Microscopic Leaching Mechanism of Fly Ash Geopolymer (FAG) Under Coupled Stray Current and Soft Water
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Materials
2.2. Mix Proportions
2.3. Experimental Methods
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Time Effect of Coupled Stray Current and Soft Water Leaching
3.2. Regulatory Effects of Mix Proportion Parameters on the Leaching Mechanism
3.2.1. Regulatory Effect of the Water-to-Binder (W/C) Ratio
3.2.2. Regulatory Effect of the Sodium Silicate Modulus (Ms)
3.2.3. Regulatory Effect of the Alkali Dosage (A/F)
4. Conclusions
- (1)
- Leaching degradation mechanism: The leaching of OH− from the FAG pore solution is accelerated by the stray current, leading to a precipitous decline in alkalinity, which subsequently destroys the N-A-S-H gel network responsible for the binding strength. The decomposition of the gel phase directly results in increased porosity, an enlarged most probable pore diameter, and a proliferation of harmful pores (diameter ≥ 50 nm), which constitute the fundamental microstructural causes of macroscopic strength deterioration.
- (2)
- Phase stability and kinetic characteristics: The crystalline phases within the FAG system are not destroyed by the stray current; the original crystals remain stable during the leaching process, and no new crystalline phases are generated. Furthermore, the coupled leaching effect of stray current and soft water exhibits a time-dependent attenuation. Specifically, the coupled destructive effect weakens with prolonged leaching time, and the leaching rate of OH− exhibits a linear decreasing trend.
- (3)
- Superior erosion resistance at lower W/C ratios: The cumulative molar amount of leached OH− can be significantly reduced by lowering the W/C ratio, thereby enhancing the leaching resistance of the FAG. Comprehensive evaluation indicates that at a W/C ratio of 0.30, the FAG not only maintains a higher pore solution alkalinity post-leaching but also retains a greater quantity of the gel phase and a superior pore structure, yielding the optimal overall leaching resistance.
- (4)
- Structural stability favored by lower Ms: Reducing Ms facilitates the inhibition of OH− leaching and optimizes the micro-morphology after leaching. The minimum leached amount and the densest pore structure (characterized by the lowest porosity and fewer harmful pores) are achieved in the FAG with an Ms of 1.0, whereas an Ms of 1.2 is more conducive to maintaining the pore solution alkalinity and gel phase content. Overall, a lower Ms (1.0–1.2) is more beneficial for resisting coupled leaching.
- (5)
- Positive inhibitory effect of increasing A/F: The resistance of the FAG to stray current-induced leaching is effectively enhanced by increasing the A/F. A higher A/F not only improves the initial pore solution alkalinity of the structure but also strongly inhibits the loss of OH− during the leaching process. Moreover, this inhibitory effect becomes increasingly significant over time, allowing the system to maintain a high-alkalinity environment even after prolonged leaching.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wang, Y.; Li, M.; Zhou, J.; Zheng, H. Sudden passenger flow characteristics and congestion control based on intelligent urban rail transit network. Neural Comput. Appl. 2022, 34, 6615–6624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, P.; Zhang, Z.; Peng, X.; Wang, R. Deep learning solutions for smart city challenges in urban development. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 5176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bi, S.; Hu, J.; Shao, L.; Feng, T.; Appolloni, A. Can public transportation development improve urban air quality? Evidence from China. Urban Clim. 2024, 54, 101825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Li, W.; Wang, Y.; Xu, S.; Fan, M. Stray current distributing model in the subway system: A review and outlook. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2018, 13, 1700–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, Z.; Koleva, D.; van Breugel, K. A review on stray current-induced steel corrosion in infrastructure. Corros. Rev. 2017, 35, 397–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Qin, G. Corrosion of underground infrastructures under metro-induced stray current: A review. Corros. Commun. 2024, 14, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gui, P.; Jin, H.; Yu, S. Study on corrosion resistance of the steel spring floating slab using rubber concrete under stray current. Constr. Build. Mater. 2025, 468, 140462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, B. Durability of low-carbon geopolymer concrete: A critical review. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2024, 40, e00882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manzoor, T.; Bhat, J.A.; Shah, A.H. Performance of geopolymer concrete at elevated temperature—A critical review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 420, 135578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Hu, X.; Du, Y.; Nematollahi, B.; Shi, C. A review on high-temperature resistance of geopolymer concrete. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 98, 111241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, J.; Zhao, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, C.; Huang, P.; Fang, C. Sulfate resistance of recycled aggregate concrete with GGBS and fly ash-based geopolymer. Materials 2019, 12, 1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guo, L.; Wu, Y.; Xu, F.; Song, X.; Ye, J.; Duan, P.; Zhang, Z. Sulfate resistance of hybrid fiber reinforced metakaolin geopolymer composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2020, 183, 107689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahedan, N.F.; Hadibarata, T.; Abdullah, M.M.A.B.; Jusoh, M.N.H.; Abd Rahim, S.Z.; Isia, I.; Bras, A.A.; Bouaissi, A.; Juwono, F.H. Potential of fly ash geopolymer concrete as repairing and retrofitting solutions for marine infrastructure: A review. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2024, 20, e03214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chenna, H.N.P.; Chouksey, S.K.; Turkane, S.D. Performance evaluation and optimization of landfill waste-fly ash geopolymer for road subgrade applications. Constr. Build. Mater. 2025, 489, 142380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, P.; Xu, G.; Wang, Q.; Zeng, Z. Corrosion behavior of steel bars in simulated concrete pore solution under the coupling action of chloride salt and DC stray current. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 455, 139126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.; Kang, X.; Chen, Y.; Chen, R. Unveiling the synergistic effects of stray current and high hydraulic pressure on chloride transport in ultra-high-performance concrete. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2025, 157, 105957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.Y.; Chen, R.P.; Chen, Y.Q.; Ma, X.Y.; Kang, X. Stray current induced chloride ion transport and corrosion characteristics of cracked ultra-high performance concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 398, 132536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saito, H.; Tajima, T.; Fujiwara, A.; Tsuji, Y. Application of electrochemical acceleration test method to changes in cementitious barrier performances by leaching degradation. MRS Online Proc. Libr. (OPL) 1997, 506, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bertolini, L.; Carsana, M.; Pedeferri, P. Corrosion behaviour of steel in concrete in the presence of stray current. Corros. Sci. 2007, 49, 1056–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Y.; Wang, C.; Luo, C.; Huang, Q.; Wang, S.; Peng, X. Effect of electrical field on TSA failure of cement-based materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 2016, 90, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Q.; Wang, C.; Yang, C.; Zhou, L.; Yin, J. Accelerated sulfate attack on mortars using electrical pulse. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 95, 875–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Q.; Wang, C.; Zeng, Q.; Yang, C.; Luo, C.; Yang, K. Deterioration of mortars exposed to sulfate attack under electrical field. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 117, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Q.; Wang, C.; Luo, C.; Yang, C.; Luo, Y.; Xie, H. Effect of mineral admixtures on sulfate resistance of mortars under electrical field. Adv. Cem. Res. 2017, 29, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Cao, J.; Gong, F.; Peng, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Zeng, B. Insights on the multiple ions distribution in concrete under stray current: From experiments to multi-field simulation. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 98, 111502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, X.; Liu, X.; Xiang, E.; Chen, M.; Ma, C. Effects of Stray Current on Chloride Ingress in Underground Reinforced Concrete Structures. Buildings 2025, 15, 3301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Chen, M.; Chen, R.; Kang, X. Deterioration mechanism of chloride attack on reinforced concrete under stray current and high hydraulic pressure coexistence environment. Mater. Struct. 2023, 56, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GB/T 4209-2022; Sodium Silicate for Industrial Use. China National Standardization Administration: Beijing, China, 2022.
- Sun, J.; Chen, Z. Effect of silicate modulus of water glass on the hydration of alkali-activated converter steel slag. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2019, 138, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, R.; Liu, F.; Wang, B.; Wang, X.; Hua, C.; Yuan, X. Mechanical Behavior of Fly-Ash Geopolymer Under Stray-Current and Soft-Water Coupling. Buildings 2025, 15, 2514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hua, C.; Tang, R.; Lu, X. Radon emission characteristics and pore structure evolution of self-compacting concrete with silica fume-molybdenum tailings under different curing environments. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 97, 110769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Al-Neshawy, F.; Punkki, J. Investigation on the effect of entrained air on pore structure in hardened concrete using MIP. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 292, 123441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, H. Mercury intrusion porosimetry in concrete technology: Tips in measurement, pore structure parameter acquisition and application. J. Porous Mater. 2014, 21, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nath, S.K.; Kumar, S. Reaction kinetics, microstructure and strength behavior of alkali activated silico-manganese (SiMn) slag–Fly ash blends. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 147, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernández-Jiménez, A.; Palomo, A.; Criado, M. Microstructure development of alkali-activated fly ash cement: A descriptive model. Cem. Concr. Res. 2005, 35, 1204–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, H.; Wang, X.; Wang, E.; Song, Y.; Chen, D.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, W. Macro-micro crack and damage evolution characteristics of concrete: After the action of acidic drying-saturation cycle. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 411, 134601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, J.; Luo, X.; Bai, R.; Pan, C.; Zhang, J. Pore characteristics of different phase in nano-modified concrete and their influences on the compressive strength. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 46, 103784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, X.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Su, Y. A comprehensive investigation on sulphate resistance of geopolymer recycled concrete: Macro and micro properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 403, 133052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Natkunarajah, K.; Masilamani, K.; Maheswaran, S.; Lothenbach, B.; Amarasinghe, D.A.S.; Attygalle, D. Analysis of the trend of pH changes of concrete pore solution during the hydration by various analytical methods. Cem. Concr. Res. 2022, 156, 106780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Xu, W.; Li, H.; Lai, J.; Qiang, S.; Luo, T. Multi-ion erosion experiment and corrosion mechanism verification of steel fiber–reinforced concrete under stray current. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2022, 34, 04022355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, Y.; He, Y.; Cui, X.; Liu, L. The influence of different water glass moduli on the chemical corrosion resistance of alkali-activated porous concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 415, 134971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Guo, L.; Cheng, L.; Xi, Y.; Chen, D. Effect of alkali dosage and silicate modulus on the deterioration of alkali-activated concrete properties subjected to sodium chloride attack and freeze thaw cycles. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 449, 138335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei, J.; Kumar, D.; Yang, E.H. Effect of pore solution alkalinity on alkali–silica reaction (ASR) in metakaolin-based geopolymer. Struct. Concr. 2025, 26, 2416–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

























| Physical Properties/Chemical Components | Fly Ash |
|---|---|
| Density (g/cm3) | 2.3 |
| Moisture content (%) | 0.7 |
| Chemical composition (%) | |
| CaO | 3.71 |
| SiO2 | 53.86 |
| Al2O3 | 29.45 |
| ZrO2 | 0.09 |
| Fe2O3 | 5.46 |
| SrO | 0.08 |
| MgO | 0.62 |
| TiO2 | 2.04 |
| ZnO | 0.06 |
| P2O5 | 0.54 |
| SO3 | 1.84 |
| BaO | 0.23 |
| K2O | 1.53 |
| Na2O | 0.44 |
| CuO | 0.02 |
| MnO | 0.02 |
| Parameter | Fly Ash |
|---|---|
| Modulus | 3.3 |
| Baumé degree (°Bé) | 39.9 |
| Density (g/mL) | 1.380 |
| Transparency (%) | 92.6 |
| Na2O (%) | 8.82 |
| SiO2 (%) | 28.26 |
| Fe (%) | 0.004 |
| Modulus of Water Glass | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 2.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NaOH dosage | 26.30 | 20.02 | 15.53 | 12.17 | 9.55 | 7.46 |
| Group | Code | W/C | Ms | A/F (%) | Water Glass (g) | NaOH (g) | Water (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W/C variable | W1 | 0.28 | 1.2 | 6 | 246.6 | 49.4 | 124.9 |
| reference | 0.3 | 1.2 | 6 | 246.6 | 49.4 | 144.9 | |
| W2 | 0.32 | 1.2 | 6 | 246.6 | 49.4 | 164.9 | |
| W3 | 0.34 | 1.2 | 6 | 246.6 | 49.4 | 184.9 | |
| Ms variable | M1 | 0.3 | 1 | 6 | 205.5 | 54 | 170.7 |
| reference | 0.3 | 1.2 | 6 | 246.6 | 49.4 | 144.9 | |
| M2 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 6 | 287.7 | 44.7 | 119 | |
| M3 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 6 | 328.7 | 40 | 93.2 | |
| A/F variable | A1 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 4 | 164.4 | 32.9 | 196.6 |
| A2 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 5 | 205.5 | 41.1 | 170.7 | |
| reference | 0.3 | 1.2 | 6 | 246.6 | 49.4 | 144.9 | |
| A3 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 7 | 287.7 | 57.6 | 119 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Liu, F.; He, Z.; Tang, R.; Zheng, X.; Wang, B.; Wang, X.; Yuan, X. Microscopic Leaching Mechanism of Fly Ash Geopolymer (FAG) Under Coupled Stray Current and Soft Water. Polymers 2026, 18, 1883. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18151883
Liu F, He Z, Tang R, Zheng X, Wang B, Wang X, Yuan X. Microscopic Leaching Mechanism of Fly Ash Geopolymer (FAG) Under Coupled Stray Current and Soft Water. Polymers. 2026; 18(15):1883. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18151883
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiu, Fang, Zhihao He, Ran Tang, Xinchao Zheng, Baomin Wang, Xiaojun Wang, and Xiaosa Yuan. 2026. "Microscopic Leaching Mechanism of Fly Ash Geopolymer (FAG) Under Coupled Stray Current and Soft Water" Polymers 18, no. 15: 1883. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18151883
APA StyleLiu, F., He, Z., Tang, R., Zheng, X., Wang, B., Wang, X., & Yuan, X. (2026). Microscopic Leaching Mechanism of Fly Ash Geopolymer (FAG) Under Coupled Stray Current and Soft Water. Polymers, 18(15), 1883. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18151883

