Next Article in Journal
Synergistic Effect of the KBrO3 Electron Acceptor on the Photocatalytic Performance of the Nb-TiO2 Nanocomposite for Polluted Phenol Red Wastewater Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Facile Preparation, Microstructure and Dielectric Properties of La(Cr0.2Mn0.2Fe0.2Co0.2Ni0.2)O3 Perovskite High-Entropy Ceramics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study of OH Stretching Modes in Pyrophyllite and Talc

1
Gemological Institute, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
2
Sciences Institute, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
3
School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2022, 12(12), 1759; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12121759
Submission received: 9 November 2022 / Revised: 23 November 2022 / Accepted: 2 December 2022 / Published: 4 December 2022

Abstract

:
Pyrophyllite and talc are both tetrahedra–octahedra–tetrahedra (TOT)-type phyllosilicates, but differences can be found in the stacking mode of the layers and the ion occupation. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy was used to differentiate between pyrophyllite and talc. In the 400–600 cm−1 region, pyrophyllite exhibits six peaks, while talc only exhibits five peaks. In the 1000–1200 cm−1 region, pyrophyllite exhibits three clear peaks at approximately 1051, 1070, and 1121 cm−1; while talc only exhibits one strong peak near 1020 cm−1. The differences between pyrophyllite and talc in the near–infrared (NIR) region are clear in the 4000–4700 cm−1 region, and pyrophyllite exhibits an intense peak around 4615 cm−1, which is attributed to the combination of the OH and Si-O-Si stretching bands. Talc has a maximum peak located near 4324 cm−1, which is attributed to the OH stretching vibration. In addition, talc has a secondary peak near 4366 cm−1. Talc has two other weaker peaks around 4054 and 4180 cm−1. The 7000–7250 cm−1 region exhibits the first fundamental overtone of the OH group stretching vibrations. The common characteristic band of these two minerals is 7175–7183 cm−1. The first overtone of OH stretching vibrations can also be generated by adjacent peaks in the fundamental overtones. The peaks of these two minerals around 7094 cm−1 appear to be a combination of 3630 (±5) cm−1 and 3642 (±3) cm−1.The factor of the first fundamental overtone of the OH group stretching vibration is 1.95 (±0.003). Therefore, the characteristic peaks in the mid-infrared (MIR) and NIR regions can be used to distinguish between pyrophyllite and talc, providing a research basis for further exploration in related geological areas.

1. Introduction

Pyrophyllite (Al2[Si4O10](OH)2) and talc (Mg3[Si4O10](OH)2) are both 2:1 tetrahedra–octahedra–tetrahedra (TOT)-type phyllosilicates. Pyrophyllite has a dioctahedral layered structure in which a sheet of octahedrally coordinated Al ions is sandwiched between two sheets of linked SiO4 tetrahedra [1], while talc consists of an octahedral layer with Mg2+ between two silicate tetrahedral layers, in which each SiO4 shares three corners with the adjacent tetrahedra [2,3]. However, due to the lattice mismatch and ion replacement between the octahedral(O) sheets and tetrahedral(T) sheets [4], the two minerals exhibit different structures [5] (Figure 1). Pyrophyllite exists in aluminum-rich acid effusive rocks and tuff, it is also commonly associated with epithermal systems that produce gold mineralization. Talc is generally related to magnesium-rich ultramafic rocks, dolomite, and products of the metasomatism of dolomitic limestone. Pyrophyllite and talc are commonly used in industrial applications, such as ceramics and rubber [6]. Due to its high absorbability and floatability, talc can be applied in environmental remediation, especially in the treatment of heavy metal-contaminated sewage. Many carving crafts and seals are made of high quality pyrophyllite. Raman spectroscopy and electron microprobe analysis (EMPA) have been widely used to distinguish between pyrophyllite and talc in previous studies, but from the perspective of OH vibrations, infrared spectroscopy is a better choice. The vibrational properties of OH groups can reflect changes in the cationic environment, so detailed information about OH bond vibrations, together with the distribution of the OH groups and metal ions can easily be obtained by analyzing infrared spectroscopy data.
Infrared spectroscopy is highly efficient, fast, and non-destructive tool for determining local cationic environments and fine structural features. The presence, intensity, wavelength position, and shape of the observed absorption peaks are diagnostic of the types and amounts of the minerals that are present in the surface material [6]. The mid-infrared region (MIR, 400–4000 cm−1 (25–2.5 μm)) reflects the basic vibration modes of the functional groups [7], while the near-infrared region (NIR, ordinarily 4000–12,500 cm−1 (2.5–1 μm)) is often used to detect the vibration characteristics of the combination bands of metal ions and OH groups, as well as the overtone bands of water and some functional groups in minerals [8]. Any change in the crystalline structure can significantly affect the overtone vibrations. Madejova studied the infrared [9] and Raman [10] spectra of pyrophyllite and talc, however, there were no additional experiments. At present, the study on differentiating pyrophyllite and talc using infrared spectroscopy is very few and has not formed a theory of large-scale systems internationally. In this article, more differentiation methods (micro X-ray fluorescence, X-ray diffraction, and so on) were used to supplement and improve the previous infrared study comprehensively.
The purpose of this study is to identify the differences in the mid-infrared and near-infrared spectra of pyrophyllite and talc systematically, and to speed up and simplify the process of distinguishing between the two minerals. In addition, this differentiation method can quickly and correctly detect soil on alien planets in the future. Related results can be used in the fields of ceramics, archaeology, and geology. Furthermore, the assignment and combination of the OH group vibration peaks will be discussed later, and we will attempt to explain the origins of these bands in detail. The thorough description and explanation of phyllosilicates may be significant for further exploration in related geological areas.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Among plenty of massive pyrophyllite and talc samples, four samples were finally chosen to analyze in this study for their high purity. The four samples were provided by the National Infrastructure of Mineral, Rock, and Fossil Resources for Science and Technology (NIMRF). Pyrophyllite samples DH-D-4 and BY-PD-4 were collected from Qingtian, Lishui City, Zhejiang Province, China, which is a famous pyrophyllite origin due to the high degree of quality; and the origin of talc samples is unknown. All the samples that were analyzed in this study were natural and specially selected. The specific gravity of the pyrophyllite samples was around 2.81, and that of the talc samples was approximately 2.76. During the related tests, the samples were shattered in moderation, and a uniform portion of each sample, i.e., without other phases, was chosen for the experiments.
The phenomenon of isomorphic substitution is quite common in phyllosilicates, so element impurities are also common, which may have different degrees of influence on the results of spectral experiments. Micro X-ray fluorescence (μ-XRF) analysis was performed before further study, and the results showed that the contents of the major elements, such as Si, Mg (in talc), and Al (in pyrophyllite), were very close to the theoretical values and were distributed uniformly (Figure 2). The contents of the impurity elements were very low; most samples contained iron, and a small number of samples contained other elements, such as magnesium and chlorine (Table 1). It is considered unlikely that the impurity elements affected the results of this study since their contents in the samples were very low (Table 1).
The ionic radius of Al (coordination number = 6) is 0.054, and that of Mg (coordination number = 6) is 0.072. There is a certain difference between the ionic radii of these elements. From the perspective of geometry, replacements between ions are more likely to occur when the ionic radii of the mutual substitution ions are similar; considering the difference in the ionic radii of Al and Mg, it is difficult for ions to achieve isomorphism in minerals. In nature, only complete isomorphism occurs in pyrophyllite and talc series minerals, so it is difficult to find minerals with compositions between the Al and Mg endmembers.

2.2. Methods

The X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was performed at room temperature (approximately 22 °C) using the Smart lab X-ray powder diffractometer at the Institute of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing (CUGB). This system was equipped with a conventional copper target X-ray tube (set to 45 kV and 200 mA) and a graphite monochromator, with a stepping scanning mode, a scanning speed of 4°/min, and a step length of 0.02° in the range of 3–90°. The humidity was around 22%. An agate mortar was used to pulverize the samples to 200-mesh powder, and then the powder was immediately stored in plastic tubes to diminish contamination and oxidation. The results were normalized using the OriginPro 9.0 software and were analyzed using the MDI Jade 6.5 software and the International Center of Diffraction Database (ICDD).
The Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) data were acquired using the Bruker Tensor II spectrometer at the NIMRF. The temperature was approximately 20 °C, and the humidity was less than 22%. The spectra were collected in the frequency regions of 400–4000 cm−1 (MIR) and 4000–8000 cm−1 (NIR) using the KBr compression transmission method, the sample to KBr weight ratio was 1:150, and the resolution was 4 cm−1. Each spectrum was averaged from 64 scans to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio. The OriginPro 9.0 software was used to remove the baseline and to normalize the NIR data.
The original FTIR spectra of the infrared hydroxyl vibration are usually analyzed by taking the second derivative to obtain accurate peaks, due to the small peak spacing and the coincidence of multiple spectral peaks. Therefore, highly efficient data processing software is necessary. The PeakFit v4.12 software can help determine the exact locations and forms of the component peaks. All of the spectra that were processed were fitted using a combined Gauss–Lorentz area function, with r2 > 0.96.

3. Results

3.1. X-ray Diffraction

Figure 3 shows the XRD patterns of the four samples, as well as the powder diffraction file (PDF) cards for pyrophyllite and talc downloaded from the ICDD® database. Samples BY-PD-4 and DH-D-4 are compatible with the features of pyrophyllite, exhibiting similar strong peaks at d(002) = 9.600–9.616° and d(006) = 29.099–29.100°. Samples xs-2-2-9 and ys81-98 are consistent with the characteristics of talc, exhibiting the same peaks within this range: d(002) = 9.421–9.479° and d(006) = 28.581–28.683°. The ranges of 18–22°, 37–41°, 54–58°, 60–64°, and 66–70° (gray area in Figure 3) are the obvious region for distinguishing between pyrophyllite and talc by observing the number and intensity of the peaks. Samples BY-PD-4 and DH-D-4 have four peaks within this range, while samples xs-2-2-9 and ys81-98 only have two. The four samples are verified to be pure minerals after comparison with the PDF cards.

3.2. MIR Characteristics

There are four characteristic spectral bands in the mid-infrared range that can be examined to differentiate between the two minerals: 400–600 cm−1, 650–800 cm−1, 850–1200 cm−1, and 3500–3750 cm−1. The spectral peaks are extremely compatible with the standard spectra of the minerals (Figure 4), i.e., with no other peaks [11].
The presence, intensity, wavelength position, and shape of the peaks in the low-frequency region of 400–1200 cm−1 can be analyzed to differentiate between talc and pyrophyllite. In the 400–600 cm−1 region, pyrophyllite exhibits six peaks around 419, 457, 482, 518, 540, and 575 cm−1, while talc exhibits five peaks near 423, 439,452, 466, and 535 cm−1. In the 650–950 cm−1 region, pyrophyllite exhibits four weak peaks around 812, 834, 852, and 950 cm−1, while talc only exhibits one strong peak near 781 cm−1. In the 1000–1200 cm−1 region, pyrophyllite exhibits three clear peaks at approximately 1051, 1070, and 1121 cm−1, and talc exhibits one strong peak near 1020 cm−1. More vibration modes can be attained in the 2800–3700 cm−1 region (Figure 4 and Figure 5; Table 2).

3.3. NIR Characteristics

The characteristic NIR spectral bands of pyrophyllite and talc can be observed in the 4000–4700 cm−1 region (Table 3 and Figure 6). The differences between the NIR spectra of pyrophyllite and talc are clear. The two pyrophyllite samples (DH-D-4 and BY-PD-4) exhibit strong peaks around 4615 cm−1, which is assigned to the combination of the OH and Si-O-Si stretching bands [14]. In pyrophyllite, the peak around 4309 cm−1 can also be observed, but the intensity of 4309 cm−1 is weaker than that of 4615 cm−1. The other two talc samples (xs-2-2-9 and ys81-98) have a maximum peak that is located near 4323 cm−1, which is assigned to the OH stretching vibration [4]. The three weaker peaks of talc are located around 4056, 4180, and 4368 cm−1.
In the 5100–5500 cm−1 and 7000–7500 cm−1 regions, masses of disordered but clear peaks appear in all four spectra. Bishop [15] pointed out that the small amount of H2O molecules that are trapped at grain boundaries or connected with impurities in the samples may cause related bands to appear in these regions. Thus, it is likely that these signals are due to the water in the crystal structure rather than the impurity elements. Cheng [6] suggested that the various absorption peaks near 5260 cm−1 and 7150 cm−1 are caused by the unbound water in the interlayer structure of clay minerals, which is generally not assigned.
The 7000–7250 cm−1 region belongs to the first fundamental overtone of the OH stretching vibration, and an obvious peak and multiple small peaks can be observed after fitting (Figure 7). In this region, the strong peak of pyrophyllite is located at around 7175 cm−1, and that of talc is located near 7183 cm−1. Among the weak peaks, the talc samples exhibit a peak at 7152 cm−1, but the pyrophyllite samples do not. The peaks near 7294 and 7300 cm−1 can be attributed to a combination of OH and H2O stretching vibration [16].
Table 3. The NIR band assignments of the pyrophyllite (DH-D-4 and BY-PD-4) and talc (xs-2-2-9 and ys81-98) samples (cm−1).
Table 3. The NIR band assignments of the pyrophyllite (DH-D-4 and BY-PD-4) and talc (xs-2-2-9 and ys81-98) samples (cm−1).
AssignmentPyrophyllite [17]Talc [18,19,20]DH-D-4BY-PD-4xs-2-2-9ys81-98
Combination of OH and Si-O-Si stretching band4615 46154617
Combination of OH stretching and bending vibration 4055 40564056
418641824185418541804177
4323 43234323
4369 43684368
690869226916691669166925
The first fundamental
overtone of OH
stretching vibration
70737069707070697076
7094709470947089
7100 7106710671057111
71187118711871187118
71367139713971397132
7153 71527152
717571857175717571837183
720172017204720472047209
7234 7231723172317236
732773277327732773277327
7340 7341734173417342
Combination of OH and H2O stretching vibration7294 7294729472947289
73007309730973087302

4. Discussion

The relationships between the band frequencies of the MIR and NIR spectra were determined through trial-and-error summations. The obvious peak around 4615 cm−1 in the pyrophyllite samples is a combination of the peaks around 3674 cm−1 and 950 cm−1. The peak at 3674 cm−1 is attributed to O-H stretching vibration [21], and the peak at 950 cm−1 is attributed to Al-OH in-plane libration [22]. In addition, the characteristic peak at around 4323 cm−1 in the talc samples appears to be a combination of the peaks around 3655 cm−1 and 669 cm−1. The peaks at 3655 cm−1 and 669 cm−1 are both attributed to OH libration. Table 4 lists the detailed corresponding values for the four samples. The errors are less than 10 cm−1 [23], and the strength is in agreement.
In the 7000–8000 cm−1 region, the absorption corresponds to the first fundamental overtone of OH stretching vibration (2νOH) [26,27]. The most obvious peaks of the pyrophyllite samples are located near 7175 cm−1, and that of the talc samples is located at 7183 cm−1, which can be attributed to the OH stretching vibration [28,29]. Table 5 lists the detailed corresponding values for the four samples. In the 7000–7250 cm−1 region, the peaks of the talc samples are similar to the peaks of the pyrophyllite samples. Pyrophyllite and talc both have a TOT structure. With only one type of OH bond, the structure is extraordinarily stable, so it is difficult for the OH vibration to be influenced. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the peaks in the 7000–7250 cm−1 region cannot be used to distinguish between pyrophyllite and talc.
It is generally accepted that the average factor between the OH stretching vibration and its overtone should be twofold. In this study, the factor was calculated to be 1.95 (±0.003) (Table 5), which is more accurate than simply rounding to twofold and is a bit less. This has been illustrated via quantum mechanics [30].
In addition to the fundamental overtone that is generated by the OH stretching vibration, pyrophyllite and talc both have bands that cannot match the single OH stretching vibration band one-to-one. To achieve better matching results, the combination of the double OH stretching vibration is more accurate than the single vibration. No obvious change was observed when comparing the NIR spectra of the four samples before and after drying, so the effect of the adsorbed water was excluded [8]. The peak at around 7094 cm−1 appears to be a combination of 3630 (±5) cm−1 and 3642 (±3) cm−1. The peaks at 3630 (±5) cm−1 and 3642 (±3) cm−1 are attributed to O-H stretching vibration. Adjacent peaks can cause combined absorption, and this combination is related to the band position of the OH stretching vibration [8].

5. Conclusions

  • XRD data show that the samples that were studied in this article are consistent with the characteristics of minerals in PDF cards, which can verify that these samples are pure minerals. The ranges of 18–22°, 37–41°, 54–58°, 60–64°, and 66–70° are the obvious regions for distinguishing between pyrophyllite and talc by observing the number and intensity of the peaks.
  • Obvious differences were identified between the MIR spectra of pyrophyllite and talc samples. In the 400–600 cm−1 region, pyrophyllite exhibits six peaks, while talc only exhibits five. In the 1000–1200 cm−1 region, pyrophyllite exhibits three clear peaks at approximately 1051, 1070, and 1121 cm−1; while talc exhibits one strong peak near 1020 cm−1.
  • The NIR spectral characteristic peaks of pyrophyllite and talc are located in the 4000–4700 cm−1 region, and they are more obvious than the MIR spectral characteristic peaks. Pyrophyllite exhibits a strong peak at around 4615 cm−1, which is attributed to the combination of the OH and Si-O-Si stretching bands. Talc exhibits a maximum peak that is located near 4323 cm−1, which is assigned to the OH stretching vibration. In addition, the talc samples exhibit a secondary peak near 4366 cm−1. Talc also contains two other weaker peaks at around 4056 and 4180 cm−1.
  • The OH stretching vibration can be combined with the OH bending vibration and Si-O vibration. The OH combination vibration of pyrophyllite is located at 4615–4617 cm−1, which is a combination of the peaks around 3674 cm−1 and 950 cm−1. The peak at 3674 cm−1 is attributed to O-H stretching vibration, and the peak at 950 cm−1 is attributed to Al-OH in-plane libration. Additionally, 7000–7250 cm−1 is the first fundamental overtone region for the OH stretching vibration, including an obvious absorption peak and various small peaks. Pyrophyllite and talc each have a few combined overtones of the OH stretching vibration, which are composed of adjacent OH stretching vibrations. The peaks of the two minerals at around 7094 cm−1 appear to be a combination of the 3630 (±5) cm−1 and 3642 (±3) cm−1 peaks. The 7000–7250 cm−1 region cannot be used to distinguish between pyrophyllite and talc.
  • Due to the effect of the non-ideal conditions, the theoretical peak position of the overtone peak is higher than that of the actual position. The factor of the first fundamental overtone of the OH group stretching vibration is 1.95 (±0.003).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.H. and X.L.; data curation, H.W.; formal analysis, H.W. and S.W.; funding acquisition, M.H.; investigation, H.W.; methodology, H.W.; resources, M.H.; writing—original draft, H.W. and M.Y.; writing—review and editing, H.W. and S.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Mineral Rock and Fossil Specimens Resource Center to Mingyue He.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ravindra Reddy, T.; Lakshmi Reddy, S.; Endo, T. Structural characterization studies on the natural mineral pyrophyllite. Radiat. Eff. Defects Solids 2016, 171, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vedanand, S.; Sambasiva Rao, P.; Reddy, B.J. Spectroscopic investigations on different grade samples of Talc. Radiat. Eff. Defects Solids 1993, 127, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Claverie, M.; Carême, C.; Dumas, A.; Poirier, M.; Le Roux, C.; Micoud, P.; Martin, F.; Aymonier, C. Synthetic Talc and Talc-Like Structures: Preparation, Features and Applications. Chem. A Eur. J. 2018, 24, 519–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Petit, S.; Decarreau, A.; Martin, F.; Wiewiora, A.; De Parseval, P. Crystal-chemistry of talc: A near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy study. Am. Miner. 2004, 89, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, M.; Salje, E.K.H.; Carpenter, M.A.; Wang, J.Y.; Groat, L.A.; Lager, G.A.; Wang, L.; Beran, A.; Bismayer, U. Temperature dependence of IR absorption of hydrous/OH species in minerals and synthetic materials. Am. Miner. 2007, 92, 1502–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cheng, H.F.; Hao, R.W.; Zhou, Y.; Frost, R.L. Visible and near-infrared spectroscopic comparison of five phyllosilicate mineral samples. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2017, 180, 19–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wu, S.; He, M.Y.; Yang, M.; Peng, B.J. Near-Infrared Spectroscopic Study of OH Stretching Modes in Kaolinite and Dickite. Crystals 2022, 12, 907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, S.; He, M.Y.; Yang, M.; Zhang, B.Y.; Wang, F.; Li, Q.Z. Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study of Serpentine Minerals and Assignment of the OH Group. Crystals 2021, 11, 1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Madejová, J.; Gates, W.P.; Petit, S. Chapter 5––IR Spectra of Clay Minerals. Dev. Clay Sci. 2017, 8, 107–149. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kloprogge, J. Chapter 6––Raman Spectroscopy of Clay Minerals. Dev. Clay Sci. 2018, 150, 199. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang, M.; Redfern, S.A.T.; Salje, E.K.H.; Carpenter, M.A.; Wang, L. H2O and the dehydroxylation of phyllosilicates: An infrared spectroscopic study. Am. Miner. 2010, 95, 1686–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kloprogge, J.T.; Ruan, H. Near-infrared spectroscopic study of synthetic and natural pyrophyllite. Neues Jahrb. Fur Mineral. Mon. 2000, 8, 337–347. [Google Scholar]
  13. Byungsuk, K.; Young-Ah, W. Optimization of in-line near-infrared measurement for practical real time monitoring of coating weight gain using design of experiments. Drug Dev. Commun. 2021, 47, 72–82. [Google Scholar]
  14. Peng, X.W.; Li, G.Y. The Preliminary Discussion on Mineral Characterics and Genesis of the Pyrophyllite Deposit in Southeastern ZheJiang. Geol. Zhejiang 1991, 7, 68–75, 85–87. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bishop, J.L.; Pieters, C.M.; Edwards, J.O. Infrared spectroscopic analyses on the nature of water in montmorillonite. Clays Clay Miner. 1994, 42, 702–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, Z.; Zong, Y.; Hou, J. Preparation of slag glass ceramic from electric arc furnace slag, quartz sand and talc under various MgO/Al2O3 ratios. Adv. Appl. Ceram. 2016, 115, 144–151. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sébastien, L.; Jean-Michel, B.; Fabrice, M.; Rémi, C. Integration of iron in natural and synthetic Al-pyrophyllites: An infrared spectroscopic study. Clay Miner. 2007, 42, 129–143. [Google Scholar]
  18. Blanchard, M.; Méheut, M.; Delon, L.; Poirier, M.; Micoud, P.; Le Roux, C.; Martin, F. Infrared spectroscopic study of the synthetic Mg-Ni talc series. Phys. Chem. Miner. 2018, 45, 843–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Julia, S.G.; Chi, M.; George, R.R. Dehydroxylation, proton migration, and structural changes in heated talc: An infrared spectroscopic study. Am. Miner. 2006, 91, 816–825. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kato, Y.; Sasakura, D.; Miura, T.; Nagatomo, A.; Terada, K. Evaluation of risk and benefit in the application of near-infrared spectroscopy to monitor the granule coating process. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2008, 13, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huang, Z.M.; Tang, D.P.; Liu, H.; Xie, X.J. Near Infrared Spectroscopy: A New Tool to Identify Different Types of Larderites. J. Gems Gemmol. 2014, 16, 34–43. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kloprogge, J.T.; Frost, R.L. An infrared emission spectroscopic study of synthetic and natural pyrophyllite. Neues Jahrb. Fur Mineral. Mon. 1999, 2, 62–74. [Google Scholar]
  23. Baron, F.; Petit, S. Interpretation of the infrared spectra of the lizardite-nepouite series in the near- and mid-infrared range. Am. Miner. 2016, 101, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liang, P.; Liu, Q.F.; He, G.W. Mineralogical Characteristics and Genesis of Pyrophyllite from the Hongmiaoling Formation in Tanzhesi Region, Western Beijing, China. Bull. Mineral. Petrol. Geochem. 2015, 34, 1223–1230. [Google Scholar]
  25. Xu, Y.T.; Qin, H.F.; Chen, T. Mineralogical and Spectroscopic Study on Xidan Stone from Shoushan County, Fujian Province. Spectrosc. Anal. 2019, 39, 543–547. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang, L.; Zhang, M.; Redfern, S.A.T.; Zhang, Z.Y. Dehydroxylation and Transformations of the 2:1 Phyllosilicate Pyrophyllite at Elevated Temperatures: An Infrared Spectroscopic Study. Clays Clay Miner. 2002, 50, 272–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, D.M.; Jiang, Z.C.; Zhang, H.F. Differential Thermal Analysis and Nfrared Absorption Spectroscopy of Pyrophyllite from China. Acta Mineral. Sin. 1991, 11, 92–96. [Google Scholar]
  28. Drits, V.A.; Besson, G.; Muller, F. An improved model for structural transformations of heat-treated aluminous dioctahedral 2:1 layer silicates. Clays Clay Min. 1995, 43, 718–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wilkins, R.W.T.; Jun, I. Infrared Spectra of some Synthetic Talcs. Am Miner. 1967, 52, 1649–1661. [Google Scholar]
  30. Bishop, J.; Murad, E.; Dyar, M.D. The influence of octahedral and tetrahedral cation substitution on the structure of smectites and serpentines as observed through infrared spectroscopy. Clay Miner. 2002, 37, 617–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Crystal structure of dioctahedron and trioctahedron: (a) pyrophyllite is dioctahedral phyllosilicate, and (b) talc is trioctahedral phyllosilicate.
Figure 1. Crystal structure of dioctahedron and trioctahedron: (a) pyrophyllite is dioctahedral phyllosilicate, and (b) talc is trioctahedral phyllosilicate.
Crystals 12 01759 g001
Figure 2. Element maps of the pyrophyllite (DH-D-4 and BY-PD-4) and talc (xs-2-2-9 and ys81-98) samples that were obtained via μ-XRF: (a) element maps of pyrophyllite samples (DH-D-4 and BY-PD-4), and (b) element maps of talc (xs-2-2-9 and ys81-98) samples.
Figure 2. Element maps of the pyrophyllite (DH-D-4 and BY-PD-4) and talc (xs-2-2-9 and ys81-98) samples that were obtained via μ-XRF: (a) element maps of pyrophyllite samples (DH-D-4 and BY-PD-4), and (b) element maps of talc (xs-2-2-9 and ys81-98) samples.
Crystals 12 01759 g002
Figure 3. XRD patterns of the pyrophyllite (DH-D-4 and BY-PD-4) and talc (xs-2-2-9 and ys81-98) samples.
Figure 3. XRD patterns of the pyrophyllite (DH-D-4 and BY-PD-4) and talc (xs-2-2-9 and ys81-98) samples.
Crystals 12 01759 g003
Figure 4. MIR spectra of the pyrophyllite (DH-D-4 and BY-PD5-4) and talc (xs-2-2-9 and ys81-98) samples.
Figure 4. MIR spectra of the pyrophyllite (DH-D-4 and BY-PD5-4) and talc (xs-2-2-9 and ys81-98) samples.
Crystals 12 01759 g004
Figure 5. MIR spectral component analysis of the OH combination bands in the 3600–3720 cm−1 region (pyrophyllite samples are DH-D-4 and BY-PD-4, while talc samples are xs-2-2-9 and ys81-98).
Figure 5. MIR spectral component analysis of the OH combination bands in the 3600–3720 cm−1 region (pyrophyllite samples are DH-D-4 and BY-PD-4, while talc samples are xs-2-2-9 and ys81-98).
Crystals 12 01759 g005
Figure 6. NIR spectra of the pyrophyllite (DH-D-4 and BY-PD-4) and talc (xs-2-2-9 and ys81-98) samples.
Figure 6. NIR spectra of the pyrophyllite (DH-D-4 and BY-PD-4) and talc (xs-2-2-9 and ys81-98) samples.
Crystals 12 01759 g006
Figure 7. NIR spectral component analysis of the OH stretching overtone bands in the 7050–7250 cm−1 region (pyrophyllite samples are DH-D-4 and BY-PD-4, while talc samples are xs-2-2-9 and ys81-98).
Figure 7. NIR spectral component analysis of the OH stretching overtone bands in the 7050–7250 cm−1 region (pyrophyllite samples are DH-D-4 and BY-PD-4, while talc samples are xs-2-2-9 and ys81-98).
Crystals 12 01759 g007
Table 1. Mineral characteristics of the pyrophyllite (DH-D-4 and BY-PD-4) and talc (xs-2-2-9 and ys81-98) samples.
Table 1. Mineral characteristics of the pyrophyllite (DH-D-4 and BY-PD-4) and talc (xs-2-2-9 and ys81-98) samples.
SampleMineralsColorSpecific Gravity (SG)Isomorphism (ω%)
DH-D-4Pyrophyllite Yellow green2.82Mg/0. 19%, Fe/0.10%, Ti/0.05%, S/0.02%
BY-PD-4Pyrophyllite Yellow green2.81Mg/0.51%, Cl/0.25%, Fe/0.14%, S/0.02%
xs-2-2-9Talc White 2.76Fe/0.10%, Cr/0.01%, Ti/0.01%
ys81-98Talc Light yellow2.77Fe/0.28%, Al/0.09%, Cl/0.02%, Ti/0.01%
Table 2. The MIR band assignments of the pyrophyllite (DH-D-4 and BY-PD-4) and talc (xs-2-2-9 and ys81-98) samples (cm−1).
Table 2. The MIR band assignments of the pyrophyllite (DH-D-4 and BY-PD-4) and talc (xs-2-2-9 and ys81-98) samples (cm−1).
Band AssignmentPyrophyllite [12]Talc [13]DH-D-4BY-PD-4xs-2-2-9ys81-98
Si-O bending vibration422 419419
O-H bending vibration

450
423
439
452
423
438
451
Si-O bending vibration459 457457
O-H bending vibration 465 466465
Si-O bending vibration480 482482
Si-O-Al bending vibration516 518518
O-H bending vibration 538 535535
Si-O-Al bending vibration541 540540
578 575575
OH bending vibration 669 668669
OH bending 690 692694
OH species 781 781781
Al-OH bending vibration812 812812
833 834834
853 852852
949 950950
Si-O stretching vibration 10201020
Si-O-Si stretching vibration1052 10511051
1068 10701070
Si-O stretching vibration1122 11211121
H2O band1632 16341634
Overtone of SiO4 vibrational mode of 2ν3285028502855285328572855
2925 2926292629282928
O-H stretching vibration3590 3590358835843584
363036233630363036253624
364536443642364436443645
3652 36553658
367536763674367436753675
3700 3703370337073707
Table 4. The major NIR bands in the 4000–4700 cm−1 region for the four samples and their corresponding MIR peaks (cm−1).
Table 4. The major NIR bands in the 4000–4700 cm−1 region for the four samples and their corresponding MIR peaks (cm−1).
Sample Measured PeakFundamental PeaksTheoretical Peak [24,25]Δ
DH-D-446153674 + 95046249
BY-PD-446173674 + 95046247
xs-2-2-940563625 + 43940648
41773644 + 53541792
43233655 + 66943241
43683675 + 69243671
ys81-9840563624 + 43840626
41773645 + 53541803
43233658 + 66943274
43683675 + 69443691
Table 5. The major NIR bands in the 7000–7250 cm−1 region for the four samples and their corresponding MIR peaks (cm−1).
Table 5. The major NIR bands in the 7000–7250 cm−1 region for the four samples and their corresponding MIR peaks (cm−1).
SampleMeasured PeakFundamental PeaksFactorSampleMeasured PeakFundamental PeaksFactor
DH-D-47094(3630 + 3642)/21.9510BY-PD-47094(3630 + 3644)/21.9505
711836421.9544 711836441.9533
717536741.9529 717536741.9529
723137031.9527 723137031.9527
Average
1.9528
Average
1.9524
xs-2-2-97094(3625 + 3644)/21.9519ys81-987089(3624 + 3645)/21.9505
711836441.9533 711836451.9528
718336751.9546 718336751.9546
723137071.9506 723637071.9519
Average
1.9526
Average
1.9525
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, H.; He, M.; Wu, S.; Yang, M.; Liu, X. Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study of OH Stretching Modes in Pyrophyllite and Talc. Crystals 2022, 12, 1759. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12121759

AMA Style

Wu H, He M, Wu S, Yang M, Liu X. Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study of OH Stretching Modes in Pyrophyllite and Talc. Crystals. 2022; 12(12):1759. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12121759

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Haoyu, Mingyue He, Shaokun Wu, Mei Yang, and Xi Liu. 2022. "Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study of OH Stretching Modes in Pyrophyllite and Talc" Crystals 12, no. 12: 1759. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12121759

APA Style

Wu, H., He, M., Wu, S., Yang, M., & Liu, X. (2022). Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study of OH Stretching Modes in Pyrophyllite and Talc. Crystals, 12(12), 1759. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12121759

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop