Next Article in Journal
Nucleation Studies of Lactobacillus brevis Alcohol Dehydrogenases in a Stirred Crystallizer Monitored by In Situ Multi-Angle Dynamic Light Scattering (MADLS)
Next Article in Special Issue
Microfluidic Fabrication of TiO2–Hydrogel Photocatalytic Composites for Water Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Chemical Controls on the Green Coloration of the Novel Gem Quartzite “Feizhoucui”: A CIE L*a*b* Colorimetric Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Thermodynamic Assessment of Reactions in the Sodium-Oxide Fluxed Aluminothermic Reduction of Manganese Ore with Si, Cr, and Cu Collector Metals
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Structural and Proton Conduction Modifications in RbH2PO4 Crystals upon Heating Under Different Environments

1
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Texas at San Antonio, 1 UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA
2
Department of Physics, University of Texas at El Paso, 500 West University Avenue, El Paso, TX 79968, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2026, 16(2), 147; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst16020147
Submission received: 21 January 2026 / Revised: 13 February 2026 / Accepted: 15 February 2026 / Published: 17 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Exploring New Materials for the Transition to Sustainable Energy)

Abstract

We used synchrotron X-ray diffraction (XRD) and ac-impedance spectroscopy (AIS) to uncover the structural and chemical modifications undergone by RbH2PO4 (RDP) at intermediate temperatures (150 °C < T < 300 °C) and investigate their relationship with RDP’s proton conductivity, σ. Nyquist plots collected on RDP samples sealed in a small volume (~50 mL) of dry air show a gradual increase in σ upon heating from 180 to 260 °C, but not the three-order-of-magnitude superprotonic jump observed in the Cs-based compound CsH2PO4 (CDP) within the same temperature range. Correspondingly, XRD measurements using synchrotron radiation (λ = 0.922 Å) on RDP crystalline powders sealed in a quartz capillary exhibit no evidence of a monoclinic-to-cubic superprotonic phase transition like the one observed in CDP. Instead, these temperature-resolved powder XRD patterns demonstrate that the intermediate-temperature RDP monoclinic phase (P21/m, a = 7.733 Å, b = 6.189 Å, c = 4.793 Å, and β = 109.21 deg) persists up to the melting point of the title compound. Our most significant finding comes from heating RDP under high pressure (P = 1 GPa), which leads to markedly different structural behavior. Indeed, our full profile refinements against XRD data collected on RDP crystals compressed at ~1 GPa show evidence of a polymorphic phase transition (at Tc = 300 °C) to a high-temperature cubic phase (Pm-3m, a = 4.784 Å) that is isomorphic with its CDP counterpart. This is significant, as it indicates that the superprotonic conduction in phosphate solid acids is not cation-specific, and a general highly efficient proton conduction mechanism is present in the high-temperature phases of these materials.

1. Introduction

Hydrogen fuel cells that can function at intermediate temperatures have received considerable attention [1,2,3] due to their ability to operate under the special conditions needed in many automotive, space exploration, and military applications. A key component of any fuel cell is the electrolyte, a membrane that needs to have the ability to effectively conduct protons [4,5,6]. Nafion®, a sulfonated tetrafluoroethylene copolymer is the material most used as an electrolyte in large-scale hydrogen fuel cell applications [7]. Yet, it should be noted that Nafion® does not conduct protons but hydronium ions (H3O+) and, consequently, the membrane needs to stay hydrated at all times. This limits the highest temperature at which the fuel cell can function to about 100 °C. A possible alternative solution is to use electrolytes based on solid acids, MHnXO4, where M is a monovalent cation, n = 1, 2, and XO4 is a tetrahedral oxy-anion (X = S, P). These compounds do not conduct protons well at room temperature, but some of them are known to exhibit a so-called superprotonic transition, where their proton conductivity, σ, sharply increases by several orders of magnitude upon heating above a temperature threshold, Tsp [8,9,10]. The first solid-acid-based fuel cell used a 1.5 mm thick electrolyte membrane made of CsHSO4 operating at 150 °C and showed very promising performance parameters [11]. It was soon realized, however, that some molecular hydrogen (the fuel) always trickles down to the membrane and triggers the sulfur reduction reaction:
2CsHSO4 + 4H2 → Cs2SO4 + 4H2O + H2S
This leads to a rapid chemical decomposition of the electrolyte that is accelerated by the generation of the catalyst poison H2S. The proposed solution was to use phosphate-based solid acids, such as CsH2PO4 (CDP) and RbH2PO4 (RDP).
Phosphate solid acids are fully hydrogen-bonded, i.e., they have hydrogen bonds at all four corners of the PO4 tetrahedra, as opposed to their half hydrogen-bonded sulfate counterparts where just two corners of each SO4 tetrahedral oxy-anion form hydrogen bonds. This structural difference is significant, as the highly efficient superprotonic conduction mechanism in CsHSO4 is known to be based on the structure and dynamics of its disordered hydrogen bond network [12], and theorical studies have shown that this specific mechanism does not necessarily carry over to the fully hydrogen-bonded CDP or RDP [13]. Consequently, the ability of phosphate solid acids to become superprotonic upon heating and be used as hydrogen fuel cell electrolytes was initially regarded with skepticism, but intermediate-temperature fuel cells have eventually been built using CDP electrolytes in their stable superprotonic state [14,15]. Yet, the microstructures and proton diffusion mechanisms that enable CDP to function as an electrolyte have become the subject of intense debate. Some authors attributed the sharp increase in CDP’s proton conductivity above Tsp = 233 °C to a monoclinic → cubic polymorphic phase transition [16,17,18,19], while others argued that this behavior is due to chemical changes such as polymerization and dehydration [20,21]. The main reason for this controversy is that the chemical decomposition of CDP via the dehydration reaction
2CsH2PO4 → Cs2H2P2O7 + 2H2O
occurs at temperatures just a few degrees above Tsp = 233 °C [22], so it is difficult to identify the microscopic origin of the observed proton conductivity increase. Two methods have been proposed and successfully used to prevent the dehydration of CDP at temperatures above 233 °C: (1) keeping the sample under a saturated water vapor atmosphere [15]; (2) applying high pressure P = 1 GPa during the heating process [23]. Using these procedures, strong evidence was eventually found that the superprotonic behavior of CDP is due to a polymorphic phase transition from CDP’s room-temperature monoclinic P21/m phase to a superprotonic cubic Pm-3m modification [8,22]. Furthermore, a method to keep the superprotonic CDP phase stable over a long period of time (>24 h) by sealing the sample in a small volume of dry air (~50 mL) has recently been developed [24]. Still, the details of the new microscopic dynamics that enable the highly efficient proton conduction in cubic CDP have not been elucidated. One key question is whether this superprotonic conduction mechanism is specific for CDP or is cation-independent, i.e., it stays the same in the high-temperature phases of other phosphate solid acids where the Cs+ ions are replaced by Rb+, K+, or Li+.
RDP presents a particularly interesting case as its crystal structure in the room-temperature phase is not monoclinic P21/m like that of its Cs-based counterpart, but tetragonal I-42d. Yet, temperature-resolved proton conductivity measurements showed sharp increases in proton conductivity in both CDP and RDP upon heating above a temperature threshold. This behavior was observed under high pressure (~1 GPa) at 265 °C for CDP [23] and 295 °C for RDP [25]. In addition, more recent studies [26,27] demonstrated that KH2PO4 (KDP) and RDP undergo polymorphic phase transitions from their room-temperature tetragonal I-42d phase to an intermediate-temperature monoclinic P21/m modification. In RDP, this transition occurs at 120 °C even under ambient humidity and pressure conditions. Most significantly, the newly discovered RDP intermediate-temperature monoclinic P21/m phase turned out to be isomorphic (structurally identical) with that of room-temperature CDP. This is important because, corroborated with the overwhelming evidence that the superprotonic conduction of CDP is due to a monoclinic P21/m → cubic Pm-3m transition, it suggests that a similar structural behavior might occur in RDP and be responsible for its enhanced proton conductivity at high temperatures. Unfortunately, however, there is a knowledge gap in terms of identifying a pure RDP cubic phase as studies have shown that chemical changes according to the reaction
2RbH2PO4 → Rb2H2P2O7 + 2H2O
occur as monoclinic RDP is heated within the 200–300 °C temperature range, even when the sample was kept under a saturated water vapor atmosphere [28].
Here, we present a study where the crystal structure of RDP is monitored upon heating using synchrotron X-ray diffraction (XRD) on powder samples (1) sealed in a quartz capillary, and (2) subjected to high pressure applied using a piston press. We also carried out temperature-resolved ac-impedance spectroscopy (AIS) measurements on RDP and CDP samples sealed in a small volume of dry air. We found that sealing the sample prevents dehydration. Moreover, after the first transition (from tetragonal to monoclinic) the P21/m monoclinic RDP phase persists as the sample is heated towards its melting point. This is consistent with the AIS results that show a gradual increase in proton conductivity upon heating from 180 to 260 °C, but not the three-order-of-magnitude superprotonic jump observed in CDP within the same temperature range. Other important results come from the full profile analysis of the XRD data collected on RDP under high pressure (P = 1 GPa). In this case, we found a different structural behavior: at Tsp = 300 °C compressed RDP shows evidence of a polymorphic phase transition to a high-temperature cubic phase (Pm-3m, a = 4.784 Å) that is isomorphic with its CDP counterpart. This is highly significant, as it indicates that the superprotonic conduction in phosphate solid acids is not cation-specific, and a general highly efficient proton conduction mechanism is present in the high-temperature phases of these materials.

2. Materials and Methods

Two methods were used to synthesize the RDP powders used in this study. The first is a co-precipitation method, where rubidium carbonate Rb2CO3 and phosphoric acid H3PO4 were mixed in stoichiometric amounts to achieve a 1 mol Rb: 2 mol P ratio. Rb2CO3 was initially dissolved in deionized water and then H3PO4 was slowly added. Once the reaction occurred, a clear RbH2PO4 solution was left. Next, methanol was added dropwise to induce precipitation. Finally, the precipitate was filtered, further washed with methanol several times, and dried overnight at a temperature of 75 °C. Alternatively, RDP single crystals were synthesized via slow evaporation, where the as-prepared RbH2PO4 solution was placed in a beaker and left to evaporate in dry air. Crystals formed upon evaporation in two weeks. For both methods, the last step was to grind the resulting crystals into a fine RbH2PO4 powder. CDP powders were synthesized using the same methods as those described above with the sole difference that Cs2CO3 was used instead of Rb2CO3.
Temperature-resolved ac-impedance spectroscopy measurements were carried out within the 150–260 °C temperature range on cylindrical pellets pressed from RDP and CDP powders. In all measurements, silver paint sprayed on both sides of the pellet and platinum mesh electrodes were used. The pellets were sealed in a 50 mL chamber filled with dry air and linked by feedthrough contacts to a Solartron 1260 impedance analyzer (Advanced Measurement Technology, Inc., Oak Ridge, TN, USA) operating at a 100 mV oscillating potential in a two point–four wire setup. At each temperature, both the in-phase and the out-of-phase components of the impedance, Z′ and Z″, were recorded at frequencies between 6 MHz and 100 Hz.
Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements using synchrotron X-ray radiation were performed at the National Synchrotron Light Source, Brookhaven National Laboratory. In the first set of experiments, the powder RDP samples were placed in a 1 mm thick quartz capillary and diffraction patterns were collected using X-rays of λ = 0.922 Å in the transmission geometry at different temperatures ranging from room temperature to 260 °C. A MAR 2300 area detector perpendicular (RAYONICS GmbH, Neumünster, Germany) to the direction of the incident beam recorded images of the Debye–Scherrer cones’ projections. These were then processed using the Fit 2D V10.132 software into typical I vs. 2θ powder diffraction patterns. A second set of temperature-resolved XRD experiments were carried out on RDP powders compressed at a pressure of ~ 1 GPa using a piston-type pressure cell with boron nitride slabs acting as pressure-transmitting media. White radiation was used in conjunction with an energy-sensitive detector placed at a fixed 2θ position to record I vs. d-spacing diffraction patterns at different temperatures up to 300 °C.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the evolution of the powder XRD pattern recorded within the 12.5–42.5 deg 2θ range on RDP samples sealed in quartz capillaries as the temperature increased (at a rate of 2 °C/min) from 50 °C to 260 °C. The as-prepared RDP powders crystallize in the tetragonal symmetry: space group I-42d and lattice constants a = 7.604 Å and c = 7.293 Å. This is confirmed by the XRD pattern in Figure 1a, where the red symbols are the I vs. 2θ data and the vertical bars mark the positions of the Bragg reflection from the above-mentioned tetragonal lattice. Notably, all of the observed reflections are indexed and there are no extra peaks, which confirms the quality and the purity of the powder samples used in this study. We used the full width at half maximum of the (103) peak FWHM = 0.19 deg. located at 2θ = 22.96 deg. to determine the average grain size of the RDP powders using Scherrer’s formula < D > = 0.9 · λ F W H M · c o s 2 θ 2 . We found <D> = 26 nm. Heating to 90 °C leads to the first changes in the powder diffraction pattern. As shown in Figure 1b, the I vs. 2θ data recorded at this temperature still shows all the reflections from the room-temperature tetragonal RDP phase, but new robust peaks are appearing, e.g., at 14.3 deg and 18.2 deg as shown by the blue arrows. At 150 °C the tetragonal I-42d RDP phase completely vanishes, as demonstrated by the absence of its strongest peak (at 13.75 deg) in the I vs. 2θ data shown in Figure 1c, where a new XRD pattern is present. The most significant feature of the data recorded upon further heating to 230 °C (Figure 1d) and then to 260 °C (Figure 1e) is a gradual and significant reduction in the peak intensities. Moreover, no powder diffraction pattern could be recorded at 290 °C, which demonstrates that there are no crystalline phases present in the sample at this temperature. Several studies have indicated that chemical changes (via dehydration) occur in RDP upon heating at temperatures below its melting point [29]. On the other hand, it was recently found that heating CDP powders sealed in dry air prevents dehydration and enables the polymorphic phase transition that triggers the superprotonic behavior in this phosphate solid acid [24]. It is therefore important to further investigate the effect of heating under a sealed environment on the microstructure and macroscopic proton conduction of RDP and compare it with its CDP counterpart.
Figure 2a,b show Nyquist plots (out-of-phase Z″ vs. in-phase Z′ ac impedance at different frequencies) measured on CDP at 200 °C (blue symbols), 225 °C (red symbols), 240 °C (maroon symbols), and 250 °C (orange symbols). In all four cases the samples are pellets pressed from CDP powders and kept sealed in 50 mL of dry air during the measurement. Clearly, the most striking feature of these data is the difference between the Nyquist plots recorded at 200 °C and 225 °C and those measured at 240 °C and 250 °C. The former are semicircles where the Z″ vs. Z′ dependence can be modeled using RC circuits [30]. The proton conductivity, σ, was determined from the intersection of the Nyquist plot with the horizontal (Z′) axis at high frequencies and the size of the pellet according to σ = L/(R·A). L is the sample thickness, R is the resistance (determined from the Z′ intercept), and A is the area of the electrodes. We found σ (200 °C) = 3.4 × 10−6 S/cm and σ (225 °C) = 5.05 × 10−6 S/cm. At higher temperatures, the shape of the Nyquist plots changes significantly. They become nearly straight segments that intersect the horizontal axis at very low Z′ values that yield a proton conductivity value σ (240 °C) = 1.7 × 10−2 S/cm, more than three orders of magnitude higher than the values observed at lower temperatures.
This is consistent with the monoclinic P21/m to cubic Pm-3m superprotonic phase transition observed in CDP powders sealed in quartz capillaries at Tsp = 233 °C [22]. RDP, however, shows a markedly different behavior.
Figure 2c presents Nyquist plots measured on RDP pellets sealed in 50 mL of dry air at five different temperatures: 180 °C (green symbols), 200 °C (blue symbols), 225 °C (red symbols), 235 °C (maroon symbols), and 250 °C (orange symbols). All five datasets have shapes similar to one another and although the proton conductivity increases with increasing temperature, the increase is gradual, from σ (180 °C) =1.35 × 10−5 S/cm to σ (250 °C) = 6.67 × 10−5 S/cm, with no superprotonic jump. This behavior occurs in the same temperature range as that corresponding to the powder XRD patterns in Figure 1c–e, i.e., after the first transition that is complete at 150 °C. Consequently, the thermally activated proton conduction occurs in an ordered P21/m RDP phase that is isomorphic to its CDP counterpart. This is markedly different from the superprotonic conduction (Figure 1b), where the PO4 tetrahedra are dynamically disordered [22]. Their libration couples with the oscillations of the protons within the disordered hydrogen bonds, which dramatically enhances the proton conductivity. Next, we analyze the microstructural changes that correspond to the observed proton conductivity data.
The two datasets (solid symbols) in Figure 3 represent the intensity vs. detector angle XRD patterns recorded on RDP powders at two different temperatures, T = 150 °C and T = 230 °C, under the same sample environment (sample sealed in dry air) as that used to collect the ac-impedance spectroscopy data shown in Figure 2c, described above. We analyzed the data measured at 150 °C using a full profile (Le Bail) fit against the observed XRD pattern, Iobs vs. 2θ (blue disks). The solid black line represents the best fit to a model based on a monoclinic lattice: space group P21/m and unit cell parameters a = 7.733 Å, b = 6.189 Å, c = 4.793 Å, and β = 109.21 deg.
The fit converged under the simultaneous variation in seven parameters: the four lattice parameters mentioned above, the “zero” of the I vs. 2θ dataset, and two parameters that characterize the pseudo-Voigt function used to model the Bragg peak profiles. The whole-pattern residual corresponding to the best fit is Rwp = 17.1. The vertical bars indicate the angular positions of the Bragg reflections from the monoclinic RDP phase as they result from the Le Bail fit. The powder XRD data collected at the higher temperature T = 230 °C (red disks) presents two important features. First, the overall intensity is significantly reduced, which indicates that the melting of the crystalline RDP phase has initiated. Second, and most significantly, all the peaks are indexed by the Bragg reflection markers (vertical bars) proven to belong to the monoclinic P21/m phase, despite some significant preferred orientation that modifies the relative peak intensities. This demonstrates that monoclinic RDP persists upon heating up to the melting point if the sample is sealed in dry air. This behavior is different from previous observations based on experiments where heating was performed under other sample environments and dehydration/chemical changes in RDP preceded melting [28,29].
Other significant results came from powder XRD measurements performed on RDP samples subjected to a pressure of 1 GPa. The rationale for carrying out such measurements is twofold. First, this method was used to unambiguously establish that the superprotonic transition in CDP is due to a monoclinic P21/m → cubic Pm-3m polymorphic phase transition [22]. Second, impedance spectroscopy measurements carried out on RDP under 1 GPa of pressure do show evidence of a superprotonic behavior, i.e., a two-order-of-magnitude sudden increase in its proton conductivity when heated to ~300 °C [25], a behavior that is not present in RDP under ambient pressure [26] or, as shown here, when the sample was sealed in a small volume of dry air. Notably, this is different from CDP where a stable superprotonic (cubic Pm-3m) phase was observed in hermetically sealed samples [31].
Figure 4 shows powder XRD data collected at four different temperatures on CDP under a pressure of 1 GPa.
As described in more detail in Section 2, a white X-ray beam and an energy-sensitive detector were used; thus, the raw data were collected in the I vs. d-spacing format. We then used Bragg’s law 2sin[(2θ)/2] = nλ (with λ = 0.922 Å) to convert to the I vs. 2θ format to enable an easier comparison with the ambient pressure powder XRD measurements discussed before. In all four datasets, there are several peaks—marked by inverted blue triangles—that belong to Rb fluorescence, W (from the W/Re thermocouple) and boron nitride (which is used as a pressure-transmission medium). These peaks will be disregarded in the analysis below. The first two datasets at room temperature (RT) and 150 °C correspond to the tetragonal I-42d and the monoclinic P21/m RDP phase, respectively. This behavior is similar to that observed in a sealed environment. At higher temperatures, however, the application of high pressure has a very strong impact. First, there is no reduction in the overall intensity under 1 GPa of pressure, indicating that the sample crystallinity persists with no evidence of melting. Furthermore, at T = 285 °C, the powder XRD pattern still shows peaks from monoclinic RDP, but new reflections appear indicating that one (or more) crystalline phase(s) grow in the sample. Most significantly, at 300 °C, the I vs. 2θ dataset (red symbols) changes dramatically into a pattern that includes just a few Bragg reflections, indicating the possibility of a transition to a high-symmetry crystalline phase, possibly cubic. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that CDP’s and RDP’s intermediate-temperature P21/m phases are isostructural and that CDP’s superprotonic behavior is due to a monoclinic P21/m → cubic Pm-3m polymorphic phase transition. Consequently, it is important to investigate in more detail the 300 °C powder XRD data recorded under high pressure.
The red symbols in Figure 5 represent the X-ray intensity, I, from an RDP powder kept at T = 300 °C under a pressure p = 1 GPa as a function of the detector angle, 2θ, corresponding to a wavelength of 0.922 Å.
The shaded areas represent excluded regions corresponding to the Rb fluorescence, W reflections, and boron nitride reflections described above, leaving only the diffraction (Bragg) peaks from RDP in the pattern. We used the full profile of the XRD pattern to analyze these data. First, we fit the six peaks individually to accurately determine their 2θ values and use this information to index the XRD pattern. The indexing process yielded a cubic lattice of space group Pm-3m and lattice constant a = 4.75 Å. The numbers in parentheses in Figure 5 show the (hkl) Miller indices of each of the six peaks. The next step was to carry out a full profile refinement, where the lattice parameter and the peak profile parameters were adjusted iteratively to reach the best agreement between the observed and the calculated curves Iobs vs. 2θ and Icalc vs. 2θ, respectively. The refinement converges upon the simultaneous variation in five parameters and the best fit (represented by the black curve) yields a value a = 4.748 Å for the refined lattice parameter. Corroborated with the observation of a steep proton conductivity increase under the same pressure and temperature conditions (p = 1 GPa and T ~ 300 °C) [25], our results indicate that the same, already known monoclinic P21/m → cubic Pm-3m polymorphic phase transition [31,32,33] might be responsible for the superprotonic transition in both RDP and CDP. In turn, this means that the mechanism that enables the highly efficient proton transport in these phosphates is cation-independent. As discussed in the introduction, this mechanism is different from the one observed in the sulfate-based compounds. Consequently, the cubic (Pm-3m) phases of fully hydrogen-bonded phosphate solid acids allow superprotonic transport via a new general mechanism that might carry over to other important functional materials such as polymers and intercalation compounds.

4. Conclusions

In this study we used synchrotron X-ray diffraction (XRD) and ac-impedance spectroscopy (AIS) to investigate the structural modifications undergone by RDP when heated from room temperature to 300 °C and correlate these microstructural changes with the temperature dependence of RDP’s macroscopic proton conductivity. XRD data show that the room-temperature tetragonal I-42d phase starts changing at 90 °C and a full transition to RDP’s intermediate-temperature monoclinic P21/m modification is observed at 150 °C. Further heating to 260 °C of samples sealed in a quartz capillary does not result in any structural or chemical changes. Instead, the monoclinic RDP phase persists up to the melting point of the title material. This is consistent with the results from AIS measurements that indicate a gradual increase in the proton conductivity upon heating from 180 °C to 250 °C, in contrast to the behavior of CDP, where a three-order-of-magnitude jump is observed at temperatures above Tsp = 233 °C. An important result comes from temperature-resolved XRD measurements carried out on RDP powders subjected to a pressure of 1 GPa. We found that the data recorded at 300 °C can be indexed to using a cubic Pm-3m phase of lattice parameter a = 4.748 Å. This demonstrates that the same monoclinic-to-cubic polymorphic phase transition known to be responsible for the superprotonic behavior in CDP is present in the Rb-based phosphate solid acid RDP. Moreover, this transition occurs at the temperature where previous AIS studies also carried out under high pressure on RDP show a two-order-of-magnitude sudden increase in its proton conductivity. This strongly suggests that the same highly efficient proton diffusion dynamics is at work in both phosphates, regardless of the cation type. Additional research is needed to unequivocally confirm this via high-pressure neutron vibration spectroscopy (NVS), and neutron inelastic spectroscopy (NIS) measurements. These experiments are currently underway.

Author Contributions

C.E.B., conceptualization, methodology, investigation, project administration, formal analysis, and writing—original draft; A.D.P., methodology, formal analysis, investigation, and writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded in part by the Donors of the American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund under Research Grant no. 45854-GB10.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Veza, I. Fuel-Cell Thermal Management Strategies for Enhanced Performance: Review of Fuel-Cell Thermal Management in Proton-Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFCs) and Solid-Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFCs). Hydrogen 2025, 6, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Manoharan, Y.; Hosseini, S.E.; Butler, B.; Alzhahrani, H.; Senior, B.T.F.; Ashuri, T.; Krohn, J. Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles; Current Status and Future Prospect. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nisar, J.; Kaur, G.; Giddey, S.; Bhargava, S.; Jones, L. Cathode Materials for Intermediate Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Fuels 2024, 5, 805–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Parker, S.F.; Cavaye, H.; Callear, S.K. Structure and Dynamics of the Superprotonic Conductor Caesium Hydrogen Sulfate, CsHSO4. Molecules 2020, 25, 1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ahmad, S.; Nawaz, T.; Ali, A.; Orhan, M.F.; Samreen, A.; Kannan, A.M. An overview of proton exchange membranes for fuel cells: Materials and manufacturing. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 19086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, H.; Yang, L. Analysis of proton exchange membranes for fuel cells based on statistical theory and data mining. iScience 2024, 27, 109360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mazzapioda, L.; Lo Vecchio, C.; Danyliv, O.; Baglio, V.; Martinelli, A.; Navarra, M.A. Composite Nafion-CaTiO3−δ Membranes as Electrolyte Component for PEM Fuel Cells. Polymers 2020, 12, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Navarrete, L.; Andrio, A.; Escolástico, S.; Moya, S.; Compañ, V.; Serra, J.M. Protonic Conduction of Partially-Substituted CsH2PO4 and the Applicability in Electrochemical Devices. Membranes 2019, 9, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kim, J.; Jang, D.; Choi, J.; Maeng, J.; Shin, H.H.; Park, T.; Kim, W.B. Pt-Based Electrocatalyst Modified by CsH2PO4/SiP2O7 for Electrochemical Oxidation of NH3 to H2 in Solid Acid Electrolysis Cell. Catalysts 2023, 13, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Veer, D.; Kumar, P.; Singh, D.; Kumar, D.; Katiyar, R.S. A synergistic approach to achieving high conduction and stability of CsH2PO4/NaH2PO4/ZrO2 composites for fuel cells. Mater. Adv. 2022, 3, 409–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Haile, S.M.; Boysen, D.A.; Chisholm, C.R.I.; Merle, R.B. Solid Acids as Fuel Cell Electrolytes. Nature 2001, 410, 910–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Belushkin, A.V.; David, W.I.F.; Ibberson, R.B.; Shuvalov, L.A. High-resolution neutron powder diffraction studies of the structure of CsHSO4. Acta Crystallogr. B 1991, 47, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dreßler, C.; Sebastiani, D. Effect of anion reorientation on proton mobility in the solid acids family CsH: YXO4 (X = S, P, Se, y = 1, 2) from ab initio molecular dynamics simulations. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020, 22, 10738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Singh, D.; Singh, J.; Veer, D.; Kumar, P.; Katiyar, R.S. Structural, thermal, and transport properties of nanocomposite CsH2PO4/NaH2PO4/TiO2: A novel proton conducting electrolyte for fuel cells. Results Chem. 2022, 4, 100262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Singh, D.; Kumar, P.; Singh, J.; Veer, D.; Kumar, A.; Katiyar, R.S. Structural, thermal and electrical properties of composites electrolytes (1−x) CsH2PO4/x ZrO2 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.4) for fuel cell with advanced electrode. SN Appl. Sci. 2021, 3, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xiong, G.; Wang, L.S.; Haile, S.M. Phase behavior, crystal structure, and superprotonic conductivity of Cs[(H2PO4)1−2y(HPO4)y]: Phosphate deficient analogs to cubic CsH2PO4 in the (1 − x)CsH2PO4−xCs2HPO4 system. J. Mater. Chem. A 2025, 13, 19705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Veer, D.; Kumar, P.; Singh, D.; Kumar, D.; Katiyar, R.S. Conduction and stability performance of CsH2PO4 with NaH2PO4/ZrO2 for fuel cell. Mater. Res. Express 2021, 8, 115501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xiong, G.; Haile, S.M. X-ray and neutron diffraction studies of single-crystal cubic Cs2(HSO4)(H2PO4). Mater. Adv. 2025, 7, 1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bagryantseva, I.; Ponomareva, V.; Kungurtsev, Y. High-Conductive CsH2PO4 Membranes with PVDF-Based Polymers Additives. Membranes 2023, 13, 617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Park, J.-H. Possible origin of the proton conduction mechanism of CsH2PO4 crystals at high temperatures. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 69, 054104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Park, J.-H.; Kim, C.-S.; Choi, B.-C.; Moon, B.K.; Seo, H.-J. Physical properties of CsH2PO4 crystal at high temperatures. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2003, 72, 1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Botez, C.E.; Hermosillo, J.D.; Zhang, J.; Qian, J.; Zhao, Y.; Majzlan, J.; Chianelli, R.R.; Pantea, C. High-temperature phase transitions in CsH2PO4 under ambient and high-pressure conditions: A synchrotron X-ray diffraction study. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 127, 194701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Boysen, D.A.; Haile, S.M.; Liu, H.; Secco, R.A. High-temperature behavior of CsH2PO4 under both ambient and high pressure conditions. Chem. Mater. 2003, 15, 727–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Botez, C.E.; Martinez, I.; Price, A.D. Stability of Superprotonic CsH2PO4 Hermetically Sealed in Different Environments. Materials 2022, 15, 4969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Boysen, D.A.; Haile, S.M.; Liu, H.; Secco, R.A. Conductivity of Potassium and Rubidium Dihydrogen Phosphates at High Temperature and Pressure. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 693–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Botez, C.E.; Martinez, H.; Tackett, R.J.; Chianelli, R.R.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y. High-temperature crystal structures and chemical modifications in RbH2PO4. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2009, 21, 325401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Botez, C.E.; Carbajal, D.; Adiraju, V.A.K.; Tackett, R.J.; Chianelli, R.R. Intermediate-temperature polymorphic phase transition modifications in KH2PO4. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2010, 71, 1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, Z.; Tang, T. High-temperature dehydration behavior and protonic conductivity of RbH2PO4 in humid atmosphere. Mater. Res. Bull. 2010, 45, 1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, Z. Impedance analysis and protonic conduction mechanism in RbH2PO4/SiO2 composite systems. Electrochim. Acta 2010, 55, 7298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Andreev, R.; Korona, D.; Anokhina, I.; Animitsa, I. Proton and Oxygen-Ion Conductivities of Hexagonal Perovskite Ba5In2Al2ZrO13. Materials 2022, 15, 3944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Botez, C.E.; Martinez, I.; Price, A.; Martinez, H.; Leal, J.H. Superprotonic CsH2PO4 in dry air. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2019, 129, 324–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Navarrete, L.; Yoo, C.-Y.; Serra, J.M. Comparative Study of Epoxy-CsH2PO4 Composite Electrolytes and Porous Metal Based Electrocatalysts for Solid Acid Electrochemical Cells. Membranes 2021, 11, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Aparnev, A.I.; Loginov, A.V.; Uvarov, N.; Ponomareva, V.; Bagryantseva, I.; Manakhov, A.; Al-Qasim, A.S.; Golovakhin, V.V.; Bannov, A.G. Novel Highly Dispersed Additive for Proton-Conducting Composites. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 5038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns recorded using synchrotron radiation of wavelength λ = 0.922 Å on RbH2PO4 sealed in quartz capillaries at five different temperatures: (a) T = 50 °C, (b) T = 90 °C, (c) T = 150 °C, (d) T = 230 °C, and (e) T = 250 °C. The green arrow shows the strongest reflection from the tetragonal I-42d RDP phase, whereas the blue arrows show new peaks that do not belong to the tetragonal RDP phase.
Figure 1. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns recorded using synchrotron radiation of wavelength λ = 0.922 Å on RbH2PO4 sealed in quartz capillaries at five different temperatures: (a) T = 50 °C, (b) T = 90 °C, (c) T = 150 °C, (d) T = 230 °C, and (e) T = 250 °C. The green arrow shows the strongest reflection from the tetragonal I-42d RDP phase, whereas the blue arrows show new peaks that do not belong to the tetragonal RDP phase.
Crystals 16 00147 g001
Figure 2. Temperature-resolved Nyquist plots collected in small (~50 mL) sealed chambers on (a) CsH2PO4 at T = 200 °C (blue symbols) and T = 225 °C (red symbols), (b) CsH2PO4 at T = 240 °C (maroon symbols) and T = 250 °C (orange symbols), and (c) RbH2PO4 at T = 180 °C (green symbols), T = 200 °C (blue symbols), T = 225 °C (red symbols), T = 235 °C (maroon symbols), and T = 250 °C (orange symbols). In all cases the solid lines are a guide to the eye.
Figure 2. Temperature-resolved Nyquist plots collected in small (~50 mL) sealed chambers on (a) CsH2PO4 at T = 200 °C (blue symbols) and T = 225 °C (red symbols), (b) CsH2PO4 at T = 240 °C (maroon symbols) and T = 250 °C (orange symbols), and (c) RbH2PO4 at T = 180 °C (green symbols), T = 200 °C (blue symbols), T = 225 °C (red symbols), T = 235 °C (maroon symbols), and T = 250 °C (orange symbols). In all cases the solid lines are a guide to the eye.
Crystals 16 00147 g002
Figure 3. Synchrotron XRD data that evidence the persistence of the intermediate-temperature monoclinic RbH2PO4 phase (space group P21/m, and lattice parameters a = 7.733 Å, b = 6.189 Å, c = 4.793 Å, and β = 109.21 deg) upon heating in a sealed sample environment. The green line is the difference curve between the observed and calculated intensity.
Figure 3. Synchrotron XRD data that evidence the persistence of the intermediate-temperature monoclinic RbH2PO4 phase (space group P21/m, and lattice parameters a = 7.733 Å, b = 6.189 Å, c = 4.793 Å, and β = 109.21 deg) upon heating in a sealed sample environment. The green line is the difference curve between the observed and calculated intensity.
Crystals 16 00147 g003
Figure 4. Temperature-resolved XRD data measured on RbH2PO4 powders kept under high pressure (P = 1 GPa) upon heating from room temperature to T = 300 °C. The filled triangles mark peaks from Rb fluorescence, W, and boron nitride.
Figure 4. Temperature-resolved XRD data measured on RbH2PO4 powders kept under high pressure (P = 1 GPa) upon heating from room temperature to T = 300 °C. The filled triangles mark peaks from Rb fluorescence, W, and boron nitride.
Crystals 16 00147 g004
Figure 5. Full profile analysis of the XRD pattern collected on RbH2PO4 powders at T = 300 °C and P = 1 GPa. The red circles are the data Iobs vs. 2θ, the black curve is the best fit Icalc vs. 2θ, and the lower trace is the difference curve Iobs − Icalc vs. 2θ. The vertical bars mark the 2θ positions of the Bragg reflections from a cubic (Pm-3m) phase of lattice parameter a = 4.784 Å.
Figure 5. Full profile analysis of the XRD pattern collected on RbH2PO4 powders at T = 300 °C and P = 1 GPa. The red circles are the data Iobs vs. 2θ, the black curve is the best fit Icalc vs. 2θ, and the lower trace is the difference curve Iobs − Icalc vs. 2θ. The vertical bars mark the 2θ positions of the Bragg reflections from a cubic (Pm-3m) phase of lattice parameter a = 4.784 Å.
Crystals 16 00147 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Botez, C.E.; Price, A.D. Structural and Proton Conduction Modifications in RbH2PO4 Crystals upon Heating Under Different Environments. Crystals 2026, 16, 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst16020147

AMA Style

Botez CE, Price AD. Structural and Proton Conduction Modifications in RbH2PO4 Crystals upon Heating Under Different Environments. Crystals. 2026; 16(2):147. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst16020147

Chicago/Turabian Style

Botez, Cristian E., and Alex D. Price. 2026. "Structural and Proton Conduction Modifications in RbH2PO4 Crystals upon Heating Under Different Environments" Crystals 16, no. 2: 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst16020147

APA Style

Botez, C. E., & Price, A. D. (2026). Structural and Proton Conduction Modifications in RbH2PO4 Crystals upon Heating Under Different Environments. Crystals, 16(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst16020147

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop