Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Sub- and Near-Critical Carbon Dioxide Assisted Manufacturing on Medical Thermoplastic Polyurethane
Previous Article in Journal
A Circular Approach for the Valorization of Tomato By-Product in Biodegradable Injected Materials for Horticulture Sector
Previous Article in Special Issue
Thermal Percolation Behavior in Thermal Conductivity of Polymer Nanocomposite with Lateral Size of Graphene Nanoplatelet
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Effect of Carbon Nanofibers on the Viscoelastic Response of Epoxy Resins

Polymers 2023, 15(4), 821; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15040821
by Paulo Santos 1, Abílio P. Silva 1 and Paulo N. B. Reis 2,*
Polymers 2023, 15(4), 821; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15040821
Submission received: 13 January 2023 / Revised: 4 February 2023 / Accepted: 6 February 2023 / Published: 7 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Polymer Composite Processing)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Author,

 

I studied your manuscript entitled "Effect of carbon nanofibers on the viscoelastic response of epoxy resins". Some spaces need to be improved in terms of journal quality. In my opinion, the technical significance and novelty of the work are still lacking. I recommend major revision before further consideration for publication in the Polymers.

 

1) The abstract and introduction fail to point out the novelty of the work and its contribution to the state-of-the-art. The authors should clearly state the objectives of their experiments and the motivations driving their research in the first place.

 

2) How did you select the CNF loadings? Did you measure their percolation threshold? You should spend a few words on this matter.

 

3) Please present and discuss FTIR analysis for neat and oxidized MWCNTs. XPS curves should also be presented.

 

4) How did you evaluate the aggregation state of the CNFs? TEM/SEM analyses of samples are very important for verifying the dispersion state of CNFs in the polymer composite. You should provide TEM/SEM images of the samples. I recommend studying the paper " https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.6314" and citing it.

 

5) English language needs some polishing since some terms are vague.

Author Response

Please, see attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

1.            It is recommended to describe in detail in the Introduction what CNT and CNF are and what their differences are. What is the difference between CNF and conventional carbon fibers?

2.            It is recommended in the Introduction to add an overview of the models used to describe viscoelastic behavior.

3.            In section 2. Materials and experimental procedure, in line 84, specify where the data for viscosity is taken from.

4.            In section 2. Materials and experimental procedure, it is recommended to describe the production of samples in more detail. Which mixer was used? How much material was used? It is recommended to add photos of the sample manufacturing process.

5.            In Figure 3, add an axis for Bending strain [%].

6.            It is recommended to try using the same vertical axes (the same maximum values) for all the sub-figures in Figure 4. This will better show the difference in resins. You can also try it with Figures 5, 6.

7.            It is recommended to add a discussion the significance of the results. How can the obtained results be applied in the engineering practice of designing products using epoxy resins? Is it possible to use the obtained data to perform calculations of complex products using the finite element methods? How are you planning to continue this research?

Author Response

Please, see attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

 

I have recommended the publication of your article as is.

Back to TopTop