Next Article in Journal
Thermodynamic Properties, Hysteresis Behavior and Stress-Strain Analysis of MgH2 Thin Films, Studied over a Wide Temperature Range
Previous Article in Journal
Silica-Metal Composite for Hydrogen Storage Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ru11Lu20, a New Intermetallic Compound with Eight- to Ten-Coordinate Ruthenium Atoms

Department für Chemie, Universität zu Köln, Greinstraße 6, D-50939 Köln, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2012, 2(2), 704-709; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst2020704
Submission received: 14 May 2012 / Revised: 11 June 2012 / Accepted: 12 June 2012 / Published: 20 June 2012

Abstract

:
The new intermetallic compound Ru11Lu20 was obtained as black single crystals during an attempted comproportionation reaction of lutetium(III) chloride, LuCl3, with metallic lutetium in the presence of ruthenium metal at 950 °C. Ru11Lu20 crystallizes with the trigonal space group R-3, Z = 6, a = 1255.1(1), c = 2973.0(4) pm, R1 for all data: 0.0380. Ruthenium atoms center eight-, nine- and ten-vertex polyhedra of lutetium atoms which are connected in a complicated manner to a three-dimensional network.

1. Introduction

A plethora of reduced rare-earth metal halides at the borderline between metal and salt have been obtained within the last decades [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. These contain cluster complexes, most frequently of the “6–12” type, in which octahedral metal clusters {R6} are surrounded by twelve halide ligands (X) capping all the edges. As the rare-earth elements R contribute only three valence electrons to intra-cluster bonding, an endohedral atom Z is needed to stabilize the cluster {ZR6} through R—Z polar covalent bonding interactions.
Rare-earth cluster complexes with endohedral atoms, {ZRx}Xz, may be obtained by comproportionation reactions of the respective rare-earth trichloride, RX3, with the metals R and Z. During one of the many attempts to synthesize new lutetium cluster complexes, in the present case in the system LuCl3/Lu/Ru, the new intermetallic compound {Ru11Lu20} was obtained as black single crystals.

2. Results and Discussion

The analysis of single-crystal X-ray diffraction data of the small black crystals obtained during an attempt to synthesize {RuLu6}Cl12Lu—in analogy to {ZSc6}Cl12Sc compounds which exist at least with Z = Co, Ni [13]—revealed the new intermetallic phase {Ru11Lu20}. This composition was not reported in the phase diagram of the binary system Ru/Lu [14]. The phase that comes closest is Ru3Lu5, with 37.5 mol% Ru, as compared with 35.48 mol% in {Ru11Lu20}. “Ru3Lu5” melts incongruently at 1460 °C: As crystallographic data are not reported it seems likely that “Ru3Lu5” = “Ru12Lu20” is in fact {Ru11Lu20}.
The crystal structure of {Ru11Lu20} exhibits a large unit cell, space group R-3, in the hexagonal setting with a = 1255.1(1), c = 2973.0(4) pm, with six formula units in the unit cell, hence with the composition Ru66Lu120. There are five crystallographically independent ruthenium sites in the unit cell, Wyckoff notations 6c (Ru2, Ru4) and 18f (Ru1, Ru3, Ru5), and nine lutetium sites at 3a (Lu1), 3b (Lu9), 6c (Lu8), and 18f (Lu2−Lu7).
As the electron affinity of ruthenium is higher than that of lutetium, 101 vs. 33 kJ/mol [15,16], {Ru11Lu20} could be regarded as a polar intermetallic compound. The sequence of the atoms, more negative to more positive in the waved brackets, is used in analogy to anti-Werner cluster complexes [12]. These are compounds of the general formula {ZRx}Xz, in which a central (transition) metal atom Z, for example Ru, is surrounded by x R metal atoms, for example Lu, and further, in the second coordination sphere, by z X atoms, usually halogen atoms, such that the polarities are −(Z), +(R), −(X). Although {Ru5Lu20}I24 was clearly shown to exist by powder X-ray diffraction data, the crystals were much too thin to determine the details of the crystal structure [17]. However, the compound is isostructural with {Os5Lu20}I24 whose structure could be established by single crystal X-ray diffraction data [18]. Essential features are chains of face-sharing {OsLu8} cubes and square antiprisms in a 1:4 ratio. These {OsLu8/2} → {Os5Lu20} chains constitute a one-dimensional intermetallic “phase” which is surrounded by iodide ligands in the second coordination sphere. Heteroatomic Os−Lu distances are, on the average, 293.2 pm (cube) and 281.7 pm (square antiprisms), hence considerably shorter than homoatomic Lu−Lu distances of 343.3 pm (average over all relevant Lu−Lu distances) and Os−Os distances of 298.8(1), 302.9(1), and 325.0(1) pm, respectively.
In the new polar intermetallic compound {Ru11Lu20} there are three crystallographically independent {RuLu8} polyhedra, two of which may be regarded as cubes (surrounding Ru1 and Ru2) and one as a square antiprism (around Ru3); the {Ru4Lu9} and {Ru5Lu10} polyhedra are best described as a monocapped square antiprism (1-4-4) and a 1-5-4 polyhedron, see Figure 1. These polyhedra occur in a 3:1:3:1:3 ratio, hence seven ruthenium atoms out of eleven, in {Ru11Lu20}, have coordination number eight (CN = 8), one has CN = 9, and three have CN = 10. All heteroatomic, polar Ru−Lu distances are shorter than the shortest homoatomic Lu−Lu or Ru−Ru distances, Table 1. In numbers, Ru−Lu distances range from 284.4 to 307.5 pm, with an overall average of 292.4 pm; the shortest Lu−Lu distances range from 319.8(1) to 358.6(1) pm with an average of 325.2 pm, and the shortest Ru−Ru distance is 328.3(1) pm (Ru1−Ru3). These values are all very similar to those observed in {Os5Lu20}I24, see above.
Figure 1. A [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10] projection of the crystal structure of {Ru11Lu20}. The colors represent the five crystallographically independent {RuLux} polyhedra, with x = 8, 9, and 10, see right part of the Figure.
Figure 1. A [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10] projection of the crystal structure of {Ru11Lu20}. The colors represent the five crystallographically independent {RuLux} polyhedra, with x = 8, 9, and 10, see right part of the Figure.
Crystals 02 00704 g001
Table 1. Ru−Lu and Ru−Ru distances in the crystal structure of {Ru11Lu20}.
Table 1. Ru−Lu and Ru−Ru distances in the crystal structure of {Ru11Lu20}.
Z−RCNd/pm; Ranged/pm; AverageZ−Zd/pm; Shortest
Ru1−Lu8279.2(2)–292.5(2)284.9Ru1−Ru328.3(2)
Ru2−Lu8277.0(3)–294.5(3)284.4Ru2−Ru340.2(2)
Ru3−Lu8271.5(2)–309.0(2)285.8Ru3−Ru328.3(2)
Ru4−Lu9292.4(2)–302.3(1)297.1Ru4−Ru417.6(2)
Ru5−Lu10285.4(2)–336.6(2)307.5Ru5−Ru353.9(2)
Given that the analogy between the three-dimensional polar intermetallic compound {Ru11Lu20} and the one-dimensional polar intermetallic incorporated as a cluster chain in the anti-Werner cluster complex {Ru5Lu20}I24 is accepted, the crystal structure of {Ru11Lu20} may be described as a connection between seven {RuLu8} (cube and square antiprism in a 4:3 ratio), one 1-4-4 {RuLu9} and three 1-5-4 {RuLu10} polyhedra. As Figure 1 shows, the connection between these polyhedra is surprisingly complex.

3. Experimental Section

Anhydrous lutetium trichloride, LuCl3, was prepared following the ammonium-chloride route [19] and purified by high-vacuum sublimation at around 900 °C. Lutetium and ruthenium metals were from Smart Elements and Merck, respectively. A mixture of 150 mg LuCl3 (0.533 mmol), 70 mg lutetium (0.400 mmol) and 24 mg ruthenium (0.237 mmol) was filled under dry-box conditions (argon, MBraun, Garching, Germany) in pre-cleaned and at one end He-arc welded tantalum containers. These were then sealed at the other end and jacketed under vacuum in silica ampoules. The reaction ensemble was heated with a rate of 10 K/h to 950 °C, kept there for two weeks and then cooled to ambient temperature with 10 K/h.
The reaction products were inspected under a microscope. The small black crystals within white crystalline materials turned out to be the intermetallic phase Ru11Lu20. Single crystals were selected under a microscope and mounted in thin-walled glass capillaries. This was unneccesary although before structure determination a lutetium chloride cluster complex was expected, and these are sensitive to moisture.
The quality of the crystals was checked on a single-crystal X-ray diffractometer (Stoe Image Plate Diffraction System, IPDS II), and a complete intensity data set was collected at ambient temperature using graphite-monochromated Mo-Kα radiation. The data were corrected for Lorentz and polarization effects. A numerical absorption correction based on crystal-shape optimization was applied for all data; the programs used in this work are Stoe’s X-Area, including X-RED and X-SHAPE for data reduction and absorption correction [20,21]. The WinGX suite of programs [22], including SIR-92 [23] and the SHELX programs [24,25,26] were used for structure solution and refinement. The last refinement cycles included atomic positions for all atoms and anisotropic thermal parameters. Further details of the crystal structure determination may be obtained from the Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe, D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany (Fax: (+49)7247-808-666; Email: [email protected]), on quoting the depository number ICSD-424634 the authors and the journal citation.
Crystal data for Ru11Lu20, 4611.17 g·mol−1; diffractometer IPDS-II, Stoe, Darmstadt, Germany; Mo-Kα (graphite monochromator, λ = 71.073 pm); T = 298(2) K; 2θmax = 54.8°; 0°≤ ω≤ 180°, ϕ = 0°, 0° ≤ ω≤ 158°, ϕ = 90°, Δω = 2°, 169 images; −16 ≤ h ≤ 16, −16 ≤ k ≤ 15, −38 ≤ l ≤ 38; ρcalc = 11.327 g·cm−3; 10990 measured reflections of which 2012 were symmetrically independent; Rint = 0.1018; F(000) = 11424; μ = 78.110 mm−1. Trigonal, Crystals 02 00704 i001 (no. 148), a = 1255.1(1), c = 2973.0(4) pm, V = 4056.1(7) × 106 pm3, Z = 6; R values: R1/wR2 for 1356 reflections with [I0 > 2σ(I0)]: 0.0364/0.0786, for all data: 0.0630/0.0855; Sall = 0.884; Δρ (min./max.) = −2.48/2.78 × 10−6 pm−3.

4. Conclusions

The hitherto unknown intermetallic compound {Ru11Lu20}—perhaps identical with “Ru3Lu5” as reported in a phase diagram determination—consists of central ruthenium atoms coordinated by eight (cube, square antiprism), nine (monocapped square antiprism, 1-4-4) and ten (1-5-4 polyhedron) lutetium atoms. These polyhedra are connected to a complicated three-dimensional structure. Coordination numbers of eight (cube and square antiprisms) are also observed in the cluster complex compound {Ru5Lu20}I24 where the polyhedra are connected via common faces to a one-dimensional intermetallic structure; the chains are isolated from each other by surrounding iodide ligands.

Acknowledgements

This work was generously supported by the State of Nordrhein-Westfalen through the Universität zu Köln.

References

  1. Corbett, J.D. Extended metal-metal bonding in halides of the early transition metals. Acc. Chem. Res. 1981, 14, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Simon, A. Condensed metal clusters. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1981, 20, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Meyer, G. Reduced halides of the rare-earth elements. Chem. Rev. 1988, 88, 93–107. [Google Scholar]
  4. Simon, A. Extended metal-metal bonding in halides of the early transition metals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1988, 27, 159–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Corbett, J.D. Exploratory synthesis in the solid state. Endless Wonders. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 5178–5191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Corbett, J.D. Exploratory synthesis of reduced rare-earth-metal halides, chalcogenides, intermetallics: New compounds, structures, and properties. J. Alloys Compd. 2006, 418, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Corbett, J.D. The fascinating and diverse chemistry of polar intermetallic phases. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 13–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Simon, A.; Mattausch, H.J.; Miller, G.J.; Bauhofer, W.; Kremer, R.K. Chapter 100 Metal-Rich Halides–Structure, Bonding and Properties. In Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare Earths; Gschneidner, K.A., Eyring, L., Eds.; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1991; Volume 15, pp. 191–285. [Google Scholar]
  9. Meyer, G.; Wickleder, M.S. Simple and Complex Halides. In Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare Earths; Gschneidner, K.A., Eyring, L., Eds.; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2000; Volume 28, pp. 53–129, Chapter 177. [Google Scholar]
  10. Simon, A.; Mattausch, H.J.; Ryazanov, M.; Kremer, R.K. Lanthanides as d Metals. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2006, 632, 919–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Meyer, G. The reduction of rare-earth metal halides with unlike Metals–Wöhler’s metallothermic reduction. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2007, 633, 2537–2552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Meyer, G. Cluster complexes as anti-Werner complexes. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2008, 634, 2729–2736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zimmermann, S. Hochkoordinierte endohedrale Übergangsmetallatome in Scandiumclustern. Ph.D. Thesis, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  14. Okamoto, H. Lu-Ru Phase Diagram. In ASM Alloy Phase Diagram Center; Villars, P., Okamoto, H., Cenzual, K., Eds.; ASM International, Materials Park: OH, USA, 2006; diagram No. 901545. [Google Scholar]
  15. Norquist, P.L.; Beck, D.R.; Bilodeau, R.C.; Scheer, M.; Srawley, R.A.; Haugen, H.K. Theoretical and experimental binding energies for the d7s2 4F levels in Ru, including calculated hyperfine structure and M1 decay rates. Phys. Rev. A 1999, 59, 1896–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Davis, V.T.; Thompson, J.S. Measurement of the electron affinity of lutetium. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 2001, 34, L433–L437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Brühmann, M. Cluster-Komplexe der Seltenerdmetalle Gadolinium und Lutetium mit endohedralen Übergangsmetall-Atomen. Ph.D. Thesis, Universität zu Köln, Köln, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  18. Brühmann, M.; Mudring, A.-V.; Valldor, M.; Meyer, G. {Os5Lu20}I24, the first extended cluster complex of Lutetium with eight-coordinate endohedral Osmium atoms in two different environments. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 4083–4088. [Google Scholar]
  19. Meyer, G. The ammonium chloride route to anhydrous rare earth chlorides—The example of YCl3. Inorg. Syntheses 1989, 25, 146–150. [Google Scholar]
  20. X-RED 1.22, Stoe Data Reduction Program (C), Stoe & Cie GmbH: Darmstadt, Germany, 1999.
  21. X-Shape 1.06, Crystal Optimisation for Numerical Absorption Correction (C), Stoe & Cie GmbH: Darmstadt, Germany, 1999.
  22. Farrugia, L.J. WINGX, A MS-Windows System of Programs for Solving, Refining and Analysing Single X-ray Diffraction Data for Small Molecules; University of Glasgow: Glasgow, Scotland, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  23. Altomare, A.; Cascarano, G.; Giacovazzo, C.; Gualardi, A. SIR92, a program for automatic solution of crystal structures by direct methods. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1993, 26, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sheldrick, G.M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Cryst. 2008, A64, 112–122. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXS-97, Program for Structure Analysis; University of Göttingen: Göttingen, Germany, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sheldrick, G.M. SHELXL-93, Program for Crystal Structure Refinement; University of Göttingen: Göttingen, Germany, 1993. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zimmermann, S.; Pantenburg, I.; Meyer, G. Ru11Lu20, a New Intermetallic Compound with Eight- to Ten-Coordinate Ruthenium Atoms. Crystals 2012, 2, 704-709. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst2020704

AMA Style

Zimmermann S, Pantenburg I, Meyer G. Ru11Lu20, a New Intermetallic Compound with Eight- to Ten-Coordinate Ruthenium Atoms. Crystals. 2012; 2(2):704-709. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst2020704

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zimmermann, Sina, Ingo Pantenburg, and Gerd Meyer. 2012. "Ru11Lu20, a New Intermetallic Compound with Eight- to Ten-Coordinate Ruthenium Atoms" Crystals 2, no. 2: 704-709. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst2020704

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop