Error in Figures 3 and 6
In the original article [1], there was a mistake in “Figure 3. Schematic diagram of setup for shock absorption test.” as published. The labels in Figure 3 (cushion material and core material) are in the wrong order. The corrected “Figure 3. Schematic diagram of setup for shock absorption test.” appears below. The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original article has been updated.
In the original article, there was a mistake in “Figure 6. Maximum loads of various specimens obtained from the shock absorption tests. The values of the same letter were not significantly different (p > 0.05).” as published. The label in Figure 6 has a typing error in the first column ABC in place of BCD. The corrected “Figure 6. Maximum loads of various specimens obtained from the shock absorption tests. The values of the same letter were not significantly different (p > 0.05).” appears below. The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original article has been updated.
Reference
- Aung, T.K.; Churei, H.; Tanabe, G.; Kinjo, R.; Togawa, K.; Li, C.; Tsuchida, Y.; Tun, P.S.; Hlaing, S.; Takahashi, H.; et al. Air Permeability, Shock Absorption Ability, and Flexural Strength of 3D-Printed Perforated ABS Polymer Sheets with 3D-Knitted Fabric Cushioning for Sports Face Guard Applications. Polymers 2021, 13, 1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).