Next Article in Journal
Intermetallic Fe2Mo Nanoparticles on Hierarchical Nanoporous Copper for Efficient Hydrogen Evolution Reaction
Previous Article in Journal
Cu-Doped CeO2 Supported by MXene Nanosheets for Enhanced Electrosynthesis of Urea from Carbon Dioxide and Nitrate
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Unveiling the Role of Copper Valence States in Enhancing the Catalytic Performance of Copper-Modified ZSM-5 for Direct Methane Conversion

School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2025, 15(3), 277; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15030277
Submission received: 20 February 2025 / Revised: 13 March 2025 / Accepted: 14 March 2025 / Published: 16 March 2025

Abstract

:
The conversion of methane (CH4) to methanol (CH3OH) under mild conditions remains a significant challenge in catalysis. In this study, we introduce a method to adjust the surface valence states of copper species in Cu-ZSM-5 catalysts by annealing under different atmospheres (N2, air, and H2). Among these, the 10% Cu-ZSM-5 catalyst calcined in H2 showed outstanding performance, achieving a methanol productivity of 8.08 mmol/(gcat·h) and 91% selectivity at 70 °C and 3 MPa using H2O2 as the oxidant. Comprehensive characterization revealed that H2 annealing optimized the Cu surface to a lower valence state (predominantly Cu+), enhancing CH4 adsorption and promoting H2O2 activation to generate ·OH and ·CH3 radicals, which drive selective CH3OH formation. In situ DRIFTS and radical trapping experiments further confirmed the critical role of Cu+ in facilitating C-H bond cleavage and suppressing overoxidation.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Methane (CH4), a principal constituent of natural gas, emerges as a viable alternative energy source for chemical production. The recent uncovering of substantial shale gas, methane hydrate, and natural gas reserves presents an opportunity to diminish reliance on petroleum, underscoring the strategic importance of CH4 in the energy landscape [1,2,3]. Concurrently, CH4 poses a more potent greenhouse effect than carbon dioxide (CO2), with approximately 30 times the global warming potential in the atmosphere, despite its significantly shorter atmospheric lifetime compared to CO2. Consequently, it is of paramount importance to achieve a 75% reduction in CH4 emissions from fossil fuel sources by 2030 in order to meet the ambitious goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C [4,5].
However, CH4 is a highly symmetrical hydrocarbon characterized by low polarity and a significant dissociation energy of 439.3 kJ/mol [6]. Consequently, its conversion under mild conditions is often referred to as the “Holy Grail” within the realm of chemistry [7]. At present, the transformation of CH4 into other products predominantly occurs under harsh conditions, where it is initially converted into syngas and subsequently into methanol (CH3OH) or other oxygenated compounds. For instance, dry reforming processes typically operate at temperatures above 750 °C, which can then be followed by Fischer–Tropsch synthesis and methanol production pathways [8,9,10]. Thus, achieving the high-value conversion of CH4 to CH3OH and other C1 oxygenates under mild conditions remains a significant challenge that needs to be addressed.
In the natural world, CH4 monooxygenase proteins (MMOs) are capable of activating the highly stable CH4 and converting it into CH3OH, with remarkable 100% selectivity [11,12]. Drawing inspiration from the enzyme’s structure, researchers have opted for zeolite as a substrate to engineer catalysts that mimic the enzyme’s functionality [13,14,15,16]. Upon calcination, ZSM-5 and MOR zeolites exhibit the formation of more robust reaction cores compared to USY, FER, BEA, and analogous zeolites, with ZSM-5 demonstrating superior performance as a substrate over MOR [17]. Noble metals possess exceptional chemical properties that enable them to exhibit remarkable productivity in the synthesis of CH3OH. Cao et al. [18] found that Au/ZSM-5 + XC72R showed excellent activity, generating CH3OH, while Qi et al. [19] obtained Au-ZSM-5 that can achieve high selectivity of oxygenates. While noble metals exhibit exceptional catalytic activity, their high cost renders them economically unfeasible. In recent years, transition metal-based catalysts, particularly those containing copper (Cu), have garnered significant research interest due to their commendable resistance to overoxidation and affordability. However, the activity and selectivity of Cu catalysts have posed challenges to their advancement. Consequently, we propose that enhancing the catalytic performance could be achieved by altering the surface properties of Cu atoms and increasing the utilization rate of Cu. Studies have indicated that catalyst surface modification can redirect the conversion pathway of CH4 and enhance the product selectivity [20]. Pappas et al. [21] presented the Cu-CHA treated in high-temperature oxygen, resulting in forming more CuII active sites to reach a higher yield of product. Pokhrel et al. [22] found that Cu-SSZ-39 exhibited better activity than Cu-SSZ-13 due to the pore structure displaying better steric effects to generate more CH3OH. Burnett et al. [23] found that the copper nanoparticles were deposited on the support structure, leading to the declining of the efficiency of the materials with low Si: Al, while Tang et al. [24] applied modified adsorption methods synthesizing catalysts with atomically dispersion, displaying higher activity characteristics than others [21,25,26,27]. While prior studies emphasized structural confinement and nuclearity effects, the interplay between Cu oxidation states and radical-mediated mechanisms in H2O2-driven systems remains underexplored—a gap that limits rational catalyst design. Notably, conventional synthetic approaches often yield mixed Cu+/Cu2+ populations, obscuring the precise role of low-valent Cu species in stabilizing reactive intermediates or suppressing parasitic overoxidation. Therefore, it is necessary to further study the effect of valence state on the production of free radicals and the effect on the performance of CH4 conversion.
Based on the above, Cu-ZSM-5 catalysts are widely applied to CH4 conversion and exhibit great activity, while the effect of the surface valence of Cu is seldom studied. Herein, to address this knowledge gap, the Cu valence states in ZSM-5 are systematically tailored through controlled annealing under N2, air, and H2 atmospheres. Combining advanced characterization with in situ DRIFTS and radical trapping experiments, we elucidate how Cu+-enriched surfaces enhance CH4 adsorption, promote H2O2 activation to generate ·OH/·CH3 radicals, and steer selectivity toward CH3OH.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Structure and Chemical Properties of Catalysts

As shown in Figure 1, the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of catalysts showed that the inherent structure of H-ZSM-5 remained unchanged after the introduction of Cu, and no diffraction peaks of Cu species were identified, indicating that the Cu had good dispersion and did not change the lattice structure of H-ZSM-5. Though the catalyst was still a well-ordered microstructure, the incorporation of copper reduced the intensity of the main diffraction peaks of the zeolite, which might ascribe to the high absorption coefficient of metallic compounds for X-ray radiation [28,29]. Furthermore, regardless of the calcination atmosphere, the peak intensities generally decreased with increasing copper content, as shown in Figure 1b,c. Notably, even the catalyst with the highest copper loading did not exhibit significant diffraction peaks for Cu, CuO, or Cu2O, indicating that a small amount of copper was uniformly dispersed across the zeolite framework. This uniform dispersion suggests that the copper species were well integrated into the zeolite structure without forming distinct crystalline phases.
The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were shown in Figure 2a–c. The 10% Cu-ZSM-5 comprised all crystals with the size of about 100 nm. A very minute quantity of Cu species loading was observed in the catalysts that were calcinated in air, N2, or H2. There was no significant difference in the morphology of the catalysts [30]. With the purpose of gaining further insight into the distribution of copper crystallites, the catalysts were characterized by the transmission electron microscopy (TEM). It could be seen that, compared with 10% Cu-ZSM-5–air (Figure 2e) and 10% Cu-ZSM-5-N2 (Figure 2f), the copper species on the 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 (Figure 2d) was less agglomerated and more evenly dispersed. Regardless of the calcination atmosphere, the Cu particles remained below 4 nm in size. High-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) images (Figure 2g) and energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) mapping (Figure 2h) confirmed that Cu species were uniformly dispersed on the zeolite surface [31,32,33]. Thus, as shown in Supplementary Table S1, the increases in the Cu contents led to the decreases in the microporosity for the catalysts treated in H2, indicating that the introduced Cu was pinned in the micropores of H-ZSM-5. The shapes of adsorption–desorption isotherm (Supplementary Figure S1) did not change after the copper doping, elucidating that the pore shapes remained the same. This was in accordance with the diffraction peaks and morphology observation of Cu species observed in XRD and SEM, being consistent with other research findings. The initial weight loss in thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) was attributed to the loss of adsorbed water; and even when heated up to 800 °C in an air or nitrogen atmosphere, the catalyst was basically stable and was not subjected to weight loss, as shown in Supplementary Figure S2.
The chemical composition and the various oxidation states of elements on the catalyst surface were analyzed using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). In the O 1s spectra (Supplementary Figure S3a), two distinct peaks at 532.3 eV and 536.9 eV were identified, suggesting the presence of lattice oxygen and adsorbed water molecules [34]. Figure 3a ascertained the presence of Cu+ and Cu2+, while the quantification was performed by analyzing the peak areas of the respective elements in the XPS spectra and converting these into atomic percentages, using the appropriate sensitivity factors provided by the instrument manufacturer. The Cu+ species could be observed at 932.9 eV and 952.6 eV, and the Cu2+ species could be identified by the peaks at 933.8 eV and 953.5 eV, which verified the existence of reduced copper species [35]. The XPS results showed that the capacity of Cu2+ of 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 was lower than that of 10% Cu-ZSM-5-N2 and 10% Cu-ZSM-5–air, while the Cu+ was higher, symbolizing the roasting in the H2 atmosphere giving rise to the contents of Cu+ species [32]. The proportion of low chemical valence of 10% Cu-ZSM-5 under different atmospheres with the order of 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 > 10% Cu-ZSM-5-N2 > 10% Cu-ZSM-5–air, namely the low copper chemical valence ratio of the sample, was the highest after hydrogen atmosphere treatment.
Following this, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) analysis was employed to further clarify the nature of Cu species present. As depicted in Supplementary Figure S4, in contrast to the H-ZSM-5 sample, the 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 sample exhibited two distinct EPR signals, with four sharp signals superimposed on a broader peak. These observations, attributed to the hyperfine interactions resulting from the partial delocalization of electronic and nuclear spins, indicated that the Cu species were localized as isolated entities, likely interacting with the zeolite support surface [36,37].
To delve deeper into the electronic state of Cu ions within the catalyst, diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier-transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) was conducted using CO as a molecular probe. As shown in Figure 3b, the in situ DRIFTS spectra of the CO probe experiment revealed that H-ZSM-5 exhibited negligible peaks in the 2200–2100 cm−1 range. In contrast, the 10% Cu-ZSM-5 catalysts displayed a pronounced vibrational band at 2157 cm−1 post-CO adsorption, which is indicative of the vibrational peak of Cu+ (CO) species. For the catalysts treated in N2 and air, a shoulder peak around 2140 cm−1 was observed in conjunction with the principal peak at 2157 cm−1, which is attributed to CO adsorbed on (Cu+-CO-Cu+) sites, also reflecting the response signal of [Cu]+ ions [38].
The temperature-programmed desorption of CH4 (CH4-TPD) test was carried out to deeply analyze the adsorption activation process before CH4 combustion. As can seen in Supplementary Figure S5, the CH4 desorption peak intensity of the Cu-loaded H-ZSM-5 was stronger than that of pure H-ZSM-5. In addition, 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 exhibited the strongest peak signal and the lowest desorption temperature, conveying the optimal CH4 adsorption ability.

2.2. Catalytic Activity and Selectivity for CH4 Conversion

The direct oxidation of CH4 reaction was conducted in a batch reactor by using H2O2 as the oxidant. The effects of the electronic state caused by calcination atmosphere and the Cu content of the H-ZSM-5 on CH3OH production are shown in Figure 4. From Figure 4a, the yield of 0.57 mmol/(gcat·h) of CH3OH was calculated over H-ZSM-5 upon 60 °C with 3 MPa of CH4 and 0.5 M H2O2. The Cu addition significantly facilitated the oxygenates’ production.
Notably, the 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 showed optimal CH4 conversion performance compared with 10% Cu-ZSM-5–air and 10% Cu-ZSM-5-N2 (Figure 4a), presenting the maximum CH3OH yield of 6.85 mmol/(gcat·h) with a selectivity of 91% within 1 h. Concurrently, the catalyst’s performance under various reaction conditions was evaluated. As the reaction temperature increased, the relationship between CH3OH productivity and reaction time exhibited a volcano-shaped curve. For instance, the 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 exhibited the best performance of 8.08 mmol/(gcat·h) CH3OH and 0.59 mmol/(gcat·h) CH3OOH at 70 °C (Figure 4b) at the same time that other catalysts inversely showed lower productivity and selectivity. The yield of CO2 increased evidently when the temperature came to 80 °C and 90 °C, which revealed the overoxidation trend as the temperature rose. Therefore, in the subsequent experiments, the reaction temperature was set to 70 °C on the basis of other experimental conditions being unchanged.
For the cycling test, the productivity and selectivity to CH3OH of 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 showed minimal decline after four cycles, as depicted in Figure 5a, suggesting the astonishing stability of 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2. Whereafter, the experiment presented that the yield of CH3OH increased with the rising H2O2 concentration, when carried out at a gradually increasing H2O2 concentration (Figure 5b). It might be ascribed to the increase in the concentration of H2O2 as the concentration of ·OH increased. Furthermore, the direct oxidation of CH4 over 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 was conducted under different pressures (Figure 5c), stirring speeds (Figure 5d), and reaction times (Figure 5e). These results revealed that the productivity of CH3OH could be enhanced gradually with the increase in pressure, and increasing the stirring rate within a certain range helped to increase the yield.
As observed in Figure 5e, the production of CH3OH initially increased with time but subsequently declined, while the generation of CO2 showed a steady increase. This trend may be attributed to the formation of by-products and overoxidation due to the excess oxidant present in the solution during the reaction. After a 10 h reaction period, the production of CH3OH remained relatively high, possibly because CH3OH formation was favored in this system, and the reduction in oxidation potential prevented further oxidation of CH3OH in the aqueous solution. The overall decline in the productivity of CH3OOH can be attributed to its inherent instability. Figure 5f compares the methane conversion performances using different oxidants, highlighting that the 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 catalyst demonstrated significantly higher productivity and selectivity for CH3OH compared to other studies reported previously.
Assessing the H2O2 consumption efficiency in the direct oxidation of CH4 is crucial. The quantity of H2O2 consumed during the reaction was determined using visible spectroscopy, employing the conventional titanium potassium oxalate method. The gain factor, a metric commonly utilized to evaluate and compare catalyst utilization, is defined as follows [39,40]:
Gain   factor = C 1   products   ( mmol ) H 2 O 2   consumption   ( mmol )
Figure 5. Productivity and selectivity of CH4 oxidation on (a) 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 with different reaction cycles, (b) with different H2O2 concentrations, (c) with different pressures, (d) with different stirring speeds, and (e) with different reaction times. Reaction conditions: 25 mg catalysts dispersed in 20 mL of 0.5 M H2O2 aqueous solution, 3 MPa CH4 at 70 °C for 1 h. (f) Productivity to CH3OH versus CH3OH selectivity by catalyst type and oxidant [2,19,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. Data are derived from the publications listed in Supplementary Table S3. Annotated data points from refs. [2,19,41,42,43,44,45,46,47].
Figure 5. Productivity and selectivity of CH4 oxidation on (a) 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 with different reaction cycles, (b) with different H2O2 concentrations, (c) with different pressures, (d) with different stirring speeds, and (e) with different reaction times. Reaction conditions: 25 mg catalysts dispersed in 20 mL of 0.5 M H2O2 aqueous solution, 3 MPa CH4 at 70 °C for 1 h. (f) Productivity to CH3OH versus CH3OH selectivity by catalyst type and oxidant [2,19,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. Data are derived from the publications listed in Supplementary Table S3. Annotated data points from refs. [2,19,41,42,43,44,45,46,47].
Catalysts 15 00277 g005
As illustrated in Supplementary Figure S6, the pristine H-ZSM-5 exhibited the lowest gain factor among the catalysts. Although the catalyst calcined in air demonstrated the highest gain factor, its productivity was significantly lower compared to the 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 catalyst. The 10% Cu-ZSM-5 catalyst showed good activity, yet its gain factor was lower than that of H-ZSM-5. This could be attributed to the inability of copper species to form stable chemical bonds with the zeolite in the absence of calcination, leading to the detachment of copper species and promoting the decomposition of H2O2 rather than the desired reaction.
Copper-loading zeolite is a research hotspot for the high yield coefficient of C1 oxygenates and high selectivity of CH3OH. Woertink et al. [48] proposed that the bent mono-(μ-oxo)dicupric core in Cu-ZSM-5 is the active site to break the C-H chemical bond. Vaneldere et al. [49] found that there are two distinct [Cu-O-Cu]2+ sites in the Cu-MOR. And Grundner et al. [50] found that the trinuclear copper-oxo clusters plays a key role to break the carbon–hydrogen bonds in CH4. Taking into account the influence of the electronic state and copper loading, catalysts were evaluated under the impregnation of three distinct gases with varying copper percentages. To ascertain the pivotal role of copper in the reaction, a series of catalysts with a gradient of copper masses were synthesized, and their performance was assessed (Supplementary Figures S7–S9). The results indicated that catalysts with a higher proportion of Cu+ ions could more effectively utilize even small amounts of copper, as evidenced by the volcano-type curve observed for the 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 catalyst’s activity in relation to copper loading. In contrast, the activities of other catalysts generally exhibited a monotonic increase, highlighting the enhancement in catalyst productivity with optimal copper loading.

2.3. Mechanism Investigate

The EPR of aqueous solution was performed after the reaction. Firstly, as shown in Figure 6a, the spectrum of H-ZSM-5 rarely showed identical signal intensity of hydroxyl radical (·OH) or methyl radical (·CH3), but the Cu-impregnated ZSM-5 exhibited evident signal intensity and is matched with the ·OH and ·CH3 [51]. This discovery demonstrates that introducing copper greatly improves H2O2 activation, producing ·OH radicals that break the C-H bond, forming ·CH3 [52] Notably, the untreated Cu-ZSM-5 displayed a more intense ·OH radical signal compared to those calcined in the three different atmospheres. However, this was accompanied by a decrease in CH3OH yield, suggesting that an excess of ·OH radicals can lead to overoxidation of CH3OH [36]. Subsequently, the aqueous solution post-reaction from the 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 catalyst at various time intervals was analyzed. As depicted in Figure 6b, the peak intensities of the ·OH and ·CH3 radicals diminished over time. The sample collected after a 0.5 h reaction exhibited the most pronounced peaks for these free radicals. The attenuation in peak intensity was attributed to overoxidation processes that consumed both ·OH and ·CH3 radicals to produce other products. Aligning with the productivity tests of the 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 catalyst over time, the yield of C1 products decreased as the reaction duration increased. The ·OH radicals generated from H2O2 were likely involved in the oxidation of CH3OH and, potentially, other undetected products. The generation of ·OH and ·CH3 radicals can be summarized as follows [52]:
H2O2 → ·OOH + *H
H2O2 → ·OH + *OH
CH4 + ·OH → ·CH3 + H2O
·CH3 + ·OH→CH3OH
·CH3 + ·OOH→CH3OOH
Copper-loading zeolite is a research hotspot for the high yield coefficient of C1 oxygenates and high selectivity of CH3OH. Woertink et al. [48] proposed that the bent mono-(μ-oxo)dicupric core in Cu-ZSM-5 is the active site to break the C-H chemical bond. Vaneldere et al. [49] found that there are two distinct [Cu-O-Cu]2+ sites in the Cu-MOR. And Grundner et al. [50] found that the trinuclear copper–oxo clusters plays a key role to break the carbon–hydrogen bonds in CH4. Taking into account the influence of the electronic state and copper loading, catalysts were evaluated under the impregnation of three distinct gases with varying copper percentages. To ascertain the pivotal role of copper in the reaction, a series of catalysts with a gradient of copper masses were synthesized, and their performance was assessed (Supplementary Figures S7–S9). The results indicated that catalysts with a higher proportion of Cu+ ions could more effectively utilize even small amounts of copper, as evidenced by the volcano-type curve observed for the 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 catalyst’s activity in relation to copper loading. In contrast, the activities of other catalysts generally exhibited a monotonic increase, highlighting the enhancement in catalyst productivity with optimal copper loading.
Additionally, in situ DRIFTS was employed to examine the surface species on the 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 catalyst following exposure to CH4, H2O2, and H2O at 70 °C. This analysis aimed to elucidate the mechanism of free radical oxidation of methane under mild conditions. As depicted in Figure 6c, the distinctive peaks for CH4 were observed at 1304 cm−1 and 1343 cm−1. Peaks at 1415 cm−1 and 1374 cm−1 were attributed to the *CH3 species, and the peaks at 1463 cm−1 correspond to the scissoring vibration of *CH3. These observations provided insights into the intermediate species formed during the catalytic oxidation process [13,42,53]. Despite the influence of H2O2 solution introduction via bubbling, the reaction’s inherent production of H2O resulted in a more pronounced peak compared to the system devoid of H2O2. This indicated that the water generated during the reaction contributed significantly to the observed spectral intensity. The surface species on the 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 catalyst were analyzed over time, as illustrated in Figure 6d. The accumulation of *CH3 peaks with time, concurrent with the decline in CH4 peaks, suggested the progressive decomposition of CH4. This observation aligned with the intermediate formation and subsequent conversion processes occurring on the catalyst surface during the oxidation of CH4.
Building on the preceding discussion, the direct oxidation mechanism of methane was delineated in Figure 7. The C-H bond cleavage was proposed to be homolytic, as evidenced by the detection of the ·CH3 radical in the EPR spectrum [40]. Based on the catalyst characterization and reactivity test outcomes, the oxidation pathway of CH4 over Cu-ZSM-5 was hypothesized, as depicted in Figure 7. H2O2 generated two types of free radicals, ·OOH and ·OH. In the presence of H-ZSM-5 in the heterogeneous catalytic system, H2O2 preferentially produced ·OOH over ·OH, leading to the combination of ·OOH with the ·CH3 radical derived from CH4 to form CH3OOH, which was produced in higher yields compared to CH3OH. Under identical reaction conditions, the incorporation of copper into the catalyst markedly enhanced the yield of CH3OH and relatively diminished that of CH3OOH. This suggested that copper had the capacity to facilitate the transition of H2O2 toward ·OH formation within this heterogeneous catalytic system.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials and Reagents

Copper nitrate trihydrate (Cu(NO3)2·3H2O, ≥99%) was purchased from Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). H-ZSM-5 was bought from Nankai University Catalyst Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). The gas used in the reaction was obtained from Messer Industrial Gas, and 30 wt% H2O2 was purchased from Guangzhou Chemical Reagent Factory (Guangzhou, China). All the materials and reagents were used directly, without purification.

3.2. Catalysts Preparation

A series of Cu-ZSM-5 catalysts with varied Cu loading from 5 to 30 wt% were synthesized by a wetness impregnation method [42]. Typically, 4.0 g of H-ZSM-5 dispersed in 100 mL of deionized water and a known amount of Cu(NO3)2·3H2O were mixed in a flat-bottom beaker at room temperature with vigorous agitation. After a 12 h standing period, the resultant sample was subjected to centrifugation, followed by overnight drying in an oven at 100 °C. These samples were designated as x% Cu-ZSM-5, where x corresponded to 5, 10, 15, and 30. Then, the samples were calcined at 300 °C for 1 h in a tubular furnace under air, nitrogen, and hydrogen, respectively, with a ramp rate of 5 °C/min. The catalysts used were denoted as x% Cu-ZSM-5-Y, where Y represented air, N2, and H2.

3.3. Characterizations

XRD was conducted through an Empyrean from Malvern Panalytical to identify the structural and crystal size information. The measurement was scanned from 5° to 60°, with a scan rate of 0.1°/s. The morphology of the catalysts was obtained with SEM, which was achieved on a Merlin from Zeiss. TEM images and the corresponding elemental mapping EDX images were recorded by Talos F200x from Thermo Fisher (Waltham, MA, USA) at an acceleration voltage of 200 KV. The specific surface area, pore size distribution, and total pore volume of the catalysts were measured by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) and Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) methods on ASAP 2460, using the desorption branches of N2 isotherm at −196 °C. The liquid products were quantitatively analyzed by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR, BRUKER AscendTM 400). TGA was used on a TGA 8000 from PerkinElmer (Waltham, MA, USA) to evaluate the thermal stability of samples. The oxidation states of the surface elements were analyzed through XPS on a ESCALAB Xi+ with C 1s of 284.8 eV as calibration. EPR spectra were obtained on Bruker E500 to detect the valence state of the transition metal, Cu, in the samples.
CH4 adsorption capacity of the catalysts was determined by CH4-TPD on a Micromeritics AutoChem II 2920 device with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD). In a typical procedure, 50 mg of sample was placed in the reaction tube. Before analysis, the sample was pretreated at 300 °C under a helium (He) steam (50 mL/min) for 1 h to remove the adsorbed gases and surface moisture. After that, the sample cooled down to 50 °C. The 10 vol % CH4/He gas mixture was introduced for the catalyst sample for 1 h until saturation. Then, the gas was switched to He flow (50 mL/min) for 1 h to remove the weak physical absorption of CH4 on the surface. Finally, the desorption temperature was raised from 50 to 800 °C under a He atmosphere at a heating rate of 10 °C/min, and the desorption gas signals were monitored by TCD.
In situ DRIFTS experiments were measured on a Nicolet iS50 spectrometer using a mercury cadmium telluride (MCT) detector by averaging 64 sequentially collected scans at a resolution of 4 cm−1. In the CO-DRIFTS sample chamber, the sample to be tested was pretreated with Ar (50 mL/min) at 250 °C for 30 min and then cooled down to 50 °C. After that, 1% CO/He (50 mL/min) was introduced and adsorbed to the saturated coverage, and then the gas phase CO was purged with Ar (50 mL/min). The infrared spectrum curve was collected to analyze the species of Cu. For CH4-DRIFTS, 1% CH4/He was introduced and adsorbed.

3.4. Evaluation of Catalytic Performance

In a standard experimental procedure, the direct oxidation of CH4 was conducted within a 100 mL Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave reactor. Typically, 25 mg of catalyst and 20 mL of a 0.5 M H2O2 aqueous solution were introduced into the reactor, followed by purging with methane to remove any residual air within the autoclave. The reactor was then pressurized to 3 MPa. Subsequently, the system was heated to the desired reaction temperature, ranging from 30 to 90 °C, for a duration of 30 min to 10 h, while maintaining a stirring speed of 800 rpm to ensure homogeneous mixing and efficient catalytic activity.
After the reaction ended, the reactor was rapidly cooled down by ice bags to ensure the products without using vaporization. Then, the gaseous product was detected by a gas chromatograph (GC, Fuli Instrument GC9720Plus) equipped with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD) and a flame ionization detector (FID). The liquid-phase oxygenates were collected via centrifugation and analyzed using GC-FID and 1H NMR. Specifically, FID was employed to detect CH3OH, while 1H NMR was used for the quantitative analysis of CH3OOH.
The yields of products and the oxygenates’ selectivity were calculated using Equations (1) and (2):
Productivity   ( mmol · / ( g cat · h ) ) = Products   ( mmol ) Catalysts   ( g ) · Reaction   time   ( h )
Selectivity   of   CH 3 OH   ( % ) = CH 3 OH   ( mmol ) Total   products   ( mmol ) × 100

4. Conclusions

In this study, it was demonstrated that precise control of Cu valence states in Cu-ZSM-5 catalysts via annealing under varied atmospheres (H2, N2, and air) profoundly influenced methane oxidation pathways under mild conditions. The H2-annealed 10% Cu-ZSM-5 catalyst, with optimized Cu+/Cu2+ ratios, achieved exceptional methanol productivity of 8.08 mmol/(gcat·h) and 91% selectivity at 70 °C and 3 MPa, using H2O2 as an oxidant. Comprehensive characterization (XPS, EPR, and CH4-TPD) revealed that Cu+ species enhanced CH4 adsorption and facilitated H2O2 activation to generate ·OH and ·CH3 radicals, which synergistically drove selective C-H bond cleavage while suppressing overoxidation. In situ DRIFTS and radical trapping experiments further corroborated the pivotal role of Cu+ in stabilizing methyl intermediates and steering the reaction toward methanol formation. This work not only establishes a robust valence engineering strategy for designing efficient zeolite-based catalysts but also provides mechanistic insights into radical-mediated methane activation.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/catal15030277/s1, Figure S1: Adsorption isotherm of catalyst treated in H2 atmosphere. Figure S2: TG tested in air or N2 of 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2. Figure S3: XPS spectrum of 10% Cu-ZSM-5-Y. (a) C 1s and (b) O 1s. Figure S4: EPR of 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2. Figure S5: CH4-TPD of pure H-ZSM-5 and 10% Cu-ZSM-5-Y. Figure S6: Gain factor for pure H-ZSM-5, 10% Cu-ZSM-5, and 10% Cu-ZSM-5-Y. Figure S7: Catalytic performances of H-ZSM-5-H2 and x% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 samples for direct methane oxidation. Figure S8: Catalytic performances of H-ZSM-5-N2 and x% Cu-ZSM-5-N2 samples for direct methane oxidation. Figure S9: Catalytic performances of H-ZSM-5–air and x% Cu-ZSM-5–air samples for direct methane oxidation. Figure S10: Typical 1H NMR spectrums of liquid mixtures over 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2. Table S1: BET results of catalyst treated in H2 atmosphere. Table S2: A brief comparison of CH4 conversion using zeolites [2,19,41,42,43,44,45,46,47].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.Y. (Chen Yang); methodology, Y.P. and H.Z.; software, Y.P. and Y.L.; validation, Y.P. and Y.L.; formal analysis, C.Y. (Chuan Yu) and Y.L.; investigation, C.Y. (Chuan Yu), Y.P. and X.S.; resource Y.P., C.Y. (Chen Yang) and M.F.; data curation, H.Z. and C.Y. (Chuan Yu); writing—original draft preparation, Y.P. and Y.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.P. and X.S.; supervision, C.Y. (Chen Yang) and M.F.; project administration, H.Z.; funding acquisition, M.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51878293 and 22476054).

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request from the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Song, H.; Meng, X.; Wang, Z.; Liu, H.; Ye, J. Solar-Energy-Mediated Methane Conversion. Joule 2019, 3, 1606–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, M.; Shan, J.; Giannakakis, G.; Ouyang, M.; Cao, S.; Lee, S.; Allard, L.F.; Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M. Single-Step Selective Oxidation of Methane to Methanol in the Aqueous Phase on Iridium-Based Catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2021, 292, 120124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mehmood, A.; Chae, S.Y.; Park, E.D. Low-Temperature Electrochemical Oxidation of Methane into Alcohols. Catalysts 2024, 14, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yvon-Durocher, G.; Allen, A.P.; Bastviken, D.; Conrad, R.; Gudasz, C.; St-Pierre, A.; Thanh-Duc, N.; Del Giorgio, P.A. Methane Fluxes Show Consistent Temperature Dependence across Microbial to Ecosystem Scales. Nature 2014, 507, 488–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Feng, X.; Jiang, L.; Li, D.; Tian, S.; Zhu, X.; Wang, H.; He, C.; Li, K. Progress and Key Challenges in Catalytic Combustion of Lean Methane. J. Energy Chem. 2022, 75, 173–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kang, J.; Park, E.D. Liquid-Phase Selective Oxidation of Methane to Methane Oxygenates. Catalysts 2024, 14, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Meng, X.; Cui, X.; Rajan, N.P.; Yu, L.; Deng, D.; Bao, X. Direct Methane Conversion under Mild Condition by Thermo-, Electro-, or Photocatalysis. Chem 2019, 5, 2296–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. He, D.; Wu, S.; Cao, X.; Chen, D.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, Y. Dynamic Trap of Ni at Elevated Temperature for Yielding High-Efficiency Methane Dry Reforming Catalyst. Appl. Catal. B Environ. Energy 2024, 346, 123728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Palmer, C.; Upham, D.C.; Smart, S.; Gordon, M.J.; Metiu, H.; McFarland, E.W. Dry Reforming of Methane Catalysed by Molten Metal Alloys. Nat. Catal. 2020, 3, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kang, J.; Park, E.D. Selective Oxidation of Methane over Fe-Zeolites by In Situ Generated H2O2. Catalysts 2020, 10, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Colby, J.; Stirling, D.I.; Dalton, H. The Soluble Methane Mono-Oxygenase of Methylococcus Capsulatus (Bath). Its ability to oxygenate n-alkanes, n-alkenes, ethers, and alicyclic, aromatic and heterocyclic compounds. Biochem. J. 1977, 165, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ross, M.O.; MacMillan, F.; Wang, J.; Nisthal, A.; Lawton, T.J.; Olafson, B.D.; Mayo, S.L.; Rosenzweig, A.C.; Hoffman, B.M. Particulate Methane Monooxygenase Contains Only Mononuclear Copper Centers. Science 2019, 364, 566–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yu, X.; Wu, B.; Huang, M.; Lu, Z.; Li, J.; Zhong, L.; Sun, Y. IrFe/ZSM-5 Synergistic Catalyst for Selective Oxidation of Methane to Formic Acid. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 4418–4427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Knorpp, A.J.; Newton, M.A.; Sushkevich, V.L.; Zimmermann, P.P.; Pinar, A.B.; Van Bokhoven, J.A. The Influence of Zeolite Morphology on the Conversion of Methane to Methanol on Copper-Exchanged Omega Zeolite (MAZ). Catal. Sci. Technol. 2019, 9, 2806–2811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Göltl, F.; Michel, C.; Andrikopoulos, P.C.; Love, A.M.; Hafner, J.; Hermans, I.; Sautet, P. Computationally Exploring Confinement Effects in the Methane-to-Methanol Conversion Over Iron-Oxo Centers in Zeolites. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 8404–8409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kim, M.S.; Yang, G.S.; Park, E.D. Effects of Cu Species on Liquid-Phase Partial Oxidation of Methane with H2O2 over Cu-Fe/ZSM-5 Catalysts. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Smeets, P.J.; Groothaert, M.H.; Schoonheydt, R.A. Cu Based Zeolites: A UV–Vis Study of the Active Site in the Selective Methane Oxidation at Low Temperatures. Catal. Today 2005, 110, 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cao, J.; Lewis, R.J.; Qi, G.; Bethell, D.; Howard, M.J.; Harrison, B.; Yao, B.; He, Q.; Morgan, D.J.; Ni, F.; et al. Methane Conversion to Methanol Using Au/ZSM-5 Is Promoted by Carbon. ACS Catal. 2023, 13, 7199–7209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Qi, G.; Davies, T.E.; Nasrallah, A.; Sainna, M.A.; Howe, A.G.R.; Lewis, R.J.; Quesne, M.; Catlow, C.R.A.; Willock, D.J.; He, Q.; et al. Au-ZSM-5 Catalyses the Selective Oxidation of CH4 to CH3OH and CH3COOH Using O2. Nat. Catal. 2022, 5, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sheppard, T.; Daly, H.; Goguet, A.; Thompson, J.M. Improved Efficiency for Partial Oxidation of Methane by Controlled Copper Deposition on Surface-Modified ZSM-5. ChemCatChem 2016, 8, 562–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pappas, D.K.; Borfecchia, E.; Dyballa, M.; Pankin, I.A.; Lomachenko, K.A.; Martini, A.; Signorile, M.; Teketel, S.; Arstad, B.; Berlier, G.; et al. Methane to Methanol: Structure–Activity Relationships for Cu-CHA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 14961–14975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Pokhrel, J.; Shantz, D.F. Continuous Partial Oxidation of Methane to Methanol over Cu-SSZ-39 Catalysts. J. Catal. 2023, 421, 300–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Burnett, L.; Rysakova, M.; Wang, K.; González-Carballo, J.; Tooze, R.P.; García-García, F.R. Isothermal Cyclic Conversion of Methane to Methanol Using Copper-Exchanged ZSM-5 Zeolite Materials under Mild Conditions. Appl. Catal. Gen. 2019, 587, 117272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tang, X.; Wang, L.; Yang, B.; Fei, C.; Yao, T.; Liu, W.; Lou, Y.; Dai, Q.; Cai, Y.; Cao, X.-M.; et al. Direct Oxidation of Methane to Oxygenates on Supported Single Cu Atom Catalyst. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2021, 285, 119827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hammond, C.; Forde, M.M.; Ab Rahim, M.H.; Thetford, A.; He, Q.; Jenkins, R.L.; Dimitratos, N.; Lopez-Sanchez, J.A.; Dummer, N.F.; Murphy, D.M.; et al. Direct Catalytic Conversion of Methane to Methanol in an Aqueous Medium by Using Copper-Promoted Fe-ZSM-5. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 5129–5133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Engedahl, U.; Boje, A.; Ström, H.; Grönbeck, H.; Hellman, A. Investigating the Composition of the Metal Dimer Site in Chabazite for Direct Methane-to-Methanol Conversion. J. Phys. Chem. C 2024, 128, 3641–3651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Narsimhan, K.; Iyoki, K.; Dinh, K.; Román-Leshkov, Y. Catalytic Oxidation of Methane into Methanol over Copper-Exchanged Zeolites with Oxygen at Low Temperature. ACS Cent. Sci. 2016, 2, 424–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yu, T.; Li, Z.; Lin, L.; Chu, S.; Su, Y.; Song, W.; Wang, A.; Weckhuysen, B.M.; Luo, W. Highly Selective Oxidation of Methane into Methanol over Cu-Promoted Monomeric Fe/ZSM-5. ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 6684–6691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dou, B.; Lv, G.; Wang, C.; Hao, Q.; Hui, K. Cerium Doped Copper/ZSM-5 Catalysts Used for the Selective Catalytic Reduction of Nitrogen Oxide with Ammonia. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 270, 549–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, W.; Wang, B.; Yang, J.; Rui, P.; Fan, N.; Liao, W.; Shu, X. Zeolite Fe-MFI as Catalysts in the Selective Liquid-Phase Dehydration of 1-Phenylethanol. Catal. Commun. 2018, 110, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, Y.; Deng, J.; Song, W.; Liu, J.; Zhao, Z.; Gao, M.; Wei, Y.; Zhao, L. Nature of Cu Species in Cu–SAPO-18 Catalyst for NH3–SCR: Combination of Experiments and DFT Calculations. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 14669–14680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pang, L.; Fan, C.; Shao, L.; Song, K.; Yi, J.; Cai, X.; Wang, J.; Kang, M.; Li, T. The Ce Doping Cu/ZSM-5 as a New Superior Catalyst to Remove NO from Diesel Engine Exhaust. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 253, 394–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Romero-Sáez, M.; Divakar, D.; Aranzabal, A.; González-Velasco, J.R.; González-Marcos, J.A. Catalytic Oxidation of Trichloroethylene over Fe-ZSM-5: Influence of the Preparation Method on the Iron Species and the Catalytic Behavior. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 180, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tagliavini, M.; Weidler, P.G.; Njel, C.; Pohl, J.; Richter, D.; Böhringer, B.; Schäfer, A.I. Polymer-Based Spherical Activated Carbon—Ultrafiltration (UF-PBSAC) for the Adsorption of Steroid Hormones from Water: Material Characteristics and Process Configuration. Water Res. 2020, 185, 116249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, H.; Cheng, R.; Liu, Z.; Du, C. Waste Control by Waste: Fenton–like Oxidation of Phenol over Cu Modified ZSM–5 from Coal Gangue. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 683, 638–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yu, B.; Cheng, L.; Dai, S.; Jiang, Y.; Yang, B.; Li, H.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Pan, C.; et al. Silver and Copper Dual Single Atoms Boosting Direct Oxidation of Methane to Methanol via Synergistic Catalysis. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, 2302143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Punnoose, A.; Seehra, M.S.; Dunn, B.C.; Eyring, E.M. Characterization of CuCl2/PdCl2/Activated Carbon Catalysts for the Synthesis of Diethyl Carbonate. Energy Fuels 2002, 16, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, L.; Li, W.; Qi, G.; Weng, D. Location and Nature of Cu Species in Cu/SAPO-34 for Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO with NH3. J. Catal. 2012, 289, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Agarwal, N.; Freakley, S.J.; McVicker, R.U.; Althahban, S.M.; Dimitratos, N.; He, Q.; Morgan, D.J.; Jenkins, R.L.; Willock, D.J.; Taylor, S.H.; et al. Aqueous Au-Pd Colloids Catalyze Selective CH4 Oxidation to CH3 OH with O2 under Mild Conditions. Science 2017, 358, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xie, P.; Ding, J.; Yao, Z.; Pu, T.; Zhang, P.; Huang, Z.; Wang, C.; Zhang, J.; Zecher-Freeman, N.; Zong, H.; et al. Oxo Dicopper Anchored on Carbon Nitride for Selective Oxidation of Methane. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Armstrong, R.D.; Peneau, V.; Ritterskamp, N.; Kiely, C.J.; Taylor, S.H.; Hutchings, G.J. The Role of Copper Speciation in the Low Temperature Oxidative Upgrading of Short Chain Alkanes over Cu/ZSM-5 Catalysts. ChemPhysChem 2018, 19, 469–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Yu, T.; Li, Z.; Jones, W.; Liu, Y.; He, Q.; Song, W.; Du, P.; Yang, B.; An, H.; Farmer, D.M.; et al. Identifying Key Mononuclear Fe Species for Low-Temperature Methane Oxidation. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 3152–3160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Jin, Z.; Wang, L.; Zuidema, E.; Mondal, K.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, J.; Wang, C.; Meng, X.; Yang, H.; Mesters, C.; et al. Hydrophobic Zeolite Modification for in Situ Peroxide Formation in Methane Oxidation to Methanol. Science 2020, 367, 193–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shan, J.; Li, M.; Allard, L.F.; Lee, S.; Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M. Mild Oxidation of Methane to Methanol or Acetic Acid on Supported Isolated Rhodium Catalysts. Nature 2017, 551, 605–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fang, Z.; Murayama, H.; Zhao, Q.; Liu, B.; Jiang, F.; Xu, Y.; Tokunaga, M.; Liu, X. Selective Mild Oxidation of Methane to Methanol or Formic Acid on Fe–MOR Catalysts. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2019, 9, 6946–6956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Huang, W.; Zhang, S.; Tang, Y.; Li, Y.; Nguyen, L.; Li, Y.; Shan, J.; Xiao, D.; Gagne, R.; Frenkel, A.I. Low-Temperature Transformation of Methane to Methanol on Pd1O4 Single Sites Anchored on the Internal Surface of Microporous Silicate. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 13441–13445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sogukkanli, S.; Moteki, T.; Ogura, M. Selective Methanol Formation via CO-Assisted Direct Partial Oxidation of Methane over Copper-Containing CHA-Type Zeolites Prepared by One-Pot Synthesis. Green Chem. 2021, 23, 2148–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Woertink, J.S.; Smeets, P.J.; Groothaert, M.H.; Vance, M.A.; Sels, B.F.; Schoonheydt, R.A.; Solomon, E.I. A [Cu2O]2+ Core in Cu-ZSM-5, the Active Site in the Oxidation of Methane to Methanol. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 18908–18913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Vanelderen, P.; Snyder, B.E.R.; Tsai, M.-L.; Hadt, R.G.; Vancauwenbergh, J.; Coussens, O.; Schoonheydt, R.A.; Sels, B.F.; Solomon, E.I. Spectroscopic Definition of the Copper Active Sites in Mordenite: Selective Methane Oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6383–6392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Grundner, S.; Markovits, M.A.C.; Li, G.; Tromp, M.; Pidko, E.A.; Hensen, E.J.M.; Jentys, A.; Sanchez-Sanchez, M.; Lercher, J.A. Single-Site Trinuclear Copper Oxygen Clusters in Mordenite for Selective Conversion of Methane to Methanol. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, L.; Duan, J.; Du, P.; Sun, W.; Lai, B.; Liu, W. Accurate Identification of Radicals by In-Situ Electron Paramagnetic Resonance in Ultraviolet-Based Homogenous Advanced Oxidation Processes. Water Res. 2022, 221, 118747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Li, W.; Li, Z.; Zhang, H.; Liu, P.; Xie, Z.; Song, W.; Liu, B.; Zhao, Z. Efficient Catalysts of Surface Hydrophobic Cu-BTC with Coordinatively Unsaturated Cu(I) Sites for the Direct Oxidation of Methane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2206619120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Bai, S.; Yao, Q.; Xu, Y.; Cao, K.; Huang, X. Strong Synergy in a Lichen-like RuCu Nanosheet Boosts the Direct Methane Oxidation to Methanol. Nano Energy 2020, 71, 104566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD patterns of (a) H-ZSM-5, 10% Cu-ZSM-5, and 10% Cu-ZSM-5-Y (Y = air, N2, and H2); and x% Cu-ZSM-5 calcinated in (b) air, (c) H2, and (d) N2.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of (a) H-ZSM-5, 10% Cu-ZSM-5, and 10% Cu-ZSM-5-Y (Y = air, N2, and H2); and x% Cu-ZSM-5 calcinated in (b) air, (c) H2, and (d) N2.
Catalysts 15 00277 g001
Figure 2. SEM and TEM of (a,d) 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2, (b,e) 10% Cu-ZSM-5-N2, and (c,f) 10% Cu-ZSM-5–air. (gk) HAADF and EDX mapping images of 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2.
Figure 2. SEM and TEM of (a,d) 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2, (b,e) 10% Cu-ZSM-5-N2, and (c,f) 10% Cu-ZSM-5–air. (gk) HAADF and EDX mapping images of 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2.
Catalysts 15 00277 g002
Figure 3. (a) XPS spectrum of Cu 2p of 10% Cu-ZSM-5-Y (Y = air, N2, and H2); (b) CO-DRIFTS of pure H-ZSM-5 and 10% Cu-ZSM-5-Y (Y represents air, N2, and H2).
Figure 3. (a) XPS spectrum of Cu 2p of 10% Cu-ZSM-5-Y (Y = air, N2, and H2); (b) CO-DRIFTS of pure H-ZSM-5 and 10% Cu-ZSM-5-Y (Y represents air, N2, and H2).
Catalysts 15 00277 g003
Figure 4. Productivity and selectivity of CH4 oxidation (a) on H-ZSM-5, 10% Cu-ZSM-5, and 10% Cu-ZSM-5-Y (Y represents air, N2, and H2) at 60 °C; and (b) on 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 at 30–90 °C. Reaction conditions: 25 mg catalysts dispersed in 20 mL of 0.5 M H2O2 aqueous solution, 3 MPa CH4 for 1 h.
Figure 4. Productivity and selectivity of CH4 oxidation (a) on H-ZSM-5, 10% Cu-ZSM-5, and 10% Cu-ZSM-5-Y (Y represents air, N2, and H2) at 60 °C; and (b) on 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 at 30–90 °C. Reaction conditions: 25 mg catalysts dispersed in 20 mL of 0.5 M H2O2 aqueous solution, 3 MPa CH4 for 1 h.
Catalysts 15 00277 g004
Figure 6. (a) EPR spectrum of hydroxyl radicals trapped by DMPO of pure H-ZSM-5, 10% Cu-ZSM-5, and 10%Cu-ZSM-5-Y (Y represents air, N2, and H2). (b) EPR spectrum of hydroxyl radicals trapped by DMPO of 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 reacted for 0.5, 1, 3, and 10 h and a background value. (c) In situ FT-IR spectra of 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 catalyst after exposure to CH4 + H2O2 and CH4 + H2O for 30 min. (d) Time-resolved in situ FT-IR spectra of 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 catalyst after exposure to CH4 +H2O2.
Figure 6. (a) EPR spectrum of hydroxyl radicals trapped by DMPO of pure H-ZSM-5, 10% Cu-ZSM-5, and 10%Cu-ZSM-5-Y (Y represents air, N2, and H2). (b) EPR spectrum of hydroxyl radicals trapped by DMPO of 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 reacted for 0.5, 1, 3, and 10 h and a background value. (c) In situ FT-IR spectra of 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 catalyst after exposure to CH4 + H2O2 and CH4 + H2O for 30 min. (d) Time-resolved in situ FT-IR spectra of 10% Cu-ZSM-5-H2 catalyst after exposure to CH4 +H2O2.
Catalysts 15 00277 g006
Figure 7. The proposed mechanism of CH4 oxidation to CH3OH and CH3OOH.
Figure 7. The proposed mechanism of CH4 oxidation to CH3OH and CH3OOH.
Catalysts 15 00277 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, Y.; Yu, C.; Song, X.; Yang, C.; Fu, M. Unveiling the Role of Copper Valence States in Enhancing the Catalytic Performance of Copper-Modified ZSM-5 for Direct Methane Conversion. Catalysts 2025, 15, 277. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15030277

AMA Style

Pu Y, Zhang H, Li Y, Yu C, Song X, Yang C, Fu M. Unveiling the Role of Copper Valence States in Enhancing the Catalytic Performance of Copper-Modified ZSM-5 for Direct Methane Conversion. Catalysts. 2025; 15(3):277. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15030277

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pu, Yunhan, Huajie Zhang, Yanjun Li, Chuan Yu, Xiaofei Song, Chen Yang, and Mingli Fu. 2025. "Unveiling the Role of Copper Valence States in Enhancing the Catalytic Performance of Copper-Modified ZSM-5 for Direct Methane Conversion" Catalysts 15, no. 3: 277. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15030277

APA Style

Pu, Y., Zhang, H., Li, Y., Yu, C., Song, X., Yang, C., & Fu, M. (2025). Unveiling the Role of Copper Valence States in Enhancing the Catalytic Performance of Copper-Modified ZSM-5 for Direct Methane Conversion. Catalysts, 15(3), 277. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15030277

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop