Next Article in Journal
Mechanical Characteristics Evaluation of a Single Ply and Multi-Ply Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Plastic Subjected to Tensile and Bending Loads
Next Article in Special Issue
Modifications of Textile Materials with Functional Silanes, Liquid Silicone Softeners, and Silicone Rubbers—A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Fresh, Mechanical, and Durability Behavior of Fly Ash-Based Self Compacted Geopolymer Concrete: Effect of Slag Content and Various Curing Conditions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Features of Functionalization of the Surface of Alumina Nanofibers by Hydrolysis of Organosilanes on Surface Hydroxyl Groups
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preparation and Properties of PED-TDI Polyurethane-Modified Silicone Coatings

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(15), 3212; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14153212
Submission received: 18 June 2022 / Revised: 30 July 2022 / Accepted: 2 August 2022 / Published: 6 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Silicon-Containing Polymeric Materials)

Abstract

:
To explore the influence mechanisms of polyurethane soft segments on modified silicone coatings, a series of modified coatings was prepared by introducing different contents of hydroxypropyl-terminated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS2200) into the soft segment of polyurethane. ATR-FTIR, NMR, CLSM, AFM, contact angle measurement, the tensile test, bacterial adhesion, and the benthic diatom adhesion test were used to investigate the structure, morphology, roughness, degree of microphase separation, surface energy, tensile properties, and antifouling properties of the modified coatings. The results show that PDMS2200 could aggravate the microphase separation of the modified coatings, increase the surface-free energy, and reduce its elastic modulus; when the microphase separation exceeded a certain degree, increasing PDMS2200 would decrease the tensile properties. The PED-TDI polyurethane-modified silicone coating prepared with the formula of PU-Si17 had the best tensile properties and antifouling properties among all modified coatings.

1. Introduction

Marine biofouling is a serious problem that ships cannot avoid, which is mainly caused by the adsorption and growth of marine organisms, such as bacteria and diatoms, on the hull’s surface [1,2]. The existence of these organisms will not only increase the roughness of the hull, thereby increasing the fuel consumption and limiting the speed of the ship, but also facilitate biological invasion [3,4].
Among all antifouling methods, fouling-release antifouling coatings that can achieve excellent antifouling effects without biocides have great advantages [5,6,7]. They prevent the adhesion of fouling organisms by providing a smooth surface with low friction and low surface-free energy. Even if adsorption is successful, the adhesion between the organisms and the coating is so weak that the fouling could be easily removed by the water stress or mechanical cleaning.
Currently, fouling-release antifouling coatings include organic fluorine coatings and silicone coatings. The latter have lower marine organism adhesion strength and cost [8]. What is more, silicone coatings also have great chemical stability and low glass transition temperature, making them widely used in ship antifouling. However, silicone coatings also have some shortcomings, such as low mechanical strength [9,10], poor adhesion to the substrate [11], and poor static antifouling effects [5,12]. Therefore, they need to be modified to meet the needs during the actual use process.
Common modified materials mainly include alkyd resin, epoxy resin, acrylic resin, and polyurethane [13,14,15,16]. With its good mechanical properties and adhesion, polyurethane can well improve the defects of silicone coatings [17], so it is an excellent modified material. Furthermore, there are two modification methods: physical blending, and chemical modification. The former is easy to operate; yet some segments will be broken before stretching due to the poor compatibility between silicone and polyurethane [18]. Therefore, it is difficult to apply in practical applications; the preparation of the latter is cumbersome, and the modification treatment is mainly achieved by the reaction of isocyanate groups with reactive hydroxyl groups on the end or side chain of silicone [19].
According to the positions and numbers of active hydroxyl groups on the organosilicon segment, the modified products can be divided into block polymers, graft polymers, and interpenetrating network polymers [20]. Dai et al. [21] prepared a new type of organosilicon block copolymer to replace polyether or polyester as the soft segment of polyurethane. The experimental results showed that the mechanical properties of the modified product could be close to pure polyurethane. Barletta et al. [22] introduced hydrophilic and hydrophobic groups into polyurethane in the form of side chains and then prepared modified coatings by reacting polysiloxane with highly reactive hydroxyl groups with polyurethane. This synthesis method can significantly shorten the modified coatings’ preparation process and give the product good amphiphilic and antifouling effects.
However, due to the differences between the soft and hard segments of the polyurethane, the microphase separation of the modified coatings is inevitable. The synthesis method of polyurethane, the composition and chain length of the soft segment [23,24], the composition of the hard segment [25], and even the choice of solvent will affect the degree of microphase separation and ultimately affect the performance of the modified coatings. Wang et al. [26] introduced zwitterions into the polyurethane’s hard segment to improve the microphase separation of the product. The test results showed that the tensile properties of the product were significantly improved, and the glass transition temperature was reduced. Zhang et al. [27] introduced polysiloxane-containing quaternary ammonium salt (QAS) groups into the polyurethane coating, and the results showed that the QAS chain linked by high polar covalent bonds had good compatibility with the polyurethane’s hard segment. Therefore, the migration of hydrophobic polysiloxane segments to the surface of the coating is limited, thus improving the hydrophilicity of the coating.
In this paper, hydroxypropyl polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS2200) with good mechanical properties was used to prepare silicone-modified polyurethane, and a series of modified coatings with different soft segments was prepared by changing the content of PDMS2200 to further explore the effect of polyurethane’s soft segments on the structure and properties of modified coatings. The antifouling mechanism was analyzed by testing the surface and interface properties, tensile properties, and antifouling properties of the modified coatings. It was hoped that a polyurethane-modified silicone coating would be developed that at the same time had good mechanical and antifouling properties.

2. Experiment

2.1. Materials

Polyether diol (PED, CP) and polyether triol (PET, CP) were purchased from Jiangsu Hai’an Petrochemical Plant (Hai’an, China). Tolylene 2,4-diisocyanate (TDI, AR) and 1,4-butanediol (BDO, AR) were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Hydroxypropyl polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS2200, CP), with an average molecular weight of 2000, was purchased from Ark (Fogang) Chemical Materials Co., Ltd. (Qingyuan, China). Dimethyl benzene (AR) was purchased from Fuchen (Tianjin) Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). Butyl acetate (AR) was purchased from Tianjin Kemiou Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). Cyclohexanone (AR) and ethyl orthosilicate (AR) were purchased from Tianjin Damao Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). Hydroxy-terminated polydimethylsiloxane (DY-107, CP) was purchased from Shandong Dayi Chemical Co., Ltd. (Shandong, China). PED, PET, and PDMS2200 were used after negative pressure dehydration for 2.5 h at 110 °C and −0.095 MPa. Dimethyl benzene, butyl acetate, cyclohexanone, and BDO were dehydrated with a 4A molecular sieve.

2.2. Synthesis Principle and Preparation Process

To obtain isocyanate-terminated polyurethanes, the molar ratio of isocyanate to hydroxyl R (R = n(NCO)/n(OH)) was controlled at 1.35. That is, the molar ratio of raw materials of the soft segment to the hard segment (composed of 70 mol% TDI and 30 mol% BDO) was 1:4.5. A series of polyurethanes was prepared by gradually increasing the molar percentage of PDMS2200 (XPDMS) in the soft segment. The mole percentages of the soft segment raw materials are shown in Table 1.

2.2.1. Synthesis Principle of the Polyurethane

Silicone-modified polyurethane prepolymers were prepared by selecting PED, PET, PDMS2200, and TDI as reaction monomers. After using BDO to extend the chain, the isocyanate-terminated PED-TDI polyurethane was obtained. The reaction principle is shown in Figure 1.

2.2.2. Synthesis Principle of Modified Organic Silicone Resin

A polyurethane-modified silicone coating that can be cross-linked and cured at room temperature was prepared in the ratio of DY-107:silicone-modified polyurethane:ethyl orthosilicate:catalyst = 20:5:4:0.5. The reaction principle involved is shown in Figure 2.

2.2.3. Preparation Process

By referring to the relevant literature [28], the reaction scheme was determined as follows:
Firstly, a four-neck flask was connected to the SZCL-2A digital intelligent control magnetic stirrer (Yuhua Instrument Co., Ltd., Gongyi, China). At the same time, polyol, PDMS2200, and 60 g mixed solvent (consisting of 40 wt.% dimethyl benzene, 40 wt.% butyl acetate, and 20 wt.% cyclohexanone) were added at the proportion shown in Table 1. Under the protection of N2, the rotating speed of the magnetic stirrer was controlled to be 160 r/min, and the reaction system was heated to 50 °C by using a DF-101 constant temperature heating magnetic stirrer (China Gongyi Yuhua Instrument Co., Ltd.), and then TDI was added dropwise. After stirring for 30 min, the reaction system was heated to 80 °C. After reacting for 2 h, the reaction system was air-cooled to 50 °C, and 2.6 g BDO was added. After that, the system was heated to 75 °C for a 4 h chain expansion reaction, and polyurethane prepolymer was finally obtained. The specific device is shown in Figure 3a.
PED-TDI polyurethane was added to DY-107 in the proportion shown above, and ethyl orthosilicate and catalyst were successively added. The modified silicone coating was obtained after 20 min of reaction. The process is shown in Figure 3b. The modified products were coated in glass slides and PTFE molds, respectively, and a series of glass slides and mold samples were obtained by crosslinking curing at room temperature. The former was used for structural characterization, surface and interface performance testing, antifouling performance testing, etc. The latter was used for tensile performance testing.

2.3. Characterizations

2.3.1. Chemical Structure

Attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) was used to determine functional groups of polyurethane and modified silicone coatings. The scanning range was 4000–650 cm−1, the resolution was 2 cm−1, and the number of scans was 32 times.
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer (NMR, Bruker 400M, Bruker Physik-Ag, Karlsruhe, Germany) was used to determine the hydrogen spectra of polyurethane prepolymers and modified organosilicon coatings. The resonance frequency was 400 MHz, and the solvent was CDCl3.

2.3.2. Surface Observation

Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM, OLS4000, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) was used to observe the surface of the modified silicone coating. The roughness was calculated by the LEXT analysis software.
Atomic force microscopy (AFM, Bruker Dimension Icon, Bruker Physik-AG, Karlsruhe, Germany) was used to observe the microphase separation on the surface of modified coatings. The probe type was OTESPA-R3, and the scanning mode was Tapping. The scanning frequency was 1 Hz, and the scanning pixel was 256.
A JC2000C contact angle measurement instrument (Zhongchen Digital Technology Equipment Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) was used to measure the modified coatings’ water and diiodomethane contact angle, and the surface energy γ of the modified coatings was calculated by Owens’s two-liquid method [29].

2.3.3. Tensile Test

A UTM 5105 computer-controlled electronic universal testing machine (Jinan Wance Electrical Equipment Co., Ltd., Jinan, China) was used to test the casting sample at a tensile rate of 50 mm/min, and the elastic modulus, elongation, and fracture strength were calculated according to the stress–strain curves.

2.3.4. Antifouling Evaluation

Bacterial adhesion and benthic diatom tests were carried out on the modified coatings. The antifouling properties of the modified coatings were measured by comparing the bacterial adhesion rate and chlorophyll content on the coating surface. The specific steps are shown in the literature [30,31].

3. Results

3.1. Chemical Structure

The preparation of the modified coatings mainly involves the reaction between hydroxyl and isocyanate. To verify whether the modification is successful, the polyurethane (denoted by P) and its modified coatings (denoted by C) were tested by ATR-FTIR. The results are shown in Figure 4.
For the polyurethane, the characteristic peaks of stretching vibration of N–H, –NCO, C–O, and C=O groups were observed at 1538 cm−1, 2270 cm−1, 1170 cm−1, and 1727 cm−1, respectively. These peaks indicated the presence of carbamate in polyurethane. The characteristic peaks at 2970 cm−1 (the C–H bond in the Si–CH3 group), 1259 cm−1 (Si–C bending), 801 cm−1 (Si–C vibration), and 1017 cm−1 (Si–O–Si stretching) indicated the successful introduction of PDMS2200.
For the modified coatings, the characteristic peaks corresponding to the –NCO groups disappeared, indicating that the free isocyanate groups in the polyurethane have been wholly consumed. At the same time, the characteristic peaks corresponding to Si–CH3 groups and Si–O–Si groups in the modified coatings were significantly enhanced, which was caused by the addition of a large amount of silicone resin in the subsequent experiments.
To further analyze the chemical structure of the polyurethane and the modified coatings, their NMR spectra were tested, and the results are shown in Figure 5.
The chemical shift near 0 ppm corresponded to the proton on the Si–CH3 group. The chemical shift at δ = 0.79–1.48 ppm was attributed to hydrogen on methylene groups linked to Si in PDMS2200. The chemical shift around 1.7 ppm corresponded to the methyl group on TDI. The chemical shift at δ = 2.0–2.5 ppm was attributed to methyl and methylene groups on PED and PET. The chemical shift at δ = 3.5 ppm corresponded to hydrogen on methyne linked to carbamate; the multiple signal peaks near 4.0 ppm were attributed to the protons in methylene on PDMS2200. Combined with ATR-FTIR spectra, it could be determined that polyurethane-modified silicone coatings were successfully prepared.

3.2. Surface Morphology and Roughness

Figure 6 shows the surface roughness of the modified silicone coatings. It was found that with the addition of PDMS2200, the surface roughness of the coatings was greatly reduced. This is because the addition of silicone segments increased the degree of microphase separation of the polyurethane. Compared with the interior of the coating, silicone tended to enrich on the surface. A large amount of silicone formed a continuous phase on the coating’s surface, thereby improving its flatness. With continued increases in XPDMS, the continuous phase did not change much, so its roughness was maintained in a relatively stable state.
The microphase separation on the surface of the PU-Si17 coating was observed by AFM, and the results are shown in Figure 7. It was found that apparent phase separation occurred on the surface of the modified coating. The part with a darker color and concave surface corresponds to the soft segment in the coating, and the part with a brighter color and convex surface is the hard segment area. It was seen that the continuous phase on the surface of the coating was composed of soft segments dominated by silicone, and a small number of hard segments was dispersed in the soft segments. This result proves the above inference.

3.3. Contact Angle and Surface Free Energy

The contact angles of the modified coatings are shown in Figure 8. All the water contact angles were greater than 107°, indicating that all the modified coatings had good hydrophobicity. Because the addition of PDMS2200 made more silicone enrich on the coatings’ surfaces, improving the hydrophobicity, the water contact angle increased; the decrease of the contact angle may have been caused by the change of its surface roughness.
The surface-free energy of the modified coatings was calculated, and the results are shown in Figure 9. It was found that with the increase of PDMS2200, the surface energy of the coatings increased continuously. On the one hand, according to the Cassie model [32,33], the higher the roughness of the coating surface, the more difficult it is for the liquid to wet the surface, and the lower the surface energy; on the other hand, according to the calculation formula of the surface energy [32], it was seen that the surface energy of the coating was composed of the polar force and the dispersion force. Comparing these two forces, it was found that the polar force could be ignored, and the dispersion force was mainly related to the degree of molecular deformation—the greater the degree, the stronger the dispersion force. As shown in Figure 9, with the continuous addition of PDMS2200, a large number of Si and O atoms significantly improved the flexibility of the molecular chain of the modified coatings, thereby increasing the dispersion force of the coating to a certain extent. Furthermore, the surface energy of the coatings continued to increase.
Under the combined effect of roughness and dispersion force, the surface free energy of the modified coatings showed a rising trend with the increase of XPDMS.

3.4. Tensile Properties

Tensile tests were carried out on the modified silicone coatings, and their elastic modulus was calculated. As shown in Figure 10, the introduction of PDMS2200 reduced the modified coatings’ elastic moduli. This is because PDMS2200 increased the length of the soft segment and improved the flexibility of the molecular chain, so the elastic moduli of the coatings decreased; with the continuous improvement of XPDMS, the strengthening effect of the hard segment on the coatings was reflected, thereby improving the elastic moduli of the coatings.
The elongation and breaking strength of the modified coatings are shown in Figure 11 and Figure 12, respectively. It was found that with the increase of XPDMS, the elongation and breaking strength of the coatings both showed a trend of increasing first and then decreasing. This is because the addition of PDMS2200 improved the flexibility of the molecular chain, so its elongation was enhanced. At the same time, the hard segment generated by the microphase separation of the polyurethane acted as the second phase to strengthen the mechanical properties of the coating, thereby improving the breaking strength of the modified coatings; as XPDMS continued to increase, the size of the hard segment was also growing, which made the deformation of the molecular chain more difficult, resulting in a decrease in the elongation of the coating. The increasing microphase separation led to an increase in the interface between soft and hard segments. These interfaces were more prone to stress concentration when subjected to external forces, which led to crack nucleation, so the fracture strength of the coating decreased.

3.5. Antifouling Performance

The bacterial and benthic diatom adhesion experiments were carried out on the modified coatings, and their colony area rate and chlorophyll concentration are shown in Figure 13 and Figure 14, respectively. It was found that with the continuous addition of PDMS2200, the colony area rate and chlorophyll concentration on the coatings’ surfaces showed a trend of first decreasing and then increasing. Furthermore, the washing treatment could effectively remove the bacteria and benthic diatoms attached to the coatings’ surfaces.

4. Discussion

Brady [34] once proposed the relative adhesion factor (RAF), which is considered an essential basis for characterizing the antifouling performance of silicone coatings. RAF is calculated with the following equation:
RAF = E γ
where E denotes the elastic modulus of the coating, and γ denotes the surface free energy of the coating. The results of the RAF are shown in Figure 15. It was found that for the rinsed samples, the colony area rate was entirely in line with Brady’s theory, that is, the smaller the RAF, the better the antifouling performance of the coating; for the washed sample, the change of the colony area rate and RAF was not precisely the same, which may have been caused by the roughness Ra of the coating surface.
Therefore, based on RAF, the roughness of the coating surface was introduced, and a new relative adhesion factor RAF’ was proposed; it was calculated with the following equation:
RAF = E γ R a
The results of RAF’ and the colony area rate of the washed samples are shown in Figure 16. It was found that the smaller the RAF’, the lower the colony area rate. This indicates that the removal of fouling organisms on the surface of the modified silicone coating prepared in this paper was controlled by its elastic modulus, surface energy, and roughness.
Based on the above, it can be seen that the increase of XPDMS will aggravate the microphase separation of the modified coatings, thereby reducing the roughness of the coating surface, which will improve the wetting and dispersibility of the liquid on the coating surface to a certain extent. The introduction of PDMS2200 brings a large number of Si, as well as O atoms, which will improve the dispersion force of the modified coatings. Under the combined action of these two factors, the coating γ will continue to increase with the increase of XPDMS.
At the same time, the introduction of PDMS2200 will also increase the content of the soft segment, which will improve the deformation ability of the modified coatings, thereby reducing its E; when the content of PDMS2200 exceeds a certain level, the strengthening effect of the hard segment is reflected, and continuing to increase XPDMS will lead to an increase in E instead of a decrease.
Therefore, by controlling XPDMS, the modified coatings can obtain a more suitable degree of microphase separation to obtain lower E, γ, and Ra, giving the modified coatings good antifouling performance.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, PED-TDI polyurethane-modified silicone coatings were prepared, and the effects of soft segments on the structure and properties of modified coatings were investigated by introducing different contents of PDMS2200 into polyurethane.
(1) By analyzing the infrared spectrum and NMR spectrum of PED-TDI polyurethane and its modified coatings, it was found that isocyanate-terminated polyurethane was successfully prepared, and it was successfully used to modify silicone;
(2) When XPDMS = 23 mol%, the modified coating has the lowest surface roughness, which is 0.0565 μm; when XPDMS = 0 mol%, the surface free energy of the modified coatings is the lowest, which is 26.01 mJ/m2; when XPDMS = 11 mol%, the elastic modulus of the modified coatings is the lowest, which is 1.30 MPa;
(3) The antifouling effect of the modified silicone coatings is related to its own RAF’. Polyurethane with different soft segment compositions changes the coating’s elastic modulus, surface energy, and roughness by affecting the microphase separation degree, which finally influences the antifouling properties. When XPDMS = 17 mol%, the modified coatings can obtain better mechanical properties and antifouling effects.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.X., Z.Z., and Y.Q.; Methodology, X.X., Z.Z., and Y.Q.; Software, X.X.; Validation, X.X.; Formal Analysis, X.X. and Z.Z.; Investigation, X.X. and Z.Z.; Resources, Z.Z. and Y.Q.; Data Curation, X.X.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, X.X.; Writing—Review and Editing, X.X. and Z.Z.; Visualization, Z.Z. and Y.Q.; Supervision, Z.Z. and Y.Q.; Project Administration, Z.Z. and Y.Q.; Funding Acquisition, Z.Z. and Y.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 51879021.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Xie, Q.; Pan, J.; Ma, C.; Zhang, G. Dynamic surface antifouling: Mechanism and systems. Soft Matter 2019, 15, 1087–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Martín-Rodríguez, A.J.; Babarro, J.; Lahoz, F.; Sansón, M.; Martin, V.; Norte, M.; Fernandez, J.J. From Broad-Spectrum Biocides to Quorum Sensing Disruptors and Mussel Repellents: Antifouling Profile of Alkyl Triphenylphosphonium Salts. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0123652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Leonardi, A.K.; Ober, C.K. Polymer-Based Marine Antifouling and Fouling Release Surfaces: Strategies for Synthesis and Modification. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 2019, 10, 241–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hu, P.; Xie, Q.; Ma, C.; Zhang, G. Silicone-Based Fouling-Release Coatings for Marine Antifouling. Langmuir 2020, 36, 2170–2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Liu, C.; Ma, C.; Xie, Q.; Zhang, G. Self-repairing silicone coatings for marine anti-biofouling. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 15855–15861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chambers, L.D.; Stokes, K.R.; Walsh, F.C.; Wood, R.J.K. Modern approaches to marine antifouling coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2006, 201, 3642–3652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Mirabedini, S.; Pazoki, S.; Esfandeh, M.; Mohseni, M.; Akbari, Z. Comparison of drag characteristics of self-polishing co-polymers and silicone foul release coatings: A study of wettability and surface roughness. Prog. Org. Coat. 2006, 57, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Patwardhan, S.V.; Taori, V.P.; Hassan, M.; Agashe, N.R.; Franklin, J.E.; Beaucage, G.; Mark, J.E.; Clarson, S.J. An investigation of the properties of poly(dimethylsiloxane)-bioinspired silica hybrids. Eur. Polym. J. 2006, 42, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lejars, M.; Margaillan, A.; Bressy, C. Fouling Release Coatings: A Nontoxic Alternative to Biocidal Antifouling Coatings. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 4347–4390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, L.; Li, L.; Feng, S. Research Progress of Silicone Supramolecular Materials. Chem. J. Chin. Univ. Chin. 2021, 42, 2111–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yi, B.; Wang, S.; Hou, C.; Huang, X.; Cui, J.; Yao, X. Dynamic siloxane materials: From molecular engineering to emerging applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 405, 127023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Han, X.; Wu, J.; Zhang, X.; Shi, J.; Wei, J.; Yang, Y.; Wu, B.; Feng, Y. Special issue on advanced corrosion-resistance materials and emerging applications. The progress on antifouling organic coating: From biocide to biomimetic surface. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2021, 61, 46–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mejía, M.C.; Palacio, J.; Murillo, E.A. Comb-shaped silicone-alkyd resins with high solid content. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017, 105, 336–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sun, X.; Chen, R.; Gao, X.; Liu, Q.; Liu, J.; Zhang, H.; Yu, J.; Liu, P.; Takahashi, K.; Wang, J. Fabrication of epoxy modified polysiloxane with enhanced mechanical properties for marine antifouling application. Eur. Polym. J. 2019, 117, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Augustinho, T.R.; Motz, G.; Ihlow, S.; Machado, R.A.F. Application of hybrid organic/inorganic polymers as coatings on metallic substrates. Mater. Res. Express 2016, 3, 095301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Szeto, W.; Leung, M.K.H.; Leung, D.Y.C. Recent developments of titanium dioxide materials for aquatic antifouling application. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 2021, 26, 301–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sui, Z.; Li, Y.; Guo, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, X. Preparation and properties of polysiloxane modified fluorine-containing waterborne polyurethane emulsion. Prog. Org. Coat. 2022, 166, 106783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lewandowski, K.; Krepski, L.R.; Mickus, D.E.; Roberts, R.R.; Heilmann, S.M.; Larson, W.K.; Purgett, M.D.; Koecher, S.D.; Johnson, S.A.; McGurran, D.J.; et al. Synthesis and properties of waterborne self-crosslinkable sulfo-urethane silanol dispersions. J. Polym. Sci. Pol. Chem. 2002, 40, 3037–3045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xia, J.; Liu, B.; Yang, M. Research Progress of Organosilicon Low Surface Energy Antifouling Coatings for Marine Vessels. Mater. Rev. 2018, 32, 326–328+340. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hua, L.; Xu, H.; Zheng, F. Review of modified silicone coatings. Sci. Technol. Chem. Ind. 2016, 24, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dai, Z.; Yang, K.; Dong, Q. Synthesis and characterization of hydroxy-terminated polyether-polydimethylsiloxane-polyether (PE-PDMS-PE) triblock oligomers and their use in the preparation of thermoplastic polyurethanes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132, 42521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Barletta, M.; Aversa, C.; Pizzi, E.; Puopolo, M.; Vesco, S. Design, manufacturing and testing of anti-fouling/foul-release (AF/FR) amphiphilic coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 2018, 123, 267–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Clarson, S.J.; Fitzgerald, J.J.; Owen, M.J.; Smith, S.D. High Strength Silicone-Urethane Copolymers: Synthesis and Properties. Silicones Silicone-Modified Mater. 2000, 26, 395–407. [Google Scholar]
  24. Yang, Z. Research on the Preparation and Properties of Polyurethane Elastomers Modified with Polydimethylsiloxane. Ph.D. Thesis, Shandong University, Jinan, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  25. He, Y.; Xie, D.; Zhang, X. The structure, microphase-separated morphology, and property of polyurethanes and polyureas. J. Mater. Sci. 2014, 49, 7339–7352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, C.; Ma, C.; Mu, C.; Lin, W. Tailor-made zwitterionic polyurethane coatings: Microstructure, mechanical property and their antimicrobial performance. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 27522–27529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Zhang, Q.; Liu, H.; Zhan, X.; Chen, F.; Yan, J.; Tang, H. Microstructure and antibacterial performance of functionalized polyurethane based on polysiloxane tethered cationic biocides. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 77508–77517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, Z.-P.; Song, X.-F.; Cui, L.-Y.; Qi, Y.-H. Synthesis of Polydimethylsiloxane-Modified Polyurethane and the Structure and Properties of Its Antifouling Coatings. Coatings 2018, 8, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Oliver, J.F.; Mason, S.G. Liquid Spreading on Rough Metal-Surfaces. J. Mater. Sci. 1980, 15, 431–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Qi, Y.; Zhang, H. Influence of Phenylmethylsilicone Oil on Anti-Fouling and Drag-Reduction Performance of Silicone Composite Coatings. Coatings 2020, 10, 1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, Y.; Qi, Y.-H.; Zhang, Z.-P.; Sun, G.-Y. Synthesis of fluorinated acrylate polymer and preparation and properties of antifouling coating. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2015, 12, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cassie, A.B.D.; Baxter, S. Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1944, 40, 546–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gao, N.; Yan, Y. Modeling Superhydrophobic Contact Angles and Wetting Transition. J. Bionic Eng. 2009, 6, 335–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Brady, R.F.; Singer, I.L. Mechanical factors favoring release from fouling release coatings. Biofouling 2000, 15, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Synthesis principle of PED-TDI polyurethane.
Figure 1. Synthesis principle of PED-TDI polyurethane.
Polymers 14 03212 g001
Figure 2. Principle of cross-linking and curing reaction of modified silicone coating.
Figure 2. Principle of cross-linking and curing reaction of modified silicone coating.
Polymers 14 03212 g002
Figure 3. Preparation process of PED-TDI polyurethane-modified silicone coating: (a) preparation process of PED-TDI polyurethane; (b) preparation process of modified silicone coating.
Figure 3. Preparation process of PED-TDI polyurethane-modified silicone coating: (a) preparation process of PED-TDI polyurethane; (b) preparation process of modified silicone coating.
Polymers 14 03212 g003
Figure 4. ATR-FTIR spectra of PED-TDI polyurethane and its modified coatings.
Figure 4. ATR-FTIR spectra of PED-TDI polyurethane and its modified coatings.
Polymers 14 03212 g004
Figure 5. NMR spectra of PED-TDI polyurethane and its modified coatings.
Figure 5. NMR spectra of PED-TDI polyurethane and its modified coatings.
Polymers 14 03212 g005
Figure 6. Roughness of modified silicone coatings.
Figure 6. Roughness of modified silicone coatings.
Polymers 14 03212 g006
Figure 7. AFM maps of PED-TDI polyurethane-modified silicone coating: (a) height maps; (b) phase maps.
Figure 7. AFM maps of PED-TDI polyurethane-modified silicone coating: (a) height maps; (b) phase maps.
Polymers 14 03212 g007
Figure 8. Contact angle of modified silicone coatings.
Figure 8. Contact angle of modified silicone coatings.
Polymers 14 03212 g008
Figure 9. Surface-free energy and dispersion force of modified silicone coatings.
Figure 9. Surface-free energy and dispersion force of modified silicone coatings.
Polymers 14 03212 g009
Figure 10. Elastic moduli of modified silicone coatings.
Figure 10. Elastic moduli of modified silicone coatings.
Polymers 14 03212 g010
Figure 11. Elongation of modified silicone coatings.
Figure 11. Elongation of modified silicone coatings.
Polymers 14 03212 g011
Figure 12. Breaking strength of modified silicone coatings.
Figure 12. Breaking strength of modified silicone coatings.
Polymers 14 03212 g012
Figure 13. Colony area rate of the modified silicone coatings.
Figure 13. Colony area rate of the modified silicone coatings.
Polymers 14 03212 g013
Figure 14. Chlorophyll concentration of the modified silicone coatings.
Figure 14. Chlorophyll concentration of the modified silicone coatings.
Polymers 14 03212 g014
Figure 15. Relationship between the RAF and the colony area rate of the modified silicone coatings.
Figure 15. Relationship between the RAF and the colony area rate of the modified silicone coatings.
Polymers 14 03212 g015
Figure 16. The relationship between the RAF’ and the colony area rate of the washed samples.
Figure 16. The relationship between the RAF’ and the colony area rate of the washed samples.
Polymers 14 03212 g016
Table 1. The raw material ratios of the soft segments.
Table 1. The raw material ratios of the soft segments.
PU-Si0PU-Si6PU-Si11PU-Si17PU-Si23
PED (mol%)89.8985.0179.7374.6669.82
PET (mol%)10.119.408.888.377.66
PDMS2200 (mol%)05.5911.3916.9722.52
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xi, X.; Zhang, Z.; Qi, Y. Preparation and Properties of PED-TDI Polyurethane-Modified Silicone Coatings. Polymers 2022, 14, 3212. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14153212

AMA Style

Xi X, Zhang Z, Qi Y. Preparation and Properties of PED-TDI Polyurethane-Modified Silicone Coatings. Polymers. 2022; 14(15):3212. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14153212

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xi, Xiaojun, Zhanping Zhang, and Yuhong Qi. 2022. "Preparation and Properties of PED-TDI Polyurethane-Modified Silicone Coatings" Polymers 14, no. 15: 3212. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14153212

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop