Next Article in Journal
Effects of Sodium Montmorillonite on the Preparation and Properties of Cellulose Aerogels
Previous Article in Journal
Towards High-performance Materials Based on Carbohydrate-Derived Polyamide Blends
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Effects of pH on Nanofibrillation of TEMPO-Oxidized Paper Mulberry Bast Fibers

Polymers 2019, 11(3), 414; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11030414
by Jung Yoon Park 1, Chan-Woo Park 2, Song-Yi Han 2, Gu-Joong Kwon 1, Nam-Hun Kim 2 and Seung-Hwan Lee 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Polymers 2019, 11(3), 414; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11030414
Submission received: 28 January 2019 / Revised: 26 February 2019 / Accepted: 28 February 2019 / Published: 4 March 2019

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1. Authors removed extractives after alkaline digestion using ethanol/benzene mixture. However, it is common to conduct the extraction before alkaline digestion because extractives consume quite amount of potassium hydroxide and then decrease the digestion efficiency. Please justify the reason why conducting extraction after digestion.

 

2. The concentration of TEMPO is only 1mmol/g cellulose which is quite low. Have authors tested the results at various TEMPO concentration? It is necessary to measure the carboxylate content of TEMPO-treated CNFs and evaluate the DP of CNFs after TEMPO treatment.

 

3. The mechanical properties of TEMPO-treated CNF sheets are lower than that in previous studies. There is a necessity to clarify the unsatisfied mechanical performance.

 

4. The cross-head speed (20mm /min) of universal tester is too fast for a 20mm span sample. Did specimens reach rupture point within 30 seconds to five minutes?  


Author Response

Thank you for your critical reviews and valuable comments to improve our manuscript. We explained detail about your comments in attached Word file, and please kindly check.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper describes the use of mulberry fibres to produce cellulose nanofibrils and an investigation of the effect of pH on nanofibrillation efficiency.

Overall, the paper is excellent. I would recommend the following changes:


- Specify number of samples used for tensile testing.
- Specify number of measurements taken to determine fibre lengths and diameters.


I would also like to praise the illustration of the dispersibility in Figure 3, which shows excellent presentation of results in a clear and understandable way, even for non-specialists.

Author Response

Thank you for your critical reviews and valuable comments to improve our manuscript. We explained detail about your comments in attached Word file, and please kindly check.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Authors can add one paragraph in materials and methods to describe the method to measure nanosheet density

Author Response

Thank you for your critical reviews and valuable comments to improve our manuscript. We revised the manuscript as your comments in attached Word file, and please kindly check.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop