1. Introduction
Articular cartilage (AC) has no blood vessels, nerves, or lymphatic systems. The main component of AC is the extracellular matrix (ECM), with a sparse population of chondrocytes distributed throughout the tissue [
1]. Because of the absence of blood vessels, undifferentiated stem cells are absent in the AC, and chondrocytes are confined to dense pits of collagen and proteoglycans [
2]. Despite advances in technology and biotechnology, local cartilage defects of the knee are common and continue to present clinical challenges. These patients are often young, physically active individuals who may also be affected by ligament, meniscus or soft tissue damage, further complicating treatment [
3]. Currently, although patients with early AC injury can be treated conservatively and surgically, conservative treatment can only reduce the swelling and local pain around the joint. This approach is unable to cure the AC damage. In terms of surgical methods, the mechanical outcome is poor and the lack of abrasion resistance eventually leads to regression [
4]. Moreover, the repair of cartilage defects through the transplantation of periosteum, bone perichondrium, and osteochondral material to try to produce hyaline cartilage has been attempted [
5,
6]. However, results of long-term clinical results for patients are uncertain. Thus, research on the repair of cartilage defects is urgently needed.
Tissue engineering technology [
7,
8], in which the principles and methods of engineering and life sciences are applied to prepare bioactive cell-scaffold complexes in vitro, has been explored to repair damaged tissues [
9]. Remarkable achievements have been made in cartilage tissue engineering. For example, Rotter et al. [
10] planted human cartilage tissue onto a mixture of polylactic acid and poly(glycolic acid) and transplanted it into mice to successfully form hyaline cartilage matrices with stable mechanical properties. Jacob et al. [
11] revealed that a smart piezoelectric nanohybrid of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) and barium titanate could stimulate cartilage regeneration; moreover, the piezoelectric scaffolds can act as sensitive mechanoelectrical transduction systems, and this is applicable to regions where mechanical loads are predominant [
12]. Actually, to date, a variety of materials have been used for different structures, including PLGA [
13], agarose [
14], chitosan [
15], alginate [
16], and collagen [
17]. However, their mechanical properties are generally inferior to those of native cartilage. Thus, biomaterial scaffold-seeding chondrocytes that can provide biosynthetic activity both in vitro and in vivo are required.
In the last few years, an alternative technology using natural cell-free ECM biomaterials has obtained great attention in cartilage regeneration [
18]. However, on the one hand, the decellularized cartilage ECMs were constructed based on different animal origin and different decellularization methods (e.g., chemical, physical and enzymatic) and agents. For example, Goldberg-Bockhorn et al. [
19] used a custom-made glass bioreactor to enhance cell migration into decellularized porcine cartilage scaffolds and mimic physiological conditions. Gong et al. [
20] developed decellularized cartilage ECM (dcECM) hydrogels from porcine ears innovatively via the main method of enzymatic digestion and verified good biocompatible properties of dcECM hydrogels to deliver chondrocytes and form subcutaneous cartilage. The 3D hierarchical porous BC/dcECM scaffolds with structurally and biochemically biomimetic cartilage regeneration microenvironment were fabricated by freeze-drying technique, which could exhibit excellent mechanical properties, water superabsorbency and shape-memory properties [
20]. However, to date, the research related to safety analysis (such as immunoreaction) of articular cartilage derived extracellular matrix (ACECM) scaffolds has been limited. In the present study, autologous pig chondrocytes were cultured and inoculated on articular cartilage extracellular matrix (ACECM) scaffolds to construct tissue-engineered artificial cartilage in vitro and to test whether devitalized cartilage ECM can induce chondrogenic differentiation. Moreover, inflammatory cell detection, cellular immune response assay and humoral immune response assay was conducted based on the heterogenous subcutaneous implantation of ACECM scaffolds. The findings are expected to provide a theoretical basis for the application of porcine articular cartilage in tissue engineering.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animals and Samples
Limbs were obtained from 13-month-old pigs soon after slaughter at a slaughterhouse in Beijing, China. Adult miniature pigs (approximately 20 kg) and New Zealand white rabbits (approximately 2.5 kg) were obtained from the experimental animal center of the Peoples Liberation Army General Hospital (Beijing, China). The study protocol was approved by the Ethics committee of the People’s Liberation Army General Hospital: 2009-x01-15, 2009-07-09.
2.2. Preparation of ACECM Scaffolds
The preparation method was based on the previous study [
21]. Briefly, the AC of pig limbs (
Figure 1a) was soaked in phosphate buffered saline (PBS; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) containing phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 0 to 4 °C to inhibit some proteases and prevent proteases from breaking down the collagen components in cartilage tissue, which would result in the loss of important components of the extracellular matrix of cartilage. Then, tissues were mashed by ultramicro wet grinding method. After dilution, the suspension was differentially centrifuged at 4 °C as follows: The slurry was centrifuged at 4 °C and freeze-dried. The diluted solution of the powder, which was prepared at a concentration of 2%, was injected into a polyethylene cylinder mold. A freeze-drying stent was irradiated with ultraviolet light at 258 nm and crosslinked with an anhydrous ethanol solution of carbonimide (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and
N-hydroxysuccinimide (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The crosslinked material was washed with disodium hydrogen phosphate for 2 h, soaked in aseptic PBS for 2 h, rinsed 3 times with steam, sterilized, and sealed for later use.
2.3. Observation of ACECM and Decellularized Cartilage Scaffold
The freeze-dried powder was dissolved in distilled water to prepare a 0.5% suspension. After conventional smear preparation, the composition of the slurry was qualitatively analyzed by toluidine blue (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and collagen type II (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) staining. Hoechst 33258 fluorescent dye (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used to detect the cell residues. The sizes of the fibers in the slurry were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM; Olympus BX51, Japan). The scaffold was fixed in 10% neutral formalin for 12 h, dehydrated with gradient alcohol, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned into 5 μm-thick sections. These were used for histological and immunohistochemical staining.
2.4. Biological Safety Analysis of ACECM Scaffold
For hemolysis test, 2 mL peripheral blood of healthy person was collected and diluted with 2.5 mL 0.9% NaCL. Then, the experiment was divided into three groups: experimental group (scaffold extract, mixed with 0.9% NaCL and ACECM scaffold surface area at a ratio of 1 mL: (3~6) cm2), positive control group (double steamed water) and negative control group (normal saline). After 0.2 mL of peripheral blood was added to each group, the A value was measured at 545 nm wavelength, and the degree of hemolysis was calculated according to the following formula: Hemolysis degree = (experimental group A value − negative control group A value)/(positive control group A value − negative control group A value) × 100%. The degree of hemolysis < 5% was considered as no hemolysis.
The surface area of serum-free DMEM culture medium (HyClone, GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK) and acellular cartilage scaffold was mixed at the ratio of 1 mL: (3–6) cm2 and stood at 37 °C for 72 h to obtain the scaffold extract. Based on scaffold extract, pyrogen assay was conducted using the endotoxin detection kit, following the manufacturer’s instructions.
For the intradermal test, 5 points were selected on each side of the spine (2 points 2 cm apart) of three New Zealand white rabbits. Next, 0.2 mL scaffold extract was injected intradermal at each point on one side, and as control, the same amount of normal saline was injected intradermal at each point on the other side. The reactions of each injection site and surrounding tissues were observed at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h after injection.
2.5. Isolation and Culture of Porcine AC Chondrocytes
Porcine AC was rinsed several times with Hank’s liquid and cut into 1 mm3 samples. Collagenase type II (0.15%; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) was added for digestion and stirred for 1 h at 37 °C until the digestive juices become cloudy. The turbid digestive fluid was centrifuged at a speed of 1000 rpm for 5 min and washed with Hank’s liquid. The chondrocyte culture solution containing 20% fetal bovine serum (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA) was added to dissolve the cell masses, and chondrocyte suspension was then transferred to 10 mL ordinary culture flask with nylon gauze and cultured in an incubator at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. All the procedures were repeated three to four times until the cartilage was completely digested. For cell activity identification, a drop of digested chondrocyte suspension was mixed with acridine orange-propidium iodide (AO-PI) dye and observed under the excitation light wavelength of 450~490 nm.
Adherent cells were selected for further expansion. The cells were inoculated on a cover glass positioned in each well of a 6-well culture plate. When cell growth was 80–90% confluent, the cover glass containing the cells was removed from the well, and the cells were fixed with a 1:3 solution of glacial acetic acid and methanol for 10 min, followed by Giemsa staining and fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde for more than 5 min. Then, the prepared cell slides were stained with safranin “O” (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), toluidine blue, and collagen type II. Briefly, for safranin “O” staining, the fixed cell slides were rinsed with PBS three times and then stained with hematoxylin for 3 min. After differentiation, they were washed with water to return to a blue color, followed by 3% bright green staining for 5 min. For toluidine blue staining, fixed cell slides were dried and dyed with freshly prepared dye for 10 min. Then, the alcohol dehydrate, xylene transparent, resin seal, and light microscopy observations were conducted. For collagen type II, fixed cell slides were with 3% H2O2/methanol at room temperature for 10 min to eliminate endogenous peroxidase activity. After blocked with 10% normal rat serum (diluted with PBS) for 10 min, the rat anti-human type II collagen polyclonal antibody was added, followed by labeled secondary antibody at 37 °C for 30 min and horseradish enzyme labeled ovalbumin at 37 °C for 30 min. In the end, samples treated in accordance with the aforementioned method were observed under a light microscope.
2.6. Inoculation of Porcine Articular Chondrocytes on Scaffolds
The third-generation chondrocytes were centrifuged at 1500 r/min for 5 min, the supernatant was discarded, and the DMEM culture medium (HEPES, 2.97 g; L-proline, 0.046 g; vitamin C, 0.05 g; ITS, 10 mL; NEAA, 10 mL) was removed to prepare the cell suspension at a concentration of 1 × 107/mL. In order to dynamically observe the morphology, adhesion, proliferation, distribution and arrangement of cells on the scaffold, the chondrocytes were labeled with PKH26 fluorescent dye according to the product instructions, and the labeled cells were prepared into 1 × 107 cells/mL cell suspension for subsequent use.
Cell suspensions (1 × 107 cells) were injected into the interior of the ACECM scaffolds. Subsequently, the cell-scaffold complex was transferred to an incubator at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere for 2 h. During this period, chondrocyte culture (10 μL) was added every 30 min, and the scaffolds were flipped. The chondrocyte culture medium (5 mL) was then slowly added to each well. The medium was changed every other day.
2.7. Examination of Cell–Scaffold Complexes
Gross observations included morphology, color, texture, and volume changes. Morphological observation was performed after 1 d of culture. The unlabeled cell–scaffold complex was stained with Hoechst33258 for observation. Cell activity was detected by AO-PI staining after 1 week of culture via observation with a fluorescence microscope. Dead cells were red and living cells were green under the excitation light wavelength of 450~490 nm.
Moreover, the morphology, adhesion, proliferation, and distribution of chondrocytes on the scaffold were observed using an inverted microscopy. The morphology, adhesion, proliferation, and distribution of chondrocytes on the scaffold were observed using inverted microscopy and inverted fluorescence microscopy at 2 h, 1 d, 1 week (7 d), and 2 weeks (14 d) after inoculation. SEM was performed to evaluate the morphology, adhesion, proliferation, and distribution of chondrocytes cultured on the scaffolds after a 3-day cultivation. Immunofluorescence staining of collagen type II was observed by fluorescence microscopy.
2.8. Analysis of Immunoreaction of ACECM Scaffolds
For the preparation of non-acellular cartilage scaffolds, cartilage was cut from the joints of pig limbs without perichondrium and subchondral bone. After the cartilage was washed with normal saline and drained, it was cut into thin slices and pulverized. Then, 25–38 μm particles were sieved and dissolved in tri-distilled water, and the prepared solution was injected into a polyethylene cylinder mold. After freeze drying, the non-decellularized cartilage was prepared [
22], and then stored at 4 °C for later use.
Then, the rabbits were divided into two groups for subcutaneous implantation experiment: decellularized cartilage scaffold group (n = 3) and non-decellularized cartilage scaffold group (n = 3). The decellularized cartilage scaffold was embedded between the deep fascia and sarcosis in the back of each rabbit (see
Figure S1 in Supporting Information). Briefly, after anesthesia, rabbit’s back was routinely skinned, disinfected and covered, and incisions were made on both sides of the spine. The skin and subcutaneous tissue were cut in turn, and the cartilage scaffold was embedded between the deep fascia and sarcosis. Three embedding points were designed on the back of each rabbit, with the incision length about 1.5 cm and a distance of about 5 cm between each embedding point. All skin incisions were sutured with 3-0 fine silk thread. Observation was performed at 1, 2 and 4 weeks after implantation.
Subsequently, in order to determine the possible toxic reactions and other adverse reactions of experimental animals after implantation of each scaffold, the activities, diet and water intake of experimental animals were observed 1, 2 and 4 weeks after the operation, respectively. Moreover, inflammatory cell detection, cellular immune response assay and humoral immune response assay were performed, respectively. Briefly, for inflammatory cell assay, the tissue was frozen and sectioned with a thickness of 5µm, and stained with HE (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Immunohistochemical staining of cellular immune response assay was performed with monoclonal antibodies against rabbit T lymphocyte CD4 (1:200) and CD8 (1:200) and labeled with fluorescein reagent. For humoral immune response detection, peripheral blood of animals was extracted to detect the antibody concentration to scaffolds. After protein quantification, the cartilage matrix of the two scaffolds was diluted to 5 µg/mL by coating solution, and then added into 96-well plates, and sealed with 10% bovine innocence protein at 37 °C for 1 h. Then, experimental animal serum before surgery and 1, 2 and 4 weeks after surgery was added, respectively. After cleaning, biotinylated anti-mouse (rabbit) secondary antibody IgG (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added at 37 °C. After washing, tri-antibody (chain ovalbumin) (37 °C; 0.5–1 h), and chromogenic agents (o-phenylenediamine and H2O2 dissolved in PBS) were successively added. The concentration was measured using a microplate reader at 490 nm.
2.9. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS 13.0 software package (IBM SPSS Statistics, Chicago, IL, USA). All values were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Differences between two groups were analyzed by t-test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
4. Discussion
Low cell density and the absence of vasculature in AC leads to poor self-repair ability [
23]. In this study, we successfully prepared AC decellularized scaffolds, cultured cartilage cells in vitro, and constructed cartilage cells and ACECM scaffold complexes in vitro. In addition, analysis of immunoreaction of ACECM scaffolds, such as inflammatory cell detection, cellular immune response assay and humoral immune response assay was conducted based on the heterogenous subcutaneous implantation of ACECM scaffolds. The results showed that chondrocytes on the scaffolds performed well in terms of adhesion and growth and secreted collagen type II moreover, the implanted xenoacellular cartilage scaffolds did not induce antibody immune response, suggesting that porcine ACECM-oriented scaffolding is an ideal natural biomaterial for cartilage tissue engineering.
Cartilage injury can cause joint diseases and affect joint functions in human. In recent years, with the advent of cartilage tissue engineering, the study of cartilage cell culture in vitro has gained increasing attention. However, most of the initial studies were based on cartilage pathology and drug reactions [
24,
25]. Owing to its simple structure and single-cell tissue type, cartilage has proven to be the ideal target for tissue engineering [
26]. Cartilage tissue consists of chondrocytes and ECM (including collagen, proteoglycan, hyaluronic acid, glycoprotein, and other components). Based on the content of different types of collagen in the cartilage matrix, the cartilage of the body can be divided into three types, hyaline cartilage, fibrocartilage, and elastic cartilage. The collagen type I content is higher in the fibrocartilage matrix, the elastic fiber content is higher in the elastic cartilage matrix, and collagen type I is the main component of hyaline cartilage matrix although that is collagen type II. In the present study, the morphology of chondrocytes cultured in vitro was consistent with that of normal chondrocytes, indicating the success of this method in cell culture. Additionally, in vitro observation of the cell–scaffold complex revealed that the ECM scaffold of AC was beneficial for the adhesion, proliferation, and distribution of cartilage cells, which was significant for the construction of functional tissue-engineered cartilage.
The purpose of fabricating tissue-engineered cartilage scaffold materials is to provide a three-dimensional structure for cartilage cells to facilitate the adhesion and proliferation of cells and to provide a suitable environment for cell growth [
27]. Given the unpredictable degradation of high-polymer synthetic material, inflammation caused by degradation products, and other events, many researchers have studied natural materials, such as alginate [
28], collagen [
29], fibrin [
30], chitosan [
31], and hyaluronan derivatives [
32,
33], with the goal of constructing scaffolds that could retain cartilage cells. AC decellularized scaffolds are similar to natural cartilage and might be an ideal natural biomaterial for clinical applications. Tissue-engineered cartilage constructed with an acellular cartilage scaffold is a promising option [
34]. In our study, after 1 week (7 d) of culturing chondrocytes and ACECM scaffolds, the cells were attached to the scaffold wall and there was a large amount of cartilage inside the scaffold, indicating that chondrocytes inoculated into ACECM scaffolds could continue to grow and differentiate. Moreover, the immunohistochemical staining for collagen type II, as well as safranin “O” and toluidine blue staining, was positive, proving that chondrocytes could continue to grow and differentiate when inoculated into ACECM scaffolds. SEM revealed that the cells were spherical or elliptical and were surrounded and partially wrapped by a secreted matrix. Morphological observation confirmed the cytocompatibility of ACECM scaffolds, the characteristic morphological changes of the chondrocytes, and the secretion of ECM by the chondrocytes. This acellular method could completely remove the chondrocytes from the porcine AC and retain the main components of the ACECM, similar to the columnar arrangement of natural AC. All results revealed that ECM-derived scaffolds could enhance the biomechanical property of chondrocytes.
Chondrocytes as seed cells for constructing tissue-engineered cartilage conform with the physiological state and are the first choice for experimental research and clinical applications [
35]. The in vitro expansion of autologous chondrocytes for the repair of full-thickness cartilage defects of the knee and ankle joints has been used in clinical practice and has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration with satisfactory clinical results [
36]. However, autologous chondrocytes are associated with limited sources, are difficult to separate, proliferate slowly, and easily dedifferentiate during in vitro culture. These shortcomings limit their clinical development. In contrast, allogeneic chondrocytes are relatively sufficient.
Biomaterials can cause immune reactions [
37,
38], including inflammation, immunosuppression, immune stimulation, hypersensitivity and autoimmunity. Different biomaterials produce different cellular immune responses when they come into contact with blood or tissue. Hence, the study of immune response of biomaterials is of great significance for its own safety evaluation. In this study, CD4+ and CD8+T lymphocytes of the scaffold and surrounding tissues were tested in the decellularized cartilage scaffolds 1, 2 and 4 weeks after implantation. And there was no lymphocyte infiltration in the xenogenated decellularized cartilage scaffolds, while obvious lymphocyte infiltration was found in the non-decellularized cartilage scaffolds. Moreover, there was no significant difference in the antibody level of the non-decellularized scaffolds at 1, 2 and 4 weeks after implantation compared with the preoperative antibody level, indicating porcine ACECM scaffolds were used for xenotransplantation without significant immune inflammatory response. Taken together, all these findings suggested the immunogenicity of allogeneic decellularized cartilage scaffolds is very low, so it has potential clinical application. In addition, the repair effect of decellularized cartilage scaffolds on joint defects needs more attention. Therefore, the use of decellularized cartilage scaffolds for the repair of joint defects in homogeneous or heterogeneous animals needs further research.