Next Article in Journal
Application of Protein-Based Films and Coatings for Food Packaging: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Waterborne Intumescent Coatings Containing Industrial and Bio-Fillers for Fire Protection of Timber Materials
Previous Article in Journal
Hyaluronan-Based Nanofibers: Fabrication, Characterization and Application
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Alginate Hybrid Sponge with High Thermal Stability: Its Flame Retardant Properties and Mechanism
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Incorporation of Comonomer exo-5-(Diphenylphosphato)Isosorbide-2-endo-Acrylate to Generate Flame Retardant Poly(Styrene)

Science of Advanced Materials Center for Applications in Polymer Science, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859-0001, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2019, 11(12), 2038; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11122038
Submission received: 24 October 2019 / Revised: 2 December 2019 / Accepted: 3 December 2019 / Published: 9 December 2019

Abstract

:
A phosphorus containing acrylate monomer has been constructed from isosorbide, a renewable biomaterial. Treatment of isosorbide with diphenylchlorophosphate generates a mixture of phosphorus esters from which exo-5-(diphenylphosphato)isosorbide-2-endo-ol may be isolated using column chromatography. Conversion of the alcohol to the corresponding acrylate by treatment with acroyl chloride provides a reactive acryloyl monomer containing a diphenylphosphato unit. Copolymerization of this monomer, at levels to provide 1% or 2% phosphorus incorporation, with styrene generates a polymer with substantially diminished flammability compared to that for styrene homopolymer.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In the decades since World War II, the development of polymeric materials has been a major contributor to the well-being of modern society [1,2]. These materials are pervasive in everyday life from food packaging to medicines to home construction to transportation. For most applications, these materials must be flame retarded [3]. Most commonly, flame retardant additives are introduced during polymer processing [4,5]. Less often, reactive flame retardant compounds are covalently incorporated into the polymer during polymerization. This is a particularly attractive approach for suitably-modified vinyl monomers [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Many flame retardants function by promoting the formation of protective char layer at the surface of the degrading polymer, while others release volatile components to the gas phase which scavenge combustion-propagating radicals [12]. Some may also intercept radicals leading to particulate formation and act as smoke suppressants [13]. Traditional organohalogen flame retardants are of the latter type. Among these, brominated aromatics have been most commonly used. These materials are readily available, modest in cost and effective as flame retardants [14,15]. They function by releasing volatile hydrogen bromide, formed by interaction with the thermally-degrading polymer, to the gas phase where it traps radicals which propagate the combustion process [12]. The action of these compounds is enhanced by the presence of antimony oxide. Volatile antimony bromide and oxybromides are formed which carry bromine to the gas phase [12,15]. Because of the toxicity of antimony oxide, alternative agents are being sought to serve in this role [16]. Although organohalogen compounds have long been widely used as flame retardants, this use is coming under increasing societal and regulatory pressure [17,18]. These compounds tend to migrate from polymeric matrices into which they have been incorporated and enter the environment [19,20]. They are stable, persistent in the environment, and bioaccumulate. Because of the widespread distribution, human exposure is relatively constant. This exposure has been associated with the development of a number of disease states [21,22]. Because of the negative health impacts of organohalogen flame retardants, organophosphorus compounds are increasingly the focus of new developments [3,23,24,25,26]. Organophosphorus flame retardants may function in either the solid phase or the gas phase depending largely on the level of oxygenation at phosphorus [27,28,29,30]. Compounds containing phosphorus at a high level of oxygenation at phosphorus, e.g., phosphates, particularly alkyl phosphates, eliminate a phosphorus acid when undergoing decomposition in a degrading polymer matrix. The phosphorus acid promotes cationic crosslinking and char formation at the surface of the degrading polymer [27,28,29,30]. This char layer acts as an insulation barrier to reduce heat feedback from the flame and consequent pyrolytic formation of volatile fuel fragments to feed the flame. Combustion is diminished for lack of fuel. In contrast, compounds containing phosphorus at low levels of oxygenation, e.g., phosphinates or phosphonates, tend to decompose to extrude PO radical to the gas phase where they scavenge combustion propagating radicals [31,32]. Some organophosphorus compounds may display both condensed phase and gas phase activity, particularly those containing two types of phosphorus functionality [33,34,35]. In general, organophosphorus compounds are less toxic than organohalogen counterparts [36,37,38,39]. Toxicity of organophosphorus compounds is usually the consequence of a particular structure rather than a function of the compounds as a class. Organophosphorus compounds based on renewable biosources are particularly attractive [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. The precursors to these compounds are usually nontoxic, benign, or biodegradable in the environment, often renewable annually, and available at costs that are independent of fluctuations in petrochemical markets. These precursor materials may come from a variety of sources from food waste to seed grains [49]. The ultimate source for many of these compounds is starch derived from cereal grains. In the US, corn alone may provide a base for a wide variety of useful compounds [50,51]. One of the compounds available from starch is isosorbide. Hydrolysis of starch affords glucose which may be reduced and dehydrated to produce isosorbide, a diether diol [52]. Its difunctionality makes it an attractive biobase for the generation of both polymers and polymer additives [53]. The two hydroxyl groups display different reactivity. One is exo and the other endo to the interior of the molecule. In this case, isosorbide was converted into a mixture of three diphenylphosphate esters, two monoesters, and the diester, which could be separated by column chromatography. exo-5-(Diphenylphosphato)isosorbide-2-endo-ol was converted to the corresponding acrylate to provide a vinyl monomer containing phosphorus. Copolymerization of this monomer with styrene at levels to provide 1% and 2% of phosphorus incorporation provided polymers with dramatically reduced flammability with respect to that for the styrene homopolymer.

2. Experimental

2.1. Methods and Instrumentation

In general ester synthesis and polymerization were carried out using the previously described methods [44,45]. Characterization was accomplished using chromatographic, thermal, and spectroscopic methods as previously described [44,45,53,54]. Thermal transitions were determined using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) at a heating rate of 10 °C/min and a TA Instruments Q2000 instrument (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). The DSC cell was purged with dry nitrogen at 50 mL/min during analysis. Thermal decomposition behavior was evaluated using thermogravimetry (TGA) (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). A TA Instruments Q500 unit and samples of 6–10 mg contained in a platinum pan were used. The heating rate was 10 °C/min. The sample compartment was purged with dry nitrogen at 50 mL/min during analysis.

2.2. Materials

Common solvents and reagents were obtained from ThermoFisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA) or the Aldrich Chemical Company (Milwaukee, WI, USA). Tetrahydrofuran was distilled from lithium aluminum hydride in a nitrogen atmosphere prior to use; methylene chloride from calcium hydride. Isosorbide, acryloyl chloride, triethylamine, and azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) were from the Aldrich Chemical Company. Diphenylchlorophosphate was supplied by ICL-IP America, Inc. (Ardsley, NY, USA).

2.3. Synthesis

Isosorbide esters were prepared as previously described [44,45,53]. The polymerization is outlined in Scheme 1 and described below.

2.3.1. exo-5-(Diphenylphosphato)isosorbide-2-endo-ol

Treatment of a solution of isosorbide and triethylamine with diphenylchlorophosphate generated a mixture of esters (two monoesters and the diester). exo-5-(Diphenylphophato)isosorbide-2-endo-ol was isolated as a colorless oil using column chromatography (silica gel; 90:10 hexane/ethyl acetate as eluent).

2.3.2. exo-5-(Diphenylphosphato)isosorbide-2-endo-Acrylate

To a solution of 8.44 g (22.3 mol) of exo-5diphenylphosphato)isosorbide-2-endo-ol and triethylamine (4.35 mL, 3.16 g) in 80 mL of anhydrous THF stirred near 0 °C (external ice bath) in a nitrogen atmosphere was added, dropwise, over a period of 0.5 h, 2.35 mL (26.8 mmol) of acryloyl chloride. After the additive was complete, the mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred until the reaction was complete. Progress of the reaction was monitored by periodic removal of an aliquot of the mixture for analysis using infrared spectroscopy. The reaction was deemed to be complete when the spectrum of the mixture no longer contained hydroxyl absorption. Triethylammonium chloride was removed by filtration and the volume of solvent was reduced by rotary evaporation at reduced pressure. The concentrated solution was diluted with 100 mL of methylene chloride and washed, successively, with two 40 mL portions of 10% aqueous sodium hydroxide solution, 40 mL of 10% aqueous hydrochloric acid solution and 40 mL of saturated aqueous sodium chloride solution. The solution was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and the solvent was removed by rotary evaporation at a reduced pressure to afford the acrylate as a colorless oil (9.51 g, 93.2% yield).

2.4. Polymerization

In general, copolymers of diphenylphosphateisosorbide acrylate and styrene were prepared by dissolving the appropriate amount of monomers (to provide copolymers containing 1 or 2% wt % phosphorus) and initiator (azobisisobutyronitrile, AIBN, 1 mol%) in chloroform. The solution was degassed using dry nitrogen and stirred under nitrogen at 65 °C until all unsaturation had been consumed as evidenced by lack of the corresponding absorbance in the infrared spectrum of an aliquot of the reaction mixture removed for inspection. The solution was poured into rapidly stirred hexane (10-fold excess) to precipitate the polymer. The polymer was collected by filtration at reduced pressure and dried at 50 °C and 15 torr. Copolymer dispersity and molecular weight were determined using size exclusion chromatography. Copolymer composition was determined using either proton or quantitative carbon-13 NMR spectroscopy. In a typical example, (for 2 wt % phosphorus in the polymer) 2.30 g (4.5 mmol) of exo-5-(diphenylphosphato) isosorbide-2-endo-ol, 12.0 g (115.2 mmol) of styrene and 0.50 g of AIBN in 70 mL of chloroform was stirred at 65 °C for 12 h. The solution was poured into 600 mL of rapidly stirred hexane. The polymer was collected and dried as noted above: Tg 85 °C (DSC); Mn 13, 600, Mw 26, 600, Mw/Mn 1.9 (size exclusion chromatography (SEC); calibration with narrow molecular weight poly(styrene) standards); 7.15 mol % acrylate from proton NMR-integration of the peak area for phenyl protons versus that for the acrylate methylene protons or from integration of the corresponding peaks in the quantitative 13C NMR spectrum.

2.5. Flammability Assessment

Microscale combustion calorimetry (MCC) was carried out using a Fire Testing Technology, Ltd. (East Grinstead, UK) instrument according to a standard protocol (ASTM D7309-072a).

3. Results and Discussion

The development of polymer additives from renewable bioresources continues to grow at an increasing rate (now about 20%/year) [55]. This is largely driven by concern about the release of toxic agents to the environment and the likely negative impact of these materials on human health. Flame retardants, in particular have been a focus of much of this development [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. Precursors for biobased flame retardants may come from a variety of sources including plant oils [49], seed grain constituents [50,51], and by-products of food manufacture [47,49]. Startch from a variety of crop grains is an extremely valuable source of several useful compounds. [50,51] It may be readily hydrolyzed to generate glucose which may be converted to hydroxymethylfurfural, a base for the production of a large number of compounds. Alternatively, glucose may be reduced and subjected to double dehydration to form isosorbide, a diether diol. Isosorbide has been used as a platform for the generation of a variety of effective flame retardants [44,45,46,56]. Isosorbide has now been converted to the mono(diphenylphosphato)ester from which an acrylate monomer can be generated. Copolymerization of the acrylate (at levels to incorporate 1 and 2 wt % phosphorus into the polymer) with styrene afford polymers with much diminished flammability compared to that of unmodified poly(styrene). The process is illustrated in Scheme 1. Copolymer composition determined using either proton or quantitative 13C NMR spectroscopy indicated that the expected level of acrylate, and therefore, the proper level of phosphorus was incorporated in all cases. Molecular weights (Mn) as determined using SEC were 12–15,000 with a dispersity of about 2.0. As expected for a polymer containing large pendant groups, the glass transition temperatures (DSC) for the copolymers are somewhat lower than that for the homopolymer (Figure 1). It may be expected that the incorporation of comonomer at the levels indicated will not significantly impact the properties of poly(styrene). As determined using thermogravimetry, the thermal stability of the copolymers (Figure 2) is slightly greater than that for poly(styrene). The onset for decomposition of poly(styrene) is 250 °C. With the introduction of comonomer, both of these values increase to 275 and 350 °C for the copolymer containing 1% phosphorus, and to 300 and 375 °C for copolymer containing 2% phosphorus. While these increases in degradation temperature are small, they may reflect radical scavenging in the degrading polymer [57]. The residual char was 1% of the initial sample mass for poly(styrene). This increased to 7% for copolymer containing 1% phosphorus, and to 17% for that containing 2% of phosphorus. This is as would be expected for the presence of an entity containing phosphorus with a high level of oxygenation and suggests that flame retardancy arises from condensed phase activity [27,28,29,30].
To assess the flammability of the copolymers, microscale combustion calorimetry (MCC) was used. MCC has been shown to be an effective and convenient method for assessing flammability [58,59,60]. As may be noted from Figure 3, the presence of 1% phosphorus in the polymer has a dramatic impact on peak heat release rate, a 50% reduction compared to that for homopolymer poly(styrene). This is a huge impact and illustrates the effectiveness of incorporation of a biobased phosphorus-containing comonomer into a standard vinyl polymer.
Poly(styrene) containing no flame-retarding entity is highly flammable. The dramatic reduction in the peak heat release rate upon incorporation of a low-level of phosphorus-containing comonomer certainly illustrates the effectiveness of this approach for reducing flammability. Since acrylate is broadly reactive toward vinyl monomers, this approach could be useful for flame-retarding a variety of polymers.

4. Conclusions

Isosorbide is a diether diol obtained from glucose (starch). It may be converted, first, to a diphenylphosphate at one hydroxyl group and then to an acrylate at the other to provide a bioderived vinyl monomer. Incorporation of low levels of this acrylate as a comonomer into poly(styrene) produces a material with strongly reduced flammability compared to that for the homopolymer. The presence of sufficient comonomer to introduce 1 wt % phosphorus brings about a 50% reduction in peak heat release rate for combustion of the polymer. This approach to the introduction of flame retardancy should be broadly applicable to vinyl polymers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology and project administration as well as manuscript preparation were provided by B.A.H.; Y.G.D. conducted experimental work and prepared Figures.

Funding

Chemtura Corporation provided funding to support this work (grant GFR 2010).

Acknowledgments

Support for this work from Great Lakes Solutions/Chemtura Corporation (now LanXess) is gratefully acknowledged. Diphenylchlorophosphate was provided by ICL-IP America

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Halavy, J.-L.; Laupretre, F.; Monnerie, L. Polymer Materials; John Wiley and Sons Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  2. Binder, W.H. The Past 40 Years of Macromolecular Sciences: Reflections on Challenges in Synthetic Polymer and Material Science. Macrol. Rapid Commun. 2018, 18006010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Morgan, A.B. The Future of Flame Retardant Polymers-Unmet Needs and likely New Approaches. Polym. Rev. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pritechard, G. Plastics Additives; Chapman and Hall: New York, NY, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lutz, J.T., Jr.; Grossman, R.F. (Eds.) Polymer Additives; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ebdon, J.R. Flame Retardancy in Styrenic and Acrylic Polymers with Covalently Bound Phosphorus-containing Groups. Recent Adv. Flame Retard. Polym. Mat. 1997, 8, 161–170. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ebdon, J.R.; Price, D.; Hunt, B.J.; Joseph, P.; Gad, F.; Milnes, G.J.; Cunliffe, L.K. Flame Retardance in some Polystyrenes and Poly(methyl methacrylate)s with Covalently Bound Phosphorus-containing Groups: Initial Screening Experiments and Some Laser Pyrolysis Mechanistic Studies. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2000, 69, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dumitrascu, A.; Howell, B.A. Flame-retarding Vinyl Polymers using Phosphorus-functionalized Styrene Monomers. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2011, 96, 342–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dumitrascu, A.; Howell, B.A. Flame-retarding Polymeric Materials Achieved by Incorporation of Styrene Monomers Containing Both Nitrogen and Phosphorus. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2012, 97, 2611–2618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tao, X.; Duan, H.; Dong, W.; Wang, X.; Yang, S. Synthesis of an Acrylate Constructed by Phosphaphenanthrene and Triazine-trione and its Application in Intrinsic Flame Retardant Vinyl Ester Resin. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2018, 154, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schmidt, C.; Ciesielski, M.; Greiner, L.; Doring, M. Novel Organophosphorus Flame Retardants and Their Synergistic Application in Novolac Epoxy Resin. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2018, 158, 190–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Salmeia, K.A.; Fage, J.; Liang, S.; Gaan, S. An Overview of Mode of Action and Analytical Methods for Evaluation of Gas Phase Activities of Flame Retardants. Polymers 2015, 7, 504–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Johansson, K.O.; Head-Gordon, M.P.; Schrader, P.E.; Wilson, K.R.; Michelsen, H.A. Resonance-stabilized Hydrocarbon-radical Chain Reactions May Explain Soot Inception and Growth. Science 2018, 361, 997–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Pettigrew, A. Halogenated Flame Retardants. In Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology, 4th ed.; Kroschwitz, J.I., Howe-Grant, M., Eds.; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1993; Volume 10, pp. 954–976. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bocehini, S.; Camino, G. Halogen-containing Flame Retardants. In Fire Retardancy of Polymeric Materials, 2nd ed.; Wilkie, C.A., Morgan, A.B., Eds.; Taylor and Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2009; pp. 79–82. [Google Scholar]
  16. Levchik, S.; Eden, E.; Hirschsohn, Y.; Leifer, M.; Ben-Zvi, A. Antimony Trioxide Free Solutions for Engineering Thermoplastics; AMI Fire Retardants in Plastics; Applied Market Information, LLC: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  17. Erickson, B. Agency to Ban Organohalogens in Some Products. Chem. Eng. News 2017, 95, 15. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hogue, C. EU Authorization Said to Be Leading to Safer Substitutes. Chem. Eng. News 2017, 95, 15. [Google Scholar]
  19. Shaw, S.D.; Blum, A.; Weber, R.; Kannan, K.; Rich, D.; Lucas, D.; Koshland, C.P.; Dobraca, D.; Hanson, S.; Birnbaum, L.S. Halogenated Flame Retardants. Do the Fire Safety Benefits Justify the Risks? Rev. Environ. Health 2010, 25, 261–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Alace, M.; Wenning, R.J. The Significance of Brominated Flame Retardants in the Environment: Current Understanding, Issues and Challenges. Chemosphere 2002, 46, 579–582. [Google Scholar]
  21. Darnerud, P.D. Brominated Flame Retardants as Possible Endocrine Distrupters. Int. J. Androl. 2008, 31, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Herbstmann, J.B.; Sjodin, A.; Kurzon, M.; Lederman, S.A.; Jones, R.S.; Rauh, V.; Needhman, L.L.; Tang, D.; Nieazwicki, M.; Wang, R.Y.; et al. Prenatal Exposure to PBDEs and Neurodevelopment. Environ. Health Perspect. 2010, 118, 712–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Velencoso, M.M.; Battig, A.; Markwart, J.C.; Schartel, B.; Wurm, F.R. Molecular FireFighting—How Modern PHosphorus Chemistry Can Solve the Flame Retardancy Task. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 10450–10467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Salmeia, K.A.; Gooneie, A.; Simonetti, P.; Nazir, R.; Kaiser, J.-P.; Rippi, A.; Hirsch, C.; Lehner, S.; Rapper, P.; Hufenus, R.; et al. Comprehensive Study on Flame Retardant Polyesters from Phosphorus Additives. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2018, 155, 22–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wendels, S.; Chavez, T.; Bonnet, M.; Salmeia, K.A.; Gaan, S. Recent Developments in Organophosphorus Flame Retardants Containing P-C Bonds and their Application. Materials 2017, 10, 784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Salmeia, K.A.; Gaan, S. An Overview of Some Recent Advances in DOPO-derivatives: Chemistry and Flame Retardant Applications. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2015, 113, 119–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Schartel, B.; Perret, B.; Dittrich, B.; Ciesielski, M.; Kramer, J.; Muller, P.; Altstadt, V.; Zhang, L.; Doring, M. Flame Retardancy of Polymers: The Role of Specific Reactions in the Condensed Phase. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2016, 301, 9–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Braun, U.; Balbanovich, A.I.; Schartel, B.; Knoll, U.; Artner, J.; Ciesielski, M.; Doring, M.; Perez, R.; Sandler, J.K.W.; Altstadt, V.; et al. Influence of the Oxidation State of Phosphorus on the Decomposition and Fire Behavior of Flame-retarded Epoxy Resin Composites. Polymer 2006, 47, 8495–8508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sonnier, R.; Negrell-Guirao, C.; Vahabi, H.; Otazaghine, B.; David, G.; Lopez-Cuesta, J.M. Relationship Between the Molecular Structure and Flammability of Polymers: Study of Phosphonate Functions Using a Microscale Combustion Calorimeter. Polymer 2012, 53, 1258–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lorenzetti, A.; Modesti, M.; Besco, S.; Hrelja, D.; Donadi, S. Influence of Phosphorus Valency on the Thermal Behavior of Flame Retarded Polyurethane Foam. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2011, 96, 1455–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Schafer, A.; Seibold, S.; Lohstroh, W.; Walter, O.; Doring, M. Synthesis and Properties of Flame-retardant Epoxy Resins Based on DOPO and One of its Analogs, DPPO. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 105, 685–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liang, S.; Hemberger, P.; Neisius, N.M.; Bodi, A.; Grutzmacher, H.; Levalois-Frutzmacher, J.; Gaan, S. Elucidating the Thermal Decomposition of Dimethyl Methylphosphonate by Vacuum Ultraviolet (FUF) Photoionization: Pathways to the PO Radical, a Key Species in Flame-retardant Mechanisms. Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 162, 1073–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, S.; Du, X.; Fu, X.; Du, Z.; Wang, H.; Cheng, X. Highly Effective Flame-retarded Diol with Synergistic Effects for Waterborne Polyurethane Application. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 48444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, L.; Chen, Y.; Wu, X.; Xu, B.; Quian, L. Biphase Flame-retardant Effect of Dimethyl Methylphosphonate and Modified Ammonium Polyphosphate on Rigid Polyurethane Foam. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2019, 30, 2721–2728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, Y.; Yu, B.; Wang, B.; Liew, K.M.; Song, L.; Wang, C.; Hu, Y. Highly Effective P-P Synergy of a Novel DOPO-based Flame Retardant for Epoxy Resin. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 1245–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Van der Veen, I.; de Boer, J. Phosphorus Flame Retardants: Properties, Production, Environmental Occurrence, Toxicity and Analysis. Chemosphere 2012, 88, 1119–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hirsch, C.; Striegl, R.; Mathes, S.; Adhart, C.; Edelmann, M.; Bono, E.; Gaan, S.; Samela, K.A.; Hoelting, L.; Krebs, A. Multiparameter Toxicity Assessment of Novel DOPO-derived Organophosphorus Flame Retardants. Arch. Toxicol. 2017, 91, 407–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Riddell, N.; Van Bavel, B.; Jogsten, I.E.; McCrindle, R.; McAlees, A.; Chittim, B. Examination of Technical Mixtures of Halogen-free Phosphorus Based Flame Retardants Using Multiple Analytical Techniques. Chemosphere 2017, 176, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Liu, M.; Yin, H.; Chen, X.; Yang, J.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yang, F.; Deng, Y.; Lu, S. Preliminary Ecotoxicity Hazard Evaluation of DOPO-HQ as a Potential Alternative to Halogenated Flame Retardants. Chemosphere 2018, 193, 126–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Sonnier, R.; Taguet, A.; Ferry, L.; Lopez-Cuesta, J.-M. Towards Biobased Flame Retardant Polymers; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  41. Costes, L.; Lautid, F.; Brohez, S.; Dubois, P. Biobased Flame Retardants: When Nature Meets Fire Protection. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2017, 117, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sag, J.; Goedderz, D.; Kubla, P.; Griener, L.; Schonberger, F.; Doring, M. Phosphorus-contaning Flame Retardants from Biobased Chemicals and their Application in Polyesters and Epoxy Resins. Molecules 2019, 24, 3746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Xia, Z.; Kiratitanavit, W.; Facendola, P.; Thota, S.; Yu, S.; Kumar, J.; Mosurkal, R.; Nagarajan, R. Fire Resistant Polyphenols Based on Chemical Modification of Bioderived Tannic Acid. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2018, 153, 227–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Howell, B.A.; Daniel, Y.G. Thermal Degradation of Phosphorus Esters Derived from Isosorbide and 10-Undecenoic Acid. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2015, 121, 411–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Daniel, Y.G.; Howell, B.A. Flame Retardant Properties of Isosorbide bis-Phosphorus Esters. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2017, 140, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Daniel, Y.G.; Howell, B.A. Phosphorus Flame Retardants from Isosorbide bis-Acrylate. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2018, 156, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Howell, B.A.; Sun, W. Biobased Flame Retardants from Tartaric Acid and Derivatives. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2018, 157, 199–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Howell, B.A.; Oberdorfer, K.L.; Ostrander, E.A. Phospohrus Flame Retardants for Polymeric Materials from Gallic Acid and Other Naturally-occurring Multihydroxybenzoic Acids. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Howell, B.A.; Daniel, Y.G.; Ostrander, E.A. Flame Retardants from Renewable Sources: Food Waste, Plant Oil, and Starch. In New Products, Processes, and Applications; (ACS Symposium Series 1310); Cheng, H.N., Gross, R.A., Smith, P.B., Eds.; Green Polymer Chemistry, American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2018; pp. 405–521. [Google Scholar]
  50. Miller, D. The Bio-harvest is Here. Progress. Farmer 2018, 130, 22–25. [Google Scholar]
  51. Hong, J.; Radojcic, D.; Ionescu, M.; Eastwood, E. Advanced Materials from Corn: Isosorbide-based Epoxy Resins. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 5360–5368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dussene, C.; Delaunay, T.; Wiatz, V.; Wyert, H.; Suisse, I.; Sauthier, M. Synthesis of Isosorbide: An Overview of Challenging Reactions. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 5332–5344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Daniel, Y.G.; Howell, B.A. Synthesis and Characterization of Isosorbide bis-Phosphorus Esters. Heteroat. Chem. 2017, 28, e21369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, T.; Howell, B.A.; Dumitrascu, A.; Martin, S.J.; Smith, P.B. Synthesis and Characterization of Glycerol-Adipic Acid Hyperbranched Poly(ester)s. Polymer 2014, 55, 5065–5072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Homberg, A.L.; Reno, K.H.; Wool, R.P.; Epps, T.H., III. Biobased Building Blocks for the Rational Design of Renewable Block Polymers. Soft Matter 2014, 10, 7405–7424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hu, C.; Bourbigot, S.; Delaunay, T.; Collinet, M.; Marcillec, S.; Fontaine, G. Synthesis of Isosorbide Based Flame Retardants: Application for Polybutylene Succinate. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2019, 164, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lazar, S.T.; Howell, B.A.; Daniel, Y.G.; Li, K.J. Thermal Decomposition of Poly(styrene in the Presence of a Hydrogen Atom Transfer Agent. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2017, 127, 969–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Morgan, A.B.; Galaska, M. Microcombustion Calorimetry as a Tool for Screening Flame Retardancy in Epoxy. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2008, 19, 530–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lyon, R.E.; Walters, R.N.; Stoliarov, J. Screening Flame Retardants for Plastics Using Microscale Combustion Calorimetry. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2007, 47, 1501–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Schartel, B.; Pawlowski, K.H.; Lyon, R.E. Pyrolysis Combustion Flow Calorimetry: A Tool to Assess Flame Retarded PC/ABS Materials. Thermochim. Acta 2007, 462, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Preparation of exo-5-(Diphenylophosphato)isosorbide-2-endo-acrylate/Styrene Copolymers.
Scheme 1. Preparation of exo-5-(Diphenylophosphato)isosorbide-2-endo-acrylate/Styrene Copolymers.
Polymers 11 02038 sch001
Figure 1. Glass Transition Temperatures for exo-5-(Diphenylphosphato)isosorbide-2-endo-acrylate/Styrene Copolymers.
Figure 1. Glass Transition Temperatures for exo-5-(Diphenylphosphato)isosorbide-2-endo-acrylate/Styrene Copolymers.
Polymers 11 02038 g001
Figure 2. Thermal Stability of exo-5-(Diphenylphosphato)isosorbide-2-endo-acrylate/Styrene Copolymers.
Figure 2. Thermal Stability of exo-5-(Diphenylphosphato)isosorbide-2-endo-acrylate/Styrene Copolymers.
Polymers 11 02038 g002
Figure 3. Heat release rate for combustion of exo-5-(Diphenylphosphato)isosorbide-2-endo-acrylate/Styrene Copolymers.
Figure 3. Heat release rate for combustion of exo-5-(Diphenylphosphato)isosorbide-2-endo-acrylate/Styrene Copolymers.
Polymers 11 02038 g003

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Howell, B.A.; Daniel, Y.G. Incorporation of Comonomer exo-5-(Diphenylphosphato)Isosorbide-2-endo-Acrylate to Generate Flame Retardant Poly(Styrene). Polymers 2019, 11, 2038. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11122038

AMA Style

Howell BA, Daniel YG. Incorporation of Comonomer exo-5-(Diphenylphosphato)Isosorbide-2-endo-Acrylate to Generate Flame Retardant Poly(Styrene). Polymers. 2019; 11(12):2038. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11122038

Chicago/Turabian Style

Howell, Bob A., and Yoseph G. Daniel. 2019. "Incorporation of Comonomer exo-5-(Diphenylphosphato)Isosorbide-2-endo-Acrylate to Generate Flame Retardant Poly(Styrene)" Polymers 11, no. 12: 2038. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11122038

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop