Next Article in Journal
Effect of Size and Distribution of Ni Nanoparticles on γ-Al2O3 in Oleic Acid Hydrodeoxygenation to Produce n-Alkanes
Next Article in Special Issue
One Pot Synthesis of Pt/Graphene Composite Using Polyamidoamine/Chitosan as a Template and Its Electrocatalysis for Methanol Oxidation
Previous Article in Journal
8th International Congress on Biocatalysis (Biocat2016), Hamburg, Germany, 28 August–1 September, 2016
Previous Article in Special Issue
What Can We Learn in Electrocatalysis, from Nanoparticulated Precious and/or Non-Precious Catalytic Centers Interacting with Their Support?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Catalysts
Volume 6
Issue 10
10.3390/catal6100159
catalysts-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Non-Precious Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction in Alkaline Media: Latest Achievements on Novel Carbon Materials

by
Angeliki Brouzgou
1,
Shuqin Song
2,*,
Zhen-Xing Liang
3,* and
Panagiotis Tsiakaras
1,4,*
1
Laboratory of Alternative Energy Conversion Systems, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Thessaly, Pedion Areos, Volos 38334, Greece
2
Key Laboratory of Low-Carbon Chemistry and Energy Conservation of Guangdong Province, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
3
Key Laboratory on Fuel Cell Technology of Guangdong Province, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, South China, University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
4
Laboratory of Electrochemical Devices Based on Solid Oxide Proton Electrolytes, Institute of High Temperature Electrochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg 620137, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2016, 6(10), 159; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal6100159
Submission received: 1 August 2016 / Revised: 16 September 2016 / Accepted: 26 September 2016 / Published: 19 October 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Catalysis for Low Temperature Fuel Cells)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Low temperature fuel cells (LTFCs) are considered as clean energy conversion systems and expected to help address our society energy and environmental problems. Up-to-date, oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is one of the main hindering factors for the commercialization of LTFCs, because of its slow kinetics and high overpotential, causing major voltage loss and short-term stability. To provide enhanced activity and minimize loss, precious metal catalysts (containing expensive and scarcely available platinum) are used in abundance as cathode materials. Moreover, research is devoted to reduce the cost associated with Pt based cathode catalysts, by identifying and developing Pt-free alternatives. However, so far none of them has provided acceptable performance and durability with respect to Pt electrocatalysts. By adopting new preparation strategies and by enhancing and exploiting synergetic and multifunctional effects, some elements such as transition metals supported on highly porous carbons have exhibited reasonable electrocatalytic activity. This review mainly focuses on the very recent progress of novel carbon based materials for ORR, including: (i) development of three-dimensional structures; (ii) synthesis of novel hybrid (metal oxide-nitrogen-carbon) electrocatalysts; (iii) use of alternative raw precursors characterized from three-dimensional structure; and (iv) the co-doping methods adoption for novel metal-nitrogen-doped-carbon electrocatalysts. Among the examined materials, reduced graphene oxide-based hybrid electrocatalysts exhibit both excellent activity and long term stability.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The design and the development of highly efficient, stable and low cost oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) electrocatalysts is one of the main determining steps for the fabrication of more commercially viable electrochemical devices (fuel cells, electrolyzers, metal-air batteries, etc.).
During the last two decades, a joint effort has been made by the international research community towards: (i) the development of low-loading precious metal electrocatalysts; (ii) the development of non-Pt electrocatalysts; (iii) the development of new supporting materials; and (iv) the investigation of novel preparation methods [1].
Among the various developed non-Pt electrocatalysts, Ir- and Pd-based ones have attracted much more attention, as they exhibited comparable activity with Pt-based electrocatalysts, though in the presence of methanol or ethanol due to alcohol crossover, they exhibited much lower stability and less activity than Pt-based ones [1]. Moreover, different supports such as tungsten carbides, carbon nanotubes, and nitrogen-modified carbon were investigated and adopted, but without the expected results [2].
During the last decade, along with the development of alkaline membranes, their promising performance, in major cases better than that of the acidic membranes, significantly boosted further investigation on the non-Pt electrocatalysts [3]. Among the non-Pt electrocatalysts, heteroatom-doped carbon materials are currently considered as the most potential Pt substitutes for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) [4]. Various heteroatoms, such as N [5,6,7,8], B [7,8], S [9,10,11], Fe [12,13], and P [7,14,15,16], with different electronegativity, have been doped for nanotubes [17], graphene [18], graphite [19], etc.
The doped-carbons show excellent ability to adsorb and bond OOH•, significantly enhancing the formation of H2O2. This facile ORR activity has been attributed to the fact that carbon atoms next to heteroatoms are the catalytically active sites and to the modification of carbon electronegativity. For instance, in N-doped carbon, a charge separation occurs due to the different electronegativity values, in which the positive pole is favorable for oxygen adsorption, enhancing the ORR. In terms of alcohol crossover, the carbon-based catalyst shows an extremely high selectivity to the ORR and inactivity to alcohol oxidation reaction. The reason mostly lies in the high activation energy for the chemical dissociative adsorption of the hydrocarbon compounds on such catalysts.
Furthermore, it has been observed that co-doping with two heteroatoms creates a higher number of catalytically active sites than single-doped counterparts. Thus, many of the ORR investigations in the last two years were devoted to N-doped carbon catalysts with another element [8]. For example, Fe-N doped carbon systems have shown excellent ORR performance in both alkaline and acid electrolytes, due to the metal-nitrogen synergetic effect [13]. The significant contribution of nitrogen when being doped in carbon has been reported since 2009. Niwa et al. [20] investigated different electronic structures of nitrogen (pyridinic, graphitic, pyrrolic, oxidic, proposing that graphitic-like nitrogen is the main reason for the enhanced ORR activity of N-doped carbon electrocatalysts.
The mesoscopic morphology, the high surface area, the pore size and the order degree reflect the available active sites of a carbon material, and consequently affect its electrocatalytic activity. Most of the synthesis strategies of doped carbon material with high surface area include multi-step chemical processes, with some of them to be of high cost. Consequently, sometimes due to the complexity of the synthesis procedure of hetero-atom doped carbon materials it is difficult to designate the nature of catalytically active sites for ORR, which is of high importance for understanding the whole ORR process [21].
The key issue to obtain optimal ORR activities by using doped-carbons lies in: (i) uniform doping of heteroatoms (ii) unique nanostructure with high surface area; and (iii) suitable mesopore distribution. In most of the preparation methods, carbon support is either post-treated with heteroatom substances [7,8,15], or obtained through direct co-pyrolysis of the heteroatom-containing organic compounds with carbon under inert gas atmosphere [22,23].
However, a sufficiently doped and finely controlled structure is rather difficult to be simultaneously achieved. Therefore, a uniform distribution of dopants into a well-designed carbon matrix with significantly enhanced ORR performance still remains a challenging goal. A second target to be achieved concerns the choice of the appropriate precursor in combination with the pyrolysis conditions, to obtain large surface area, high nitrogen content and, thus, high performance to be attained.
The deliberated defects on carbon structures lead to the destruction of its conductivity, which is the most essential characteristic in electrocatalytic processes [4]. For this reason, in the last years, researchers have turned their attention to carbons with graphitic structure, such as graphene; the conductivity of which is not influenced by introducing heteroatoms.
The current review focuses on different strategies very recently developed by different research groups in order to enhance the activity of non-precious metal, namely carbon based electrocatalysts towards ORR. Mainly, four strategies have been distinguished: (i) the fabrication of 3D structure including interconnected networks by modifying carbon structure; (ii) the development of novel hybrid materials; (iii) the adoption of alternative precursor for a more homogeneous distribution of the heteroatoms into carbon matrix; and (iv) the co-doping technique of two heteroatoms, mainly into highly ordered mesoporous materials.

2. 2D and 3D Doped-Carbon Electrocatalysts

Two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) porous structures with controllable compositions can provide high activity and stability for ORR due to their interconnected open-pore structure, which can facilitate electron and mass transfer. In addition, the offered large active area of mesopore structure that can provide more active sites, in combination with microporous structure that reduces the electrolyte diffusion distances to the interior surfaces and serves as an electrolyte buffering reservoir, significantly enhances the ORR activity [24,25]. The addition of nitrogen at this advantageous carbon structure further facilitates ORR.
Recently, it has been reported that hierarchically porous materials offer greater active surface area via their interconnected macro-porosity [26]. Liu et al. [27], for the N-doped hierarchically porous carbon pyrolysed at 1000 °C, reported a kinetic-limiting current density (Jk) of 20.0 mA·cm−2 at 0.853 V (vs. RHE), a half wave-potential (E1/2) of 0.773 V (vs. RHE), an excellent methanol tolerance (0.5 M) and 8.1% of current loss after 3.5 operational hours at −0.5 V vs Ag/AgCl. The observed high ORR activity was attributed to the existence of 3D-hierarchically interconnected porous frameworks with high surface area, large pore volume and high conductivity.
N-doped hierarchically macro/mesoporous carbon pyrolysed at the optimal temperature (850 °C) was also examined by Tao et al. [28]. By the aid of rotating disk electrode (RDE) measurements, they recorded a limiting current density close to 4.4 mA·cm−2 (1600 rpm), and a half-wave potential of 0.753 V (vs. RHE); in the presence of 3.0 M methanol in 0.1 M KOH the activity was almost unchanged. Chronoamperometric test at −0.55 V vs. Ag/AgCl reveals that after 12.5 h durability test, the electrocatalyst lost only 5% of its activity, while a dramatic degradation of 15% was observed for Pt/C after 2.5 h.
The 3D dual-doped highly ordered macro-mesoporous structure is observed to provide more active ORR electrocatalysts than the single-doped one. Namely, 3D Co and N-doped highly ordered macro-mesoporous carbon electrocatalyst with the optimum content of cobalt displayed high activity towards ORR due to the presence of a large number of active sites. According to linear sweep voltammetry curves (LSV), a limiting current density of 5.8 mA·cm−2 in oxygen saturated alkaline environment and a half-wave potential (E1/2) of 0.83 V (vs. RHE), was observed [29]. The kinetic current density at 0.70 V vs. RHE was calculated close to 23.2 mA·cm−2, while in the presence of 1.0 M of methanol, its ORR activity remained satisfactorily stable, indicating its high tolerance to the methanol. Additionally, after 25 h of continuous operation at 0.5 V vs. RHE, there was negligible current loss, in comparison with Pt (20 wt %)/C that lost ~50% of its initial activity when examined under the same experimental conditions. [29].
Transition metal oxides, especially the doped-ones, have shown very good ORR activity [30]. The role of Ni-doping in MnO2 nanoneedles for the ORR in alkaline media was recently investigated by Hao et al. [31]. The increment of Mn(III), which serves as electrochemical active site, according to the authors, is the main reason for its higher activity, in comparison to the other samples. The ORR activity is enhanced when transition metals are adopted in 3D hierarchical porous spinel hollow nanospheres, especially those with spinel structure [32,33]. Hollow structure also contributes to the increment of the number of active sites. More precisely, CoFeO2 3D hollow nanospheres benefited the formation of a large three-phase boundary (solid–liquid–gas), which is necessary for the transfer of reactants and products. The yielded limiting current density (5.3 mA·cm−2) decreased by 34% after 12-h durability test; whereas the Pt/C electrocatalyst decreased by 54% under the same experimental conditions [34]. The enhanced stability was attributed to the combination of its hollow morphology with the hierarchically porous structure. However, according to LSV curves, its half-wave potential was 0.58 V vs. RHE, negatively shifted by ~0.30 V compared with Pt. In general, even without a special 3D structure, transition metal spinel oxide nanoparticles (NPs) have shown really good ORR performance [35,36,37]. 3D hollow-structured NiCo2O4/C NPs with interconnected pores as bifunctional electrocatalysts, which are transformed from solid NiCo2 alloy NPs, have also been investigated for ORR [35]. From the RDE measurements, a limiting current density of 5.7 mA·cm−2 and a half-wave potential of 0.68 V vs. RHE were recorded (Table 1). In addition, NiCo2O4/C showed a superior long-term stability over Pt/C electrocatalyst. At a constant potential of 0.6 V vs. RHE, a current decay of only 9% after 10 h occurred, whereas a gradual decrease of 52% was recorded for Pt/C under the same conditions.
Among all carbon materials, graphene is the most promising for accommodating various nanoparticles to achieve high electron transport rate, electrolyte contact area and structural stability, all of which lead to markedly improved ORR performance. Replacing carbon with graphene in 3D structures combined with M-N-doped-carbon further enhances their electrocatalytic activity and stability (M-N-doped-3D graphene). The effective dispersion of Co3O4 nanosheets among 3D graphene sheets was made via argon-plasma synthesis. The Co3O4 nanosheets formed strong bonds with graphene sheets enhancing its electrical conductivity and electrochemical activity. The kinetic analysis resulted a kinetic current density of 34 mA·cm−2 at −0.75 V vs. RHE and a half-wave potential of 0.832 V vs. RHE. Additionally, a high stability was obtained as after 5.5 operational hours only 2% of its initial limiting current density was lost, while in the case of Pt (20 wt %)/C, ca 21% loss was detected [38].
The kinetic parameters (the available ones) of the electrocatalysts reported in the current review, along with the respective preparation methods are summarized in Table 1. It is observed that most of the electrocatalysts have also been investigated for the ORR in presence of methanol, as its crossover to cathode has been considered as one of the major reasons for the decay of ORR activity [3]. It is remarkable that each of them shows excellent tolerance to methanol, considering that just few years ago the main disadvantage of the non-precious electrocatalysts was related with their instability due to alcohol crossover [1,3].
It should be pointed out that the data given in literature are often problematic or misleading. For example, the limiting current density from RDE measurement varies considerably under the same conditions. According to Levich equation, the steady-state limiting current density for the 4e− ORR is ca 6.0 mA·cm−2 in a diluted electrolyte aqueous solution. The deviation observed in Table 1 should possibly be originated from several reasons. A negative deviation is caused by at least, but not limited, to the following reasons: (i) the poor quality of the fabricated electrode with an incomplete coverage of the electrocatalyst on the substrate; (ii) a mixed reaction pathway with both 2e− and 4e− charge transfer processes; (iii) poor electrocatalytic activity, and not mass transfer controlled steady state. A positive deviation, the other side of the coin, can also be found in literature (see Table 2), which is understandable as follows. The loading of the non-precious metal catalyst is generally pretty high, and thereby, the thickness of the “thin-film” electrode cannot be neglected any more. As such, the radial mass transfer should be considered for such “column-like” electrodes. Therefore, the comparison is sometimes tricky and should be cautious in practice. In our opinion, the normalized kinetic current density, other than the mass transfer-controlled current, should be used to benchmark the activity in future. Nevertheless, the data are summarized in this review (Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3), which are phenomenally used for reference.
On 2016, porous N-doped carbon nanotubes (NCNTs) with high surface area (>1000 m2·g−1) are fabricated by KOH activation and pyrolysis of polypyrrole nanotubes. They exhibited excellent ORR electrocatalytic (those annealed at 900 °C) performance and yielded a more positive onset potential, higher current density, and long-term operation stability in alkaline media, when compared with a commercially available 20 wt % Pt/C catalyst; this behaviour is mostly due to the synergetic effect between the dominant pyridinic/graphitic-N species and the porous tube structures. These metal-free porous nitrogen-doped carbon nanomaterials could be considered as potential alternatives to Pt/C catalysts, for electrochemical energy conversion and storage [40].
2D materials, as the 3D ones, have also attracted increased interest, with graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) as a derivative graphene to be identified also as a good ORR electrocatalyst. More precisely, the development of porous organic networks, which stems from the polymerization of rigid organic molecules, offers the opportunity of 3D controllable structured electrocatalysts preparation [42]. Recently, Hao et al. [41] exploited the 2D structure of triazine-based framework (metal organic) and convert it to a 3D porous electrocatalyst. Its stability at 0.6 V vs. RHE was excellent as kept stable by 100% for 11 h of operation, as well as its tolerance in presence of 3.0 M methanol. Moreover, its catalytic performance is considered high compared with the results reviewed in the present work, as its half-wave potential reached 0.767 V vs. RHE.
Zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF) constitutes another precursor used often for the preparation of 2D/3D controllable structures More precisely, this is a zeolite-type nanoscale metal-organic framework (MOF), which is used as a self-sacrificing template as well as both carbon and nitrogen source [43]. A 2D carbon-based network electrocatalyst (Co-Al-LDH@ZIF67-800 °C), consisting of well-defined metal-organic framework (MOF) arrays on layered double hydroxides (LHDs) exhibited a limiting current density of 5.2 mA·cm−2, with half-wave potential of 0.675 V vs. RHE; no reaction was observed in the presence of 2.0 M methanol [39]. Moreover, the as-prepared electrocatalyst presented superior durability as it lost only 1% of its activity after 5.5 h of operation at −0.5 V vs. RHE; under the same operation conditions, Pt/C lost 40% of its activity [39].
Miner et al. [44] using as MOF hexa-iminotriphenylene (HITP) synthesized a tunable highly ordered 2D-structured ORR electrocatalyst material, Ni3(HITP)2. However, according to RDE results it did not reach a plateau when examined in oxygen saturated 0.1 M KOH solution, at 2000 rpm. Therefore, for the enhancement of its ORR activity further investigation should be carried out.
In Figure 1, the long term stability comparison between the above-mentioned electrocatalysts is depicted. All the examined electrocatalysts are characterized by relatively good stability; after 10 h, they lose less than 8% of their initial current density. Longer-term stability for 25 h is observed for 3D-structured Co-N-doped highly ordered macro-mesoporous carbon electrocatalyst [29]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the highest value of long-term stability, which is mostly attributed to the 3D as well as to the macro and mesoporous structures.
The half-wave potential (E1/2) is conventionally used for the comparison of the ORR activity between different electrocatalysts [36]. To evaluate the catalytic activities of the electrocatalysts listed in Table 1, the half-wave potentials are depicted in Figure 2. As can be seen, 3D-structured Co-N-doped highly ordered macro-mesoporous carbon electrocatalyst [29] and 3D nanosheet Co3O4-doped-graphene [38] exhibit the same half-wave potential values (~0.83 V vs. RHE). The specific half-wave value is almost the same as that of Pt (ca 0.8 V vs. RHE). However, they differ in their kinetic current values: the 3D nanosheets Co3O4-doped-graphene [38] exhibited a kinetic current density of 34 mA·cm−2 at 0.75 V vs. RHE, while the 3D-structured Co-N-doped highly ordered macro-mesoporous carbon of 23.2 mA·cm−2.

3. Hybrid (Metal Oxide-Nitrogen-Carbon) Electrocatalysts

Despite the fact that, in acidic media, the transition metal oxides exhibit very low ORR activity and insufficient stability, in alkaline media, they exhibit high activity, mostly due to the oxygen-containing groups [45]. The key for their enhanced activity is the amplification of their conductivity by integrating their conductive matrix, forming the as-called hybrid materials; metal oxide-N-C [46].
In Table 2, along with their respective kinetic parameters, the most active ORR hybrid electrocatalysts are listed. Most of them seem to present higher ORR activity than the 2D or 3D electrocatalysts (Table 1). Characteristic is that all authors report higher limiting current and more positive onset and half-wave potential values than Pt/C electrocatalyst (Table 2). Additionally, most of those that were examined for methanol tolerance were found totally unaffected by methanol’s presence.
In general, Metal-N-doped carbon (especially graphene)-based electrocatalysts are preferred as conductive matrix materials. They are more positive than the others’ hybrid materials, and half-wave potential as well as onset potential (Figure 3) make them more plausible candidate for cathodes. Namely, N/Co-doped graphene-type electrocatalyst (CoNPs@NG) [58] performed half-wave potential (E1/2) of 1.01 V vs. RHE; about 0.19 V more positive than Pt/C’s, the value of which is usually around 0.8 V vs. RHE. Its high activity was attributed to the growth of N-Co nanocrystal through the graphene plane and not at its edges, permitting the formation of a higher amount of active sites available to the reactants. Its special structure also offered very good stability performance as it is indicated from Figure 4. After ca 10 h of operation, only about 8% of current decay was observed. Remarkably, the same catalyst also presented good long-term stability in acidic environment, preserving 91% of its initial activity after 8.5 h of operation.
A novel hybrid electrocatalyst with reduced nitrogen-doped graphene/cobalt embedded porous carbon polyhedron was developed by Hou et al. [53]. A four-electron pathway was activated, performing E1/2 = 0.93 V vs. RHE. Except for its excellent activity, this catalyst exhibited also a good durability, as after 5.5 h operation, its initial activity decreased by 14.5% in comparison with Pt/C, whose initial activity was reduced more than 30% for the same operation period. Its excellent activity was mainly attributed to the following factors: (i) the doping effect of N and Co; (ii) the porous structure; and (iii) the good contact between N/Co-doped carbon polyhedron and nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide.
N-containing metal organic frameworks, like in the case of three-dimensional category, can deliver really good ORR electrocatalytic activity. An in in-situ grown metal-organic framework (MOF)/carbon nanotube (CNT) composite, instead of a surface grown one, was prepared and tested by Ge et al. [55], using ZIF-8 as precursor and by pyrolyzing the catalyst at 1000 °C. The as-prepared electrocatalyst reached a half-wave potential of 0.887 V vs. RHE and a limiting current of 6.0 mA·cm−2, remaining stable even in the presence of 1 M CH3OH.
Yang et al. [56] used, in their turn, melamine as natural source of nitrogen, synthesizing bamboo-like carbon nanotube Fe3C NPs hybrid electrocatalyst, which also exhibited E1/2 = 0.861 V vs. RHE as well as excellent tolerance towards methanol. The Co/N-doped graphene hybrid catalyst, prepared by using urea as natural nitrogen source, in combination with sucrose and cobalt nitrate performed a half-wave potential of 0.81 V vs. RHE [47]. Moreover, the as-prepared electrocatalyst after 10 h operation at 0.4 V lost only 8% of its initial activity.
Urea with boric acid and polyethylene glycol were used for the preparation of B-N-co-doped graphite layers [48]. The obtained ORR kinetic current density was ca 27.0 mA·cm−2, while its half-wave potential was very satisfactory; ca 0.707 V vs. RHE. Its activity remained unaffected in the presence of methanol (2.0 M) and its stability was very good, unchanged for 8.5 h, at 0.853 V vs. RHE, while Pt (20 wt %)/C, examined under the same experimental conditions, decreased by 20%. In hybrid-BCNs the extra electrons of nitrogen and the empty orbital of boron are connected into the carbon matrix, changing the electron density distribution of carbon [60,61,62].
Moreover, sandwich-like hybrid porous Co3O4 nanospheres and N-doped graphene using melamine as precursor were prepared by Zhang et al. [57]. By using melamine instead of urea or ammonia as nitrogen source, nitrogen NPs helped being attached not only at the edges of the graphene, but also in its inert areas; cobalt in each turn is intruded in the inert part of graphene providing much more active area. However, Co3O4/NG (nitrogen-doped graphene) exhibited good and close to Pt’s half-wave potential, ca 0.74 V vs. RHE, indicating that it possesses high ORR activity. Meanwhile, its stability was good since after 5.5 h durability test at 0.913 V vs. RHE lost only 6% of its activity, while Pt/C lost 30% [57].
Additionally, Chao et al. [51] tried to make more environmentally friendly the preparation processes of hybrid materials by using inexpensive Co(CH3COO)2·4H2O and 2,6-bis(benzimidazol-2-yl)pyridine (BBP) as raw materials. As described above, most of the fabrication methods of hybrid materials include multiple and relatively expensive processes. The result was a hollowed-out octahedral Co/N-co-doped carbon electrocatalyst that also performed a half-wave potential close to 0.81 V vs. RHE, and a limiting current density of 4.9 mA·cm−2. Its activity remained almost constant even after 8000 cycles from 0 to 1.2 V, showing additionally remarkable methanol tolerance [51].
Among the investigated N-containing precursors, polyaniline (PANI) is commonly used for the preparation of N-doped carbon electrocatalysts. The combination of PANI’s aromatic rings and the N-containing groups result in highly efficient ORR hybrid materials [63]. Recently, Cao et al. [59] reported half-wave potential of 0.784 V vs. RHE and 23 h long-term stability, at mesoporous hybrid shell of carbonized polyaniline Mn2O3 (CPANI/Mn2O3) electrocatalyst. Their high activity and excellent stability was believed to be related with: (i) the high specific surface area; (ii) the surface oxidation state of Mn; and (iii) the composition codependent behavior (Mn2O3 and CPANI are strongly dependent on each other). Hybrid materials have also been developed in order to improve the density of N-doped carbon electrocatalysts. The low density, observed in many N-doped carbons, leads to a thick electrode layer with reduced mass transfer ability [63,64]. By increasing the density of the carbon structure the volumetric ORR activity increases too.
Recently, N-doped reduced graphene oxide materials have attracted much interest due to their ability to increase electrocatalytic activity of the simple N-doped graphene electrocatalyst [65,66,67]. In N-doped graphene, it has been found that oxygen groups are responsible for the formation of the C-N bonds, increasing the conductivity of carbons. The reduction of N-doped graphene increases the oxygen groups and consequently the electronic-conductivity; reduced graphene oxide exhibit n-type electron doping behavior.
The introduction of metal oxides into N-doped graphene sheets, in order to form the hybrid material, can be processed through the following two-ways: (i) on the surface of the sheets; or (ii) through the plane of the graphene nanosheets. The second approach results in a better dispersion and higher stability of the NPs, giving the opportunity of exploiting both sides of graphene sheet [67,68].
According to Figure 3, CoII-A-rG-O (hybrid-ammonium hydroxide-reduced graphene) performed the same ORR activity, giving also 0.81 V vs. RHE half-wave potential. Han et al. [50] proved that the high hybrid materials’ activity toward ORR is attributed to the coordination of the modified carbon with the organometallic molecules. More precisely, the Co atom is coordinated in a square planar arrangement and an additional N-atom (or N containing aromatic ring) at an axial position, to two acetylacetonate ligands.
Co3Mn-CO3-LDH/RGO electrocatalyst exhibited that its relative activity maintained 87% of its initial value, while in the case of Pt/C at 82% [60].
A different geometrical hybrid electrocatalyst was developed by Zhan et al. [52], compounding hexagonal Co(OH)2 nanoplates with nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide. According to the authors, its good performance (0.66 V vs. RHE) is attributed to the nanosizing of Co(OH)2 and the synergistic interaction between Co(OH)2 and N-rGO. After 4 h of operation at (−0.7 V), its activity remained stable and the same with that of (20 wt %) Pt/C.
Additionally, the combination of layered double hydroxides (LDHs) with metal oxides results in highly efficient ORR electrocatalysts. The LDHs’ more positive charge and their good long-term stability in alkaline environment make them advantageous and promising. The CoAl-LDHs on reduced graphene oxide support at the optimum ratio (wCoAl-LDHs/wGO = 1:5) performed 0.853 V vs. RHE half-wave potential, presenting no reaction in the presence of methanol (3.0 M) [49]. Moreover, it exhibited very stable behavior after 2.5 h operation at −0.4 V without losing its activity. It was found that the presence of LDHs improved the electrons transfer, while the reduced graphene oxide has been considered as the hydrogen peroxide cleaner. Thus, the synergetic effect of those two factors lead to a really effective ORR electrocatalyst [49].
Zhao et al. [69] prepared and tested, a new type of cost-effective artificial oxygen-evolving complex (OEC) rather active for the ORR catalysts based on cobalt-phosphate (Co-Pi). More precisely, Co-Pi OEC anchoring on reduced graphite oxide (rGO) nanosheet is shown to possess dramatically improved electrocatalytic activity. It was suggested that rGO serves as ‘‘peroxide cleaner’’ in enhancing the electrocatalytic behavior.
A new hybrid catalyst in the form of core-shell type, CoCN(carbonnitirde)@CoOx NPs, supported on N-doped graphene was designed for the ORR in an alkaline solution [54]. The oxide 2 nm thin layer (CoOx) played a protective role preventing the oxidation corrosion of CoCN. This electrocatalyst presented a low half-wave potential (E1/2 = 0.763 V vs. RHE) compared to the other hybrid materials, but significantly high stability, losing only 10% of its initial reduction activity after 20 h of operation; under the same operational conditions, Pt/C lost ~30% of its activity. Its methanol tolerance was also high, as no any reaction was observed in 1.0 M methanol concentration.
By comparing Figure 1 and Figure 4, it can be deduced that hybrid materials exhibit a higher long-term stability performance during the ORR process. Among the examined hybrid electrocatalysts, the mesoporous hybrid shell of carbonized polyaniline Mn2O3 (CPANI/Mn2O3) [59] and the CoCN(carbonnitirde)@CoOx supported on the graphene maintained more than 90% of their initial activity for about 20 h of operation [54]; both electrocatalysts have mesoporous core-shell structure offering more active sites and mass transfer. Thus, the strategy of intervening in carbon nanostructure by deliberately introducing in its main structure metal-organic frameworks develops hybrid materials/electrocatalysts. This strategy, according to the current review, has proven the most efficient one. Another, third, strategy of improving electrocatalytic activity of the non-precious metals concerns with the use of different nitrogen sources, as will be discussed below.

4. Alternative Raw Materials

Increasing homogeneity by the aid of doping constitutes another strategy adopted for the improvement of the characteristics of non-precious metal electrocatalysts. However, the control of the homogeneity is not easy since most of the synthesis procedures include multiple chemical steps. Especially when a precursor that includes an inbuilt homogeneous source of heteroatoms is adopted, the synthesis of a homogeneous doped carbon matrix is easier and more successful [70,71,72].
In Table 3, the electrochemical ORR activities in terms of half-wave potential (vs. RHE) for this class of electrocatalysts is reported. Among them, Prussian-blue, polyaniline (PANI), soya plant and others, have been investigated as alternative-raw precursors in order to facilitate the preparation procedure of electrocatalysts as well as to include a ready 3D-structure framework into the carbon matrix. These precursors contain M-N ready bonds responsible for the electrocatalysts activity enhancement [73].
According to the literature review, the composition of single-source molecular precursor affects the properties of any adopted metal and carbon and consequently the ORR electrocatalyst’s activity. For example, Fe/Fe3C NPs encapsulated in nitrogen-doped carbon using ammonium ferritic citrate as single molecular precursor exhibited the highest according to half-wave potential, E1/2 = 0.881 V vs. RHE (Figure 5), ORR activity as well as an excellent methanol tolerance [74]. The conversion of amorphous carbon to graphitic carbon and the encapsulation of the iron nanoparticles into carbon’s matrix were the main factors of its high ORR performance.
Another biomass product, okara, has been used as an alternative precursor, namely as nitrogen source. Okara is a byproduct from tofu and soy milk production, commonly used as feed for livestock or as a natural nitrogen fertilizer. The okara-derived nitrogen-doped carbon electrocatalyst exhibited the second highest activity, among the investigated samples, showing 0.86 V vs. RHE half-wave potential. This electrocatalyst was characterized by the high content of sp2C, pyridinic-N and graphitic-N [75]. However, it is noted that such okara-derived catalysts are not easy to be reproduced as the composition of biomass varies considerably in reality, depending also on the factories and on the kind of soy beans.
Prussian blue is another precursor with ordered three-dimensional framework, which is consisted of coordinative bonded transition metal cations and cyanide groups. Such precursors contain M-N bonds and they are more active for ORR [76,77]. The observed high ORR activity 0.85 V vs. RHE is mainly attributed to the coordination of metal structure MNx [73]. Fe/N co-doped graphitic carbon bulb electrocatalyst was prepared using only Prussian blue as precursor; exhibiting 0.81 V vs. RHE half-wave potential [76].
On the other hand, it has been also reported [77] a high ORR activity (Figure 5) for FePhen@MOF (metallic organic framework)-ArNH3 electrocatalyst, with 0.86 V vs. RHE half-wave potential, without observing any direct coordination of iron with nitrogen. Its high activity was attributed also to the encapsulation of Fe into N-doped carbon’s matrix and its synergetic effect with nitrogen via stabilizing the peroxide intermediate. Another kind of alternative-precursor, soya plant, which is rich in proteins, can lead to multiheteroatom-doped (S-N-P) carbon electrocatalysts after the appropriate treatment [78]. More precisely, the as prepared electrocatalyst exhibited 0.79 V vs. RHE half-wave potential for ORR and was inactive in presence of 1.25 M methanol. Additionally, at 0.4 V vs. RHE, its current density remained stable for almost one hour, while the corresponding commercial Pt/C’s current density reduced more than 10%.
By pyrolyzing a homogeneous mixture of exfoliated graphitic flakes and ionic liquid, a very active ORR electrocatalyst was fabricated performing 0.768 V vs. RHE [80]. The great ORR activity was ascribed to the exfoliated graphite flakes which aid to the increased nitrogen doping and consequently the increased active surface area as well as to the co-doping of nitrogen and sulfur.
Hierarchically porous carbon materials are appropriate for accommodating more active sites and are synthesized via chemically complicated routes. A template-free and easier preparation method via using melamine, formaldehyde and cobalt acetate in combination with pyrolysis were adopted to prepare hierarchically structured yolk-shell Co and N co-doped porous carbon microspheres by Chao et al. [79]. This structure combined the high surface of the micropores, the active sites of Co-Nx and graphitic N, yielding 0.706 V vs. RHE.

5. Dual Hetero-Atom Doped Electrocatalysts

Doping nitrogen can facilitate 4e− ORR process leading to water formation, while boron, sulfur, and phosphorus are more prone to enhance 2e− ORR process leading to hydrogen peroxide formation Besides, nitrogen-doped carbon materials are cheaper and also offer long durability; for this reason, in the last 2–3 years, they have been studied more intensively. Among the investigated N-doped carbon materials ordered mesoporous carbon (OMC) attracts much more attention due to the unique regular arrays of uniform mesopores [81,82,83].
Sheng et al. [84] recently reported a highly active N-OMC electrocatalyst which exhibited 0.853 V vs. RHE half-wave potential (Figure 6). Furthermore, it presented very good stability, as after 5 h operation at −0.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl, its relative current density decreased only by 10% (Figure 7). The well-defined ordered mesoporous framework consisting of interconnected N-doped carbon rods with uniform size was the reason for the high ORR activity.
The doping of N-doped-carbon materials with a second element such as silicon, boron, phosphorus, etc. favors the synergetic effect between the second element and the N-doped carbon. The resulting materials exhibit a better ORR activity than single N-doped carbon materials.
For instance, phosphorus has lower electronegativity than nitrogen and sulfur, leading to a higher modification extent of carbon and having as a result a more efficient electrocatalyst towards ORR. Wu et al. [85] prepared phosphorus-doped carbon hollow spheres (P(2 at.%)-CHS) electrocatalysts, which exhibited more positive than Pt’s half-wave potential, 0.883 V vs. RHE (Figure 6). Its special structural design offered higher triple phase (solid–liquid–gas) area and consequently enhanced ORR activity. Moreover, the as-prepared electrocatalyst operating at −0.25 V for almost 17 h lost only 5% of its initial activity (Figure 7). On the contrary, under the same operation conditions, the activity loss on Pt/C recorded almost 20%.
Iron encapsulation into carbon’s matrix, as preparation method of ORR electrocatalysts’ fabrication, has been adopted from other research groups too [74,78,86]. According them, the observed enhanced ORR activity was attributed to the iron’s encapsulation, which stabilized the produced peroxide intermediate, and to the coordination of iron with nitrogen.
Niu et al. [88] tried to enlarge the active surface area of N-doped mesoporous carbon by embedding rigid templates within precursor matrices. They fabricated Fe-N/C catalysts by the aid of controlled pyrolysis of a poly(2-fluoroaniline) (P2FANI) matrix, within which FeO-(OH) nanorods were homogeneously embedded. They obtained a half-wave potential value of 0.8 V vs. RHE, the same with Pt’s one. The Fe-N/C pyrolysed at 800 °C exhibited, additionally, remarkable long-term stability keeping 93.3% of its initial activity for 2.8 h; while under the same experimental conditions Pt/C lost half of its initial activity.
It is worth to be noticed that it is surprising that in some cases Pt/C is so much unstable compared to non-noble metal catalysts. Part of this difference (sometimes higher than 20%) could be due to the comparison of “normalized current” at different potentials. However, we could conclude here that most of the examined non-noble catalysts exhibit at least similar stability with Pt/C one.
Iron has been also investigated as a second co-doped with nitrogen element. A novel nitrogen-doped-graphene nanoplatelets of Fe@N-graphene nanoplatelet-embedded carbon nanofibers was proposed by Ju et al. [94], delivering half-wave potential value 0.8 V vs. RHE (Figure 6), which is the same as Pt. Its high activity was due to the high number of functional groups.
Sulfur constitutes another element that has been investigated a lot as a second element in N-doped electrocatalysts. According to Figure 6, sulfur-nitrogen-doped CNTs [92] and sulfur-nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide [91] electrocatalysts exhibited 0.685 and 0.703 V vs. RHE half-wave potential, respectively. According to the authors of both works, the synergetic effect between N and S favors the 4e− ORR pathway. Additionally, S-N-CNTs electrocatalyst exhibited excellent methanol tolerance (10 wt %) even after 2.5 h operation at −0.3 V vs. Hg/HgO [93]. The advantages of the ordered mesoporous structure and of the co-doping method were exploited by Jiang et al. [92], fabricating a S-N-ordered mesoporous electrocatalyst. The authors also stated very good long-term stability, as the electrocatalyst maintained 91.6% of its relative current density after 2.5 h operation, while Pt/C maintained only 70% of its owns; excellent methanol (1.0 M) tolerance was recorded.
Additionally, silicon doped into nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes (SiN-CNTs) matrix exhibited a very good activity, E1/2 = 0.753 V vs. RHE (Figure 6), remaining also inactive in presence of 1.0 M methanol. Moreover, for the first operational seconds its initial relative current decayed by 8% and it remained stable for 2.8 h, at −0.3 V vs. Ag/AgCl, while over Pt/C, the measured current decay was 30% [90].
Boron and nitrogen co-doping mostly on graphene and carbon nanotubes has been investigated thoroughly in international literature [95,96,97,98]. Liu et al. [87], recently proved that synergetic effect of co-doping and doping one by one element was the main factor for enhancing ORR activity. As depicted in Figure 6, the B-N co-doped over core shell graphitic carbon nanodiamonds electrocatalysts exhibited high half-wave potential, E1/2 = 0.805 V vs. RHE [87].
Finally, some research groups turned their attention to halogen doped-nitrogen carbon materials. By introducing a halogen element into graphene structure, its electronic structure changes, accommodating more active sites [89]. F-, Cl-, Br- and I-co-doped reduced graphene oxide electrocatalyst, according to LSV measurements, exhibited a half-wave potential of 0.773 V vs. RHE; just a little more negative from Pt’s. After 2000 s, its current density remained the same, while for Pt/C it was decreased by 10%.
Taking into consideration the results listed in Table 4, a common characteristic of the dual-doped electrocatalysts is the hollow carbon nanospheres, as well as the mesoporous structure. According to Figure 7, the highest long-term stability was displayed by phosphorus-doped hollow sphere electrocatalyst, ca 18 h, maintaining 90% of its initial activity [85]. It has been stated that the hollow structure offers efficient mass transfer of the reactants. Finally, the development of ORR electrocatalysts with alternative precursors, by the aid of simpler preparation methods, is still of great challenge as deduced during the current review.

6. Conclusions

The present review mainly focuses on novel carbon based materials for ORR, including: (i) the development of three-dimensional structures; (ii) the synthesis of novel hybrid (metal oxide-nitrogen-carbon) electrocatalysts; (iii) the use of alternative raw precursors characterized from three-dimensional structure; (iv) the adoption of co-doping methods for novel metal-nitrogen-doped-carbon electrocatalysts.
Hybrid-materials exceed the other types of electrocatalysts in terms of ORR activity as well as long-term stability. Among them, nitrogen-doped-reduced graphene oxide with mesoporous structure is the most efficient support. However, the greatest challenge of those electrocatalysts is the simplification of their synthesis procedure. Towards this direction, non-precious ORR electrocatalysts via one step process utilizing alternative precursors, mainly Prussian-blue and/or polyaniline, were prepared. The main advantage of these kinds of alternative precursors is their ready (from their nature) three-dimensional structures offering enriched M-N bonds, which, after pyrolysis, form MNx ORR active sites. The same precursors can serve also as carbon or nitrogen sources. This class of electrocatalysts exhibits very good ORR electrochemical activity; however, their main drawback is their short stability over time.
In their turn, dual-doped ORR electrocatalysts succeed to change the ORR mechanism in N-doped electrocatalysts from 2e− to 4e− process. The most efficient dual-doped electrocatalysts: (i) are characterized by either ordered mesoporous or hollow mesoporous graphene structure; (ii) have been prepared by co-doping metals; and (iii) the doped-metals have been embedded throughout carbon matrix and not at its edges. In terms of long-term stability, it can be deduced that they are less stable than hybrids, but more stable than the alternative precursors’ electrocatalysts.
Finally, 3D interconnected structures facilitate electron and mass transfer. The key for the development of the most active electrocatalyst (3D Co-N-OMMC) was the combination of: (i) co-doping of the two metals; (ii) highly ordered macro-mesoporous graphene’s structure; and (iii) synergetic effect of the two metals with the support. Typically, their ORR activity is still lower than the other as-reported electrocatalysts. The degradation of their structure and, consequently, the much lower stability are the main challenges that need to be overcome in future.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Sino-Greek Science and Technology Cooperation (Project 2013DFG62590), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21575299, 21576300, and 21276290), and to the Guangdong Province Nature Science Foundation (2014A030313150) for the financial support. Panagiotis Tsiakaras is also grateful to the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (Mega-grant contract No. 14.Z50.31.0001) for funding.

Author Contributions

Angeliki Brouzgou searched the literature papers, categorized the electrocatalysts in the present paper and wrote the main part of the current work; Shuqin Song and Zhen-Xing Liang corrected English, helped with data analysis and wrote part of this work; Panagiotis Tsiakaras wrote part of this work, corrected English grammar and syntax and supervised the whole work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brouzgou, A.; Song, S.Q.; Tsiakaras, P. Low and non-platinum electrocatalysts for pemfcs: Current status, challenges and prospects. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2012, 127, 371–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, Y.; He, C.; Brouzgou, A.; Liang, Y.; Fu, R.; Wu, D.; Tsiakaras, P.; Song, S. A facile soft-template synthesis of ordered mesoporous carbon/tungsten carbide composites with high surface area for methanol electrooxidation. J. Power Sources 2012, 200, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Brouzgou, A.; Podias, A.; Tsiakaras, P. PEMFCS and AEMFCS directly fed with ethanol: A current status comparative review. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2013, 43, 119–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wan, K.; Long, G.-F.; Liu, M.-Y.; Du, L.; Liang, Z.-X.; Tsiakaras, P. Nitrogen-doped ordered mesoporous carbon: Synthesis and active sites for electrocatalysis of oxygen reduction reaction. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 165, 566–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gong, K.; Du, F.; Xia, Z.; Durstock, M.; Dai, L. Nitrogen-doped carbon nanotube arrays with high electrocatalytic activity for oxygen reduction. Science 2009, 323, 760–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lee, J.S.; Park, G.S.; Kim, S.T.; Liu, M.; Cho, J. A highly efficient electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction: N-doped ketjenblack incorporated into Fe/Fe3C-functionalized melamine foam. Angew. Chem. 2013, 125, 1060–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Choi, C.H.; Chung, M.W.; Kwon, H.C.; Park, S.H.; Woo, S.I. B, N-and P, N-doped graphene as highly active catalysts for oxygen reduction reactions in acidic media. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 3694–3699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xue, Y.; Yu, D.; Dai, L.; Wang, R.; Li, D.; Roy, A.; Lu, F.; Chen, H.; Liu, Y.; Qu, J. Three-dimensional B, N-doped graphene foam as a metal-free catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 12220–12226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zhang, L.; Niu, J.; Li, M.; Xia, Z. Catalytic mechanisms of sulfur-doped graphene as efficient oxygen reduction reaction catalysts for fuel cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 3545–3553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Park, J.-E.; Jang, Y.J.; Kim, Y.J.; Song, M.-S.; Yoon, S.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, S.-J. Sulfur-doped graphene as a potential alternative metal-free electrocatalyst and Pt-catalyst supporting material for oxygen reduction reaction. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ma, Z.; Dou, S.; Shen, A.; Tao, L.; Dai, L.; Wang, S. Sulfur-doped graphene derived from cycled lithium–sulfur batteries as a metal-free electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 1888–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Peng, H.; Mo, Z.; Liao, S.; Liang, H.; Yang, L.; Luo, F.; Song, H.; Zhong, Y.; Zhang, B. High performance Fe-and N-doped carbon catalyst with graphene structure for oxygen reduction. Sci. Rep. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liang, J.; Zhou, R.F.; Chen, X.M.; Tang, Y.H.; Qiao, S.Z. Fe–N decorated hybrids of CNTs grown on hierarchically porous carbon for high-performance oxygen reduction. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 6074–6079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wu, J.; Yang, Z.; Li, X.; Sun, Q.; Jin, C.; Strasser, P.; Yang, R. Phosphorus-doped porous carbons as efficient electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 9889–9896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, C.; Mahmood, N.; Yin, H.; Liu, F.; Hou, Y. Synthesis of phosphorus-doped graphene and its multifunctional applications for oxygen reduction reaction and lithium ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 4932–4937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Li, R.; Wei, Z.; Gou, X.; Xu, W. Phosphorus-doped graphene nanosheets as efficient metal-free oxygen reduction electrocatalysts. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 9978–9984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liang, Y.; Wang, H.; Diao, P.; Chang, W.; Hong, G.; Li, Y.; Gong, M.; Xie, L.; Zhou, J.; Wang, J.; et al. Oxygen reduction electrocatalyst based on strongly coupled cobalt oxide nanocrystals and carbon nanotubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 15849–15857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Yang, Z.; Yao, Z.; Li, G.; Fang, G.; Nie, H.; Liu, Z.; Zhou, X.; Chen, X.; Huang, S. Sulfur-doped graphene as an efficient metal-free cathode catalyst for oxygen reduction. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Liu, R.; Wu, D.; Feng, X.; Müllen, K. Nitrogen-doped ordered mesoporous graphitic arrays with high electrocatalytic activity for oxygen reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 2565–2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Niwa, H.; Horiba, K.; Harada, Y.; Oshima, M.; Ikeda, T.; Terakura, K.; Ozaki, J.-I.; Miyata, S. X-ray absorption analysis of nitrogen contribution to oxygen reduction reaction in carbon alloy cathode catalysts for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. J. Power Sources 2009, 187, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ferrandon, M.; Kropf, A.J.; Myers, D.J.; Artyushkova, K.; Kramm, U.; Bogdanoff, P.; Wu, G.; Johnston, C.M.; Zelenay, P. Multitechnique characterization of a polyaniline-iron-carbon oxygen reduction catalyst. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 16001–16013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wu, G.; More, K.L.; Johnston, C.M.; Zelenay, P. High-performance electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction derived from polyaniline, iron, and cobalt. Science 2011, 332, 443–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhang, P.; Sun, F.; Xiang, Z.; Shen, Z.; Yun, J.; Cao, D. Zif-derived in situ nitrogen-doped porous carbons as efficient metal-free electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 442–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, Y.; Chu, M.; Yang, L.; Deng, W.; Tan, Y.; Ma, M.; Xie, Q. Synthesis and oxygen reduction properties of three-dimensional sulfur-doped graphene networks. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 6382–6385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Fang, B.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, M.-S.; Yu, J.-S. Hierarchical nanostructured carbons with meso–macroporosity: Design, characterization, and applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 1397–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, J.G.; Zhou, H.J.; Sun, P.C.; Ding, D.T.; Chen, T.H. Hollow carved single-crystal mesoporous silica templated by mesomorphous polyelectrolyte-surfactant complexes. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 3829–3831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, Y.-L.; Shi, C.-X.; Xu, X.-Y.; Sun, P.-C.; Chen, T.-H. Nitrogen-doped hierarchically porous carbon spheres as efficient metal-free electrocatalysts for an oxygen reduction reaction. J. Power Sources 2015, 283, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tao, G.; Zhang, L.; Chen, L.; Cui, X.; Hua, Z.; Wang, M.; Wang, J.; Chen, Y.; Shi, J. N-doped hierarchically macro/mesoporous carbon with excellent electrocatalytic activity and durability for oxygen reduction reaction. Carbon 2015, 86, 108–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sun, T.; Xu, L.; Li, S.; Chai, W.; Huang, Y.; Yan, Y.; Chen, J. Cobalt-nitrogen-doped ordered macro-/mesoporous carbon for highly efficient oxygen reduction reaction. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 193, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Duan, J.; Zheng, Y.; Chen, S.; Tang, Y.; Jaroniec, M.; Qiao, S. Mesoporous hybrid material composed of Mn3O4 nanoparticles on nitrogen-doped graphene for highly efficient oxygen reduction reaction. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 7705–7707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Hao, J.; Liu, Y.; Shen, H.; Li, W.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Chen, Q. Effect of nickel-ion doping in MnO2 nanoneedles as electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2016, 27, 6598–6605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bian, W.; Yang, Z.; Strasser, P.; Yang, R. A CoFe2O4/graphene nanohybrid as an efficient bi-functional electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution. J. Power Sources 2014, 250, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Huo, R.; Jiang, W.J.; Xu, S.; Zhang, F.; Hu, J.S. Co/CoO/CoFe2O4/G nanocomposites derived from layered double hydroxides towards mass production of efficient Pt-free electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 203–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Xu, Y.; Bian, W.; Wu, J.; Tian, J.-H.; Yang, R. Preparation and electrocatalytic activity of 3D hierarchical porous spinel CoFe2O4 hollow nanospheres as efficient catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction and oxygen evolution reaction. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 151, 276–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, J.; Wu, Z.; Han, L.; Lin, R.; Xin, H.L.; Wang, D. Hollow-structured carbon-supported nickel cobaltite nanoparticles as an efficient bifunctional electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction and evolution reactions. ChemCatChem 2016, 8, 736–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lee, E.; Jang, J.-H.; Kwon, Y.-U. Composition effects of spinel MnxCo3−xO4 nanoparticles on their electrocatalytic properties in oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline media. J. Power Sources 2015, 273, 735–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ma, Y.; Wang, R.; Wang, H.; Key, J.; Ji, S. Control of MnO2 nanocrystal shape from tremella to nanobelt for ehancement of the oxygen reduction reaction activity. J. Power Sources 2015, 280, 526–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Odedairo, T.; Yan, X.; Ma, J.; Jiao, Y.; Yao, X.; Du, A.; Zhu, Z. Nanosheets Co3O4 interleaved with graphene for highly efficient oxygen reduction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 21373–21380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Li, Z.; Shao, M.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, C.; Wei, M.; Evans, D.G.; Duan, X. Directed growth of metal-organic frameworks and their derived carbon-based network for efficient electrocatalytic oxygen reduction. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 2337–2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Pan, T.; Liu, H.; Ren, G.; Li, Y.; Lu, X.; Zhu, Y. Metal-free porous nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes for enhanced oxygen reduction and evolution reactions. Sci. Bull. 2016, 61, 889–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hao, L.; Zhang, S.; Liu, R.; Ning, J.; Zhang, G.; Zhi, L. Bottom-up construction of triazine-based frameworks as metal-free electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 3190–3195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Xu, Y.; Jin, S.; Xu, H.; Nagai, A.; Jiang, D. Conjugated microporous polymers: Design, synthesis and application. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 8012–8031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhang, L.; Su, Z.; Jiang, F.; Yang, L.; Qian, J.; Zhou, Y.; Li, W.; Hong, M. Highly graphitized nitrogen-doped porous carbon nanopolyhedra derived from ZIF-8 nanocrystals as efficient electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reactions. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 6590–6602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Miner, E.M.; Fukushima, T.; Sheberla, D.; Sun, L.; Surendranath, Y.; Dincă, M. Electrochemical oxygen reduction catalysed by Ni3(hexaiminotriphenylene)2. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Verma, A.; Jha, A.K.; Basu, S. Manganese dioxide as a cathode catalyst for a direct alcohol or sodium borohydride fuel cell with a flowing alkaline electrolyte. J. Power Sources 2005, 141, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rojas-Carbonell, S.; Babanova, S.; Serov, A.; Ulyanova, Y.; Singhal, S.; Atanassov, P. Hybrid electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction: Integrating enzymatic and non-platinum group metal catalysis. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 190, 504–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, G.; Lu, W.; Cao, F.; Xiao, Z.; Zheng, X. N-doped graphene coupled with Co nanoparticles as an efficient electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction in alkaline media. J. Power Sources 2016, 302, 114–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jin, J.; Pan, F.; Jiang, L.; Fu, X.; Liang, A.; Wei, Z.; Zhang, J.; Sun, G. Catalyst-free synthesis of crumpled boron and nitrogen Co-doped graphite layers with tunable bond structure for oxygen reduction reaction. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 3313–3321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wu, X.; Liu, X.; Li, M. Synergistic effect between strongly coupled coal layered double hydroxides and graphene for the electrocatalytic reduction of oxygen. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 192, 196–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Han, J.; Sa, Y.J.; Shim, Y.; Choi, M.; Park, N.; Joo, S.H.; Park, S. Coordination chemistry of [Co(acac)2] with N-doped graphene: Implications for oxygen reduction reaction reactivity of organometallic Co-O4-N species. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 12622–12626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Chao, S.; Bai, Z.; Cui, Q.; Yan, H.; Wang, K.; Yang, L. Hollowed-out octahedral Co/N-codoped carbon as a highly efficient non-precious metal catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Carbon 2015, 82, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhan, Y.; Du, G.; Yang, S.; Xu, C.; Lu, M.; Liu, Z.; Lee, J.Y. Development of cobalt hydroxide as a bifunctional catalyst for oxygen electrocatalysis in alkaline solution. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 12930–12936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hou, Y.; Wen, Z.; Cui, S.; Ci, S.; Mao, S.; Chen, J. An advanced nitrogen-doped graphene/cobalt-embedded porous carbon oolyhedron hybrid for efficient catalysis of oxygen reduction and water splitting. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 872–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wu, Y.; Shi, Q.; Li, Y.; Lai, Z.; Yu, H.; Wang, H.; Peng, F. Nitrogen-doped graphene-supported cobalt carbonitride@oxide core–shell nanoparticles as a non-noble metal electrocatalyst for an oxygen reduction reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 1142–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ge, L.; Yang, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhou, W.; De Marco, R.; Chen, Z.; Zou, J.; Zhu, Z. High activity electrocatalysts from metal–organic framework-carbon nanotube templates for the oxygen reduction reaction. Carbon 2015, 82, 417–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yang, W.; Liu, X.; Yue, X.; Jia, J.; Guo, S. Bamboo-like carbon nanotube/Fe3C nanoparticle hybrids and their highly efficient catalysis for oxygen reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 1436–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Zhang, M.; Li, R.; Chang, X.; Xue, C.; Gou, X. Hybrid of porous cobalt oxide nanospheres and nitrogen-doped graphene for applications in lithium-ion batteries and oxygen reduction reaction. J. Power Sources 2015, 290, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lv, L.-B.; Ye, T.-N.; Gong, L.-H.; Wang, K.-X.; Su, J.; Li, X.-H.; Chen, J.-S. Anchoring cobalt nanocrystals through the plane of graphene: Highly integrated electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 544–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cao, S.; Han, N.; Han, J.; Hu, Y.; Fan, L.; Zhou, C.; Guo, R. Mesoporous hybrid shells of carbonized polyaniline/Mn2O3 as non-precious efficient oxygen reduction reaction catalyst. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 6040–6050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Huang, W.; Zhong, H.; Li, D.; Tang, P.; Feng, Y. Reduced graphene oxide supported CoO/MnO2 electrocatalysts from layered double hydroxides for oxygen reduction reaction. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 173, 575–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zheng, Y.; Jiao, Y.; Ge, L.; Jaroniec, M.; Qiao, S.Z. Two-step boron and nitrogen doping in graphene for enhanced synergistic catalysis. Angew. Chem. 2013, 125, 3192–3198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhao, Y.; Yang, L.; Chen, S.; Wang, X.; Ma, Y.; Wu, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Qian, W.; Hu, Z. Can boron and nitrogen co-doping improve oxygen reduction reaction activity of carbon nanotubes? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1201–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ding, W.; Wei, Z.; Chen, S.; Qi, X.; Yang, T.; Hu, J.; Wang, D.; Wan, L.J.; Alvi, S.F.; Li, L. Space-confinement-induced synthesis of pyridinic-and pyrrolic-nitrogen-doped graphene for the catalysis of oxygen reduction. Angew. Chem. 2013, 125, 11971–11975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Cao, Y.; Wei, Z.; He, J.; Zang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Zheng, M.; Dong, Q. α-MnO2 nanorods grown in situ on graphene as catalysts for Li–O2 batteries with excellent electrochemical performance. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 9765–9768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Qu, L.; Liu, Y.; Baek, J.-B.; Dai, L. Nitrogen-doped graphene as efficient metal-free electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction in fuel cells. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 1321–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Lin, Z.; Waller, G.; Liu, Y.; Liu, M.; Wong, C.P. Facile synthesis of nitrogen-doped graphene via pyrolysis of graphene oxide and urea, and its electrocatalytic activity toward the oxygen-reduction reaction. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012, 2, 884–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. He, D.; Jiang, Y.; Lv, H.; Pan, M.; Mu, S. Nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide supports for noble metal catalysts with greatly enhanced activity and stability. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2013, 132, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Li, X.-H.; Antonietti, M. Metal nanoparticles at mesoporous N-doped carbons and carbon nitrides: Functional mott–schottky heterojunctions for catalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 6593–6604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Zhao, Z.-G.; Zhang, J.; Yuan, Y.; Lv, H.; Tian, Y.; Wu, D.; Li, Q.-W. In-situ formation of cobalt-phosphate oxygen-evolving complex-anchored reduced graphene oxide nanosheets for oxygen reduction reaction. Sci. Rep. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Zhao, H.; Hui, K.S.; Hui, K.N. Synthesis of nitrogen-doped multilayer graphene from milk powder with melamine and their application to fuel cells. Carbon 2014, 76, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, Z.; Xu, Z.; Tan, X.; Wang, H.; Holt, C.M.B.; Stephenson, T.; Olsen, B.C.; Mitlin, D. Mesoporous nitrogen-rich carbons derived from protein for ultra-high capacity battery anodes and supercapacitors. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 871–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Senoz, E.; Stanzione, J.F.; Reno, K.H.; Wool, R.P.; Miller, M.E.N. Pyrolyzed chicken feather fibers for biobased composite reinforcement. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2013, 128, 983–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wang, X.; Zou, L.; Fu, H.; Xiong, Y.; Tao, Z.; Zheng, J.; Li, X. Noble metal-free oxygen reduction reaction catalysts derived from prussian blue nanocrystals dispersed in polyaniline. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 8436–8444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Wang, J.; Wang, G.; Miao, S.; Jiang, X.; Li, J.; Bao, X. Synthesis of Fe/Fe3C nanoparticles encapsulated in nitrogen-doped carbon with single-source molecular precursor for the oxygen reduction reaction. Carbon 2014, 75, 381–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wang, R.; Wang, H.; Zhou, T.; Key, J.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Ji, S. The enhanced electrocatalytic activity of okara-derived N-doped mesoporous carbon for oxygen reduction reaction. J. Power Sources 2015, 274, 741–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhou, R.; Qiao, S.Z. An Fe/N co-doped graphitic carbon bulb for high-performance oxygen reduction reaction. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 7516–7519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Strickland, K.; Miner, E.; Jia, Q.; Tylus, U.; Ramaswamy, N.; Liang, W.; Sougrati, M.-T.; Jaouen, F.; Mukerjee, S. Highly active oxygen reduction non-platinum group metal electrocatalyst without direct metal-nitrogen coordination. Nat. Commun 2015, 6, 7343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Rana, M.; Arora, G.; Gautam, U.K. N-and S-doped high surface area carbon derived from soya chunks as scalable and efficient electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2016, 16, 014803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chao, S.; Cui, Q.; Wang, K.; Bai, Z.; Yang, L.; Qiao, J. Template-free synthesis of hierarchical yolk-shell Co and N codoped porous carbon microspheres with enhanced performance for oxygen reduction reaction. J. Power Sources 2015, 288, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. She, Y.; Lu, Z.; Ni, M.; Li, L.; Leung, M.K.H. Facile synthesis of nitrogen and sulfur codoped carbon from ionic liquid as metal-free catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 7214–7221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Xi, J.; Xia, Y.; Xu, Y.; Xiao, J.; Wang, S. (Fe,Co)@nitrogen-doped graphitic carbon nanocubes derived from polydopamine-encapsulated metal-organic frameworks as a highly stable and selective non-precious oxygen reduction electrocatalyst. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 10479–10482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Wang, D.-W.; Su, D. Heterogeneous nanocarbon materials for oxygen reduction reaction. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 576–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Daems, N.; Sheng, X.; Vankelecom, I.F.; Pescarmona, P.P. Metal-free doped carbon materials as electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 4085–4110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Sheng, X.; Daems, N.; Geboes, B.; Kurttepeli, M.; Bals, S.; Breugelmans, T.; Hubin, A.; Vankelecom, I.F.; Pescarmona, P.P. N-doped ordered mesoporous carbons prepared by a two-step nanocasting strategy as highly active and selective electrocatalysts for the reduction of O2 to H2O2. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 176, 212–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Wu, J.; Jin, C.; Yang, Z.; Tian, J.; Yang, R. Synthesis of phosphorus-doped carbon hollow spheres as efficient metal-free electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction. Carbon 2015, 82, 562–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Xiao, M.; Zhu, J.; Feng, L.; Liu, C.; Xing, W. Meso/macroporous nitrogen-doped carbon architectures with iron carbide encapsulated in graphitic layers as an efficient and robust catalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction in both acidic and alkaline solutions. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 2521–2527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Dong, L.; Chen, X.; Xin, G.; Zhang, Y.; Zang, J. One-step synthesis of shell/core structural boron and nitrogen co-doped graphitic carbon/nanodiamond as efficient electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline media. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 194, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Niu, W.; Li, L.; Liu, X.; Wang, N.; Liu, J.; Zhou, W.; Tang, Z.; Chen, S. Mesoporous N-doped carbons prepared with thermally removable nanoparticle templates: An efficient electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 5555–5562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Kakaei, K.; Balavandi, A. Synthesis of halogen-doped reduced graphene oxide nanosheets as highly efficient metal-free electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 463, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Liu, Z.; Fu, X.; Li, M.; Wang, F.; Wang, Q.; Kang, G.; Peng, F. Novel silicon-doped, silicon and nitrogen-codoped carbon nanomaterials with high activity for the oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline medium. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 3289–3293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bag, S.; Mondal, B.; Das, A.K.; Raj, C.R. Nitrogen and sulfur dual-doped reduced graphene oxide: Synergistic effect of dopants towards oxygen reduction reaction. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 163, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Jiang, T.; Wang, Y.; Wang, K.; Liang, Y.; Wu, D.; Tsiakaras, P.; Song, S. A novel sulfur-nitrogen dual doped ordered mesoporous carbon electrocatalyst for efficient oxygen reduction reaction. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 189, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Li, W.; Yang, D.; Chen, H.; Gao, Y.; Li, H. Sulfur-doped carbon nanotubes as catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline medium. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 165, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ju, Y.-W.; Yoo, S.; Kim, C.; Kim, S.; Jeon, I.-Y.; Shin, J.; Baek, J.-B.; Kim, G. Fe@N-graphene nanoplatelet-embedded carbon nanofibers as efficient electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Adv. Sci. 2016, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Zhong, S.; Zhou, L.; Wu, L.; Tang, L.; He, Q.; Ahmed, J. Nitrogen-and boron-co-doped core–shell carbon nanoparticles as efficient metal-free catalysts for oxygen reduction reactions in microbial fuel cells. J. Power Sources 2014, 272, 344–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Bai, J.; Zhu, Q.; Lv, Z.; Dong, H.; Yu, J.; Dong, L. Nitrogen-doped graphene as catalysts and catalyst supports for oxygen reduction in both acidic and alkaline solutions. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2013, 38, 1413–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Cheng, Y.; Tian, Y.; Fan, X.; Liu, J.; Yan, C. Boron doped multi-walled carbon nanotubes as catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction and oxygen evolution reactionin in alkaline media. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 143, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Pumera, M. Heteroatom modified graphenes: Electronic and electrochemical applications. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 6454–6461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Catalysts 06 00159 g001 550
Figure 1. Comparison of stability of 3D-structured non-precious carbon based electrocatalysts: (1) NHCs (N-doped hierarchically carbon) (at 0.5 V vs. RHE) [27]; (2) 3D-HPC-N (N-doped-3D-hierarchically porous carbon materials)-850 (at 0.55 V vs. RHE) [28]; (3) 3D Co-N-OMMC-0.6 (Co(NO3)2·6H2O) (ordered macro-mesoporous carbon) (at 0.6 V vs. RHE) [29]; (4) 3D hierarchical porous-CoFe2O4 hollow nanospheres (at 0.56 V vs. RHE) [34]; (5) MnxCo3xO4 (x = 0.4) [36]; (6) Nanosheet Co3O4-doped-graphene-3D [38]; (7) 2D-CoAl-LDH@ZIF-67-800 (LDH: layered double hydroxides, ZIF: zeolitic imidazolate framework [39]; and (8) 3D-N-doped-TTF (thermalized triazine-based framework)-700 (at 0.6 V vs. RHE) [41].
Figure 1. Comparison of stability of 3D-structured non-precious carbon based electrocatalysts: (1) NHCs (N-doped hierarchically carbon) (at 0.5 V vs. RHE) [27]; (2) 3D-HPC-N (N-doped-3D-hierarchically porous carbon materials)-850 (at 0.55 V vs. RHE) [28]; (3) 3D Co-N-OMMC-0.6 (Co(NO3)2·6H2O) (ordered macro-mesoporous carbon) (at 0.6 V vs. RHE) [29]; (4) 3D hierarchical porous-CoFe2O4 hollow nanospheres (at 0.56 V vs. RHE) [34]; (5) MnxCo3xO4 (x = 0.4) [36]; (6) Nanosheet Co3O4-doped-graphene-3D [38]; (7) 2D-CoAl-LDH@ZIF-67-800 (LDH: layered double hydroxides, ZIF: zeolitic imidazolate framework [39]; and (8) 3D-N-doped-TTF (thermalized triazine-based framework)-700 (at 0.6 V vs. RHE) [41].
Catalysts 06 00159 g001
Catalysts 06 00159 g002 550
Figure 2. Comparison of half-wave potential (V vs. RHE). (References from left to right column: [38], [29], [27], [41], [28], [40], [35], [39], [34]).
Figure 2. Comparison of half-wave potential (V vs. RHE). (References from left to right column: [38], [29], [27], [41], [28], [40], [35], [39], [34]).
Catalysts 06 00159 g002
Catalysts 06 00159 g003 550
Figure 3. Comparison of half-wave potentials. (References from left to right bar: [58], [53], [55], [56], [49], [47], [50], [51], [59], [54], [57], [48], [52]).
Figure 3. Comparison of half-wave potentials. (References from left to right bar: [58], [53], [55], [56], [49], [47], [50], [51], [59], [54], [57], [48], [52]).
Catalysts 06 00159 g003
Catalysts 06 00159 g004 550
Figure 4. Long-term stability curves of hybrid materials: (1) Co0.03@CoO-N-doped graphene carbon shells-800 (at −0.4 V vs. SCE) [47]; (2) Two-dimensional materials based on ternary system of B, C and N (B(2 at%)N(5 at%)G-1000 °C) [48]; (3) N/Co-doped PCP//NRGO (at −0.25 V vs. Ag/AgCl) [53]; (4) CoCN@CoOx(18)/NG (cobalt carbonitride/nitrogen doped graphene) [54]; (5) Co3O4/NG (nitrogen-doped graphene) (at −0.36 V vs. SCE) [57]; (6) CoNPs@NG (nitrogen-doped graphene) [58]; (7) C(PANI)/Mn2O3 (hybrid) (at 0.8 V vs. RHE) [59]; and (8) CoO/MnO2/RGO (reduced graphene oxide) (at 0.66 V vs. RHE) [60].
Figure 4. Long-term stability curves of hybrid materials: (1) Co0.03@CoO-N-doped graphene carbon shells-800 (at −0.4 V vs. SCE) [47]; (2) Two-dimensional materials based on ternary system of B, C and N (B(2 at%)N(5 at%)G-1000 °C) [48]; (3) N/Co-doped PCP//NRGO (at −0.25 V vs. Ag/AgCl) [53]; (4) CoCN@CoOx(18)/NG (cobalt carbonitride/nitrogen doped graphene) [54]; (5) Co3O4/NG (nitrogen-doped graphene) (at −0.36 V vs. SCE) [57]; (6) CoNPs@NG (nitrogen-doped graphene) [58]; (7) C(PANI)/Mn2O3 (hybrid) (at 0.8 V vs. RHE) [59]; and (8) CoO/MnO2/RGO (reduced graphene oxide) (at 0.66 V vs. RHE) [60].
Catalysts 06 00159 g004
Catalysts 06 00159 g005 550
Figure 5. Comparison of half-wave potential of modified-alternative raw electrocatalytic materials. (Ref. from left to right bar: [74], [75], [77], [73], [76], [78], [80], [79]).
Figure 5. Comparison of half-wave potential of modified-alternative raw electrocatalytic materials. (Ref. from left to right bar: [74], [75], [77], [73], [76], [78], [80], [79]).
Catalysts 06 00159 g005
Catalysts 06 00159 g006 550
Figure 6. Comparison of ORR activity in terms of half-wave potential. (Ref. from left to right bars: [85], [86], [84], [87], [88], [89], [90], [91], [92]).
Figure 6. Comparison of ORR activity in terms of half-wave potential. (Ref. from left to right bars: [85], [86], [84], [87], [88], [89], [90], [91], [92]).
Catalysts 06 00159 g006
Catalysts 06 00159 g007 550
Figure 7. Long-term stability curves for modified with alternative precursor and mono or dual-doped electrocatalysts: (1) NCNT-900 (N-doped carbon nanotubes) (at −0.4 V vs. SCE) [40]; (2) S-P-N-doped graphitized carbon-1000 (at −0.3 V vs. SCE) [78]; (3) NOMC (N-doped ordered mesoporous) (at −0.3 V vs. Ag/AgCl) [84]; (4) P(2 at. %)-CHS (phosphorus-doped hollow spheres) (at 0.8 V vs. RHE) [85]; (5) shell core structural boron and nitrogen co-doped graphitic carbon/nanodiamond (BN-C/ND) [87]; (6) Fe-N/C-800 (at −0.3 V vs. Ag/AgCl) [88]; (7) SiN-CNTs (at −0.3 V vs. Ag/AgCl) [90]; and (8) S-doped/CNTs-900 (at −0.3 V vs. Ag/AgCl) [93].
Figure 7. Long-term stability curves for modified with alternative precursor and mono or dual-doped electrocatalysts: (1) NCNT-900 (N-doped carbon nanotubes) (at −0.4 V vs. SCE) [40]; (2) S-P-N-doped graphitized carbon-1000 (at −0.3 V vs. SCE) [78]; (3) NOMC (N-doped ordered mesoporous) (at −0.3 V vs. Ag/AgCl) [84]; (4) P(2 at. %)-CHS (phosphorus-doped hollow spheres) (at 0.8 V vs. RHE) [85]; (5) shell core structural boron and nitrogen co-doped graphitic carbon/nanodiamond (BN-C/ND) [87]; (6) Fe-N/C-800 (at −0.3 V vs. Ag/AgCl) [88]; (7) SiN-CNTs (at −0.3 V vs. Ag/AgCl) [90]; and (8) S-doped/CNTs-900 (at −0.3 V vs. Ag/AgCl) [93].
Catalysts 06 00159 g007
Table
Table 1. Non-precious 2D and 3D-structured doped-carbon ORR (oxygen reduction reaction) electrocatalysts.
Table 1. Non-precious 2D and 3D-structured doped-carbon ORR (oxygen reduction reaction) electrocatalysts.
CatalystPreparation Method and Experimental ConditionsLimiting Current (Jd; d = disc), Kinetic Current Density (Jk), Half Wave Potential (E1/2))Reference
N-HCS (hierarchically mesoporous spheres)-900Nanocasting method, 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated 20 mV·s−1, 1600 rpmJd = 4.7 mA·cm−2
Jk = 20.0 mA·cm−2 @ 0.3 V vs. Ag/AgCl sat. KCl (0.85 V vs. RHE)
E1/2 = 0.748 V vs. RHE		[27]
3D-HPC-N (N-doped-3D-hierarchically porous carbon materials)-850Hierarchically macro/mesoporous silica as a hard template followed by a simple N-doping procedure and 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated 5 mV·s−1, 1600 rpm (0.1 M KOH + 3.0 M MeOH)Jd = 4.4 mA·cm−2
(Inactive in MeOH presence)
E1/2 = 0.753 V vs. RHE		[28]
3D Co-N-OMMC-0.6 (Co(NO3)2·6H2O) (ordered macro-mesoporous carbon)Dual-templating synthesis approach in a one-pot controllable procedure by the use of silica colloidal crystal (opal) as a macroporous mold and triblock copolymer Pluronic F127 as a mesoporous template and 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated; 5 mV·s−1, 1600 rpm (0.1 M KOH + 1.0 M MeOH)Jd = 5.8 mA·cm−2
(Inactive in MeOH presence),
Jk = 23.2 mA·cm−2 @ 0.7 V vs. RHE,
E1/2 = 0.83 V vs. RHE		[29]
3D hierarchical porous-CoFe2O4 hollow nanospheresHydrothermal method and 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 10 mV·s−1, 1600 rpmJd = 5.3 mA·cm−2
E1/2 = 0.58 V vs. RHE		[34]
3D hollow NiCo2O4/CTransformation from solid NiCo2 alloy nanoparticles through the Kirkendall effect and 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 5 mV·s−1, 1600 rpmJd = 5.7 mA·cm−2
E1/2 = 0.68 V vs. RHE		[35]
3D Nanosheet Co3O4-doped-grapheneMicrowave argon-plasma synthesis approach and 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 5 mV·s−1, 1600 rpmJd = 5.7 mA·cm−2
Jk = 34mAcm−2 @ 0.75 V vs. RHE
E1/2 = 0.832 V vs. RHE		[38]
2D-CoAl-LDH@ZIF-67-800 (LDH: layered double hydroxides, ZIF: zeolitic imidazolate framework)In situ nucleation and directed growth of MOFs arrays on the surface of LDHs nanoplatelets followed by a subsequent pyrolysis process and 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated 10 mV·s−1, 1500 rpm (0.1 M KOH + 2.0 M MeOH)Jd = 5.2 mA·cm−2
(Inactive in MeOH presence)
E1/2 = 0.675 V vs. RHE		[39]
3D-NCNT-900 (N-doped carbon nanotubes)PPy nanotubes were synthesized by the chemical oxidative polymerization of pyrrole, in the presence of FeCl3 as an oxidant, and p-toluene sulfonic acid (TsOH) as a dopant and 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 10 mV·s−1, 1600 rpm (0.1 M KOH + 5.0 M MeOH)Jd = 5.2 mA·cm−2
(Inactive in MeOH presence)
E1/2 = 0.707 V vs. RHE		[40]
3D-N-doped-TTF-700 (thermalized triazine-based framework)A nitrogen-containing molecule, terephthalonitrile, as the basic building block and through first trimerization into a 2D covalent triazine-based framework and 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated; 10 mV·s−1, 1600 rpmJd = 4.0 mA·cm−2
E1/2 = 0.767 V vs. RHE		[41]
Table
Table 2. Non-precious hybrid ORR electrocatalysts.
Table 2. Non-precious hybrid ORR electrocatalysts.
CatalystPreparation Method and Experimental ConditionsLimiting Current (Jd; d = disc), Kinetic Current Density (Jk), Half Wave Potential (E1/2))Reference
Co0.03@CoO-N-doped graphene carbon shells-800Introduction of metal precursor (cobalt nitrate) to sucrose and urea followed by pyrolyzing and 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 10 mV·s−1, 1600 rpm, (0.1 M KOH + 0.5 M MeOH)Jd = 4.1 mA·cm−2
(Inactive in MeOH presence)
E1/2 = 0.81 V vs. RHE		[47]
BCN-2.5 at. %-1000CVD synthesis of BCN sheets by thermally decomposing solid B C- and N-containing precursors at normal pressure and 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 10 mV·s−1, 1600 rpm, (0.1 M KOH + 2.0 M MeOH)Jd = 6.0 mA·cm−2
(Inactive in MeOH presence)
E1/2 = 0.707 V vs. RHE
Jk = 26.62 mA·cm−2		[48]
CoAl-LDHs (layered double hydroxide)/rGO (reduced graphene oxide)Grow CoAl-LDHs on the surface of GO in-situ via coprecipitation and subsequently hydrothermal treatment and 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 10 mV·s−1, 1600 rpmJd = 4.8 mA·cm−2
E1/2 = 0.853 V vs. RHE		[49]
CoII-A-rG-O (hybrid-ammonium) hydroxide-reduced graphene)Synthesis at room temperature of archetypical hybrid materials consisting of cobalt-based organometallic complexes ([Co(acac)2], acac = acetylacetonate) coordinated to N-doped graphenes and 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 10 mV·s−1, 1600 rpmJd = 5.4 mA·cm−2
E1/2 = 0.81 V vs. RHE
Jk = 8.9 mA·cm−2 at 0.8 V vs. RHE		[50]
Co/N-HCOs (Co/N-co-doped hollowed-out carbon octahedrons) Octahedral Co(II) complex with 2,6-bis(benzimidazol-2-yl)pyridine (BBP) as the precursor and 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 10 mV·s−1, 1600 rpmJd = 4.9 mA·cm−2
E1/2 = 0.81 V vs. RHE		[51]
Co(OH)2-nanoplate/N-RGO (N-doped reduced graphene oxide)Hydrothermal method and 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 5 mV·s−1, 1600 rpmJd = 4.7 mA·cm−2
E1/2 = 0.66 V vs. RHE		[52]
N/Co-doped PCP(porous carbon polyhedron)/NRGOPyrolysis of graphene oxide-supported cobalt-based zeolitic imidazolate-framework and 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 5 mV·s−1, 1600 rpm (0.1 M KOH + 3.0 M MeOH)Jd = 7.8 mA·cm−2
(Inactive even after of 48h)
Jk = 11.6 mA·cm−2 at 0.7 V vs. RHE
E1/2 = 0.93 V vs. RHE		[53]
CoCN@CoOx(18)/NG (cobaltcarbonitride/nitrogen doped graphene)High temperature ammonia nitridation method and 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 10 mV·s−1, 1600 rpm, (0.1 M KOH + 1.0 M MeOH)Jd = 5.9 mA·cm−2
(Inactive in MeOH presence)
E1/2 0.763 V vs. RHE		[54]
C-CZ-4(N-CNTs)-1000In situ growth of metal–organic frameworks (ZIF-8) on carbon nanotubes, followed by pyrolysis and 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 5 mV·s−1, 1600 rpm (0.1 M KOH + 1.0 M MeOH)Jd = 6.0 mA·cm−2
(Inactive in MeOH presence)
E1/2 = 0.887 V vs. RHE		[55]
Bamboo-like CNT/Fe3C nanoparticle hybrids-800Annealing a mixture of PEG-PPG-PEG Pluronic P123, melamine, and Fe(NO3)3 at 800 °C in N2 and 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 10 mV·s−1, 1600 rpmJd = 4.0 mA·cm−2
E1/2 = 0.861 V vs. RHE		[56]
Co3O4/NG (nitrogen-doped graphene)Hydrothermal reaction of GO, MR, and CoCl2 followed by a two-step heat treatment and 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 10 mV·s−1, 1600 rpmJd = 4.6 mA·cm−2
E1/2 = 0.74 V vs. RHE		[57]
CoNPs@NG (nitrogen-doped graphene)Thermal condensation of biomass and corresponding metal salts and 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 10 mV·s−1, 1600 rpm (0.1 M KOH + 1.0 M MeOH)Jd = 7.2 mA·cm−2
E1/2 = 1.01 V vs. RHE		[58]
C(PANI)/Mn2O3Surface protected calcination processes and 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 10 mV·s−1, 1600 rpmJd = 5.61 mA·cm−2
E1/2 = 0.784 V vs. RHE		[59]
Table
Table 3. Non-precious alternative precursors’ ORR electrocatalysts.
Table 3. Non-precious alternative precursors’ ORR electrocatalysts.
CatalystPreparation Method and Experimental ConditionsLimiting Current (Jd; d = disc), Kinetic Current Density (Jk), Half Wave Potential (E1/2)Reference
C-2PANI (polyaniline)/PBA (prussian blue analogue), 2-aniline/(aniline + PBA)Mixing and pyrolysis & 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 10 mV·s−1, 1600 rpmJd = 6.1 mA·cm−2
E1/2 = 0.85 V vs RHE 		[73]
AFC-600 (ammonium ferric citrate, 600: treatment temperature)A single-source molecular precursor containing carbon, nitrogen and transition metal & 1.0 M NaOH, oxygen saturated, 10 mV·s−1, 2500 rpmJd = 2.6 mA·cm−2
E1/2 = 0.881 V vs. RHE		[74]
N(okara source)-C-800Nitrogen-doped carbon by okara treatment using also FeCl3 & 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 5 mV·s−1, 1600 rpmJd = 4.0 mA·cm−2
E1/2 = 0.86 V vs. RHE		[75]
Fe/N-gCB (co-doped graphitic carbon bulb)Prussian blue (PB) as the only precursor & 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 10 mV·s−1, 1600 rpmJd = 5.0 mA·cm−2
E1/2 = 0.81 V vs. RHE 		[76]
FePhen@MOF-ArNH3Encapsulation synthesis and heat treatment in ammonia & 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 20 mV·s−1, 1600 rpmJd = 5.6 mA·cm−2
E1/2 = 0.86 V vs. RHE		[77]
S-P-N-doped graphitized carbon-1000Soya (plant) as carbon source-graphitized product as support & 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 5 mV·s−1, 1600 rpm (0.1 M KOH + 1.25 M MeOH)Jd = 3.7 mA·cm−2
(MeOH tolerant)
E1/2 = 0.79 V vs. RHE 		[78]
YS-Co/N-PCMs (yolk-shell/porous carbon microspheres)Template-free hydrothermal method and a subsequent pyrolysis & 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 10 mV·s−1, 1600 rpmJd = 5.0 mA·cm−2
E1/2 = 0.706 V vs. RHE
Jk = 16.0 mA·cm−2 at 0.3 V vs. SCE		[79]
N-S-co-doped-graphitePyrolysis of homogeneous mixture of exfoliated graphitic flakes and ionic liquid 1-butyl-3-methylimidazoliumbis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl) imide & 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 10 mV·s−1, 2500 rpmJd = 6.5 mA·cm−2
E1/2 = 0.768 V vs. RHE		[80]
Table
Table 4. Non-precious dual-doped carbon ORR electrocatalysts.
Table 4. Non-precious dual-doped carbon ORR electrocatalysts.
CatalystPreparation Method and Experimental ConditionsLimiting Current (Jd; d = disc), Kinetic Current Density (Jk), Half-Wave Potential (E1/2))Reference
N-OMC (N-doped ordered mesoporous)Two-step nanocasting method (DHN as precursors) & 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated 10 mV·s−1, 2500 rpmJd = 5.8 mA·cm−2
Jk = 22 mA·cm−2 (at 0.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl)
E1/2 = 0.853 V vs. RHE		[84]
P(2 at. %)-CHS (phosphorus-doped hollow spheres)Hydrothermal method using glucose as a carbon source, tetraphenylphosphonium bromide as a P source and anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate as a soft template & 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated 10 mV·s−1, 1600 rpmJd = 5.7 mA·cm−2
E1/2 = 0.883 V vs. RHE		[85]
Fe3C/N-G(nano graphitic layers)-800Pyrolysis of poly (1,8-diaminonapphthalene) (PDAN) using precursors of 1,8-diaminonaphthalene (DAN) and FeCl3 & 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 5 mV·s−1, 1600 rpm, (0.1 M KOH + 1.0 M MeOH)Jd = 5.8 mA·cm−2
E1/2 = 0.86 V vs. RHE
(Inactive in MeOH presence)		[86]
Shell core structural B and N co-doped graphitic carbon/nanodiamond (BN-C/ND)One-step heat-treatment of the mixture with nanodiamond, melamine, boric acid and FeCl3 & 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 10 mV·s−1, 1600 rpm (0.1 M KOH + 1.0 M MeOH)Jd = 6.0 mA·cm−2
E1/2 = 0.22 V vs. Hg/HgO (0.805 V vs. RHE)
(Inactive in MeOH presence)		[87]
Fe-N/C-800Thermally removable nanoparticle templates & 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated (0.1 M KOH + 1.0 M MeOH)Jd = 4.9 mA·cm−2
E1/2 = 0.80 V vs. RHE
(Inactive in MeOH presence)		[88]
F, Cl, B and I–doped RGO in presence of NaFHalogenations of reduced graphene oxide (RGO) with simultaneously fluorine, chlorine, bromine and iodine by electrochemical exfoliation of GO and obtained XRGO in presence of IL and halogen salts (X = F, Cl, Br, I) & 0.5 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 10 mV·s−1, 1600 rpmJd = 5.7 mA·cm−2
E1/2 = 0.773 V vs. RHE		[89]
SiN-CNTsThermolysis of 3-aminopropyl-triethoxysilane and dimethylsilicone oil, respectively, using FeMo/Al2O3 as catalysts & 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated 5 mV·s−1, 1600 rpm (0.1 M KOH + 1.0 M MeOH)Jd = 6.12 mA·cm−2
E1/2 = 0.753 V vs. RHE
(Inactive in MeOH presence)		[90]
S-N-RGO (reduced graphene oxide)Single-step non-hydrothermal chemical route Reflux in ethylene glycol at 180 °C for 3 h & 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 5 mV·s−1, 1600 rpmJd = 5.1 mA·cm−2
E1/2 = 0.703 V vs. RHE
Jk = 7.7 mA·cm−2 (at 0.6 V vs. Hg/HgO)		[91]
S1N5-OMC (dual doped with S and N ordered mesoporous carbon)Polythiophene (PTh) and polypyrrole (PPy) as the precursors, ordered mesoporous silica (SBA-15) as the hard template, and FeCl3 as the catalyst & 0.1 M KOH, oxygen saturated, 10 mV·s−1, 1600 rpm, (0.1 M KOH + 0.5 M MeOH)Jd = 4.6 mA·cm−2
E1/2 = 0.685 V vs. RHE
(Inactive in MeOH presence)		[92]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Brouzgou, A.; Song, S.; Liang, Z.-X.; Tsiakaras, P. Non-Precious Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction in Alkaline Media: Latest Achievements on Novel Carbon Materials. Catalysts 2016, 6, 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal6100159

AMA Style

Brouzgou A, Song S, Liang Z-X, Tsiakaras P. Non-Precious Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction in Alkaline Media: Latest Achievements on Novel Carbon Materials. Catalysts. 2016; 6(10):159. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal6100159

Chicago/Turabian Style

Brouzgou, Angeliki, Shuqin Song, Zhen-Xing Liang, and Panagiotis Tsiakaras. 2016. "Non-Precious Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction in Alkaline Media: Latest Achievements on Novel Carbon Materials" Catalysts 6, no. 10: 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal6100159

APA Style

Brouzgou, A., Song, S., Liang, Z. -X., & Tsiakaras, P. (2016). Non-Precious Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction in Alkaline Media: Latest Achievements on Novel Carbon Materials. Catalysts, 6(10), 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal6100159

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop