Next Article in Journal
Decomposition of Elasticity Tensor on Material Constants and Mesostructures of Metal Plates
Previous Article in Journal
Interfacial Engineering of Hydrophobic Montmorillonite for High-Energy-Capability Polypropylene Nanocomposite Dielectrics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Theoretical Insights and Experimental Studies of the New Layered Tellurides EuRECuTe3 with RE = Nd, Sm, Tb and Dy

by
Anna V. Ruseikina
1,*,
Evgenii M. Roginskii
2,
Maxim V. Grigoriev
1,3,
Vladimir A. Chernyshev
4,
Alexander A. Garmonov
1,
Ralf J. C. Locke
3 and
Thomas Schleid
3,*
1
School of Natural Sciences, University of Tyumen, 625003 Tyumen, Russia
2
Ioffe Institute, Politekhnicheskaya 26, 194021 Saint Petersburg, Russia
3
Institute for Inorganic Chemistry, University of Stuttgart, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
4
Institute of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Ural Federal University Named After the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, 620002 Ekaterinburg, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2025, 15(9), 787; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst15090787
Submission received: 31 May 2025 / Revised: 2 August 2025 / Accepted: 29 August 2025 / Published: 31 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Inorganic Crystalline Materials)

Abstract

Single crystals of the layered EuRECuTe3 series with RE = Nd, Sm, Tb and Dy are obtained for the first time, completing the series of studies on quaternary tellurides synthesized using the halide flux method. These compounds crystallize in the orthorhombic space group Pnma (no. 62) with unit cell parameters ranging from a = 11.5634(7) Å, b = 4.3792(3) Å and c = 14.3781(9) Å for EuNdCuTe3 to a = 11.2695(7) Å, b = 4.3178(3) Å and c = 14.3304(9) Å for EuDyCuTe3. The influence of prismatic polyhedra [EuTe6+1]7− structural units on the stabilization of 3d framework composed by 2d layered fragments [RECuTe3]2−, which have a key role in the interlayer interaction, is established. A comparative analysis of structural and magnetic properties dependence on the rare-earth element radius ri(RE3+) in the EuRECuTe3 series (RE = Sc, Y, Nd–Lu) is carried out. The structural contraction, including decrease in degree of tetrahedral polyhedra distortion, bond lengths shortening and unit cell volume shrinking with increasing ri(RE3+), is established. It is shown that the structural alternation leads to transition from ferromagnetic to ferrimagnetic ordering. It was established that changes in the cationic sublattice have a more significant impact on structural transitions in the series of quaternary tellurides than changes in the anionic sublattice. The electronic structure and elastic and dynamic properties were estimated using ab initio calculations. The exfoliation energy for each compound is obtained by estimation of monolayer ground state energy as a result of structure relaxation. The symmetry and structural properties of monolayer EuRECuTe3 (RE = Nd, Sm, Tb, Dy) compound are established and the orthorhombic symmetry is obtained with layer group pm2_1b.

1. Introduction

Layered materials based on metal chalcogenides have great potential for use in optoelectronics, photonics, flexible electronics, highly sensitive sensor systems, catalysis, as well as in energy storage and conversion devices [1,2,3,4,5]. Layered chalcogenide structures possess various properties depending on their composition and can be semiconductors, semimetals, true metals, and superconductors [6]. Their properties are also regulated by the crystal structure, the number, and the stacking sequence of layers in the crystals [6]. Due to the development of efficient exfoliation methods, it is becoming increasingly possible to experimentally obtain two-dimensional crystals from almost any layered material known in chemistry [7].
Experimentally obtained quaternary copper chalcogenides with the composition MRECuCh3 (M = Eu [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16], Ba [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28], Sr [29,30,31], Pb [32,33,34,35]; Ch = S, Se, Te; RE = Sc, Y, La–Nd, Sm–Lu) crystallize in four structural types: KZrCuS3, Eu2CuS3, Ba2MnS3 and BaLaCuS3. The decrease in the symmetry of the crystal structure and the sequential change in structural types are caused by the increasing distortion of the parallel two-dimensional [RECuCh3]2− layers in the KZrCuS3 → Eu2CuS3 → Ba2MnS3 series [21]. When the distortion becomes so strong that the layers connect with each other, a three-dimensional channel structure of the BaLaCuS3 type is formed [21,36,37]. The formation of 2D layers contributes to improved electrical transport characteristics in multilayer solar cells [25,27,28,38,39]. In heterometallic chalcogenides, substantial exfoliation energy is observed, since interlayer interaction is governed by both van der Waals and covalent forces [40]. This indicates the promise of using alternative methods for obtaining monolayer structures compared to traditional approaches: pulsed laser deposition [41], chemical vapor deposition [42], physical vapor deposition [43] and molecular beam epitaxy [44]. In these structures, one-dimensional chains of acentric tetrahedra are also formed, indicating their potential use as photonic materials for nonlinear optical devices [26]. Incorporating magnetic cations Eu2+ and RE3+ into heterometallic chalcogenides, as well as using the chalcogen with the largest radius, simultaneously leads to a decrease in band gap width and the emergence of magnetic properties. This opens up the possibility of creating materials that combine optimal semiconductor characteristics for photovoltaic devices and the properties of ferro- and ferrimagnetics, which are important for magnetic electronics [8,45,46].
The theoretical existence of orthorhombic compounds of the entire EuRECuTe3 series was predicted in [39]. According to calculations, compounds with light lanthanides such as RE = La, Ce, Pr are metastable and crystallize in the BaLaCuS3 structural type with Pnma symmetry [39]. The remaining EuRECuTe3 (RE = Nd, Sm–Lu) representatives are stable, with most expected to form crystals of the KZrCuS3 structural type with Cmcm symmetry [39]. To date, using the halide flux method, six quaternary europium tellurides EuRECuTe3 (RE = Gd [47], Ho [48], Tm [48], Er [49], Lu [47], Sc [48], Y [40]) have been obtained. It has been established that these compounds have a layered structure, are ultra-narrow bandgap semiconductors [40], simultaneously exhibit soft ferromagnetic [40] or ferrimagnetic [49] properties, and are characterized by low thermal conductivity [38,39,40]. Additionally, a rearrangement of the crystal structure was found with a slight increase in temperature, and significant prospects for the synthesis of monolayer structures were demonstrated [40].
No reports exist in the available literature on the synthesis and structural analysis of tellurium-containing EuRECuTe3 (RE = La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Tb or Dy) single crystals. The ionic radius of europium ri(Eu2+) is close to that of strontium ri(Sr2+) [50]. Therefore, it can be expected that europium compounds with rare-earth elements in the range from La to Dy will form the same type of crystal lattice as their strontium analogs. Experimentally, it has been established that the SrRECuTe3 representatives with RE = Sm–Tb crystallize in the orthorhombic space group Pnma with the Eu2CuS3 structure type [51], which raises doubts about the conclusions in [39]. The possibility of synthesizing europium compounds with light rare-earth elements in Pnma symmetry is confirmed by studies of layered quaternary chalcogenides MRECuCh3 (RE = La–Nd, Sm, Tb, Dy; M = Sr [21,29,30,31], Eu [8,9,12,13,14,15,16,36,37], Ba [17,22,23,24,25,26,27]; Ch = S, Se, Te).
The experimental synthesis of tellurides with light rare-earth elements will complete the cycle of research on the synthesis of europium chalcogenides by the halide flux method and will significantly expand the fundamental knowledge in the chemistry of rare-earth chalcogenides. Layered structures are of great interest for technical applications, especially in submicron electronics, as tunable materials for photovoltaic and sensor devices.
In this work, the tellurides EuRECuTe3 (RE = Nd, Sm, Tb, Dy) were obtained for the first time, their crystal structures were refined, and their magnetic properties were studied. Dependencies of changes in structural and magnetic characteristics on the rare-earth ionic radius in the series EuRECuTe3 (RE = Sc, Y, Nd, Sm–Lu) have been established. The results of band structure calculations, as well as elastic and dynamic properties, are presented, which help explain the reasons for changes in symmetry in the EuRECuTe3 (RE = Sc, Y, Nd, Sm–Lu) telluride series. In addition, modeling of the monolayer exfoliation process was performed, and a theoretical analysis of its dynamic properties was carried out.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The elements Eu (99.99%), Nd (99.99%), Sm (99.99%), Tb (99.99%), Dy (99.99%), Te (99.9%), Ar (99.99%) as well as C2H2 (99.9%) and CsI (99.9%) were purchased from ChemPur (Karlsruhe, Germany), while Cu (99.999%) was obtained from Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI, USA).

2.2. Synthesis

Single crystals of the new EuRECuTe3 members with RE = Nd, Sm, Tb and Dy were obtained using the halide flux method according to the procedure described in [40].
During synthesis, needle-like single crystals of EuRECuTe3 (RE = Nd, Sm, Tb, Dy) with a black color and metallic luster, up to 1400 μm in length (Figure S1 in the Supplementary Materials), were obtained, with no impurity phases detected according to the powder X-ray diffraction data (Figure 1).
Attempts were also made to synthesize quaternary chalcogenides EuRECuTe3 (RE = La, Ce, Pr, Eu), but all of these attempts were unsuccessful. A variation in temperature and time conditions of synthesis and various variations in halide flux did not lead to the formation of single crystals of the target phase EuRECuTe3. During the synthesis of EuRECuTe3 compounds (RE = La, Ce, Pr), inclusion of cesium from the flux (CsI) into hexagonal compounds (space group: P63/m) of the composition CsxCu6−xRE2Te6 (RE = La, Ce, Pr) [52] was observed and single crystals of Cu0.4RETe2 also [53]. EuTe were also present in the samples. Unfortunately, single crystals of the EuRECuTe3 phase (RE = La, Ce, Pr) could not be detected in the obtained samples. During the synthesis of Eu2+Eu3+CuTe3, single crystals of Cu0.66EuTe2 and EuTe were identified among the reaction products. Single crystals of Eu2+Eu3+CuTe3 could also not be detected, probably due to the insufficient oxidizing ability of tellurium, which prevents the oxidation reaction of europium according to the scheme Eu0–3e = Eu3+ from occurring.

2.3. X-Ray Diffraction Analysis

The single-crystals diffraction intensities of EuRECuTe3 (RE = Nd, Sm, Tb, Dy) were obtained at room temperature 293(2) K using a κ-CCD single crystal diffractometer (Bruker AXS, Billerica, MA, USA) equipped with a CCD detector, a graphite monochromator and a Mo-Kα radiation source. The unit-cell parameters of all the studied compounds corresponded to the orthorhombic crystal system. The space group Pnma was determined based on a statistical analysis of the reflection intensities. Absorption correction was performed using the SADABS program (2008). The structure was solved by direct methods using the SHELXS program (2013), and further refinement was carried out anisotropically with SHELXL (2013) [54]. The analysis for possible missing symmetry elements was performed using the PLATON program (2009) [55]. The crystallographic data have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre and can be obtained at http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif (accessed on 25 April 2025).
Powder diffraction data were obtained at room temperature on a Rigaku SmartLab powder diffractometer (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) using monochromatic Cu-Kα radiation in reflection mode.

2.4. Magnetic Measurements

The magnetic measurements were performed via the MPMS3 measurement system by Quantum Design (San Diego, CA, USA). Using a SQUID magnetometer, the temperature dependencies of the magnetic moments of the EuRECuTe3 samples with a mass of 0.01305 g (EuNdCuTe3), 0.01000 g (EuSmCuTe3), 0.00984 g (EuTbCuTe3) and 0.01304 g (EuDyCuTe3) were measured in the temperature range from 2 to 300 K under a constant external field of 40 kA∙m−1. Measurements were conducted in both FC (field-cooled) and ZFC (zero-field-cooled) modes. Another experiment consisted of measuring the dependence of the magnetic moment of the same sample stayed at constant temperature on changing the external magnetic field using a vibrating sample magnetometer. The field varied from 0 to ±4 MA∙m−1 in magnitude, the temperature points were 2 and 300 K.

2.5. Spectroscopy of the Raman Scattering

Raman spectra of the single crystal samples of EuRECuTe3 were acquired using a Horiba XploRa spectrometer (HORIBA Scientific, Kyoto, Japan). The excitation light at a wavelength of 532 nm was used. The acquisition conditions were as follows: filter-10, hole-300, slit-100, and resolution-2400.

2.6. Calculations at Framework of DFT

For the first time, a DFT study of crystals EuRECuTe3 (RE = Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy) with hybrid functional B3LYP was carried out. The calculations were made in the MO LCAO approximation in the CRYSTAL17 program [56,57], developed for periodic structures.
We employed pseudo-potentials ECPnMWB “4f in core” for RE and Eu ions [58,59]. The outer shells of RE and Eu ions were modeled using TZVP basis sets. These pseudo-potentials combined with the basis sets for the outer shells are accessible on the website [60]. For copper and tellurium, all-electron bases available on CRYSTAL program’s website and Mike Towler’s website [61] were employed accordingly. The exponents in the eighth, ninth and tenth contractions were set to 0.3797, 0.5309 and 0.1900, respectively. At integration in the CRYSTAL code the Monkhorst–Pack method used. In our calculations, the k-point grid was chosen as 8 × 8 × 8. Two-electron integrals were computed with a precision of at least 10−8 a. u. The SCF was calculated with tolerance no less than 10−9. Phonons or elastic constants were calculated for the optimized crystal structure. Algorithms of the calculations are considered in work [62].
The most optimal for crystals with ionic or covalent chemical bond are exchange-correlation DFT functionals, which take into account the contribution of non-local exchange in the Hartree–Fock formalism. These are so-called hybrid functionals. The most well-known hybrid functional is B3LYP (20% HF exchange) [63]. The functional has been reliably tested for compounds with ionic and covalent bonds [64].

3. Results

3.1. Layered Crystal Structures of EuRECuTe3 (RE = Nd, Sm, Tb, Dy) and Regularities in the Variation in Structural Parameters in the EuRECuTe3 Series (RE = Nd, Sm–Lu)

According to single-crystal X-ray structural analysis, the four new members of EuRECuTe3 with RE = Nd, Sm, Tb and Dy crystallize in the orthorhombic space group Pnma corresponding to the Eu2CuS3 structure type. The structural data are presented in Tables S2–S5 in the Supplementary Materials. The synthesized tellurides have the same crystal structure as the quaternary chalcogenides with the formula EuRECuSe3 [9] and EuRECuS3 [8,11,12,13,15,36]. The unit cell parameters determined by DFT calculations (a = 11.6190 Å, b = 4.3862 Å, c = 14.2561 Å for EuNdCuTe3, a = 11.4632 Å, b = 4.3724 Å, c = 14.2881 Å for EuSmCuTe3, a = 11.3644 Å, b = 4.3651 Å, c = 14.2684 Å for EuGdCuTe3, a = 11.3192 Å, b = 4.3567 Å, c = 14.2672 Å for EuTbCuTe3 and a = 11.2971 Å, b = 4.3504 Å, c = 14.2474 Å for EuDyCuTe3) are in good agreement with the experimental values (Table S2 in the Supplementary Materials, Figure 2). Previously, experimental data on the crystal structure and properties for the compound EuGdCuTe3 were presented in [47], but DFT calculations were not carried out. In this work, we have addressed this gap and performed ab initio calculations for this compound.
In the series of the quaternary tellurides EuRECuTe3 (RE = Nd, Sm–Dy), isostructural with Eu2CuS3, due to the decrease in the ionic radius RE3+ (~7%) [50], the observed reduction in lattice parameters and unit cell volume occurs in the following ranges: a = 11.5634(7)–11.2695(7) Å, b = 4.3792(3)–4.3178(3) Å, c = 14.3781(9)–14.3304(9) Å, V = 728.08(8)–697.31(8) Å3 (Table S2, Figure 2). The parameter a undergoes the greatest change, decreasing by 2.5%, the parameter b by 1.4%, and the parameter c by 0.33%, with the overall unit cell volume changing by 4.3%. A decrease in the RE–Te bond distance by 3.1% was also observed, ranging from 3.1438(8)–3.045(1) Å (Table S5 in the Supplementary Materials, Figure 3), which correlates with the reduction in the RE3+ radius. For six bonds, d(RE–Te), the experimental values are smaller than the theoretical values (d(Nd–Te) = 3.193 Å) and d(Dy–Te) = 3.112 Å [50]. Distorted octahedra [RETe6]9− are formed in the structures, consisting of covalent polar bonds, forming infinite layers through edge-sharing along the b-axis (Figure 4). When forming the coordination polyhedron, Te2− ligands with distances exceeding the theoretically calculated value were not considered, as they have negligible interaction forces. The deviation of the ∡(Te–RE–Te) bond angles from the theoretical octahedral value ranges from 0.04% to 3.1% (Table S5 in the Supplementary Materials). In EuNdCuTe3, the d(Cu–Te) bond lengths range from 2.649(2) to 2.696(1) Å, while in EuDyCuTe3 they range from 2.632(2) to 2.673(1) Å; both are shorter than the theoretical value of 2.81 Å [50]. The deviation of the ∡(Te–Cu–Te) bond angles from the theoretical tetrahedral value is 0.7–3% (Table S5 in the Supplementary Materials). To assess the degree of distortion of the [CuTe4]7− tetrahedra, distortion coefficients DI(Te–Cu–Te), DI(Cu–Te), and DI(Te···Te) were calculated (Table 1), using the methods proposed in [65,66], and the σ2 values were obtained using the methodology described in [67]. With a decrease in the ionic radius of RE3+ in the EuRECuTe3 structure, the distortion of the ∡Te–Cu–Te bond angles relative to symmetric coordination decreases, and the σ2 bond angle dispersion decreases (Figure 5), which results in the formation of a more regular tetrahedral structure (Table 1). The greatest distortions of polyhedra are manifested in the d(Cu–Te) distances, compared to d(Te···Te) and ∡Te–Cu–Te (Table 1). However, the decrease in the ionic radius of RE3+ leads to a change in the space group from the less symmetrical Pnma to the more symmetrical Cmcm in the EuRECuTe3 series. Therefore, the distortions in the d(Cu–Te) bonds are most likely of a local nature and do not affect the overall symmetry of the structure. In contrast to the behavior of the [CuTe4]7− tetrahedra, the analysis of octahedral distortion parameters for the [RETe6]9− polyhedra reveals an opposite trend. With decreasing RE3+ ionic radius and the corresponding transition from Pnma to Cmcm symmetry, the bond angle variance in the [RETe6]9− octahedra actually increases, indicating a greater deviation from ideal geometry. This effect can be attributed to enhanced crystal-chemical compression in the more densely packed Cmcm phase, where the incorporation of smaller RE3+ ions leads to increased local strain and angular distortion within the octahedra. Thus, despite the higher global symmetry of the Cmcm structure, the local environment of the rare-earth cation becomes more distorted, highlighting the fact that increased structural symmetry does not necessarily result in lower polyhedral distortion for all coordination types within the lattice.
Distorted vertex-connected copper tetrahedra form chains along the b-axis, and by edge-sharing with the distorted octahedra [RETe6]9−, they create parallel two-dimensional layers in the ab plane (Figure 4). Thus, a layered structure of the quaternary chalcogenide is formed (Figure 4). Between these parallel layers are located the seven-coordinate Eu2+ cations, which form chains of single-capped trigonal prisms along the b-axis, connected pairwise by faces. As the ionic radius of ri(RE3+) decreases, crystallochemical compression of the parallel layers occurs, which subsequently leads to changes in the europium coordination, structure type, and space group of the compounds.
Calculation of the sum of valence forces taking into account the coordination environment showed that the oxidation states of Eu, RE, and Cu ions in the compounds EuRECuTe3 are approximately 2, 3, and 1, respectively. The obtained values are as follows: for Eu (1.71–1.75), for RE (3.01–3.16), for Cu (1.33–1.41) (Table S6 in the Supplementary Materials).
Thus, according to previously conducted studies on tellurides [40,47,48,49] and the present work, it has been established that the compounds in the EuRECuTe3 series (RE = Nd, Sm, Gd–Lu) crystallize in two space groups: Pnma (for RE = Nd (this work), Sm (this work), Gd [47], Tb (this work), Dy (this work), Y [40]) and Cmcm (for RE = Ho [48], Er [49], Tm [48], Lu [47], Sc [48], Y [40]), and two structural types: Eu2CuS3 and KZrCuS3, respectively.
The crystal structures of the compounds in the EuRECuTe3 series share both similarities and differences (Figure 4). Some of the similarities include the following:
The Eu2+, RE3+, and Cu+ cations are crystallographically independent.
The Cu+ and RE3+ cations in different space groups throughout the EuRECuTe3 series form similar coordination polyhedra.
In all structures of the EuRECuTe3 series, distorted copper tetrahedra are joined via two shared vertices, forming infinite linear chains Cu ( Te 1 ) 1 / 1 t ( Te 2 ) 1 / 1 t ( Te 3 ) 2 / 2 e 5 1 for EuRECuTe3 (RE = Y, Nd, Sm–Dy) and Cu ( Te 1 ) 2 / 2 e ( Te 2 ) 2 / 1 t 5 1 for EuRECuTe3 (RE = Sc, Y, Ho–Lu).
In these structures, distorted [RETe6]9− octahedra are interconnected by shared edges and vertices, forming two-dimensional layers R E ( Te 1 ) 2 / 2 ( Te 2 ) 2 / 2 ( Te 3 ) 2 / 2 3 2 along the b-axis for RE = Y, Nd, Sm–Dy, and R E ( Te 1 ) 2 / 2 e ( Te 2 ) 4 / 2 k 2 } along the a-axis for RE = Sc, Y, Ho–Lu.
Parallel two-dimensional layers Cu R E Te 3 2 2 are formed.
The differences include the following:
In the compounds EuRECuTe3 (RE = Nd–Dy), chains of copper tetrahedra [CuTe4] are formed along the b axis, and two-dimensional layers Cu R E Te 3 2 2 are formed in the ab plane. In the compounds EuRECuTe3 (RE = Ho–Lu, Sc, Y), the formation of chains and layers occurs along the a-axis and in the bc-plane, respectively.
The metal cations Cu+ and RE3+, in tetrahedral and octahedral coordinations, respectively, are surrounded by tellurium ions with different symmetry operations in the space groups Pnma and Cmcm.
The Eu2+ cation has a different coordination environment depending on the compound’s composition. In the compounds EuRECuTe3 (RE = Y, Nd, Sm–Dy), it is surrounded by seven Te2− anions, forming single-capped trigonal prisms [EuTe6+1]12−, which are connected by faces and edges, forming chains Eu ( Te 1 ) 2 / 2 ( Te 2 ) 3 / 3 ( Te 3 ) 2 / 2 4 1 along the b-axis. In the compounds EuRECuTe3 (where RE = Sc, Y, Ho–Lu), Eu2+ cations form trigonal prisms [EuTe6]10−, which are connected by their faces and assemble into one-dimensional chains Eu ( Te 1 ) 2 / 2 ( Te 2 ) 4 / 2 2 1 along the a-axis.
In the group of EuRECuTe3 representatives (RE = Sc, Y, Nd, Sm–Lu), the following trends are observed as ri(RE3+) decreases:
The lattice parameters and unit cell volume decrease: aPnma(cCmcm) by 5.9%, bPnma(aCmcm) by 3.3%, cPnma(bCmcm) by 1.5%, and V by 10.5% (Figure 2).
The distance d(RE–Te) decreases by 5.9% (Figure 3).
The degree of distortion of the tetrahedral polyhedra decreases, while that of the octahedral polyhedra increases (Table 1, Figure 5). Tetrahedra and octahedra are stable structural motifs in the EuRECuTe3 compound series. It is likely that the opposite changes in the degree of distortion of the polyhedra forming the Cu R E Te 3 2 2 layer lead to compensation of the overall distortion of the layer and, therefore, the orthorhombic symmetry is preserved throughout the entire series of compounds.
The gradual increase in the symmetry of the structure occurs not only with a decrease in the ionic radius of RE3+ (this work, [47,48,49]), but also with an increase in temperature by 30 K [40].
The crystal-chemical compression of the parallel layers Cu R E Te 3 2 2 reduces the number of anions coordinating Eu2+.
The valence states of the Eu, RE, and Cu ions in the entire EuRECuTe3 series are close to 2, 3, and 1 (Table S6 in the Supplementary Materials, [40,47,48,49]).
The data obtained for the tellurides complement the information on the isostructural chalcogenides EuRECuS3 and EuRECuSe3 and have been plotted on the structural-field map for quaternary copper chalcogenides EuRECuCh3 (Ch = S [8,11,12,13,14,15,16,36,37], Se [9,10], Te (this work, [40,47,48,49])) and MRECuTe3 (M = Ba [21,24,26,28], Sr [52], Eu (this work, [40,47,48,49])) (Figure S2 in the Supplementary Materials). Dependencies of the ionic radii of divalent anions ri(Ch2−) = S2−, Se2−, Te2− and cations ri(M2+) = Ba2+, Sr2+, Eu2+ on the ionic radii of rare-earth metal cations ri(RE3+) = Sc, Y, Nd, Sm–Lu have been constructed. The boundaries of the colored fields correspond to the demarcation lines between different structural types. When moving from S2− to Se2− and further to Te2−, an expansion of the anionic sublattice occurs. An increase in the sublattice size by 7% when replacing S2− with Se2− does not affect the position of the boundary between the space groups Pnma and Cmcm, which still runs between the heavy rare-earth elements Ho and Er. However, a further increase in the sublattice by 10.4% when moving from Se2− to Te2− slightly shifts the PnmaCmcm transition boundary to the region between Dy, Ho or Y.
Compounds with light rare-earth metals show greater sensitivity to changes in the sublattice size: thus, when transitioning from sulfides to selenides, the change in structural type Ba2MnS3 → BaLaCuS3 occurs at the Pr or Nd and La or Ce boundaries, respectively, while the transition from BaLaCuS3 to Eu2CuS3 occurs at the Nd or Sm and Ce or Pr boundaries. Changes in the cationic sublattice have a more noticeable effect on structural transitions in the series of quaternary tellurides. Even a slight increase in the size of the cationic sublattice by 0.8% when replacing Eu2+ with Sr2+ results in the transition boundary for the heavy elements shifting from Dy or Ho to Tb or Dy. A more significant expansion of the cationic sublattice by 12.5% when moving from Sr2+ to Ba2+ causes a sharp change in the space group PnmaCmcm already for the light rare-earth metals, with the demarcation line lying between La and Pr.
Thus, an increase in the sizes of the chalcogen and divalent metal ions accelerates the onset of structural transitions, leading to an earlier change in both the space group PnmaCmcm and the structural type in the series of quaternary tellurides. The cationic sublattice plays a key role in the structure formation of this class of compounds, making it possible to purposefully control the structural features of the compounds by varying the sizes of the cations and anions.

3.2. Magnetic Properties of EuRECuTe3

First, the experimental field dependencies of the moments of all samples at 300 K (Figure S3 in the Supplementary Materials) were approximated by paramagnetic Curie law: m = C H T . From this assumption Curie constants C300K and their corresponding effective magnetic moments μ300K were estimated (Table 2).
Then, based on the experimental data, the following dependencies were calculated: (1) the inverse susceptibilities versus temperature (an external magnetic field of 40 kA∙m−1 applied), and (2) moments per formula unit versus magnetic field (at 2 K). These plots are pictured in Figure 6 and Figure 7.
These temperature dependencies were assumed to follow the Curie–Weiss law: χ−1 = C−1(T − θp). In that approximation Curie constants and corresponding effective magnetic moments were calculated. In Table 2, they are designated as C50–300K and μ50–300K. The table also contains the values of the Weiss constants θp (paramagnetic Curie temperatures) obtained from these calculations.
Analysis of the measurement results allows us to divide the studied compounds of the entire series of EuRECuTe3 (RE = Nd (this work), Sm (this work), Gd [47], Tb (this work), Dy (this work), Y [40], Er [49], Lu [47]) tellurides into three groups.
The first group includes compounds with RE = Y [40] and Lu [47]. All of them have the following properties. They contain only one type of magnetic ions: Eu2+. Their measured paramagnetic parameters (effective magnetic moment μ and Curie constant C) are in good agreement with the parameters of independent ions (Table 2). Their paramagnetic Curie temperatures θp are positive. At low temperatures the thermal dependencies of magnetic susceptibility exhibit signs of a phase transition (in the form of kinks and divergences in the curves for FC and ZFC modes) [40,47]. Table 2 shows the values of critical temperatures Graph Tc, approximately corresponding to these points on the graphs. At considerably high temperatures the thermal dependencies very well obey the Curie-Weiss law. Their magnetization curves at 2 K for have a typical appearance for soft ferromagnets. The saturation magnetization per formula unit is close to the theoretical value for the Eu2+ ion (7 μB). All of this allows to conclude that these compounds are soft ferromagnets.
The second group includes compounds with RE = Gd [47], Tb (this work), Dy (this work), and Er [49]. They contain two types of magnetic RE3+ ions, so they are expected to form two magnetic sublattices. Their measured paramagnetic parameters (effective magnetic moment μ and Curie constant C) are also in good agreement with the parameters of independent ions (Table 2). Their θp parameters are negative, indicating that magnetic moments in the paramagnetic state are partially negatively coordinated. The shapes of inverse susceptibility plots in the low-temperature region (Figure 6) are typical of ferrimagnetic compounds. So, these plots were approximated by the Néel hyperbolic formula for two-sublattice ferrimagnets: χ−1 = T/C + χ0−1 − σ/(Tθ). The values of C denoted as Cfit, χ0, σ, and θ are given in Table 2. The table also shows the values of the critical temperatures Tc, calculated using the formula Tc = (θC/χ0 + ((θC/χ0)2 + 4C(θ/χ0 + σ))0.5)/2. The magnetization curves at 2 K (Figure 6) show kinks, indicating different behavior of the magnetic ions’ sublattices of different types in an external magnetic field. Saturation is not achieved even up to fields of 4 MA∙m−1, confirming the conclusion about the ferrimagnetic structure of these compounds.
Finally, the third group includes compounds with RE = Nd (this work) and Sm (this work). Their paramagnetic Curie temperatures are negative (Table 2), like those of the second group, and at sufficiently high temperatures, their magnetic ions are also partially negatively coordinated. However, the graphs of the temperature dependencies of inverse susceptibility for these compounds are almost linear from 300 K to 4 K, similar to ferromagnets. Below 4 K, signs of a phase transition are observed in compounds with Sm, while sample of EuNdCuTe3 shows no such signs down to 2 K.
Nevertheless, considering that the curvature of the hyperbola decreases as it moves away from the foci, a successful attempt was made to approximate these experimental curves using the above Néel formula. The results of the approximation are shown in the graphs (Figure 6), and the calculated parameters are in Table 2. Notably, the sign of the parameter θ, which determines the position of the vertical asymptote of the hyperbola on the graph χ−1 vs. T, differs from the parameters for the second group’s compounds. A negative θ in Néel theory means that at least one sublattice of the ferrimagnet does not reach saturation at 0 K. In cases where Tc < 0, as for EuNdCuTe3 sample, both sublattices remain unsaturated, meaning the sample remains paramagnetic down to 0 K.
These conclusions are consistent with the magnetization graphs of the samples as a function of the external magnetic field magnitude (Figure 7). Firstly, they are smooth, resembling the behavior of a single sublattice. Secondly, in the maximum field of 4 MA∙m−1, the magnetization is far from the theoretical total values of 10.27 and 7.71 μB for RE = Nd and Sm, respectively. However, for RE = Sm, there are signs of saturation in one sublattice, specifically the Eu2+ ion sublattice, near the theoretical value of 7 μB. The EuNdCuTe3 sample is magnetized weaker. Thus, it should be concluded that the Sm compound has two oppositely oriented sublattices, one of which is saturated and the other is not, while Nd compound remains in an unordered state.
The experimental magnetic characteristics are In good agreement with the calculated ones and correlate with the sulfide and selenide derivatives of EuRECuCh3 (Ch = S, Se).
A magnetic field map of europium chalcogenides EuRECuCh3 (Ch = S, Se, Te) was constructed (Figure S4 in the Supplementary Materials), according to which in the range EuGdCuCh3—EuTmCuCh3 the compounds are low-temperature ferrimagnets, while representatives of the rest of the series of quaternary chalcogenides exhibit ferromagnetic properties.

3.3. Phonons

The phonon mode frequencies and types derived from the DFT calculations are presented in the Supplementary Materials, specifically in Tables S7–S10. The contribution of each ion to individual phonon modes can be assessed by analyzing the displacement vectors obtained from these DFT calculations (Figure 8). The results of modeling the Raman spectrum of crystals EuRECuTe3 (RE = Sm, Gd) at Pnma phase compared to experimental one are presented in Figure 9. The spectrum simulation was made in assumption of powder sample in parallel (VV) and crossed (VH) polarizations. The VV spectra shows the presence of at least two intense Raman peaks of Ag type. Calculations indicate that the Ag phonon mode, with an approximate frequency of 60 cm−1, mainly involves copper and europium ions. In the intensive mode with a frequency of about 150 cm−1, tellurium ions are predominantly involved (Figure 8, Table S7, in the “Participating ions” column). The phonon frequencies of crystals EuRECuTe3 with Pnma structure do not exceed ~200 cm−1. Since the spectrum is confined to low frequencies, all ions participate simultaneously in these modes. This is reflected in Tables S7–S10, under the “Participating ions” column. Europium and copper ions are significantly engaged in modes of frequency with approximately 90 cm−1 and 150 cm−1, respectively. Additionally, rare earth RE3+ ions play a prominent role in phonon modes whose frequencies in the range up to 80 cm−1. Tellurium ions contribute significantly in all frequency range (Figure 8). The calculations reveal a phonon gap about 95–110 cm−1. Furthermore, the findings suggest that the majority of vibrational modes involve all or nearly all ions. However, it is possible to identify individual phonon modes in which participate only one or two types of ions.
As an example, Te1 and Te2 ions predominantly contribute to the B2u (109 cm−1) and the B1g (114 cm−1) modes. Dy3+ and Te2− ions are the main participants in the Ag (154 cm−1) and B3u (155 cm−1) modes. The most intense IR and Raman modes are illustrated on Figure 10.
The comparison of simulated spectra in Figure 9a–d with experimental ones (Figure 9c,d) demonstrates a fair correlation. Due to spectrometer limit, only part of Raman spectrum above 75 cm−1 was recorded. In order to analyze experimental data, the spectrum was decomposed on set of oscillators using Lorentzian shape fitting. One can find the strong band at c.a. 125 cm−1 accompanied with satellites in low and high frequency wings of the band. This feature is well reproduced in simulated spectra. The band at ~175 cm−1 is damped in experimental spectra, which is probably due to random orientation of the sample, which does not fully correspond to the parallel polarization experimental setup. Comparing spectra for two compounds with RE = Sm, Gd one can find the similarity of the spectra shape—the only difference is band positions, which are slightly shifted towards high frequencies for EuSmCuTe3 compound. Therefore, the dynamical properties of EuRECuTe3 crystal series are very similar and obtain only slight influence on variation in rare-earth element.

3.4. Band Structure of EuRECuTe3

Since hybrid DFT functionals overestimate the band gap value, we used a non-hybrid functional PBE to calculate the band structure. Note, that band structure of range of quaternary chalcogenides was calculated with PBE functional too [38]. We calculated band structure and density of states (Figure 11). Figure 11 does not display 4f states since pseudopotentials “4f in core” were used for rare earth ions. By building the band structure path within the Brillouin zone connects points Γ–X–Z–U–Y–S–T–R–Γ with coordinates (0,0,0), (1/2,0,0), (0,0,1/2), (1/2,0,1/2), (0,1/2,0), (1/2,1/2,0), (0,1/2,1/2), (1/2,1/2,1/2), and (0,0,0), respectively. These are the high-symmetry points of the orthorhombic lattice. The top of the valence band consists of tellurium and copper states. The bottom of the conduction band consists of europium and RE3+ ion states (Figure 11).
Band gap values in the “HOMO-LUMO” estimation are presented in Table 3. The calculations show Γ–Γ direct band gap. The estimated band gap value is approximately 0.5 eV.
The inclusion of f-electrons for the rare-earth elements in the computational scheme makes self-consistent calculations of electronic structure far more difficult. Such spin-unrestricted calculations using the GGA+U (U = 5 eV) method as implemented in the GPAW software package [68] were performed for EuRECuTe3 (RE = Gd, Tb, Dy) compounds including different magnetic order considerations. The calculated bandstructures for ferrimagnetic spin ordering (spin moments are anti-collinear for magnetic sublattices of different rare-earth elements) are plotted in Figure 12a–c. One can find a clear magnetic ordering due to difference in the bandstructure for states with spin up and spin down states. It is noteworthy that in the conduction band, some states with spin up from a high density sub-band with small dispersion, which normally correspond to highly localized states formed by f- or d- electrons. In order to estimate the nature of these states, the projection density of states was calculated and plotted for EuDyCuTe3 compound in Figure 12d. The analysis shows that there are strong bands in the range of valence band top, which can be attributed to f-states of the Eu atom. The other strong band in the conduction band bottom is clearly observed in the PDOS of the other rare-earth element—Dy. There are two bands, and both correspond to f-states of Dy atom, where the lowest energy states take part in optical properties and determine the value of the bandgap.
The bandgap values for EuRECuTe3 (RE = Gd, Tb, Dy) compounds are represented in Table 4.
The calculation of total energy of different EuRECuTe3 for different magnetic orderings was tested, namely the general state ferrimagnetic (FIM-I) with spins being parallel in each sublattice (first sublattice related to spin moments on Eu atoms and second one related to spin moments on RE atoms). The second configuration is ferromagnetic with all spin moments collinear (FM). The third configuration is antiferromagnetic ordering in the Eu sublattice and ferromagnetic for the RE sublattice (AFM-I) and vice versa for fourth configuraion (AFM-II). The difference on energy for abovementioned configuration is given in Table 5.
It is noteworthy that all values in Table 5 are positive, which means that these configurations are less preferable than the ferrimagnetic configuration, which perfectly fits the experimental data.

3.5. Elastic Properties

Calculated elastic constants, as elastic moduli for EuRECuTe3 crystals, are presented in Table 6. The dependence of Young’s modulus on direction in crystal can be utilized to assess the elastic anisotropy (Figure 13).
The universal anisotropy index AU [49] (1) have been calculated for the crystals EuRECuTe3 [69]:
A U = 5 G V G R + B V B R 6
In term (1), G is the shear modulus, and B is the bulk modulus calculated using either the Reuss (R) or Voigt (V) approximation. The more the index AU deviates from zero, the higher the degree of anisotropy. The EuRECuTe3 crystals (RE = Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy) exhibit notable anisotropy in their elastic properties, as shown in Table 6.

3.6. Layered Structure of EuRECuTe3

The properties of the single-layer structure were studied using the approach previously reported in paper [40]. The simulations of layered structure were carried out by step-by-step unitcell volume expansion until the structure become clearly composed of layers with a gap between layers. Then, the single layer was extracted, and the symmetry was determined by applying symmetry operations of parent space group. The resulting layered group for all studied compounds is determined as pm2_1b (# 28).
Next, the structural parameters for monolayered samples were obtained using geometry relaxation procedure and exfoliation energy is established using the following equation:
E e x f = E b u l k E L
where Ebulk and EL are total reduced energies for bulk and monolayer. The obtained values are represented in Table 7.
The obtained values are little bit smaller than the one obtained for EuRECuTe3 [52] but are still too much for mechanical exfoliation; therefore, the synthesis should be made using enhanced techniques like molecular beam epitaxy.

4. Conclusions

Thus, by applying the ampoule synthesis method with the use of a flux, we synthesized orthorhombic single crystals of four new layered tellurides EuRECuTe3 (RE = Nd, Sm, Tb, Dy) with Pnma symmetry. Based on the analysis of data obtained using a SQUID magnetometer, the EuRECuTe3 tellurides were classified according to their low-temperature magnetic properties. Compounds with RE = Y and Lu were identified as soft ferromagnets, while those with RE = Gd, Tb, Dy and Er were classified as ferrimagnets, showing different behavior of the Eu2+ and RE3+ sublattices in an external magnetic field; in addition, the Sm-containing ferrimagnet was distinguished by the saturation of one sublattice (Eu2+). The regions of manifestation of ferro- and ferrimagnetic properties in the chalcogenides EuRECuCh3 (Ch = S, Se, Te) were identified, as well as the ranges of existence of various structural types of quaternary chalcogenides. In addition to the established structural and magnetic regularities, electronic structure calculations showed that the new tellurides EuRECuTe3 (RE = Nd, Sm, Tb, Dy) are narrow-bandgap semiconductors with a direct band gap of 0.45–0.48 eV. The analysis of the anisotropy of elastic properties revealed a pronounced directional dependence of the Young’s modulus, indicating the potential suitability of these materials for the creation of flexible micro- and nanoelectronic components. The obtained results on exfoliation of individual layers and the calculated energetic parameters confirm the possibility of obtaining stable two-dimensional crystals possessing a unique combination of magnetic and electronic properties. This opens up prospects for further research in the field of two-dimensional magnetic materials, as well as for the development of new heterostructures based on them.

Supplementary Materials

The following Supporting Information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cryst15090787/s1, Table S1. The angular intensity dependence of observed XRD reflexes with solved Miller indexes hkl. Table S2. Data processing and structure refinement parameters for EuRECuTe3 (RE = Nd, Sm, Tb, Dy) single crystals. Table S3. Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters of EuRECuTe3 (RE = Nd, Sm, Tb, Dy). Table S4. Anisotropic displacement parameters (Å2) of EuRECuTe3 (RE = Nd, Sm, Tb, Dy). Table S5. Bond lengths (d/Å) and bond angles (∡/°) in the crystal structures of EuRECuTe3 (RE = Nd, Sm, Tb, Dy). Table S6. Calculation data of bond valence for Eu, RE and Cu ions in EuRECuTe3 structures. Table S7. Wavenumbers (cm−1) and types of the phonon modes at the Г-point for EuDyCuTe3, Pnma. The intensity of the Raman modes was calculated for polycrystal at λ = 532 nm and T = 300 K. Table S8. Calculated IR modes of the EuRECuTe3 (RE = Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb). Wavenumbers (cm−1) and types. Table S9. Calculated Raman modes of the EuRECuTe3 (RE = Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb). Wavenumbers (cm−1) and types. Table S10. Calculated “silent” modes of the EuRECuTe3 (RE = Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy). Wavenumbers (cm−1) and types. Figure S1. Photograph of EuNdCuTe3 crystal placed in a capillary for X-ray diffraction analysis. Figure S2. Structure-field diagrams of chalcogenides: EuRECuCh3 (Ch = S, Se, Te (top) and MRECuTe3 (M = Ba, Sr, Eu (bottom). Description: the background color corresponds to the structure type (yellow: Ba2MnS3, blue: BaLaCuS3, green: KZrCuS3, red: Eu2CuS3). White area—absence of experimental data. Figure S3. Field-dependent magnetic moments at 300 K. Figure S4. Magnetic phase diagram of EuRECuCh3 (Ch = S, Se, Te). Legend: purple color—ferromagnetic transition; blue color—ferrimagnetic transition. White area—absence or insufficiency of experimental data.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.V.R. and T.S.; validation, A.V.R. and E.M.R.; formal analysis, M.V.G., V.A.C., A.A.G., E.M.R. and R.J.C.L.; data curation, V.A.C., E.M.R., A.V.R. and T.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.V.R., T.S., A.A.G., E.M.R. and V.A.C.; writing—review and editing, A.V.R., E.M.R., V.A.C. and T.S.; visualization, A.V.R., A.A.G., V.A.C., E.M.R. and M.V.G.; project administration, A.V.R.; funding acquisition, M.V.G. and A.V.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by grant support Russian Science Foundation, grant number 24-23-00416 (https://rscf.ru/project/24-23-00416/ (accessed on 25 December 2024)).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Navarro-Moratalla, E.; Jarillo-Herrero, P. Two-dimensional superconductivity: The Ising on the monolayer. Nat. Phys. 2016, 12, 112–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Huang, X.; Zeng, Z.; Zhang, H. Metal dichalcogenide nanosheets: Preparation, properties and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 1934–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chianelli, R.R.; Siadati, M.H.; Perez de la Rosa, M.; Berhault, G.; Wilcoxon, J.P.; Bearden, R., Jr.; Abrams, B.L. Catalytic Properties of Single Layers of Transition Metal Sulfides Catalytic Materials. Catal. Rev. 2006, 48, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rao, C.N.R.; Gopalakrishnan, K.; Maitra, U. Comparative Study of Potential Applications of Graphene, MoS2, and Other Two-Dimensional Materials in Energy Devices, Sensors, and Related Areas. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 7809–7832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Heine, T. Transition metal chalcogenides: Ultrathin inorganic materials with tunable electronic properties. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lv, R.; Robinson, J.A.; Schaak, R.E.; Sun, D.; Sun, Y.; Mallouk, T.E.; Terrones, M. Transition metal dichalcogenides and beyond: Synthesis, properties, and applications of single- and few-layer nanosheets. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huang, Y.L.; Zheng, Y.J.; Song, Z.; Chi, D.; Wee, A.T.S.; Quek, S.Y. The organic–2D transition metal dichalcogenide heterointerface. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 3241–3264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wakeshima, M.; Furuuchi, F.; Hinatsu, Y. Crystal structures and magnetic properties of novel rare-earth copper sulfides, EuRCuS3 (R = Y, Gd–Lu). J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2004, 16, 5503–5518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Habibullayev, N.N.; Burkov, A.T.; Novikov, S.V.; Yurev, I.O.; Aleksandrovskiy, A.S.; Zakharova, A.D.; Shulaev, N.A.; Denisenko, Y.G.; Andreev, O.V. Regularity of thermal characteristics, thermoelectric properties of EuLnCuSe3 compounds (Ln = La–Lu). Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2024, 139, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gladisch, F.C.; Maier, S.; Steinberg, S. Eu2CuSe3 revisited by means of experimental and quantum-chemical techniques. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 15, 1510–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lemoine, P.; Carré, D.; Guittard, M. Structure du sulfure d’europium et de cuivre Eu2CuS3. Acta Crystallog. 1986, 42, 390–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ruseikina, A.V.; Solovyov, L.A.; Molokeev, M.S.; Andreev, O.V. Crystal structures of EuLnCuS3 (Ln = Nd and Sm). Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 57, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Murashko, Y.A.; Ruseikina, A.V.; Kislitsyn, A.A.; Andreev, O.V. Optical and Thermal Properties of the EuLnCuS3 (Ln = La, Pr, Sm, Gd) Compounds. Inorg. Mater. 2015, 51, 1213–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ruseikina, A.V.; Andreev, O.V. Phase equilibria in the Cu2S–La2S3–EuS system. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 62, 610–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ruseikina, A.V.; Solovyev, L.A.; Andreev, O.V.; Kislitsyn, A.A. EuNdCuS3: Crystal Structure of the High-Temperature Polymorph and Properties. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 59, 1109–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ruseikina, A.V.; Solov’Ev, L.A.; Andreev, O.V. Crystal structure of EuLaCuS3. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 57, 574–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Azarapin, N.O. Synthesis, Structure and Properties of Compounds BaRECuS3 (RE = Rare Earth Element). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  18. Solovieva, A.V. Regularities of Phase Equilibria in AIIS–FeS, AIIS–FeS–Ln2S3, AIIS–Cu2S–Ln2S3 (AII = Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba; Ln = La–Lu) Systems. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia, 11 May 2005. [Google Scholar]
  19. Huang, F.Q.; Mitchell, K.; Ibers, J.A. New layered materials: Syntheses, structures, and optical and magnetic properties of CsGdZnSe3, CsZrCuSe3, CsUCuSe3, and BaGdCuSe3. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 5123–5126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Maier, S.; Prakash, J.; Berthebaud, D.; Perez, O.; Bobev, S.; Gascoin, F. Crystal structures of the four new quaternary copper(I) selenides A0.5CuZrSe3 and ACuYSe3 (A = Sr, Ba). J. Solid State Chem. 2016, 242, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Koscielski, L.A.; Ibers, J.A. The structural chemistry of quaternary chalcogenides of the type AMM‘Q3. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2012, 638, 2585–2593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wu, P.; Christuk, A.E.; Ibers, J.A. New Quaternary Chalcogenides BaLnMQ3 (Ln = Rare Earth or Sc; M = Cu, Ag; Q = S, Se). II. Structure and Property Variation vs. Rare-Earth Element. J. Solid State Chem. 1994, 110, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Christuk, A.E.; Wu, P.; Ibers, J.A. New quaternary chalcogenides BaLnMQ3 (Ln = Rare Earth; M = Cu, Ag; Q = S, Se). Structures and grinding-lnduced phase transition in BaLaCuQ3. J. Solid State Chem. 1994, 110, 330–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yang, Y.; Ibers, J.A. Synthesis and characterization of a series of quaternary chalcogenides BaLnMQ3 (Ln = rare earth, M = coinage metal, Q = Se or Te). J. Solid State Chem. 1999, 147, 366–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shahid, O.; Ray, A.K.; Yadav, S.; Deepa, M.; Niranjan, M.K.; Prakash, J. Structure-property relationships and DFT studies of three quaternary chalcogenides: BaCeCuSe3, BaCeAgS3, and BaCeAgSe3. Mater. Res. Bull. 2023, 168, 112469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Huang, F.Q.; Choe, W.; Lee, S.; Chu, J.S. Syntheses and Crystal Structures of Three Copper Tellurides: BaDyCuTe3, K1.5Dy2Cu2.5Te5, and Acentric K0.5Ba0.5DyCu1.5Te3. Chem. Mater. 1998, 10, 1320–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shahid, O.; Yadav, S.; Maity, D.; Deepa, M.; Niranjan, M.K.; Prakash, J. Synthesis, crystal structure, DFT, and photovoltaic studies of BaCeCuS3. New J. Chem. 2023, 47, 5378–5389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ishtiyak, M.; Jana, S.; Karthikeyan, R.; Mamindla, R.; Tripathy, B.; Malladi, S.K.; Niranjan, M.; Prakash, J. Syntheses of five new layered quaternary chalcogenides SrScCuSe3, SrScCuTe3, BaScCuSe3, BaScCuTe3, and BaScAgTe3: Crystal structures, thermoelectric properties, and electronic structures. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2021, 8, 4086–4101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sikerina, N.V. Regularities of Phase Equilibria in SrS–Ln2S3–Cu2S Systems, Preparation and Structure of SrLnCuS3 Compounds. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia, 13 December 2005. [Google Scholar]
  30. Eberle, M.A. Darstellung und Charakterisierung quaternärer Seltenerdmetall-Verbindungen in Kombination mit Kupfer und Schwefel. Ph.D. Thesis, Stuttgart University, Stuttgart, Germany, 16 December 2016. [Google Scholar]
  31. Strobel, S. Quarternäre Kupfer-Lanthanid-Selenide mit Alkali- und Erdalkalimetallen. Ph.D. Thesis, Stuttgart University, Stuttgart, Germany, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  32. Gulay, L.D.; Shemet, V.Y.; Olekseynuk, I.D. Crystal structures of the compounds YCuPbSe3, Y3CuSnSe7 and Y3Cu0.685Se6. J. Alloys Compd. 2004, 385, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gulay, L.D.; Olekseyuk, I.D. Crystal structures of the RCuPbSe3 (R = Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb and Lu) compounds. J. Alloys Compd. 2005, 387, 160–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Brennan, T.D.; Ibers, J.A. LaPbCuS3: Cu(I) insertion into the a-La2S3 framework. J. Solid State Chem. 1992, 97, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Aliyeva, R.A.; Bayramova, S.T.; Aliyev, O.M. Phase equilibriums in quasi-ternary system PbS–Cu2S–La2S3. Chem. Probl. 2008, 3, 503–508. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ruseikina, A.V.; Andreev, O.V. Regularities of Change in the Structural Parameters of EuLnCuS3 (Ln = La–Nd, Sm, Gd, Ho). Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 62, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ruseikina, A.V.; Solov’Ev, L.A.; Andreev, O.V. Crystal structures of α- and β-EuPrCuS3. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 58, 1231–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pal, K.; Xia, Y.; Shen, J.; He, J.; Luo, Y.; Kanatzidis, M.G.; Wolverton, C. Accelerated discovery of a large family of quaternary chalcogenides with very low lattice thermal conductivity. Comput. Mater. 2021, 7, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pal, K.; Hua, X.; Xia, Y.; Wolverton, C. Unraveling the structure-valence-property relationships in AMM′Q3 chalcogenides with promising thermoelectric performance. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 3, 2110–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ruseikina, A.V.; Grigoriev, M.V.; Chernyshev, V.A.; Roginskii, E.M.; Garmonov, A.A.; Locke, R.J.C.; Schleid, T. Theoretical and Experimental Studies of the Structural Chameleon EuYCuTe3. Materials 2025, 18, 820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mondal, K.P.; Gaowei, M.; Echeverria, E.; Evans-Lutterodt, K.; Jordan-Sweet, J.; Juffmann, T.; Karkare, S.; Maxson, J.; van der Molen, S.J.; Pennington, C.; et al. Pulsed laser deposition assisted epitaxial growth of cesium telluride photocathodes for high brightness electron sources. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 3421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rahmani, E.; Reyhani, A.; Khanlary, M.R.; Mortazavi, S.Z.; Mohammadi, M.R.; Dau, H.; Gholami, M.F.; Mohammadi, A.B.; Rabe, J.P.; Soleimani, M.; et al. Phosphorus doped few layer WS2 flakes grown by chemical vapor deposition for hydrogen evolution reactions. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 6350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bennett, H.C.; Tamilarasi, R.; Magesh, R.; Nandhakumar, R.; Ganesan, N.; Jeba, B.R.; Abiram, A.; Velu, S.K.P. Enhanced charge transfer and stability in heterojunction perovskite solar cells with optimized Se/CuSe multi-layer hole transport layer using physical vapor deposition technique. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2025, 206, 112835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pan, Z.; Xiong, W.; Dai, J.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; Jian, T.; Cui, X.; Deng, J.; Lin, X.; Cheng, Z.; et al. Ferromagnetism and correlated insulating states in monolayer Mo33Te56. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 3084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Dietl, T.A. A ten-year perspective on dilute magnetic semiconductors and oxides. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 965–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hoffmann, A.; Bader, S.D. Opportunities at the Frontiers of Spintronics. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2015, 4, 047001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ruseikina, A.V.; Grigoriev, M.V.; Garmonov, A.A.; Molokeev, M.S.; Schleid, T.; Safin, D.A. Synthesis, structures and magnetic properties of the Eu-based quaternary tellurides EuGdCuTe3 and EuLuCuTe3. CrystEngComm 2023, 25, 1716–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ruseikina, A.V.; Grigoriev, M.V.; Locke, R.J.C.; Chernyshev, V.A.; Schleid, T. Syntheses and Patterns of Changes in Structural Parameters of the New Quaternary Tellurides EuRECuTe3 (RE = Ho, Tm, and Sc): Experiment and Theory. Materials 2024, 17, 3378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Ruseikina, A.V.; Grigoriev, M.V.; Locke, R.J.C.; Chernyshev, V.A.; Garmonov, A.A.; Schleid, T. Synthesis, Crystal Structure, and Optical and Magnetic Properties of the New Quaternary Erbium Telluride EuErCuTe3: Experiment and Calculation. Materials 2024, 17, 2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Shannon, R.D. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr. 1976, A32, 751–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ruseikina, A.V.; Grigoriev, M.V.; Molokeev, M.S.; Garmonov, A.A.; Elyshev, A.V.; Locke, R.J.C.; Schleid, T. Synthesis, Crystal Structure and Properties of the New Laminar Quaternary Tellurides SrLnCuTe3 (Ln = Sm, Gd–Tm and Lu). Crystals 2023, 13, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Meng, C.-Y.; Chen, H.; Wang, P.; Chen, L. Syntheses, Structures, and Magnetic and Thermoelectric Properties of Double-Tunnel Tellurides: AxRE2Cu6–xTe6 (A = K–Cs; RE = La–Nd). Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 4910–4919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Huang, F.Q.; Brazis, P.; Kannewurf, C.R.; Ibers, J.A. Syntheses, Structures, Physical Properties, and Theoretical Study of LaCu0.40Te2, NdCu0.37Te2, SmCu0.34Te2, GdCu0.33Te2, and DyCu0.32Te2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sheldrick, G.M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. 2008, 64, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Spek, A.L. PLATON—A Multipurpose Crystallographic Tool; Utrecht University: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  56. Dovesi, R.; Saunders, V.R.; Roetti, C.; Orlando, R.; Zicovich-Wilson, C.M.; Pascale, F.; Civalleri, B.; Doll, K.; Harrison, N.M.; Bush, I.J.; et al. 2018 CRYSTAL17 User’s Manual. Available online: http://www.crystal.unito.it/Manuals/crystal17.pdf (accessed on 30 December 2024).
  57. Crystal. Available online: http://www.crystal.unito.it/index.php (accessed on 30 December 2024).
  58. Dolg, M.; Stoll, H.; Savin, A.; Preuss, H. Energy-adjusted pseudopotentials for the rare earth elements. Theor. Chim. Acta 1989, 75, 173–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dolg, M.; Stoll, H.; Preuss, H.A. Combination of quasi-relativistic pseudo-potential and ligand field calculations for lanthanoid compounds. Theor. Chim. Acta 1993, 85, 441–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Energy-Consistent Pseudopotentials of the Stuttgart/Cologne Group. Available online: http://www.tc.uni-koeln.de/PP/clickpse.en.html (accessed on 24 July 2024).
  61. Towler, M. CRYSTAL Resources Page. Available online: https://vallico.net/mike_towler/crystal.html (accessed on 24 July 2024).
  62. Dovesi, R.; Erba, A.; Orlando, R.; Zicovich-Wilson, C.M.; Civalleri, B.; Maschio, L.; Rérat, M.; Casassa, S.; Baima, J.; Salustro, S.; et al. Quantum-mechanical condensed matter simulations with CRYSTAL. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2018, 8, e1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Becke, A.D. Density-Functional Thermochemistry. III. The Role of Exact Exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. De la Pierre, M.; Orlando, R.; Maschio, L.; Doll, K.; Ugliengo, P.; Dovesi, R. Performance of six functionals (LDA, PBE, PBESOL, B3LYP, PBE0, and WC1LYP) in the simulation of vibrational and dielectric properties of crystalline compounds. The case of forsterite Mg2SiO4. J. Comput. Chem. 2011, 32, 1775–1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Baur, W. The geometry of polyhedral distortions. Predictive relationships for the phosphate group. Acta Crystallogr. 1974, B30, 1195–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mikheykin, A.S.; Chernyshov, D.Y.; Bush, A.A.; Prokhorov, A.S.; Yuzyuk, Y.I.; Dmitriev, V.P. Features of the Jahn-Teller transition in Ni1−xCoxCr2O4 solid solutions. Phys. Solid State 2014, 56, 785–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Fleet, M. Distortion parameters for coordination polyhedra. Mineral. Mag. 1976, 40, 531–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mortensen, J.J.; Larsen, A.H.; Kuisma, M.; Ivanov, A.V.; Taghizadeh, A.; Peterson, A.; Haldar, A.; Dohn, A.O.; Schäfer, C.; Jónsson, E.Ö.; et al. GPAW: An open Python package for electronic structure calculations. J. Chem. Phys. 2024, 160, 092503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ranganathan, S.I.; Ostoja-Starzewski, M. Universal Anisotropy Index. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101, 055504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The measured X-ray diffraction pattern of EuDyCuTe3 powder sample (blue line) compared with the simulated XRD pattern using obtained structural parameters (orange line). The asterisk marks the aluminum peak obtained in the Rigaku SmartLab sample plate holder. Most intensive peaks marked by Miller hkl indexes (which denote lattice planes). The full list of measured peaks and corresponding Miller indexes are reported in Table S1 of the Supplementary Materials.
Figure 1. The measured X-ray diffraction pattern of EuDyCuTe3 powder sample (blue line) compared with the simulated XRD pattern using obtained structural parameters (orange line). The asterisk marks the aluminum peak obtained in the Rigaku SmartLab sample plate holder. Most intensive peaks marked by Miller hkl indexes (which denote lattice planes). The full list of measured peaks and corresponding Miller indexes are reported in Table S1 of the Supplementary Materials.
Crystals 15 00787 g001
Figure 2. Dependence of the parameters and volume of the unit cell on the radius of the rare earth ion. The values of the unit-cell parameters bPnma, cPnma, aPnma (this work and [40,47]) correspond to aCmcm, bCmcm, cCmcm [40,47,48,49].
Figure 2. Dependence of the parameters and volume of the unit cell on the radius of the rare earth ion. The values of the unit-cell parameters bPnma, cPnma, aPnma (this work and [40,47]) correspond to aCmcm, bCmcm, cCmcm [40,47,48,49].
Crystals 15 00787 g002
Figure 3. Dependence of bond lengths d(Cu–Te), d(Eu–Te), d(RE–Te) on the radius of the rare-earth metal cation in EuRECuTe3 (RE = Nd, Sm, Tb, Dy [this work] and Sc, Y, Gd, Ho, Er, Tm, Lu [40,47,48,49]) compounds.
Figure 3. Dependence of bond lengths d(Cu–Te), d(Eu–Te), d(RE–Te) on the radius of the rare-earth metal cation in EuRECuTe3 (RE = Nd, Sm, Tb, Dy [this work] and Sc, Y, Gd, Ho, Er, Tm, Lu [40,47,48,49]) compounds.
Crystals 15 00787 g003
Figure 4. Appearance of orthorhombic crystal structures of EuRECuTe3 (RE = Nd (this work), Sm (this work), Gd [47], Tb (this work), Dy (this work), Y [40]) and EuRECuTe3 (RE = Ho [48], Tm [48], Er [49], Lu [47], Sc [48], Y [40]) with space groups Pnma (left) and Cmcm (right), respectively, together with coordination polyhedra formed around the metal cations. The metal cations and their corresponding polyhedra are indicated by colors: red—Cu+ and [CuTe4]7−, blue—RE3+ and [EuTe6+1]12− (Pnma) or [RETe6]9− (Cmcm), pink—Eu2+ and [EuTe6]10−.
Figure 4. Appearance of orthorhombic crystal structures of EuRECuTe3 (RE = Nd (this work), Sm (this work), Gd [47], Tb (this work), Dy (this work), Y [40]) and EuRECuTe3 (RE = Ho [48], Tm [48], Er [49], Lu [47], Sc [48], Y [40]) with space groups Pnma (left) and Cmcm (right), respectively, together with coordination polyhedra formed around the metal cations. The metal cations and their corresponding polyhedra are indicated by colors: red—Cu+ and [CuTe4]7−, blue—RE3+ and [EuTe6+1]12− (Pnma) or [RETe6]9− (Cmcm), pink—Eu2+ and [EuTe6]10−.
Crystals 15 00787 g004aCrystals 15 00787 g004b
Figure 5. Calculated values of dispersion parameters for [CuTe4]7− tetrahedra (top) and for [RETe6]9− octahedra (bottom) in the crystal structures of the EuRECuTe3 series.
Figure 5. Calculated values of dispersion parameters for [CuTe4]7− tetrahedra (top) and for [RETe6]9− octahedra (bottom) in the crystal structures of the EuRECuTe3 series.
Crystals 15 00787 g005aCrystals 15 00787 g005b
Figure 6. Temperature-dependent specific magnetization and inverse magnetic susceptibility (right column—at low temperatures). The horizontal rows of magnetic dependencies are presented for the compounds EuNdCuTe3, EuSmCuTe3, EuTbCuTe3, and EuDyCuTe3, listed from top to bottom. The green lines show the Curie–Weiss approximation and the blue lines show the Néel one.
Figure 6. Temperature-dependent specific magnetization and inverse magnetic susceptibility (right column—at low temperatures). The horizontal rows of magnetic dependencies are presented for the compounds EuNdCuTe3, EuSmCuTe3, EuTbCuTe3, and EuDyCuTe3, listed from top to bottom. The green lines show the Curie–Weiss approximation and the blue lines show the Néel one.
Crystals 15 00787 g006aCrystals 15 00787 g006b
Figure 7. Magnetization curves of EuNdCuTe3 and EuSmCuTe3 (top), EuTbCuTe3 and EuDyCuTe3 (below) at 2 K.
Figure 7. Magnetization curves of EuNdCuTe3 and EuSmCuTe3 (top), EuTbCuTe3 and EuDyCuTe3 (below) at 2 K.
Crystals 15 00787 g007
Figure 8. Displacements of ions in phonon modes at EuDyCuTe3.
Figure 8. Displacements of ions in phonon modes at EuDyCuTe3.
Crystals 15 00787 g008
Figure 9. The simulated Raman spectra for EuGdCuTe3 in crossed (a) and parallel (c) polarizations, respectively, and experimental spectrum (e). The simulated Raman spectra for EuSmCuTe3 in crossed (b) and parallel (d) polarizations, respectively, and experimental spectrum (f). For simulations, total spectrum (black line) was separated on each modes type contribution. The cyan fill area is contribution of Ag modes, orange green and magenta are contribution of B1g B2g B3g modes correspondingly. The experimental spectra (black points) were fitted by Lorenzian-shape lines, the resulting fitting is plotted by red line.
Figure 9. The simulated Raman spectra for EuGdCuTe3 in crossed (a) and parallel (c) polarizations, respectively, and experimental spectrum (e). The simulated Raman spectra for EuSmCuTe3 in crossed (b) and parallel (d) polarizations, respectively, and experimental spectrum (f). For simulations, total spectrum (black line) was separated on each modes type contribution. The cyan fill area is contribution of Ag modes, orange green and magenta are contribution of B1g B2g B3g modes correspondingly. The experimental spectra (black points) were fitted by Lorenzian-shape lines, the resulting fitting is plotted by red line.
Crystals 15 00787 g009
Figure 10. Displacements of ions in highest intensive IR and highest intensive Raman modes in EuDyCuTe3.
Figure 10. Displacements of ions in highest intensive IR and highest intensive Raman modes in EuDyCuTe3.
Crystals 15 00787 g010
Figure 11. The band structures and the density of states of the compound EuNdCuTe3.
Figure 11. The band structures and the density of states of the compound EuNdCuTe3.
Crystals 15 00787 g011
Figure 12. Calculated band structure of EuGdCuTe3 (a), EuTbCuTe3 (b), EuDyCuTe3 (c) (spin up states marked with cyan color, spin down ones are red colored), and the projected density of states calculated for EuDyCuTe3 (d).
Figure 12. Calculated band structure of EuGdCuTe3 (a), EuTbCuTe3 (b), EuDyCuTe3 (c) (spin up states marked with cyan color, spin down ones are red colored), and the projected density of states calculated for EuDyCuTe3 (d).
Crystals 15 00787 g012
Figure 13. The dependence on direction for Young’s modulus (GPa) in the crystal EuNdCuTe3.
Figure 13. The dependence on direction for Young’s modulus (GPa) in the crystal EuNdCuTe3.
Crystals 15 00787 g013
Table 1. Distortion parameters for tetrahedra and octahedra in the structure of EuRECuTe3 compounds.
Table 1. Distortion parameters for tetrahedra and octahedra in the structure of EuRECuTe3 compounds.
CompoundStructural TypeDI(Te–Cu–Te)DI(Cu–Te)DI(Te···Te)σ2
Distortion parameters for [CuTe4]7− tetrahedra
EuNdCuTe3Eu2CuS30.02470.04730.016216.794
EuSmCuTe3Eu2CuS30.02340.04930.016614.324
EuGdCuTe3Eu2CuS30.02220.05110.017112.716
EuTbCuTe3Eu2CuS30.02120.05260.017211.530
EuDyCuTe3Eu2CuS30.02050.05390.018110.227
EuYCuTe3Eu2CuS30.02080.05360.01429.636
EuHoCuTe3KZrCuS30.01940.05500.01917.892
EuErCuTe3KZrCuS30.01850.05550.01966.960
EuTmCuTe3KZrCuS30.01750.05620.02036.207
EuLuCuTe3KZrCuS30.01600.05760.02174.933
EuScCuTe3KZrCuS30.00580.06870.03320.842
Distortion parameters for [RETe6]9− octahedra
EuNdCuTe3Eu2CuS30.01380.02060.00941.826
EuSmCuTe3Eu2CuS30.01100.02110.00951.628
EuGdCuTe3Eu2CuS30.01170.02120.01512.013
EuTbCuTe3Eu2CuS30.01350.02120.01912.475
EuDyCuTe3Eu2CuS30.01490.02160.02273.011
EuYCuTe3Eu2CuS30.01450.01770.02272.927
EuHoCuTe3KZrCuS30.01530.02100.02563.086
EuErCuTe3KZrCuS30.01750.02020.02833.790
EuTmCuTe3KZrCuS30.01890.01910.03044.220
EuLuCuTe3KZrCuS30.02200.01770.03495.404
EuScCuTe3KZrCuS30.03460.00470.059311.325
Table 2. Magnetic characteristics for EuRECuTe3 (RE = Nd, Sm, Tb, Dy (this work) and Gd, Er, Y, Lu [40,47,49]).
Table 2. Magnetic characteristics for EuRECuTe3 (RE = Nd, Sm, Tb, Dy (this work) and Gd, Er, Y, Lu [40,47,49]).
NdSmGd [47]TbDyEr [49]Y [40]Lu [47]
χ300K·104 (m3 kmol−1)2.812.996.016.728.267.723.033.20
Exp. μ300KB)7.327.5610.7111.3312.5612.147.607.82
Exp. μ50–300KB)7.687.8811.1411.7813.2412.397.798.04
Calc. μB)8.727.98211.2212.55013.27912.4427.9377.937
Exp. C300K (K m3 kmol−1)0.0840.0900.1800.2020.2480.2320.0910.096
Exp. C50–300K (K m3 kmol−1)0.0930.0980.1950.2180.2750.2410.0950.102
Calc. C (K m3 kmol−1)0.11960.11010.19800.24750.27710.24330.09900.0990
θp (K)−7.7−1.1−6.1−5.8−3.8−4.01.55.1
Graph. Tc (K)3.58.06.06.53.53.03.0
Cfit (K m3 kmol−1)0.0940.0980.1990.2200.2760.241
1/χ0 (kmol m−3)15729.239.831.910.514.5
σ (kmol K m−3)7880187013.56.381.7637.0
θ (K)–55.7–28.07.766.316.513.09
Tc (K)–1.163.047.936.416.564.24
arrangement ? *FiFiFiFiFiFF
* there are no magnetic transitions in the measured temperature range.
Table 3. Band gap of EuRECuTe3, eV.
Table 3. Band gap of EuRECuTe3, eV.
RENdSmGdTbDy
Band gap 0.45 (direct)0.45 (direct)0.47 (direct)0.48 (direct)0.48 (direct)
Table 4. Bandgap values in GGA+U calculations with f-electrones included in pseudopotential.
Table 4. Bandgap values in GGA+U calculations with f-electrones included in pseudopotential.
EuGdCuTe3EuTbCuTe3EuDyCuTe3
Eg, eV 0.450.410.53
Table 5. Different of energy with respect to general ferrimagnetic state in meV.
Table 5. Different of energy with respect to general ferrimagnetic state in meV.
EuGdCuTe3EuTbCuTe3EuDyCuTe3
FM 13.114.75.11
AFM-I 8.39.46.8
AFM-II 12.17.3811.29
Table 6. Calculated properties of EuRECuTe3 crystals (RE = Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy). Elastic constants (Cij), GPa. Elastic moduli: Bulk (B), (G), Young’s (Y), Poisson’s ratio (ν). Universal anisotropy index (AU).
Table 6. Calculated properties of EuRECuTe3 crystals (RE = Nd, Sm, Gd, Tb, Dy). Elastic constants (Cij), GPa. Elastic moduli: Bulk (B), (G), Young’s (Y), Poisson’s ratio (ν). Universal anisotropy index (AU).
REC11C12C13C22C23C33C44C55C66Calculation SchemeBYGνAu
10037461174883371429Voigt62.571.527.30.3090.80
NdReuss61.962.723.60.331
Hill62.267.125.40.320
1003948118508941830Voigt64.571.527.20.3150.59
SmReuss64.051.819.00.365
Hill64.261.823.10.340
1093947120529243831Voigt66.474.628.40.3132.26
GdReuss66.053.519.60.365
Hill66.264.324.00.338
1064046120519243831Voigt65.774.528.40.3112.25
TbReuss65.353.519.60.363
Hill65.564.224.00.337
1124047120519344831Voigt66.776.029.00.3102.13
DyReuss66.355.420.40.361
Hill66.565.924.70.335
Table 7. Monolayer exfoliation energy for EuRECuTe3.
Table 7. Monolayer exfoliation energy for EuRECuTe3.
RENdSmGdTbDy
Eexf, meV 228233237238236
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ruseikina, A.V.; Roginskii, E.M.; Grigoriev, M.V.; Chernyshev, V.A.; Garmonov, A.A.; Locke, R.J.C.; Schleid, T. Theoretical Insights and Experimental Studies of the New Layered Tellurides EuRECuTe3 with RE = Nd, Sm, Tb and Dy. Crystals 2025, 15, 787. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst15090787

AMA Style

Ruseikina AV, Roginskii EM, Grigoriev MV, Chernyshev VA, Garmonov AA, Locke RJC, Schleid T. Theoretical Insights and Experimental Studies of the New Layered Tellurides EuRECuTe3 with RE = Nd, Sm, Tb and Dy. Crystals. 2025; 15(9):787. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst15090787

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ruseikina, Anna V., Evgenii M. Roginskii, Maxim V. Grigoriev, Vladimir A. Chernyshev, Alexander A. Garmonov, Ralf J. C. Locke, and Thomas Schleid. 2025. "Theoretical Insights and Experimental Studies of the New Layered Tellurides EuRECuTe3 with RE = Nd, Sm, Tb and Dy" Crystals 15, no. 9: 787. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst15090787

APA Style

Ruseikina, A. V., Roginskii, E. M., Grigoriev, M. V., Chernyshev, V. A., Garmonov, A. A., Locke, R. J. C., & Schleid, T. (2025). Theoretical Insights and Experimental Studies of the New Layered Tellurides EuRECuTe3 with RE = Nd, Sm, Tb and Dy. Crystals, 15(9), 787. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst15090787

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop