Next Article in Journal
Development and Characterization of Hyaluronic Acid Graft-Modified Polydopamine Nanoparticles for Antibacterial Studies
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Molecularly Imprinted Photonic Crystals Sensor for High-Sensitivity, Rapid Detection of Sulfamethazine in Food Samples
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ultrasonic-Assisted Synthesis and Cytocompatibility Assessment of TiO2/SiO2 Nanoparticles-Impregnated Gum Arabic Nanocomposite: Edible Coating of Dates for Shelf-Life Extension

by
Jegan Athinarayanan
,
Vaiyapuri Subbarayan Periasamy
and
Ali A. Alshatwi
*
Nanobiotechnology and Molecular Biology Research Laboratory, Department of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Food Science and Agriculture, King Saud University, Riyadh P.O. Box 2460, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2025, 17(2), 161; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17020161
Submission received: 28 November 2024 / Revised: 30 December 2024 / Accepted: 6 January 2025 / Published: 10 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Biobased and Biodegradable Polymers)

Abstract

:
The post-harvest management of fruit is crucial to preventing its decay and loss. Generally, edible coatings are applied to fruit to avoid decay and microbial contamination. We have used ultrasonication to synthesize TiO2 and Pennisetum glaucum residue-derived biosilica embedded in gum arabic nanocomposite. The SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite morphological and crystalline features were investigated using a scanning electron microscope and X-ray diffractometer, respectively. The SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic cytocompatibility was assessed using cell viability and microscopic assay. The SEM images revealed that 70–90 nm biosilica and 70–100 nm TiO2 nanostructures were present on the gum arabic. According to MTT assay and microscopic examination results, SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic do not inhibit cell viability and modulate cellular structural features; it inferred that SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic possess good cytocompatibility on human mesenchymal stem cells even up to 400 µg/mL. The date fruits were immersed in SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic-based coating mixtures and stored at 6 °C for 4 weeks. When date fruits were examined during storage, it was found that the applied coatings contributed to maintaining physicochemical features (e.g., color and texture). These findings suggest that the SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic-based coating can be applied to extend the shelf life of dates.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Postharvest processing removes undesirable elements, enhances fruit appearance, and ensures quality [1,2]. A postharvest technique involves monitoring and controlling temperature, humidity, packaging, and fungicides [3,4]. Postharvest management aims to improve the value of fruits and vegetables [5]. The value of fruits and vegetables is added continuously until they can be eaten after harvesting [6]. Increasing wages and keeping fruit fresh throughout the year are benefits of postharvest technologies [7,8]. Earlier studies have shown that 30–40% of fruits and vegetables are thrown away because of damage or spoilage [9,10]. Several technological advancements can reduce postharvest losses. Edible coatings are an effective and novel method for preserving fruits and vegetables to reduce postharvest loss [11]. Using edible coatings is expected to extend the shelf life and maintain the quality of meat, fish, dairy, fruits, and vegetables. In recent years, edible films and coatings have emerged as a promising technology to enhance food safety by preventing environmental exposure and increasing shelf life [11,12]. Fruit coatings derived from natural ingredients also reduce spoilage rates and preserve freshness during transportation and storage [13]. The edible coatings can also serve as delivery systems of functional ingredients like antibacterials, odors, antioxidants, and nutritional components, extending the freshness of fruits and preventing microbial growth [14]. In addition, edible coatings are commonly applied to different fruits, including bananas, papayas, tomatoes, grapes, mangoes, strawberries, avocados, apples, oranges, and seasonal fruits [13,15,16,17].
Dates are seasonal fruits that grow widely in semi-arid and dry climates. In Arab countries, it is widely recognized as a crucial tree. Producing date fruits provides significant economic assistance to native communities [18]. Date fruit is enriched with various nutrients, including fiber, carbohydrates (fructose and glucose), minerals, and vitamins [19,20,21]. There are many challenges and obstacles to maintaining the quality and extending the shelf life of dates, such as environmental and biological factors [22]. It has been reported that 5–20% of dates were lost during postharvest management [23]. In date fruit post-harvesting management, microbial contamination is the primary concern. Dates deteriorate quickly due to their moisture, oxygen, and chemical composition [24]. In recent years, studies have been conducted on developing edible coatings for preserving and maintaining the freshness of date fruit. For instance, Rahemi et al. reported that olive oil, methylcellulose, and pectin-based edible coatings were utilized to protect the semi-dry and dry dates [25]. Abu-Shama et al. reported that guar gum, gelatin, chitosan, and composite-based edible coatings prolong Barhi date fruit freshness [18]. Additionally, soy protein, gelatin, zein, chitosan, thyme oil, aniseed oil, pea starch, and carnauba wax were used in the edible coating of dates [26,27,28].
Organic/inorganic nanohybrid materials have garnered attention for their electrical, catalytic, antimicrobial, antioxidant, anticancer, and cytocompatible properties. Le et al. reported that ZnO/chitosan/gum arabic edible coating showed promising results for the shelf-life extension of avocados up to 7 days at room temperature [29]. According to Ramírez-Concepción et al. study, the chitosan/TiO2/ZnO/MgO composite coating most effectively prolonged the shelf life of jackfruit bulbs [30]. Gum arabic is a natural polymer that contains a non-viscous soluble fiber derived from exudates of acacia species [31]. It is extensively employed as a stabilizer and emulsifier in pharmaceutical, food, and cosmetic applications [32]. It is interesting to note that gum arabic possesses antibacterial, antioxidant, antidiabetic, and antiulcer activities. In traditional medicine, gum arabic is also used to relieve inflammation of the intestinal mucosa and kidney disease [31,32,33]. Nanoparticles of TiO2 and SiO2 exhibit unique physical, chemical, and biological properties, which improve the composite material’s performance. Specifically, TiO2 nanoparticles have photocatalytic, antibacterial, and UV-shielding properties [34]. The SiO2 nanoparticles were used as an anti-caking agent, gas and moisture barrier, reinforcing filler [35]. Some studies have reported that nanomaterials incorporated into polymers can improve their tensile strength and elasticity [35,36]. The role of organic/inorganic nanohybrids-based edible coating materials on date fruits at the khalal stage is unknown. Thus, in this study, we fabricated the SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite via ultrasonication and employed them as an edible coating formulation. Furthermore, we assessed the preservation effectiveness of SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite edible coatings on dates at the khalal stage.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Raw Materials and Chemicals

The Pennisetum glaucum residues were purchased from Karur, Tamil Nadu, India. Glycerol, TiO2 nanoparticles, gum arabic, and hydrochloric acid were purchased from Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA. We collected dates at the khalal stage from a local date palm farm in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Fetal bovine serum (FBS), Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide dye, ethidium bromide (EB), acridine orange (AO), and JC-1 stain were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA.

2.2. Synthesis of Biogenic Silica Nanostructures

We mixed 10 g of Pennisetum glaucum residues powder with 100 mL of 0.1 M hydrochloric acid [37]. Afterward, we transferred the mixture to an autoclave and kept it at 120 °C under 103 kPa of pressure for 2 h. Subsequently, acid-pretreated seed hull residues were extracted by filtration. After that, distilled water was used to wash the residues until the acid was removed. Then, the residue was dried and calcined in a muffle furnace at 500 °C for 1 h.

2.3. Synthesis of SiO2/TiO2 Embedded in Gum Arabic

Silica nanostructures (60 mg) derived from Pennisetum glaucum residues and TiO2 nanoparticles (40 mg) were mixed with 200 mL of 5% gum arabic aqueous solution. Next, the mixture was sonicated at 750 W at 20 kHz for 30 min using a probe ultrasonicator (VCX-750, Sonics, Newtown, CT, USA). The obtained colloid was dried at 60 °C. Following that, the obtained material was used for further studies.

2.4. Characterization of SiO2/TiO2 Embedded in Gum Arabic

We investigated the functional groups of gum arabic and their SiO2/TiO2 hybrid using FTIR measurements (Bruker Alpha, Eco Corporations, Berlin, Germany). Using a thermogravimetric analyzer, we analyzed the decomposition and weight loss profiles of gum arabic and their SiO2/TiO2 hybrid as the temperature increased (TGA-60H Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Thermogravimetric analysis was performed at a temperature range of 30–600 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min. We investigated the differences in the crystallinity profiles of gum arabic and their SiO2/TiO2 hybrid using an X-ray diffractometer operating with CuK α-radiation (Lab X, XRD 6100, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) and 2θ data acquired ranging from 10 to 80°, scan speed: 5° min−1.

2.5. Cytocompatibility Assessment

The impact of SiO2/TiO2-embedded gum arabic powder on human mesenchymal stem cell viability was examined using the MTT assay described previously [38]. The 96-well plate was plated with around 1 × 104 cells per well. Following 80% confluence, the cells were exposed to different doses of testing material for 24 and 48 h. After exposure, 20 µL of MTT dye at 5 mg/mL concentration in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) was poured into each well of the plate, and the plate was incubated for 4 h. After carefully aspirating the cell culture media, 200 µL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added to each well. The absorbance of the plate was measured using a microplate reader at 570 nm and 650 nm. Cell viability of human mesenchymal stem cells was calculated from the obtained results.

2.6. Microscopic Assessment of Cell Morphology

We examined the effects of SiO2/TiO2-embedded gum arabic on human mesenchymal stem cells using bright-field and fluorescent microscopes [39]. The 24-well plate was seeded with approximately 1 × 105 cells per well. After reaching 80% confluence, the cells were incubated with various SiO2/TiO2-embedded gum arabic concentrations for 24 and 48 h. A bright-field microscope was used to examine the cellular morphology after incubation, and photographs were taken. Fluorescent microscopic analysis of the cells was performed by staining them with acridine orange/ethidium bromide (AO/EB), examining them under a microscope, and capturing pictures.

2.7. Coating

We collected dates during their khalal stage. We discarded dates that were physically damaged or decayed. We chose dates with uniform color and size. After that, dates were equally divided into two groups. The dates were washed and dried at an ambient temperature. The SiO2/TiO2-impregnated gum arabic coating formulation was prepared using 1% glycerol through ultrasonication. Following complete mixing, the coating formulation was used for date coating. We soaked the dates in coating formulation for 2 min, then dried them at an ambient temperature for 30 min. Afterward, the coated dates were stored in a polyethylene terephthalate box with venting holes at 6 °C. All analyses used uncoated dates as controls under the same storage conditions.

2.8. Color

We monitored the color changes of date fruit after edible coating with a colorimeter (CM-5, Minolta, Tokyo, Japan). The color of dates fruit was estimated using three color parameters: L* (lightness), a* (green/red), and b* (blue/yellow). Date fruit color features were examined from three different points, using their means to evaluate the color variation (E), yellowness index (YI), whiteness index (WI), and chroma.

2.9. Firmness

We assessed the firmness of date fruits at different intervals during storage using the Brookfield CT3 texture analyzer (Brookfield, Middleboro, MA, USA). A two-cycle test measured the textural profile (hardness, springiness, and cohesiveness).

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed from three replicates’ data for each measurement. The statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Office Excel 2016. The statistical significance between the control and coated group was investigated using the student-t test. Also, the significance was considered as p ≤ 0.05.

3. Results and Discussion

Hybrid organic–inorganic systems comprising organic and inorganic materials gained considerable attention in food packaging systems because of their promising physicochemical features. Several hybrid organic/inorganic materials exist in nature, including bone, mollusk shells, and teeth, formed from biomacromolecules and inorganic ingredients assembled at a nanoscale [40]. As a result of the synergistic interactions between organic and inorganic functions, a nanocomposite possesses new properties, including enhanced electrical, catalytic, optical, magnetic, and antimicrobial attributes. In this study, we synthesized biogenic silica and TiO2 nanoparticles-impregnated gum arabic nanocomposite using an environmentally benign approach. Figure 1 depicts the schematic diagram of gum arabic with biogenic SiO2/TiO2 hybrid fabrication.
Silica phytoliths are deposited in plant tissues through the silicification mechanism. A significant silica content is found in plant residues. Accordingly, some studies have reported the fabrication of silica nanostructures from agrarian waste [41,42]. In this study, silica nanostructures were fabricated from pearl millet seed husk. Utilizing inexpensive, non-toxic, and natural Pennisetum glaucum (pearl millet), seed husk is an excellent raw material for naturally occurring silica. Also, seed husks from pearl millet consist of 9.1% silica [37]. Pearl millet biomass-derived silica nanostructures and TiO2 nanoparticles were mixed with gum arabic and sonicated at 750 W for 30 min. Ultrasonication is a highly versatile dispersing strategy employed in several applications. The process involves breaking down large particles into smaller or more uniformly sized ones [43]. Under sonication, the SiO2 and TiO2 nanostructures dispersed well and adhered to the gum arabic matrix (Figure 1).
The FT-IR spectra of the SiO2 nanoparticles and TiO2/SiO2 incorporated gum arabic are shown in Figure 2. The biogenic silica nanoparticles show notable peaks at 1167, 1070, and 810 cm−1, vibration of Si–O–Si, asymmetric vibration of Si–O, and symmetric vibration of Si–O, respectively (Figure 2a). The spectrum of TiO2 nanoparticles showed peaks around 3448, 1639, 686, and 532 cm−1 (Supporting Material Figure S1). The 3448 and 1639 cm−1 peaks correspond to the OH group of water and deformative vibration of the Ti–OH stretching mode of TiO2 nanoparticles. The spectrum of SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic showed the band at 3309 cm−1 ascribed to extensive intramolecular hydrogen bonds and stretching vibration of the OH groups (Figure 2b). The peak at 2931 cm−1 is attributable to the vibration mode of the C–H bonds. The 1604 cm−1 peaks correspond to the deformative vibration of the Ti–OH stretching mode of TiO2 nanoparticles. Two characteristic bands at 1418 cm−1 and 1244 cm−1 correspond to C=O symmetric and C–O–C stretching vibration. A distinct peak at approximately 1067 cm−1 corresponds to the alkene C–H bending in gum arabic. Additionally, we observed that the peaks around 1141, 988, and 810 cm−1 are responsible for Si–O–Si, asymmetric Si–O vibration, and symmetric Si–O, respectively (Figure 2b). These results revealed the presence of TiO2 and SiO2 nanoparticles on gum arabic matrix.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of silica nanoparticles and SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite are present in Figure 3. The silica nanoparticles exhibited the peak at 2θ = 21.12°, revealing the presence of amorphous silica nanoparticles (Figure 3a). This observation is consistent with previous researchers who have noted the amorphous nature of silica [37]. Upon incorporating SiO2 and TiO2 nanostructures, a broad peak was observed between 19 and 24.92°, corresponding to gum arabic and silica. Also, we examined different additional peaks at 2θ of 25.02°, 37.94°, 47.98°, 54.82°, and 69.68°, which are responsible for anatase TiO2 lattice planes of (1 0 1), (0 0 4), (2 0 0), (1 0 5), and (1 1 6), respectively. Our results suggest that highly crystalline TiO2 and amorphous silica nanoparticles were successfully impregnated onto the gum arabic matrix.
Figure 4 presents SEM images of biogenic silica nanoparticles and TiO2 and SiO2 incorporated gum arabic matrix. The SEM images display spherical silica nanoparticles of 70–90 nm in size in Figure 4a,b. Moreover, the SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic SEM images possess 70–100 nm spherical TiO2 and SiO2 nanoparticles distributed evenly on the gum arabic. These results are attributed to the strong interaction between TiO2/SiO2 and gum arabic (Figure 4c,d). Figure 5a displays the elemental composition of the prepared SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite. The results confirmed the presence of Ti, Si, O, and C elements in SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite. Also, the elemental mapping image indicates that Si and Ti elements dispersed well on the gum arabic matrix (Figure 5b). Compared with organic materials, the amount of inorganic ingredients (SiO2 and TiO2) is significantly less (Figure 5a) in the prepared nanocomposite. Thermogravimetric analysis results of gum arabic and SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite are shown in Figure S2. We observed the weight loss percentage of gum arabic reached about 81%. The first stage of weight loss for gum arabic occurs between 100 and 260 °C, as the water molecules are dehydrated. The second weight loss occurred between 260 °C and 350 °C, which is associated with the degradation of hydrocarbons. The weight loss in SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic was around 71%. Based on the results, the SiO2/TiO2-impregnated gum arabic showed superior thermostability.
The biological compatibility of materials is essential for its application in the food industry. Thus, we studied SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic hybrid materials’ biological compatibility with human mesenchymal stem cells. The SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic cytocompatibility was evaluated using various techniques, including cell viability, cellular and nuclear morphology, and JC-1 staining. We assessed the viability of hMSCs after SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic exposure. These results revealed that SiO2/TiO2 nanoparticles-incorporated gum arabic did not affect cell viability. Compared to the control, SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite did not affect cell viability after 24 h and 48 h exposure (Figure 6). These findings imply that hMSCs survived successfully with SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite. Cell and material interaction can be improved by the hydrophilicity of gum arabic in nanocomposite. Earlier studies demonstrated that SiO2 nanoparticles have good biocompatibility [37].
Microscopic observation of cell structural changes in hMSCs after 24 and 48 h SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic exposure was studied. Figure 7 displays bright-field and fluorescence microscopic images of hMSCs after SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic exposure. The cell morphology examination revealed the cells were healthy and grew well in SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic-treated and a control group of 24 and 48 h. Also, acridine orange/ethidium bromide (AO/EB) staining illustrated the cells were viable (Figure 7a,b). We did not find any dead cells in the treated and control groups. Our result suggested that SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite can promote hMSCs proliferation and good growth.
Furthermore, we investigate the mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) level in SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic-treated and control hMSCs to find cell health. Figure 8 represents MMP changes in SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic-treated and control groups. These study results indicated no significant difference between the control and treated groups. The SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite is also non-toxic. Thus, SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite can be used in food industrial applications.
Due to the biocompatibility of SiO2/TiO2-incorporated gum arabic nanocomposite, we utilize it for date fruit shelf-life extension and preservation via an edible coating approach. Generally, food color is one of the main critical components in attracting consumers. Fruit and vegetable colors are also a reliable sign of ripeness, freshness, quality, and maturity. Most commonly, edible coatings do not interfere with fruit and vegetable colors. In particular, in this study, we have examined the outer color of raw and SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite-coated khalal stage dates at various storage stages at 6 °C. Table 1 illustrates the color change results of khalal stage dates. Color differences between the control and treated groups after a week of storage were insignificant. Notably, the control group showed a change in color after 2 weeks. After 4 weeks, we found a significant color change in the control group compared with SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite-coated dates. All the color parameters have noticeable changes between the treatment and control groups because it is easy to make predictions based on individual color parameters (i.e., L*, a*, and b*).
A fruit’s texture is also a crucial aspect that contributes to its freshness and quality. Several factors can affect fruit texture, including moisture content, chemical composition, and the ripening stage. According to the texture study, the control sample’s hardness decreased significantly over time in coated and uncoated dates (Figure 9). Meanwhile, the SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic-coated dates have higher hardness than the control dates. Additionally, cohesiveness and springiness were evaluated in this study. Coated dates had slightly improved cohesiveness and springiness. Earlier studies reported that different biopolymers, including guar gum, gelatin, and chitosan-based edible coatings, extend Barhi date fruit freshness [18]. Furthermore, soy protein, zein, thyme oil, aniseed oil, pea starch, and carnauba wax were used as edible coatings [26,27,28]. Based on our findings, we found that SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite coatings extended the shelf life of dates. The rate of senescence and ripening process may increase during storage, which leads to a loss of hardness (Figure 10). Hence, based on this significance, future studies will measure the chemical composition and enzyme activity using different coating formulations containing SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic.

4. Conclusions

We have synthesized TiO2/SiO2 nanoparticles embedded in gum arabic nanocomposite via ultrasonication. The SEM images revealed biosilica nanostructures of 70–90 nm and TiO2 nanostructures of 70–100 nm adhered on gum arabic. Microscopic analysis and MTT assay results indicated that SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic maintained cell viability and did not modulate cellular structural features. Therefore, it is concluded that SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic possessed good cytocompatibility on human mesenchymal stem cells even at 400 g/mL. We coated date fruits with SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite and stored them at 6 °C. During storage, it was found that the applied coatings contributed to maintaining the physicochemical features of dates. As a result of these findings, it seems that a coating based on SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic can be used to prolong the shelf life of dates.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym17020161/s1, Figure S1: FTIR spectrum of TiO2 nanoparticles; Figure S2: Thermogravimetric analysis of (a) gum arabic and (b) SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.A. and A.A.A.; methodology, J.A. and V.S.P.; formal analysis, V.S.P.; investigation, J.A. and V.S.P.; resources, A.A.A.; writing—original draft, J.A.; writing—review and editing, A.A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors would like to extend their gratitude to the Saudi Arabia Ministry of Environment, Water and Agriculture for providing financial, technical, and administrative support to fund this work through the initiative of encouraging the agricultural “Applied research project in the field of palm and dates” no. 220001154.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend their gratitude to the Saudi Arabia Ministry of Environment, Water and Agriculture for providing financial, technical, and administrative support to fund this work through the initiative of encouraging the agricultural “Applied research project in the field of palm and dates” no. 220001154.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Raju, P.S.; Chauhan, O.P.; Bawa, A.S. Postharvest handling systems and storage of vegetables. In Handbook of Vegetables and Vegetable Processing; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 247–264. [Google Scholar]
  2. De Corato, U. Improving the shelf-life and quality of fresh and minimally-processed fruits and vegetables for a modern food industry: A comprehensive critical review from the traditional technologies into the most promising advancements. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 940–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. El-Ramady, H.R.; Domokos-Szabolcsy, É.; Abdalla, N.A.; Taha, H.S.; Fári, M. Postharvest management of fruits and vegetables storage. Sustain. Agric. Rev. 2015, 15, 65–152. [Google Scholar]
  4. Brecht, J.K.; Sargent, S.A.; Kader, A.A.; Mitcham, E.J.; Maul, F.; Brecht, P.E.; Menocal, O. Mango Postharvest Best Management Practices Manual: HS1185. 2020. Available online: https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/HS1185 (accessed on 27 November 2024).
  5. Shewfelt, R.L.; Prussia, S.E. Challenges in handling fresh fruits and vegetables. In Postharvest Handling; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 167–186. [Google Scholar]
  6. Shakeel, Q.; Shaheen, M.R.; Ali, S.; Ahmad, A.; Raheel, M.; Bajwa, R.T. Postharvest management of fruits and vegetables. In Applications of Biosurfactant in Agriculture; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  7. Suresh, B.V.; Shireesha, Y.; Kishore, T.S.; Dwivedi, G.; Haghighi, A.T.; Patro, E.R. Natural energy materials and storage systems for solar dryers: State of the art. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2023, 255, 112276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Iturralde-García, R.D.; Cinco-Moroyoqui, F.J.; Martínez-Cruz, O.; Ruiz-Cruz, S.; Wong-Corral, F.J.; Borboa-Flores, J.; Cornejo-Ramírez, Y.I.; Bernal-Mercado, A.T.; Del-Toro-Sánchez, C.L. Emerging Technologies for Prolonging Fresh-Cut Fruits’ Quality and Safety during Storage. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bancal, V.; Ray, R.C. Overview of Food Loss and Waste in Fruits and Vegetables: From Issue to Resources. In Fruits and Vegetable Wastes: Valorization to Bioproducts and Platform Chemicals; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2022; pp. 3–29. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kitinoja, L.; Saran, S.; Roy, S.K.; Kader, A.A. Postharvest technology for developing countries: Challenges and opportunities in research, outreach and advocacy. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2011, 91, 597–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Riva, S.C.; Opara, U.O.; Fawole, O.A. Recent developments on postharvest application of edible coatings on stone fruit: A review. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 262, 109074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Panahirad, S.; Dadpour, M.; Peighambardoust, S.H.; Soltanzadeh, M.; Gullón, B.; Alirezalu, K.; Lorenzo, J.M. Applications of carboxymethyl cellulose-and pectin-based active edible coatings in preservation of fruits and vegetables: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 110, 663–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. La, D.D.; Nguyen-Tri, P.; Le, K.H.; Nguyen, P.T.; Nguyen, M.D.B.; Vo, A.T.; Nguyen, M.T.; Chang, S.W.; Tran, L.D.; Chung, W.J.; et al. Effects of antibacterial ZnO nanoparticles on the performance of a chitosan/gum arabic edible coating for post-harvest banana preservation. Prog. Org. Coat. 2021, 151, 106057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kumar, N.; Pratibha Prasad, J.; Yadav, A.; Upadhyay, A.; Neeraj Shukla, S.; Petkoska, A.T.; Heena Suri, S.; Gniewosz, M. Recent trends in edible packaging for food applications—Perspective for the future. Food Eng. Rev. 2023, 15, 718–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, J.; Wang, B.; Jiang, W.; Zhao, Y. Quality and shelf life of mango (Mangifera indica L. cv. Tainong’) coated by using chitosan and polyphenols. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2007, 13, 317–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Han, C.; Lederer, C.; McDaniel, M.; Zhao, Y. Sensory evaluation of fresh strawberries (Fragaria ananassa) coated with chitosan-based edible coatings. J. Food Sci. 2005, 70, S172–S178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Correa-Pacheco, Z.N.; Bautista-Baños, S.; de Lorena Ramos-García, M.; del Carmen Martínez-González, M.; Hernández-Romano, J. Physicochemical characterization and antimicrobial activity of edible propolis-chitosan nanoparticle films. Prog. Org. Coat. 2019, 137, 105326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abu-Shama, H.S.; Abou-Zaid, F.O.F.; El-Sayed, E.Z. Effect of using edible coatings on fruit quality of Barhi date cultivar. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 265, 109262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Alshatwi, A.A.; Athinarayanan, J.; Periasamy, V.S.; Alatiah, K.A. Date fruits-assisted synthesis and biocompatibility assessment of nickel oxide nanoparticles anchored onto graphene sheets for biomedical applications. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2017, 181, 725–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Yahia, E.M.; Lobo, M.G.; Kader, A.A. Harvesting and postharvest technology of dates. In Dates: Postharvest Science, Processing Technology and Health Benefits; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 105–135. [Google Scholar]
  21. Tang, Z.X.; Shi, L.E.; Aleid, S.M. Date fruit: Chemical composition, nutritional and medicinal values, products. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 93, 2351–2361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Siddiq, M.; Greiby, I. Overview of date fruit production, postharvest handling, processing, and nutrition. In Dates: Postharvest science, Processing Technology and Health Benefits; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  23. El-Ansary, M.A.; Omar, A.K.; Salama, A.; Helal, S.M. Assessment of fruit defects and economic loss of some soft date palm cultivars (Phoenix dactylifera L.) in north delta, Egypt. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2019, 17, 5965–5974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shenasi, M.; Aidoo, K.E.; Candlish, A.A. Microflora of date fruits and production of aflatoxins at various stages of maturation. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2002, 79, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Rahemi, M.; Roustai, F.; Sedaghat, S. Use of Edible Coatings to Preserve Date Fruits (Phoenix dactylofera L.). J. Packag. Technol. Res. 2020, 4, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Salajegheh, F.; Tajeddin, B.; Panahi, B.; Karimi, H. Effect of edible coatings based on zein and chitosan and the use of Roman aniseed oil on the microbial activity of Mazafati dates. J. Food Bioprocess Eng. 2020, 3, 178–184. [Google Scholar]
  27. Yousef, A.R.; El-Moniem, E.A.A.A.; Mahmoud, T.S.M. Edible coating of soy protein or gelatin as a carrier of thyme oil for maintaining quality of ‘barhee ‘dates fruits during cold storage. Plant Arch. 2020, 20, 9311–9322. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mehyar, G.F.; El Assi, N.M.; Alsmairat, N.G.; Holley, R.A. Effect of edible coatings on fruit maturity and fungal growth on Berhi dates. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 49, 2409–2417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Le, K.H.; Nguyen, M.D.B.; Dai Tran, L.; Thi, H.P.N.; Van Tran, C.; Van Tran, K.; Thi, H.P.N.; Thi, N.D.; Yoon, Y.S.; Nguyen, D.D.; et al. A novel antimicrobial ZnO nanoparticles-added polysaccharide edible coating for the preservation of postharvest avocado under ambient conditions. Prog. Org. Coat. 2021, 158, 106339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ramírez-Concepción, H.R.; Anaya-Esparza, L.M.; de Lourdes García-Magaña, M.; Yahia, E.M.; Meza-Espinoza, L.; Montalvo-González, E. The effects of chitosan-TiO2 and chitosan-TiO2-ZnO-MgO hybrid coatings on the shelf life of jackfruit bulbs (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam). Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 58, 6708–6717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Prasad, N.; Thombare, N.; Sharma, S.C.; Kumar, S. Gum arabic–A versatile natural gum: A review on production, processing, properties and applications. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 187, 115304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. De, A.; Nayak, A.K.; Kundu, A.; Das, B.; Samanta, A. Gum arabic-based nanomaterials in drug delivery and biomedical applications. In Biopolymer-Based Nanomaterials in Drug Delivery and Biomedical Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 165–182. [Google Scholar]
  33. Patel, S.; Goyal, A. Applications of natural polymer gum arabic: A review. Int. J. Food Prop. 2015, 18, 986–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Burda, C. TiO2 nanoparticles as functional building blocks. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 9283–9318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Dubey, R.S.; Rajesh, Y.B.R.D.; More, M.A. Synthesis and characterization of SiO2 nanoparticles via sol-gel method for industrial applications. Mater. Today Proc. 2015, 2, 3575–3579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, W.; Ahari, H.; Zhang, Z.; Jafari, S.M. Role of silica (SiO2) nano/micro-particles in the functionality of degradable packaging films/coatings and their application in food preservation. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 133, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Athinarayanan, J.; Periasamy, V.S.; Qasem, A.A.; Al-Shagrawi, R.A.; Alshatwi, A.A. Synthesis of SiO2 nanostructures from Pennisetum glaucum and their effect on osteogenic differentiation for bone tissue engineering applications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2019, 30, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Athinarayanan, J.; Periasamy, V.S.; Alshatwi, A.A. Unveiling the biocompatible properties of date palm tree (Phoenix dactylifera L.) biomass-derived lignin nanoparticles. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 19270–19279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Athinarayanan, J.; Alshatwi, A.A.; Periasamy, V.S. Biocompatibility analysis of Borassus flabellifer biomass-derived nanofibrillated cellulose. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 235, 115961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Zhao, N.; Yan, L.; Zhao, X.; Chen, X.; Li, A.; Zheng, D.; Zhou, X.; Dai, X.; Xu, F.J. Versatile types of organic/inorganic nanohybrids: From strategic design to biomedical applications. Chem. Rev. 2018, 119, 1666–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Athinarayanan, J.; Periasamy, V.S.; Alhazmi, M.; Alatiah, K.A.; Alshatwi, A.A. Synthesis of biogenic silica nanoparticles from rice husks for biomedical applications. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Athinarayanan, J.; Periasamy, V.S.; Alhazmi, M.; Alshatwi, A.A. Synthesis and biocompatibility assessment of sugarcane bagasse-derived biogenic silica nanoparticles for biomedical applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2017, 105, 340–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sandhya, M.; Ramasamy, D.; Sudhakar, K.; Kadirgama, K.; Harun, W.S.W. Ultrasonication an intensifying tool for preparation of stable nanofluids and study the time influence on distinct properties of graphene nanofluids–A systematic overview. Ultrason. Sonochemistry 2021, 73, 105479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic fabrication.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic fabrication.
Polymers 17 00161 g001
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of (a) Pennisetum glaucum-derived biogenic silica and (b) SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite.
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of (a) Pennisetum glaucum-derived biogenic silica and (b) SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite.
Polymers 17 00161 g002
Figure 3. XRD pattern of (a) Pennisetum glaucum-derived biogenic silica and (b) SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite.
Figure 3. XRD pattern of (a) Pennisetum glaucum-derived biogenic silica and (b) SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite.
Polymers 17 00161 g003
Figure 4. SEM images of (a,b) Pennisetum glaucum-derived biogenic silica and (c,d) SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite.
Figure 4. SEM images of (a,b) Pennisetum glaucum-derived biogenic silica and (c,d) SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite.
Polymers 17 00161 g004
Figure 5. (a) Energy-dispersive X-ray diffraction (EDX) spectrum of SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite and (b) elemental mapping of prepared SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite.
Figure 5. (a) Energy-dispersive X-ray diffraction (EDX) spectrum of SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite and (b) elemental mapping of prepared SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite.
Polymers 17 00161 g005
Figure 6. Influence of prepared nanocomposite on cell viability of human mesenchymal stem cells assessed using MTT assay.
Figure 6. Influence of prepared nanocomposite on cell viability of human mesenchymal stem cells assessed using MTT assay.
Polymers 17 00161 g006
Figure 7. (a) Bright-field microscopic and acridine orange/ethidium bromide staining images of human mesenchymal stem cells after 24 h exposure to SiO2/TiO2-incorporated gum arabic nanocomposite. (b) Bright-field microscopic and acridine orange/ethidium bromide staining images of human mesenchymal stem cells after 48 h exposure to SiO2/TiO2-incorporated gum arabic nanocomposite.
Figure 7. (a) Bright-field microscopic and acridine orange/ethidium bromide staining images of human mesenchymal stem cells after 24 h exposure to SiO2/TiO2-incorporated gum arabic nanocomposite. (b) Bright-field microscopic and acridine orange/ethidium bromide staining images of human mesenchymal stem cells after 48 h exposure to SiO2/TiO2-incorporated gum arabic nanocomposite.
Polymers 17 00161 g007aPolymers 17 00161 g007b
Figure 8. Effect of SiO2/TiO2-incorporated gum arabic nanocomposite on the mitochondria membrane potential of human mesenchymal stem cells.
Figure 8. Effect of SiO2/TiO2-incorporated gum arabic nanocomposite on the mitochondria membrane potential of human mesenchymal stem cells.
Polymers 17 00161 g008
Figure 9. Textural features of SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite-coated and uncoated khalal stage dates during storage at 6 °C.
Figure 9. Textural features of SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite-coated and uncoated khalal stage dates during storage at 6 °C.
Polymers 17 00161 g009
Figure 10. Digital images of SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite-coated and uncoated khalal stage dates during storage at 6 °C.
Figure 10. Digital images of SiO2/TiO2/gum arabic nanocomposite-coated and uncoated khalal stage dates during storage at 6 °C.
Polymers 17 00161 g010
Table 1. Color parameters in SiO2/TiO2 nanostructures-impregnated gum arabic-coated khalal stage dates at different storage intervals.
Table 1. Color parameters in SiO2/TiO2 nanostructures-impregnated gum arabic-coated khalal stage dates at different storage intervals.
Storage Time (Days)L*a*b*
ControlSiO2/TiO2/gum ArabicControlSiO2/TiO2/gum ArabicControlSiO2/TiO2/gum Arabic
056.9762.63 8.227.4934.6440.08
754.7562.059.265.1335.5436.98
1453.3461.427.366.9337.7142.62
2143.7059.787.118.1522.6742.71
2834.4554.075.858.2315.9238.41
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Athinarayanan, J.; Periasamy, V.S.; Alshatwi, A.A. Ultrasonic-Assisted Synthesis and Cytocompatibility Assessment of TiO2/SiO2 Nanoparticles-Impregnated Gum Arabic Nanocomposite: Edible Coating of Dates for Shelf-Life Extension. Polymers 2025, 17, 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17020161

AMA Style

Athinarayanan J, Periasamy VS, Alshatwi AA. Ultrasonic-Assisted Synthesis and Cytocompatibility Assessment of TiO2/SiO2 Nanoparticles-Impregnated Gum Arabic Nanocomposite: Edible Coating of Dates for Shelf-Life Extension. Polymers. 2025; 17(2):161. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17020161

Chicago/Turabian Style

Athinarayanan, Jegan, Vaiyapuri Subbarayan Periasamy, and Ali A. Alshatwi. 2025. "Ultrasonic-Assisted Synthesis and Cytocompatibility Assessment of TiO2/SiO2 Nanoparticles-Impregnated Gum Arabic Nanocomposite: Edible Coating of Dates for Shelf-Life Extension" Polymers 17, no. 2: 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17020161

APA Style

Athinarayanan, J., Periasamy, V. S., & Alshatwi, A. A. (2025). Ultrasonic-Assisted Synthesis and Cytocompatibility Assessment of TiO2/SiO2 Nanoparticles-Impregnated Gum Arabic Nanocomposite: Edible Coating of Dates for Shelf-Life Extension. Polymers, 17(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17020161

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop