Next Article in Journal
Effect of the Degree of Substitution on the Hydrophobicity, Crystallinity, and Thermal Properties of Lauroylated Amaranth Starch
Previous Article in Journal
3D Finite Element Pseudodynamic Analysis of Deficient RC Rectangular Columns Confined with Fiber Reinforced Polymers under Axial Compression
Previous Article in Special Issue
Lithographic Performance of Aryl Epoxy Thermoset Resins as Negative Tone Photoresist for Microlithography
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

General-Purpose Coarse-Grained Toughened Thermoset Model for 44DDS/DGEBA/PES

Polymers 2020, 12(11), 2547; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12112547
by Michael M. Henry 1, Stephen Thomas 1, Mone’t Alberts 1, Carla E. Estridge 2, Brittan Farmer 3, Olivia McNair 2 and Eric Jankowski 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Polymers 2020, 12(11), 2547; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12112547
Submission received: 30 September 2020 / Revised: 23 October 2020 / Accepted: 23 October 2020 / Published: 30 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Toughened Thermosets)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript entitled, “General-purpose coarse-grained toughened thermoset model for 44DDS/DGEBA/PES” by Henry et al. involves development of a model that can predict the morphology and the properties of crosslinking polymeric materials used in aerospace applications. They used molecular simulations to find out the cure path dependence of toughened thermoset morphologies. This model will be very useful to control the morphology of the thermoset during the curing process improving the reliability and the part fabrication.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

In this manuscript, the authors reported a prediction of glass transition temperature, gel point and morphologies of the thermosetting blends composed of bisphenol A epoxy, 4,4-DDS and poly(ether sulfone). By extending the open-source dybond plugin for HOOMD-Blue to implement a new coarse-grained model, the authors determined the parameters for the coarse-grained model from atomistic solubility data, calibrated reaction dynamics against experiments and then checked for size-dependent artifacts. This is an interesting and important work, which should be published in this journal after the authors considered the following minor points:

  1. In the section of Introduction, the authors should increase the sentences to review the main results of the studies on this system. To my knowledge, there have been a great number of reports on this system involving with reaction-induced phase separation, fracture toughness improvement. A compressive summary is required;
  2. The term “microphase separation” should be used as “phase separation” because in literature “microphase separation” has a different meaning.
  3. Please add some discussion about the effect of reaction-induced phase separation on the computation of Tg and gel point in your prediction.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop