Next Article in Journal
Next-Generation Wound Healing Materials: Role of Biopolymers and Their Composites
Previous Article in Journal
Photodegradation Behavior of Nanosilica-Filled PMMA Composite: Cooperative Effect of Mixed Solvents and Interfacial Functional Groups
Previous Article in Special Issue
Critical Adsorption of Polyelectrolytes onto Patchy Particles with a Low-Dielectric Interior
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Editorial to the Special Issue “Theoretical and Computational Polymer Science: Physics, Chemistry, and Biology”

by
Hector Eduardo Roman
Department of Physics, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 3, 20126 Milano, Italy
Polymers 2025, 17(16), 2242; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17162242
Submission received: 11 August 2025 / Accepted: 18 August 2025 / Published: 19 August 2025
This Editorial provides a concise review of the contributions featured in this Special Issue (SI), which is dedicated to the theoretical aspects of polymers in physics, chemistry, and biology, covering both their structural and dynamical properties. The SI was originally conceived to highlight algorithms for generating suitable chain configurations in diverse environments, including disordered structures, fractals, and confined biological complexes such as proteins and the cell nucleus. The research articles collected and presented here address recent challenges of both general and specific interest across these three scientific domains, with extensions into engineering applications. The Special Issue also features a review article focusing on the fundamental properties and characterization of linear polymers, their modeling and scaling behavior, and their embedding in deterministic and disordered fractals. We expect readers will benefit from this collection of works, which spans a broad spectrum of current research and aims to provide a unified perspective on the physical and chemical properties of these complex and remarkable systems.
The SI brings together experts working across different fields of polymer science and technology, and comprises 13 research contributions organized into three main categories: physics [1,2,3,4,5,6], chemistry [7,8,9,10,11], and biology [12,13]. Contribution [14] concludes this SI. In the following, we briefly summarize each contribution separately.
Block Copolymers and Brushes: Self-consistent field theory (SCFT) is a powerful theoretical framework for studying many-body systems, where complex interactions are handled using a mean-field approximation. In contribution [1], the authors present a simplified 3D SCFT algorithm that employs real-space methods with adaptive discretization, enhancing both the accuracy and efficiency of numerical computations. This algorithm is applied to the study of polymeric material surfaces and is tested on two distinctly different systems: block copolymer films and polymer brushes. A key innovation is the use of finer contour discretization at the grafted chain ends, which improves spatial resolution in regions affected by external forces. This approach results in one of the most accurate SCFT implementations for 3D polymeric systems to date.
Material Models for Limb Orthoses: Fused deposition modeling is widely used in the biomedical sector due to its versatility in processing various materials. However, selecting the most suitable material for a specific application can be challenging. In particular, understanding the mechanical behavior of polymeric materials is crucial to achieving the desired performance. In contribution [2], the authors use a finite element numerical approach to analyze three material models: the Bergstrom–Boyce, the three-network, and the three-network viscoplastic models. These models are employed for studying the mechanical behavior of three commonly used polymers: acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polylactic acid (PLA), and polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG), in the context of personalized upper limb orthoses. This approach integrates theoretical modeling with experimental validation to assess the mechanical suitability of these materials for producing accurate, customized orthotic devices.
Hydrogen Desorption in Polymer Materials: In contribution [3], the authors numerically investigate the diffusion of hydrogen through a polymer material in storage containers of various geometries, including cylindrical, spherical, and sheet-shaped forms. They quantify the results using the desorption equilibrium time—defined as the time at which hydrogen diffusion loss reaches saturation. This equilibrium time exhibits an exponential increase with the square of both the thickness and diameter for cylindrical specimens. For spherical containers, it is found to be proportional to the square of the diameter, and for sheet-shaped containers, to the square of the thickness. The model calculations, based on solutions to the diffusion equation, show good agreement with experimental data, offering a reliable tool for predicting the time-dependent behavior of hydrogen desorption in polymer materials.
Carbon Fiber Fabric-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone: In modern industrial applications, thermoplastic resins are predominantly selected for their high-temperature resistance and robust performance. Among these, polyetheretherketone (PEEK) stands out as a semi-crystalline, aromatic, and high-performance engineering polymer. PEEK is widely recognized for its exceptional thermal stability, radiation and corrosion resistance, superior dimensional stability, and excellent electrical properties. Combined with its outstanding processability, these features have earned PEEK a reputation as one of the most advanced thermoplastic materials in current use. In [4], the authors focus on carbon fiber fabric–reinforced PEEK (CFF/PEEK) composites. In their study, PEEK resin samples were first subjected to a saturated hygroscopic treatment at 70 °C. Tensile and compressive tests were then performed on the composites both before and after moisture exposure, generating mechanical property data under different environmental conditions. The work examines the hygroscopic behavior of pure PEEK resin and CFF/PEEK composites, and it compares the mechanical performance, failure modes, and fracture morphologies of the samples prior to and following hygroscopic treatment. The findings provide valuable insights into how hygrothermal environments affect the mechanical behavior of CFF/PEEK composites. Such knowledge is crucial for guiding the design and engineering applications of thermoplastic composite materials, particularly in fields requiring long-term durability under variable environmental conditions.
Mesoscopic Phase Separation in 3D gels: Contribution [5] reports molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of mesoscopic phase separation in three-dimensional gels using a bead–spring Lennard–Jones model. The study focuses on the formation of high-density phase (HDP) networks, driven by the interplay of short-range attractions and long-range elastic forces. HDP network morphology is highly sensitive to temperature, spring stiffness, and particle density; higher stiffness yields faceted structures, elevated temperatures produce wider but less dense networks, and higher densities generate more compact morphologies. Network evolution proceeds through initial HDP precipitation followed by surface minimization. These insights are relevant for applications where the gel microstructure is critical, such as ion-gel solid electrolytes and the mechanical behavior of polymeric gels.
Carbon Fiber/Glass Fiber (CF/GF) Hybrid-Reinforced Resin Matrix: A flywheel energy storage system stores and releases energy by converting electrical energy to mechanical energy through the acceleration and deceleration of a rotating rotor. The radial stability of the rotor can be significantly enhanced by using carbon fiber/glass fiber (CF/GF) hybrid-reinforced resin matrix composites as the rotor material. The inclusion of glass fiber not only provides a smooth transition between the metal hub and the composite rim but also reduces material costs, addressing the economic limitations of rotors made solely from carbon fiber-reinforced composites. In contribution [6], the authors employ finite element analysis to study a three-dimensional model of such a composite rotor, focusing on the behavior of the metal hub and the hybrid composite rim. The radial stress distribution during operation is used to optimize the CF/GF mixing ratio. A high-speed rotation scenario at 18,000 rpm is simulated to evaluate the rotor’s safety and reliability. Based on these results, the material selection and structural design of the rotor are refined to avoid resonance regions, demonstrating that the flywheel can safely operate at high rotational speeds.
Swelling Response of Nitrile Butadiene Rubber (NBR): In contribution [7], the authors perform an equilibrium swelling test to evaluate the swelling behavior of NBR with varying acrylonitrile content. A predictive model for the oil resistance of NBR was developed using the three-dimensional Hansen solubility parameter (HSP) and the modified Flory–Huggins interaction parameter ( χ HSP). Results show that the energy difference (Ra) between NBR and the solvent, derived from HSP values, correlates with swelling behavior in an inverse S-shaped trend, with significant swelling occurring at Ra < 8 MPa1/2. For model development, the χ HSP parameter was calculated and correlated with the swelling response using both exponential and logarithmic fittings, yielding two predictive models that incorporate all relevant influencing factors. These models accurately estimate the swelling and oil resistance of NBR-based components in biofuels, demonstrated here with biodiesel and IRM 903 test oil. By identifying and avoiding high-swelling regions, the approach provides a reliable prediction of oil resistance for NBR seals, hoses, and gaskets in emerging fuel environments.
Cross-linked Polyethylene (XLPE): XLPE is widely used in high-voltage direct-current (HVDC) cable insulation, traditionally produced via dicumyl peroxide (DCP) cross-linking. However, byproducts from the DCP process can increase the electrical conductivity of the insulation, prompting interest in byproduct-free cross-linking methods. In contribution [8], the authors discuss a promising alternative involving in situ cross-linking between ethylene–glycidyl methacrylate copolymer and 1,5-disubstituted pentane via reactive compounding. Ab initio quantum chemical calculations, based on density functional theory (DFT), were performed for 18 reaction pathways, revealing that epoxy groups react with the disubstituted pentane to form a covalently linked XLPE network through epoxy ring-opening and ester formation, with the pentane acting as the cross-linker. Among the functional groups examined, carboxyl groups were the most reactive, and a pathway denoted as RTS1 was kinetically favored with a Gibbs energy barrier of 1.95 eV. This byproduct-free XLPE cross-linking approach provides a viable alternative to DCP, paving the way for thermoplastic insulation materials with improved electrical performance for next-generation HVDC power cables.
Dynamical Properties of Polyurea (PUR): PUR has gained widespread use as a protective coating due to its excellent mechanical durability and energy absorption properties. In contribution [9], using material characterization techniques and MD simulations, the authors compare PURs synthesized with different macrodiol structural units to better understand the relationship between microstructure and energy absorption. The findings reveal that PURs based on polycarbonate diols exhibit high tensile strength, superior toughness, and favorable energy dissipation behavior, as demonstrated through stress–strain curves, glass transition analysis, phase imaging, and dynamic storage/loss modulus measurements. MD simulations further showed that external energy from shear deformation is primarily absorbed via non-bond interactions, particularly influenced by fractional free volume, interaction energy, total energy variations, and hydrogen bond dynamics. Crucially, hydrogen bonding between soft and hard segments plays a dominant role in controlling the mechanical and dynamic responses of PURs. The close agreement between experimental characterization and MD predictions highlights the potential of molecular-level insights to guide the structural design of PURs with optimized energy absorption performance.
New Graftable Antioxidant for Improved XLPE Insulation: In conventional XLPE insulation, the presence of additives—such as antioxidants and cross-linking agents—can significantly increase electrical conductivity. Consequently, reducing antioxidant content is a promising strategy to further minimize conductivity. Contribution [10] introduces the dual-functional antioxidant 5-allyloxy-2-hydroxyl-3-tert-butylbenzophenone (5ATB), specifically designed to enhance insulation performance. The antioxidant behavior and UV-induced grafting reaction of 5ATB were investigated using DFT. Calculations reveal that the Gibbs energy barrier for the reaction of 5ATB with O2 is approximately 0.5 eV lower than that of a polyethylene chain with O2, confirming its superior antioxidative potential. Natural bond orbital analysis further identifies the hydrogen-accepting site of 5ATB on the CH2 group of the C=C double bond. This mechanistic insight highlights a novel approach to antioxidant design, offering a pathway for developing next-generation low-conductivity XLPE insulation materials for advanced power cable applications.
Dielectric Permittivity of Polymer Nanocomposites: In contribution [11], a revised Poon–Shin (PS) model incorporating interphase effects is proposed to predict the dielectric permittivity of polymer nanocomposites reinforced with spherical nanoparticles. In this case, each nanoparticle and its surrounding interphase are treated as a core–shell equivalent particle, allowing the composite to be modeled as a homogeneous mixture of the polymer matrix and equivalent particles. The dielectric calculation proceeds in two steps: first, the permittivity of the core–shell particle is determined; then, the overall composite permittivity is evaluated using the modified PS framework. Model predictions show strong agreement with experimental data when interphase properties are accurately incorporated. The study also examines how nanoparticle, interphase, and matrix characteristics influence dielectric behavior. This enhanced PS model provides a useful theoretical basis for designing polymer–nanoparticle composites with optimized dielectric performance for advanced electronics and energy storage applications.
Model Polymers vs. Globular Proteins: In contribution [12], the behavior of linear chain molecules is explored through Monte Carlo (MC) simulations of standard polymer chains represented as tethered spheres, evaluated across both low- and high-temperature regimes. The simulated polymer chains are then systematically compared with the three-dimensional structures of globular proteins, using experimental data retrieved from the Protein Data Bank (PDB). The study provides a detailed structural analysis encompassing both local features—such as bond connectivity and short-range packing—and non-local features, including long-range folding patterns and contact maps. By examining the distribution of closest contacts and applying symmetry-based considerations, the authors attempt to reconcile the seemingly different conformational behaviors of idealized model chains and real protein structures. This approach not only deepens the understanding of polymer–protein structural analogies but also offers insights into how chain connectivity, packing, and symmetry govern the emergence of three-dimensional conformations in complex biomolecular systems.
Polyelectrolyte Adsorption: Contribution [13] investigates the adsorption behavior of polyelectrolyte (PE) chains onto spherical particles with heterogeneously charged surfaces. The primary focus is on identifying critical adsorption conditions and understanding the influence of a low-dielectric particle core. Using Metropolis Monte Carlo simulations within the canonical ensemble, the PE chains are allowed to explore the configurational space around the binding particle. Remarkably, two distinct adsorption–desorption transitions are identified when the particle carries a net surface charge of the same sign as the PE, leading to a non-monotonic dependence of the critical surface charge density required for electrostatically driven adsorption. The study reveals an enhanced adsorption affinity for particles with heterogeneous charge distributions, particularly when the particle has a low dielectric constant. This contrasts with the weaker adsorption observed for homogeneously charged, low-dielectric particles. The increased affinity arises when the Debye screening length in the surrounding medium is comparable to the size of oppositely charged surface patches, facilitating localized electrostatic attraction. The Discussion section highlights several real-world applications of such PE–particle systems, especially in the context of complex formation between polyelectrolytes and globular proteins that exhibit dipolar or patchy surface charge distributions. Examples include biologically relevant proteins such as insulin and bovine serum albumin (BSA), where the findings may help explain binding mechanisms critical to drug delivery, biosensing, and protein–polymer interactions.
Review: Finally, contribution [14] offers an overview of recent applications of linear polymers and polymer networks across condensed matter physics, chemistry, and biology by briefly discussing a selection of papers published between 2022 and 2024. It is structured into three main subsections: physics (focusing on coarse-grained model simulations and the structural properties of materials), chemistry (covering quantum mechanical calculations, environmental considerations, and rheological behavior of viscoelastic composites), and biology (addressing macromolecules, proteins, and biomedical applications). The central part of the work reviews theoretical aspects of linear polymers, with a particular emphasis on self-avoiding walk (SAW) chains on regular lattices as well as on deterministic and random fractal structures. The latter are modeled as critical percolation clusters, with the concept of multifractality, typical of such complex systems, being explored in detail. A detailed discussion of the reptation model and its broad range of applications is included. The topics of protein folding and protein evolution are also addressed, with key challenges and open questions highlighted. An experimental section introduces the most relevant physical aspects of linear polymers pertinent to the review. The final two sections are devoted to applications: one in materials science, focusing on fractal characteristics of plasma-treated polymer surfaces and the growth of polymer thin films, and the other in biology, which considers, among other topics, long linear polymers like DNA confined within finite domains.
Among the different issues reviewed in [14], the following themes were considered: the structure of linear polymers in 3D lattices [15], polymer melts [16], elastic and plastic responses of these glassy materials [17], bottlebrushes [18], amphiphilic copolymers such as block polyelectrolytes [19], surfactants at water–oil interfaces [20], polymeric crystals [21], nucleation of hard spheres [22], fibrous materials [23,24], anomalous dynamics and mixing behavior [25,26], translocation through a nanomembrane [27], polymerization of hexanediol dimethacrylate (HDDMA) [28], relaxation of nitrile buttadiene rubber [29], polymeric biocomposites [30,31], insulating aramid/SiO2 mixtures [32], charge polymers [33], bioplastics and their accumulation in the environment [34,35], polymerization of branched polymers [36], synthetic hydrogels [37], block copolymers [38], covalently functionalized graphene and carbon nanotubes [39], an artificial network of neurons [40], polymer/graphene interfaces [41], translocation of polymers through narrow channels [42,43], porous polyimide [44,45], additive manufacturing [46,47,48,49], conjugated polymers [50,51], block copolymers and brushes [52,53], plasma techniques for the treatment of polymeric surfaces [54,55,56], polymer electrolyte for fuel cells [57,58,59], nitrile butadiene rubber [60], dendrimers [61,62,63,64], pyrolysis of polystyrene [65,66], oilfield scale inhibitors [67], insulating materials [68,69], gas desorption of H2 from polymer media [70,71,72], biodegradable polymer materials [73,74,75,76], gas separation membranes [77,78,79], polymer electrolytes for Li-based batteries [80,81,82,83], epoxy resins [84,85,86,87], viscoelastic behavior of polymer fluids [88,89], natural fiber-reinforced polymer composites [90], elongational rheology [91,92], polymer rheology theories [93,94], orientational relaxation [95,96,97], large-scale molecular simulations [98,99,100], actin filaments [101,102,103], conformational dynamics of GLP-2 peptide [104,105,106], soft vesicle–polymer chain conformations [107,108], entangled polymer networks [109,110,111], polyelectrolyte pore translocation [112,113,114,115], protein adsorption dynamics [116,117,118,119], biomedical applications of polymers [120,121,122], and polymer hydrophilic networks for energy storage [123,124].

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Qiao, L.; Giannakou, M.; Schmid, F. An Efficient and Accurate SCF Algorithm for Block Copolymer Films and Brushes Using Adaptive Discretizations. Polymers 2024, 16, 1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mian, S.H.; Umer, U.; Moiduddin, K.; Alkhalefah, H. Predicting Mechanical Properties of Polymer Materials Using Rate-Dependent Material Models: Finite Element Analysis of Bespoke Upper Limb Orthoses. Polymers 2024, 16, 1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jung, J.K.; Lee, J.H.; Park, J.Y.; Jeon, S.K. Modeling of the time-dependent H2 emission and equilibrium time in H2-enriched polymers with cylindrical, spherical and sheet shapes and comparisons with experimental investigations. Polymers 2025, 16, 2158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xu, X.; Zhang, B.; Shi, F.; Liu, K.; Peng, G.; Gao, L.; Gao, J.; Du, Y. Study on the Influence of Hygrothermal Aging on the Mechanical Properties of Carbon Fabric/Polyetheretherketone Composites. Polymers 2025, 17, 724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Beer, G.F. Complex Networks in Phase-Separating Gels: A Computer Simulation Study. Polymers 2025, 17, 880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Li, C.; Wang, J.; Li, M.; Wang, H.; Song, Y.; Meng, X.; Liu, R. Simulation of the Design Performance of Carbon Fiber/Glass Fiber Hybrid-Reinforced Resin Matrix Composite Rotors. Polymers 2025, 17, 1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jing, Y.; Liu, G. Systematic Investigation on the Swelling Response and Oil Resistance of NBR Using the Prediction Models Determined by the Modified Flory–Huggins Interaction Parameter. Polymers 2025, 16, 2696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Du, Y.; Zhang, H.; Han, W.; Du, X.; Shang, Y.; Yang, H.; Wang, X.; Chen, Q.; Li, Z. The network construction of a new byproduct-free XLPE-based insulation using a click chemistry-type reaction and a theoretical study of the reaction mechanism. Polymers 2024, 16, 3536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, K.; Wang, S.; Chen, Y.; Dong, H.; Wang, Q.; Cheng, Q. Dynamic Mechanical Properties and Energy Absorption Capabilities of Polyureas Through Experiments and Molecular Dynamic Simulation. Polymers 2025, 17, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Du, Y.; Zhang, H.; Deng, C.; Du, X.; Shang, Y.; Wang, X.; Chen, Q.; Li, Z. The Structural Design of a New Graftable Antioxidant and the Theoretical Study of Its Role in the Cross-Linking Reaction Process of Polyethylene. Polymers 2025, 17, 546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tang, B.; Liu, X.; Deng, S.; Zhong, W.; Shao, J. Dielectric Constant Estimation of Spherical Particle-Filled Nanocomposites Based on the Poon and Shin Model, Considering Interphase Properties. Polymers 2025, 17, 1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Škrbić, T.; Giacometti, A.; Hoang, T.X.; Maritan, A.; Banavar, J.R. A Tale of Two Chains: Geometries of a Chain Model and Protein Native State Structures. Polymers 2024, 16, 502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Anhesini, D.A.; Caetano, D.L.Z.; Caruso, I.P.; Cherstvy, A.G.; de Carvalho, S.J. Critical adsorption of polyelectrolytes onto patchy particles with a low-dielectric interior. Polymers 2025, 17, 2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Roman, H.E. Polymers in Physics, Chemistry and Biology: Behavior of Linear Polymers in Fractal Structures. Polymers 2024, 16, 3400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Schiemann, R.; Bachmann, M.; Janke, W. Exact enumeration of three-dimensional lattice proteins. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2005, 166, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tsolou, G.; Stratikis, N.; Baig, C.; Stephanou, P.S.; Mavrantzas, V.G. Melt structure and dynamics of unentangled polyethylene rings: Rouse theory, atomistic molecular dynamics simulation, and comparison with the linear analogues. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 10692–10713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Araki, T.; Tanaka, H. Three-dimensional numerical simulations of viscoelastic phase separation: Morphological characteristics. Macromolecules 2001, 34, 1953–1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tu, S.; Choudhury, C.K.; Luzinov, I.; Kuksenok, O. Recent advances towards applications of molecular bottlebrushes and their conjugates. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2019, 23, 50–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shah, S.; Leon, L. Structural dynamics, phase behavior, and applications of polyelectrolyte complex micelles. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 53, 101424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tang, X.; Xiao, S.; Lei, Q.; Yuan, L.; Peng, B.; He, L.; Luo, J.; Pei, Y. Molecular dynamics simulation of surfactant flooding driven oil-detachment in nano-silica channels. J. Phys. Chem. B 2018, 123, 277–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Manoharan, V.N. Colloidal matter: Packing, geometry, and entropy. Science 2015, 349, 1253751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Espinosa, J.R.; Vega, C.; Valeriani, C.; Frenkel, D.; Sanz, E. Heterogeneous versus homogeneous crystal nucleation of hard spheres. Soft Matter 2019, 15, 9625–9631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Luu, H.T.; Perrot, C.; Monchiet, V.; Panneton, R. Three-dimensional reconstruction of a random fibrous medium: Geometry, transport, and sound absorbing properties. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2017, 141, 4768–4780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mostaço-Guidolin, L.B.; Smith, M.S.; Hewko, M.; Schattka, B.; Sowa, M.G.; Major, A.; Ko, A.C.T. Fractal dimension and directional analysis of elastic and collagen fiber arrangement in unsectioned arterial tissues affected by atherosclerosis and aging. J. Appl. Physiol. 2019, 126, 638–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yethiraj, A.; Schweizer, K.S. Self-consistent polymer integral equation theory: Comparisons with Monte Carlo simulations and alternative closure approximations. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97, 1455–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jaramillo, E.; Wu, D.T.; Grest, G.S.; Curro, J.G. Anomalous mixing behavior of polyisobutylene/polypropylene blends: Molecular dynamics simulation study. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120, 8883–8886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sofos, F.; Karakasidis, T.E.; Spetsiotis, D. Molecular Dynamics simulations of ion separation in nano-channel water flows using an electric field. Mol. Simul. 2019, 45, 1395–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ansong, O.E.; Jansen, S.; Wei, Y.; Pomrink, G.; Lu, H.; Patel, A.; Li, S. Accelerated controlled radical polymerization of methacrylates. Polym. Int. 2009, 58, 54–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, X.J.; Zhao, X.Y.; Li, Q.G.; Chan, T.W.; Wu, S.Z. Artificial neural network modeling and mechanism study for relaxation of deformed rubber. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2016, 55, 4059–4070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. John, M.J.; Thomas, S. Biofibres and biocomposites. Carbohydr. Polym. 2008, 71, 343–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Faruk, O.; Bledzki, A.K.; Fink, H.P.; Sain, M. Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 1552–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tian, W.; Qiu, T.; Shi, Y.; He, L.; Tuo, X. The facile preparation of aramid insulation paper from the bottom-up nanofiber synthesis. Mater. Lett. 2017, 202, 158–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Frischknecht, A.L.; Winey, K.I. The evolution of acidic and ionic aggregates in ionomers during microsecond simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 2019, 150, 064901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Schwarz, A.E.; Ligthart, T.N.; Boukris, E.; Van Harmelen, T. Sources, transport, and accumulation of different types of plastic litter in aquatic environments: A review study. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 143, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hong, S.-H.; Gorce, J.B.; Punzmann, H.; Francois, N.; Xia, H. Surface waves control bacterial attachment and formation of biofilms in thin layers. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, aaz9386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Schamboeck, V.; Iedema, P.D.; Kryven, I. Dynamic networks that drive the process of irreversible step-growth polymerization. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 2276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhang, H.P.; Cao, J.J.; Jiang, W.B.; Yang, Y.Q.; Zhu, B.Y.; Liu, X.Y.; Wu, Y.; Sun, X.; Essouma, A.F.B.E.; Liu, J.; et al. Synthesis and mechanical properties of polyacrylamide gel doped with graphene oxide. Energies 2022, 15, 5714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ferrarese Lupi, F.; Giammaria, T.J.; Miti, A.; Zuccheri, G.; Carignano, S.; Sparnacci, K.; Seguini, G.; De Leo, N.; Boarino, L.; Perego, M.; et al. Hierarchical order in dewetted block copolymer thin films on chemically patterned surfaces. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 7076–7085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, A.; Ye, J.; Humphrey, M.G.; Zhang, C. Graphene and Carbon-Nanotube Nanohybrids Covalently Functionalized by Porphyrins and Phthalocyanines for Optoelectronic Properties. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1705704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Escárcega-Bobadilla, M.V.; Zelada-Guillén, G.A.; Pyrlin, S.V.; Wegrzyn, M.; Ramos, M.M.; Giménez, E.; Stewart, A.; Maier, G.; Kleij, A.W. Nanorings and rods interconnected by self-assembly mimicking an artificial network of neurons. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, X.; Nguyen, H.; Daly, M.; Nguyen, S.T.; Espinosa, H.D. Nanoscale toughening of ultrathin graphene oxide-polymer composites: Mechanochemical insights into hydrogen-bonding/van der Waals interactions, polymer chain alignment, and steric parameters. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 12305–12316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Guo, J.; Li, X.; Liu, Y.; Liang, H. Flow-induced translocation of polymers through a fluidic channel: A dissipative particle dynamics simulation study. J. Chem. Phys. 2011, 134, 134906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chelakkot, R.; Winkler, R.G.; Gompper, G. Flow-induced helical coiling of semiflexible polymers in structured microchannels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 178101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Min, C.K.; Wu, T.B.; Yang, W.T.; Chen, C.L. Functionalized mesoporous silica/polyimide nanocomposite thin films with improved mechanical properties and low dielectric constant. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2008, 68, 1570–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lee, T.; Park, S.S.; Jung, Y.; Han, S.; Han, D.; Kim, I.; Ha, C.S. Preparation and characterization of polyimide/mesoporous silica-hybrid nanocomposites based on water-soluble poly (amic acid) ammonium salt. Eur. Polym. J. 2009, 45, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cai, W.; Shalaev, V. Optical Metamaterials: Fundamentals and Applications; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cummer, S.A.; Christensen, J.; Alù, A. Controlling sound with acoustic metamaterials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 16001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, Y.; Li, W.; Han, T.; Zheng, X.; Li, J.; Li, B.; Fan, S.; Qiu, C.W. Transforming heat transfer with thermal metamaterials and devices. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2021, 6, 488–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Levchenko, I.; Baranov, O.; Keidar, M.; Riccardi, C.; Roman, H.E.; Xu, S.; Alexander, K. Additive Technologies and Materials for the Next-Generation CubeSats and Small Satellites. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2407602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fratini, S.; Nikolka, M.; Salleo, A.; Schweicher, G.; Sirringhaus, H. Charge transport in high-mobility conjugated polymers and molecular semiconductors. Nat. Mater. 2020, 19, 491–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xiao, M.; Sadhanala, A.; Abdi-Jalebi, M.; Thomas, T.H.; Ren, X.; Zhang, T.; Chen, H.; Carey, R.L.; Wang, Q.; Senanayak, S.P.; et al. Linking Glass-Transition Behavior to Photophysical and Charge Transport Properties of High-Mobility Conjugated Polymers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2007359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Matsen, M.W.; Bates, F.S. Unifying weak-and strong-segregation block copolymer theories. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 1091–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Vigil, D.L.; Quah, T.; Sun, D.; Delaney, K.T.; Fredrickson, G.H. Self-Consistent Field Theory Predicts Universal Phase Behavior for Linear, Comb, and Bottlebrush Diblock Copolymers. Macromolecules 2022, 55, 4237–4244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Amberg, M.; Höhener, M.; Rupper, P.; Hanselmann, B.; Hufenus, R.; Lehner, S.; Perret, E.; Hegemann, D. Surface modification of recycled polymers in comparison to virgin polymers using Ar/O2 plasma etching. Plasma Process. Polym. 2022, 19, 2200068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hegemann, D. Plasma activation mechanisms governed by specific energy input: Potential and perspectives. Plasma Process. Polym. 2023, 20, 2300010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Riccardi, C.; Roman, H.E. (Eds.) Plasma Applications in Gases, Liquids and Solids: Technology and Methods; World Scientific: Singapore, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, Z.; Wu, L.; Xu, T. Synthesis and properties of side-chain-type sulfonated poly (phenylene oxide) for proton exchange membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 373, 160–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kim, D.J.; Choi, D.H.; Park, C.H.; Nam, S.Y. Characterization of the sulfonated PEEK/sulfonated nanoparticles composite membrane for the fuel cell application. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 5793–5802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pan, M.; Pan, C.; Li, C.; Zhao, J. A review of membranes in proton exchange membrane fuel cells: Transport phenomena, performance and durability. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 141, 110771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. da Silva Ruiz, N.M.; de Sousa, A.M.F.; Calderari, M.R.D.C.M.; de Figueiredo, M.A.G.; Lima, A.P.; de Azevedo, E.R. Time domain NMR evaluation of thermal and thermochemical aging of nitrile rubber on crosslinking and mechanical properties. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2024, 224, 110727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Seo, S.E.; Hawker, C.J. The Beauty of Branching in Polymer Science. Macromolecules 2020, 53, 3257–3261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tsukamoto, T.; Imaoka, T.; Yamamoto, K. Unique functions and applications of rigid dendrimers featuring radial aromatic chains. Accounts Chem. Res. 2021, 54, 4486–4497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Nikzamir, M.; Hanifehpour, Y.; Akbarzadeh, A.; Panahi, Y. Applications of dendrimers in nanomedicine and drug delivery: A review. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2021, 31, 2246–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Patel, P.; Patel, V.; Patel, P.M. Synthetic strategy of dendrimers: A review. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2022, 99, 100514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Çelikgöğüs, Ç.; Karaduman, A. Thermal-catalytic pyrolysis of polystyrene waste foams in a semi-batch reactor. Energy Sources Part Recover. Util. Environ. Eff. 2015, 37, 2507–2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ordaz-Quintero, A.; Monroy-Alonso, A.; Saldívar-Guerra, E. Thermal Pyrolysis of Polystyrene Aided by a Nitroxide End-Functionality: Experiments and Modeling. Processes 2020, 8, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Olajire, A.A. A review of oilfield scale management technology for oil and gas production. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2015, 135, 723–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Huang, X.; Ding, Z.A.; Wang, J.; Wang, J.; Li, Q. The impacts of chemical modification on the initial surface creepage discharge behaviors of polyimide insulating film in power electronics. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2020, 2, 3418–3425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ren, L.; Li, H.; Xie, Z.; Ai, D.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Yang, L.; Zhao, X.; Peng, Z.; et al. High-temperature high-energy-density dielectric polymer nanocomposites utilizing inorganic core-shell nanostructured nanofillers. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2101297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gondal, I.A.; Sahir, M.H. Prospects of natural gas pipeline infrastructure in hydrogen transportation. Int. J. Energy Res. 2012, 36, 1338–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zheng, Y.; Tan, Y.; Zhou, C.; Chen, G.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Liao, B.; Zhang, G. A review on effect of hydrogen on rubber seals used in the high-pressure hydrogen infrastructure. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 23721–23738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jung, J.K.; Kim, I.G.; Kim, K.T.; Ryu, K.S.; Chung, K.S. Evaluation techniques of hydrogen permeation in sealing rubber materials. Polym. Test. 2021, 93, 107016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Emadian, S.M.; Onay, T.T.; Demirel, B. Biodegradation of bioplastics in natural environments. Waste Manag. 2017, 59, 526–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Sanjay, M.R.; Madhu, P.; Jawaid, M.; Senthamaraikannan, P.; Senthil, S.; Pradeep, S. Characterization and properties of natural fiber polymer composites: A comprehensive review. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 566–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kalpana, S.; Priyadarshini, S.R.; Leena, M.M.; Moses, J.A.; Anandharamakrishnan, C. Intelligent packaging: Trends and applications in food systems. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 93, 145–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Reis, R.S.; Souza, D.D.H.S.; Marques, M.D.F.V.; da Luz, F.S.; Monteiro, S.N. Novel bionanocomposite of polycaprolactone reinforced with steam-exploded microfibrillated cellulose modified with ZnO. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 13, 1324–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bernardo, P.; Drioli, E.; Golemme, G. Membrane gas separation: A review/state of the art. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48, 4638–4663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Park, H.B.; Kamcev, J.; Robeson, L.M.; Elimelech, M.; Freeman, B.D. Maximizing the right stuff: The trade-off between membrane permeability and selectivity. Science 2017, 356, eaab0530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kardani, R.; Asghari, M.; Mohammadi, T.; Afsari, M. Effects of nanofillers on the characteristics and performance of PEBA-based mixed matrix membranes. Rev. Chem. Eng. 2018, 34, 797–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ali, A.M.M.; Subban, R.H.Y.; Bahron, H.; Yahya, M.Z.A.; Kamisan, A.S. Investigation on modified natural rubber gel polymer electrolytes for lithium polymer battery. J. Power Sources 2013, 244, 636–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yu, X.; Bi, Z.; Zhao, F.; Manthiram, A. Hybrid lithium-sulfur batteries with a solid electrolyte membrane and lithium polysulfide catholyte. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 16625–16631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Zhu, Y.S.; Xiao, S.Y.; Li, M.X.; Chang, Z.; Wang, F.X.; Gao, J.; Wu, Y.P. Natural macromolecule based carboxymethyl cellulose as a gel polymer electrolyte with adjustable porosity for lithium ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2015, 288, 368–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Manthiram, A.; Yu, X.; Wang, S. Lithium battery chemistries enabled by solid-state electrolytes. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 16103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Gu, H.; Ma, C.; Gu, J.; Guo, J.; Yan, X.; Huang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Guo, Z. An overview of multifunctional epoxy nanocomposites. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 5890–5906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ahmadi, Z. Epoxy in nanotechnology: A short review. Prog. Org. Coatings 2019, 132, 445–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Xiang, Q.; Xiao, F. Applications of epoxy materials in pavement engineering. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 235, 117529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Tian, Z.S.; Wang, Y.Q.; Hou, X.L. Review of chemical recycling and reuse of carbon fiber reinforced epoxy resin composites. New Carbon Mater. 2022, 37, 1021–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Pipe, C.J.; Kim, N.J.; Vasquez, P.A.; Cook, L.P.; McKinley, G.H. Wormlike micellar solutions: II. Comparison between experimental data and scission model predictions. J. Rheol. 2010, 54, 881–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. de Souza Mendes, P.R. Thixotropic elasto-viscoplastic model for structured fluids. Soft Matter 2011, 7, 2471–2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Santha, R.D.; Gopala Krishna, M.O. Evaluation of mechanical and micro structural properties of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites. Mater. Sci. Forum 2022, 1065, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Masubuchi, Y.; Takimoto, J.I.; Koyama, K.; Ianniruberto, G.; Marrucci, G.; Greco, F. Brownian simulations of a network of reptating primitive chains. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 115, 4387–4394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Stephanou, P.S.; Tsimouri, C.I.; Mavrantzas, G.V. Simple, accurate and user-friendly differential constitutive model for the rheology of entangled polymer melts and solutions from nonequilibrium thermodynamics. Materials 2020, 13, 2867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Ibar, J.P. Trouble with Polymer Physics: Development of “Sustained Orientation” Contradicts the Current Understanding of the Liquid State of Polymers. J. Macromol. Sci. Part B 2015, 54, 722–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ibar, J.P. Shear-Thinning of Polymeric Melts: The Failure of the Reptation Model. In The Physics of Polymer Interactions—A Novel Approach to Rheology and Processing; Hanser Publishers: Munich, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  95. Likhtman, A.E.; McLeish, T.C. Quantitative theory for linear dynamics of linear entangled polymers. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 6332–6343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Shahid, T.; Huang, Q.; Oosterlinck, F.; Clasen, C.; Van Ruymbeke, E. Dynamic dilution exponent in monodisperse entangled polymer solutions. Soft Matter 2017, 13, 269–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Lentzakis, H.; Costanzo, S.; Vlassopoulos, D.; Colby, R.H.; Read, D.J.; Lee, H.; Chang, T.; Van Ruymbeke, E. Constraint release mechanisms for H-polymers moving in linear matrices of varying molar masses. Macromolecules 2019, 52, 3010–3028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Limbach, H.J.; Arnold, A.; Mann, B.A.; Holm, C. ESPResSo—An extensible simulation package for research on soft matter systems. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2006, 174, 704–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Abraham, M.J.; Murtola, T.; Schulz, R.; Páll, S.; Smith, J.C.; Hess, B.; Lindahl, E. GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 2015, 1, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kwok, A.; McCarthy, D.; Hart, S.L.; Tagalakis, A.D. Systematic Comparisons of Formulations of Linear Oligolysine Peptides with si RNA and Plasmid DNA. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2016, 87, 747–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Cong, Y.; Topf, M.; Sali, A.; Matsudaira, P.; Dougherty, M.; Chiu, W.; Schmid, M.F. Crystallographic conformers of actin in a biologically active bundle of filaments. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 375, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Arii, Y.; Hatori, K. Relationship between the flexibility and the motility of actin filaments: Effects of pH. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 371, 772–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Tassieri, M. Dynamics of semiflexible polymer solutions in the tightly entangled concentration regime. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 5611–5618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Venneti, K.C.; Hewage, C.M. Conformational and molecular interaction studies of glucagon-like peptide-2 with its N-terminal extracellular receptor domain. FEBS Lett. 2011, 585, 346–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Li, Y.; Sun, J.; Li, D.; Lin, J. Activation and conformational dynamics of a class B G-protein-coupled glucagon receptor. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 12642–12650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Song, G.; Yang, D.; Wang, Y.; De Graaf, C.; Zhou, Q.; Jiang, S.; Liu, K.; Cai, X.; Dai, A.; Lin, G.; et al. Human GLP-1 receptor transmembrane domain structure in complex with allosteric modulators. Nature 2017, 546, 312–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Antonietti, M.; Förster, S. Vesicles and liposomes: A self-assembly principle beyond lipids. Adv. Mater. 2003, 15, 1323–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Li, W.; Luo, T.; Yang, Y.; Tan, X.; Liu, L. Formation of controllable hydrophilic/hydrophobic drug delivery systems by electrospinning of vesicles. Langmuir 2015, 31, 5141–5146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Lang, P.; Frey, E. Disentangling entanglements in biopolymer solutions. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Händler, T.; Tutmarc, C.; Glaser, M.; Freitag, J.S.; Smith, D.M.; Schnauß, J. Measuring structural parameters of crosslinked and entangled semiflexible polymer networks with single-filament tracing. Phys. Rev. E 2021, 103, 062501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Elbalasy, I.; Mollenkopf, P.; Tutmarc, C.; Herrmann, H.; Schnauß, J. Keratins determine network stress responsiveness in reconstituted actin-keratin filament systems. Soft Matter 2021, 17, 3954–3962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Palyulin, V.V.; Ala-Nissila, T.; Metzler, R. Polymer translocation: The first two decades and the recent diversification. Soft Matter 2014, 10, 9016–9037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Payet, L.; Martinho, M.; Merstorf, C.; Pastoriza-Gallego, M.; Pelta, J.; Viasnoff, V.; Auvray, L.; Muthukumar, M.; Mathé, J. Temperature effect on ionic current and ssDNA transport through nanopores. Biophys. J. 2015, 109, 1600–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Lee, N.K.; Jung, Y.; Johner, A.; Joanny, J.F. Globular polyampholytes: Structure and translocation. Macromolecules 2021, 54, 2394–2411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Malkin, A.; Ilyin, S.; Vasilyev, G.; Arinina, M.; Kulichikhin, V. Pressure losses in flow of viscoelastic polymeric fluids through short channels. J. Rheol. 2014, 58, 433–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Senaratne, W.; Andruzzi, L.; Ober, C.K. Self-assembled monolayers and polymer brushes in biotechnology: Current applications and future perspectives. Biomacromolecules 2005, 6, 2427–2448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Barbey, R.; Lavanant, L.; Paripovic, D.; Schuwer, N.; Sugnaux, C.; Tugulu, S.; Klok, H.A. Polymer brushes via surface-initiated controlled radical polymerization: Synthesis, characterization, properties, and applications. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 5437–5527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Wei, S.; Knotts, T.A. A coarse grain model for protein-surface interactions. J. Chem. Phys. 2013, 139, 095102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Han, Y.; Cui, J.; Jin, J.; Jiang, W. Hydrogen bonding induced protein adsorption on polymer brushes: A Monte Carlo study. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 8479–8486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Ramakrishna, S.; Mayer, J.; Wintermantel, E.; Leong, K.W. Biomedical applications of polymer-composite materials: A review. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2001, 61, 1189–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Senra, M.R.; Marques, M.D.F.V. Synthetic polymeric materials for bone replacement. J. Compos. Sci. 2020, 4, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Agrawal, R.; Kumar, A.; Mohammed, M.K.; Singh, S. Biomaterial types, properties, medical applications, and other factors: A recent review. J. Zhejiang-Univ.-Sci. A 2023, 24, 1027–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Wang, Z.; Li, H.; Tang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Ruan, Z.; Ma, L.; Yang, Q.; Wang, D.; Zhi, C. Hydrogel electrolytes for flexible aqueous energy storage devices. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1804560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Chan, C.Y.; Wang, Z.; Jia, H.; Ng, P.F.; Chow, L.; Fei, B. Recent advances of hydrogel electrolytes in flexible energy storage devices. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 2043–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Roman, H.E. Editorial to the Special Issue “Theoretical and Computational Polymer Science: Physics, Chemistry, and Biology”. Polymers 2025, 17, 2242. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17162242

AMA Style

Roman HE. Editorial to the Special Issue “Theoretical and Computational Polymer Science: Physics, Chemistry, and Biology”. Polymers. 2025; 17(16):2242. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17162242

Chicago/Turabian Style

Roman, Hector Eduardo. 2025. "Editorial to the Special Issue “Theoretical and Computational Polymer Science: Physics, Chemistry, and Biology”" Polymers 17, no. 16: 2242. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17162242

APA Style

Roman, H. E. (2025). Editorial to the Special Issue “Theoretical and Computational Polymer Science: Physics, Chemistry, and Biology”. Polymers, 17(16), 2242. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17162242

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop