Techno-Economic and Statistical Assessment of Agricultural Flours for Bacterial Cellulose Production by Komagataeibacter xylinus
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Strain Maintenance and Inoculum Preparation
2.2. Media Formulation and Flour Variant Preparation
2.3. Fermentation Procedure
2.4. Purification and Dry Weight Determination
2.5. Techno-Economic Analysis
2.6. Statistical Analysis
2.7. Schematic Diagram of Experiment
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. BC Production Under the CTN (0.6 g·L−1 Fixed Nitrogen Content) and CNSM Regimes (5 g·L−1 Fixed Media Weight)
3.1.1. CTN Regime: Fixed Nitrogen Content Replacement
3.1.2. CNSM Regime: Fixed Media Weight Replacement
3.2. Effect of Flour Substitution Level on BC Yield
3.3. Correlation Patterns Between Substitution Level and BC Production
3.4. Techno-Economic Analysis of Flour-Based Nitrogen Substitution
3.4.1. Cost Performance Under Nitrogen-Limited Conditions (0.6 g N)
3.4.2. Cost Performance in the Fixed-Media-Weight (5 g) Regime
4. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| BC | Bacterial Cellulose |
| C/N | Carbon-to-Nitrogen (ratio) |
| CNSM | Constant Nitrogen-Source Mass |
| CTN | Constant Total Nitrogen |
| HS | Hestrin–Schramm |
| SZMC | Szeged Microbiology Collection |
| TEA | Techno-Economic Analysis |
References
- Treviño-Garza, M.Z.; Guerrero-Medina, A.S.; González-Sánchez, R.A.; García-Gómez, C.; Guzmán-Velasco, A.; Báez-González, J.G.; Márquez-Reyes, J.M. Production of Microbial Cellulose Films from Green Tea (Camellia sinensis) Kombucha with Various Carbon Sources. Coatings 2020, 10, 1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, H.T.; Saha, N.; Ngwabebhoh, F.A.; Zandraa, O.; Saha, T.; Saha, P. Kombucha-derived bacterial cellulose from diverse wastes: A prudent leather alternative. Cellulose 2021, 28, 9335–9353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernández-Hernández, R.N.; Vázquez-García, R.A.; Villagómez-Ibarra, J.R.; Velasco Azorsa, R.; Islas-Rodríguez, N.; Vázquez-Rodríguez, S.; Veloz Rodríguez, M.A. Characterization of bacterial cellulose from Kombucha as a potential resource for its application on biodegradable films. In Characterization of Minerals, Metals, and Materials 2024; Peng, Z., Zhang, M., Li, J., Li, B., Monteiro, S.N., Soman, R., Hwang, J.-Y., Kalay, Y.E., Escobedo-Diaz, J.P., Carpenter, J.S., et al., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Catarino, R.P.F.; Mascareli, V.A.B.; Leite da Costa, V.L.; Pavanello, A.C.L.; Spinosa, W.A. Sustainability and Influencing Factors in Bacterial Cellulose Production: A Review of the Impact of Microorganisms, Culture Media and Cultivation Methods. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2025, 63, 332–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Banat, I.M.; Franzetti, A.; Gandolfi, I.; Bestetti, G.; Martinotti, M.G.; Fracchia, L.; Smyth, T.J.; Marchant, R. Microbial biosurfactants: Production, applications and future potential. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 87, 427–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ullah, M.W.; Manan, S.; Kiprono, S.J.; Ul-Islam, M.; Yang, G. Synthesis, structure, and properties of bacterial cellulose. In Nanocellulose: From Fundamentals to Advanced Materials; Lin, N., Dufresne, A., Huang, J., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2019; pp. 81–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alidu, M.; Alexander, S.L.M. Mixed Food Waste as a Low-Cost Carbon Source for Kombucha Bacterial Cellulose. ACS Omega 2026. ASAP article. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaroenjaturong, P.; Cheirsilp, B.; Thumarat, U.; Boonsawang, P. Enhanced bacterial nano-cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum using cost-effective sweet black tea medium added with ethanol. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2026, 33, 102482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Güzel, M.; Akpınar, Ö. Preparation and characterization of bacterial cellulose produced from fruit and vegetable peels by Komagataeibacter hansenii GA2016. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 162, 1597–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Souza, E.F.; Furtado, M.R.; Carvalho, C.W.P.; Freitas-Silva, O.; Gottschalk, L.M.F. Production and characterization of Gluconacetobacter xylinus bacterial cellulose using cashew apple juice and soybean molasses. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 146, 285–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Hong, F.; Yang, X.; Han, S. Biotransformation of wheat straw to bacterial cellulose and its mechanism. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 135, 464–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narh, C.; Frimpong, C.; Mensah, A.; Wei, Q. Rice bran as an alternative nitrogen source for Acetobacter xylinum bacterial cellulose synthesis. BioResources 2018, 13, 4346–4363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amorim, L.F.A.; Li, L.; Gomes, A.P.; Fangueiro, R.; Gouveia, I.C. Sustainable bacterial cellulose production using low-cost feedstocks: Evaluation of apple and tea by-products as alternative nutrient sources. Cellulose 2023, 30, 5589–5606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabatini, F.; Maresca, E.; Aulitto, M.; Termopoli, V.; De Risi, A.; Correggia, M.; Fiorentino, G.; Consonni, V.; Gosetti, F.; Orlandi, M.; et al. Exploiting agri-food residues for kombucha tea and bacterial cellulose production. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 302, 140293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gök, C.; Işıtan, A.; Bersani, M.; Bettotti, P.; Pasquardini, L.; Fedrizzi, M.; D’Angelo, D.; Boyacıoğlu, H.; Koluman, A. Physicochemical and antimicrobial evaluation of bacterial cellulose derived from spent tea waste. Polymers 2025, 17, 2521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Penloglou, G.; Basna, A.; Pavlou, A.; Kiparissides, C. Techno-economic considerations on nanocellulose progress. Processes 2023, 11, 2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Gendi, H.; Salama, A.; El-Fakharany, E.M.; Saleh, A.K. Optimization of bacterial cellulose production from prickly pear peels and its ex situ impregnation with fruit byproducts for antimicrobial and strawberry packaging applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 302, 120383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tsouko, E.; Kourmentza, C.; Ladakis, D.; Kopsahelis, N.; Mandala, I.; Papanikolaou, S.; Paloukis, F.; Alves, V.; Koutinas, A. Bacterial cellulose production from industrial waste and by-product streams. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 14832–14849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oraby, A.; Rupp, S.; Zibek, S. Techno-economic analysis for optimisation of cellobiose lipid fermentation. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 913351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Absharina, D.; Veres, C.; Kedves, A.; Kónya, Z.; Szabó, B.P.; Vágvölgyi, C. Enhanced bacterial cellulose production by Komagataeibacter xylinus using agro-derived flour nitrogen sources. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2026, 110, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henry, S.; Dhital, S.; Sumer, H.; Butardo, V., Jr. Solid-state fermentation of cereal waste improves the bioavailability and yield of bacterial cellulose production by a Novacetimonas sp. isolate. Foods 2024, 13, 3052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cruz, M.A.; Flor-Unda, O.; Avila, A.; Garcia, M.D.; Cerda-Mejía, L. Advances in bacterial cellulose production: A scoping review. Coatings 2024, 14, 1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keshk, S.M.A.S.; Razek, T.M.A.; Sameshima, K. Bacterial cellulose production from beet molasses. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 5, 1519–1523. [Google Scholar]
- Dourado, F.; Fontão, A.; Leal, M.; Rodrigues, A.C.; Gama, M. Process modeling and techno-economic evaluation of an industrial bacterial nanocellulose fermentation process. In Bacterial Nanocellulose: From Biotechnology to Bio-Economy; Gama, M., Dourado, F., Bielecki, S., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 199–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Zheng, Y.; Song, W.; Luan, J.; Wen, X.; Wu, Z.; Chen, X.; Wang, Q.; Guo, S. In situ synthesis of silver-nanoparticles/bacterial cellulose composites for slow-released antimicrobial wound dressing. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 102, 762–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Volova, T.G.; Prudnikova, S.V.; Kiselev, E.G.; Nemtsev, I.V.; Vasiliev, A.D.; Kuzmin, A.P.; Shishatskaya, E.I. Bacterial cellulose and composites: Production and properties. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Behera, B.; Laavanya, D.; Balasubramanian, P. Techno-economic feasibility assessment of bacterial cellulose biofilm production. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 346, 126659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sundaram, M.K.; Nehru, G.; Tadi, S.R.R.; Katsuno, N.; Nishizu, T.; Sivaprakasam, S. Bacterial cellulose production by Komagataeibacter hansenii utilizing agro-industrial residues and its application in coffee milk stabilization. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2023, 13, 7971–7981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Núñez, D.; Oyarzún, P.; Cáceres, R.; Elgueta, E.; Gamboa, M. Citrate-buffered Yamanaka medium for high-yield bacterial nanocellulose. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2024, 12, 1375984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arendt, E.K.; Zannini, E. Cereal Grains for the Food and Beverage Industries; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Singhsa, P.; Narain, R.; Manuspiya, H. Physical structure variations of bacterial cellulose under static and agitated culture. Cellulose 2018, 25, 1571–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, C.; Zhang, G.C.; Liu, M.; Zheng, X.T.; Han, P.P.; Jia, S.R. Metabolic flux analysis of Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 6189–6199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blanco Parte, F.G.; Santoso, S.P.; Chou, C.-C.; Verma, V.; Wang, H.-T.; Ismadji, S.; Cheng, K.-C. Progress on production and applications of bacterial cellulose. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2020, 40, 397–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandes, I.; de Araújo, A.A.; Pedro, A.C.; Ribeiro, V.R.; Bortolini, D.G.; Ozaki, M.S.C.; Maciel, G.M.; Haminiuk, C.W.I. Bacterial cellulose: From optimization to applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 2598–2611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Tian, C.; Tian, H.; Zhang, J.; He, X.; Ping, W.; Lei, H. Improvement of bacterial cellulose production via metabolic manipulation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 96, 1479–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keshk, S.M.A.S.; Sameshima, K. Evaluation of different carbon sources for bacterial cellulose production. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2005, 4, 478–482. [Google Scholar]
- de Lima Fontes, M.; Meneguin, A.B.; Tercjak, A.; Gutierrez, J.; Cury, B.S.F.; Dos Santos, A.M.; Ribeiro, S.J.L.; Barud, H.S. Effect of in situ modification of bacterial cellulose with carboxymethylcellulose on its nano/microstructure and methotrexate release properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 179, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, X.; Cao, L.; Wang, S.; Huang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Tian, M.; Li, X.; Zhang, J. Isolation and characterization of bacterial cellulose produced from soybean whey and soybean hydrolyzate. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 16024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Souza, K.C.; dos Santos, G.R.; Trindade, F.C.; Costa, A.F.S.; Almeida, Y.M.B.; Sarubbo, L.A.; Vinhas, G.M. Production of bacterial cellulose biopolymers in media containing rice and corn hydrolysate as carbon sources. Polym. Polym. Compos. 2021, 29, S1466–S1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hungarian Central Statistical Office (KSH). Cereal Producer Prices in Hungary (STADAT Table ARA0013). Available online: https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/ara/hu/ara0013.html (accessed on 28 October 2025).
- European Commission. Cereals Prices. Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development. Available online: https://agridata.ec.europa.eu/extensions/DashboardCereals/ExtCerealsPrice.html (accessed on 8 October 2025).
- Centre for the Promotion of Imports from Developing Countries (CBI). Entering the European Market for Quinoa. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands. Available online: https://www.cbi.eu/market-information (accessed on 10 October 2025).
- Sigma-Aldrich (Merck KGaA). Sucrose, Product No. S9378. 2025. Available online: https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/HU/hu/product/sigma/s9378 (accessed on 10 October 2025).
- Sigma-Aldrich (Merck KGaA). Yeast Extract, Product No. Y1625. 2025. Available online: https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/HU/en/product/sigma/y1625 (accessed on 10 October 2025).
- Sigma-Aldrich (Merck KGaA). Tryptone, Product No. T9410. 2025. Available online: https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/HU/en/product/sial/t9410 (accessed on 10 October 2025).




| A. Constant total nitrogen (CTN)—0.6 g·L−1 fixed nitrogen content | ||||
| Media Component (g·L−1) | 0% (Control) | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| Sucrose | 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 |
| Yeast Extract (value dependent on flour type) | 2.5 | 2.0–2.43 | 1.0–2.30 | 0.5–1.95 |
| Tryptone (value dependent on flour type) | 2.5 | 2.00–2.43 | 1.0–2.30 | 0.5–1.95 |
| S-Flour | 0 | 1.74 | 5.22 | 6.96 |
| C-Flour | 0 | 1.61 | 4.48 | 11.11 |
| R-Flour | 0 | 1.58 | 4.60 | 11.50 |
| W-Flour | 0 | 1.58 | 4.28 | 9.93 |
| O-Flour | 0 | 1.62 | 4.32 | 10.19 |
| SP-Flour | 0 | 1.55 | 4.20 | 9.65 |
| Q-Flour | 0 | 1.60 | 4.26 | 9.80 |
| B-Flour | 0 | 1.58 | 4.30 | 10.26 |
| T-Flour | 0 | 1.60 | 4.25 | 9.00 |
| M-Flour | 0 | 1.58 | 4.30 | 10.26 |
| TR-Flour | 0 | 1.60 | 4.20 | 9.60 |
| RY-Flour | 0 | 1.62 | 4.40 | 10.80 |
| BY-Flour | 0 | 1.62 | 4.38 | 10.73 |
| SG-Flour | 0 | 1.62 | 4.44 | 10.82 |
| B. Constant nitrogen-source mass (CNSM)—5 g·L−1 fixed media weight | ||||
| Media Component (g·L−1) | 0% (Control) | 25% | 50% | 75% |
| Sucrose | 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 |
| Yeast Extract | 2.5 | 1.875 | 1.25 | 0.625 |
| Tryptone | 2.5 | 1.875 | 1.25 | 0.625 |
| All Flour Types | 0 | 1.25 | 2.50 | 3.75 |
| Flour (Code) | CTN (0.6 g·L−1) | CNSM (5 g·L−1) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| S-BC | Moderate | Weak | Small CTN increments (0.32 g·L−1 highest), no increment under CNSM |
| C-BC | Weak | Weak | Small CTN increments (3.70 g·L−1 highest), no increment under CNSM; low nitrogen and low soluble nutrient fraction |
| W-BC | Moderate | Weak | Moderate CTN increments (4.03 g·L−1 highest), low performance under CNSM |
| R-BC | Weak | Moderate | No increment under CTN, medium CNSM increment at 25% and 50% substitution levels (0.96 g·L−1 highest) |
| O-BC | Weak | Weak | Worse than control in all but one case (highest increment 1.06 g·L−1) |
| B-BC | Weak | Weak | Worse than control in all but one case (highest increment 0.26 g·L−1) |
| SP-BC | Strong | Weak | High increments under CTN (3.37 g·L−1 highest), maintains performance under CNSM but yield does not increase |
| Q-BC | Strong | Weak | High increments under CTN (2.67 g·L−1 highest), low performance under CNSM |
| T-BC | Weak | Moderate | No increase under CTN, medium increments under CNSM (1.61 g·L−1 highest); high protein and micronutrient content nevertheless |
| M-BC | Moderate | Weak | Medium increment under CTN (3.47 g·L−1); poor performer under CNSM and solids stress. |
| TR-BC | Strong | Moderate | One of the strongest performers under CTN and CNSM (1.60·L−1 highest) |
| RY-BC | Weak | Weak | No increment under both regimes |
| SG-BC | Strong | Moderate | Strong performer under both CTN and CNSM (1.34·L−1 highest) |
| BY-BC | Strong | Strong | Strong performer under both regimes (1.42·L−1 highest) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Absharina, D.; Veres, C.; Kocsubé, S.; Vágvölgyi, C. Techno-Economic and Statistical Assessment of Agricultural Flours for Bacterial Cellulose Production by Komagataeibacter xylinus. Polymers 2026, 18, 721. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18060721
Absharina D, Veres C, Kocsubé S, Vágvölgyi C. Techno-Economic and Statistical Assessment of Agricultural Flours for Bacterial Cellulose Production by Komagataeibacter xylinus. Polymers. 2026; 18(6):721. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18060721
Chicago/Turabian StyleAbsharina, Dheanda, Csilla Veres, Sándor Kocsubé, and Csaba Vágvölgyi. 2026. "Techno-Economic and Statistical Assessment of Agricultural Flours for Bacterial Cellulose Production by Komagataeibacter xylinus" Polymers 18, no. 6: 721. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18060721
APA StyleAbsharina, D., Veres, C., Kocsubé, S., & Vágvölgyi, C. (2026). Techno-Economic and Statistical Assessment of Agricultural Flours for Bacterial Cellulose Production by Komagataeibacter xylinus. Polymers, 18(6), 721. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18060721

