Next Article in Journal
Energy Efficient and Intermittently Variable Ammonia Synthesis over Mesoporous Carbon-Supported Cs-Ru Nanocatalysts
Next Article in Special Issue
Biocatalysis and Pharmaceuticals: A Smart Tool for Sustainable Development
Previous Article in Journal
Reduction of Nitrobenzene to Aniline by CO/H2O in the Presence of Palladium Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis of Ribavirin, Tecadenoson, and Cladribine by Enzymatic Transglycosylation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Catalysts
Volume 9
Issue 5
10.3390/catal9050405
catalysts-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tailored Enzymatic Synthesis of Chitooligosaccharides with Different Deacetylation Degrees and Their Anti-Inflammatory Activity

by
P. Santos-Moriano
1,2,
P. Kidibule
3,
N. Míguez
1,
L. Fernández-Arrojo
1,
A.O. Ballesteros
1,
M. Fernández-Lobato
3 and
F.J. Plou
1,*
1
Instituto de Catálisis y Petroleoquímica, CSIC, 28049 Madrid, Spain
2
Applied Biotechnology Group, Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Villaviciosa de Odón, 28670 Madrid, Spain
3
Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa, CSIC-UAM, 28049 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2019, 9(5), 405; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9050405
Submission received: 5 April 2019 / Revised: 24 April 2019 / Accepted: 28 April 2019 / Published: 30 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biocatalysis and Pharmaceuticals: A Smart Tool for Sustainable Development)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

By controlled hydrolysis of chitosan or chitin with different enzymes, three types of chitooligosaccharides (COS) with MW between 0.2 and 1.2 kDa were obtained: fully deacetylated (fdCOS), partially acetylated (paCOS), and fully acetylated (faCOS). The chemical composition of the samples was analyzed by high-performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD) and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. The synthesized fdCOS was basically formed by GlcN, (GlcN)2, (GlcN)3, and (GlcN)4. On the contrary, faCOS contained mostly GlcNAc, (GlcNAc)2 and (GlcNAc)3, while paCOS corresponded to a mixture of at least 11 oligosaccharides with different proportions of GlcNAc and GlcN. The anti-inflammatory activity of the three COS mixtures was studied by measuring their ability to reduce the level of TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor) in murine macrophages (RAW 264.7) after stimulation with a mixture of lipopolysaccharides (LPS). Only fdCOS and faCOS were able to significantly reduce the production of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α at 6 h after stimulation with lipopolysaccharides.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Chitin [(C8H13O5N)n] is a linear biopolymer of N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (GlcNAc) moieties that gives toughness to the exoskeleton of arthropods (crustaceans, insects, etc.) and mollusks, as well as fungi cell walls [1,2]. The hydrolysis of chitin (and of its deacetylated product chitosan, more soluble than chitin) yields a series of chitooligosaccharides (COS) containing random GlcNAc and D-glucosamine (GlcN) units [3].
Three families of COS can be differentiated (Figure 1): fully acetylated chitooligosaccharides (faCOS) (formed exclusively by GlcNAc), partially acetylated chitooligosaccharides (paCOS) (composed of GlcN and GlcNAc), and fully deacetylated chitooligosaccharides (fdCOS) (formed exclusively by GlcN) [4]. The bioactivity of COS is well reported [5,6,7], in particular their anti-inflammatory [8], neuroprotective [9], antibacterial [10], antiviral [11], antihypertensive [12] antiangiogenic [13], and antitumor [14] properties, among others. The size of COS (defined by the degree of polymerization, DP), degree of deacetylation (DD) and pattern of acetylation (PA) exert a notable influence on their properties [4,13,15,16].
Among the methodologies to perform the partial hydrolysis of chitin/chitosan into COS, the use of chitinolytic/chitosanolytic enzymes offer some advantages over physical, chemical, or electrochemical depolymerization [17]. Glycosidic enzymes require mild reaction conditions (moderate temperature and slightly acidic pH), display high efficiency, and allow for control of the composition of the final product on the basis of enzyme specificity [4,18,19,20,21,22], which can also be altered by protein engineering techniques [23,24]. The enzymatic strategies are more environmentally friendly and generate less waste than the chemical methods [3,25,26]. The physicochemical properties of the starting chitosan also influence the composition of the resulting oligosaccharides [27,28].
For the hydrolysis of chitosan, chitosanases (EC 3.2.1.132) catalyze specifically the cleavage of β (1→4) glycosidic linkages between GlcN moieties [29,30,31,32]. However, other enzymes such as pectinases [33], cellulases [34], and proteases [35] also display chitosanolytic activity yielding COS. We have recently reported that a proteolytic preparation from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (Neutrase 0.8L) is able to produce a mixture of COS that is highly enriched in fdCOS [18].
Chitinases (EC 3.2.1.14) are hydrolytic enzymes involved in chitin decomposition that play an important role as control agents against pathogenic fungi in plants [36,37,38]. In recent research, we cloned chitinase Chit42 from fungus Trichoderma harzianum in Pichia pastoris to produce 3 g/L using fed-batch fermentation, and its 3D structure was characterized [39]. This enzyme hydrolyzed chitin and chitosan with a low DD giving rise to mixtures enriched in faCOS and paCOS, respectively. In general, the binding site of chitinases of fungal origin is substantially long and interacts with a minimum of five sugar units. The glycosyl-binding subsites are designated as −3, − 2, −1, +1, and +2, and the split occurs between the −1 and +1 sugar. A detailed structural analysis of Chit42 indicated that this protein requires a GlcNAc residue in the substrate located at the −1 position for substrate hydrolysis.
In the present work, we have synthesized three COS mixtures enriched in fdCOS, paCOS, and faCOS. The samples were chemically characterized by chromatography and mass spectrometry. The effect of COS composition on anti-inflammatory properties was studied using a murine macrophage cell line (RAW 264.7). Although the anti-inflammatory activity of chitosan oligosaccharides is well reported [40,41,42,43], most of the works have been performed with COS mixtures not fully characterized in terms of DP, DD, or PA, probably due to the difficulties in the controlled synthesis and analysis of COS mixtures.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Enzymatic Production and Characterization of fdCOS

Based on previous work [18], we selected the commercial proteolytic preparation Neutrase 0.8L and a chitosan (CHIT600) with a high DD (>90%) to scale up the production of fully deacetylated COS (fdCOS). The reaction was carried out over 24 h with 1% (w/v) chitosan at pH 5.0 and 50 °C. After this time, the enzyme and the remaining chitosan were eliminated by ultrafiltration with a 10 kDa membrane. Then, the COS of high molecular weight were removed using a 1 kDa cut-off membrane. The resulting solution was dialyzed over 0.1–0.5 kDa cut-off tubing to eliminate the salts and other small contaminants, yielding a COS fraction with a molecular mass between 0.2 and 1.2 kDa. This fraction was further freeze-dried and characterized by high-performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD) chromatography and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.
The HPAEC-PAD chromatogram of the COS obtained with Neutrase 0.8 L—purified as described above—is represented in Figure 2. The chromatogram shows five main peaks corresponding to fdCOS, which was identified with the corresponding standards as GlcN (1), (GlcN)2 (2), (GlcN)3 (3), (GlcN)4 (4), and (GlcN)5 (5). In particular, chitobiose [(GlcN)2] and chitotriose [(GlcN)3] were the major products. Peaks marked with asterisks were not identified due to the lack of available standards.
The MALDI-TOF spectrum of the COS mixture was in accordance with the chromatographic analysis since the main m/z peaks corresponded to the molecular weight of the fdCOS. The main signals in the mass spectrum in positive mode belonged to the M + [Na]+ and M + [K]+ cations. Table 1 compiles the major m/z signals and the assigned composition. Several m/z values in agreement with partially acetylated COS (paCOS) appeared in the MS spectrum, with significantly lower intensity than the fdCOS. These paCOS probably corresponded to the unidentified peaks in the HPAEC-PAD analysis (Figure 2). However, their chemical structure could not be unequivocally assigned from the obtained data. The deacetylation degree of this fdCOS sample must be between 95 and 100%.
We calculated the efficiency of COS production with Neutrase 0.8 L. Starting from 1 g chitosan CHIT600, and after all the purification steps, approximately 210 mg of COS (mostly fully deacetylated) was obtained.

2.2. Enzymatic Production and Characterization of faCOS

For the production of faCOS, the first step was the transformation of chitin flakes into colloidal chitin as previously described [39]. Chitinase Chit42 was used for the hydrolysis of chitin into fully acetylated chitooligosaccharides. Figure 3 illustrates the HPAEC-PAD chromatogram of the reaction mixture obtained with Chit42, which was purified as described in the Experimental Section. The presence of the faCOS GlcNAc (1), (GlcNAc)2 (2), and (GlcNAc)3 (3) was verified by using the corresponding standards. The deacetylation degree of this faCOS sample was between 0 and 5%.
The MALDI-TOF spectrum of this mixture was simpler than that of fdCOS. Table 2 summarizes the main m/z peaks and their assignations. The main signal in the mass spectrum corresponded to (GlcNAc)2. It is worth noting that both the monomer GlcNAc and the trimer (GlcNAc)3 did not appear in the MS spectrum, probably due to bad ionization or low stability of the formed ions. In contrast, several peaks containing a GlcN moiety were present, which probably corresponded to the minor peaks detected in the HPAEC-PAD analysis, indicating that GlcN units favor MALDI ionization. Starting from 1 g of colloidal chitin, 75.8 mg of the characterized faCOS was obtained.

2.3. Enzymatic Production and Characterization of paCOS

Chitosan QS1—with a lower DD (81%) than CHIT600 (>90%)—and chitinase Chit42, which requires a GlcNAc residue at −1 position [39], were used for the preparation of partially acetylated chitooligosaccharides (paCOS). The analysis of this family of COS is quite difficult due to the lack of commercial standards. Figure 4 illustrates the HPAEC-PAD chromatogram of the resulting mixture. At least 11 unidentified peaks were detected.
Table 3 summarizes the main m/z peaks detected in the MALDI-TOF spectrum and the proposed composition. However, the chemical structure of these compounds cannot be inferred from the mass spectrometry data. Since chitinase Chit42 only cleaves chitosan when a GlcNAc residue is located at the −1 position, the synthesized COS should present a GlcNAc at the reducing end. Table 3 includes COS containing up to nine residues with GlcN as the main component, which correlates well with the degree of deacetylation of chitosan QS1. After the purification steps, starting from 500 mg of chitosan QS1, 18 mg of paCOS was isolated. The lower yield obtained in comparison with fdCOS and faCOS was probably a consequence of the requirement of Chit42 for a GlcNAc at −1 position and the presence of a high proportion of GlcN (81%) in chitosan QS1.

2.4. Anti-Inflammatory Activity of fdCOS, faCOS, and paCOS

Inflammation plays an important role in the development of a series of pathologies including autoimmune diseases and cancer [44]. The anti-inflammatory activity of the three samples of COS previously obtained was assessed by measuring their ability to reduce the level of TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor) in murine macrophages (RAW 264.7) after stimulation with a mixture of lipopolysaccharides (LPS). TNF-α is a cytokine involved in systemic inflammation and one of the cytokines released by activated macrophages during the acute phase reaction of inflammation [45].
Three concentrations of COS were tested in a multi-well plate: 100, 250, and 500 ng per well. The ELISA methodology for the detection of TNF-α was properly validated through the accuracy of the standard curve obtained, which allowed the quantification of samples with a TNF-α concentration between 30 and 1000 pg/mL. The amount of TNF-α was measured at 2 and 6 h after incubation with LPS (10 ng/well). To discard the possible inflammatory effect of the compounds, the cells were also exposed to the three COS samples in the absence of LPS. However, no significant effect was observed in samples supplemented only with fdCOS, faCOS, or paCOS (data not shown). After the stimulations, both the culture supernatants and the cells were collected at 2 and 6 h.
Figure 5 shows the TNF-α concentration in the supernatants after 2 and 6 h stimulated with fdCOS, faCOS, and paCOS (at the three concentrations) in combination with 10 ng LPS. The results of the control experiment of cells stimulated only with LPS are also included in the figure. As illustrated in Figure 5, the TNF-α concentration tended to increase over time for most samples. The highest TNF-α concentration (1575 pg/mL) was obtained after 6 h post-stimulation with 10 ng of LPS per well.
The three types of COS were able to decrease the production of TNF-α at 6 h after stimulation with LPS. The highest effect was obtained using 250 ng/well (Figure 5). It is worth noting that fdCOS exhibited a negligible anti-inflammatory effect at concentrations of 100 and 500 ng/well after a 2-h incubation, but this effect increased significantly at 6 h. This relates well with our preliminary results with fdCOS [18]. In contrast, paCOS (except for 100 ng/well) and faCOS displayed a more stable effect between 2 and 6 h. These results could be indicating a critical role of the acetamido group of COS in their properties. However, only the fdCOS and faCOS at a concentration of 250 ng/well and after 6 h incubation displayed a statistically significant anti-inflammatory effect.
These results correlate well with previous works that analyzed the anti-inflammatory activity of COS. Yoon et al. reported the attenuation of secretion of TNF-α and IL-6 induced by LPS upon incubation with COS, demonstrating that the expression of these cytokines was regulated by COS at the transcription level [41]. However, the authors employed a commercial COS that was not fully characterized (MW < 10000; 90–95% DD). The dependence of anti-inflammatory activity on the molecular weight of COS was studied by Fernandes et al. [8] and Pangestuti et al. [46], concluding that COS of a low molecular weight were the most efficient. Sánchez et al. reported that a mixture with a similar content of deacetylated and monoacetylated HMW COS (5–10 kDa) produced the best anti-inflammatory effects [47].
Our results correlate well with those of Lee et al. [48]. They demonstrated that COS with 90% N-deacetylation (90-COS) displayed a higher anti-inflammatory effect than COS with 50% N-deacetylation (50-COS, more related to paCOS); interestingly, the 90-COS with a molecular mass between 5 and 10 kDa showed the highest inhibition activity.
In conclusion, the secretion of TNF-α decreased during the first 6 h in macrophages treated with the three COS mixtures in comparison with macrophages stimulated with LPS only. These results confirm the inhibitory effect of COS against inflammation, which confirms their potential as ingredients in functional foods and nutraceutical and pharmaceutical preparations.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Enzymes and Reagents

Neutrase 0.8 L was kindly donated by Novozymes A/S (Bagsværd, Denmark). The expression and production of Chit42 (chitinase from Trichoderma harzianum) by Pichia pastoris was performed as previously described [39]. Chitosan CHIT600 from shrimp shells (600–800 kDa, DD > 90%) was purchased from Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium). Chitosan QS1 from Paralomis granulosa (98 kDa, 81% DD) was supplied by InFiQus (Madrid, Spain). Chitin (coarse flakes, DD ≤ 5%) from shrimp shells and N-acetyl-glucosamine (GlcNAc) were from Sigma-Aldrich (Madrid, Spain). Chitobiose [(GlcN)2], chitotriose [(GlcN)3], chitotetraose [(GlcN)4], N,N′-di-N-acetyl-glucosamine [(GlcNAc)2], and N,N′,N″-tri-N-acetyl-glucosamine [(GlcNAc)3] were acquired from Carbosynth Ltd. (Compton, Berkshire, UK). All other reagents were of the highest purity grade available.

3.2. Preparation of Colloidal Chitin

Colloidal chitin was prepared following the method of Jeuniaux [49]. In particular, 10 g of chitin and 175 mL of 10 M HCl were stirred for 16 h at 4 °C. Then, the mixture was filtered using thick glass fibers and mixed with 1 L of ethanol. After 16 h at 4 °C, the precipitated chitin floccules were separated by centrifugation at 5000× g for 10 min and washed with distilled water. Finally, 200 mL of potassium phosphate buffer (70 mM, pH 6.0) was added to the pellet. To determine the concentration of colloidal chitin, 1 mL of solution was frozen at −70 °C, lyophilized, and weighed.

3.3. COS Production and Purification

Chitooligosaccharides with different deacetylation degrees were produced by different combinations of enzymes and substrates based on previous works [18,39]. The reaction conditions for the production of each type of COS are summarized in Table 4.
Reactions were carried out in a final volume of 40 mL containing 4 mL of enzyme solution and 36 mL of 1% (w/w) substrate dissolved properly in ammonium acetate at the optimal pH for the reaction. The formation of COS was followed by HPAEC-PAD until the hydrolysis was complete. Samples were filtrated through a paper filter to remove any insoluble particles and further purified by a series of membranes. First, the reaction mixture was fractionated using a 50 mL Amicon system with a 10 kDa cut-off membrane. This step separated the enzyme and the unreacted high molecular weight chitosan from the chitooligosaccharides. Then, the fraction of COS (< 10 kDa) was further fractionated with a 1 kDa cut-off membrane. The fraction of COS whose MW was lower than 1 kDa was then dialyzed with a 0.1–0.5 kDa membrane (Biotech Cellulose Ester Dialysis Membrane, Spectra/Por, Fisher Scientific, Madrid, Spain) to remove the salts and small contaminants from the sample, yielding a COS fraction with a MW between 0.1 and 1 kDa. This fraction was lyophilized, analyzed by HPAEC-PAD and MALDI-TOF, and used for bioactivity assays.

3.4. COS Characterization by HPAEC-PAD and MALDI-TOF

COS samples were analyzed at 30 °C by HPAEC-PAD on a chromatograph ICS3000 (Dionex, Thermo Fischer Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) formed by a gradient pump (model SP), an electrochemical detector consisting of a working electrode (Au) and a reference electrode (Ag/AgCl), and a AS-HV autosampler. The column was an anion exchange Carbo-Pack PA-200 (Dionex, 4 × 250 mm) connected to a CarboPac PA-200 guard column (4 × 50 mm). A post-column delivery system (PC10) pumped 200 mM NaOH to enhance the detector response. The mobile phase was 1 mM NaOH at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min for 20 min, followed by a gradient from 0 to 320 mM sodium acetate/100 mM NaOH in 10 min, that was kept for another 10 min. Equilibration of the column to the initial conditions was made for 40 min. The chromatograms were analyzed using Chromeleon software. The identification and quantification of the different carbohydrates were done based on commercial standards when available.
The molecular size of COS was analyzed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry using Ultraflex III TOF/TOF equipment (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) equipped with a NdYAG laser. The spectra were acquired in positive reflector mode in the mass interval 40–5000 Da, employing 20 mg/mL 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB) in acetonitrile: H2O (3:7) (v/v) as matrix and external calibration. The samples were mixed with the DHB matrix in a 4:1 (v/v) ratio and 0.5 µL was injected.

3.5. Anti-Inflammatory Activity of COS

RAW 264.7 cells were cultured in DMEM (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s medium) supplemented with 10% FBS (fetal bovine serum) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Cells were counted with a Neubauer chamber in order to seed a concentration of 2 million cells per well. Each of the compounds was tested in duplicate at three different concentrations: 500, 250, and 100 ng/well. A mixture of lipopolysaccharides (LPS, potent immune cell activator) at a concentration of 10 ng per well was used as a positive control, and PBS (phosphate buffered saline) was used as a negative control and added to the wells in the same volume as the rest of the compounds. The cells were also exposed to the three chitooligosaccharides (without LPS) as a control for the inflammatory effect of the compounds. After the stimulations, both the culture supernatants and the cells were collected at 2 and 6 h. Samples were frozen and kept at −80 °C until analysis.
The quantification of anti-TNF-α antibodies in culture supernatants was assessed by ELISA using a murine TNF-α ELISA kit (Diaclone, Besançon, France) following the protocol provided by the manufacturer. Samples were diluted 1:2 (v/v) in an appropriate buffer (provided by the kit) and 100 μL was added in duplicate to the plate. Serial dilutions of the standard were made to provide a concentration range from 1000 to 31.25 pg/mL, and 100 μL was added per well in duplicate to the ELISA plate. Biotinylated anti-murine TNF-α antibody was properly diluted according to the manufacturer’s protocol and 50 μL was added to each well. Plates were sealed and incubated at room temperature for 3 h. After incubation, plates were washed three times with the wash buffer provided with the kit. Streptavidin-Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP) solution (100 μL) was added for the detection of the biotinylated detection antibody and plates were incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Then, 100 μL of ready-to-use 3,3’,5,5’-Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate solution was transferred into each well. Plates were incubated in the dark at room temperature (10 min) for color development. To stop the color reaction, 50 μL of 2 N H2S04 was added. The optical density (OD) for each well was measured with a microplate reader set to 450 nm.
Data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) with n = 2. Brown–Forsythe test and post-hoc Games–Howell method were used to find differences with respect to the LPS control. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM® SPSS® Statistics v25 and differences were considered significant when p < 0.05.

Author Contributions

F.J.P., M.F.-L. and A.O.B. conceived and designed the experiments; P.S.-M. and N.M. performed most of the experiments; P.K. and M.F.-L. contributed with Chit42 production; L.F.-A. contributed with chromatographic methods for COS analysis; F.J.P. and P.S.-M. wrote the paper, which was improved by the rest of the authors.

Funding

This work was supported by the Fundación Ramón Areces (XIX Call of Research Grants in Life and Materials Sciences) and the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Grants BIO2016-76601-C3-1-R and BIO2016-76601-C3-3-R). We also acknowledge the institutional grant from Ramon Areces Foundation to the Centre of Molecular Biology “Severo Ochoa”. The European Union’s Horizon 2020 program also financed this work (Blue Growth: Unlocking the potential of Seas and Oceans; grant agreement No. 634486; INMARE). We thank the support of the EU COST-Action CM1303 on Systems Biocatalysis.

Acknowledgments

We thank Laura Córdoba and Miguel Angel Llamas (Diomune S.L.) for their help in the analysis of the anti-inflammatory properties. We thank Ramiro Martinez (Novozymes A/S) for supplying Neutrase 0.8 L and for relevant suggestions. We are also grateful for the support of the publication fee by the CSIC Open Access Publication Support Initiative through its Unit of Information Resources for Research (URICI).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hamed, I.; Özogul, F.; Regenstein, J.M. Industrial applications of crustacean by-products (chitin, chitosan, and chitooligosaccharides): A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 48, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gortari, M.C.; Hours, R.A. Biotechnological processes for chitin recovery out of crustacean waste: A mini-review. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2013, 16, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kumar, M.; Brar, A.; Vivekanand, V.; Pareek, N. Bioconversion of chitin to bioactive chitooligosaccharides: Amelioration and coastal pollution reduction by microbial resources. Mar. Biotechnol. 2018, 20, 269–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hamer, S.N.; Cord-Landwehr, S.; Biarnés, X.; Planas, A.; Waegeman, H.; Moerschbacher, B.M.; Kolkenbrock, S. Enzymatic production of defined chitosan oligomers with a specific pattern of acetylation using a combination of chitin oligosaccharide deacetylases. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liaqat, F.; Eltem, R. Chitooligosaccharides and their biological activities: A comprehensive review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 184, 243–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Je, J.Y.; Kim, S.K. Chitooligosaccharides as potential nutraceuticals: production and bioactivities. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2012, 65, 321–336. [Google Scholar]
  7. Xia, W.; Liu, P.; Zhang, J.; Chen, J. Biological activities of chitosan and chitooligosaccharides. Food Hydrocolloids 2011, 25, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fernandes, J.C.; Spindola, H.; de Sousa, V.; Santos-Silva, A.; Pintado, M.E.; Malcata, F.X.; Carvalho, J.E. Anti-inflammatory activity of chitooligosaccharides in vivo. Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 1763–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jiang, M.; Guo, Z.; Wang, C.; Yang, Y.; Liang, X.; Ding, F. Neural activity analysis of pure chito-oligomer components separated from a mixture of chitooligosaccharides. Neurosci. Lett. 2014, 581, 32–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wu, S.-J.; Pan, S.-K.; Wang, H.-B.; Wu, J.-H. Preparation of chitooligosaccharides from cicada slough and their antibacterial activity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 62, 348–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Artan, M.; Karadeniz, F.; Karagozlu, M.Z.; Kim, M.M.; Kim, S.K. Anti-HIV-1 activity of low molecular weight sulfated chitooligosaccharides. Carbohydr. Res. 2010, 345, 656–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Huang, R.; Mendis, E.; Kim, S.K. Improvement of ACE inhibitory activity of chitooligosaccharides (COS) by carboxyl modification. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005, 13, 3649–3655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wu, H.; Aam, B.B.; Wang, W.; Norberg, A.L.; Sørlie, M.; Eijsink, V.G.H.; Du, Y. Inhibition of angiogenesis by chitooligosaccharides with specific degrees of acetylation and polymerization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 89, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kim, E.K.; Je, J.Y.; Lee, S.J.; Kim, Y.S.; Hwang, J.W.; Sung, S.H.; Moon, S.H.; Jeon, B.T.; Kim, S.K.; Jeon, Y.J.; et al. Chitooligosaccharides induce apoptosis in human myeloid leukemia HL-60 cells. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 22, 6136–6138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mengíbar, M.; Mateos-Aparicio, I.; Miralles, B.; Heras, A. Influence of the physico-chemical characteristics of chito-oligosaccharides (COS) on antioxidant activity. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 97, 776–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yarullina, L.G.; Sorokan, A.V.; Burkhanova, G.F.; Cherepanova, E.A.; Maksimov, I.V. Influence of chitooligosaccharides with different acetylation degrees on the H2O2 content and the activity of pathogenesis-related proteins in potato plants infected with Phytophthora infestans. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2018, 54, 528–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liang, S.; Sun, Y.X.; Dai, X.L. A review of the preparation, analysis and biological functions of chitooligosaccharide. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Santos-Moriano, P.; Fernandez-Arrojo, L.; Mengibar, M.; Belmonte-Reche, E.; Peñalver, P.; Acosta, F.N.; Ballesteros, A.O.; Morales, J.C.; Kidibule, P.; Fernandez-Lobato, M.; et al. Enzymatic production of fully deacetylated chitooligosaccharides and their neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory properties. Biocatal. Biotransform. 2018, 36, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. de Araujo, N.K.; de Assis, C.F.; Dos Santos, E.S.; de Macedo, G.R.; de Farias, L.F.; Arimateia, H., Jr.; de Freitas Fernandes Pedrosa, M.; Pagnoncelli, M.G. Production of enzymes by Paenibacillus chitinolyticus and Paenibacillus ehimensis to obtain chitooligosaccharides. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2013, 170, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Plou, F.J.; Gómez de Segura, A.; Ballesteros, A. Application of glycosidases and transglycosidases for the synthesis of oligosaccharides. In Industrial enzymes: Structure, Function and Application; Polaina, J., MacCabe, A.P., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 141–157. [Google Scholar]
  21. Fernandez-Arrojo, L.; Marin, D.; Gomez de Segura, A.; Linde, D.; Alcalde, M.; Gutierrez-Alonso, P.; Ghazi, I.; Plou, F.J.; Fernandez-Lobato, M.; Ballesteros, A. Transformation of maltose into prebiotic isomaltooligosaccharides by a novel alpha-glucosidase from Xantophyllomyces dendrorhous. Process Biochem. 2007, 42, 1530–1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Linde, D.; Rodriguez-Colinas, B.; Estevez, M.; Poveda, A.; Plou, F.J.; Fernandez-Lobato, M. Analysis of neofructooligosaccharides production mediated by the extracellular beta-fructofuranosidase from Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 109, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, S.; Shao, S.; Li, L.; Cheng, Z.; Tian, L.; Gao, P.; Wang, L. Substrate-binding specificity of chitinase and chitosanase as revealed by active-site architecture analysis. Carbohydr. Res. 2015, 418, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. de Abreu, M.; Alvaro-Benito, M.; Sanz-Aparicio, J.; Plou, F.J.; Fernandez-Lobato, M.; Alcalde, M. Synthesis of 6-kestose using an efficient beta-fructofuranosidase engineered by directed evolution. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2013, 355, 1698–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Song, J.Y.; Alnaeeli, M.; Park, J.K. Efficient digestion of chitosan using chitosanase immobilized on silica-gel for the production of multisize chitooligosaccharides. Process Biochem. 2014, 49, 2107–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alcalde, M.; Ferrer, M.; Plou, F.J. Environmental biocatalysis: From remediation with enzymes to novel green processes. Biocatal. Biotransform. 2007, 25, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Olicón-Hernández, D.R.; Vázquez-Landaverde, P.A.; Cruz-Camarillo, R.; Rojas-Avelizapa, L.I. Comparison of chito-oligosaccharide production from three different colloidal chitosans using the endochitonsanolytic system of Bacillus thuringiensis. Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2017, 47, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Santos-Moriano, P.; Woodley, J.M.; Plou, F.J. Continuous production of chitooligosaccharides by an immobilized enzyme in a dual-reactor system. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2016, 133, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, H.; Fei, Z.; Gong, J.; Yang, T.; Xu, Z.; Shi, J. Screening and characterization of a highly active chitosanase based on metagenomic technology. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2015, 111, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Thadathil, N.; Velappan, S.P. Recent developments in chitosanase research and its biotechnological applications: A review. Food Chem. 2014, 150, 392–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sinha, S.; Chand, S.; Tripathi, P. Production, purification and characterization of a new chitosanase enzyme and improvement of chitosan pentamer and hexamer yield in an enzyme membrane reactor. Biocatal. Biotransform. 2014, 32, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Santos-Moriano, P.; Kidibule, P.E.; Alleyne, E.; Ballesteros, A.O.; Heras, A.; Fernandez-Lobato, M.; Plou, F.J. Efficient conversion of chitosan into chitooligosaccharides by a chitosanolytic activity from Bacillus thuringiensis. Process Biochem. 2018, 73, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kittur, F.S.; Vishu Kumar, A.B.; Varadaraj, M.C.; Tharanathan, R.N. Chitooligosaccharides—Preparation with the aid of pectinase isozyme from Aspergillus niger and their antibacterial activity. Carbohydr. Res. 2005, 340, 1239–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xia, W.; Liu, P.; Liu, J. Advance in chitosan hydrolysis by non-specific cellulases. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 6751–6762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kumar, A.B.V.; Tharanathan, R.N. A comparative study on depolymerization of chitosan by proteolytic enzymes. Carbohydr. Polym. 2004, 58, 275–283. [Google Scholar]
  36. Oyeleye, A.; Normi, Y.M. Chitinase: Diversity, limitations, and trends in Engineering for suitable applications. Biosci. Rep. 2018, 38, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Moon, C.; Seo, D.J.; Song, Y.S.; Hong, S.H.; Choi, S.H.; Jung, W.J. Antifungal activity and patterns of N-acetyl-chitooligosaccharide degradation via chitinase produced from Serratia marcescens PRNK-1. Microb. Pathog. 2017, 113, 218–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Sha, L.; Shao, E.; Guan, X.; Huang, Z. Purification and partial characterization of intact and truncated chitinase from Bacillus thuringiensis HZP7 expressed in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Lett. 2016, 38, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kidibule, P.E.; Santos-Moriano, P.; Jiménez-Ortega, E.; Ramírez-Escudero, M.; Limón, M.C.; Remacha, M.; Plou, F.J.; Sanz-Aparicio, J.; Fernández-Lobato, M. Use of chitin and chitosan to produce new chitooligosaccharides by chitinase Chit42: Enzymatic activity and structural basis of protein specificity. Microb. Cell Fact. 2018, 17, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Wei, P.; Ma, P.; Xu, Q.S.; Bai, Q.H.; Gu, J.G.; Xi, H.; Du, Y.G.; Yu, C. Chitosan oligosaccharides suppress production of nitric oxide in lipopolysaccharide-induced N9 murine microglial cells in vitro. Glycoconjugate J. 2012, 29, 285–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yoon, H.J.; Moon, M.E.; Park, H.S.; Im, S.Y.; Kim, Y.H. Chitosan oligosaccharide (COS) inhibits LPS-induced inflammatory effects in RAW 264.7 macrophage cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 358, 954–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Li, Y.; Liu, H.T.; Xu, Q.S.; Du, Y.G.; Xu, J. Chitosan oligosaccharides block LPS-induced O-GlcNAcylation of NF-kappa B and endothelial inflammatory response. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 99, 568–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yousef, M.; Pichyangkura, R.; Soodvilai, S.; Chatsudthipong, V.; Muanprasat, C. Chitosan oligosaccharide as potential therapy of inflammatory bowel disease: Therapeutic efficacy and possible mechanisms of action. Pharmacol. Res. 2012, 66, 66–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lee, H.J.; Park, J.M.; Han, Y.M.; Gil, H.K.; Kim, J.; Chang, J.Y.; Jeong, M.; Go, E.J.; Hahm, K.B. The role of chronic inflammation in the development of gastrointestinal cancers: reviewing cancer prevention with natural anti-inflammatory intervention. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016, 10, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhou, Z.J.; Wang, L.; Feng, P.P.; Yin, L.H.; Wang, C.; Zhi, S.X.; Dong, J.Y.; Wang, J.Y.; Lin, Y.; Chen, D.P.; et al. Inhibition of epithelial TNF-alpha receptors by purified fruit bromelain ameliorates intestinal inflammation and barrier dysfunction in colitis. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Pangestuti, R.; Bak, S.S.; Kim, S.K. Attenuation of pro-inflammatory mediators in LPS-stimulated BV2 microglia by chitooligosaccharides via the MAPK signaling pathway. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2011, 49, 599–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Sánchez, Á.; Mengíbar, M.; Fernández, M.; Alemany, S.; Heras, A.; Acosta, N. Influence of preparation methods of chitooligosaccharides on their physicochemical properties and their anti-inflammatory effects in mice and in RAW 264.7 macrophages. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Lee, S.-H.; Senevirathne, M.; Ahn, C.-B.; Kim, S.-K.; Je, J.-Y. Factors affecting anti-inflammatory effect of chitooligosaccharides in lipopolysaccharides-induced RAW264.7 macrophage cells. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 19, 6655–6658. [Google Scholar]
  49. Jeuniaux, C. Chitinases. Methods Enzymol. 1966, 8, 644–650. [Google Scholar]
Catalysts 09 00405 g001
Figure 1. Structure of the three main types of chitooligosaccharides (COS): fully acetylated (faCOS), partially acetylated (paCOS), and fully deacetylated (fdCOS).
Figure 1. Structure of the three main types of chitooligosaccharides (COS): fully acetylated (faCOS), partially acetylated (paCOS), and fully deacetylated (fdCOS).
Catalysts 09 00405 g001
Catalysts 09 00405 g002
Figure 2. High-performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD) chromatogram of the chitooligosaccharides produced by Neutrase 0.8 L using chitosan CHIT600. Reaction conditions: 1% (w/v) chitosan, 10% (v/v) Neutrase 0.8 L, 50 °C, 50 mM ammonium acetate buffer pH 5.0, 24 h. Identified peaks: (1) GlcN; (2) (GlcN)2; (3) (GlcN)3; (4) (GlcN)4; (5) (GlcN)5.
Figure 2. High-performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD) chromatogram of the chitooligosaccharides produced by Neutrase 0.8 L using chitosan CHIT600. Reaction conditions: 1% (w/v) chitosan, 10% (v/v) Neutrase 0.8 L, 50 °C, 50 mM ammonium acetate buffer pH 5.0, 24 h. Identified peaks: (1) GlcN; (2) (GlcN)2; (3) (GlcN)3; (4) (GlcN)4; (5) (GlcN)5.
Catalysts 09 00405 g002
Catalysts 09 00405 g003
Figure 3. HPAEC-PAD chromatogram of the chitooligosaccharides obtained with chitinase Chit42 employing chitin (colloid). Reaction conditions: 1% (w/v) colloidal chitin, 10% (v/v) chitinase, 70 mM potassium phosphate pH 6.0. Identified peaks: (1) GlcNAc; (2) (GlcNAc)2; (3) (GlcNAc)3.
Figure 3. HPAEC-PAD chromatogram of the chitooligosaccharides obtained with chitinase Chit42 employing chitin (colloid). Reaction conditions: 1% (w/v) colloidal chitin, 10% (v/v) chitinase, 70 mM potassium phosphate pH 6.0. Identified peaks: (1) GlcNAc; (2) (GlcNAc)2; (3) (GlcNAc)3.
Catalysts 09 00405 g003
Catalysts 09 00405 g004
Figure 4. HPAEC-PAD chromatogram of the chitooligosaccharides produced by chitinase Chit42 using chitosan QS1 as substrate. Reaction conditions: 1% (w/v) chitosan, 10% (v/v) chitinase Chit42, 70 mM potassium phosphate pH 6.0.
Figure 4. HPAEC-PAD chromatogram of the chitooligosaccharides produced by chitinase Chit42 using chitosan QS1 as substrate. Reaction conditions: 1% (w/v) chitosan, 10% (v/v) chitinase Chit42, 70 mM potassium phosphate pH 6.0.
Catalysts 09 00405 g004
Catalysts 09 00405 g005
Figure 5. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) concentration in the supernatants from cells stimulated with fdCOS, faCOS, and paCOS (at 100, 250, and 500 ng per well) in combination with 10 ng lipopolysaccharide (LPS) per well. Graphs show the amount of TNF-α at 2 and 6 h post-stimulation. The data is expressed as the mean ± SD (*p < 0.05 vs. LPS control).
Figure 5. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) concentration in the supernatants from cells stimulated with fdCOS, faCOS, and paCOS (at 100, 250, and 500 ng per well) in combination with 10 ng lipopolysaccharide (LPS) per well. Graphs show the amount of TNF-α at 2 and 6 h post-stimulation. The data is expressed as the mean ± SD (*p < 0.05 vs. LPS control).
Catalysts 09 00405 g005
Table 1. Main identified signals in the MALDI-TOF mass spectrum of the reaction between chitosan CHIT600 and Neutrase 0.8 L. Reaction conditions were as described in Figure 2.
Table 1. Main identified signals in the MALDI-TOF mass spectrum of the reaction between chitosan CHIT600 and Neutrase 0.8 L. Reaction conditions were as described in Figure 2.
m/zAssignation
180.0GlcN + H+
363.1(GlcN)2 + Na+
524.2/540.2(GlcN)3 + Na+/K+
566.2/582.2(GlcN)2-GlcNAc + Na+/K+
685.3/701.3(GlcN)4 + Na+/ K+
727.3/743.3(GlcN)3-GlcNAc + Na+/K+
846.3/862.2(GlcN)5 + Na+/ K+
888.3/904.3(GlcN)4-GlcNAc + Na+/K+
1023.3(GlcN)6 + K+
1049.4(GlcN)5-GlcNAc + Na+
1210.4(GlcN)6-GlcNAc + Na+
Table 2. Main identified signals in the MALDI-TOF mass spectrum of the reaction between chitinase Chit42 and colloidal chitin. Reaction conditions were as described in Figure 3.
Table 2. Main identified signals in the MALDI-TOF mass spectrum of the reaction between chitinase Chit42 and colloidal chitin. Reaction conditions were as described in Figure 3.
m/zAssignation
405.2GlcN-GlcNAc + Na+
447.2/463.2(GlcNAc)2 + Na+/K+
608.3/624.2GlcN-(GlcNAc)2 + Na+
769.3/785.2(GlcN)2-(GlcNAc)2 + Na+/K+
811.3GlcN-(GlcNAc)3 + Na+
853.3(GlcNAc)4 + Na+
Table 3. Main identified signals in the MALDI-TOF mass spectrum of the reaction between chitosan QS1 and chitinase Chit42. Reaction conditions were as described in Figure 4.
Table 3. Main identified signals in the MALDI-TOF mass spectrum of the reaction between chitosan QS1 and chitinase Chit42. Reaction conditions were as described in Figure 4.
m/zAssignation
405.2/421.2GlcN-GlcNAc + Na+/K+
447.2/463.2(GlcNAc)2 + Na+/K+
566.3/582.2(GlcN)2-GlcNAc + Na+/K+
608.3/624.3GlcN-(GlcNAc)2 + Na+/K+
727.3/743.3(GlcN)3-GlcNAc + Na+/K+
769.3/785.3(GlcN)2-(GlcNAc)2 + Na+/K+
811.3/827.3GlcN-(GlcNAc)3 + Na+/K+
888.4/904.3(GlcN)4-GlcNAc + Na+/K+
930.4/946.3(GlcN)3-(GlcNAc)2 + Na+/K+
1049.4/1065.4(GlcN)5-GlcNAc + Na+/K+
1091.4/1107.4(GlcN)4-(GlcNAc)2 + Na+/K+
1133.4/1149.4(GlcN)3-(GlcNAc)3 + Na+/K+
1210.4/1226.4(GlcN)6-GlcNAc + Na+/K+
1252.5/1268.4(GlcN)5-(GlcNAc)2 + Na+/K+
1294.5/1310.4(GlcN)4-(GlcNAc)3 + Na+/K+
1413.5/1429.5(GlcN)6-(GlcNAc)2 + Na+/K+
1532.6/1548.5(GlcN)8-GlcNAc + Na+/K+
Table 4. Experimental conditions for the preparation of COS samples.
Table 4. Experimental conditions for the preparation of COS samples.
EnzymeSubstrateReaction ConditionsMain Products
Chit42Colloidal chitin35 °C, pH 6.0faCOS
Chit42Chitosan QS135 °C, pH 6.0paCOS
Neutrase 0.8 LChitosan CHIT60050 °C, pH 5.0fdCOS

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Santos-Moriano, P.; Kidibule, P.; Míguez, N.; Fernández-Arrojo, L.; Ballesteros, A.O.; Fernández-Lobato, M.; Plou, F.J. Tailored Enzymatic Synthesis of Chitooligosaccharides with Different Deacetylation Degrees and Their Anti-Inflammatory Activity. Catalysts 2019, 9, 405. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9050405

AMA Style

Santos-Moriano P, Kidibule P, Míguez N, Fernández-Arrojo L, Ballesteros AO, Fernández-Lobato M, Plou FJ. Tailored Enzymatic Synthesis of Chitooligosaccharides with Different Deacetylation Degrees and Their Anti-Inflammatory Activity. Catalysts. 2019; 9(5):405. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9050405

Chicago/Turabian Style

Santos-Moriano, P., P. Kidibule, N. Míguez, L. Fernández-Arrojo, A.O. Ballesteros, M. Fernández-Lobato, and F.J. Plou. 2019. "Tailored Enzymatic Synthesis of Chitooligosaccharides with Different Deacetylation Degrees and Their Anti-Inflammatory Activity" Catalysts 9, no. 5: 405. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9050405

APA Style

Santos-Moriano, P., Kidibule, P., Míguez, N., Fernández-Arrojo, L., Ballesteros, A. O., Fernández-Lobato, M., & Plou, F. J. (2019). Tailored Enzymatic Synthesis of Chitooligosaccharides with Different Deacetylation Degrees and Their Anti-Inflammatory Activity. Catalysts, 9(5), 405. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9050405

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop