Next Article in Journal
Cross-Linked Chitosan/Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Composite as Ecofriendly Biocatalyst for Synthesis of Some Novel Benzil Bis-Thiazoles
Next Article in Special Issue
Computational Study on Temperature Driven Structure–Function Relationship of Polysaccharide Producing Bacterial Glycosyl Transferase Enzyme
Previous Article in Journal
Properties Enhancement of High Molecular Weight Polylactide Using Stereocomplex Polylactide as a Nucleating Agent
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Persea Americana Agro-Industrial Waste Biorefinery for Sustainable High-Value-Added Products

by
Anthony Mora-Sandí
1,
Abigail Ramírez-González
1,
Luis Castillo-Henríquez
2,3,
Mary Lopretti-Correa
4 and
José Roberto Vega-Baudrit
1,2,*
1
School of Chemistry, National University of Costa Rica (UNA), Heredia 86-3000, Costa Rica
2
National Laboratory of Nanotechnology (LANOTEC), National Center for High Technology (CeNAT), San José 1174-1200, Costa Rica
3
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Costa Rica, San José 11501-2060, Costa Rica
4
Nuclear Research Center, Faculty of Science, Universidad de la República (UdelaR), Montevideo 11300, Uruguay
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2021, 13(11), 1727; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13111727
Submission received: 2 April 2021 / Revised: 11 May 2021 / Accepted: 20 May 2021 / Published: 25 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biopolymers: Recent Progress and New Perspectives II)

Abstract

:
Significant problems have arisen in recent years, such as global warming and hunger. These complications are related to the depletion and exploitation of natural resources, as well as environmental pollution. In this context, bioprocesses and biorefinery can be used to manage agro-industrial wastes for obtaining high-value-added products. A large number of by-products are composed of lignin and cellulose, having the potential to be exploited sustainably for chemical and biological conversion. The biorefinery of agro-industrial wastes has applications in many fields, such as pharmaceuticals, medicine, material engineering, and environmental remediation. A comprehensive approach has been developed toward the agro-industrial management of avocado (Persea americana) biomass waste, which can be transformed into high-value-added products to mitigate global warming, save non-renewable energy, and contribute to health and science. Therefore, this work presents a comprehensive review on avocado fruit waste biorefinery and its possible applications as biofuel, as drugs, as bioplastics, in the environmental field, and in emerging nanotechnological opportunities for economic and scientific growth.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

For years, the world has focused on economic development without any concern or planning regarding the exploitation of natural resources [1]. Currently, significant problems have arisen due to that behavior, such as global warming, climate change, and hunger. In addition, overpopulation generates instability in economic models, forcing societies to find sustainable ways for development, such as biobased industries that can mitigate pollution and the depletion of natural sources [2].
One strategy that impacts all fields is the recovery of agro-industrial wastes. This assessment includes the implementation of biorefineries, which complement or replace current oil refineries, thus reducing our impact on the environment [3]. Biorefinery involves converting biomass through various technologies to obtain an extensive list of high-value-added products and energy from a biobased raw material [4]. Many biotechnological bioprocesses have been developed to optimize energy consumption and reduce the amount of waste [2,5]. However, it has been difficult for innovative and sustainable industries to move towards the concepts of green chemistry, cleaner production, and zero waste [6].
Generally, agro-industrial waste is mainly composed of lignocellulosic biomass (LCB), which has gained attention in material and chemical engineering. Due to its outstanding properties (e.g., mechanical, thermal, renewability, wide availability, non-toxicity, low cost, and biodegradability) it is regarded as a novel alternative for obtaining high-value-added products [7]. Charpentier et al. recently used empty palm fruit bunch fiber (EPFBF), a lignocellulosic biomass by-product of palm oil production, for obtaining fermentable sugars. In addition, pretreated EPFBF hydrolysate was subjected to simultaneous saccharification and fermentation for bioethanol production [8].
Moreover, avocado (Persea americana) industrial wastes are being addressed with great importance [9,10]. This native tree of Mesoamerica has the largest production areas concentrated in Central and South America, while its consumption is increasing worldwide [11,12]. According to the average production between 1994 and 2019, the top 10 avocado producers were Mexico, the Dominican Republic, Indonesia, Colombia, Peru, United States, Brazil, Chile, Kenya, and Malawi. In 2019, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) reported a world production of 7.0 million tons, of which approximately half was lost throughout the production chain [12].
The biorefinery of this fruit waste is mandatory to provide a solution to this problem and to the need for creating sustainable economic growth. In this sense, Trujillo et al. compared three different avocado fruit sizes (small, medium, and large) regarding their total phenolic (TPC) and flavonoid contents (TFC). The study reported higher TPC, TFC, and antioxidant and enzymatic activities in avocado peel extract from the small size group, while these parameters were significantly lower in the other groups. These results suggest avocado by-products’ suitability for biorefinery applications [13].
Furthermore, the valorization of avocado fruit by-products within a biorefinery frame allows for obtaining different bioactive compounds for therapeutic applications [14]. Additionally, as stated by Bayón et al., biopolymers are abundant in agro-industrial wastes. This variety of molecules presented in avocado residues can be used for drug delivery applications, tissue engineering, and other health-associated technologies [15]. Therefore, this review presents a comprehensive approach to the biorefinery of the agro-industrial wastes from Persea americana to obtain products with high-value-added, highlighting their applications as biofuels, bioenergy, bioactive compounds, and biopolymers with nanotechnological functions.

2. Applications of Avocado Agro-Industrial Wastes

2.1. Waste and Pretreatments

An average avocado fruit weighs approximately 150–400 g [16,17]. This fruit is made up of exocarp (peel), mesocarp (pulp), endocarp, and seed (Figure 1). Mesocarp is the most abundant, representing between 52.9 and 81.3% of the fruit mass, which is in great demand because of its properties and high nutritional value [18,19]. Avocado provides vitamins, such as A, B, D, and E, that can be used for different applications (e.g., pharmaceutical, nutritional, and cosmetic industries) [19,20,21].
On the other hand, the peel and seed are not often used in the food industry, thus becoming an excessive amount of waste. These by-products usually represent between 21–30% of the avocado mass and are full of biopolymers and raw materials that constitute a great source of lignin and cellulose [22,23]. Lignin is an aromatic polymer and the second most abundant on earth after cellulose. It is usually burned to generate heat, but in biorefineries, the conversion of LCB into liquid transportation fuels generates more lignin than needed to power the process [24]. In addition, lignin makes the biopolymeric structure highly resistant to solubilization, which inhibits cellulose hydrolysis and thus causes an issue for its isolation [25,26,27]. Therefore, special efforts are underway to transform this excess into high-value-added products [24].
Given the above, avocado fruit wastes and LCB demand physical, chemical, and biological pretreatments (Figure 2) that ease handling and improve process efficiency significantly [28,29]. It is relevant to consider that LCB’s crystalline structure, its lignification degree, and the complexity of its cellwall constituents create a resistance to chemical and biological breakdown, known as biomass recalcitrance [30,31]. As a consequence, it is imperative to execute a pretreatment technique that allows the disruption of LCB recalcitrant structure [32,33].
In the first place, physical pretreatment is necessary before any other pretreatment or operation [28]. This action aims to reduce the particle size, which produces an increase in surface area, incrementing the accessible surface, which in turn, improves hydrolysis due to better heat and mass transfer and, consequently, the process of obtaining high-value-added products [34,35]. Although these methods are considered eco-friendly, reducing the polymerization degree, as well as the crystallinity, imply high energy consumption [36].
The most common physical pretreatments include milling, extrusion, microwaves, and ultrasonication [28]. Milling is mostly employed for reducing crystallinity and, in particular, the particle size, since it has been demonstrated that a biomass below 0.4 mm does not interfere with hydrolysis [37]. Extrusion is commonly employed for pretreating LCBs. In these methods, raw materials are passed through a tight barrel that is heated above 300 °C. The high temperature combined with the shear forces produced by the screws that spin into the barrel disrupt the LCB recalcitrant structure [38,39,40].
Regarding microwave pretreatment, the biomass sample is immersed in dilute alkalis, and it is then subjected to microwaves exposure for 5–20 min. The method is energy-efficient, easy to perform, and possesses a high-heating capacity in a short time [41,42]. Duan et al. evaluated the effects of microwave temperature, microwave time, and hydrochloric acid concentration on different physicochemical properties from pure lignin. The study reported better properties for the pretreated samples in contrast to raw lignin, allowing for the production of bio-oil of excellent quality [43].
Ultrasonication generates the disintegration of biomass as a result of cavitation, which produces the significant shear forces exerted by the liquid phase. This process allows isolating cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin [44,45,46]. Other possible physical pretreatments implement radiation (e.g., gamma rays, electron beams), as well as thermal processes (e.g., pyrolysis, roasting, or steam explosions) [47,48].
On the other hand, chemical pretreatments focus on fractioning biomass through hydrolysis mediated by ionic or organic solvents and alkaline or acidic solution exposure [28]. Ionic liquids (IL) are green solvents composed of cations and anions and present a melting point below 100 °C. During the pretreatment, the charged species promote lignin and cellulose solubilization by interrupting intra-and intermolecular hydrogen bonding in these compounds [49,50]. Nevertheless, further research is required for developing IL with no or low toxicity to enzymes as well as low-cost recovery technologies for these solvents [51].
The organosolv pretreatment uses organic solvents or their mixtures with water to break down the internal bonds between lignin and hemicellulose, which allows obtaining a pure cellulose residue. The delignification causes an increase in pore volume and the surface area of cellulose, enhancing the accessibility for enzymatic hydrolysis and saccharification [52,53]. Among the most widely used organic solvents are ethanol, methanol, acetone, and ethylene glycol [54].
Alkali pretreatment attempts to solubilize lignin in alkali solution, usually made of hydroxides (e.g., sodium, potassium, calcium, and ammonium) [55]. In these processes, several events take place. First, saponification causes cleavage of intermolecular ester linkages between lignin and hemicellulose, resulting in their solubilization [56]. In addition, cellulose swelling reduces crystallinity and the degree of polymerization, which increases the surface area available to enzymatic hydrolysis [57,58]. The combination of this pretreatment with organic solvents or aqueous solutions enhances the process. Zhong et al. employed a diluted sodium hydroxide (NaOH)-aided methanol organosolv pretreatment for the efficient exploitation of LCB from xylose residues. This approach resulted in a more efficient delignification of 86.7% and the recovery of highly pure lignin [59].
On the other hand, acid pretreatment is based on the vulnerability of glucosidic bonds between hemicellulose and cellulose to be broken by acids, causing the breakdown of long chains into sugar monomers [60,61]. This approach usually employs sulfuric, hydrochloric, nitric, phosphoric, and acetic acids as substrates. Although it is very useful for enhancing cellulose availability and biodegradability, it is not effective in dissolving lignin, only for disrupting it [62,63].
Physicochemical pretreatment methods employ both chemical and physical techniques for disrupting LCB structure [64]. These methods can make use of hydrothermal pretreatment (steam explosion and liquid hot water) to promote the separation of the lignocellulosic matrix [65,66,67,68]. In addition, ammonia fiber explosion subjects biomass material to liquid anhydrous ammonia under high pressures, followed by a rapid depressurization of the system. The degree of disruption will depend on the temperature applied, which is usually between 60–100 °C and affects the rapidness of the ammonia vaporization [69].
Finally, biological pretreatments are based on exoenzyme-mediated decomposition or hydrolysis and saccharification. It must be a solid or liquid substrate fermentation by whole-cell systems or solely enzymatic digestion. The technique presents different advantages since it is eco-friendly, consumes less energy, and there is no inhibitor formation during the process [70,71].
Furthermore, the residues obtained by these pretreatment techniques contain essential oils, bioactive compounds, fibers, and carbon sources, giving them the potential to be exploited sustainably for chemical and biological conversion for diverse industrial fields [72].

2.2. Potential Biorefinery

The annual amount of biomass waste generated by agro-industrial activity is estimated at 50 billion tons [16]. This biomass can be converted into different raw materials that will be further processed in biorefineries. The previous fact demands changes in current economic industrial strategies, as well as the development of suitable and sustainable biorefinery models [73,74].
Bioactive and high-value-added products have been obtained by biorefinery of different tropical fruits [75]. Melo et al. employed an organic solvent extraction for isolating phenolic compounds such as anthocyanins and flavonoids from açaí (Euterpe oleracea) seeds [76]. Rezende et al. also obtained anthocyanins from Acerola (Malpighia emarginata) seed and peel through an ultrasound-assisted extraction with ethanol as a solvent [77]. Banana (Musa paradisiaca) peel biorefinery was studied by Fu et al. who were able to recover phenolic compounds through successive extractions with organic solvents [78]. In addition, Lima et al. and Mugwagma et al. used guava (Psidium guajava) seeds and mango (Mangifera indica) peel, respectively, for obtaining phenolic compounds through a hydroalcoholic extraction [79,80].
In this sense, the valorization of avocado wastes is also of great interest, not only because of the high amount of by-products generated by the activity but also due to the opportunities for obtaining bioenergy, biofuels, and other marketable products [81,82]. Dávila et al. stated in their work the presence (%wt) of cellulose (26–38%), hemicellulose (24–26%), and lignin (4%) in the avocado seed. The authors also reported the same components in peel but with certain differences in the content, where cellulose is greatly reduced (6–7%), hemicellulose is doubled (46–50%), and lignin is halved (2%) in comparison to seed [83]. As mentioned before, the rich content of LCB fosters the reincorporation of the industrial wastes into production processes to reduce disposal costs and environmental impact, while providing eco-friendly sources of high-value-added products [84,85].
Moreover, Salazar et al. studied avocado seed, peel, and dry pulp, reporting, respectively, the presence (%wt) of carbohydrates (43–85%, 44–84%, and 32%), lipids (2–4%, 2–6%, and 55%), proteins (3–9%, 3–8%, and 7.5%), and minerals (2–4%, 2–6%, and 6%). This biochemical composition allows for the design of biobased polymers, which have emerged with an advantage over conventional materials due to their biodegradability and renewability [83]. Carbohydrates can be used in the energy and fuel industry (e.g., bioethanol). Although seeds and peels are being prioritized, pulp residues are also sources of monounsaturated fatty acids, oleic acid, palmitic acid, tocopherols, tocotrienols, phytosterols, carotenoids, and polyphenols, which may potentially exhibit pharmacological activity in human beings [86].
Páramos et al. developed a method for oil extraction and the recovery of bioactive compounds from Brazilian and Mexican avocados, using only their waste materials (peels and seeds). The research group used a Soxhlet system with hexane, ethanol, and ethyl acetate as solvents. In addition, they employed as cosolvents supercritical CO2 (SC–CO2), ethanol, and ethyl acetate. The results demonstrated the greatest extraction efficiency for the system that used ethanol as a solvent and supercritical carbon dioxide as a cosolvent, where oil extraction yielded up to 10.3 wt% for the Brazilian seeds and 14.0 wt% for the Mexican peels [16].
Another method for optimizing the recovery of bioactive compounds was developed by Figueroa et al. In this research, phenolic compounds from avocado peels were extracted using pressurized liquid extraction with safe non-toxic solvents. The research group defined the conditions of 200 °C as the extraction temperature and a solvent system composed of 1:1 ethanol/water. More than 47 phenolic compounds were isolated in the obtained extracts [87].
In another approach, Ortiz et al. evaluated the effect of different extraction methods (microwave extraction, hexane extraction, microwave–hexane combined extraction, and acetone extraction) on the recovery of fatty acids, as well as on the physicochemical properties of avocado oil. The study suggests that the highest fatty acid yield is obtained when using the combined microwave–hexane extraction. In addition, oil physicochemical properties are affected mainly by solvents rather than by microwaves [88].
The biorefinery approach for avocado by-products can also have applications in the food industry. Permal et al. used dried avocado wastewater generated by cold-pressed oil production to assess its suitability to be sprayed as a natural food preservative in cooked pork sausages. The wastewater contained 6.3 wt% of lipids, and its antioxidant activity increased after spray drying, being as effective as synthetic antioxidants to inhibit lipid oxidation [89].

3. High-Value Products Obtained from Avocado Wastes

3.1. Biofuels and Bioenergy

The importance of fossil fuels is well known worldwide, as they are the most common source of energy commercialized. However, their production limitations and the depletion of these fossil sources cause their price to increase on a regular basis [90]. Considering the significant amount of waste obtained by the avocado industry, the production of bioenergy and biofuels from these are regarded as possible alternatives to fossil fuels in the short-term [91].
In the biorefinery approach, biomass conversion into biofuels and biochemicals represents a promising and valuable way to mitigate global warming and diversifying energy sources [92]. In that sense, cellulosic biomass from the avocado seed and peel can be used for bioethanol production through fermentation (Figure 3) [93,94]. Woldu et al. employed powdered avocado seed hydrolysate wastes for producing bioethanol. The optimum fermentation conditions were achieved using Saccharomyces cerevisiae for 3 days, and a pH medium of 5.5 at 30 °C [95]. Additionally, Pratywi et al. reported the use of avocado seed powder to obtain starch that can be degraded by simple heating. This degradation can be considered a suitable method to recover glucose for bioethanol production [96].
This approach can also be employed for obtaining other substances with industrial importance, such as butanediol. However, there is still a major challenge regarding the optimization of the lignocellulosic raw material conversion to ethanol [97].
The latest efforts and research are focused on solving this lack of technology. In this sense, Gu et al. proposed the use of SC–CO2 explosion pretreatment as a green solvent to treat the biomass before enzyme hydrolysis [98]. This solvent is of great interest due to its natural character, non-toxicity, and non-flammability within the operating conditions [99]. In addition, conventional enzyme processes require large amounts of water and energy, while SC–CO2 is designed to reduce and optimize the energy used [98].
To date, some studies have declared it possible to obtain biodiesel from avocado seed through transesterification, which simplifies the process due to the low content of free fatty acids and the presence of triglycerides [81,91,100]. Colombo et al. determined that the fruit wastes have the potential to be transformed into biofuel. Pyrolysis and torrefaction allow obtaining liquid fuel, while for solid fuel, further thermal treatment is required to reduce part of the volatile liquid [17].

3.2. Drugs and Bioactive Compounds

It is well known that avocado contains many bioactive compounds that make this fruit a potential source for different drug candidates, which has attracted the attention of the pharmaceutical industry [101]. The fruit is remarkable because of its antioxidant activity, especially aqueous and alcoholic peel extracts [81]. A study carried out by Alkhalaf et al. proved significant antioxidant activity present in the seed as well [102].
Although seeds and peels are being prioritized, pulp residues are also sources of relevant therapeutic compounds. In these wastes, different studies have reported the presence of monounsaturated fatty acids, metabolites (e.g., oleic, palmitic acid), and tocopherols, tocotrienols, phytosterols, carotenoids, and polyphenols, which may potentially exhibit pharmacological activity in human beings [18,86].
Moreover, gastric, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial activities obtained from avocado wastes are currently being studied [103,104]. Athaydes et al. exposed the possible use of this product to prevent gastric ulcer disease in mice [105]. In this study, its efficacy relies on lowering mediators’ production, such as IL-6 and PEG2, known as proinflammatory factors [105,106]. In another approach, Dabas et al. confirmed this anti-inflammatory activity by anin vitroassay. The research group used an extract of the avocado seed on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammatory responses of murine macrophages, which revealed a reduction in the production of the inflammatory factors significantly [107].
The antibacterial activity is regarded with great interest by the scientific community. According to current studies, antibiotic-resistant bacteria will be the leading cause of death in the year 2050 and are becoming a real threat to human health [108]. Thus, it is imperative to develop new antibiotic drugs using natural resources, such as avocado wastes, which have exhibited antibacterial and antifungal activity.
Amado et al. prepared peel, seed, and pulp ethanolic extracts to evaluate the antimicrobial activity on Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, Escherichia coli, and Salmonella typhi. The results determined that the peel showed a better bactericidal and bacteriostatic effect over the Gram-positive. However, the different ethanolic extracts also demonstrated activity against Gram-negative bacteria [109].
Villarreal et al. and Salinas et al. evaluated the inhibitory activity of avocado acetogenins (i.e., fatty acid derivatives) used against Listeria monocytogenes. In these studies, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) showed a bactericidal effect probably due to increased membrane permeability and lytic effects. Therefore, the test with L. monocytogenes was successful, decreasing initial growth of bacteria. In addition, the results showed a significant inhibition activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains [110,111].
Furthermore, caffeoylquinic acid, a high-interest product, is present in the fruit as well. This substance possesses therapeutic properties due to its pharmacological activity as an anti-inflammatory, antiviral, anticancer, and antidiabetic molecule [112,113]. These properties, combined with the possibility of obtaining biopolymer from avocado wastes, represent a great opportunity for developing advanced drug delivery systems that can improve the bioavailability of these compounds and, thus, their therapeutic effect [17].

3.3. Biopolymers

Biotechnological innovations have developed high-value-added processes and biomaterials with a significant impact on regenerative medicine and for the design of biomedical devices. In order to successfully achieve the former, a convergence between bioactivity, biocompatibility, biodegradability, and good mechanical properties is necessary for the generation of new biomaterials [114,115].
Among the materials used for the design of medical devices, plastics such as polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) are widely used. However, the medical device industry demands the designing and engineering of new materials made from biomass as raw material. The biobased polymer approach takes advantage of polysaccharides in the avocado peel and seeds, where chemical and/or microbiological treatments can transform these wastes into biomaterials such as polylactic acid (PLA), nanocellulose fibers (NCFs), and polyhydroxybutyrates (PHBs) [7].

3.3.1. PolylacticAcid

Avocado wastes can be pretreated with filamentous fungi or Gram-positive bacteria such as Lactobacillus delbruekii. The solid or liquid bioprocesses involved can generate lactic acid, which allows for obtaining PLA through a process that seeks to reduce the impact on the environment, improves processibility, and results in energy savings [116]. Coban et al., in the case of Rhizopus oryzae, described how fermentation with fungi may be most effective due to high concentrations of starch in the remaining biomass. Once the lactic acid has been produced and extracted, PLA polymerization is carried out [117].

3.3.2. Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB)

PHB is a biodegradable and biocompatible thermoplastic. It belongs to the polyhydroxyalkanoate family (PHAs), demonstrating an enormous potential to replace petroleum-based plastics [118,119]. According to Getachew et al., a wide variety of bacteria such as Bacillus spp. can use biomass waste to perform its synthesis and production as an intracellular storage material, also known as inclusion bodies. Thus, it is possible to obtain this plastic from avocado waste material [120].
This biopolymer can be positively used for cell growth, tissue scaffolding for nerve and bone regeneration, controlled-release drug delivery, surgical sutures, cartilage, and cardiovascular support, thermo gels, and wound dressing [118,121]. Moreover, PHB is used in nanocomposites associated with other plastics (e.g., PLA), which improves the mechanical properties and makes them stronger [122]. Regarding this, Kai et al. described an improved tensile strength and elongation when these plastics are combined [123].

3.3.3. Starch Applicability

Starch is a renewable biopolymer material that is entirely biodegradable, easy to handle, and widely available in nature, such as in the avocado [124,125]. Seeds have shown to contain a large amount of starch that can reach over 90%. The recollection and processing of waste avocado seeds can be a new source of starch and provide income opportunities, since this macromolecule is widely employed in different fields for textiles, pharmaceutical excipients as a binder and adhesive, food processing, beverages, and more. In addition, many biopolymers based on starch can be obtained [126,127].
Hendra et al. used avocado starch to produce a plastic film since this material is composed of approximately 73% of amylopectin, making it a suitable raw material for the application. The manufacturing of the plastic film followed the standard method consisting of heating the mixture of starch filler solution until gelatinization [128]. Although starch bioplastics allow for obtaining a hydrophilic material, the mechanical properties tend to be weak. Therefore, it is necessary to continue researching these materials to improve their physicochemical and mechanical properties [129,130].
Araújo et al. evaluated avocado by-products to recover starch through microwave-assisted extraction (MAE). The obtained biopolymer exhibited high solubility, low water absorption capacity, a non-granular structure with particles smaller than 2 µm, and polydispersity at different sizes. Therefore, starch extraction resulted in being suitable and feasible by MAE technology when using avocado seed [131].

3.3.4. Nanocellulose Fibers (NCFs)

Likewise, a high-value product obtained from avocado seed and peel is NCFs. As described before, cellulose is one of the most abundant polymers in biomass waste [132]. Thus, avocado wastes represent a great source of cellulose for the production of these nanofibers with outstanding properties due to their high surface area, rheological behavior, water absorption, and high bending strength (~10 GPa). In addition, NCFs are used in the food and medical industry since these are not cytotoxic nor genotoxic. [133,134].
Regarding the food industry, NCFs are used as stabilizing agents (i.e., a functional ingredient in foods and food packaging) [133]. On the other hand, in the medical industry, they can be used as scaffolds for cellular culture, drug excipients and drug delivery, and enzyme immobilization. Additionally, they can be used in the design of macroscopic materials such as catheters, skin and bone repair, and antimicrobial materials [134].

4. Nanotechnology

Nanotechnology is increasingly gaining popularity because it plays an essential role in many fields, such as pharmaceuticals, medicine, material engineering, and environmental remediation [135]. This technology offers a wide range of opportunities to develop new products and processes for designing high-value-added products.
There are multiple applications in the agro-industrial area, such as in pest control by designing nanomaterials. Avocado seed and peel can be used for extracting nanocellulose, which can work as a new packing material and as a carrier of antimicrobial agents extracted from the same fruit waste [136,137]. Additionally, phenols and essential oils are added to nanocomposites to improve food materials’ lifespan and are used for the production of nanoemulsifiers, which have advantages over conventional emulsifiers [138].
Another incredible research area is the green synthesis of nanoparticles with multiple applications according to their properties. For example, the biosynthesis of copper, silver, and gold nanoparticles using fruit by-products represents great potential for biomedical applications due to the nanoparticles’antimicrobial and antioxidant properties [135,139].

5. Challenges and Future Perspectives

Advanced research is looking for the development of renewable lignin-based biopolymers, for which novel technologies are required by engineering plant feedstocks to achieve structural homogeneity in the separation and purification procedures. Although this irreversible trend represents an eco-friendly process, the growing of agricultural products without proper management of soils and pesticides use may cause the depletion of soil nutrients. In addition, biopolymers’ conversion into useful materials requires chemical and biological additives, so improvements at all stages of their life cycle should be done to preserve environmental integrity [74,85,140].
Moreover, nanotechnology will play an important role in taking advantage of all these biopolymers. Developing novel platforms based on hybrid biopolymeric systems with applications in nanomedicine, environmental preservation, and food packaging will be necessary for years to come [141]. More joint efforts from multidisciplinary and multi-industry research, investment, and social commitment are needed to make all the proposed technologies and bioprocesses viable and for agro-industries to migrate towards these biorefinery models.

6. Concluding Remarks

An integrated biorefinery approach applied to avocado excessive wastes allows for reintroducing these into the production chain. The transformation of waste biomass into high-value-added products provides society with the opportunity to develop renewable fuels, biobased materials, and chemicals for different pharmaceutical, biotechnological, nanotechnological, agro-industrial, and engineering applications. At the same time, LCB plays an irreplaceable role in human society’s attempt at sustainable development with a minimum impact on the environment. The valorization of avocado wastes, as well as any other natural by-product, holds potential for mid-term replacement of fossil carbon fuels in a biobased economy. This could provide a suitable strategy to manage natural resource depletion and to create sustainable economic growth from a bioeconomic perspective.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.-S. and J.R.V.-B.; methodology, A.M.-S. and A.R.-G.; investigation, A.M.-S., A.R.-G. and L.C.-H.; resources, J.R.V.-B. and M.L.-C.; writing—original draft preparation, L.C.-H. and A.R.-G.; writing—review and editing, L.C.-H. and J.R.V.-B.; visualization, L.C.-H. and M.L.-C.; supervision, J.R.V.-B. and M.L.-C.; project administration, J.R.V.-B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. De Buck, V.; Polanska, M.; Van Impe, J. Modeling Biowaste Biorefineries: A Review. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2020, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Morais, A.R.; Bogel-Lukasik, R. Green chemistry and the biorefinery concept. Sustain. Chem. Process. 2013, 1, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Dávila, J.A.; Rosenberg, M.; Castro, E.; Cardona, C.A. A model biorefinery for avocado (Persea americanamill.) processing. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 243, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ruiz, H.A. Foreword. High Pressure Processing for the Valorization of Biomass; Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC): London, UK, 2017; pp. P007–P008. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cherubini, F. The biorefinery concept: Using biomass instead of oil for producing energy and chemicals. Energy Convers. Manag. 2010, 51, 1412–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pauliuk, S.; Arvesen, A.; Stadler, K.; Hertwich, E.G. Industrial ecology in integrated assessment models. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2017, 7, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Redondo-Gómez, C.; Quesada, M.R.; Astúa, S.V.; Zamora, J.P.M.; Lopretti, M.; Vega-Baudrit, J.R. Biorefinery of Biomass of Agro-Industrial Banana Waste to Obtain High-Value Biopolymers. Molecules 2020, 25, 3829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Alfaro, C.C.; Arias, J.M. Enzymatic conversion of treated oil palm empty fruit bunches fiber into fermentable sugars: Optimization of solid and protein loadings and surfactant effects. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Moreno, A.J.P.; Aguilera-Ureña, M.-J.; Manzano-Agugliaro, F. Fuel properties of avocado stone. Fuel 2016, 186, 358–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hurtado-Fernández, E.; Fernández-Gutiérrez, A.; Carrasco-Pancorbo, A. Avocado fruit—Persea americana. In Exotic Fruits; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 37–48. [Google Scholar]
  11. Li, Y.; Bundeesomchok, K.; Rakotomanomana, N.; Fabiano-Tixier, A.-S.; Bott, R.; Wang, Y.; Chemat, F. Towards a Zero-Waste Biorefinery Using Edible Oils as Solvents for the Green Extraction of Volatile and Non-Volatile Bioactive Compounds from Rosemary. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Zafar, T.; Sidhu, J.S. Avocado Production, Processing, and Nutrition. In Handbook of Vegetables and Vegetable Processing, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2018; pp. 509–534. [Google Scholar]
  13. Trujillo-Mayol, I.; Badillo-Muñoz, G.; Céspedes-Acuña, C.; Alarcón-Enos, J. The Relationship between Fruit Size and Phenolic and Enzymatic Composition of Avocado Byproducts (Persea americana Mill.): The Importance for Biorefinery Applications. Horticulturae 2020, 6, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Villacís-Chiriboga, J.; Elst, K.; Van Camp, J.; Vera, E.; Ruales, J. Valorization of byproducts from tropical fruits: Extraction methodologies, applications, environmental, and economic assessment: A review (Part 1: General overview of the byproducts, traditional biorefinery practices, and possible applications). Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 19, 405–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bayón, B.; Berti, I.R.; Gagneten, A.M.; Castro, G.R. Biopolymers from Wastes to High-Value Products in Biomedicine. In Applications of Paleoenvironmental Techniques in Estuarine Studies; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 1–44. [Google Scholar]
  16. Páramos, P.R.; Granjo, J.F.; Corazza, M.L.; Matos, H.A. Extraction of high value products from avocado waste biomass. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2020, 165, 104988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Colombo, R.; Papetti, A. Avocado (Persea americana Mill.) by-products and their impact: From bioactive compounds to biomass energy and sorbent material for removing contaminants. A review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 54, 943–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Duarte, P.F.; Chaves, M.A.; Borges, C.D.; Mendonça, C.R.B. Avocado: Characteristics, health benefits and uses. Ciênc. Rural 2016, 46, 747–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Jimenez, P.; Garcia, P.; Quitral, V.; Vasquez, K.; Parra-Ruiz, C.; Reyes-Farias, M.; Garcia-Diaz, D.F.; Robert, P.; Encina, C.; Soto-Covasich, J. Pulp, Leaf, Peel and Seed of Avocado Fruit: A Review of Bioactive Compounds and Healthy Benefits. Food Rev. Int. 2020, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ghodake, H.; Goswami, T.; Chakraverty, A. Moisture sorption isotherms, heat of sorption and vaporization of withered leaves, black and green tea. J. Food Eng. 2007, 78, 827–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bhuyan, D.J.; Alsherbiny, M.A.; Perera, S.; Low, M.; Basu, A.; Devi, O.A.; Barooah, M.S.; Li, C.G.; Papoutsis, K. The Odyssey of Bioactive Compounds in Avocado (Persea americana) and their Health Benefits. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Zhang, Z.; Huber, D.J.; Rao, J. Antioxidant systems of ripening avocado (Persea americana Mill.) fruit following treatment at the preclimacteric stage with aqueous 1-methylcyclopropene. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2013, 76, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Araújo, R.G.; Rodriguez-Jasso, R.M.; Ruiz, H.A.; Pintado, M.M.E.; Aguilar, C.N. Avocado by-products: Nutritional and functional properties. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 80, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ragauskas, A.J.; Beckham, G.T.; Biddy, M.J.; Chandra, R.; Chen, F.; Davis, M.F.; Davison, B.H.; Dixon, R.A.; Gilna, P.; Keller, M.; et al. Lignin Valorization: Improving Lignin Processing in the Biorefinery. Science 2014, 344, 1246843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Akhtar, N.; Gupta, K.; Goyal, D.; Goyal, A. Recent advances in pretreatment technologies for efficient hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2016, 35, 489–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sun, Y.-G.; Ma, Y.-L.; Wang, L.-Q.; Wang, F.-Z.; Wu, Q.-Q.; Pan, G.-Y. Physicochemical properties of corn stalk after treatment using steam explosion coupled with acid or alkali. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 117, 486–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Loow, Y.; Wu, T.Y.; Tan, K.A.; Lim, Y.S.; Siow, L.F.; Jahim, J.M.; Mohammad, A.W.; Teoh, W.H. Recent Advances in the Application of Inorganic Salt Pretreatment for Transforming Lignocellulosic Biomass into Reducing Sugars. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 8349–8363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Baruah, J.; Nath, B.K.; Sharma, R.; Kumar, S.; Deka, R.C.; Baruah, D.C.; Kalita, E. Recent Trends in the Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Value-Added Products. Front. Energy Res. 2018, 6, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kumari, D.; Singh, R. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes for biofuel production: A critical review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 90, 877–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, H.; Liu, J.; Chang, X.; Chen, D.; Xue, Y.; Liu, P.; Lin, H.; Han, S. A review on the pretreatment of lignocellulose for high-value chemicals. Fuel Process. Technol. 2017, 160, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mirmohamadsadeghi, S.; Chen, Z.; Wan, C. Reducing biomass recalcitrance via mild sodium carbonate pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 209, 386–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dahadha, S.; Amin, Z.; Lakeh, A.A.B.; Elbeshbishy, E. Evaluation of Different Pretreatment Processes of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Enhanced Biomethane Production. Energy Fuels 2017, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Seidl, P.R.; Goulart, A.K. Pretreatment processes for lignocellulosic biomass conversion to biofuels and bioproducts. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2016, 2, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rajendran, K.; Drielak, E.; Varma, V.S.; Muthusamy, S.; Kumar, G. Updates on the pretreatment of lignocellulosic feedstocks for bioenergy production—A review. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2018, 8, 471–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Alvira, P.; Tomás-Pejó, E.; Ballesteros, M.; Negro, M. Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 4851–4861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Shirkavand, E.; Baroutian, S.; Gapes, D.J.; Young, B.R. Combination of fungal and physicochemical processes for lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 54, 217–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bai, X.; Wang, G.; Yu, Y.; Wang, D.; Wang, Z. Changes in the physicochemical structure and pyrolysis characteristics of wheat straw after rod-milling pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 250, 770–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kumar, A.K.; Sharma, S. Recent updates on different methods of pretreatment of lignocellulosic feedstocks: A review. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2017, 4, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Wahid, R.; Hjorth, M.; Kristensen, S.; Møller, H.B. Extrusion as Pretreatment for Boosting Methane Production: Effect of Screw Configurations. Energy Fuels 2015, 29, 4030–4037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Duque, A.; Manzanares, P.; Ballesteros, M. Extrusion as a pretreatment for lignocellulosic biomass: Fundamentals and applications. Renew. Energy 2017, 114, 1427–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Aguilar-Reynosa, A.; Romaní, A.; Rodríguez-Jasso, R.M.; Aguilar, C.N.; Garrote, G.; Ruiz, H.A. Microwave heating processing as alternative of pretreatment in second-generation biorefinery: An overview. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 136, 50–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Li, H.; Qu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Chang, S.; Xu, J. Microwave irradiation—A green and efficient way to pretreat biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 199, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Duan, D.; Ruan, R.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Dai, L.; Zhao, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Wu, Q. Microwave-assisted acid pretreatment of alkali lignin: Effect on characteristics and pyrolysis behavior. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 251, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ravindran, R.; Jaiswal, A.K. A comprehensive review on pre-treatment strategy for lignocellulosic food industry waste: Challenges and opportunities. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 199, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Li, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, M.; Xiu, H.; He, H. Ultrasonic enhance acid hydrolysis selectivity of cellulose with HCl–FeCl3 as catalyst. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 117, 917–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Trujillo-Mayol, I.; Céspedes-Acuña, C.; Silva, F.L.; Alarcón-Enos, J. Improvement of the polyphenol extraction from avocado peel by assisted ultrasound and microwaves. J. Food Process. Eng. 2019, 42, 13197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Araújo, R.G.; Rodriguez-Jasso, R.M.; Ruiz, H.A.; Govea-Salas, M.; Pintado, M.E.; Aguilar, C.N. Process optimization of microwave-assisted extraction of bioactive molecules from avocado seeds. Ind. Crop Prod. 2020, 154, 112623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lei, H.; Cybulska, I.; Julson, J. Hydrothermal Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass and Kinetics. J. Sustain. Bioenergy Syst. 2013, 03, 250–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Stanton, J.; Xue, Y.; Pandher, P.; Malek, L.; Brown, T.; Hu, X.; la Cruz, D.S.-D. Impact of ionic liquid type on the structure, morphology and properties of silk-cellulose biocomposite materials. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 108, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Smuga-Kogut, M.; Zgórska, K.; Kogut, T.; Kukiełka, K.; Wojdalski, J.; Kupczyk, A.; Dróżdż, B.; Wielewska, I. The use of ionic liquid pretreatment of rye straw for bioethanol production. Fuel 2017, 191, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Brandt-Talbot, A.; Gschwend, F.J.V.; Fennell, P.S.; Lammens, T.M.; Tan, B.; Weale, J.; Hallett, J.P. An economically viable ionic liquid for the fractionation of lignocellulosic biomass. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 3078–3102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Koo, B.-W.; Min, B.-C.; Gwak, K.-S.; Lee, S.-M.; Choi, J.-W.; Yeo, H.; Choi, I.-G. Structural changes in lignin during organosolv pretreatment of Liriodendron tulipifera and the effect on enzymatic hydrolysis. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 42, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ahmad, E.; Pant, K.K. Chapter 14—Lignin Conversion: A Key to the Concept of Lignocellulosic Biomass-Based Integrated Biorefinery. In Waste Biorefinery; Bhaskar, T., Pandey, A., Mohan, S.V., Lee, D.-J., Khanal, S.K., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 409–444. [Google Scholar]
  54. Borand, M.N.; Karaosmanoğlu, F. Effects of organosolvpretreatment conditions for lignocellulosic biomass in biorefinery applications: A review. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2018, 10, 033104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Xu, L.; Zhang, S.-J.; Zhong, C.; Li, B.-Z.; Yuan, Y.-J. Alkali-Based Pretreatment-Facilitated Lignin Valorization: A Review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 16923–16938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chen, Y.; Stevens, M.A.; Zhu, Y.; Holmes, J.; Xu, H. Understanding of Alkaline Pretreatment Parameters for Corn Stover Enzymatic Saccharification. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2013, 6, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Xu, H.; Li, B.; Mu, X. Review of Alkali-Based Pretreatment to Enhance Enzymatic Saccharification for Lignocellulosic Biomass Conversion. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2016, 55, 8691–8705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Oriez, V.; Peydecastaing, J.; Pontalier, P.-Y. Lignocellulosic Biomass Mild Alkaline Fractionation and Resulting Extract Purification Processes: Conditions, Yields, and Purities. Clean Technol. 2020, 2, 91–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Zhong, L.; Wang, C.; Xu, M.; Ji, X.; Yang, G.; Chen, J.; Janaswamy, S.; Lyu, G. Alkali-Catalyzed Organosolv Pretreatment of Lignocellulose Enhances Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Results in Highly Antioxidative Lignin. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 5039–5048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Solarte-Toro, J.C.; Romero-García, J.M.; Martínez-Patiño, J.C.; Ruiz-Ramos, E.; Castro-Galiano, E.; Cardona-Alzate, C.A. Acid pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for energy vectors production: A review focused on operational conditions and techno-economic assessment for bioethanol production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 107, 587–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mafe, O.A.; Davies, S.M.; Hancock, J.; Du, C. Development of an estimation model for the evaluation of the energy requirement of dilute acid pretreatments of biomass. Biomass Bioenergy 2015, 72, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Binod, P.; Pandey, A. Chapter 1—Introduction. In Pretreatment of Biomass; Pandey, A., Negi, S., Binod, P., Larroche, C., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 3–6. [Google Scholar]
  63. Keskin, T.; Abubackar, H.N.; Arslan, K.; Azbar, N. Chapter 12—Biohydrogen Production from Solid Wastes. In Biohydrogen; Pandey, A., Mohan, S.V., Chang, J.-S., Hallenbeck, P.C., Larroche, C., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 321–346. [Google Scholar]
  64. Brodeur, G.; Yau, E.; Badal, K.; Collier, J.; Ramachandran, K.B.; Ramakrishnan, S. Chemical and Physicochemical Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass: A Review. Enzym. Res. 2011, 2011, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yu, G.; Yano, S.; Inoue, H.; Inoue, S.; Endo, T.; Sawayama, S. Pretreatment of Rice Straw by a Hot-Compressed Water Process for Enzymatic Hydrolysis. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2010, 160, 539–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ingram, T.; Rogalinski, T.; Bockemühl, V.; Antranikian, G.; Brunner, G. Semi-continuous liquid hot water pretreatment of rye straw. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2009, 48, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Chen, H.-Z.; Liu, Z.-H. Steam explosion and its combinatorial pretreatment refining technology of plant biomass to bio-based products. Biotechnol. J. 2015, 10, 866–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rabemanolontsoa, H.; Saka, S. Various pretreatments of lignocellulosics. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 199, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Alizadeh, H.; Teymouri, F.; Gilbert, T.I.; Dale, B.E. Pretreatment of Switchgrass by Ammonia Fiber Explosion (AFEX). Appl.Biochem. Biotechnol. 2005, 124, 1133–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wan, C.; Li, Y. Solid-State Biological Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass. In Green Biomass Pretreatment for Biofuels Production; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 67–86. [Google Scholar]
  71. Yepes-Betancur, D.P.; Márquez-Cardozo, C.J.; Cadena-Chamorro, E.M.; Martinez-Saldarriaga, J.; Torres-León, C.; Ascacio-Valdes, A.; Aguilar, C.N. Solid-state fermentation-assisted extraction of bioactive compounds from hass avocado seeds. Food Bioprod. Process. 2021, 126, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Anwar, Z.; Gulfraz, M.; Irshad, M. Agro-industrial lignocellulosic biomass a key to unlock the future bioenergy: A brief review. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2014, 7, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Dhamodharan, K.; Ahlawat, S.; Kaushal, M.; Rajendran, K. 25—Economics and cost analysis of waste biorefineries. In Refining Biomass Residues for Sustainable Energy and Bioproducts; Kumar, R.P., Gnansounou, E., Raman, J.K., Baskar, G., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2020; pp. 545–565. [Google Scholar]
  74. Rodríguez, S.P.; Alzate, C.A.C. Chapter 12—Small-scale biorefineries based on plantain and avocado residues. In Waste Biore-finery; Bhaskar, T., Varjani, S., Pandey, A., Rene, E.R., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 349–374. [Google Scholar]
  75. Poveda-Giraldo, J.A.; Piedrahita-Rodríguez, S.; Alzate, C.A.C. Life Cycle Analysis of Biotechnological Processes Based on the Composition of the Raw Material: Eucalyptus, Avocado, and Plantain Cases in a Biorefinery System. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2021, 83, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Melo, P.S.; Arrivetti, L.D.O.R.; De Alencar, S.M.; Skibsted, L.H. Antioxidative and prooxidative effects in food lipids and synergism with α-tocopherol of açaí seed extracts and grape rachis extracts. Food Chem. 2016, 213, 440–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Rezende, Y.R.R.S.; Nogueira, J.P.; Narain, N. Comparison and optimization of conventional and ultrasound assisted extraction for bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity from agro-industrial acerola (Malpighia emarginata DC) residue. LWT 2017, 85, 158–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Fu, X.; Cheng, S.; Liao, Y.; Huang, B.; Du, B.; Zeng, W.; Jiang, Y.; Duan, X.; Yang, Z. Comparative analysis of pigments in red and yellow banana fruit. Food Chem. 2018, 239, 1009–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lima, R.D.S.; Ferreira, S.R.S.; Vitali, L.; Block, J.M. May the superfruit red guava and its processing waste be a potential ingredient in functional foods? Food Res. Int. 2019, 115, 451–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Mugwagwa, L.; Chimphango, A. Box-Behnken design based multi-objective optimisation of sequential extraction of pectin and anthocyanins from mango peels. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 219, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. García-Vargas, M.C.; Contreras, M.D.M.; Castro, E. Avocado-Derived Biomass as a Source of Bioenergy and Bioproducts. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Hennessey-Ramos, L.; Murillo-Arango, W.; Guayabo, G.T. Evaluation of a colorant and oil extracted from avocado waste as functional components of a liquid soap formulation. Rev. Fac. Nac. Agron. Medellin 2019, 72, 8855–8862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Salazar-López, N.J.; Domínguez-Avila, J.A.; Yahia, E.M.; Belmonte-Herrera, B.H.; Wall-Medrano, A.; Montalvo-González, E.; González-Aguilar, G. Avocado fruit and by-products as potential sources of bioactive compounds. Food Res. Int. 2020, 138, 109774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Del Castillo-Llamosas, A.; del Río, P.G.; Pérez-Pérez, A.; Yáñez, R.; Garrote, G.; Gullón, B. Recent advances to recover value-added compounds from avocado by-products following a biorefinery approach. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2021, 28, 100433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Chen, H. Future perspectives for lignocellulose biorefinery engineering. In Lignocellulose Biorefinery Engineering; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; pp. 247–251. [Google Scholar]
  86. Weschenfelder, C.; dos Santos, J.L.; de Souza, P.A.L.; de Campos, V.P.; Marcadenti, A. Avocado and Cardiovascular Health. Open J. Endocr. Metab. Dis. 2015, 5, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Figueroa, J.G.; Borrás-Linares, I.; Lozano-Sánchez, J.; Quirantes-Piné, R.; Segura-Carretero, A. Optimization of drying process and pressurized liquid extraction for recovery of bioactive compounds from avocado peel by-product. Electrophoresis 2018, 39, 1908–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Moreno, A.O.; Dorantes, L.; Galíndez, A.J.; Guzmán, R.I. Effect of Different Extraction Methods on Fatty Acids, Volatile Compounds, and Physical and Chemical Properties of Avocado (Perseaamericana Mill.) Oil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 2216–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Permal, R.; Chang, W.L.; Seale, B.; Hamid, N.; Kam, R. Converting industrial organic waste from the cold-pressed avocado oil production line into a potential food preservative. Food Chem. 2020, 306, 125635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. El-Ahmady, N.; Deraz, S.; Khalil, A. Bioethanol Production from Lignocellulosic Feedstocks Based on Enzymatic Hydrolysis: Current Status and Recent Developments. Biotechnology 2013, 13, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Baidhe, E.; Kiggundu, N.; Banadda, N. The Bioprocessing Quick Wins from Avocado Fruit in Uganda. Adv. Biosci. Biotechnol. 2020, 11, 405–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Di Bitonto, L.; Reynel-Ávila, H.E.; Castillo, D.I.M.; Bonilla-Petriciolet, A.; Pastore, C. Residual Mexican biomasses for bioenergy and fine chemical production: Correlation between composition and specific applications. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2021, 11, 619–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Karagoz, P.; Bill, R.M.; Ozkan, M. Lignocellulosic ethanol production: Evaluation of new approaches, cell immobilization and reactor configurations. Renew. Energy 2019, 143, 741–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ginting, M.H.S.; Misran, E.; Maulina, S. Potential of durian, avocado and jackfruit seed as raw material of bioethanol: A review. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 801, 012045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Woldu, A.R.; Ashagrie, Y.N.; Tsigie, Y.A. Bioethanol Production from Avocado Seed Wastes Using Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Am. J. Environ. Energy Power Res. 2015, 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  96. Pratywi, C.D.; Marantika, S.; Dwijananti, P. Masturi Characterization of starch degradation during simple heating for bioethanol production from the avocado seed. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 432, 012042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Faik, A. “Plant Cell Wall Structure-Pretreatment” the Critical Relationship in Biomass Conversion to Fermentable Sugars. In Green Biomass Pretreatment for Biofuels Production; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 1–30. [Google Scholar]
  98. Silvello, M.A.D.C.; Martínez, J.; Goldbeck, R. Alternative technology for intensification of fermentable sugars released from enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2020, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Gu, T. Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass Using Supercritical Carbon Dioxide as a Green Solvent. In Green Biomass Pretreatment for Biofuels Production; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 107–125. [Google Scholar]
  100. Dagde, K. Extraction of vegetable oil from avocado seeds for production of biodiesel. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manag. 2019, 23, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Melgar, B.; Dias, M.I.; Ciric, A.; Sokovic, M.; Garcia-Castello, E.M.; Rodriguez-Lopez, A.D.; Barros, L.; Ferreira, I.C. Bioactive characterization of Persea americana Mill. by-products: A rich source of inherent antioxidants. Ind. Crop Prod. 2018, 111, 212–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Alkhalaf, M.I.; Alansari, W.S.; Ibrahim, E.A.; Elhalwagy, M.E. Anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer activities of avocado (Persea americana) fruit and seed extract. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2019, 31, 1358–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Cires, M.J.; Navarrete, P.; Pastene, E.; Carrasco-Pozo, C.; Valenzuela, R.; Medina, D.; Andriamihaja, M.; Beaumont, M.; Blachier, F.; Gotteland, M. Protective Effect of an Avocado Peel Polyphenolic Extract Rich in Proanthocyanidins on the Alterations of Colonic Homeostasis Induced by a High-Protein Diet. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 11616–11626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Torres, E.; García, A.; Aranda, M.; Saéz, V.; Zúñiga, F.; Alarcón, J.; Avello, M.; Pastene, E. One-step purification of two semi-synthetic epicatechin adducts prepared from avocado peels procyanidins by centrifugal partition chromatography and evaluation of their anti-inflammatory effects on adenocarcinoma gastric cells infected with Helicobacter pylori. J. Chil. Chem. Soc. 2018, 63, 4222–4228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Athaydes, B.R.; Alves, G.M.; de Assis, A.L.E.M.; Gomes, J.V.D.; Rodrigues, R.P.; Campagnaro, B.P.; Nogueira, B.V.; Silveira, D.; Kuster, R.M.; Pereira, T.M.C.; et al. Avocado seeds (Persea americana Mill.) prevents indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer in mice. Food Res. Int. 2019, 119, 751–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Zhang, W.; Wu, J.; Zhang, F.; Dou, X.; Ma, A.; Zhang, X.; Shao, H.; Zhao, S.; Ling, P.; Liu, F.; et al. Lower range of molecular weight of xanthan gum inhibits apoptosis of chondrocytes through MAPK signaling pathways. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 130, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Dabas, D.; Ziegler, G.R.; Lambert, J.D. Anti-Inflammatory Properties of a Colored Avocado Seed Extract. Adv. Food Technol. Nutr. Sci. Open J. 2019, 5, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Willyard, C. The drug-resistant bacteria that pose the greatest health threats. Nat. Cell Biol. 2017, 543, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. Amado, D.A.V.; Helmann, G.A.; Detoni, A.M.; De Carvalho, S.L.C.; De Aguiar, C.M.; Martin, C.A.; Tiuman, T.S.; Cottica, S.M. Antioxidant and antibacterial activity and preliminary toxicity analysis of four varieties of avocado (Persea americana Mill.). Braz. J. Food Technol. 2019, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Villarreal-Lara, R.; Rodríguez-Sánchez, D.G.; De La Garza, R.I.D.; García-Cruz, M.I.; Castillo, A.; Pacheco, A.; Hernández-Brenes, C. Purified avocado seed acetogenins: Antimicrobial spectrum and complete inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes in a refrigerated food matrix. CyTAJ. Food 2019, 17, 228–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Salinas-Salazar, C.; Hernández-Brenes, C.; Rodríguez-Sánchez, D.G.; Castillo, E.C.; Navarro-Silva, J.M.; Pacheco, A. Inhibitory Activity of Avocado Seed Fatty Acid Derivatives (Acetogenins) against Listeria Monocytogenes. J. Food Sci. 2016, 82, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Gonçalves, B.; Moeenfard, M.; Rocha, F.; Alves, A.; Estevinho, B.N.; Santos, L. Microencapsulation of a Natural Antioxidant from Coffee—Chlorogenic Acid (3-Caffeoylquinic Acid). Food Bioprocess Technol. 2017, 10, 1521–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Liu, W.; Li, J.; Zhang, X.; Zu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Liu, W.; Xu, Z.; Gao, H.; Sun, X.; Jiang, X.; et al. Current Advances in Naturally Occurring Caffeoylquinic Acids: Structure, Bioactivity, and Synthesis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 10489–10516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. You, Z.; Wang, Y. A Versatile Synthetic Platform for a Wide Range of Functionalized Biomaterials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 2812–2820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Gullón, P.; Astray, G.; Gullón, B.; Tomasevic, I.; Lorenzo, J.M. Pomegranate Peel as Suitable Source of High-Added Value Bioactives: Tailored Functionalized Meat Products. Molecules 2020, 25, 2859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Tan, J.; Abdel-Rahman, M.A.; Sonomoto, K. Biorefinery-Based Lactic Acid Fermentation: Microbial Production of Pure Monomer Product. In Synthesis, Structure and Properties of Poly(lactic acid); Di Lorenzo, M.L., Androsch, R., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 27–66. [Google Scholar]
  117. Rasal, R.M.; Janorkar, A.V.; Hirt, D.E. Poly(lactic acid) modifications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010, 35, 338–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Yeo, J.C.C.; Muiruri, J.K.; Thitsartarn, W.; Li, Z.; He, C. Recent advances in the development of biodegradable PHB-based toughening materials: Approaches, advantages and applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2018, 92, 1092–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Naranjo, J.M.; Cardona, C.A.; Higuita, J.C. Use of residual banana for polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) production: Case of study in an integrated biorefinery. Waste Manag. 2014, 34, 2634–2640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Getachew, A.; Woldesenbet, F. Production of biodegradable plastic by polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) accumulating bacteria using low cost agricultural waste material. BMC Res. Notes 2016, 9, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Manavitehrani, I.; Fathi, A.; Badr, H.; Daly, S.; Shirazi, A.N.; Dehghani, F. Biomedical Applications of Biodegradable Polyesters. Polymers 2016, 8, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Krucińska, I.; Żywicka, B.; Komisarczyk, A.; Szymonowicz, M.; Kowalska, S.; Zaczyńska, E.; Struszczyk, M.; Czarny, A.; Jadczyk, P.; Umińska-Wasiluk, B.; et al. Biological Properties of Low-Toxicity PLGA and PLGA/PHB Fibrous Nanocomposite Implants for Osseous Tissue Regeneration. Part I: Evaluation of Potential Biotoxicity. Molecules 2017, 22, 2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Kai, D.; Zhang, K.; Liow, S.S.; Loh, X.J. New Dual Functional PHB-Grafted Lignin Copolymer: Synthesis, Mechanical Properties, and Biocompatibility Studies. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2018, 2, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Santos, D.M.d.; Ascheri, D.P.R.; Bukzem, A.d.; Morais, C.C.; Carvalho, C.W.P.; Ascheri, J.L.R. Physicochemical properties of starch from avocado seed (Persea americana Mill). Dos Santos 2016, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Chel-Guerrero, L.; Barbosa-Martín, E.; Martínez-Antonio, A.; González-Mondragón, E.; Betancur-Ancona, D. Some physicochemical and rheological properties of starch isolated from avocado seeds. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 86, 302–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Tesfaye, T.; Gibril, M.; Sithole, B.; Ramjugernath, D.; Chavan, R.; Chunilall, V.; Gounden, N. Valorisation of avocado seeds: Extraction and characterisation of starch for textile applications. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2018, 20, 2135–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Tesfaye, T.; Ayele, M.; Ferede, E.; Gibril, M.; Kong, F.; Sithole, B. A techno-economic feasibility of a process for extraction of starch from waste avocado seeds. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2020, 1, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Ubwa, S.T.; Abah, J.; Asemave, K.; Shambe, T. Studies on the Gelatinization Temperature of Some Cereal Starches. Int. J. Chem. 2012, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Ginting, M.; Hasibuan, R.; Lubis, M.; Alanjani, F.; Winoto, F.; Siregar, R. Utilization of Avocado Seeds as Bioplastic Films Filler Chitosan and Ethylene Glycol Plasticizer. Asian J. Chem. 2018, 30, 1569–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Lubis, M.; Harahap, M.B.; Ginting, H.S.; Sartika, M.; Azmi, H. Production of bioplastic from avocado seed starch reinforced with microcrystalline cellulose from sugar palm fibers. Chemistry 2018, 13, 13. [Google Scholar]
  131. Araújo, R.G.; Rodríguez-Jasso, R.M.; Ruiz, H.A.; Govea-Salas, M.; Rosas-Flores, W.; Aguilar-González, M.A.; Pintado, M.E.; Lopez-Badillo, C.; Luevanos, C.; Aguilar, C.N. Hydrothermal–Microwave Processing for Starch Extraction from Mexican Avocado Seeds: Operational Conditions and Characterization. Processes 2020, 8, 759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. George, J. Cellulose nanocrystals: Synthesis, functional properties, and applications. Nanotechnol. Sci. Appl. 2015, 8, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Gómez, H.C.; Serpa, A.; Velásquez-Cock, J.; Gañán, P.; Castro, C.; Vélez, L.; Zuluaga, R. Vegetable Nanocellulose in Food Science: A Review. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 57, 178–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Lin, N.; Dufresne, A. Nanocellulose in biomedicine: Current status and future prospect. Eur. Polym. J. 2014, 59, 302–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. RajeshKumar, S.; Rinitha, G. Nanostructural characterization of antimicrobial and antioxidant copper nanoparticles synthesized using novel Persea americana seeds. OpenNano 2018, 3, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Azeredo, H.M.; Rosa, M.F.; Mattoso, L.H.C. Nanocellulose in bio-based food packaging applications. Ind. Crop Prod. 2017, 97, 664–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Rajwade, J.M.; Chikte, R.G.; Paknikar, K.M. Nanomaterials: New weapons in a crusade against phytopathogens. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 1437–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Liu, F.; Avena-Bustillos, R.J.; Chiou, B.-S.; Li, Y.; Ma, Y.; Williams, T.G.; Wood, D.F.; McHugh, T.H.; Zhong, F. Controlled-release of tea polyphenol from gelatin films incorporated with different ratios of free/nanoencapsulated tea polyphenols into fatty food simulants. Food Hydrocoll. 2017, 62, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Adebayo, A.E.; Oke, A.M.; Lateef, A.; Oyatokun, A.A.; Abisoye, O.D.; Adiji, I.P.; Fagbenro, D.O.; Amusan, T.V.; Badmus, J.A.; Asafa, T.B.; et al. Biosynthesis of silver, gold and silver–gold alloy nanoparticles using Persea americana fruit peel aqueous extract for their biomedical properties. Nanotechnol. Environ. Eng. 2019, 4, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Lara-Flores, A.A.; Araújo, R.G.; Rodríguez-Jasso, R.M.; Aguedo, M.; Aguilar, C.N.; Trajano, H.L.; Ruiz, H.A. Bioeconomy and Biorefinery: Valorization of Hemicellulose from Lignocellulosic Biomass and Potential Use of Avocado Residues as a Promising Resource of Bioproducts. In Waste to Wealth; Singhania, R.R., Agarwal, R.A., Kumar, R.P., Sukumaran, R.K., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 141–170. [Google Scholar]
  141. Antunes, F.A.F.; Gaikwad, S.; Ingle, A.P.; Pandit, R.; dos Santos, J.C.; Rai, M.; da Silva, S.S. Bioenergy and Biofuels: Nano-technological Solutions for Sustainable Production. In Nanotechnology for Bioenergy and Biofuel Production; Rai, M., da Silva, S.S., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 3–18. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Avocado parts and properties. Reprinted with permission from Bhuyan et al. The Odyssey of Bioactive Compounds in Avocado (Persea americana) and Their Health Benefits. Antioxidants. Copyright (2019) MDPI [21].
Figure 1. Avocado parts and properties. Reprinted with permission from Bhuyan et al. The Odyssey of Bioactive Compounds in Avocado (Persea americana) and Their Health Benefits. Antioxidants. Copyright (2019) MDPI [21].
Polymers 13 01727 g001
Figure 2. Flow chart diagram of pretreatment processes. Reprinted with permission from Baruah et al. Recent Trends in the Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Value-Added Products. Frontiers in Energy Research. Copyright (2018) Frontiers [28].
Figure 2. Flow chart diagram of pretreatment processes. Reprinted with permission from Baruah et al. Recent Trends in the Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Value-Added Products. Frontiers in Energy Research. Copyright (2018) Frontiers [28].
Polymers 13 01727 g002
Figure 3. Bioethanol production from avocado’s cellulosic biomass. Reprinted with permission from Karagoz P et al. Lignocellulosic ethanol production: Evaluation of new approaches, cell immobilization and reactor configurations. Renewable Energy. Copyright (2019) Elsevier [93].
Figure 3. Bioethanol production from avocado’s cellulosic biomass. Reprinted with permission from Karagoz P et al. Lignocellulosic ethanol production: Evaluation of new approaches, cell immobilization and reactor configurations. Renewable Energy. Copyright (2019) Elsevier [93].
Polymers 13 01727 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mora-Sandí, A.; Ramírez-González, A.; Castillo-Henríquez, L.; Lopretti-Correa, M.; Vega-Baudrit, J.R. Persea Americana Agro-Industrial Waste Biorefinery for Sustainable High-Value-Added Products. Polymers 2021, 13, 1727. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13111727

AMA Style

Mora-Sandí A, Ramírez-González A, Castillo-Henríquez L, Lopretti-Correa M, Vega-Baudrit JR. Persea Americana Agro-Industrial Waste Biorefinery for Sustainable High-Value-Added Products. Polymers. 2021; 13(11):1727. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13111727

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mora-Sandí, Anthony, Abigail Ramírez-González, Luis Castillo-Henríquez, Mary Lopretti-Correa, and José Roberto Vega-Baudrit. 2021. "Persea Americana Agro-Industrial Waste Biorefinery for Sustainable High-Value-Added Products" Polymers 13, no. 11: 1727. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13111727

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop