Next Article in Journal
Low-Dimensional ReS2/C Composite as Effective Hydrodesulfurization Catalyst
Previous Article in Journal
Low-Temperature Sol-Gel Synthesis of Nitrogen-Doped Anatase/Brookite Biphasic Nanoparticles with High Surface Area and Visible-Light Performance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Base Catalysis by Mono- and Polyoxometalates
Article Menu
Issue 12 (December) cover image

Export Article

Catalysts 2017, 7(12), 375;

Cross-Linked CoMoO4/rGO Nanosheets as Oxygen Reduction Catalyst
Key Laboratory of Polyoxometalate Science of Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Nanobiosensing and Nanobioanalysis at Universities of Jilin Province, Faculty of Chemistry, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China
School of Chemistry, The University of Glasgow, Galsgow G12 8QQ, UK
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 23 November 2017 / Accepted: 28 November 2017 / Published: 4 December 2017


Development of inexpensive and robust electrocatalysts towards oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is crucial for the cost-affordable manufacturing of metal-air batteries and fuel cells. Here we show that cross-linked CoMoO4 nanosheets and reduced graphene oxide (CoMoO4/rGO) can be integrated in a hybrid material under one-pot hydrothermal conditions, yielding a composite material with promising catalytic activity for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) were used to investigate the efficiency of the fabricated CoMoO4/rGO catalyst towards ORR in alkaline conditions. The CoMoO4/rGO composite revealed the main reduction peak and onset potential centered at 0.78 and 0.89 V (vs. RHE), respectively. This study shows that the CoMoO4/rGO composite is a highly promising catalyst for the ORR under alkaline conditions, and potential noble metal replacement cathode in fuel cells and metal-air batteries.
CoMoO4 nanosheets; reduced graphene oxide; hydrothermal reaction; oxygen reduction reaction; fuel cell

1. Introduction

The exponential increase of energy demand and serious environmental problems induce the growth of clean and sustainable energy [1,2,3,4,5]. The electrochemical oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) have been deemed as two main processes which are highly important in green energy applications. From these two processes, the ORR is the determinant reaction in fuel cells and metal-air batteries [6,7,8,9].
ORR is inherently complicated and has sluggish oxygen reduction kinetics in both fuel cells and metal-air batteries [10]. At present, Pt and Pt based alloys catalysts have been conceded as the best ORR catalysts [11,12]; however platinum’s scarcity in the earth’s crust, its high cost, and poor stability have prevented widespread commercial application. In an effort to overcome the above issues, extensive research efforts have been focused on the devise and synthesis of ORR electrocatalysts based on transition-metal elements which are cheap, highly active, and stable over the long term.
Transition metal elements such as iron, manganese, nickel, and cobalt were investigated as potential low-cost and earth-abundant catalysts towards ORR under alkaline condition [13,14,15,16,17,18]. Binary metal oxides and mixed metal oxides have been considered due to their good performance for ORR, such as ZnCo2O4 [19], Zn2SnO4 [20], NiCo2O4 [21], NiMoO4 [22], and CoMoO4 [23,24]. Additionally, transition metal oxides have attracted the attention of research groups and have been widely utilized as bifunctional catalysts due to their multiple oxidation states, which is apt to be used in electrocatalytic processes. The relevant materials that can adopt different oxidation states which are directly related to the observed functionality and activity in various processes while they can contribute to the stability of an electrolytic cell. Also, in marked contrast to the noble metal catalysts, transition metal oxides are earth-abundant and cheaper [25]. Lately metal molybdates were proposed to be an outstanding candidate in electrochemical energy conversion, such as water-splitting and lithium-ion batteries, indicative of their rapid and efficient redox activity. Metal molybdates illustrate exceptional stability in alkaline solution. Especially CoMoO4 is deemed as a highly promising ORR catalyst due to its low cost, low toxicity, abundance, and durability. Yet, CoMoO4 nanostructure also exhibits the disadvantage of easy aggregation. So, there have only been rare reports on the synthesis of highly dispersed CoMoO4 nanostructure with good electrocatalytic activity via hydrothermal synthesis. A general means to tackle this issue is to devise and synthesize an appropriate material exhibiting high conductivity, evenly distributed catalytic active sites, increase the onset potential which will finally boost the reaction rates [26].
It has been reported that carbon based components like graphene and single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) have been routinely used for the preparation of hybrid materials as ORR electrocatalysts, in supercapacitors and proton-exchange-membrane fuel cells, owing to their extraordinary performances arising from their big surface area, high conductivity, and structural flexibility [27,28,29,30]. Graphene intrinsically has numerous advantages such as high specific surface area which can easily contact with electrolyte solution and long term electrochemical stability, making it a superb substrate for high-property electrocatalysis reactions.
Herein, we report the preparation and characterization of a hybrid material composed of CoMoO4 nanosheets and reduced graphene oxide as well as its efficiency as ORR catalyst in alkaline media. CoMoO4 nanosheets grown on rGO revealed improved conductivity, increased active area and enhanced contact of the electrolyte solution with the electrode material. Cooperative effects of the composite’s components revealed improved ORR performance and higher stability compared to pristine CoMoO4 or rGO.

2. Results and Discussion

X-ray Powder Diffraction (XRD) patterns for the as-prepared materials were presented in Figure 1a. The main diffraction peaks at 2θ of 27.5°, 33.7°, 58.4° in both CoMoO4/rGO and CoMoO4 are attributed to the (−2 0 2), (−2 2 2), (0 2 4) lattice planes, respectively, which is consistent with the CoMoO4 (JCPDS, card No. 21-0868). The weak and wide diffraction peak at 2θ of 26.1° in rGO is corresponding to the lattice plane of (0 0 2). The result implies the formation of a carbon framework with relatively higher degree of graphitization. The (0 0 2) diffraction peak becomes lightly weaker and wider in CoMoO4/rGO, this means that the degree of crystallization of the rGO decreases due to the incorporation of CoMoO4.
The degree of defect in carbon materials can be studied by Raman spectroscopy. We observed the Raman spectrum of CoMoO4/rGO. As shown in Figure 1b, we can clearly observe that there are mainly seven peaks in the CoMoO4/rGO sample, centered at 339, 670, 817, 879, 932 cm−1, corresponding to the Co–Mo–O bond stretching vibration. D-band and G-band peaks of rGO were centered at 1361 and 1600 cm−1, respectively. The G band expresses sp2 carbon atoms possession, the D is usually connected with the vibration of sp3 carbon atoms [31]. Furthermore, the intensity ratio of the D peak and the G peak exhibits a structural defect density on the surface of the carbon nanomaterial [32]. The Raman spectra of CoMoO4/rGO shows that the ID/IG ratio (1.09) is higher than the ratio observed in pristine graphene oxide (0.87; Figure S1), indicating that the CoMoO4/rGO composite exhibits more structural defects which can be beneficial for the ORR.
The morphology of the prepared composite was studied by SEM (Figure 1c,d) and TEM (Figure 1e,f). As shown in Figure 1c,d, the cross-linked CoMoO4 nanosheets were assembled on rGO by a conventional hydrothermal process. From the scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of CoMoO4/rGO, it was obviously demonstrated that CoMoO4 nanosheets were well embedded into the graphene nanosheets, but a part of the CoMoO4 nanosheets was easier to agglomerate on the surface of graphene. Thus the doped graphene can further hinder the aggregation of CoMoO4 so that it can increase the accessibility of multiple active sites with direct consequences to the performance of the composite material.
From the transmission electron microscope (TEM) pictures (Figure 1e,f), it can be evidently seen that CoMoO4 is deposited (darker areas in the TEM image) on the surface of rGO, indicating that CoMoO4/rGO composite has been synthesized.
The surface chemical component, element valence of the prepared CoMoO4/rGO composites are evaluated by XPS examination, and the relevant results are shown in Figure 2, which demonstrates that the material mainly contains Co (Figure 2b), Mo (Figure 2c), O (Figure 2d), N (Figure 2e), and C (Figure 2f) elements. Two peaks at 780.9 and 796.9 eV are attributed to Co 2p3/2 and Co 2p1/2, separately, implying the existence of Co2+ (Figure 2b) which are the active catalytic sites which can promote the ORR [33,34]. Particularly, the splitting doublets of Mo 3d3/2 and Mo 3d5/2 peaks at 231.9 and 235.2 eV could be observed in Mo 3d XPS (Figure 2c), and the region width is 3.3 eV (Δ Mo 3d). The region width and the binding energy are characteristics of the Mo6+ oxidation state which is consistent with previously published examples [35,36]. In the O 1s spectrum, the peak at 532.7 and 531.1 eV correspond to the C=O and O–C=O bonds (Figure 2d). In the N 1s peak, pyridinic, pyrrolic, graphitic, and oxidized N are noticed in the CoMoO4/rGO (Figure 2e) [37]. The peaks centered at 398.0, 399.3, 400.9, and 403.3 eV correspond to the pyridinic N, pyrrolic N, graphitic N, and oxidized N. The observed peak at 396.7 eV is attributed to the charge transfer from molybdenum to nitrogen [38]. Furthermore, C 1s core level spectrum with 284.7, 286.1, 286.7, 288.4 eV are owing to sp2 hybridized carbon, sp2 carbon atoms bonded to nitrogen, C–O groups, and carbonyl carbon (O–C=O) (Figure 2f) [39,40]. The above XPS results affirm that the valence of Co, Mo, and O elements are +2, +6 and −2, respectively. All the above data demonstrate the incorporation of N atoms into the graphene lattice which was due to the treatment with ammonia solution. The types of pyridinic N and graphitic N in graphene have a profound effect on the ORR catalytic performance.
FT-IR measurements were carried out in an effort to investigate further the structural features of the synthesized composite material, Figure 3 shows the FT-IR spectra of CoMoO4/rGO powders. The broad peak centered at 3442 cm−1 is owing to the hydroxyl (O–H) stretching mode [41] while the one located at 1624 cm−1 verified the existence of O–H bending vibrations of water molecule. The spectra of CoMoO4/rGO sample revealed peaks centereda at 924 and 864 cm−1 ascribe to the symmetric and asymmetric stretching vibration of O–Mo–O [42]. However, a peak located at 672 cm−1 is ascribed to Co–Mo–O stretching vibration [43].
Cyclic voltammetry (CV) is a quite informative technique regarding the investigation of the ORR activity of a nanomaterial. CV was carried out at 25 °C in the presence of N2 or O2 under alkaline condition using a standard three-electrode cell. As shown in Figure 4a, the CoMoO4 /rGO catalyst shows a clear cathodic redox peak (0.78 V) in O2-purged electrolyte but not in N2-saturated solution. This observation is indicative of the CoMoO4/rGO composite’s catalytic activity toward ORR. LSV studies provided additional proof of the material’s activity using a rotating disk electrode (RDE) or rotating ring disk electrode (RRDE). In a similar fashion to the CV experiments, linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) was employed under the same experimental conditions (O2-saturated electrolyte) with predefined rotation speeds at 25 °C. As soon as the working electrode reached the desired rotation speed, the observed changes of current density were recorded. Figure 4b, CoMoO4/rGO illustrates the observed onset potential at 0.89 V which is higher than of the one obtained for the pristine CoMoO4. The improved electrochemical activity of the CoMoO4/rGO composite can be explained as follows; on one hand, the rGO contains pyridinic N and graphitic N, the two types of nitrogen influence the ORR catalytic activity and can improve the overall performance. On the other hand, the CoMoO4 doping of rGO hinders the aggregation of graphene, the CoMoO4 can disperse onto rGO which can expose more cobalt based active sites. The Co2+ plays a crucial role in ORR catalytic process [33,34]. Thus, the CoMoO4/rGO composite exhibits more exposed and accessible active sites compared with the pristine CoMoO4. Among them, commercial Pt/C material exhibits an onset potential at 0.92 V and a limiting current density of ~5.5 mA cm−2. We made an effort to compare the ORR catalytic activity between the CoMoO4/rGO composite and other catalysts reported previously (Table S1). Figure 4c shows the RDE linear sweep voltammetry analysis for the ORR of the CoMoO4/rGO electrode at rotation speeds ranging from 100 rpm to 2500 rpm. It can be observed that the limiting density of the CoMoO4/rGO increases as a function of the rotation speed. The diffusion-limiting current density increases as the rotating speed increases, due to the shortened diffusion distance at high rotation speed.
LSV studies offer the basis for further understanding of ORR performance. Figure 4b, represent the obtained tafel plots of all catalysts which presented in Figure 4d. The Tafel slope of the rGO, CoMoO4, CoMoO4/rGO, and Pt/C were found to be 88, 94, 76, and 84 mV/dec, respectively. It is worth noting that the rGO and CoMoO4/rGO have a Tafel slope of 88 and 76 mV/dec, respectively, which is quite close to the one observed for Pt/C (84 mV/dec). This means that rGO and CoMoO4/rGO have similar ORR kinetics to the Pt/C. The relevant Kouteckye-Levich (K-L) curves (Figure 4e) at 0.3–0.7 V display good linear relationship. As computed from the slopes of the K-L curves (Figure 4e), the electron-transfer number (n) values are 4.25, 4.23, 4.09, 4.03, and 3.79 at 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7 V (vs. reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE)), respectively. The number of transferred electrons (n) and the H2O2 yield were estimated based on the Equations (S1) and (S2) (see Supplementary Materials). The number of transferred electrons (n) and peroxide yields were calculated from the obtained RRDE (Figure 4f) curves. Form Figure 4g, the n was found to be 3.8–3.9 in a range of potential values of 0.1 to 0.8 V (vs. RHE) for CoMoO4/rGO. This means that the ORR on CoMoO4/rGO follows a 4e- pathway with a low H2O2 (mean value less than 15%) production yield. The number of transferred electrons (n) of CoMoO4/rGO is the same as the Pt/C, and the result certifies that the ORR own a four-electron mechanism on CoMoO4/rGO. The promising catalytic activity originates from the structural features of CoMoO4/rGO which ensures a high-density of accessible active sites. The methanol tolerance and electrochemical stability are vital for the evaluation of the catalytic activity of ORR electrocatalysts. In Figure 4h, CoMoO4/rGO did not show significant current change after addition of 1 M methanol at 2000 s, where the relative current density of the Pt/C electrode was significantly decreased. The result shows that the CoMoO4/rGO composite has better resistance to methanol. The stability of CoMoO4/rGO was tested further using chronoamperometric measurements in 0.1 M KOH electrolyte. As shown in Figure 4i, the CoMoO4/rGO maintains the initially observed current after 18,000 s. On the contrary, the current density of Pt/C drops to 84%. These data demonstrate that the CoMoO4/rGO composite exhibits better stability than Pt/C.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Chemicals and Materials

Cobalt(II) chloride hexahydrate (CoCl2·6H2O), ammonium molybdate tetrahydrate ((NH4)6Mo7O24·24H2O), urea, ethanol and potassium hypermanganate were acquired from Beijing Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China). Nafion (5 wt %) and commercial Pt/C (20 wt %) catalysts were obtained from DuPont (DuPont, Shanghai, China) and Johnson Matthey (Johnson Matthey, Shanghai, China), respectively. Flake graphite was acquired from Qingdao Risheng graphite Ltd. (Qingdao, China). All chemicals were all directly applied without any further purification. Ultrapure water (18.25 MΩ cm−2) was offered by Water Purifier system and used for all aqueous solution.

3.2. Synthesis of Graphene Oxide (GO)

Graphene oxide was prepared with the improved method reported in the literature [44]. For the improved method, the mixed acid of 360 mL H2SO4 and 40 mL H3PO4 was slowly added to a large drying beaker containing 3 g graphite flakes and 18 g KMnO4 mixed solid, the exothermic reaction led to the increase of the temperature of the reaction system. Then the resultant solution was kept at 50 °C and oscillated for 12 h. After cooling to ambient temperature, about 400 mL of ice water and 3 mL 30% H2O2 slowly poured into the reaction under vigorous stirring, changing the color of the resultant from dark brown to bright yellow. The prepared product was rinsed several times with H2O and filtered. The as-synthesized sample was dried at room temperature.

3.3. Synthesis of CoMoO4/rGO Catalysts

0.1185 g CoCl2·6H2O (0.5 mmol), 0.877 g (NH4)6Mo7O24·24H2O (0.5 mmol) were dissolved in 10 mL of deionized water (DI) and stirred for 10 min to form CoMoO4 solution. Then 72.6 mg GO (ρ = 6.6 g/L) dispersion was added into the CoMoO4 solution. Meanwhile, 29 mL distilled water was poured into the reaction mixture. The mixture was agitated for 1 h and formed a clear solution. After 1 h, the pH of the solution was adjusted to 10 using ammonia solution (25~28%). The homogenous solution was placed into an autoclave. The autoclave was sealed and maintained at 120 °C for 12 h. After cooling down to ambient temperature, the product was filtered, rinsed several times with distilled water and dried at 60 °C overnight. For comparison, rGO and CoMoO4 samples were also prepared in a similar manner in the absence of CoMoO4 or GO, respectively.

4. Conclusions

Graphene-supported, cross-linked CoMoO4/rGO nanosheets were fabricated employing a facile one-pot hydrothermal approach. The CoMoO4/rGO hybrid material revealed an improved catalytic performance for the oxygen reduction reaction, comparing to the pristine CoMoO4 and rGO. Furthermore, CoMoO4/rGO displays a remarkable durability towards the ORR compared to the Pt/C in alkaline medium. The electrocatalytic activity of the as-synthesized CoMoO4/rGO can be attributed to: (1) the molybdenum based induced fast electron transfer processes; (2) the CoMoO4 doping of rGO hinders the aggregation of graphene leading to uniform dispersion of CoMoO4 onto rGO; and (3) the overall synergistic effect between CoMoO4 and rGO improved the accessibility of more cobalt based active sites. The observed improvement of the electrochemical properties renders the CoMoO4/rGO composite material as a highly promising electrode material for energy related applications such as manufacturing of cost-affordable fuel cells.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at, Figure S1. Raman spectra of graphene oxide, Table S1. Comparison of ORR activity parameters with other recently reported. 1. Physical characterization, 2. Electrochemical measurements.


The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21471028), National Key Basic Research Program of China (No. 2013CB834802), Changbai Mountain Scholarship, Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province (No. 20150101064JC), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2412015KJ012).

Author Contributions

Jiaqi Fu and Jiang-Li Meng have contributed equally. Jiaqi Fu wrote the paper, Jiaqi Fu and Jiang-Li Meng did the experiments. Mei-Jie Wei contributed analysis tools and reagents. Hong-Ying Zang and Haralampos N. Miras revised the article. Hong-Ying Zang, Hua-Qiao Tan, Yong-Hui Wang, Yang-Guang Li, Jiaqi Fu, Jiang-Li Meng, and Mei-Jie Wei analyzed the data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Canadell, J.G.; Quéré, C.L.; Raupach, M.R.; Field, C.B.; Buitenhuis, E.T.; Ciais, P.; Conway, T.J.; Gillett, N.P.; Houghton, R.A.; Marland, G. Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 18866–18870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hoel, M.; Kverndokk, S. Depletion of fossil fuels and the impacts of global warming. Resour. Energy Econ. 1996, 18, 115–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shafiee, S.; Topal, E. When will fossil fuel reserves be diminished? Energy Policy 2009, 37, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Du, Z.; Li, H.; Gu, T. A state of the art review on microbial fuel cells: A promising technology for wastewater treatment and bioenergy. Biotechnol. Adv. 2007, 25, 464–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Watanabe, M.; Tryk, D.A.; Wakisaka, M.; Yano, H.; Uchida, H. Overview of recent developments in oxygen reduction electrocatalysis. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 84, 187–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Steele, B.C.H.; Heinzel, A. Materials for fuel-cell technologies. Nature 2001, 414, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Debe, M.K. Electrocatalyst approaches and challenges for automotive fuel cells. Nature 2012, 486, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Cao, R.; Thapa, R.; Kim, H.; Xu, X.; Kim, M.G.; Li, Q.; Park, N.; Liu, M.; Cho, J. Promotion of oxygen reduction by a bio-inspired tethered iron phthalocyanine carbon nanotube-based catalyst. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  9. Li, Y.; Gong, M.; Liang, Y.; Feng, J.; Kim, J.E.; Wang, H.; Hong, G.; Zhang, B.; Dai, H. Advanced zinc-air batteries based on high-performance hybrid electrocatalysts. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wu, T.; Zhang, L. Metal molybdate nanorods as non-precious electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction. Funct. Mater. Lett. 2015, 8, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Stamenkovic, V.R.; Fowler, B.; Mun, B.S.; Wang, G.; Ross, P.N.; Lucas, C.A.; Markovic, N.M. Improved oxygen reduction activity on Pt3Ni(111) via increased surface site availability. Science 2007, 315, 493–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Winter, M.; Brodd, R.J. What are batteries, fuel cells, and supercapacitors? Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 4245–4270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Xiao, W.; Wang, D.; Lou, X. Shape-Controlled Synthesis of MnO2 Nanostructures with Enhanced Electrocatalytic Activity for Oxygen Reduction. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 114, 1694–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xu, Y.; Jiang, H.; Li, X.; Xiao, H.; Xiao, W.; Wu, T. Synthesis and characterization of Mn-based composite oxides with enhanced electrocatalytic activity for oxygen reduction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 13345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lu, Q.; Zhou, Y. Hierarchical polythiophene-coated MnO2 nanosheets as non-precious electro-catalyst to oxygen reduction. Funct. Mater. Lett. 2010, 3, 89–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liang, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhou, J.; Wang, J.; Regier, T.; Dai, H. Co3O4 nanocrystals on graphene as a synergistic catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 780–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Vezzù, K.; Delpeuch, A.B.; Negro, E.; Polizzi, S.; Nawn, G.; Bertasi, F.; Pagot, G.; Artyushkova, K.; Atanassov, P.; Noto, V.D. Fe-carbon nitride “Core-shell” electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 222, 1778–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gokhal, R.; Chen, Y.; Serov, A.; Artyushkova, K.; Atanassov, P. Novel dual templating approach for preparation of highly active Fe-N-C electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 224, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Karthikeyan, K.; Kalpana, D.; Renganathan, N.G. Synthesis and characterization of ZnCo2O4 nanomaterial for symmetric supercapacitor applications. Ionics 2009, 15, 107–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bao, L.; Zang, J.; Li, X. Flexible Zn2SnO4/MnO2 Core/Shell Nanocable-Carbon Microfiber Hybrid Composites for High-Performance Supercapacitor Electrodes. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 1215–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Shen, L.; Che, Q.; Li, H.; Zhang, X. Mesoporous NiCo2O4 Nanowire Arrays Grown on Caibon Textiles as Binder- Free Flexible Electrodes for Energy Storage. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 2630–2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cai, D.; Liu, B.; Wang, D.; Liu, Y.; Wang, L.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Wang, C.; Li, Q.; Wang, T. Facile hydrothermal synthesis of hierarchical ultrathin mesoporous NiMoO4 nanosheets for high performance supercapacitors. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 115, 358–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cai, D.; Liu, B.; Wang, D.; Wang, L.; Liu, Y.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Li, Q.; Wang, T. Construction of unique NiCo2O4 [email protected]4 nanoplate core/shell arrays on Ni foam for high areal capacitance supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 4954–4960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yu, X.; Lu, B.; Xu, Z. Super Long-Life Supercapacitors Based on the Construction of Nanohoneycomb-Like Strongly Coupled CoMoO4–3D Graphene Hybrid Electrodes. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 1044–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Osgood, T.; Devaguptapu, S.V.; Xu, H.; Cho, J.; Wu, G. Transition metal (Fe, Co, Ni, and Mn) oxides for oxygen reduction and evolution bifunctional catalysts in alkaline media. Nano Today 2016, 11, 601–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, M.; Xu, S.; Cherry, C.; Zhu, Y.; Wu, D.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, X.; Huang, R.; Qi, R.; Wang, L.; Chu, P.K. Hierarchical 3-dimensional CoMoO4 nanoflakes on a macroporous electrically conductive network with superior electrochemical performance. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 13776–13785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cheng, F.; Shen, J.; Peng, B.; Pan, Y.; Tao, Z.; Chen, J. Rapid room-temperature synthesis of nanocrystalline spinels as oxygen reduction and evolution electrocatalysts. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Mu, Y.; Liang, H.; Hu, J.; Jiang, L.; Wan, L. Controllable Pt Nanoparticle Deposition on Carbon Nanotubes as an Anode Catalyst for Direct Methanol Fuel Cells. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 22212–22216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Liang, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, H.; Dai, H. Strongly Coupled Inorganic/Nanocarbon Hybrid Materials for Advanced Electrocatalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 2013–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Liang, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhou, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Regier, T.; Dai, H. Covalent Hybrid of Spinel Manganese-Cobalt Oxide and Graphene as Advanced Oxygen Reduction Electrocatalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 3517–3523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Sun, M.; Liu, H.; Liu, Y.; Qu, J.; Li, J. Graphene-based transition metal oxide nanocomposites for the oxygen reduction reaction. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 1250–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Dou, S.; Shen, A.; Tao, L.; Wang, S. Molecular doping of graphene as metal–free electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 10672–10675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhuang, L.; Ge, L.; Yang, Y.; Li, M.; Jia, Y.; Yao, X.; Zhu, Z. Ultrathin Iron-Cobalt Oxide Nanosheets with Abundant Oxygen Vacancies for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Song, W.; Ren, Z.; Chen, S.; Meng, Y.; Biswas, S.; Nandi, P.; Elsen, H.A.; Gao, P.; Suib, S.L. Ni- and Mn-Promoted Mesoporous Co3O4: A Stable Bifunctional Catalyst with Surface-Structure-Dependent Activity for Oxygen Reduction Reaction and Oxygen Evolution Reaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 20802–20813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yu, M.; Jiang, L.; Yang, H. Ultrathin nanosheets constructed CoMoO4 porous flowers with high activity for electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 14361–14364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wang, B.; Li, S.; Wu, X.; Liu, J.; Tian, W.; Chen, J. Self-assembly of ultrathin mesoporous CoMoO4 nanosheet networks on flexible carbon fabric as a binder-free anode for lithium-ion batteries. New J. Chem. 2016, 40, 2259–2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, C.; Hao, R.; Liao, H.; Hou, Y. Synthesis of amino-functionalized graphene as metal–free catalyst and exploration of the roles of various nitrogen states in oxygen reduction reaction. Nano Energy 2013, 2, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Baraldi, A.; Brena, B.; Cocco, D.; Comelli, G.; Lizzit, S.; Paolucci, G.; Baumann, P.; Scheuch, V.; Uebing, C. The structure of the MoN surface compound on Fe-3.5%Mo-N (100) studied by X-ray photoelectron diffraction: First results from ELElTRA. Vacuum 1997, 48, 351–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gao, S.; Geng, K.; Liu, H.; Wei, X.; Zhang, M.; Wang, P.; Wang, J. Transforming organic-rich amaranthus waste into nitrogen-doped carbon with superior performance of the oxygen reduction reaction. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, Y.; Dou, S.; Yan, D.; Liu, D.; Xia, Z.; Wang, S. In Situ Exfoliated, Edge-Rich, Oxygen-Functionalized Graphene from Carbon Fibers for Oxygen Electrocatalysis. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Tsay, J.D.; Fang, T.T. Effects of Molar Ratio of Citric Acid to Cations and of pH Value on the Formation and Thermal-Decomposition Behavior of Barium Titanium Citrate. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1999, 82, 1409–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Moura, A.P.D.; Oliveira, L.H.D.; Pereira, P.F.S.; Rosa, I.L.V.; Li, M.S.; Longo, E.; Varela, J.A. Photoluminescent Properties of CoMoO4 Nanorods Quickly Synthesized and Annealed in a Domestic Microwave Oven. Adv. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2012, 2, 465–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sieber, K.; Kershaw, R.; Dwight, K.; Wold, A. Dependence of Magnetic Properties on Structure in the Systems NiMoO4 and CoMoO4. Inorg. Chem. 1983, 22, 2667–2669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Marcano, D.C.; Kosynkin, D.V.; Berlin, J.M.; Sinitskill, A.; Sun, Z.; Slesarev, A.; Alemany, L.B.; Lu, W.; Tour, J.M. Improved synthesis of graphene oxide. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 4806–4814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) X-ray Powder Diffraction (XRD) patterns of CoMoO4/rGO, CoMoO4 and rGO powder samples; (b) Raman spectra. GO: graphene oxide. (c,d) SEM images of CoMoO4/rGO. (e,f) TEM images of CoMoO4/rGO.
Figure 1. (a) X-ray Powder Diffraction (XRD) patterns of CoMoO4/rGO, CoMoO4 and rGO powder samples; (b) Raman spectra. GO: graphene oxide. (c,d) SEM images of CoMoO4/rGO. (e,f) TEM images of CoMoO4/rGO.
Catalysts 07 00375 g001
Figure 2. (a) the XPS survey of CoMoO4/rGO; (b) Co 2p XPS peaks; (c) Mo 3d XPS peaks; (d) O 1s XPS spectrum; (e) N 1s XPS spectrum; (f) C 1s peaks XPS.
Figure 2. (a) the XPS survey of CoMoO4/rGO; (b) Co 2p XPS peaks; (c) Mo 3d XPS peaks; (d) O 1s XPS spectrum; (e) N 1s XPS spectrum; (f) C 1s peaks XPS.
Catalysts 07 00375 g002
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of the CoMoO4, rGO, and CoMoO4/rGO.
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of the CoMoO4, rGO, and CoMoO4/rGO.
Catalysts 07 00375 g003
Figure 4. (a) CV curves of CoMoO4/rGO in O2-saturated (red line) or N2-saturated (black line) 0.1 M KOH with a scan rate of 10 mV s−1; (b) linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves of CoMoO4, rGO, CoMoO4/rGO, and Pt/C nanocomposites in O2-saturated 0.1 M KOH with a sweep rate of 5 mV s−1 at 1600 rmp; (c) LSV curves of CoMoO4/rGO at various rotation speeds with a sweep of 5 mV s−1; (d) Tafel plots of CoMoO4, rGO, CoMoO4/rGO, and Pt/C in O2 saturated 0.1 M KOH at a scan rate of 5 mV/s, rotation rate = 1600 rpm; (e) Koutecky–Levich plots of CoMoO4/rGO at different electrode potentials; (f) rotating ring disk electrode (RRDE) voltammograms of CoMoO4/rGO and Pt/C; (g) The transfer electron number (n) and hydrogen peroxide yield (H2O2%) curves of CoMoO4/rGO material; (h) Current-time (I-t) curves of CoMoO4/rGO and Pt/C with the addition of 1 M methanol; (i) the relative retention of current vs. Time in O2-saturated 0.1 M KOH solution for CoMoO4/rGO and Pt/C.
Figure 4. (a) CV curves of CoMoO4/rGO in O2-saturated (red line) or N2-saturated (black line) 0.1 M KOH with a scan rate of 10 mV s−1; (b) linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves of CoMoO4, rGO, CoMoO4/rGO, and Pt/C nanocomposites in O2-saturated 0.1 M KOH with a sweep rate of 5 mV s−1 at 1600 rmp; (c) LSV curves of CoMoO4/rGO at various rotation speeds with a sweep of 5 mV s−1; (d) Tafel plots of CoMoO4, rGO, CoMoO4/rGO, and Pt/C in O2 saturated 0.1 M KOH at a scan rate of 5 mV/s, rotation rate = 1600 rpm; (e) Koutecky–Levich plots of CoMoO4/rGO at different electrode potentials; (f) rotating ring disk electrode (RRDE) voltammograms of CoMoO4/rGO and Pt/C; (g) The transfer electron number (n) and hydrogen peroxide yield (H2O2%) curves of CoMoO4/rGO material; (h) Current-time (I-t) curves of CoMoO4/rGO and Pt/C with the addition of 1 M methanol; (i) the relative retention of current vs. Time in O2-saturated 0.1 M KOH solution for CoMoO4/rGO and Pt/C.
Catalysts 07 00375 g004

© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (
Catalysts EISSN 2073-4344 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top