Next Article in Journal
Composites Based on Poly(ε-caprolactone) and Graphene Oxide Modified with Oligo/Poly(Glutamic Acid) as Biomaterials with Osteoconductive Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
Extraction and Characterization of Acidolysis Lignin from Turkey Oak (Quercus cerris L.) and Eucalypt (Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh.) Wood from Population Stands in Italy
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Potential of Fique Fiber as a Natural Composite Material: A Comprehensive Characterization Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Lignin Nanoparticles with Entrapped Thymus spp. Essential Oils for the Control of Wood-Rot Fungi

1
Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-Food and Forest Systems (DIBAF), University of Tuscia, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
2
Department of Chemistry, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale A. Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
3
Research Center for Applied Sciences to the Safeguard of Environment and Cultural Heritage (CIABC), Sapienza University of Rome, P.le A. Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
4
Department of Wood Science and Technology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Jamnikarjeva 101, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2023, 15(12), 2713; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15122713
Submission received: 27 April 2023 / Revised: 10 June 2023 / Accepted: 13 June 2023 / Published: 17 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Natural Polymeric Materials)

Abstract

:
After decades of utilization of fossil-based and environmentally hazardous compounds for wood preservation against fungal attack, there is a strong need to substitute those compounds with bio-based bioactive solutions, such as essential oils. In this work, lignin nanoparticles containing four essential oils from thyme species (Thymus capitatus, Coridothymus capitatus, T. vulgaris, and T. vulgaris Demeter) were applied as biocides in in vitro experiments to test their anti-fungal effect against two white-rot fungi (Trametes versicolor and Pleurotus ostreatus) and two brown-rot fungi (Poria monticola and Gloeophyllum trabeum). Entrapment of essential oils provided a delayed release over a time frame of 7 days from the lignin carrier matrix and resulted in lower minimum inhibitory concentrations of the essential oils against the brown-rot fungi (0.30–0.60 mg/mL), while for the white-rot fungi, identical concentrations were determined compared with free essential oils (0.05–0.30 mg/mL). Fourier Transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was used to assess the fungal cell wall changes in the presence of essential oils in the growth medium. The results regarding brown-rot fungi present a promising approach for a more effective and sustainable utilization of essential oils against this class of wood-rot fungi. In the case of white-rot fungi, lignin nanoparticles, as essential oils delivery vehicles, still need optimization in their efficacy.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The interest in wood as the construction material of the future is steadily increasing not only because of its role in CO2 sequestration into woody tissue but also because of the 50% reduction in a new building’s carbon footprint when concrete or steel is replaced by wood [1]. There are still obstacles for the general acceptance of wood-based buildings, which are related to the risk of degradation by wood-rot fungi, especially when considering less durable wood species such as beech, which is abundantly present in all of Europe and suitable for the bio-building sector [2,3]. Wood preservation is imperative to extend the service life of wood products. The strategies based on the use of toxic chemical wood preservation agents, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons containing creosote or chromated copper arsenate, which have a great impact on the environment, must be replaced by eco-friendly strategies [4]. The most used methods for wood preservation are still based on fossil-based organic compounds [5,6,7], non-renewable inorganic salts, or combinations of the two [8,9]. Innovative methods also comprise the application of nanomaterials, although the possible effects on human and environmental health need to be carefully assessed, as recently reviewed by Papadopoulos and Taghiyari [10]. In this context, the interest for more environmentally friendly solutions for wood preservation, such as thermal and other modification techniques [11,12,13,14], as well as impregnation with natural products, has rapidly increased [15,16,17,18]. Among natural bioactive compounds, essential oils (EOs) have gained considerable interest from researchers regarding their application as biocides [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. EOs have been used since Ancient Egypt where plants were extracted using animal fats and vegetable oils, and their use increased after the invention of steam distillation at approximately 1000 AD in Arabia, which set the standard industrial method for EO extraction of today. In the first half of the 20th century, aromatherapy was founded, and early research demonstrated the therapeutic properties of EOs that, consequently, led to the treatments of various medical conditions, such as cancer, pain, stress, and infectious diseases, utilizing EOs today [39].
EOs can contain up to several hundreds of individual compounds, and through this large palette of molecules with various functional moieties and their respective chemical and physiological properties, EOs exhibit a multi-target activity in contrast to single chemical compounds [40]. Thus, these mixtures of plant secondary metabolites, such as terpenes, aldehydes, alcohols, ketones, and phenols, play an important role in growth inhibition of a wide range of human, as well as plant, pathogens. Further, broad antiviral properties of EOs were reported, where EOs stimulate immune response and, at the same time, suppress inflammation caused by viral infection. Thus, EOs were also utilized for supplemental treatments against COVID-19, causing rapid viral clearance, reduced fatigue, as well as shorter recovery times, as recently reviewed by [41]. The antibacterial activities of EOs comprise the destruction of cell membranes and eventual leakage of cell contents, damage of genetic material of microorganisms, inhibition of enzymes responsible for their metabolism, and consumption of ATP stored in their cells [42,43]. Regarding plant fungal pathogens, the mycelia growth of Botrytis cinerea, Penicillium italicum, and P. digitatum can be significantly reduced by EOs from oregano (Origanum vulgare L. ssp. hirtum), thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.), and lemon (Citrus limon L.) [44]. EOs from clove (Syzygium aromaticum), lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus), mint (Mentha × piperita), and eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus) inhibit tomato wilt by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici 1322 [45]. EO from Pinus rigida wood completely inhibited the growth of the common wood mold fungi Alternaria alternata, Fusarium subglutinans, Chaetomium globosum, and Aspergillus niger, while Eucalyptus camaldulensis leaf EO showed inhibitory effects against F. subglutinans and C. globosum [46]. Dill seed EO inhibited mycelium growth and sclerotial germination of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in vitro and suppressed S. sclerotium on infected oilseed rape leaves in vivo [47].
One of the advantages when utilizing EOs as biocides is that most of the terpenoids and phenols found in the plant EOs are relatively less toxic to humans and the environment than are synthetic chemicals [48]. Accordingly, thyme EO, as well as its principal components thymol and carvacrol, is generally recognized as safe for use in minimum-risk pesticides, and there are no significant adverse effects known to human health and the environment [49,50]. Since thyme EO and the thymol and carvacrol it contains are readily biodegradable in air, water, and soil, their utilization as biocides for wood protection is not expected to cause negative environmental effects [51]. Thymus spp. EOs, in general, consist of the two phenolic monoterpenes thymol and carvacrol, the aromatic terpenoid p-cymene, and the terpene y-terpinene, but the contents of these compounds can vary strongly depending on the respective thyme species as well as on the respective cultivation methods and locations. For Tunisian T. capitatus EO, carvacrol contents of 62–83% were reported [52,53], while the major component in T. capitatus EO from Sardinia was thymol with 29.3% [54]. The great variability of the main components is supported in a study by Miceli et al., who collected samples of T. capitatus at 23 different sites in Southern Apulia, Italy, where thymol contents ranged from 1 to 72%, and the carvacrol contents ranged from 7 to 74% [55].
Despite significant advances in the use of EOs against plant pathogens, only a few studies have investigated the antifungal effect of thyme EOs against specific wood-rot fungi and showed promising bioactivity against white-rot fungi, such as Trametes versicolor and T. hirsuta, and against the brown-rot Laetiporous sulphureus and the wet-rot Coniopohora puteana [25,56,57]. In a recent work, the authors studied in vitro the antifungal effects of pure thyme EOs against brown-rot (Gloeophyllum trabeum and Poria monticola) as well as white-rot fungi (T. versicolor and Pleurotus ostreatus) and proved their efficiency as biocides against wood-rot fungi [22]. Other alternatives for greener wood protection approaches are the substitution of fossil-based components in commonly used wood protection formulations with bio-based additives or, e.g., the utilization of lignin nanoparticles (LNPs) as coatings or as carriers of bioactives [4,25,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69].
Recently, LNPs have been investigated in detail as nano- or microcarriers in the design of biocide delivery systems in agricultural or pharma applications [70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79]. Lignin qualifies as a carrier material due to its intrinsic properties as an aromatic phenolic macromolecule. It can provide protection to UV-sensitive loaded compounds and prevent the oxidation of the loadings due to its anti-oxidant properties as well as provide an unwanted fast evaporation of the volatile bioactive loadings, such as in the case of volatile essential oils [76,80]. LNPs were successfully tested as carriers and for the eventual controlled release of fungicides and plant growth regulators [81,82]. Others additionally took advantage of the UV-protective properties of lignin to prepare LNPs containing the photosensitive abscisic acid for its controlled release for plant growth stimulation [83]. The literature reports regarding the encapsulation of EOs into LNPs, however, are rather rare. Chen et al. prepared pickering emulsions of EOs containing cinnamaledhyde and eugenol stabilized by LNPs and applied them for the post-harvest protection of oranges, where fruit decay by Penicillium italicum was reduced by almost 50% when EOs were stabilized by LNPs [84]. Another research work utilized lignin for the encapsulation of orange EO and found an increased toxicity of orange EO against the pest insect Spodoptera frugiperda compared with non-encapsulated orange EO in the conducted bioassay [85].
In recent works, Zikeli et al. successfully tested the entrapment of cinnamon and thyme EOs into LNPs, and the successive delayed release of the entrapped EOs [24]. Additionally, LNPs with entrapped thyme EOs were successfully applied for controlling Phytophtora cactorum diseases [23].
The aim of this study was to apply EOs from Thymus spp. entrapped into LNPs as antifungal additives in the cultivation substrate of the two white-rot fungi T. versicolor and P. ostreatus and of the two brown-rot fungi G. trabeum and P. monticola, respectively. Entrapment of EOs in LNPs for their utilization in industrial wood preservation applications will reduce treatment costs significantly and are expected to have a positive effect on their efficiency as biocides due to the decreased release rate and longer duration of their biocidal effect. To our best knowledge, this is the first time that EO-containing LNPs are applied as biological control agents against wood-rot fungi.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Essential Oils Containing Lignin Nanoparticles Preparation

Organsolv lignin (OSL) from beech wood was supplied by Fraunhofer CBP (Leuna, Germany). Acetone (HPLC grade) and EtOH (96%, ACS reagent grade) were purchased from Carlo Erba reagents (Cornaredo, Italy). Seamless cellulose dialysis tubing with a MWCO of 12 kDa was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany).
Essential oils (EOs) from Thymus capitatus (TC), Coridothymus capitatus (CC), T. vulgaris (TV), and T. vulgaris Demeter (TVD), identical to those used in an earlier work [22], were kindly provided by Flora srl, Florence, Italy (Table 1). The plants were cultivated either on organic farms in Spain (TC and TV) or on Demeter biodynamic (TVD) or organic farms (TV) in Italy, respectively. Flora srl extracted respective essential oils by hydrodistillation using a Clevenger-type apparatus. Chemical compositions were determined by Flora srl, using a PerkinElmer Clarus 500 GC-FIDMS system, and are reported in Table 1.
Essential oils containing lignin nanoparticles (EOLs) were prepared according to the protocol reported in Zikeli et al. [24], with small modifications. OSL (300 mg) and respective EOs (100 mg) were dissolved in 10 mL acetone and filled into dialysis bags, which were exposed to an excess of distilled water under stirring for 2.5 h at room temperature. Dialysis time was retained long enough to get rid of acetone and short enough to prevent release of the entrapped EOs. After dialysis, the samples were kept in the refrigerator for further analysis and application. Solid content of the EOL was determined by freeze-drying of aliquots of the prepared EOL dispersions. EO contents were determined with a Ultrospec 1000 photometer (Pharmacia Biotech, GE Healthcare Europe GmbH, Milano, Italy), diluting the EOL dispersions in EtOH/water (50/50 vol%) at 280 nm against external calibration by dilutions of the respective pure EO samples. EO contents were determined in triplicate.
For preparation of the samples for SEM, three drops of the EOL suspensions were adsorbed onto a glass coverslip and air-dried at 25 °C (4 h). The cover slips were then attached to aluminum stubs using carbon tape and sputter-coated with gold in a Balzers MED 010 unit (Oerlikon Balzers, Balzers, Liechtenstein), followed by SEM analysis using a JSM 6010LA electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
Release experiments were conducted using 25 µL EOL samples in 225 µL liquid fungal cultivation medium (potato dextrose broth, 24 g/L, autoclaved at 121 °C for 20 min, VWR International S.r.l., Milan, Italy) in steady state in the refrigerator. Every 24 h, a sample was taken, the EO content was quantified using UV photometry as explained above, and a cumulative release of the EO was determined. Release experiments were conducted in triple determination, and the reported values represent the average of three experiments.

2.2. Fungal Strains

Trametes versicolor (ZIML057), G. trabeum (ZIML018), P. ostreatus (ZIML030), and P. monticola (ZIML037) from the Department of Wood Science and Technology, University of Ljubljana (Slovenia), were cultivated on Malt Extract Agar medium (MEA, 20 g/L malt extract (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) and 15 g/L bacteriological agar (VWR International srl, Milan, Italy)) plates by subculture of mycelia from an active 7-day culture at 24 °C for seven days. The fungal isolates derived from the fungal collection of the Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, and are available to research institutions on demand. Origin and details of the fungal isolates are described in the respective catalogue [86].

2.3. Anti-Fungal Assay

In vitro antifungal activity of EOLs on mycelia growth of the selected fungi were determined using the method described by Vettraino et al. [23]. In particular, treatments were prepared within the concentration range of 0.05–1.20 mg/mL (0.05, 0.15, 0.30, 0.60, and 1.20 mg/mL). Five different concentrations of nano-encapsulated essential oils, as well as empty LNPs (LNPs solo), were dissolved into Malt Extract Agar (MEA, 20 mL) just before it was poured into the Petri dishes (9 cm) at a temperature of 45–50 °C. A 6 mm diameter circular disk of each fungal isolate, cut from the margin of the actively growing cultures on MEA using a cork borer, was inoculated in the center of each Petri dish containing the different treatments. Negative controls had only empty nanoparticles and untreated MEA. Petri dishes were sealed with polyethylene film and incubated at 25 ± 2 °C. Mycelia growth was measured every day for 7 days. Five replicates for each treatment were performed. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined as the lowest concentration that completely inhibited the fungal growth.

2.4. FTIR Spectroscopy

FTIR spectra of T. versicolor, P. ostreatus, P. monticola, and G. trabeum grown on MEA and MEA amended with EOLs, respectively, were recorded on a Jasco FTIR-4100 FTIR spectrometer (Jasco Corporation, Easton, MD, USA). For the evaluation of fungal growth under stress conditions, the FTIR spectra of culture medium samples with EO concentrations just below the respective MICs were taken. The mycelium samples were analyzed after thorough and repeated (3 times) washing with distilled water, followed by centrifugation and freeze-drying (−50 °C, 72 h) to remove cultivation medium residues. After grinding in an agate mortar, potassium bromide (KBr) discs were prepared with a sample concentration of 2% (wt.) using a Specac Mini-Pellets Press (Specac Inc., Fort Washington, MD, USA). The spectra were acquired in the absorbance mode in the range of 4000–400 cm−1, with a resolution of 4 cm−1 against a background of pure KBr, and 64 scans were accumulated. Raw FTIR spectra were smoothed using the Means–Movement method with a convolution width of 15, baseline-corrected (zero absorbance at 822 cm−1, 1815 cm−1, 1860 cm−1, 2350 cm−1, and 3800 cm−1), and normalized to the absorbance maximum in the fingerprint region at 1076 cm−1 using Spectra Manager software (v. 2.15.01, Jasco Corporation, Easton, MD, USA). The resulting FTIR spectra were background-corrected in order to eliminate spectral information deriving from the cultivation substrate, as described in Vettraino et al. [22]. Second-derivative FTIR spectra were produced using the Savitzky–Golay algorithm (polynomial degree 3, 11 data points) and utilized for IR band area integration as well as principal component analysis (PCA) using Spectra Manager software.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

In order to evaluate the effect of pure nanoparticles against fungal growth, obtained data and control data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the Shapiro–Wilk test, and the means were compared by the Kruskal–Wallis test (p > 0.05) using GraphPad Prism 5.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). PCA was applied on second-derivative FTIR spectra using the PCA Model Editor of the Spectra Manager Software. Number of principal components was 3, and the calculation ranges were 3050–2750 cm−1 and 1835–825 cm−1.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Lignin Nanoparticles Loaded with Essential Oils (EOL)

The detailed compositions of the utilized essential oils and their percentages are provided in Table 1. The three terpenoids—carvacrol, thymol, and p-cymene—can be considered as key compounds, as at least one of them is present in high concentrations in each of the four EOs. Further description of the contained substance classes is already presented in detail in Vettraino et al. [22].
The prepared EOLs had solid contents of 15.7–17.3 mg/mL, and the respective EO contents ranged from 5.0 to 7.5 mg (Table 2). The resulting drug-loading efficiencies (DLE) were between 50 and 75%, with the highest value for TVD and the lowest for CC. Drug-loading capacities (DLC) were in the same range for EOL-CC and EOL-TV, respectively, while the values were higher for EOL-TC and EOL-TVD. The results for DLE and DLC were in good accordance with those reported in an earlier work for T. vulgaris and T. serpyllum, respectively, where acidolysis lignin from beech wood was used in contrast to the technical Organosolv beech lignin utilized in this study, indicating little influence of the lignin extraction process on the EO entrapment into the lignin matrix [24].
SEM analysis revealed LNPs with a high polydispersity, ranging from 100 to 200 nanometers to several micrometers (Figure 1). EOLs showed surface pores and hollow shapes, and some larger particles were observed that contained smaller particles inside them and, in higher magnifications, film-like structures were observed on the EOL surface, which were attributed to EOs incorporated into the shells of the particles (Figure 1B,D,F,H, yellow arrows). This assumption was confirmed by the absence of these film-like structures on the respective SEM photos of the empty LNPs (Figure 1J).
Release experiments were designed in order to prove the retention of the bioactive compound inside its carrier matrix and its eventual gradual release over a prolonged time. The release behavior of the prepared EOLs was tested in a standard liquid cultivation medium for fungi in order to simulate fungal growth conditions and observe their effect on the release of the EOs from the lignin nanoparticles. The cumulative release was determined for 7 days, with the respective cumulative release rates reported in Figure 2. For all four EOL samples, the initial release from Day 0 to Day 1 was higher than the later daily release rates. In the SEM images, film-like structures formed from EOs were observed (Figure 1), which could be responsible for the rather large portion of EOs released during Day 1 of the release experiment, while EOs incorporated in deeper layers of the LNP matrix were assumed to be retained for a longer time. Interestingly, the release rate of EOL-TC was already higher from Day 1 onward, resulting in almost 100% release already after five days. EOL-CC also showed a high initial release rate, but the release relatively slowed down afterwards, reaching almost 100% after six days. The release rate of EOL-TVD initially was rather low, with <40% release after one day but also reaching approximately 95% after six days of the experiment. In contrast, EOL-TV showed a quite different release, with the lowest release after one day (32%) and an almost constant release rate until Day 7, indicating that even after 7 days of release, there was still EO-TV contained inside the lignin nanoparticles. Interestingly, EOL-TC and EOL-CC, which consisted of an elevated content of the single component carvacrol, showed a higher initial release rate than EOL-TV and EOL-TVD, respectively, which contained more thymol and p-cymene, respectively (Table 1). The different chemical structures of the compounds might interact to a different extent with the lignin carrier material, which results in a faster or slower release from the LNPs. Considering the chemical structures of the compounds contained in the EOs, the non-phenolic terpenoid p-cymene, whose content was higher in EOL-TVD and EOL-TV, respectively, seemed to contribute to a stronger interaction of the EOs with the lignin carrier. Compared with an earlier study [24], where full release was already achieved after 72 h, it must be stated that the release experiment method used strongly affects the outcome. While in [24], the release experiment was conducted at room temperature and under magnetic stirring, in this study, the release was assessed in a steady state and in the refrigerator to prevent the spoilage of the utilized fungal growth medium.

3.2. In Vitro Inhibition Experiments

The fungal growth of T. versicolor, G. trabeum, P. ostreatus, and P. monticola was not significantly affected by the empty LNPs (Kruskal–Wallis statistics, p = 0.07; p = 0.10; p = 0.98; p = 0.56, respectively). In contrast, the tested EOs entrapped in the LNPs showed an inhibition effect against the pathogens, with MIC values ranging from 0.05 mg/mL (P. monticola treated with EOL-TC) up to 0.60 mg/mL (P. ostreatus treated with EOL-TVD and T. versicolor treated with EOL-TVD and EOL-CC) (Table 3). Of all the EOs investigated, EOL-TVD had the highest median MIC across all four tested strains (median 0.3 mg/mL; 0.15–0.60 mg/mL). In accordance with previous studies, a considerable variation in the in vitro inhibitory effects of the different EOs investigated was observed. To a lesser extent, the observed differences also depended on the pathogen investigated [22,87]. The entrapment of the EOs resulted in a higher inhibition effect against G. trabeum and P. monticola mycelia growth than treatments with free EOs, while no differences were observed for the treatments against T. versicolor and P. ostreatus, respectively. The ability of the two white-rot fungi T. versicolor and P. ostreatus to degrade lignin most likely caused the absence of a visible effect on the determined MIC of the entrapped EOs compared with pure EOs in contrast to the brown-rot strains. A positive effect of EOs entrapment into the LNPs also in the case of the white-rots might be achieved when extending the experimental time to a point, where all of the lignin carrier material is consumed, and the EOs are fully released. Another approach to increase efficacy against white-rot may be to decrease the ratio of lignin to EOs for the preparation of the respective EOLs so that the biocide delivery system provides relatively less substrate for the white-rot fungi.

3.3. FTIR Spectroscopy

Figure 3 shows the FTIR spectra of the four investigated fungi grown under control conditions on pure MEA (MEA) and on MEA containing lignin nanoparticles with the four applied thyme essential oils entrapped. To maintain their ability to carry out specialized and life-essential functions in the cell, microorganisms are used to adapt to changes and stressful events in their environment by variation of their cell wall composition in order to keep the metabolic processes up and running, which is essential for their survival. Thus, the detection of intensity differences of IR bands specific to their cell wall compounds indicate modifications in the cell wall composition [88]. IR bands were assigned to specific compounds in the fungal cell wall—lipids (bands 1, 4, 5, and 9), polyphosphates (bands 8, 11, and 13), and chitin/carbohydrates (bands 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, 12, and 13)—based on the respective functional groups (Table A2) and according to the respective literature [89,90,91,92,93,94,95]. Regarding G. trabeum (Figure 3A), the largest changes were observed at the IR bands 1 (lipids), 3 (chitin), 12 (chitin), and 14 (polyphosphates). For EOL-TV, the absorbance at IR band 1 increased, and it decreased for all other MEA formulations, being almost eliminated in the case of EOL-CC. The absorbance of IR band 14 was strongly affected by the applied EOLs compared with pure MEA. This could mean that the structure of the fungal cell wall phospholipid layer was significantly influenced by the presence of the respective EOLs in the culture medium. The intensity of the chitin-related IR band 3 was strongly reduced for EOL-TC, EOL-CC, and EOL-TVD, while the absorbance loss was lower for EOL-TV and the empty LNPs. Further, increases in absorbance were registered for IR band 12 for all formulations except EOL-TVD, indicating an increased chitin synthesis as a possible defense mechanism of G. trabeum against stress caused by the EOs entrapped in the LNPs.
In the overlay of the FTIR spectra of P. monticola grown on the different substrates in Figure 1B, the respective spectrum of the fungus grown on MEA containing EOL-CC is missing because there was 100% inhibition, even in the lowest used concentration of EO-CC. The respective background and baseline-corrected FTIR spectrum is, therefore, considered to be a straight horizontal line of zero absorbance (Figure 3B, EOL-CC) since there was no growth and, therefore, no mycelium of P. monticola in the cultivation substrate. The FTIR spectra of P. monticola grown on modified MEA showed absorbance decreases at IR band 1 (lipids) for all four EOs. Further, changes in the chitin-related IR band 3 as well as the IR band 8 related to polyphosphates were observed. The absorbance of IR band 3 became slightly lower for EOL-TC and slightly higher for EOL-TV and the empty LNPs, respectively. The IR band 8 showed higher absorbance for EOL-TV, EOL-TVD, as well as the empty LNPs. Considering simultaneous changes in the lipid IR band 1 and the poylphosphate IR band 8, the EOs apparently had an effect on the phospholipid layer of the cell wall of P. monticola.
The white-rot fungus P. ostreatus showed stronger absorbance differences at the IR bands 1, 3, 6, and 9 (Figure 3C). Similar to those of G. trabeum and P. monticola, an absorbance decrease in IR band 1 (lipids) was registered for EOL-CC, EOL-TC, and EOL-TVD, respectively, while for the empty LNPs and EOL-TV, the absorbance remained in the range of the control sample. There were absorbance decreases in another lipid IR band (9) for all samples except EOL-TVD when compared with the control sample. Further, the chitin-related IR bands 3 and 6 showed differences: the formulation with EOL-CC had a strong absorbance decrease, while the other EOs remained at the intensity of the control sample, and the pure LNPs caused an absorbance increase.
Similar to the other three fungal strains, T. versicolor showed IR absorbance changes at IR band 1 and 3 compared with the control experiment on pure MEA (Figure 3D). Additionally, changes were detected at the IR bands 10, 12, and 14. At IR band 1, an absorbance decrease was registered for the MEA formulations containing EOL-CC, EOL-TC, and EOL-TVD, while an increase was observed for MEA containing the empty LNPs. Regarding the chitin-related IR band 3, the EOLs from TC, CC, and TVD caused a strong absorbance decrease, while EOL-TV and the empty LNPs led to a higher absorbance than for pure MEA. The polyphosphates IR band 14 was reduced for EOL-TV, EOL-TVD, and the empty LNPs, while the absorbance of this band was larger than in pure MEA when adding EOL-CC and EOL-TC, respectively. Simultaneous changes in the lipids as well as the polyphosphate-related IR band indicated a disturbance in the phospholipid biosynthesis of T. versicolor caused by the different formulations. Additionally, the changed absorbance in the chitin-related bands indicated a modified chitin biosynthesis as a stress response to the added EOs.
In all in vitro inhibition experiments, changes in band 1 (lipids) were observed, namely a decrease in IR absorbance when the EOLs were used. This is in contrast to the earlier work of the authors, in which a respective IR absorbance increase in the lipid band was observed in the presence of pure EOs [22], which is a known fungal response to stressful events in order to protect the cell membrane and the proteins contained therein [95]. This indicates that the effect on the fungi was different in the presented work when the EOs were applied entrapped inside the LNPs. Lignin is known to non-productively adsorb polysaccharide hydrolases by hydrophobic-, electrostatic-, or hydrogen-bonding interactions when they are used for enzymatic digestion of biomass [96]. It could, therefore, be speculated, that the presence of LNPs could somehow inhibit or deactivate the conventional fungal response and the respective enzymes responsible for an increased lipid synthesis to protect their cell wall against stress caused by EOs.
When analyzing the band area ratios of the respective second derivatives of the FTIR spectra (Figure 4), it was observed that in the spectra of the fungi grown on MEA containing the empty LNPs (LNPs solo), the ratio of Lipids/Amide I decreased just a little (P. monticola, P. ostreatus, T. versicolor) or even increased (G. trabeum). On the basis of Figure 1, it was already observed that the lipid-related IR band 1 had a similar absorbance intensity for MEA containing the empty LNPs (LNPs solo) compared with the control samples for all four fungi. Therefore, this can be confirmed by the FTIR data of the second derivatives illustrated in Figure 4, where the lipid band at 3000–2800 cm−1, which lies outside the fingerprint region of the respective FTIR spectra, was also taken into account. In contrast to the empty LNPs, in the FTIR spectra of the four fungi grown on MEA containing the EOLs, the ratio of Lipids/Amide I decreased in almost all the cases compared with the respective control samples. In just two cases (T. versicolor vs. EOL-TVD and T. versicolor vs. EOL-TC), this ratio increased compared with the control experiment. In three other cases, the ratio of Lipids/Amide I remained at the level of the control sample (G. trabeum vs. EOL-CC, G. trabeum vs. EOL-TC, and P. monticola vs. EOL-TV). The general decrease in the ratio of Lipids/Amide I in the EOL-containing MEA formulations compared with pure MEA was already indicated by the observations of the respective FTIR spectra in Figure 2, where the absorbance of the lipid-related IR band 1 decreased in most cases. When analyzing the IR band ratio of Lipids/Amide II, the general pattern was similar to the ratio of Lipids/Amide I for P. monticola and P. ostreatus, respectively. In the case of G. trabeum, the ratio of Lipids/Amide II increased for MEA containing EOL-CC, EOL-TC, and EOL-TV, which correlated with the strong absorbance decrease in IR band 3 observed in Figure 3A. In the case of T. versicolor, a strong increase in the ratio of Lipids/Amide II was registered for MEA containing EOL-TC and EOL-TVD, respectively.
When considering the MIC values calculated for EOL-TC and EOL-TVD against T. versicolor (Table 3), it is evident that an increase in the IR band ratio of Lipids/Amide II, which indicated a stress reaction of the fungus, was not always in correlation with a growth inhibition of the fungus by the applied EOLs. Although the IR band ratio of Lipids/Amide II was highest for EOL-TVD, the MIC values were lower for EOL-TC and EOL-TV, respectively, meaning that EOL-TVD was less effective against T. versicolor. On the contrary, the high Lipids/Amide II ratio of EOL-TC against T. versicolor correlated with the low MIC determined for this case (Table 3). When observing the Lipids/Carbos IR band ratio of the fungi grown on MEA containing the empty LNPs, it became evident that for the brown-rot fungi G. trabeum and P. monticola, the ratio decreased compared with that of pure MEA, while it increased for the white-rot fungi P. ostreatus and T. versicolor. Their ability to degrade lignin could be a reason for the different response to the LNPs in the MEA terrain observed for the white-rot strains. The processing of lignin can provide additional acetyl-CoA and succinyl-CoA that, in turn, feed their central metabolism for lipid biosynthesis, for example, as an eventual stress response leading to a higher Lipids/Carbos IR band ratio [97,98,99,100]. On the contrary, it could be speculated that the presence of the LNPs might disturb lipid synthesis in brown-rot fungal cell walls via the inhibition of enzymes responsible for the construction of the phospholipid layer in the cell wall, as pointed out above. While the ratios of Lipids/Carbos for EOL-CC and EOL-TVD were in the range of the empty LNPs and lower than in the control MEA for G. trabeum, it was higher than in the control MEA when the cultivation medium contained EOL-TC or EOL-TV, respectively. This could have been caused by a relatively greater stress imposed by EOL-TC and EOL-TV on G. trabeum, triggering a lipid accumulation stress response, to a certain extent, which was not disturbed by the amount of LNPs present in the cultivation medium. While the IR band ratio of Amide I/Total Amides showed only slight variations between pure and EOL-containing MEA (Table A1), respectively, the ratio of Amide II/Total Amides varied much more, which means that the EOs affected the Amide II band to a greater extent, which corresponds to IR band 3 in Figure 2. Figure 4 shows that the ratio of Amide II/Total Amides decreased for EOL-CC, EOL-TC, and EOL-TV, while it increased for EOL-TVD and the empty LNPs compared with pure MEA in the case of G. trabeum. P. monticola, instead, showed low variations for both the IR band ratios of Amide I/Total Amides and Amide II/Total Amides. Interestingly, P. ostreatus had the largest variation in the case of MEA with added EOL-TC, but the MIC results were equal to those for EOL-CC and EOL-TV, respectively, which showed a much lower change in the Amide II/Total Amides ratio. In the case of T. versicolor, the strongest variations in this IR band ratio were registered for EOL-TV and EOL-TC, which correlated with the MIC results that were lowest for those two substrate formulations. Interestingly, the ratio was almost the same for pure MEA and MEA containing EOL-CC, but the respective MIC for EOL-CC was comparable to MEA containing EOL-TV, where the IR band ratio of Amide II/Total Amides was the largest. As mentioned above, the changes in the IR band ratios might not always reflect the respectively determined MICs, as changes in the cell wall structure induced by the fungi might not affect its growth but instead should allow the fungus to cope with the stress induced by the present EOLs.
The results of the PCA analysis of the second derivatives of the respective FTIR spectra are illustrated in a scatter plot, where the single experiments were grouped according to the different fungal strains (Figure 5). This is in contrast to an earlier work of the authors, where the pure EOs were utilized in their free form as additives of the cultivation substrate, and the single experiments were grouped according to the different EOs applied [22]. Interestingly, the single experiments of the two fungi T. versicolor (Figure 5, squares) and P. ostreatus (Figure 5, downward triangles), which are both white-rot fungi, strongly overlap in the PCA scatter plots (Figure 5B, grey circle). Their ability to degrade lignin and eventually even deactivate phenolic compounds in the EOs, such as thymol and carvacrol, via peroxidases as pointed out by Pánek et al. [56], apparently caused these two fungi to react in a similar way to the stress caused by the present EOLs. When considering the PCA scatter plot of the first two PCs (Figure 5, left), the fungus P. monticola (circles) grouped up in distance to the other three fungi, similar as G. trabeum (upward triangles), for which the grouping is clearer in the PCA scatter plot of P.C.2 and P.C.3, respectively (Figure 5A, right). A concordance of the results of the white-rot fungi was also observed in the in vitro inhibition experiments regarding the respective MIC values, as mentioned above, confirming the findings of FTIR spectroscopic investigations.

4. Conclusions

EOL from thyme spp. proved to be efficient as a biocide delivery system for the control of wood-rot fungi, such as T. versicolor, P. ostreatus, G. trabeum, and P. monticola in in vitro experiments. The EOL dispersions showed a delayed release of the entrapped EOs when applied in a liquid fungal cultivation medium. FTIR spectroscopy once again proved to be a useful tool to estimate the fungal cell wall changes caused by the presence of the EOs in the cultivation medium. For each one of the four wood-rot fungi, an EOL sample with satisfying efficacy was identified. EOL dispersions are now ready to be tested as wood coatings against wood-rot fungi, and the respective in vitro experiments using coated wood specimens will be conducted next. EOL dispersions from thyme showed a promising potential approach for a wide range of wood protection applications where wooden structures in indoor as well as outdoor conditions encounter humidity and the danger of an attack by wood-rot fungi.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.Z., A.M.V. and M.R.; methodology, F.Z., A.M.V., C.P. and M.R.; validation, F.Z., A.M.V. and M.R.; formal analysis, F.Z. and A.M.V.; investigation, F.Z., A.M.V., S.B. and M.B.; resources, M.R.; data curation, F.Z. and A.M.V.; writing—original draft preparation, F.Z. and A.M.V.; writing—review and editing, F.Z., A.M.V., C.P., M.H. and M.R.; visualization, F.Z.; supervision, M.R.; project administration, M.R.; funding acquisition, M.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by PORFESR 2014-2020 “BIOEDILCARBON: Protezione della bioedilizia in legno: IOT e nanomateriali per lo stoccaggio di carbonio” PROGETTO GRUPPI DI RICERCA REGIONE LAZIO (A0375-2020-36712, scientific responsible Manuela Romagnoli). This research was carried out also in the frame of Project ECS 0000024 Rome Technopole,—CUP B83C22002820006, PNRR Mission 4 Component 2 Investment 1.5, funded by the European Union—NextGenerationEU.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The support from Davor Kržišnik, Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Wood Science and Technology, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, regarding the fungal isolates is greatly acknowledged. The support from Anna Rita Taddei, Large Equipment Centre, Section of Electron Microscopy, University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy, regarding SEM analysis is greatly acknowledged. The contribution of COST Action LignoCOST (CA17128), supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology), in promoting interaction, exchange of knowledge, and collaborations in the field of lignin valorization is gratefully acknowledged.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Appendix A

Table A1. IR band area ratios of the second derivatives of the FTIR spectra of the fungi grown on pure MEA and MEA containing empty LNPs as well as LNPs loaded with EOs of the four thyme species (EOL-CC, EOL-TC, EOL-TV, EOL-TVD). Spectral regions used for band area integration: Lipids, 3000–2800 cm−1; Amide I, 1705–1575 cm−1; Amide II, 1575–1480 cm−1; Amide III, 1350–1240 cm−1; Carbohydrates, 1200–900 cm−1.
Table A1. IR band area ratios of the second derivatives of the FTIR spectra of the fungi grown on pure MEA and MEA containing empty LNPs as well as LNPs loaded with EOs of the four thyme species (EOL-CC, EOL-TC, EOL-TV, EOL-TVD). Spectral regions used for band area integration: Lipids, 3000–2800 cm−1; Amide I, 1705–1575 cm−1; Amide II, 1575–1480 cm−1; Amide III, 1350–1240 cm−1; Carbohydrates, 1200–900 cm−1.
FungusSubstrateLipids/Amide ILipids/Amide IIAmide I/Total AmidesAmide II/Total AmidesLipids/Carbos
Gloeophyllum trabeumEOL-CC0.9552.4650.4480.1740.177
EOL-TC0.9631.4220.4390.2970.263
EOL-TV0.7621.3630.4630.2590.190
EOL-TVD0.7061.0210.5400.3730.231
LNPs solo1.0681.1310.4160.3930.180
MEA pure1.0041.1630.4010.3460.221
Poria monticolaEOL-CC-----
EOL-TC0.2100.3940.5170.2750.080
EOL-TV0.4010.9800.5800.2370.144
EOL-TVD0.3400.7450.4760.2170.128
LNPs solo0.3060.8220.5840.2170.111
MEA pure0.4090.8490.5290.2550.150
Pleorotus ostreatusEOL-CC0.6751.3140.4540.2330.164
EOL-TC0.4120.4830.4790.4090.177
EOL-TV0.4870.8120.5120.3070.186
EOL-TVD0.5651.1010.4850.2490.141
LNPs solo0.9201.3670.4010.2700.260
MEA pure0.9411.5320.3780.2320.229
Trametes versicolorEOL-CC0.5281.1010.4550.2190.154
EOL-TC0.6631.8880.3990.1400.195
EOL-TV0.5710.6630.4630.3990.201
EOL-TVD1.1151.7900.3770.2340.305
LNPs solo0.5330.8670.4670.2880.192
MEA pure0.6401.1820.4280.2320.180
Table A2. Main IR absorption bands and signal assignments of chemical structures derived from the respective biopolymers [89,90,91,92,93,94,95].
Table A2. Main IR absorption bands and signal assignments of chemical structures derived from the respective biopolymers [89,90,91,92,93,94,95].
Band NumberWavenumber (cm−1)Signal AssignmentBiopolymer Contribution
-3500–3200O-H stretchingcarbohydrates
-3275N-H stretchingchitin/chitosan
-3105N-H stretchingchitin/chitosan
-2955=C-H stretchinglipids
-2925-C-H (CH3) stretchinglipids
-2855-C-H (CH2) stretchinglipids
11745-C=O stretching in esterslipids
21680–1630-C=O stretching, Amide Iproteins, chitin
31560–1530C-N-H deformation, Amide IIproteins, chitin
41465-C-H (CH2, CH3) bendinglipids
51402C=O pf COO- groupslipids
61377-C-H (CH3) bendingchitin
71320Amide IIIproteins, chitin
81265P=O stretchingpolyphosphates, phospholipids
91180C-O-C stretching in esterslipids
101150C-O and C-O-C stretchingcarbohydrates
111075PO2 symmetric stretchingpolyphosphates, phospholipids
121043C-O stretchingcarbohydrates
13930glycosidic linkagescarbohydrates
14894P-O-P stretchingpolyphosphates

References

  1. Romagnoli, M.; Fragiacomo, M.; Brunori, A.; Follesa, M.; Scarascia Mugnozza, G. Solid Wood and Wood Based Composites: The Challenge of Sustainability Looking for a Short and Smart Supply Chain. In Digital Wood Design: Innovative Techniques of Representation in Architectural Design, Bianconi, F., Filippucci, M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 783–807. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sciomenta, M.; Spera, L.; Bedon, C.; Rinaldi, V.; Fragiacomo, M.; Romagnoli, M. Mechanical characterization of novel Homogeneous Beech and hybrid Beech-Corsican Pine thin Cross-Laminated timber panels. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 271, 121589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sciomenta, M.; Spera, L.; Peditto, A.; Ciuffetelli, E.; Savini, F.; Bedon, C.; Romagnoli, M.; Nocetti, M.; Brunetti, M.; Fragiacomo, M. Mechanical characterization of homogeneous and hybrid beech-Corsican pine glue-laminated timber beams. Eng. Struct. 2022, 264, 114450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zikeli, F.; Romagnoli, M.; Mugnozza, G.S. Chapter 12—Lignin nanoparticles in coatings for wood preservation. In Micro and Nanolignin in Aqueous Dispersions and Polymers; Puglia, D., Santulli, C., Sarasini, F., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 357–384. [Google Scholar]
  5. Khademibami, L.; Bobadilha, G.S. Recent Developments Studies on Wood Protection Research in Academia: A Review. Front. For. Glob. Change 2022, 5, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Blanchet, P.; Pepin, S. Trends in Chemical Wood Surface Improvements and Modifications: A Review of the Last Five Years. Coatings 2021, 11, 1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Teng, T.-J.; Mat Arip, M.N.; Sudesh, K.; Nemoikina, A.; Jalaludin, Z.; Ng, E.-P.; Lee, H.-L. Conventional technology and nanotechnology in wood preservation: A Review. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 13, 9220–9925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. De Angelis, M.; Humar, M.; Kržišnik, D.; Tamantini, S.; Romagnoli, M. Influence of Thermal Modification and Impregnation with Biocides on Physical Properties of Italian Stone Pine Wood (Pinus pinea L.). Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 3801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. De Angelis, M.; Romagnoli, M.; Vek, V.; Poljanšek, I.; Oven, P.; Thaler, N.; Lesar, B.; Kržišnik, D.; Humar, M. Chemical composition and resistance of Italian stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) wood against fungal decay and wetting. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 117, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Papadopoulos, A.N.; Taghiyari, H.R. Innovative Wood Surface Treatments Based on Nanotechnology. Coatings 2019, 9, 866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Esteves, B.; Pereira, H. Wood modification by heat treatment: A Review. BioResources 2009, 4, 370–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Romagnoli, M.; Vinciguerra, V.; Silvestri, A. Heat Treatment Effect on Lignin and Carbohydrates in Corsican Pine Earlywood and Latewood Studied by PY–GC–MS Technique. J. Wood Chem. Technol. 2018, 38, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Herrera, R.; Sandak, J.; Robles, E.; Krystofiak, T.; Labidi, J. Weathering resistance of thermally modified wood finished with coatings of diverse formulations. Prog. Org. Coat. 2018, 119, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Herrera Díaz, R.; Gordobil, O.; de Hoyos-Martinez, P.L.; Sandak, A.; Labidi, J. Hydrophobization and Photo-Stabilization of Radiata Pinewood: The Effect of the Esterification on Thermal and Mechanical Properties. Forests 2020, 11, 1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Vek, V.; Keržič, E.; Poljanšek, I.; Eklund, P.; Humar, M.; Oven, P. Wood Extractives of Silver Fir and Their Antioxidant and Antifungal Properties. Molecules 2021, 26, 6412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Broda, M. Natural Compounds for Wood Protection against Fungi—A Review. Molecules 2020, 25, 3538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tondi, G.; Palanti, S.; Wieland, S.; Thevenon, M.F.; Petutschnigg, A.; Schnabel, T. Durability of tannin-boron-treated timber. BioResources 2012, 7, 5138–5151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Lozhechnikova, A.; Bellanger, H.; Michen, B.; Burgert, I.; Österberg, M. Surfactant-free carnauba wax dispersion and its use for layer-by-layer assembled protective surface coatings on wood. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 396, 1273–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Antonelli, F.; Bartolini, M.; Plissonnier, M.-L.; Esposito, A.; Galotta, G.; Ricci, S.; Davidde Petriaggi, B.; Pedone, C.; Di Giovanni, A.; Piazza, S.; et al. Essential Oils as Alternative Biocides for the Preservation of Waterlogged Archaeological Wood. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Sadiki, M.; El Abed, S.; Balouiri, M.; Barkai, H.; El Bergadi, F.Z.; El Farricha, O.; Ibnsouda Koraichi, S. Combined effect of essential oils against bacteria associated with deterioration of historical wood. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2017, 8, 594–602. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang, Z.; Yang, T.; Mi, N.; Wang, Y.; Li, G.; Wang, L.; Xie, Y. Antifungal activity of monoterpenes against wood white-rot fungi. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2016, 106, 157–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vettraino, A.M.; Zikeli, F.; Humar, M.; Biscontri, M.; Bergamasco, S.; Romagnoli, M. Essential oils from Thymus spp. as natural biocide against common brown- and white-rot fungi in degradation of wood products: Antifungal activity evaluation by in vitro and FTIR analysis. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2023, 81, 747–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vettraino, A.M.; Zikeli, F.; Scarascia Mugnozza, G.; Vinciguerra, V.; Tabet, D.; Romagnoli, M. Lignin nanoparticles containing essential oils for controlling Phytophthora cactorum diseases. For. Pathol. 2022, 52, e12739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zikeli, F.; Vinciguerra, V.; Sennato, S.; Scarascia Mugnozza, G.; Romagnoli, M. Preparation of Lignin Nanoparticles with Entrapped Essential Oil as a Bio-Based Biocide Delivery System. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 358–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Xie, Y.; Wang, Z.; Huang, Q.; Zhang, D. Antifungal activity of several essential oils and major components against wood-rot fungi. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 108, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, S.-Y.; Chen, P.-F.; Chang, S.-T. Antifungal activities of essential oils and their constituents from indigenous cinnamon (Cinnamomum osmophloeum) leaves against wood decay fungi. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96, 813–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Spagnoletti, A.; Guerrini, A.; Tacchini, M.; Vinciguerra, V.; Leone, C.; Maresca, I.; Simonetti, G.; Sacchetti, G.; Angiolella, L. Chemical Composition and Bio-efficacy of Essential Oils from Italian Aromatic Plants: Mentha suaveolens, Coridothymus capitatus, Origanum hirtum and Rosmarinus officinalis. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2016, 11, 1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Vinciguerra, V.; Rojas, F.; Tedesco, V.; Giusiano, G.; Angiolella, L. Chemical characterization and antifungal activity of Origanum vulgare, Thymus vulgaris essential oils and carvacrol against Malassezia furfur. Nat. Prod. Res. 2019, 33, 3273–3277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Voda, K.; Boh, B.; Vrtačnik, M.; Pohleven, F. Effect of the antifungal activity of oxygenated aromatic essential oil compounds on the white-rot Trametes versicolor and the brown-rot Coniophora puteana. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2003, 51, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vrenna, G.; Artini, M.; Ragno, R.; Relucenti, M.; Fiscarelli, E.V.; Tuccio Guarna Assanti, V.; Papa, R.; Selan, L. Anti-Virulence Properties of Coridothymus capitatus Essential Oil against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Clinical Isolates from Cystic Fibrosis Patients. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wińska, K.; Mączka, W.; Łyczko, J.; Grabarczyk, M.; Czubaszek, A.; Szumny, A. Essential Oils as Antimicrobial Agents—Myth or Real Alternative? Molecules 2019, 24, 2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Mohareb, A.S.O.; Badawy, M.E.I.; Abdelgaleil, S.A.M. Antifungal activity of essential oils isolated from Egyptian plants against wood decay fungi. J. Wood Sci. 2013, 59, 499–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nostro, A.; Papalia, T. Antimicrobial Activity of Carvacrol: Current Progress and Future Prospectives. Recent. Pat. Anti-Infect. Drug. Discov. 2012, 7, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Satish, S.; Mohana, D.; Ranhavendra, M.; Raveesha, K. Antifungal activity of some plant extracts against important seed borne pathogens of Aspergillus sp. J. Agric. Technol. 2007, 3, 109–119. [Google Scholar]
  35. Felšöciová, S.; Vukovic, N.; Jeżowski, P.; Kačániová, M. Antifungal activity of selected volatile essential oils against Penicillium sp. Open. Life Sci. 2020, 15, 511–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kumar, R.; Pandey, A.; Varshney, V.K. Antifungal Activity of the Essential Oil of Tagetes minuta Against Some Fungi of Forestry Importance. J. Biol. Act. Prod. Nat. 2019, 9, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Karpiński, T.M. Essential Oils of Lamiaceae Family Plants as Antifungals. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Nazzaro, F.; Fratianni, F.; De Martino, L.; Coppola, R.; De Feo, V. Effect of Essential Oils on Pathogenic Bacteria. Pharmaceuticals 2013, 6, 1451–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Abers, M.; Schroeder, S.; Goelz, L.; Sulser, A.; St. Rose, T.; Puchalski, K.; Langland, J. Antimicrobial activity of the volatile substances from essential oils. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2021, 21, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bunse, M.; Daniels, R.; Gründemann, C.; Heilmann, J.; Kammerer, D.R.; Keusgen, M.; Lindequist, U.; Melzig, M.F.; Morlock, G.E.; Schulz, H.; et al. Essential Oils as Multicomponent Mixtures and Their Potential for Human Health and Well-Being. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 2645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Iqhrammullah, M.; Rizki, D.R.; Purnama, A.; Duta, T.F.; Harapan, H.; Idroes, R.; Ginting, B. Antiviral Molecular Targets of Essential Oils against SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review. Sci. Pharm. 2023, 91, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liao, W.; Badri, W.; Dumas, E.; Ghnimi, S.; Elaissari, A.; Saurel, R.; Gharsallaoui, A. Nanoencapsulation of Essential Oils as Natural Food Antimicrobial Agents: An Overview. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nazzaro, F.; Fratianni, F.; Coppola, R.; Feo, V.D. Essential Oils and Antifungal Activity. Pharmaceuticals 2017, 10, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Vitoratos, A.; Bilalis, D.; Karkanis, A.; Efthimiadou, A. Antifungal Activity of Plant Essential Oils Against Botrytis cinerea, Penicillium italicum and Penicillium digitatum. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2013, 41, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Sharma, A.; Rajendran, S.; Srivastava, A.; Sharma, S.; Kundu, B. Antifungal activities of selected essential oils against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici 1322, with emphasis on Syzygium aromaticum essential oil. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2017, 123, 308–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Salem, M.Z.M.; Zidan, Y.E.; Mansour, M.M.A.; El Hadidi, N.M.N.; Abo Elgat, W.A.A. Antifungal activities of two essential oils used in the treatment of three commercial woods deteriorated by five common mold fungi. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2016, 106, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ma, B.; Ban, X.; Huang, B.; He, J.; Tian, J.; Zeng, H.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y. Interference and Mechanism of Dill Seed Essential Oil and Contribution of Carvone and Limonene in Preventing Sclerotinia Rot of Rapeseed. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0131733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Abdollahi, A.; Hassani, A.; Ghosta, Y.; Meshkatalsadat, M.H.; Shabani, R. Screening of antifungal properties of essential oils extracted from sweet basil, fennel, summer savory and thyme against postharvest phytopathogenic fungi. J. Food Saf. 2011, 31, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Baker, B.P.; Grant, J.A. Active Ingredients Eligible for Minimum Risk Pesticide Use: Overview of the Profiles; Cornell University: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  50. Ochoa-Velasco, C.E.; Navarro-Cruz, A.R.; Vera-López, O.; Palou, E.; Avila-Sosa, R. Growth modeling to control (in vitro) Fusarium verticillioides and Rhizopus stolonifer with thymol and carvacrol. Rev. Argent. De Microbiol. 2018, 50, 70–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Baker, B.P.; Grant, J.A. Thyme & Thyme Oil Profile; Cornell University: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  52. Akrout, A.; Hajer, E.J.; Amouri, S.; Neffati, M. Screening of Antiradical and Antibacterial Activities of Essential Oils of Artemisia campestris L., Artemisia herba alba Asso, & Thymus capitatus Hoff. Et Link. Growing Wild in the Southern of Tunisia. Recent. Res. Sci. Technol. 2009, 2, 29–39. [Google Scholar]
  53. Bounatirou, S.; Smiti, S.; Miguel, M.G.; Faleiro, L.; Rejeb, M.N.; Neffati, M.; Costa, M.M.; Figueiredo, A.C.; Barroso, J.G.; Pedro, L.G. Chemical composition, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of the essential oils isolated from Tunisian Thymus capitatus Hoff. et Link. Food Chem. 2007, 105, 146–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cosentino, S.; Tuberoso, C.I.G.; Pisano, B.; Satta, M.; Mascia, V.; Arzedi, E.; Palmas, F. In-vitro antimicrobial activity and chemical composition of Sardinian Thymus essential oils. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 1999, 29, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Miceli, A.; Negro, C.; Tommasi, L. Essential oil variability in Thymbra capitata (L.) Cav. growing wild in Southern Apulia (Italy). Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2006, 34, 528–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pánek, M.; Reinprecht, L.; Hulla, M. Ten Essential Oils for Beech Wood Protection—Efficacy Against Wood-destroying Fungi and Moulds, and Effect on Wood Discoloration. BioResources 2014, 9, 5588–5603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Reinprecht, L.; Pop, D.-M.; Vidholdová, Z.; Timar, M.C. Anti-decay potential of five essential oils against the wood-decaying fungi Serpula lacrymans and Trametes versicolor. Acta Fac. Xylologiae Zvolen. 2019, 61, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Alinejad, M.; Henry, C.; Nikafshar, S.; Gondaliya, A.; Bagheri, S.; Chen, N.; Singh, S.K.; Hodge, D.B.; Nejad, M. Lignin-Based Polyurethanes: Opportunities for Bio-Based Foams, Elastomers, Coatings and Adhesives. Polymers 2019, 11, 1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Balakshin, M.Y.; Capanema, E.A.; Sulaeva, I.; Schlee, P.; Huang, Z.; Feng, M.; Borghei, M.; Rojas, O.J.; Potthast, A.; Rosenau, T. New Opportunities in the Valorization of Technical Lignins. ChemSusChem 2021, 14, 1016–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Bergamasco, S.; Tamantini, S.; Zikeli, F.; Vinciguerra, V.; Scarascia Mugnozza, G.; Romagnoli, M. Synthesis and Characterizations of Eco-Friendly Organosolv Lignin-Based Polyurethane Coating Films for the Coating Industry. Polymers 2022, 14, 416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. de Hoyos-Martinez, P.L.; Charrier-El Bouhtoury, F.; Labidi, J. Biobased phenolic resins for wood protection against fire. In Proceedings of the COST FP1407 3rd Conference ”Wood Modification Research and Applications”, Kuchl, Austria, 14–15 September 2017. [Google Scholar]
  62. Jusic, J.; Tamantini, S.; Romagnoli, M.; Vinciguerra, V.; Di Mattia, E.; Zikeli, F.; Cavalera, M.; Scarascia Mugnozza, G. Improving sustainability in wood coating: Testing lignin and cellulose nanocrystals as additives to commercial acrylic wood coatings for bio-building. Iforest-Biogeosciences For. 2021, 14, 499–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Santiago-Medina, F.J.; Basso, M.C.; Pizzi, A.; Delmotte, L. Polyurethanes from Kraft Lignin without Using Isocyanates. J. Renew. Mater. 2018, 6, 413–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Singh, T.; Singh, A.P. A review on natural products as wood protectant. Wood Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 851–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Teaca, C.-A.; Roşu, D.; Mustaţă, F.; Rusu, T.; Roşu, L.; Roşca, I.; Varganici, C.D. Natural bio-based products for wood coating and protection against degradation: A Review. BioResources 2019, 14, 4873–4901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tamantini, S.; Bergamasco, S.; Zikeli, F.; Humar, M.; Cavalera, M.; Romagnoli, M. Cellulose Nano Crystals (CNC) as Additive for a Bio-Based Waterborne Acrylic Wood Coating: Decay, Artificial Weathering, Physical and Chemical Tests. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zikeli, F.; Vinciguerra, V.; D’Annibale, A.; Capitani, D.; Romagnoli, M.; Scarascia Mugnozza, G. Preparation of Lignin Nanoparticles from Wood Waste for Wood Surface Treatment. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Vieira, F.R.; Magina, S.; Evtuguin, D.V.; Barros-Timmons, A. Lignin as a Renewable Building Block for Sustainable Polyurethanes. Materials 2022, 15, 6182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Henn, K.A.; Forsman, N.; Zou, T.; Österberg, M. Colloidal Lignin Particles and Epoxies for Bio-Based, Durable, and Multiresistant Nanostructured Coatings. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 34793–34806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Beisl, S.; Friedl, A.; Miltner, A. Lignin from Micro- to Nanosize: Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Hussin, M.H.; Appaturi, J.N.; Poh, N.E.; Latif, N.H.A.; Brosse, N.; Ziegler-Devin, I.; Vahabi, H.; Syamani, F.A.; Fatriasari, W.; Solihat, N.N.; et al. A recent advancement on preparation, characterization and application of nanolignin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 200, 303–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Österberg, M.; Sipponen, M.H.; Mattos, B.D.; Rojas, O.J. Spherical lignin particles: A review on their sustainability and applications. Green. Chem. 2020, 22, 2712–2733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Pereira, A.d.E.S.; Luiz de Oliveira, J.; Maira Savassa, S.; Barbara Rogério, C.; Araujo de Medeiros, G.; Fraceto, L.F. Lignin nanoparticles: New insights for a sustainable agriculture. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 345, 131145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Pylypchuk, I.; Sipponen, M.H. Organic solvent-free production of colloidally stable spherical lignin nanoparticles at high mass concentrations. Green. Chem. 2022, 24, 8705–8715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sipponen, M.H.; Lange, H.; Ago, M.; Crestini, C. Understanding Lignin Aggregation Processes. A Case Study: Budesonide Entrapment and Stimuli Controlled Release from Lignin Nanoparticles. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 9342–9351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sipponen, M.H.; Lange, H.; Crestini, C.; Henn, A.; Österberg, M. Lignin for Nano- and Microscaled Carrier Systems: Applications, Trends, and Challenges. ChemSusChem 2019, 12, 2039–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Stanisz, M.; Klapiszewski, Ł.; Collins, M.N.; Jesionowski, T. Recent progress in biomedical and biotechnological applications of lignin-based spherical nano- and microstructures: A comprehensive review. Mater. Today Chem. 2022, 26, 101198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Liu, K.; Zhuang, Y.; Chen, J.; Yang, G.; Dai, L. Research Progress on the Preparation and High-Value Utilization of Lignin Nanoparticles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 7254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Verdini, F.; Gaudino, E.C.; Canova, E.; Tabasso, S.; Behbahani, P.J.; Cravotto, G. Lignin as a Natural Carrier for the Efficient Delivery of Bioactive Compounds: From Waste to Health. Molecules 2022, 27, 3598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Mattos, B.D.; Tardy, B.L.; Magalhães, W.L.E.; Rojas, O.J. Controlled release for crop and wood protection: Recent progress toward sustainable and safe nanostructured biocidal systems. J. Control. Release 2017, 262, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Andeme Ela, R.C.; Tajiri, M.; Newberry, N.K.; Heiden, P.A.; Ong, R.G. Double-Shell Lignin Nanocapsules Are a Stable Vehicle for Fungicide Encapsulation and Release. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 17299–17306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Falsini, S.; Clemente, I.; Papini, A.; Tani, C.; Schiff, S.; Salvatici, M.C.; Petruccelli, R.; Benelli, C.; Giordano, C.; Gonnelli, C.; et al. When Sustainable Nanochemistry Meets Agriculture: Lignin Nanocapsules for Bioactive Compound Delivery to Plantlets. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 19935–19942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Yin, J.-M.; Wang, H.-L.; Yang, Z.-K.; Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; Duan, L.-S.; Li, Z.-H.; Tan, W.-M. Engineering Lignin Nanomicroparticles for the Antiphotolysis and Controlled Release of the Plant Growth Regulator Abscisic Acid. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 7360–7368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Chen, L.; Shi, Y.; Gao, B.; Zhao, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Zha, Z.; Xue, W.; Gong, L. Lignin Nanoparticles: Green Synthesis in a γ-Valerolactone/Water Binary Solvent and Application to Enhance Antimicrobial Activity of Essential Oils. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 714–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Aguiar, M.C.S.; Denadae, B.E.; Silva, M.F.G.F.; Fernandes, J.B.; Bittencourt, P.R.S.; Scremin, F.R.; Forim, M.R. Quality Control for Lignin and Gelatin Microcapsules Loaded with Orange Essential Oil. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2022, 33, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Raspor, P.; Smole Možina, S.; Podjavoršek, J.; Pohleven, F.; Gogala, N.; Nekrep, F.V.; Rogelj, I.; Hacin, J. ZIM: Culture Collection of Industrial Microorganisms; University of Ljubljana: Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  87. Van, N.T.B.; Vi, O.T.; Yen, N.T.P.; Nhung, N.T.; Cuong, N.V.; Kiet, B.T.; Hoang, N.V.; Hien, V.B.; Thwaites, G.; Campell, J.; et al. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of commercial essential oils against common chicken pathogenic bacteria and their relationship with antibiotic resistance. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 132, 1025–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Szeghalmi, A.; Kaminskyj, S.; Gough, K.M. A synchrotron FTIR microspectroscopy investigation of fungal hyphae grown under optimal and stressed conditions. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007, 387, 1779–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Bekiaris, G.; Tagkouli, D.; Koutrotsios, G.; Kalogeropoulos, N.; Zervakis, G.I. Pleurotus Mushrooms Content in Glucans and Ergosterol Assessed by ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy and Multivariate Analysis. Foods 2020, 9, 535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Bhat, R. Potential Use of Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy for Identification of Molds Capable of Producing Mycotoxins. Int. J. Food Prop. 2013, 16, 1819–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Dzurendova, S.; Zimmermann, B.; Kohler, A.; Tafintseva, V.; Slany, O.; Certik, M.; Shapaval, V. Microcultivation and FTIR spectroscopy-based screening revealed a nutrient-induced co-production of high-value metabolites in oleaginous Mucoromycota fungi. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0234870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Gupta, B.S.; Jelle, B.P.; Gao, T. Application of ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy to Compare the Cell Materials of Wood Decay Fungi with Wood Mould Fungi. Int. J. Spectrosc. 2015, 2015, 521938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Gupta, B.S.; Jelle, B.P.; Gao, T. In vitro cell composition identification of wood decay fungi by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. R. Soc. Open. Sci. 2022, 9, 201935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Skotti, E.; Kountouri, S.; Bouchagier, P.; Tsitsigiannis, D.I.; Polissiou, M.; Tarantilis, P.A. FTIR spectroscopic evaluation of changes in the cellular biochemical composition of the phytopathogenic fungus Alternaria alternata induced by extracts of some Greek medicinal and aromatic plants. Spectrochim. Acta Part. A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2014, 127, 463–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sompong, M.; Thumanu, K.; Prakhongka, I.; Burapatpong, B.; Athinuwat, D.; Prathuangwong, S.; Buensanteai, N. Infrared spectroscopy: Methods for investigating cellular components of phytopathogenic fungi response to temperature stress. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2013, 7, 4331–4337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Huang, C.; Jiang, X.; Shen, X.; Hu, J.; Tang, W.; Wu, X.; Ragauskas, A.; Jameel, H.; Meng, X.; Yong, Q. Lignin-enzyme interaction: A roadblock for efficient enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosics. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 154, 111822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. del Cerro, C.; Erickson, E.; Dong, T.; Wong, A.R.; Eder, E.K.; Purvine, S.O.; Mitchell, H.D.; Weitz, K.K.; Markillie, L.M.; Burnet, M.C.; et al. Intracellular pathways for lignin catabolism in white-rot fungi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2017381118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Kijpornyongpan, T.; Schwartz, A.; Yaguchi, A.; Salvachúa, D. Systems biology-guided understanding of white-rot fungi for biotechnological applications: A review. iScience 2022, 25, 104640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Subhash, G.V.; Mohan, S.V. Sustainable biodiesel production through bioconversion of lignocellulosic wastewater by oleaginous fungi. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2015, 5, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Hao, G.; Barker, G.C. Fatty acid secretion by the white-rot fungus, Trametes versicolor. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 49, kuab083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. SEM images of lignin nanoparticles containing essential oils from T. capitatus (A,B), T. vulgaris (C,D), C. capitatus (E,F), T. vulgaris Demeter (G,H), and empty LNPs (I,J). Yellow arrows indicate film-like structures.
Figure 1. SEM images of lignin nanoparticles containing essential oils from T. capitatus (A,B), T. vulgaris (C,D), C. capitatus (E,F), T. vulgaris Demeter (G,H), and empty LNPs (I,J). Yellow arrows indicate film-like structures.
Polymers 15 02713 g001
Figure 2. Cumulative release of essential oils from lignin nanoparticles containing essential oils from C. capitatus (EOL-CC), T. capitatus (EOL-TC), T. vulgaris Demeter (EOL-TVD), and T. vulgaris (EOL-TV).
Figure 2. Cumulative release of essential oils from lignin nanoparticles containing essential oils from C. capitatus (EOL-CC), T. capitatus (EOL-TC), T. vulgaris Demeter (EOL-TVD), and T. vulgaris (EOL-TV).
Polymers 15 02713 g002
Figure 3. FTIR spectra, background and baseline-corrected, of Gloeophyllum trabeum (A), Poria monticola (B), Pleurotus ostreatus (C), and Trametes versicolor (D) grown on pure MEA as well as on MEA containing lignin nanoparticles with essential oils from T. capitatus (EOL-TC), T. vulgaris (EOL-TV), T. vulgaris Demeter (EOL-TVD) and C. capitatus (EOL-CC) in concentrations below the respective minimum inhibitory concentrations.
Figure 3. FTIR spectra, background and baseline-corrected, of Gloeophyllum trabeum (A), Poria monticola (B), Pleurotus ostreatus (C), and Trametes versicolor (D) grown on pure MEA as well as on MEA containing lignin nanoparticles with essential oils from T. capitatus (EOL-TC), T. vulgaris (EOL-TV), T. vulgaris Demeter (EOL-TVD) and C. capitatus (EOL-CC) in concentrations below the respective minimum inhibitory concentrations.
Polymers 15 02713 g003
Figure 4. IR band area ratios of the second derivatives of the background-corrected FTIR spectra of the four fungi grown on pure MEA (MEA) and on MEA containing empty lignin nanoparticles (LNPs solo) as well as LNPs containing the essential oils of the four thyme species (EOL-CC, EOL-TC, EOL-TV, EOL-TVD).
Figure 4. IR band area ratios of the second derivatives of the background-corrected FTIR spectra of the four fungi grown on pure MEA (MEA) and on MEA containing empty lignin nanoparticles (LNPs solo) as well as LNPs containing the essential oils of the four thyme species (EOL-CC, EOL-TC, EOL-TV, EOL-TVD).
Polymers 15 02713 g004
Figure 5. PCA scatter plots of the first three principal components (P.C.1 vs. P.C.2, left, and P.C.2 vs. P.C.3, right) of the second derivatives of the background and baseline-corrected FTIR spectra of T. versicolor (squares), G. trabeum (upward triangles), P. monticola (circles), P. ostreatus (downward triangles) grown on pure MEA (Control, black) as well as on MEA with lignin nanoparticles containing essential oils from T. capitatus (EOL-TC, purple), C. capitatus (EOL-CC, red), T. vulgaris (EOL-TV, orange), and T. vulgaris Demeter (EOL-TVD, green). (A) Groupings according to the fungal species. (B) Groupings according to white-rot (grey circle) and brown-rot (brown circle) fungi.
Figure 5. PCA scatter plots of the first three principal components (P.C.1 vs. P.C.2, left, and P.C.2 vs. P.C.3, right) of the second derivatives of the background and baseline-corrected FTIR spectra of T. versicolor (squares), G. trabeum (upward triangles), P. monticola (circles), P. ostreatus (downward triangles) grown on pure MEA (Control, black) as well as on MEA with lignin nanoparticles containing essential oils from T. capitatus (EOL-TC, purple), C. capitatus (EOL-CC, red), T. vulgaris (EOL-TV, orange), and T. vulgaris Demeter (EOL-TVD, green). (A) Groupings according to the fungal species. (B) Groupings according to white-rot (grey circle) and brown-rot (brown circle) fungi.
Polymers 15 02713 g005
Table 1. Main chemical compounds (relative abundance) contained in the essential oils of Thymus capitatus (EO TC), Coridothymus capitatus (EO CC), T. vulgaris (EO TV), and T. vulgaris Demeter (EO TVD).
Table 1. Main chemical compounds (relative abundance) contained in the essential oils of Thymus capitatus (EO TC), Coridothymus capitatus (EO CC), T. vulgaris (EO TV), and T. vulgaris Demeter (EO TVD).
EO TCEO CCEO TVEO TVD
Component% Peak AreaComponent% Peak AreaComponent% Peak AreaComponent% Peak Area
carvacrol68.6carvacrol76.9thymol47.9p-cymene26.7
p-cymene7.7α-bisabolene3.7p-cymene15.8thymol20.7
γ-terpinene6.8caryophyllene oxide3.3γ-terpinene10.0limonene5.6
β-caryophyllene2.6β-bisabolene3.2carvacrol4.4α-terpinolene5.0
β-myrcene1.8β-caryophyllene2.8linalool4.1carvacrol3.8
linalool1.5carvacrol acetate1.4β-caryophyllene2.1β-caryophyllene2.9
α-thujene1.2L-terpinen-4 ol0.6β-myrcene2.0camphene2.3
α-terpinene1.1eugenol0.3borneol1.3α-pinene2.1
α-pinene0.9borneol0.3α-terpinene1.3borneol2.1
terpinene 4-ol0.7δ-cadinene0.2α-thujene1.2linalool2.0
thymol0.6cedrenol0.7camphene1.1β-pinene1.9
Table 2. Solids content, essential oil (EO) content, drug-loading efficiency (DLE), and drug-loading capacity (DLC) of empty lignin nanoparticles (LNP solo) as well as LNPs with entrapped EOs from C. capitatus (EOL-CC), T. capitatus (EOL-TC), T. vulgaris (EOL-TV), and T. vulgaris Demeter (EOL-TVD).
Table 2. Solids content, essential oil (EO) content, drug-loading efficiency (DLE), and drug-loading capacity (DLC) of empty lignin nanoparticles (LNP solo) as well as LNPs with entrapped EOs from C. capitatus (EOL-CC), T. capitatus (EOL-TC), T. vulgaris (EOL-TV), and T. vulgaris Demeter (EOL-TVD).
Solids
(mg/mL)
EO
(mg/mL)
DLE
(%)
DLC
(%)
LNPs solo16.7---
EOL-CC15.75.05032
EOL-TC16.77.17143
EOL-TV17.35.65632
EOL-TVD15.77.57548
Table 3. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) lignin nanoparticles containing the essential oils from C. capitatus (EOL-CC), T. capitatus (EOL-TC), T. vulgaris (EOL-TV), and T. vulgaris Demeter (EOL-TVD) against the four wood-rot fungi T. versicolor, G. trabeum, P. ostreatus, and P. monticola. * The table also includes data obtained in a previous study focused on the antifungal activity of the EOs against the same wood-rot fungi [22].
Table 3. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) lignin nanoparticles containing the essential oils from C. capitatus (EOL-CC), T. capitatus (EOL-TC), T. vulgaris (EOL-TV), and T. vulgaris Demeter (EOL-TVD) against the four wood-rot fungi T. versicolor, G. trabeum, P. ostreatus, and P. monticola. * The table also includes data obtained in a previous study focused on the antifungal activity of the EOs against the same wood-rot fungi [22].
Fungal StrainEOLMIC * MIC EOs Solo
(mg/mL)(mg/mL)
T. versicolorEOL-CC0.600.60
EOL-TC0.300.30
EOL-TV0.300.30
EOL-TVD0.600.60
P. ostreatusEOL-CC0.300.30
EOL-TC0.300.30
EOL-TV0.300.30
EOL-TVD0.600.60
G. trabeumEOL-CC0.300.60
EOL-TC0.300.60
EOL-TV0.150.30
EOL-TVD0.300.60
P. monticolaEOL-CC0.150.30
EOL-TC0.050.05
EOL-TV0.150.30
EOL-TVD0.150.30
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zikeli, F.; Vettraino, A.M.; Biscontri, M.; Bergamasco, S.; Palocci, C.; Humar, M.; Romagnoli, M. Lignin Nanoparticles with Entrapped Thymus spp. Essential Oils for the Control of Wood-Rot Fungi. Polymers 2023, 15, 2713. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15122713

AMA Style

Zikeli F, Vettraino AM, Biscontri M, Bergamasco S, Palocci C, Humar M, Romagnoli M. Lignin Nanoparticles with Entrapped Thymus spp. Essential Oils for the Control of Wood-Rot Fungi. Polymers. 2023; 15(12):2713. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15122713

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zikeli, Florian, Anna Maria Vettraino, Margherita Biscontri, Sara Bergamasco, Cleofe Palocci, Miha Humar, and Manuela Romagnoli. 2023. "Lignin Nanoparticles with Entrapped Thymus spp. Essential Oils for the Control of Wood-Rot Fungi" Polymers 15, no. 12: 2713. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15122713

APA Style

Zikeli, F., Vettraino, A. M., Biscontri, M., Bergamasco, S., Palocci, C., Humar, M., & Romagnoli, M. (2023). Lignin Nanoparticles with Entrapped Thymus spp. Essential Oils for the Control of Wood-Rot Fungi. Polymers, 15(12), 2713. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15122713

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop