Next Article in Journal
Crystal Structure and Magnetism of Potassium-Intercalated 2,7-Dimethylnaphthalene
Next Article in Special Issue
Reduction of Fluorine Diffusion and Improvement of Dark Current Using Carbon Implantation in CMOS Image Sensor
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Sulfurization Time on the Physical Properties of Tin (II) Monosulfide Thin Films
Previous Article in Special Issue
CHCl3-Dependent Emission Color and Jumping Behavior of Cyclic Chalcone Single Crystals: The Halogen Bond Network Effect
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Axial Error of Spindle Measurements Using a High-Frequency-Modulated Interferometer

School of Mechanical Engineering, Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2021, 11(7), 801; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11070801
Submission received: 31 May 2021 / Revised: 25 June 2021 / Accepted: 8 July 2021 / Published: 9 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Organic Optoelectronic Materials (Volume II))

Abstract

:
In this paper, a novel, compact, and high-precision axial error measurement using a frequency-modulated interferometer is developed. Normally, heterodyne interferometers are a powerful system for small displacement measurements due to their property of being less sensitive to temperature and pressure variations. However, the maximum measurement speed of the heterodyne interferometer is around 5 m/s because it is usually limited by the difference in frequency between the two components of the laser beam, which is no larger than 3 MHz or 20 MHz corresponding laser source based on the Zeeman effect and acousto-optic modulator, respectively. The proposed measuring system is realized by modulating the frequency of the laser diode source at a high modulation frequency and using lock-in amplifiers to extract the harmonics of the interference signal. The measurement speed is proportional to the modulation frequency. Thus, the higher the modulation frequency, the higher the measuring speed attains. The frequency-modulated interferometer is then applied to measure the axial error of an ultra-precision spindle. The proposed system can be a capable solution for noncontact and high-precision spindle error measurements in the machining process.

1. Introduction

The error motion of the machine tool spindle causes deviation for the workpieces such as roundness, straightness, and surface roughness [1,2]. Recently, the requirements for geometric parameters and finish surface quality of mechanical parts are increasingly tight. Therefore, the control of the spindle rotational error in ultra-fine machines is an urgent demand [3,4]. Error motions are small unwanted movements of the rotation axis relative to the stationary reference coordinate axes. There are five components of this error, the first three ones are translation in the three directions x, y, and z. The fourth component is a tilting relative to the x and y axes at a specified position along the z-axis and called the radial error motion. Axial error motion is error motion colinear with z-axis direction [5,6,7]. Spindle error measurements play an important role in the field of ultra-precision manufacturing. Normally, a cylindrical or spherical artifact combined with noncontact sensors to measure a machine tool spindle errors was used [8,9]. Capacitive sensor and eddy current sensor are most employed. Both types of sensors can achieve a nanometer level of resolution. However, these sensors are relatively low bandwidth, sensitivity to the environment, and short stand-off distance [10,11].
Laser interferometer has emerged as an effective tool for measuring the spindle error motion of machining machines with nanometer-scale measurement uncertainty because of their inherent accuracy and accordance with the definition of meter through the frequency of the laser source. Laser interference systems have been developed such as homodyne [12,13,14,15,16], heterodyne [17,18], and frequency modulation technique [19,20,21]. The heterodyne interferometer is not greatly affected by ambient temperature and refractive index because its beat frequency is the carrier frequency of the information and is far from DC components and low-frequency noise sources. Some available phase measurements such pulse counting, two-phase lock-in amplifier (LIA), two phase-locked loops (PLLs) are developed for the heterodyne system. The pulse counting method is fast enough to cover high-speed measurements (up to 2.1 m/s), but the discrete nature of the counting operation limits the system resolution [18]. This resolution can be improved using the LIA with arc-tangent operations or the PLLs with feedback loop controls. However. The maximum measuring speed of the heterodyne interferometer is limited by the heterodyne frequency. In addition, the complicated and high-cost systems are also their drawbacks. Homodyne interferometers are widely employed in measuring small motion with high resolution. T. Keem eliminated the cyclic errors to achieve an accuracy of 10 pm [15] and J. Ahn reported a nonlinear compensation method in a homodyne interferometer to obtain sub-picometer resolution [16]. The homodyne interferometer signal is time-independent and therefore it enables ultra-fast response because the phase change in the interferometer converts instantaneously into the intensity variation. Hence, homodyne interferometers have the potential to be used in high-speed applications. However, the homodyne interferometer requires high stability of the laser source intensity during the whole measurement. This means that the misalignment of the optical components, disturbance of the environment, or the shift of a measuring point will have an extreme effect on measurement accuracy. Additionally, the moving direction of the measurement target cannot be found if only one interference signal is available. Normally, a pair of quadrature signals are employed to treat such drawbacks. Among these techniques, sinusoidal frequency modulation (SFM) has many advantages. The SFM interference signal, a continuous function of time, is a series of harmonics of the modulation frequency. The phase-shift caused by the displacement of the target mirror in the interferometer can be accurately extracted from the interference signal using the synchronous detection method [22,23]. Furthermore, the measurement speed of the SFM interferometer is only limited by the modulation frequency, which can be obtained very high by modulating the injection current on a normal laser diode (LD).
In this paper, a new method to measure the axial error of a spindle was proposed. A sinusoidal injection current of frequency 3 MHz was used to modulate the frequency of an LD, and then the modulated LD was used as the light source of the Michelson interferometer. The frequency-modulated interferometer was then used to measure the axial error of an ultra-precision spindle. The axial error was determined from the interference signal of the interferometer using the synchronous detection method. The system can operate accurately even though the presence of vibration and environmental disturbance.

2. Methodology

The purpose of this paper is to determine the axial error of an ultra-precision spindle that includes (1) longitudinal-motion error and (2) runout error of the spindle. The longitudinal-motion error (1) is the error motion of the spindle collinear with the direction of the laser beam. Moreover, the runout error (2) is caused by the misalignment of the rotational spindle axis and the laser beam direction. A homodyne interferometer using the frequency modulation of an LD is used to detect the axial error.
Figure 1 shows the diagram of the interferometer. The measurement mirror (MM) is hardly glued to the end face of the spindle. A tunable laser diode (LD) is used as the laser source, which is frequency-modulated with an MHz-order sinusoidal signal by a function generator (FG). The angle frequency ω(t) of the LD is expressed as
ω ( t ) = ω 0 + Δ ω sin ( ω m t )
where ω0 (=2πf0), ωm (=2πfm), and Δω are the initial angle frequency of LD, the angle modulation frequency, and the magnitude of ωm, respectively. A polarization beam splitter (PBS1) divides the laser beam into two parts. One of the two parts (vertically polarized beam) is directed to a half-wave plate (HWP) and reaches an interferometer (Agilent 10706A). Here, the polarization axis of HWP is oriented at 45° to the polarization axis of the incident beam. In the interferometer, another PBS splits the incident beam into two components (reflection and transmission components). The reflection component passes long the reference arm via a quarter-wave plate (QWP), a reference mirror (RM), the QWP again, and the PBS. Meanwhile, the transmission laser beam passes along the measurement arm via another QWP, MM, QWP, and PBS. It should be noted that the incident beams are reflected twice on the RM and MM in both arms and the measurement resolution of the interferometer is increased by double times.
At the PBS, the reflection and transmission beams combine and reach a photodetector (PD). Between the PBS and PD, a polarizer (P) is used. Since the polarization axis of P is oriented at 45° to the polarization axes of the overlapping two beams, they interfere with each other. At PD, the interference signal I(L,t) is thus generated and can be written as [22,23]
I ( L , t ) = I 0 [ 1 + V cos ( m sin ω m t + ω 0 4 L n a i r c ) ]
where ω 0   ( = 2 π f 0 ) , ω m , nair, I 0 , V, L, and c are the central angular frequency of LD, the angular modulation frequency, the refractive index of air, the average intensity, the contrast of a beat signal, the unbalance length of the interferometer, and the light velocity within vacuum, respectively. Here,
m = Δ ω ω m sin ( ω m τ 2 ) 4 π Δ f L n a i r c
is the modulation index, where τ and ∆f are the time delay between the two arms of the interferometer and the frequency modulation amplitude, respectively. Using the Bessel function, Equation (2) is expanded as
I ( L , t ) = I 0 { 1 + V { cos ( ω 0 4 L n c ) [ ( J 0 ( m ) + 2 k = 1 J 2 k ( m ) cos 2 k ω m   t ) ] sin ( ω 0 4 L n c ) 2 k = 1 [ J 2 k 1 ( m ) sin ( 2 k 1 ) ω m   t ] } }
Here, L in Equation (4) can be expressed as
L = L 0 + Δ L
where L0 and ΔL are the initial unbalanced length between the two arms and the displacement of the measurement mirror (MM) that is ruled as the axial error of the spindle when the spindle performs a high-velocity rotation. Substituting Equation (5) into (4) and using 2 π c λ 0 , we can obtain
I ( Δ L , t ) = I 0 { 1 + V { cos ( 8 π n λ 0 Δ L ) [ J 0 ( m ) + 2 k = 1 ( J 2 k ( m ) cos 2 k ω m   t ) ] sin ( 8 π n λ 0 Δ L ) 2 k = 1 ( J 2 k 1 ( m ) sin ( 2 k 1 ) ω m   t ) } }  
As a result, Equation (6) shows that the interference signal I ( Δ L , t ) contains many frequency components with a fundamental modulation frequency ω m and its harmonics of ( 2 k 1 ) ω m and 2 k ω m . Using two lock-in amplifiers (LIAs), we can extract any pair of consecutive harmonics, ( 2 k 1 ) ω m and 2 k ω m , where k is an integer ≥1 [22].
The ( 2 k 1 ) ω m and 2 k ω m harmonics are given by
I 2 ω m = I 0 V J 2 ( m ) cos ( 8 π n λ 0 Δ L )
I 3 ω m = I 0 V J 3 ( m ) sin ( 8 π n λ 0 Δ L )
In Equations (7) and (8), the gains of the two LIAs are assumed to be the same. A Lissajous diagram is a representation of I 3 ω m / I 2 ω m . The phase of the Lissajous diagram is obtained, and ΔL can be calculated as
Δ L = λ 0 8 π n { arctan ( J 2 ( m ) I 3 ω m J 3 ( m ) I 2 ω m ) }
In the frequency-modulated interferometer, two successive harmonics are detected using LIAs. When the target moves, the Doppler frequency shortens the gap between these harmonics. The maximum measurement speed is limited when the bandwidth of two successive harmonics is overlapped. The maximum velocity of the target can be expressed as the following
V m a x λ 0 4 f m
where V m a x is the maximum velocity.
In Figure 1, we set up the two incident beams directing to the MM such that they are symmetrical to the axis of the spindle rotation. It leads that the axial error only contains the longitudinal-motion error of the spindle. This interferometer can obtain the longitudinal error vibration of the spindle.
To verify the proposed method, an axial error measurement of an ultra-precision spindle that the maximum speed of the spindle was less than 5000 pps (600 rpm) was performed. Following the ANSI/ASME B89.3.4M, Axes of Rotation: Methods for Specifying and Testing Standard, the motion error is described by its radial (x- and y-directions at a specified location), axial (along the z-axis), and tilt components (rotation about the x- and y-axes) [7]. It is noteworthy that both the radial and axial errors can be determined using the displacement-measuring interferometer. For the radial error measurements, the measurement speed must be much higher than the axial error measurement. From Equation (5), the measurement speed of the frequency modulation interferometer can be improved using a high-frequency modulation frequency. Therefore, a modulation frequency of 3 MHz (according to Equation (10), the measurable speed ~0.48 m/s with λ = 635 nm) was applied to the laser to measure the axial errors of the spindle. Moreover, a primary experiment using a modulation frequency of 20 MHz (~3.16 m/s) that can be used to measure the radial errors was performed and validated.

3. Results and Discussion

The experimental conditions used in the axial error measurement of an ultra-precision spindle are shown in Table 1. An LD (Thorlabs, HL6312G wavelength λ = 635 nm) is used as the laser source of the interferometer. The MM mounted on the end face of the spindle was driven by an ultra-precision spindle (HDR50/M, Thorlabs Inc.) at 4200 pps (4200 × 0.72°/360° × 60 = 504 rpm, 8.4 Hz). The modulation frequency of LD f m = 3 MHz generated from the digital FG (Moku: labs) is used for the LD. The interference signal IL, t) is recorded by a PD (Thorlabs, DET08CFC/M) and then is transmitted to two LIAs. We employ two Moku: labs, whose sampling rate is up to 500 Ms/s, as two digital LIAs to extract the 2 f m (=6 MHz) and 3 f m (=9 MHz) harmonics. The LIAs must be synchronized with each other. In the experiment, the cutoff frequency of the LIAs was set at 50 kHz. In the experiment, the MM was located at L = ~0.9 m. Therefore, m = 3.77 from Equation (3) with Δf = 100 MHz, nair ≈ 1, and c ≈ 3.108 m/s.
Figure 2 and Figure 3 show experimental results of the axial error measurement. Two LIAs were used to detect second and harmonics and to remove anything unsynchronized with the reference signals. Hence, a Lissajous diagram using the harmonics was generated accurately even though the presence of environmental disturbance, as shown in Figure 2. Figure 3 shows the axial error of the spindle. An axial error of the spindle with a peak-to-peak value of 0.8 µm was successfully detected. The effect of vibration can be seen clearly at the peaks of the axial error measurement graph caused by the air gap of the ball bearings of the spindle. The length noise floor analyzed using FFT are shown in Figure 3b. The result shows that a primary peak of 8.4 Hz, which is the same as the rotary frequency of the spindle axis, and its harmonics are found. The obtained noise level reaches less than 10 nm/√Hz from 1 Hz to 1000 Hz and downs to 0.01 nm/√Hz and lower at frequencies above 10 kHz instead of those unwanted peaks. Moreover, other redundant peaks found may be caused by this air gap of the ball bearings of the spindle above.
According to Equation (10), the measurement speed of the interferometer is limited by fm. To obtain measurements of the radial error of the spindle with a speed of up to several m/s, fm ~ tens of MHz should be achieved. In our previous works, it was difficult to restore an interferometric signal modulated with fm ~ tens of MHz owing to the hardware limitation caused by the low bandwidth of LIAs [22,23]. In the following experimental step, we attempt to enhance the modulation frequency of LD up to 20 MHz using the new digital LIAs of the Moku: labs with a large bandwidth of 200 MHz for improving high-speed measurements. A digital oscilloscope (Moku: labs, San Diego, CA, USA) is employed to examine the modulated signal for one cycle period of ~30 μs at a sampling frequency of 500 Ms/s. Figure 4 shows the measurement result. An fm sine-wave modulation signal with a peak-to-peak amplitude of ~6.5 mV is graphed for 1 μs (one portion of 30 μs), as shown in Figure 4a. Figure 4b,c show the RMS amplitude of the signal in the frequency domain a bandwidth of 250 MHz and a frequency resolution of approximately 30.5 kHz using the FFT. A peak of 10−2 mV/√Hz at fm = 20 MHz is attained. Additionally, the 2nd and 3rd harmonics of fm = 20 MHz were found, and the sine wave in Figure 4a can be distorted. Unfortunately, since the spindle speed is limited, we have not acquired the high-speed measurement of both the axial and radial errors using fm = 20 MHz. We are planning to execute this problem using high-speed spindle.

4. Conclusions

A new method to measure the axial error of a spindle using a high-frequency-modulated interferometer was proposed and validated. The frequency modulation of 3 MHz was applied to an LD and the axial error of an ultra-precision spindle at 504 rpm was determined using two consecutive harmonics. There was some deformation in the Lissajous diagram because of environmental disturbance and vibration. The measurement resolution with the order of approximately 10 nm can be achieved. Moreover, the primary experimental result has proved that the modulation frequency up to 20 MHz for the LD was possible. Some harmonics can be seen clearly by the FFT analysis. It was a significant condition to extend the measurement speed of the proposed system. The measuring system is compact, low-cost, and stable. For future work, the proposed interferometer should be compared with a heterodyne interferometer to clarify the measurement accuracy of the system.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.-T.V. (Toan-Thang Vu) and T.-T.V. (Thanh-Tung Vu).; methodology, T.-T.V. (Toan-Thang Vu) and T.-D.N.; software, T.-T.N.; validation, T.-T.V. (Thanh-Tung Vu); formal analysis, T.-T.N.; investigation, T.-T.N.; resources, T.-T.V. (Toan-Thang Vu); data curation, T.-D.N.; writing—original draft preparation, T.-T.N.; writing—review and editing, T.-T.V. (Thanh-Tung Vu); supervision, T.-T.V. (Toan-Thang Vu); funding acquisition, T.-T.V. (Toan-Thang Vu). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Hanoi University of Science and Technology, grant number T2020-PC-204.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Murakami, H.; Katsuki, A.; Sajima, T. Simple and simultaneous measurement of five-degrees-of-freedom error motions of high-speed microspindle: Error analysis. Precis. Eng. 2014, 38, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jin, A.; Chen, J.; Yang, W.; Lin, J.; Wang, L.; Jin, P. Measurement of spindle radial error based on target trajectory tracking. Measurement 2019, 146, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lei, W.; Hsu, Y. Accuracy test of five-axis CNC machine tool with 3D probe–ball. Part I: Design and modeling. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2002, 42, 1153–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cao, H.; Li, B.; Li, Y.; Kang, T.; Chen, X. Model-based error motion prediction and fit clearance optimization for machine tool spindles. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2019, 133, 106252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Conte, J.; Santolaria, J.; Majarena, A.; Acero, R.; Conte, J.; Santolaria, J.; Majarena, A.; Acero, R. Modelling, kinematic parameter identification and sensitivity analysis of a Laser Tracker having the beam source in the rotating head. Measurement 2016, 89, 261–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. ANSI/ASME B89.3.4M. Axes of Rotation–Methods for Specifying and Testing; The American Society of Mechanical Engineers: New York, NY, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  7. ISO 230-7:2006. Test Code for Machine Tools–Part 7: Geometry Accuracy of Axes of Rotation; International Standardisation Organisation: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cui, H.; Lei, D.; Zhang, X.; Lan, H.; Jiang, Z.; Kong, L. Measurement and analysis of the radial motion error of aerostatic ultra-precision spindle. Measurement 2019, 137, 624–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chrzanowski, J.; Sałaciński, T.; Skiba, P. Spindle Error Movements and Their Measurement. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Peng, K.; Yu, Z.; Liu, X.; Chen, Z.; Pu, H. Features of capacitive displacement sensing that provide high-accuracy measurements with reduced manufacturing precision. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2017, 64, 7377–7386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ye, Y.; Zhang, C.; He, C.; Wang, X.; Huang, J.; Deng, J. A Review on Applications of Capacitive Displacement Sensing for Capacitive Proximity Sensor. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 45325–45342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Castro, H. A method for evaluating spindle rotation errors of machine tools using a laser interferometer. Measurement 2008, 41, 526–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gregorčič, P.; Požar, T.; Možina, J. Quadrature phase-shift error analysis using a homodyne laser interferometer. Opt. Express 2009, 17, 16322–16331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Petrů, F.; Číp, O. Problems regarding linearity of data of a laser interferometer with a single-frequency laser. Precis. Eng. 1999, 23, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Keem, T.; Gonda, S.; Misumi, I.; Huang, Q.; Kurosawa, T. Simple, real-time method for removing the cyclic error of a homodyne interferometer with a quadrature detector system. Appl. Opt. 2005, 44, 3492–3498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ahn, J.; Kim, J.-A.; Kang, C.-S.; Kim, J.W.; Kim, S. A passive method to compensate nonlinearity in a homodyne interferometer. Opt. Express 2009, 17, 23299–23308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wu, C.-C.; Hsu, C.-C.; Lee, J.-Y.; Chen, H.-Y.; Dai, C.-L. Optical heterodyne laser encoder with sub-nanometer resolution. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2008, 19, 045305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Demarest, F.C. High-resolution, high-speed, low data age uncertainty, heterodyne displacement measuring interferometer electronics. Meas. Sci. Technol. 1998, 9, 1024–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sasaki, O.; Okazaki, H. Sinusoidal phase modulating interferometry for surface profile measurement. Appl. Opt. 1986, 25, 3137–3140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Suzuki, T.; Sasaki, O.; Higuchi, K.; Maruyama, T. Real time displacement measurement in sinusoidal phase modulating interferometry. Appl. Opt. 1989, 28, 5270–5274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Sasaki, O.; Yoshida, T.; Suzuki, T. Double sinusoidal phase-modulating laser diode interferometer for distance measurement. Appl. Opt. 1991, 30, 3617–3621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vu, T.-T.; Higuchi, M.; Aketagawa, M. Accurate displacement-measuring interferometer with wide range using an I2 frequency-stabilized laser diode based on sinusoidal frequency modulation. Meas. Sci. Technol 2016, 27, 105201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Duong, Q.A.; Vu, T.T.; Higuchi, M.; Wei, D.; Aketagawa, M. Iodine-frequency-stabilized laser diode and displacement-measuring interferometer based on sinusoidal phase modulation. Meas. Sci. Technol 2018, 29, 065204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Measurement of the axial error of spindle using the frequency-modulated interferometer. HWP: half-wave plate; QWP: quarter-wave plate; PBS: polarization beam splitter; RM and MM: reference and measurement mirrors; HSS: high-speed spindle; M: mirror; P: polarizer; PD: photodetector; LIA: lock-in amplifier; ADC: analog-to-digital converter.
Figure 1. Measurement of the axial error of spindle using the frequency-modulated interferometer. HWP: half-wave plate; QWP: quarter-wave plate; PBS: polarization beam splitter; RM and MM: reference and measurement mirrors; HSS: high-speed spindle; M: mirror; P: polarizer; PD: photodetector; LIA: lock-in amplifier; ADC: analog-to-digital converter.
Crystals 11 00801 g001
Figure 2. Lissajous diagram using second and third harmonics.
Figure 2. Lissajous diagram using second and third harmonics.
Crystals 11 00801 g002
Figure 3. Axial error measurement result using the frequency-modulated interferometer. (a) axial error; (b) noise level.
Figure 3. Axial error measurement result using the frequency-modulated interferometer. (a) axial error; (b) noise level.
Crystals 11 00801 g003
Figure 4. Modulation signal of the interferometer at fm = 20 MHz. (a) Sine waveform of the signal versus time, (b) and (c) FFT analysis of graph (a) with linear and logarithmic frequency axes, respectively.
Figure 4. Modulation signal of the interferometer at fm = 20 MHz. (a) Sine waveform of the signal versus time, (b) and (c) FFT analysis of graph (a) with linear and logarithmic frequency axes, respectively.
Crystals 11 00801 g004
Table 1. Experimental conditions.
Table 1. Experimental conditions.
Spindle Speed4200 pps (~504 rpm or 8.4 Hz)
Laser Source (Thorlabs, HL6312G)
Modulation Frequency Amplitude Δf≈100 MHz
Modulation Frequency for LD3 MHz
Lock-in AmplifierMoku:labs
Cut Off Frequency of Low Pass Filters50 kHz
Output Sampling Frequency100 kS/s
Sampling Time2 s
ADC(Contect, AD16-16(PCI)EV)
Resolution of ADC16 bits
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nguyen, T.-T.; Vu, T.-T.; Nguyen, T.-D.; Vu, T.-T. Axial Error of Spindle Measurements Using a High-Frequency-Modulated Interferometer. Crystals 2021, 11, 801. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11070801

AMA Style

Nguyen T-T, Vu T-T, Nguyen T-D, Vu T-T. Axial Error of Spindle Measurements Using a High-Frequency-Modulated Interferometer. Crystals. 2021; 11(7):801. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11070801

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nguyen, Thanh-Trung, Thanh-Tung Vu, Thanh-Dong Nguyen, and Toan-Thang Vu. 2021. "Axial Error of Spindle Measurements Using a High-Frequency-Modulated Interferometer" Crystals 11, no. 7: 801. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11070801

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop