Next Article in Journal
Investigation on the Preparation and Properties of CMC/magadiite Nacre-Like Nanocomposite Films
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Drug Release Behavior Utilizing the Swelling Characteristics of Cellulosic Nanofibers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Isolation of the Flavonoid from Bamboo Residues and Its Application as Metal Ion Sensor in Vitro

1
Key Laboratory of Forestry Genetics & Biotechnology (Nanjing Forestry University), Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210037, China
2
Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, College of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
3
College of Furnishings and Industrial Design, Nanjing Forestry University, Longpan Road 159, Nanjing 210037, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Polymers 2019, 11(9), 1377; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11091377
Submission received: 15 July 2019 / Revised: 11 August 2019 / Accepted: 19 August 2019 / Published: 22 August 2019

Abstract

:
Fluorescence sensors prepared from natural polymers have received increasing attention based on their luminescence characteristics for bioimaging, cell imaging, and intracellular detection of inorganic metabolites. In this work, flavonoids isolated from bamboo residues (BRF) were applied as fluorescence sensors for different metal cations’ detection in vitro. Results showed the optimal flavonoids extraction condition of solid to liquid ratio, ethanol concentration, extraction time and temperature were determined at 1:25, 50%, 240 min and 90 °C, respectively, resulting in an extraction yield with 104.7 mg/100 g bamboo residues. The BRF is mainly composed of isoorientin, isovitexin, pinosylvin, tricin and isorhamnetin by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis. It is found that the BRF displayed strong blue-green emission as well as notable excitation, which can selectively and sensitively detect Fe3+ with the limit of detection (LOD) as low as 38.0 nM. In the Fe3+ detection was no obvious interference by other cations except for Al3+. In addition, the BRF displayed excellent biocompatibility that can be applied to bioimages of the intracellular detection of Fe3+ in L02 cells. Finally, it is found that the BRF possessed significant antioxidant properties in scavenging H2O2-induced endogenous reactive oxygen species (ROS) in a zebrafish module (in vivo) and L02 cells (in vitro). These results showed that the flavonoid products sustainably isolated from an abundant lignocellulosic waste appear to be effective fluorescent sensors for Fe3+ detection in biological systems with excellent biocompatibility and antioxidant activity.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Growing societal concerns about environmental pollution have prompted demands for renewable and sustainable bio-based materials. Lignocellulosic biomasses such as forest and agriculture residues are a candidate for producing biofuels, bio-based chemicals and bio-materials because they are abundant and presently of low cost [1,2]. As one of the most important forest resources, bamboo is a particularly attractive lignocellulosic resource due to its rapid growth rate and wide range of applications [3]. Examples of applications that utilize bamboo include its use as a substitute for wood in flooring and furniture manufacturing. In the bamboo utilization industry, present technical challenges result in about 46 million tons of bamboo processing residues going unused on an annual basis in China [4]. These residues, which comprise leaves, green bamboo, and yellow bamboo, are currently (and inefficiently) burnt for energy or simply landfilled. While, these bamboo residues have been of great medical use in eastern culture due to the documented pharmacological and biological functions of their extractives [5]. Hence, efficient utilization of bamboo residues for producing biological products is the ideal choice for the valorization of bamboo residues.
Anatomically, bamboo residues comprise a complex lignocellulosic matrix containing three main polymeric constituents: cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. The general chemical composition of bamboo residues is 40%–45% cellulose, 28%–34% hemicelluloses, and 13%–24% of lignin, as well as some flavonoids [6]. In the cell walls, cellulose is tightly associated with hemicellulose and lignin, resulting in a strong recalcitrance towards conversion of the polysaccharide polymers into fermentable sugars. Apart from these polymers, there exists a variety of flavonoids, which are fixated to the hard tissues of bamboo with partial responsibility for bamboo’s recalcitrant properties. Flavonoids are mainly in the insoluble form of free aglycone or flavonoid ligand in the hard tissues of bamboo, which make the extraction process difficult. Some general methods for flavonoid extraction include application of a heat reflux, alkaline treatment, or enzyme-assisted liberation of these compounds [7,8,9]. Recently, a variety of emerging extraction technologies involving the assistance of ultrasonic treatment have been developed for more efficient flavonoid extraction from bamboo. Compared with conventional methods, ultrasound-assisted ethanol extraction has a lowered extraction time, which both preservers flavonoid bioactivity and results in processes with greater production rates [10]. This greater efficiency is attributable to the effect of ultrasonic vibration on bamboo cells, which promotes deconstruction of cell walls and solvent penetration [11]. Based on these benefits, such methods have attracted signification attention as a viable process for extracting flavonoids from plants.
It has been reported that more than 9000 varieties of flavonoids have been identified, they exist in the form of either glycosylated or esterified derivatives with a basic 2-phenylchromanone structure consisting of C6–C3–C6 rings [12]. Classes of flavonoids include flavones, flavonols, flavanones and many more. Various classes of flavonoids different along the lines of their oxidation level and substitution pattern on their respective structure rings. Importantly, the two benzene rings in the flavonoid structure are different among the same subclass. Many studies have reported that flavonoids exhibit a variety of bioactive benefits, such as anti-viral/bacterial, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, and hepatoprotection [13,14,15]. An example of value-adding flavonoids is tricin, one of the dominant flavonoids in bamboo residues. It has been reported that tricin extract has cancer-treating properties, as well as the potential for aiding in the treatment of cytomegalovirus [16]. More importantly, it has been reported that flavonoids can be used as antioxidants with the capability of scavenging free radicals or chelating of metal ions in vivo [17]. Based on all of these benefits, it is certain that flavonoids are viable for application in medicines, functional foods and cosmetics.
In recent development, research has been conducted intended to investigate the feasibility of flavonoids-based natural materials as fluorescent sensors used in detection of metal ions, such as Al3+, Fe3+, Zn2+, Cu2+ [18,19]. Among these metal ions, Fe3+ plays an important role in many biological processes and affects human health. Excess or deficiency of Fe3+ can result in serious disorders involving protein damage, anemia, low blood pressure and decreased immunity [20]. Thus, effective method for determination of metal ions is of great significance to biochemical, environmental and industrial purposes. Conventional spectrophotometric, electroanalytical techniques available for metal ions detection exists the problems of time-consuming, expensive requirements and complex. So, fluorescent sensors gained considerable attention due to its high sensitivity, simple, rapid detection and low cost. Many types of fluorescence sensors currently exist, including those that are polymer-based, quantum dots, carbon nanotubes or nanoparticles [21]. Many of these sensors have demonstrated the capability to detect aqueous metal ions like Cu2+, Al3+, Mg2+, Zn2+ and Fe3+. However, most of them were synthesized by organic reaction with toxic reagents. A fluorescence sensor based on a Schiff compound was designed and synthesized to recognize Al3+ with the detection limit of 10-7 M [22]. Compared to these compounds, flavonoids, as natural products, is highly promising to be natural fluorescent sensors for metal ions with high sensitivity and selectivity and good biocompatibility. It had been reported that fluorescence sensors composed of flavonoids could be used to detect and bio-image metal ions within cellular structures. For example, a combination fluorescence sensor of both carbon dots and quercetin provided bio-imaging of the distribution of Zn2+ in HeLa cells [23]. This is a lane for the abundant flavonoids from bamboo to be used in this application as a sustainable alternative that also promotes use of a waste biomass stream. However, few works have been carried out which study development of fluorescent sensors based on flavonoids extracted from bamboo residues to detect metal ion in the biological system.
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are chemically defined as reactive molecules including hydrogen peroxide, superoxide radical, hydroxyl radical and nitrogen-containing peroxynitrite [24]. The balance between ROS production and elimination is essential for biological process involving cell signal transduction and homeostasis. The overproduction of ROS will cause cellular damage and various diseases such as oxidative stress, cancer, inflammation and others. Hence, research has paid attention to seek the antioxidants with low-toxic and strong activity. Natural products, such as polysaccharides from different biomass, are known to inhibit H2O2-stimulated ROS generation in vivo zebrafish and in vitro vero cells [25]. However, little work has been done to investigate if the bamboo residues flavonoids can be the antioxidant in scavenging ROS in vivo and in vitro cells.
In this work, ultrasound-assisted ethanol extraction followed by purification were carried out to obtain the flavonoids from bamboo residues (BRF). Flavonoid extraction was optimized with regard to several variables involved in the method. The main component in BRF was revealed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) technology. The fluorescence properties of the BRF were investigated and used as the probe to detected the Fe3+ concentration. In addition, the cell compatibility of BRF was evaluated and its intracellular bioimaging of Fe3+ was conducted using L02 cells. The antioxidant activity of BRF evaluated by scavenging endogenous ROS in L02 in vitro and endogenous ROS in zebrafish model in vivo. This work will serve as a demonstration of how valuable chemicals from bamboo residues can be elegantly applied to generate value for the emerging bio-economy.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) residues were provided by a bamboo processing factory in Fujian, China. Bamboo residues was pulverized using a laboratory grinder and milled into 20–80 mesh (average sizes of 0.18–0.85 mm). Milled materials with 10% moisture content was stored at room temperature until use. The samples of bamboo residues were extracted with petroleum ether for 6 h to remove lipid components and air dried for 24 h prior to the experiment.

2.2. Ultrasonic-Assisted Ethanol Extraction (UAEE)

Extraction conditions were investigated by employing single-factor experiments. Factors corresponding to solid-liquid ratio, ethanol-water concentration, temperature and time were investigated to better understand their effects on the yields of bamboo residues flavonoids. Six levels related to each variable were tested, with a range of 1:15–1:40 g/mL, 40%–90%, 50–100 °C, and 30–300 min, respectively. The following standard procedure was applied while changing the value of one factor at a time. Extraction was performed in a 250 mL round-bottomed flask. Specifically, samples of 3 g (on a dry weight basis) were weighed and added into the flask. 70% (v/v) ethanol solutions were poured into the flask and mixed with samples, achieving a final solid-to-liquid ratio of 1:30. Then, the flask was put under an ultrasonic cell disruptor (30 min and 500 w). After that, the flask was placed in a laboratory oil bath with magnetic stirring for 240 rpm/min. The apparatus was refluxed at 80 °C for 60 min. After extraction, the resultant liquor and solid residues were separated by vacuum filtration. Residues were washed again using fresh 70% ethanol. Extraction liquor combined with wash liquor was then kept under refrigeration (4 °C) for further use.
According to the results given by a single-factor experiment, an orthogonal experiment for four factors and three levels was designed to further optimize extraction conditions. This experiment was conducted congruent with the previously described procedures.

2.3. Separation and Purification of Flavonoids from Extraction Solution

Flavonoid separation was performed using a glass column filled with wet HPD 600 macroporous resin (polystyrene, 0.3–1.2 mm particle size, Cangzhou Bon Adsorber Technology Co., Ltd., Cangzhou, China). Before separation, the resin required pretreatment through immersion into 150 mL of absolute ethanol for 4 h. After soaking, the resin was eluted with 200 mL of deionized water to remove the muddy solution generated. Water elution was continued until the aqueous eluent registered no absorption under an ultraviolet (UV) spectrophotometer. The flavonoid solution collected from best extraction conditions (150 mL) was first diluted with large amount of deionized water and then loaded through the column. After absorption, the column was eluted with deionized water (100 mL) to remove the absorbed impurities. Subsequently, the column was eluted with 200 mL 70% ethanol solution to remove the absorbed flavonoids. The eluent was collected and evaporated to solid by rotary evaporation. The solids obtained were termed bamboo residue flavonoids (BRF).

2.4. Determination of Total Flavonoids Content in the Extraction Solution

Total flavonoids content was performed with a photocolorimetric method, using a rutin standard as a control. 10% Al(NO3)3 (150 mL), 5% NaNO2 and 4% NaOH solutions were prepared in advance. Next, a 0.15 mg/mL solution of rutin standard was prepared using the rutin standard and pure ethanol. Rutin standard solutions of different volumes in the range of 0 to 3.5 mL were separately reacted with 0.3 mL 5% NaNO2 solution for 6 min followed by a second reaction with 0.3 mL of 10% Al(NO3)3 solution for 6 min. The twice-reacted solution was then mixed with 2 mL 4% NaOH solution, followed by the addition of ethanol solution to reach 10 mL in total volume. After 10 min, the absorbance of these solutions were read at 510 nm using a UV spectrophotometer. Based on absorbance recorded, a linear regression between rutin concentration (C, mg/mL) and absorbance (A) was established. The amount of total flavonoids was calculated according to the following equations:
C = 0.1012A − 0.0062, R2 = 0.9954

2.5. The Component Analysis of Bamboo Residue Flavonoids (BRF) by Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS)

The BRF was analyzed by the LC-MS technology. The LC system operation conditions are: UPLC (Thermo Scientific Q Exactive Ultimate 3000 Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography); C-18 (Accucore aQ, 2.1 × 150 mm, i.d., 2.6 μm) column; temperature: 25 °C (column); wavelength: 280 nm; mobile phase: acetonitrile+0.1% formic acid(A), water+0.1% formic acid (B); flow rate: 0.2 mL/min (gradient elution) running 50 min. Mass spectrometry system: ES (Electrospray ionization); Mass spectra mode: positive and negative; mass analysis range: 50–1500 m/z; spray voltage: 3200 V; source temperature: 350 °C; capillary temperature: 300 °C; auxiliary gas flow: 15 L/min; sheath gas flow: 40 L/min. The comparative analysis of the obtained peaks with respect to mass spectral data of standard compound(s) was used to identify known compounds in the BRF.

2.6. Fluorescence of BRF Solution

The bamboo residues flavonoid was dissolved into CH3OH/Tris-HCl buffer solution (1:99, v/v) as BRF solution for the following characterization and use, which concentration is 0.08 g/L.

2.6.1. Fluorescence Emission Spectra under Various Excitation Wavelengths and Temperatures

The BRF solution used here was following another 25x dilution, which concentration is 3.2 mg/L. Fluorescence emission spectra of BRF solution was recorded at different excitation wavelengths (370–440 nm). To investigate the effect of temperature on fluorescence, BRF solution was incubated at 4, 20, 30, 37, 50 and 60 °C for 12 h. Then, fluorescence emission spectras of different temperatures were detected at an excitation wavelength of 420 nm by PerkinElmer LS55 spectrophotometer.

2.6.2. Selective Detection of Different Metal Ions

Aqueous solutions containing different chloride salts with various cations (Na+, Mg2+, Al3+, K+, Ca2+, Mn2+, Fe3+, Zn2+, Co2+, Cu2+) were prepared with concentration of 4 mM. Selective detection of Fe3+ was conducted in working volume of 5 mL. The BRF solution (0.2 mL, 0.08 g/L) was dissolved in 0.2 mL CH3OH/Tris-HCl buffer solution, subsequently mixed with different metal cation solutions (0.1 mL), respectively. After equilibrated for 2 min, Fluorescence emission spectra was recorded at an excitation wavelength of 420 nm.

2.6.3. Detection of Fe3+

Detection of Fe3+ was carried out by adding different volumes of Fe3+ solution (4 mM) into BRF solution (0.2 mL) in total working volume of 5 mL. Addition volumes of Fe3+ solution varied from 20, 50, 65, 80, 100, 115, 130, 165, 180 to 200 μL. After the equilibration, fluorescence emission spectra from the test solutions were individually detected at an excitation wavelength of 420 nm.

2.6.4. Interference of Other Metal Cations on Fe3+ Detection

The BRF solution (0.2 mL, 0.08 g/L) was mixed with Fe3+ solution (0.1 mL, 4 mM) before the addition of other metal cations solution. Subsequently, 0.1 mL other metal cations solutions (Na+, Mg2+, Al3+, K+, Ca2+, Mn2+, Fe3+, Zn2+, Co2+) with concentration of 4 mM was separately added. Similarly, fluorescence emission spectra was recorded at an excitation wavelength of 420 nm.

2.7. Cell Viability Evaluation of BRF

The 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay of L929 fibroblasts was carried out to estimate cell viability of BRF in vitro. First, fibroblasts were seeded into 96-well plates and incubated at 37 °C in an atmosphere with 5% CO2 for 24 h to allow the cells to attach to the wells. After the attachment period, 20 µL of MTT solution was mixed with 100 µL of BRF solution at concentrations of 25, 50, 100, 200 and 400 µg/mL. These new mixtures were further incubated at 37 °C for 4 h. After incubation, the absorbance of each well was measured at 490 nm using a microplate reader to calculate the growth of fibroblasts. All assays were performed at least in triplicate.

2.8. Intracellular Determination of Fe3+ by BRF

L02 cells (human normal hepatocyte cells) were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) for 24 h before monolayer culture. Then, medium was changed and the L02 cells were washed with phosphate buffer (PBS, pH = 7.4) for three times. The cells with different concentrations of Fe3+ were cultured in an incubator for 1 h at 37 °C. After incubation, the cells were co-cultured with 0.2 g/L BRF for 3 h at 37 °C. At last, the cells were washed three times with PBS for fluorescent recogniting of Fe3+, which were recorded by confocal laser scanning microscope.

2.9. Free-Radical Scavenging Activity Assay

The free radical scavenging activity of bamboo residues ethanol extracts solution was measured using its response to DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl), performed in an assay based on the method in the work of Brand-Williams et al. [26]. First, 2 mL ethanol extract solution was added to 2 mL DPPH ethanol solution (0.2 M). Next, the mixture was shaken and kept in the dark for 30 min. At the conclusion of the incubation period, absorbance was read at λ = 517 nm. A mixture of 2 mL DPPH and 2 mL ethanol solution served as the blank. In addition, 2 mL ethanol extracts solution and 2 mL ethanol solution were mixed as an unreacted control. The percentage of scavenging activity was calculated as follows:
Scavenging   activity = 1 A s A c A b × 100 %
where As is absorbance value of the sample, Ac is absorbance value of the control and Ab is absorbance value of the blank.

2.10. Antioxidant Activity of BRF on Hydrogen Peroxide-Induced Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Generation in In Vitro L02 Cell and in In Vivo Zebrafish

2.10.1. In Vitro L02 Cell

L02 cells were cultured in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) for 24 h following the monolayer culture. When cells grew well, they were sequently treated by fresh medium (control), H2O2 (0.25 mM) as well as H2O2 (0.25 mM) coupling BRF (0.2 g/L). After treating for 24 h, the medium was changed and the cells were washed with PBS for three times. Then, cells of three groups were incubated with oxidation-sensitive fluorescent probe dye of 2,7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA). The cell images of the all samples were recorded by using a confocal laser scanning microscopy.

2.10.2. In Vivo Zebrafish

The gamic zebrafish embryo (4 h), obtained from the Institute of Hydrobiology of the Chinese Academy of Science (Wuhan, China), were transferred to the individual wells of a 6-well plate. The zebrafish embryos were cultured by the exposed water (control group), 5 mM H2O2 (oxidative stress group) as well as mixture of 5 mM H2O2 coupling 0.2 g/L BRF (recovery group) for up to three days post fertilization (dpf). After that, cells of three groups were incubated with DCFH-DA fluorescent probe and wrapped with tinfoil to prevent the fluorescence quenching. After incubation, the embryos were rinsed in fresh embryo media and anesthetized before visualization. Fluorescence Images of embryos were photographed by a confocal laser scanning microscopy.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Optimization of UAEE Process for Total Flavonoids Extraction from Bamboo Residues

Implementation of ultrasonic-assisted ethanol extraction was used to extract bamboo residues flavonoids (BRF). This approach was chosen given its established alignment with “green” chemistry principles due to the ethanol as the extractive solvent, as well as its ability to achieve high efficiency of flavonoid recovery. Ethanol as the extraction solution presents additional advantages due to its recyclability and generally low degree of toxicity. Extraction yield is dependent on several factors, including temperature, time, ethanol concentration and solid to liquid ratio [27]. Based on the breadth of potentially influential factors, it was important to determine the optimal conditions to design a whole extraction process for bamboo residues. To begin, a single factor designed experiment (Figure 1) followed by an orthogonal designed experiment were carried out.
As shown in Figure 1, it was found that flavonoid extraction yield increased with the rise of four parameters (temperature, time, ethanol concentration and solid to liquid ratio) before achieving the peak value and then decreased. As shown in Figure 1a, the highest extraction yield (104.167 mg/100 g bamboo residues) was obtained at ethanol concentration of 60%. The yield decreased rapidly as ethanol concentration proceeded over 60%. One possible explanation for this observation could be that increasing ethanol’s proportion in the extraction solvent progressively lowers solvent polarity, which can impede flavonoid glycoside solubility given both their high polarity and abundance in bamboo residues [28]. Regarding the temperature’s influence (Figure 1b), as temperature increased from 50 to 100 °C, the extraction yield progressively increased until reaching a maximum at 80 °C. However, further increasing the temperature resulted in lowered extraction yields. The initial improvement to yield at elevated temperatures could be explained by the combination effect of heating and ultrasonic cavitation synergistically elevating the extent of swelling of materials, which led to an improvement in extraction yield [29]. However, extraction yield decreased with temperature rising, which can be explained that the degradation of heat-sensitive flavonoids might be occured when temperatures over 80 °C [30]. With regards to extraction time (Figure 1c), a notable increase in the extraction yield was observed in the range of 30 to 240 min. However, yield began to drop in a linear fashion beyond that time point, suggesting that the decomposition of flavonoids might take place over these extended extraction periods. Finally, on the matter of solid–liquid ratio (Figure 1d), flavonoid extraction yields were observed to be the greatest at the ratio of 1:30. Further increasing solid-liquid ratio resulted in unchanged and then decreased yield, which is possible that the soluble flavonoids has been extracted thoroughly except those that are insoluble at ratio of 1:30. Based on all of the above results, it can be assessed that the optimal conditions amongst the four parameters tested are as follows: ethanol concentration of 60%, temperature of 80 °C, time of 240 min and solid to liquid ratio of 1:30, which resulted in the extraction yield of flavonoid with 104.667 mg/100 g bamboo residues. The result was similar to the work reported that the highest yield was obtained at 1:20 solid to liquid ratio using 60% methanol solution for 2 h [31].
To further optimize extraction parameters, a L9 (34) orthogonal test was designed with its details presented in Table 1. Results obtained from the orthogonal test are shown in Table 2. According to the range analysis, it can be found that extraction temperature had the most significant impact on extraction yield. To verify this result, the, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to evaluate the statistical significance of process parameters. As shown in Table 3, compared to the critical Fα value of 4.26, it can be clearly seen that temperature is the most significant. This result is consistent with the results in orthogonal experiments. In order of importance following temperature were ethanol concentration, solid to liquid ratio, and finally extraction time. The optimal extraction combination was A1B1C2D3, which differed from the results obtained by the single factor experiment. This phenomenon could be attributed to the interaction between parameters and other relevant factors unconsidered in single factor test. Under this optimal condition, the extraction yield of flavonoid can reach to 104.760 mg/100 g bamboo residues, which was similar to the result of single factor extraction experiment.

3.2. The Component Analysis of BRF by Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS)

The main component in BRF was revealed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. As shown in Figure S1, the sample was separated and displayed five main peaks at 11.31, 12.64, 15.65, 24.7 and 27.71 min, respectively. Then, standards related to five peaks were ionized and results were shown in Figure S2. It can be seen that the retention times of five standards in chromatogram were in consistent with that of sample. Combined with the mass spectra data of five standards (Table S1), the peaks at 11.31, 12.64, 15.65, 24.7 and 27.71 min of BRF correspond to isoorientin, isovitexin, pinosylvin, tricin, isorhamnetin, respectively. These resulted indicated that the BRF is mainly composed of these compounds, which is in accordance to the results from bamboo leaves [32,33].

3.3. Optical Properties of BRF

In general, flavonoids display characteristic light absorption in the range of 250 to 385 nm due to the absorption from the two benzene rings, namely A ring and B ring [34]. As a demonstration, ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) absorption, fluorescence emission, excitation spectra of BRF are depicted in Figure 2a. As can be seen, the isolated flavonoids were found to have a wide UV absorption band ranging from 250 to 380 nm. The flavonoids showed a characteristic absorption peak at around 280 nm and a little shoulder at 308 nm, which can be attributed to the contribution of the π–π* transitions related to the benzoyl structure in the flavonoids [35]. In addition, a tail to the signal extended into the visible light range. In the fluorescence spectra, it can be seen that the maximum fluorescence emission peak was at 524 nm when excited at 420 nm. As seen from the inset picture, the BRF solution was visibly light yellow and transparent in daylight, while exhibiting blue-green emission irradiated by UV light of 365 nm.
Flavonoids show strong absorption peaks under UV light within wavelengths ranging from 200 to 400 nm. Thus, effect of excitation wavelength increasing from 370 to 440 nm on fluorescence emission spectra of BRF solution was investigated. As shown in Figure 2b, the emission spectra of BRF solution displayed an obvious excitation-dependent feature. When the samples were excited from 370 to 440 nm by an increment of 10 nm, the resultant fluorescence emission peak continuously red-shifted from 515 to 527 nm. The strongest emission intensity was detected at 420 nm excitation and 524 emission. Beyond this excitation wavelength the emission intensity gradually decreased. Based on identification of this maximum, all fluorescence spectra were excited at 420 nm in the following experiments.
Temperature is a crucial factor which clearly influenced both the stability of flavonoids and the accuracy of the fluorescence probe. Taking this into consideration, the effect of temperature on the fluorescence emission spectra of BRF solution at 420 nm excitation was discussed in Figure 2c. It was visualized that the fluorescence intensity continued decreasing when temperature changed from 4 °C to 30 °C, and then kept declining once temperature was over 30 °C. Interestingly, a fairly strong fluorescence intensity was observed at 37 °C. Observation of this specific fluorescence suggests that the BSF can be promising biologically when used for in vivo metal ions detection. This result is similar to a work that prepared fluorescent carbon dots, which demonstrated stability at 30 °C when temperature ranged from 3 to 60 °C [36].

3.4. Fluorescence Sensing of BRF Solution to Fe3+ Ions

3.4.1. Selectivity over Various Metal Ions

The strong binding affinity of oxygen-containing groups, such as hydroxyl and carbonyl groups on the surface of fluorescence sensor towards metal ions, which may result in remarkable changes of wavelengths and fluorescence intensity concerning emission spectra [37]. To analyze the selective fluorescence response behavior of BRF solution towards various metal ions, the emission spectra excited at 420 nm was detected, and the results are shown in Figure 3a. It can be seen that the fluorescence intensity varied with the addition of different metal ions (10 tested in total). The presence of some metal ions like Ca2+, Mn2+, Mg2+, Na+, and K+ contributed to the enhancement of fluorescence intensity, while other metal ions functionalized as fluorescence quencher. It has been reported that metal ions can coordinate with both hydroxyl groups and carbonyl groups on flavonoids. Resultant coordination complex then change the conjugation strength of the flavonoids, resulting in charge transfer between flavonoids and metal ions during excitation. This phenomenon is referred to as intramolecular charge transfer (ICT), which is responsible for either fluorescence quenching or enhancement [38]. Moreover, under the same conditions, a noticeable quenching behavior of Fe3+ to fluorescence intensity was observed compared to other metal ions, which alludes to higher thermodynamic affinity between Fe3+ ion and oxygen-containing groups of flavonoids [39]. This occurrence demonstrates that the BRF solution is highly selective over Fe3+ than other metal ions when analyzed using fluorescence methods.

3.4.2. Detection and Quantification Limit of Fe3+ Ions

Due to the high affinity between Fe3+ and flavonoids, response of BRF solution towards different Fe3+ concentration was detected and the fluorescence spectra was shown in Figure 3b. In Figure 3b, the emission intensity diminished upon gradual addition of Fe3+, providing a demonstration as to the range of detection available for measuring Fe3+ at the tested concentrations. Furthermore, the slight red shift was observed, which can be attributed to the formation of complex between flavonoids and Fe3+. Flavonoids have a high super-delocalization, a complete large π conjugate system as well as a strong ligand oxygen atom and a suitable spatial configuration, which can be used as a good ligand for metal ions. Upon the addition of Fe3+, the interaction of Fe3+ with the hydroxyl group and carbonyl group of flavonoids was sufficient to the extension of conjugate π system. Then, electron delocalization of the conjugate π system increases, the transition energy decreases, causing the shift of absorption wavelength toward the long wavelength, which is so-called red shift phenomenon. In addition, a strong linear relationship (R2 = 0.99) between fluorescence intensity ratio (F0/F) and Fe3+ concentration was shown in Figure 3c. Importantly, this linear relationship is congruent with the Stern-Volmer equation:
F0/F = 1 + KSVC
where KSV is defined as Stern-Volmer quenching constant, C is the concentration of Fe3+, and both F0 & F are defined as fluorescence intensity of BRF solution in absence and presence of Fe3+, respectively. The detection limit of BRF solution was measured to be 38.0 nM, which is much lower than the maximum level (0.54 µM) of Fe3+ allowed in drinking water by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. This performance was also excellent compared to another ferrous biosensor system described in literature [40]

3.4.3. Interference of Other Metal Ions on Fe3+ Detection

Considering the complexity of real environments which could require Fe3+ detection, interference by different metal ions upon the sensing system demands discussion. Changes to fluorescence intensity in a BRF-Fe(Ⅲ) system that has been spiked with different metal ions is depicted in Figure 3d. It was found that the notable interference by Al3+ was observed, followed by slight interference by the presence of Co2+, Cu2+ and K+. For other cations, however, there was a relatively slight negative impact on Fe3+ detection.

3.5. Biocompatibility Evaluation of BRF

During biological processes, Fe3+ is an important metal ion that involving oxygen uptake, oxygen metabolism and electronic transfer. The lack of Fe3+ can induce many serious diseases in humans, including anemia, decline of immunity and virus infection [41]. Hence, it is important to investigate the biocompatibility behavior of the prepared BRF in vitro. In this work, the in vitro cytotoxicity of BRF was estimated by using an assay involving L929 fibroblasts, with assay results shown in Figure 4.
Notably, it can be seen that cell viability remained greater than 95% when the concentrations of BRF increased from 25 to 400 mg/L. This demonstration indicates that they have excellent biocompatibility, providing further proof that they are suitable and nontoxic for detecting the Fe3+ when it carried out in the human body. It can be concluded that the obtained BRF with low toxicity exhibited both high sensitivity and selectivity towards metal ions and in particular, ferrous ions. Hence, the properties of biocompatibility and bioavailability of BRF allow it to be applied as a fluorescent sensor for Fe3+ detection in cells.

3.6. Intracellular Determination of Fe3+ by BRF

Considering the excellent fluorescence sensing of Fe3+ and biocompatibility of BRF, the bioimaging application of BRF for Fe3+ detection was investigated in living cells of liver cell L02 cells, which play important role in detoxification, metabolic regulation and energy storage. As shown in Figure 5, viable and intact cell morphology can be observed from the bright field and merge images, indicating the good biocompatible performance of BRF in L02 cells. Figure 5f,g showed the L02 cells did not emit fluorescence while cells with BRF incubation showed strong green fluorescence in the same condition, indicating the good cell membrane permeability property of BRF. In Figure 5h–j, it can be seen that the green fluorescence intensity of cell was decreased when it was incubated with the increased concentrations of Fe3+, indicating the efficient fluorescence quenching behavior of Fe3+ towards BRF in vitro. It can be concluded that the ICT detection system is capable of detecting Fe3+ in L02 cells, indicating the ability of BRF probe for Fe3+ detection in the biological system.

3.7. Antioxidant Activity of BRF

It has demonstrated that C-glycoside flavonoids in bamboo extracts are mainly responsible for the biological activity, including the antioxidant activity [42]. The antioxidant potency of BRF was measured using the DPPH free-radical scavenging assay, with the results shown in Figure 6.
As it can be seen that when BRF concentration ranged from 0 to 0.30 g/L, the scavenging activity of the extracts increased from 40% to 85%. Then, the scavenging activity maintained constant when concentration was furthered increased to 0.45 g/L. The highest scavenging activity with IC50 was obtained at the concentration of 124 mg/L, which is lower than the IC50 value from 137 to 260 mg/L for the five native Brazilian bamboos [43]. This excellent antioxidant activity indicates that the obtained BRF might have additionally beneficial antioxidant capacity when it applied as the fluorescence sensing for Fe3+ ions.

3.8. The Antioxidant Effect of BRF on Hydrogen Peroxide-Induced ROS Generation in Vitro L02 Cell and in Vivo Zebrafish

In the biological system, ROS includes H2O2, 1O2, O2•−, ClO, ONOO and •OH radicals. ROS balance plays key role in protecting DNA, proteins, and lipids in the living cells. To investigate the antioxidant ability of BRF on the scavenging ROS, the level of intracellular ROS after being treated with or without BRF in zebrafish and L02 cell were detected using a chemical fluorescence method (2,7-dichlorofuorescin diacetate, DCFH-DA). As shown in Figure 7a–c, the fluorescence of L02 cell with H2O2 stimulation was notably increased compared to the normal L02 cell (control), This suggested the ROS was generated in cells by treated with H2O2. However, when these cells were incubated with BRF, the fluorescence of cell was visibly decreased. In addition, the investigation on protective effect of BRF against overproduced ROS in vivo zebrafish is shown in Figure 7d–f. Notably, the whole-body fluorescence intensity of zebrafish was significantly increased when it was treated by H2O2, which is due to the generation of ROS. It is interesting to note that the intensity fluorescence of H2O2-induced zebrafish declined, indicating the generated ROS in zebrafish was scavenged by BRF. These results suggested the excellent scavenging effect of BRF for H2O2-induced ROS generation in vivo and in vitro. It has been demonstrated that bamboo leaf flavonoids extracts could show ability to alleviate oxidative stress in HepG2 cells that were induced by oleic acid [44].

4. Conclusions

In this work, a sustainable flavonoid-based fluorescence sensor was successfully prepared from bamboo residues using a non-destructive extraction method. The flavonoids exhibited obvious luminescence performance with strong blue-green light at 360 nm, an expected optical property of the compounds. In addition, the flavonoids showed high sensitivity and selectivity towards Fe3+ detection in the range of 0 to 16 mM (R2 = 0.99) with a detection limit as low as 38 nM. The flavonoids sensor showed good bioimaging of Fe3+ detection in L02 cell as well as excellent compatibility and antioxidant activity to scavenge ROS produced in zebrafish and L02 cell. This robustness offers a simple and green fluorescence sensor for Fe3+ detection. Overall, the results show the obtained flavonoids from bamboo residues with excellent antioxidant ability can potentially be used as a metal ions sensor in the fields of bioimaging and biosensing.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be accessed at: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/11/9/1377/s1. Figure S1. HPLC chromatogram of the BRF detected at 280 nm; Figure S2. LCMS profiles of five standard compounds. From (a) to (e) are isoorientin, isovitexin, pinosylvin, tricin, isorhamnetin; Table S1. Main flavonoids compounds in BRF identified using LCMS profiling.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, Y.S. and H.D.; Funding acquisition, C.H. and Q.Y.; Investigation, Y.S. and H.D.; Supervision, C.L., C.H. and Q.Y.; Writing—original draft, Y.S.; Writing—review and editing, C.L., C.H. and Q.Y.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31800501) and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20180772).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Shilong Yang in Advanced Analysis and Testing Center of Nanjing Forestry University for help with the work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nie, S.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; Wu, Q.; Wang, S. Preparation and Characterization of Nanocomposite Films Containing Nano-Aluminum Nitride and Cellulose Nanofibrils. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gu, L.; Jiang, B.; Song, J.; Jin, Y.; Xiao, H. Effect of Lignin on Performance of Lignocellulose Nanofibrils for Durable Superhydrophobic Surface. Cellulose 2019, 26, 933–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Huang, C.; Lin, W.; Lai, C.; Li, X.; Jin, Y.; Yong, Q. Coupling the Post-Extraction Process to Remove Residual Lignin and Alter the Recalcitrant Structures for Improving the Enzymatic Digestibility of Acid-Pretreated Bamboo Residues. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 285, 121355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chand, N.; Jain, D.; Nigrawal, A. Investigation on Gradient Dielectric Characteristics of Bamboo (Dendrocalamus strictus). J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2006, 102, 3489–3494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Huang, C.; Tang, S.; Zhang, W.; Tao, Y.; Lai, C.; Li, X.; Yong, Q. Unveiling the Structural Properties of Lignin–Carbohydrate Complexes in Bamboo Residues and Its Functionality as Antioxidants and Immunostimulants. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 12522–12531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xin, D.; Yang, Z.; Liu, F.; Xu, X.; Zhang, J. Comparison of Aqueous Ammonia and Dilute Acid Pretreatment of Bamboo Fractions: Structure Properties and Enzymatic Hydrolysis. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 175, 529–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mou, H.; Wu, S. Comparison of Hydrothermal, Hydrotropic and Organosolv Pretreatment for Improving the Enzymatic Digestibility of Bamboo. Cellulose 2017, 24, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ma, X.; Cao, S.; Lin, L.; Luo, X.; Hu, H.; Chen, L.; Huang, L. Hydrothermal Pretreatment of Bamboo and Cellulose Degradation. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 148, 408–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Su, J.; Wang, C.; Noro, J.; Cavaco-Paulo, A.; Silva, C.; Fu, J. Polymers from Bamboo Extracts Produced by Laccase. Polymers 2018, 10, 1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vilkhu, K.; Mawson, R.; Simons, L.; Bates, D. Applications and Opportunities for Ultrasound Assisted Extraction in the Food Industry—A Review. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2008, 9, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhu, X.Y.; Mang, Y.L.; Xie, J.; Wang, P.; Su, W.K. Response Surface Optimization of Mechanochemical-Assisted Extraction of Flavonoids and Terpene Trilactones from Ginkgo Leaves. Ind. Crops Prod. 2011, 34, 1041–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Heim, K.E.; Tagliaferro, A.R.; Bobilya, D.J. Flavonoid Antioxidants: Chemistry, Metabolism and Structure-Activity Relationships. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2002, 13, 572–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, J.; Gong, J.; Ding, Y.; Lu, B.; Wu, X.; Zhang, Y. Antibacterial Activity of Water-Phase Extracts from Bamboo Shavings Against Food Spoilage Microorganisms. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 9, 7710–7717. [Google Scholar]
  14. Fu, Y.; Chen, J.; Li, Y.J.; Zheng, Y.F.; Li, P. Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Six Flavonoids Separated from Licorice. Food Chem. 2013, 141, 1063–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tanaka, A.; Zhu, Q.; Tan, H.; Horiba, H.; Ohnuki, K.; Mori, Y.; Yamauchi, R.; Ishikawa, H.; Iwamoto, A.; Kawahara, H.; et al. Biological Activities and Phytochemical Profiles of Extracts from Different Parts of bamboo (Phyllostachys Pubescens). Molecules 2014, 19, 8238–8260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Liu, M.H.; Ko, C.H.; Ma, N.; Tan, P.W.; Fu, W.M.; He, J.Y. Chemical Profiles, Antioxidant and Anti-Obesity Effects of Extract of Bambusa Textilis McClure Leaves. J. Funct. Foods 2016, 22, 533–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gong, J.; Huang, J.; Xiao, G.; Chen, F.; Lee, B.; Ge, Q.; You, Y.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Y. Antioxidant Capacities of Fractions of Bamboo Shaving Extract and Their Antioxidant Components. Molecules 2016, 21, 996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zou, Y.; Yan, F.; Dai, L.; Luo, Y.; Fu, Y.; Yang, N.; Wun, J.; Chen, L. High Photoluminescent Carbon Nanodots and Quercetin-Al3+ Construct A Ratiometric Fluorescent Sensing System. Carbon N. Y. 2014, 77, 1148–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, S.; Jiang, W.; Tang, Y.; Xu, L.; Gao, B.; Xu, H. Sensitive Fluorescent Assay for Copper(ii) Determination in Aqueous Solution Using Quercetin-Cyclodextrin Inclusion. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 37828–37834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hu, Z.Q.; Feng, Y.C.; Huang, H.Q.; Ding, L.; Wang, X.M.; Lin, C.S.; Li, M.; Ma, C.P. Fe3+-Selective Fluorescent Probe Based on Rhodamine B and Its Application in Bioimaging. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 156, 428–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, J.; Zhu, C.; Yang, Z.; Wang, P.; Yue, Y.; Kitaoka, T. Thermally Tunable Pickering Emulsions Stabilized by Carbon-Dot-Incorporated Core-Shell Nanospheres with Fluorescence ‘On-Off’ Behavior. Langmuir 2018, 34, 273–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Qin, J.C.; Yang, Z.Y. Bis-Schiff Base as A Donor-Acceptor Fluorescent Probe: Recognition of Al3+ Ions in Near 100% Aqueous Solution. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2015, 303–304, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, M.; Kong, W.; Li, H.; Liu, J.; Huang, H.; Liu, Y.; Kang, Z. Fluorescent Carbon Dots for Sensitive Determination and Intracellular Imaging of Zinc(II) Ion. Microchim. Acta 2015, 182, 2443–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Adegoke, O.; Forbes, P.B.C. Challenges and Advances in Quantum Dot Fluorescent Probes to Detect Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species: A Review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2015, 862, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wang, L.; Oh, J.Y.; Kim, H.S.; Lee, W.W.; Cui, Y.; Lee, H.G.; Kim, Y.T.; Ko, J.Y.; Jeon, Y.J. Protective Effect of Polysaccharides from Celluclast-Assisted Extract of Hizikia Fusiforme Against Hydrogen Peroxide-Induced Oxidative Stress in Vitro in Vero Cells and in Vivo in Zebrafish. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 112, 483–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Brand-Williams, W.; Cuvelier, M.E.; Berset, C. Use of A Free Radical Method to Evaluate Antioxidant Activity. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 1995, 28, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vázquez, M.F.B.; Comini, L.R.; Martini, R.E.; Montoya, S.C.N.; Bottini, S.; Cabrera, J.L. Ultrasonic-Assisted Extraction of Anthraquinones from Heterophyllaea Pustulata Hook f. (Rubiaceae) Using Ethanol-Water Mixtures. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 69, 278–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Butsat, S.; Siriamornpun, S. Effect of Solvent Types and Extraction Times on Phenolic and Flavonoid Contents and Antioxidant Activity in Leaf Extracts of Amomum Chinense C. Int. Food Res. J. 2016, 23, 180–187. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang, T.; Guo, N.; Wang, S.X.; Kou, P.; Zhao, C.J.; Fu, Y.J. Ultrasound-Negative Pressure Cavitation Extraction of Phenolic Compounds from Blueberry Leaves and Evaluation of Its DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity. Food Bioprod. Process. 2018, 108, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Briones-Labarca, V.; Giovagnoli-Vicuña, C.; Cañas-Sarazúa, R. Optimization of Extraction Yield, Flavonoids and Lycopene from Tomato Pulp by High Hydrostatic Pressure-Assisted Extraction. Food Chem. 2019, 278, 751–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, C.; Zhao, W.; Han, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhai, X.; Liu, Y. Extraction Process and Content Determination of Total Flavonoids in Acanthopanax Giraldii Harms. Med. Pl. 2016, 7, 7–11. [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang, Y.; Bao, B.; Lu, B.; Ren, Y.; Tie, X.; Zhang, Y. Determination of Flavone C-Glucosides in Antioxidant of Bamboo Leaves (AOB) Fortified Foods by Reversed-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Ultraviolet Diode Array Detection. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1065, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Pei, J.; Sun, Q.; Zhao, L.; Shi, H.; Tang, F.; Cao, F. Efficient Biotransformation of Luteolin to Isoorientin through Adjusting Induction Strategy, Controlling Acetic Acid, and Increasing UDP-Glucose Supply in Escherichia Coli. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2019, 67, 331–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Lin, G.; Chan, S.S.K.; Chung, H.S.; Li, S.L. Chemistry and Biological Activities of Naturally Occurring Phthalides. Stud. Nat. Prod. Chem. 2005, 32, 611–669. [Google Scholar]
  35. Yang, S.; Jiang, W.; Zhao, F.; Xu, L.; Xu, Y.; Gao, B.; Sun, H.; Du, L.; Tang, Y.; Cao, F. A highly Sensitive and Selective Fluorescent Sensor for Detection of Copper Ions Based on Natural Isorhamnetin from Ginkgo Leaves. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 236, 386–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Aslandaş, A.M.; Balci, N.; Arik, M.; Şakiroʇlu, H.; Onganer, Y.; Meral, K. Liquid Nitrogen-Assisted Synthesis of Fluorescent Carbon Dots from Blueberry and Their Performance in Fe3+ Detection. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 356, 747–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chowdhury, S.; Rooj, B.; Dutta, A.; Mandal, U. Review on Recent Advances in Metal Ions Sensing Using Different Fluorescent Probes. J. Fluoresc. 2018, 28, 999–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ma, D.L.; Ma, V.P.Y.; Chan, D.S.H.; Leung, K.H.; He, H.Z.; Leung, C.H. Recent Advances in Luminescent Heavy Metal Complexes for Sensing. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2012, 256, 3087–3113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Han, C.; Wang, R.; Wang, K.; Xu, H.; Sui, M.; Li, J.; Xu, K. Highly Fluorescent Carbon Dots as Selective and Sensitive ‘On-Off-On’ Probes for Iron(III) Ion and Apoferritin Detection and Imaging in Living Cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 83, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Atchudan, R.; Edison, T.N.J.I.; Aseer, K.R.; Perumal, S.; Karthik, N.; Lee, Y.R. Highly Fluorescent Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Dots Derived from Phyllanthus Acidus Utilized as A Fluorescent Probe for Label-Free Selective Detection of Fe3+ Ions, Live Cell Imaging and Fluorescent Ink. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 99, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, L.; Li, W.; Zhi, W.; Wang, Y.; Han, J.; Cao, Z.; Ni, L.; Li, H.; Jing, J. A Water-Soluble Fe 3+ Selective Fluorescent Turn-On Chemosensor: Preparation, Theoretical Study and Its Optical Vitro Imaging. J. Lumin. 2018, 196, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wróblewska, K.B.; Baby, A.R.; Grombone Guaratini, M.T.; Moreno, P.R.H. In Vitro Antioxidant and Photoprotective Activity of Five Native Brazilian Bamboo Species. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 130, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gong, J.; Xia, D.; Huang, J.; Ge, Q.; Mao, J.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Y. Functional Components of Bamboo Shavings and Bamboo Leaf Extracts and Their Antioxidant Activities in Vitro. J. Med. Food 2014, 18, 453–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yu, Y.; Li, Z.; Cao, G.; Huang, S.; Yang, H. Bamboo Leaf Flavonoids Extracts Alleviate Oxidative Stress in HepG2 Cells via Naturally Modulating Reactive Oxygen Species Production and Nrf2-Mediated Antioxidant Defense Responses. J. Food Sci. 2019, 84, 1609–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Effect of ethanol concentration (a); temperature (b); time (c); and solid to liquid ratio (d) on the extraction yield of total flavonoids.
Figure 1. Effect of ethanol concentration (a); temperature (b); time (c); and solid to liquid ratio (d) on the extraction yield of total flavonoids.
Polymers 11 01377 g001
Figure 2. The optical properties of BRF. (a) Ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) absorption, fluorescence excitation and emission spectra of BRF. Insert: images of the BRF observed under sunlight and UV light (365 nm), respectively; (b) fluorescence emission spectra of BRF with irradiation of various excitation wavelengths; (c) effect of temperature on the fluorescence intensity of BRF at the emission of 524 nm.
Figure 2. The optical properties of BRF. (a) Ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) absorption, fluorescence excitation and emission spectra of BRF. Insert: images of the BRF observed under sunlight and UV light (365 nm), respectively; (b) fluorescence emission spectra of BRF with irradiation of various excitation wavelengths; (c) effect of temperature on the fluorescence intensity of BRF at the emission of 524 nm.
Polymers 11 01377 g002
Figure 3. Fluorescence sensing of BRF towards Fe3+. (a) Fluorescence emission spectra of BRF with the addition of different metal ions; (b) fluorescence emission spectra of BRF quenched by various Fe3+ concentrations (0–0.16 mM); (c) Stern–Volmer plot for fluorescence quenching of BRF after the addition of Fe3+ (0–0.16 mM); (d) the interference of other metal ions on the fluorescence detection of BRF to Fe3+. F0 and F represent the fluorescence intensity of BRF-Fe(Ⅲ) system before and after the addition of other metal ions.
Figure 3. Fluorescence sensing of BRF towards Fe3+. (a) Fluorescence emission spectra of BRF with the addition of different metal ions; (b) fluorescence emission spectra of BRF quenched by various Fe3+ concentrations (0–0.16 mM); (c) Stern–Volmer plot for fluorescence quenching of BRF after the addition of Fe3+ (0–0.16 mM); (d) the interference of other metal ions on the fluorescence detection of BRF to Fe3+. F0 and F represent the fluorescence intensity of BRF-Fe(Ⅲ) system before and after the addition of other metal ions.
Polymers 11 01377 g003
Figure 4. Cell viability of L929 fibroblasts after incubation with different concentrations of BRF.
Figure 4. Cell viability of L929 fibroblasts after incubation with different concentrations of BRF.
Polymers 11 01377 g004
Figure 5. Confocal images of L02 cells. (a)–(e): bright field images; (f)–(j): fluorescence images; (k)–(o): merge images.
Figure 5. Confocal images of L02 cells. (a)–(e): bright field images; (f)–(j): fluorescence images; (k)–(o): merge images.
Polymers 11 01377 g005
Figure 6. DPPH free radical scavenging ability of BRF with different concentrations of flavonoids.
Figure 6. DPPH free radical scavenging ability of BRF with different concentrations of flavonoids.
Polymers 11 01377 g006
Figure 7. The antioxidant effect of BRF on H2O2-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in zebrafish embryos. (A) L02 cell under fluorescence microscope; (B) zebrafish embryo under fluorescence microscope.
Figure 7. The antioxidant effect of BRF on H2O2-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in zebrafish embryos. (A) L02 cell under fluorescence microscope; (B) zebrafish embryo under fluorescence microscope.
Polymers 11 01377 g007
Table 1. Factors and levels of L9 (34) orthogonal experiment.
Table 1. Factors and levels of L9 (34) orthogonal experiment.
LevelFactor
Solid to Liquid Ratio (A)Ethanol Concentration (B)Time (C)Temperature (D)
(g/mL)(%)(min)(°C)
11:255018070
21:306024080
31:357030090
Table 2. Design and results of L9 (34) orthogonal experiment.
Table 2. Design and results of L9 (34) orthogonal experiment.
NumberA BC D Total Flavonoids Yield mg/100g Bamboo Residues
1111184.246
2122274.504
3133396.370
42123100.942
5223168.024
6231264.221
7313276.855
8321376.016
9332174.413
k185.040 87.348 74.828 75.561
k277.729 72.848 83.286 71.860
k375.761 78.334 80.417 91.109
R9.278 14.500 8.459 19.249
Table 3. Results of variance analysis.
Table 3. Results of variance analysis.
FactorSS aDf bMS cF dP e
A286.8142143.4071.061>0.05
B321.5802321.5802.739>0.05
C111.0262111.0260.736>0.05
D625.9932625.9938.150<0.05
F0.05 (2,9) = 4.26; a: sum of squares of deviation from mean; b: degree of freedom; c: mean square; d: F-ratio; e: percentage of contribution.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Su, Y.; Dong, H.; Li, M.; Lai, C.; Huang, C.; Yong, Q. Isolation of the Flavonoid from Bamboo Residues and Its Application as Metal Ion Sensor in Vitro. Polymers 2019, 11, 1377. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11091377

AMA Style

Su Y, Dong H, Li M, Lai C, Huang C, Yong Q. Isolation of the Flavonoid from Bamboo Residues and Its Application as Metal Ion Sensor in Vitro. Polymers. 2019; 11(9):1377. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11091377

Chicago/Turabian Style

Su, Yan, Huiling Dong, Min Li, Chenhuan Lai, Caoxing Huang, and Qiang Yong. 2019. "Isolation of the Flavonoid from Bamboo Residues and Its Application as Metal Ion Sensor in Vitro" Polymers 11, no. 9: 1377. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11091377

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop