Next Article in Journal
Healing of Early Stage Fatigue Damage in Ionomer/Fe3O4 Nanoparticle Composites
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU) and Ag-Carbon Black TPU Nanocomposite for Potential Application in Additive Manufacturing
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of a Crosslinker Containing an Azo Group on the Actuation Properties of a Photoactuating LCE System
Previous Article in Special Issue
Polyetheretherketone Hybrid Composites with Bioactive Nanohydroxyapatite and Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube Fillers
Open AccessArticle

Creep and Recovery Behaviour of Polyolefin-Rubber Nanocomposites Developed for Additive Manufacturing

School of Engineering, RMIT University, P.O. Box 71, Bundoora, Victoria 3083, Australia
School of Science, RMIT University, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Lloyd M. Robeson
Polymers 2016, 8(12), 437;
Received: 17 October 2016 / Revised: 6 December 2016 / Accepted: 7 December 2016 / Published: 15 December 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanocomposites of Polymers and Inorganic Particles 2016)
Nanocomposite application in automotive engineering materials is subject to continual stress fields together with recovery periods, under extremes of temperature variations. The aim is to prepare and characterize polyolefin-rubber nanocomposites developed for additive manufacturing in terms of their time-dependent deformation behaviour as revealed in creep-recovery experiments. The composites consisted of linear low density polyethylene and functionalized rubber particles. Maleic anhydride compatibilizer grafted to polyethylene was used to enhance adhesion between the polyethylene and rubber; and multi-walled carbon nanotubes were introduced to impart electrical conductivity. Various compositions of nanocomposites were tested under constant stress in creep and recovery. A four-element mechanistic Burger model was employed to model the creep phase of the composites, while a Weibull distribution function was employed to model the recovery phase of the composites. Finite element analysis using Abaqus enabled numerical modelling of the creep phase of the composites. Both analytical and numerical solutions were found to be consistent with the experimental results. Creep and recovery were dependent on: (i) composite composition; (ii) compatibilizers content; (iii) carbon nanotubes that formed a percolation network. View Full-Text
Keywords: polyethylene; polymer-matrix composite; creep and recovery; modelling; nanocomposite polyethylene; polymer-matrix composite; creep and recovery; modelling; nanocomposite
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Daver, F.; Kajtaz, M.; Brandt, M.; Shanks, R.A. Creep and Recovery Behaviour of Polyolefin-Rubber Nanocomposites Developed for Additive Manufacturing. Polymers 2016, 8, 437.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop