Next Article in Journal
Preparation and Barrier Performance of Layer-Modified Soil-Stripping/Cassava Starch Composite Films
Next Article in Special Issue
Living Chain-Walking (Co)Polymerization of Propylene and 1-Decene by Nickel α-Diimine Catalysts
Previous Article in Journal
Film Blowing of Linear and Long-Chain Branched Poly(ethylene terephthalate)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Experimental and Theoretical Study of Zirconocene-Catalyzed Oligomerization of 1-Octene
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 12
Issue 7
10.3390/polym12071609
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Copolymerization of Ethylene and Vinyl Fluoride by Self-Assembled Multinuclear Palladium Catalysts

by
Qian Liu
and
Richard F. Jordan
*
Department of Chemistry, The University of Chicago, 5735 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2020, 12(7), 1609; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12071609
Submission received: 10 June 2020 / Revised: 8 July 2020 / Accepted: 14 July 2020 / Published: 19 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Coordination Catalysis in Additive Polymerization)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The self-assembled multinuclear PdII complexes {(Li-OPOOMe2)PdMe(4-5-nonyl-pyridine)}4Li2Cl2 (C, Li-OPOOMe2 = PPh(2-SO3Li-4,5-(OMe)2-Ph)(2-SO3−-4,5-(OMe)2-Me-Ph)), {(Zn-OP-P-SO)PdMe(L)}4 (D, L = pyridine or 4-tBu-pyridine, [OP-P-SO]3− = P(4-tBu-Ph)(2-PO32−-5-Me-Ph)(2-SO3−-5-Me-Ph)), and {(Zn-OP-P-SO)PdMe(pyridine)}3 (E) copolymerize ethylene and vinyl fluoride (VF) to linear copolymers. VF is incorporated at levels of 0.1–2.5 mol% primarily as in-chain -CH2CHFCH2- units. The molecular weight distributions of the copolymers produced by D and E are generally narrower than for catalyst C, which suggests that the Zn-phosphonate cores of D and E are more stable than the Li-sulfonate-chloride core of C under copolymerization conditions. The ethylene/VF copolymerization activities of C–E are over 100 times lower and the copolymer molecular weights (MWs) are reduced compared to the results for ethylene homopolymerization by these catalysts.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The coordination–insertion copolymerization of ethylene with polar vinyl monomers by PdII catalysts has been extensively studied [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Vinyl halides are particularly challenging polar comonomers due to (i) their poor competition with ethylene for binding to PdII catalysts [9,10], (ii) the formation of inactive LnPd-X complexes by β-X elimination of LnPdCH2CXR species (generated by 1,2 CH2=CHX insertion or 2,1- CH2=CHX insertion followed by chain walking) [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20], and (iii) the low insertion reactivity of LnPdCHXCH2R species formed by 2,1 CH2=CHX insertion [16,21]. We previously reported that (PO)PdMe(L) catalysts (A, Figure 1) that contain phosphine-arenesulfonate ligands (PO−) copolymerize ethylene and vinyl fluoride (VF) to linear copolymers with up to 0.55 mol% VF incorporation [22,23,24,25]. The catalyst activities are significantly reduced and the polymer molecular weights (MWs) are also reduced in ethylene/VF copolymerization compared to ethylene homopolymerization under the same conditions. For example, {P(2-Et-Ph)2(2-SO3-Ph)}PdMe(py) exhibits an activity of 296 kg∙mol−1∙h−1 in ethylene homopolymerization and produces polyethylene (PE) with Mn = 16,560 Da (300 psi ethylene, toluene, 80 °C), while in ethylene/VF copolymerization the activity and polymer Mn are reduced to 5 kg∙mol−1∙h−1 and 6800 Da, respectively (300 psi total pressure, VF/ethylene = 4/1, toluene, 80 °C) [22]. The ethylene/VF copolymers produced by (PO)PdMe(L) catalysts contain internal -CH2CHFCH2- units formed by 1,2 and/or 2,1 VF insertion into growing (PO)PdR species. The copolymers also contain -CH2CHFCH3, -CH2CHF2, and -CH2CH2F chain ends. The -CH2CHFCH3 units are formed by 2,1 VF insertion into (PO)PdH species followed by chain growth. It was proposed that the -CH2CHF2 and -CH2CH2F groups are generated by VF or ethylene insertion of (PO)PdF species (formed by β-F elimination of (PO)Pd(CH2CHFR) species), followed by chain growth. Strong support for this proposal was provided by the demonstration that (POBpOMe)PdF(2,6-lutidine) ([POBp,OMe]− = [P(2′,6′-(OMe)2-2-biphenyl)(2-OMe-Ph)(2-SO3-5-Me-Ph)]-) reacts with VF to yield the 1,2-insertion product (POBp,OMe)Pd(CH2CHF2)(2,6-lutidine) and with ethylene to yield PE with -CH2CH2F end groups [23]. It was also demonstrated that (POBp,OMe)Pd(CH2CHF2)(2,6-lutidine) reacts with ethylene to produce PE with -CH2CHF2 chain ends. The ability of (PO)PdF species to undergo olefin insertions is key to the ability of (PO)PdRL species to catalyze ethylene/VF copolymerization. The copolymerization of ethylene with other CH2=CHX monomers by (PO)PdRL catalysts has been extensively studied [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34].
The related (Li-OPO)PdMe(py’) complex (py’ = 4-5-nonyl-pyridine) based on the phosphine-bis(arensulfonate) ligand PPh(2-SO3Li-5-Me-Ph)(2-SO3−-5-Me-Ph) (Li[OPO]−) self-assembles into the tetrameric {(Li-OPO)PdMe(py’)}4 species B, which is held together by a Li4S4O12 double 4-ring (D4R) cage (Figure 1) [35,36,37]. “Pd4 cage” catalyst B produces linear PE with a high MW and linear ethylene/VF copolymers that contain up to 3.6 mol% VF (Table 1, entries 8,9). The ethylene/VF copolymers produced by B contain internal -CH2CHFCH2- units as well as -CH2CHFCH3 and -CH=CHF end groups, but no NMR-detectable -CH2CF2H or -CH2CH2F chain ends. The -CH=CHF chain ends are most likely formed by 2,1 VF insertion into growing (Li-OPO)Pd-R species, followed by β-H elimination. However, B undergoes partial disassembly to the monomeric (Li-OPO)PdMe(py’) “Pd1” species under polymerization conditions, which strongly influences the MWs and molecular weight distributions (MWDs) of the polyethylene and ethylene/VF copolymers it produces. For example, B produces a high-MW ethylene/VF copolymer with a broad bimodal MWD (Mw = 494 kDa, PDI = 310; Table 1, entry 9) in hexanes suspension, due to competing copolymerization by intact B (which generates the high-MW fraction) and monomeric (Li-OPO)PdR species (which generates the low-MW fraction). In contrast, B produces a low-MW copolymer with a narrow MWD (Mw = 4200, PDI = 2.4; entry 8) in toluene solution, indicative of nearly complete dissociation to monomeric species.
We recently reported several new multinuclear Pd “cage” catalysts (C‒E) [39,40]. The sterically-expanded phosphine-bis(arensulfonate) ligand PPh(2-SO3Li-4,5-(OMe)2-Ph)(2-SO3−-4,5-(OMe)2-Me-Ph) ([Li-OPOOMe2]−) directs the self-assembly of the tetranuclear complex (Li-OPOOMe2)PdMe(py’)}4Li2Cl2 (C, Figure 1), in which four (Li-OPOOMe2)PdMe(py’) units are arranged around the periphery of a Li4S4O12•Li2Cl2 cage [39]. Compound C is much less susceptible to cage dissociation than B. For example, C undergoes only 6.5% dissociation to monomeric species in CDCl2CDCl2 solution at 80 °C ([Pd4]initial = 4.7 mM), whereas B undergoes 38% dissociation under these conditions. In toluene, C is only partially dissociated into monomeric species and therefore produces PE with broad MWD as expected for a multi-site catalyst. In contrast, in hexanes suspension at 80 °C, C is resistant to disassembly and exhibits nearly ideal single-site behavior in ethylene homopolymerization and produces high-MW PE (Mw = 1473 kDa, PDI = 2.3, Figure 2). The solvent effects on the MWDs of the PEs produced by B and C may appear to be opposite but simply reflect the relative stabilities of B and C toward disassembly to monomeric species.
The phosphine-arenephosphonate-arenesulfonate ligand P(4-tBu-Ph)(2-PO32−-5-Me-Ph)(2-SO3−-5-Me-Ph) ([OP-P-SO]3−) directs the self-assembly of the tetrameric complex {(Zn-OP-P-SO)PdMe(L)}4 (D, Figure 1, L = py or 4-tBu-py), which is a direct structural analogue of B [40]. The Zn-phosphonate interactions in the central D4R Zn4P4O12 cage of D are stronger than the Li-sulfonate and Li-chloride interactions in the cores of B and C and, as a result, D is more thermally stable, exhibiting no NMR-detectable dissociation to monomeric species at 80 °C in CDCl2CDCl2 solution. However, D (L = 4-tBu-py) is isolated as a mixture of the major diastereomer shown in Figure 1 and ca. 20% of minor diastereomers that differ in the relative stereochemical configurations at the phosphorus centers. In the presence of 1 equiv B(C6F5)3 per 4-tBu-py, D produces PE with a high MW but a broad MWD (Mw = 436 kDa, PDI = 15; toluene/chlorobenzene solvent, 80 °C, 410 psi ethylene), consistent with the expected multi-site catalysis.
D (L = py) is converted to trimeric complex {(Zn-OP-P-SO)PdMe(py)}3 (E, Figure 1) in the presence of methanol. E adopts a cage structure composed of Zn3P3O6 and Pd3O3 rings linked through bridging (aryl)PO32− groups and is thermally stable at 80 °C in CDCl2CDCl2 solution. In the presence of 1 equiv of B(C6F5)3 per pyridine, E produces high-MW linear PE with a narrow MWD indicative of single-site catalysis (Mw = 691 kDa, PDI = 2.7; toluene/chlorobenzene solvent, 80 °C, 410 psi ethylene).
The availability of these new, more stable multinuclear Pd assemblies provides an opportunity to probe the reactivity of Pd cage catalysts while reducing the complications from thermal cage disassembly. In this paper we report the ethylene/VF copolymerization behavior of C–E.

2. Results and Discussion

Ethylene/VF copolymerizations were carried out using C as the catalyst at 80 °C in toluene or hexanes (Scheme 1), and the results are shown in Table 1. Experimental details and copolymer characterization data are provided in the Supplementary Materials. In toluene, C produces low-MW copolymers with ≤0.25 mol% VF incorporation (entries 1,2). In contrast, in hexanes slurry, C generates a high-MW copolymer with 0.87 mol% VF incorporation at a VF/ethylene feed ratio of 0.36 (entry 3), which is increased to 2.5 mol% at a VF/ethylene feed ratio of 0.92 (entry 4). The microstructure of the copolymer produced by C is similar to that from B (Table 2, Figure 3), with major in-chain -CH2CHFCH2- units and minor VF-derived -CH2CFHCH3 and cis-CH=CHF end groups [41,42,43,44,45,46,47].
The ethylene/VF copolymers produced by C in hexanes exhibit broad MWDs (Table 1, entries 3,4; Figure 2). Given the nearly ideal single-site behavior observed in ethylene homopolymerization by C in hexanes, it is unlikely that the broadening of the MWD of the ethylene/VF copolymers formed in this solvent is due to thermal disassembly of the cage structure (Figure 2). One possibility is that nucleophilic Pd-F species generated by 1,2-VF insertion and β-F elimination react with the Li+ ions in the central cage, leading to the formation of new active Pd species [23,25,48,49,50,51,52]. Consistent with this proposal, -CH2CH2F and –CH2CHF2 end groups, which are formed by ethylene and VF insertion of Pd-F species in copolymerization by mononuclear catalysts A, are not observed in the copolymer produced by C (Figure 3) [23]. This process provides a potential catalyst deactivation pathway.
Ethylene/VF copolymerization by D (L = 4-tBu-py) was investigated in a mixed toluene/chlorobenzene (49/1) solvent at a VF/ethylene feed ratio of 0.92 (Table 1, entry 5). D decomposes in the presence of free 4-tBu-py (and other Lewis bases). Therefore, 1 equiv B(C6F5)3 per 4-tBu-py was added to a solution of D in chlorobenzene prior to dilution with toluene to sequester the 4-tBu-py that will be displaced by monomer, in order to minimize catalyst deactivation. Under these conditions, D produces a linear copolymer with 0.96 mol% VF incorporation. The MWD of the copolymer formed by D is unimodal but somewhat broadened (PDI = 4.1), which can be attributed to the presence of several diastereomeric forms of the catalyst. The copolymer contains in-chain -CH2CFHCH2- and a small amount of VF-derived -CH2CFHCH3 chain ends. Catalyst E behaves similarly to D, incorporating 1.1 mol% VF in the form of both -CH2CFHCH2- (major) and -CH2CFHCH3 (minor) units (Table 1, entry 7). The MWDs of the copolymers formed by E are narrow (PDI ≤ 2.4), indicative of nearly ideal single-site catalysis. These results suggest that the multinuclear structures of D and E are substantially retained during ethylene/VF copolymerization.
The ethylene/VF copolymerization activities of C–E are over 100 times lower than the ethylene homopolymerization activities, and the copolymer MWs are reduced compared to the results for ethylene homopolymerization, as observed previously for A and B and mononuclear (PO)PdRL catalysts.

3. Conclusions

“Pd cage” catalysts C‒E copolymerize ethylene with VF to linear copolymers with 0.1 to 2.5 mol% VF incorporation depending on the catalyst and reaction conditions. VF is incorporated predominantly as in-chain -CH2CHFCH2- units, with minor -CH2CFHCH3 and, for C, cis-CH=CHF end groups. C produces an ethylene/VF copolymer with a broad MWD in hexanes, which contrasts results for ethylene homopolymerization where nearly ideal single-site behavior is observed. These results suggest that the presence of VF promotes structural disruption of the catalyst, possibly through reaction of Pd-F species with the Li+ ions in the cage. The ethylene/VF copolymerization behavior of C is very similar to that of B, except the extent of VF incorporation by C is somewhat lower than by B. D and E produce ethylene/VF copolymers with narrow MWDs, suggesting that the cage assemblies remain substantially intact during copolymerization. The activities of C–E in ethylene/VF copolymerization are >100 times lower than in ethylene homopolymerization. This inhibition effect is a major roadblock to the development of more practical ethylene/VF copolymerization catalysts.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/12/7/1609/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: R.F.J.; funding acquisition: R.F.J.; investigation: Q.L.; supervision: R.F.J.; writing—original draft: Q.L.; writing—review and editing: R.F.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the US National Science Foundation under Grant CHE-1709159.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Boffa, L.S.; Novak, B.M. Copolymerization of polar monomers with olefins using transition-metal complexes. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1479–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ittel, S.D.; Johnson, L.K.; Brookhart, M. Late-metal catalysts for ethylene homo- and copolymerization. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1169–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Berkefeld, A.; Mecking, S. Coordination copolymerization of polar vinyl monomers H2C=CHX. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 2538–2542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nakamura, A.; Ito, S.; Nozaki, K. Coordination−insertion copolymerization of fundamental polar monomers. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 5215–5244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chen, E.Y.-X. Coordination polymerization of polar vinyl monomers by single-site metal catalysts. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 5157–5214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nakamura, A.; Anselment, T.M.J.; Claverie, J.; Goodall, B.; Jordan, R.F.; Mecking, S.; Rieger, B.; Sen, A.; van Leeuwen, P.W.N.M.; Nozaki, K. Ortho-phosphinobenzenesulfonate: A superb ligand for palladium-catalyzed coordination–insertion copolymerzation of polar vinyl monomers. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 1438–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mu, H.L.; Pan, L.; Song, D.; Li, Y.S. Neutral nickel catalysts for olefin homo- and copolymerization: Relationships between catalyst structures and catalytic properties. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 12091–12137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, C. Designing catalysts for olefin polymerization and copolymerization: Beyond electronic and steric tuning. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2018, 2, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kang, M.; Sen, A.; Zakharov, L.; Rheingold, A.L. Diametrically opposite trends in alkene insertion in late and early transition metal compounds:  Relevance to transition-metal-catalyzed polymerization of polar vinyl monomers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12080–12081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhao, H.; Ariafard, A.; Lin, Z. In-depth insight into metal–alkene bonding interactions. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2006, 359, 3527–3534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Stockland, R.A., Jr.; Jordan, R.F. Reaction of vinyl chloride with a prototypical metallocene catalyst:  Stoichiometric insertion and β-Cl elimination reactions with rac-(EBI)ZrMe+ and catalytic dechlorination/oligomerization to oligopropylene by rac-(EBI)ZrMe2/MAO. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6315–6316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Foley, S.R.; Stockland, R.A.; Shen, H.; Jordan, R.F. Reaction of vinyl chloride with late transition metal olefin polymerization catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4350–4361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Strazisar, S.A.; Wolczanski, P.T. Insertion of H2CCHX (X = F, Cl, Br, OiPr) into (tBu3SiO)3TaH2 and β-X-Elimination from (tBu3SiO)3HTaCH2CH2X (X = OR):  Relevance to Ziegler−Natta copolymerizations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 4728–4740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gaynor, S.G. Vinyl Chloride as a Chain Transfer agent in olefin polymerizations:  Preparation of highly branched and end functional polyolefins. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 4692–4698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Watson, L.A.; Yandulov, D.V.; Caulton, K.G. C−D0 (D0 = π-donor, F) cleavage in H2C=CH(D0) by (Cp2ZrHCl)n:  Mechanism, agostic fluorines, and a carbene of Zr(IV). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 603–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kilyanek, S.M.; Stoebenau, E.J., III; Vinayavekhin, N.; Jordan, R.F. Mechanism of the reaction of vinyl chloride with (α-diimine)PdMe+ species. Organometallics 2010, 29, 1750–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Stockland, R.A., Jr.; Foley, S.R.; Jordan, R.F. Reaction of vinyl chloride with group 4 metal olefin polymerization catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 796–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Boone, H.W.; Athey, P.S.; Mullins, M.J.; Philipp, D.; Muller, R.; Goddard, W.A. Copolymerization studies of vinyl chloride and vinyl acetate with ethylene using a transition-metal catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 8790–8791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Leicht, H.; Gottker-Schnetmann, I.; Mecking, S. Incorporation of vinyl chloride in insertion polymerization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 3963–3966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Clot, E.; Mégret, C.; Kraft, B.M.; Eisenstein, O.; Jones, W.D. Defluorination of perfluoropropene using Cp*2ZrH2 and Cp2ZrHF: A mechanism investigation from a joint experimental-theoretical perspective. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5647–5653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Foley, S.R.; Shen, H.; Qadeer, U.A.; Jordan, R.F. Generation and insertion reactivity of cationic palladium complexes that contain halogenated alkyl ligands. Organometallics 2004, 23, 600–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Weng, W.; Shen, Z.; Jordan, R.F. Copolymerization of ethylene and vinyl fluoride by (Phosphine-Sulfonate)Pd(Me)(py)catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 15450–15451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wada, S.; Jordan, R.F. Olefin insertion into a Pd-F bond: Catalyst reactivation following β-F elimination in ethylene/vinyl fluoride copolymerization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 129, 1846–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, Q.; Jordan, R.F. Synthesis and reactivity of phosphine-arenesulfonate palladium(II) alkyl complexes that contain methoxy substituents. J. Organomet. Chem. 2019, 896, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Black, R.E.; Kilyanek, S.M.; Reinhart, E.D.; Jordan, R.F. Olefin insertion reactivity of a (phosphine-arenesulfonate) palladium(II) fluoride complex. Organometallics 2019, 38, 4250–4260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Drent, E.; van Dijk, R.; van Ginkel, R.; van Oort, B.; Pugh, R.I. Palladium catalysed copolymerisation of ethene with alkylacrylates: Polar comonomer built into the linear polymer chain. Chem. Commun. 2002, 7, 744–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Luo, S.; Vela, J.; Lief, G.R.; Jordan, R.F. Copolymerization of ethylene and alkyl vinyl ethers by a (phosphine- sulfonate)PdMe catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 8946–8947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Guironnet, D.; Roesle, P.; Runzi, T.; Gottker-Schnetmann, I.; Mecking, S. Insertion polymerization of acrylate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 422–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kochi, T.; Noda, S.; Yoshimura, K.; Nozaki, K. Formation of linear copolymers of ethylene and acrylonitrile catalyzed by phosphine sulfonate palladium Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 8948–8949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ito, S.; Munakata, K.; Nakamura, A.; Nozaki, K. Copolymerization of vinyl acetate with ethylene by palladium/alkylphosphine−sulfonate catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 14606–14607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Skupov, K.M.; Marella, P.R.; Simard, M.; Yap, G.P.A.; Allen, N.; Conner, D.; Goodall, B.L.; Claverie, J.P. Palladium Aryl sulfonate phosphine catalysts for the copolymerization of acrylates with ethene. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2007, 28, 2033–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Skupov, K.M.; Piche, L.; Claverie, J.P. Linear polyethylene with tunable surface properties by catalytic copolymerization of ethylene with N-Vinyl-2-pyrrolidinone and N-Isopropylacrylamide. Macromolecules 2008, 41, 2309–2310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, Z.; Brookhart, M. Exploring ethylene/polar vinyl monomer copolymerizations using Ni and Pd α-diimine catalysts. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 51, 1831–1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Keyes, A.; Alhan, H.E.B.; Ordonez, E.; Ha, U.; Beezer, D.B.; Dau, H.; Liu, Y.S.; Tsogtgerel, E.; Jones, G.R.; Harth, E. Olefins and vinyl polar monomers: Bridging the gap for next generation materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 12370–12391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Shen, Z.; Jordan, R.F. Self-assembled tetranuclear palladium catalysts that produce high molecular weight linear polyethylene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 52–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Shen, Z.; Jordan, R.F. Copolymerization of ethylene and vinyl fluoride by (phosphine-bis (arenesulfonate)) PdMe (pyridine) catalysts: Insights into inhibition mechanisms. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 8706–8708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wei, J.; Shen, Z.; Filatov, A.S.; Liu, Q.; Jordan, R.F. Self-assembled cage structures and ethylene polymerization behavior of palladium alkyl complexes that contain phosphine-bis (arenesulfonate) Ligands. Organometallics 2016, 35, 3557–3568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Grinshpun, V.; Rudin, A. Measurement of Mark-Houwink constants by size exclusion chromatography with a low angle laser light scattering detector. Die Makromol. Chem. Rapid Commun. 1985, 6, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, Q.; Jordan, R.F. Sterically controlled self-assembly of a robust multinuclear palladium catalyst for ethylene polymerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 6827–6831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, Q.; Jordan, R.F. Multinuclear palladium olefin polymerization catalysts based on self-assembled zinc phosphonate cages. Organometallics 2018, 37, 4664–4674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Geier, S.J.; Gille, A.L.; Gilbert, T.M.; Stephan, D.W. From classical adducts to frustrated lewis pairs: Steric effects in the interactions of pyridines and B(C6F5)3. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 10466–10474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ennan, A.A. Pentacoordinate fluorosilicate anions. Russ. Chem. Rev. 1989, 58, 371. [Google Scholar]
  43. Pevec, A.; Demšar, A. The variations in hydrogen bonding in hexafluorosilicate salts of protonated methyl substituted pyridines and tetramethylethylenediamine. J. Fluor. Chem. 2008, 129, 707–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Conley, B.D.; Yearwood, B.C.; Parkin, S.; Atwood, D.A. Ammonium hexafluorosilicate salts. J. Fluor. Chem. 2002, 115, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Christe, K.O.; Wilson, W.W. Reaction of the fluoride anion with acetonitrile. Chloroform and methylene chloride. J. Fluor. Chem. 1990, 47, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Christe, K.O.; Wilson, W.W. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum of the fluoride anion. J. Fluor. Chem. 1990, 46, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Massey, A.G.; Park, A.J. Perfluorophenyl derivatives of the elements: VII. further studies on tris (pentafluorophenyl) boron. J. Organomet. Chem. 1996, 5, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Grushin, V.V. Palladium fluoride complexes: One more step toward metal-mediated C-F bond formation. Chem. A Eur. J. 2002, 8, 1006–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Katcher, M.H.; Norrby, P.-O.; Doyle, A.G. Mechanistic investigations of palladium-catalyzed allylic fluorination. Organometallics 2014, 33, 2121–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Park, H.; Verma, P.; Hong, K.; Yu, J.-Q. Controlling Pd (iv) reductive elimination pathways enables Pd (ii)-catalysed enantioselective C (sp3)−H fluorination. Nat. Chem. 2018, 10, 755–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Smith, D.A.; Beweries, T.; Blasius, C.; Jasim, N.; Nazir, R.; Nazir, S.; Robertson, C.C.; Whitwood, A.C.; Hunter, C.A.; Brammer, L.; et al. The contrasting character of early and late transition metal fluorides as hydrogen bond acceptors. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 11820–11831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Mezzetti, A.; Becker, C. Swimming against the Stream? A discussion of the bonding in d6 and d8 fluoro complexes and its consequences for catalytic applications. Helv. Chim. Acta 2002, 85, 2686–2703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 12 01609 g001 550
Figure 1. (PO)PdR Complexes. Py’ = 4-(5-nonyl)pyridine. The lower (Li-OPO)PdMe(py’) or (OP-P-SO)PdMeL units in the schematic structure of B, C, and D are denoted by “Pd”.
Figure 1. (PO)PdR Complexes. Py’ = 4-(5-nonyl)pyridine. The lower (Li-OPO)PdMe(py’) or (OP-P-SO)PdMeL units in the schematic structure of B, C, and D are denoted by “Pd”.
Polymers 12 01609 g001
Polymers 12 01609 g002 550
Figure 2. Molecular weight distributions of polyethylene (PE) [39] and ethylene/VF copolymer (Table 1, entry 4) generated by C determined by high temperature GPC. Polymerization conditions: hexanes solvent, 80 °C.
Figure 2. Molecular weight distributions of polyethylene (PE) [39] and ethylene/VF copolymer (Table 1, entry 4) generated by C determined by high temperature GPC. Polymerization conditions: hexanes solvent, 80 °C.
Polymers 12 01609 g002
Polymers 12 01609 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Ethylene/VF Copolymerization by Catalyst B.
Scheme 1. Ethylene/VF Copolymerization by Catalyst B.
Polymers 12 01609 sch001
Polymers 12 01609 g003 550
Figure 3. 19F{1H} NMR spectrum of ethylene/VF copolymer (o-dichlorobenzene-d4, 120 °C) produced by C (Table 1, entry 4).
Figure 3. 19F{1H} NMR spectrum of ethylene/VF copolymer (o-dichlorobenzene-d4, 120 °C) produced by C (Table 1, entry 4).
Polymers 12 01609 g003
Table
Table 1. Ethylene/vinyl-fluoride copolymerization by catalysts C, D, and E [38].
Table 1. Ethylene/vinyl-fluoride copolymerization by catalysts C, D, and E [38].
EntryCat.SolventPC2H4
(psi)		PVF
(psi)		Acitivity d
(kg∙mol−1∙h−1)		Mw e
(103)		PDI eVF Incorp f
(mol%)		Tm g
(°C)
1 aCtoluene220801.420.38.00.10128.8
2 aCtoluene1301200.441.921.40.25ND h
3 aChexanes2208012.049818.20.87134.4
4 aChexanes1301203.441926.22.5132.8
5 a,bDtoluene + PhCl1301202.042.24.10.96131.4
6 a,bEtoluene + PhCl220804.950.32.40.43134.7
7 a,bEtoluene + PhCl1301201.023.02.31.1131.6
8 a,cBtoluene1301201.94.22.42.4127.8
9 a,cBhexanes1301201.44943103.6127.8
a Conditions: [Pd] = 10 μmol, temperature = 80 °C, time = 2 h, 50 mL solvent. b 1 equiv B(C6F5)3 per L, 49/1 toluene/chlorobenzene solvent. c cited from reference 36. d Activity is reported per mol Pd. e Determined by Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC) [38]. f VF incorporation in copolymer determined by 1H NMR. g DSC. h Not determined due to the limited quantity of copolymer.
Table
Table 2. Microstructures of E/VF copolymers produced by catalysts C, D, and E [41,42,43,44,45,46,47].
Table 2. Microstructures of E/VF copolymers produced by catalysts C, D, and E [41,42,43,44,45,46,47].
CatalystEntry in Table 1Distribution of VF Incorporation Modes (%) a
Polymers 12 01609 i001 Polymers 12 01609 i002 Polymers 12 01609 i003
C1100Not observedNot observed
C285.15.09.9
C399.10.9Not observed
C499.20.40.4
D5>99Trace bNot observed
E699.20.8Not observed
E798.81.2Not observed
a Determined by 19F NMR spectroscopy; -CH2CH2F and -CH2CHF2 end groups were not observed. b Resonance observed but intensity too low for accurate integration.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Q.; Jordan, R.F. Copolymerization of Ethylene and Vinyl Fluoride by Self-Assembled Multinuclear Palladium Catalysts. Polymers 2020, 12, 1609. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12071609

AMA Style

Liu Q, Jordan RF. Copolymerization of Ethylene and Vinyl Fluoride by Self-Assembled Multinuclear Palladium Catalysts. Polymers. 2020; 12(7):1609. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12071609

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Qian, and Richard F. Jordan. 2020. "Copolymerization of Ethylene and Vinyl Fluoride by Self-Assembled Multinuclear Palladium Catalysts" Polymers 12, no. 7: 1609. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12071609

APA Style

Liu, Q., & Jordan, R. F. (2020). Copolymerization of Ethylene and Vinyl Fluoride by Self-Assembled Multinuclear Palladium Catalysts. Polymers, 12(7), 1609. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12071609

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop