Next Article in Journal
Advanced Ozone Oxidation Systems for Organic Pollutant Degradation: Performance Evaluation and Mechanism Insights
Previous Article in Journal
Degradation of Atrazine to Cyanuric Acid by an Encapsulated Enzyme Cascade
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recent Advances in Transition Metal Selenide-Based Catalysts for Organic Pollutant Degradation by Advanced Oxidation Processes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mechanistic Insights into Radical-Mediated Moxifloxacin Degradation Using Ultrasound-Assisted Persulfate Activation by Iron-Rich Soil

by
Mahamadou Kamagate
1,
Fekri Abdulraqeb Ahmed Ali
2,
Traore Lancine
1,
Coulibaly Gnougon Nina
1,
Amine Aymen Assadi
2,
Coulibaly Lacina
3,
Goné Droh Lanciné
3 and
Oussama Baaloudj
4,*
1
UFR Sciences and Technology, Polytechnic University of Man, Man BP 20, Côte d’Ivoire
2
Chemical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia
3
Laboratory of Environment and Aquatic Biology, Department of Sciences and Environment Management, University of Nangui Abrogoua, Abidjan 02 BP 801, Côte d’Ivoire
4
Department of Basic and Applied Sciences (DiSBA), University of Basilicata, Via dell’Ateneo Lucano 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2025, 15(11), 1056; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15111056
Submission received: 16 September 2025 / Revised: 27 October 2025 / Accepted: 2 November 2025 / Published: 5 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Collection Catalysis in Advanced Oxidation Processes for Pollution Control)

Abstract

Fluoroquinolones are a major issue in aquatic ecosystems due to their persistence, potential to induce antibiotic resistance, and inability to be effectively removed using conventional treatment methods. Several advanced oxidation processes have been studied for their degradation; however, there is still a lack of knowledge about their degradation mechanisms and the precise roles played by reactive species. In this context, the study investigated the heterogeneous activation of persulfate (PS) to degrade fluoroquinolones (FQs), such as moxifloxacin (MFX), in iron-rich soil (Cat) under ultrasound irradiation (US). The analysis of the soil catalyst revealed the presence of quartz (35%), iron oxides (33%), and alumina (26%) as the predominant constituents of the sample. The mineral phase analysis indicated the presence of magnetite, hematite, and alumina. Then, the outcomes of the specific surface area, micropore volume, and total pore volume were determined to be 19 m2 g−1, 6 m3 g−1 and 9.10 m3 g−1, respectively. The MFX/PS/US/Cat system demonstrated 89% degradation and 56% mineralization after 300 min. However, the optimized concentrations of i-PrOH, t-BuOH, and CHCl3 were 50, 100, and 50 mM, respectively, in order to trap the radicals SO4•−, OH, and O2•−. The study examined the individual contributions of SO4•−, OH, and O2•− radicals to the overall process of MFX degradation. The results indicated that SO4•− was the primary radical, with a contribution of 52%, followed by OH with 43%, and O2•− with 5%. Finally, the investigation revealed that laterite exhibited both good catalytic activity and reusability over several cycles. The development of this new process could stimulate the creation of cost-effective technology for water remediation through the effective removal of fluoroquinolones.

1. Introduction

Moxifloxacin (MFX), a synthetic fluoroquinolone antibiotic, is widely employed for the treatment of diverse bacterial infections due to its broad-spectrum efficacy [1,2,3]. Reported concentrations of fluoroquinolones (FQs) in aquatic environments range from 3 ng L−1 to 240 µg L−1 in hospital effluents and from 0.5 ng L−1 to 6.5 mg L−1 in surface waters, depending on geographical location and sampling period [4]. However, the extensive usage of MFX has contributed to its ubiquitous occurrence in aquatic environments, particularly in wastewater systems [5]. This persistence raises serious concerns due to the potential development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and ecological disruption [6,7,8]. Therefore, the effective removal of MFX from wastewater represents a significant environmental challenge.
Conventional wastewater treatment processes are inefficient at eliminating such recalcitrant pharmaceutical pollutants, necessitating the development of advanced treatment strategies [9,10,11]. Among them, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), which are characterized by the generation of highly reactive species, have shown great potential for the degradation of persistent organic contaminants [12,13,14]. Specifically, the persulfate/iron (PS/Fe) system is a promising technology because of its capacity to produce both sulfate (SO4•−) and hydroxyl (OH) radicals. These oxidants are capable of effectively transforming complex antibiotic molecules into less harmful by-products [15,16,17]. A critical step in optimizing the PS/Fe system lies in evaluating the role of selective radical quenchers (scavengers). The systematic variation in scavenger concentrations (e.g., tert-butanol, isopropanol, chloroform) allows for clarification of the contribution of SO4•−, OH, and O2•− radicals to pollutant degradation. Understanding these contributions is essential for enhancing mineralization efficiency and for designing sustainable water remediation technologies [18,19].
This study, therefore, aimed to assess the actual contribution of radical species under optimized operating conditions (i.e., pollutant concentration, catalyst dose, and oxidant concentration were optimized). Specifically, scavenger concentrations of chloroform (Chl), tert-Butanol (t-BuOH), and isopropanol (i-ProH), responsible for trapping superoxide or hydroperoxides, sulfate anions, and hydroxyl radicals, respectively, were varied under optimized operating conditions. The percentage contribution of each radical species to MFX degradation was then quantified.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Laterite Characterization

2.1.1. Morphology and Composition

The XRF analysis revealed quartz (35.99%), iron oxides (33.59%), and alumina (26.97%) as the predominant constituents in the sample (Figure 1b). This finding was corroborated by XRD, which confirmed the presence of magnetite, hematite, and alumina (see XRD spectrum, Figure 1a). Indeed, a significant proportion of ferric iron would contribute to the oxidation–reduction process of the oxidation mechanism [20]. SEM/EDS analysis further supported these results, showing the presence of elements such as iron, silica, potassium, aluminum, titanium, and oxygen (see EDS spectrum and image) (Figure 1c,d). Overall, the most prevalent phases identified in this study are consistent with those reported in previous works [21,22].

2.1.2. Surface Texture and Properties

As demonstrated in Figure 2a, the specific surface area, micropore volume, and total pore volume were found to be 19 m2 g−1, 6 m3 g−1, and 5 cm3 g−1, respectively, based on the multipoint adsorption isotherm of N2. Subsequently, the BJH Adsorption Pore Distribution method was employed, revealing an average pore diameter of 1.19 nm (see Figure 2b). All of the above demonstrate that the adsorption phenomenon is minimal in the pollutant elimination process.

2.2. Oxidation and Adsorption Processes

As illustrated in Figure 3, the removal of MFX was evaluated under different systems as a function of time. The single systems (MFX/US, MFX/Cat, and MFX/PS) achieved only about 10% removal. When combined in dual systems (MFX/US/Cat, MFX/PS/Cat, and MFX/US/PS), the elimination efficiency remained below 20%. In contrast, the complete MFX/PS/US/Cat system achieved almost total removal, reaching ~92% after 300 min. To distinguish between degradation and adsorption, a desorption test was performed by increasing the pH of the reaction medium to 12 after the final sampling. Results indicated a degradation rate of 89% and a mineralization extent of 56%, leaving approximately 3% of MFX adsorbed on the catalyst surface. This low adsorption of the pollutant makes sense because of the low surface area (approximately 19 m2/g), which indicates that degradation controls the elimination process. The enhanced efficiency of laterite in conjunction with ultrasound irradiation can be attributed to the increased generation of reactive oxygen species (SO4•−, OH, and HO2/O2•−). These radicals are produced from persulfate activation under the redox cycling of surface-bound ≡FeIII+/≡FeII+ on laterite, as previously reported [23,24]. This process is promoted by sonication activity. The following equation is derived:
≡FeIII+ + H2O → ≡FeII+ + OH + H+
It has been demonstrated that the generation of ≡Fe(II) can be achieved through the process of sono-reduction of Fe(III) sites present on the surfaces of laterite. After this, a reaction occurs between the generated Fe(II) and PS, resulting in the formation of SO4. The subsequent sequence of events is as follows [23,24]:
≡FeII + S2O82− → ≡FeIII + SO4•− + SO42− k = 2.7 × 101 M−1 s−1
Then, OH could also be produced when SO4•− reacts with H2O/HO [25,26,27]:
SO4•− + H2O → SO42− + OH + H+   k [H2O] = 1.3 × 103 s −1
SO4•− + OH → SO42− + OH (pH > 8.5) k = 6.5 ± 1 × 107 M −1 s −1
Furthermore, the formation of SO4•− and OH can also be attributed to chain reactions predominantly governed by the superoxide anion radicals (O2•−) [28]:
≡FeII + O2 → ≡FeIII + O2
S2O82− + O2•− → SO4•− + O2 + SO42−
2O2•− + 2H+ → H2O2 + O2
≡FeII + H2O2 → ≡FeIII + OH + OH

2.3. Chloroform Effect on MFX Degradation

Figure 4 illustrates the effect of chloroform (Chl) concentration on MFX degradation kinetics. The degradation rate was 92 ± 2% without scavengers after 300 min, while the inhibition effects at 10, 50, and 100 mM of Chl were 5%, 7%, and 8 ± 2%, respectively, resulting in a reduced degradation rate to 84 ± 2%. The mineralization rate (i.e., [TOC]/[TOC]0) accordingly decreased from 56 ± 2% to 48 ± 2% after 300 min. This inhibition corresponded to the reduced contribution of superoxide radicals to MFX oxidation. In contrast, superoxide (O2•−), sulfate (SO4•−), and hydroxyl (OH) radicals are known to react with chloroform at very high second-order rate constants. Notably, chloroform exhibits high reactivity with O2•− (kCHCl3/O2•− = 2.3 × 108 M−1 S−1) [29] and low reactivity with OH (kCHCl3/OH = 5.4 × 107 M−1 S−1) [30] and SO4•− (kCHCl3/SO4• = 1.5 × 105 M−1 S−1) [31]. It was therefore determined that the optimum concentration of chloroform required to quench the superoxide radicals was 50 mM. Indeed, the concentration of Chl used to trap superoxide radicals can vary, with some researchers opting for 10 mM and others choosing 5 mM.

2.4. Tert-Butanol Impact on MFX Degradation

As illustrated in Figure 5, the impact of tert-Butanol (t-BuOH) concentration on the degradation kinetics of MFX is evident. The results showed that the degradation rate was 92 ± 2% without scavengers after 300 min, while the inhibition effects at 10, 50, and 100 mM of t-BuOH were 15%, 26%, and 30 ± 2%, respectively, resulting in a reduced degradation rate of 62 ± 2%. The mineralization rate (i.e., [TOC]/[TOC]0) also decreased from 56 ± 2% to 40 ± 2% after 300 min. This reduction in degradation efficiency was attributed to the scavenging of hydroxyl radicals (OH) by t-BuOH [16,30]. Despite the high reaction rate between OH and MFX, t-BuOH exhibits a stronger reactivity with hydroxyl radicals (OH) (i.e., kt-BuOH/OH = (3.8–7.6) × 108 M−1 S−1) [23] and a weaker reactivity with sulfate radicals (SO4•−) (i.e., kt-BuOH/SO4•− = (4–9.1) × 105 M−1 S−1) [32]. However, t-BuOH does not react with O2•− [29]. The best concentration of t-BuOH needed to stop the hydroxyl radicals was found to be 100 mM.

2.5. Isopropanol Effect on MFX Degradation

Figure 6 illustrates the effect of varying isopropanol (i-PrOH) concentration on the degradation kinetics of MFX. Without scavengers, the degradation rate is 92 ± 2% after 300 min. Meanwhile, the inhibition rates of 10, 50, and 100 mM i-PrOH are 5%, 82%, and 84% ± 2%, respectively. This demonstrated that the degradation rate has decreased by only 8% ± 2%. The mineralization rate accordingly fell from 56 ± 2% to 3 ± 2% after 300 min. This strong inhibition was attributed to the simultaneous scavenging of both sulfate (SO4•−) and hydroxyl (OH) radicals by i-PrOH. Indeed, i-PrOH simultaneously traps sulfate and hydroxyl radicals with high rate constants, i.e., ki-PrOH/HO= 1.9 × 109 M−1 S−1 [30] et ki-PrOH/SO4•− = 7.42 × 107 M−1 S−1 [33]. Unlike the other radicals above-mentioned, the reactivity between i-PrOH and O2•− is low in the range of 1.0 × 106 M−1 S−1 [34]. It should be noted that the concentration of i-PrOH required to trap radicals is 50 mM.

2.6. Scavenging Tests on MFX Degradation

Figure 7 illustrates the degradation and inhibition percentages of MFX as a function of various scavengers, as well as the relative contribution of individual radicals to the overall degradation. The overall degradation efficiency was 89%, while the total elimination was 92%, indicating approximately 3% of MFX removal was due to adsorption (sorption). After the addition of i-PrOH, only 5% degradation of MFX was observed, while 84% was inhibited. In the case of t-BuOH, 51% of degradation and 38% of inhibition were recorded. Similarly, in the presence of Chl, 73% degradation and 16% inhibition were observed (Figure 7a,b). Based on these results, the relative degradation percentages assigned to the main reactive species O2•−, OH, and SO4•− were 5%, 38%, and 46%, respectively. These contributions were further refined to 5.62%, 42.7%, and 51.69%, respectively, indicating their quantitative roles in overall MFX degradation (89%) (see Figure 7c) [16].

2.7. Summary of Second-Order Rate Constants of ROS Relative to Some Scavengers

A categorized list of scavengers that can be used for different radicals is presented in Table 1. The scavenger’s effectiveness depends on its second-order rate constant towards the radicals in the degradation process [31,32,33,34,35,36].
Among these scavengers, Chl and BQ are used to catch superoxides due to their high reactivity, while t-BuOH and i-PhOH commonly capture hydroxyl radicals. Subsequently, i-PrOH and MeOH, as well as KI, serve to trap sulfate and hydroxyl radicals in a simultaneous manner [37,38,39,40,41,42]. According to literature [43], MFX (m/z = 401) is capable of undergoing decomposition into either m/z = 360 and m/z = 320, or m/z = 337 and m/z = 125 and m/z = 101 (Figure 8).

2.8. Effect of Hospital Wastewater Components on Removal Efficiency

The kinetics of MFX removal from Hospital Wastewater (HW) and Ultra Pure Water (UPW) are illustrated in Figure 7. A reduction in elimination performance was observed for HW. The inhibitory effect in HW can be ascribed to the abundant dissolved components in HW, such as chlorides, phosphates, nitrates, sulfates, and dissolved organic matter (Figure 9). It is important to note that these wastewater components exist in very high concentrations compared to the target compounds (e.g., the molar ratio of [Phosphate]/[MFX] = 3 and [Chloride]/[MFX] = 4). This may produce strong competitive and/or radical scavenging impacts [44]. Indeed, phosphates have a strong inhibitory effect, which can be explained by their ability to adsorb strongly onto metal oxides, reducing the interaction between the oxidant and the solid surface. Phosphate really sticks to FeIII oxides, through monodentate and/or multidentate–mononuclear surface complexes. There are a bunch of different models that try to explain how phosphate is eliminated by mineral surfaces [45]. Additionally, phosphate can also effectively react to SO4•− and OH according to the following equations [30,33]:
SO4•− + HPO42− → HPO4•− + SO42−  k = 1.2 × 106 M−1 s−1
OH + HPO42− → HPO4•− + OH   k = 1.5 × 105 M−1 s−1

2.9. Stability and Reusability of the Catalyst

From an eco-economic point of view, whether the catalyst can be used more than once is a key factor in its use in large-scale reactors. The reusability of the catalyst was then subjected to rigorous testing involving successive oxidation cycles, with the optimal conditions previously outlined (Figure 10). At the end of each oxidation process, the solid is carefully removed from the reactor. It is then washed with very pure water. After that, it dries at 50 °C overnight. Finally, it is used in the next experiment. The results demonstrated that the catalyst exhibited slight variations when used for the second time, yet retained its activity after five cycles. The removal yield decreased from 92% ± 2% to 86% ± 2% from the first oxidation cycle to the last cycle, representing a decrease of 6% ± 2%. The TOC then confirmed that the system was very stable, which was also shown before by US/PS/Cat. This showed that the mineralization (56 ± 2%) stayed the same even after five oxidation cycles [46,47]. The catalytic activity is very stable because not much iron is lost during the oxidation cycles, and the structure of the solid is stable [48,49].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals

All chemicals were used at analytical grade without further purification. Moxifloxacin (MFX, C21H24FN3O4, ≥99% purity) and potassium persulfate (K2S2O8, ≥99% purity) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France). Hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37% v/v, ≥98%), tert-Butanol (t-BuOH, C4H10O ≥ 99%), isopropanol (i-PrOH, C3H8O, ≥99.8%), and chloroform (Chl, CHCl3, ≥99.5%) were also purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, France). Other chemicals, including sodium hydroxide (NaOH, ≥97%), acetonitrile (CH3CN, ≥99.99%), and formic acid (≥99%) were supplied via Sigma-Aldrich (Merck), St. Louis, MO, USA. FerroVer® iron reagent pillows and the LCK 380 kit were obtained from Hach Company (Loveland, CO, USA).

3.2. Catalyst Soil and Characterization Methods

Laterite soil, found in tropical regions that are both humid and hot, was used as a catalyst in this study. The soil was collected from Man, western Côte d’Ivoire, at coordinates 5°44′06″ N and 3°24′12″ W. Samples were crushed to less than 50 µm mesh size, washed with ultrapure water (UPW) three times, and dried at 50 °C. The chemical composition was determined by X-ray fluorescence (XRF, Horiba MESA-50, Tokyo, Japan). Morphology and surface microanalysis were examined by SEM–EDX (Hirox, SH4000 M, Tokyo, Japan). Crystalline phases were identified via X-ray diffraction (GBC Emma, Hampshire, IL, USA). The specific surface area is measured using a Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analyzer (V-Sorb 2800, Gold APP Instruments, Beijing, China). Zeta potential is measured using a Zeta Compact CAD, Naucelle, France. Ultrapure water (resistivity 18.2 MΩ cm, Millipore Milli-Q, Loveland, CO, USA) was used for all experiments. The Regional Public Hospital Establishment (RPHE) of Man is the Public Regional Hospital of Man City in Côte d’Ivoire. The RPHE of Man encompasses a wide spectrum of clinical services and health requirements, boasting a substantial capacity for hospitalization (131 beds; 20,000 admissions and 50,000 consultations in 2025) across diverse specialties, including medicine, surgery, obstetrics, and gynecology. The Hospital Wastewater (HW) was supplied by RPHE. Consequently, the wastewater sample examined in this study is a suitable representation of the HW in Côte d’Ivoire. A tabular presentation has been provided which details the physico-chemical characteristics and inorganic species of HW (Table 2).

3.3. Ultrasonic Oxidation Tests and Analytical Methods

The experimental setup consisted of a stainless-steel ultrasonic tank (10 L, 240 W, 40 kHz, 15 × 24 × 30 cm). Batch experiments were performed in 250 mL borosilicate reactors immersed in the ultrasonic bath under ambient temperature and neutral pH. Each reaction mixture contained pollutant solution (MFX), laterite catalyst, and PS oxidant. The solution pH was adjusted using HCl or NaOH (0.01–1 M) [11]. Two sets of pre-tests were conducted: (i) adsorption equilibrium of MFX onto laterite in the absence of light, and (ii) oxidation reaction under ultrasonic conditions with catalyst and oxidant. Samples (3 mL) were withdrawn every 30 min, filtered, and analyzed.
MFX concentrations were determined by HPLC (Waters 600 controller, binary pump, autosampler Waters 717 plus, UV detector Waters 2489 set at 294 nm, Milford, MA, USA). Separation was achieved using a reverse-phase C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) under isocratic elution with acetonitrile/water (30:70 v/v) acidified with 0.1% formic acid at 1.0 mL min−1. The degradation efficiency at time t was calculated by:
Degradation   ( % )   = C 0 C t C 0 100
where C0 and Ct are the initial and residual concentrations of MFX, respectively.
Leached iron concentrations were measured colorimetrically using a DR 3900 spectrophotometer (Hach, 10 mL cuvette tests), while total organic carbon (TOC) was measured using the same platform. Potential leaching of trace metals (Cr, Mn, Cu, Co, Ni, Zn) from the laterite was monitored by XRF [48,49,50,51]. To determine the role of SO4•−, OH, and HO2/O2•− radicals in the MFX elimination process, quenching experiments were performed using Chl, i-PrOH, and t-BuOH, respectively. Indeed, i-PrOH and t-BuOH were used to scavenge SO4•− and OH radicals, while Chl was employed to trap HO2/O2•− radicals [11,13,19]. Each scavenger concentration was varied from 10 to 100 mM. Experiments were conducted in triplicate, and results showed a high reproducibility with a relative standard deviation below 3%.

4. Conclusions

The objective of this research was to investigate how PS is activated heterogeneously and generate radicals to degrade MFX in iron-rich soil when subjected to ultrasound. XRF analysis of the soil catalyst revealed the presence of quartz (35%), iron oxides (33%), and alumina (26%) as the predominant constituents. Subsequently, XRD confirmed the presence of magnetite, hematite, and alumina. The MFX/PS/US/Cat system demonstrated an effective degradation of approximately 89% with a 56% mineralization after 300 min. An optimization for the concentration of i-PrOH (50 mM), t-BuOH (100 mM), and Chl (50 mM) was performed to selectively quench SO4•−, OH, and O2•− radicals, respectively. After that, the relative contributions of these radicals to MFX degradation have been investigated, with results indicating that SO4•− was the dominant reactive species. The contributions of SO4•−, OH, and O2•− were quantified as 51.69%, 42.7%, and 5.62%, respectively. This cost-effective process has the potential to facilitate the development of innovative technologies for water remediation and the removal of fluoroquinolones from contaminated sources.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A.A., C.L., G.D.L. and O.B.; methodology, A.A.A., C.L., G.D.L. and O.B.; validation, A.A.A. and O.B.; investigation, M.K.; resources, F.A.A.A., T.L. and C.G.N.; writing—original draft preparation, M.K. and F.A.A.A.; writing—review and editing, T.L., C.G.N., A.A.A., C.L., G.D.L. and O.B.; visualization, F.A.A.A., T.L. and C.G.N.; supervision, A.A.A., C.L., G.D.L. and O.B.; project administration, F.A.A.A., G.D.L. and O.B.; funding acquisition, F.A.A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported and funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research at Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU) (grant number IMSIU-DDRSP2502).

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ishaq, M.; Zafar, E.; Maqbool, M.F.; Mansha, M.; Khan, M.; Li, Y. Repurposing fluoroquinolones as cancer chemosensitizers: A way to overcome cancer therapeutic bottleneck. Naunyn. Schmiedebergs. Arch. Pharmacol. 2025. ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, J.; Chu, L.; Wojnárovits, L.; Takács, E. Occurrence and fate of antibiotics, antibiotic resistant genes (ARGs) and antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) in municipal wastewater treatment plant: An overview. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 744, 140997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Negrete-Paz, A.M.; Vázquez-Marrufo, G.; Rodríguez-Carlos, A.; Rivas-Santiago, B.; Vázquez-Garcidueñas, M.S. Whole-Genome Sequence-Based Diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Strains Isolated from a Central Western Region of Mexico. Pathogens 2025, 14, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Van Doorslaer, X.; Dewulf, J.; Van Langenhove, H.; Demeestere, K. Fluoroquinolone antibiotics: An emerging class of environmental micropollutants. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 500–501, 250–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jacobs, G.P. Irradiation of pharmaceuticals: A literature review. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2022, 190, 109795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Manoharan, R.K.; Ishaque, F.; Ahn, Y.H. Fate of antibiotic resistant genes in wastewater environments and treatment strategies—A review. Chemosphere 2022, 298, 134671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Baaloudj, O.; Nasrallah, N.; Bouallouche, R.; Kenfoud, H.; Khezami, L.; Assadi, A.A. High efficient Cefixime removal from water by the sillenite Bi12TiO20: Photocatalytic mechanism and degradation pathway. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 330, 129934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bal, I.; Macit, M.; Alasiri, A.; Namli, O.C.; Arshad, M.S.; Ahmad, Z.; Duman, G.; Kucuk, I. Engineering Moxifloxacin-Encapsulated Liposome-Enriched Alginate Hydrogel Films. Gels 2025, 11, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kumar, K.S.; Mohanchand, G.; Gaddam, V.S.K.; Matli, C.S. Heterogeneous Photocatalysis of Fluoroquinolone Antibiotics: Scavenger Study and Determination of Residual Antibacterial Activity. Ozone Sci. Eng. 2025, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Baaloudj, O.; Kenfoud, H.; Brienza, M.; El Jery, A.; Aldrdery, M.; Assadi, A.A. Exploring the Synthesis of Novel Sillenite Bi12SnO20: Effect of Calcination Temperature on the Phase Formation and Catalytic Performance. Catalysts 2024, 14, 650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kamagate, M.; Coulibaly, N.G.; Koffi, A.P.M.; Zie, O.; Coulibaly, L.; Assadi, A.A.; Elfalleh, W.; Hjiri, M.; Khezami, L.; Tahraoui, H.; et al. Enhancing Levofloxacin Degradation in Contaminated Water: Catalytic Performance of Pegmatite in a Sodium Percarbonate/Ultrasound System. Catalysts 2025, 15, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kabir, M.H.; Miah, M.J.; Mohiuddin, A.K.; Hossain, M.S.; Upoma, B.P.; Shaikh, M.A.A.; Pabel, M.Y.; Mojumder, F.; Mahmud, R.; Tanvir, N.I.; et al. Highly Effective Removal of Moxifloxacin from Aqueous Solutions Using Graphene Oxide Functionalized with Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate. ACS Sustain. Resour. Manag. 2025, 2, 256–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ma, H.; Jiang, W.; Wang, H.; Zhan, S.; Zhou, F. Triggering the efficient photocarriers separation of Bi8(CrO4)O11 under visible light greater than 550 nm via the synergistic effect of PMS and Cl−. Opt. Mater. 2024, 150, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dong, Y.; Gao, T.; Yuan, S.; Zhu, C.; Yang, L.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; Yin, Y.; Chen, C.; Tang, L.; et al. Ultrathin TiO2(B) nanosheets-decorated hollow CoFeP cube as PMS activator for enhanced photocatalytic activity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2024, 643, 158667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Diao, Z.H.; Yan, L.; Dong, F.X.; Qian, W.; Deng, Q.H.; Kong, L.J.; Yang, J.W.; Lei, Z.X.; Du, J.J.; Chu, W. Degradation of 2,4-dichlorophenol by a novel iron based system and its synergism with Cd(II) immobilization in a contaminated soil. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 379, 122313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kamagate, M.; Amin Assadi, A.; Kone, T.; Coulibaly, L.; Hanna, K. Activation of persulfate by irradiated laterite for removal of fluoroquinolones in multi-component systems. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 346, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zeghioud, H.; Kamagate, M.; Coulibaly, L.S.; Rtimi, S.; Assadi, A.A. Photocatalytic degradation of binary and ternary mixtures of antibiotics: Reactive species investigation in pilot scale. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2019, 144, 300–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Diao, Z.H.; Zhang, W.X.; Liang, J.Y.; Huang, S.T.; Dong, F.X.; Yan, L.; Qian, W.; Chu, W. Removal of herbicide atrazine by a novel biochar based iron composite coupling with peroxymonosulfate process from soil: Synergistic effect and mechanism. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 409, 127684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pei, L.; Jiang, W.; Ma, H.; Zhao, H.; An, J.; Ma, Y.; Zhan, S.; Zhou, F. Interfacial electric field driven photocatalytic activation of peroxymonosulfate over CoFe-LDH/Bi4O5Br2 for enhanced antibiotics removal across the full pH range. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2025, 692, 162754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Guo, J.; Zhang, X.; Gao, J.; Cai, A.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Yuan, J. The constraints on oxidation of structural Fe(II) by aqueous Fe3+ and the pathways of electron transfer in clay minerals. Appl. Clay Sci. 2025, 276, 107940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Coulibaly, L.S.; Akpo, S.K.; Yvon, J.; Coulibaly, L. Fourier transform infra-red (FTIR) spectroscopy investigation, dose effect, kinetics and adsorption capacity of phosphate from aqueous solution onto laterite and sandstone. J. Environ. Manage. 2016, 183, 1032–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kamagate, M.; Assadi, A.A.; Kone, T.; Giraudet, S.; Coulibaly, L.; Hanna, K. Use of laterite as a sustainable catalyst for removal of fluoroquinolone antibiotics from contaminated water. Chemosphere 2018, 195, 847–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Anipsitakis, G.P.; Dionysiou, D.D. Radical generation by the interaction of transition metals with common oxidants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 3705–3712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rao, Y.F.; Qu, L.; Yang, H.; Chu, W. Degradation of carbamazepine by Fe(II)-activated persulfate process. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 268, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hou, L.; Zhang, H.; Xue, X. Ultrasound enhanced heterogeneous activation of peroxydisulfate by magnetite catalyst for the degradation of tetracycline in water. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 84, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kianian, S.; Toulakani, R.M.; Zisti, F.; Balarak, D.; Siddiqui, S.H.; Saloot, M.K. Degradation of Antibiotics by Ultrasound-Assisted Heterogeneous Activation of Persulfate and Peroxymonosulfate: A Review. Int. J. Pharm. Investig. 2023, 14, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hayon, E.; Treinin, A.; Wilf, J. Electronic Spectra, Photochemistry, and Autoxidation Mechanism of the Sulfite-Bisulfite-Pyrosulfite Systems. the SO2-, SO3-, SO4-, and SO5- Radicals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fang, G.D.; Dionysiou, D.D.; Al-Abed, S.R.; Zhou, D.M. Superoxide radical driving the activation of persulfate by magnetite nanoparticles: Implications for the degradation of PCBs. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2013, 129, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Guo, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, G.; Wang, Y. Revisiting the role of reactive oxygen species for pollutant abatement during catalytic ozonation: The probe approach versus the scavenger approach. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2021, 280, 119418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Buxton, G.V.; Greenstock, C.L.; Helman, W.P.; Ross, A.B. Critical Review of rate constants for reactions of hydrated electrons, hydrogen atoms and hydroxyl radicals (⋅OH/⋅O− in Aqueous Solution. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1988, 17, 513–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wu, G.; Katsumura, Y.; Chu, G. Photolytic and radiolytic studies of SO4•− in neat organic solvents. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2000, 2, 5602–5605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Antoniou, M.G.; de la Cruz, A.A.; Dionysiou, D.D. Degradation of microcystin-LR using sulfate radicals generated through photolysis, thermolysis and e transfer mechanisms. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2010, 96, 290–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Neta, P.; Madhavan, V.; Zemel, H.; Fessenden, R.W. Rate Constants and Mechanism of Reaction of SO4 with Aromatic Compounds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 163–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liang, C.; Lei, J. Identification of Active Radical Species in Alkaline Persulfate Oxidation. Water Environ. Res. 2015, 87, 656–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Petersen-Sonn, E.A.; Brigante, M.; Deguillaume, L.; Jaffrezo, J.L.; George, C. Tropospheric Multiphase Chemistry: Excited Triplet States Compete with OH Radicals and Singlet Molecular Oxygen. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2025, 9, 533–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gao, J.; Alsaab, H.O.; Zare, M.H.; Shirazian, S. Magnesiothermal reduction and doping strategies in engineered TiO2 for pharmaceutical degradation and CO2 conversion. NPJ Clean Water 2025, 8, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, P.; Kang, F.; Huang, X.; Luo, Z.; Zou, J.; Yang, M.; Sun, M.; Yu, X.; Zeng, H. A pH-responsive production of hydroxyl radical in Fenton process. Environ. Sci. Ecotechnol. 2025, 25, 100566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yu, S.Y.; Xie, Z.H.; Wu, X.; Zheng, Y.Z.; Shi, Y.; Xiong, Z.K.; Zhou, P.; Liu, Y.; He, C.S.; Pan, Z.C.; et al. Review of advanced oxidation processes for treating hospital sewage to achieve decontamination and disinfection. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2024, 35, 108714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hu, D.; Wang, Z.; Aruffo, E.; Dai, X.; Zhao, Z.; Ye, Z. Kinetics of Different Substituted Phenolic Compounds’ Aqueous OH Oxidation in Atmosphere. Atmosphere 2025, 16, 567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Huang, B.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Shi, Y.; He, C.-S.; Xiong, Z.; Lai, B. Is the choice of quencher appropriate for exploring reactive oxygen species in advanced oxidation processes? Chin. Chem. Lett. 2025, 111537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hwang, S.; Huling, S.G.; Ko, S. Fenton-like degradation of MTBE: Effects of iron counter anion and radical scavengers. Chemosphere 2010, 78, 563–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Galeas, S.; Guerrero, V.H.; Pontón, P.I.; Goetz, V. Visible Light-Driven Phenol Degradation via Advanced Oxidation Processes with Ferrous Oxalate Obtained from Black Sands: A Kinetics Study. Molecules 2025, 30, 2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mo, F.; Liu, Y.; Xu, Y.; He, Q.; Sun, P.; Dong, X. Photocatalytic elimination of moxifloxacin by two-dimensional graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets: Enhanced activity, degradation mechanism and potential practical application. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 292, 121067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Joohyun, K.; Coulibaly, G.N.; Yoon, S.; Assadi, A.A.; Hanna, K.; Bae, S. Red mud-activated peroxymonosulfate process for the removal of fluoroquinolones in hospital wastewater. Water Res. 2020, 184, 116171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Khare, N.; Hesterberg, D.; Martin, J.D. XANES investigation of phosphate sorption in single and binary systems of iron and aluminum oxide minerals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 2152–2160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Xiao, S.; Ma, L.; An, W.; Shen, P. Stability optimization of iron-based catalysts: Application of Cr-enriched alloy steel catalyst in ozonation pharmaceutical wastewater. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 354, 129007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Moreno-Bermedo, L.; Correa-Puerta, J.; González-Fuentes, C.; Escalona, N.; Onfray, C.; Thiam, A. Tea Waste as a Sustainable Catalyst Support for Enhanced Removal of Contaminants of Emerging Concern via the Electro-Fenton Process: A Circular Economy Approach. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, K.X.; Tunyaz, A.; Zhou, G.N.; Ding, R.R.; Zheng, P.W.; Liu, X.C.; Yang, H.Y.; Mu, Y. Carbon encapsulated Fe0/Fe oxides for heterogeneous electro-Fenton process: Promoting Fe(II) regeneration under nanoconfinement. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 519, 165674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fahim, A.M.; Abas, K.M. Properties and computational insights of catalysts based on amide linked polymer for photo-Fenton remediation of Rhodamine B dye. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 30566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Maxime, G.; Aymen Amine, A.; Abdelkrim, B.; Dominique, W. Removal of gas-phase ammonia and hydrogen sulfide using photocatalysis, nonthermal plasma, and combined plasma and photocatalysis at pilot scale. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 13127–13137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Assadi, A.A.; Palau, J.; Bouzaza, A.; Penya-Roja, J.; Martinez-Soriac, V.; Wolbert, D. Abatement of 3-methylbutanal and trimethylamine with combined plasma and photocatalysis in a continuous planar reactor. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2014, 282, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. X-ray diffractogram of laterite soil (a) and Oxides table detected by X-ray fluorescence analysis (b), Elemental mapping (scale: 10 µm) (c), and spectrum of laterite using EDX analysis (d).
Figure 1. X-ray diffractogram of laterite soil (a) and Oxides table detected by X-ray fluorescence analysis (b), Elemental mapping (scale: 10 µm) (c), and spectrum of laterite using EDX analysis (d).
Catalysts 15 01056 g001
Figure 2. Laterite soil surface characteristics: Adsorption and desorption isotherm of N2 (a), and BJH Adsorption Pore Distribution Report (b).
Figure 2. Laterite soil surface characteristics: Adsorption and desorption isotherm of N2 (a), and BJH Adsorption Pore Distribution Report (b).
Catalysts 15 01056 g002
Figure 3. Evolution of MFX degradation in different systems. Experimental conditions: [MFX] = 60 µmol L−1, [Laterite] = 0.75 g L−1, [PS] = 60 µmol L−1, pH = 7 ± 0.2, T = 25 ± 2 °C, Ultrasound power = 240 W, Ultrasound frequency = 24 KHz, Reaction time = 300 min.
Figure 3. Evolution of MFX degradation in different systems. Experimental conditions: [MFX] = 60 µmol L−1, [Laterite] = 0.75 g L−1, [PS] = 60 µmol L−1, pH = 7 ± 0.2, T = 25 ± 2 °C, Ultrasound power = 240 W, Ultrasound frequency = 24 KHz, Reaction time = 300 min.
Catalysts 15 01056 g003
Figure 4. Evolution of degradation kinetics as a function of different concentrations of Chloroform. Experimental conditions: [MFX] = 60 µmol L−1, [Laterite] = 0.75 g L−1, |PS] = 60 µmol L−1, [Chl] = 10–100 mM, pH = 7± 0.2, T = 25 ± 2 °C, Ultrasound power = 240 W, Ultrasound frequency = 24 KHz, Reaction time = 300 min.
Figure 4. Evolution of degradation kinetics as a function of different concentrations of Chloroform. Experimental conditions: [MFX] = 60 µmol L−1, [Laterite] = 0.75 g L−1, |PS] = 60 µmol L−1, [Chl] = 10–100 mM, pH = 7± 0.2, T = 25 ± 2 °C, Ultrasound power = 240 W, Ultrasound frequency = 24 KHz, Reaction time = 300 min.
Catalysts 15 01056 g004
Figure 5. Optimization of Tert-Butanol concentration during MFX degradation. Experimental conditions: [MFX] = 60 µmol L−1, [Laterite] = 0.75 g L−1, |PS] = 60 µmol L−1, [t-BuOH] = 10–100 mM, pH = 7± 0.2, T = 25 ± 2 °C, Ultrasound power = 240 W, Ultrasound frequency = 24 KHz, Reaction time = 300 min.
Figure 5. Optimization of Tert-Butanol concentration during MFX degradation. Experimental conditions: [MFX] = 60 µmol L−1, [Laterite] = 0.75 g L−1, |PS] = 60 µmol L−1, [t-BuOH] = 10–100 mM, pH = 7± 0.2, T = 25 ± 2 °C, Ultrasound power = 240 W, Ultrasound frequency = 24 KHz, Reaction time = 300 min.
Catalysts 15 01056 g005
Figure 6. Optimization of Isopropanol concentration during MFX degradation. Experimental conditions: [MFX] = 60 µmol L−1, [Laterite] = 0.75 g L−1, |PS] = 60 µmol L−1, [i-PrOH] = 10–100 mM, pH = 7 ± 0.2, T = 25 ± 2 °C, Ultrasound power = 240 W, Ultrasound frequency = 24 KHz, Reaction time = 300 min.
Figure 6. Optimization of Isopropanol concentration during MFX degradation. Experimental conditions: [MFX] = 60 µmol L−1, [Laterite] = 0.75 g L−1, |PS] = 60 µmol L−1, [i-PrOH] = 10–100 mM, pH = 7 ± 0.2, T = 25 ± 2 °C, Ultrasound power = 240 W, Ultrasound frequency = 24 KHz, Reaction time = 300 min.
Catalysts 15 01056 g006
Figure 7. Mechanism comprehension: Inhibition (a) and degradation (b) percentages of MFX as a function of various scavengers, as well as the implication rate of radicals in degradation (c).
Figure 7. Mechanism comprehension: Inhibition (a) and degradation (b) percentages of MFX as a function of various scavengers, as well as the implication rate of radicals in degradation (c).
Catalysts 15 01056 g007
Figure 8. Mechanism of moxifloxacin degradation under the PS/US/Cat system.
Figure 8. Mechanism of moxifloxacin degradation under the PS/US/Cat system.
Catalysts 15 01056 g008
Figure 9. Evolution of MFX removal in different matrices. Experimental conditions: [MFX] = 60 µmol L−1, [Laterite] = 0.75 g L−1, [PS] = 60 µmol L−1, pH = 7 ± 0.2, T = 25 ± 2 °C, Ultrasound power = 240 W, Ultrasound frequency = 24 KHz, Reaction time = 300 min.
Figure 9. Evolution of MFX removal in different matrices. Experimental conditions: [MFX] = 60 µmol L−1, [Laterite] = 0.75 g L−1, [PS] = 60 µmol L−1, pH = 7 ± 0.2, T = 25 ± 2 °C, Ultrasound power = 240 W, Ultrasound frequency = 24 KHz, Reaction time = 300 min.
Catalysts 15 01056 g009
Figure 10. Reusability of the catalyst in several cycles upon MFX degradation. Experimental conditions: [MFX] = 60 µmol L−1, [Laterite] = 0.75 g L−1, |PS] = 60 µmol L−1, [i-PrOH] = 10–100 mM, pH = 7 ± 0.2, T = 25 ± 2 °C, Ultrasound power = 240 W, Ultrasound frequency = 24 KHz, Reaction time = 300 min.
Figure 10. Reusability of the catalyst in several cycles upon MFX degradation. Experimental conditions: [MFX] = 60 µmol L−1, [Laterite] = 0.75 g L−1, |PS] = 60 µmol L−1, [i-PrOH] = 10–100 mM, pH = 7 ± 0.2, T = 25 ± 2 °C, Ultrasound power = 240 W, Ultrasound frequency = 24 KHz, Reaction time = 300 min.
Catalysts 15 01056 g010
Table 1. Second-order rate constants of scavengers towards different radicals.
Table 1. Second-order rate constants of scavengers towards different radicals.
CompoundsFormularpKaMWM−1 s−1
kO2•−kOHkSO4•−
ChloroformCHCl315.5119.372.3 × 1085.4 × 1071.5 × 105
IsopropanolC3H8016.560.101.0 × 1061.9 × 1097.42 × 107
TerbutanolC4H10O16.5474.12-(3.8–7.6) × 108(4–9.1) × 105
MethanolCH3OH15.5432.04-9.7 × 1082.5 × 107
Phenol C6H6O10.094.11-6.0 × 108-
BenzoquinoneC6H4O29.91108.109.6 × 1087.4 × 106-
Potassium iodideKI0.06166-1.1 × 1010>1.0 × 1010
Table 2. Physico-chemical characteristics and inorganic species of HW.
Table 2. Physico-chemical characteristics and inorganic species of HW.
ParametersValues
pH6.91 ± 0.2
Turbidity (NTU)186 ± 2
Conductivity (µS Cm−1)1432 ± 5
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) (mg L−1)270 ± 5
Total Suspended Solids (TSS) (mg L−1)110 ± 2
Carbon Oxygen Demand (COD) (mg O2 L−1)196 ± 2
Nitrates (mg L−1)69 ± 2
Chloride (mg L−1)72 ± 2
Sulfate (mg L−1)47 ± 3
Phosphate (mg L−1)179 ± 5
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kamagate, M.; Ahmed Ali, F.A.; Lancine, T.; Gnougon Nina, C.; Assadi, A.A.; Lacina, C.; Lanciné, G.D.; Baaloudj, O. Mechanistic Insights into Radical-Mediated Moxifloxacin Degradation Using Ultrasound-Assisted Persulfate Activation by Iron-Rich Soil. Catalysts 2025, 15, 1056. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15111056

AMA Style

Kamagate M, Ahmed Ali FA, Lancine T, Gnougon Nina C, Assadi AA, Lacina C, Lanciné GD, Baaloudj O. Mechanistic Insights into Radical-Mediated Moxifloxacin Degradation Using Ultrasound-Assisted Persulfate Activation by Iron-Rich Soil. Catalysts. 2025; 15(11):1056. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15111056

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kamagate, Mahamadou, Fekri Abdulraqeb Ahmed Ali, Traore Lancine, Coulibaly Gnougon Nina, Amine Aymen Assadi, Coulibaly Lacina, Goné Droh Lanciné, and Oussama Baaloudj. 2025. "Mechanistic Insights into Radical-Mediated Moxifloxacin Degradation Using Ultrasound-Assisted Persulfate Activation by Iron-Rich Soil" Catalysts 15, no. 11: 1056. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15111056

APA Style

Kamagate, M., Ahmed Ali, F. A., Lancine, T., Gnougon Nina, C., Assadi, A. A., Lacina, C., Lanciné, G. D., & Baaloudj, O. (2025). Mechanistic Insights into Radical-Mediated Moxifloxacin Degradation Using Ultrasound-Assisted Persulfate Activation by Iron-Rich Soil. Catalysts, 15(11), 1056. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15111056

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop