Next Article in Journal
Piezoelectric Films Based on Polyethylene Modified by Aluminosilicate Filler
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation and Comparison of Properties of Three Phase Change Energy Storage Materials with Hollow Fiber Membrane as the Supporting Carrier
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 11
Issue 8
10.3390/polym11081344
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Novel Hierarchically Porous Polypyrrole Sphere Modified Separator for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

by
Baoe Li
1,
Zhenghao Sun
1,
Yan Zhao
1,* and
Zhumabay Bakenov
2
1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, China
2
Institute of Batteries LLC, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, 53 Kabanbay Batyr Avenue, Nur-Sultan 010000, Kazakhstan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2019, 11(8), 1344; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11081344
Submission received: 22 July 2019 / Revised: 9 August 2019 / Accepted: 9 August 2019 / Published: 13 August 2019
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The commercialization of Lithium-sulfur batteries was limited by the polysulfide shuttle effect, and modifying the routine separator was an effective method to solve this problem. In this work, a novel hierarchically porous polypyrrole sphere (PPS) was successfully prepared by using silica as hard-templates. As-prepared PPS was slurry-coated on the separator, which could reduce the polarization phenomenon of the sulfur cathode, and efficiently immobilize polysulfides. As expected, high sulfur utilization was achieved by suppressing the shuttle effect. When tested in the lithium-sulfur battery, it exhibited a high capacity of 855 mAh·g−1 after 100 cycles at 0.2 C, and delivered a reversible capacity of 507 mAh·g−1 at 3 C, showing excellent electrochemical performance.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries, which possess superior theoretical specific capacity (1672 mAh·g−1), is regarded as one of the most promising rechargeable batteries [1,2,3,4]. However, Li-S batteries still cannot satisfy the needs of practical applications, for example, the low conductivity of sulfur and polysulfide intermediates lead to low utilization efficiency, especially cycled at a high current rate. Furthermore, the unavoidable intermediate lithium polysulfides; Li2Sx (4 ≤ x ≤ 8) could lead to the gradual loss of the sulfur, as well as a serious fade in the capacity [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Therefore, nanostructured host materials, including carbon materials, polymers and metal oxides, have been designed to confine sulfur or its intermediates and improve the conductivity [13,14,15,16].
Presently, the composite modified separator has been found as one of the effective methods to alleviate the solution of polysulfides for improving the electrochemical performance [17,18,19,20,21]. Various conductive materials have been used as the coating layer and introduced between the cathode and separator, not only to block the shuttle effect of the polysulfide, but also to suppress the volume expansion of the sulfur [22,23,24,25]. For example, conductive metal oxides, carbon materials, and conductive polymers have been used as intermediate layers for suppressing the shuttle effect. Among them, polypyrrole (PPy) was considered a superior polysulfide immobilizer because of its good electrical conductivity and stable physicochemical properties [26,27,28,29,30].
In Li et al′s study, a polypyrrole coated separator was used to suppress the shuttle effect, and when the cell was equipped with such a modified separator, it exhibied a stable cycling performance [31]. Ma et al designed a self-assembled polypyrrole nanotube film (PNTF), as a functional interlayer for Li-S cells. The resulting cell showed an encouraging electrochemical performance, due to that PPy having a strong interaction with polysulfides [32]. In Yin et al′s work, a novel modified separator was prepared by coating PPy/ZnO composite slurry on a routine separator. Due to the polar ZnO and porous polypyrrole, PPy/ZnO composites could act as polysulfide immobilizers to intercept the migration of soluble polysulfides [33].
Having this mind, in this work, we developed a novel hierarchically porous polypyrrole sphere (PPS) modified separator for Li-S cells and investigated their electrochemical performance. PPS was designed and prepared via a hard-template method because we simultaneously integrated the physical encapsulation of the rich mesopore in PPS and the on-site chemical adsorption PPS to polysulfides into a coating layer system. This novel optimized configuration presented here is potentially suitable for application in future Li-S cells.

2. Materials and Methods

The silica (SiO2) template nanosphere (with a diameter of ~30 nm) was prepared by the method reported [34,35]. 0.5 g of template was added to the resulting solution (20 mL) with 0.2 mM pyrrole and 0.2 mM sodium acetate, and then the mixture was stirred for 6 h. The mixture and FeCl3 solution (0.2 mM, 20 mL) were placed for stirring for 4 h. After reacting, the precipitates were washed with deionized water and dried at 60 °C. Subsequently, the PPS/SiO2 was etched using an HF (10 wt %, 72 h) at 60 °C. Then, the PPS was obtained after filtrating and washing with distilled water. For preparation of PPS-modified separator, 80 wt % PPS, 10 wt % super-P, and 10 wt % polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) were mixed in N-methylpyrrolidinone (NMP) to form a slurry which was then cast on the routine separator. The sample was dried out and cut into circular disks with a mass loading of 0.35 mg·cm−2.
The samples were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8 Discover Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) and Fourier-trans-form infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR, TENSOR, Billerica, MA, USA). The specific surface area and pore size distributions were analyzed by N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms measurement (V-Sorb 2800P, Gold APP, Beijing, China) and calculated based on multipoint Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) and Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) methods. The morphology and microstructure were measured using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-7600F, JEOL Ltd., Akishima, Japan), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL-2100, JEOL Ltd., Akishima, Japan). The elemental composition was analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, K-Alpha 1063, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
The sulfur cathode composited of sulfur (70 wt %), super-P (20 wt %), and PVDF binder (10 wt %) was dissolved in NMP. The resulting slurry was uniformly coated on aluminum foil and dried at 60 °C in vacuum for 12 h. The sulfur cathode was cut into circular disks and the sulfur loading was 2.1 mg·cm−2. The PPS-modified separator was assembled in the electrolyte made of 1 M lithium bistrifluoromethanesulfonamide (LiTFSI) mixed with 1,3-dioxolane (DOL) and dimethoxy ethane (DME) with 1:1 volume ratio. The CR2025 coin cells were assembled in argon-filled glove box and tested using a battery test instruments (NEWARE BTS-4000, Shenzhen, China). The electrochemical measurement system (Princeton Applied Research, Versa STAT4, Oak Ridge, TN, USA) was used for Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectrometry (EIS) measurement.

3. Results

The PPS structural characteristics and the schematic diagram of Li-S batteries equipped with PPS-modified separator were shown in Figure 1. The porous PPS coating layer effectively blocks the shuttle effect of polysulfide, improving the electrochemical performance of Li-S batteries.
Crystal microstructural properties of the PPS were investigated by XRD analysis in Figure 2a. A broad characteristic peak located at about 24° was founded, corresponding to the successful formation of the polypyrrole material [36]. The FT-IR spectrum of PPS showed several obvious characteristic bands in Figure 2b. The bands of PPS located at 1534 and 1451 cm−1 were ascribed to the pyrrole ring basic vibrations. The bands of 1292 and 1034 cm−1 were assigned to the C–H in-plane vibration and the adsorption band at 1161 cm−1 was attributed to C–N stretching vibration [37].
The morphology and microstructure of PPS were measured by SEM and TEM (Figure 3). As shown in Figure 3a, PPS exhibited a spherical matrix structure, and a three-dimensional ordered spherical mesopore was present in the PPS matrix. At the same time, TEM images were employed to examine the internal structural features of the PPS. The TEM image showed the mean mesopore size was about 30 nm in Figure 3b. In addition, the image of Figure 3c delivered the interconnected mesoporous structure for facilitating the transmission [38]. The PPS was designed hierarchically as the coating layer could effectively trap polysulfides to restrain the shuttle effect, and enhance the cycling performance of Li-S cells. The PPS was applied onto one side of the routine separator, yielding an 8 µm thick film, as shown in Figure 3d.
Figure 4a exhibits the N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms for the PPS with a large BET surface area of 111.03 m2·g−1. The average pore size is about 2.71 nm, indicating that the small mesopores were embedded in the PPS (Figure 4b). The results of the investigation of the pore size distribution for PPS were in agreement with the TEM images.
In order to visually prove that the PPS modified separator can effectively suppress shutting effect, the polysulfide penetration test was carried out in H-type bottles. The left half of the bottle contained 0.1 M Li2S6-THF solution, and the blank THF solution was filled in the right half of the bottle, and the bottles were separated by the routine separator or the PPS modified separator. Obviously, the color of the right bottle equipped with the routine separator gradually turned reddish-brown (Figure 5a), indicating a severe polysulfide penetration phenomenon. In contrast, as shown in Figure 5b, the bottle equipped with the PPS modified separator exhibited almost no color change even after five hours, exhibited an effective block to polysulfide [39].
The EIS measurements were carried out as illustrated in Figure 6a. The cell with the PPS-modified separator shows a smaller charge transfer resistance than with the routine separator, which can be attributed to the superior conductivity of the PPS coating layer [40]. Figure 6b shows the CV profiles of the cells with different separators. Obviously, typical oxidation and reduction peaks of cells were visible. The cell with the PPS-modified separator showed two cathodic peaks located at 2.33 and 2.0 V, corresponding to a reduction of sulfur to polysulfide and finally to Li2S2 (or Li2S), respectively [41]. The anodic peak with the PPS-modified separator were located at around 2.41 V, corresponding to the oxidation of Li2S2 (Li2S) to sulfur [42]. Meanwhile the cell with the routine separator exhibited two cathodic peaks (2.28 and 2.03 V) and one anodic peak (2.48 V) as well, which revealed the peaks shift. The charge-discharge curves corresponded to the CV results. The charge-discharge curves of the cell with the PPS-modified separator showed a higher reduction plateau and lower oxidation plateau than those with the routine separator, which was ascribed to the lower polarization (Figure 6c). After 100 cycles, the cells showed that the discharge capability with the PPS-modified separator was higher than that of the routine separator.
The cycling performance of Li-S cells with the PPS-modified separator and with the routine separator were investigated at 0.2 C in Figure 6d. The cell with the PPS-modified separator delivered the discharge capacity of 855 mAh·g−1 and retained a high efficiency of more than 94% over 100 cycles. In addition, the cell with the routine separator only delivered 559 mAh·g−1 over 100 cycles. To further clarify the superior electrochemical performance of the cell with the PPS-modified separator, Figure 6e showed the rate performance from 0.1 to 3 C. It is worth noting, that the cell with the PPS-modified separator exhibited better capacity and delivered a high capacity of 507 mAh·g−1 even at 3 C. In contrast, the cell with the routine separator only delivered 163 mAh·g−1 at 3 C. The charge-discharge curves of the cell with the PPS-modified separator are presented at Figure 6f, showing a low potential gap between the charge-discharge plateaus voltage, and exhibit two flat typical discharge plateaus even at 3 C. The stability of the Li-S cells was further investigated by the long-term cycle, and the cell with the routine separator delivered a low capacity of 201 mAh·g−1 after 500 cycles. On the contrary, the cell with the PPS-modified separator exhibited excellent long-term cycling performance as high as 517 mAh·g−1 after 500 cycles at 1 C, suggesting superior long-term cycling stability.
In order to further demonstrate the adsorption of polysulfide by PPS, the XPS spectra of the cycled PPS coating layer was shown in Figure 7. As shown in Figure 7a, the C 1s spectrum was resolved into five peaks, corresponding to different chemical bonds of carbon in PPS. The spectrum of N 1s was shown in Figure 7b, the peaks at 401.2, 399.8, and 398.2 eV correspond to graphitic-N, pyrrolic-N, and pyridinic-N. As shown in Figure 7c, the S 2p XPS spectrum reveals six sulfur peaks. The three major peaks at 169.6, 168.4, and 166.9 eV were ascribed to sulfate, thiosulfate complex groups, and polythionate complex, respectively. In addition, two peaks at 163.7 and 162.2 eV could be assigned to the formation of Li2S2 and Li2S, respectively [43,44,45]. These results proved that the PPS coating layer could improve the capability of polysulfide absorption.
To compare the electrochemical performance of these interlayers or modified separators, further comparison among these Li-S batteries were carried out as shown in Table 1. It is significant to note that the cycling performance of the Li-S batteries with the PPS-modified separator exhibited a good cycle performance and rate capability.

4. Conclusions

In summary, a novel hierarchically porous polypyrrole sphere (PPS) was successfully obtained using as coating layer to restrain the shuttle effect of polysulfide. The mesopores in the PPS matrix reduce the mass density of the coating and act as a collector to adsorb polysulfides and enhance the utilization of sulfur. The Li-S cell with the PPS-modified separator delivered a high discharge capacity of 1274 mAh·g−1 and maintained the discharge capacity of 855 mAh·g−1 with a corresponding coulombic efficiency of 94% after 100 cycles. Moreover, the PPS-modified separator improved the polarization of the cell, exhibiting excellent rate performance. The developed strategy of using the PPS-modified separator was expected to improve the electrochemical performance of Li-S batteries.

Author Contributions

Formal Analysis, Y.Z. and B.L.; Investigation, B.L. and Z.S.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, B.L. and Z.S.; Writing-Review & Editing, Z.B. and Y.Z.; Supervision, Y.Z.; Project Administration, Y.Z. and Z.B.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province of China, grant number (E2017202032); Technology Foundation for returned overseas Chinese scholars, grant number (C2015003038).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chu, S.; Cui, Y.; Liu, N. The Path Towards Sustainable Energy. Nat. Mater. 2016, 16, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pang, Q.; Liang, X.; Kwok, C.Y.; Nazar, L.F. Review-The Importance of Chemical Interactions between Sulfur Host Materials and Lithium Polysulfides for Advanced Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2015, 162, A2567–A2576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Manthiram, A.; Fu, Y.; Chung, S.H.; Zu, C.; Su, Y.S. Rechargeable Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 11751–11787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Sun, Y.; Lee, H.; Seh, Z.W.; Zheng, G.; Sun, J.; Li, Y.; Cui, Y. Lithium Sulfide/Metal Nanocomposite as a High-Capacity Cathode Prelithiation Material. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1600154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gao, X.; Yang, H. Multi-electron reaction materials for high energy density batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2010, 3, 174–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, Z.; Guan, B.Y.; Zhang, J.; Lou, X.W. A Compact Nanoconfined Sulfur Cathode for High-Performance Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. Joule 2017, 1, 576–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Sun, Y.; Lee, H.; Seh, Z.W.; Liu, N.; Sun, J.; Li, Y.; Cui, Y. High-capacity battery cathode prelithiation to offset initial lithium loss. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 15008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Park, J.; Yu, S.H.; Sung, Y.E. Design of Structural and Functional Nanomaterials for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. Nano Today 2018, 18, 35–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, Y.G.; Zhao, Y.; Yermukhambetova, A.; Bakenov, Z.; Chen, P. Ternary sulfur/polyacrylonitrile/Mg0.6Ni0.4O composite cathodes for high performance lithium/sulfur batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sun, Y.; Lee, H.; Zheng, G.; Seh, Z.W.; Sun, J.; Li, Y.; Cui, Y. In Situ Chemical Synthesis of Lithium Fluoride/Metal Nanocomposite for High Capacity Prelithiation of Cathodes. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 1497–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tian, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Ricardezsandoval, L.A.; Wang, X.; Li, J. Construction of Oxygen-deficient La(OH)3 Nanorods Wrapped by Reduced Graphene Oxide for Polysulfide Trapping toward High-Performance Lithium/Sulfur Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 23271–23279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zheng, C.; Niu, S.; Lv, W.; Zhou, G.; Li, J.; Fan, S.; Deng, Y.; Pan, Z.; Li, B.; Kang, F.; et al. Propelling polysulfides transformation for high-rate and long-life lithium–sulfur batteries. Nano Energy 2017, 33, 306–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gueon, D.; Hwang, J.T.; Yang, S.B.; Cho, E.; Sohn, K.; Yang, D.; Moon, J.H. Spherical Macroporous Carbon Nanotube Particles with Ultrahigh Sulfur Loading for Lithium–Sulfur Battery Cathodes. ACS Nano 2018, 1, 226–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Agostini, M.; Scrosati, B.; Hassoun, J. An Advanced Lithium-Ion Sulfur Battery for High Energy Storage. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1500481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lin, H.; Yang, L.; Jiang, X.; Li, G.; Zhang, T.; Yao, Q.; Zheng, J.W.; Lee, J.Y. Electrocatalysis of polysulfide conversion by sulfur-deficient MoS2 nanoflakes for lithium–sulfur batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 1476–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xu, G.; Yan, Q.; Wang, S.; Kushima, A.; Bai, P.; Liu, K.; Zhang, X.; Tang, Z.; Li, J. A Thin Multifunctional Coating on a Separator Improves the Cyclability and Safety of Lithium Sulfur Batteries. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 6619–6625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Song, X.; Chen, G.; Wang, S.; Huang, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Ding, L.X.; Wang, H. Self-Assembled Close-Packed MnO2 Nanoparticles Anchored on a Polyethylene Separator for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 26274–26282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhou, G.; Pei, S.; Li, L.; Wang, D.W.; Wang, S.; Huang, K.; Yin, L.C.; Li, F.; Cheng, H.M. A Graphene-Pure-Sulfur Sandwich Structure for Ultrafast, Long-Life Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 625–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sun, Y.; Seh, Z.W.; Li, W.; Yao, H.; Zheng, G.; Cui, Y. In-operando optical imaging of temporal and spatial distribution of polysulfides in lithium-sulfur batteries. Nano Energy 2015, 11, 579–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, X.; Qian, T.; Liu, J.; Tian, J.; Zhang, L.; Yan, C. Greatly Improved Conductivity of Double-Chain Polymer Network Binder for High Sulfur Loading Lithium-Sulfur Batteries with a Low Electrolyte/Sulfur Ratio. Small 2018, 14, 1801536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sun, Z.; Zhang, J.; Yin, L.; Hu, G.; Fang, R.; Cheng, H.M.; Li, F. Conductive porous vanadium nitride/graphene composite as chemical anchor of polysulfides for lithium-sulfur batteries. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dong, Y.F.; Zheng, S.H.; Qin, J.Q.; Zhao, X.J.; Shi, H.D.; Wang, X.H.; Chen, J.; Wu, Z.S. All-Mxene-based integrated electrode constructed by Ti3C2 nanoribbon framework host and nanosheet interlayer for high-energy-density Li-S batteries. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 2381–2388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Seh, Z.W.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Cui, Y. Designing high-energy lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 5605–5634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Qiu, W.; An, C.; Yan, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Guo, W.; Wang, Z.; Zheng, Z.; Wang, Z.; Deng, Q.; et al. Suppressed polysulfide shuttling and improved Li+ transport in Li-S batteries enabled by NbN modified PP separator. J. Power Sources 2019, 423, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, N.; Chen, Z.; Chen, F.; Hu, G.; Wang, S.; Sun, Z.; Sun, X.; Li, F. From interlayer to lightweight capping layer: Rational design of mesoporous TiO2 threaded with CNTs for advanced Li-S batteries. Carbon 2019, 143, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, D.; Zhang, C.; Zhou, G.; Lv, W.; Ling, G.; Zhi, L.; Yang, Q. Catalytic effects in lithium-sulfur batteries: Promoted sulfur transformation and reduced shuttle effect. Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1700270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, T.; Zhang, Z.; Cheng, B.; Chen, R.; Hu, Y.; Ma, L.; Zhu, J.; Liu, J.; Jin, Z. Self-Templated Formation of Interlaced Carbon Nanotubes Threaded Hollow Co3S4 Nanoboxes for High-Rate and Heat-Resistant Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 12710–12715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, Y.; Shi, B.; Liu, W.; Guo, R.; Pei, H.; Ye, D.; Xie, J.; Kong, J. Hollow polypyrrole@MnO2 spheres as nano-sulfur hosts for improved lithium-sulfur batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 260, 912–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Peng, Y.; Wen, Z.; Liu, C.; Zeng, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, J. Refining Interfaces between Electrolyte and Both Electrodes with Carbon Nanotube Paper for High-Loading Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 6986–6994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, X.; Fan, L.; Qiu, Y.; Wang, M.; Cheng, J.; Guan, B.; Guo, Z.; Zhang, N.; Sun, K. Ion-Selective Prussian-Blue-Modified Celgard Separator for High-Performance Lithium-Sulfur Battery. ChemSusChem 2018, 11, 3345–3351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, F.; Kaiser, M.R.; Ma, J.; Guo, Z.; Liu, H.; Wang, J. Free-standing sulfur-polypyrrole cathode in conjunction with polypyrrole-coated separator for flexible Li-S batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2018, 13, 312–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Ma, G.; Wen, Z.; Wang, Q.; Shen, C.; Peng, P.; Jin, J.; Wu, X. Enhanced performance of lithium sulfur battery with self-assembly polypyrrole nanotube film as the functional interlayer. J. Power Sources 2015, 273, 511–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yin, F.; Ren, J.; Zhang, Y.; Tan, T.; Chen, Z. A PPy/ZnO functional interlayer to enhance electrochemical performance of lithium/sulfur batteries. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2018, 1, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, H.; Sun, L.; Zhao, Y.; Tan, T.; Zhang, Y. Blackberry-like hollow graphene spheres synthesized by spray drying for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 295, 822–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yin, F.; Ren, J.; Wu, G.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Y. Polypyrrole Nanowires with Ordered Large Mesopores: Synthesis, Characterization and Applications in Supercapacitor and Lithium/Sulfur Batteries. Polymers 2019, 2, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rao, J.; Xu, R.; Zhou, T.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, C. Rational design of self-supporting graphene-Polypyrrole/sulfur-Graphene sandwich as structural paper electrode for lithium sulfur batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 728, 376–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yin, F.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Menbayeva, A.; Bakenov, Z.; Wang, X. Well-dispersed sulfur anchored on interconnected polypyrrole nanofiber network as high performance cathode for lithium-sulfur batteries. Solid State Sci. 2017, 66, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cao, J.; Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Li, X.; Walsh, F.; Ouyang, J.; Jia, D.; Zhou, Y. Three-dimensional graphene oxide/polypyrrole composite electrodes fabricated by one-step electrodeposition for high performance supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 14445–14457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pei, F.; Lin, L.; Fu, A.; Mo, S.; Ou, D.; Fang, X.; Zheng, N. A Two-Dimensional Porous Carbon-Modified Separator for High-Energy-Density Li-S Batteries. Joule 2017, 2, 323–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Song, Y.; Zhao, W.; Kong, L.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, X.; Shao, Y.; Ding, F.; Zhang, Q.; Sun, J.; Liu, Z.; et al. Synchronous Immobilization and Conversion of Polysulfides on VO2-VN Binary Host Targeting High Sulfur Loading Li−S Batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 2620–2630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, S.; Li, J.; Yan, X.; Su, Q.; Lu, Y.; Qiu, J.; Wang, Z.; Lin, X.; Huang, J.; Liu, R.; et al. Superhierarchical Cobalt-Embedded Nitrogen-Doped Porous Carbon Nanosheets as Two-in-One Hosts for High-Performance Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1706895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kong, W.; Yan, L.; Luo, Y.; Wang, D.; Jiang, K.; Li, Q.; Fan, S.; Wang, J. Ultrathin MnO2/Graphene Oxide/Carbon Nanotube Interlayer as Efficient Polysulfide-Trapping Shield for High-Performance Li−S Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1606663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. He, Y.; Shan, Z.; Tan, T.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, Y. Ternary Sulfur/Polyacrylonitrile/SiO2 Composite Cathodes for High-Performance Sulfur/Lithium Ion Full Batteries. Polymers 2018, 8, 930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wu, J.; Zeng, H.; Li, X.; Xiang, X.; Liao, Y.; Xue, Z.; Ye, Y.; Xie, X. Ultralight Layer-by-Layer Self-Assembled MoS2-Polymer Modified Separator for Simultaneously Trapping Polysulfides and Suppressing Lithium Dendrites. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1802430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Son, B.D.; Cho, S.H.; Bae, K.Y.; Kim, B.H.; Yoon, W.Y. Dual functional effect of the ferroelectricity embedded interlayer in lithium sulfur battery. J. Power Sources 2019, 419, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yao, H.; Yan, K.; Li, W.; Zheng, G.; Kong, D.; Seh, Z.W.; Narasimhan, V.K.; Liang, Z.; Cui, Y. Improved lithium-sulfur batteries with a conductive coating on the separator to prevent the accumulation of inactive S-related species at the cathode-separator interface. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 3381–3390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, Y.; Wang, W.; Liu, X.; Mao, E.; Wang, M.; Li, G.; Fu, L.; Li, Z.; Eng, Y.S.; Seh, Z.W.; et al. Engineering stable electrode-separator interfaces with ultrathin conductive polymer layer for high-energy-density Li-S batteries. Energy. Storage Mater. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, H.; Sun, L.; Zhang, Y.; Tan, T.; Wang, G.; Bakenov, Z. Enhanced cycle performance of Li/S battery with the reduced graphene oxide/activated carbon functional interlayer. J. Energy Chem. 2017, 26, 1276–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Zhou, X.; Liao, Q.; Tang, J.; Bai, T.; Chen, F.; Yang, J. A high-level N-doped porous carbon nanowire modified separator for long-life lithium–sulfur batteries. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2016, 768, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kong, L.; Chen, X.; Li, B.; Peng, H.; Huang, J.; Xie, J.; Zhang, Q. A Bifunctional Perovskite Promoter for Polysulfide Regulation toward Stable Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1705219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sun, Z.; Guo, Y.; Li, B.; Tan, T.; Zhao, Y. ZnO/carbon nanotube/reduced graphene oxide composite film as an effective interlayer for lithium/sulfur batteries. Solid State Sci. 2019, 95, 105924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 11 01344 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic of PPS structural characteristics and Li-S cell with PPS-modified separator.
Figure 1. Schematic of PPS structural characteristics and Li-S cell with PPS-modified separator.
Polymers 11 01344 g001
Polymers 11 01344 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) XRD pattern and (b) FT-IR spectrum of PPS.
Figure 2. (a) XRD pattern and (b) FT-IR spectrum of PPS.
Polymers 11 01344 g002
Polymers 11 01344 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) SEM image of PPS; (b,c) TEM images at different magnifications of the PPS; (d) cross-section SEM image of PPS coating layer.
Figure 3. (a) SEM image of PPS; (b,c) TEM images at different magnifications of the PPS; (d) cross-section SEM image of PPS coating layer.
Polymers 11 01344 g003
Polymers 11 01344 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms and (b) Pore size distribution of the PPS.
Figure 4. (a) N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms and (b) Pore size distribution of the PPS.
Polymers 11 01344 g004
Polymers 11 01344 g005 550
Figure 5. Polysulfide permeation measurements for (a) routine separator and (b) PPS modified separator.
Figure 5. Polysulfide permeation measurements for (a) routine separator and (b) PPS modified separator.
Polymers 11 01344 g005
Polymers 11 01344 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) EIS spectra; (b) CV profiles; and (c) charge-discharge curves of Li-S cells with the PPS-modified separator and the routine separator; (d) Cycling performance of Li-S cells with the PPS-modified separator and the routine separator at 0.2 C; (e) Rate performance of Li-S cells with the PPS-modified separator and the routine separator; (f) Charge-discharge curves of Li-S cells with the PPS-modified separator at various rates; (g) Long-term cycling performance of Li-S cells with the PPS-modified separator and the routine separator at 1 C.
Figure 6. (a) EIS spectra; (b) CV profiles; and (c) charge-discharge curves of Li-S cells with the PPS-modified separator and the routine separator; (d) Cycling performance of Li-S cells with the PPS-modified separator and the routine separator at 0.2 C; (e) Rate performance of Li-S cells with the PPS-modified separator and the routine separator; (f) Charge-discharge curves of Li-S cells with the PPS-modified separator at various rates; (g) Long-term cycling performance of Li-S cells with the PPS-modified separator and the routine separator at 1 C.
Polymers 11 01344 g006
Polymers 11 01344 g007 550
Figure 7. XPS spectra of (a) C 1s, (b) N 1s and (c) S 2p of the PPS coating layer after cycling.
Figure 7. XPS spectra of (a) C 1s, (b) N 1s and (c) S 2p of the PPS coating layer after cycling.
Polymers 11 01344 g007
Table
Table 1. Comparison of the electrochemical performance of previous reports with our work.
Table 1. Comparison of the electrochemical performance of previous reports with our work.
SampleSulfur Loading of Cathode (Content or Areal Loading)Initial Capacity (mAh·g−1, at n C)Final Capacity (mAh·g−1, after n Cycles)High Rate Performance (mAh·g−1, at n C)Ref.
Super P coated separator1.5–2.0 mg·cm−2~1000 mAh·g−1 (0.1 C)610 mAh·g−1 (200 th)~390 mAh·g−1 (1 C)[46]
PPy modified separator70%, 1.2 mg·cm−2985 mAh·g−1 (0.5 C)805 mAh·g−1 (250 th)682 mAh·g−1 (2 C)[47]
RGO/AC interlayer58.2%1078 mAh·g−1 (0.1 C)655 mAh·g−1 (100 th)348 mAh·g−1 (1.5 C)[48]
N-PCNW- modified separator1.5–1.7 mg·cm−21430 mAh·g−1 (0.2 C)881.5 mAh·g−1 (200 th)618 mAh·g−1 (2 C)[49]
PrNPs70%, 1.1 mg·cm−2986 mAh·g−1 (0.2 C)695 mAh·g−1 (200 th)753 mAh·g−1 (2 C)[50]
ZnO/CNT/RGO interlayer68.3%, 1.7 mg·cm−21061 mAh·g−1 (0.2 C)768 mAh·g−1 (200 th)597 mAh·g−1 (2 C)[51]
PPS-modified separator2.1 mg·cm−21274 mAh·g−1 (0.2 C)855 mAh·g−1 (100th)507 mAh·g−1 (3 C)This work

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, B.; Sun, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Bakenov, Z. A Novel Hierarchically Porous Polypyrrole Sphere Modified Separator for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. Polymers 2019, 11, 1344. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11081344

AMA Style

Li B, Sun Z, Zhao Y, Bakenov Z. A Novel Hierarchically Porous Polypyrrole Sphere Modified Separator for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. Polymers. 2019; 11(8):1344. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11081344

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Baoe, Zhenghao Sun, Yan Zhao, and Zhumabay Bakenov. 2019. "A Novel Hierarchically Porous Polypyrrole Sphere Modified Separator for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries" Polymers 11, no. 8: 1344. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11081344

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop