Next Article in Journal
σ- and π-Hole Interactions
Previous Article in Journal
Forbidden Reflections in TeO2 in the Vicinity of the Te L1 Absorption Edge
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preparation and Electrochemical Properties of Co3O4 Supercapacitor Electrode Materials

1
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin 123000, China
2
School of Geomatics, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin 123000, China
3
College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2020, 10(9), 720; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10090720
Submission received: 14 July 2020 / Revised: 13 August 2020 / Accepted: 18 August 2020 / Published: 19 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Inorganic Crystalline Materials)

Abstract

:
A special gas-phase diffusion precipitation method with ammonia as the gas-phase diffusion precipitant was adopted. After fully reacting with different cobalt sources in a sealed space, the liquid funnel was separated and dried, and calcined at different temperatures for 2 h. The prepared Co3O4 powder was used as a supercapacitor (SCs) electrode to measure the electrochemical properties of the prepared material. The influences of different cobalt sources and sodium phosphate monobasic dehydrate on the preparation of Co3O4 SCs electrodes were investigated. The optimal performance of Co3O4 was 640 F·g−1 before modification, and this reached 1140 F·g−1 after modification, which was an improvement of 78.1%.

1. Introduction

Supercapacitors (SCs) have been extensively studied due to their high specific power density, long cycle life and fast charge and discharge rate in important electrical energy storage devices [1,2,3]. In recent years, transition metal oxides have been widely studied for their variable oxidation states and high charge storage capacity [4,5,6]. Among them, RuO2 has been considered for its good electrochemical properties [7], but its environmentally poisonous nature and relatively high cost make it limited in commercial application. For other transition oxides [8], Co3O4 has been found to be a better alternative material due to its low price and environmental friendliness [9]. Furthermore, recent research has shown that Co3O4 with different dimensions and special morphology exhibits excellent specific capacitance and electrochemical performance [10,11,12]. For example, Liu et al. prepared zero dimensional (0D) Co3O4 nanoparticles [13]. These Co3O4 nanoparticles showed a specific capacitance of 523.0 F·g−1 at 0.5 A·g−1. Venkatachalam et al. successfully fabricated Co3O4 one-dimensional (1D) rod-like arrays [14], which exhibited a specific capacitance of 655 F·g−1 at 0.5 A·g−1. Besides this, a two-dimensional (2D) Co3O4 nanosheet was prepared [15]. The electrode showed a specific capacitance of 233.6 F·g−1 at 0.5 A·g−1. Therefore, the research on Co3O4 SCs attracts more and more attention from researchers.
The preparation methods of the Co3O4 SCs materials have been widely reported [16,17], and include the hydrothermal method [18], the solvothermal method [19], chemical precipitation [20], thermal decomposition [21], the sol-gel method [22], the template method [23], electrodeposition [24], chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [25], chemical bath deposition [26], the in-situ self-organization method [27], spray pyrolysis [28], galvanic displacement [29], laser ablation [30], the electrospinning technique [31], and so on. Although the Co3O4 electrode materials synthesized by one of these synthetic methods have excellent properties, they require difficult synthesis conditions or are confined to the laboratory stage, which affects the rapid development of their commercialization and industrialization. Therefore, developing a low-cost and simple synthesis method for Co3O4 electrode materials with excellent performance is an important work. The gas-phase diffusion precipitation method is an improvement of chemical precipitation. It retains the advantages of chemical precipitation, but also has the characteristics of being able to synthesize homogeneous and smaller particles of supercapacitor materials.
In addition, different cobalt sources have great influence on the properties of the materials in the process of synthesis [32]. Material post-treatment modification is also an important means by which to enhance the performance of Co3O4 electrode materials [33]. Herein, Co3O4 electrode materials for SCs have been prepared by the gas-phase diffusion precipitation method. Ammonium hydroxide is a gas-phase diffusion precipitator. It is placed in a sealed space with the cobalt source. After the full reaction of gas diffusion, precipitation is obtained. This is followed by separate drying and calcination for 2 h. The prepared Co3O4 was used as an SCs electrode to measure the electrochemical properties. The effects of ammonium hydrogen phosphate and different cobalt sources on the preparation of Co3O4 SCs electrode materials were investigated in order to obtain the best reaction conditions. In addition, the materials were tested and characterized via X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and electrochemical properties.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Instrumentation

The reagents were commercially purchased and not further purified. These mainly contained cobalt chloride hexahydrate (CoCl2·6H2O, 99%, Shenyang Huadong Reagent Co., Ltd., Shenyang, China), cobaltous acetate tetrahydrate (Co(OAc)2·4H2O, 99%, Liaoning Quanrui Reagent Co., Ltd., Shenyang, China), ammonium hydroxide (NH3·H2O, 28 wt.%, Liaoning Quanrui Reagent Co., Ltd., Shenyang, China), sodium hypophosphite (NaH2PO2·H2O, 99%, Sinopharm Group Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), potassium hydroxide (KOH, 90%, Liaoning Quanrui Reagent Co., Ltd., Shenyang, China), nickel foam (Ni, 99.8%, 1 mm, Shanghai Tanqi New Materials., Ltd., Shanghai, China), acetylene carbon black (C, 40 nm, Sinopharm Group Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) (-(CF2-CF2)n-, 5 μm, Sinopharm Group Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), ethanol absolute (C2H6O, 99.7%, 0.82 g/mL, Sinopharm Group Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) and deionized water.
A Bruker D8 X-ray diffractometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) was used to measure the powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) data. A JEOL JSM-7500F scanning electron microscopy (SEM) device (JEOL Inc., Tokyo, Japan) was utilized to characterize the surface morphology of the Co3O4 samples. An Ivium Stat electrochemical workstation (IVIUM Inc., Amsterdam, The Netherlands) was employed to test the galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD), cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of the Co3O4 electrode materials. In addition, an SX2-4−10GJ muffle furnace, a DHG-9036A constant temperature drying oven, a JKKZ-4−10GJ centrifuge and a KQ-700 ultrasonic cleaner were incorporated into the preparation process of Co3O4 electrode materials.
The electrode active substance Co3O4, an acetylene black conductive agent and a PTFE emulsion (diluted to 15%) were mixed uniformly in accordance with the mass ratio of 80:15:5. This mixture was poured into agate mortar and we added an appropriate amount of deionized water. The mixed paste substance was achieved by grinding for more than 1 h. A piece of nickel foam (1 cm × 3 cm) was taken to weigh the quality of nickel foam and recorded as m1. The mixed slurry material was uniformly coated on one side of the nickel foam with an area of 1 cm × 1 cm. The coated active material was pressed at a constant pressure of 15 MPa for 1 min. The loading mass of the active material was acquired via measuring electrode with a microbalance with accuracy of 0.1 mg. Typically, the loading mass of the active material was ≈4.0 mg. The pressed electrode was placed in a drying oven for 10 h at 60 °C. After that, the electrode was taken out, and the quality of the dried nickel foam was weighed and recorded as m2. The accomplished electrodes were put in 6 M KOH solution for 24 h, after using a three-electrodes system and electrochemical workstation to measure the electrochemical properties of the electrodes. The Co3O4 electrode, the platinum plate and the Hg/HgO electrode were used as the working electrode, the counter electrode and the reference electrode, respectively.

2.2. Synthesis and Preparation

The schematic diagram of the gas-phase diffusion precipitation method for Co3O4 synthesis is shown in Figure 1. The materials for the synthesized Co3O4 electrode materials are provided in Table 1. The specific conditions for synthesis are as follows, taking synthesis B as an example. A quantity of 20 mL of NH3·H2O was loaded into beaker B1. A measured amount of CoCl2·6H2O (0.692 g, 3 mmol) was dissolved into beaker B2 with 50 mL deionized water, and then the two beakers were put into an airtight container at the same time. After being heated at 20 °C for 10 h, the upper layer of beaker B2 was a red solution, the lower layer was a blue-green precipitation, and there was small amount of ammonium hydroxide in beaker B1. Beaker B2 was taken out, and the precipitate in the beaker was separated by centrifuge. The product was washed several times with deionized water and ethanol respectively, and dried at 60 °C to obtain the dark green substance Co(OH)2. Finally, the prepared precursor was calcined in a muffle furnace at 300 °C for 2 h with a heating rate of 10 °C/min−1. Co3O4 target product (B) was obtained. A was obtained by replacing CoCl2·6H2O with Co(OAc)2·4H2O under the same reaction conditions.
The Co3O4 electrode was modified by NaH2PO2·H2O with heat treatment under the protection of an Ar atmosphere. To introduce phosphate ions, the as prepared B products were further thermally annealed in the presence of NaH2PO4·2H2O. With a ratio of B to NaH2PO2·H2O of 5, the B material and NaH2PO2·H2O were respectively placed in two separate positions in a porcelain boat, whereby NaH2PO2·H2O was at the upstream side of the furnace. After introducing Ar gas into the tube furnace for 30 min, the tubular furnace was heated to 250 °C with a heating rate of 5 °C/min−1 and held at this temperature for 30 min. Then, the tube furnace was naturally cooled to room temperature under Ar, and the black powder was obtained, which was abbreviated as C.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural and Morphological Characterization

As shown in Figure 2, A is the XRD pattern of Co3O4 prepared by CoCl2·6H2O, B is the XRD pattern of Co3O4 prepared by Co(OAc)2·4H2O, and C is the XRD pattern of B modified by NaH2PO4·2H2O. The XRD pattern of them all can be well indexed as face-centered cubic (fcc) Co3O4 (PDF no. 80−1542). The diffraction peaks at 18.98°, 31.32°, 36.90°, 44.84°, 59.64° and 65.35° can be denoted as (1 1 1), (2 2 0), (3 1 1), (4 0 0), (5 1 1) and (4 4 0) reflections of Co3O4, respectively [34]. The XRD data confirmed that Co3O4 was obtained by the calcining of the Co(OH)2 precursor at 300 °C.
To observe the morphology of the Co3O4 electrode materials, SEM images with different magnification are shown in Figure 3. We can find that sample A has a micro-spherical morphology (Figure 3a). It is about 1 μm in diameter. From SEM images with high multiples, it can be confirmed that the morphology of A is a hollow micro-spherical morphology (Figure 3b), which is composed of nanoflocculent Co3O4 electrode materials. As for B, it has a flower-like microsphere (Figure 3c), which is composed of thin nanosheets (Figure 3d). The thickness of the nanosheet is about 10 nm. Here, it becomes apparent that the cobalt source plays the most significant role in directing the morphological habit of the aerogel structure. The SEM images of the materials resulting from the cobalt source syntheses reveal variability in the microstructures. This variability results from the selection of the precursor metal salt [32]. The phosphate modification of sample B resulted in sample C. It can be seen that the morphology of sample C has not changed significantly (Figure 3e). However, it can be observed that there are some small nanoparticles in the middle of the petals (Figure 3f). This is due to phosphate modification [33]. Generally, NaH2PO4·2H2O will decompose and form PH3 gas at a temperature greater than 150 °C, according to the reaction equation:
2 N a H 2 P O 2 · 2 H 2 O s P H 3 g + N a 2 H P O 4 s + 2 H 2 O g
P H 3 + x 4 C o 3 O 4 = x 4 C o 3 O 4 x + H 3 P O 4
In the copresence of PH3 gas and H2O gas, the Co3O4 was modified. The small nanoparticles in the middle of the petals were Na2HPO4 and phosphate residue after modification.

3.2. Electrochemical Performances

To evaluate the electrochemical performances of the Co3O4 electrode materials, galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD), cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were used to test. Figure 4a–c show that the GCD measurements of A-C Co3O4 electrodes in the potential window 0–0.45 V exhibited the current densities of 1, 2, 5 and 10 A·g−1. There is a big deviation between the discharge curve and the straight line, especially for C, indicating that the capacitance is mainly caused by faradic redox reactions. Therefore, the Co3O4 electrode has typical pseudo-capacitance characteristics. According to Figure 4d, it can be found that the C discharge time increases significantly after phosphate modification at 1 A·g−1. The specific capacitances from the discharge curves are calculated from the following equation:
C = IΔt/mΔV
where I is the discharging current, Δt is the discharging time, m is the mass load of the active materials and ΔV is the discharging potential range.
The plot of specific capacitance at different discharge current densities is shown in Figure 5. The capacitance of the A electrodes is 564 F·g−1 at 1 A·g−1 and 331 F·g−1 at 10 A·g−1, with a capacitance retention of 58.7%. It shows the best rate performance among the three samples. The capacitance of B retains 85.3%, 72.3% and 54.7% at 2 A·g−1, 5 A·g−1 and 10 A·g−1, versus 640 F·g−1 at 1 A·g−1. The sample of C shows the maximum capacitance of 1140 F·g−1 at 1 A·g−1. It can retain 96.5% at 2 A·g−1, and 41.8% at 10 A·g−1. The phosphate ion groups (H2PO4) formed on the surface of Co3O4 were key to enhancing the electrochemical performance of the electrode materials [35]. With the increase in discharge current density, the specific capacitance decreases gradually. This is due to an increase in the potential drop, and only the external active substance participates in the electrochemical redox at a higher current density [36]. Especially for sample C, dissociating small particles can accelerate the reaction but hinder the movement of ions at higher current densities [37]. There are some small nanoparticles present in the middle of the petals on electrode C, which are phosphate particles left after modification. By comparing with the literature [35], it can be found that the remaining particles are larger. Although these particles can accelerate the redox reaction, they will affect the charge transfer, especially under the condition of a large current density, so the deterioration of capacitance is significant at a high current density. The performances of Co3O4 samples synthesized via different methods are shown in Table 2.
Figure 6a–c shows the CV measurement curves of three Co3O4 electrodes with a potential window of 0–0.45 V at scan rates of 20–100 mV·s−1, respectively. The integral area of the CV curves increased with the increase in scanning rate. The CV curves of three Co3O4 electrodes show peaks that indicate the pseudocapacitive nature of three Co3O4 electrode. For the three Co3O4 electrodes, a couple of redox peaks can be observed on the CV curves. Compared with other electrodes, the C electrode has the largest CV area, indicating the highest levels of stored charge (Figure 6d). However, it can be found that as the scanning rate increases, the area of sample C increases most slowly. This is related to the morphology of the modified sample, as evidenced by GCD.
EIS technology was used to research the electrochemical behavior of the Co3O4 electrode material in an electrolyte. Figure 7 reveals the Nyquist plots of three Co3O4 electrodes in a frequency range from 1 to 105 Hz. The Nyquist impedance curve is the plot of the imaginary component (Z″) of the impedance against the real component (Z′), which consists of a semicircle at a high frequency region (charge transfer process) and a straight line at a low frequency region (diffusion-limited process). The X-intercept of the Nyquist plot is defined as the equivalent series resistance (Rs). It is obvious that C has a lower solution resistance (corresponds to curve intercept with real axis), Rs = 0.12 Ω, than A and B (0.25 Ω). The Nyquist plot shows a small semicircle at high frequency regions. The diameter of the semicircle is related to the charge–transfer resistance (Rct) of the redox reactions [38]. Comparing the semicircle diameter of three Co3O4 samples (C < B < A), it can be concluded that the charge transfer resistance (Rct) of B synthesized by CoCl2·6H2O is smaller than that of A synthesized by Co(OAc)2·4H2O, and the Rct of C modified by sodium phosphate monobasic dehydrate is smaller than that of the unmodified B. The steep slope of the straight line at the lower frequency can show the ion diffusion speed. At the low frequency range, the slope of the straight line represents the diffusion of ions in the electrolyte. The curve slopes decrease in the order of A, B and C, which demonstrates the fastest ion transfer speed of C between the inner channel of the electrode and the electrolyte in, accordance with the specific capacitance of the three samples. In all three areas, the Co3O4 electrodes of the C sample have good presentation. This is due to phosphate modification [42].

4. Conclusions

Three Co3O4 supercapacitor materials were prepared by a special gas-phase diffusion precipitation method. A has a hollow nano-spherical morphology, while B and C have flower-like microsphere. The Co3O4 of B prepared from Co(OAc)2·4H2O has a good electrochemical performance. The capacitance of the A electrode is 564 F·g−1 at 1 A·g−1, with a high capacitance retention. It shows the best rate performance among the three samples. The capacitance of B is 640 F·g−1 at 1 A·g−1. The C sample shows the maximum capacitance of 1140 F·g−1 at 1 A·g−1, which improved by 78.1% after NaH2PO2·H2O modification.

Author Contributions

X.W. (Xuelei Wang) and J.F. conceived and designed the paper; Q.W. and Z.D. performed the experiment; A.H. and W.W. analyzed the data; S.Y. and X.W. (Xiaoliang Wang) helped shape the research; X.W. (Xuelei Wang) wrote the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51774175 and 51974152), Joint Research Fund Liaoning-Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science (2019JH3/30100025) and Scientific Research Foundation of Educational Department of Liaoning Province for Basic Research (LJ2019JL008).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Salunkhe, R.R.; Tang, J.; Kamachi, Y.; Nakato, T.; Kim, J.H.; Yamauchi, Y. Asymmetric Supercapacitors Using 3D Nanoporous Carbon and Cobalt Oxide Electrodes Synthesized from a Single Metal-Organic Framework. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 6288–6296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pendashteh, A.; Moosavifard, S.E.; Rahmanifar, M.S.; Wang, Y.; El-Kady, M.F.; Kaner, R.B.; Mousavi, M.F. Highly Ordered Mesoporous CuCo2O4 Nanowires, a Promising Solution for High-Performance Supercapacitors. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 3919–3926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, X.F.; Liu, B.; Liu, R.; Wang, Q.F.; Hou, X.J.; Chen, D.; Wang, R.M.; Shen, G.Z. Fiber-Based Flexible All-Solid-State Asymmetric Supercapacitors for Integrated Photodetecting System. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1849–1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhao, Y.F.; Zhang, J.Q.; Wu, W.J.; Guo, X.; Xiong, P.; Liu, H.; Wang, G.X. Cobalt-doped MnO2 ultrathin nanosheets with abundant oxygen vacancies supported on functionalized carbon nanofibers for efficient oxygen evolution. Nano Energy 2018, 54, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Seok, J.Y.; Lee, J.; Yang, M. Self-Generated Nanoporous Silver Framework for High-Performance Iron Oxide Pseudocapacitor Anodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 17223–17231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dong, Y.; Xing, L.; Chen, K.; Wu, X. Porous α-Fe2O3@C Nanowire Arrays as Flexible Supercapacitors Electrode Materials with Excellent Electrochemical Performances. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Wu, Z.S.; Sun, Y.; Tan, Y.Z.; Yang, S.B.; Feng, X.L.; Mullen, K. Three-Dimensional Graphene-Based Macro- and Mesoporous Frameworks for High-Performance Electrochemical Capacitive Energy Storage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 19532–19535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Eskusson, J.; Rauwel, P.; Nerut, J.; Jänes, A. A Hybrid Capacitor Based on Fe3O4-Graphene Nanocomposite/Few-Layer Graphene in Different Aqueous Electrolytes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016, 163, 2768–2775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, X.; Hu, A.; Meng, C.; Wu, C.; Yang, S.; Hong, X. Recent Advance in Co3O4 and Co3O4-Containing Electrode Materials for High-Performance Supercapacitors. Molecules 2020, 25, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Jiang, Y.; Chen, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, W.; Zhu, J.; Song, D. Two-dimensional Co3O4 thin sheets assembled by 3D interconnected nanoflake array framework structures with enhanced supercapacitor performance derived from coordination complexes. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 292, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gong, X.F.; Cheng, J.P.; Liu, F.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, X.B. Nickel-Cobalt hydroxide microspheres electrodepositioned on nickel cobaltite nanowires grown on Ni foam for high-performance pseudocapacitors. J. Power Sources 2014, 267, 610–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xiao, Z.; Fan, L.; Xu, B.; Zhang, S.; Kang, W.; Kang, Z.; Lin, H.; Liu, X.; Zhang, S.; Sun, D. Green Fabrication of Ultrathin Co3O4 Nanosheets from Metal–Organic Framework for Robust High-Rate Supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 41827–41836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Liu, F.; Su, H.; Jin, L.; Zhang, H.; Chu, X.; Yang, W. Facile synthesis of ultrafine cobalt oxide nanoparticles for high-performance supercapacitors. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 505, 796–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Venkatachalam, V.; Alsalme, A.; Alswieleh, A.; Jayavel, R. Shape controlled synthesis of rod-like Co3O4 nanostructures as high-performance electrodes for supercapacitor applications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 6059–6067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Guo, X.G.; Li, X.M.; Xiong, Z.S.; Lai, C.; Li, Y.; Huang, X.Y.; Bao, H.B.; Yin, Y.J.; Zhu, Y.H.; Zhang, D.X. A comprehensive investigation on electrophoretic self-assembled nano-Co3O4 films in aqueous solution as electrode materials for supercapacitors. J. Nanopart. Res. 2016, 18, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, C.; Meng, Y.S.; Wang, L.; Zhu, F.L.; Zhang, Y. One Step Hydrothermal Synthesis of Flower-shaped Co3O4 Nanorods on Nickel Foam as Supercapacitor Materials and Their Excellent Electrochemical Performance. Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 2018, 34, 882–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Deori, K.; Ujjain, S.K.; Sharma, R.K.; Deka, S. Morphology controlled synthesis of nanoporous Co3O4 nanostructures and their charge storage characteristics in supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 10665–10672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Feng, C.; Zhang, J.; He, Y.; Zhong, C.; Hu, W.; Liu, L.; Deng, Y. Sub-3 nm Co3O4 Nanofilms with Enhanced Supercapacitor Properties. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 1730–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Meng, T.; Xu, Q.-Q.; Wang, Z.-H.; Li, Y.-T.; Gao, Z.-M.; Xing, X.-Y.; Ren, T.-Z. Co3O4 Nanorods with Self-assembled Nanoparticles in Queue for Supercapacitor. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 180, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Song, F.M.; Zan, G.T.; Chen, Y.; Wu, Q.S.; Xu, Y.Y. In situ transformation of iron-group ternary metal oxides nanocubes from Co/Ni-PBA for high-performance supercapacitors. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 741, 633–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xu, Y.N.; Ding, Q.; Li, L.; Xie, Z.J.; Jiang, G.X. Facile fabrication of porous Co3O4 nanowires for high performance supercapacitors. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 20069–20073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pudukudy, M.; Yaakob, Z. Sol-gel synthesis, characterisation, and photocatalytic activity of porous spinel Co3O4 nanosheets. Chem. Pap. 2014, 68, 1087–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wei, G.; Zhou, Z.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, W.; An, C. Ultrathin Metal–Organic Framework Nanosheet-Derived Ultrathin Co3O4 Nanomeshes with Robust Oxygen-Evolving Performance and Asymmetric Supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 23721–23730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ren, S.R.; Guo, Y.K.; Ju, L.L.; Xiao, H.; Hu, A.M.; Li, M. Facile synthesis of petal-like nanocrystalline Co3O4 film using direct high-temperature oxidation. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 7922–7930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Duan, Y.; Hu, T.; Yang, L.; Gao, J.; Guo, S.; Hou, M.; Ye, X. Facile fabrication of electroactive microporous Co3O4 through microwave plasma etching for supercapacitors. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 771, 156–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yadav, A.A.; Hunge, Y.M.; Kulkarni, S.B. Chemical synthesis of Co3O4 nanowires for symmetric supercapacitor device. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 16401–16409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jiang, T.; Yang, S.; Bai, Z.; Dai, P.; Yu, X.; Wu, M.; Hu, H. Facile fabrication and configuration design of Co3O4 porous acicular nanorod arrays on Ni foam for supercapacitors. Nanotechnology 2018, 29, 315402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ambare, R.C.; Lokhande, B.J. Ru incorporation enhanced electrochemical performance of spray deposited Mn: Co3O4 nano-composite: Electrochemical approach. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2018, 132, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. You, Y.; Zheng, M.; Ma, L.; Yuan, X.; Zhang, B.; Li, Q.; Wang, F.; Song, J.; Jiang, D.; Liu, P.; et al. Galvanic displacement assembly of ultrathin Co3O4 nanosheet arrays on nickel foam for a high-performance supercapacitor. Nanotechnology 2017, 28, 105604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, X.Y.; Gao, Y.Q.; Yang, G.W. A flexible, transparent and super-long-life supercapacitor based on ultrafine Co3O4 nanocrystal electrodes. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 4227–4235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kumar, M.; Subramania, A.; Balakrishnan, K. Preparation of electrospun Co3O4 nanofibers as electrode material for high performance asymmetric supercapacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 149, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Peterson, G.R.; Hung-Low, F.; Gumeci, C.; Bassett, W.P.; Korzeniewski, C.; Hope-Weeks, L.J. Preparation–Morphology–Performance Relationships in Cobalt Aerogels as Supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 1796–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhai, T.; Wan, L.; Sun, S.; Chen, Q.; Sun, J.; Xia, Q.; Xia, H. Phosphate Ion Functionalized Co3O4 Ultrathin Nanosheets with Greatly Improved Surface Reactivity for High Performance Pseudocapacitors. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1604167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Xu, J.; Gao, L.; Cao, J.; Wang, W.; Chen, Z. Preparation and electrochemical capacitance of cobalt oxide (Co3O4) nanotubes as supercapacitor material. Electrochim. Acta 2010, 56, 732–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, Z.; Lu, M.; Wang, J.; Kang, L.; Liu, Z.-H. Phosphate ion functionalized Co3O4 nanosheets/RGO with improved electrochemical performance. Colloids Surf. A 2020, 586, 124232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, Y.; Pan, A.; Zhu, Q.; Nie, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, Y.; Liang, S.; Cao, G. Facile synthesis of nanorod-assembled multi-shelled Co3O4 hollow microspheres for high-performance supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2014, 272, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhao, Y.; Chen, Z.; Xiong, D.-B.; Qiao, Y.; Tang, Y.; Gao, F. Hybridized Phosphate with Ultrathin Nanoslices and Single Crystal Microplatelets for High Performance Supercapacitors. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 17613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, Y.; Lei, Y.; Li, J.; Gu, L.; Yuan, H.; Xiao, D. Synthesis of 3D-Nanonet Hollow Structured Co3O4 for High Capacity Supercapacitor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 6739–6747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kong, S.Y.; Yang, F.; Cheng, K.; Ouyang, T.; Ye, K.; Wang, G.L.; Cao, D.X. In-situ growth of cobalt oxide nanoflakes from cobalt nanosheet on nickel foam for battery-type supercapacitors with high specific capacity. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2017, 785, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Aghazadeh, M.; Ahmadi, R.; Gharailou, D.; Ganjali, M.R.; Norouzi, P. A facile route to preparation of Co3O4 nanoplates and investigation of their charge storage ability as electrode material for supercapacitors. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2016, 27, 8623–8632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yadav, A.A.; Chavan, U.J. Electrochemical supercapacitive performance of spray deposited Co3O4 thin film nanostructures. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 232, 370–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wu, C.; Lu, X.; Peng, L.; Xu, K.; Peng, X.; Huang, J.; Yu, G.; Xie, Y. Two-dimensional vanadyl phosphate ultrathin nanosheets for high energy density and flexible pseudocapacitors. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of preparing Co3O4 electrode materials by gas-phase diffusion precipitation method.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of preparing Co3O4 electrode materials by gas-phase diffusion precipitation method.
Crystals 10 00720 g001
Figure 2. XRD pattern of A, B and C Co3O4 electrode materials.
Figure 2. XRD pattern of A, B and C Co3O4 electrode materials.
Crystals 10 00720 g002
Figure 3. (a) Low and (b) high magnification SEM images of A (Co3O4 electrode material prepared by CoCl2·6H2O), (c) low and (d) high magnification SEM images of B (Co3O4 electrode material prepared by Co(OAc)2·4H2O), and (e) low and (f) high magnification SEM images of C (B modified by NaH2PO2·H2O).
Figure 3. (a) Low and (b) high magnification SEM images of A (Co3O4 electrode material prepared by CoCl2·6H2O), (c) low and (d) high magnification SEM images of B (Co3O4 electrode material prepared by Co(OAc)2·4H2O), and (e) low and (f) high magnification SEM images of C (B modified by NaH2PO2·H2O).
Crystals 10 00720 g003
Figure 4. The galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) curves of the different Co3O4 electrodes: (a) A, (b) B, (c) C and (d) GCD curves of the different Co3O4 electrodes at 1 A·g−1.
Figure 4. The galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) curves of the different Co3O4 electrodes: (a) A, (b) B, (c) C and (d) GCD curves of the different Co3O4 electrodes at 1 A·g−1.
Crystals 10 00720 g004
Figure 5. The specific capacitance of the different Co3O4 electrodes at different current densities: A, B and C.
Figure 5. The specific capacitance of the different Co3O4 electrodes at different current densities: A, B and C.
Crystals 10 00720 g005
Figure 6. CV curves of the different Co3O4 electrodes: (a) A, (b) B, (c) C and (d) CV curves of the different Co3O4 electrodes at 20 mV·s−1.
Figure 6. CV curves of the different Co3O4 electrodes: (a) A, (b) B, (c) C and (d) CV curves of the different Co3O4 electrodes at 20 mV·s−1.
Crystals 10 00720 g006
Figure 7. EIS of the different Co3O4 electrodes.
Figure 7. EIS of the different Co3O4 electrodes.
Crystals 10 00720 g007
Table 1. Co3O4 electrode materials were prepared by gas-phase diffusion precipitation method.
Table 1. Co3O4 electrode materials were prepared by gas-phase diffusion precipitation method.
SampleCobalt SourceSolventPrecipitatorNaH2PO4·2H2O
ACo(OAc)2·4H2OH2ONH3·H2OUnmodified
BCoCl2·6H2OH2ONH3·H2OUnmodified
CCoCl2·6H2OH2ONH3·H2OModified
Table 2. Electrochemical performance of Co3O4 electrode materials.
Table 2. Electrochemical performance of Co3O4 electrode materials.
MethodStructureSpecific CapacitanceRateRef.
HydrothermalNanoflake1500 F·g−1 at 1 A·g−155.2% at 10 A·g−1[10]
TemplateNanosheet1121 F·g−1 at 1 A·g−177.9% at 25 A·g−1[12]
SolvothermalNanoparticle523.0 F·g−1 at 0.5 A·g−166.9% at 5 A·g−1[13]
CVD methodNanosphere128 F·g−1 at 10 A·g−190% at 20 A·g−1[25]
Chemical bath depositionNanowire850 F·g−1 at 5 mV·s−185% at 100 mV·s−1[26]
In-site self-organizationNanorods1486 F·g−1 at 1 A·g−172.9% at 15 A·g−1[27]
Galvanic displacementNanosheet1095 F·g−1 at 1 A·g−161.9% at 15 A·g−1[29]
Laser ablationNanosheet762 F·g−1 at 6 A·g−182.7% at 36 A·g−1[30]
Electrospinning techniqueNanofiber340 F·g−1 at 1 A·g−187.1% at 10 A·g−1[31]
Sol-gelNetlike708 F·g−1 at 5 A·g−171.9% at 50 A·g−1[32]
Chemical precipitationNanonet739 F·g−1 at 1 A·g−172.1% at 15 A·g−1[38]
Thermal decompositionNanoflake576.8 F·g−1 at 1 A·g−149.2% at 50 A·g−1[39]
ElectrodepositionNanoplate517 F·g−1 at 1 A·g−139.1% at 20 A·g−1[40]
Spray pyrolysisThin film412 F·g−1 at 1 A·g−193% at 4 A·g−1[41]
Gas-phase diffusion precipitationNanofloc564 F·g−1 at 1 A·g−158.7% at 10 A·g−1A
Gas-phase diffusion precipitationNanosheet640 F·g−1 at 1 A·g−154.7% at 10 A·g−1B
Gas-phase diffusion precipitationNanosheet1140 F·g−1 at 1 A·g−141.8% at 10 A·g−1C

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, X.; Fu, J.; Wang, Q.; Dong, Z.; Wang, X.; Hu, A.; Wang, W.; Yang, S. Preparation and Electrochemical Properties of Co3O4 Supercapacitor Electrode Materials. Crystals 2020, 10, 720. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10090720

AMA Style

Wang X, Fu J, Wang Q, Dong Z, Wang X, Hu A, Wang W, Yang S. Preparation and Electrochemical Properties of Co3O4 Supercapacitor Electrode Materials. Crystals. 2020; 10(9):720. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10090720

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Xuelei, Jiawei Fu, Qiufeng Wang, Zhaojun Dong, Xiaoliang Wang, Anyu Hu, Wei Wang, and Shaobin Yang. 2020. "Preparation and Electrochemical Properties of Co3O4 Supercapacitor Electrode Materials" Crystals 10, no. 9: 720. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10090720

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop