Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Mechanical Characterization and Impact Damage Assessment of Hybrid Three-Dimensional Five-Directional Composites
Previous Article in Journal
CuS@Corn Stalk/Chitin Composite Hydrogel for Photodegradation and Antibacterial
Previous Article in Special Issue
Thermal Conductivity Enhancement Derived from Poly(Methyl Methacrylate)-Grafted Carbon Nanotubes in Poly(Methyl Methacrylate)/Polystyrene Blends
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

3D Printing of Amino Resin-based Photosensitive Materials on Multi-parameter Optimization Design for Vascular Engineering Applications

1
School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40447, Taiwan
2
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40447, Taiwan
3
Department of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, Asia University, Taichung 40447, Taiwan
4
3D Printing Medical Research Institute, Asia University, Taichung 40447, Taiwan
5
3D Printing Medical Research Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40447, Taiwan
6
Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, China Medical University, Taichung 40447, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2019, 11(9), 1394; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11091394
Submission received: 2 August 2019 / Revised: 18 August 2019 / Accepted: 23 August 2019 / Published: 24 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymer Hybrid Composites)

Abstract

:
Cardiovascular diseases are currently the most common cause of death globally and of which, the golden treatment method for severe cardiovascular diseases or coronary artery diseases are implantations of synthetic vascular grafts. However, such grafts often come with rejections and hypersensitivity reactions. With the emergence of regenerative medicine, researchers are now trying to explore alternative ways to produce grafts that are less likely to induce immunological reactions in patients. The main goal of such studies is to produce biocompatible artificial vascular grafts with the capability of allowing cellular adhesion and cellular proliferation for tissues regeneration. The Design of Experimental concepts is employed into the manufacturing process of digital light processing (DLP) 3D printing technology to explore near-optimal processing parameters to produce artificial vascular grafts with vascular characteristics that are close to native vessels by assessing for the cause and effect relationships between different ratios of amino resin (AR), 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), dopamine, and curing durations. We found that with proper optimization of fabrication procedures and ratios of materials, we are able to successfully fabricate vascular grafts with good printing resolutions. These had similar physical properties to native vessels and were able to support cellular adhesion and proliferation. This study could support future studies in exploring near-optimal processes for fabrication of artificial vascular grafts that could be adapted into clinical applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cardiovascular disease is a common disease worldwide and many scientists have put in great efforts to explore the best treatment methodology for cardiovascular diseases. It is currently estimated that there are up to 15 million deaths worldwide from cardiovascular diseases annually [1,2,3]. The artificial vascular grafts that are available in the market now are mainly made up of Dacron and polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) and such grafts often have a diameter of more than 6 mm as the characteristics of Dacron make it unsuitable to fabricate grafts with smaller diameters [4,5]. In addition, Dacron has poor biocompatibility which limits its regeneration capability after transplantation. On the other hand, artificial grafts comprising of ePTFE have good biocompatibility and good physical properties that allowed surgeons to have more room for surgical procedures. Furthermore, small pores to be fabricated using ePTFE and one of the main advantages of ePTFE grafts is that it does not require any pre-anti-coagulant before implantations. However, it was reported that the wall of the grafts was more prone to pseudoaneurysm and it has little longitudinal elasticity, thus restricting seeding of endothelial cells [6,7]. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop artificial vascular grafts with structures similar to native blood vessels with the final goal of achieving regenerative medicine and organ reconstruction standards [8,9].
Since the past decades, tissue engineering had evolved tremendously and one of the recent focus of tissue engineering was on developing artificial biological organs substitutes either for transplantations or as models for drug screening [10,11]. The greatest feature of tissue engineering is in its inherent biological stability, which is characterized by successful implantation and healing [12,13]. There are three key elements in tissue engineering and these elements include cells, scaffolds and environmental factors [14]. In the early years, scaffolds were thought to be only providing cells with temporary support for cell growth [15]. However, modern scaffolds have evolved to be a critical factor in tissue engineering and scaffolds were reported to be more than a mere container or support [16]. Scaffolds are thought to resemble the “extra-cellular matrix” of native micro-environment and certain structural properties of scaffolds are reported to be able to influence cellular differentiation into certain cell lines by providing biological, chemical and mechanical cues [17,18]. In this study, we aimed to develop scaffolds for vascular tissue engineering and hoped that such a study can be used as a platform for potential vascular implantations.
Currently, 3D printing is considered as an effective and potential technology to revolutionize the field of regenerative medicine and tissue engineering [19,20]. Recently, a novel multi-layered manufacturing concept had emerged and had since garnered attention as it was able to provide answers to problems that were unable to be solved previously and thus this concept increases the possibility of cure for many diseases [21,22]. Additive manufacturing is a very flexible technology and as proven, it can be replaced with biomedical materials combined with tissue engineering to fabricate biocompatible scaffolds for more medical research [23]. The combination of additive manufacturing and tissue engineering has made it possible to create more complexed scaffolds with highly mimicry structures as native tissues [20,24,25].
In recent years, different types of 3D printing techniques had emerged and it includes fused deposition modeling (FDM), selective laser sintering (SLS), stereolithography (SLA) and digital light processing (DLP) [24,26,27]. Each technology has its own advantages and disadvantages and it was reported that DLP technology had the potential to print with high printing resolutions thus we were able to fabricate scaffolds with small pores. However, a key component of DLP technology lies in the chosen material [28]. Currently, there are numerous types of printable materials in the market, however, it is important to note that biological or implantable scaffolds require certain unique characteristics such as biocompatibility, degradability and ample mechanical properties. In addition, printing parameters also have a role to play in determining the performance and biocompatibility of the printed product. In the past, most research was focused on material development and scaffold printings and was less focused on printing parameters and 3D printer printing settings. Therefore, the aim of this study was not only to develop biocompatible photopolymerization curing materials but also looked into the fine-tuning of 3D printer printing setting parameters as one of the studies focus into the design and fabrication of artificial vascular grafts. There were current report studies that used indirect manufacturing methods with 3D printing technology to fabricate channel molds to develop artificial vascular grafts [29]. However, this indirect method requires longer manufacturing time and such grafts were still found to be different as native vessels. In 2012, Meyer et al. used DLP to print soft artificial blood vessels and assessed for its physical properties. However, the vascular grafts were not structurally and strategically designed. Current studies had shown that different structural supports and designs can help in promoting cellular adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. In addition, biocompatibility tests were not conducted for the study conducted by Meyer et al. thus casting doubts regarding their fabricated graft and cellular support [30]. In 2016, Melchiorri et al. used DLP 3D printing technology to print elastic artificial vascular grafts and implant them into related animal experiments [31]. Similarly, the grafts that they fabricated had no proper structural designs. A recent study by Kroll and Buchris used DLP 3D printing technology to print soft artificial vascular grafts with pores, but it was unfortunate that degradation studies and profiling were not conducted in their study [32]. Single layered vascular grafts with pores may cause pre-mature degradation and thus leading to blood leakage as new vascular tissues had not yet been established. Furthermore, native blood vessels have three or four differing layers thus the studies above were not able to mimic the multi-layered characteristics of native vessels. Therefore, this study aimed to solve the shortfalls from previous studies and attempt to develop vascular grafts with similar biological, physical properties and functions of native blood vessels so as to further aid the development of vascular tissue engineering [33,34].
There are several factors to consider when developing an artificial vascular graft which included materials, printing processes, and post-treatments. In this study, we used a photocurable amine-based resin (AR) as the printing material with a natural material dopamine (DA) as a light absorber to improve the printing resolution. In addition, statistical design of experiments (DoE), which is the science of obtaining the largest possible amount of information about a system with the smallest number of experiments, was also applied to this research [35]. For the experimental designs, we conducted 23 full factor experiments and added three center points for each study. The selected testing factors were ratio of materials, addition of dopamine and printer setting parameters. In this study, we developed biomedical materials that can be applied to DLP 3D printing technology and further used this material in combination with bionic artificial vascular graft designs to achieve high accuracy, biocompatibility and physical properties that were similar with native vascular properties, including strength, elasticity, and porosity. Furthermore, by attempting to determine optimal parameters for fabrication of vascular grafts, we could pave an effective method for future tissue reconstruction studies and also facilitate the long-term goal of developing a suitable and implantable vascular graft.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Design

Experimental design and statistical evaluation can ease, as well as improve the property of experimentation, by evaluating and recognizing the most important parameters and interactions of such parameters that are likely to occur [36]. Resolution statistical design was applied for DA-contained AR materials formulation to consider the effect of formulation processes and parameters (such as stirring speed and rate, injection volume and concentrations of the used excipients) in two different extreme levels (Table 1). The significant effect of these formulation independent variables in Table 1 were examined on the dependent variables viz. resolution (response 1), Young’s modulus (response 2), and cell viability (response 3), using Design-Expert®. The design generated 11 experiments as shown in Table 2.

2.2. Preparation of Amino Resin-based Composites

50% AR AgiSyn 003 (DSM-AGI, Nederland) was placed into Tris-(hydroxymethyl) aminomethane (Tris, Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) buffer (10 mM, pH 8.5) with 0.1–3 mg/mL dopamine (DA, Acros Organics, NJ, USA) and 1.2 mg/ml of ammonium persulfate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) added next. The AR-based composites were mixed using the ultrasonic oscillator for 5 min, after which the composites turned dark brown after mixing. The hybrid materials were then heated at 180 °C and stirred to dehydrate the mixtures. Various amounts of 1.5% 2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl-diphenyl-phosphineoxide (TPO, Ciba Specialty Chemicals Inc., Basel, Switzerland) photo-initiators, 0.1% 2-Hydroxy-4-methoxybenzophenone-5-sulfonic acid (HMBS, Tokyo Chemical Industry, Tokyo, Japan) and 2,2,6,6-Tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO, Acros Organics, Morris Plains, NJ, USA) were dissolved in 2-Hydroxylethyl methacrylate (HEMA, Sigma-Aldrich and then added to the AR-based composites, mixed at 80 °C to form the 40–80% AR-contained resin for 3D printing.

2.3. Artificial Blood Vessel Fabrication

All test objects and scaffolds were designed using SolidWorks (Dassault Systemes SolidWorks Corp., MA, USA) and fabricated with a MiiCraft high resolution DLP 3D printer (Young Optics Inc., Hsinchu, Taiwan). Figure 1 showed design of vascular grafts with triangular holes which was previously reported to facilitate cell growth. The diameter of the vascular graft was determined to be at 6 mm and this decision was with reference to the diameter of human muscular artery. In addition, the thickness of the wall was determined to be at 1 mm. For printing, an individual 100 μm layer was exposed to blue light (405 nm) digital stereolithography for 23 to 40 s depending on the concentrations of the DA-contained AR resins. The uncured materials were washed off and the scaffolds were post-cured under UV light, yielding the fully cured scaffolds. The cured scaffolds were washed again for cell culture.

2.4. Printing Accuracy Analysis

Figure 2 showed the samples which were designed for printing accuracy analysis. The internal dimensions of the test piece were determined to have a length of 30 mm and a width of 16 mm to produce equilateral triangles. In addition, the length of the regular triangle was designed to be at 1.5 mm, with the total quantities set at a maximum of 234 equilateral triangles. Briefly, a digital microscope was used to use to capture images of the scaffolds and analyzed using the MATLAB software (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA). Pixel sizes with a scale of 5 mm were calculated using the program and the area of an individual pixel was then calculated and tabulated. After which, the images depicting the pores of the triangles was transferred and merged using Avizo software (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) to obtain pixels size and areas of triangles. The area of the triangle was obtained using the formula below:
1-pixel area × total pixel of the triangle hole/total number

2.5. Mechanical Testing

The mechanical properties assay was conducted in dry environments and the maximum tensile force was analyzed using an EZ-Test machine (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). For this test, we had the samples printed out to be in the shape of a dumbbell and the samples were subsequently stretched from both ends with a rate of 10 mm/min. Six assays were conducted for each sample and the average was recorded.

2.6. Cell Viability

In this study, we evaluated biocompatibility using Human Wharton’s Jelly mesenchymal stem cells (WJMSCs, Bioresource Collection and Research Center, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan) that was cultured in a commercially available mesenchymal stem cell medium (#7501, Sciencell, Carlsbad, CA, USA) to passage 4-8. Subsequently, the cells were seeded onto the specimens at a concentration of 104 cells per specimens. The cell viability was determined by the PrestoBlue® (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA) assay. The values of the absorbance were examined in a multi-well spectrophotometer Infinite M200 PRO (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) at 570 nm with a reference wavelength of 600 nm.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Results were subjected to regression analysis. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) method was applied to test the statistical significance of the process parameters. The analysis was carried out at a 9X% confidence level (α = 0.0(10-X). All observations were confirmed by at least three independent experiments. All data are expressed as mean ± standard error (SE).

3. Results and Discussion

There are many considerable factors when it comes to designing artificial blood vessels. Previous studies had attempted to fabricate artificial blood vessels that are similar to native blood vessels, but most had failed in attempting to achieve high levels of mimicry [37,38]. Therefore, this study used experimental design methods to optimize printing processes and ratios of materials to attempt to develop artificial blood vessels with good resolution and good biocompatibility. The experimental factors assessed were fabrication process, material formulation, and DLP printing parameters. These mentioned factors were known to affect and have an impact on characteristics of the fabricated artificial blood vessels. In order to improve efficiency and to obtain cost reductions, partial factor experimental designs with three central points were applied with statistical analysis to obtain a significant model.

3.1. Resolution

The amine-based resin itself is an extremely viscous material and any changes in its concentration ratio would affect printing resolution of the artificial blood vessel. Therefore, difference in AR/HEMA ratio affects the resolution of the material directly. Here, the relationship between ratio of amino resin and resolution was observed. More specifically, it can be seen that the ratio of amino resin and resolution had an inverse proportionate relationship with each other. Printing resolution decreases with increment of amino resin (Figure 3A). In addition, it can be noted that R6, R3, and R7 are in the centre portion of the graph. All three groups had 1.55 mg/mL of dopamine and a curing time of 32 s. However, the resolutions were 1.59 mm2, 1.24 mm2 and 0.88 mm2 respectively. The expected value, or the optimal value was determined to be at 0.975 mm2. Therefore, R7 was closest to the expected value. Moreover, it was a well-known fact that addition of DA had also a part to play in affecting the resolution. At this point, it was important to note that DA at the range of 0.1 mg/mL to 3 mg/mL was reported to be able to promote cellular behaviors [39]. In addition, since DA is able to undergo polymerization to form polydopamine, it would be able to act as a light absorber. Thus, appropriate concentration of dopamine can aid in increasing resolutions (Figure 3B). It was also known from our prior studies that differences in DA ratio significantly affects solidification, thus affecting resolutions. Resolutions were proportionate to concentration of DA, thus indicating that higher DA concentrations led to higher resolutions (Table 2). Since amine resin itself is an extremely viscous material, any difference in proportion (ratio of amine resin to hydroxyethyl methacrylate) can drastically affect and influence the physical properties of the printed blood vessel. Lastly, curing durations also had a significant effect on the Young’s modulus. From our prior studies, it can be known that longer the exposure of light led to harder products, thus causing an increment in measured Young’ modulus.

3.2. Young’s Modulus

Since the amine-based resin itself is an extremely viscous material, any changes in the proportion of resin would affect hardness and elasticity of the printed blood vessel. The Young’s modulus decreased with increment of resin concentration (Figure 4A). Similarly, it can be noted that R7, R3 and R6 falls in the middle range of the graph. All three groups had 1.55 mg/mL of dopamine and a curing time of 32 s. However, the Young’s modulus was at 1.22 MPa, 0.92 MPa and 0.86 MPa respectively. The expected value, or the optimal value was determined to be between 0.70 MPa to 0.98 MPa and it can be seen that only R3 and R6 falls within the range. On the other hand, the Young’s modulus increased with increment in curing durations (Figure 4B). Therefore, longer duration of light curing led to increased hardness thus translating to increased Young’s modulus. From Figure 4C, we can see an interesting phenomenon of which a low DA concentration of 0.10 mg/mL would lead to a sharp decrement of Young modulus with increment of resin concentration. However, a DA concentration of 3 mg/ml, on the other hand, led to a gradual increment of Young’s modulus with increment of resin concentration. Therefore, it was postulated that increased DA concentration could overcome the viscosity effects of resin, thus making it a more suitable material for tissue engineering.

3.3. Cell Viability

Figure 5A showed that increment of resin concentrations led to a gradual decline of cell viability. Similarly, it can be noted that R7, R3, and R6 falls in the middle range of the graph. All three groups had 1.55 mg/mL of dopamine and a curing time of 32 s. However, the cell viabilities were 81.02%, 74.28%, and 70.14% respectively (Figure 5B). In addition, curing duration also had a significant impact on cell viability (Figure 5C). Interestingly, longer duration led to increment of cell viability and together with Figure 5D, our team concluded that increment in DA led to higher photo-curability of material thus having a lesser impact on cells.

3.4. Comprehensive Comparison of Experimental Models

All experimental samples were then analyzed in a three-dimensional scatter plot as shown in Figure 6 with the optimal properties denoted by a blue line. The optimal properties were determined to be resolution of 0.975 mm2, Young’s modulus of 0.701 MPa - 0.983 MPa and highest cellular viability. The formula for this optimal properties were as follows:
X = 0.975 Y = 0.282 t + 0.701 ,   0 t 1 Z = 100
Table 3 showed the proximity of each group to the optimal properties. Of which, sample 7 and 8 were the nearest to the optimal properties with 18.98 and 10.81 respectively. The experimental parameters of sample 8 were resolution of 0 mm2, Young’s modulus of 4.298 MPa and cell viability of 89.23%. In addition, the experimental parameters of sample 7 were resolution of 0.88 mm2, Young’s modulus of 1.218 MPa and the cell viability of 81.02 %. Comparing the above two samples, it can be found that the resolution of sample 7 was lower than the expected value of 0.975 mm2, thus exhibiting a structure without pores. In addition, its Young’s modulus is larger than the expected value range of 0.701 MPa - 0.983 MPa. On the other hand, the three reaction variables of sample 8 were very close to the expected value, with only the Young’s modulus slightly higher than the expected value. However, this difference was found to be insignificant. Therefore, it can be considered that sample 8 was the closest to native blood vessels.

3.5. The Predicted Optimal Factor-level Combination for Verification

It was acknowledged from the prior studies that differences in the ratios of materials would affect properties of materials and the studies showed that addition of DA can improve printing resolutions with DA proportionate to printing resolutions (Table 2). Since the amine resin itself is an extremely viscous material, the difference in proportion (ratio of the amine resin to the hydroxyethyl methacrylate) affects the softness and elasticity of the material. The curing durations also has a significant effect on Young’s modulus. It was known from the prior studies that longer the exposure led to harder product, thus increasing Young’s modulus. Moreover, the statistical analysis of the available rankings, according to the ideal value of the reaction variables (resolution is not 0), the optimal feasible solution is selected/set optimally, and the experimental results are confirmed. After setting (ex: MTT>80% max=100%) the ideal value range, the calculated factors obtained by the calculation (the first one to the fifth group in Table 4) are very similar, so the parameters of the first group (the ratio of amine resin to hydroxyethyl methacrylate is 4:6, DA concentration is 0.1 mg/mL, and the curing time is 26.62 s) were set to be the predicted values.

3.6. Optimization Parameter and Fabrication

According to the above parameter, the materials are prepared and printed for analyzed (Figure 7). Compared with the prediction model, the actual value of the resolution is lower than the predicted value, but it is still an acceptable error (Table 5). There are two reasons. One is that the actual value is closer to the true triangle resolution area; the other is that the error value is only -2.68%, which is a small error. The actual value of Young’s modulus is very close to the predicted value, and only 0.55% of the error value shows that the model prediction is very accurate. Finally, the actual value of cell viability is 6.99 % higher than the predicted value, and according to ISO10993, the cell survival rate is more than 80%, which can be regarded as a non-toxic material [40].

4. Conclusions

This study explored the significant relationship between different factors and the response variables, and used this to give the optimal parameters for the fabrication of bionic artificial blood vessel stents. This study is based on the use of amine-based resins with soft characteristics that are used as the main material and further modified with dopamine. This material has never been developed in artificial blood vessels and is, therefore, a novel material for artificial blood vessel development. The artificial vascular material developed in this study can be applied to the vascular replacement treatment of coronary artery-related diseases in the future, and the goal of customizing artificial blood vessel stent can be achieved. This AR-based 3D printing photosensitive materials modified with dopamine in different concentrations (S.D.5 w/ dopamine) has been applied to the development of printed scaffolds for blood vessel engineering by applying DLP technology. The modified materials lead to important advantages such as good biocompatibility, which showed 88.37% cell viability, good printing resolution, and the 3D printed scaffolds can facilitate growth of cells. Furthermore, the development may be applied for customized tissue reconstruction in the future.

Author Contributions

Data Curation, Y.-W.C. and Y.-F.S.; Funding Acquisition, Y.-C.C. and Y.-W.C.; Investigation, Y.-F.S. and Y.-C.W.; Methodology, Y.-W.C.; Writing—Original Draft, S.-H.L. and A.K.-X.L.; Writing—Review & Editing, Y.-C.C. and Y.-W.C.

Funding

The authors acknowledge receipt grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 108-2321-B-039-001 and 108-2314-B-039-041) and China Medical University Hospital grants (CMU108-ASIA-12).

Acknowledgments

Experiments and data analysis were performed in part through the use of the Medical Research Core Facilities Center, Office of Research & Development at China Medical University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, Y.; Yu, Y.; Akkouch, A.; Dababneh, A.; Dolati, F.; Ozbolat, I.T. In vitro study of directly bioprinted perfusable vasculature conduits. Biomater. Sci. 2015, 3, 134–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kucukgul, C.; Ozler, S.B.; Inci, I.; Karakas, E.; Irmak, S.; Gozuacik, D.; Taralp, A.; Koç, B. 3D bioprinting of biomimetic aortic vascular constructs with self-supporting cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2015, 112, 811–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kang, T.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, B.J.; Kang, J.A.; Hong, J.M.; Kim, B.S.; Cha, H.J.; Rhie, J.W.; Cho, D.W. In vivo endothelization of tubular vascular grafts through in siturecruitment of endothelial and endothelial progenitor cells by RGD-fused mussel adhesive proteins. Biofabrication 2015, 7, 015007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Spadaccio, C.; Rainer, A.; Barbato, R.; Trombetta, M.; Chello, M.; Meyns, B. The long-term follow-up of large-diameter Dacron® vascular grafts in surgical practice: A review. J. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2019, 60, 501–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chen, Y.; Tillman, B.; Go, C.; Cho, S.K.; Clark, W.W.; Hur, T.B.; Ding, Y.; Chun, Y. A novel customizable stent graft that contains a stretchable ePTFE with a laser-welded nitinol stent. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2019, 107, 911–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jia, W.; Gungor-Ozkerim, P.S.; Zhang, Y.S.; Yue, K.; Zhu, K.; Liu, W.; Pi, Q.; Byambaa, B.; Dokmeci, M.R.; Shin, S.R.; et al. Direct 3D bioprinting of perfusable vascular constructs using a blend bioink. Biomaterials 2016, 106, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Tu, F.; Liu, Y.; Li, H.; Shi, P.; Hao, Y.; Wu, Y.; Yi, H.; Yin, Y.; Wang, J. Vascular cell co-culture on silk fibroin matrix. Polymers 2018, 10, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Guan, G.; Yu, C.; Xing, M.; Wu, Y.; Hu, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, L. Hydrogel small-diameter vascular graft reinforced with a braided fiber strut with improved mechanical properties. Polymers 2019, 11, 810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, H.; Dalisson, B.; Tran, S.; Barralet, J. Preservation of blood vessels with an oxygen generating composite. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2018, 7, 1701338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hong, S.; Kang, E.Y.; Byeon, J.; Jung, S.H.; Hwang, C. Embossed membranes with vascular patterns guide vascularization in a 3D tissue model. Polymers 2019, 11, 792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, F.; Chen, Q.; Liu, C.; Ao, Q.; Tian, X.; Fan, J.; Tong, H.; Wang, X. Natural polymers for organ 3D bioprinting. Polymers 2018, 10, 1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shie, M.Y.; Chiang, W.H.; Chen, I.W.P.; Liu, W.Y.; Chen, Y.W. Synergistic acceleration in the osteogenic and angiogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells by calcium silicate–graphene composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2017, 73, 726–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sarkar, S.; Schmitz-Rixen, T.; Hamilton, G.; Seifalian, A.M. Achieving the ideal properties for vascular bypass grafts using a tissue engineered approach: A review. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2007, 45, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Garreta, E.; Oria, R.; Tarantino, C.; Pla-Roca, M.; Prado, P.; Fernández-Avilés, F.; Campistol, J.M.; Samitier, J.; Montserrat, N. Tissue engineering by decellularization and 3D bioprinting. Mater. Today 2017, 20, 166–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Maiti, B.; Díaz Díaz, D. 3D printed polymeric hydrogels for nerve regeneration. Polymers 2018, 10, 1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kankala, R.K.; Xu, X.M.; Liu, C.G.; Chen, A.Z.; Wang, S.B. 3D-printing of microfibrous porous scaffolds based on hybrid approaches for bone tissue engineering. Polymers 2018, 10, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shojaie, S.; Ermini, L.; Ackerley, C.; Wang, J.; Chin, S.; Yeganeh, B.; Bilodeau, M.; Sambi, M.; Rogers, I.; Rossant, J.; et al. Acellular lung scaffolds direct differentiation of endoderm to functional airway epithelial cells: Requirement of matrix-bound HS proteoglycans. Stem Cell Rep. 2015, 4, 419–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dong, C.; Lv, Y. Application of collagen scaffold in tissue engineering: Recent advances and new perspectives. Polymers 2016, 8, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, J.Y.; Hwang, J.V.; Ao-Ieong, W.S.; Lin, Y.C.; Hsieh, Y.K.; Cheng, Y.L.; Wang, J. Study of physical and degradation properties of 3D-printed biodegradable, photocurable copolymers, PGSA-co-PEGDA and PGSA-co-PCLDA. Polymers 2018, 10, 1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chiu, Y.C.; Shie, M.Y.; Lin, Y.H.; Lee, K.X.; Chen, Y.W. Effect of strontium substitution on the physicochemical properties and bone regeneration potential of 3D printed calcium silicate scaffolds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, C.C.; Yu, J.; Ng, H.Y.; Lee, K.X.; Chen, C.C.; Chen, Y.S.; Shie, M.Y. The physicochemical properties of decellularized extracellular matrix-coated 3D printed poly(ε-caprolactone) nerve conduits for promoting Schwann cells proliferation and differentiation. Materials 2018, 11, 1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ho, C.C.; Fang, H.Y.; Wang, B.; Huang, T.H.; Shie, M.Y. The effects of Biodentine/polycaprolactone 3D-scaffold with odontogenesis properties on human dental pulp cells. Int. Endod. J. 2018, 51, e291–e300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tsai, C.H.; Hung, C.H.; Kuo, C.N.; Chen, C.Y.; Peng, Y.N.; Shie, M.Y. Improved bioactivity of 3D printed porous titanium alloy scaffold with chitosan/magnesium-calcium silicate composite for orthopaedic applications. Materials 2019, 12, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lin, Y.H.; Chuang, T.Y.; Chiang, W.H.; Chen, I.W.P.; Wang, K.; Shie, M.Y.; Chen, Y.W. The synergistic effects of graphene-contained 3D-printed calcium silicate/poly-ε-caprolactone scaffolds promote FGFR-induced osteogenic/angiogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 104, 109887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wu, Y.H.; Chiu, Y.C.; Lin, Y.H.; Ho, C.C.; Shie, M.Y.; Chen, Y.W. 3D-printed bioactive calcium silicate/poly-ε-caprolactone bioscaffolds modified with biomimetic extracellular matrices for bone regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, Y.W.; Shen, Y.F.; Ho, C.C.; Yu, J.; Wu, Y.H.; Wang, K.; Shih, C.T.; Shie, M.Y. Osteogenic and angiogenic potentials of the cell-laden hydrogel/mussel-inspired calcium silicate complex hierarchical porous scaffold fabricated by 3D bioprinting. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2018, 91, 679–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Derby, B. Printing and prototyping of tissues and scaffolds. Science 2012, 338, 921–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cheng, Y.L.; Chen, Y.W.; Wang, K.; Shie, M.Y. Enhanced adhesion and differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cell inside apatite-mineralized/poly(dopamine)-coated poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds by stereolithography. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 6307–6315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ozbolat, I.T. Scaffold-based or scaffold-free bioprinting: Competing or complementing approaches? J. Nanotechnol. Eng. Med 2015, 6, 024701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Datta, P.; Ayan, B.; Ozbolat, I.T. Bioprinting for vascular and vascularized tissue biofabrication. Acta Biomater. 2017, 51, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Melchiorri, A.J.; Hibino, N.; Best, C.A.; Yi, T.; Lee, Y.U.; Kraynak, C.A.; Kimerer, L.K.; Krieger, A.; Kim, P.; Breuer, C.K.; et al. 3D-printed biodegradable polymeric vascular grafts. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2016, 5, 319–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kroll, E.; Buchris, E. Weight reduction of 3D-printed cylindrical and toroidal pressure vessels through shape modification. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 21, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Anada, T.; Pan, C.C.; Stahl, A.M.; Mori, S.; Fukuda, J.; Suzuki, O.; Yang, Y. Vascularized bone-mimetic hydrogel constructs by 3D bioprinting to promote osteogenesis and angiogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ware, H.O.T.; Farsheed, A.C.; Akar, B.; Duan, C.; Chen, X.; Ameer, G.; Sun, C. High-speed on-demand 3D printed bioresorbable vascular scaffolds. Mater. Today Chem. 2018, 7, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Goh, T.N. A pragmatic approach to experimental design in industry. J. Appl. Stat. 2001, 28, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Avasatthi, V.; Pawar, H.; Dora, C.P.; Bansod, P.; Gill, M.S.; Suresh, S. A novel nanogel formulation of methotrexate for topical treatment of psoriasis: Optimization, in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2016, 21, 554–562. [Google Scholar]
  37. Silva, J.M.; Custódio, C.A.; Reis, R.L.; Mano, J.F. Multilayered hollow tubes as blood vessel substitutes. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 2, 2304–2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Al Kayal, T.; Maniglio, D.; Bonani, W.; Losi, P.; Migliaresi, C.; Soldani, G. A combined method for bilayered vascular graft fabrication. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2015, 26, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kao, C.T.; Lin, C.C.; Chen, Y.W.; Yeh, C.H.; Fang, H.Y.; Shie, M.Y. Poly(dopamine) coating of 3D printed poly(lactic acid) scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2015, 56, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Antonova, L.V.; Silnikov, V.N.; Sevostyanova, V.V.; Yuzhalin, A.E.; Koroleva, L.S.; Velikanova, E.A.; Mironov, A.V.; Godovikova, T.S.; Kutikhin, A.G.; Glushkova, T.V.; et al. Biocompatibility of small-diameter vascular grafts in different modes of RGD modification. Polymers 2019, 11, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The design of the bi-layer engineering blood vessel scaffold.
Figure 1. The design of the bi-layer engineering blood vessel scaffold.
Polymers 11 01394 g001
Figure 2. The design of resolution test specimens.
Figure 2. The design of resolution test specimens.
Polymers 11 01394 g002
Figure 3. The main effect of (A) amine-based resin (AR) concentration and (B) dopamine (DA) concentration on the resolution.
Figure 3. The main effect of (A) amine-based resin (AR) concentration and (B) dopamine (DA) concentration on the resolution.
Polymers 11 01394 g003
Figure 4. The main effect of (A) AR concentration, (B) curing time, and (C) AR-curing time-DA interaction on the Young’s modulus.
Figure 4. The main effect of (A) AR concentration, (B) curing time, and (C) AR-curing time-DA interaction on the Young’s modulus.
Polymers 11 01394 g004
Figure 5. The main effect of (A) AR concentration, (B) DA concentration, (C) curing time, and (D) AR-curing time-DA interaction on the cell viability.
Figure 5. The main effect of (A) AR concentration, (B) DA concentration, (C) curing time, and (D) AR-curing time-DA interaction on the cell viability.
Polymers 11 01394 g005
Figure 6. Three-dimensional scatter plot of resolution, Young’s modulus and cell viability.
Figure 6. Three-dimensional scatter plot of resolution, Young’s modulus and cell viability.
Polymers 11 01394 g006
Figure 7. The images of the 3D-printed blood vessels with the optimization parameter. The blood vessels with bi-layer structure and triangle pore. Scale bar is 1 mm.
Figure 7. The images of the 3D-printed blood vessels with the optimization parameter. The blood vessels with bi-layer structure and triangle pore. Scale bar is 1 mm.
Polymers 11 01394 g007
Table 1. Experimental factors and levels.
Table 1. Experimental factors and levels.
Experimental FactorAR con. (%)DA con. (mg/mL)Curing time(sec)
Low level400.123
High Level 80340
Table 2. Experimental factors (columns 2–4) and response variables (columns 5-7) of the 23 fractional factorial screening design (#1–#11).
Table 2. Experimental factors (columns 2–4) and response variables (columns 5-7) of the 23 fractional factorial screening design (#1–#11).
Run#AR con. (%)DA con. (mg/mL)Curing Time (sec)Resolution (mm2)Young’s Modulus (MPa)Cell Viability (%)
140.003.0040.002.761.3367.26
240.003.0024.003.052.7165.76
360.001.5532.001.240.9270.14
480.000.1024.000.050.8268.64
580.003.0040.001.863.4677.30
660.001.5532.001.590.8674.28
760.001.5532.000.881.2281.02
840.000.1040.000.004.3089.23
980.000.1040.000.000.0072.76
1040.000.1024.001.680.4876.06
1180.003.0024.000.000.000.00
Table 3. The distance between the response variables and the coordinate values of the expected values.
Table 3. The distance between the response variables and the coordinate values of the expected values.
Run#X:
Resolution (mm2)
Y:
Young’s Modulus (MPa)
Z:
Cell Viability (%)
DistanceOrder
12.761.33367.2632.799
23.052.70765.7634.3410
31.240.91770.1429.867
40.050.82268.6431.378
51.863.45677.3022.853
61.590.85674.2825.735
70.881.21881.0218.982
80.004.29889.2311.311
90.000.0072.7627.266
101.680.48476.0623.954
110.000.000.0010011
Table 4. The optimal factor-level combination.
Table 4. The optimal factor-level combination.
Run#AR con. (%)DA con. (mg/mL) Curing time (sec)Resolution (mm2)Young’s Modulus (MPa)Cell Viability (%)
140.000.1026.621.390.9882.19
240.000.1026.541.390.9682.12
340.000.1026.471.400.9482.06
441.750.1026.531.340.9881.37
540.000.1026.741.480.7881.47
Table 5. Optimization parameter verification.
Table 5. Optimization parameter verification.
ParameterAR con. (%)DA con. (mg/mL) Curing Time (sec)Resolution (mm2)Young’s Modulus (MPa)Cell Viability (%)
Expectation value40.000.1026.621.390.98382.19
Experimental value40.000.1026.601.350.98888.37
Deviation (%)0 0 0.75 -2.68 0.55 6.99

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chiu, Y.-C.; Shen, Y.-F.; Lee, A.K.-X.; Lin, S.-H.; Wu, Y.-C.; Chen, Y.-W. 3D Printing of Amino Resin-based Photosensitive Materials on Multi-parameter Optimization Design for Vascular Engineering Applications. Polymers 2019, 11, 1394. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11091394

AMA Style

Chiu Y-C, Shen Y-F, Lee AK-X, Lin S-H, Wu Y-C, Chen Y-W. 3D Printing of Amino Resin-based Photosensitive Materials on Multi-parameter Optimization Design for Vascular Engineering Applications. Polymers. 2019; 11(9):1394. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11091394

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chiu, Yung-Cheng, Yu-Fang Shen, Alvin Kai-Xing Lee, Shu-Hsien Lin, Yu-Chen Wu, and Yi-Wen Chen. 2019. "3D Printing of Amino Resin-based Photosensitive Materials on Multi-parameter Optimization Design for Vascular Engineering Applications" Polymers 11, no. 9: 1394. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11091394

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop