q

_{1}* for S100-S91, open circles, at the same concentration). This similarity between neutral and charged stars gives further support to a direct relation between q

_{1}* and the mean distance between star cores, 2π/q

_{1}*. By the way, it also confirms nicely that no significant degradation of the star-branched architecture occurs under the sulfonation process. Finally, all the q

_{1}* values can be roughly superimposed into a single curve if the star concentration c

_{star}(not to be mistaken with c*) is used as variable instead of the polymer concentration c (Figure 3b). Taking into account polydispersity, c

_{star}is defined as:

_{star}= (<m>/M

_{N})c

_{N}is the number average molecular weight of the star; <m>, the molar mass of its effective units (Table 1); c, the statistical unit concentration.

^{1/3}scaling law as the concentration increases. It may be ascribed to the fact that at large concentrations, q

_{1}* enters the q region where the star form factor shows a steeper variation, producing a shift to lower q. It could also be ascribed to some increase in packing compactness as concentration increases, which would be more sensitive for lower N

_{a}.

_{1}*, we stress the fact that the c

^{1/3}scaling law shows a continuous variation when the solution passes c*. This classical behavior does not allow us, in principle, to differentiate between interpenetration of the stars and a progressive shrinking (compaction) of each star keeping them at the overlapping concentration. A better insight could come from the analysis of the shape of the scattering maximum, but modeling is beyond the scope of this paper. We discuss below (see Section 3.6) another fact in favor of interpenetration.

_{2}* > q

_{1}*. Since this maximum never exists for neutral PS stars, it has an electrostatic origin. Its position dependence upon polymer concentration shows that it is not commensurate with the first one (Figure 3a).

_{2}* is found to be constant. Actually, it only depends on the arm degree of polymerization N

_{a}for a fixed mean functionality <f>. For a given N

_{a}, we attribute this to the fact that the average internal polymer concentration c

_{i}inside each individual star is constant, as long as the stars do not overlap each other. This regime actually corresponds to the dilute regime, c < c*.

_{2}* starts to increase. Our interpretation is that stars begin to interpenetrate each other; therefore their average inner concentration increases. In practice, this could be related to either an interdigitation or a compaction process. The only knowledge of the peak position (and unfortunately, its limited accuracy around c*) is indeed not enough to distinguish between them since both could in principle lead to a similar variation of the average correlation length with c. Since the number of arms is rather limited, we consider hereafter the interdigitation process. Whatever the real situation is, the concentration at which q* passes from a plateau to an increasing line is therefore interpreted as the overlap threshold, c*. Note the interesting fact that in this interpenetrating range c > c *, the q

_{2}* values are found to be unaffected by the arm degree of polymerization N

_{a}. All q

_{2}* values fall over the same dotted line, which corresponds correctly to the variation q*(Å

^{−1}) = (0.165 ± 0.002)·c (mol·L

^{−1})

^{1/2}found for linear fully sulfonated NaPSS [18,19,20,21]. Therefore, when the stars studied here (with a point-like center) are interpenetrated, the average correlations behave as if the repeat unit’s concentration was spatially homogeneous inside the star and equal to the nominal one, c.

_{2}* ~ c

^{α}, with α = ½, for all these highly sulfonated stars, is at variance with the lower value of α found for NaPSS stars of lower degree of sulfonation 0.63 < τ

_{S}< 0.78 in Ref. [6]. The latter variation agreed with the one found from partially sulfonated linear PSS solutions (e.g., q* = 0.130c

^{0.465}, for τ

_{S}= 0.69, from SAXS measurements of [25,26]). Thus, we get the pleasing result that the q

_{2}*(c) function is the same for interpenetrated stars and for interpenetrated linear chains of equal τ

_{S}, both in the case of τ

_{S}= 0.69, and in the case of τ

_{S}close to 1.

_{a}, the value of the q

_{2}* plateau in the dilute regime is lower for this paper (0.045 Å

^{−1}for N

_{a}= 96 and τ

_{S}= 0.91) than for Ref. [1] (0.06 Å

^{−1}for N

_{a}= 96 and τ

_{S}= 0.65). This is related to the difference in c*, which is smaller for total sulfonation than for partial sulfonation (0.075 mol·L

^{−1}compared to 0.165 mol·L

^{−1}, with N

_{a}= 96, for τ

_{S}= 0.91 and 0.65, respectively): stars overlap here at lower concentration c because their arms are more extended, and this is consistent with a lower concentration inside the star.

#### 3.3. Effect of Temperature

#### 3.4. Direct Estimate of the Star Size from the c Dependence of the First Maximum and Comparison with Theories

#### 3.4.1. Estimate of the Size R from the Star Overlap Concentration

_{2}* with c. Having checked the different models of packing in Figure 3b, we can use directly the relation q

_{1}* = 2π/2R at c = c* to determine the radius of the stars. The obtained values of R for the three quite different arm degrees of polymerization N

_{a}, 36, 96, and 280 are plotted in Figure 5.

^{3/5}, where 3/5 is approximately the exponent for the self-avoiding random walk, or a chain in good solvent. For PE stars, the three points R(N

_{a}) are aligned in log-log plot, with a slope clearly equal to one, suggesting strongly elongated arms. This is in agreement with the linear scaling law (R ∝ N

_{a}) predicted by the scaling theories [14,46,47], and with simulations [10,11,12,13]. The front factor of the scaling law here is close to 1.41 Å per repeat unit that indicates a rather extended average conformation for the arms.

#### 3.4.2. Comparing with Scaling Theory

_{eff}= a/l

_{B}, for monovalent counterions. Here, a is the contour length of the monomer unit, which is equal to 2.5 Å for PSS; l

_{B}, the Bjerrum length that is equal to 7.12 Å in water at room temperature (hence f

_{eff}= 0.35). The end-to-end distance for linear macro-ions in theta solvent is then [24]:

_{eff}

^{2}(l

_{B}/a)]

^{1/3}= N·a·(a/l

_{B})

^{1/3}

_{el}≈ a·[f

_{eff}

^{2}(l

_{B}/a)]

^{−1/3}= a·(l

_{B}/a)

^{1/3}

_{el}≈ 3.54 Å for linear PSS macro-ions. Hence our measurement is close (1.41 instead of 1.76) to the prediction of the scaling theory for linear chains in the dilute regime, and therefore, in a very extended state [24]. This prediction is very close to the prediction from the scaling approach of Shusharina and Rubinstein for the dilute osmotic regime of star polyelectrolytes [14]. In this approach, the radius of a star is determined by the balance of (i) the counterion entropy favoring the increase in the star volume and (ii) the entropic elasticity of arms that opposes this expansion. Balance of these two contributions then leads to a star radius independent of the number of arms and close to the end-to-end distance of a linear chain associated with one arm. In other words, the arms of the star are not stretched with respect to the size of a corresponding individual PE chain with counterions condensed on it. In practice we summarize that our experimental result for R agrees with both equal scaling predictions, the one for a linear chain [24] and the one for the dilute osmotic regime of stars [14].

#### 3.4.3. Comparison with the Wormlike Chain Model

_{eff}, obtained from the analyses of the measured form factors for fully sulfonated PSS chains through the wormlike chain model, estimated between 1.7 and 2.5 Å [48,49,50]. This also means that both for linear chains and stars, the electrostatic blob size is not far from that of the repeat unit.

^{2}= 2l

_{p}× [L − l

_{p}(1 − exp(−L/l

_{p}))] = 2l

_{p}× [Na

_{eff}− l

_{p}(1 − exp(−N(a

_{eff}/l

_{p}))]

_{eff}is the chain contour length; N, the degree of polymerization; a

_{eff}, the effective contour length per repeat unit; l

_{p}, the persistence length. For l

_{p}/a

_{eff}very large (or very small L/l

_{p}values), Equation (7) reduces to R ~ N·a

_{eff}. We will see below that in our experiments, for each value of N, the obtained value of l

_{p}is such that the contour length and the radius of the stars only represents a few persistence lengths l

_{p}.

_{N})

^{k+1}·N

^{k}·exp(-k·N/N

_{N})

_{N}is the number-average degree of polymerization and k is related to the polydispersity index I by the relation I = N

_{W}/N

_{N}= (k + 1)/k.

_{a}>

_{N}(listed in Table 1), as well as a common average effective monomer size a

_{eff}= 2.1 Å, we can find solutions for l

_{p}: l

_{p}= 29 Å, for <N

_{a}>

_{N}= 36 (R = 53 Å); l

_{p}= 80 Å, for <N

_{a}>

_{N}= 96 (R = 145 Å); l

_{p}= 180 Å, for <N

_{a}>

_{N}= 280 (R = 391 Å). As announced above, within this approach, the radius of the stars R and the chain contour length (L = N

_{a ·}a

_{eff}) only involve a few persistence lengths (R ≈ 2l

_{p}, and L/l

_{p}≈ 3). This leads to a linear relationship between R and N

_{a}. The observed variation of l

_{p}with the degree of polymerization can be surprising. However it may simply result from the variation of the average internal concentration in the stars c

_{i}, which depends on N

_{a}and which can be directly approximated to c* (where stars are in contact and fill the space).

_{i}≈ c* ∝ <f>·N

_{a}/R

^{3}

_{p}values with that of linear NaPSS chains (in the semidilute range) for a monomer concentration equal to c

_{i}, we find that the two variations are close (see Figure S1 in Supplementary Materials using data from Ref. [18] and others). The conformation of arms in the stars, and more precisely their persistence length, therefore resembles that of linear chains in semidilute regime at the same average concentration (we note however that the degrees of polymerization of the corresponding linear chains are much larger than N

_{a}).

#### 3.5. Counterions Condensed and/or Trapped Inside the Stars: Information from the Second Maximum

#### 3.5.1. Estimating the Inner Counterions Concentration from q_{2}*

_{2}* is connected to an average internal screening length K

_{i}

^{−1}, through the scaling law q

_{2}* ∝ K

_{i}[6]. K

_{i}

^{−1}is an average Debye screening length, which can be linked to the ionic strength and therefore, to an average inner concentration of counterions c

_{ion}through:

_{i}

^{2}= 4πl

_{B}c

_{ion}

_{trapped}) are active

_{i}

^{2}= 4πl

_{B}c

_{trapped}

_{2}* does not depend on concentration in the dilute regime (Figure 3a), we can assume, c

_{ion}or c

_{trapped}to be constant for c < c*. Equation (12) is also valid in the semidilute regime (c > c*) where q

_{2}* varies as c

^{1/2}(trapped ions can now be viewed as classical “free ions” in a semidilute solution). Since q

_{2}* gradually evolves from a constant value to the c

^{1/2}regime, we can argue that the concentration of trapped ions in the dilute state coincides with that of the free ions just above c*. This indicates that most counterions are confined inside the stars and show a condensation process similar to that of linear chains, as expected from the scaling approach of Shusharina and Rubinstein for osmotic star PEs [14].

_{i}and is thus related to the overlap concentration c*. Therefore, Equation (12) becomes:

_{i}

^{2}∝ 4πl

_{B}c* ∝ 4πl

_{B}c

_{i}∝ <f> N

_{a}/R

^{3}

_{a}, and q

_{2}* K

_{i}, we obtain:

_{i}

^{2}∝ N

_{a}

^{−2}and q

_{2}* ∝ N

_{a}

^{−1}∝ R

^{−1}, i.e., q

_{2}*R ∝ q

_{2}*N

_{a}= cst

_{a}, leads to a scaling law previously established for linear hydrophilic PE, c* ∝ N

_{a}

^{−2}. The three couples (c*, N

_{a}) associated with our experiments fit the curve previously established from SAXS and viscosity results obtained with NaPSS linear PEs [51], as shown in Figure S2. This is in favor of lengths of the arms similar to that of a linear chain in dilute solution, as predicted by theory.

#### 3.5.2. A Heterogeneous Radial Distribution? Present State of the Art

_{i}(r) is expected to scale as f/r

^{2}and correlatively K

_{i}

^{−1}would scale as r/f

^{1/2}[14,46,47]. The star architecture therefore would force an average growing of the Debye length K

_{i}

^{−1}with r. That is in agreement with the observation of a change in q

_{2}* according to N

_{a}.

_{B}/a for monovalent counterions; here, we are in the third one (ξ = l

_{B}/a = 7.12 Å/2.5 Å = 2.85 >1), where the counterions are confined inside the star and part of them condensed around the arms according to the Manning-Oosawa process. In this case, the simulations yield a counterion radial distribution (ρ(r) ~ r

^{2}c

_{i}(r)) inside the hydrophilic part, increasing slower than r

^{2}, up to the micelle radius; thus c

_{i}(r) is slightly peaked around the center. Molecular dynamics simulations [11,12,13] made for similar ξ values (conditions f = 10, N

_{a}= 50 and one charged monomer unit out of 3, α = 1/3) show a more peaked c

_{i}(r) distribution, both for repeat units and counterions (this one follows the repeat unit distribution).

#### 3.5.3. A Heterogeneous Radial Distribution? Return from Our SANS Experiments

_{2}* and assuming that it is linked to an average ionic strength. First, the fact that q

_{2}* is constant below c* suggests a constant inner ionic strength, which would be the case when all, or almost all, counterions are confined (and rather homogenously distributed) inside the star. Second, q

_{2}* has just the same values than for linear PSS at the same nominal concentration c ≥ c*; this suggests that the counterion distribution is the same as for linear chains, including Manning-Oosawa condensation around the arms. The observed existence of Manning-Oosawa condensation agrees with findings of simulations [10,11,12,13], but at the same time no effect of center-peaked counterion distribution is shown by q

_{2}*. Observing an average can be linked to the fact that the inner ionic strength is not low enough to yield a sufficiently detectable l

_{p}increase. Then its value would be irrelevant: the main trend towards chain stretching remains repulsion between all charged repeating units inside the star, even in the strong coupling limit. This agrees also with our finding that R/N

_{a}varies as 1.4 Å: the chain is rather strongly elongated. Above c*, q

_{2}* varies as in linear chain semidilute solutions; we cannot detect any onset of the progressive compaction suggested by simulations in the strong coupling regime [10].

#### 3.6. Final Picture in Real Space

_{1}* peak decreases rapidly, becoming comparable to the height of the q

_{2}* electrostatic peak. The shrinking would correspond to a more intense peak. As said above, more could be obtained from the analysis of the scattering profile, which is beyond the scope of this paper.

_{i}inside the star increases, so both spatial and electrostatic screenings make ξ decrease. This results in an increase of q

_{2}*; strikingly, data show that q

_{2}*, for c > c*, varies right as the position of the PE peak of the semidilute solutions of linear PSS. This suggests that spatial distributions of both polymer units and counterions are: (i) the same as for linear in average; (ii) rather homogenous (though the peak appears wider than in linear PSS); (iii) the same whatever N

_{a}. These three points suggest that the size χ of the “islands” is limited. The same can be inferred at c < c*, from the constancy of q

_{2}* according to c (the inner average concentration appears constant), observed for each N

_{a}(the q

_{2}* value depends on N

_{a}). Therefore the least we can say is that we have no direct evidence of the distribution being peaked on the center of the star.

## 4. Summary and Conclusions

_{1}*) and a drastic one for the branch-to-branch one (maximum abscissa q

_{2}*) that allows defining c*. Remarkably, we found no effect of temperature, confirming the hydrophilic nature of these PSS stars as is nowadays commonly accepted for fully sulfonated PSS.

_{1}* at c = c*, we are able to extract directly a star radius R, which varies linearly with the arm degree of polymerization N

_{a}, indicating an extended average conformation for the arms. The front factor of R is in agreement with scaling theory and with the wormlike chain model for linear chains. This is in agreement with simulations and theory. On the contrary, the variation of q

_{2}* with c, strikingly close to the linear PSS solution case in the semi-dilute regime, does not really evidence the centering effect shown by simulations for the counterion distribution inside the stars. More will be known about the counterion distribution both inside and outside the stars, which will be studied as a function of the counterion valence in a forthcoming paper.

## Supplementary Materials

## Acknowledgments

## Author Contributions

## Conflicts of Interest

## Abbreviations

PE | Polyelectrolyte |

SANS | Small Angle Neutron Scattering |

SAXS | Small Angle X Rays Scattering |

DVB | DiVinylBenzene |

PS | Polystyrene |

NaPSS | Sodium DiVinylBenzene Polystyrene Sulfonate |

SEC | Size Exclusion Chromatography |

## References

- Schmidt, M. Polyelectrolytes with Defined Molecular Architecture I & II; Springer-Verlag: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2004; Volume 165 & 166. [Google Scholar]
- Grest, G.S.; Fetters, L.J.; Huang, J.S.; Richter, D. Advances in Chemical Physics; Prigogine, I., Rice, S.A., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1996; Volume XCIV, p. 67. [Google Scholar]
- Witten, T.A.; Pincus, P.A.; Cates, M.E. Macrocrystal ordering in star polymer solutions. Europhys. Lett.
**1986**, 2, 137–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Daoud, M.; Cotton, J.-P. Star shaped polymers: A model for the conformation and its concentration dependence. J. Phys.
**1982**, 43, 531–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Marques, C.M.; Charitat, T.; Izzo, D.; Mendes, E. Scattering from solutions of star polymers. Eur. Phys. J. B
**1998**, 3, 353–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Heinrich, M.; Rawiso, M.; Zilliox, J.-G.; Lesieur, P.; Simon, J.-P. Small-angle X-ray scattering from salt-free solutions of star-branched polyelectrolytes. Eur. Phys. J. E
**2001**, 4, 131–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Heinrich, M. Structure de solutions aqueuses de polyélectrolytes en étoile. Ph.D. Thesis, Université Louis Pasteur de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Guenoun, P.; Muller, F.; Delsanti, M.M.; Auvray, L.; Chen, Y.J.; Mays, J.W.; Tirrell, M. Rodlike behavior of polyelectrolyte brushes. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**1998**, 81, 3872–3875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Muller, F.; Delsanti, M.; Auvray, L.; Yang, J.; Chen, Y.J.; Mays, J.W.; Demé, B.; Tirrell, M.; Guenoun, P. Ordering of urchin-like charged copolymer micelles: Electrostatic, packing and polyelectrolyte correlations. Eur. Phys. J. E
**2000**, 3, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Roger, M.; Guenoun, P.; Muller, F.; Belloni, L.; Delsanti, M. Monte Carlo simulations of star-branched polyelectrolyte micelles. Eur. Phys. J. E
**2002**, 9, 313–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Jusufi, A.; Likos, C.N.; Löwen, H. Conformations and Interactions of Star-Branched Polyelectrolytes. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**2002**, 88, 18301–18304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Jusufi, A.; Likos, C.N.; Löwen, H. Counterion-induced entropic interactions in solutions of strongly stretched, osmotic polyelectrolyte stars. J. Chem. Phys.
**2002**, 116, 11011–11027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jusufi, A.; Likos, C.N. Colloqium: Star-branched polyelectrolytes: The physics of their conformations and interactions. Rev. Mod. Phys.
**2009**, 81, 1753–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shusharina, N.P.; Rubinstein, M. Concentration regimes in solutions of polyelectrolyte stars. Macromolecules
**2008**, 41, 203–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Groenewegen, W.; Egelhaaf, S.U.; Lapp, A.; van der Maarel, J.R.C. Concentration regimes in solutions of polyelectrolyte stars. Macromolecules
**2000**, 33, 3283–3293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Moinard, D.; Taton, D.; Gnanou, Y.; Rochas, C.; Borsali, R. SAXS from four-arm polyelectrolyte stars in semi-dilute solutions. Macromol. Chem. Phys.
**2003**, 204, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cotton, J.-P.; Moan, M. Inter-polyionic orientation in polyelectrolyte solution, observed by small angle neutron scattering. J. Phys. Lett.
**1976**, 37, 75–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Nierlich, M.; Williams, C.E.; Boué, F.; Cotton, J.-P.; Daoud, M.; Farnoux, B.; Jannink, G.; Picot, C.; Moan, M.; Wolf, C.; et al. Small angle neutron scattering by semi-dilute solutions of polyelectrolyte. J. Phys. (Paris)
**1979**, 40, 701–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Nierlich, M.; Boué, F.; Lapp, A.; Oberthür, R.C. Characteristic lengths of the structure of salt free polyelectrolyte solutions. A neutron scattering study. Colloid Polym. Sci.
**1985**, 263, 955–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kaji, K.; Urakawa, H.; Kanaya, T.; Kitamaru, R. Phase diagram of polyelectrolyte solutions. J. Phys.
**1988**, 49, 993–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ise, N.; Okubo, T.; Kunigi, S.; Matsuoka, H.; Yamamoto, K.I.; Ishii, Y. “Ordered” structure in dilute solutions of sodium polystyrenesulfonates as studied by small-angle x-ray scattering. J. Chem. Phys.
**1984**, 81, 3294–3306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - De Gennes, P.G.; Pincus, P.; Velasco, R.M.; Brochard, F. Remarks on polyelectrolyte conformation. J. Phys.
**1976**, 37, 1461–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hayter, J.B.; Jannink, G.; Brochard-Wyart, F.; de Gennes, P.-G. Correlations and dynamics of polyelectrolyte solutions. J. Phys. Lett.
**1980**, 41, 451–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dobrynin, A.V.; Colby, R.H.; Rubinstein, M. Scaling theory of polyelectrolyte solutions. Macromolecules
**1995**, 28, 1859–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Essafi, W.; Lafuma, F.; Williams, C.E. Effect of solvent quality on the behaviour of highly charged polyelectrolytes. J. Phys. II
**1995**, 5, 1269–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Essafi, W. Structure des polyélectrolytes fortement chargés. Etude DXPA d’un polyélectrolyte hydrophobe, le PSSNa partiellement sulfoné. Ph.D. Thesis, Université Paris 11, Orsay, France, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Essafi, W.; Spiteri, M.N.; Williams, C.; Boué, F. Hydrophobic polyelectrolytes in better polar solvent. Structure and chain conformation as seen by SAXS and SANS. Macromolecules
**2009**, 42, 9568–9580. [Google Scholar] - Spiteri, M.-N. Conformation et arrangement des polyélectrolytes en solutions semi-diluée. Etude par diffusion de neutrons aux petits angles. Ph.D. Thesis, Université Paris 11, Orsay, France, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Dobrynin, A.V.; Rubinstein, M.; Obukhov, S. Cascade of transitions of polyelectrolytes in poor solvents. Macromolecules
**1996**, 29, 2974–2979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dobrynin, A.V.; Rubinstein, M. Hydrophobic polyelectrolytes. Macromolecules
**1999**, 32, 915–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mann, B.A.F.; Kremer, K.; Lenz, O.; Holm, C. Hydrogels in poor solvents: a molecular dynamics study. Macromol. Theory Simul.
**2011**, 20, 721–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Worsfold, D.J.; Zilliox, J.G.; Rempp, P. Préparation et caractérisation de polymères-modèle à structure en étoile, par copolymérisation séquencée anionique. Can. J. Chem.
**1969**, 47, 3379–3385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rawiso, M. De l'intensité à la structure en physico-chimie des polymères. J. Phys. IV
**1999**, 9, Pr1–Pr147. [Google Scholar] - Makowski, H.S.; Lundberg, R.D.; Singhal, G.S. Flexible polymeric compositions comprising a normally plastic polymer sulfonated to about 0.2 to about 10 mole % sulfonate. U.S. Patent 3870841, 1975. [Google Scholar]
- Essafi, W.; Lafuma, F.; Williams, C.E. Macroion Characterization from Dilute Solutions to Complex Fluids; Schmitz, K.S., Ed.; ACS Symposium Series 548; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 1994; Chapter 21. [Google Scholar]
- Tondre, C.; Zana, R. Apparent molal volumes of polyelectrolytes in aqueous solutions. J. Phys. Chem.
**1972**, 76, 3451–3459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Millero, F.J. The partial molal volumes of electrolytes in aqueous solutions. In Water and Aqueous Solutions; Horne, R.A., Ed.; Wiley Interscience: New York, NY, USA, 1972; Chapter 13. [Google Scholar]
- Cotton, J.-P. Introduction to scattering experiment. In Neutron X-ray and Light Scattering: Introduction to an Investigate Tool for Colloidal and Polymeric Systems; Lindner, P., Zemb, Th., Eds.; North-Holland Delta Series: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1991; Chapter 2; pp. 19–31. [Google Scholar]
- Lindner, P. Scattering experiments: experimental aspects, initial data reduction and absolute calibration. In Neutrons, X-rays and Light: Scattering Methods Applied to Soft Condensed Matter; Lindner, P., Zemb, Th., Eds.; North-Holland Delta Series: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2002; Chapter 2; pp. 23–48. [Google Scholar]
- Brûlet, A.; Lairez, D.; Lapp, A.; Cotton, J.-P. Improvement of data treatment in small-angle neutron scattering. J. Appl. Cryst.
**2007**, 40, 165–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Sears, G.D. Neutron scattering lengths and cross sections. Neutron News
**1992**, 3, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Van Krevelen, D.W.; te Nijenhuis, K. Properties of Polymers, 4th ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Combet, J.; Isel, F.; Rawiso, M.; Boué, F. Scattering functions of flexible polyelectrolytes in the presence of mixed valence counterions: condensation and scaling. Macromolecules
**2005**, 38, 7456–7469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Boué, F.; Cotton, J.-P.; Lapp, A.; Jannink, G. A direct measurement of the polyion conformation in aqueous solutions at different temperatures. Small angle neutron scattering of PSSNa using zero average and full contrast. J. Chem. Phys.
**1994**, 101, 2562–2568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Essafi, W.; Haboubi, N.; Williams, C.; Boué, F. Weak temperature dependence of structure in hydrophobic polyelectrolyte aqueous solution (PSSNa): correlation between scattering and viscosity. J. Phys. Chem. B
**2011**, 115, 8951–8960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Borisov, O.V. Conformations of star-branched polyelectrolytes. J. Phys. II
**1996**, 6, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Borisov, O.V.; Zhulina, E.B. Effects of ionic strength and charge annealing in star-branched polyelectrolytes. Eur. Phys. J. B
**1998**, 4, 205–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kassapidou, K.; Jesse, W.; Kuil, M.E.; Lapp, A.; Egelhaaf, S.; van der Maarel, J.R.C. Structure and charge distribution in DNA and poly(styrenesulfonate) aqueous solutions. Macromolecules
**1997**, 30, 2671–2684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Dubois, E.; Boué, F. Conformation of polystyrene sulfonate polyions in the presence of multivalent ions: Small angle neutron scattering experiments. Macromolecules
**2001**, 34, 3684–3697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Combet, J.; Lorchat, P.; Rawiso, M. Salt-free aqueous solutions of polyelectrolytes: Small angle X-ray and neutron scattering characterization. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top.
**2012**, 213, 243–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Boris, D.C.; Colby, R.H. Rheology of sulfonated polystyrene solutions. Macromolecules
**1998**, 31, 5746–5755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhulina, E.B. Phase diagram for semi-rigid macromolecules grafted to a solid sphere. Polym. Sci. USSR
**1984**, 26, 885–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Birshtein, T.M.; Zhulina, E.B. Conformations of star-branched macromolecules. Polymer
**1984**, 25, 1453–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Birshtein, T.M.; Zhulina, E.B.; Borisov, O.V. Temperature-concentration diagram for a solution of star-branched macromolecules. Polymer
**1986**, 27, 1078–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 1.**Scattering functions of NaPSS star solutions in the dilute and semi-dilute regimes. (

**a**) S100-S91/D

_{2}O in the dilute regime (c < c* ≈ 0.075 mol·L

^{−1}– φ < φ* ≈ 0.83%); c = 0.013 mol·L

^{−1}– φ = 0.14% (dotted circles); c = 0.025 mol·L

^{−1}– φ = 0.28% (circles); c = 0.038 mol·L

^{−1}– φ = 0.42% (dotted lozenges); c = 0.052 mol·L

^{−1}− φ = 0.58% (lozenges); (

**b**) S100-S91/D

_{2}O in the semi-dilute regime (c > c*); c = 0.102 mol·L

^{−1}− φ = 1.13% (squares); c = 0.258 mol·L

^{−1}− φ = 2.87% (dotted triangles); c = 0.754 mol·L

^{−1}− φ = 8.39% (triangles).

**Figure 2.**Scattering functions of NaPSS star solutions in the semi-dilute regime. (

**a**) Changes according to N

_{a}; S100-S91/D

_{2}O c = 0.258 mol·L

^{−1}− φ = 2.87% (dotted triangles); S300-S94/D

_{2}O c = 0.230 mol·L

^{−1}– φ = 2.57% (crosses); (

**b**) Changes according to c; S100-S91/D

_{2}O c = 0.258 mol·L

^{−1}– φ = 2.87% (dotted triangles); S100-S91/D

_{2}O c = 0.996 mol·L

^{−1}– φ = 11.08% (half-dotted squares).

**Figure 3.**Indexation of the main maxima of the PS and NaPSS star scattering functions. (

**a**) Scattering vectors q* (PS) [1], q

_{1}* and q

_{2}* (NaPSS) versus statistical unit concentration c. The scaling law associated with NaPSS linear polyelectrolytes of sulfonation degree close to one is also plotted (q* = (0.165 ± 0.002)c

^{1/2}[18,20]); (

**b**) q* (PS) [1], q

_{1}* (NaPSS) versus star concentration c

_{star}(not to be confused with c*). The expected scaling laws for a simple cubic lattice (. . .), a body-centered cubic (bcc)-lattice (- - -) and a face-centered cubic (fcc)-lattice (× × ×).

**Figure 4.**Scattering functions of the same NaPSS star solution (S100-S91 in D

_{2}O at c = 0.480 mol·L

^{−1}– φ = 5.34%; c > c* = 0.075 mol·L

^{−1}– φ* = 0.83%) at two distinct temperatures 25 °C (circles) and 65 °C (crosses).

**Figure 5.**Mean radii of NaPSS stars (R) according to their arm degrees of polymerization (N

_{a}). For each star polyelectrolyte, R is obtained from the q

_{1}* value at c* (R = π/q

_{1}*). A comparison with some precursor PS stars is also offered.

**Figure 6.**Fourier space (

**a**,

**b**) versus real space (

**a’**,

**b’**). Relation between the positions of the main maxima of the NaPSS scattering functions in the reciprocal space (q

_{1}* and q

_{2}*) and the mean distances characterizing the average structure of the NaPSS star solutions in the direct space (d, <κ

_{i}>

^{−1}, χ and ξ). (

**a**and

**a’**) S100-S91/D

_{2}O (c < c* ≈ 0.075 mol·L

^{−1}– φ < φ* ≈ 0.83%); c = 0.013 mol·L

^{−1}– φ = 0.14% (dotted circles); c = 0.052 mol·L

^{−1}– φ = 0.58% (lozenges); (

**b**and

**b’**) S300-S94/D

_{2}O (c > c* ≈ 0.010 mol·L

^{−1}– φ < φ* ≈ 0.11%); c = 0.088 mol·L

^{−1}– φ = 0.98% (crossed squares); c = 0.230 mol·L

^{−1}– φ = 2.57% (crosses); c = 0.444 mol·L

^{−1}– φ = 4.97% (inverted triangles).

Sample | X_{L} % | <M_{a}>_{N} g·mol^{−}^{1} | I_{a} | <N_{a}>_{N} | M_{N} g·mol^{−}^{1} | I | τ_{DVB} % | <f> | σ/<f> | τ_{S} % | <m> g·mol^{−}^{1} | <v> cm^{3}·mol^{−}^{1} | τ_{W} % | c* mol·L^{−}^{1} | Φ* % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

S40 | 3 | 3.8 k | 1.05 | 36 | 40 k | 1.13 | 3.70 | 10.0 | 0.35 | 0 | 105.1 | 96.68 | 0 | 1.924 | 18.60 |

S40-S85 | 3 | – | 1.05 | 36 | – | 1.13 | 3.70 | 10.0 | 0.35 | 85 ± 2 | 188.6 | 109.90 | 10.7 | 0.515 | 5.66 |

S100 | <2 | 10 k | 1.09 | 96 | 126 k | 1.06 | 1.86 | 10.8 | 0.32 | 0 | 104.6 | 96.54 | 0 | 0.993 | 9.59 |

S100-S91 | <2 | – | 1.09 | 96 | – | 1.06 | 1.86 | 10.8 | 0.32 | 91 ± 5 | 195.8 | 111.22 | 10 | 0.075 | 0.83 |

S300 | <2 | 29 k | 1.10 | 280 | 364 k | 1.07 | 0.64 | 12.4 | 0.25 | 0 | 104.3 | 96.45 | 0 | – | – |

S300-S94 | <2 | – | 1.10 | 280 | – | 1.07 | 0.64 | 12.4 | 0.25 | 94 ± 5 | 199.6 | 111.93 | 11 | 0.01 | 0.11 |

_{L}is the fraction of residual linear macromolecules; <M

_{a}>

_{N}and <N

_{a}>

_{N}, the number average arm molecular weight and the number average arm degree of polymerization, determined before sulfonation, respectively (<N

_{a}>

_{N}= <Μ

_{a}>

_{N}/m

_{PS}; m

_{PS}is the molar mass of PS monomers (104.15 g·mol

^{−1})); M

_{N}, the number average star molecular weight; I

_{a}and I, the arm and star polydispersity indexes, respectively. These characteristics were obtained from SEC measurements on PS arms and PS stars, by using THF as eluent and a low angle laser light scattering spectrometer (LALLS; Chromatix CMX 100) as molecular mass detector (except for S40 arms). <f> represents the number average star functionality; σ

^{2}, the variance of the f-distribution; σ, its standard deviation. τ

_{DVB}is the DVB content of stars; τ

_{S}, the arm degree of sulfonation; <m> and <v>, the molar mass and molar volume of the effective monomers (accounting for the τ

_{DVD}and τ

_{S}values of the stars [1]), respectively; τ

_{W}, the weight fraction of water content of dried NaPSS star samples. The overlap concentrations c* associated to PS stars in THFd and NaPSS stars in D

_{2}O have been estimated as explained in Ref. [1]. For PS stars in D

_{2}O, it specifically corresponds to the concentration under which q

_{2}* is constant. The overlap volume fraction φ* is then given by the relation φ* = c*<v>.

**Table 2.**Characteristics of the NaPSS stars in the dilute regime. <N

_{a}>

_{N}is the number average arm degree of polymerization; R, the star geometric radius obtained from the position q

_{1}* of the first maximum of the scattering function measured at c*; q

_{2}*, the position of the second maximum of the scattering function measured at c ≤ c*.

Sample | <N_{a}>_{N} | R (Å) | q_{2}* (Å^{−1}) | q_{2}*<N_{a}>_{N} (Å^{−1}) | q_{2}*R |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

S40-S85 | 36 | 53 | 0.116 | 4.2 | 6.1 |

S100-S91 | 96 | 145 | 0.045 | 4.3 | 6.5 |

S300-S94 | 280 | 391 | 0.0162 | 4.5 | 6.3 |

© 2016 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Boué, F.; Combet, J.; Demé, B.; Heinrich, M.; Zilliox, J.-G.; Rawiso, M.
SANS from Salt-Free Aqueous Solutions of Hydrophilic and Highly Charged Star-Branched Polyelectrolytes. *Polymers* **2016**, *8*, 228.
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym8060228

**AMA Style**

Boué F, Combet J, Demé B, Heinrich M, Zilliox J-G, Rawiso M.
SANS from Salt-Free Aqueous Solutions of Hydrophilic and Highly Charged Star-Branched Polyelectrolytes. *Polymers*. 2016; 8(6):228.
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym8060228

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Boué, François, Jérôme Combet, Bruno Demé, Martine Heinrich, Jean-Georges Zilliox, and Michel Rawiso.
2016. "SANS from Salt-Free Aqueous Solutions of Hydrophilic and Highly Charged Star-Branched Polyelectrolytes" *Polymers* 8, no. 6: 228.
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym8060228