Next Article in Journal
Development and Application of Polymer Scaffolds
Previous Article in Journal
Development and Characterization of a Novel Erucyl Ultra-Long-Chain Gemini Surfactant
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preparation of Highly Antibacterial MXene Nanofiltration Membranes and Investigation of Their Separation Performance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Advanced Cellulose Triacetate-Based Mixed Matrix Membranes Enhanced by Bimetallic Ni-Cu-BTC MOFs for CO2/CH4 Separation

School of Chemical and Materials Engineering (SCME), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2025, 17(16), 2258; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17162258
Submission received: 17 July 2025 / Revised: 17 August 2025 / Accepted: 18 August 2025 / Published: 21 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymer-Based Membranes: Innovation in Separation Technology)

Abstract

Cu-BTC (HKUST-1) metal–organic framework (MOF) is widely recognized for its carbon capture capability due to its unsaturated copper sites, high surface area, and well-defined porous structure. This study developed mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) using cellulose triacetate (CTA), incorporating bimetallic Ni-Cu-BTC MOFs for CO2/CH4 separation, and benchmarked them against membranes fabricated with monometallic Cu-BTC. CTA was selected for its biodegradability, membrane-forming properties, and cost-effectiveness. The optimized membrane with 10 wt.% Ni-Cu-BTC achieved a CO2 permeability of 22.9 Barrer at 25 °C and 5 bar—more than twice that of pristine CTA—with a CO2/CH4 selectivity of 33.8. This improvement stems from a 51.66% increase in fractional free volume, a 49.30% rise in the solubility coefficient, and a 51.94% boost in the diffusivity coefficient. Dual-sorption model analysis further confirmed enhanced solubility and adsorption mechanisms. These findings establish CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC membranes as promising candidates for high-performance CO2 separation in natural gas purification and related industrial processes.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The rising energy demands of today’s world have significantly increased natural gas consumption, which currently meets over 22% of global energy requirements [1]. This trend is expected to continue, with global energy consumption projected to rise from 505 Giga BTUs in 2017 to 770 Giga BTUs by 2035 [2]. While natural gas emits less CO2 than coal or oil, its growing use, alongside other fossil fuels, contributed to atmospheric CO2 levels exceeding 417 ppm by 2022, a 50% rise since pre-industrial times [3]. CO2 emissions increased drastically from burning fossil fuels, reaching 36.3 billion tons in 2022 [4]. Methane (CH4), a significant component of natural gas, has a high heating value of 55.5 MJ/kg, which makes it an attractive energy source [5]. However, CO2 in natural gas reduces its energy density, causes pipeline corrosion, and introduces operational challenges [6]. Therefore, removing CO2 is crucial for enhancing purity and improving methane’s energy content and quality.
The conventional technologies used for CO2 separation and capture include cryogenic distillation [7], microbial processes [8], absorption [9], and adsorption [10]. Cryogenic distillation is highly energy-intensive and costly [11]; absorption involves high regeneration energy and solvent degradation [12]; adsorption suffers from slow regeneration and moisture sensitivity [13]; and microbial techniques face challenges related to scalability, operational costs, and maintaining microbial stability under varying environmental conditions [14]. In contrast, membrane separation technology has become a widely favored method for this application due to its low energy requirements, cost-effective operation, ability to function continuously, compact design, ease of scale-up, and minimal environmental impact [15]. Among the various types of membranes, polymeric membranes are beneficial over ceramic and inorganic membranes due to their easy fabrication, mechanical robustness, and scalability [16]. These properties ensure their effectiveness in gas separation processes at an industrial scale [17].
One of the most widely used polymers, cellulose acetate (CA), is a thermoplastic material synthesized from cellulose. It can be broadly categorized into two primary forms: cellulose diacetate (CDA) and cellulose triacetate (CTA) [18]. This classification is based on the degree of acetylation, which can vary between 1 and 3, specifying the number of hydroxyl groups that acetyl groups replace on the cellulose repeat unit [19]. Cellulose triacetate (CTA), characterized by the highest degree of acetylation, possesses excellent thermal stability and exhibits a higher affinity for CO2 over CH4 [20]. It is highly valued for its low cost, non-toxic characteristics, and biodegradable nature, making it a sustainable and safe choice for various applications [21]. It is recognized for its excellent film-forming capacity, in addition to its strong thermal stability and mechanical strength. It offers efficient gas transport characteristics and exceptional chemical and structural stability. CTA membranes remain stable even when exposed to acidic gases such as sulfur dioxide (SO2), which makes them well-suited for use in demanding or corrosive environments [22].
In polymeric membranes, enhancing gas permeability typically reduces selectivity, a phenomenon described by Robeson’s upper-bound curve [23,24,25]. To address this trade-off, numerous high-efficiency membranes have been designed and optimized, such as mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) [26], thermally rearranged membranes (TRMs) [27], carbon molecular sieve (CMS) membranes [28], and polymer of intrinsic microporosity (PIM) membranes [29]. Among these, MMMs stand out for merging the ease of polymer processing with the superior performance of inorganic fillers. Incorporating nanoparticles into polymer matrices enhances permeability and selectivity by increasing fractional free volume (FFV) and creating additional pathways for gas molecules [16]. This structural modification increases gas permeability for CO2 and H2, while also enhancing CH4 selectivity [30]. However, weak interactions at the filler–polymer interface may give rise to non-selective voids, negatively affecting membrane performance [31].
Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are widely utilized as nanofillers in MMMs, primarily because their tunable pore networks, large specific surface areas, and high porosity enable enhanced gas separation performance [32]. Also, MOFs, with their partially organic structure, are easier to integrate into polymers compared to zeolites [33]. Among MOFs, Cu-BTC (HKUST-1, MOF-199, Basolite C-300) is particularly effective for CO2/CH4 separation [34]. Cu-BTC consists of divalent copper ions (Cu2+) coordinated with benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate (BTC) ligands, forming a stable three-dimensional porous framework [35,36,37,38]. Its crystalline structure, with unsaturated copper sites and selective pores, enables strong interactions with CO2 molecules, which possess a significant quadrupole moment, enhancing both permeability and selectivity [39]. According to findings by Mu et al. [40], the Cu-BTC MOF was capable of capturing 7.2 millimoles of CO2 per gram when tested at 1 bar and 273 K. Under identical testing conditions, MOF-74 showed a lower uptake, reaching only 4.9 millimoles per gram. Cu-BTC is distinguished by its large specific surface area, measured at around 945 m2/g [41], a substantial pore volume of roughly 0.70 cm3/g [42], and excellent thermal stability, withstanding temperatures up to 350 °C [43]. When Cu-BTC is integrated into polymer matrices, its high surface area and controlled porosity create microporous regions that enhance gas transport and exhibit good CO2 affinity. Mahdi et al. [36] reported a CO2 permeability of 238.8 Barrer with 15 wt.% NH2-Cu BTC in Pebax 1657 and selectivities to 29.72 (CO2/CH4) and 43.59 (CO2/N2). A 23% improvement in CO2 permeance was achieved by Swati et al. [44] by incorporating 10 wt.% Cu-BTC into polysulfone-based MMMs.
Although single-metal MOFs have received considerable attention for gas separation, research on bimetallic MOFs in this field remains relatively underexplored. Incorporating a secondary metal into the MOF framework—whether during initial synthesis or via post-synthetic modification—can notably influence its porosity, its structural characteristics, and the spatial arrangement of active sites [45,46,47]. These modifications can improve gas adsorption due to synergistic interactions between the two metal centers acting as open sites [48,49,50]. For instance, Zhou et al. [51] showed that incorporating magnesium into MIL-101(Cr) enhanced its capacity to adsorb CO2 to 3.28 mmol/g at 1 bar, reflecting a 40% increase over the monometallic MIL-101(Cr). Li et al. [52] reported that a bimetallic MOF comprising copper and zinc (Zn/Cu-BTC) achieved a CO2/N2 selectivity of up to 17, exceeding that of its monometallic counterparts. By incorporating both titanium and zirconium into the UiO-66 framework, Lau et al. [53] achieved a significant 81% improvement in CO2 adsorption performance over the pristine material. Shahbaz et al. [54] integrated bimetallic Zn/Co-ZIF-NH2 into 6FDA-DAM polyimide membranes, leading to marked enhancements in the H2/CH4 and CO2/CH4 separation performance. Li et al. [55] incorporated rod-like bimetallic Cu0.5Ca0.5-SBMOF into Matrimid® 5218 membranes for CH4/N2 separation, achieving a selectivity of 17.03 and notable permeability with excellent stability. Khan et al. [56] enhanced composite hollow fiber membranes from polysulfone by incorporating amine-functionalized PEI loaded with copper–magnesium-modified HKUST-1 MOF, achieving a CO2/CH4 selectivity of 51.
This work investigates the impact of incorporating bimetallic Ni-Cu-BTC MOF into CTA-based MMMs, focusing on the separation performance of CO2/CH4, and benchmarks their performance against MMMs containing monometallic Cu-BTC. We hypothesize that introducing nickel into the Cu-BTC framework will significantly enhance CO2/CH4 separation by generating additional active sites, facilitating stronger interactions with CO2 molecules, increasing adsorption affinity, and improving structural stability through synergistic effects between the two metal centers. This study is the first to explore CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC MMMs for CO2/CH4 separation, aiming to improve membrane performance for natural gas purification.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

For the fabrication of membranes, cellulose triacetate (CTA, DS = 2.84) and the polar aprotic solvent N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP) were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The materials utilized for the MOF synthesis included nickel(II) nitrate hexahydrate, copper(II) nitrate trihydrate, benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid (BTC), dimethylformamide (DMF), ethanol, and deionized water, all obtained from the same supplier. Each chemical reagent had a purity level of 99.99%, ensuring the reliability of experimental outcomes. For gas permeation testing, high-purity CO2 and CH4 gases were supplied by Paradise Gases (Islamabad, Pakistan). Figure 1 illustrates the chemical configuration of CTA and the MOFs utilized in this research.

2.2. Synthesis Procedures for Cu-BTC and Ni-Cu-BTC MOFs

To synthesize Cu-BTC MOFs, 1.5 g of BTC was dissolved in a solvent mixture comprising equal volumes (22.5 mL each) of DMF and ethanol. In a separate step, 3.11 g of copper(II) nitrate was completely dissolved in 22.5 mL of deionized water under continuous stirring to ensure homogeneity. After obtaining a clear solution of copper nitrate, it was slowly introduced into the solution containing BTC. The synthesized reaction mixture was treated in a Teflon-lined autoclave for 12 h at 120 °C. After cooling, the solid product was collected by filtration and vacuum-dried at 55 °C for 24 h to remove residual solvent. The bimetallic Ni-Cu-BTC MOF was synthesized by introducing equimolar quantities of copper(II) and nickel(II) nitrate hexahydrate into a pre-prepared BTC solution. This mixture was processed using the same temperature and vacuum-drying conditions as applied in the Cu-BTC synthesis procedure to ensure consistency across samples.

2.3. Membrane Fabrication

2.3.1. Pristine Cellulose Triacetate (CTA) Membrane

A 12% w/v solution of CTA in NMP was prepared to fabricate a pristine membrane. Prior to solution preparation, the powdered cellulose triacetate was oven-dried for 5 h at 100 °C to ensure exclusion of any residual moisture content. After drying, the polymer was slowly introduced into NMP and stirred steadily at 45 °C for 24 h for thorough dissolution. Following this, the polymer solution was degassed to eliminate entrapped air bubbles. The homogeneous mixture was then cast evenly onto a cleaned glass slab. To finalize the membrane formation, the cast film was dried overnight in a vacuum oven at 100 °C. After drying, the resulting membrane was carefully detached from the glass using a surgical blade, yielding an intact and defect-free film.

2.3.2. Mixed Matrix Membranes (MMMs)

To fabricate Cu-BTC-based MMMs, a homogeneous solution of CTA in NMP was first prepared by stirring continuously overnight. Cu-BTC MOF particles were separately dispersed in NMP and sonicated in a bath sonicator for one hour to ensure uniform nanoparticle distribution. After sonication, the resulting suspension was slowly added to the previously prepared CTA/NMP solution. This blended mixture was then subjected to additional stirring for one more hour to ensure uniform mixing. Then, after uniform casting over a glass plate, the solution underwent vacuum drying at 100 °C for a duration of 12 h. The resulting membranes were then carefully peeled off using a blade. This procedure was followed for all MMM samples, with the stepwise process schematically illustrated in Figure 2. The amount of filler incorporated was determined using a formula:
Particle   loading   ( % )   = w e i g h t   o f   t h e   p a r t i c l e s w e i g h t   o f   t h e   p a r t i c l e s + w e i g h t   o f   t h e   p o l y m e r × 100

2.4. Membrane Characterizations

To analyze the functional, structural, and morphological features, advanced characterization techniques were used. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectra of all fabricated membranes and Ni-Cu-BTC MOF were recorded using a PerkinElmer Spectrum 100 spectrometer (PerkinElmer Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) to investigate functional groups and chemical bonding. The analysis emphasized characteristic vibrational bands, interpreted in comparison with standard spectral references. The spectral analysis was conducted over a wavenumber range spanning from 4000 to 400 cm−1. The membranes’ crystalline structure was analyzed with a Bruker D2 Phaser XRD instrument (Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany). Scans were performed across a 2θ range of 5° to 35°, allowing the identification of any crystalline phases in the membrane materials. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (JSM-6490LA, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was employed to examine the surface and cross-sectional morphology of the membrane samples. For imaging, the samples were fractured under cryogenic conditions using liquid nitrogen and then sputter-coated with a thin platinum layer to improve electrical conductivity. Structural features were examined using SEM at magnifications ranging from 500× to 20,000×. In addition to morphological characterization, an elemental examination of the optimized membrane was undertaken through Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX) using a detector integrated within the microscope. Fractional free volume (FFV) was calculated using Equation (2) to estimate the free volume in each of the fabricated membranes [59,60]:
F F V =   V V 0 V
Here, V indicates the molar volume of the cellulose triacetate (CTA) repeating unit, whereas V 0 is the volume that is occupied by the polymer chains. These values were determined using Equations (3) and (4):
V = M ρ
V 0 = 1.3 × V v d w
The molecular weight M , given in grams per mole (g/mol), corresponds to the repeating unit of CTA. The van der Waals volume ( V v d w ) was calculated based on Bondi’s approach [61]. All volumes— V , V 0 , and V v d w —were expressed in cm3/mol. The membrane density, ρ , expressed in g/cm3, was calculated using Equation (5).
ρ = W a i r W a i r W l i q u i d × ρ 0
where W a i r and W l i q u i d represent the membrane weights in grams, while ρ 0 indicates the density of ethanol, measured in g/cm3. The membranes’ weight was measured both before and after immersion in ethanol for 24 h.

2.5. Gas Permeation Measurements

Membrane performance was assessed through permeation tests using both single- and mixed-gas systems, conducted at 25 °C and a pressure of 5 bar. For both CO2 and CH4, measurements employed a constant-pressure, variable-volume technique. An equimolar (50:50 v/v) mixture of CO2 and CH4 was utilized in the mixed-gas experiments. Each membrane underwent three separate tests to verify consistency, with corresponding standard errors reported. The experimental configuration of the gas permeation setup is shown in Figure 3.
Gas permeability was calculated based on the relationship defined in Equation (6):
P i = Q i × Δ l Δ P × A
where P i denotes the gas permeability expressed in Barrer, where 1 Barrer equals 10−10 cm3 (STP)·cm/(cm2·s1·cmHg1). Q i represents the volumetric gas flow rate in cm3 (STP)/s, Δ l is the membrane thickness in centimeters, Δ P signifies the pressure gradient across the membrane in cmHg, and A denotes the effective membrane area, expressed in cm2. The CO2/CH4 selectivity of the membranes was determined using Equation (7):
α =   P C O 2   P C H 4
α denotes the ideal selectivity, while P C O 2 and P C H 4 refer to the respective permeabilities of CO2 and CH4.
The sorption analysis of CO2 for the pristine CTA membrane and the optimized mixed matrix membrane was performed using an H-Sorb 2600 high-pressure adsorption (GOLD APP INSTRUMENT CORP. LTD., HongKong, China) analyzer at 45 °C, with pressures up to 15 bar. Before the sorption studies, the membranes were degassed to eliminate moisture. The solubility coefficient, S (cm3(STP)/cm3 cmHg), and the diffusivity coefficient, D (cm2/s), were calculated at a pressure of 5 bar using Equations (8) and (9), respectively.
S = C p
P = S × D  
In these expressions, C   denotes the total amount of gas adsorbed, given in cm3 (STP)/cm3, and feed pressure is represented by p , measured in cmHg.
The dual-mode sorption model, represented by Equation (10), was employed to further analyze CO2 sorption behavior, characterizing gas solubility in glassy polymers via two distinct mechanisms. The initial term in Equation (10) represents gas absorption into the polymer matrix as described by Henry’s law. The second term corresponds to Langmuir adsorption, which explains gas uptake in microvoids or “holes” within the polymer [62,63]. The dual-mode sorption model is mathematically expressed as
C = C D + C H = K D p + C H b p 1 + b p  
Here, C denotes the total gas concentration within the polymer, measured in cm3(STP)/cm3 polymer. It consists of two parts: C D , representing the Henry’s law contribution, and C H , arising from Langmuir adsorption—both expressed in the same units. K D is the Henry’s law constant, with units of cm3 (STP)/cm3 polymer·bar. The term C H signifies the Langmuir capacity constant, reflecting the maximum adsorption capacity, while b is the Langmuir affinity constant, indicating adsorption strength, measured in 1/bar. Lastly, p refers to the feed pressure applied during sorption, expressed in bar.
The parameters K D , C H , and b were determined using a graphical method based on the procedure described by Vieth et al. [64]. To evaluate the accuracy, the standard error of the estimate (SEE) was calculated using Equation (11):
S E E =   i ( C i ,   e x p C i ,   c a l c ) 2 n p
where C i ,   e x p represents the experimental concentration, C i ,   c a l c denotes the concentration calculated from Equation (10), n represents the total count of data points, and p refers to the number of parameters estimated in the model. SEE was chosen over the correlation coefficient (R2) as it provides a more reliable fit measure for nonlinear regression models, including the dual-sorption model [65].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Analysis

Figure 4 displays the FTIR spectra corresponding to the fabricated membranes and the Ni-Cu-BTC MOFs. All membrane spectra showed distinct bands near 3480 cm−1, 2950 cm−1, and 1740 cm−1, which are indicative of O–H, C–H, and C=O stretching vibrations, respectively [66]. Characteristic peaks at ~1380 cm−1 (C–O stretch) and ~610 cm−1 (Cu–O stretch) confirm the successful embedding of Cu-BTC MOF into the MMM structure [67]. A sharp peak between 1675 and 1600 cm−1 signifies C=C stretching vibrations from benzene rings, indicating the presence of the H3BTC linker in the Cu-BTC MOF [68]. The detection of a peak around 470 cm−1, corresponding to Ni–O stretching vibrations, confirmed the successful incorporation of nickel into the Ni-Cu-BTC MOF framework [50,69]. Furthermore, the FT-IR spectrum of the Ni-Cu-BTC MOFs shows identical characteristic bands to those reported in the literature [70], validating the structural integrity of the synthesized MOFs. The absence of new peaks suggests that no strong chemical interactions or structural degradation occurred during MOF incorporation, indicating that the MOFs retained their chemical identity within the CTA matrix [71].

3.2. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) Analysis

Figure 5 presents the XRD patterns, which provide insight into the crystalline phases of the fabricated membrane samples. The pristine CTA membrane exhibited distinct diffraction peaks near 2θ angles of 8° and 18°, indicative of its semi-crystalline nature [20]. The incorporation of Cu-BTC into CTA membranes introduced characteristic peaks around 6.7°, 11.78°, 13.34°, 19.24°, and 28.97°, signifying the presence of the Cu-BTC crystalline phase [72,73]. With increasing Cu-BTC loading, the intensity of these peaks increased, indicating a higher contribution of the crystalline MOF phase within the membrane. Additional peaks around 21.5°, 26.3°, and 43.20° were observed in the CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC-10 wt.% MMM due to Ni incorporation. The prominent peak near 11.78° further confirmed its higher crystallinity, as supported by the literature [41]. This can be attributed to the partial exchange of Ni2+ ions into the Cu-BTC structure, which led to an intensified peak. The diffraction patterns of all fabricated MMMs revealed characteristic peaks for both the polymer and the incorporated nanofillers. This indicates that the crystalline phases of both the MOF fillers and the polymer were retained during membrane fabrication.

3.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and EDX Analysis

The cross-sectional and surface microstructures of all fabricated membranes at different filler concentrations are presented in Figure 6 and Figure 7. The detailed morphology of the optimized CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC-10 wt.% membrane, along with the corresponding EDX elemental mapping, is shown in Figure 8. All the fabricated membranes exhibited asymmetry, with loosely packed structures between the dense and defect-free skin layer. Moreover, the incorporated nanoparticles were well-dispersed, showing no signs of agglomeration up to 10 wt.% loading. This observation was further confirmed by EDX analysis of the optimized membrane. Elemental mapping revealed that Ni (green) and Cu (purple) from the bimetallic MOF were uniformly distributed across the CTA matrix surface. There was no evidence of agglomeration, indicating homogeneous nanoparticle dispersion even at 10 wt.% loading. These results are primarily due to the favorable interfacial interactions and high compatibility between Cu-BTC and the CTA polymer matrix. The EDX spectra further confirmed a 1:1 atomic ratio of Ni to Cu, verifying the intended bimetallic composition in the membrane. However, when the filler concentration was raised from 10 to 15 wt.%, signs of agglomeration appeared, likely caused by the polymer’s limited capacity to uniformly distribute the excess filler, leading to particle clustering [74]. According to Zhang et al. [75], disparities in physical characteristics between the polymer and MOF crystals may lead to particle agglomeration. Such agglomeration frequently results in the formation of non-selective voids within the membrane and may also contribute to increased brittleness. These findings highlight the need to carefully optimize MOF loading to balance improved separation efficiency with mechanical stability [76].

3.4. Fractional Free Volume (FFV) Analysis

Table 1 provides a summary of the fractional free volume (FFV) and density measurements for all fabricated membranes. The values of the pristine CTA membrane aligned well with previously reported data [77]. Integrating Cu-BTC and Ni-Cu-BTC MOFs into the CTA matrix notably increased the membranes’ fractional free volume (FFV). A notable 82.78% rise in FFV was observed when Cu-BTC loading increased from 0 to 15 wt.%. This enhancement is mainly due to the disruption of the regular polymer chain arrangement, leading to the creation of extra free volume within the membrane matrix [78]. Overall, greater free volume typically results in lower density, as evidenced by a 14.75% decline—from 1.186 g/cm3 to 1.011 g/cm3—when the Cu-BTC content was increased from 0 to 15 wt.%. A similar trend was observed for Cu-BTC/Matrimid MMMs [79]. These findings suggest that while moderate increases in FFV improve gas separation, excessive FFV, as seen at higher MOF loadings, may reduce separation performance due to the formation of non-selective gas transport pathways.

3.5. Gas Permeation Analysis

Figure 9 depicts the impact of varying Cu-BTC MOF concentrations on the gas separation efficiency of the CTA membrane. The incorporation of Cu-BTC into the CTA framework notably boosted CO2 permeability. However, an up-and-down trend was observed in CO2/CH4 selectivity. Generally, introducing fillers into a polymer matrix disrupts the polymer chain alignment, which increases the fractional free volume (FFV) and creates additional non-selective diffusion channels for gas molecules. Despite this, increasing the Cu-BTC content from 0 to 10 wt.% significantly boosted CO2 permeability by 102.97%. Moreover, CO2/CH4 selectivity improved by 184.37%, a trend attributed to Cu-BTC’s high affinity for CO2 molecules. The increase in permeability with greater filler loading is further supported by FFV analysis (Table 1), which indicates disrupted polymer chain alignment. The observed selectivity improvement may be attributed to the superior molecular sieving capability and crystalline structure of Cu-BTC MOF, characterized by unsaturated copper sites and well-defined pores that favor the adsorption of CO2 molecules [39]. However, the decline in selectivity at 15 wt.% can be attributed to (1) particle agglomeration at higher loadings [80], as observed in SEM analysis, (2) excessive fractional free volume (FFV) [81], and (3) potential mechanical instability or polymer rigidification, causing microstructural defects in the membrane [82]. Based on these findings, a bimetallic Ni-Cu-BTC was introduced at an optimized loading of 10 wt.% in the CTA matrix to further investigate gas separation performance. The findings showed a 11.71% boost in CO2 permeability, increasing from 20.5 to 22.9 Barrer, and a 23.81% improvement in CO2/CH4 selectivity, which rose from 27.3 to 33.8. Figure 10 contrasts the performance of pristine CTA and MMMs with Cu-BTC and Ni-Cu-BTC MOFs against the 2008 Robeson upper bound. This benchmark highlights the balance between gases.
The observed improvement in gas separation efficiency is likely due to the partial substitution of Cu2+ with Ni2+ ions, which strengthens interactions at the unsaturated metal sites. As a result, the membrane exhibited enhanced CO2 adsorption capacity and improved molecular affinity [41,46]. Moreover, the addition of nickel promoted a more uniform distribution of active sites, improving the molecular sieving properties and optimizing the pore structure [46,83]. As a result, CO2 diffusion was enhanced while CH4 diffusion was restricted, leading to superior gas separation performance. Figure 11 illustrates the structural modification from Cu-BTC MOF to bimetallic Ni-Cu-BTC MOF, as well as CO2 adsorption at both Cu and Ni sites [84]. This substitution yielded a bimetallic MOF with Ni2+ and Cu2+ active sites, which enhanced CO2 coordination and improved the membrane’s adsorption capability [41,46,83].
In Table 2, the separation performance of pristine CTA and CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC-10 wt.% membranes is compared under mixed-gas conditions using an equimolar CO2/CH4 (50:50) feed, highlighting the effect of MOF incorporation on gas selectivity and permeability. Under these experimental conditions, CO2 permeability shows a marked reduction compared to single-gas measurements, whereas CO2/CH4 selectivity increases. The reduction in permeability is primarily linked to the competitive sorption and diffusion interactions between CO2 and CH4, which interfere with the transport process when both gases coexist [85,86]. These observations align with previously published studies [87,88,89,90,91,92]. The higher condensability and stronger interaction of CO2 with the CTA matrix enable CO2 to preferentially occupy sorption sites and dominate diffusion pathways, thereby restricting CH4 movement and enhancing the overall CO2/CH4 selectivity [93].

3.6. Sorption Analysis

Figure 12 shows the CO2 sorption behavior for pristine CTA and CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC-10 wt.% membranes, highlighting the dual-mode interaction mechanisms described by the Langmuir–Henry model. Table 3 summarizes the key findings. The optimized membrane incorporating 10 wt.% Ni-Cu-BTC showed a 49.30% increase in the solubility coefficient and a 51.94% enhancement in the diffusion coefficient relative to the pristine CTA membrane. The values for the pristine CTA membrane align closely with the previously reported literature, with slight differences attributed to variations in temperature and acetylation degree [94]. The integration of Ni-Cu-BTC MOF significantly improved the Langmuir capacity constant ( C H ) by 15.04%, Henry’s coefficient ( K D ) by 14.81%, and the hole affinity constant ( b ) by 65%. The increase in C H was primarily due to the disruption of polymer chain packing caused by the incorporation of Ni-Cu-BTC particles, which created extra free volume and consequently improved CO2 sorption capacity. According to Tsujita et al. [95] the presence of unrelaxed volumes or microvoids—both influenced by pressure and temperature—significantly impacts the Langmuir capacity constant ( C H ). K D and b increased due to improved polymer–gas interactions, reflecting enhanced CO2 solubility and sorption affinity in the membrane [96]. Enhanced separation efficiency resulted mainly from the strong affinity between CO2 molecules and the active sites generated by the Ni-Cu-BTC MOF, particularly the coordinatively unsaturated Ni2+ and Cu2+ metal sites, which enhanced the membrane’s affinity for CO2 and resulted in higher uptake [41]. Furthermore, the polar characteristics of the CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC membrane contribute notably to its increased affinity for CO2. The acetate and ester groups in CTA possess dipolar characteristics, which interacted with the quadrupolar CO2 molecules. These dipole–quadrupole interactions increased the solubility of CO2 within the membrane matrix [97]. The incorporation of Ni-Cu-BTC MOFs significantly enhanced the membrane’s affinity for CO2 molecules by introducing additional polar functional groups and metal coordination sites. Such features facilitated stronger affinity between the membrane matrix and CO2 molecules, promoting selective gas sorption and transport. The rise in the diffusion coefficient is likely due to the MOF’s inherent porosity and large surface area, which facilitated multiple pathways for gas movement and increased the membrane’s available free volume. Furthermore, incorporating MOF particles disturbed the regular arrangement of polymer chains, which reduced resistance to gas transport and promoted more rapid CO2 diffusion through the membrane [78].

3.7. Benchmark with the Literature

Table 4 presents a performance comparison of the newly developed CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC mixed matrix membranes with previously reported CTA-based MMMs and composite materials for single-gas separation. The CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC-10 wt.% membrane demonstrated enhanced CO2 permeability and higher CO2/CH4 selectivity compared to several previously reported membranes. This improvement is primarily due to the incorporation of bimetallic MOFs, which enhanced gas transport by creating better pathways for CO2 diffusion while retaining molecular sieving properties.

4. Conclusions

In this study, MMMs comprising CTA/Cu-BTC and CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC were prepared via the solution casting technique. Their gas separation performance was assessed across different filler loadings. The findings resulted in the following key conclusions:
(a)
The increase in CO2 permeability observed at a filler concentration of 10 wt.% loading can be primarily attributed to two key factors: (1) the strong interactions between quadrupolar CO2 molecules and the Lewis acidic Cu2+ centers present in the Cu-BTC structure, and (2) the enhancement in fractional free volume resulting from the disruption of the polymer matrix structure.
(b)
However, CO2/CH4 selectivity exhibited a fluctuating trend. This trend could result from particle agglomeration at higher loadings and excessive fractional free volume (FFV), which may create non-selective pathways. Therefore, optimized loading is required to fabricate higher-performance CTA/Cu-BTC MMMs.
(c)
Pure gas permeation analysis revealed that the optimized bimetallic CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC mixed matrix membrane containing 10 wt.% filler showed a 126.7% increase in CO2 permeability along with a 252.1% enhancement in CO2/CH4 selectivity relative to the pristine CTA membrane. Further validation through mixed-gas separation using a 50:50 CO2/CH4 mixture confirmed these enhancements, with CO2 permeability rising by 91.7% and selectivity improving by 154.8%. This improved performance is primarily due to the synergistic effects introduced by the Ni-Cu-BTC framework, which contributes additional unsaturated metal sites, a higher surface area, and a well-structured pore network—factors that collectively enhance CO2 interaction and diffusion.
(d)
The enhancement in gas separation performance of CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC-10 wt.% MMM is primarily the result of a 49.30% increase in the solubility coefficient and a 51.94% rise in the diffusion coefficient compared with the pristine membrane. This improvement likely arises from the excellent molecular sieving capability and high surface area of the dual-metal framework. Additionally, the inclusion of Ni-Cu-BTC MOF improved the Langmuir capacity constant ( C H ) by 15.04%, Henry’s coefficient ( K D ) by 14.81%, and the hole affinity constant ( b ) by 65%, highlighting significant enhancements in gas sorption and interaction properties.
(e)
The FFV analysis supports the permeation and sorption trends, with CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC-10 wt.% showing a notable increase in FFV (0.229) relative to the pristine CTA membrane (0.151).
Therefore, the fabricated CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC MMM demonstrates considerable potential to enhance gas separation efficiency for CO2/CH4 separation.

Author Contributions

A.E. wrote the main manuscript text, conducted the investigation, and contributed to the conceptualization of the study; A.R. supervised the work and reviewed and edited the manuscript; A.S. contributed financially; M.N.A.K. supervised the work; and H.R. assisted in conducting the experiments. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Supporting data for this study can be obtained from the corresponding author * upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

Appreciation is extended to the Membrane for Advanced Research Laboratory (MEMAR Lab), SCME, NUST, Pakistan, for their significant technical support and expert contributions throughout the course of this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest related to this work.

References

  1. Mubashir, M.; Fong, Y.Y.; Leng, C.T.; Keong, L.K.; Jusoh, N. Study on the effect of process parameters on CO2/CH4 binary gas separation performance over NH2-MIL-53(Al)/cellulose acetate hollow fiber mixed matrix membrane. Polym. Test. 2020, 81, 106223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Doman, L.E.; Smith, K.A.; Mayne, L.D.; Yucel, E.M.; Barden, J.L.; Fawzi, A.M.; Martin, P.D.; Zaretskaya, V.V.; Mellish, M.L.; Kearney, D.R.; et al. International Energy Outlook; USA Energy Information Administration (EIA): Washington, DC, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  3. Iulianelli, A.; Russo, F.; Galiano, F.; Manisco, M.; Figoli, A. Novel bio-polymer based membranes for CO2/CH4 separation. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2022, 117, 103657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zeeshan, M.H.; Yeong, Y.F.; Chew, T.L. Current Progress on Dual-Layer Hollow Fiber Mixed-Matrix Membrane in CO2 Capture. ChemBioEng Rev. 2024, 11, 513–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Alcheikhhamdon, Y.; Hoorfar, M. Natural gas purification from acid gases using membranes: A review of the history, features, techno-commercial challenges, and process intensification of commercial membranes. Chem. Eng. Process.-Process Intensif. 2017, 120, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bashir, Z.; Lock, S.S.M.; e Hira, N.; Ilyas, S.U.; Lim, L.G.; Lock, I.S.M.; Yiin, C.L.; Darban, M.A. A review on recent advances of cellulose acetate membranes for gas separation. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 19560–19580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Patil, T.; Dharaskar, S.A.; Reddy, B.R. Innovations in cryogenic carbon capture. Emerging Carbon Capture Technologies: Towards a Sustainable Future; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 239–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Patil, T.; Patel, S.; Sinha, M.K.; Dharaskar, S.; Pandya, J.; Shinde, S.; Sillanpaa, M.; Yoo, C.; Khalid, M. Tailoring CO2/CH4 Separation Efficiency with [THTDP][Cl]/Pebax-1657 Supported Ionic Liquid Membranes: Design, Characterization, and Theoretical Insights. Top. Catal. 2024, 68, 290–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lee, W.; Xu, R.; Kim, S.; Park, J.H.; Kang, Y.T. Nanofluid and nanoemulsion absorbents for the enhancement of CO2 absorption performance. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 291, 125848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, X.; Lim, G.J.H.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Mullangi, D.; Wu, Y.; Zhao, D.; Ding, J.; Cheetham, A.K.; Wang, J. Binder-free 3D printing of covalent organic framework (COF) monoliths for CO2 adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 403, 126333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, S.J.; Yu, B.Y. Rigorous simulation and techno-economic evaluation on the hybrid membrane/cryogenic distillation processes for air separation. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2021, 127, 56–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vega, F.; Sanna, A.; Navarrete, B.; Maroto-Valer, M.M.; Cortés, V.J. Degradation of amine-based solvents in CO2 capture process by chemical absorption. Greenh. Gases Sci. Technol. 2014, 4, 707–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Altaf, F.; Ahmed, S.; Ali, S.; Mansha, M.; Kouser, T.; Khan, S.A. Transforming Natural Resources into Advanced Solutions: The Contribution of Clay-Based Adsorbents to Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Adsorption. Trans. Tianjin Univ. 2025, 31, 74–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Okoro, J. Microbial Strategies for Carbon Capture and Environmental Sustainability. Archives of Industrial Biotechnology n.d.;8. Available online: https://www.alliedacademies.org/articles/microbial-strategies-for-carbon-capture-and-environmental-sustainability-31056.html (accessed on 17 August 2025).
  15. Xie, K.; Fu, Q.; Qiao, G.G.; Webley, P.A. Recent progress on fabrication methods of polymeric thin film gas separation membranes for CO2 capture. J. Membr. Sci. 2019, 572, 38–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rajpure, M.M.; Mujmule, R.B.; Kim, U.; Kim, H. Fabrication of MgO nanorods blended cellulose acetate-based mixed matrix membranes for selective gas separation of H2/CH4, CO2/CH4 and H2/CO2: Effect of loading and pressure. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 50, 615–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Abdulabbas, A.A.; Mohammed, T.J.; Al-Hattab, T.A. Parameters estimation of fabricated polysulfone membrane for CO2/CH4 separation. Results Eng. 2024, 21, 101929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Raza, A.; Farrukh, S.; Hussain, A.; Khan, I.; Othman, M.H.D.; Ahsan, M. Performance Analysis of Blended Membranes of Cellulose Acetate with Variable Degree of Acetylation for CO2/CH4 Separation. Membranes 2021, 11, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Puleo, A.C.; Paul, D.R.; Kelley, S.S. The effect of degree of acetylation on gas sorption and transport behavior in cellulose acetate. J. Membr. Sci. 1989, 47, 301–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Roafi, H.; Farrukh, S.; Salahuddin, Z.; Raza, A.; Karim, S.S.; Waheed, H. Fabrication and Permeation Analysis of Polysulfone (PSf) Modified Cellulose Triacetate (CTA) Blend Membranes for CO2 Separation from Methane (CH4). J. Polym. Environ. 2023, 32, 2414–2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kamide, K.; Saito, M. Cellulose and Cellulose Derivatives: Recent Advances in Physical Chemistry. In Biopolymers; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1987; pp. 1–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Boháčová, M.; Zetková, K.; Knotek, P.; Bouša, D.; Friess, K.; Číhal, P.; Lanč, M.; Hrdlička, Z.; Sofer, Z. Mildly oxidized SWCNT as new potential support membrane material for effective H2/CO2 separation. Appl. Mater. Today 2019, 15, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Regmi, C.; Ashtiani, S.; Průša, F.; Friess, K. Synergistic effect of hybridized TNT@GO fillers in CTA-based mixed matrix membranes for selective CO2/CH4 separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 282, 120128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cheng, Y.; Ying, Y.; Zhai, L.; Liu, G.; Dong, J.; Wang, Y.; Christopher, M.P.; Long, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, D. Mixed matrix membranes containing MOF@COF hybrid fillers for efficient CO2/CH4 separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2019, 573, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Goh, P.S.; Ismail, A.F.; Sanip, S.M.; Ng, B.C.; Aziz, M. Recent advances of inorganic fillers in mixed matrix membrane for gas separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011, 81, 243–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xu, S.; Zhao, N.; Wu, L.; Kang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Huo, G.; Dai, Z.; Li, N. Carbon molecular sieve gas separation membranes from crosslinkable bromomethylated 6FDA-DAM polyimide. J. Membr. Sci. 2022, 659, 120781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shao, L.; Chung, T.S.; Goh, S.H.; Pramoda, K.P. Transport properties of cross-linked polyimide membranes induced by different generations of diaminobutane (DAB) dendrimers. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 238, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Thür, R.; Lemmens, V.; Van Havere, D.; van Essen, M.; Nijmeijer, K.; Vankelecom, I.F.J. Tuning 6FDA-DABA membrane performance for CO2 removal by physical densification and decarboxylation cross-linking during simple thermal treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2020, 610, 118195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ward, J.K.; Koros, W.J. Crosslinkable mixed matrix membranes with surface modified molecular sieves for natural gas purification: I. Preparation and experimental results. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 377, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alkadhem, A.M.; Elgzoly, M.A.A.; Onaizi, S.A. Novel Amine-Functionalized Magnesium Oxide Adsorbents for CO2 Capture at Ambient Conditions. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 103968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Barooah, M.; Kundu, S.; Kumar, S.; Katare, A.; Borgohain, R.; Uppaluri, R.V.S.; Kundu, L.M.; Mandal, B. New generation mixed matrix membrane for CO2 separation: Transition from binary to quaternary mixed matrix membrane. Chemosphere 2024, 354, 141653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tanvidkar, P.; Jonnalagedda, A.; Kuncharam, B.V.R. Investigation of cellulose acetate and ZIF-8 mixed matrix membrane for CO2 separation from model biogas. Environ. Technol. 2024, 45, 2867–2878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lim, S.Y.; Choi, J.; Kim, H.Y.; Kim, Y.; Kim, S.J.; Kang, Y.S.; Won, J. New CO2 separation membranes containing gas-selective Cu-MOFs. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 467, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Abid, H.R.; Hanif, A.; Keshavarz, A.; Shang, J.; Iglauer, S. CO2, CH4, and H2 Adsorption Performance of the Metal-Organic Framework HKUST-1 by Modified Synthesis Strategies. Energy Fuels 2023, 37, 7260–7267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dewi, K.K.; Septiani, N.L.W.; Iqbal, M.; Irzaman Nugroho, W.S.; Rusydi, F.; Nugraha; Yuliarto, B. Triethylamine assisted HKUST-1 formation and its electrochemical properties. In Proceedings of the Engineering Physics International Conference 2021–Epic 2021, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 24–25 August 2021; AIP Publishing LLC: Melville, NY, USA, 2023; Volume 2580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fakoori, M.; Fakoori, M.; Azdarpour, A.; Honarvar, B. Investigation of Thin Film Nanocomposite (TFN) Membrane with NH2-CuBTC for CO2/N2 Separation. Chem. Afr. 2024, 7, 865–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Abraham, D.S.; Athul, K.V.; Shamna, I.; Bhagiyalakshmi, M.; Jeong, S.K. Rationalizing the Efficiency of HKUST-1 for Capture and Biomimetic Sequestration of CO2. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2024, 41, 1467–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nik, O.G.; Chen, X.Y.; Kaliaguine, S. Functionalized metal organic framework-polyimide mixed matrix membranes for CO2/CH4 separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 413–414, 48–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zulhairun, A.K.; Fachrurrazi, Z.G.; Nur Izwanne, M.; Ismail, A.F. Asymmetric hollow fiber membrane coated with polydimethylsiloxane–metal organic framework hybrid layer for gas separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 146, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mu, X.; Chen, Y.; Lester, E.; Wu, T. Optimized synthesis of nano-scale high quality HKUST-1 under mild conditions and its application in CO2 capture. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2018, 270, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Peedikakkal, A.M.P.; Aljundi, I.H. Mixed-Metal Cu-BTC Metal-Organic Frameworks as a Strong Adsorbent for Molecular Hydrogen at Low Temperatures. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 28493–28499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sabouni, R.; Kazemian, H.; Rohani, S. Carbon dioxide capturing technologies: A review focusing on metal organic framework materials (MOFs). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 5427–5449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kim, C.; Talapaneni, S.N.; Dai, L. Porous carbon materials for CO2 capture, storage and electrochemical conversion. Mater. Rep. Energy 2023, 3, 100199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Singh, S.; Varghese, A.M.; Karanikolos, G.N. Mixed Matrix CO2 Separation Membranes based on Polysulfone with Cu-BTC Metal-Organic Framework and Poly(ethylene glycol)-grafted-Carbon Nanotubes. In Proceedings of the 15th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference 2021, GHGT 2021, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 15–18 March 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rehman, A.; Jahan, Z.; Khan Niazi, M.B.; Noor, T.; Javed, F.; Othman, S.I.; Abukhadra, M.R.; Nawaz, A. Graphene-grafted bimetallic MOF membranes for hazardous & toxic contaminants treatment. Chemosphere 2023, 340, 139721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yang, X.; Xu, Q. Bimetallic Metal-Organic Frameworks for Gas Storage and Separation. Cryst. Growth Des. 2017, 17, 1450–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. He, X.; Chen, D.R.; Wang, W.N. Bimetallic metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) synthesized using the spray method for tunable CO2 adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 382, 122825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Villajos, J.A.; Orcajo, G.; Martos, C.; Botas, J.Á.; Villacañas, J.; Calleja, G. Co/Ni mixed-metal sited MOF-74 material as hydrogen adsorbent. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 5346–5352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Botas, J.A.; Calleja, G.; Sánchez-Sánchez, M.; Orcajo, M.G. Effect of Zn/Co ratio in MOF-74 type materials containing exposed metal sites on their hydrogen adsorption behaviour and on their band gap energy. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2011, 36, 10834–10844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, C.; Kosari, M.; Jing, M.; He, C. Microwave-assisted synthesis of bimetallic NiCo-MOF-74 with enhanced open metal site for efficient CO2 capture. Environ. Funct. Mater. 2022, 1, 253–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhou, Z.; Mei, L.; Ma, C.; Xu, F.; Xiao, J.; Xia, Q.; Li, Z. A novel bimetallic MIL-101(Cr, Mg) with high CO2 adsorption capacity and CO2/N2 selectivity. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2016, 147, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, X.; Li, S.; Liu, J.; Zhang, J.; Ren, Y.; Zhao, J. Construction of Zn–Cu bimetallic metal–organic frameworks for carbon dioxide capture. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 20780–20785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hon Lau, C.; Babarao, R.; Hill, M.R. A route to drastic increase of CO2 uptake in Zr metal organic framework UiO-66. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 3634–3636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Shahbaz, R.; Li, T.; Sun, Y.; Sharif, S.; He, G.; Ma, C. Amino-modified bimetallic ZIF (Zn/Co-NH2)/Polyimide-based mixed matrix membranes for enhanced hydrogen separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 377, 134322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Li, W.; Wang, J.; Han, M.; Xu, S. Efficient N2/CH4 separation by mixed matrix membrane with bimetallic metal–organic framework. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2025, 172, 113757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Khan, A.U.; Samuel, O.; Othman, M.H.D.; Younas, M.; Kamaludin, R.; Khan, Z.I.; Al-Ogaili, M.F.A.; Yoshida, N.; Kurniawan, T.A.; Puteh, M.H.; et al. Modifying polysulfone dual-layer hollow fiber membrane with amine-functionalized bimetallic MOF (PEI@HKUST-1(Cu, Mg)) for improved mechanical stability and CO2/CH4 separation performance. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 114913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Baldanza, A.; Mallamace, D.; Mensitieri, G.; Brondi, C.; Musto, P.; Scherillo, G. Survey on Adsorption of Low Molecular Weight Compounds in Cu-BTC Metal–Organic Framework: Experimental Results and Thermodynamic Modeling. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Momin, S.; Mahmood, T.; Ullah, A.; Ali, R. Novel bimetallic organic frameworks of Cu/Ni-BTC for enhanced remediation of methylene blue from aqueous medium. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2025, 102, 101905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cheng, S.; Chung, T.; Wang, R.; Vora, R. Gas-Sorption Properties of 6FDA-Durene/1,4-Phenylenediamine (pPDA) and 6FDA-Durene/1,3-Phenylenediamine (mPDA) Copolyimides. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 90, 2187–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Suhaimi, N.H.; Yeong, Y.F.; Ch’ng, C.W.M.; Jusoh, N. Tailoring CO2/CH4 Separation Performance of Mixed Matrix Membranes by Using ZIF-8 Particles Functionalized with Different Amine Groups. Polymers 2019, 11, 2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Bondi, A. Van der waals volumes and radii. J. Phys. Chem. 1964, 68, 441–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Stern, S.A.; De Meringo, A.H. Solubility of carbon dioxide in cellulose acetate at elevated pressures. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed. 1978, 16, 735–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Vieth, W.R.; Howell, J.M.; Hsieh, J.H. Dual sorption theory. J. Membr. Sci. 1976, 1, 177–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Vieth, W.R.; Tam, P.M.; Michaels, A.S. Dual sorption mechanisms in glassy polystyrene. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 1966, 22, 360–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ricci, E.; De Angelis, M.G. Modelling Mixed-Gas Sorption in Glassy Polymers for CO2 Removal: A Sensitivity Analysis of the Dual Mode Sorption Model. Membranes 2019, 9, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Douna, I.; Farrukh, S.; Hussain, A.; Salahuddin, Z.; Noor, T.; Pervaiz, E.; Younas, M.; Fan, X.F. Experimental investigation of polysulfone modified cellulose acetate membrane for CO2/H2 gas separation. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2022, 39, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hayat, H.; Noor, T.; Iqbal, N.; Ahmed, R.; Zaman, N.; Huang, Y. Electrocatalytic activity of Cu MOF and its g-C3N4-based composites for oxygen reduction and evolution reaction in metal-air batteries. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 109627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lee, J.Y.; Choi, J.H. Copper-based metal-organic framework for highly efficient adsorption of lead ions from aqueous solution. Mater. Res. Express 2022, 9, 095505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Abbasi, M.; Noor, T.; Iqbal, N.; Zaman, N. Electrocatalytic study of cu/Ni MOF and its g-C3N4 composites for methanol oxidation reaction. Int. J. Energy Res. 2022, 46, 13915–13930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Jaksani, B.; Abburi, J.; Islam, H.; Gonuguntla, S.; Baidya, T.; Pal, U. In situ decorated Ni and Co in a CuBTC MOF for synergistic photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Mater. Adv. 2025, 6, 4211–4219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Suleman, M.S.; Lau, K.K.; Yeong, Y.F. Characterization and Performance Evaluation of PDMS/PSF Membrane for CO2/CH4 Separation under the Effect of Swelling. Procedia Eng. 2016, 148, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Nivetha, R.; Sajeev, A.; Mary Paul, A.; Gothandapani, K.; Gnanasekar, S.; Jacob, G.; Sellappan, R.; Raghavan, V.; N, K.C.; Pitchaimuthu, S.; et al. Cu based Metal Organic Framework (Cu-MOF) for electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction. Mater. Res. Express 2020, 7, 114001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ghafuri, H.; Ganjali, F.; Hanifehnejad, P. Cu.BTC MOF as a Novel and Efficient Catalyst for the Synthesis of 1,8-Dioxo-octa-hydro Xanthene 2021. Chem. Proc. 2021, 3, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Meng, Y.; Shu, L.; Liu, L.; Wu, Y.; Xie, L.; Zhao, M.; Li, J. A high-flux mixed matrix nanofiltration membrane with highly water-dispersible MOF crystallites as filler. J. Membr. Sci. 2019, 591, 117360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhang, Y.; Feng, X.; Yuan, S.; Zhou, J.; Wang, B. Challenges and recent advances in MOF-polymer composite membranes for gas separation. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2016, 3, 896–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Tajuddin, M.H.A.; Jaafar, J.; Hasbullah, H.; Awang, N.; Ismail, A.F.; Othman, M.H.D.; Rahman, M.A.; Yusof, N.; Aziz, F.; Salleh, W.N.W. Metal Organic Framework in Membrane Separation for Wastewater Treatment: Potential and Way Forward. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2021, 46, 6109–6130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Chen, G.Q.; Kanehashi, S.; Doherty, C.M.; Hill, A.J.; Kentish, S.E. Water vapor permeation through cellulose acetate membranes and its impact upon membrane separation performance for natural gas purification. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 487, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Jusoh, N.; Yeong, Y.F.; Lau, K.K.; Shariff, A.M. Fabrication of silanated zeolite T/6FDA-durene composite membranes for CO2/CH4 separation. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 166, 1043–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Akbari, A.; Karimi-Sabet, J.; Ghoreishi, S.M. Intensification of helium separation from CH4 and N2 by size-reduced Cu-BTC particles in Matrimid matrix. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 251, 117317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Pradanos, P.; Soto, C.; Carmona, F.J.; Lozano, Á.E.; Hernández, A.; Palacio, L. Morphological Study before and after Thermal Treatment of Polymer-Polymer Mixed-Matrix Membranes for Gas Separations. Polymers 2024, 16, 1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Takeuchi, H.; Roe, R.J.; Mark, J.E. Molecular dynamics simulation of diffusion of small molecules in polymers. II. Effect of free volume distribution. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 93, 9042–9048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Li, L.; Wang, C.; Wang, N.; Cao, Y.; Wang, T. The preparation and gas separation properties of zeolite/carbon hybrid membranes. J. Mater. Sci. 2015, 50, 2561–2570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Yang, M.; Han, N.; Shi, L.; Gao, H.; Liu, X.; Mi, Y.; Zeng, X.; Bai, J.; Xiong, D. Effect of nickel doping on the structure, morphology and oxygen evolution reaction performance of Cu-BTC derived CuCoO2. Dalton Trans. 2022, 51, 8757–8765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Sirijaraensre, J. Structures and mechanisms of CO2 cycloaddition with styrene oxide on bimetallic M–Cu–BTC MOFs (M = Mg, Ca, Al, and Ga): A DFT study. New J. Chem. 2021, 45, 4729–4737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Nguyen, H.; Wang, M.; Hsiao, M.Y.; Nagai, K.; Ding, Y.; Lin, H. Suppression of crystallization in thin films of cellulose diacetate and its effect on CO2/CH4 separation properties. J. Membr. Sci. 2019, 586, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Raza, A.; Japip, S.; Liang, C.Z.; Farrukh, S.; Hussain, A.; Chung, T.S. Novel Cellulose Triacetate (CTA)/Cellulose Diacetate (CDA) Blend Membranes Enhanced by Amine Functionalized ZIF-8 for CO2 Separation. Polymers 2021, 13, 2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Lin, H.; Yavari, M. Upper bound of polymeric membranes for mixed-gas CO2/CH4 separations. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 475, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bhide, B.D.; Stern, S.A. Membrane processes for the removal of acid gases from natural gas. II. Effects of operating conditions, economic parameters, and membrane properties. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 81, 239–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Wind, J.D.; Staudt-Bickel, C.; Paul, D.R.; Koros, W.J. Solid-state covalent cross-linking of polyimide membranes for carbon dioxide plasticization reduction. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 1882–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Jiang, X.; Li, S.; Shao, L. Pushing CO2-philic membrane performance to the limit by designing semi-interpenetrating networks (SIPN) for sustainable CO2 separations. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 1339–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ma, X.; Ghanem, B.; Salines, O.; Litwiller, E.; Pinnau, I. Synthesis and effect of physical aging on gas transport properties of a microporous polyimide derived from a novel spirobifluorene-based dianhydride. ACS Macro Lett. 2015, 4, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Sanaeepur, H.; Nasernejad, B.; Kargari, A. Cellulose acetate/nano-porous zeolite mixed matrix membrane for CO2 separation. Greenh. Gases Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 291–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Khan, A.L.; Li, X.; Vankelecom, I.F.J. Mixed-gas CO2/CH4 and CO2/N2 separation with sulfonated PEEK membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 372, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Houde, A.Y.; Krishnakumar, B.; Charati, S.G.; Stern, S.A.; Wiley, J. Permeability of Dense (Homogeneous) Cellulose Acetate Membranes to Methane, Carbon Dioxide, and Their Mixtures at Elevated Pressures. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1996, 62, 2181–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Tsujita, Y. Gas sorption and permeation of glassy polymers with microvoids. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2003, 28, 1377–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Suhaimi, N.H.; Yeong, Y.F.; Jusoh, N.; Chew, T.L.; Bustam, M.A.; Mubashir, M. Altering sorption and diffusion coefficients of gases in 6FDA-based membrane via addition of functionalized Ti-based fillers. Polym. Compos. 2022, 43, 440–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Rehman, A.; Jahan, Z.; Sher, F.; Noor, T.; Khan Niazi, M.B.; Akram, M.A.; Sher, E.K. Cellulose acetate based sustainable nanostructured membranes for environmental remediation. Chemosphere 2022, 307, 135736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Nguyen, H.; Hsiao, M.Y.; Nagai, K.; Lin, H. Suppressed crystallization and enhanced gas permeability in thin films of cellulose acetate blends. Polymer 2020, 205, 122790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lam, B.; Wei, M.; Zhu, L.; Luo, S.; Guo, R.; Morisato, A.; Alexandridis, P.; Lin, H. Cellulose triacetate doped with ionic liquids for membrane gas separation. Polymer 2016, 89, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Regmi, C.; Ashtiani, S.; Sofer, Z.; Hrdlička, Z.; Průša, F.; Vopička, O.; Friess, K. CeO2-blended cellulose triacetate mixed-matrix membranes for selective CO2 separation. Membranes 2021, 11, 632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Zeeshan, M.H.; Yeong, Y.F.; Chew, T.L. Mixed matrix membrane encompassing of cellulose triacetate and ZIF-90 for CO2 separation from CH4 and N2. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2025, 65, 3334–3345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Mehmood, O.; Farrukh, S.; Hussain, A.; Younas, M.; Salahuddin, Z.; Pervaiz, E.; Ayoub, M. Investigation of cellulose acetate/gamma-cyclodextrin MOF based mixed matrix membranes for CO2/CH4 gas separation. Greenh. Gases Sci. Technol. 2021, 11, 313–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Číhal, P.; Vopička, O.; Lanč, M.; Kludský, M.; Velas, J.; Hrdlička, Z.; Michalcová, A.; Dendisová, M.; Friess, K. Poly(butylene succinate)-cellulose triacetate blends: Permeation, pervaporation, sorption and physical structure. Polym. Test. 2018, 65, 468–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Asadi, H.; Alizadehdakhel, A.; Ramazani, A.; Dorosti, F. The effect of Cu-BTC metal–organic framework (MOF) in mixed matrix membranes on permeability and separation of carbon dioxide and methane. Polym. Bull. 2021, 78, 6953–6968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Chemical structures of (A) CTA polymer [18], (B) Cu-BTC MOF [57], and (C) Ni-Cu-BTC MOF [58]. (Adapted with permission from Ref. [58]. Copyright 2025, Elsevier).
Figure 1. Chemical structures of (A) CTA polymer [18], (B) Cu-BTC MOF [57], and (C) Ni-Cu-BTC MOF [58]. (Adapted with permission from Ref. [58]. Copyright 2025, Elsevier).
Polymers 17 02258 g001
Figure 2. Pictorial representation of MMM fabrication process.
Figure 2. Pictorial representation of MMM fabrication process.
Polymers 17 02258 g002
Figure 3. Diagram illustrating the experimental arrangement for gas permeation testing. (Adapted with permission from Ref. [20]. Copyright 2025, Springer Nature).
Figure 3. Diagram illustrating the experimental arrangement for gas permeation testing. (Adapted with permission from Ref. [20]. Copyright 2025, Springer Nature).
Polymers 17 02258 g003
Figure 4. FT-IR spectra of pristine CTA, CTA/Cu-BTC, and CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC membranes, and Ni-Cu-BTC MOFs.
Figure 4. FT-IR spectra of pristine CTA, CTA/Cu-BTC, and CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC membranes, and Ni-Cu-BTC MOFs.
Polymers 17 02258 g004
Figure 5. XRD patterns of pristine CTA, CTA/Cu-BTC, and CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC membranes.
Figure 5. XRD patterns of pristine CTA, CTA/Cu-BTC, and CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC membranes.
Polymers 17 02258 g005
Figure 6. Surface morphology of membranes: (a) pristine CTA, (b) CTA/Cu-BTC-5 wt.%, (c) CTA/Cu-BTC-10 wt.%, (d) CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC-10 wt.%, and (e) CTA/Cu-BTC-15 wt.%.
Figure 6. Surface morphology of membranes: (a) pristine CTA, (b) CTA/Cu-BTC-5 wt.%, (c) CTA/Cu-BTC-10 wt.%, (d) CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC-10 wt.%, and (e) CTA/Cu-BTC-15 wt.%.
Polymers 17 02258 g006
Figure 7. Cross-sectional morphology of membranes: (a) pristine CTA, (b) CTA/Cu-BTC-5 wt.%, (c) CTA/Cu-BTC-10 wt.%, (d) CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC-10 wt.%, and (e) CTA/Cu-BTC-15 wt.%.
Figure 7. Cross-sectional morphology of membranes: (a) pristine CTA, (b) CTA/Cu-BTC-5 wt.%, (c) CTA/Cu-BTC-10 wt.%, (d) CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC-10 wt.%, and (e) CTA/Cu-BTC-15 wt.%.
Polymers 17 02258 g007
Figure 8. SEM and EDX analysis of the optimized CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC-10 wt.% membrane: (a) cross-sectional view at 500×; (b) surface morphology at 2500×; (c) cross-sectional view at 5000×; (d) EDX mapping of Ni distribution (green); (e) EDX mapping of Cu distribution (purple); and (f) EDX spectrum with corresponding elemental composition (weight % and atomic %).
Figure 8. SEM and EDX analysis of the optimized CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC-10 wt.% membrane: (a) cross-sectional view at 500×; (b) surface morphology at 2500×; (c) cross-sectional view at 5000×; (d) EDX mapping of Ni distribution (green); (e) EDX mapping of Cu distribution (purple); and (f) EDX spectrum with corresponding elemental composition (weight % and atomic %).
Polymers 17 02258 g008
Figure 9. CO2/CH4 separation efficiency of CTA-based membranes with varying filler content.
Figure 9. CO2/CH4 separation efficiency of CTA-based membranes with varying filler content.
Polymers 17 02258 g009
Figure 10. Gas separation performance of pristine CTA and fabricated MMMs against the 2008 Robeson upper bound.
Figure 10. Gas separation performance of pristine CTA and fabricated MMMs against the 2008 Robeson upper bound.
Polymers 17 02258 g010
Figure 11. Structural transformation from Cu-BTC MOF to the bimetallic Ni-Cu-BTC MOF, along with CO2 adsorption behavior.
Figure 11. Structural transformation from Cu-BTC MOF to the bimetallic Ni-Cu-BTC MOF, along with CO2 adsorption behavior.
Polymers 17 02258 g011
Figure 12. CO2 sorption isotherms for the pristine CTA and CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC-10 wt.% membranes measured across varying feed pressures.
Figure 12. CO2 sorption isotherms for the pristine CTA and CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC-10 wt.% membranes measured across varying feed pressures.
Polymers 17 02258 g012
Table 1. FFV and density measurements of pristine CTA, CTA/Cu-BTC, and CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC membranes.
Table 1. FFV and density measurements of pristine CTA, CTA/Cu-BTC, and CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC membranes.
MembranesDensity (g/cm3)FFV
Pristine CTA1.186 ± 0.100.151 ± 0.12
CTA/Cu-BTC-5 wt.%1.143 ± 0.130.181 ± 0.13
CTA/Cu-BTC-10 wt.%1.096 ± 0.110.215 ± 0.10
CTA/Cu-BTC-15 wt.%1.011 ± 0.120.276 ± 0.12
CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC-10 wt.%1.076 ± 0.140.229 ± 0.13
Table 2. Comparison of CO2/CH4 mixed-gas separation efficiency between pristine CTA and CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC-10 wt.% membranes.
Table 2. Comparison of CO2/CH4 mixed-gas separation efficiency between pristine CTA and CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC-10 wt.% membranes.
MembranesCO2 Permeability (Barrer)CO2/CH4 Selectivity
Pristine CTA9.6 ± 0.1115.7
CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC-10 wt.%18.4 ± 0.1240.0
Table 3. Calculated pure gas CO2 permeabilities, solubility coefficients, diffusivity coefficients, K D , C H , b , and the standard error of estimate for the pristine CTA membrane and the optimized CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC-10 wt.% mixed matrix membranes.
Table 3. Calculated pure gas CO2 permeabilities, solubility coefficients, diffusivity coefficients, K D , C H , b , and the standard error of estimate for the pristine CTA membrane and the optimized CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC-10 wt.% mixed matrix membranes.
MembranesCO2 Permeability (Barrer)Solubility Coefficient
(10−2 cm3(STP)/cm3 cmHg)
Diffusivity Coefficient
(10−8 cm2/s)
K D C H b Standard Error of
Estimate
Pristine CTA10.1 ± 0.133.572.831.6216.020.201.816
CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC-10 wt.%22.9 ± 0.145.334.301.8618.430.331.808
Table 4. Benchmarking CO2/CH4 separation performance of CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC-10 wt.% MMM against reported membranes.
Table 4. Benchmarking CO2/CH4 separation performance of CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC-10 wt.% MMM against reported membranes.
MembranesPressure (Bar)Temp. (°C)CO2 Permeability (Barrer)CO2/CH4
Selectivity
Ref.
CDA-CTA11351432[98]
CTA-GO1.52511.2934.22[23]
CTA/PSf42511.2030.70[20]
CTA/[emim][BF4]4351220[99]
CTA-CeO2-0.32 wt.%1 (torr)256.8924.61[100]
ZIF-90-(1.5)-CTA72546.510.1[101]
ZIF-8/CA-10 wt.%2259.515.3[32]
CA-γ-CD-MOF-0.8 wt.%5251335.5[102]
PBS-CTA-10 wt.%1.5253.535[103]
PSF-PES-Cu-BTC (52%-28%-20%)3253.9020.52[104]
CTA/Ni-Cu-BTC-10 wt.%52522.933.8This work
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Esha, A.; Raza, A.; Safdar, A.; Khan, M.N.A.; Roafi, H. Advanced Cellulose Triacetate-Based Mixed Matrix Membranes Enhanced by Bimetallic Ni-Cu-BTC MOFs for CO2/CH4 Separation. Polymers 2025, 17, 2258. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17162258

AMA Style

Esha A, Raza A, Safdar A, Khan MNA, Roafi H. Advanced Cellulose Triacetate-Based Mixed Matrix Membranes Enhanced by Bimetallic Ni-Cu-BTC MOFs for CO2/CH4 Separation. Polymers. 2025; 17(16):2258. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17162258

Chicago/Turabian Style

Esha, Asad, Ayesha Raza, Amna Safdar, Muhammad Nouman Aslam Khan, and Humais Roafi. 2025. "Advanced Cellulose Triacetate-Based Mixed Matrix Membranes Enhanced by Bimetallic Ni-Cu-BTC MOFs for CO2/CH4 Separation" Polymers 17, no. 16: 2258. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17162258

APA Style

Esha, A., Raza, A., Safdar, A., Khan, M. N. A., & Roafi, H. (2025). Advanced Cellulose Triacetate-Based Mixed Matrix Membranes Enhanced by Bimetallic Ni-Cu-BTC MOFs for CO2/CH4 Separation. Polymers, 17(16), 2258. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17162258

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop