Next Article in Journal
Phase Behaviour of Methane Hydrates in Confined Media
Previous Article in Journal
Encapsulation of Calcium Phosphates on Electrospun Nanofibers for Tissue Engineering Applications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Crystals
Volume 11
Issue 2
10.3390/cryst11020200
crystals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of the Dimensions of Coplanar Inner Floating Ring Electrode on the Performance of Liquid Crystal Lenses

by
Yung-Hsiang Hsu
,
Bo-Yu Chen
and
Chia-Rong Sheu
*
Department of Photonics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2021, 11(2), 200; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11020200
Submission received: 28 January 2021 / Revised: 13 February 2021 / Accepted: 15 February 2021 / Published: 18 February 2021
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, we mainly investigated the effect of the dimensions of a coplanar inner floating ring (CIFR) on the lens performance in CIFR–hole-patterned electrode liquid crystal lenses (HPELCLs) at 100 Hz of the electrical driving frequency. The operation and threshold voltages in CIFR–HPELCLs are approximately 76% compared with those of the conventional HPELCL. The diameter of the CIFR with 360 μm in relation to imaging capabilities and those of the conventional glass lens and HPELCL were analyzed via the modulation transfer function. The relative mechanisms of the CIFR dimensions and the lens performance were also examined. An electric circuit model was used to analyze and illustrate the experimental results.

1. Introduction

Liquid crystals (LCs) have been studied to fabricate various electro-optical devices because of their unique physical properties, such as birefringence, response time and dielectric anisotropy [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Amongst these devices, LC lenses have been highly investigated [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18], especially their easy fabrication processes, absence of disclination line, polarization independence and tunable focal length [19,20,21,22,23,24].
A novel structure LC lens based on a microstructured transmission line is recently proposed; it uses a transmission line acting as a voltage divider and concentric electrodes that distribute the voltage homogeneously across the active area of the LC lens [25,26]. It can modulate the LC-induced phase profile to achieve optical devices with multiple functions, such as beam steering, 2D tunable diffraction gratings and lens function. However, this structure requires high lithography accuracy, which increases the difficulty of the process fabrication of LC lens.
Hole-patterned electrode LC lenses (HPELCLs) are a type of LC lens that has been successfully designed with good lens performance, easy fabrication and simple cell structure. Thus, HPELCLs have been widely researched [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. HPELCLs use an applied voltage between the hole-patterned electrode on the top substrate and the plane electrode on the bottom substrate. The intensity of the fringe field generated by the hole-patterned electrode gradually decreases from the edge to the center of the hole pattern; thus, it provides a nonuniform and circularly symmetric electric field to spatially reorient LC molecules with suitable refractive index distributions.
A suitable dielectric layer is generally required to allow electric fields to penetrate the center of an HPELCL. The generated electric fields distributed in the LC layers drive the molecular orientations to achieve ideal distributions of the gradient refractive indices with lens capabilities [35]. In addition, the dielectric layer coating on the hole-patterned electrode effectively prevents disclination line occurrence in the HPELCL that is mainly caused by the inconsistency of locally spatial LC reorientations with respect to the fringe fields. However, the inserted dielectric layer significantly increases the operation and threshold voltages of the HPELCL. This effect becomes significant as the operating frequency decreases.
Extra floating electrodes that are fabricated in HPELCLs effectively enhance the lens capabilities with a large focusing power at low operation voltages [36,37]. In the past two decades, HPELCLs have been extensively investigated and used for various electro-optical applications. In our previous work [38], the coplanar inner floating ring (CIFR)–HPELCL demonstrated a better lens performance, such as lower threshold and operation voltages at 100 Hz electric frequency, than the conventional HPELCL. This design requires only a single channel to apply an operation voltage, and the fringe field generated by the CIFR electrode can greatly reduce the operating voltage of the LC lens at low operating frequencies. Connecting the inner electrode to the external electrode/voltage with stripes can more accurately control the refractive index gradient distribution of the LC molecules; however, it requires additional channels to apply more than one operation voltage. The ion effect is obvious when the ionic impurity charge in the LC layer is caused by the DC component contained in the driving signal. The positive- and negative-charged ions will be affected by the external electric field and move to the opposite polarity electrodes in the LC layer to form electric double layers, which will affect the quality of the LC device. However, we apply AC signal operation voltage on CIFR–HPELCL, which can effectively avoid the influence of ion effect on the performance of the LC device.
In this study, we examined the improvement in lens performance with the various dimensions of CIFR electrodes based on an electric circuit model. Through equivalent electric circuit model analysis, we examined the influence of CIFR electrode dimensions on the focusing ability and imaging quality of the lens via changing the key factor Cglass capacitance. The change in Cglass capacitance also significantly affects the operation voltage and threshold voltage of CIFR–HPELCL, given that the fringe field intensity generated by the CIFR electrode and the cross voltage of the electric field applied to the LC layer is affected. The relationship between the capacitance Cglass and the dimension of the CIFR electrode was also established via the commercial simulation software. The electric field distribution generated by various diameters CIFR electrode and hole-patterned electrode in the LC cell were also investigated via simulation software to compare with the results of optical experiments. The optical interference patterns of the LC lenses were obtained to calculate the maximum lens power and determine the most suitable dimension of the CIFR electrode for use as an optical lens in CIFR–HPELCL of 1 mm diameter. Modulation transfer functions (MTFs) were used to examine and compare the image resolutions of the HPELCL, the CIFR–HPELCL and the conventional glass lens.

2. Structure and Electric Circuit Model of CIFR–HPELCL

Figure 1 presents the cross-sectional scheme and top view of the CIFR–HPELCL with its equivalent resistor–capacitor (RC) electric circuit model. The lens consists of an LC layer and two indium tin oxide (ITO) conductive glass substrates of 1.1 mm thickness. The cell gap was controlled by Mylar spacers and filled with nematic E7 LCs (purchased from Daily Polymer, Ltd.) to achieve homogeneous cells with rubbed polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) films. The actual optically measured thickness of the LC was near 50 μm. Three CIFR ITO electrodes (D) with different diameters at the outside boundaries, namely, 240, 360 and 440 μm, were investigated. To prevent the occurrence of disclination lines, all the CIFR–HPELCLs were coated with an additional 82 μm thick Norland optical adhesive (NOA65, Thorlabs, Inc.) films on the hole-patterned ITO electrodes as dielectric layers [32,39]. The equivalent RC electric circuit model shown in Figure 1c was used to analyze the lens performance with the variation in the dimensions of the CIFR electrodes. The dimensions are represented by three major parts individually indicated by blue, red and yellow dotted rectangles in the figure. The dielectric constants (ε) and resistivity (ρ) of the materials at 1 kHz electric frequency are listed in Table 1 [1,40,41]. At 100 Hz electric frequency, these physical constants obtained through measurements are the same as those at 1 kHz, except for dielectric constant 6 for the NOA65 material.
Given the equivalent RC electric circuit model, the electric fields distributed in the LC layer are directly related to the voltages from the fringe fields of the hole-patterned electrode (VLCH) and the induced electric fields of the floating ring electrode (VLCF), which satisfy Equations (1) and (2), respectively. The symbols in both equations are defined as follows: V is the driving voltage; the first grouped impedance of ZLC1 and ZNOA1 is related to the fringe electric field at the hole-patterned electrode; the second grouped impedance of ZLC2 and ZNOA2 is related to the induced electric field at the CIFR electrode, and the impedance of ZGlass is related to the top glass substrate between the CFIR and the hole-patterned electrodes.
V L C H ≈ Z L C 1 / ( Z N O A 1 + Z L C 1 ) V ,
V L C F ≈ [ Z L C 2 / ( Z G l a s s + Z N O A 2 + Z L C 2 ) ] V .
In general, resistance R is defined as Equation (3) if the material is geometrical with d thickness and A area. According to the list in Table 1 for LC lens fabrications, the resistivity (ρ) values of NOA65 and E7 LCs are 1.0 × 1013 and 1.8 × 1010 Ω∙m, respectively. Therefore, a related equation, RNOA1 = 1.82 × 103 RLC1, could be used.
In the equivalent circuit, the impedance of capacitor Zc is dependent on electric frequency f and capacitance value C, which satisfies Equation (4). The total impedance (Z) of each dielectric layer can be expressed as the parallel connection of resistance R and capacitor impedance Zc, as shown in Equation (5). In the equation, Z can be ZLC1, ZNOA1, ZLC2, ZNOA2 or ZGlass.
R = ρ d / A ,
Z c = 1 / ( j 2 π f C ) ,
Z = ( R − 1 + Z c − 1 ) − 1 .
According to Equation (4), capacitor impedance Zc increases when the LC lens operates at low electric frequencies. Therefore, total impedance Z is dominated by resistance R when operating at low electric frequencies due to the parallel RC connections in each component. This condition satisfies Equation (5). Thus, the threshold and operation voltages increase in the HPELCL when operating at an electric frequency of 100 Hz instead that of 1 kHz due to that the relation RNOA1 = 1.82 × 103 RLC1 is based on Equation (1). Here, the threshold voltages corresponding to the beginning of the initial interference patterns. The operation voltages correspond to the maximum pairs of black–white concentric interference patterns in the lenses. The CIFR electrode provides an additionally induced electric field to contribute to the original fringe field from the hole-patterned electrode to enhance the final radial phase retardation when the fringe electric field is generated by the hole-patterned electrode attenuates as the electric frequency decreases [38].
According to Equation (2), the induced electric field from the CIFR electrode is related to impedance ZGlass in which RGlass and CGlass are related to the electric frequency (f). This condition satisfies Equation (6):
Z G l a s s = ( R G l a s s − 1 + j 2 π f C G l a s s ) − 1
In general, capacitance is directly related to the geometry of the terminal electrodes, the dielectric materials and the distances between terminals. In this study, the radial dimensions of the CIFR electrodes were the main variables that affected the electrical properties of the LC cells due to the various distances between the terminal electrodes. A large D of CFIR electrode achieves a large capacitance of CGlass due to the short distance between the CIFR and the hole-patterned terminals [39]. Thus, impedance ZGlass was decreased to induce an increase in VLCF, which enhanced the fringe field generated by the CIFR electrode and effectively drove the LC molecules in turn.
Figure 2 shows the calculated CGlass value corresponding to the floating ring electrode diameter under the 1 mm hole-patterned electrode using the commercial software COMSOL Multiphysics (COMSOL, Inc., Burlington, MA, USA). The structure dimensions and their parameters were set as follows: The diameter of the hole-patterned electrode was 1 mm, the LC cell was 50 μm thick, the line width of the floating ring electrode was 20 μm, the NOA65 film was 82 μm thick, the PVA film was 0.1 μm thick, the ITO film was 0.1 μm thick, and the glass substrate was 0.55 mm thick. The CIFR electrode was set to 1 V via the terminal interface, and the hole-patterned electrode was set to the ground under the electrostatics module. The stationary source sweep study was used to calculate the capacitance through the integration of the surface charge density.
The hole-patterned and floating ring electrodes were in concentric circles. When the line width of the floating ring electrode was fixed at 20 μm, CGlass increased from 6.12 × 10−14 F to 2.11 × 10−13 F with the diameter increase of the floating ring electrode from 200 μm to 600 μm under the 1 mm hole-patterned electrode. According to Equation (2), the decrease in impedance ZGlass enhances the fringe field generated by the CIFR electrode and reduces the threshold and operation voltages of CIFR–HPELCLs.
Figure 3 indicates the simulation comparisons of the electric field distributions in the two layers of NOA 65 and LCs in the HPELCL and the CIFR–HPELCL with dimensions of 240, 360 and 440 μm in diameter to drive the LC molecules via COMSOL Multiphysics. In the calculation, 10 Vrms was supplied across the hole-patterned and bottom planar electrodes, and the electric frequency was 100 Hz. The structure dimensions and their parameters were set up similarly to those in the CGlass simulation. The color bar shows the gradual decrease in the electric fields from red to blue.
Figure 3a shows the electric field distributions of the 1 mm diameter HPELCL. The 240 μm CIFR induced a smaller fringe field than the 360 and 440 μm CIFRs due to its smaller CGlass capacitance, as shown in Figure 3b. By contrast, large CIFR diameters, such as 360 and 440 μm, responded to a large CGlass capacitance. Thus, the fringe fields induced by the CIFR electrodes achieved remarkable distributions of gradient refractive index, as shown in Figure 3c,d. The total phase retardation with respect to the distributions of the gradient refractive index in the case of the 440 μm CIFR electrode decreased in the lens center. The induced fringe electric field in the LC layer gathered around the large inner diameter (440 μm) of the CIFR electrode against the fringe field and extended to the lens center. Consequently, the relative position of the hole-patterned and CIFR electrodes achieved maximum phase retardation in the 360 μm CIFR–HPELCL due to the smooth distribution of the electric field intensity from the edge to the center of the hole-patterned electrode.

3. Experiment and Result Discussion

Figure 4 shows the experimental setup used to measure the interference patterns (i.e., pairs of black–white circles) of the LC lens under various electric voltages and frequencies [42]. A collimated He–Ne laser beam (λ = 632.8 nm) with an intensity controlled by an attenuator was passed through a spatial filter and a beam expander for purification. An expanded beam with a diameter of 35 mm was then achieved and used as the final incident beam of the LC lens. Two crossed polarizers (i.e., a polarizer and an analyzer) placed in the front and rear of the LC lens, respectively, were used to record the interference patterns in the LC lens. Both polarization directions of the polarizers were at a 45° angle to the rubbing directions of the LC alignment in the cell. A waveform generator (33220A, Agilent) was used to provide an AC electrical signal (i.e., a square waveform with 100 Hz frequency) that was amplified 20 times via a voltage amplifier (FLC Electronics AB, Broadband Linear Amplifier F20A) to connect the LC lens. In the end, a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (DVC Company, 1500 M-00-CL) was used to record the interference pattern. The various AC voltages were connected to two terminals, namely, hole-patterned and the entire ITO electrodes, in the CIFR–HPELCL and the HPELCL.
Figure 5 shows the maximum pairs of concentric black–white interference patterns in the HPELCL and the CIFR–HPELCL with D radial dimensions operating at an electric frequency of 100 Hz with square waveforms. A pair of black–white concentric circular interference patterns indicates the 2π phase retardation in the radial direction. The total number of pairs is denoted as N. R in red is the rubbing direction, and A and P in black are the directions of the analyzer and the polarizer, respectively. The patterns resulted in pair numbers N = 12, 11, 14, 10 that correspond to the HPELCL and the CIFR–HPELCLs with CIFR electrode diameters of 240, 360 and 440 μm. Although the operation voltages of the HPELCL and the CIFR–HPELCLs increased due to the low electrical driving frequency (100 Hz), the operation voltages of the CIFR–HPELCLs were 12, 12 and 8 Vrms, which correspond to CIFR electrode diameters of 240, 360 and 440 μm, respectively. These values are lower than the operation voltage increase to 50 Vrms in the HPELCL.
Table 2 lists the threshold and operation voltages with the maximum pairs of black–white concentric interference patterns (N) at an electric frequency of 100 Hz in the HPELCL and the CIFR–HPELCLs with radial dimensions of the CIFR electrodes. The HPELCL required larger threshold and operation voltages than the CIFR–HPELCL at the electric frequency of 100 Hz because low electric frequency ƒ resulted in large capacitance impedance ZNOA1 and ZLC1, which decreased VLCH. This condition satisfies Equation (1). The threshold voltages also decreased simultaneously. The large dimensions of the CIFR electrodes achieved low threshold voltages. This trend is consistent with Equation (2) due to the decrease in impedance ZGlass. The threshold voltages of the CIFR–HPELCLs were related to the diameter of the CIFR electrode under the electric frequency of 100 Hz. The threshold voltage decreased under a 440 μm CIFR electrode compared with those under the 240 and 360 μm CIFR electrodes due to the increased fringe field generated by the CIFR VLCF.
However, the distributions of the gradient refractive index were due to combining the spatially electric fields with the fringe fields at the hole-patterned electrode and the induced electric fields at the CIFR electrode. Therefore, the CIFR–HPELCL with a 360 μm CIFR electrode obtained the maximum pair number N = 14 at 12 Vrms. This value is larger than those of the CIFR–HPELCLs with 240 and 440 μm diameter CIFR electrodes (i.e., N = 11 at 12 Vrms and N = 10 at 8 Vrms, respectively).
Figure 6 presents the curve fitting of the radial phase retardation in the CIFR–HPELCLs with radial dimensions of CIFR electrodes with respect to the operating voltages at 100 Hz electric frequency. By contrast, the phase distribution profile of the 360 μm CIFR electrode was deeper into the center of the lens than those of the 240 and 440 μm CIFR electrodes. This finding can be attributed to the electric field gradient distribution’s maximization of the refractive index gradient distribution of the LC molecules.
Table 3 shows a comparison of the wavefront error root-mean-square (RMS) values of the HPELCL and the CIFR–HPELCL with 240, 360 and 440 μm CIFR electrodes under an electric frequency of 100 Hz. The RMS of the wavefront error is generally used to evaluate the lens performance compared with an ideal parabolic refractive index profile. An RMS value smaller than 0.07 λ is considered acceptable for lens performance for imaging applications [43]. The RMS values in the fabricated HPELCL and CIFR–HPELCL with 240, 360 and 440 μm CIFR electrodes under an electric frequency of 100 Hz were 0.59, 0.54, 0.56 and 0.52 λ. The CIFR–HPELCL presented a better lens performance in the imaging applications than the HPELCL under the electric frequency of 100 Hz.
According to Equation (7), the focal length of the HPELCL and the CIFR–HPELCLs is related to the number of interference fringes with the appropriate spatial distribution [44]:
f l e n s = r 2 2 λ N ,
where r is the radius of the hole-patterned electrode, N represents the pairs of black–white concentric interference patterns of the LC lens, λ is the wavelength of the incident light, and flens denotes the focal lengths of the HPELCL and the CIFR–HPELCLs under the applied voltages. Figure 7 shows the tuneable focuses at the electric frequency of 100 Hz with the HPELCL and the CIFR–HPELCLs with respect to the applied voltages in the LC lens.
As shown in Figure 7a, the HPELCL shows the minimum foci, that is, 16.45 mm, at an operating voltage of 50 Vrms. The fabricated CIFR–HPELCLs also possessed the minimum foci, namely, 17.95, 14.10 and 19.74 mm in the 240, 360 and 440 μm CIFR electrodes at 12, 12 and 8 Vrms operation voltages, respectively. These findings can be attributed to the embedded CIFR electrode that enhanced the fringe field and reduced the operation voltage, as shown in Figure 7b.
The imaging capabilities of the HPELCL and the CIFR–HPELCLs under an electric frequency of 100 Hz was evaluated as follows: The fabricated CIFR–HPELCL with a 360 μm CIFR electrode was used for image analysis because it has the shortest minimum foci. A 1951 USAF (U.S. Air Force) resolution test chart was used as the object and placed in front of the LC lens to analyze the image resolution, as shown in Figure 8a. The red circle indicates the target used to analyze the lens imaging. It is located in the group 1 target 3 straight pattern of the 1951 USFA, and the line width is 198 μm.
The distance between the LC lens and the object was 65 mm, and a polarizer was placed between the LC lens and the object with a transmission axis parallel to the rubbing direction of the LC cell. The images were recorded using a CCD camera (DVC Company, 1500M-00-CL), which was placed behind the LC lens. Figure 8b presents the straight pattern image of a part of the 1951 USAF resolution test chart recorded by the CCD without an LC lens. Then, the LC lens was placed in front of the object and operated at the minimum foci under 100 Hz electric frequency. Figure 8c,d shows the straight pattern recorded by the CCD camera via the HPELCL at 50 Vrms and the CIFR–HPELCL with a 360 μm CIFR electrode at 12 Vrms, respectively. The image captured via a conventional glass lens with a 30 mm focal length as a reference is shown in Figure 8e.
The commercially available software Quick MTF was used to calculate the MTF using Equation (8).
M T F = I max − I min I max + I min ,
where Imax and Imin denote the maximum and minimum intensities in the image, respectively, in general, the MTF defines the ability of an optical system to resolve a contrast at a given spatial frequency and falls from 1 to 0 as the spatial frequency increases. Figure 9 shows the MTF curve calculated from the images in Figure 8b,c,d. At spatial frequencies from 0.3 to 0.4 cycles/pixel, the MTF curve of the HPELCL descended to 0, similar to that of the CIFR–HPELCL. However, the MTF curve of the HPELCL descended rapidly below the spatial frequency at 0.1 cycles/pixel compared with that of the CIFR–HPELCL. Therefore, the fabricated CIFR–HPELCL with a 360 μm CIFR electrode at 12 Vrms operation voltage exhibited better imaging performance and image resolutions than the HPELCL at 50 Vrms operation voltage under the 100 Hz electric frequency. Once its dimension matches the diameter of its hole-patterned electrode, the fringe field achieves the maximum refractive index gradient distribution of LC molecules in the active area of the LC lens. The CIFR electrode will not damage the imaging quality of the lens because the CIFR electrode has a line width of only 20 μm and is a transparent ITO electrode. Thus, it will not impair the lensing performance of the device. By contrast, the conventional glass lens exhibited the best performance of the MTF curve, which decayed slowly with the increasing spatial frequency.

4. Conclusions

The proposed CIFR–HPELCL with suitable CIFR electrode dimensions achieved a lens performance with large-phase retardation penetrating the central area of the lenses and low operation voltages at the electric frequency of 100 Hz. The fringe field intensity of the CIFR electrode was mainly affected by the capacitance (CGlass) between the CIFR and hole-patterned electrodes. The fringe field generated by the CIFR electrode increased with the increase in CGlass. However, with the increase in the CIFR electrode dimension, the fringe field generated by the inner CIFR electrode cannot enter the central working area of the LC lens due to the relative position geometry of the hole-patterned, CIFR and planar ITO electrodes. Consequently, the 360 μm CIFR electrode achieved the maximum phase retardation under the CIFR–HPELCL of 1 mm diameter in this study.
The proposed CIFR–HPELCL with an aperture dimension of 1 mm and a 360 μm CIFR electrode was electrically operated at the operating voltage of 12 Vrms and the electric frequency of 100 Hz to achieve the maximum radial phase retardation, that is, N = 14. The operation voltage (from 50 Vrms to 12 Vrms) and threshold voltage (from 13 Vrms to 3 Vrms) of the 360 μm CIFR–HPELCL successfully decreased by approximately 76% for the electric operation in the HPELCL at the electric frequency of 100 Hz. The imaging capabilities of the proposed CIFR–HPELCL, the HPELCL and the conventional glass lens via the MTF curves were compared. The influence of the dimensions of each layer and the dielectric constants of each material on the threshold and operation voltage trends of the CIFR-HPELCL can be predicted via the proposed equivalent circuit model.

Author Contributions

Y.-H.H. and C.-R.S. conceived the experiments. Y.-H.H. and B.-Y.C. performed the experiments. Y.-H.H. analyzed the data and wrote the paper. C.-R.S. supervised the study. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan: MOST 107-2221- E-006-149.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Maune, H.; Jost, M.; Reese, R.; Polat, E.; Nickel, M.; Jakoby, R. Microwave liquid crystal technology. Crystals 2019, 8, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Xianyu, H.; Wu, S.T.; Lin, C.L. Dual frequency liquid crystals: A review. Liq. Cryst. 2009, 36, 717–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Andrienko, D. Introduction to liquid crystals. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 267, 520–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wu, S.T.; Lackner, A.M.; Efron, U. Optimal operation temperature of liquid crystal modulators. Appl. Opt. 1987, 26, 3441–3445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wu, S.T. Design of a liquid crystal based tunable electrooptic filter. Appl. Opt. 1989, 28, 48–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xu, S.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Sun, J.; Ren, H.; Wu, S.T. Fast-response liquid crystal microlens. Micromachines 2014, 5, 300–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Lin, H.C.; Lin, Y.H. A fast response and large electrically tunable-focusing imaging system based on switching of two modes of a liquid crystal lens. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97, 063505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Lin, H.C.; Lin, Y.H. An electrically tunable focusing pico-projector adopting a liquid crystal lens. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 49, 102502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ye, M.; Wang, B.; Kawamura, M.; Sato, S. Image formation using liquid crystal lens. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 46, 6776–6777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ye, M.; Wang, B.; Takahashi, T.; Sato, S. Properties of variable-focus liquid crystal lens and its application in focusing system. Opt. Rev. 2007, 14, 173–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lin, Y.H.; Chen, M.S.; Lin, H.C. An electrically tunable optical zoom system using two composite liquid crystal lenses with a large zoom ratio. Opt. Express 2011, 19, 4714–4721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Lin, H.C.; Chen, M.S.; Lin, Y.H. A review of electrically tunable focusing liquid crystal lenses. Trans. Electr. Electron. Mater. 2011, 12, 234–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. He, Z.; Lee, Y.H.; Chen, R.; Chanda, D.; Wu, S.T. Switchable Pancharatnam–Berry microlens array with nano-imprinted liquid crystal alignment. Opt. Lett. 2018, 43, 5062–5065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. He, Z.; Lee, Y.H.; Chanda, D.; Wu, S.T. Adaptive liquid crystal microlens array enabled by two-photon polymerization. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 21184–21193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. He, Z.; Tan, G.; Chanda, D.; Wu, S.T. Novel liquid crystal photonic devices enabled by two-photon polymerization. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 11472–11491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Algorri, J.F.; Zografopoulos, D.C.; Urruchi, V.; Sánchez-Pena, J.M. Recent advances in adaptive liquid crystal lenses. Crystals 2019, 9, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Duan, W.; Chen, P.; Ge, S.; Liang, X.; Hu, W. A fast-response and helicity-dependent lens enabled by micro-patterned dual-frequency liquid crystals. Crystals 2019, 9, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Sova, O.; Galstian, T. Liquid crystal lens with optimized wavefront across the entire clear aperture. Opt. Commun. 2019, 433, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lin, C.H.; Chen, C.H.; Chiang, R.H.; Jiang, I.M.; Kuo, C.T.; Huang, C.Y. Dual-frequency liquid-crystal lenses based on a surface-relief dielectric structure on an electrode. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2011, 23, 1875–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lin, C.H.; Huang, H.Y.; Wang, J.Y. Polarization-independent liquid-crystal Fresnel lenses based on surface-mode switching of 90 degrees twisted-nematic liquid crystals. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2010, 22, 137–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kim, D.W.; Yu, C.J.; Kim, H.R.; Kim, S.J.; Lee, S.D. Polarization-insensitive liquid crystal Fresnel lens of dynamic focusing in an orthogonal binary configuration. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 203505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Patel, J.S.; Rastani, K. Electrically controlled polarization-independent liquid-crystal Fresnel lens arrays. Opt. Lett. 1991, 16, 532–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sato, S. Liquid-crystal lens-cells with variable focal length. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1979, 18, 1679–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, Q.; Wu, S.T. Polarization independent blue-phase liquid crystal cylindrical lens with a resistive film. Appl. Opt. 2012, 51, 2568–2572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Algorri, J.F.; Morawiak, P.; Zografopoulos, D.C.; Bennis, N.; Spadlo, A.; Rodríguez-Cobo, L.; Jaroszewicz, L.R.; Sánchez-Pena, J.M.; López-Higuera, J.M. Multifunctional light beam control device by stimuli-responsive liquid crystal micro-grating structures. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 13806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Algorri, J.F.; Morawiak, P.; Zografopoulos, D.C.; Bennis, N.; Zografopoulos, D.C.; Urruchi, V.; Rodríguez-Cobo, L.; Jaroszewicz, L.R.; Sánchez-Pena, J.M.; López-Higuera, J.M. Positive-negative tunable liquid crystal lenses based on a microstructured transmission line. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 10153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kawamura, M.; Nakamura, K.; Sato, S. Liquid-crystal micro-lens array with two-divided and tetragonally hole-patterned electrodes. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 26520–26526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kang, S.; Qing, T.; Sang, H.; Zhang, X.; Xie, C. Ommatidia structure based on double layers of liquid crystal microlens array. Appl. Opt. 2013, 52, 7912–7918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hsu, C.J.; Sheu, C.R. Preventing occurrence of disclination lines in liquid crystal lenses with a large aperture by means of polymer stabilization. Opt. Express 2011, 19, 14999–15008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ye, M.; Hayasaka, S.; Sato, S. Liquid crystal lens array with hexagonal-hole-patterned electrodes. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Part 1-Regul. Pap. Short Notes Rev. Pap. 2004, 43, 6108–6111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, B.; Ye, M.; Sato, S. Liquid crystal lens with focal length variable from negative to positive values. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2006, 18, 79–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ye, M.; Sato, S. Optical properties of liquid crystal lens of any size. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2002, 41, L571–L573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hsu, Y.H.; Lu, W.Y.; Wu, T.T.; Hung, C.Y.; Chou, Y.C.; Wu, B.H.; Sheu, C.R. Switchable aperture of liquid crystal lens array fabricated with a hole-array patterned metal foil spacer. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2015, 613, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hsu, Y.H.; Kao, T.H.; Chien, C.Y.; Sheu, C.R. Polarization-independent liquid crystal lens array with additional dielectric films over self-aligned dual hole pattern electrodes. Liq. Cryst. 2020, 47, 1312–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Naumov, A.F.; Love, G.D.; Loktev, M.Y.; Vladimirov, F.L. Control optimization of spherical modal liquid crystal lenses. Opt. Express 1999, 4, 344–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Beeckman, J.; Yang, T.H.; Nys, I.; George, J.P.; Lin, T.H.; Neyts, K. Multi-electrode tunable liquid crystal lenses with one lithography step. Opt. Lett. 2018, 43, 271–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Hsu, C.J.; Jhang, J.J.; Huang, C.Y. Large aperture liquid crystal lens with an imbedded floating ring electrode. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 16722–16731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hsu, Y.H.; Chen, B.Y.; Sheu, C.R. Improvement of hole-patterned electrode liquid crystal lens by coplanar inner ring electrode. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2019, 31, 1627–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhao, X.; Liu, C.; Zhang, D.; Luo, Y. Tunable liquid crystal microlens array using hole patterned electrode structure with ultrathin glass slab. Appl. Opt. 2012, 51, 3024–3030. [Google Scholar]
  40. Hassanein, G.N. Optical tuning of polymer stabilized liquid crystals refractive index. J. Laser Opt. Photonics 2018, 5, 2. [Google Scholar]
  41. Ye, M.; Wang, B.; Sato, S. Effects of dielectric constant of glass substrates on properties of liquid crystal lens. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2007, 19, 1295–1297. [Google Scholar]
  42. Hsu, C.J.; Agrahari, K.; Selvaraj, P.; Manohar, R.; Huang, C.Y. Modification of liquid crystal lens performance by embedded floating ring electrode. Opt. Mater. Express 2019, 9, 3226–3237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kao, Y.Y.; Chao, P.C.; Hsueh, C.W. A new low-voltage-driven GRIN liquid crystal lens with multiple ring electrodes in unequal widths. Opt. Express 2010, 18, 18506–18518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ren, H.; Fox, D.W.; Wu, B.; Wu, S.T. Liquid crystal lens with large focal length tunability and low operating voltage. Opt. Express 2007, 15, 11328–11335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Crystals 11 00200 g001 550
Figure 1. Structure and corresponding equivalent circuit model of the coplanar inner floating ring (CIFR)– hole-patterned electrode liquid crystal lenses (HPELCL). (a) Top view and (b) cross-sectional view of the proposed CIFR–HPELCL; (c) corresponding equivalent RC circuit composed of three parts individually indicated with colorful dotted rectangles.
Figure 1. Structure and corresponding equivalent circuit model of the coplanar inner floating ring (CIFR)– hole-patterned electrode liquid crystal lenses (HPELCL). (a) Top view and (b) cross-sectional view of the proposed CIFR–HPELCL; (c) corresponding equivalent RC circuit composed of three parts individually indicated with colorful dotted rectangles.
Crystals 11 00200 g001
Crystals 11 00200 g002 550
Figure 2. Capacitance value simulation results corresponding to the various CIFR electrode diameters under 1 mm hole-patterned electrode.
Figure 2. Capacitance value simulation results corresponding to the various CIFR electrode diameters under 1 mm hole-patterned electrode.
Crystals 11 00200 g002
Crystals 11 00200 g003 550
Figure 3. Simulation results of electric field distributions with the (a) HPELCLs and CIFR–HPELCLs with the diameters of (b) 240, (c) 360 and (d) 440 μm under the 10 Vrms operation voltage at an electric frequency of 100 Hz. The red lines indicate the position of CIFR electrodes in the cells.
Figure 3. Simulation results of electric field distributions with the (a) HPELCLs and CIFR–HPELCLs with the diameters of (b) 240, (c) 360 and (d) 440 μm under the 10 Vrms operation voltage at an electric frequency of 100 Hz. The red lines indicate the position of CIFR electrodes in the cells.
Crystals 11 00200 g003
Crystals 11 00200 g004 550
Figure 4. Experimental setup for measuring and evaluating the electro-optical performance of the fabricated liquid crystal (LC) lens.
Figure 4. Experimental setup for measuring and evaluating the electro-optical performance of the fabricated liquid crystal (LC) lens.
Crystals 11 00200 g004
Crystals 11 00200 g005 550
Figure 5. Optical comparisons of the black–white concentric interference patterns with respect to individual operation voltages at the electric frequency of 100 Hz in the HPELCL and the CIFR–HPELCLs with the radial dimensions of the CIFR electrodes.
Figure 5. Optical comparisons of the black–white concentric interference patterns with respect to individual operation voltages at the electric frequency of 100 Hz in the HPELCL and the CIFR–HPELCLs with the radial dimensions of the CIFR electrodes.
Crystals 11 00200 g005
Crystals 11 00200 g006 550
Figure 6. Radial phase retardation and curve fitting of the HPELCL and the CIFR–HPELCLs with the individual CIFR electrodes of different diameters (i.e., 240, 360 and 440 μm) under the electric frequency of 100 Hz with operation voltages.
Figure 6. Radial phase retardation and curve fitting of the HPELCL and the CIFR–HPELCLs with the individual CIFR electrodes of different diameters (i.e., 240, 360 and 440 μm) under the electric frequency of 100 Hz with operation voltages.
Crystals 11 00200 g006
Crystals 11 00200 g007 550
Figure 7. Electrically tunable focal lengths of the (a) HPELCL and (b) the CIFR–HPELCLs with individual CIFR electrodes of different diameters (i.e., 240, 360 and 440 μm) under the electric frequency of 100 Hz.
Figure 7. Electrically tunable focal lengths of the (a) HPELCL and (b) the CIFR–HPELCLs with individual CIFR electrodes of different diameters (i.e., 240, 360 and 440 μm) under the electric frequency of 100 Hz.
Crystals 11 00200 g007
Crystals 11 00200 g008 550
Figure 8. Imaging evaluation of the proposed CIFR–HPELCL. (a) 1951 USAF resolution test chart. (b) Straight pattern image recorded via the charge-coupled device (CCD) without a lens. Straight pattern image with the (c) HPELCL at 50 Vrms, the (d) 360 μm CIFR electrode CIFR–HPELCL at 12 Vrms under the 100 Hz electric frequency and the (e) conventional glass lens.
Figure 8. Imaging evaluation of the proposed CIFR–HPELCL. (a) 1951 USAF resolution test chart. (b) Straight pattern image recorded via the charge-coupled device (CCD) without a lens. Straight pattern image with the (c) HPELCL at 50 Vrms, the (d) 360 μm CIFR electrode CIFR–HPELCL at 12 Vrms under the 100 Hz electric frequency and the (e) conventional glass lens.
Crystals 11 00200 g008
Crystals 11 00200 g009 550
Figure 9. Modulation transfer functions (MTFs) of the fabricated HPELCL, the CIFR–HPELCL with a 360 μm CIFR electrode under the 100 Hz electric frequency and the conventional glass lens.
Figure 9. Modulation transfer functions (MTFs) of the fabricated HPELCL, the CIFR–HPELCL with a 360 μm CIFR electrode under the 100 Hz electric frequency and the conventional glass lens.
Crystals 11 00200 g009
Table
Table 1. Dielectric constant and resistivity of the material in the CIFR–HPELCL.
Table 1. Dielectric constant and resistivity of the material in the CIFR–HPELCL.
MaterialDielectric Constant εResistivity ρ (Ω·m)
LC (E7)19.3 (ε∥), 5.2 (ε⊥)1.8 × 1010
NOA6541.0 × 1013
Glass substrate6.91.0 × 1010
Table
Table 2. Comparison of various diameters of floating ring electrodes.
Table 2. Comparison of various diameters of floating ring electrodes.
CIFR Electrode DiameterThreshold VoltageOperation Voltages with Maximum Pairs (Voltages/N)
No CIFR13 Vrms50 Vrms/12
240 μm4 Vrms12 Vrms/11
360 μm3 Vrms12 Vrms/14
440 μm2 Vrms8 Vrms/10
Table
Table 3. Comparison of the wavefront error root-mean-square values of the HPELCL and CIFR–HPELCL with radial diameter CIFR electrodes at an electric frequency of 100 Hz.
Table 3. Comparison of the wavefront error root-mean-square values of the HPELCL and CIFR–HPELCL with radial diameter CIFR electrodes at an electric frequency of 100 Hz.
HPELCL240 μm CIFR Electrode360 μm CIFR Electrode440 μm CIFR Electrode
0.59 λ0.54 λ0.56 λ0.52 λ
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hsu, Y.-H.; Chen, B.-Y.; Sheu, C.-R. Effect of the Dimensions of Coplanar Inner Floating Ring Electrode on the Performance of Liquid Crystal Lenses. Crystals 2021, 11, 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11020200

AMA Style

Hsu Y-H, Chen B-Y, Sheu C-R. Effect of the Dimensions of Coplanar Inner Floating Ring Electrode on the Performance of Liquid Crystal Lenses. Crystals. 2021; 11(2):200. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11020200

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hsu, Yung-Hsiang, Bo-Yu Chen, and Chia-Rong Sheu. 2021. "Effect of the Dimensions of Coplanar Inner Floating Ring Electrode on the Performance of Liquid Crystal Lenses" Crystals 11, no. 2: 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11020200

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop