Next Article in Journal
Optimization of Bond Strength Between Heat-Polymerized PMMA and Contemporary CAD/CAM Framework Materials: A Comparative In Vitro Study
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Chitosan on Drug Load and Release for Cisplatin–Hydroxyapatite–Gelatin Composite Microspheres
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced Energy Storage Capacity in NBT Micro-Flake Incorporated PVDF Composites

1
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
2
Center for Smart Materials and Device Integration, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2025, 17(11), 1486; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17111486
Submission received: 27 April 2025 / Revised: 17 May 2025 / Accepted: 23 May 2025 / Published: 27 May 2025

Abstract

:
In recent years, dielectric films with a high energy-storage capacity have attracted significant attention due to their wide applications in the fields of renewable energy, electronic devices, and power systems. Their fundamental principle relies on the polarization and depolarization processes of dielectric materials under external electric fields to store and release electrical energy, featuring a high power density and high charge–discharge efficiency. In this study, sodium bismuth titanate (NBT) micro-flakes synthesized via a molten salt method were treated with hydrogen peroxide and subsequently blended with a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) matrix. An oriented tape-casting process was utilized to fabricate a dielectric thin film with enhanced energy storage capacity under a weakened electric field. Experimental results demonstrated that the introduction of modified NBT micro-flakes facilitated the interfacial interactions between the ceramic fillers and polymer matrix. Additionally, chemical interactions between surface hydroxyl groups and fluorine atoms within PVDF promoted the phase transition from the α to the β phase. Consequently, the energy storage density of PVDF-NBT composite increased from 2.8 J cm−3 to 6.1 J cm−3, representing a 110% enhancement. This design strategy provides novel insights for material innovation and interfacial engineering, showcasing promising potential for next-generation power systems.

1. Introduction

Dielectric energy storage represents a critical research frontier in advanced capacitor technologies [1], with primary objectives centered on achieving high energy density [2], charge–discharge efficiency, and long-term reliability through optimization of material and structural designs [3]. The energy storage performance [4,5,6] of dielectric films is predominantly determined by dielectric permittivity, breakdown strength, and polarization characteristics [7]. This has driven extensive exploration of hybrid systems combining high-permittivity materials (e.g., barium titanate-based [8] and zirconia-based [9] compositions, etc.) with high-breakdown configurations [10,11,12,13] such as multilayered heterointerfaces [14] and nanocomposite architectures [15,16,17]. Recent advances have demonstrated that strategic approaches—including interface engineering [18], defect modulation [19], and nanofiller [20] incorporation (e.g., graphene and boron nitride nanosheets)—can substantially enhance both energy storage density [21] and charge–discharge efficiency [22,23,24]. In this work, we incorporated the modified NBT micro-flakes into PVDF. With the aim of developing a flexible energy storage material that performs well under low electric fields, this study provides valuable insights into the development of this field.
Yue [25] et al. reported enhanced energy storage performance up to 6.5 J/cm3 by incorporating BaTiO3 into PVDF with PMMA as a reinforcement phase. Similarly, Shraddha [26] et al. improved the overall energy storage density by co-doping PZT and BNT into PVDF, which dramatically increased the β phase content. This mechanism of enhancing the β phase through ceramic doping has inspired our work. Tang [27] have revealed that incorporating high-aspect-ratio BaTiO3 nanowires (NWs) into a PVDF matrix significantly enhances dielectric permittivity compared to low-aspect-ratio nanoparticles (NPs). Zhu [28] employed finite element simulations to analyze electric field distribution in PVDF-HFP composites containing TiO2 nanostructures, of which TiO2 nanosheets induce more homogeneous field distribution than nanoparticles or nanorods [29] through planar interface-induced directional charge diffusion. Yao [30] developed PVDF-based composites by introducing polydopamine modified SrTiO3 fibers (ST-PDA). With 5 vol% ST-PDA fibers, the breakdown strength reached 3600 kV/cm, corresponding to a discharge energy density of 9.12 J cm−3 (190% enhancement versus pristine PVDF). Zhao [31] implemented hot-pressing technology to construct multilayer PVDF/FKM-GNP/PVDF structures. This architecture exhibited a discharge energy density of 6.1 J cm−3 at 3200 kV/cm, attributed to enhanced β phase content through thermal-induced α to β phase transition.
In this study, molten-salt-derived Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 micro-flakes (NBT) were surface-modified with hydrogen peroxide to achieve two objectives: (1) improving dispersion homogeneity in the PVDF matrix; (2) strengthening interfacial bonding through hydroxyl-F interactions. These modifications synergistically elevate breakdown strength while maintaining a high polarization response, establishing a new paradigm for interface-engineered dielectric composites. Despite recent progress, critical challenges persist in simultaneously enhancing breakdown strength, improving charge–discharge efficiency, ensuring thermal stability under elevated temperatures, and developing scalable manufacturing processes for large-scale dielectric films [32,33,34,35]. This study proposes a strategy for developing high-performance dielectric composites through multiscale interface optimization, demonstrating promising potential for emerging applications in energy storage systems.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

Titanium(IV) oxide (TiO2, ≥99%, Aladdin, Shanghai, China), barium carbonate (BaCO3, ≥99%, Aladdin, Shanghai, China), bismuth oxide (Bi2O3, ≥99%, Aladdin, Shanghai, China), sodium carbonate (NaCO3, ≥99%, Aladdin, Shanghai, China), potassium chloride (KCl, ≥99%, Aladdin, Shanghai, China), sodium chloride (NaCl, ≥99%, Aladdin, Shanghai, China), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF, ≥99.5%, Aladdin, Shanghai, China), poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF, -(CH2CF2)n-, Aladdin, Shanghai, China), and absolute ethanol (CH3CH2OH, ≥99.8%, Aladdin, Shanghai, China) were used as received. All chemicals were stored in a nitrogen-filled glovebox prior to use.

2.2. Ceramic Filler Fabrication

Sodium bismuth titanate micro-platelets were synthesized via molten salt synthesis following three-stages of phase evolution:
2 B i 2 O 3 + 3 T i O 2 N a C l   K C l B i 4 T i 3 O 12
B i 4 T i 3 O 12 + 2 N a 2 C O 3 + 5 T i O 2 N a C l   K C l 8 N a 0.5 B i 4.5 T i 4 O 15 + 2 C O 2
N a 0.5 B i 4.5 T i 4 O 15 + 2 N a 2 C O 3 + 5 T i O 2 N a C l   K C l ( N a 0.5 B i 0.5 ) T i O 3 + 2 C O 2
First, the bismuth-layered bismuth titanate micro-platelets were synthesized [36], and then the Bi in the micro-platelets was replaced with Na via a chemical flipping method [37]. In this substitution process, the material undergoes a series of reactions in the molten salt, including the transformation of the crystal from the bismuth-layered structure to the perovskite structure. The thickness of sodium bismuth titanate micro-platelets can be modulated by adjusting the appropriate temperature and holding time.

2.3. Film Fabrication

To prepare PVDF films, 0.2 g of PVDF powder was dissolved in 4 mL of DMF solution. The mixture was magnetically stirred at ambient temperature for 12 h to ensure complete dissolution. Ceramic fillers were then added at concentrations of 1 wt%, 3 wt%, and 5 wt%, with a blank control group established. The solution was stirred and ultrasonicated prior to casting to guarantee uniform dispersion of solutes. Using a doctor-blade process, the PVDF film was cast onto a glass substrate, with the blade gap height set as 20 μm. All films were placed in a drying oven at 60 °C for 24 h to fully evaporate the organic solvent. The dried films were hot-pressed at 110 °C (pressure ~20 MPa) for 30 min, ultimately yielding PVDF-based films with defined dimensions. The preparation process is illustrated in Figure 1.

2.4. Material Characterization

Microstructural analysis was conducted using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, JSM-7610FPlus, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) operated at 5 kV. Prior to imaging, samples were sputter-coated with a 5 nm Au/Pd layer to enhance conductivity. Elemental mapping was performed on cross-sectional specimens using a Zeiss Ultra Plus SEM equipped with Oxford X-MaxN 80 EDS detector. Crystalline phase identification was carried out via X-ray diffraction (XRD, SmartLab, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15418 nm) at 2°/min scanning rate. Residual stress analysis was derived from peak shift quantification using the Williamson–Hall method.

2.5. Energy Storage Performance

Energy storage properties were evaluated using a precision ferroelectric tester (Radiant Premier II, Albuquerque, NM, USA) with a 10 kV HVI-SC module. Samples immersed in silicone oil were subjected to unipolar electric fields (10 Hz sinusoidal waveform) up to 4000 KV/cm. Polarization-electric field (D-E) hysteresis loops were recorded for energy density calculation via numerical integration [33,38]:
U = D r D m a x E   d D
U 0 = 0 D m a x E   d D
The key parameters are defined as follows: where E is the electric field and D is the electric displacement [39].
The charge–discharge efficiency can be calculated according to the following formula:
η = U U 0
where η represents the charge–discharge efficiency, U is the discharge energy density, and U0 denotes the total charged energy density [40].

2.6. Calculation of β Phase

In this study, the conformation and crystal phase of the polymer chain were determined by Nexus 670 Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR) (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). According to Lambert–Beer’s law, Equation (7) is derived, and the relative fraction of β phase is calculated, where Aα and Aβ are the absolute intensities of the peaks at 763 cm−1 and 841 cm−1, respectively [41,42,43]:
F β = X β X α + X β = A β K α K β A α + K α A β × 100 %
Kα and Kβ represent the absorption coefficients at each wavenumber, which are 6.1 × 104 cm2/mol and 7.7 × 104 cm2/mol, respectively [44].

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2a presents the overall flaky morphology of NBT fillers, with a relatively smooth surface. The thickness of NBT is about 0.3 μm, which proves that NBT micro-flakes were successfully synthesized via the molten salt method. The even distribution of Na, Ti, and Bi elements (atomic ratio of 0.5:0.5:1:3) in NBT micro-flakes was confirmed by Figure 2b. As can be seen in Figure 2c, the NBT micro-flakes have a perovskite cubic crystal structure and no impurity could be detected. Figure 2d displays the cross-sectional morphology of PVDF-based composite doped with 3 wt% NBT. A uniform and smooth interface is observed. Distinct arrangements of NBT micro-flakes in PVDF matrix can be seen from the cross-sectional morphology (Figure 2d), and can be further determined through the elemental distribution (Figure 2e). Figure 2f compares the XRD patterns of composite films with different NBT doping concentrations. It can be seen that after adding NBT, two characteristic peaks (32° and 45°) of NBT appeared. As the concentration of NBT micro-flakes increases, the intensity of the characteristic diffraction peaks of NBT gradually increases. This confirms that NBT fillers with different concentrations were indeed incorporated into PVDF.
Figure 3 shows the FT-IR spectra of the PVDF-NBT composites and the corresponding β phase content is given. As calculated by Formula (7), the β phase contents of the PVDF-NBT composites are 62%, 68%, 72%, and 74%, respectively. With 5 wt% NBT doping in PVDF, the β phase content presents an increase of 12% accordingly. This is because NBT can act as a nucleating agent in PVDF, promoting the transformation from the α to the β phase [26]. In addition, the hydroxyl groups attached to the surface of NBT form hydrogen bonds with the fluorine atoms in PVDF, causing the polymer chains to twist, thereby further increasing the β phase content [45]. Therefore, the addition of modified NBT can effectively increase the β phase content of PVDF, and the increase in the β phase helps to increase the energy storage capacity [46].
Figure 4a presents the unipolar D-E hysteresis loops of various PVDF-NBT films. As NBT is added, the electric displacement increases gradually, indicating the optimized ferroelectric properties (Figure 4d). The energy storage performance improves gradually with NBT addition. Figure 4b shows the discharge energy density of various PVDF-NBT films at the highest breakdown voltage. When the mass fraction of NBT is 3 wt%, the discharge energy density reaches up to 6.1 J/cm3 at a voltage of 3200 V, which is more than twice that of pure PVDF (2.8 J/cm3). The charge–discharge efficiency is above 50%, as can be seen in Figure 4e. When the concentration of NBT is too high, it will lead to the mutual overlap of micro-flakes or their non-parallel arrangement. This causes more defects at the contact areas between NBT and PVDF, resulting in an increase in the dielectric loss [47,48]. Moreover, it becomes more difficult for the domains to reverse and return to their original states, which further affects the charge–discharge efficiency. Figure 4c,f show the dielectric constant and dielectric loss of various composite films. With the increase in NBT concentration, the dielectric properties of the films are greatly improved. Compared with the pure PVDF, the dielectric constant can reach the highest value of 20 after proper NBT incorporation, which is nearly 2.5 times that of pure PVDF.
Figure 5a shows the Weibull distribution of various PVDF-NBT composites; the breakdown electric field decreases with the increased NBT concentration. Considering the relatively low breakdown field strength of NBT ceramics, multiple NBT stacks inside PVDF can easily form a through-thickness breakdown channel from top to bottom [49]. Therefore, the breakdown strength is lower at high NBT concentrations. Combined with the shape factor in Figure 5b, it can be found that as the NBT concentration increases, the breakdown electric field decreases from 3500 kV/cm to 2500 kV/cm, and the shape factor decreases from 27 to 15. This indicates that with the increase in NBT, the stability of the film decreases, and this phenomenon mainly originates from two mechanisms. Firstly, the breakdown strength of NBT ceramic itself is significantly lower than that of PVDF matrix. When the concentration of NBT increases in the composite, it will cause a change in the internal electric field, and the electric field in the middle part will become lower. This structure will make the upper and lower interfaces easier to penetrate. Secondly, high concentrations of NBT can lead to an increased contact area between the two phases, resulting in the formation of more interfaces. Defects and the local concentrated electric field that exist at these interfaces can further reduce the breakdown strength. It is worth noting that although the introduction of NBT can reduce Eb, the contribution of NBT to polarization improves the energy storage performance. Therefore, the use of an appropriate concentration of NBT doping can enhance the energy storage performance of the composite. Thus, the doping of NBT forms distorted electric field regions, thereby reducing the breakdown electric field. But at the same time, NBT doping can also promote the flipping of domains, thereby improving the energy storage performance. As shown in Figure 5c, COMSOL Multiphysics 5.6 software was used to simulate the internal electric field distribution in NBT/PVDF composite films. The dielectric constant of pure PVDF and NBT was set as 8 and 2000, and the electric field was set as 3000 V/cm [50,51]. It can be observed that at a concentration of 5 wt%, the film will form a large range of electric field distortion areas (blue area) in the film cross-section. In this distorted electric field area, the film is easily broken down. Through the distorted electric field, a vertically connected conductive channel is formed, causing the film to be broken down. The electric field distribution at low concentrations is uniform, and the electric field at most positions is in a stable state. In this work, the PVDF-NBT with 3 wt% NBT doping obtained the best energy storage density, up to 6.1 J cm−3.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the regulation mechanism of NBT micro-flakes on the structure and properties of PVDF-based dielectric films was systematically discussed. The correlation between NBT concentration and energy storage properties was revealed by multi-scale characterization, and the optimal preparation process was determined. By incorporating the modified NBT into PVDF, the hydroxyl group attached to the surface of NBT interacts with the fluorine atom group inside PVDF and thus increases the β phase content. This method enhances the energy storage capacity from 2.8 J cm−3 to 6.1 J cm−3, which shapes a new design strategy for performance optimization.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.Z. and Y.Z.; Validation, M.Z.; Formal analysis, T.M.; Investigation, T.M. and H.Z.; Data curation, T.M.; Writing—review and editing, Y.Z.; Supervision, Y.Z.; Project administration, Y.Z.; Funding acquisition, Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 52002301), the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (grant no. 2020CFB308 and 2023AFB675), the Start-up Funding of Wuhan University of Technology (grant no. 40120490), and the Basic Research Program of Jiangsu (BK20230270).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhao, J.; Burke, A.F. Electrochemical Capacitors: Performance Metrics and Evaluation by Testing and Analysis. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2002192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. He, Q.; Sun, K.; Shi, Z.; Liu, Y.; Fan, R. Polymer Dielectrics for Capacitive Energy Storage: From Theories, Materials to Industrial Capacitors. Mater. Today 2023, 68, 298–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yang, H.-J.; Lu, Z.; Li, L.; Bao, W.; Ji, H.; Li, J.; Feteira, A.; Xu, F.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, H.; et al. Novel BaTiO3-Based, Ag/Pd-Compatible Lead-Free Relaxors with Superior Energy Storage Performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 43942–43949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yazawa, K.; Ducharne, B.; Uchida, H.; Funakubo, H.; Blendell, J.E. Barkhausen Noise Analysis of Thin Film Ferroelectrics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2020, 117, 012902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xu, B.; Ren, S. Integrated Charge Transfer in Organic Ferroelectrics for Flexible Multisensing Materials. Small 2016, 12, 4502–4507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lai, K. Spontaneous Polarization in van Der Waals Materials: Two-Dimensional Ferroelectrics and Device Applications. J. Appl. Phys. 2022, 132, 121102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lu, R.; Shen, Z.; Ma, C.; Duan, T.; Lu, L.; Hu, G.; Hu, T.-Y.; You, C.; Mi, S.; Jia, C.-L.; et al. Ultrahigh-Temperature Film Capacitors via Homo/Heterogeneous Interfaces. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 17166–17173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Y.; Yang, D.; Hessien, M.M.; Du, K.; Ibrahim, M.M.; Su, Y.; Mersal, G.A.M.; Ma, R.; El-Bahy, S.M.; Huang, M.; et al. Flexible Barium Titanate@polydopamine/Polyvinylidene Fluoride/Polymethyl Methacrylate Nanocomposite Films with High Performance Energy Storage. Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 2022, 5, 2106–2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mahajan, U.; Dhonde, M.; Das, M.; Sahu, K.; Sakthivel, P.; Shirage, P.M. Unlocking the Potential of Zirconia Nanostructures in Electrochemical Sensing and Sustainable Energy Solutions. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 511, 162156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Djoković, V.; Dudić, D.; Dojčilović, R.; Marinković, F.S.; Pavlović, V.P.; Pavlović, V.B.; Vlahovic, B. Toward Improved PVDF-BaTiO3 Composite Dielectrics: Mechanical Activation of the Filler versus Filler Content. Phys. Scr. 2023, 98, 115932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jing, L.; Li, W.; Gao, C.; Li, M.; He, J. Highly Enhanced Dielectric Performances in PVDF-Based Nanocomposites Filled with (Eu0.2Bi0.2Y0.2La0.2Cr0.2)2O3 High-Entropy Oxide Nanofibers. Polymer 2022, 262, 125428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hu, X.; Yi, K.; Liu, J.; Chu, B. High Energy Density Dielectrics Based on PVDF-Based Polymers. Energy Technol. 2018, 6, 849–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Feng, Q.-K.; Ping, J.-B.; Zhu, J.; Pei, J.-Y.; Huang, L.; Zhang, D.-L.; Zhao, Y.; Zhong, S.-L.; Dang, Z.-M. All-Organic Dielectrics with High Breakdown Strength and Energy Storage Density for High-Power Capacitors. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2021, 42, e2100116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Develos-Bagarinao, K.; Budiman, R.A.; Ishiyama, T.; Yamaji, K.; Kishimoto, H. Leveraging Catalytic Effects of Heterointerfaces through Multilayering for Superior Cathode Performance. J. Power Sources 2020, 480, 229094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lu, R.; Wang, J.; Duan, T.; Hu, T.-Y.; Hu, G.; Liu, Y.; Fu, W.; Han, Q.; Lu, Y.; Lu, L.; et al. Metadielectrics for High-Temperature Energy Storage Capacitors. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 6596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Silva, J.P.; Silva, J.M.; Oliveira, M.J.S.; Weingärtner, T.; Sekhar, K.C.; Pereira, M.; Gomes, M.J.M. High-Performance Ferroelectric–Dielectric Multilayered Thin Films for Energy Storage Capacitors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 29, 1807196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, Y.; Hu, T.-Y.; Liu, M.; Lu, R.; Lu, L.; Lu, Y.; Han, Q.; Fu, W.; Duan, T.; Dai, Y.; et al. High-Energy Density Dielectric Film Capacitors Enabled by Grain Boundary Engineering. J. Mater. Chem. A 2025, 13, 4309–4316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yu, X.; Yang, R.; Zhang, W.; Yang, X.; Ma, C.; Sun, K.; Shen, G.; Lv, F.; Fan, S. Interface Engineering of Polymer Composite Films for High-Temperature Capacitive Energy Storage. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 496, 154056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dong, Q.; Zeng, D.; Pan, Y.; Nong, P.; Chen, X.; Li, X.; Zhou, H. Mechanism and Simulation Analysis of High Electric Field of NaNbO3—Based Energy Storage Ceramics Based on Defect Engineering Design. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 493, 152786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, J.; Wang, B.; Wu, W.; Gong, H.; Guo, Y.; Mao, J.; He, L.; Liang, S.; Xie, Y. Enhanced Energy Storage Density and Efficiency of Nanocomposite Dielectrics by Modifying Polymer Matrix and Aminated Boron Nitride Nanosheet. Mater. Res. Bull. 2024, 180, 113056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Luo, S.; Yu, J.; Yu, S.; Sun, R.; Cao, L.; Liao, W.-H.; Wong, C.-P. Significantly Enhanced Electrostatic Energy Storage Performance of Flexible Polymer Composites by Introducing Highly Insulating-Ferroelectric Microhybrids as Fillers. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 9, 1803204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, J.; Wang, Y.; Yuan, Q.; Xu, X.; Niu, Y.; Wang, Q.; Wang, H. Multilayered Ferroelectric Polymer Films Incorporating Low-Dielectric-Constant Components for Concurrent Enhancement of Energy Density and Charge–Discharge Efficiency. Nano Energy 2018, 54, 288–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yi, Z.; Wang, Z.; Li, Y.; Wu, D.; Xue, Y. Improving the Energy Storage Performance of All-Polymer Composites by Blending PVDF and P(VDF-CTFE). Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2023, 44, 2200728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Meereboer, N.L.; Terzić, I.; Portale, G.; Loos, K. Improved Energy Density and Charge-Discharge Efficiency in Solution Processed Highly Defined Ferroelectric Block Copolymer-Based Dielectric Nanocomposites. Nano Energy 2019, 64, 103939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, Y.; Zhu, B.; He, Y.; Guo, J.; He, R.; Cai, C.; Ye, L.; Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Ma, S. PMMA/PVDF-BaTiO3 Nanocomposite Films for Dielectric and Energy Storage Applications. J. Electron. Mater. 2025, 54, 1961–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Joshi, S.; Acharya, S.; Sayyad, S.; Shirbhate, S.; Quazi, T.; Dorle, N. Enhancing the β-Phase of PVDF by Nano Piezoceramic Hybrid for Advanced Capacitive and Energy Storage Application. J. Electroceramics 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tang, H.; Lin, Y.; Sodano, H.A. Synthesis of High Aspect Ratio BaTiO3 Nanowires for High Energy Density Nanocomposite Capacitors. Adv. Energy Mater. 2013, 3, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhu, Y.; Yao, H.; Jiang, P.; Wu, J.; Zhu, X.; Huang, X. Two-Dimensional High-k Nanosheets for Dielectric Polymer Nanocomposites with Ultrahigh Discharged Energy Density. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 18282–18293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bai, H.; Ge, G.; Yan, F.; Zhu, K.; Lin, J.; Shi, C.; Qian, J.; Wang, Z.; Shen, B.; Zhai, J. Interfacial Polarization Regulation of Ultrathin 2D Nanosheets Inducing High Energy Storage Density of Polymer-Based Nanocomposite with Opposite Gradient Architecture. Energy Storage Mater. 2022, 46, 503–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yao, L.; Pan, Z.; Zhai, J.; Zhang, G.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Y. High-Energy-Density with Polymer Nanocomposites Containing of SrTiO3 Nanofibers for Capacitor Application. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2018, 109, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhao, X.; Li, C.; Hu, J.; Qi, R.; Zhang, S.; Yin, F.; Peng, G. Investigation on Dielectric Properties of Sandwich-Structured Fluoroelastomer/PVDF Films Containing Graphene. Compos. Commun. 2023, 38, 101522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, P.; Pan, Z.; Wang, W.; Hu, J.; Liu, J.; Yu, J.; Zhai, J.; Chi, Q.; Shen, Z. Ultrahigh Energy Storage Performance of a Polymer-Based Nanocomposite via Interface Engineering. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 3530–3539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yue, D.; Feng, Y.; Liu, X.-X.; Yin, J.-H.; Zhang, W.-C.; Guo, H.; Su, B.; Lei, Q.-Q. Prediction of Energy Storage Performance in Polymer Composites Using High-Throughput Stochastic Breakdown Simulation and Machine Learning. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2105773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. He, Z.; Xu, H.; Zhang, C.; Sun, L.; Li, C.; Cao, J. Microstructure and Properties of Different Carbon Fiber Reinforced Ceramic Composites Brazed Joint by Si–Ti Alloy Filler. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2024, 33, 7931–7937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hou, W.; Tang, D.; Han, B.; Chen, Y.; Wang, C.; Liu, Y.; Chi, W.; Chen, J.; Zhu, Y.; Ouyang, M.; et al. Mechanism of Chloride Modification Ambipolar Polymer Electrode Materials for High-Performance Energy Storage Device. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 497, 154901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, J.; Huang, R.; Peng, C.; Dai, Y.; Xiong, S.; Cai, C.; Lin, H.-T. Low Temperature Synthesis of Plate-like Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 via Molten Salt Method. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 19752–19757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, Y.; Shi, Z.; Zhang, J.; Chen, C.; Zhang, Y.; Li, L.; Chen, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Xing, F. Crystal Structure and Molten Salt Environment Cooperatively Controlling the Morphology of the Plate-like CaMnO3 Template through Topochemical Conversion. Inorg. Chem. 2024, 63, 4628–4635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, S.; Dong, J.; Niu, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, F.; Hu, R.; Cheng, J.; Sun, L.; Pan, Z.; Xu, X.; et al. Enhanced High-Temperature Energy Storage Properties of Polymer Composites by Interlayered Metal Nanodots. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 18773–18781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, B.; Zhu, W.; Wang, T.; Peng, B.; Xu, Y.; Dong, G.; Guo, Y.; Liu, H.; Huang, H.; Liu, M. Ultrahigh Energy Storage Capacitors Based on Freestanding Single-Crystalline Antiferroelectric Membrane/PVDF Composites. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2302683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Diao, C.; Wang, H.; Wang, B.; He, Y.; Hou, Y.; Zheng, H. Overviews of Dielectric Energy Storage Materials and Methods to Improve Energy Storage Density. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2022, 33, 21199–21222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, S.; Du, C.; Liu, M.; Zhang, Y. Boosting the Piezoelectric Response and Interfacial Compatibility in Flexible Piezoelectric Composites via DET-Doping BT Nanoparticles. Polymers 2024, 16, 743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhou, S.; Zhang, H.; Du, C.; Liu, M.; Liu, L.; Zhang, Y. Chitosan-Doped PVDF Film with Enhanced Electroactive β Phase for Piezoelectric Sensing. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2024, 6, 2575–2583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, J.; Li, H.; Liu, J.; Duan, Y.; Jiang, S.; Yan, S. On the α → β Transition of Carbon-Coated Highly Oriented PVDF Ultrathin Film Induced by Melt Recrystallization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 1496–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yasar, M.; Hassett, P.; Murphy, N.; Ivankovic, A. β Phase Optimization of Solvent Cast PVDF as a Function of the Processing Method and Additive Content. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 26020–26029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cao, X.; Xue, J.; Zhang, Q.; Tian, J.; Li, X.; Qiu, X.; Pan, B.; Gu, A.Z.; et al. Effect of Carboxyl and Hydroxyl Groups on Adsorptive Polysaccharide Fouling: A Comparative Study Based on PVDF and Graphene Oxide (GO) Modified PVDF Surfaces. J. Membr. Sci. 2020, 595, 117514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jia, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, H.; Wang, Y.; Wang, C.; Yang, M.; Zhai, C.; Qi, X.; Hu, D.; Zhao, L.; et al. Energy Storage Density of BSCZT/PVDF Composites Based on Egg-like Ceramic Filler Driving PVDF Phase Transformation. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 512, 162538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, Y.; Zhou, W.; Peng, W.; Yao, T.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, B.; Cai, H.; Li, B. Core@Double–Shell Engineering of Zn Particles toward Elevated Dielectric Properties: Multiple Polarization Mechanisms in Zn@Znch@PS/PVDF Composites. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2024, 45, 2300585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chen, G.; Wang, X.; Lin, J.; Yang, W.; Li, D.; Ding, W.; Li, H. Improvement of Dielectric Performance and Temperature-Dependent Behavior of Polyvinylidene Fluoride Composite with KTa0.5Nb0.5O3@Ag Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 15028–15035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, X.; Li, B.-W.; Dong, L.; Liu, H.; Chen, W.; Shen, Y.; Nan, C.-W. Superior Energy Storage Performances of Polymer Nanocomposites via Modification of Filler/Polymer Interfaces. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 5, 1800096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jia, Y.; Fan, Y.; Lei, L.; Gong, Y.; Yang, Z.; Dong, G.; Li, Q.; Wang, W.; Fan, H. Ultrahigh Electrobending Deformation in Poled Sodium Bismuth Titanate-Based Piezoelectric Ceramics by Uneven Defect Distribution. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 2421320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, H.; Krynski, M.; Fortes, A.D.; Saunders, T.G.; Palma, M.; Hao, Y.; Krok, F.; Yan, H.; Abrahams, I. Origin of Polarization in Bismuth Sodium Titanate-Based Ceramics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 5569–5579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Preparation of NBT micro-flakes and PVDF-based dielectric film.
Figure 1. Preparation of NBT micro-flakes and PVDF-based dielectric film.
Polymers 17 01486 g001
Figure 2. (a) SEM image of the NBT micro-flakes; (b) EDS spectra of the NBT micro-flakes; (c) X-ray diffraction pattern of NBT micro-flakes; (d) SEM image of the film cross-section; (e) EDS spectra of the film cross-section; (f) X-ray diffraction pattern of PVDF-NBT composites with different doping concentrations.
Figure 2. (a) SEM image of the NBT micro-flakes; (b) EDS spectra of the NBT micro-flakes; (c) X-ray diffraction pattern of NBT micro-flakes; (d) SEM image of the film cross-section; (e) EDS spectra of the film cross-section; (f) X-ray diffraction pattern of PVDF-NBT composites with different doping concentrations.
Polymers 17 01486 g002
Figure 3. (a,b) FT−IR spectra and corresponding β phase content with different NBT concentrations.
Figure 3. (a,b) FT−IR spectra and corresponding β phase content with different NBT concentrations.
Polymers 17 01486 g003
Figure 4. Electrical characteristics of PVDF-NBT composites: (a) unipolar D-E hysteresis loops; (b) energy storage density; (c) dielectric constant; (d) Dmax and Dr; (e) charge–discharge efficiency; (f) dielectric Loss.
Figure 4. Electrical characteristics of PVDF-NBT composites: (a) unipolar D-E hysteresis loops; (b) energy storage density; (c) dielectric constant; (d) Dmax and Dr; (e) charge–discharge efficiency; (f) dielectric Loss.
Polymers 17 01486 g004
Figure 5. (a) Weibull distribution of various PVDF-NBT composites; (b) corresponding shape factor and breakdown voltage; (c) simulation result.
Figure 5. (a) Weibull distribution of various PVDF-NBT composites; (b) corresponding shape factor and breakdown voltage; (c) simulation result.
Polymers 17 01486 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mei, T.; Zhu, M.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y. Enhanced Energy Storage Capacity in NBT Micro-Flake Incorporated PVDF Composites. Polymers 2025, 17, 1486. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17111486

AMA Style

Mei T, Zhu M, Zhang H, Zhang Y. Enhanced Energy Storage Capacity in NBT Micro-Flake Incorporated PVDF Composites. Polymers. 2025; 17(11):1486. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17111486

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mei, Tingwei, Mingtao Zhu, Hongjian Zhang, and Yong Zhang. 2025. "Enhanced Energy Storage Capacity in NBT Micro-Flake Incorporated PVDF Composites" Polymers 17, no. 11: 1486. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17111486

APA Style

Mei, T., Zhu, M., Zhang, H., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Enhanced Energy Storage Capacity in NBT Micro-Flake Incorporated PVDF Composites. Polymers, 17(11), 1486. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17111486

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop