Next Article in Journal
Organic Zinc Salts as Pro-Ecological Activators for Sulfur Vulcanization of Styrene–Butadiene Rubber
Previous Article in Journal
Tough Polyelectrolyte Hydrogels with Antimicrobial Property via Incorporation of Natural Multivalent Phytic Acid
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 11
Issue 10
10.3390/polym11101722
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Investigation into the Direct Photolysis Process of Photo-Induced RAFT Polymerization by ESR Spin Trapping

by
Jiajia Li
1,
Mengmeng Zhang
1,
Jian Zhu
1,* and
Xiulin Zhu
1,2
1
State and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory for Novel Functional Polymeric Materials, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Functional Polymer Design and Application, Department of Polymer Science and Engineering, College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China
2
Global Institute of Software Technology, Suzhou 215163, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2019, 11(10), 1722; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11101722
Submission received: 23 September 2019 / Revised: 16 October 2019 / Accepted: 18 October 2019 / Published: 21 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Polymer Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

The direct photolysis of reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) agents under visible light was demonstrated by electron spin resonance (ESR) using 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide as a typical spin trap. The hyperfine coupling lines obtained by ESR spectroscopy showed the successful capture of the carbon-centered and the sulfur-centered radical. Photo-polymerization of vinyl acetate under different wavelengths was performed to verify the effects of wavelength on the process. The effect of the R group of RAFT agents on the photolysis was investigated by spin-trapping experiments using poly (butyl acrylate) and poly (vinyl acetate) as macroRAFT agents. The quantitative experiment showed the yield of photolysis of a xanthate to be only 0.023% under λ > 440 nm.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Visible light has been widely applied in various reversible deactivation radical polymerization (RDRP) [1] techniques, such as nitroxide mediated polymerization (NMP) [2,3,4,5], atom-transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) [6,7,8,9] and reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) [10,11,12] polymerization, owing to its advantages of mild reaction conditions, cheap commercially available light sources, and particularly, the spatial and temporal control [13] of the polymerization. Among these methods, visible-light-induced RAFT [14] polymerization has been considered as one of the most versatile RDRP techniques due to its tolerance of a wide range of compatible reagents.
Currently, three main approaches are known for photo-RAFT polymerizations. The first approach utilizes photo initiators instead of traditionally used thermal initiators for generating primary radicals. For instance, Cai′s group developed photo-RAFT polymerization carried out under UV light and sunlight by using diphenyl(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)phosphine oxide (TPO) and its derivatives as photo initiators [15,16]. The second approach is the activation of a RAFT agent using a photoredox catalyst, namely photo-induced electron transfer RAFT (PET-RAFT) polymerization [17], developed by Boyer and co-workers. In this approach, the primary radical is generated by the reduction of a RAFT agent by a photoredox catalyst under visible light irradiation. Various photoredox catalysts have been explored for this process, including Ir(ppy)3 [18], Ru(bpy)3Cl2 [19], ZnTPP [20], and organo dyes [21]. The main advantages of the use of such catalysts are their oxygen tolerance [22] and wavelength selectivity [23]. The former allows for the controlled polymerizations to be carried out without degassing, thus making the process more convenient. The dissolved oxygen can be consumed by catalysts owing to its strong photo-reducing nature. The wavelength selectivity has been applied in single unit monomer insertion (SUMI) reactions to prepare sequence-defined polymers by selecting appropriate monomer/chain transfer agent and catalyst/wavelength combinations [24]. Finally, the third approach of photo-RAFT involves the direct photoactivation of RAFT agents without an exogenous photocatalyst. The advantages of this method include high chain end fidelity and ease of operation due to simple components (monomer and RAFT agent). Furthermore, no toxic metal- or organo-photocatalysts are needed for the reactions.
The direct photoactivation of thio compounds is well known and was first reported by Otsu as photoiniferters [25], paving the way for their subsequent use in polymerization. Soon after the first report on RAFT polymerization [10], the activation of RAFT agents via irradiation was investigated. Bai et al. reported the first RAFT polymerization under γ-radiation [26], which can produce propagating radicals from a monomer, RAFT agent, or solvent. With the development of the concept of “green chemistry”, UV irradiation-induced photo-RAFT polymerization later emerged as a milder alternative to γ-radiation [27,28,29]. Since then, the activation of RAFT agents under visible light has gained much attention. Recent studies have utilized the n→π* transition absorption of the C-S double bond of RAFT agents using 400–600 nm light [30]. In 2015, the Boyer′s group and Qiao′s group both reported such photo-RAFT through the direct photoactivation of RAFT agents [31,32], followed by several similar reports, investigating various monomers and RAFT agents [33,34]. In the reported systems, the reversible termination process provided the initial propagating radicals and was also considered a reversible degenerative process, playing a similar role to the degenerative transfer process. The mechanism of the direct photoactivation process was proposed as a combination of reversible termination and degenerative transfer (Scheme 1). Subsequently, the possibility of oxygen tolerance of this method was researched [35,36] and was later referred to as “polymerizing through” oxygen [37]. The dissolved oxygen was hypothesized to be consumed by the RAFT agent, as suggested by a longer induction time. In the meantime, the wavelength selectivity has also been developed for the synthesis of complex polymeric materials through careful selection of the wavelength of the irradiation and radical stabilization energy (RSE) of the R-leaving group [38]. However, the mechanism of this direct photoactivation process is still unclear due to limited research that has mainly focused on the photolytic stability of RAFT agents [39] and the effects of light sources on the apparent polymerization rate [40]. There is still no direct evidence to prove the photolysis of the C–S bond in RAFT agents. Especially, the reversible termination and degenerative transfer process need to be further understood.
Electron spin resonance (ESR) is a selective and direct method for detecting free radicals [41]. However, using this approach, the direct detection of radicals generated by the photo-RAFT process is difficult due to the low radical concentration. The ESR spin-trapping technique [42] has, however, been extensively used in such cases. 5,5-Dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO) is typically used as a spin trap by radical addition to form more stable radical adducts, which can be detected by ESR spectroscopy [43,44]. The signals in ESR spectra from DMPO adducts can be used to determine the structures of radical adducts based mainly on the hyperfine coupling constants, which are, in general, useful for distinguishing trapped radicals. Herein, we employ DMPO as a spin trap for the radicals generated from the direct photolysis of a RAFT agent under visible light, aiming to prove the direct photoactivation process (Scheme 2).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Vinyl acetate (VAc) and n-butyl acrylate (BA) were obtained from Chinasun Specialty Products Co., Ltd. (Shanghai), China at AR grade. They were purified by passing through a neutral alumina column before polymerization. (2,2,6,6-Tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxyl (TEMPO), 5,5-Dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO), 2-cyanopropan-2-yl dodecyl carbonotrithioate (CPDT), and 2-cyanopropan-2-yl benzodithioate (CPDB)) were ordered from Sigma–Aldrich (Shanghai, China). These chemicals were used without further purification. Ethyl 2-((ethoxycarbonothioyl)thio)propanoate (EXEP) was synthesized according to the literature [45].

2.2. Polymerization Procedures

The polymerization of VAc is described as a typical example. The monomer (1 mL, 10.8 mmol) was mixed with EXEP (12 mg, 0.054 mmol).The mixture was placed in an ampoule bottle. The content was degassed by three freeze–pump–thaw cycles under nitrogen atmosphere. The polymerization was carried out by blue or purple LED irradiation at a controlled temperature. After the desired polymerization time, the ampoule was exposed to oxygen. The product was diluted by tetrahydrofuran, and the polymer was obtained after precipitation in hexane. Monomer conversion was calculated by gravimetric analysis.

2.3. Characterization

TOSOH HLC-8320 size exclusion chromatography (SEC) was used to determine the number-average molecular weight (Mn) and molecular weight dispersity (Ð) of polymers equipped with a TSK gel Muliti pore HZ-N (3) 4.6 mm × 150 mm column at 40 °C. THF was used as the eluent with a flow rate of 0.35 mL min−1. SEC samples were injected using a TOSOH HLC-8320 SEC plus auto sampler (Shanghai, China). Narrow polydispersity polystyrene standards were used to calibrate the molecular weights.
ESR measurements were carried out on a JEOL JES-X3 Series ESR spectrometer (Shanghai, China) at room temperature. General instrument parameters are as follows: microwave power, 1 mW, macrowave frequency, 9147 MHz, modulation frequency, 100 kHz, modulation amplitude, 300 G, field scan range, 100 G, center field, 3260 G. The photoirradiation is from ES-USH500 UV lamp (Shanghai, China) with power of 1000 W. The hyperfine coupling constants of the spin adducts were determined by simulating the spectra using the WinSim software (National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, 0.96, Durham, NC, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

RAFT agents with different structures, namely ethyl 2-((ethoxycarbonothioyl)thio)propanoate (EXEP), 2-cyanopropan-2-yl dodecyl carbonotrithioate (CPDT) and 2-cyanopropan-2-yl benzodithioate (CPDB) were employed for the spin trapping experiments after their UV-Vis spectra were obtained. The n→π* transition absorption of these RAFT agents can be seen in Figure 1. The Z group of a RAFT agent has an important effect on the absorption, as suggested by CPDB, with a resonance Z group showing a red shift of n→π* absorption, as opposed to those of CPDT and EXEP.
A reaction mixture of the RAFT agent and three equivalents of DMPO was then prepared and placed in the cavity of an ESR spectrometer, which could be directly irradiated by a light source in the spectrometer. A filter was used to cut undesired wavelengths, and the experiment was first studied under light irradiation of light with λ > 440 nm. Two series of six hyperfine lines for all three RAFT agents (Figure 2A) were observed, resulting from hyperfine coupling to one proton and one nitrogen. The result of the spin trapping of DMPO and EXEP was consistent with the simulated spectra (Figure 2B). Signal “a” was assigned to the adduct of DMPO and the carbon-centered radical with coupling constants of aN = 13.90 G and aβ-H = 21.70 G while signal “b” was assigned to the adduct of DMPO and the sulfur-centered radical with coupling constants of aN = 12.96 G and aβ-H = 13.85 G according to the literature [46,47]. Regarding the spin trapping result of CPDT, the intensity of signal “c” is lower than that of signal “d”, suggesting a lower reactivity between the isobutylcyanide radical and DMPO than the sulfur-centered radical. The direct photolysis of CPDB was also supported by the spin trapping by DMPO, despite the signals of “e” and “f” being very weak. Controlled experiments were performed by irradiating only DMPO or EXEP with λ > 440 nm light. No obvious signals were observed (Figures S1 and S2 in Supplementary Materials), which can be attributed to the recombination of radicals after photolysis without DMPO. It can be concluded that the signals detected in Figure 2 were indeed formed by successful spin-trapping of radicals generated from direct photolysis of RAFT agents under visible light irradiation.
EXEP was selected for further spin-trapping experiments due to its ESR signals being much clearer than those given by CPDT and CPDB. The effect of wavelength was investigated by irradiating the sample under λ > 390 nm, λ > 440 nm, and λ > 520 nm light (Figure 3A). The highest signal intensity of DMPO adduct was observed under light with λ > 390 nm, indicating that the photolysis of EXEP was most efficient under this wavelength. The relationship between signal intensity and time under different wavelengths is presented in Figure 3B. When λ > 390 nm light was used, the signal intensity rapidly reached a maximum and then started to diminish, suggesting the radical adduct was unstable under this wavelength. In comparison, upon irradiation with λ > 440 nm light, the signal intensity did not reach its maximum until after 3 min, followed by a slower decrease. With λ > 520 nm light, only a very weak signal was observed. Hence, it was reasonable to propose that more reversible termination took place under light with λ > 390 nm, which was hypothesized to have an accelerating effect on the polymerization rate.
Although the photo-polymerization of vinyl acetate (VAc) with EXEP was successfully performed under blue LED [33], the n→π* absorption of EXEP at around 360 nm suggested a purple LED (λem,max = 390 nm) was more appropriate for the polymerization. Kinetic experiments were performed to verify the effects of wavelength on the photo-polymerization. As expected, polymerization of VAc with EXEP under the irradiation of purple LED (λem,max = 390) showed a faster polymerization rate than that under the irradiation of blue LED (λem,max = 440) (Figure 4A). Molecular weights determined by SEC correlated well with theoretical molecular weights and increased linearly with monomer conversion (Figure 4B), indicating living polymerization under these wavelengths. The results were consistent with the spin-trapping experiments.
Next, BA or VAc was added to the mixture of EXEP and DMPO to investigate the photo-RAFT process in more depth. After irradiation by light with λ > 440 nm, the signal showed no obvious differences in the presence or in the absence of BA (Figure 3A and Figure 5A), while the signal of DMPO adduct generated from the sulfur-centered radical disappeared after 5 seconds under irradiation (Figure 5B) in the presence of VAc. We proposed that the structure of the R group changes from BA-type to VAc-type after radical addition of the monomer, thus affecting the photolytic stability of the RAFT agent.
PBA (Mn = 3500 g mol−1, Ð = 1.41) and PVAc (Mn = 1800 g mol−1, Ð = 1.06) prepared through photo-induced polymerization with EXEP were then used as macroRAFT agents for spin trapping experiments. Strong signal intensity of six hyperfine lines was observed from the PBA-DMPO adduct, in contrast to the weak signal intensity of the PVAc-DMPO adduct (Figure 6), further confirming that the structure of the R group has an important effect on the photolytic stability.
Finally, a quantitative experiment was performed by the integral of the signal in the ESR spectrum, which makes it possible to calculate the quantum yield of the photolysis of the RAFT agent. A quantitative (2,2,6,6-Tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxyl (TEMPO) was prepared and used as a standard sample. Hence, the concentration of DMPO-adduct can be obtained by comparing the integral of their signals via ESR software (Figure 7). The result showed the yield of photolysis of EXEP was only 0.023% under λ > 440 nm, implying the degenerative transfer process plays a key role in photo-induced RAFT polymerization.

4. Conclusions

The direct photolysis of RAFT agents under visible light was demonstrated using the spin-trapping technique with ESR for the first time. The quantitative experiment indicated that the degenerative transfer process plays the main role in the photo-RAFT process, while the reversible termination process was affected by the selectivity of the light wavelength. The structure of the R group of the RAFT agent had a significant effect on the photolytic stability. We demonstrated that the photo-RAFT polymerization was initiated by the carbon-centered radical, and reversibly terminated by the sulfur-centered radical. Thus, this work provided a further understanding of the direct photoactivation of RAFT agents under visible light.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/11/10/1722/s1, Figure S1: X-band ESR spectra of EXEP in toluene under light with λmax = 440 nm taken at t = 3 min, [EXEP]0 = 0.225 mol L−1. Figure S2: X-band ESR spectra of DMPO in toluene under light with λmax = 440 nm taken at t = 3 min, [DMPO]0 = 0.675 mol L−1.

Author Contributions

Experiment and writing—original draft preparation, J.L.; writing—review and editing, M.Z. and J.Z.; data curation, J.L.; supervision, J.Z.; project administration, X.Z.

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21871200).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions and Educational Commission of Jiangsu Province of China (17KJA150008).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Jenkins, A.D.; Jones, R.G.; Moad, G. Terminology for reversible-deactivation radical polymerization previously called “controlled” radical or “living” radical polymerization (IUPAC Recommendations 2010). Pure Appl. Chem. 2009, 82, 483–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hawker, C.J.; Bosman, A.W.; Harth, E. New Polymer Synthesis by Nitroxide Mediated Living Radical Polymerizations. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3661–3688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hu, S.; Malpert, J.H.; Yang, X.; Neckers, D.C. Exploring chromophore tethered aminoethers as potential photoinitiators for controlled radical polymerization. Polymer 2000, 41, 445–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Guillaneuf, Y.; Bertin, D.; Gigmes, D.; Versace, D.-L.; Lalevee, J.; Fouassier, J.-P. Toward Nitroxide-Mediated Photopolymerization. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 2204–2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Su, J.; Liu, X.; Hu, J.; You, Q.; Cui, Y.; Chen, Y. Photo-induced controlled radical polymerization of methyl methacrylate mediated by photosensitive nitroxides. Polym. Int. 2015, 64, 867–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Maatyjaszewski, K.; Xia, J. Atom transfer radical polymerization. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 2921–2990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kamigaito, M.; Ando, T.; Sawamoto, M. Metal-catalyzed living radical polymerization. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3689–3745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fors, B.P.; Hawker, C.J. Control of a Living Radical Polymerization of Methacrylates by Light. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 8850–8853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Theriot, J.C.; Lim, C.-H.; Yang, H.; Ryan, M.D.; Musgrave, C.B.; Miyake, G.M. Organocatalyzed atom transfer radical polymerization driven by visible light. Science 2016, 352, 1082–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chiefari, J.; Chonng, Y.K.; Ercole, F.; Krstina, J.; Jeffery, J.; Le, T.P.T.; Ayadunne, R.T.A.; Meijs, G.F.; Moad, C.L.; Moad, G.; et al. Living free-radical polymerization by reversible addition—Fragmentation chain transfer: The RAFT process. Macromolecules 1998, 31, 5559–5562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hill, M.R.; Carmean, R.N.; Sumerlin, B.S. Expanding the Scope of RAFT Polymerization: Recent Advances and New Horizons. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 5459–5469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Perrier, S. 50th Anniversary Perspective: RAFT Polymerization—A User Guide. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 7433–7447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Leibfarth, F.A.; Mattson, K.M.; Fors, B.P.; Collins, H.A.; Hawker, C.J. External Regulation of Controlled Polymerizations. Angew. Chem. In. Ed. 2013, 52, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Corrigan, N.; Yeow, J.; Judzewitsch, P.; Xu, J.; Boyer, C. Seeing the Light: Advancing Materials Chemistry through Photopolymerization. Angew. Chem. 2018, 131, 5224–5243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lu, L.; Zhang, H.; Yang, N.; Cai, Y. Toward Rapid and Well-Controlled Ambient Temperature RAFT Polymerization under UV−Vis Radiation:  Effect of Radiation Wave Range. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 3770–3776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jiang, W.; Lu, L.; Cai, Y. Highly Efficient and Well-Controlled Ambient Temperature RAFT Polymerization under Solar Radiation. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2007, 28, 725–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Phommalysack-Lovan, J.; Chu, Y.; Boyer, C.; Xu, J. PET-RAFT polymerisation: Towards green and precision polymer manufacturing. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 6591–6606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xu, J.; Jung, K.; Atme, A.; Shanmugam, S.; Boyer, C. A Robust and Versatile Photoinduced Living Polymerization of Conjugated and Unconjugated Monomers and Its Oxygen Tolerance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 5508–5519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xu, J.; Jung, K.; Boyer, C. Oxygen Tolerance Study of Photoinduced Electron Transfer–Reversible Addition–Fragmentation Chain Transfer (PET-RAFT) Polymerization Mediated by Ru(bpy)3Cl2. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 4217–4229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shanmugam, S.; Xu, J.; Boyer, C. Exploiting Metalloporphyrins for Selective Living Radical Polymerization Tunable over Visible Wavelengths. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 9174–9185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Xu, J.; Shanmugam, S.; Duong, H.T.; Boyer, C. Organo-photocatalysts for photoinduced electron transfer-reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer (PET-RAFT) polymerization. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 5615–5624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gormley, J.; Yeow, J.; Ng, G.; Conway, O.; Boyer, C.; Chapman, R. An Oxygen-Tolerant PET-RAFT Polymerization for Screening Structure–Activity Relationships. Angew. Chem. 2018, 57, 1557–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shanmugam, S.; Xu, J.; Boyer, C. Light-Regulated Polymerization under Near-Infrared/Far-Red Irradiation Catalyzed by Bacteriochlorophyll a. Angew. Chem. 2016, 55, 1036–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huang, Z.; Noble, B.B.; Corrigan, N.; Chu, Y.; Satoh, K.; Thomas, D.S.; Hawker, C.J.; Moad, G.; Kamigaito, M.; Coote, M.L.; et al. Discrete and Stereospecific Oligomers Prepared by Sequential and Alternating Single Unit Monomer Insertion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 13392–13406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Otsu, T.; Yoshida, M.; Tazaki, T. A model for living radical polymerization. Die Makromol. Chem. Rap. Commun. 1982, 3, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bai, R.; You, Y.; Pan, C. 60Co γ-Irradiation-Initiated “Living” Free-Radical Polymerization in the Presence of Dibenzyl Trithiocarbonate. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2001, 22, 315–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ham, M.-K.; HoYouk, J.; Kwon, Y.-K.; Kwark, Y.-J. Photoinitiated RAFT polymerization of vinyl acetate. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2012, 50, 2389–2397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, H.; Li, Q.; Dai, J.; Du, F.; Zheng, H.; Bai, R. Real-Time and in Situ Investigation of “Living”/Controlled Photopolymerization in the Presence of a Trithiocarbonate. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 2576–2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Khan, M.Y.; Cho, M.-S.; Kwark, Y.-J. Dual Roles of a Xanthate as a Radical Source and Chain Transfer Agent in the Photoinitiated RAFT Polymerization of Vinyl Acetate. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 1929–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Thomas, Q.F.; McKenzie, G.; Uchiyama, M.; Satoh, K.; Xu, J.; Boyer, C.; Kamigaito, M.; Qiao, G.G. Beyond Traditional RAFT: Alternative Activation of Thiocarbonylthio Compounds for Controlled Polymerization. Adv. Sci. 2016, 3, 1500394. [Google Scholar]
  31. Xu, J.; Shanmugam, S.; Corrigan, N.A.; Boyer, C. Controlled Radical Polymerization: Mechanisms; ACS Publication: Washington, DC, USA, 2015; pp. 247–267. [Google Scholar]
  32. McKenzie, T.G.; Fu, Q.; Wong, E.H.H.; Dunstan, D.E.; Qiao, G.G. Visible Light Mediated Controlled Radical Polymerization in the Absence of Exogenous Radical Sources or Catalysts. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 3864–3872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ding, C.; Fan, C.; Jiang, G.; Pan, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, J.; Zhu, X. Photocatalyst-Free and Blue Light-Induced RAFT Polymerization of Vinyl Acetate at Ambient Temperature. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2015, 36, 2181–2185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Li, J.; Pan, X.; Li, N.; Zhu, J.; Zhu, X. Photoinduced controlled radical polymerization of methyl acrylate and vinyl acetate by xanthate. Polym. Chem. 2018, 9, 2897–2904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, J.; Ding, C.; Zhang, Z.; Pan, X.; Li, N.; Zhu, J.; Zhu, X. Visible Light-Induced Living Radical Polymerization of Butyl Acrylate: Photocatalyst-Free, Ultrafast, and Oxygen Tolerance. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2016, 13, 1600482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lamb, J.R.; Qin, K.P.; Johnson, J.A. Visible-light-mediated, additive-free, and open-to-air controlled radical polymerization of acrylates and acrylamides. Polym. Chem. 2019, 10, 1585–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Yeow, J.; Chapman, R.; Gormley, A.J.; Boyer, C. Up in the air: Oxygen tolerance in controlled/living radical polymerization. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 4357–4387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Shanmugam, S.; Cuthbert, J.; Kowalewski, T.; Boyer, C.; Matyjaszewski, K. Catalyst-Free Selective Photoactivation of RAFT Polymerization: A Facile Route for Preparation of Comblike and Bottlebrush Polymers. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 7776–7784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. McKenzie, T.G.; Costa, L.P.d.M.; Fu, Q.; Dunstan, D.E.; Qiao, G.G. Investigation into the photolytic stability of RAFT agents and the implications for photopolymerization reactions. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7, 4246–4253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cabannes-Boué, B.; Yang, Q.; Lalevée, J.; Morlet-Savary, F.; Poly, J. Investigation into the mechanism of photo-mediated RAFT polymerization involving the reversible photolysis of the chain-transfer agent. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 1760–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Weil, J.A.; Bolton, J.R.; Wertz, J.E. Electron Paramagnetic Resonance: Elementary Theory and Practical Applications; Wiley-Interscience: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  42. Janzen, E.G. Spin trapping. Acc. Chem. Res. 1971, 4, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Iwamura, M.; Inamoto, N. Novel Formation of Nitroxide Radicals by Radical Addition to Nitrones. Bull. Chem. Soc. Japan. 1967, 40, 702–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, Y.; Lee, T.S.; Petersen, J.L.; Milsmann, C. A Zirconium Photosensitizer with a Long-Lived Excited State: Mechanistic Insight into Photoinduced Single-Electron Transfer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 5934–5947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Stenzel, M.H.; Cummins, L.; Roberts, G.E.; Davis, T.P.; Vana, P.; Barner-Kowollik, C. Xanthate Mediated Living Polymerization of Vinyl Acetate: A Systematic Variation in MADIX/RAFT Agent Structure. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2003, 204, 1160–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Janzen, E.G.; Liu, J.I.-P.J. Radical Addition Reactions of 5,5-Dimethyl-l-pyrroline-l-oxide. Spin Trapping with a Cyclic Nitrone. J. Magn. Reson. 1973, 9, 510–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zamora, P.L.; Villamena, F.A. Theoretical and Experimental Studies of the Spin Trapping of Inorganic Radicals by 5,5-Dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-Oxide (DMPO). 3. Sulfur Dioxide, Sulfite, and Sulfate Radical Anions. J. Phys. Chem. A 2012, 116, 7210–7218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 11 01722 sch001
Scheme 1. Proposed mechanism of visible-light-induced reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer (photo-RAFT) polymerization utilizing direct photolysis of RAFT agents.
Scheme 1. Proposed mechanism of visible-light-induced reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer (photo-RAFT) polymerization utilizing direct photolysis of RAFT agents.
Polymers 11 01722 sch001
Polymers 11 01722 sch002
Scheme 2. Proposed mechanism of RAFT spin-trapping experiment.
Scheme 2. Proposed mechanism of RAFT spin-trapping experiment.
Polymers 11 01722 sch002
Polymers 11 01722 g001
Figure 1. Different thiocarbonylthio compounds investigated in this study and their UV-Vis absorption spectra in ethyl acetate with a concentration of 10−4 mol L−1.
Figure 1. Different thiocarbonylthio compounds investigated in this study and their UV-Vis absorption spectra in ethyl acetate with a concentration of 10−4 mol L−1.
Polymers 11 01722 g001
Polymers 11 01722 g002
Figure 2. (A) X-band electron spin resonance (ESR) spectra of 5,5-Dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO) and different RAFT agents in toluene under light with λ > 440 nm taken at t = 3 min, [RAFT agent]0:[DMPO]0 = 1:3, [RAFT agent]0 = 0.225 mol L−1; (B) Simulation of the result of spin trapping of ethyl 2-((ethoxycarbonothioyl)thio)propanoate (EXEP) and DMPO.
Figure 2. (A) X-band electron spin resonance (ESR) spectra of 5,5-Dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO) and different RAFT agents in toluene under light with λ > 440 nm taken at t = 3 min, [RAFT agent]0:[DMPO]0 = 1:3, [RAFT agent]0 = 0.225 mol L−1; (B) Simulation of the result of spin trapping of ethyl 2-((ethoxycarbonothioyl)thio)propanoate (EXEP) and DMPO.
Polymers 11 01722 g002
Polymers 11 01722 g003
Figure 3. (A) X-band ESR spectra of DMPO and EXEP in toluene under light taken at t = 5 s for λ > 390 nm, t = 3 min for λ > 440 nm, t = 3 min for λ > 520 nm, [EXEP]0:[DMPO]0 = 1:3, [EXEP]0 = 0.225 mol L−1; (B) Signal intensity versus time under different wavelength.
Figure 3. (A) X-band ESR spectra of DMPO and EXEP in toluene under light taken at t = 5 s for λ > 390 nm, t = 3 min for λ > 440 nm, t = 3 min for λ > 520 nm, [EXEP]0:[DMPO]0 = 1:3, [EXEP]0 = 0.225 mol L−1; (B) Signal intensity versus time under different wavelength.
Polymers 11 01722 g003
Polymers 11 01722 g004
Figure 4. Kinetic experiments of photo-induced RAFT polymerization of vinyl acetate (Vac) with [VAc]0:[EXEP]0 = 200:1 at 25 °C under different wavelength. (A) ln([M]0/[M]) versus time; (B) Molecular weight (Mn) and molecular weight distribution (Ð) versus conversion.
Figure 4. Kinetic experiments of photo-induced RAFT polymerization of vinyl acetate (Vac) with [VAc]0:[EXEP]0 = 200:1 at 25 °C under different wavelength. (A) ln([M]0/[M]) versus time; (B) Molecular weight (Mn) and molecular weight distribution (Ð) versus conversion.
Polymers 11 01722 g004
Polymers 11 01722 g005
Figure 5. X-band ESR spectra of DMPO and EXEP and monomers in toluene under light with λ > 440 nm at different time, (A) [EXEP]0:[DMPO]0:[BA]0 = 1:3:1, [EXEP]0 = 0.225 mol L−1; (B) [EXEP]0:[DMPO]0:[VAc]0 = 1:3:1, [EXEP]0 = 0.225 mol L−1.
Figure 5. X-band ESR spectra of DMPO and EXEP and monomers in toluene under light with λ > 440 nm at different time, (A) [EXEP]0:[DMPO]0:[BA]0 = 1:3:1, [EXEP]0 = 0.225 mol L−1; (B) [EXEP]0:[DMPO]0:[VAc]0 = 1:3:1, [EXEP]0 = 0.225 mol L−1.
Polymers 11 01722 g005
Polymers 11 01722 g006
Figure 6. X-band ESR spectra of DMPO and macroRAFT agents in toluene under light with λ > 440 nm at 3 min, [macroRAFT agent]0:[DMPO]0 = 0.02:3, [EXEP]0 = 0.00455 mol L−1.
Figure 6. X-band ESR spectra of DMPO and macroRAFT agents in toluene under light with λ > 440 nm at 3 min, [macroRAFT agent]0:[DMPO]0 = 0.02:3, [EXEP]0 = 0.00455 mol L−1.
Polymers 11 01722 g006
Polymers 11 01722 g007
Figure 7. Quantitative experiments using (2,2,6,6-Tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxyl (TEMPO) as a standard sample, [TEMPO]0 = 0.00225 mol L−1, signal of EXEP-DMPO adduct was obtained under light with λ > 440 nm at 3 min, [EXEP]0 = 0.00455 mol L−1.
Figure 7. Quantitative experiments using (2,2,6,6-Tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxyl (TEMPO) as a standard sample, [TEMPO]0 = 0.00225 mol L−1, signal of EXEP-DMPO adduct was obtained under light with λ > 440 nm at 3 min, [EXEP]0 = 0.00455 mol L−1.
Polymers 11 01722 g007

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, J.; Zhang, M.; Zhu, J.; Zhu, X. Investigation into the Direct Photolysis Process of Photo-Induced RAFT Polymerization by ESR Spin Trapping. Polymers 2019, 11, 1722. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11101722

AMA Style

Li J, Zhang M, Zhu J, Zhu X. Investigation into the Direct Photolysis Process of Photo-Induced RAFT Polymerization by ESR Spin Trapping. Polymers. 2019; 11(10):1722. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11101722

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Jiajia, Mengmeng Zhang, Jian Zhu, and Xiulin Zhu. 2019. "Investigation into the Direct Photolysis Process of Photo-Induced RAFT Polymerization by ESR Spin Trapping" Polymers 11, no. 10: 1722. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11101722

APA Style

Li, J., Zhang, M., Zhu, J., & Zhu, X. (2019). Investigation into the Direct Photolysis Process of Photo-Induced RAFT Polymerization by ESR Spin Trapping. Polymers, 11(10), 1722. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11101722

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop