Next Article in Journal
Combining Chitosan Nanoparticles and Garlic Essential Oil as Additive Fillers to Produce Pectin-Based Nanocomposite Edible Films
Next Article in Special Issue
Rapid Impregnating Resins for Fiber-Reinforced Composites Used in the Automobile Industry
Previous Article in Journal
Renewable Poly(Lactic Acid)Lignocellulose Biocomposites for the Enhancement of the Water Retention Capacity of the Soil
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Different Hot Runner-Systems in the Injection Molding Process on the Structural and Mechanical Properties of Regenerated Cellulose Fiber Reinforced Polypropylene
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Short Flax Fibres and Shives as Reinforcements in Bio Composites: A Numerical and Experimental Study on the Mechanical Properties

1
Research Group ProPoliS, Department of Materials Engineering, KU Leuven Campus Bruges, Spoorwegstraat 12, 8200 Bruges, Belgium
2
Surface and Interface Engineered Materials, Department of Materials Engineering, KU Leuven Campus Bruges, Spoorwegstraat 12, 8200 Bruges, Belgium
3
Research Group M-Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven Campus Bruges, Spoorwegstraat 12, 8200 Bruges, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2023, 15(10), 2239; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15102239
Submission received: 10 February 2023 / Revised: 4 May 2023 / Accepted: 6 May 2023 / Published: 9 May 2023

Abstract

:
The complete flax stem, which contains shives and technical fibres, has the potential to reduce the cost, energy consumption and environmental impacts of the composite production process if used directly as reinforcement in a polymer matrix. Earlier studies have utilised flax stem as reinforcement in non-bio-based and non-biodegradable matrices not completely exploiting the bio-sourced and biodegradable nature of flax. We investigated the potential of using flax stem as reinforcement in a polylactic acid (PLA) matrix to produce a lightweight, fully bio-based composite with improved mechanical properties. Furthermore, we developed a mathematical approach to predict the material stiffness of the full composite part produced by the injection moulding process, considering a three-phase micromechanical model, where the effects of local orientations are accounted. Injection moulded plates with a flax content of up to 20 V% were fabricated to study the effect of flax shives and full straw flax on the mechanical properties of the material. A 62% increase in longitudinal stiffness was obtained, resulting in a 10% higher specific stiffness, compared to a short glass fibre-reinforced reference composite. Moreover, the anisotropy ratio of the flax-reinforced composite was 21% lower, compared to the short glass fibre material. This lower anisotropy ratio is attributed to the presence of the flax shives. Considering the fibre orientation in the injection moulded plates predicted with Moldflow simulations, a high agreement between experimental and predicted stiffness data was obtained. The use of flax stems as polymer reinforcement provides an alternative to the use of short technical fibres that require intensive extraction and purification steps and are known to be cumbersome to feed to the compounder.

1. Introduction

To address the end-of-life challenges of thermoset composite materials, the use of thermoplastic as matrix material is receiving more and more attention in academia and industry. Thermoplastic matrices allow faster cycle times and are applicable in large volume processes such as extrusion, compression moulding or injection moulding. The latter two processes allow the production of complex parts at relatively low production costs. However, these production processes restrict the reinforcement to short fibres. Short fibre-reinforced thermoplastics are therefore used in applications where ultimate strength or stiffness are not the main requirements [1].
As the awareness for sustainable resources is growing, recent trends show an increasing interest in the use of natural fibres as a bio-based alternative to synthetic fibres [2,3,4,5,6]. Flax fibres with mechanical properties that even outperform the specific stiffness of glass fibres are among the most commonly used natural fibre reinforcements [7]. The cultivation of flax fibres is characterised by a low environmental impact and relatively short sowing-to-harvesting cycle of approximately 100 days. Cultivation factors such as flax species, geographical location, nutrition, temperature, season and local climate conditions affect the mechanical properties and overall quality of natural fibres [8,9]. To cope with this inevitable variation in properties, special regulations and monitoring of cultivation are applied. This ensures the high quality of flax and reduces the variation in mechanical properties [10]. After harvesting, the flax stems are carefully and evenly spread on the soil to undergo a dew-retting process. The flax fibres and the wooden parts, also called shives, are hereby separated by a natural process of pectin degradation that binds the fibres with shives [11]. After retting, flax stem is broken, and the shives are separated from the fibres by a scutching process. Finally, flax fibres are hackled to detangle and straighten producing individual technical fibres that are suited for use in the textile industry or long-fibre reinforced composites [12,13].
Further advances towards “green composites” require the development and utilisation of alternative bio-based polymers. These polymers are synthesised out of renewable feedstock such as sugar, starch, cellulose, lignin and show an interesting combination of environmental friendliness and mechanical properties [14]. A starch-based polylactic acid (PLA) biopolymer can achieve Young’s modulus of 3 GPa, tensile modulus of up to 70 MPa and impact strength of 2.5–3 kJ/m2 [15]. The literature indicates that adding short flax fibres to a PLA matrix preserves the possibility of using the material in an injection moulding process, while the tensile modulus increases up to 5 GPa at a volume fraction of 20% [16,17].
Shives are separated from the flax stem during the production process of flax fibres and represent agricultural waste that is currently used as animal bedding, particleboard, thermal insulation material for buildings [18] or even as an alternative to the widely used wood flour plastic composites (WPC) [19]. About 70 to 85% (depending on the flax variety) of the flax stem consists of shives [20]. As France, Belgium and the Netherlands combined have a total flax cultivation area of over 124,000 ha, it is estimated that about 400,000 tonnes of flax shives was available in 2018. This amount is expected to further increase due to the growing interest in the application of natural fibres [21].
Shives were found to be responsible for 30% of the bending stiffness of the dry flax stem [20]. Nuez et al. investigated the potential of these flax shives as reinforcement in a polymetric matrix and found an improvement in the mechanical properties of a flax shive/polypropylene composite [22]. In another study by Soete et al., the fibre breakage of the flax stem during an injection moulding process was investigated [23]. They showed that the high shear forces during the compounding and injection moulding process are responsible for fibre breakage, resulting in rupture of the flax fibres and the wooden parts or flax shives that are adjacent to each other in the composite. Results of the tensile tests showed an improvement in mechanical properties when used in a PP matrix [24]. Results of the tensile tests on hackled flax fibre-reinforced PP showed an improvement in mechanical properties [24].
Since the use of flax shives as well as the whole flax stem as reinforcements in a PP matrix have shown promising results, there is a potential for high-value application of this agricultural waste product. Therefore, the present study focuses on the use of flax shives as well as the whole stem in a bio-based PLA matrix. The obtained composite is then 100% bio-based and biodegradable. By using the whole stem of the flax plant as reinforcement, energy-consuming production steps to extract the technical fibres are avoided. This leads to a reduction in the production cost of the material while maintaining the interesting mechanical properties of the composites.
The effect of the reinforcements strongly depend on the size of the fibres. In the case of continuous fibre-reinforced composites, application of nano particles in a polymetric matrix result in an increase in mechanical (tensile, flexural, fatigue, …) properties or flame retardant improvement [25,26,27,28,29,30], or they can act to improve the mechanical properties for long fibre composites [31]. For short fibre composites, an optimal design of the fibre orientation extends the life of the composite system while lowering production cost and minimising the fibre volumetric percentage [32]. When a short fibre composite is produced through injection moulding, it is well documented that the fibre orientation is determined by the flow of the material. In this way, the typical skin–shell–core orientation is obtained [1]. The orientation of the short fibres mainly depends on the rheological properties of the molten compound, which is directly affected by the aspect ratio and volume fraction of fibre in the compound. This results in non-isotropic and non-orthotropic mechanical properties of the composite. The ratio of the minimum and maximum value of tensile modulus is defined as the degree of anisotropy in the material, which increases with increasing fibre volume fraction [33]. The literature reports a higher tensile modulus and strength along the flow direction of injection moulded parts [34,35]. The coupling of the injection moulding production process and the obtained mechanical properties is inevitable and must be considered during the design phase of a part. When used in larger assemblies for semi-structural applications, considering the local anisotropic material properties is mandatory [36].
Therefore, in the present study, the stiffness ratio along the two orthogonal directions was considered to evaluate the degree of anisotropy, and a three-phase [37] multi-layer analytical model was established to predict the mechanical stiffness along all orientations of an injection moulded plate. The approach is based on the Mori–Tanaka (MT) micromechanics model combined with general laminate theory (GL) and considers the aspect ratio, mechanical properties and process-induced orientations of the flax fibres and shives.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The thermoplastic matrix material considered in this study is a commercially available polylactic-acid (PLA) 4043D Ingeo biopolymer (manufactured by NatureWorks, Minneapolis, MN, USA) with a melt flow index (MFI) of 6 g/10 min (210 °C, 2.16 kg) and a density of 1.24 g/cm3.
Flax straw (consisting of technical flax fibres and flax shives) and flax shives were provided by ABV (Algemeen Belgisch Vlasbond, Kortrijk, Belgium) and used as reinforcement to the PLA material. Short E-glass fibres are used as reference material to benchmark the performance of the flax reinforcements. The initial properties of the considered fibres are summarised in Table 1.

2.2. Production Process of the Bio-Based Composite

The composites are produced using a two-step production process. First, a compounding step is used to blend the reinforcement into the PLA matrix. Subsequently, samples are produced through injection moulding. Prior to each processing step, the PLA matrix and the flax reinforcements are dried with a Moretto pressurised air dryer at 80°C for 6 h. A Leistritz ZSE18MAXX (Nürnberg, Germany) corotating twin-screw laboratory extruder was used to shear-blend the components and produce pellets with a length of 5 mm. The details of the compounding step are shown in Table 2. Compounds of PLA with up to 15 V% flax shives, up to 20 V% straw flax (flax shives + flax fibres) and up to 20 V% glass fibres were prepared. In the following sections, the volume fraction is referred to as the volume percentage and is therefore indicated with the unit %. The compounding screw elements were selected to avoid excessive shear forces to reduce fibre breakage.
After the second drying step of the compound (80 °C, 6 h), a batch of 15 plates of 85 mm × 85 mm × 3 mm was produced using an Arburg 320S injection moulding machine (Loßburg, Germany). The studied compounds exist of virgin PLA, PLA with 5-, 10- and 15% flax shives (FS), 5-, 10- and 20% straw flax fibres (FF) and 10- and 20% of glass fibres (GF). Tensile bar samples are milled out of the injection moulded plates at different orientations with respect to the flow direction of the melt. These tensile bars are used for mechanical testing (Figure 1a). The parameters of the injection moulding process are summarised in Table 3.
A fan-gate injection sprue is used to obtain a parallel flow front in the plate, as shown in Figure 1b. This parallel flow front ensures a high fibre orientation along the flow direction, which allows for the investigation of the tensile modulus of composites along different orientations with respect to the flow direction.

2.3. Fibre Morphology

During twin screw compounding, high shear forces are exerted by the screw onto the material. These shear forces separate the technical fibres from the shives, but also inevitably cause unwanted fibre breakage and damage [24]. At each step of the production process, the morphology and dimensions of the fibres and shives were determined using an extraction process. This comprises dissolving the PLA material in chloroform for 24 h. The shives were separated from the fibres based on density, and the chloroform was removed from each component by filtration.
The straw flax structure was examined by optical laser microscopy. The fibre was embedded in an epoxy resin (EpoxyFix for embedding materialographic specimens, Struers, Kopenhagen, Denmark), and the surface was polished using a diamond paste with grain size of 1 µm. The composition was determined by weighting the two components from at least 3 batches and at different volume fractions, as described by [23]. Dimensions of the reinforcements, such as aspect ratio (AR) and volume fraction, were measured using a reflection mode optical laser microscope (VK1050, Keyence, Mechelen, Belgium) in combination with an image processing algorithm in MATLAB.

2.4. Mechanical Characterisation

ISO 527-1BA dog bone specimens were produced, using a milling process, at different orientations relative to the flow direction (0°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 90°) from the plates (PLA, PLA + 5-, 10- and 15% FS, PLA + 5-, 10-, 20% FF and PLA + 10- and 20% GF). Three specimens of each compound were tested at room temperature using an Instron 3367 two-column tensile bench equipped with a 30 kN load cell (Darmstadt, Germany), in combination with an extension meter (Instron 2630–125). A crosshead speed of 1.3 mm/min was used. Additional tests were performed in combination with a digital image correlation setup (stereo-DIC, Limess, Krefeld, Germany) to obtain values for Poisson’s ratio. The CMOS cameras with a resolution of 2.3 Mpx were calibrated using an A6 (type: KL 50108) calibration grid. Results were measured with a frequency of 4 Hz and analysed in the ISTRA4D (4.6) software. A summary of the setup is given in Table 4, as described in [39].

3. Theoretical Analysis

A numerical method is developed to determine the elastic properties of straw flax-reinforced thermoplastics. The result of this numerical method is compared to experimental data.

3.1. Three-Phase Mori–Tanaka (MT) Modelling

The Mori–Tanaka micromechanics approach is selected to determine the elastic properties. Since straw flax consists of flax fibres and shives, the composite is considered to be a three-phase system [40]. The different phases are illustrated in Figure 2. The first step considers the composite made of neat PLA and flax shives. In the second step, this composite is reinforced with flax fibres. In each step, the individual elastic properties and dimensions of both reinforcing components are taken into account.
The stiffness tensor of the flax straw reinforced composite is calculated by the generalised Mori–Tanaka homogenisation procedure [35]. In the first step of this three-phase system, the stiffness tensor C c o m p _ 1 is described by a Mori–Tanaka homogenisation model presented in Equation (1). This compliance refers to the neat PLA reinforced with flax shives. The second homogenisation step, described in Equation (2), calculates the stiffness matrix C c o m p for the full straw flax composite. In this step, the shives-reinforced composite is considered to be the matrix material and the flax fibres the reinforcement.
C c o m p _ 1 = C m + V s C s C m A M o r i T a n a k a _ 1
C c o m p = C c o m p _ 1 + V f C f C c o m p _ 1 A M o r i T a n a k a _ 2
The subscript m represents the PLA matrix, s the flax shives and f the flax fibres. V indicates the volume fraction corresponding to the relevant composition of the fibres or shives, and A M o r i t a n a k a is the concentration strain, as defined by Mori–Tanaka [35],
A M o r i T a n a k a _ x = A 1 V f I + V f A 1
A   = I   +   S C m 1 C f   C m 1
where S represent the Eshelby strain tensor. This tensor is based on the assumption of an elliptic inclusion in which the width and height of the inclusion are assumed to be equal ( a 2 = a 3 ) [35]. The aspect ratio of the inclusion is calculated as ρ = a 1 a 2 , where the values for a 1 and a 2 are experimentally determined values for shives and technical fibres.

3.2. Orientation

Subsequently, the effect of the fibre orientation on the elastic properties is evaluated. During injection moulding, the short fibres are immersed in a highly viscous polymer melt. The final orientation distribution of the fibres is determined by the rheological behaviour of the compound and by the injection moulding process conditions. The orientation of the fibres is described by the probability distribution function Ψ p . In this function, the orientation of the fibres is associated with unit vector p . The components of p are related to the angles θ and Φ , as shown in Figure 3 [40].
p 1 = s i n θ   c o s Φ
p 2 = s i n θ   s i n Φ
p 3 = c o s θ  
.
A set of second-order orientation tensors is defined by forming dyadic products of the vector p and integrating them with the distribution function over all possible directions, as given in Equation (8). Each element of the orientation tensor is described as a i j =   p i p j Ψ p d p [40]. The subscripts i and j represent values between 1 and 3, referring to the orientations in Equations (5)–(7).
P = p 1 p 1 p 1 p 2 p 1 p 3 p 2 p 1 p 2 p 2 p 1 p 3 p 3 p 1 p 3 p 2 p 1 p 3 a 11 a 12 a 13 a 21 a 22 a 23 a 31 a 32 a 33
The fourth-order stiffness tensors T i j k l according to the fibre orientation tensor P are then obtained for a transversely isotropic material assumption using Equation (9).
T i j k l p = B 1 a i j k l + B 2 a i j δ k l + a k l δ i j   + B 3 a i k δ j l + a i l δ j k + a j l δ i k + a j k δ i l + B 4 δ i j δ k l + B 5 δ i k δ j l + δ i l δ j k
The B-factors are 5 scalar constants related to the independent components of the transversely isotropic elasticity tensor. These are defined as B 1 = C 11 + C 22 2 C 12 4 C 66 , B 2 = C 12 C 23 , B 3 = C 66 + 1 2 C 23 C 22 , B 4 = C 23 and B 5 = 1 2 C 22 C 23 [40].
The fourth-order orientation tensor a i j k l in Equation (9) is calculated using Equations (10)–(12). The hybrid closure approximation is used to obtain the fourth-order orientation tensor from the second-order orientation tensor, where f = A a i j a j i B . For orientation in a planar state, A is equal to 2, and B is equal to 1 [40].
a i j k l L I N = 1 7 a i j δ k l + a i k δ j l + a i l δ j k + a k l δ i j + a j l δ i k + a j k δ i l 1 35 a i j δ k l + a i k δ j l + a i l δ j k
a i j k l Q U A = a i j a k l
a i j k l H Y B = 1 f a i j k l L I N + f   ·   a i j k l Q U A

3.3. Variability of the Fibre Orientation through Thickness

Due to the injection moulding process, there is no uniform fibre orientation through the thickness of the plate [41,42,43,44]. To account for these variations, the injection moulded samples are considered as a multilayer material. In each layer, the orientation distribution is assumed to comply with transverse isotropic material properties. These values are obtained with Autodesk Moldflow simulations using a Midplane mesh consisting of 12 layers (determined by a sensitivity study) [45]. The revised Folgar–Tucker fibre orientation model was selected, introducing standard calculated values for the coefficient of interaction (Cl) and the thickness moment of interaction coefficient (Dz). This approach gives high accuracy of the predicted fibre orientation in a concentrated suspension, using hybrid closure [46].
The fibre orientation tensor component a 11 represents the fibre orientation along the flow direction in the plate. In this study, the x-direction is parallel to the flow direction. The numerical results for a 11 through the thickness of the plates (PLA reinforced with 10- and 20% straw flax fibres) are shown in Figure 4. In this figure, the through-thickness position in the 3 mm thick plates is normalised in the range (–1,1). The a 11 values are reported for different positions ( X 1   X 5 ) on the plate and visualised in Figure 4. These positions are chosen at specific locations in the plate, covering both the longitudinal and transverse orientations during mechanical testing. Position 1 is at the centre of the plate, positions 2 and 3 are along the orientation of the flow, position 4 is along the perpendicular orientation (y-direction), and position 5 is at an angle of 45° with respect to the x-axis. Results indicate a constant orientation distribution through the thickness over the chosen positions on the plate. Therefore, the fibre orientation tensor (FOT) at the location in the centre of the plate ( X 1 ) is considered to be the representative distribution over the entire plate. Additionally, the fibre volume fraction affects the final fibre orientation distribution in the plate by changing the viscosity of the SFRT in the molten state [1]. For this reason, a representative FOT distribution is defined per volume fraction of a composite.
Next, the classical laminate theory (CLT) [47,48,49] is applied to obtain the material behaviour of the full SFRT, considering the 12 individual layers of the midplane mesh. The reduced stiffness matrix K is constructed in Equation (16), using Equations (13)–(15). Where k is the number of layers, and z is the height of the bottom of the layer, for which the coordinate system is taken at the centre of the composite. According to the plain stress assumption, a reduced 3 × 3 matrix Q is obtained using the fourth-order stiffness tensor T described in Equation (9). Subscript i refers to each individual layer.
A =   i = 1 k Q i z i z i 1
B = 1 2 i = 1 k Q i z i 2 z i 1 2
D = 1 3 i = 1 k Q i z i 3 z i 1 3
K = A B B D
The 6 × 6 matrix Q of the laminate of 12 layers in Equation (16) is obtained according to Equations (13)–(15). Note that injection moulding allows the presence of a limited amount of out-of-plane oriented fibres. The present model does not allow taking different fibre orientations into consideration. Since the Moldflow simulations indicate values for a 33 to be smaller than 0.05, this assumption is reasonable.
To predict the stiffness of the composite along these different orientations, only the relevant part of the stiffness matrix K is considered [50,51]. The reduced stiffness matrix Q is rotated for angles Φ in the (1,2) plane. Experimental data for load cases at different angles with respect to the flow direction are compared to the calculated elastic properties under these angles in Equation (17).
Q _ a n g l e = T 1 Q T 2 1
where:
T 1 = c o s 2 Φ s i n 2 Φ 2 cos Φ sin Φ s i n 2 Φ c o s 2 Φ 2 cos Φ sin Φ cos Φ sin Φ cos Φ sin Φ c o s 2 Φ s i n 2 Φ
T 2 1 = c o s 2 Φ s i n 2 Φ cos Φ sin Φ s i n 2 Φ c o s 2 Φ cos Φ sin Φ 2 cos Φ sin Φ 2 cos Φ sin Φ c o s 2 Φ s i n 2 Φ

4. Results

4.1. Measurement of Fibre Composition

Figure 5 presents the interior structure of a flax stem before processing. The elemental fibres are located in the outer layer of the flax stem, while the flax shives are located in the core of the stem. This observation is in line with the literature [23].
Fibre breakage and splitting of shives and fibres occur due to the high shear forces during processing [24]. This results in flax shives and elementary fibres separately present in the composite. The microscopic image in Figure 6 shows the cross-sectional area of the composite after injection moulding. The impregnation of the PLA matrix within the hollow structure of the flax shives is visible.
The composition of the flax straw used in this work was determined after dissolving the PLA matrix of the injection moulded plates. The results of these measurements are summarised in Table 5 and are consistent with the data in the literature. The shives content is in the range of 70 to 85 V%, depending on the type of flax [20,52].

4.2. Measurement of the Fibre Morphology

The aspect ratio distribution for shives and fibres is shown in Figure 7. Gravimetric separation of shives and fibres (1.5 g/cm3 and 1.237 g/cm3, respectively [23]) allows the evaluation of their aspect ratio separately. Both number and volume-based distributions of the aspect ratio can be used to analyse the fibre breakage during processing. However, earlier studies indicate that the distribution by volume of the fibres is preferred, as this parameter is most representative of the volume fraction of the reinforcements and, therefore, of the mechanical reinforcement properties [22,24,38]. Therefore, volume-based distribution is reported in this study.
The results summarised in Table 6 indicate a strong reduction in the dimensions of the reinforcements during processing. Average aspect ratios of 2.3 and 9.5 were measured for the flax shives and fibres, respectively. The fibre aspect ratio shows a much wider distribution, compared to the shives (Figure 7). The main difference in size between the two components is shown by the larger average values for the length and width of the flax shives. These act rather as larger particles in the flow.
Furthermore, an average fibre diameter of about 200 µm is measured for the flax fibres. It is known from the literature that the average diameter of an elementary flax fibre is between 40 and 80 µm [50]. This difference between the measured diameter and the literature values suggests that the elementary fibres are not completely separated into individual technical fibres, and that fibre bundles are also present in the compound. This reduces the apparent aspect ratio of the flax fibres, leading to an underestimate of the mechanical stiffness of the composite. To determine the effect of flax fibres on mechanical performance, the average diameter of the elementary fibres is considered. These results also indicate that separation of the fibres from the shives occurs during the compounding and injection moulding step. When technical flax fibres are used as reinforcement, an extra scutching step prior to the processing would be required.

4.3. Tensile Properties SFRT Composite

The elastic properties of the SFRT composites obtained after tensile testing are summarised in Table 7. They mainly depend on the type of reinforcement, volume fraction and orientation. Adding 15% of flax shives to the neat PLA material results in a 31% increase of stiffness in the flow direction and a degree of anisotropy of 11%, defined by the relative difference in stiffness in the first and second orientation, written as E 11 E 22 E 11 · 100 % . Lower pressure values were observed during the melt processing of the compounds for straw flax-reinforced materials. This allowed the production of straw flax-reinforced composites with a volume fraction up to 20%. This is attributed to a smaller increase in viscosity caused by the straw flax, compared to the flax shives. Adding 20% of straw flax of the PLA results in a 58% increase in stiffness and a degree of anisotropy of 21%.
These results show the promising effect of using the whole stem as reinforcement, thus avoiding the extra scutching step beforehand. A variation of less than 5% in the mechanical properties was obtained. This low variation is attributed to well-controlled processing parameters and using fibres and shives from the same batch. The values for the Poisson’s ratios were obtained by taking the ratio of the average strain in the first and second direction over the surface of the tensile bar, as shown in Figure 8.
The mechanical properties of glass fibre-reinforced PLA are summarised in Table 8. The stress strain curves are visualized in Figure 9. The increase in tensile stiffness of these composites is slightly higher, compared to the straw flax-reinforced PLA. However, if the density of the reinforcement is considered (2.6 g/cm3 [38] and 1.3 g/cm3 [23], respectively), the flax-reinforced composite shows a higher specific stiffness than the glass fibre-reinforced composite. A higher aspect ratio of the glass fibres was measured using the same technique as for the straw flax-reinforced composites. This higher aspect ratio is mainly caused by the small diameter of the glass fibres (10 µm), compared to the diameter of the flax fibres. This explains the higher degree of anisotropy. Furthermore, as the flax shives possess an aspect ratio of only 2.1, they rather act as a filler that increases the stiffness in both directions at a lower degree of anisotropy, compared to the fibre-filled composites.

4.4. Stiffness Estimation of Flax Shives

The literature on the effect of flax shives on a PP matrix indicates that a micromechanics-based model is well suited to determine the elastic properties of the composite [23]. No experimental data on the mechanical properties of flax shives are currently available in the literature. To obtain the stiffness of the flax shives used within this study, a micromechanics-based reverse engineering approach is applied. Due to the low aspect ratio of the flax shives, the effect of the varying orientations trough thickness is negligible. Therefore, a generalised two-phase Mori–Tanaka approach for unidirectional (UD) is used. The error between the predicted tensile modulus C using the generalised Mori–Tanaka homogenisation approach and experimental data for the tensile modulus in both longitudinal and transversal directions at different volume fractions was minimised. The minimisation of the cost function in Equation (20) is obtained by a nonlinear optimisation function in MATLAB. By optimising the cost function, a stiffness of 22.2 GPa was found for the shives. Figure 10 indicates the correlation between the experimental values and the predictive model optimised according to these data.
C o s t C s h i v e s =   min i = 0 %     15 % s h i v e s   C m o r i t a n a k a i C e x p e r i m e n t a l i ²

4.5. Fibre Orientation

Considering the straw flax reinforced composites, the mechanical properties are initially modelled by assuming a highly aligned SFRT using the proposed generalised Mori–Tanaka approach for a three-phase system. The stiffness of the flax fibre bundles used in this work is reported to be 43.5 GPa in the literature [24]. The other necessary input values were obtained in the experimental part of this study. When the composite is assumed to be a highly aligned SFRT composite material (UD assumption), with no variations in fibre orientation through the thickness, the obtained stiffness data overestimate the experimental data for the longitudinal direction and underestimate the data in the transverse direction (Figure 11). This indicates the expected importance of the through-thickness variation in fibre orientation, caused by the injection moulding process. The use of the multilayer approach (multi-layer setup) leads to a better correspondence of the model to the experimental data. The overestimated stiffness predictions are reduced by lower orientations across the plate thickness.
The varying fibre orientation through the thickness causes non-negligible deviations in tensile modulus with respect to a unidirectional (UD) orientation of the fibres [46]. The experimental results of tensile stiffness and strength at 0, 30, 45, 60, and 90° are summarised in Table 9. Since the analytical model allows the consideration of any fibre orientation, a comparison of the modelling approach with the experimental data is made. A fibre rotation matrix for the cases between 0° and 90° was used to obtain stiffness data along different directions. The results are shown in Figure 12.
Experimental data are compared with the two modelling approaches. When the UD orientation of the SFRT is assumed, there is a rapid decrease in stiffness as the angle deviates from 0°. When the multilayer approach is used, the stiffness remains at a higher value over a wider range of angles. In this approach, the effect of local fibre orientations through the thickness increases the stiffness in different orientations and thus results in a reduction of this drop in stiffness for off-axis orientations. This highly corresponds to the experimental data, which indicates this effect by showing a slow decrease in stiffness over varying angles with the flow front. Results of this study clearly indicate the importance of taking local orientations into account for short fibre reinforced injection moulded composites, as otherwise the anisotropy over the full composite will be overestimated. The deviation between the UD assumption and the experimental data was shown to be even more pronounced considering the stiffness under various angles with respect to the flow orientation.

5. Discussion and Conclusions

Considering the entire flax stem as reinforcement for thermoplastic composites requires less production steps and reduces the cost of time and energy. The potential of flax shives, available as agricultural waste, and straw flax (consisting of fibres and shives) as reinforcing materials in a thermoplastic matrix is investigated in this study. The use of these bio-based reinforcements to produce lightweight and high-performance composites was found to be promising in previous studies that focus on non-renewable feedstock-based matrices such as PP/MAPP [21,22,23]. This work has investigated the applicability of this type of reinforcement in a polylactic acid (PLA) matrix to obtain a fully bio-based material. Moreover, the elastic material properties using a multilayer micromechanical approach were predicted.
Results show that the tensile stiffness of the material increases with increasing volume fraction of the straw flax. These results included an increased degree of anisotropy due to fibre orientation caused by the injection moulding process. For straw flax-reinforced PLA, an increase in tensile strength was observed up to a fibre volume fraction of 10%, after which there was a decrease. Compared to chopped glass fibre-reinforced PLA, the low density of natural fibres leads to a higher specific composite stiffness in the proposed bio-based composite. In addition, the presence of the flax shives in the compound also leads to a lower degree of anisotropy, as they behave more as fillers to increase the stiffness of the matrix.
Furthermore, an analytical modelling approach based on the Mori–Tanaka micromechanical model was set up and validated. By minimising the cost function of flax shives reinforced PLA for different volume fractions, the stiffness of flax shives was estimated via a reverse engineering approach. Assuming that the material is a three-phase system, the dimensions and mechanical properties of both the flax shives and the flax fibres present in the flax stem were considered separately. Injection moulding causes a typical through-thickness variation in fibre orientation, which is taken into account with a multilayer approach, with each layer considered to have its own fibre orientation. This approach resulted in a high correlation of the predicted stiffness with the experimental data in the longitudinal and transverse directions. Assuming complete UD orientation gives an overestimation of the mechanical properties indicating the importance of taking the actual fibre orientation into account, even if the deviation from UD seems rather small. The UD assumption overestimates the drop in stiffness at increasing angle values. The multilayer approach presented in this work was found to be better suited to predict the stiffness of the injection moulded SFRT composites along different orientations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.V.; Methodology, S.V., B.B., S.D. and F.D.; Investigation, S.V.; Writing original draft, S.V.; Writing—review & editing, S.V., B.B., D.M. and S.D.; Funding acquisition, B.B., S.D. and F.D.; Supervision, F.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by INTERREG France-Wallonia-Vlaanderen via the ATHENS project (1.1.351).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Monfared, V. Problems in short-fiber composites and analysis of chopped fiber-reinfoced materials. In New Materials in Civil Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  2. Yildizhan, S.; Calik, A.; Serin, H. Bio-composite materials: A short review of trends, mechanical and chemical properties, and applications. Eur. Mech. Sci. 2018, 2, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bharath, K.N.; Basavarajappa, S. Applications of biocomposite materials based on natural fibers from renewable resources: A review. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 2016, 23, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vijayan, R.; Krishnamoorthy, A. Review on Natural Fiber Reinfoced Composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 16, 897–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Akampumuza, O.; Wambua, P.M.; Ahmed, A.; Li, W.; Qin, X.-H. Review of the applications of biocomposites in the automotive industry. Polym. Compos. 2016, 38, 2553–2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Witayakran, S.; Smitthipong, W.; Wangpradid, R.; Chollakup, R.; Clouston, P. Natural Fiber Composites: Review of Recent Automotive Trends. In Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rahman, Z. Mechanical and damping performances of flax fibre composites–A review. Compos. Part C Open Access 2020, 4, 100081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Komuraiah, A.; Kumar, N.S.; Prasad, B.D. Chemical composition of Natural fiers and its influence on their mechanical properties. Mech. Compos. Mater. 2014, 50, 359–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dittenber, D.B.; GangaRao, H.V. Critical review of recent publications on use of natural composites in infrastructure. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2012, 43, 1419–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Baley, C.; Gomina, M.; Breard, J.; Bourmaud, A.; Davies, P. Variability of mechanical properties of flax fibres for composite reinfocements. A review. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2020, 145, 111984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Djemiel, C.; Grec, S.; Hawkins, S. Characterization of bacterial and fungal community dynamics by high*-throughput sequencing (HTS) metabarcoding during flax daw-retting. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yan, L.; Chouw, N.; Jayaraman, K. Flax fibre and its composites–A review. Compos. Part B 2014, 56, 296–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Barillari, F.; Chini, F. Biopolymers—Sustainability for the Automotive Value-added Chain. ATZ Worldw. 2020, 122, 36–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ilyas, R.A.; Zuhri, M.Y.M.; Aisyah, H.A.; Asyraf, M.R.M.; Hassan, S.A.; Zainudin, E.S.; Sapuan, S.M.; Sharma, S.; Bangar, S.P.; Jumaidin, R.; et al. Natural fiber-reinforced polylactic acid, polylactic acid blends and their composites for advanced applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Aliotta, L.; Gigante, V.; Coltelli, M.B.; Cinelli, P.; Lazzeri, A. Evaluation of mechanical and interfacial properties of bio-composites based on poly(lactic acid) with natural cellulose Fibers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Aliotta, L.; Gigante, V.; Coltelli, M.-B.; Cinelli, P.; Lazzeri, A.; Seggiani, M. Thermo-Mechanical properties of PLA/Short Flax Fiber Biocomposites. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 3797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Foulk, J.; Akin, D.E.; Dodd, R.; Ulven, C. Production of flax fibers for biocomposites. In Cellulose Fibers: Bio- and Nano-Polymer Composites; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  18. Le Duigou, A.; Deux, J.M.; Davies, P.; Bayley, C. PLLA/flax mat/balsa bio-sandwich envirnomental impact and simplified life cycle analysis. Appl. Compos. Mater. 2012, 19, 363–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Goudenhooft, C.; Bourmaud, A.; Baley, C. Varietal section of flax over time: Evolution of plant architecture related to influence on the mechanical properties of fibers. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 97, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Evons, P. Production of fiberboards from shives collected after continuous fiber mechanical extraction from oleaginous flax. J. Nat. Fibres 2018, 16, 453–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nuez, L.; Beaugrand, J.; Shah, D.U.; Mayer-Laigle, C.; Bourmaud, A.; D’arras, P.; Baley, C. The potential of flax shives as reinforcements for injection moulded polypropylene composites. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2020, 148, 112324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nuez, L.; Magueresse, A.; Lu, P.; Day, A.; Boursat, T.; D’Arras, P.; Perré, P.; Bourmaud, A.; Baley, C. Flax xylem as composite material reinforcement: Microstructure and mechanical properties. Compos. Part A 2021, 149, 106550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Soete, K.; Desplentere, F.; Lomov, S.V.; Vandepitte, D. Variability of flax fibre morphology and mechanical properties in injection moulded short straw flax fibre-reinfoced PP composites. J. Compos. Mater. 2016, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tanguy, M.; Bourmaud, A.; Beaugrand, J.; Gaudry, T.; Baley, C. Polypropylene reinforcement with flax or jute fibre; Influence of microstructure and constituents properties on the performance of composite. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 139, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zaghloul, M.M.Y.; Mohamed, Y.S.; El-Gamal, H. Fatigue and tensile behaviors of fiber-reinforced thermosetting composites embedded with nanoparticles. J. Compos. Mater. 2018, 53, 709–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zaghloul, M.M.Y.; Zaghloul, M.Y.M.; Zaghloul, M.M.Y. Experimental and modeling analysis of mechanical-electrical behaviors of polypropylene composites filled with graphite and MWCNT fillers. Polym. Test. 2017, 63, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zaghloul, M.M.Y. Influence of flame retardant magnesium hydroxide on the mechanical properties of high density polyethylene composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2017, 36, 1802–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yousry, M.; Zaghloul, M.; Mahmoud, M. Developments in polyester composite materials–An in-depth review on natural fibres and nano fillers. Compos. Struct. 2021, 278, 114698, ISSN 0263-8223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fuseini, M.; Zaghloul, M.M.Y. Investigation of Electrophoretic Deposition of PANI Nano fibers as a Manufacturing Technology for corrosion protection. Prog. Org. Coat. 2022, 171, 107015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Moustafa, Z. Mechanical properties of linear low-density polyethylene fire-retarded with melamine polyphosphate. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 46770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zaghloul, M.; Zaghloul, Y.; Zaghloul, Y. Physical analysis and statistical investigation of tensile and fatigue behaviors of glass fiber-reinforced polyester via novel fibers arrangement. J. Compos. Mater. 2023, 57, 147–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ansari, F.; Granda, L.A.; Joffe, R.; Berglund, L.A.; Vilaseca, F. Experimental evaluation of anisotropy in injection molded polypropylene/wood fiber biocomposites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2017, 96, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Holmström, P.H.; Hopperstad, O.S.; Clausen, A.H. Anisotropic tensile behaviour of short glass-fibre reinforced polyamide-6. Compos. Part C Open Access 2020, 2, 100019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Garofalo, E.; Russo, G.M.; Di Maio, L.; Incarnato, L. Modelling of mechanical behavior of polyamide nanocomposite fibers using a three-phase Halpin-Tsai model. e-Polymers 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tucker, C.L.; Liang, E. Stiffness predictions for unidirectional short-fiber composites: Review and evaluation. Compos. Sci. Technol. 1999, 59, 655–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Verstraete, S.; Desplentere, F.; Debruyne, S. Evaluating the influence of short fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites produced by injection molding on the stress distribution in an adhesively bonded joint using a multi-scale numerical modeling approach. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Industrial Applications of Adhesives 2022, Carvoeiro, Portugal, 3–4 March 2022; Proceedings in Engineering Mechanics. Springer: Cham, Switzerland; pp. 101–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jones, E.M.C.; Iadicola, M.A. A Good Practices Guide for Digital Image Correlation; International Digital Image Correlation Society, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dai, X.Q. 10–Fibers, Biomechanical Engineering of Textiles and Cloting. Woodhead Publishing Ltd: Cambridge, UK; Abington Hall: Abington, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ashrafi, B. Theoretical and Experimental Investigations on the Elastic Properties of Carbon Nanotube-Reinfoced Polmer Thin Films. 2008. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/30003294_Theoretical_and_experimental_investigations_of_the_elastic_properties_of_carbon_nanotube-reinforced_polymer_thin_films (accessed on 25 March 2023).
  40. Avanti, S.; Tucker, C. The use of Tensors to describe and predict fiber orientation in short fiber composites. J. Rheol. 1987, 31, 751–784. [Google Scholar]
  41. Kugler, S.K.; Kech, A.; Cruz, C.; Osswald, T. Fiber Orientation Predictions—A Review of Existing Models. J. Compos. Sci. 2020, 4, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ogah, A.O.; Afiukwa, J.N. Characterization and comparison of mechanical behavior of agro fier-filled high-density polyethylene bio-composites. J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 2014, 33, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Réquilé, S.; Goudenhooft, C.; Bourmaud, A.; Le Duigou, A.; Baley, C. Exploring the link between flexural behavior of hemp and flax stems and fibre stiffness. Ind. Crops. Prod. 2018, 113, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bernasconi, A.; Cosmi, F.; Dreossi, D. Local anisotropy analysis of injection moulded fibre reinforced polymer composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2008, 68, 2574–2581. [Google Scholar]
  45. Caton-Rose, P.; Hine, P.; Costa, F.; Jin, X.; Wang, J.; Parveen, B. Measurement and predictions of short glass fibre orientation in injection moulding composites. In Proceedings of the ECCM15–15th conference on composite materials, Venice, Italy, 24–28 June 2012. [Google Scholar]
  46. Vinson, J.R.; Sierakowski, R.L. Anisotropic Elasticity and Composite Laminate Theory. In The Behavior of Structures Composed of Composite Materials; Solid Mechanics and Its Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  47. Aboudi, J.; Arnold, S.M.; Bednarcyk, B.A. Micromechanics of Composite Materials, a Generalized Multiscale Analysis Approach; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  48. Mallick, P.K. Fiber-Reinfoced Composites, Materials, Manufacturing and Design; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  49. Tsai, S.W.; Hahn, H.T. Introduction to Composite Materials; Routledge: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  50. Lu, N.; Swan, R.H., Jr.; Ferguson, I. Composition, structure, and mechanical properties of hemp fiber reinforced composite with recycled high-density polyethylene matrix. J. Compos. Mater. 2012, 46, 1915–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Aufrere, C. Plenary Lecture II: Current Advances, Needs and Future Challenges in High-Volume Automotive Composite Structures [FAURECIA] | Rooms: Sevilla (1,2 and 3), ECCM Conference 16. 2014. Available online: http://www.escm.eu.org/eccm16/cgif00f.html?idexp=HN6FE&main=progetaglance (accessed on 25 March 2023).
  52. Di Giusteppe, E. Reliability evaluation of automated analysis, 2D scanner, and micro-tomography methods for measuring fiber dimensions in polymer-lignocellulosic fier composites. Compos. Part A–Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2019, 90, 320–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Plate mould geometry showing (a) the production of tensile bars (ISO 527-1BA) under different orientations for material characterisation and (b) the filling time of the plate, indicating a parallel flowing front during injection moulding process.
Figure 1. Plate mould geometry showing (a) the production of tensile bars (ISO 527-1BA) under different orientations for material characterisation and (b) the filling time of the plate, indicating a parallel flowing front during injection moulding process.
Polymers 15 02239 g001
Figure 2. Setup of a Mori–Tanaka model for a three-phase system.
Figure 2. Setup of a Mori–Tanaka model for a three-phase system.
Polymers 15 02239 g002
Figure 3. Coordinate system of unit vector p .
Figure 3. Coordinate system of unit vector p .
Polymers 15 02239 g003
Figure 4. Orientation distribution for a11 through the (normalized) thickness of the plate at different locations, obtained via Moldflow simulations for (a) PLA10FF and (b) PLA20FF.
Figure 4. Orientation distribution for a11 through the (normalized) thickness of the plate at different locations, obtained via Moldflow simulations for (a) PLA10FF and (b) PLA20FF.
Polymers 15 02239 g004
Figure 5. Microscopic image of the straw flax fibre before processing using the Keyence laser microscopy.
Figure 5. Microscopic image of the straw flax fibre before processing using the Keyence laser microscopy.
Polymers 15 02239 g005
Figure 6. Microscopic image of the reinforcements in the PLA matrix after the production process.
Figure 6. Microscopic image of the reinforcements in the PLA matrix after the production process.
Polymers 15 02239 g006
Figure 7. Volume distribution of the aspect ratio of flax shives and fibres after processing the different composite compounds.
Figure 7. Volume distribution of the aspect ratio of flax shives and fibres after processing the different composite compounds.
Polymers 15 02239 g007
Figure 8. Stereo-vision DIC measurement on tensile bar with defined region for averaging of strain to determine the Poisson’s ratio.
Figure 8. Stereo-vision DIC measurement on tensile bar with defined region for averaging of strain to determine the Poisson’s ratio.
Polymers 15 02239 g008
Figure 9. Tensile stress–strain curves in longitudinal and transversal direction according to ISO 527-1BA for (a) PLA10FF, (b) PLA20FF, (c) PLA10GF and (d) PLA20GF.
Figure 9. Tensile stress–strain curves in longitudinal and transversal direction according to ISO 527-1BA for (a) PLA10FF, (b) PLA20FF, (c) PLA10GF and (d) PLA20GF.
Polymers 15 02239 g009
Figure 10. Comparison between the generalised Mori–Tanaka model and the experimental data for flax shives reinforced composites in both the longitudinal and transverse orientation. The presented lines for the Mori–Tanaka model are obtained after optimisation of the cost function.
Figure 10. Comparison between the generalised Mori–Tanaka model and the experimental data for flax shives reinforced composites in both the longitudinal and transverse orientation. The presented lines for the Mori–Tanaka model are obtained after optimisation of the cost function.
Polymers 15 02239 g010
Figure 11. Results of the analytical modelling approach using a UD-based assumption and by considering it to be a laminate consisting of 12 layers with different fibre orientations.
Figure 11. Results of the analytical modelling approach using a UD-based assumption and by considering it to be a laminate consisting of 12 layers with different fibre orientations.
Polymers 15 02239 g011
Figure 12. Comparison of the UD modelling approach, the proposed multi-layer approach and experimental data for (a) PLA reinforced with 10% straw flax and (b) PLA reinforced with 20% straw flax.
Figure 12. Comparison of the UD modelling approach, the proposed multi-layer approach and experimental data for (a) PLA reinforced with 10% straw flax and (b) PLA reinforced with 20% straw flax.
Polymers 15 02239 g012
Table 1. Physical properties of the raw fibre materials.
Table 1. Physical properties of the raw fibre materials.
Fibre TypeE-Modulus (GPa)Tensile Strength (GPa)Density (g/cm³)Initial Length (mm)Initial Diameter (µm)
Glass fibre [38]703.52.61010
Flax fibre [23]450.771.510±1500
Table 2. Compounding parameters.
Table 2. Compounding parameters.
ParameterValue
Main feed150 rpm
Melt pressure61 bar
Melt temperature195 °C
Die   temperature   (   3 mm)185 °C
Screw configuration (length: 36D)
  • 2D
  • 12–16D
  • 16–20D
  • 28–32D
 
  • Feeding PLA
  • Vent
  • Feeding fibres
  • Vacuum
Table 3. Injection moulding parameters.
Table 3. Injection moulding parameters.
ParameterValue
Melt temperature190 °C
Injection volume30.7 cm3
Injection pressure1065 bar
Injection time5.8 s
Holding pressure750 bar
Holding time15 s
Cooling water temperature25 °C
Mould temperature25 °C
Temperature profile in cylinder
• T1
• T2
• T3
• T4
• T5
• T6
 
30 °C
160 °C
170 °C
190 °C
190 °C
190 °C
Table 4. Experimental DIC settings and performance (Limess).
Table 4. Experimental DIC settings and performance (Limess).
Parameter3D Image Correlation
Sensor type1/1.2″ CMOS
Resolution1920 × 1200 px (2.3 Mpx)
Pixel size5.86 µm × 5.86 µm
Correlation criterionUniversal correlation evaluation
Optimisation residual0.1349 pixel
Pre-smoothing applied to the imagesNone
Subset size17 × 17 pixel
Shape functionAffine
Interpolation functionBicubic polynomial
Smoothing methodLocal regression (kernel size ACSP 05 × 05)
Table 5. Composition of the str aw flax fibre.
Table 5. Composition of the str aw flax fibre.
ComponentWeight FractionVolume Fraction
Technical fibres25 wt%22 V%
Flax shives75 wt%78 V%
Table 6. Properties of fibre morphology by volume averaging.
Table 6. Properties of fibre morphology by volume averaging.
Component Length (µm)Diameter (µm)Aspect Ratio (-)
Flax shive-reinforced composite
Flax shivesMean. Value
St. dev.
1147 ± 109521 ± 372.3
Straw flax-reinforced composite
Technical fibresMean. Value
St. dev.
567 ± 21560 ± 179.5
Flax shivesMean. Value
St. dev.
992 ± 212496 ± 992.1
Glass fibre composite
E-glassMean
St. dev.
228 ± 14010 ± 0.122.6
Table 7. Mechanical properties of SFRT (FS: Flax Shives, FF: Straw Flax Fibres).
Table 7. Mechanical properties of SFRT (FS: Flax Shives, FF: Straw Flax Fibres).
MaterialE11 Modulus (MPa)E22 Modulus (MPa)V12 (-)Degree of Anisotropy (%)
PLA3877 (±193)-0.35-
PLA + 5% FS4186 (±96)4077 (±239)0.342.6
PLA + 10% FS4737 (±100)4337 (±128)0.348.8
PLA + 15% FS5070 (±307)4596 (±515)0.3311.1
PLA + 5% FF4284 (±79)4137 (±135)0.343.5
PLA + 10% FF5091 (±158)4563 (±133)0.3310.4
PLA + 20% FF6129 (±58)4828 (±123)0.3221.2
Table 8. Specific stiffness (FF: straw Flax Fibres, GF: Glass Fibres).
Table 8. Specific stiffness (FF: straw Flax Fibres, GF: Glass Fibres).
MaterialYoung’s Modulus E11 (MPa) Specific   Young s   Modulus   E 11 / ρ Stiffness Ratio (%)
PLA + 10% FF5091 (±158)408510.4
PLA + 20% FF6129 (±58)489521.2
PLA + 10% GF5211 (±103)378727.0
PLA + 20% GF6475 (±240)428236.1
Table 9. Mechanical properties of SFRT under different orientations (FF: straw Flax Fibres).
Table 9. Mechanical properties of SFRT under different orientations (FF: straw Flax Fibres).
OrientationPLA + 10% FFPLA + 20% FF
Angle on Flowing FrontE (MPa)σ (MPa)E (MPa)σ (MPa)
5091 (±158)65.3 (±1.2)6129 (±58)58.0 (±0.0)
30°5051 (±73)59.3 (±2.8)5544 (±130)49.6 (±2.3)
45°4897 (±243)51.3 (±0.9)5263 (±247)48.3 (±2.3)
60°4675 (±36)54.3 (±0.4)5037 (±23)44.3 (±2.3)
90°4546 (±113)54.4 (±0.4)4829 (±123)44.8 (±1.0)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Verstraete, S.; Buffel, B.; Madhav, D.; Debruyne, S.; Desplentere, F. Short Flax Fibres and Shives as Reinforcements in Bio Composites: A Numerical and Experimental Study on the Mechanical Properties. Polymers 2023, 15, 2239. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15102239

AMA Style

Verstraete S, Buffel B, Madhav D, Debruyne S, Desplentere F. Short Flax Fibres and Shives as Reinforcements in Bio Composites: A Numerical and Experimental Study on the Mechanical Properties. Polymers. 2023; 15(10):2239. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15102239

Chicago/Turabian Style

Verstraete, Sofie, Bart Buffel, Dharmjeet Madhav, Stijn Debruyne, and Frederik Desplentere. 2023. "Short Flax Fibres and Shives as Reinforcements in Bio Composites: A Numerical and Experimental Study on the Mechanical Properties" Polymers 15, no. 10: 2239. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15102239

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop