Previous Article in Journal
AI-Based Polymer Classification Using Ensemble Deep Learning and Heuristic Optimization: Implications for Recycling Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Comparative Analysis of AWJM Performance in FFF-Printed PLA and PLA–CF: Influence of Process Parameters and Cutting Regions

by
Pedro F. Mayuet Ares
*,
Lucía Rodríguez-Parada
*,
Sergio de la Rosa
and
Moises Batista
Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Design Department, School of Engineering, University of Cadiz, Avda. de la Universidad de Cádiz, 10, E11519 Puerto Real, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2026, 18(10), 1210; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18101210
Submission received: 18 April 2026 / Revised: 10 May 2026 / Accepted: 13 May 2026 / Published: 15 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Processing and Engineering)

Abstract

Additive manufacturing by Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) enables the fabrication of complex polymer components, although limitations in surface quality and dimensional accuracy often require post-processing. Abrasive water jet machining (AWJM) is a non-thermal technique suitable for improving surface integrity in polymers and composites without inducing thermal damage. This study investigates the AWJM performance on FFF-printed polylactic acid (PLA) and carbon-fiber-reinforced PLA (PLA–CF), focusing on the influence of water pressure (WP), traverse feed rate (TFR), and abrasive mass flow rate (AMFR). A full factorial design was implemented, and surface integrity was evaluated through surface roughness (Ra) and kerf taper (T), considering their variation across characteristic cutting regions: initial damage region (IDR), smooth cutting region (SCR), and rough cutting region (RCR). Results show that WP and TFR are the dominant parameters, while AMFR has a limited effect within the studied range. The SCR exhibits the lowest roughness, whereas the RCR shows significant degradation due to energy loss. Both materials present similar behavior, with only minor improvements in PLA–CF. ANOVA confirms that process parameters have a stronger influence than material type, providing useful criteria for AWJM optimization in FFF polymers.
Keywords: abrasive water jet machining; fused filament fabrication; polylactic acid; surface integrity; process parameters abrasive water jet machining; fused filament fabrication; polylactic acid; surface integrity; process parameters

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mayuet Ares, P.F.; Rodríguez-Parada, L.; Rosa, S.d.l.; Batista, M. Comparative Analysis of AWJM Performance in FFF-Printed PLA and PLA–CF: Influence of Process Parameters and Cutting Regions. Polymers 2026, 18, 1210. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18101210

AMA Style

Mayuet Ares PF, Rodríguez-Parada L, Rosa Sdl, Batista M. Comparative Analysis of AWJM Performance in FFF-Printed PLA and PLA–CF: Influence of Process Parameters and Cutting Regions. Polymers. 2026; 18(10):1210. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18101210

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mayuet Ares, Pedro F., Lucía Rodríguez-Parada, Sergio de la Rosa, and Moises Batista. 2026. "Comparative Analysis of AWJM Performance in FFF-Printed PLA and PLA–CF: Influence of Process Parameters and Cutting Regions" Polymers 18, no. 10: 1210. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18101210

APA Style

Mayuet Ares, P. F., Rodríguez-Parada, L., Rosa, S. d. l., & Batista, M. (2026). Comparative Analysis of AWJM Performance in FFF-Printed PLA and PLA–CF: Influence of Process Parameters and Cutting Regions. Polymers, 18(10), 1210. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18101210

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop