Next Article in Journal
Research on Silicone Rubber Sheds of Decay-Like Fractured Composite Insulators Based on Hardness, Hydrophobicity, NMR, and FTIR
Next Article in Special Issue
Preparation and Photodegradation Properties of Carbon-Nanofiber-Based Catalysts
Previous Article in Journal
Finite Element Study of PEEK Materials Applied in Post-Retained Restorations
Previous Article in Special Issue
New Method for a SEM-Based Characterization of Helical-Fiber Nonwovens
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Optical Algorithm for Relative Thickness of Each Monochrome Component in Multilayer Transparent Mixed Films

1
College of Textile Science and Engineering (International Institute of Silk), Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China
2
Key Laboratory of Intelligent Textile and Flexible Interconnection of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(16), 3423; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14163423
Submission received: 27 July 2022 / Revised: 12 August 2022 / Accepted: 12 August 2022 / Published: 22 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart Textile and Polymer Materials)

Abstract

:
A modification of the two-flux Kubelka-Munk (K-M) model was proposed to describe the energy conservation of scattered light in colored mixed material with a defined scattered photometric, which is applied for the relative quantity distribution of each colored monochrome component in mixed material. A series of systematical experiments demonstrated a higher consistency with the reference quantity distribution than the common Lambert-Beer (L-B) law. Its application in the fibrogram of each component for measuring the cotton fiber’s length was demonstrated to be good, extending its applicability to white and dark colored blended fibers, the length of which is harder to measure using L-B law.

1. Introduction

The quantity or relative quantity distribution of each monochrome item is an important variable to configure a color-mixed material’s properties in terms of structure and uniformity in the textile industry, such as the color blending fibers, yarn, and fabric. A potential environmental textile brand featured blending fibers after fiber coloring, with 50% reduction of water than traditional process [1,2,3]. Meanwhile, it is proposed to be applied in the field of photometric measurement, among which the fibrogram is a typical application, a way for measuring the length of white cotton fiber by the parallel fiber beard linear density along the fiber axis [4,5].
In 1932, Hertel [4,5] proposed a modified form of the derived Lambert-Beer (L-B) law to measure the linear density of cotton beards for bias reduction. However, experimental coefficients were different for various materials and obtained difficultly, calling for theoretical study [4,5,6,7,8,9]. In 1970s, the high volume instrument (HVI) was invented by Spinlab Corporation based on Hertle’s study for cotton fiber length distribution, and has been an international standard method on white cotton fiber length until now [9]. In 2016, Wu et al. [10] derived a modification of two-flux Kubelka-Munk (K-M) theory for relative thickness or surface density of a turbid medium. The theory contains the up- and down-wards absorption and scattering light overcoming the L-B law’s shortcoming of including down-wards absorption only [10,11,12]. Its results proved to be much better than L-B law, particularly for scattered wool fibers [10,11,12]. Although the derived transmittance K-M theory has been widely used in predicting the relative thickness of white materials [10,11,12], the mixed-colored specimen of each monochrome fibers has not yet been investigated which is typical important for quality control of color blending yarn industry.
In 2021, Chen et al. [13,14] of our group proposed an optical algorithm for the thickness of each color material in a mixed multilayer transparent specimen, combined L-B law and transmission images. An estimating equation group was developed to describe the relationship between the physical thickness of each color material and the optical depth of multilayer transparent specimen under different monochrome light from linear regression methods. The binary system of first order equations was employed to predict each colored wool fiber material’s relative physical thickness in the mixed colored-fiber specimen. Although its results turn to be pretty good in smooth films, the L-B law’s shortcoming of containing down-wards absorption only limits its usage scope in scattering and thick films [13] and fiber materials [14], particularly the fiber beards with different colors [14]. Hence, relative quantity distribution of each monochrome component needs further study.
In this paper, combined with the previous derived transmission K-M theory and conservation law of light flux of scattered light, a new scattering optical algorithm is proposed for the relative thickness of each color material in a multilayer transparent specimen. This algorithm has an advantage of comprising up- and down-ward scattering and absorption lights, overcoming L-B law’s shortcomings of including down-ward absorption light only. In this optical algorithm, the linear regression method was applied in obtaining linear equation between the physical thickness and optical scattered photometric of multilayer transparent monochrome specimens. According to the conservation law of light flux of scattered light, ab estimation equation system was expressed to predict relative thickness of each colored material in the multilayer specimen, and a better affinity is achieved according to the comparison between experimental and predicted relative thickness which is compared with results of previous algorithm from L-B law.

2. Theory

2.1. Lambert-Beer Law

L-B law [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15] provides a light absorptivity relationship between the attenuation of light and the physical thickness of material when a light transmits through a material. This relationship only considers the down-wards light absorption, expressed as in Equations (1) and (2),
I = I 0 e K x
A = x K = ln ( I 0 I ) = ln ( T )
where K is the absorption coefficient, x is the thickness of the material, T is the transmittance, and A is the absorbance.

2.2. Derived Kubelka-Munk Theory

Considering the up- and down-wards light scattering and absorption, Wu et al. [12], the author, published a derived K-M theory indicating a scattering relationship between the transmittance of light and the physical thickness of material when light transmits through a material. According to the equation, the thickness (x) of specimen is proportional to the algorithm of transmittance as elaborated in Equation (3),
P = S x = 2 r 1 r 2 ln ( 1 r 2 + ( 1 r 2 ) 2 + 4 T 2 r 2 2 T )
where, S denotes the coefficient of scatter defined by the corresponding thickness of layer; r is the light reflectivity of the material with infinite thickness; P is defined as scattered photometric here representing the ability of material’s light scattered. Here, S could be obtained experimentally.
According to the conservation law of light flux of scattered light, the scattered coefficients of color-mixed material is equal to the sum of the results of scattered coefficient of each composition multiplied by its corresponding concentration ratio w i , Smix =   i = 1 n w i S i , where wi = xi/xmix and n is number of the monochrome materials.
Hence, the scattered photometrics of mixed material is proposed in this paper to be equal to the sum of the scattered photometrics of its corresponding monochrome materials, expressed as Pmix = i = 1 n P i . Two or three of these equations under different lights form the mixed-film estimation equation system for 2-mixed or 3-mixed color multilayer films, respectively.

2.3. Proposed Estimation Procedure

In this study, our own built imaging scanner was applied to obtain the RGB transmission images at a greyscale of 0–255 with a resolution of 1000 dpi, where dpi means the number of points within per inch. These acquired R, G, and B values represent the transmitted light of red (R), green (G), and blue (B) monochromatic light, respectively.
Figure 1 shows that when monochromatic light enters the fiber aggregate, it is assumed that both light reflection and light scattering inside the fiber aggregate are considered as scattering, while scattering and absorption in air are ignored. According to the above conservation law of scattered light flux, for A and B two-color mixed color fiber, the scattered light amount of the mixed color fiber is equal to the total scattered light of component A and the total scattered light of component B.
Figure 2 shows the flow chart to achieve the physical thickness of each color film in the multilayer specimen, in which ith (i = 1, 2, 3) film represents different monochromatic film and kth (k = R, G, B) light denotes the light channel of color images. This procedure has two steps: (1) Color-mixed estimation system and (2) Application. For color-mixed estimation system, the monochrome films were piled up to multilayer films one by one to scan their transmitted RGB digital images. Next, calculate their corresponding transmittance using R/R0, G/G0 and B/B0, where R0, G0 an B0 represents the amount of incident light under each channel. These transmittance and corresponding infinite reflectance were applied in Equations (1) and (2) to get A i , k and P i , k , respectively. Details of reflectance measurement are described in Section 3.2 Optical parameter. After that, train the estimating equations referred to photometric with linear regression method of ith monochromatic films and each light. Furthermore, these estimating equations were added up to form the mixed-film estimation equation under each light. Two or three of these equations under different lights form the mixed-film estimation system for 2-mixed or 3-mixed color multilayer films, respectively. In step 2: Application, the designed mixed films were arranged according to their corresponding designed order and number of a group and accumulated to multi-groups. Next, the RGB images of these groups were scanned to get their transmittance using R/R0, G/G0 and B/B0. These transmittance and corresponding infinite reflectance were applied to obtain the absorbed and scattered photometric, A m i x , k and P m i x , k , using Equations (1) and (2), respectively. Afterwards, these results are substituted into the mixed-film estimation equation system above.

3. Experiment

3.1. Material

In this experiment, seven commercial transparent and uniform films with different colors are chosen as the experimental materials, numbered 1# to 7#, whose information are listed in Table 1. Film 1# to 5# are made of poly-ethylene terephthalate (PET) and film 6# to 7# are polypropylene (PP) films. All these colored films have characteristics of transparent and smoothy, except 6# and 7# with rough surfaces. All images in Table 1 were captured from films with 20 layers except 5# containing 40 layers for higher transparency. These samples were employed to build the estimation equation systems for color separation.
To test the proposed method, 8 sets of mixed multilayer films, numbered a# to h# were designed in accordance to their corresponding order and ratio given in Table 2. For example, a group of a# mixed films turns to be 211 arranged from bottom to top, where 2 and 1 stands for a layer of 2# and 1# film respectively. Different numbers of groups are selected for the limit linear test range. Films a#–f# and film g# are of PET and PP respectively, while h# is a mixture of PP and PET with rough and smooth surfaces. a#–h# samples in Table 2 are divided into 5 sets by the compositions of each mixed material, numbered A# to E#. An estimation linear equation system of each set could be composed for thickness or quantity of monochrome material.

3.2. Optical Parameter r

Reflectance of infinite layers r , is an essential optical parameter for derived K-M theory. To measure this parameter, specimens need to be piled up to enough thickness, so that no light can transmit. Samples of monochrome and mixed films are stacked to 20 layers and 10 groups of layers respectively, except 5# with 40 layers for higher transparency. Table 3 denotes the reflectance of infinite layers from reflective images of these multilayers obtained with built scanning image equipment.

3.3. Monochrome Estimation Equation

To get the linear equation between the scattered photometric and thickness, specimens with same color were accumulated to multilayers for RGB images of 1# to 7# samples using a scanner, as shown in Figure 1. Scan images of each colored film with multilayers at an area of 9 mm × 10 mm, ranging from 0–5 layer. Afterwards, their scattered and absorbance were computed with Equation (2) and Equation (1), respectively. Figure 3 indicates the transmitted intensity, absorbed and scattered photometric of 0–5 layers with sample 1# to 7# under R, G and B lights. As physical thicknesses are multiples of its layer numbers, the latter was used as reference values here. It can be seen that the scattered photometric has a better linearity than the absorbed photometric with the layer of films for most films ranging from 0 to 5 layers, such as 7# in R and G channels, and different colored film shows different linearities in R, G and B channels. Hence, optimal channels could be selected according to the transmittance under R, G, and B channels of the 2-mixed mixture and its components.
In addition, linear regression method was employed for linear equation between the layer number and absorbance or scattered photometric. Data of 0–4 layers for 1#–5# and 0–3 layers for 6#–7# were regressed for better linearity of scattered photometric P = SX + C, and absorbed photometric A = KX + D, where S denotes the coefficient of scatter defined by the corresponding thickness of layer; and K is the coefficient of absorption, and C and D are constants related to noises. In this section, the experiments results indicated good linear relationship between photometric and layer numbers of monochrome films under each monochrome light, whose r2 were all above 0.98. These estimated scattering and absorption linear equations could be used in the construction of color-mixed equations complied with the conversation of scattered and absorbed light in the following section.

3.4. Thickness of Each Component in Mixed Samples

To examine the accuracy of proposed method, specimens a# and b# were created numbered A# set as listed in Table 2. Following the conversation of scattered and absorbed light in the following section, estimation equation system was constructed by summing up linear equations from Figure 3 for each component, 1# and 2#, in mixed samples of A# about scattered photometric and absorbance under particular (G or B) light, respectively. Its results comprised 2-mixed estimation equation systems of A#. Figure 3 declared a higher degree of linearity between predicted and measured scattered photometric compared with that of the absorbance from L-B law. This may lead to more accurate predicted layer numbers for scattered method. Afterwards, compute layer number of colored films 1# and 2# with 2-mixed estimation systems of Figure 2. Their results and the sum of each component with both methods are illustrated in Figure 4.
For accuracy analysis, their corresponding layer number deviation ratios σ of each composition were calculated according to Equation (4),
σ = | x x 0 | x 0 × 100 %
where x denotes the calculated value; x 0 is the reference value.
The mean and maximum value of these deviation ratios turns to be 2.05%, 6.21% and 4.14%, 20.40% for derived K-M and L-B methods, respectively. Particularly, the sum of each component measured with the derived K-M has presents less difference from the true data. Hence, the scattered method exhibits a better consequence in a# and b# PET materials compared with L-B law.

3.5. Relative Thickness of Each Component in Mixed Material

To avoid effect of boundary reflectance ignorance, random error of reflectance of infinite layers and noises of equipment [8,16], relative optical thickness was proposed for testing the quantity distribution of each monochrome material. PET, PP and PP\PET mixed materials were applied for relative optical thicknesses of monochromatic film in multilayers as Table 2 described. For estimation system construction, add up the linear equations of each component from 0–4 layers of colored films in Figure 3, following procedures in Figure 2 to a predicted mixed equation under a particular light (R, G and B). Afterward, two or three of these predicted equations under different monochromatic light were employed to construct the 2- or 3-mixed estimation equation system. Finally, the relative thickness for each composition of the mixed multilayers was calculated with Equation (5), shown in Figure 5.
x r = x x min x max x min × 100 %
Relative thickness deviation ratios of Figure 5 were computed with Equation (4) as shown in Table 4, whose mean and maximum values from scattered photometric and absorbance were 3.56%, 14.03% and 6.77%, 42.24%, for 2-mixed PET material (1#2# and 2#1#), 2.28%, 6.86% and 1.7%, 6.74% for 3-mixed PET material (4#5#3#), 1.94%, 6.13% and 4.08%, 12.05% for 2-mixed PP material (6#7#), and 2.89%, 14.38% and 17.07%, 78.31% for PET/PP material (7#4#), respectively. This indicates a better application of the modification of K-M theory than L-B law both in average and maximum error rate. The reason for this is that the L-B model only considers the unidirectional absorption of light by materials but does not consider the reflection and scattering of light. When the light passes through the material, in addition to absorption and reflection, a large amount of scattered light will be generated inside and on the surface. Therefore, the modified K-M theory is proposed to consider not only light absorption and light transmission, but also light scattering. Its advantages are particularly obvious in PP\PET mixed sample with smooth and rough surfaces.

4. Application

To make sure the algorithm’s applicability in fiber assemblies, cotton, wool and polymer colored fiber assemblies were used to compare with the common L-B law. Primary fibers, white and black colored cotton, grey and yellow colored wool fibers, and pink colored polymer fibers were piled up parallelly with different weight for optical weight with transmission images. Linear regression method was applied to relationship between scattered photometric or absorbance and their weight in R, G, and B channels, respectively. These linear equations for each primary fibers under same light were summed up to construct the estimation equations system, as shown in Figure 2. Relative quantity of each primary fiber could be obtained in gray-yellow blended wool and black-white cotton with ratio of 1:1 and 1:2 respectively as procedure above compared with actual weights from a balance (accurate to 0.001 g), as described in Figure 6. The mean and maximum relative weight deviation ratios of scattered photometric and absorbance are 3.57%, 15.29% and 4.44%, 15.04%, for 2-mixed wool fibers, 1.86%, 5.5% and 27.25%, 176.79% for cotton samples, and 1.46%, 5.31% and 6.65%, 16.63% for cotton and polymer mixed fibers, respectively. Hence, this new proposed method is better in fiber assemblies. The large derivation of black cotton using L-B law in Figure 6(a2) may deduced from random errors of fiber assemblies and ignorance of reflectance. Hence, based on this theory, a new method with digital image technology could be invented for primary fiber quantity distribution from blending fiber beards, which is essential data for the fibrogram for primary fiber length measurement.

5. Conclusions

In this study, a scattered optical algorithm was proposed for relative quantity distribution of each monochrome component in color mixed material based on derived K-M theory and the color transmission image. The linear regression method and conservation of scattered light were applied to obtain the estimating equation system on a defined optical variable, scattered photometric P, from transmission images of monochrome item with different weight or thickness. The obtained results were relative quantities to avoid ignorance factors of theoretical surface reflectance, random error, and measured derivation of reflectance of infinite layers. A series of experiments were performed with color-mixed specimens with smooth PET, rough PP, PP\PET mixed films, cotton, and wool fiber assemblies. Results show that this algorithm performs better than the commonly used L-B theory, especially in smooth PET\rough PP mixed materials and fiber assemblies. Therefore, this optical algorithm shows a potential application in assessing the primary fiber length of blending fibers, as well as testing the evenness of scattering film and fiber assembly, especially hollow fibers and other fiber materials with shape modifications for functional application [17,18,19], as well as to support the fibrogram of fiber beards for fiber length testing. Based on this theory, a new method with digital image technology could be invented for primary fiber length measurement from blending fiber beards, having the characteristics speed, high accuracy, and low cost.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.W. and Z.L.; methodology, M.W. and Z.L.; software, M.W. and Z.L.; validation, M.W., Z.L., X.Y., Y.L., F.Z. and X.C.; formal analysis, M.W., Z.L., Y.L., X.Y., F.Z. and X.C.; investigation, M.W., Z.L., X.Y. and X.C.; resources, M.W.; data curation, M.W., Z.L., Y.L., X.Y., F.Z. and X.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.W. writing—review and editing, M.W., Z.L., X.Y., F.Z. and X.C.; visualization, M.W.; supervision, M.W. and C.Z. project administration, M.W.; funding acquisition, M.W. and C.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (52003244); Science Foundation of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University (ZSTU) (20202092-Y); Outstanding Doctors Foundation of Zhejiang Sci-Tech University (2020YBZX15).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Fiber experiment material assistance was provided by Changshan Textile Co., Ltd. (Quzhou, China).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yang, R.H.; Pan, B.; Wang, L.J.; Lin, J.W. Blending effects and performance of ring-, rotor-, and air-jet-spun color-blended viscose yarns. Cellulose 2021, 28, 1769–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lam, N.Y.K.; Zhang, M.; Guo, H.F.; Ho, C.P.; Li, L. Effect of fiber length and blending method on the tensile properties of ring spun chitosan–cotton blend yarn. Text. Res. J. 2017, 87, 244–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, S.Y.; Fu, H. Image analysis and evaluation for internal structural properties of cellulosic yarn. Cellulose 2021, 28, 6739–6756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hertel, K.L.; Zervigon, M.G. An optical method for the length analysis of cotton fibres. Text. Res. J. 1936, 6, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hertel, K.L. A method of fibre-length analysis using the fibrograph. Text. Res. J. 1940, 10, 510–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wu, H.Y.; Wang, F.M. Image measuring method for fiber length measurements. Ind. Text. 2013, 64, 321–325. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jin, J.Y.; Xu, B.G.; Wang, F.M. Measurement of short fiber contents in raw cotton using dual-beard images. Text. Res. J. 2018, 88, 14–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gordon, H.R. Can the Lambert-Beer law be applied to the diffuse attenuation coefficient of ocean water? Limnol. Oceanogr. 1989, 34, 1389–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Naylor, G.R.; Delhom, C.D.; Cui, X.; Gourlot, J.P.; Rodgers, J. Understanding the influence of fiber length on the high volume instrument measurement of cotton fiber strength. Text. Res. J. 2014, 84, 979–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wu, M.Q.; Wang, F.M. Optical algorithm for calculating the quantity distribution of fiber assembly. Appl. Opt. 2016, 55, 7157–7162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Wu, M.Q.; Jin, J.Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, F.M. Calculation method of a random beard fibrogram based on the derived Kubelka–Munk theory. Text. Res. J. 2019, 89, 2281–2293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lang, C.H.; Wu, M.Q.; Pan, X.X.; Jin, J.Y.; Wang, F.M.; Xu, B.G.; Qiu, Y.P. Algorithm for measuring fiber length distributions of raw cotton and combed wool using dual-beard image method. Text. Res. J. 2020, 90, 2149–2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, L.J.; Shen, H.; Wang, F.M. Quantifying the thickness of each color material in multilayer transparent specimen based on transmission image. Text. Res. J. 2020, 90, 2522–2532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, L.J.; Shen, H.; Heng, C.; Wang, F.M. Algorithm for predicting the length of each color fiber in mixed-wool fiber assemblies based on the transmission image. Text. Res. J. 2020, 90, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Strong, F.C. Theoretical basis of Bouguer-Beer law of radiation absorption. Anal. Chem. 1952, 24, 338–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Molenaar, R.; Jaap, J.; Zijp, J.R. Determination of Kubelka–Munk scattering and absorption coefficients by diffuse illumination. Appl. Opt. 1999, 38, 2068–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Dong, T.; Li, Q.; Tian, N.; Zhao, H.G.; Zhang, Y.M.; Han, G.T. Concus Finn Capillary driven fast viscous oil-spills removal by superhydrophobic cruciate polyester fibers. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 417, 126133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Tian, N.; Wu, S.H.; Han, G.T.; Zhang, Y.M.; Li, Q.; Dong, T. Biomass-derived oriented neurovascular network-like superhydrophobic aerogel as robust and recyclable oil droplets captor for versatile oil/water separation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 424, 127393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Guo, Z.J.; Lu, Z.; Li, Y.; Liu, W. Highly Performed Fiber-Based Supercapacitor in a Conjugation of Mesoporous MXene. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 9, 2101977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Monochromatic light incident analysis of two-color hybrid fiber aggregates.
Figure 1. Monochromatic light incident analysis of two-color hybrid fiber aggregates.
Polymers 14 03423 g001
Figure 2. Flow chart to achieve relative thickness of each color film in the multilayer films, (a) Scattered photometric (P), (b) Absorbance (A).
Figure 2. Flow chart to achieve relative thickness of each color film in the multilayer films, (a) Scattered photometric (P), (b) Absorbance (A).
Polymers 14 03423 g002
Figure 3. Relationship between transmittance (a1c1), scattered photometric (a2c2) and absorbance (a3c3) of 0–5 layers with 1#–7# films under R, G and B lights.
Figure 3. Relationship between transmittance (a1c1), scattered photometric (a2c2) and absorbance (a3c3) of 0–5 layers with 1#–7# films under R, G and B lights.
Polymers 14 03423 g003
Figure 4. Comparison between physical and calculated monochrome film layers number, in mixed samples of (a) Sample a# and (b) Sample b# using scattered photometric and absorbance.
Figure 4. Comparison between physical and calculated monochrome film layers number, in mixed samples of (a) Sample a# and (b) Sample b# using scattered photometric and absorbance.
Polymers 14 03423 g004
Figure 5. Comparison between layers number and calculated relative thickness (calculated value) of each component and their sum for Sample a# (a1c1), b# (a2c2), c# (a3c3), d# (a4c4), e# (a5c5), and f# (a6d6) with PET material, g# (a7c7) with PP materials and h# (a8c8), and i# (a9c9) with PP\PET mixed material.
Figure 5. Comparison between layers number and calculated relative thickness (calculated value) of each component and their sum for Sample a# (a1c1), b# (a2c2), c# (a3c3), d# (a4c4), e# (a5c5), and f# (a6d6) with PET material, g# (a7c7) with PP materials and h# (a8c8), and i# (a9c9) with PP\PET mixed material.
Polymers 14 03423 g005aPolymers 14 03423 g005bPolymers 14 03423 g005cPolymers 14 03423 g005d
Figure 6. Comparison between actual weight and calculated relative thickness, named calculated value in Figure of each component and their sum for color mixed wool (a1c1), cotton (a2c2) and cotton and polymer mixed (a3c3) fibers.
Figure 6. Comparison between actual weight and calculated relative thickness, named calculated value in Figure of each component and their sum for color mixed wool (a1c1), cotton (a2c2) and cotton and polymer mixed (a3c3) fibers.
Polymers 14 03423 g006aPolymers 14 03423 g006b
Table 1. Information of Monochrome Films.
Table 1. Information of Monochrome Films.
NumberColorImageThickness/mmMaterialSurface
1#Blue Polymers 14 03423 i0010.02PETS
2#Yellow Polymers 14 03423 i0020.02PETS
3#Pink Polymers 14 03423 i0030.35PETS
4#Cyan Polymers 14 03423 i0040.35PETS
5#White Polymers 14 03423 i0050.01PETS
6#Dark blue Polymers 14 03423 i0060.5PPR
7#Dark Yellow Polymers 14 03423 i0070.5PPR
S and R means smooth and rough respectively.
Table 2. Information of Mixed Multilayer Films.
Table 2. Information of Mixed Multilayer Films.
ImageOrderRatioGroupMaterialSurface
A#a# Polymers 14 03423 i0082#1#1:24PETS
b# Polymers 14 03423 i0091#2#3:13PETS
c# Polymers 14 03423 i0101:13PETS
d# Polymers 14 03423 i0111:24PETS
B#e# Polymers 14 03423 i0124#3#1:13PETS
C#f# Polymers 14 03423 i0134#5#3#1:1:12PETS
D#g# Polymers 14 03423 i0146#7#1:13PPR
E#h# Polymers 14 03423 i0157#4#1:17PP\PETR\S
i# Polymers 14 03423 i0161:24PP\PETR\S
S and R means smooth and rough respectively.
Table 3. r of Monochrome and Mixed Films under Monochrome Light.
Table 3. r of Monochrome and Mixed Films under Monochrome Light.
Numberr of Monochromatic Specimen/%Numberr of Mixed Specimen/%
RGBRGB
1#2.1050.8570.02a#27.0355.8442.43
2#74.3571.7922.13b#26.5055.8946.89
3#22.4910.1212.01c#35.3359.8240.22
4#29.3740.5823.73d#44.6462.5435.07
5#85.1987.9893.58e#30.1526.9320.40
6#15.8031.1153.62f#32.9316.8514.82
7#76.4966.9534.00g#17.4032.8337.44
h#73.4771.3533.41
Table 4. The relative thickness deviation ratios of each component.
Table 4. The relative thickness deviation ratios of each component.
OrderRatioScattered PhotometricAbsorbance
Mean Deviation Rate%Max Deviation Rate%Mean Deviation Rate%Max Deviation Rate%
2#1#1:21.535.094.2620.4
1#2#3:12.566.214.02919.57
1:16.8114.0312.4542.24
1:23.368.766.3523.48
4#3#1:12.726.355.1224.63
4#5#3#1:1:12.286.861.76.74
6#7#1:11.946.134.0812.05
7#4#1:12.8914.3817.0778.31
1:24.0912.0110.6942.72
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, M.; Lu, Z.; Li, Y.; Yan, X.; Chen, X.; Zeng, F.; Zhu, C. An Optical Algorithm for Relative Thickness of Each Monochrome Component in Multilayer Transparent Mixed Films. Polymers 2022, 14, 3423. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14163423

AMA Style

Wu M, Lu Z, Li Y, Yan X, Chen X, Zeng F, Zhu C. An Optical Algorithm for Relative Thickness of Each Monochrome Component in Multilayer Transparent Mixed Films. Polymers. 2022; 14(16):3423. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14163423

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Meiqin, Zuoxiang Lu, Yongrui Li, Xiaofei Yan, Xuefei Chen, Fangmeng Zeng, and Chengyan Zhu. 2022. "An Optical Algorithm for Relative Thickness of Each Monochrome Component in Multilayer Transparent Mixed Films" Polymers 14, no. 16: 3423. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14163423

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop