Next Article in Journal
Fluorescence Switchable Conjugated Polymer Microdisk Arrays by Cosolvent Vapor Annealing
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Sustainability of Bio Treated Lignocellulose-Based Oleogels
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/polym13020268
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Kinetic and Thermal Study of Ethylene and Propylene Homo Polymerization Catalyzed by ansa-Zirconocene Activated with Alkylaluminum/Borate: Effects of Alkylaluminum on Polymerization Kinetics and Polymer Structure

by
Amjad Ali
1,
Nadeem Muhammad
2,
Shahid Hussain
1,
Muhammad Imran Jamil
3,
Azim Uddin
3,
Tariq Aziz
3,
Muhammad Khurram Tufail
2,
Yintian Guo
3,
Tiantian Wei
1,
Ghulam Rasool
2,
Zhiqiang Fan
3,* and
Li Guo
1,*
1
Research School of Polymeric Materials, School of Material Science & Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 202113, China
2
Department of Enviromental Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430223, China
3
MOE Key Laboratory of Macromolecular Synthesis and Functionalization, Department of Polymer Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(2), 268; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13020268
Submission received: 24 December 2020 / Revised: 7 January 2021 / Accepted: 11 January 2021 / Published: 15 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The kinetics of ethylene and propylene polymerization catalyzed by homogeneous metallocene were investigated using 2-thiophenecarbonyl chloride followed by quenched-flow methods. The studied metallocene catalysts are: rac-Me2Si(2-Me-4-Ph-Ind)2ZrCl2 (Mt-I), rac-Et(Ind)2ZrCl2 (Mt-II) activated with ([Me2NPh][B(C6F5)4] (Borate-I), [Ph3C][B(C6F5)4] (Borate-II), and were co-catalyzed with different molar ratios of alkylaluminum such as triethylaluminium (TEA) and triisobutylaluminium (TIBA). The change in molecular weight, molecular weight distribution, microstructure and thermal properties of the synthesized polymer are discussed in detail. Interestingly, both Mt-I and Mt-II showed high activity in polyethylene with productivities between 3.17 × 106 g/molMt·h to 5.06 × 106 g/molMt·h, activities were very close to each other with 100% TIBA, but Mt-II/borate-II became more active when TEA was more than 50% in cocatalyst. Similarly, Polypropylene showed the highest activity of 11.07 106 g /molMt·h with Mt-I/Borate-I/TIBA. The effects of alkylaluminum on PE molecular weight were much more complicated; MWD curve changed from mono-modal in Mt-I/borate-I/TIBA to bimodal type when TIBA was replaced by different amounts of TEA. In PE, the active center fractions [C*]/[Zr] of Mt-I/borate were higher than that of Mt-II/borate and average chain propagation rate constant (kp) value slightly decreased with the increase of TEA/TIBA ratio, but the Mt-II/borate systems showed higher kp 1007 kp (L/mol·s). In PP, the Mt-I/borate presented much higher [C*]/[Zr] and kp value than the Mt-II. This work also extend to investigate the mechanistic features of zirconocenes catalyzed olefin polymerizations that addressed the largely unknown issues in zirconocenes in the distribution of the catalyst, between species involved in polymer chain growth and dormant state. In both metallocene systems, chain transfer with alkylaluminum is the dominant way of chain termination. To understand the mechanism of cocatalyst effects on PE Mw and (MWD), the unsaturated chain ends formed via β-H transfer have been investigated by 1H NMR analysis.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

On the way of synthesizing polyolefin with unique characterizations with narrow molar mass distributions and branching degree, academic and industrial researchers have devoted their consideration in polymer science and organometallic chemistry [1,2,3,4]. To design new polymerization technologies based on transition metal compound, homogeneous metallocene single-site catalyst precursors and main-group organometallic alkylaluminum cocatalysts can be considered valuable strategies to achieve this goal [5,6,7,8,9]. Homogeneous metallocene catalyzed polyolefin has become an interesting topic over the past decade and the commercialization of homogeneous metallocene catalyst is expected to be a revolution in the polymer industry [10,11,12,13]. However, the productivity of these polymerization catalysts has been significantly improved and produces polyolefin with narrow molecular weight distribution. In addition, soluble Ziegler–Natta polymerization catalysts based on zirconium are much more productive than heterogeneous Ziegler–Natta catalysts. Therefore, soluble Ziegler–Natta or homogeneous metallocene single-site catalyst can be used to synthesis new polymers without the need to remove the catalyst residues from the final polymer product. The activities of soluble catalysts are very encouraging for commercial purposes, but the kinetics behind these catalysts system have not been investigated extensively [14,15,16,17].
Kinetic method delivers not only an appreciated mechanistic understanding into catalyzed reactions but also has the potential to establish an extremely sensitive method to evaluate the effectiveness of the catalyst, cocatalyst [18,19,20]. Since the 1990s, the kinetic and mechanistic of the polyolefin have been widely studied and mechanistic investigation through detailed polyolefin chains structure characterization has made significant achievements [20,21,22,23,24,25] Historically, findings of novel and more effective and effective findings of kinetic models have contributed significantly to the technology as well as the fundamental understanding in this field. It is obvious that the kinetic studies based on direct counting of the [C*]/[Z] concentration in the polymer reaction system can permit the easier construction of a comprehensive mechanistic model. Many such studies have been reported based on different procedures of counting the active center concentration in homogenous metallocene catalyzed polymerization [26,27,28,29,30]. However, conflicting results of active centers values have been found in the literature while dealing with the same type of metallocene catalyzed polymerization, maybe because of different sensitivity levels of the methods that have been used [26,31,32].
With respect to the cocatalyst, there are indeed conceptions that describe the activation of homogeneous metallocenes catalyst through Alkylaluminum derivatives cocatalyst to form the active cation, alkylaluminum. Active cations like methylaluminoxane (MAO), triethylaluminum (TEA), and triisobutylaluminum (TIBA) are added as a scavenger of impurities and, more importantly, as alkylation agent, to form alkylated metallocene that is the precursor of cationic active centers [31,32,33]. However, the mechanism of alkylaluminum derivatives that affects the metallocene/borate catalyzed olefin polymerization and polymer structure has not been fully clarified. Till now, only five mechanistic studies are acknowledged about the role of alkylaluminum derivatives cocatalyst during the polymerization process. In principle, a suitable alkylaluminum cocatalyst is needed for conversion of transition metal such as Ti, Hf, Zr based metallocene complex into active species of olefins polymerization [34,35,36]. Alkylaluminum derivatives like methylaluminoxane (MAO) and modified methylaluminoxanes (MMAO) are a more efficient alkylaluminum cocatalyst because of their stronger Lewis acidity, weaker reduction ability and high steric bulk, but excess of the MAO is needed for activation of transition metal based metallocene complex. In contrast, using TEA, TIBA or TEA/TIBA mixture in combination with borate as activator can lead to the same level of catalytic activity as the metallocene/MAO system without the need of an excess amount of an expensive MAO. However, excessive use of alkylaluminum in the metallocene/borate/alkylaluminum system can reduce the metallocene’s catalytic activity. Therefore, an optimal quantity and type of alkylaluminum is required for olefin polymerization with borate cocatalyst. In the metallocene/MAO system, the MAO solution always contains “free” trimethylaluminum (TMA) that works as a reducing agent and chain transfer agent when it reacts with the metallocene complex and the active centers, and it can form Me-bridged dinuclear metallocene species which are thought to be catalytically inactive.
Our group has previously reported the effects of alkylaluminum cocatalyst (TEA, TIBA and TEA/TIBA mixtures) on ethylene, propylene polymerizations and E/P copolymerization with Z-N catalyst. Stronger alkylaluminum cocatalyst effects on the active center distribution and molecular weight and molecular weight distribution of polyolefin have been found, and the effects were explained by the different alkylation, reduction and chain transfer properties of different diverse alkylaluminus [37,38,39,40]. According to the best of our knowledge, the effects of cocatalysts on fundamental polymer reaction stage have not been studied so far, despite the homogeneous metallocene catalyst systems based on borate/alkylaluminum derivatives demonstrated the most attractive combination of selectivity, activity and generality for a wide-ranging variety of olefins.
Hence, in this work, the effects of linear and branched alkylaluminum on polyethylene and polypropylene with zirconocenes/borate/alkylaluminum have systematically been investigated. By changing the alkylaluminum/zirconocene molar ratio and TEA/TIBA molar ratio in alkylaluminum component, Mw, MWD, microstructure and thermal properties of the obtained polymers are found to be strongly changed. It will be interesting to know how to clarify the mechanism of the observed effects, the changes of active center concentration as well as the apparent chain propagation constant with the alkylaluminum type and concentration. It will also be interesting to know how to determine the following effect by the quench-labeling method using 2-thiophenecarbonyl chloride (TPCC) as the quencher based on selectively quenching the metal-polymer bonds through acyl chloride, which has been verified in our previous study by application in the polymerization of olefins with Ziegler–Natta, nickel–diimine and metallocene catalysts [39,41,42,43,44]. Thus, it would be worthwhile to understand the mechanism of cocatalyst effects on PE molecular weight, MWD mono-modal to bimodal type and unsaturated chain ends formed via β-H transfer, which have investigated by 1H NMR and GPC (Flory components) analysis.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

All the reagents used were bought from commercial sources. The metallocene catalyst rac-Me2Si(2-Me-4-Ph-Ind)2ZrCl2 (Mt-I) was supplied by Shanghai Research Institute of Chemical Industry, Shanghai, China. rac-Ethylenebis(indenyl)zirconium dichloride (Mt-II) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Hangzhou, China). Borates [Me2NPh] [B(C6F5)4] (Borate-I) and [Ph3C] [B(C6F5)4] (Borate-II) were kindly supplied by Sinochem Lantian, Zhejiang Research Institute of Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Hangzhou China. The metallocenes and borates were respectively diluted in toluene and stored under nitrogen before use. Solutions of alkylaluminum such as TIBA (triisobutyl aluminum) and TEA (triethylaluminium) were made by the dissolving the required quantity of neat TIBA or TEA in n-heptane by the Schlenk line method.
All moisture and oxygen sensitive manipulations were carried out by using glove and Schlenk techniques. Both gases, i.e., ethylene and propylene (polymerization grade, 99.9% purity), were bought from Zhejiang mixing Gas Co. (Hangzhou, China). Further, they were purified by columns gas purification method containing 4 Å molecular sieves and deoxygenize agent in the purification system (Dalian Samat Chemicals Co., Ltd., Dalian, China). N-Heptane (Shanghai Titan Scientific Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) was purified by passing through columns of deoxygenate agent and molecular sieve, refluxed over sodium-benzophenone and refined under nitrogen prior to use. Toluene solvent (HPLC grade, Jiangsu Yonghua Fine Chemical Co., Ltd., Changsha, China) was refluxed over sodium-benzophenone and distilled under the nitrogen before experiments.

2.2. Polymerization

Polymerizations were conducted in a 100 mL glass reactor. In a standard experiment, the polymerizations reactor was heated at 95 °C for at least half hour under vacuum and then cooled down to the desired reaction temperature (50 °C). The glass reactor was flushed with nitrogen gas three times, and 50 mL of toluene solvent was charged, fallow by saturation with monomers gas of 0.1 MPa. The solution of alkylaluminum (TEA, TIBA or TEA/TIBA mixture) was added to the polymer reactor, respectively. Afterwards, the metallocene (dissolved in toluene) was introduced and the reaction run for 10 min to complete alkylation of the metallocene catalyst by alkylaluminum [21]. Lastly, the polymerization reactions was started by injecting the borate (dissolved in toluene) solution. During the polymerization process monomers gas of 0.1 MPa was continuously supplied to the reactor to compensate for the converted monomer. After the required time of polymerization, TPCC (solution in n-Heptane) at TIBA/TPCC or TEA/TPCC = 1/2 was introduced to quench the polymer reaction for 5 min; 5 mL of ethanol with 2–3 drop of HCl was also injected to totally decompose the unreacted quencher and the catalyst system. The obtained polymer was precipitated with an excess amount of ethanol. Finally, it was purified according to our previous work [26].

2.3. Characterization of Polymer

2.3.1. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (1H-NMR and 13C-NMR)

Obtained polymers products were characterized by high temperature (120 °C) nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-NMR and 13C-NMR) using instrument Varian Mercury-300 spectrometer (Hangzhou, China) operating 75 MHz within acquisition time 3.0 s. To obtai 13C-NMR spectra for quantitative determination, the estimated amount (2–3 mg) of relaxation agent Cr(acac)3 was added to the sample tube, and 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane-d2 was used as the solvent for NMR analysis at 120 °C [45,46,47].

2.3.2. Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC)

The molecular weight (Mw) and molecular weight distribution (MWD) of produced polymers were determined by using a PL-220 gel permeation chromatography (GPC, Polymer Laboratories, Shrophire, Uk) With refractive index detector (RID, Polymer Laboratories, Shrophire, UK) at 150 °C using 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene as eluent. The device was equipped with three PL-MIXED-B (300 mm × 7.5 mm) columns, as well as a 50 mm guard column. The polymer samples were dissolved in 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene at 135 to 140 °C with the concentration of 0.3–0.4 wt %. The eluent flow rate was set at 1 mL/min. The columns were calibrated with narrow molar mass distribution polystyrene standard samples. Molecular weight was calculated by the method of universal calibration method.

2.3.3. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC, Hangzhou, China) characterization was done with a TA Q200 instrument calibrated with indium and water. Four to six mg of each polymer was weighted and sealed into the sample pan. The thermal analysis of the polymers samples were conducted under the nitrogen atmosphere. The polymer samples was first heated from room temperature to 150 °C (for PE) or 180 °C (for PP) at 10 °C/min, and kept for 2–5 min, then cooled to −60 °C at 10 °C/min, and kept for 2–5 min. The polymer sample was heated again to 150 °C (for PE) or 180 °C (for PP) at 10 °C/min. the heat flow of the second heating scan was recorded as the thermal curve for each sample.

2.3.4. Sulfur Content of the Quench-Labeled Samples

To count the active sites, the sulfur content of the quenched and purified polymer samples was measured in an YHTS-2000 ultraviolet fluorescence sulfur analyzer with a lower detection limit of 0.05 ppm (Jiangyan Yinhe Instrument Co., Jiangyan, China). The polymer samples for analysis were in the form of rubbery or powder materials for further analysis. 3 to 5 mg of the samples was weighed for each analysis run of with four parallel measurements, and the average value was taken as the sulfur content. The sulfur content of a blank polyethylene sample synthesized at the same conditions without the quenching step was found to be nearly 0, in contrast to the 5–25 ppm sulfur content of the quench-labeled samples. The relative error of the measurement was about 5% [26,30].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Ethylene Polymerization: Activity and Polymer Structure

Ethylene polymerization at 0.1 MPa monomer pressure was conducted with Mt-Mt-II and I activated by different borate/alkylaluminum combinations (Borate-I, Borate-II, TEA and TIBA), respectively. The alkylaluminum/Zr molar ratio was fixed at 800. The other reaction parameters are described in Table 1 and Table 2. It is obvious that both Mt-I and Mt-II showed high activity in ethylene polymerization, with productivities between 3.17 × 106 g/molMt·h to 5.06 × 106 g/molMt·h. In our previous study on ethylene polymerization with Mt-II/MMAO and Mt-II/dMAO, productivities of 2.16 × 106 g/molMt·h and 5.2 × 106 g/molMt·h were observed, respectively [30]. The borate/alkylaluminum cocatalyst showed similar activity as that of aluminoxane-based cocatalyst.
As seen in Table 1 and Table 2, gradually changing the alkylaluminum from pure TIBA to TEA/TIBA mixture and finally pure TEA caused moderate variation of catalytic activity. In the cases of Mt-II/borate-II systems, higher activity is observed with TEA/TIBA mixture of 50/50 molar ratio (run 2.8 in Table 2, but further increase of TEA amount caused a decrease in activity. In contrast, adding TEA in Mt-I/borate systems caused a decrease in activity, though the extent of the activity decrease was not so large (see Figure 1b). Normally, the addition of TIBA in metallocene/MAO system led to an increase in the polymer’s molecular weight, while adding TEA or TMA caused a decrease in molecular weight [48]. However, in metallocene/borate systems, the effects of alkylaluminum on PE molecular weight were much more complicated. For the Mt-II/borate I systems, increasing the TEA/TIBA ratio in the alkylaluminum from 0 to 50/50 has caused an evident increase of the Mw; meanwhile, the MWD was moderately broadened. The further increase of the TEA/TIBA mole ratio decreased the Mw and slightly narrowed MWD. As compared with the Mt-II/MMAO system that produced PE with Mw of higher than 100,000 under similar conditions [20], the very low Mw (<5000) of PE produced with Mt-II/borate I/TIBA or Mt-II/borate I/TEA is quite strange.
The lack of high molecular weight polymer chains in PE produced with Mt-II/borate-I means that chain transfer with alkylaluminum was very fast in this system, and the structure of alkyls in the alkylaluminum only slightly influence the efficiency of chain transfer with alkylaluminum. This phenomenon will be further discussed in a later part of this section. In contrast to the Mt-II/borate-I/alkylaluminum systems, the Mt-I/borate-I/alkylaluminum catalysts produced PE with much higher Mw and significantly broader MWD. When pure TIBA was the alkylaluminum, the Mw (163,000) was very close to that of the PE produced with Mt-II/MMAO (195,000) reported in the literature [49], but the polydispersity of PE by Mt-I/borate I/TIBA (Ɖ = 10.3) was more than three times larger than that of Mt-II/MMAO (Ɖ = 3.05). Similarly, when TEA was introduced in the Mt-I/borate I catalyst, the PE molecular weight sharply decreased with increase of the TEA/TIBA ratio, and the polydispersity index first increased then decreased (see Table 1). As shown in Figure 2, the MWD curve changed from mono-modal in Mt-I/borate I/TIBA to a bimodal type when TIBA was replaced by a different amount of TEA. This kind of complicated MWD change by alkylaluminum has not been reported in the literatures before.
The melting temperature and melting enthalpy of PE with both metallocenes have been determined by DSC thermal analysis, as shown in Figure 2, and the data of thermal properties have been listed in Table 1 and Table 2.
PE synthesized with Mt-I/borate showed a melting temperature of 120–30 °C, and melting of 106–225 J/g, and indicates more consistency in melting temperature; while Mt-II/borate produces a PE melting temperature of 101–123 °C and melting enthalpy of 156–218 J/g, With an increase of TEA content in the alkylaluminum cocatalyst, the melting enthalpy increased evidently, but pure TEA in cocatalyst shows a decrease in melting temperature and melting enthalpy. The melting temperature of PE is mainly associated with the short chain branching density. The higher the short chain branch density, there is a decline in lamellar thickness of the crystal structure, and this therefore shows the lower melting temperature of the polyethylene.

3.2. Ethylene Polymerization: Chain Transfer Reactions

To understand the mechanism of cocatalyst effects on PE molecular weight and MWD, the unsaturated chain ends formed via β-H transfer have been investigated by 1H NMR analysis on the polymer. According to the chain transfer mechanism, as shown in Scheme 1, β-H transfer of a propagating chain forms a vinyl ended polyethylene chain. Chain transfer with alkylaluminum will lead to PE chains with saturated chain ends. In the 1H NMR spectra of PE samples in Table 1 and Table 2, the multiple peaks at 4.8–5.1 ppm and 5.6–5.8 ppm observable in some samples were assigned to protons of the vinyl end group (see Figure 3).
Other kinds of double bond (vinylidene and vinylene) cannot be detected or showed very weak signals in the 1H NMR spectra, so they are neglected in counting the unsaturated end groups. The total chain number of synthesized PE (Npol) was calculated by the following equation:
N pol = m pol M n ¯
where mpol is the mass of the PE sample, and Mn is the number average molecular weight determined by GPC analysis. Since the vinyl group is the only unsaturated end group present in PE, the number of saturated end groups (NAl) can be calculated by NAl = Npol − Nv (Nv is the number of the vinyl end group determined by 1H NMR analysis).
The number of PE chains formed via different chain transfer reactions are summarized (see supporting information) in Table SI. It could be found that chain transfer with alkylaluminum is the only way of chain termination in most PE samples. In ethylene polymerization with Mt-II/borate/TIBA, vinyl ended PE accounted for about 70% of the chains, while in the Mt-I/borate/TEA system, vinyl ended PE accounted for about 10%. It means that the Mt-I/borate/alkylaluminum system produced PE with dominantly saturated end groups regardless of the type of alkylaluminum.
In this system, the Mw of PE evidently decreased with an increase of TEA in the cocatalyst, meaning that the chain transfer with the Al-Et bond should be faster than that with the Al-iBu bond. Larger steric bulkiness in Al-iBu than Al-Et could be responsible for their different chain transfer efficiencies. In the case of Mt-II/borate/alkylaluminum systems, chain transfer via β-H transfer became the major way of chain termination only when TIBA was used as cocatalyst, and most of the PE chain ends were saturated when TEA was added. Since the rate of chain transfer with alkylaluminum is not be influenced by monomer concentration, it can be expected that molecular weight of PE has been increased by raising ethylene pressure in ethylene polymerization with Mt-I/borate/alkylaluminum and Mt-II/borate/TEA.

3.3. Ethylene Polymerization: Active Center Fraction and Mechanism

The method of counting active center concentration by the quench-labeling method using TPCC as the quencher has been successfully applied in this study on ethylene and propylene polymerization with Mt-I/borate/TIBA and Mt-II/borate/TIBA. This method has been used in our previous systematical comparative studies on the kinetics of ethylene and propylene polymerizations with Mt-I and Mt-II using borate/alkylaluminum as the activator [30]; the same method has been used to study the effects of alkylaluminum cocatalyst on active fraction ([C*]/[Zr]). Detailed kinetics of zirconium catalyzed ethylene polymerization provides key information for understanding the mechanism of these important industrial processes. As indicated by Busico et al. [50,51], the chain propagation constant (kp) can be calculated using the “deceptively simple” rate law (Equations (2) and (3)) as follows:
Rp = k[M]
Rp = kp [C*][M]
where [M] is monomer equilibrium concentration, [E] = 0.085 mol/L in toluene at 50 °C and 0.1 MPa was used for the calculation [26,52]. Since the instant polymerization rate at the time of TPCC quenching (tp = 20 min) was not determined, the average Rp value calculated from the polymer yield after 20 min polymerization and the catalyst amount has been used. The kp value thus obtained is an average value in the 20 min polymerization process. When we compare the average kp value of different polymerization runs conducted under the same conditions for the same period, it is possible to draw meaningful information on the alkylaluminum effects on the intrinsic reactivity of the active centers. Figure 4 and Figure 5 show the active center fraction and average propagation rate constant of Mt-I/borate/alkylaluminum and Mt-II/borate/alkylaluminum systems, respectively. The detailed data have been shown in Table 1 and Table 2.
As shown in Figure 4, the active center fractions of Mt-I/borate/alkylaluminum catalyzed ethylene polymerization were higher than 50%, when TIBA was present in the cocatalyst (the lower active center fractions of the systems with TEA/TIBA mixtures could be attributed to experimental error), and the system with only TEA showed a slightly lower [C*]/[Zr] fraction, meaning that activation of Mt-I by the borate/alkylaluminum cocatalyst was not evidently influenced by the type of alkylaluminum.
Since the molecular weight of PE was strongly depressed by increasing the amount of TEA, and chain transfer with alkylaluminum was the major way of chain termination irrespective of the type of alkylaluminum, we can conclude that chain transfer with an Al–Et bond is more efficient than that with an Al–iBu bond. In other words, it is feasible to regulate PE molecular weight by adding TEA in the catalytic system. By comparing the kp values of Mt-I/borate/alkylaluminum systems with different TEA/TIBA ratios, we can see that the effects of the alkylaluminum type were rather weak. In Mt-I/borate-I/alkylaluminum systems, the kp value slightly decreased with the increase of the TEA/TIBA ratio. When borate-II was used as activator, the change of kp value was negligible. These results seem to imply that the active centers formed in the presence of different alkylaluminum cocatalysts are similar to each other.
In the case of ethylene polymerization with Mt-II/borate in the presence of TEA/TIBA, similarly weak effects of alkylaluminum type on active center fraction and kp value can be observed (see Figure 5). In comparison with the Mt-I/borate/alkylaluminum catalysts, the Mt-II/borate/alkylaluminum systems gave a lower [C*]/[Zr] fraction (44–55%), but larger kp value (700–850 L/mol.s). The stronger steric hindrance in the molecular structure of Mt-I than that of Mt-II could be responsible for their different kp values, since lower steric hindrance in the metallocene active sites allows for more efficient olefin coordination and insertion. As to the higher [C*]/[Zr] fraction in Mt-I, the electronic effects of its substituents on indenyl ligand (methyl at position 2 and phenyl at 4) could be the main reason, since electron donating substituents have been found to be beneficial to abstracting anions from neutral metallocene complexes.
Figure 6a shows that MWD curves of PE produced with Mt-I/Borate-I/alkylaluminum became bimodal when TEA was introduced in the catalytic system. To explain the reasons for this phenomenon, each MWD curve was deconvoluted into six to nine Flory “most probable” distribution functions (Flory components) with satisfactory accuracy according to the method reported in the literature [37,53]. A typical MWD curve and the deconvoluted Flory components are shown in Figure 6b.
The Flory components are named A, B … to I in the order of descending molecular weight. Supporting information Table S2, shows the fraction (relative intensity) and weight average molecular weight of the deconvoluted Flory components. It was found that six Flory components could be observed in polyethylene produced using either TIBA or TEA as coactivator, while more components were seen using a TIBA/TEA mixture as coactivator. As proposed in the previous work of our group, polyethylene chains with high molecular weight are formed by active centers composed of contact ion pairs, which have a fast rate of chain propagation but a much slower rate of chain transfer reaction due to the steric hindrance of the counter ion.
On the contrary, active centers with loosely associated ion pairs would form low molecular weight polymer, since this type of active centers has both fast chain propagation and fast chain transfer reaction [37]. By comparing the distribution of Flory components in different PE samples (see the supporting information), it will be possible to understand the effects of alkylaluminum cocatalyst on the active center distribution, and make further discussions on the related mechanism.
Figure 6c schematically shows the distribution of Flory components in PE samples and the weight fraction of the Flory component (see supporting information, Table S2). It is seen that components B and C only existed with high content (>9%) in PE produced with pure TIBA or 25/75 TEA/TIBA mixture, while components H and I only existed with high content (>6%) in PE produced with TEA as the dominant alkylaluminum (see supporting information, Figures S1–S5).
The general trend of alkylaluminum effects on the Flory component distribution can be summarized as follows: with the rise of TEA content in cocatalyst from 0 to 100%, at first the Flory components with low molecular weight (components F, G, H and I) were enhanced; meanwhile, those with high molecular weight became weaker. For example, total fraction of components F–I was increased from 32% in PE formed with 100% TIBA to 42% in PE formed with 25/75 TEA/TIBA mixture. A further rise of TEA content in the cocatalyst from 25% to 50% and finally to 100% caused an evident shift of the high molecular weight components to the low molecular weight side (compare Figure 3). It means that the components forming a low molecular weight PE (F–H) are more sensitive to the Al–Et bond in the cocatalyst, and enhancement of chain transfer with alkylaluminum in the components forming high molecular weight PE (A–D) requires a higher percentage of Al–Et bond in the cocatalyst. The different efficiency of chain transfer with Al–Et and Al–iBu bonds could be explained by their different steric bulkiness. With larger steric hindrance of the isobutyl in Al–iBu, the surrounding of active centers became more sterically crowded, and the rate of chain transfer reaction became slower, leading to polyethylene with higher molecular weight. With smaller alkyl-like ethyl in Al–Et, the smaller steric hindrance would be beneficial for fast chain transfer with the Al–Et bond.
In our earlier study on ethylene polymerization with Mt-II/MMAO, three kinds of active centers were discriminated, in which the active centers with the highest kp and a loose ion pair produce polymers with the lowest molecular weight, and the active centers with lower kp and a tight ion pair produce polymers with the highest molecular weight [26]. According to the literature, the TEA/TIBA mixture undergoes quick alkyl exchanges to form AlEt2(iBu) and AlEt(iBu)2 [54]. Thus, the TEA/TIBA mixture is a mixture of AlEt3, AlEt2(iBu), AlEt(iBu)2 and AliBu3, and the proportion of Al–Et bond will increase with the increase of TEA/TIBA molar ratio. At a TEA/TIBA molar ratio lower than 50/50, the content of AlEt2(iBu) will be lower than AlEt(iBu)2. It seems that chain transfer with AlEt(iBu)2 in the active centers with tight ion pair is not much different from chain transfer with TIBA, possibly for the strong steric hindrance of AlEt(iBu)2. Meanwhile, chain transfer with AlEt(iBu)2 in the active centers with a loose ion pair (producing low molecular weight PE) can take place efficiently, since they have a larger space to adapt the bulky AlEt(iBu)2. When there is a large amount of AlEt2(iBu) in alkylaluminum mixtures of high TEA/TIBA ratio, efficient chain transfers with AlEt2(iBu) can take place in the active centers with a tight ion pair, since AlEt2(iBu) is less bulky than AlEt(iBu)2. By these discussions, the complicated changes of PE MWD with cocatalyst structure can be largely understood.

3.4. Propylene Polymerization: Active Center Fraction and Mechanism

In this section, the effects of alkylaluminum cocatalyst on propylene polymerization with Mt-I and Mt-II activated by different borate/alkylaluminum combinations were investigated. The polymerization results, including active center fraction and average propagation rate constant, are listed in Table 3 and Table 4. As seen in Figure 7, the activity of Mt-I gradually decreased with an increase of the amount of TEA in the cocatalyst, but the activity loss was only slight when there was a small amount of TIBA in the system. The activity was reduced to about 30% of the system with pure TIBA when only TEA was added. It means that TIBA is a key component of the cocatalyst for Mt-I to show high activity in propylene polymerization. The type of cation in the borate (PhN+HMe2 in borate-I and Ph3C+ in borate-II) had only slight influence on the activity. The molecular weight of PP produced with Mt-I/borate-I tended to decrease with an increase of TEA in the cocatalyst. Unlike the very broad and sometimes bimodal MWD of PE produced with the same catalytic system, propylene polymerization gave PP with relatively narrow MWD, with the polydispersity index not higher than 4.5. It is interesting to see that the polydispersity index of PP decreased with the increase of TEA in the cocatalyst. The related mechanism will be discussed later in this paper.
In contrast to Mt-II, the effects of alkylaluminum on activity of Mt-II/borate showed a different trend. The activity was only slightly changed with an increase of TEA content. In comparison with the activity of propylene polymerization with Mt-II/MMAO (3.8 × 106 g/molMt·h) under the same conditions [20], the Mt-II/borate/alkylaluminum system showed evidently lower activity.
However, the molecular weight of PP produced with Mt-II/borate-I/TIBA (60 kg/mol) was much higher than that of the Mt-II/MMAO system (15 kg/mol). Similar to the Mt-I/borate-I systems, the molecular weight of PP produced with Mt-II/borate-I also decreased with an increase of TEA in the cocatalyst. The two zirconocenes Mt-I and Mt-II studied in this study showed markedly different activity in propylene polymerization, with Mt-I (the highest activity was 11 × 106 g/molMt·h) being about seven times more active than Mt-II (the highest activity was 1.4 × 106 g/molMt·h). Similarly, the same difference between Mt-I and Mt-II has been reported by Spaleck et al., who used MAO as the cocatalyst [55]. The changes of polypropylene chain structure with a different cocatalyst may disclose important evidence of the catalytic process. The microstructure of some PP samples in Table 3 and Table 4 was analyzed with 13C NMR spectroscopy using peak assignments reported in the literature [56,57,58].
In Mt-I/borate-I systems, changing the alkylaluminum from TIBA to TEA caused a slight decrease of isotacticity ([mmmm]) from 76.9% to 75.2%. Similarly, in Mt-I/borate-II systems [mmmm] of PP was 89.3% in the presence of TEA and 90.1% in the presence of TIBA. [mmmm] of PP formed with TEA/TIBA mixture fell in between 87–91%. On the other hand, [mmmm] of PP formed with Mt-II/Borate-I/TEA was 62.9%, and that with Mt-II/Borate-II/TEA was 60%. Both metallocenes produced PP with higher isotacticity ([mmmm]) by using borate-II rather than borate-I as the activator, and the effect of alkylaluminum structure on PP isotacticity was rather weak. The lower stereoselectivity of Mt-II than Mt-I has also been reported in the literature [55].
The melting temperature and melting enthalpy of PP samples were determined by DSC thermal analysis. The DSC curves are shown in Figure 8, and the data of thermal properties are listed in Table 3 and Table 4. PP synthesized with Mt-I/borate showed melting temperature of 157–59 °C, and melting enthalpy of 70–120 J/g, which are similar to PP produced by supported Ziegler–Natta catalysts. With an increase of TEA content in the alkylaluminum cocatalyst, the melting enthalpy increased evidently. On other side, Mt-II produced PP with more stereo- and regiochemical errors, leading to markedly lower melting temperature (90–122 °C) and lower melting enthalpy (about 50% of the PP produced with Mt-I).
To collect more evidence for explaining the observed cocatalyst effects in metallocene catalyzed propylene polymerization, active center fraction ([C*]/[M]) of the polymerization runs in Table 3 and Table 4 were determined by the TPCC quench-labeling method, and the results are shown in Figure 9 and Figure 10. It can be found that the active center fraction in propylene polymerization was evidently lower than that in ethylene polymerization. The active center fraction of Mt-I/borate/alkylaluminum was not higher than 44% in propylene polymerization, but was higher than 60% in ethylene polymerization. In the case of Mt-II/borate/alkylaluminum, the [C*]/[M] level was lower than 26.0% in propylene polymerization, in contrast to Mt-I, 45–57% in ethylene polymerization.
Similar phenomena have been found in the previous studies of our group on ethylene and propylene polymerizations with Mt-II/MMAO, where the [C*]/[M] level was about 70% in the ethylene system and lower than 30% in propylene polymerization (see Table 5) [30,39,51] It has been explained that the active centers producing polypropylene should be loosely associated ion pairs but not contact ion pairs, since the high steric hindrance in active centers with contact ion pairs will prohibit coordination of the bulky propylene, but allow for ethylene coordination. Therefore, the lower [C*]/[M] level in propylene polymerization can be largely attributed to absence of contact ion pairs in its active center family.
In Figure 9 Mt-I/borate systems, increasing TEA in the cocatalyst caused decrease in [C*]/[M], especially when borate-II was used as the activator. [C*]/[M] of Mt-I/borate-II/TEA system was only about half of the Mt-I/borate-II/TIBA system. In the case of Mt-II/borate, an increase of TEA in the cocatalyst caused a slight increase in [C*]/[M], but further increase of the TEA/TIBA ratio caused a decrease in [C*]/[M]. In comparison with the Mt-I/borate systems, the alkylaluminum structure exerted rather weak influence on [C*]/[M] of Mt-II/borate systems (see Figure 10).
The effects of the alkylaluminum structure on kp value were stronger in the Mt-I/borate systems. The rather high kp value of Mt-I/borate/TIBA and Mt-I/borate/TIBA/TEA systems was reduced for about 50–60% when pure TEA was used as the cocatalyst, meaning that TIBA is a necessary component for high kp of these systems. On the other side, effects of alkylaluminum structure on kp value of Mt-II/borate systems were only moderate. The kp value was reduced for about 20% when TIBA was replaced by TEA.
It is worth noting that both [C*]/[M] and kp values of Mt-II/borate systems were evidently lower than that of Mt-I/borate systems in propylene polymerization. It means that the markedly lower activity of Mt-II than Mt-I is caused by lower efficiency of metallocene activation and slower monomer coordination in the former. The different stereochemical and electronic effects in these zirconocenes should be responsible for their different kinetics characteristics.

4. Further Discussion

Generally, activation of metallocene (L2MTX2 or L2MTR2) includes abstraction of an X- or R- anion from metallocene by MAO or borate, which leads to formation of cationic active center (L2MTR+). When borate is used as the activator for L2MTX2 type metallocenes, alkylaluminum like TIBA must be added to scavenge the impurities and alkylate the metallocene. In such a catalytic system, the structure and nature of both borate and alkylaluminum cocatalyst can obviously affect the catalyst activity, polymerization kinetics and the polymer’s chain structure. In this study, by combining investigations based on active center counting and polymer structure characterization, we have collected plenty of information that enables us to make further discussions on the mechanism of alkylaluminum effects in ethylene and propylene polymerization with zirconocene/borate.
In ethylene polymerization with Mt-I/borate/alkylaluminum, the MWD of PE was broadened and the two GPC peaks in bimodal MWD became more separated when TEA content in alkylaluminum was increased. Meanwhile, molecular weight of PE markedly decreased with an increase of the TEA/TIBA ratio. This phenomenon can be explained by a more efficient chain transfer of the active centers with the Al–Et bond than with the Al–iBu bond. The slight decrease of the chain propagation rate constant with the increase of the TEA/TIBA ratio could be attributed to an increase in the proportion of dormant active sites that cannot be coordinated by ethylene for too short a distance between the metallocenium cation and counter anion. According to the literature [1,26,53], [L2MTR] +[B(C6F5)4]− type ion pair has been proposed as a model of an active center in borate activated metallocene catalysts.
In this model, initiation of polymerization requires dissociation of the ion pair to leave space for approaching and coordination of the olefin to the transition metal. When TEA is used as the cocatalyst, alkylation of the zirconocene forms L2MT(C2H5)2, which then forms the primary active center [L2MT(C2H5)]+[B(C6F5)4]− after activation by borate. Because of the smaller size of Et than that of iBu, the cation–anion distance in [L2MT(C2H5)]+[B(C6F5)4]− should be shorter than that in [L2MT(i-C4H9)]+[B(C6F5)4]− of the metallocene/borate/TIBA system, making its initiation (insertion of the first monomer in MT-R bond) more difficult. This factor may be the reason for the lower [C*]/[M] value of Mt-I/borate/TEA system than that of the Mt-I/borate/TIBA system in ethylene polymerization.
The same mechanism can be applied to explain the much lower [C*]/[M] value of the Mt-I/borate/TEA system than that of the Mt-I/borate/TIBA system in propylene polymerization. Since propylene is a bulkier monomer than ethylene, the initiation efficiency of [L2MT(i-C4H9)]+[B(C6F5)4]− will be markedly higher than that of [L2MT(C2H5)]+[B(C6F5)4]− in the former system. It is thus understandable that the difference of [C*]/[M] between TEA and TIBA systems is larger in propylene polymerization.
The effects of alkylaluminum on kp values of ethylene and propylene polymerization can also be discussed based on the same active center model. Significant reduction of kp value by increasing TEA content was only observed in propylene polymerization catalyzed by Mt-I/borate. This phenomenon could be explained by a faster chain with Al–Et bond introduced by TEA, and slower initiation of [L2MT(C2H5)]+[B(C6F5)4]− species formed in the chain transfer. When chain transfer with the Al–iBu bond takes place in the same catalytic system, initiation of [L2MT(i-C4H9)]+[B(C6F5)4]− will be much faster, and chain propagation will resume more quickly, leading to a high kp value (see Scheme 2). Molecular weights of PE and PP synthesized by Mt-I/borate have been found to be markedly reduced by adding TEA, which is caused by faster chain transfer with the Al–Et bond. In the case of Mt-II/borate, reduction of kp by increasing TEA content was rather weak, since reduction of molecular weight by adding TEA in the system was only moderate. In addition, the different kinetic behaviors of Mt-I and Mt-II systems can be tentatively explained by shorter cation–anion distance (active centers composed of tight ion pairs) than those with a longer cation–anion distance (loose ion pairs). As presented in Table 1 and Table 2, the (kP) value of the Mt-I catalyzed ethylene polymerization was lower than that of the Mt-II; meanwhile, it produced PE with higher Mw. It means that [C*]/[M] in the Mt-I has shorter cation–anion distances than the Mt-II. Presence of methyl and phenyl substituents in Mt-I could be responsible for its tighter ion pairs.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the kinetics and mechanism of ethylene, propylene homopolymerizations with ansa-zirconocenes activated by alkylaluminum/borate cocatalysts, were systematically studied. The kinetic rate constant of chain propagation (kp) was determined based on the data of polymerization rate and active center fraction. By changing the TEA/TIBA molar ratio (0/100, 25/75, 50/50, 75/25 and 100/0) in the alkylaluminum component, polymerization activity as well as polymer’s MW, MWD, microstructure and thermal properties were found to be strongly changed. Activity of PE with Mt-I/borate was reduced by adding TEA in the cocatalyst, but the system with 100% TEA showed only slightly lower activity than the system with 100% TIBA. In PE with Mt-II/borate, the activity was not evidently influenced by changing the TEA/TIBA ratio. In PP, Mt-I was about seven times more active than Mt-II, and produced PP with higher isotacticity than the latter. The Mw was evidently reduced by raising TEA content in the cocatalyst, meaning that chain transfer with the Al–Et bond should be faster than that with the Al–iBu bond. Polyethylene MWD curve changed from mono-modal to bimodal type when TIBA was replaced by a different amount of TEA. PE produced by Mt-II/borate showed lower Mw and relatively narrow MWD. In PE, with Mt-II/borate/TIBA, vinyl ended PE accounted for about 70% of the chains, while in the Mt-I/borate/TEA system vinyl ended PE accounted for about 10%. It means that the Mt-I/borate/alkylaluminum system produced PE with dominantly saturated end groups regardless of the type of alkylaluminum. The data with kinetic modelling recommend that different types of active centers are present in PE system than PP. In PE, the [C*]/[Zr] of Mt-I/borate systems were higher than that of Mt-II/borate, but the Mt-II showed a higher kp value. Totally speaking, changing the TEA/TIBA ratio caused only limited influence on the kinetic parameters of Mt-I and Mt-II for PE. In PP, the Mt-I showed a much higher ([C*]/[Zr]) and kp value than the Mt-II. In Mt-I/borate, raising the TEA/TIBA ratio caused a reduction in kp, and the kp of the Mt-I/borate/TEA system was less than 50% of the Mt-I/borate/TIBA system.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/13/2/268/s1. Table S1 Number of PE chains formed by different chain transfer reactions a. Table S2 Distribution of Flory components in PE samples. Figure S1 Distribution of Flory components of PE produced from Mt-I/Borate-I with TEA/TIBA 0/100. Figure S2 Distribution of Flory components of PE produced from Mt-I/Borate-I with TEA/TIBA 25/75. Figure S3 Distribution of Flory components of PE produced from Mt-I/Borate-I with TEA/TIBA 50/50. Figure S4 Distribution of Flory components of PE produced from Mt-I/Borate-I with TEA/TIBA 75/25. Figure S5 Distribution of Flory components of PE produced from Mt-I/Borate-I with TEA/TIBA 100/0.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A. and N.M.; methodology, A.A.; software, A.A, N.M., Y.G., G.R. and A.U.; validation, A.A., T.A. and M.K.T.; formal analysis, A.A, A.U., G.R., Y.G., Z.F., L.G., S.H. and M.I.J.; investigation, A.A., T.A., M.I.J.; resources, Y.G., T.W., Z.F. and L.G.; data curation, A.A.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A., N.M., S.H., M.I.J., A.U., G.R., T.A., M.K.T., Y.G., T.W. and L.G.; writing—review and editing, A.A., N.M., S.H., M.I.J., A.U., G.R., T.A., M.K.T., Y.G., T.W. and L.G.; visualization, A.A.; supervision, A.A., Y.G., T.W. and L.G.; project administration, Y.G., T.W. and L.G.; funding acquisition, Y.G., T.W. and L.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51803081) and Jiangsu Distinguished Professors Grant. The Research School of polymeric Materials, School of Material Science & Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 202113, PR China.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Yucai Cao of SRICI, China for donating SiBh catalyst.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, E.Y.-X.; Marks, T.J. Cocatalysts for metal-catalyzed olefin polymerization: Activators, activation processes, and structure—Activity relationships. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1391–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wondimagegn, T.; Wang, D.; Razavi, A.; Ziegler, T. Computational design of C2-symmetric metallocene-based catalysts for the synthesis of high molecular weight polymers from ethylene/propylene copolymerization. Organometallics 2008, 27, 6434–6439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sarzotti, D.M.; Marshman, D.J.; Ripmeester, W.E.; Soares, J.B. A kinetic study of metallocene-catalyzed ethylene polymerization using different aluminoxane cocatalysts. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2007, 45, 1677–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nifant’ev, I.; Vinogradov, A.; Vinogradov, A.; Karchevsky, S.; Ivchenko, P. Experimental and Theoretical Study of Zirconocene-Catalyzed Oligomerization of 1-Octene. Polymers 2020, 12, 1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Nifant’ev, I.E.; Ivchenko, P.V.; Bagrov, V.V.; Okumura, Y.; Elder, M.; Churakov, A.V. Asymmetric ansa-zirconocenes containing a 2-methyl-4-aryltetrahydroindacene fragment: Synthesis, structure, and catalytic activity in propylene polymerization and copolymerization. Organometallics 2011, 30, 5744–5752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yano, A.; Sone, M.; Yamada, S.; Hasegawa, S.; Sato, M.; Akimoto, A. Effect of ligand structures on high temperature homo-and copolymerization of ethylene by cationic hafnocene catalysts based on tetrakis (pentafluorophenyl) borate. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2000, 156, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. McKnight, A.L.; Waymouth, R.M. Group 4 ansa-cyclopentadienyl-amido catalysts for olefin polymerization. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 2587–2598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Motolko, K.S.; Price, J.S.; Emslie, D.J.; Jenkins, H.A.; Britten, J.F. Zirconium complexes of a rigid, dianionic pincer ligand: Alkyl cations, arene coordination, and ethylene polymerization. Organometallics 2017, 36, 3084–3093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lamb, J.V.; Buffet, J.C.; Turner, Z.R.; Khamnaen, T.; O’Hare, D. Metallocene Polyethylene Wax Synthesis. Macromolecules 2020, 53, 5847–5856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kaminsky, W. New polymers by metallocene catalysis. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 1996, 197, 3907–3945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kaminsky, W.; Bark, A.; Arndt, M. New polymers by homogenous zirconocene/aluminoxane catalysts. In Makromolekulare Chemie. Macromol. Symposia; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1991; pp. 83–93. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kaminsky, W. Highly active metallocene catalysts for olefin polymerization. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1998, 1413–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ehm, C.; Vittoria, A.; Goryunov, G.P.; Izmer, V.V.; Kononovich, D.S.; Samsonov, O.V.; Budzelaar, P.H.M.; Voskoboynikov, A.Z.; Busico, V.; Uborsky, D.V. On the limits of tuning comonomer affinity of ‘Spaleck-type’ ansa-zirconocenes in ethene/1-hexene copolymerization: A high-throughput experimentation/QSAR approach. Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 10162–10172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bochmann, M. Cationic group 4 metallocene complexes and their role in polymerisation catalysis: The chemistry of well defined Ziegler catalysts. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1996, 255–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bochmann, M. The chemistry of catalyst activation: The case of group 4 polymerization catalysts. Organometallics 2010, 29, 4711–4740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bochmann, M.; Lancaster, S.J. Base-free cationic zirconium benzyl complexes as highly active polymerization catalysts. Organometallics 1993, 12, 633–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. González-Pelayo, S.; Bernardo, O.; Borge, J.; López, L. Synthesis of Metallocene Analogues of the Phenethylamine and Tetrahydroisoquinoline Scaffolds via Regioselective Ring Opening of 2-Aryl-N-Sulfonyl Aziridines. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bochmann, M. Kinetic and mechanistic aspects of metallocene polymerisation catalysts. J. Organomet. Chem. 2004, 689, 3982–3998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lin, S.; Tagge, C.D.; Waymouth, R.M.; Nele, M.; Collins, S.; Pinto, J. Kinetics of propylene polymerization using bis (2-phenylindenyl) zirconium dichloride/methylaluminoxane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 11275–11285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ghiotto, F.; Pateraki, C.; Severn, J.R.; Friederichs, N.; Bochmann, M. Rapid evaluation of catalysts and MAO activators by kinetics: What controls polymer molecular weight and activity in metallocene/MAO catalysts? Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 9040–9048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Tritto, I.; Donetti, R.; Sacchi, M.C.; Locatelli, P.; Zannoni, G. Dimethylzirconocene− Methylaluminoxane Catalyst for Olefin Polymerization: NMR Study of Reaction Equilibria. Macromolecules 1997, 30, 1247–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Babushkin, D.E.; Semikolenova, N.V.; Zakharov, V.A.; Talsi, E.P. Mechanism of dimethylzirconocene activation with methylaluminoxane: NMR monitoring of intermediates at high Al/Zr ratios. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2000, 201, 558–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bryliakov, K.P.; Semikolenova, N.V.; Yudaev, D.V.; Ystenes, M.; Rytter, E.; Zakharov, V.A.; Talsi, E.P. 1H and 13C NMR Study of the Intermediates Formed by (Cp-R)2ZrCl2 Activation with MAO and AlMe3/[CPh3][B(C6F5)4]. Correlation of Spectroscopic and Ethene Polymerization Data. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2003, 204, 1110–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bryliakov, K.P.; Babushkin, D.E.; Talsi, E.P.; Voskoboynikov, A.Z.; Gritzo, H.; Schröder, L.; Damrau, H.-R.H.; Wieser, U.; Schaper, F.; Brintzinger, H.H. ansa-Titanocene Catalysts for α-Olefin Polymerization. Syntheses, Structures, and Reactions with Methylaluminoxane and Boron-Based Activators. Organometallics 2005, 24, 894–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Babushkin, D.E.; Brintzinger, H.-H. Activation of dimethyl zirconocene by methylaluminoxane (MAO) size estimate for Me-MAO-anions by pulsed field-gradient NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12869–12873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Guo, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Guo, W.; Khan, A.; Fu, Z.; Xu, J.; Fan, Z. Kinetics and mechanism of metallocene-catalyzed olefin polymerization: Comparison of ethylene, propylene homopolymerizations, and their copolymerization. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2017, 55, 867–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Desert, X.; Carpentier, J.-F.; Kirillov, E. Quantification of active sites in single-site group 4 metal olefin polymerization catalysis. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019, 386, 50–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Altaf, A.A.; Badshah, A.; Khan, N.; Marwat, S.; Ali, S. Zirconium complexes in homogeneous ethylene polymerization. J. Coord. Chem. 2011, 64, 1815–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nelsen, D.L.; Anding, B.J.; Sawicki, J.L.; Christianson, M.D.; Arriola, D.J.; Landis, C.R. Chromophore quench-labeling: An approach to quantifying catalyst speciation as demonstrated for (EBI) ZrMe2/B(C6F5)3-catalyzed polymerization of 1-hexene. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 7398–7408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ali, A.; Liu, X.; Guo, Y.; Akram, M.A.; Wu, H.; Liu, W.; Khan, A.; Jiang, B.; Fu, Z.; Fan, Z. Kinetics and mechanism of ethylene and propylene polymerizations catalyzed with ansa-zirconocene activated by borate/TIBA. J. Organomet. Chem. 2020, 922, 121366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, Z.; Somsook, E.; Landis, C.R. A 2H-labeling scheme for active-site counts in metallocene-catalyzed alkene polymerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2915–2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Karl, J.; Dahlmann, M.; Erker, G.; Bergander, K. Arriving at an experimental estimate of the intrinsic activation barrier of olefin insertion into the Zr− C bond of an active metallocene Ziegler catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5643–5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bryliakov, K.P.; Semikolenova, N.V.; Panchenko, V.N.; Zakharov, V.A.; Brintzinger, H.H.; Talsi, E.P. Activation of rac-Me2Si (ind)2ZrCl2 by Methylalumoxane Modified by Aluminum Alkyls: An EPR Spin-Probe, 1H NMR, and Polymerization Study. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2006, 207, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Panin, A.; Sukhova, T.; Bravaya, N. Triisobutylaluminum as cocatalyst for zirconocenes. I. Sterically opened zirconocene/triisobutylaluminum/perfluorophenylborate as highly effective ternary catalytic system for synthesis of low molecular weight polyethylenes. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2001, 39, 1901–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Franceschini, F.C.; Tavares, T.T.d.R.; Greco, P.P.; Galland, G.B.; dos Santos, J.H.; Soares, J.B. Effects of the type and concentration of alkylaluminum cocatalysts on the molar mass of polypropylene made with in situ supported metallocene catalysts. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2005, 95, 1050–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dong, C.; Niu, H.; Dong, J.-Y. “Two-in-One” catalysis of broad/bimodal molecular-weight-distribution polypropylene by a combination of Ziegler–Natta and metallocene catalysts. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2014, 484, 142–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Huang, R.; Liu, D.; Wang, S.; Mao, B. Preparation of spherical MgCl2 supported bis (imino) pyridyl iron (II) precatalyst for ethylene polymerization. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2005, 233, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nejabat, G.R.; Nekoomanesh, M.; Arabi, H.; Salehi-Mobarakeh, H.; Zohuri, G.-H.; Mortazavi, M.-M.; Ahmadjo, S.; Miller, S.A. Study of Ziegler-Natta/(2-PhInd)2ZrCl2 hybrid catalysts performance in slurry propylene polymerization. Polyolefins J. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Guo, Y.; He, F.; Zhang, Z.; Khan, A.; Fu, Z.; Xu, J.; Fan, Z. Influence of trimethylaluminum on kinetics of rac-Et (Ind) 2ZrCl2/aluminoxane catalyzed ethylene polymerization. J. Organomet. Chem. 2016, 808, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, B.; Zhang, L.; Fu, Z.; Fan, Z. Effect of internal electron donor on the active center distribution in MgCl2-supported Ziegler–Natta catalyst. Catal. Commun. 2015, 69, 147–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guo, Y.; Yang, P.; Zhang, S.; Jiang, B.; Khan, A.; Zhu, L.; Fu, Z.; Fan, Z. Study on 2-thiophenecarbonyl chloride-quenched olefin polymerization with α-diimine nickel catalysts. Iran. Polym. J. 2018, 27, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dubdub, I.; Al-Yaari, M. Pyrolysis of Low Density Polyethylene: Kinetic Study Using TGA Data and ANN Prediction. Polymers 2020, 12, 891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. He, F.; Wang, D.; Jiang, B.; Zhang, Z.; Cheng, Z.; Fu, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Fan, Z. Introducing electron-donating substituents on ligand backbone of α-diimine nickel complex and the effects on catalyst thermal stability in ethylene polymerization. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2019, 486, 704–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yang, P.; Zhong, W.; Jiang, B.; Zhang, B.; Fu, Z.; Fan, Z. Determination and tracing of active and dormant propagation chains in 1-hexene polymerization with supported Ziegler-Natta catalyst. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2020, 595, 117469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, Z.; Jiang, B.; He, F.; Fu, Z.; Xu, J.; Fan, Z. Comparative Study on Kinetics of Ethylene and Propylene Polymerizations with Supported Ziegler–Natta Catalyst: Catalyst Fragmentation Promoted by Polymer Crystalline Lamellae. Polymers 2019, 11, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Shamiri, A.; Chakrabarti, M.H.; Jahan, S.; Hussain, M.A.; Kaminsky, W.; Aravind, P.V.; Yehye, W.A. The influence of Ziegler-Natta and metallocene catalysts on polyolefin structure, properties, and processing ability. Materials 2014, 7, 5069–5108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ali, A.; Akram, M.A.; Guo, Y.; Wu, H.; Liu, W.; Khan, A.; Liu, X.; Fu, Z.; Fan, Z. Ethylene–propylene copolymerization and their terpolymerization with dienes using ansa-Zirconocene catalysts activated by borate/alkylaluminum. J. Macromol. Sci. Part A 2020, 57, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Khan, A.; Guo, Y.; Fu, Z.; Fan, Z. Kinetics of short-duration ethylene polymerization with MgCl2-supported Ziegler-Natta catalyst: Two-stage initiation evidenced by changes in active center concentration. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017, 134, 45187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jiang, B.; Zhang, B.; Guo, Y.; Ali, A.; Guo, W.; Fu, Z.; Fan, Z. Effects of titanium dispersion state on distribution and reactivity of active centers in propylene polymerization with MgCl2-supported Ziegler-Natta catalysts: A kinetic study based on active center counting. ChemCatChem 2020, 12, 5140–5148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vasilenko, I.V.; Kostjuk, S.V.; Kaputsky, F.N.; Nedorezova, P.M.; Aladyshev, A.M. Effect of Different Aluminum Alkyls on the Metallocene/Methylaluminoxane Catalyzed Polymerization of Higher α-Olefins and Styrene. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2008, 209, 1255–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jiang, B.; Liu, X.; Weng, Y.; Fu, Z.; He, A.; Fan, Z. Mechanistic study on comonomer effect in ethylene/1-hexene copolymerization with TiCl4/MgCl2 model Ziegler-Natta catalysts. J. Catal. 2019, 369, 324–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liu, Z.; Somsook, E.; White, C.B.; Rosaaen, K.A.; Landis, C.R. Kinetics of initiation, propagation, and termination for the [rac-(C2H4(1-indenyl)2)ZrMe][MeB(C6F5)3]-catalyzed polymerization of 1-hexene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11193–11207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Sillars, D.R.; Landis, C.R. Catalytic propene polymerization: Determination of propagation, termination, and epimerization kinetics by direct NMR observation of the (EBI)Zr(MeB(C6F5)3) Propenyl catalyst species. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9894–9895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Valencia López, L.A.; Enríquez-Medrano, F.J.; Maldonado Textle, H.; Soriano Corral, F.; López González, H.R.; St Thomas, C.; Hernández Gámez, F.; Olivares Romero, J.L.; Díaz de León Gómez, R.E. The Influence of co-catalyst in the Polymerization of 1, 3-butadiene Catalyzed by Neodymium Chloride Tripentanolate. J. Mex. Chem. Soc. 2016, 60, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, B.; Dong, Q.; Fu, Z.; Fan, Z. Improving microisotacticity of Ziegler–Natta catalyzed polypropylene by using triethylaluminum/triisobutylaluminum mixtures as cocatalyst. Polymer 2014, 55, 4865–4872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Spaleck, W.; Kueber, F.; Winter, A.; Rohrmann, J.; Bachmann, B.; Antberg, M.; Dolle, V.; Paulus, E.F. The influence of aromatic substituents on the polymerization behavior of bridged zirconocene catalysts. Organometallics 1994, 13, 954–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Carvill, A.; Tritto, I.; Locatelli, P.; Sacchi, M.C. Polymer microstructure as a probe into hydrogen activation effect in ansa-zirconocene/methylaluminoxane catalyzed propene polymerizations. Macromolecules 1997, 30, 7056–7062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Huang, J.; Rempel, G.L. Kinetic study of propylene polymerization using Et (H4Ind) 2ZrCl2/methylalumoxane catalysts. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1997, 36, 1151–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Estrada, J.V.; Hamielec, A. Modelling of ethylene polymerization with Cp2ZrCl2MAO catalyst. Polymer 1994, 35, 808–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 13 00268 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Metallocene catalysts, borates and alkyl aluminums used in this work; (b) changes of activity with type of alkylaluminum triisobutylaluminium (TIBA)/triethylaluminium (TEA) mixtures.
Figure 1. (a) Metallocene catalysts, borates and alkyl aluminums used in this work; (b) changes of activity with type of alkylaluminum triisobutylaluminium (TIBA)/triethylaluminium (TEA) mixtures.
Polymers 13 00268 g001
Polymers 13 00268 g002 550
Figure 2. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) heating traces of PE produced with both metallocenes under TEA/TIBA mixture of different ratios.
Figure 2. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) heating traces of PE produced with both metallocenes under TEA/TIBA mixture of different ratios.
Polymers 13 00268 g002
Polymers 13 00268 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Mechanism of chain transfer reactions in ethylene polymerization with metallocene /borate/alkyl aluminum.
Scheme 1. Mechanism of chain transfer reactions in ethylene polymerization with metallocene /borate/alkyl aluminum.
Polymers 13 00268 sch001
Polymers 13 00268 g003 550
Figure 3. 1H NMR spectra of polyethylene ((see supporting information) (a). Run 1.1, 1.3, 1.5 in Table S1, (b). Runs 2.1, 2.3 and 2.5 in Table S1).
Figure 3. 1H NMR spectra of polyethylene ((see supporting information) (a). Run 1.1, 1.3, 1.5 in Table S1, (b). Runs 2.1, 2.3 and 2.5 in Table S1).
Polymers 13 00268 g003
Polymers 13 00268 g004 550
Figure 4. Active center ratio and kP of ethylene polymerization with Mt-I/borate/alkylaluminum.
Figure 4. Active center ratio and kP of ethylene polymerization with Mt-I/borate/alkylaluminum.
Polymers 13 00268 g004
Polymers 13 00268 g005 550
Figure 5. Active center ratio and kP of ethylene polymerization with Mt-II/borate/alkylaluminum.
Figure 5. Active center ratio and kP of ethylene polymerization with Mt-II/borate/alkylaluminum.
Polymers 13 00268 g005
Polymers 13 00268 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) MWD curves of PE produce with Mt-I/borate-I and TEA/TIBA mixtures, (b) deconvolution of PE MWD curve into Flory components (run 1.2 in Table 1, (c) distribution of Flory components of PE produced from Mt-I/Borate-I with various mixtures of TIBA/TEA.
Figure 6. (a) MWD curves of PE produce with Mt-I/borate-I and TEA/TIBA mixtures, (b) deconvolution of PE MWD curve into Flory components (run 1.2 in Table 1, (c) distribution of Flory components of PE produced from Mt-I/Borate-I with various mixtures of TIBA/TEA.
Polymers 13 00268 g006
Polymers 13 00268 g007 550
Figure 7. Effects of alkylaluminum on activity of propylene polymerization.
Figure 7. Effects of alkylaluminum on activity of propylene polymerization.
Polymers 13 00268 g007
Polymers 13 00268 g008 550
Figure 8. DSC heating traces of PP produced with Mt/borate under TEA/TIBA mixtures of different ratios.
Figure 8. DSC heating traces of PP produced with Mt/borate under TEA/TIBA mixtures of different ratios.
Polymers 13 00268 g008
Polymers 13 00268 g009 550
Figure 9. Active center ratio and kP of propylene polymerization with Mt-I/borate/alkylaluminum.
Figure 9. Active center ratio and kP of propylene polymerization with Mt-I/borate/alkylaluminum.
Polymers 13 00268 g009
Polymers 13 00268 g010 550
Figure 10. Active center ratio and kP of propylene polymerization with Mt-II/borate/alkylaluminum.
Figure 10. Active center ratio and kP of propylene polymerization with Mt-II/borate/alkylaluminum.
Polymers 13 00268 g010
Polymers 13 00268 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Chain transfer reactions of metallocenium active center with different Al-alkyl bonds of alkylaluminum.
Scheme 2. Chain transfer reactions of metallocenium active center with different Al-alkyl bonds of alkylaluminum.
Polymers 13 00268 sch002
Table
Table 1. Results of ethylene polymerization with Mt-I a.
Table 1. Results of ethylene polymerization with Mt-I a.
RunBorateTriethylaluminium (TEA)/Triisobutylaluminium (TIBA) (mol/mol)Activity
(kg/mmolMt·h)		[C*]/[Zr]
(%)		kp
(L/mol·s)		Mw b
(kg/mol)		Ɖ bTmc
(°C)		ΔHm c
(J/g)
1.1I0/1003.0554.764316310.3126179
1.2I25/752.2152.148911324.2130196
1.3I50/501.8535.75974818.0130203
1.4I75/252.2353.54814410.9131206
1.5I100/02.0244.35253110.2120106
1.6II0/1003.1466.0549n.dn.d130209
1.7II25/751.5422.4791n.dn.d128223
1.8II50/502.0437.2633n.dn.d128201
1.9II75/202.9060.8551n.dn.d129225
1.10II100/03.0763.6557n.dn.d120116
a Reaction conditions: Mt-I = 1.25 μmol, Borate-I = 2.5 μmol, Borate-II = 2.5 μmol, ethylene pressure = 0.1 MPa, temperature = 50 °C, tp = 20 min, solvent toluene = 50 mL, alkylaluminum (TEA, TIBA or TEA/TIBA mixture) 1000 μmol, 2-thiophenecarbonyl chloride (TPCC) = 2000 μmol, tq = 5 min, b Determined by high temperature gel permeation chromatography (GPC), c Determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), n.d Not determined.
Table
Table 2. Results of ethylene polymerization with Mt-II a.
Table 2. Results of ethylene polymerization with Mt-II a.
RunBorateTEA/TIBA (mol/mol)Activity
(kg/mmolMt·h)		[C*]/[Zr]
(%)		kp
(L/mol·s)		Mwb (kg/mol)Ɖ bTmc (°C)ΔHm c
(J/g)
2.1I25/753.2244.38372.42.2122214
2.2I25/753.2244.38372.42.2122214
2.3I50/503.0251.46788.23.310654
2.4I75/253.7254.77852.62.2123212
2.5I100/03.4150.17852.92.5101156
2.6II0/1003.0043.6793n.dn.d122226
2.7II25/752.9047.1712n.dn.d122170
2.8II50/505.0257.51007n.dn.d117157
2.9II75/203.6550.4835n.dn.d123207
2.10II100/03.1049.4722n.dn.d101158
a Reaction conditions: Mt-II = 1.25 μmol, Borate-I = 2.5 μmol, Borate-II = 2.5 μmol, ethylene pressure = 0.1 MPa, temperature = 50 °C, tp = 20 min, solvent toluene = 50 mL, alkylaluminum (TEA, TIBA or TEA/TIBA mixture) 1000 μmol, TPCC = 2000 μmol, tq = 5 min, b Determined by high temperature GPC, c Determined by DSC, n.dNot determined.
Table
Table 3. Results of propylene polymerization Mt-I/borate/alkylaluminum a.
Table 3. Results of propylene polymerization Mt-I/borate/alkylaluminum a.
RunBorateTEA/TIBA
(mol/mol)		Activity
(kg/mmolMt·h)		[C*]/[Zr]
(%)		kp
(L/mol·s)		Mwb
(kg/mol)		Ɖ bTmc
(°C)		ΔHm c
(J/g)
3.1I0/10010.9742.345659.64.515875
3.2I25/759.6041.241033.63.515883
3.3I50/5010.2742.3427n.dn.d15897
3.4I75/259.4635.1474n.dn.d157106
3.5I100/03.9434.220312.62.4158104
3.6II0/10010.6644.0426n.dn.d15862
3.7II25/759.2238.1425n.dn.d15889
3.8II50/509.5342.9391n.dn.d158109
3.9II75/207.7333.8402n.dn.d158112
3.10II100/02.4720.6211n.dn.d159122
a Reaction conditions: catalyst Mt-I = 1.25 μmol, Borate-I = 2.5 μmol, Borate-II = 2.5 μmol, propylene pressure = 0.1 MPa, temperature = 50 °C, tp = 20 min, solvent toluene = 50 mL, coactivator: TEA, TIBA or TEA/TIBA mixture, Al = 1000 μmol, TPCC = 2000 μmol, tq = 5 min, b Determined by high temperature GPC, c Determined by DSC, n.d Not determined.
Table
Table 4. Results of propylene polymerization Mt-II/borate/alkylaluminum a.
Table 4. Results of propylene polymerization Mt-II/borate/alkylaluminum a.
RunBorateTEA/TIBA
(mol/mol)		Activity
(kg/mmolMt·h)		[C*]/[Zr]
(%)		kp
(L/mol·s)		Mwb
(kg/mol)		Ɖ bTmc
(°C)		ΔHmc
(J/g)
4.1I0/1001.1817.511859.64.512251
4.2I25/751.3721.511234.43.411551
4.3I50/501.4422.511316.12.89151
4.4I75/251.4621.2122n.dn.d11556
4.5I100/01.2219.810912.72.210649
4.6II0/1001.4618.8137n.dn.d12257
4.7II25/751.1017.5111n.dn.d11648
4.8II50/501.3919.9123n.dn.d9252
4.9II75/200.9412.7130n.dn.d11554
4.0II100/01.0117.4102n.dn.d10647
a Reaction conditions: catalyst Mt-II = 1.25 μmol, Borate-I = 2.5 μmol, Borate-II = 2.5 μmol, propylene pressure = 0.1 MPa, temperature = 50 °C, tp = 20 min, solvent toluene = 50 mL, coactivator: TEA, TIBA or TEA/TIBA mixture, Al = 1000 μmol, TPCC = 2000 μmol, tq = 5 min, b Determined by high temperature GPC, c Determined by DSC, n.d Not determined.
Table
Table 5. Comparisons between reported and recent experimental results under the same experimental conditions for Mt-II catalyzed polyethylene and polypropylene [26,30,39,59].
Table 5. Comparisons between reported and recent experimental results under the same experimental conditions for Mt-II catalyzed polyethylene and polypropylene [26,30,39,59].
MCocatalyst a Activit[C*]/[Zr] (%)kp(L/mol·s)Mwb (kg/mol)Ɖ bTmc (°C)ΔHm c (J/g)
EMethylaluminoxane (MAO)3.3740.45922723.1134.976.9
EMethylaluminoxanes (MMAO)2.1667.83301953.0n.dn.d
EdMAO5.245.58042903.6n.dn.d
ETIBA-borate-I3.2463.35912.82.2122214
ETEA borate-I 3.4150.17852.92.5101156
ETIBA-borate-II3.0043.6793n.dn.d122226
ETEA borate-II 3.1049.4722n.dn.d101158
PMMAO3.824.315615.21.8n.dn.d
PTIBA-borate-I1.1817.511859.64.512251
pTIBA borate-I 1.2219.810912.72.210649
pTEA-borate-II1.4618.8137n.dn.d12257
pTIBA borate-II 1.0117.4102n.dn.d10647
a Activity (kg/mmolMt·h), b Determined by high-temperature GPC, c Determined by DSC, n.d Not determined.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ali, A.; Muhammad, N.; Hussain, S.; Jamil, M.I.; Uddin, A.; Aziz, T.; Tufail, M.K.; Guo, Y.; Wei, T.; Rasool, G.; et al. Kinetic and Thermal Study of Ethylene and Propylene Homo Polymerization Catalyzed by ansa-Zirconocene Activated with Alkylaluminum/Borate: Effects of Alkylaluminum on Polymerization Kinetics and Polymer Structure. Polymers 2021, 13, 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13020268

AMA Style

Ali A, Muhammad N, Hussain S, Jamil MI, Uddin A, Aziz T, Tufail MK, Guo Y, Wei T, Rasool G, et al. Kinetic and Thermal Study of Ethylene and Propylene Homo Polymerization Catalyzed by ansa-Zirconocene Activated with Alkylaluminum/Borate: Effects of Alkylaluminum on Polymerization Kinetics and Polymer Structure. Polymers. 2021; 13(2):268. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13020268

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ali, Amjad, Nadeem Muhammad, Shahid Hussain, Muhammad Imran Jamil, Azim Uddin, Tariq Aziz, Muhammad Khurram Tufail, Yintian Guo, Tiantian Wei, Ghulam Rasool, and et al. 2021. "Kinetic and Thermal Study of Ethylene and Propylene Homo Polymerization Catalyzed by ansa-Zirconocene Activated with Alkylaluminum/Borate: Effects of Alkylaluminum on Polymerization Kinetics and Polymer Structure" Polymers 13, no. 2: 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13020268

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop