Next Article in Journal
Preparation of Rosin-Based Composite Membranes and Study of Their Dencichine Adsorption Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Shaping in the Third Direction; Fabrication of Hemispherical Micro-Concavity Array by Using Large Size Polystyrene Spheres as Template for Direct Self-Assembly of Small Size Silica Spheres
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 14
Issue 11
10.3390/polym14112159
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Research and Application of Polypropylene Carbonate Composite Materials: A Review

by
Xiangrui Li
1,
Lingyu Meng
1,
Yinliang Zhang
1,
Zexiu Qin
1,
Lipeng Meng
2,
Chunfeng Li
1,* and
Mingli Liu
1,*
1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Beihua University, Jilin City 132013, China
2
Jilin Forestry Research Institute, Jilin City 130117, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2022, 14(11), 2159; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14112159
Submission received: 26 April 2022 / Revised: 16 May 2022 / Accepted: 19 May 2022 / Published: 26 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Circular and Green Polymer Science)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The greenhouse effect and plastic pollution caused by the accumulation of plastics have led to a global concern for environmental protection, as well as the development and application of biodegradable materials. Polypropylene carbonate (PPC) is a biodegradable polymer with the function of “carbon sequestration”, which has the potential to mitigate the greenhouse effect and the plastic crisis. It has the advantages of good ductility, oxygen barrier and biocompatibility. However, the mechanical and thermal properties of PPC are poor, especially the low thermal degradation temperature, which limits its industrial use. In order to overcome this problem, PPC can be modified using environmentally friendly materials, which can also reduce the cost of PPC-based products to a certain extent and enhance their competitiveness in terms of improving their mechanical and thermal properties. In this paper, we present different perspectives on the synthesis, properties, degradation, modification and post-modification applications of PPC. The modification part mainly introduces the influence of inorganic materials, natural polymer materials and degradable polymers on the performance of PPC. It is hoped that this work will serve as a reference for the early promotion of PPC.

1. Introduction

The development and use of plastics has profoundly changed the contemporary world, and plastics have been widely used in packaging, transportation, electronics, chemical, aerospace, national defense, furniture, sporting goods, daily necessities, medical supplies, instrumentation and other fields. Global plastic production reached 348 million tons in 2017 [1]. However, over time, the problems posed by plastics have also been recognized: the accumulation problem and the carbon dioxide (CO2) (abbreviations used in this paper are summarized in Table A1) release issues [2]. First of all, the problem directly brought about by plastics is that of accumulation, that is, the problem of plastic pollution. As a polymer material, the properties of plastic are very stable. From manufacturing to complete degradation by nature, the process is very long and can last for decades to hundreds of years [3]. During this process, new plastics are continuously produced, and waste plastics do not fully degrade, resulting in the accumulation of plastics. Four methods are commonly used to treat waste plastics in piles: recycling, chemical recycling, incineration and landfilling [4]. Apart from these methods, the problem of ‘white pollution’ is a direct consequence of discarding waste without any treatment. Among these methods, recycling and chemical recycling both reuse waste plastics, but the reuse rate is very low, resulting in higher costs than producing new plastics and severely limiting their development. Only 9–12% of total global plastics are recycled [5]. Both incineration and landfill methods cause a certain amount of environmental pollution. Plastic pollution can be found everywhere in the habitat of plants and animals and already represents a major threat to their habitat. In addition to plastic pollution visible to the naked eye, microplastics produced during industrial primary production and waste degradation processes have appeared in the living environment through various media, posing a serious threat to human health [6]. Plastic pollution is already an urgent problem for human society. The plastic buildup problem is shown in Figure 1.
On the other hand, a more serious problem is the large amount of greenhouse gases that accompany the production of plastics, which gradually aggravates the greenhouse effect. The main common greenhouse gases are CO2, methane (CH4), nitrous oxide and fluorinated gases [7,8]. Among the greenhouse gases, there is a need to focus on CO2 to mitigate the greenhouse effect. CO2 is a common gas in production and life. The combustion of fossil fuels and other industrial activities are often accompanied by CO2, which is inevitably produced by human production and life activities [9,10,11]. However, because CO2 is a carbon resource, is capture, storage and use are of practical significance with respect to mitigating the effects of CO2 on global warming.
Biodegradable plastics have emerged as a response to the problem of plastic accumulation. Degradable plastics can be gradually decomposed into low-molecular-weight polymer chains or small molecules under the stimulus of ozone, water, other molecules, pH, enzymes, mechanical loading and temperature [12]. Biodegradable plastics can be decomposed into water, CO2, CH4 and other compounds under natural conditions or after treatment [13].
Degradable plastics are mainly divided into bio-based degradable plastics and petroleum-based degradable plastics. Some common biodegradable plastics are thermoplastic starch (TPS), polylactic acid (PLA), polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA), polyglutamic acid (PGA), etc. Petroleum-based degradable plastics are plastics produced from fossil energy sources, including polybutylene succinate (PBS), polybutylene adipate-co-terephthalate (PBAT), polycaprolactone (PCL), polypropylene carbonate (PPC), etc.
Depending on the degradation mechanism and the form of destruction, they can be divided into fully biodegradable and destructive biodegradable plastics [14]. Completely biodegradable plastics are generally macromolecular structures that can be completely broken down by microorganisms to produce low-molecular-weight, non-polluting inorganic substances, such as PLA, PBS, etc. Destructive biodegradable plastics are degradable plastics made from synthetic materials and natural polymers. Such plastics undergo an oxidation reaction when in contact with microorganisms, causing the molecular chains in the plastic to break and shorten to a point where they can be metabolized by micro-organisms. Examples include cellulose-modified polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), PPC, etc. [15,16,17].
Degradable plastic degradation methods include water degradation, photodegradation, water photodegradation, biodegradation and other methods. With the support of national policies and the enhancement of environmental awareness, the production capacity of degradable plastics has been gradually increased in recent years, and the proportion is increasing in the plastics industry. Common biodegradable plastics are listed in Table 1.
Degradable plastics can alleviate the problem of plastic accumulation to a certain extent, and compared with other degradable plastics, PPC has unique advantages. PPC is a copolymer of CO2 and propylene oxide (PO), which can combine CO2 as a resource and PO to solve the problems caused by traditional plastics. However, the poor mechanical properties of PPC and the easy degradation of hot processing treatment seriously limit the application and promotion of PPC and PPC-based composites. Therefore, PPC needs to be modified to make up for its shortcomings and to broaden its application areas. It is also necessary to develop and use PPC to adhere to concept of green development.
In this paper, we review the progress of environmental modification of biodegradable material PPC and introduce the synthesis, structure, properties and applications of PPC. Furthermore, the effects of various environmentally friendly reinforcing materials on the performance of PPC mechanical, thermal, degradation and other properties are addressed. The Section 3 focuses on the enhancement of PPC performance by inorganic materials, natural organic polymers and degradable polymers. Based on the performance of PPC and the effect after modification, the specific applications of PPC in several fields are introduced. The main purpose of this review is to facilitate an overall understanding of PPC and to provide guidance on its development, promotion and application.

2. Polypropylene Carbonate

Worldwide, the problem of polymer pollution (especially white pollution) caused by improper disposal of waste polymers and inadequate regulations has attracted the attention of various governments [19,20]. These concerns have prompted scientists and industry players to develop and promote biodegradable polymers [21]. PPC is a CO2-based, “carbon-sequestering”, fully degradable polymer with great potential for development.

2.1. Synthesis of PPC

Inoue first obtained polycarbonate in 1969 from the copolymerization of CO2 and epoxide as a raw material, catalyzed by a diethylzinc/water catalytic system [22,23]. This opened the research era of PPC, the synthesis process of which is shown in Figure 2.
In terms of economics, the high price of the product of PO and CO2 and the low conversion rate of PPC prepared using a diethylzinc/water catalytic system do not give PPC a great advantage in the polymer market [25]. Hence, some researchers have worked to identify a catalyst with high catalytic efficiency and mild reaction conditions.
The major catalytic systems currently used for the synthesis of aliphatic polycarbonates are zinc-based catalysts, rare earth coordination catalysts, metal porphyrin complex catalysts and bimetallic cyanide catalysts [26,27]. The above catalytic systems can be divided into two main categories: homogeneous and non-homogeneous catalysts. Homogeneous catalyst structures are easily defined and exhibit better activity and product selectivity. Hence, homogeneous catalysts are often more suitable for research. Some non-homogeneous catalysts (heterogeneous catalysts) have shown good production performance in industrial production, although their chemical and crystal structures are not yet clear. Common catalysts and their characteristics are listed in Table 2. Moreover, several commonly used catalysts and their catalytic effects are listed in Table 3. The performance of PPCs produced under different catalytic conditions varies, so a suitable catalytic system needs to be selected according to demand and actual production conditions.

2.2. Structure of PPC

PPC is a thermoplastic aliphatic polymer with high barrier properties that can be made from CO2 and PO. The use of CO2 as a raw material gives PPC a unique “carbon-sequestration” function, and PPC is completely degradable. Its chemical structure is shown in Figure 3.
The presence of ether bonds (-O-) on the main chain of PPC increases the flexibility of the chain and enhances the solubility of the polymer in organic solvents. The presence of the ether bond makes the entire chain segment susceptible to intramolecular rotation around the ether bond, and the molecular chain can easily unravel. The polar carbonyl group (-CO-) increases the intermolecular forces and the rigidity of the molecule. The ester group (-COO-) is easily hydrolyzed and broken, so PPC is susceptible to hydrolysis.
The end group of PPC is a hydroxyl group (-OH), and the thermal stability of PPC is mainly influenced by the end group. At high temperatures, the presence of hydroxyl groups causes lipid alcoholysis, which results in unzipping-type degradation; therefore PPC is thermally unstable. The glass transition temperature (Tg) of PPC is between 30 °C and ~41 °C, i.e., it is not resistant to high temperature.
The side group of PPC is methyl (-CH3). The difference in side groups affects the polymer properties. The larger the side group, the more rigid the molecule and the higher the potential resistance, which leads to higher Tg, static flexural strength, melting temperature (Tm), etc., and lower toughness. However, larger side groups also weaken the intermolecular forces.

2.3. Performance of PPC

The properties of PPC are shown in Table 4 on macroscopic level according to the microstructure. PPC has an excellent gas barrier and ductility, which gives PPC potential as a packaging material. The main indicator used to evaluate a material for packaging potential is the gas transmission rate. Table 5 lists the oxygen and water-vapor barrier properties of different polymers. Compared to the oxygen permeability of polyethylene terephthalate, a common reference material for barrier properties, from 0.90 × 10−13 to 1.60 × 10−13 cm3 m m−2 s−1 Pa−1 at 23 °C and pure PPC exhibited OPs of 4.16 × 10−13 to 8.71 × 10−13 cm3mm−2s−1Pa−1 [50]. Compared with other polymer films, PPC has better oxygen barrier properties, so iy is often used in low-temperature packaging materials. Due to this property, in practical production applications, it is usually necessary to modify PPC to enhance its comprehensive performance [51].
Mechanical properties are an important and fundamental function in the evaluation of materials. The main indicators of the mechanical properties of materials are modulus of elasticity, strength at break, yield strength, elongation at break, tensile strength, etc. As PPC is an amorphous polymer with low intermolecular forces, its mechanical properties are poor [52]. It has been shown that the mechanical properties of PPC are influenced by the Tg and molecular weight [53]. For a PPC with a Tg of 40.3 °C, the energy storage modulus drops from 1000 MPa to 10 MPa as the temperature rises from below Tg to the glass transition zone. As the number-average molecular weight of PPC increased from 109 kg/mol to 227 kg/mol, its modulus increased at both temperatures above and below the Tg [54]. The thermal properties of PPC and the reasons for the poor thermal properties were described in the Section 2.2 and will not be repeated here.
Additionally, PPC has good melt processability and biocompatibility, which provide a variety of possibilities for PPC modification, will be described specifically in Section 3.

2.4. The Cyclicality and Sustainability of PPC

The raw materials for PPC production are CO2 and PO, of which CO2 is widely used and cheap. Although PO is slightly more expensive, PPC can still offer significant economic benefits. In the process of catalytic synthesis mentioned above, there is no lack of synthesis methods for PPC at room temperature and low pressure, which reduces the synthesis difficulty and processing cost of PPC to a certain extent. During the production of PPC, no new harmful substances are produced, and CO2 is fixed in the PPC. PPC will degrades to CO2 and other non-polluting substances. This means that no new CO2 is generated throughout the production and utilization of PPC until its degradation. Combined with CO2 capture and fixation technology, a certain amount of CO2 can be dynamically recycled to meet production needs and mitigate the environmental crisis caused by the greenhouse effect. The life cycle of PPC is shown in Figure 4.
As mentioned above, PPC is a recyclable and degradable green polymer. The ability to “sequester carbon” from CO2 is a unique advantage of PPC over other biodegradable polymers. On the one hand, it saves resources, and on the other hand, it fixes CO2, which reduces greenhouse gas emissions to a certain extent. These factors are critical to sustainable development and to addressing plastic buildup and the greenhouse effect.

2.5. Degradation of PPC

Complete degradation is one of the advantages of PPC, which can be degraded in various ways, such as thermal degradation, biodegradation and hydrolysis (under acid and alkaline conditions). The effects of biodegradation and hydrolysis are mainly after the PPC has been put into use, causing the PPC to gradually age and lose its performance. Biodegradation and hydrolysis are the advantages of non-polluting degradation of PPC. However, biodegradation and hydrolysis also make PPC products susceptible to unwanted aging and other problems caused by environmental influences during use. The problem affecting the production of PPC is thermal degradation. The decomposition onset temperature of PPC is low, ranging from 180 °C to 240 °C. In industrial production, the processing temperature is often above 200 °C, which can cause certain degradation of PPC during thermal processing and affect the performance of PPC materials.
Shouhei Inoue proposed a mechanism for thermal degradation of PPC in 1975. After subsequent specific studies, the thermal degradation of PPC was determined as random chain-breaking degradation and “back-bite”/unzipping degradation [56,57]. It was subsequently pointed out that PPC is susceptible to unzipping degradation at lower temperatures and random chain-breaking degradation at higher temperatures. Among them, the main factor affecting the unzipping decomposition of PPC is the terminal hydroxyl group, and capping the hydroxyl group is an effective method to inhibit zipper degradation. However, the seal-end method, cannot solve random chain-breaking degradation, although the use of some organic additives can effectively inhibit the random chain-breaking degradation. The unzipping degradation mechanism is shown in Figure 5a. The random-break degradation mechanism is shown in Figure 5b. In this case, the product of PPC unzipping decomposition is cyclic carbonate, and random-break degradation produces CO2 and generates compounds containing terminal alkene bonds [58]. Although no polluting substances are produced, thermal degradation affects the performance of PPC to some extent, so this is a major problem faced by PPC production applications. After decatalyzation of PPC, its degradation rate was found to lower than that of PPC without decatalyzation, even when the degradation temperature was reached [59]. However, PPC cannot be prepared without the use of catalysts, and there will always be some catalyst residues in PPC, so it is necessary to seek suitable catalysts, refined PPC removal or other methods to enhance the performance of PPC.
Biodegradation is an advantage of PPC [61]. There are various types of microorganisms and biodegradable flora in the soil, and when PPC or modified PPC is placed directly in the soil environment, microorganisms start to erode from its surface, which leads to degradation by splitting, oxidation and chain breaking [62]. A degradation schematic is shown in Figure 6. Some studies have shown that the degradation of PPC membranes placed in soil extracts is poor, probably due to the hydrophobic nature of PPC itself, which prevents micro-organisms from growing on its surface, leading to unsatisfactory degradation rates [63]. Compared the degradation behavior of PPC placed in a soil environment, the degradation of PPC in a soil extraction buffer was faster, probably because the products of degradation were washed away and stripped by the buffer, allowing the degradation to continue [64]. We do not want micro-organisms to corrode PPC materials during production, so in practical application, certain anticorrosion treatments of PPC materials or PPC-based materials can extend their service life.
There are other factors that can affect the degradation of PPC, including light, acidity and alkalinity. Sang Liangyong and colleagues [67,68,69] investigated the effects of light, alkaline conditions and seawater environment on the degradation behavior of pure PPC, as well as PPC/PLA copolymers. In conditions of simulated light from a xenon lamp, pure PPC is susceptible to degradation due to the softness of the PPC molecular chains. After PPC has been blended with PLA, light may cause the blends to produce free radicals, which further interact with certain groups or atoms to promote photodegradation. As a result, the PPC/PLA blend loses more mass under xenon light conditions than pure PPC. Under seawater conditions, the ester bonds of PPC are prone to hydrolysis and breakage, so that after 240 days of degradation in seawater, PPC in its pure form develops a large number of tiny holes. The PPC and PLA in the 50/50 PPC/PLA blend are partially compatible, and there is a certain interaction between the two that makes it difficult for water molecules to react with the ester bonds; therefore the degradation of the blend is lower than that of pure PPC. PPC degrades when placed in an environment of NaOH solution to produce acidic substances, such as carboxyl groups, which further contribute to the positive reaction of hydrolysis. Furthermore, in the degradation of PPC, the quality and strength of the plastic usually decrease with time, although degradation of the plastic during normal use is not expected. It would be misleading to measure PPC degradation when it is not uniformly degraded. Yang Xuxu and colleagues [70] explored the non-uniform degradation of extreme forms of degradable plastics and found that the cracking rate was insensitive to load and sensitive to relative humidity and pH. This is a guideline for the study of PPC degradation.
It is necessary to consider the influence of various factors on the degradation of PPC in different environments. The advantage of is that the degradation rate is fast in a specific environment, not causing problems of “microplastics” and “plastic accumulation” brought about by the degradation of petroleum-based plastics and not producing new CO2.

3. Modification of PPC

The thermal stability of PPC prepared from homogeneous catalysts may be compromised during the preparation process due to its poor thermal stability, which is produced at around 230 °C in industrial production of normal industrial polymers. Moreover, due to the poor mechanical properties of PPC, the above defects seriously limit its application in industrial production. Therefore, PPC needs to be modified to improve its performance and expand its industrial applications. In order to broaden the field of application of PPC, other materials are usually selected to be fused with PPC to prepare composite materials. The main focus here is on the modification of PPC with green materials (inorganic materials, natural organic polymers, biodegradable polymers, etc.). The use of such degradable materials allows the modified PPC to retain its degradability, which is still in line with the green development route. The modified materials introduced in this paper are shown in Figure 7.
The main common blending methods are melt blending and solution blending. Melt blending is a common method of modifying many thermoplastics and is technically mature. Melt blending comprises the use of thermoplastics to achieve a molten state when blended with other materials. Melt blending is industrially easy to implement, simple to operate and does not require solvent recovery operations. Solution blending is a more complex procedure whereby PPC is mixed with other materials in a solvent state, resulting in a more complete blend. Both melt blending and solution blending methods require a second substance or substances to blend with PPC to improve the properties of the composite.

3.1. Inorganic Material Modification

Inorganic materials are diverse, abundant and inexpensive, and mineral materials are often used as filler materials to enhance the mechanical and thermal properties of other materials. Moreover, a variety of inorganic mineral materials have special properties that can often contribute a certain functionality to the material. The main inorganic materials presented here are carbon fibers, graphene oxide, laponite, montmorillonite (MMT), modified silica nanoparticles, activated white clay (AC), aluminum hydroxide (ATH), elokite nanotubes (HNTs), calcium carbonate and other materials. Furthermore, different processing methods and additives are used in the preparation of composites. The inorganic materials used to modify PPC and their modification effects are shown in Table 6.

3.2. Modification of Natural Organic Polymer Materials

Modification of PPC using polymeric materials, especially natural ones, often achieves better results [81,82]. In this regard, natural degradable polymers, such as cellulose, lignin, starch, chitosan (CS) and wool, are renewable, degradable, widely available and inexpensive [83]. Because natural polymers are inherently biodegradable, the composites produced by mixing PPC with natural polymers are still biodegradable. The complete degradability of natural polymer-modified PPC does not put pressure on the ecological environment.
Of the natural polymers, cellulose, the main component of the cell walls of plants, is simple and easy to obtain and is the natural polymer with the largest reserves. The twin-screw extruder method is commonly used for melt blending; therefore, the melt blending process of PPC/cellulose composites can be achieved with the help of a twin-screw extruder. The addition of cellulose enhances the tensile properties and energy storage modulus of the composite. However, the compatibility between PPC and cellulose is poor, and the reinforcing effect is somewhat limited. The addition of cellulose hinders the molecular-chain movement of PPC to some extent, which can enhance the thermal stability and Tg of composites [84].
Once a material reaches the nanoscale, some superior functionality often emerges. Nanocellulose (NCC) has more excellent properties than natural cellulose, such as high specific surface area, high crystallinity, high strength and ultra-fine structure [85]. Some studies have shown that the tensile strength of PPC increases with the increase in NCC content when the NCC addition does not exceed 1.5%. As the NCC content exceeds 1.5%, agglomeration of NCC occurs, which leads to a decrease in the tensile strength of PCC. The composite material changes from ductile fracture to brittle fracture.
Lignin is also a common natural polymer, and byproducts from the paper industry are often include alkaline lignin (AL), which is difficult to utilize. Lignin is a renewable, degradable and heat-resistant material with a Tg of between 100 and 180 °C. A considerable amount of research has been carried out to make effective use of lignin, not least of which is the preparation of composites from AL mixed with PPC. PPC/AL composites can also be prepared using melt-blending methods, and for composite studies the blending ratio is the first issue of concern. The thermal and mechanical properties of PPC/AL composites were investigated at 10% and 40% AL content [86]. The Tg of PPC/AL composites was found to be 30.9 °C at 10% AL content, which was 8.9 °C higher than that of pure PPC; the tensile strength of PPC/AL composites was 13.44 MPa at 40% AL content, which was 213% higher than that of PPC, and the elongation at break was 115%. However, AL is poorly dispersed, and therefore, modification is often required. Chemical modification of AL using formaldehyde enhances the dispersibility of the lignin. Formaldehyde-modified black liquor lignin (BLF) is then blended with PPC using a melt-blending method. The tensile strength, modulus of elasticity, thermal stability and processing stability of composites were significantly improved after the addition of small amounts of BLF due to its good dispersion [87].
BLF could also be modified with hydroxypropylation to make modified hydroxy black liquor lignin (HBL) [88]. The unmodified lignin is prone to agglomeration, whereas HBL has a lower thermal transition temperature and higher melt flow, resulting in better dispersion of HBL in the PPC matrix. As a result, the tensile properties, thermal stability and processing stability of the PPC/HBL composites are improved. In addition, the hydrophilicity of the composites is improved, which accelerates the natural degradation rate of the composites.
Starch is a natural polymer that is completely degradable and has the advantages of being non-toxic and inexpensive. Starch can be melted and blended with PPC to enhance its performance. However, there are two problems with this treatment method. First, starch is a polysaccharide polymer compound with a large number of hydroxyl groups in its molecules, which can form a large number of intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonds and complete granules with a microcrystalline structure, resulting in a Tm much higher than the degradation temperature. As a result, common starch does is not thermoplastically processable. PPC is also less compatible with starch, which leads to limited modification. To overcome these problems, there are usually two solutions. On the one hand, reactive bulking agents, such as succinic anhydride, diphenylmethane diisocyanate, maleic anhydride, etc., can be added to the blend of PPC and starch. On the other hand, starch can be pretreated by grafting and esterification before being blended with PPC to prepare composites. It has been shown that oxidation of starch can improve compatibility with biodegradable materials [89,90].
In the first type of solution, one step of using maleic anhydride as a reaction capacitor is as follows. PPC was first grafted to prepare maleic-anhydride-grafted PPC (PPCMA), and then PPCMA was melt-blended with TPS, thermoplastic starch oxide (TPOS) and aluminate-pretreated starch oxide (DL-TPOS) to compare the modification effect of each of the three [91,92]. Hydrogen bonding is formed between PPCMA and starch, so the tensile strength of PPCMA/TPS composites is increased compared to that of pure PPC. For PPCMA/TPOS composites, the partial conversion of hydroxyl groups in TPOS to carbonyl groups enhances the compatibility between PPCMA and TPOS, and the PPCMA/TPOS composites have improved tensile and impact strength, energy storage modulus, loss modulus and complex viscosity. DL-TPOS reduces the exposure of hydroxyl groups on the starch surface, reduces the probability of starch granule agglomeration, improves dispersion and further enhances the tensile strength of the composite. At a DL-TPOS content of 40%, the tensile strength of a PPC/DL-TPOS composite was increased by 460% compared to pure PPC. A maximum value of 13.72 MPa was reached.
The presence of a large number of hydrogen bonds between starch molecules is not conducive to melting operations. PPC is hydrophobic, whereas common starch is hydrophilic and rigid, resulting in poor compatibility between the two materials. Core-shell starch nanoparticles (CSS NPs) can be used as the core, and the shell is prepared using a poly (methyl acrylate) (PMA), which is produced in the soap-free emulsion copolymerization of methyl acrylate. The combination of the flexibility of PMA shells and the flexibility of CSS NPs resulted in improved compatibility of microcapsules with PPC, which significantly enhanced the mechanical and thermal properties of the PPC/CSS composites. The improved compatibility of starch with PPC, which has a core-shell structure, enhanced the mechanical and thermal properties of the PPC/CSS composite [93].
CS is the second most abundant natural organic polymer after cellulose. In the PPC/CS composites, the compatibility, Tg, thermal weight, loss temperature and tensile properties of the PPC/CS blends were examined for different levels of CS, and the effect of different levels of CS on the abovementioned properties of the PPC/CS blends was analyzed [94]. The tensile properties of PPC/CS increased when CS content was increased to 20%, and the tensile properties of PPC/CS composites increased from 4.7 MPa to 12.5 MPa when the CS content reached 20%. Moreover, the addition of CS also inhibited unzipping-type degradation in the low-temperature region of PPC and improved the heat resistance of PPC. O-lauroyl chitosan and PPC are blended using the solution casting method [95]. Hydrogen bonding interactions are formed between PPC and OCS. The tensile properties, elongation at break and Young’s modulus of the PPC/OCS blended film increase.
Wool is a widely used animal fiber, and its specific surface area is significantly increased when it is ground into granules to make wool powder (WP). WP can be used as an effective additive to modify PPC, and the thermal and mechanical properties of PPC can be significantly improved by blending PPC with WP using the solution-blending method and making a film by stirring and drying [96].
Besides the abovementioned common natural polymers, many researchers have blended agricultural residues containing the above components with PPC, such as straw [97], waste tea leaf powder [98], sisal [99], eggshell powder [100] and waste wood powder.

3.3. Degradable Polymer Modification

Other biodegradable plastics, such as PLA, β-hydroxyvalerate copolymer (PHBV) and PCL, are also often used to modify PPC. As both PPC and PLA are environmentally friendly materials, the blending of the two can provide complementary advantages, although their poor compatibility has led to much research [101,102]. Integral to this type of research is the study of the effect of blending ratios on the performance of PPC/PLA composites. The effect of variations in PPC content on the overall properties of the composite was analyzed under melt-blending preparation conditions. As the PPC content of the blend increases, the flexibility of the molecular arrangement increases and the elongation at break of the PPC/PLA blend increases significantly, with a relative decrease in tensile strength. Thermal properties analysis, fracture surface analysis and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy analysis yielded a partially blended phase of PPC and PLA. Analysis by differential scanning calorimetry showed that the Tg of PLA decreased as the PPC content of the blend increased [103]. Similar conclusions were reached in a study by Wang Shufang et al. [104]. In PPC/PLA blends, a modifier, long-chain hyperbranched polymer (LCHBP), can be added to improve PLA/PPC compatibility, as PLA/PPC are partially compatible. The modification of PLA/PPC blends using LCHBP yielded a much higher elongation at break and impact strength of the blends, whereas the tensile strength was essentially unchanged, and the brittleness of the modified blends was increased [105]. Besides simply studying the blending of two materials, PPC and PLA, some inorganic minerals and degradable polymers can be used to prepare ternary blends in order to retain their degradability. PLA/PPC-modified montmorillonite (OMMT) nanocomposites can be prepared by adding organic OMMT to the PLA/PPC system using a twin-screw extruder [106]. When the ratio of PLA/PPC was 80/20 and the content of OMMT was 1.5%, the tensile strength, elongation at break and impact strength of the composites reached maximum values of 51.07 MPa, 3.53% and 13.38 kJ/m2, respectively.
Three environmentally friendly materials, PLA, PPC and PHBV, can be used to prepare PLA/PPC/PHBV composites using the solution-casting method [107]. Different ratios (60/20/20, 40/20/40, 40/40/20, 20/60/20, 20/40/40 and 20/20/60) were chosen to prepare the blended films. The Tg of the blended system varies with the content of the three components. At constant PLA and PPC content, the Tg of the blends decreases with increasing PHBV content, and the opposite is true for PLA. When the PLA content of the blend increases, the Tg of the blend rises. In addition, the Tm of the blended system is generally lower than the Tm of the monomer. Such a ternary blending system allows the three materials to complement one another, with PLA, PPC and PHBV improving the strength, elongation at break and biodegradation rate, respectively. Blending PBSA with PPC can also enhance the thermal and mechanical properties of PPC [108].
Biomass-derived degradable poly(γ-thiobutyrolactone)s are new materials that have recently been developed with high thermal and mechanical properties. More notably, poly(γ-thiobutyrolactone)s can be ultra-rapidly degraded (within 15s) to the parent γ-thiobutyrolactone by the catalytic action of commercially available 1,5,7-triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene organocatalyst (0.2 mol%) thiobutyrolactone. This material is recyclable in a real sense [109]. The coblending modification of PPC with poly(γ-thiobutyrolactone)s might be a feasible solution.
In the case of poor compatibility between the blends, it may also be possible to improve the compatibility between the blends by first modifying one or all of the blends. In the PPC/PCL blending system, Si-g-PCL composite nanoparticles were prepared by introducing C-OH on the surface of Si nanoparticles, using a melt-blending method as a means of modifying PPC [110]. The mechanical properties and thermal stability of the material were eventually enhanced. Enzymatic degradation experiments have also demonstrated that Si nanoparticles and Si-g-PCL composite nanoparticles improve the enzymatic degradation of PPC without compromising biodegradability.

3.4. Other Modification Methods

Modification of PPC by chemical reagents is also a common method. Although physical modifications are easy to achieve industrially, they have a limited range of modifications to adjust, and the modified PPC properties obtained from chemical modifications tend to be more stable. Chemical modification requires the introduction of appropriate units into the polymer, starting from the microstructure, so that a chemical reaction can take place to copolymerize the molecular chain structure [111,112]. Chemical modification methods include terpolymerization, capping, cross linking, chain transfer, block copolymerization and graft copolymerization [113,114,115]. Chemical reagents may affect the environmental friendliness of PPC and are therefore not described in this paper.
In summary, the modifications carried out on PPC are based on retaining the advantages of PPC biodegradation and improving the defects of PPC by various means.

4. Applications of PPC

PPC has good macroscopic properties, such as non-toxicity, gas barrier (oxygen barrier), biodegradability [116], biocompatibility [117], toughness and low-temperature flexibility. These properties have led to the use of modified PPC in a wide range of applications, and the green material modification of PPC has not only retained its inherent ability to “sequester carbon” but has also overcome its poor mechanical and thermal properties and broadened the application areas of PPC.
PPC has a wide range of applications, and due to its widely exhibited properties, it is now widely used in film-like materials, cushioning foams [118], adhesives, medical materials [119], battery materials [120], sheets, plastic modification aids, toughening agents, coatings/inks and many other fields. It has the potential to replace PE and PP in the preparation of disposable materials [121]. The application areas of PPC are shown in Figure 8.
PPC can be used in the textile industry for non-woven fabrics. Biodegradable PPC-based composite spunbond non-wovens were prepared using a twin-screw extruder and an integrated spinning machine to melt-blend, draft and hot-press PPC with PP as an additive [123]. Environmentally friendly spunbond non-woven slices were prepared using PLA and PPC, whereby PLA and PPC were capped by accessing maleic anhydride during the melting process; the prepared materials met the process requirements for spunbond non-woven fiber forming [124]. Non-wovens technology has been applied to a wide range of plastics, and treating waste PPC for such applications is one way to reuse PPC.
Because PPC has good transparency and high barrier properties and is completely degradable, some researchers have prepared it as a floor membrane [125]. PPC is degraded by micro-organisms in the soil environment. Although degraded PPC increases the pH of soil, it does not significantly affect the richness of the microbial community in the soil [126]. Nevertheless, PPC degrades slowly under normal conditions and does not meet usage requirements. Cellulose acetate (CA) is a widely used class of thermoplastic resin membrane materials; the presence of ester groups in CA allows for improved compatibility with polyester-based polymers. Therefore, Cai Zhuo et al. [127] added CA to PPC to prepare a composite film with better biodegradability, and the mechanical properties and thermal stability of the composite film were also significantly improved. This kind of laminated film is more in line with real-life production applications. PPC and PCL can be used to prepare a PCL/PPC blended film, and unlike mulch films, PCL/PPC blended films can also be used for food preservation of mushrooms. This requires the co-blended membrane to have good gas-barrier and water-vapor permeability. PCL/PPC50 met these requirements, and no condensation occurred in the composite. This composite also has a special function in preserving polyphenol oxidase activity and mushroom color [128].
As a packaging material, especially for medical supplies or food, it is necessary to maintain good antibacterial properties and a long time to maintain antibacterial properties. Traditional antimicrobial treatments include the application of antimicrobial coatings to the surface of packaging materials or the use of nanoparticles, organic acids and antimicrobial polymers to create antimicrobial packaging materials. Both of these methods may have a negative impact on the environment, as well as the packaged material. Such problems can be avoided by using plasma for the treatment of packaging materials. If the natural antimicrobial compound thymol is first immobilized on the PPC surface using plasma technology, its maximum antimicrobial activity is retained. The antimicrobial activity of modified PPC was maintained for 7 days and several months under aqueous media conditions and dry conditions, respectively [129].
Because of its good biocompatibility, PPC was placed under the surface of experimental mice and exhibited good biocompatibility, with no extensive chronic inflammation or tissue necrosis at the implanted site. PPC instead underwent degradation behavior within the organism [130]. Therefore, blending of hydroxyapatite (HAP), which is often compounded with other biomedical materials, such as PLA, PCL, PLGA [131] and PHA [132], with PPC was attempted. As HAP is one of the components of human bone, it has good biocompatibility and osteoconductivity. The research team tried to investigate the effect of the addition of HAP on the performance of PPC. The experimental results showed that the addition of HAP gradually changed the fracture of PPC from ductile fracture to brittle fracture; the fracture strength, impact strength and hydrophilicity of PPC/HAP composites increased with increased HAP content. The elongation at break of the composites decreases [133]. The improvement of the above properties offers the possibility of PPC as a medical material.
In the field of medical dressings, PPC/diatomaceous earth medical composite fibrous films can be prepared using electrostatic spinning technology [134]. The best process for preparing composite membranes was determined by orthogonal tests: the mass fraction of spinning solution was 7%, the mass fraction of diatomaceous earth was 0.8%, the inner diameter of the needle was 0.6 mm and the receiving speed was 60 r/min. A bacteria inhibition test found that when the mass fraction of diatomaceous earth is 0.8%, the composite fiber film has a certain degree of bacterial inhibition up to 69.3%. Therefore, PPC/diatomaceous earth composite fiber film can be used for medical dressing.
In the field of dentistry, caries disease is a common chronic infectious disease. Fluoride is considered to have the potential to prevent and treat dental caries. However, the duration of fluorine residence in the oral cavity affects the effectiveness of treatment of dental caries. Fluoride-based PPC with good caries prevention action was prepared by melting and blending PPC with fluorine [135].
The demand for lithium-ion batteries with high energy density and long service life is expanding in today’s society. However, the poor thermal stability of lithium-ion batteries at high temperatures requires a focus on the development of solid-state electrolytes. Solid electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries comprise two types: inorganic solid electrolytes and polymer electrolytes. PPC can be used as a polymer electrolyte with excellent performance. The excellent performance of PPC-based electrolytes includes higher ionic conductivity, wider electrochemical window and excellent thermal stability. The use of the ionic liquid 1-vinylimidazole bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (VIm-TFSI) plasticizer incorporated into a PPC matrix significantly enhanced the ionic conductivity of the PPC-based electrolyte and improved the interfacial similarity between the PPC-based electrolyte and the electrode [136].
All-solid-state lithium batteries can be prepared using PPC electrolytes with LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2; however, an oxidation reaction occurs between LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 and the PPC-based electrolyte, and Ni3+ and Co4+ can decompose the PPC into aldehydes. However, graphene was used as a sandwich layer to solve this problem [137]. The introduction of graphene interlayers onto the surface of LiNi0.5Co0.2Mn0.3O2 cathodes can attenuate side reactions and enhance the structure of the cathode, improving the electrochemical performance of solid-state lithium batteries. In addition, PPC can be used in the bonding process of PPC-based aluminum-coated silicon wafers [138].
Nanocomposites with shape-memory PPC have also been applied in smart materials [139,140]. In addition, in order to cope with the current shortage of wood materials, PPC can be used as a supplementary material to replace some wood materials to prepare PPC-based wood–plastic composites with better performance [141].

5. Conclusions

PPC is a fully degradable and “carbon-sequestering” material that can cope with the problems of plastic accumulation and the “greenhouse effect”. Many studies have been conducted to modify PPC by physical or chemical means to address its thermal and mechanical properties and other deficiencies, resulting in modified PPC composites with improved properties. In this paper, we reviewed the synthesis, catalysis, modification and degradation of PPC, as well as the effect of various inorganic materials, natural organic polymers and degradable polymers on PPC modification. The inherent ability of PPC to “sequester carbon” makes it very suitable for today’s green development. On the basis of its modification, PPC will play a more important role in many fields. This article will hopefully provide a clear understanding of PPC for those involved.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.L. and C.L.; methodology, C.L., M.L. and L.M. (Lingyu Meng); software, X.L.; validation, X.L., C.L. and Z.Q.; formal analysis, X.L.; investigation, L.M.(Lipeng Meng); resources, M.L. and L.M. (Lingyu Meng); data curation, Z.Q.; writing—original draft preparation, X.L.; writing—review and editing, C.L. and Y.Z.; visualization, L.M. (Lipeng Meng); supervision, M.L., Z.Q. and L.M. (Lingyu Meng); project administration, L.M. (Lipeng Meng); funding acquisition, C.L., M.L. and L.M. (Lipeng Meng) All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Jilin Provincial Budget Capital Construction Fund (Innovative Capability Building), Project No. 2021C036-8; the Jilin Provincial Budget Capital Construction Fund (Innovative Capability Building), Project No. 2022C039-4; and the Open Foundation of Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Wood Materials Science and Engineering.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table
Table A1. Abbreviated table.
Table A1. Abbreviated table.
First AppearanceShorthandFull NameFirst AppearanceShorthandFull Name
1CO2Carbon dioxide11MMTMontmorillonite
2CH4Methane11ACActivated white clay
2pHHydrogen ion concentration11ATHAluminum hydroxide
2TPSThermoplastic starch12CSChitosan
2PHAPolyhydroxyalkanoate12NCCNanocellulose
2PGAPolyglutamic acid13ALAlkaline lignin
2PBSPolybutylene succinate13BLFBlack liquor lignin
2PBATPolybutyleneadipate-co-terephthalate13HBLHydroxy black liquor lignin
2PCLPolycaprolactone13PPCMAMaleic anhydride grafted PPC
2PPCPolypropylene carbonate13TPOSThermoplastic starch oxide
2PLAPolylactic acid13DL-TPOSAluminate pretreated starch oxide
2PEPolyethylene14CSS NPsCore-shell starch nanoparticles
2PPPolypropylene14PMAPoly (methyl acrylate)
3PBSAPolybutylene succinate-co-butylene adipate14PHBVβ-hydroxyvalerate copolymer
4PVAPolyvinyl alcohol14WPWool powder
4POPropylene oxide14LCHBPLong-chain hyperbranched polymer
6TgGlass transition temperature16CACellulose acetate
6TmMelting temperature17HAPHydroxyapatite

References

  1. Shen, M.; Song, B.; Zeng, G.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, W.; Wen, X.; Tang, W. Are biodegradable plastics a promising solution to solve the global plastic pollution. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 263, 114469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Millican, J.M.; Agarwal, S. Plastic pollution: A material problem? Macromolecules 2021, 54, 4455–4469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nie, H. Study on the Growth of Energy Consumption in China and Countermeasures. Ph.D. Thesis, Jilin University, Changchun, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zheng, Q. Plastic and “white pollution” rumination. Polym. Bull. 2022, 4, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  5. Yuan, J.; Ma, J.; Sun, Y.; Zhou, T.; Yu, F. Microbial degradation and other environmental aspects of microplastics/plastics. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 715, 136968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Qin, X.; Zhou, Y.; Huang, Y. A review of population exposure routes of microplastics and their possible health hazards. Asian J. Ecotoxicol. 2021, 16, 221–227. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jeffry, L.; Ong, M.Y.; Nomanbhay, S.; Mofijur, M.; Mubashir, M.; Show, P.L. Greenhouse gases utilization: A review. Fuel 2021, 301, 121017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sharma, K.; Park, Y.K.; Nadda, A.K.; Nadda, A.K.; Banerjee, P.; Singh, P.; Raizada, P.; Banat, F.; Bharath, G.; Jeong, S.M.; et al. Emerging chemo-biocatalytic routes for valorization of major greenhouse gases (GHG) into industrial products: A comprehensive review. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2022, 109, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Muthuraj, R.; Mekonnen, T. Recent progress in carbon dioxide (CO2) as feedstock for sustainable materials development: Co-polymers and polymer blends. Polymer 2018, 145, 348–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Peters, R.L.; Darling, J. The greenhouse effect and nature reserves: Global warming would diminish biological diversity by causing extinctions among reserve species. Bioscience 1985, 35, 707–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Demir, Z.; Yapcolu, P. Investigation of GHG emission sources and reducing GHG emissions in a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Greenh. Gases Sci. Technol. 2019, 9, 948–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zeenat, E.A.; Bkhari, D.A.; Shamim, S.; Rehman, A. Plastics degradation by microbes: A sustainable approach. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2021, 33, 101538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, J.P. Study on Modification of Poly(Propylene Carbonate) and Its Application Properties in Packaging Field. Master’s Thesis, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  14. Xiang, X.W. Microbial degradable packaging materials. J. Hunan Univ. Technol. 1995, 9, 31–38. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang, Z.Y.; Zhang, J.; Su, T.T. Research and development of biodegradable plastics. Environ. Prot. Circ. Econ. 2003, 4, 9–11. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhang, S.H.; Xiao, Y.; Jiang, Y.M. Research status and development trend of biodegradable plastics. J. Guangxi Norm. Univ. 1999, S1, 189–193. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chang, Q.; Zhu, D.; Hu, L.; Kim, H.; Liu, Y.; Cai, L. Rapid photo aging of commercial conventional and biodegradable plastic bags. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 822, 153235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jin, Y.; Cai, F.F.; Wang, L.G.; Song, C.; Jin, W.X.; Sun, J.F.; Liu, G.Q.; Chen, C. Advance in degradation of biodegradable plastics in different environments. Chin. J. Biotechnol. 2021, 37, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sisti, L.; Totaro, G.; Celli, A.; Marek, A.A.; Verney, V.; Leroux, F. Chain extender effect of 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl) propionic acid/layered double hydroxide in biopolyesters containing the succinate moiety. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 10127–10136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, G.X.; Huang, D.; Ji, J.H.; Völker, C.; Wurm, F.R. Seawater-Degradable Polymers—Fighting the Marine Plastic Pollution. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2001121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, W.; Mo, T.; Wang, Y. Better self and better us: Exploring the individual and collective motivations for China’s Generation Z consumers to reduce plastic pollution. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2022, 179, 106111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mtibe, A.; Motloung, M.P.; Bandyopadhyay, J.; Bandyopadhyay, J.; Ray, S.S. Synthetic biopolymers and their composites: Advantages and limitations—An overview. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2021, 42, 2100130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Inoue, S.; Koinuma, H.; Tsuruta, T. Copolymerization of carbon dioxide and epoxide with organometallic compounds. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 1969, 130, 210–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sasanuma, Y.; Takahashi, Y. Structure–Property Relationships of Poly (ethylene carbonate) and Poly (propylene carbonate). ACS Omega 2017, 2, 4808–4819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lei, Y.X. Production Technology and Market Application Status and Development Prospects of Aliphatic Polycarbonate. Pe-Troleum Petrochem. Today 2007, 15, 28–31 + 50. [Google Scholar]
  26. Fu, L.; Li, Q.S.; Bu, Z.W.; Chang, H.B. Copolymerization of carbon dioxide and epoxides catalyzed by zinc acetate. Chem. Res. 2017, 28, 752–756. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhuo, C.; Qin, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, F. Temperature-responsive Catalyst for the Coupling Reaction of Carbon Dioxide and Propylene Oxide. Chin. J. Chem. 2018, 36, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Qin, Y.; Wang, X. Carbon dioxide-based copolymers: Environmental benefits of PPC, an industrially viable catalyst. Biotechnol. J. 2010, 5, 1164–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Klaus, S.; Lehenmeier, M.W.; Anderson, C.E.; Rieger, B. Recent advances in CO2/epoxide copolymerization—New strategies and cooperative mechanisms. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2010, 255, 1460–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhao, L. Study on the Structure and Properties of Biodegradable Poly(Propylene Carbonate) Blends. Master’s Thesis, Changchun University of Technology, Changchun, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  31. Rokicki, A.; Kuran, W. Copolymerization of carbon dioxide with propylene oxide in the presence of catalysts based on alkylmetal compounds and pyrogallol. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 1979, 180, 2153–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Marbach, J.; Nörnberg, B.; Rahlf, A.F.; Luinstra, G.A. Zinc glutarate-mediated copolymerization of CO2 and PO—Parameter studies using design of experiments. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2017, 7, 2897–2905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, H.; Li, Y.M.; Huang, K.; Long, S.Y.; Huang, R.B. Copolymerization of Carbon Dioxide and Propylene Oxide with Co-Zn Double Metal Cyanide Complex/Zinc Glutarate Composite Catalysts. Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2014, 30, 24–28. [Google Scholar]
  34. Luo, L.; Wang, W.Z.; Wang, L.; Li, L.L.; Zhang, Y.L.; Zhao, S.D. Copolymerization of CO2, propylene oxide, and itaconic anhydride with double metal cyanide complex catalyst to form crosslinked polypropylene carbonate. E-Polymers 2021, 21, 854–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Quan, Z.; Min, J.; Zhou, Q.; Xie, D.; Liu, J.; Wang, X.; Zhao, X.; Wang, F. Synthesis and properties of carbon dioxide–epoxides copolymers from rare earth metal catalyst. In Macromolecular Symposia; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  36. Anderson, C.E.; Vagin, S.I.; Xia, W.; Jin, H.; Rieger, B. Cobaltoporphyrin-Catalyzed CO2/Epoxide Copolymerization: Selectivity Control by Molecular Design. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 6840–6849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Darensbourg, D.J.; Wildeson, J.R.; Yarbrough, J.C.; Reibenspies, J.H. Bis 2,6-difluorophenoxide Dimeric Complexes of Zinc and Cadmium and Their Phosphine Adducts: Lessons Learned Relative to Carbon Dioxide/Cyclohexene Oxide Alternating Copolymerization Processes Catalyzed by Zinc Phenoxides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 12487–12496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Koning, C.; Wildeson, J.; Parton, R.; Plum, B.; Steeman, P.; Darensbourg, D.J. Synthesis and physical characterization of poly (cyclohexane carbonate), synthesized from CO2 and cyclohexene oxide. Polymer 2001, 42, 3995–4004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pilz, M.F.; Limberg, C.; Lazarov, B.B.; Hultzsch, K.C.; Ziemer, B. Dinuclear zinc complexes based on parallel β-diiminato binding sites: Syntheses, structures, and properties as CO2/epoxide copolymerization catalysts. Organometallics 2007, 26, 3668–3676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, Y.Y.; Yang, G.W.; Wu, G.P. A bifunctional β-diiminate zinc catalyst with CO2/epoxides copolymerization and RAFT polymerization capacities for versatile block copolymers construction. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 3640–3646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Roznowska, A.; Dyduch, K.; Lee, B.Y.; Michalak, A. Theoretical study on preference of open polymer vs. cyclic products in CO2/epoxide copolymerization with cobalt (III)-salen bifunctional catalysts. J. Mol. Model. 2020, 26, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ree, M.; Hwang, Y.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, H.; Kim, G.; Kim, H. New findings in the catalytic activity of zinc glutarate and its application in the chemical fixation of CO2 into polycarbonates and their derivatives. Catal. Today 2006, 115, 134–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ang, R.R.; Sin, L.T.; Bee, S.T.; Tee, T.T.; Kadhum, A.A.H.; Rahmat, A.R.; Wasmi, B.A. Determination of zinc glutarate complexes synthesis factors affecting production of propylene carbonate from carbon dioxide and propylene oxide. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 327, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, X.; Shen, Z.; Zhang, Y. New catalytic systems for the fixation of carbon dioxide. 1. Copolymerization of carbon dioxide and propylene oxide with new rare-earth catalysts-RE(P204)3-Al(i-Bu)3-R(OH)n. Macromolecules 1991, 24, 5305–5308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, B.; Zhao, X.; Wang, X.; Wang, F. Copolymerization of carbon dioxide and propylene oxide with Ln (CCl3COO)3-based catalyst: The role of rare-earth compound in the catalytic system. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2001, 39, 2751–2754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tao, Y.; Wang, X.; Chen, X.; Zhao, X.; Wang, F. Regio-regular structure high molecular weight poly (propylene carbonate) by rare earth ternary catalyst and Lewis base cocatalyst. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2008, 46, 4451–4458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhou, T.; Zou, Z.; Gan, J.; Chen, L.; Zhang, M. Copolymerization of epoxides and carbon dioxide by using double metal cyanide complex (DMC) with high crystallinity. J. Polym. Res. 2011, 18, 2071–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dai, W.L.; Yin, S.F.; Guo, R.; Luo, S.L.; Du, X.; Au, C.T. Synthesis of propylene carbonate from carbon dioxide and propylene oxide using Zn-Mg-Al composite oxide as high-efficiency catalyst. Catal. Lett. 2010, 136, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cui, S.; Li, L.; Wang, Q. Fabrication of (PPC/NCC)/PVA composites with inner-outer double constrained structure and improved glass transition temperature. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 191, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Jiang, G.; Zhang, M.; Feng, J.; Zhang, S.; Wang, X. High oxygen barrier property of poly (propylene carbonate)/polyethylene glycol nanocomposites with low loading of cellulose nanocrytals. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 11246–11254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, L.J. Modification of Poly(Propylene Carbonate)Based on Hydrogen Bonding Interaction. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  52. Udipi, K.; Gillham, J.K. Poly(Ethylene Carbonate) and Poly(Propylene Carbonate): Transitions and Thermomechanical Spectra. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1974, 18, 1575–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lin, S.; Yu, W.; Wang, X.; Zhou, C. Study on the thermal degradation kinetics of biodegradable poly (propylene carbonate) during melt processing by population balance model and rheology. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 18411–18419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tao, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhao, X.; Li, J.; Wang, F. Double propagation based on diepoxide, a facile route to high molecular weight poly (propylene carbonate). Polymer 2006, 47, 7368–7373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, Q. Study on Properties of High-Barrier Composite Film of Carbon Dioxide-Propylene Oxide Copolymers. Master’s Thesis, Jilin University, Changchun, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  56. Cheng, M.P.; Li, Z.; Liu, B.H.; Song, L.N. Degradation and stability of PPC. China Synth. Resin Plast. 2019, 36, 80–85. [Google Scholar]
  57. Li, J.M.; Huang, X.L.; Su, H.Q. Effect of processing conditions in melt blending on properties of poly propylene carbonate. Chem. Reag. 2014, 36, 210–214. [Google Scholar]
  58. Shi, P.; Zhong, M.M.; Li, F.Z.; Ou, Y.L.; Liu, Y.J. Effect of processing conditions in melt blending on properties of poly propylene carbonate. J. Funct. Mater. 2015, 46, 15090–15094. [Google Scholar]
  59. Varghese, J.K.; Na, S.J.; Park, J.H.; Woo, D.; Yang, I.; Lee, B.Y. Thermal and weathering degradation of poly (propylene carbonate). Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2010, 95, 1039–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lu, X.; Zhu, Q.; Meng, Y. Kinetic analysis of thermal decomposition of poly(propylene carbonate). Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2005, 89, 282–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tran, T.N.; Mai, B.T.; Setti, C.; Athanassiou, A. Transparent bioplastic derived from CO2-based polymer functionalized with oregano waste extract toward active food packaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2020, 12, 46667–46677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Peng, C.; Wang, J.; Liu, X.; Wang, L. Differences in the Plastispheres of Biodegradable and Non-biodegradable Plastics: A Mini Review. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 849147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Liu, B.H.; Zhang, M.; Yu, A.F.; Chen, L.B. Degradation mechanism of poly(propylene carbonate) polyols. Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2004, 20, 76–79. [Google Scholar]
  64. Du, L.C.; Meng, Y.Z.; Wang, S.J.; Tjong, S.C. Synthesis and degradation behavior of poly (propylene carbonate) derived from carbon dioxide and propylene oxide. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 92, 1840–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Dhanraj, N.D.; Hatha, A.; Jisha, M.S. Biodegradation of petroleum based and bio-based plastics: Approaches to increase the rate of biodegradation. Arch. Microbiol. 2022, 204, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bano, K.; Kuddus, M.R.; Zaheer, M.; Zia, Q.F.; Khan, M.; Gupta, A.; Aliev, G. Microbial enzymatic degradation of biodegradable plastics. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2017, 18, 429–440. [Google Scholar]
  67. Sang, L.Y.; Yan, H.; Hu, Z.D.; Dai, J.; Yang, J.J. Degradation properties of poly (propylene carbonate)/poly (lactic acid) blends under natural light irradiation. China Plast. 2018, 32, 116–124. [Google Scholar]
  68. Sang, L.Y.; Yan, H.; Hu, Z.D.; Dai, J.; Yang, J.J. Degradation behavior and kinetics analysis of poly (propylene carbonate)/poly (lactic acid) blends in alkaline environment. China Plast. Ind. 2018, 41, 37–41. [Google Scholar]
  69. Sang, L.Y.; Yan, H.; Hu, Z.D.; Xue, M. Degradation properties of poly (propylene carbonate)/poly (lactic acid) blends in marine en-vironment. China Plast. Ind. 2018, 32, 122–130. [Google Scholar]
  70. Yang, X.; Steck, J.; Yang, J.; Wang, Y.; Suo, Z. Degradable Plastics Are Vulnerable to Cracks. Engineering 2021, 7, 624–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wang, W.; Han, C.; Wang, X.; Zhou, G.; Xu, M. Enhanced rheological properties and heat resistance of poly (propylene carbonate) composites with carbon fiber. Compos. Commun. 2020, 21, 100422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Qu, H.; Wang, Y.; Ye, Y.S.; Zhou, W.; Bai, S.P.; Zhou, X.P.; Peng, H.Y.; Xie, X.L.; Mai, Y.W. A promising nanohybrid of silicon carbide nanowires scrolled by graphene oxide sheets with a synergistic effect for poly (propylene carbonate) nanocomposites. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 22361–22371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wang, D.; Li, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Yu, J.; Zhang, J. Poly (propylene carbonate)/clay nanocomposites with enhanced mechanical property, thermal stability and oxygen barrier property. Compos. Commun. 2020, 22, 100520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Xie, D.; Wang, X.; Wu, L.L.; Zhang, C.C. Preparation of poly (propylene carbonate)/nano-silica composite. China Plast. Ind. 2018, 46, 24–29. [Google Scholar]
  75. Li, M.Q.; Zhao, X.R.; Zhang, J.; Li, R.M.; Zhang, Y.D.; Chang, H.B.; Li, X.H.; Zhang, Z.J. Preparation and properties of activated clay/PPC composites. Chem. Res. 2021, 32, 514–518. [Google Scholar]
  76. Zhang, Y.X.; Yan, L.; Lu, X.L. Study on mechanical properties and thermal stability of aluminum hydroxide reinforced PPC composites. Plast. Sci. Technol. 2019, 47, 20–24. [Google Scholar]
  77. Liu, Y.M.; Zhang, C.L.; Hai, S.S.; Zhang, W.N.; Yu, X. Preparation and characterization of flame retardant and Reinforced PPC composites with boehmite. Plast. Sci. Technol. 2018, 46, 73–77. [Google Scholar]
  78. Zheng, F.; Mi, Q.H.; Zhang, K.; Xu, J. Synthesis and characterization of poly(propylene carbonate)/modified sepiolite nanocom-posites. Polym. Compos. 2016, 37, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chen, T.T.; Yu, W. Modification of poly (propylene carbonate) by halloysite nanotubes. China Plast. 2017, 31, 21–27. [Google Scholar]
  80. Zhu, J.Y.; Dong, X.M.; Wang, N.; Yuan, N.X.; Sun, H.Y. Effects of calcium carbonate on mechanical properties and thermal stability of cassava straw flour/PPC composites. Chin. J. Wood Sci. Technol. 2020, 34, 27–31. [Google Scholar]
  81. Guo, Y.Y. Research progress of degradable plastic materials. China Pet. Chem. Stand. Qual. 2017, 37, 74–75. [Google Scholar]
  82. Tan, L.C. Synthesis of Biodegradable Copolyesters and Antibacterial Polyesters via Melting Transesterification and Their Nanocomposites. Ph.D. Thesis, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  83. Guo, C.Q.; Yang, Q.F. Studies on modifying poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate). Chem. Adhes. 2002, 5, 217–219 + 240. [Google Scholar]
  84. An, J.J.; Liu, W.R.; Ke, Y.C.; Huang, G.B.; Ma, Y.M.; Wang, F.S. Preparation and characterization of poly (propylene carbonate)/cellulose composite. Plastics 2014, 43, 65–68. [Google Scholar]
  85. Chu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Wu, W.; Xiao, H. Dispersion properties of nanocellulose: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 250, 116892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Pan, L.S.; Xiong, Y.L.; Pang, S.J.; Dai, H.X.; Xu, N.; Lin, Q. Modification of poly (propylene carbonate) by blending lignin. China Pulp Pap. 2011, 30, 26–30. [Google Scholar]
  87. Xiao, X.; Jiang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Cai, Z.; Yu, P. Preparation and characterization of formaldehyde-modified black liquor lignin/poly (propylene carbonate) composites. Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact. 2018, 23, 346–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Jiang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Xiao, X.; Cai, Z.; Yu, P. High-performance hydroxypropyl black liquor lignin/poly (propylene carbonate) bio-composites with enhanced natural degradability. Polym. Test. 2018, 72, 348–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Yang, Y.; Liu, C.; Chang, P.R.; Chen, Y.; Anderson, D.P.; Stumborg, M. Properties and structural characterization of oxidized starch/PVA/α-zirconium phosphate composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 115, 1089–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wu, H.; Liu, C.; Chen, J.; Chen, Y.; Anderson, D.P.; Chang, P.R. Oxidized pea starch/chitosan composite films: Structural characterization and properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 118, 3082–3088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Jiang, G.; Xu, J.H.; Feng, J.; Huang, H.X.; Zhang, Y.D. Rheological behavior, morphology and mechanical property of poly (propylene car-bonate)/thermoplastic oxidized starch composites. CIESC J. 2015, 66, 2718–2724. [Google Scholar]
  92. Jiang, G.; Xu, J.; Zhao, N.; Zhang, S.; Huang, H. Influence of starch oxidization and modification on interfacial interaction, rheological behavior, and properties of poly (propylene carbonate)/starch blends. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 2017, 56, 1084–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Liu, L.; Wang, Y.; Hu, Q.; Li, T.; Ma, P.; Zhang, H.; Du, M.; Chen, M.; Dong, W. Core–shell starch nanoparticles improve the mechanical and thermal properties of poly (propylene carbonate). ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 13081–13088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Pang, S.J.; Xu, N.; Pan, L.S.; Xu, G.; Wang, X. Study on melt blending modification of PPC/CS. Plast. Sci. Technol. 2013, 41, 73–77. [Google Scholar]
  95. Qin, Y.; Chen, L.; Wang, X.; Zhao, X.; Wang, F. Enhanced mechanical performance of poly (propylene carbonate) via hydrogen bonding interaction with o-lauroyl chitosan. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 84, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Chang, H.; Li, Q.; Xu, C.; Li, R.; Wang, H.; Bu, Z.; Lin, T. Wool powder: An efficient additive to improve mechanical and thermal properties of poly (propylene carbonate). Compos. Sci. Technol. 2017, 153, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zhu, J.Y.; Guo, J.X.; Wang, N.; Sun, H.Y.; Yuan, N.X. Effects of particle size and filling amount on mechanical properties of cassava straw pow-der/PPC composites. Chin. J. Wood Sci. Technol. 2019, 33, 5–8. [Google Scholar]
  98. Xia, G.; Reddy, K.O.; Maheswari, C.U.; Jayaramudu, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, J.; Rajulu, A.V. Preparation and properties of biodegradable spent tea leaf powder/poly (propylene carbonate) composite films. Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact. 2015, 20, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Liu, X.J.; Pang, S.J.; Xu, N.; Pan, L.S.; Lin, Q.; Ma, N.S.; Xu, R.Z.; Wang, Y.Y.; Yang, S.Y. Study of polyurethane prepolymers on the interface modification and performance of sisal fi-ber/poly(propylcarbonate)composites. China Plast. Ind. 2013, 41, 55–59. [Google Scholar]
  100. Feng, Y.; Ashok, B.; Madhukar, K.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, J.; Reddy, K.O.; Rajulu, A.V. Preparation and characterization of polypropylene carbonate bio-filler (eggshell powder) composite films. Int. J. Polym. Anal. Charact. 2014, 19, 637–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Gao, J.; Bai, H.; Zhang, Q.; Gao, Y.; Chen, L.; Fu, Q. Effect of homopolymer poly (vinyl acetate) on compatibility and mechanical properties of poly (propylene carbonate)/poly (lactic acid) blends. Express Polym. Lett. 2012, 6, 860–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Li, Y.; Yu, Y.C.; Han, C.Y.; Wang, X.H.; Huang, D.X. Sustainable blends of poly (propylene carbonate) and stereocomplex polylactide with enhanced rheological properties and heat resistance. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2020, 38, 1267–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Haneef, I.; Buys, Y.; Shaffiar, N.M.; Shaharuddin, S.I.; Khairusshima, M.N. Miscibility, mechanical, and thermal properties of polylactic acid/polypropylene carbonate (PLA/PPC) blends prepared by melt-mixing method. Mater. Today Proc. 2019, 17, 534–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Wang, S.F.; Tao, J.; Guo, T.Y.; Fu, T.; Yuan, C.Y.; Zheng, J.P.; Song, C.J. Thermal characteristics, mechanical properties and biodegradability of polycarbonates/poly(lactic acid)(PPC/PLA)blends. Ion Exch. Adsorpt. 2007, 23, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  105. Kang, K.E.; Jin, Y.J.; Wang, B.; Weng, Y.X. Study on compatibilizing modification of PLA/PPC blends with long-chain hyperbranched polymer. China Plast. 2019, 33, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  106. Wang, X.Y.; Sai, H.J.; Zhang, Y.X.; Wang, F.Y. Phase morphology and properties of ternary PLA/PPC/OMMT nanocomposties. China Plast. 2018, 32, 49–56. [Google Scholar]
  107. Tao, J.; Hu, D.; Liu, L.; Kong, M.M.; Song, C.J.; Wang, S.F. Thermal characteristics, mechanical properties and degradability of PLA/PPC/PHBV blends. Ion Ex Change Adsorpt. 2010, 26, 59–67. [Google Scholar]
  108. Jiang, G.; Yu, L. High Strength and Barrier Properties of Biodegradable PPC/PBSA Blends Prepared by Reaction Compatibilization for Promising Application in Packaging. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2021, 306, 2000723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Guillaume, S.M. Sustainable and degradable plastics. Nat. Chem. 2022, 14, 245–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Qi, W.L.; Wang, Z.J.; Tang, L.X. Structure and properties of PPC/Si-g-PCL nanocomposites. Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 36, 74–80. [Google Scholar]
  111. Zhang, Y.L.; Wang, W.Z.; Li, L.L.; Zhang, K.Y. Research progress of ternary polymerization of carbon dioxide and epoxides. Polym. Bull. 2021, 8, 19–25. [Google Scholar]
  112. Yang, J.; Zhang, X.; Li, T.; Wang, Y.; Xia, B.; Jiang, J.; Chen, M.; Dong, W. A novel biodegradable poly (propylene carbonate) with enhanced thermal and mechanical properties by incorporating tannic acid. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2022, 33, 1341–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Tong, Y.; Cheng, R.; Yu, L.; Liu, B. New strategies for synthesis of amino-functionalized poly (propylene carbonate) over SalenCo (III) Cl catalyst. J. Polym. Sci. 2020, 58, 1325–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Zhao, L.; Jia, S.L.; Wang, Z.P.; Chen, Y.J.; Bian, J.J.; Han, L.J.; Zhang, H.L.; Dong, L.S. Thermal, Rheological and Mechanical Properties of Biodegradable Poly (propylene carbonate)/Epoxidized Soybean Oil Blends. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2021, 39, 1572–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Huang, M.; Gao, L.; Feng, J.; Huang, X.; Li, Z.; Huang, Z.; Wang, L. Cross-linked networks in poly (propylene carbonate) by incorporating (maleic anhydride/cis-1, 2, 3, 6-tetrahydrophthalic anhydride) oligomer in CO2/propylene oxide copolymerization: Improving and tailoring thermal, mechanical, and dimensional properties. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 17808–17817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Li, K. Strengthening and Toughening of Poly(Propylene Carbonate) Using Non-Isocyanate Urethane. Ph.D. Thesis, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  117. Wang, P.; Zhang, W.; Pi, Q.; Chen, W.F. Progress in the synthesis and application of polymethylene-ethylene-carbonate. Shandong Chem. Ind. 2016, 45, 33–35. [Google Scholar]
  118. Liu, Z.; Hu, J.; Gao, F.; Cao, H.; Zhou, Q.; Wang, X. Biodegradable and resilient poly (propylene carbonate) based foam from high pressure CO2 foaming. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2019, 165, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Zeng, B.; Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Zheng, Y.; Shen, J.; Guo, S. Body temperature-triggered shape-memory effect via toughening sustainable poly (propylene carbonate) with thermoplastic polyurethane: Toward potential application of biomedical stents. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 1538–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Didwal, P.N.; Singhbabu, Y.N.; Verma, R.; Sung, B.J.; Lee, G.H.; Lee, J.S.; Chang, D.R.; Park, C.J. An advanced solid polymer electrolyte composed of poly (propylene carbonate) and mesoporous silica nanoparticles for use in all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2021, 37, 476–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Hu, J.L.; Gao, C.; Mi, W.T.; Bao, W. Application progress of polypropylene carbonate. China Plast. Ind. 2021, 49, 1–4 + 80. [Google Scholar]
  122. Liu, J.; Li, R.; Yang, B. Carbon dots: A new type of carbon-based nanomaterial with wide applications. ACS Cent. Sci. 2020, 6, 2179–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Yang, Q.; Pan, L.S.; Xu, N.; Pang, S.J.; Lin, C.; Chen, L.M. Preparation and performance of biodegradable poly(propylene carbonate) spun-bonded non-woven. Plastics 2018, 47, 64–68 + 71. [Google Scholar]
  124. Zhang, Z.Q.; Xu, N.; Pan, L.S.; Pang, S.J.; Xu, R.Z.; Ma, N.S.; Wei, T.Y.; Chen, Z.; Chen, L.M. Preparation and property of poly(lactic acid)/poly(propylene carbonate) spunlaid nonwoven slice. New Chem. Mater. 2015, 43, 40–43. [Google Scholar]
  125. Wang, X.; Pan, H.; Jia, S.; Lu, Z.; Han, L.; Zhang, H. Mechanical properties, thermal behavior, miscibility and light stability of the poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate)/poly (propylene carbonate)/polylactide mulch films. Polym. Bull. 2022, 79, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Liang, J.; Zhang, J.; Yao, Z.; Luo, S.; Tian, L.; Tian, C.; Sun, Y. Preliminary Findings of Polypropylene Carbonate (PPC) Plastic Film Mulching Effects on the Soil Microbial Community. Agriculture 2022, 12, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Cai, Z.; Zhang, Y.S.; Xiao, X.F.; Luo, Z.J.; Xia, L.L.; Jiang, C. Preparation and characterization of cellulose acetate/polypropylene carbonate complex films. Plastics 2018, 47, 64–66 + 71. [Google Scholar]
  128. Cheng, P.F.; Liang, M.; Yun, X.Y.; Dong, T. Biodegradable blend films of poly (ε-caprolactone)/poly (propylene carbonate) for shelf life extension of whole white button mushrooms. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 59, 144–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Bahramian, B.; Chrzanowski, W.; Kondyurin, A.; Thomas, N.; Dehghani, F. Fabrication of antimicrobial poly (propylene carbonate) film by plasma surface modification. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 12578–12587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Kim, G.; Ree, M.; Kim, H.; Kim, I.J.; Kim, J.R.; Lee, J.I. Biological affinity and biodegradability of poly (propylene carbonate) prepared from copolymerization of carbon dioxide with propylene oxide. Macromol. Res. 2008, 16, 473–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Zhu, Y.H. An Injectable Hydroxyapatite/Poly(Lactide-Co-Glycolide) Composite Reinforced by Micro/Nano-Hybrid Poly(Glycolide) Fibers for Bone Repair. Ph.D. Thesis, Jilin University, Changchun, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  132. Li, G.; Liu, X.N.; Zhang, D.H.; He, M.; Qin, S.H.; Yu, J. Preparation and properties of nano-hydroxyapatite/polylactic acid porous bioengineering materials. Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 34, 158–164. [Google Scholar]
  133. Zhang, Y.X.; Yan, L.; Lu, X.L. Preparation and Properties of PPC/Nano-hydroxyapatite Composites. Plast. Sci. Technol. 2019, 47, 7–11. [Google Scholar]
  134. Jiang, Y.; Yang, S.P.; Gang, H.L.; Xi, M.; He, J.W. Preparation and properties of PPC/diatomite composite fiber membrane. China Elastomerics 2020, 30, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  135. Chen, X.; Zhao, S.; Chu, S.; Liu, S.; Yu, M.; Li, J.; Gao, F.; Liu, Y. A novel sustained release fluoride strip based Poly (propylene carbonate) for preventing caries. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 171, 106128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Zhao, C.; Ding, F.; Li, H.; Zhang, S.; Liu, X.; Xu, Q. Ionic liquid-modified poly (propylene carbonate)-based electrolyte for all-solid-state lithium battery. Ionics 2020, 26, 5503–5511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Zhuang, Z.; Yang, L.; Ju, B.; Lei, G.; Zhou, Q.; Liao, H.; Yin, A.; Deng, Z.; Tang, Y.; Qin, S.; et al. Ameliorating Interfacial Issues of LiNi0. 5Co0. 2Mn0. 3O2/Poly (propylene carbonate) by Introducing Graphene Interlayer for All-Solid-State Lithium Batteries. Chem. Sel. 2020, 5, 2291–2299. [Google Scholar]
  138. Zhu, Z.; Xia, K.; Fu, J.; Du, C.; Zhang, H.; Lou, H.; Xu, Z. Bonding of aluminum coated silicon wafers based on polypropylene carbonate and as a multi-functional sensor. Org. Electron. 2018, 63, 296–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Qi, X.; Jing, M.; Liu, Z.; Dong, P.; Liu, T.; Fu, Q. Microfibrillated cellulose reinforced bio-based poly (propylene carbonate) with dual-responsive shape memory properties. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 7560–7567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Zeng, B.; Cao, M.; Shen, J.; Yang, K.; Zheng, Y.; Guo, S. Tuning the dual-and triple-shape-memory effect of thermoplastic polyurethane/polylactic acid/poly (propylene carbonate) ternary blends via morphology control. Polymer 2022, 242, 124546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Ge, J.; Li, F.; Gao, Y.; Jin, J.; Jiang, W. A high-performance structural material based on maize straws and its biodegradable composites of poly (propylene carbonate). Cellulose 2021, 28, 11381–11395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 14 02159 g001 550
Figure 1. Problems of plastics.
Figure 1. Problems of plastics.
Polymers 14 02159 g001
Polymers 14 02159 g002 550
Figure 2. Synthetic reaction of PPC [24].
Figure 2. Synthetic reaction of PPC [24].
Polymers 14 02159 g002
Polymers 14 02159 g003 550
Figure 3. Chemical structure of PPC [49].
Figure 3. Chemical structure of PPC [49].
Polymers 14 02159 g003
Polymers 14 02159 g004 550
Figure 4. Life cycle of PPC.
Figure 4. Life cycle of PPC.
Polymers 14 02159 g004
Polymers 14 02159 g005 550
Figure 5. Thermal degradation of PPC. (a) Unzipping degradation; (b) unconventional chain-breaking degradation [60].
Figure 5. Thermal degradation of PPC. (a) Unzipping degradation; (b) unconventional chain-breaking degradation [60].
Polymers 14 02159 g005
Polymers 14 02159 g006 550
Figure 6. Biodegradation of plastics in natural environments [65,66].
Figure 6. Biodegradation of plastics in natural environments [65,66].
Polymers 14 02159 g006
Polymers 14 02159 g007 550
Figure 7. Some materials that can be used for PPC modification.
Figure 7. Some materials that can be used for PPC modification.
Polymers 14 02159 g007
Polymers 14 02159 g008 550
Figure 8. Application areas of PPC. (Style referenced from [122]).
Figure 8. Application areas of PPC. (Style referenced from [122]).
Polymers 14 02159 g008
Table
Table 1. Summary of common biodegradable plastics [18,19].
Table 1. Summary of common biodegradable plastics [18,19].
TypeAbbreviationStructural FormulaApplication
Thermoplastic starchTPS Polymers 14 02159 i001Packaging, shopping bags, garbage bags, mulch films, disposable tableware and disposable medical products.
PolyhydroxyalkanoatePHA Polymers 14 02159 i002Tissue engineering, medical implants, controlled drug delivery systems, packaging, mulch films and disposable medical products.
Polyglutamic acidPGA Polymers 14 02159 i003Food thickeners, stabilisers, surgery, food, cosmetics, pharmaceutical industry, agriculture.
Poly (lactic acid)PLA Polymers 14 02159 i004Packaging, shopping bags, garbage bags, mulch films, disposable tableware, disposable medical products, building materials and textiles.
Poly (butylene succinate)PBS Polymers 14 02159 i005Packaging, shopping bags, garbage bags, pesticide and fertilizer sustained-release materials, mulch films and disposable tableware.
Poly (butylene
succinate-co-butylene
adipate)		PBSA Polymers 14 02159 i006Packaging, shopping bags, garbage bags and mulch films.
Poly (butylene
adipate-co-terephthalate)		PBAT Polymers 14 02159 i007Packaging, shopping bags, garbage bags, mulch films and disposable tableware.
PolycaprolactonePCL Polymers 14 02159 i008Medical implants, controlled drug delivery systems, absorbable surgical sutures and cryogenic packaging.
Poly (propylene
carbonate)		PPC Polymers 14 02159 i009Cryogenic packaging, mulch films, foam materials, controlled drug delivery systems and high-barrier materials.
Poly (vinyl alcohol)PVA Polymers 14 02159 i010Soluble packaging, high-barrier materials and medical implant.
Table
Table 2. Catalysts for the copolymerization of CO2 and epoxides [28,29].
Table 2. Catalysts for the copolymerization of CO2 and epoxides [28,29].
CategoryTypical Catalyst Features
Heterogeneous catalystsZnEt2-active hydrogen [25,30,31](1)Low catalytic activity.
(2)High price.
Zinc carboxylic acid [32](1)Easy preparation and low cost.
(2)Long reaction time.
Double metal cyanide complex [33,34](1)High catalytic activity.
(2)Polymers with low Mn (a) and low CO2 fixation.
Ternary rare-earth catalyst [35](1)Mn over 100 kg/mol in a relatively short time.
(2)Catalytic activity needs improvement.
Homogeneous catalystMetal-porphyrin [36](1)High catalytic activity but very slow polymerization rate.
(2)Catalyst structure is clear.
(3)Simple to synthesize and easy to handle.
(4)Product may have an undesirable color.
Zinc and cadmium phenoxides [37,38](1)Catalyst structure is clear.
(2)Rapidly induced copolymerization.
(3)Most of the polymers have a molecular weight of less than 100 kg/mol.
β-Diiminate zinc [39,40](1)Catalyst structure is clear.
(2)Controlled ring opening.
Metal-salen or -salan complexes [41](1)Catalyst structure is clear.
(2)High selectivity.
(3)High catalytic activity.
(4)Product may have an undesirable color.
(a) Mn: number-average molecular weight.
Table
Table 3. Catalytic effect of different catalysts.
Table 3. Catalytic effect of different catalysts.
No.CatalystPPC Yield (a)PPC ProductRef.
Mn (b)Mw (c)PDI (d)[η] (e),dL/g
1ZnGA83 (g polymer/g of catalyst)160 k60 k2.7-[42]
2ZnGA + GA68.25 (g polymer/g of catalyst)--1.2815-[43]
3-RE(P204)3-Al(i-Bu)3-R(OH)n1672 (g/mol of Y (f))46.9 × 10−4 (g/mol)--3.82[44]
4Nd(CCl3COO)3-ZnEt2-glycerol ternary catalystImproving62,28273,412-0.76[45]
5Lewis Base416.1 (g/(mol Zn))11.0 × 10−4
(g/mol)		-2.9-[46]
6Zn3 [Co(CN)6]2-based Co-Zn DMC catalyst7488 (g polymer/g of catalyst)35,900-3.99-[47]
7Zn-Mg-Al composite oxide high-efficiency catalyst88.8%----[48]
(a) Because the units used are not uniform across studies, the units here are different. (b) Mn: number-average molecular weight. (c) Mw: weight-average molecular mass. (d) PDI: polydispersity index. (e) [η]: intrinsic viscosity. (f) Y: yttrium.
Table
Table 4. Performance of PPC [55].
Table 4. Performance of PPC [55].
CharacteristicNumerical Values
Glass transition temperature (°C)30, 33, 41
Elastic modulus (MPa)993
Tensile strength (MPa)33.2
Density (103 kJ/kg)1.275, 1.3
Permittivity (kHz)3.0
Combustion heat (103 kJ/kg)18.5
Refractive index, n1.463
Hydroscopicity (23 °C, %)0.397
Thermally decomposed temperature (°C)218
Venting quality N2 (ml-cm10−12)5.3
Table
Table 5. Barrier properties of different polymers [30].
Table 5. Barrier properties of different polymers [30].
MaterialH2O (g/m2/24h)O2 (cm3/m2/d/atm)
PPC40–6010–20
Biaxially oriented polyethylene terephthalate10060–100
Bidirectional oriented polypropylene-2000
High-density Polyethylene201400
Nylon-615025–40
Polyvinylidene chloride0.4–1<1
Ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer20–700.1–1
PBS-1200
PLA325550
Ecoflex (BASF)1701400
Ecoflex/PPC/PBS triple-coextruded film59.3
Ecoflex/PPC/LDPE triple-coextruded film5.39.5
Table
Table 6. Modified materials and enhanced performance.
Table 6. Modified materials and enhanced performance.
No.MaterialsPreparation Method (a),(b)Amount Added (wt%)Performance EnhancementReference
Mechanical BehaviorThermal Properties
Tensile Strength/MPaElongation at Break/%Tg/°CTd−5%/°C (c)Td−10%/°C (d)Tmax/°C(e)
1Carbon fiberM0–20--42---[71]
2Graphene/Si hybridsM0–535.5 ± 1.336.7 ± 1.534.2289.5--[72]
3Elokite nanotubesM0–1022.6--285.1311.3311.3[73]
4MontmorilloniteS0~10----280 °C-
5LaponiteS0–10----250-[74]
6Activated white clayS0–236.8 ± 1.792 ± 1632.7260-276[75]
7Boehmite M0–2037.83lower-399.9410439.4[76]
8-modified sepioliteS0–1025.621635.8288.7-322.9[77]
9NanosilicaS-1549837238--[78]
10Calcium carbonateM0–2036.6--256-292[79]
11Aluminum hydroxideM0–2031.54-----[80]
(a) M: melt blending method. (b) S: solution comingling method. (c) Td−5%: thermal decomposition temperature at 5 wt% loss. (d) Td−10%: thermal decomposition temperature at 10 wt% loss. (e) Tmax: maximum thermal decomposition temperature.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, X.; Meng, L.; Zhang, Y.; Qin, Z.; Meng, L.; Li, C.; Liu, M. Research and Application of Polypropylene Carbonate Composite Materials: A Review. Polymers 2022, 14, 2159. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14112159

AMA Style

Li X, Meng L, Zhang Y, Qin Z, Meng L, Li C, Liu M. Research and Application of Polypropylene Carbonate Composite Materials: A Review. Polymers. 2022; 14(11):2159. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14112159

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Xiangrui, Lingyu Meng, Yinliang Zhang, Zexiu Qin, Lipeng Meng, Chunfeng Li, and Mingli Liu. 2022. "Research and Application of Polypropylene Carbonate Composite Materials: A Review" Polymers 14, no. 11: 2159. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14112159

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop