Next Article in Journal
Towards Sustainable Composite Manufacturing with Recycled Carbon Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites
Previous Article in Journal
Hair Growth-Promoting Activities of Glycosaminoglycans Extracted from the Tunics of Ascidian (Halocynthia roretzi)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microscopic and Structural Studies of an Antimicrobial Polymer Film Modified with a Natural Filler Based on Triterpenoids

All Russian Dairy Research Institute («VNIMI»), 115093 Moskow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(6), 1097; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14061097
Submission received: 17 January 2022 / Revised: 25 February 2022 / Accepted: 25 February 2022 / Published: 9 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Circular and Green Polymer Science)

Abstract

:
The aspects of component visualization of the antimicrobial triterpenoids (betulin) additive, both on the surface and in the bulk of the polymer, constituting food film packaging, are considered. This paper presents new knowledge about the morphology and surface structure of modified films using three independent methodological approaches: optical microscopy; a histological method adapted to packaging materials; and a method of attenuated total internal reflection (ATR) spectroscopy in the infrared region with Fourier transform. The use of these methods shows the betulin granules, individual or forming chains. To visualize the antimicrobial additive in the polymer bulk, a modified histological method adapted for film materials and attenuated total internal reflection (ATR) spectroscopy in the infrared region were used with Fourier transform using a Lumos Bruker microscope (Germany) (ATR crystal based on germanium). Sample sections were analyzed using Leica 818 blades at an angle of 45 degrees. The histological method consists of the study of a biological object thin section, in the transmitted light of a microscope, stained with contrast dyes to reveal its structures, and placed on a glass slide. In the method modified for the present study, instead of a biological one, a synthetic object was used, namely the developed film materials with the addition of natural organic origin. Individual granules are about 2 µm long; chains can be up to 10 µm long. The thickness of the granules ranged from 1 to 1.5 microns. It can be seen that the depth distribution of granules in the film from the inner surface to the outer one is rather uniform. Spectroscopic studies using the method of automatic ATR mapping in the region of 880 cm−1 made it possible to evaluate the distribution of an antimicrobial additive based on triterpenoids on the surface and in the polymer bulk.

1. Introduction

The safety issues of polymeric materials for dairy and food products have recently become increasingly important [1,2]. In this regard, there is a growing interest in creating packaging with functional properties [2,3,4]. This is especially promising for solid food products [2,5]. Giving functional properties to polymer films intended for food packaging will reduce the risks of recontamination during packaging, as well as preserve products throughout their entire life cycle [2,4].
One of the ways to improve the mechanical or physical characteristics and adapt to certain operating conditions of polymeric materials used as packaging materials is their modification—a transformation characterized by the new property’s appearance. This can be achieved by subjecting materials to mechanical or chemical treatment [6,7]. In the dairy and food industries, the modification of traditional polymeric materials of the polyolefin class, such as polyethylene, polypropylene, and its copolymers, is of the greatest interest.
Modern engineering and technology open up wide possibilities for targeted action on polymers at different stages of their production, processing, or use to impart certain desired properties to them [6]. The following main methods of directional change in properties are distinguished: physical, chemical, and physicochemical [7].
Physical modification is suitable for many types of polymeric materials: it is based on the influence of physical factors, as a result of which structural-physical, chemical, and other transformations can occur in polymers [8,9].
There are three main tasks that can be solved with the help of physical modification: [10] targeted regulation of the physicochemical and technological properties of oligomers and polymers at the stage of synthesis and processing; accelerating the production processes and improving the technology for producing polymeric materials; and improving the physicochemical and other operational properties of polymeric materials and coatings.
This is achieved through the use of technology for modifying the polymer base with natural organic and inorganic components, which, in combination, impart a bacteriostatic or antimicrobial effect [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20].
The use of antimicrobial packaging in the dairy and food industries will solve several main problems: to extend the shelf life of food products, while reducing food waste [21], and also to stabilize products in storage throughout their life cycle. Antimicrobial packaging can be made by adding antimicrobial agents such as chitosan, essential oil, and others to systems [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. Various types of synthetic antimicrobial agents are described in the literature, such as metallic silver and copper nanoparticles [30], including their oxides [31], clay nanoparticles [32], etc. The type of antimicrobial agents chosen may differ depending on which application and packaging material is used.
The technology for modifying polymeric materials [1,10,20] used in this work is based on the principles of combining the base polymer in the melt (low-density polyethylene was used in the work) and a modifying additive of natural origin [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. The application of this method is not always successful, since the existing modifying components are not thermally stable and may lose their inhibitory properties at high temperatures [11,14,37]. The creation of polymer films with antimicrobial properties using melt-combination technology is possible only if the melting temperature ranges of the modifying components and the base polymer are comparable [38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45].
The relevance of the research, in addition to the above, lies in the lack of scientifically substantiated data on the structure of the new modified film material and the distribution of betulin organic particles in the mass and the polyethylene near-surface layer.
The work has significant potential for further scientific development and practical application, which consists of a deeper study of the processes occurring during the contact of antimicrobial film packaging materials with food products in the dynamics of their storage.
The novelty of the research lies in the following:
-
For the first time, variants of a modified low-density polyethylene (LDPE) film with a natural hydrophobic filler based on triterpenoids were obtained by melt matching with confirmed antimicrobial activity;
-
New knowledge about the film surface morphology and the structure of its side section was obtained using methods not previously used in polymer research (histological);
-
It has been determined that the betulin distribution on the surface and in the bulk of the polymer is uneven; however, it has an antimicrobial effect in the case of forced contamination of the film by 2–3 orders of magnitude, depending on the selected microorganisms.

2. Materials and Methods

At the first stage of work planning, a research scheme was drawn up, as shown in Figure 1.

2.1. Research Objects

Birch bark extract was used as a modifying additive. It contains a number of triterpene pentocyclic compounds, consisting of betulin (betulinol), betulinic acid, lupeol, etc. [46,47,48]. The structural formula of the main extract active ingredient is shown in Figure 2.
Betulin, a naturally occurring triterpene, is usually obtained from the Betula L. birch bark [49]. The content of betulin and lupeol in the outer bark varies from 10% to 40% depending on the type of birch, its place and conditions of its growth, the age of the tree, and the season [50,51]. Betulin’s dependence on the birch type and variety is shown in Table 1 [52].
Betulin is a low-toxic compound (toxicity class 4): the half-lethal dose of betulin when taken orally is 9000 mg/kg. Betulin does not show allergenic, skin-irritating, sensitizing, carcinogenic, mutagenic, embryotoxic, or cumulative effects. The structure of the triterpenoid determines its affinity for biological membranes of human cells. Numerous biological studies indicate that betulin has high biological activity [53,54,55].
As a compound belonging to the class of triterpenoids, betulin has surface activity, exhibits the properties of an emulsifier and structure former. Betulin is slightly soluble in organic non-polar solvents (benzene, butanol) and fatty oils. The disadvantages of this compound include its low solubility in polar solvents (ethanol, isopropanol, water) [56].
Recently, research has been carried out to increase betulin solubility in various ways.
The inhibitory effect of this extract is given by betulin (C36H60O3), which is a triterpene alcohol, the concentration of which is at least 70.0% in the extract.
The used birch bark extract is approved for contact with food, is safe for humans, and has a neutral taste and smell. The literature sources describe in detail the betulin properties, its antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and other functional properties [57,58,59].
The extract melting point is 258 °C (according to Gausmann) [41,47].
In practice, the process of obtaining various packaging materials with a selected extract can be implemented using extrusion or co-extrusion [1,43].
In this work, prototypes of polyethylene films (PE) based on low-density polyethylene (LDPE), the main physical and chemical properties of which are presented in Table 2, and an organic extract, the properties of which are given in Table 3, were obtained. To create a package with a given concentration of active betulin and its distribution over the volume of the polymer, the method of introducing a modifier through a superconcentrate was used [60,61,62]. It should be noted that this is a classical technique used to obtain films filled with various substances. Directly, the superconcentrate itself was made in several stages: preparation of the polymer base; preparation of modifier particles in certain concentrations; introducing the extract into the polymer matrix (melt mixing); and granule production (melting, cooling, cutting, and other technological operations).
To obtain a superconcentrate with the required characteristics, research was carried out on the effect of the concentration of betulin in the extract on the complex of properties of the resulting packaging materials [43,44,60,61].
The temperature regimes for processing the base of polyethylene are quite high (160–180 °C), and the extract itself is even higher (according to the manufacturer, the melting point of the obtained superconcentrate was 251–252 °C); therefore, in order to obtain high-quality prototypes of packaging, thermal stabilizers were introduced into the composition formulation. The process of obtaining a superconcentrate does not fundamentally differ from the traditional one. The obtained strands were cooled using a water chamber, with further cooling, granulation, and drying. In production, an extruder with 7 heating zones was used. Main technological characteristics of the superconcentrate: bulk density—0.48 g/cm3; melt flow index (MFI)—020, g/10 min; moisture content—no more than 0.10% [60,61].
The exterior of the obtained granules resembles small cylinders, 2–5 mm in size and slightly yellow in color (Figure 3).
After obtaining prototype samples of the superconcentrate with different betulin content, research was carried out on the effect of its content on microorganisms located on the package surface. The concentrates presented in Table 4 were used in the tests.
From the literature data [43,44,61], it is known that betulin has high antimicrobial characteristics at an active substance concentration of at least 70%. In this work, to assess the microbiological parameters of the films, the range of betulin concentrations from 70% to 90% was chosen.
This range of concentrations was used in the first stage of the work to select the optimal one when creating a masterbatch on an LDPE matrix. At the second stage of the ongoing work, polymer films were obtained with a concentration of the antimicrobial component from 0.2 to 1.0 wt% in the finished product. Structural and microscopic tests were carried out.
On the basis of the above objects, plates with a flat surface were obtained by thermoforming. The size of the obtained samples was 100 mm long and 200 mm wide, with a thickness of 500 μm.
Polymer films were obtained on extrusion equipment using a ring die. LDPE brand 15803-020 was used as the base polymer. Processing was carried out under standard extrusion conditions without additional adjustment. The obtained film was cooled by air.
When evaluating the quality of the obtained samples, it was shown that the introduction of the extract does not affect the thickness variation of the finished polymer film. The film thickness in the sleeve was 45 ± 5 µm.
The production of multilayer polymer modified materials differs from the traditional processing of monofilms. Sample production was carried out on classical co-extrusion equipment without additional readjustment. Technical characteristics of the extrusion line were as follows: head Ø 190 mm; slot width 1.2 mm, and forming roll speed 10 m/min.
The resulting films had the following layer ratio: outer layer: polyamide (PA) 15 ± 3 µm; adhesive layer: 8 ± 2 µm; inner layer—LDPE 55 ± 5 µm. The conducted studies have shown that the resulting multilayer material has a uniform thickness at the level of 80 ± 5 μm. The introduction of the modifier does not lead to an increase in the thickness variation of the obtained samples. A visual assessment of the obtained samples showed the absence of visual defects.

2.2. Research Methods

2.2.1. Optical Microscopy Methods

Visualization of the surface of the samples with different magnifications was carried out by the bright field method on an Axio Lab A1 transmission optical microscope with Axiocam 105 color optics at a final 1000× magnification.
Photographs of the sample surface of modified films containing various betulin amounts with 300× magnification were obtained using an Olympus BX50 microscope with an Ach 20×/0.40 Phz objective.
Two methods were used to visualize the antimicrobial additive in the polymer bulk:
(a) Histological method modified and adapted for film materials.
The principle of the method is to study a thin section of a biological object in the transmitted light of a microscope, stained with contrast dyes to reveal its structures, and placed on a glass slide [63]. In the method modified for the present research, instead of a biological one, a synthetic object was used, namely the developed film materials with the addition of natural organic origin.
Pieces of 15 × 15 × 4 mm3 in size were made from the film samples; at the same time, they were cut out at least three from different places of the film roll. The cut pieces were placed in a microtome, frozen to a temperature of minus (20 ± 3) °C, and sections were made, with a thickness of 10 to 30 µm. Sections were transferred under a light microscope.
The following analytical equipment was used in the study: stereoscopic microscope for transmitted light (Stemi 200—Carl Zeiss, Germany Oberkochen), microscope for transmitted light (Axio Imager. A1., Carl Zeiss, Germany Oberkochen), and Microm HM 525 cryomicrotome.
All obtained images were processed with the corresponding computer program ACD See Pro 9 in order to increase the possibilities of visual betulin differentiation inside the polymer film, on its surface, and during the sample’s storage.
It should be noted that this method was used for the first time to research objects made of synthetic polymers.
(b) Attenuated total internal reflection (ATR) spectroscopy in the infrared region with Fourier transform using a Lumos Bruker microscope (Germany Oberkochen) (germanium-based ATR crystal) [64,65].
Sample sections were analyzed using Leica 818 blades at an angle of 45 degrees.
The number of analyzed points for one sample is 50–70. Each material was subjected to spectral mapping in three planes (3 repetitions), while mapping was carried out perpendicular to the sample.

2.2.2. Microbiological Research

To determine the inhibitory activity of the modifying additive containing betulin, we selected the following most representative surface spoilage microorganisms: Escherichia coli of CB), yeasts, and molds [40,44,60,66,67,68]. From the literature data, it is known that pure betulin has a consistently high inhibitory effect on selected groups of microorganisms [63,65].
One of the objectives of the research was to determine the effect of the extract concentration in the superconcentrate and, accordingly, in the obtained film packaging materials on their antimicrobial effectiveness, since the mixture of the polymer with the extract underwent significant thermomechanical effects during its processing.
The paper proposes a method of forced contamination of the surface of the obtained film materials with different extracts. The need for such a methodological approach is due to the fact that the determination of the microbial contamination of packaging objects is carried out by washing bacteria from surfaces [66]. This study required reliable knowledge of the number and species of surface spoilage microorganisms [61].
The inhibitory effect on the package surface was determined similarly to determining the effectiveness of aseptic treatment of the package surface by ultraviolet irradiation and was expressed as decimal logarithms of the number of microorganisms before the start of exposure (Nc) and after its completion (Nm) [69].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Visualization of Antimicrobial Additives on the Film Surface and in Polymer Mass by Optical Microscopy

With the naked eye, the presence of the additive in the obtained samples of packaging materials is not determined; therefore, it was of interest to conduct a series of studies on additive visualization in films.
Visualization of the sample’s microstructure using the bright field method made it possible to obtain a more detailed picture of the surface structure of the modified LDPE film at different magnifications, as shown in Figure 4. In this case, magnification from 100× to 1000× was used [70].
Consideration of the obtained surface micrographs of the modified film showed that the introduced additive is visualized at all magnification options and that from 200× to 400× magnification is, in principle, sufficient to detect it in the polymer bulk [71].
Based on the obtained results, a simpler optical technique and 300× magnification were used to determine the change in the nature of the microstructure of the surface of modified films containing different amounts of the modifier.
Figure 5 shows micrographs of film samples containing 0.2%, 0.5%, and 1.0% additives.
The presented photographs show particles of the modifying additive, the number of which increases with increasing concentration. Those, the microstructure of the surface of the sample’s changes with increasing concentration of the modifier.
A similar picture is observed when determining the surface microstructure of the resulting polyamide/polyethylene multilayer material, with a modified polyethylene layer (Figure 6).
Microphotographs of multilayer material samples are clearer when comparing the color range of the superconcentrate (Figure 1), and in the resulting picture, micro-inclusions of light-yellow color can be detected in the samples containing the additive (Figure 6b).
Figure 7 shows the results of a visual assessment of the presence and distribution of betulin inside the LDPE film. Film is cut across. The cut thickness is 15 microns. Betulin granules are visible, separate, or form chains. Individual granules are about 2 µm long; chains can be up to 10 µm long. The thickness of the granules ranged from 1 to 1.5 microns. It can be seen that the depth distribution of granules in the film from the inner surface to the outer one is rather uniform.
It was of interest to visualize the inner surface of the multilayer material using a modified histological method.
Figure 8 shows a microphotograph of the inner surface of a PA/LDPE laminate containing betulin.
Presumably, the diffusion of the additive takes place mainly in the zones of damage to the polymer integrity during its processing into a multilayer material.
Comparison of micrographs in Figure 6 and Figure 8 shows that the use of two different methods makes it possible to obtain a completely different picture of the surface microstructure. One unites them. In both micrographs, the polymer modifying additive is visualized; only in Figure 8, the structure of its orientation in the polymer mass was more obvious.
It follows from the presented data that, first, the method makes it possible to determine and visualize the presence of betulin both on the surface and in the polymer bulk, and second, the analysis of the cross section proves the presence of an additive in the bulk [60].
Figure 9 shows the results of visualization of the surface of a multilayer PA/LDPE film from the side of modified polyethylene containing 0.5% extract.
The square zone highlighted in Figure 10 is the automatic ATR mapping region. To determine the betulin distribution in the PE layer, automatic integration was performed under the peak in the region of 880 cm−1 [72].
It can be seen that in the researched region, there are both areas that do not contain an antimicrobial organic additive, as well as areas with increased content.
Comparison of visualization results in film material samples containing betulin showed that it is present both on the surface and in the mass of polyethylene and that its distribution is random.

3.2. Results of Microbiological Research

It has been established that the inhibitory ability of polymer packaging films with a natural antimicrobial betulin-containing additive in relation to sanitary indicative microorganisms (CB, yeast, and mold fungi) with an increase in the total amount of extract in the polymer mass by 2 times—from 10% to 20%—practically does not change. The efficiency in this range is only 3%.
The obtained experimental data on the effect of betulin concentration on the inhibitory ability of the film surface in relation to sanitary indicative microorganisms are presented in Table 5.
To determine the level of microbial contamination reduction of the film material samples’ surface, the antimicrobial efficiency index was used, which is expressed in Lg Nm/Nc, where Nc is the number of microorganisms on the surface of the control sample after exposure, CFU/cm3; Nm is the number of microorganisms on the surface of the modified sample after exposure, CFU/cm3 [60].
The results presented in the table are averages based on 5 parallel tests and show the high antimicrobial efficacy of the obtained film materials.
When more than 15% of the extract was added to the polymer mass, a noticeable foreign odor was observed in the obtained samples. This smell can be described as “bark smell”. The presence of extraneous stock is absolutely unacceptable for the packaging of dairy products. We chose the composition of a superconcentrate based on LDPE with the addition of 10% extract containing 80% betulin [60].
The manifestation of an inhibitory effect in prototypes of modified film packaging to selected microorganisms is hypothetically based on the principle of migration of antimicrobial components from the polymer mass to its surface, since the selected polymers mainly have an amorphous structure. The introduced organic and inorganic substances can be transferred from the surface of the packaging material to the product, while their concentration in the package gradually decreases, and in the surface layers of the product increases.
A preliminary economic calculation shows that the cost of obtaining a modified film with antimicrobial properties will be 1–5% higher than traditional polyethylene packaging, depending on the concentration of the introduced modifier. Industrial production of such packaging is possible on standard equipment without additional configuration and debugging, which also minimizes financial costs.
It should be noted that during the entire shelf life of the product, the concentration of the inhibitory natural component and the rate of its diffusion must be quite high in order to achieve the required level of bactericidal effect. This hypothesis was partially confirmed both by earlier studies [60] and by the fact that during long-term storage of samples, the additive practically “sweats” onto the surface, and this can be seen even with the naked eye. The observed effect is not observed in “fresh” samples. Figure 10 shows the picture of the mentioned “sweating” after 18 months of storage of samples, visualized using a modified histological method.

4. Conclusions

Thus, regularities in the distribution of the antimicrobial additive betulin in film materials were revealed by optical, histological, and spectroscopic methods.
It has been shown that when film and multilayer materials are obtained by combining the base polymer and the antimicrobial additive (betulin) in the melt, its distribution on the surface and in the bulk of the polymer is uneven and unsystematic. There are several ways to increase the uniformity of additive distribution in the polymer mass: the use of extrusion equipment with additional ultrasonic mixing, evaluation of the granulometric composition of the additive, or its sifting. At the same time, comparison of the results of these studies with the data on the antimicrobial activity of the developed materials shows that such a distribution does not affect the inhibition of surface spoilage microorganisms. The main factor affecting the antimicrobial activity is the concentration of the applied extract.

Author Contributions

Writing—reviewing and editing, D.M.; Writing—preparation of the original project, O.F. and D.M.; conceptualization, O.F.; examination, D.M.; research, O.F., D.M., N.P., E.Y. and E.A.; methodology, O.F.; visualization, D.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was carried out as part of the implementation of the State task of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Maksanova, L.A. High-Molecular Compounds and Materials Based on Them, Used in the Food Industry. 2005. Available online: https://www.ozon.ru/product/vysokomolekulyarnye-soedineniya-i-materialy-na-ih-osnove-primenyaemye-v-pishchevoy-27905636/?sh=C3_drAAAAA (accessed on 11 January 2022).
  2. Galstyan, A.G.; Aksyonova, L.M.; Lisitsyn, A.B.; Oganesyants, L.A.; Petrov, A.N. Modern approaches to storage and efficient processing of agricultural products to obtain high quality food products. Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci. 2019, 89, 539–542. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yurova, E.A.; Kobzeva, T.V.; Polyakova, O.S. Development of assessing methods for the storage capacity of dairy products. Milk Processing 2016, 12, 38–41. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zobkova, Z.S.; Fursova, T.P.; Zenina, D.V. Selection of protein ingredients that enrich and modify the structure of fermented milk drinks. Curr. Issues Beverage Ind. 2018, 2, 64–69. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kruchinin, A.G.; Agarkova, E.Y. Various approaches to the functional properties of dairy products formation. Milk Processing 2018, 5, 36–39. [Google Scholar]
  6. Abdel-Bari, E.M.; Zaikova, G.E. Polymer Films; Profession: Saint Petersburg, Russia, 2006; p. 352. [Google Scholar]
  7. Aksenova, T.I.; Baburina, O.V.; Baburina, T.M.; Cheremnykh, E.G. Effect of physical surface modification on the properties of packaging materials. Technology of packaging production and food engineering in the light of the environmental safety of food raw materials and foodstuffs: A collection of materials of the second scientific and practical conference. 2011. Available online: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vliyanie-fizicheskoy-modifikatsii-upakovki-na-razvitie-porchi-pischevyh-produktov/viewer (accessed on 11 January 2022).
  8. Mastalygina, E.E.; Kolesnikova, N.N.; Karpova, S.G.; Popov, A.A. Investigation of Polypropylene/Low-Density Polyethylene Blends. In A Systematic Approach to Experiments, Evaluation, and Modeling; Apple Academic Press Inc.: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 103–121. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mastalygina, E.E.; Varyan, I.A.; Kolesnikova, N.N.; Monakhova, T.V.; Karpova, S.G.; Popov, A.A. The role of the filler in the formation of the structure and properties of polyolefin composites. In Structure and Dynamics of Molecular Systems; IPChE RAS: Moscow, Russia, 2016; pp. 354–362. [Google Scholar]
  10. Anpilova, A.Y.; Mastalygina, E.E.; Khrameeva, N.P.; Popov, A.A. Methods for Cellulose Modification in the Development of Polymeric Composite Materials. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 2020, 14, 176–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Seyedeh, H.F.; Seyed, H.P.; Seyed, J.S.; Abdulrasoul, O. Development of novel active polypropylene-based packaging filmscontaining different concentrations of sorbic acid. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2018, 18, 87–94. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lord, A.W. Food and nutritional analysis. In Packaging Materials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005; Volume 3, pp. 341–352. [Google Scholar]
  13. Beigmohammadi, F.; Peighambardoust, S.H.; Hesari, J.; Azadmard-Damirchi, S.; Peighambardoust, S.J.; Khosrowshahi, N.K. Antibacterial properties of LDPE nanocomposite films in packaging of UF cheese. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 65, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Haghighi-Manesh, S.; Azizi, M.H. Active packaging systems with emphasis on its applications in dairy products. J. Food Process Eng. 2017, 40, 12542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Han, J.H. Antimicrobial food packaging. Food Technol. 2000, 54, 56–65. [Google Scholar]
  16. Han, J.H.; Floros, J.D. Casting antimicrobial packaging films and measuring their physical properties and antimicrobial activity. J. Plast. Film. Sheeting 1997, 13, 287–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Han, C.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Lu, F.; Cui, Y. Antimicrobial-coated polypropylene films with polyvinyl alcohol in packaging of fresh beef. Meat Sci. 2014, 96, 901–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Davidson, P.M.; Taylor, T.M.; Schmidt, S.E. Chemical preservatives and natural antimicrobial compounds. In Food Microbiology; American Society of Microbiology (ASM) Press: Vancouver, WA, USA, 2013; pp. 765–801. [Google Scholar]
  19. Degirmencioglu, N.; Göcmen, D.; Inkaya, A.N.; Aydin, E.; Guldas, M.; Gonenc, S. Influence of modified atmosphere packaging and potassium sorbate on microbiological characteristics of sliced bread. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 48, 236–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Guynot, M.E.; Marín, S.; Sanchis, V.; Ramos, A.J. An attempt to minimize potassium sorbate concentration in sponge cakes by modified atmosphere packaging combination to prevent fungal spoilage. Food Microbiol. 2004, 21, 449–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kamarudin, S.H.; Rayung, M.; Abu, F.; Ahmad, S.; Fadil, F.; Karim, A.A.; Norizan, M.N.; Sarifuddin, N.; Mat Desa, M.S.Z.; Mohd Basri, M.S.; et al. A Review on Antimicrobial Packaging from Biodegradable Polymer Composites. Polymers 2022, 14, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ramamurthy, U.K.; Skrivars, M.; Persson, A. A review of natural fibers used in biocomposites: Plant, animal, and regenerated cellulose fibers. Polymers 2015, 55, 107–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Abdul Khalil, H.P.S.; Dawoodpour, Y.; Islam, M.; Mustafa, A.; Sudesh, K.; Dungany, R.; Jawaid, M. Manufacture and modification of nanofibrillated cellulose using various mechanical processes: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 99, 649–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jonubi, M.; Harun, J.; Tahir, P.M.; Shakeri, A.; Saifulazri, S.; Makinejad, M.D. Physicochemical characterization of cellulose and nanofibers from kenaf stem. Mater. Lat. 2011, 65, 1098–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, W.; Yu, H.; Liu, Y.; Hai, Y.; Zhang, M.; Chen, P. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from four plant cellulose fibers using a chemo-ultrasonic process. Cellulose 2011, 18, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alemdar, A.; Sign, M. Isolation and characterization of nanofibers from agricultural waste—Wheat straw and soy husks. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 1664–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jonubi, M.; Harun, J.; Shakeri, A.; Mishra, M.; Oxmand, K. Chemical composition, crystallinity, and thermal degradation of bleached and unbleached kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus) bast pulp and nanofibers. Bioresources 2009, 4, 626–639. [Google Scholar]
  28. Norrahim, M.N.F.; Ariffin, H.; Yasim-Anuar, T.A.T.; Gami, F.; Hassan, M.; Ibrahim, N.A.; Nji, J.L.H.; Yunus, W.M.Z.W. Superheated steam pretreatment of pulp affects its electrospinning ability to produce microfibrillated pulp. Cellulose 2018, 25, 3853–3859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fahma, F.; Iwamoto, S.; Hori, N.; Iwata, T.; Takemura, A. Isolation, preparation and characterization of oil palm empty fruit nanofibers (OPEFB). Cellulose 2010, 17, 977–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sanchez-Lopez, E.; Gomez, D.; Esteruelas, G.; Bonilla, L.; Lopez-Machado, A.; Galindo, R.; Cano, A.; Espina, M.; Etcheto, M.; Kamins, A.; et al. Metal-based nanoparticles as antimicrobial agents: A review. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Nguyen, W.T.; Wu, V.T.; Nguyen, T.H.; Nguyen, T.A.; Tran, V.K.; Nguyen-Tri, P. Antibacterial activity of TiO2- and ZNO-decorated silver nanoparticles. J. Compos. Sci. 2019, 3, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Ebrahimi, H.; Abedi, B.; Bodagi, H.; Davarinejad, G.; Kharatizadeh, H.; Conte, A. Investigation of a developed clay-nanocomposite packaging film on the quality of peach fruits (Prunus persica Cv. Alberta) in refrigerated storage. J. Food Process Save 2018, 42, e13466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Uz, M.; Altınkaya, S.A. Development of mono and multilayer antimicrobial food packaging materials for controlled release of potassium sorbate. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44, 2302–2309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Dong, S.C.; Manjeet, S.C. Biopolymer-based antimicrobial packaging: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2004, 44, 223–237. [Google Scholar]
  35. Baldevraj, R.M.; Jagadish, R.S. Incorporation of chemical antimicrobial agents into polymeric films for food packaging. In Multifunctional and Nanoreinforced Polymers for Food Packaging; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2011; pp. 368–420. [Google Scholar]
  36. Cagri, A.; Ustunol, Z.; Ryser, E.T. Antimicrobial, mechanical, and moisture barrier properties of low pH whey protein-based edible films containing p-Aminobenzoic or sorbic acids. J. Food Sci. 2001, 66, 865–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lee, J.W.; Son, S.M.; Hong, S.I. Characterization of protein-coated polypropylene films as a novel composite structure for active food packaging application. J. Food Eng. 2008, 86, 484–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ramos, M.; Jiménez, A.; Peltzer, M.; Garrigós, M.C. Characterization and antimicrobial activity studies of polypropylene films with carvacrol and thymol for active packaging. J. Food Eng. 2012, 109, 513–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Torlak, E.; Sert, D. Antibacterial effectiveness of chitosan–propolis coated polypropylene films against foodborne pathogens. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 60, 52–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Meira, S.M.M.; Zehetmeyer, G.; Jardim, A.I.; Scheibel, J.M.; de Oliveira, R.V.B.; Brandelli, A. Polypropylene/montmorillonite nanocomposites containing nisin as antimicrobial food packaging. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2014, 7, 3349–3357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Llana-Ruiz-Cabello, M.; Pichardo, S.; Bermudez, J.M.; Baños, A.; Ariza, J.J.; Guillamón, E.; Aucejo, S.; Cameán, A.M. Characterization and antimicrobial activity of active polypropylene films containing Oregano essential oil and Allium extract to be used in packaging for meat products. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2017, 35, 782–791. [Google Scholar]
  42. Krepker, M.; Prinz-Setter, O.; Shemesh, R.; Vaxman, A.; Alperstein, D.; Segal, E. Antimicrobial carvacrol-containing polypropylene films: Composition, structure and function. Polymers 2018, 10, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Fedotova, O.B.; Myalenko, D.M. An unconventional approach to food packaging disinfection. Dairy Ind. 2016, 1, 25–27. [Google Scholar]
  44. Fedotova, O.B.; Myalenko, D.M.; Shalaeva, A.B. “Active packaging” made of polymeric materials. Food Ind. 2010, 1, 22–23. [Google Scholar]
  45. Cooksey, K. Utilization of antimicrobial packaging films for inhibition of selected microorganism. In Food Packaging Testing Methods and Applications; Risch, S.J., Ed.; American Chemical Society: Seattle, WA, USA, 2000; pp. 17–25. [Google Scholar]
  46. Tolstikova, T.G.; Sorokina, I.V. Lupane series terpenoids—Biological activity and pharmacological prospects. Derivatives of the lupane series. Bioorganic Chem. 2006, 1, 42–55. [Google Scholar]
  47. Alakurtti, S.; Mäkelä, T.; Koskimies, S.; Yli-Kauhaluoma, J. Pharmacological properties of the ubiquitous natural product botulin. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2006, 29, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Arvanitoyannis, I.S.; Kotsanopoulos, K.V. Migration phenomenon in food packaging. Food–Package interactions, mechanisms, types of migrants, testing and relative legislation—A review. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2014, 7, 21–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Blondeau, D.; St-Pierre, A.; Bourdeau, N.; Bley, J.; Lajeunesse, A.; Desgagné-Penix, I. Antimicrobial activity and chemical composition of white birch (Betula papyrifera Marshall) bark extracts. Microbiologyopen 2020, 9, e00944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Khaitbaev, A.K.; Turgunbaev, S.S. Synthesis of betulinic acid. Bull. Fergu. 2019, 4, 24–28. [Google Scholar]
  51. Turgunbaev, S.S.; Khaitbaev, A.K. Obtaining extractive substances of birch. Univers. Chem. Biol. Electron. Sci. Mag. 2020, 8, 27–31. [Google Scholar]
  52. Zalesińska, M.D.; Borska, S. Betulin and its derivatives—Precursors of new drugs. World Sci. News 2019, 127, 123–138. [Google Scholar]
  53. Huang, T.; Chen, C.; Li, D.; Ek, M. Hydrophobic and antibacterial textile fibres prepared by covalently attaching betulin to cellulose. Cellulose 2019, 26, 665–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Huang, T.; Li, D.; Ek, M. Water repellency improvement of cellulosic textile fibers by betulin and a betulin-based copolymer. Cellulose 2018, 25, 2115–2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Tolstikova, T.G.; Sorokina, I.V.; Tolstikov, G.A.; Tolstikov, A.G.; Flekhter, O.B. Biological activity and pharmacological prospects of lupane terpenoids: I. Natural lupane derivatives. Russ. J. Bioorganic Chem. 2006, 32, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Alexandrovna, V.O. Development and Standardization of the Phytopreparation Betulin and Thymol Based on Pumpkin Seed Oil. Ph.D. Thesis, Samara State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Samara, Russia, 2016; p. 120. [Google Scholar]
  57. Shachtschneider, T.P.; Kuznetsova, S.A.; Mikhailenko, M.A. Obtaining non-toxic composites of betulin with polyvinylpyrrolidone and polyethylene glycol. Chemistry 2012, 1, 52–60. [Google Scholar]
  58. Amiri, S.; Dastghaib, S.; Ahmadi, M.; Mehrbod, P.; Khadem, F.; Behrouj, H.; Aghanoori, M.R.; Machaj, F.; Ghamsari, M.; Rosik, J.; et al. Betulin and its derivatives as novel compounds with different pharmacological effects. Biotechnol. Adv. 2020, 38, 107409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tuli, H.S.; Sak, K.; Gupta, D.S.; Kaur, G.; Aggarwal, D.; Chaturvedi Parashar, N.; Choudhary, R.; Yerer, M.B.; Kaur, J.; Kumar, M.; et al. Anti-Inflammatory and Anticancer Properties of Birch Bark-Derived Betulin: Recent Developments. Plants 2021, 10, 2663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Nagorny, M.Y.; Fedotova, O.B. Inhibitory properties of a multilayer packaging material modified with an antimicrobial natural component. Food Industry 2013, 2, 32–33. [Google Scholar]
  61. Yuryevich, N.M. Development of a Modified Combined Material for Dairy Products Packaging. Ph.D. Thesis, V.M. Gorbatov Research Institute of Meat Industry, Moscow, Russia, 2013; p. 131. [Google Scholar]
  62. Fedotova, O.B.; Nagorny, M.Y.; Myalenko, D.M. Development of modified packaging material. Milk Processing 2014, 1, 6–7. [Google Scholar]
  63. GOST 31796-2012. Meat and Meat Products. Accelerated Histological Method for Determining the Structural Composition Formulation. 2019. Available online: https://www.turkmenistanlaws.com/p-56107-gost-31796-2012.aspx (accessed on 11 January 2022).
  64. Elizaquivel, P.; Aznar, R. A multiplex RTi-PCR reaction for simultaneous detection of Escherichia coli O157: H7, Salmonella spp. And Staphylococcus aureus on fresh, minimally processed vegetables. Food Microbiol. 2008, 25, 705–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Torres, J.A.; Karel, M. Microbial stabilization of intermediate moisture food surfaces III. Effects of surface preservative concentration and surface pH control on microbial stability of an intermediate moisture cheese analog. J. Food Processing Preserv. 1985, 9, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Filchakova, S.A. Microbiological purity of packaging for dairy products. Dairy Ind. 2008, 7, 44–46. [Google Scholar]
  67. Filchakova, S.A.; Medvedev, E.V.; Tambovtsev, Y.N. Ecologically safe products with functional properties. Ecol. Syst. Devices 2006, 8, 42–44. [Google Scholar]
  68. Semenikhina, V.F.; Rozhkova, I.V. Microbiology in the dairy industry. Dairy Ind. 2004, 12, 22–24. [Google Scholar]
  69. Mialenko, D.M. Improving the Technology of Packaging Dairy Products by Disinfecting Consumer Containers with Pulsed Ultraviolet Radiation. Ph.D. Thesis, V.M. Gorbatov Research Institute of the Meat Industry, Moscow, Russia, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  70. Ovchinnikov, V.; Mastalygina, E.; Pantyukhov, P. Investigation of novel polymer composites based on recycled multilayer combined packaging materials. Solid State Phenom. 2020, 299, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Nazarov, V.A.; Kondratov, A.P.; Stolyarov, V.P.; Evlampiev, L.A.; Baranov, V.A.; Gagarin, M.A. Surface morphology of a layer of polymers modified with gaseous fluorine. High-Mol. Compd. Ser. A 2006, 48, 1976–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bhargava, R.; Wang, S.-Q.; Koenig, J.L. FTIR Microspectroscopy of Polymeric Systems. Adv. Polym. Sci. 2003, 163, 137–191. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Schematic work diagram.
Figure 1. Schematic work diagram.
Polymers 14 01097 g001
Figure 2. Betulinol molecule structure.
Figure 2. Betulinol molecule structure.
Polymers 14 01097 g002
Figure 3. The exterior of the superconcentrate granules.
Figure 3. The exterior of the superconcentrate granules.
Polymers 14 01097 g003
Figure 4. Microphotographs of the sample surface of LDPE film modified with betulin at different magnifications.
Figure 4. Microphotographs of the sample surface of LDPE film modified with betulin at different magnifications.
Polymers 14 01097 g004
Figure 5. Photomicrographs of the surface of a betulin-modified LDPE film.
Figure 5. Photomicrographs of the surface of a betulin-modified LDPE film.
Polymers 14 01097 g005
Figure 6. Surface microstructure of modified PA/LDPE film: (a) PA/LDPE (control), (b) PA/LDPE (0.5% additive in polyethylene layer).
Figure 6. Surface microstructure of modified PA/LDPE film: (a) PA/LDPE (control), (b) PA/LDPE (0.5% additive in polyethylene layer).
Polymers 14 01097 g006
Figure 7. Cross section of a film with an extract concentration of 1% (63× magnification).
Figure 7. Cross section of a film with an extract concentration of 1% (63× magnification).
Polymers 14 01097 g007
Figure 8. The inner surface of the film with betulin diffused from the film (2.3× magnification).
Figure 8. The inner surface of the film with betulin diffused from the film (2.3× magnification).
Polymers 14 01097 g008
Figure 9. Internal Surface Mapping of PA/LDPE Multilayer Film.
Figure 9. Internal Surface Mapping of PA/LDPE Multilayer Film.
Polymers 14 01097 g009
Figure 10. The inner surface of the “old” film with betulin diffused from the polymer is a dark zone. 20× magnification.
Figure 10. The inner surface of the “old” film with betulin diffused from the polymer is a dark zone. 20× magnification.
Polymers 14 01097 g010
Table 1. Betulin dependence on the birch type.
Table 1. Betulin dependence on the birch type.
BirchBetulin Mass Fraction, %
1Betula costata5
2Betula mandshurica27
3Betula pendula14
4Betula pubescens44
Table 2. Physical and chemical LDPE properties [6].
Table 2. Physical and chemical LDPE properties [6].
No.IndicatorDimensionValue
1Densityg/cm20.918–0.930
2Breaking stress in diseasekgf/cm2100–170
3Breaking stress in static bendingkgf/cm2120–170
4Breaking stress at shearkgf/cm2140–170
5Relative strength at break%500–600
6Elasticity modulus in bendingkgf/cm21200–2600
7Hygiene yield strengthkgf/cm290–160
8Relative attachment at the beginning of the current%15–20
9Brinell hardnesskgf/mm21.4–2.5
Table 3. The main extract characteristics.
Table 3. The main extract characteristics.
No.IndicatorActual Result
Physicochemical indicators *
Water mass fraction, %Cream-colored powder, with a specific characteristic odor
2Quantitative betulinol content, %1.0
3Water mass fraction, %70–98
Toxic elements
4Lead, mg/kgLess than 0.15
5Arsenic, mg/kgLess than 0.02
6Cadmium, mg/kgLess than 0.015
7Mercury, mg/kgLess than 0.01
Pesticides
8Hexachlorocyclohexane (α, β, γ-isomers), mg/kgNot found
9DDT and its metabolites, mg/kgNot found
10Heptachlor, mg/kgNot found
11Aldrin, mg/kgNot found
Microbiological indicators
12QMAFAnM, CFU/gLess than 10
13CB (coliforms) in 0.1 gNA
14E. coli in 1.0 gNA
15Pathogenic, including salmonella in 10.0 gNA
16Yeast and mold, CFU/g20
* Depending on the concentration of the initial active ingredient (betulinol), the physicochemical indicators of the additive may vary.
Table 4. Polyethylene-based concentrates.
Table 4. Polyethylene-based concentrates.
Base PolymerPolymer: Extract RatioExtract Content in Concentrate, %Extract Concentration, %Active Betulin Content, %
LDPE9:110704.90
LDPE9:110785.46
LDPE9:120785.46
LDPE9:110805.60
LDPE9:110906.30
Table 5. Efficiency of films disinfection with different content of betulin in relation to yeasts, mold fungi, and CB.
Table 5. Efficiency of films disinfection with different content of betulin in relation to yeasts, mold fungi, and CB.
Additive Concentration (Betulin), %Actual Result, Lg Nm/Nc
YeastsMold FungiCB
701.00 ± 0.030.86 ± 0.041.00 ± 0.02
781.10 ± 0.040.96 ± 0.051.74 ± 0.02
801.18 ± 0.041.02 ± 0.041.76 ± 0.01
981.49 ± 0.051.00 ± 0.041.78 ± 0.01
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fedotova, O.; Myalenko, D.; Pryanichnikova, N.; Yurova, E.; Agarkova, E. Microscopic and Structural Studies of an Antimicrobial Polymer Film Modified with a Natural Filler Based on Triterpenoids. Polymers 2022, 14, 1097. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14061097

AMA Style

Fedotova O, Myalenko D, Pryanichnikova N, Yurova E, Agarkova E. Microscopic and Structural Studies of an Antimicrobial Polymer Film Modified with a Natural Filler Based on Triterpenoids. Polymers. 2022; 14(6):1097. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14061097

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fedotova, Olga, Dmitry Myalenko, Nataliya Pryanichnikova, Elena Yurova, and Evgeniya Agarkova. 2022. "Microscopic and Structural Studies of an Antimicrobial Polymer Film Modified with a Natural Filler Based on Triterpenoids" Polymers 14, no. 6: 1097. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14061097

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop