A Highly Efficient Composite Catalyst (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production

Abstract

As non-noble metal co-catalysts, Nitrides have received extensive attention for their high efficiency and low cost in photocatalytic hydrogen production. In this study, we develop a novel composite co-catalyst of Au/Ta₃N₅ that significantly enhanced the photocatalytic hydrogen production activity of CdS. The activity of photocatalyst (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS is 7.3 times of bare CdS and 2.2 times of Ta₃N₅/CdS. The proper capacitance and enhanced activity of Ta₃N₅ demonstrates the capacitance catalysis effect of Ta₃N₅, which improves the charges separation and storing of the photoexcited electrons from CdS. Au acts as an active site for proton reduction to further improve the activity.

1. Introduction

Excessive consumption of conventional fossil energy brings numerous environmental pollution problems. Hydrogen (H₂) has increased significant attention as a clean, renewable energy source. Technology of photocatalytic hydrogen production by water decomposition uses semiconductors that directly convert solar energy into hydrogen [1]. However, the limited catalytic efficiency of this endothermic reaction is due to kinetic and thermodynamic energy barriers, combined with insufficient active sites and recombination of photogenerated carriers. To address these issues, various co-catalysts are usually loaded on the surface of the photocatalyst to reduce the recombination of photogenerated carriers, increase the active site of the catalytic reaction and improve the hydrogen production activity. Generally speaking, co-catalysts are noble and non-noble metal hydrogen production co-catalysts. Noble metals, such as platinum, palladium, are limited by their high cost and global low availability [2]. Therefore, it is imperative to develop a non-precious metal co-catalyst.

CdS is a type of semiconductor that exhibits a strong visible light response and possesses the ability to absorb solar energy across a wider spectrum compared with ordinary UV-absorbing semiconductors. It has a strong molar-absorption rate and good light trapping characteristics. However, a single CdS tends to suffer from photo-corrosion and poor self-catalytic activity, which limits its applications in the field of photocatalysis. The supported co-catalyst can provide abundant active sites, enhance light absorption, enhance electron-hole pair separation, and improve the photocatalytic hydrogen production performance of CdS. Recently, some non-noble metal co-catalysts are reported for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution, which includes sulfides [3,4], nitrides [5,6], carbides [7,8], phosphides [9,10], etc. In recent years, transition metal nitrides and nitrogen oxides have received extensive attention in the fields of photocatalysis and photocatalysis. We also develop a series of non-noble metal co-catalysts. The composite co-catalysts are formed by combining non-noble metals and noble metals. Non-noble metals with suitable capacitance can store photo-excited electrons and promote the separation of photo-excited charges of semiconductor [11]. However, excessive capacitance will hinder the release of electrons. The non-noble metal co-catalysts exhibit capacitance catalysis effects (positive and negative effects) [12]. Loading noble metals on the surface of a non-noble metal co-catalyst is an effective way to improve the electrons releasing [13].

In the field of photocatalysis, Ti²⁺, Ta⁵⁺, Ga³⁺, Nb⁵⁺ and other metal cation nitrides and nitrogen oxides are suitable photoanode materials. Preparation of these materials involves a straightforward process of subjecting metal oxides to ammonia gas (NH₃). Ta₃N₅ as a famous nitride semiconductor, extensively utilized in the degradation of harmful pharmaceutical pollutants [14,15] and photocatalytic hydrogen production [16]. In recent years, there has been a deepened interest on the research of nitrogen compounds and nitrogen oxide materials in the field of photocatalytic water decomposition. As a typical d0-type transition metal nitride, Ta₃N₅ possesses an appropriate band gap and band position, making it one of the most promising semiconducting materials for photocatalytic water splitting. According to the concept of nitrides, as non-noble metal co-catalysts, can tantalum nitride be used as a co-catalyst or further combined with noble metals to form a more efficient co-catalyst? In addition, precious metals (such as Au, Pt, Ru and Rh) have empty electron orbitals and small energy level spacing, and when they are combined with co-catalysts, they exhibit excellent catalytic effects [17,18]. Due to the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) effect, gold usually exhibits extensive absorption in the UV-VIS range. Combining gold into semiconductors greatly improves the efficiency of photocatalytic hydrogen production [19].

Here, a composite co-catalyst of (Au/Ta₃N₅) is designed on CdS for photocatalytic hydrogen production. (Au/Ta₃N₅) shows excellent co-catalytic properties. The activity of (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS is 7.3 times of bare CdS and 2.2 times of Ta₃N₅/CdS, respectively. Through cyclic voltammetry testing, it was observed that Ta₃N₅/CdS has a larger specific capacitance than CdS. This indicates that when Ta₃N₅ was loaded, Ta₃N₅/CdS’s ability to store electrons enhanced. Furthermore, the fluorescence intensity of Au/Ta₃N₅/CdS is the lowest, indicating that the loading of Au greatly inhibits the recombination of electron hole pairs, which is attributed to Ta₃N₅’s capacity to store electrons and Au’s enhanced electron transport rate. Finally, Ta₃N₅ is also demonstrated as a nitride co-catalyst, and the roles of Au and Ta₃N₅ in (Au/Ta₃N₅) are illustrated.

2. Results

2.1. Catalysts Structure

First of all the Ta₃N₅ was prepared by an nitridation method in an ammonia flow, subsequently, the Ta₃N₅ was combined with CdS to form Ta₃N₅/CdS composite photocatalyst. Additionally, the (Au/Ta₃N₅) is prepared with photo-deposition method and then combined with CdS to form an (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS ternary photocatalyst. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the different samples are shown in Figure S1. For CdS, typical characteristic diffraction peaks of 24.8, 26.5, and 28.2° were observed, which could be indexed to the (100), (002), and (101) planes of CdS, and could also correspond to PDF#41-1049. Meanwhile, Ta₃N₅ exhibited characteristic diffraction peaks of 17.3, 24.5, 34.9, and 36.0° was observed, which indexed to the (002), (022), and (025) planes of Ta₃N₅, respectively. Figure S1 (Supplementary materials) also shows the XRD patterns of CdS loading with different amounts of Ta₃N₅. When the amount of Ta₃N₅ (PDF #19-1291) loading exceeded 5.0%, Ta₃N₅’s diffraction peaks can be distinguished. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of the Ta₃N₅ (Figure 1a) exhibited a smooth block, while CdS shows a uniformly distributed rod structure (Figure 1b). Figure 1c is the TEM image of (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS, which shows the uniform small particles (Au/Ta₃N₅) loading on a rod-shaped CdS. The HRTEM image of (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS (Figure 1d) shows that Au and Ta₃N₅ are closely bound to CdS, with the lattice spacing of 0.348 nm, corresponding to the (022) crystal plane of Ta₃N₅, the lattice spacing of 0.338 nm relating to the (002) crystal plane of CdS, and that of 0.165 nm corresponding to the (220) crystal plane of Au.

2.2. Photocatalytic H₂ Evolution

Figure 2 shows the photocatalytic H₂ evolution on CdS, Ta₃N₅, Ta₃N₅/CdS and (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS. It is evident that CdS alone exhibits poor H₂ evolution activity (1161 μmol/(h·g)). When Ta₃N₅ is loaded on CdS, the hydrogen production activity of Ta₃N₅/CdS is significantly enhanced, which shows 3.3 times of bare CdS. Here, the loading amount of Ta₃N₅ on CdS shows photocatalytic activity of 3846 μmol/(h·g) was optimal at 10.0% (Figure S2a). When the loading capacity of Au was 1% and that of Ta₃N₅ was 10%, the hydrogen production activity of Au/(Ta₃N₅/CdS) and Ta₃N₅/(Au/CdS) was 7022 μmol/(h·g) and 4294 μmol/(h·g), respectively (Figure S2b,c). When the (Au/Ta₃N₅) is loaded on CdS, the activity of (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS is improved further, and shows the highest photocatalytic activity of 8454 μmol/(h·g), which is 2.2 times of Ta₃N₅/CdS and 7.3 times of CdS. The improved activities by the use of Ta₃N₅ and (Au/Ta₃N₅) demonstrates that Ta₃N₅ and (Au/Ta₃N₅) are proper co-catalysts. The optimal loading of Ta₃N₅ and Au in (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS are 10.0% and 1.0%, respectively (Figure S2). Based on integration with Figure S2, the role of Au and Ta₃N₅ in (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS can be inferred. In (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS, Ta₃N₅ plays the role of storing photoexcited electrons, and Au further improves the electron transport rate. Among the ternary catalyst formed by Au, Ta₃N₅ and CdS; (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS is the optimum catalyst. The electrons transfer from CdS to Ta₃N₅ and then to Au, and this is the best way for the photocatalytic H₂ evolution (Figure S2).

2.3. Capacitance of Catalysts

In order to further explore the internal reasons of excellent activity of a composite catalyst (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS in photocatalytic hydrogen evolution, we carried out double-layer capacitance analysis and constant-current charge–discharge. Figure 3a shows the capacitance plot of CdS, Ta₃N₅, Ta₃N₅/CdS and (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS. CdS has the smallest specific capacitance of 2.40 F/g, while Ta₃N₅ has the capacitance of 3.60 F/g. However, it is interesting that the specific capacitance of Ta₃N₅/CdS is increased to 4.29 F/g after Ta₃N₅ is loaded on CdS, which may be attributed to the interface effects between Ta₃N₅ and CdS. When Au and Ta₃N₅ form a composite co-catalyst and are supported on CdS, the specific capacitance of (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS is at a maximum of 5.82 F/g. Figure S3 also supports this result. It attributed to Ta₃N₅’s large capacitance for storing electrons [20] and Au’s plasma effect, which can also store electrons to some degree [21]. Figure 3b shows the constant current charge and discharge curves of the four different catalysts. In the test of ten cycles, CdS has the shortest charge and discharge time, Ta₃N₅/CdS shows a slightly longer time than CdS, and (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS shows the longest time, which further proves the largest capacitance of (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS.

2.4. Photoelectrochemical Performance Evaluation

The curves of transient photocurrent responses of the four different catalysts are shown in Figure 4a. The bare Ta₃N₅ and bare CdS shows the very photocurrent responses, also indicating Ta₃N₅ and CdS are semiconductor photocatalysts. When the light is obstructed, the photocurrent of the individual CdS decreases rapidly, indicating that the photogenic charge will quickly recombine and annihilate, whereas Ta₃N₅/CdS shows a slower photocurrent attenuation, indicating that the photoinduced charge in CdS is not immediately annihilated, but stored in the co-catalyst. The Ta₃N₅/CdS has improved photocurrent responses compared with CdS, and the (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS ternary catalyst shows the highest photocurrent responses. The improved photocurrent responses indicates that Ta₃N₅ is an efficient co-catalyst and Au further enhances the co-catalyst properties of Ta₃N₅. Figure 4b shows the linear scanning voltammetry curves of the four kinds of catalysts. The (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS has the lowest hydrogen overpotential which is attributed to addition of the noble metal of Au. Higher −60 mA/cm², Ta₃N₅/CdS shows the poorest overpotential, which may be caused by the interface effects between Ta₃N₅ and CdS. At and lower −60 mA/cm², Ta₃N₅/CdS shows the similar overpotential to the Ta₃N₅. The electrochemical impedance spectra is shown in Figure 4c. The Nyquist semicircle radius of the CdS is the largest and then followed by the Ta₃N₅. The Nyquist semicircle radius of Ta₃N₅/CdS is much smaller than the bare CdS and the bare Ta₃N₅, while (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS shows the minimum Nyquist semicircle radius. The reduced semicircle radius means the minimum interface resistance and the fast-charge transfer is beneficial to the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Among the different catalysts composed of Au, Ta₃N₅ and CdS, (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS still exhibits the highest photocurrent response, the lowest overpotential and the smallest interfacial resistance(Figure S4). Through the above electrochemical performance tests, we found that the excellent hydrogen production performance of the ternary composite photocatalyst (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS was due to the excellent performance of both noble metal Au and non-noble metal Ta₃N₅ as the composite co-catalyst (Au/Ta₃N₅). Non-precious metal Ta₃N₅ has large capacitance, which can store more photogenerated electrons and effectively reduce the recombination of photogenerated carriers. Noble metal Au has good electron conduction and proton catalytic ability, which can significantly reduce the overpotential and interfacial transfer resistance in the process of hydrogen production reaction, and then reduce the energy barrier in the photocatalytic hydrogen production reaction, and carry out the proton catalytic hydrogen production reaction, so that the ternary composite catalyst (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS has the best hydrogen production performance. In Figure 4d,e, the direct bandgap between CdS and Ta₃N₅ can be seen through Tauc plot, respectively. What needs to be noted is that we use the absorption value of diffuse reflection spectrum Abs to replace the absorption coefficient α. The band gap of CdS is 2.32 eV with the absorption edge at 562 nm. The band gap of Ta₃N₅ is 1.95 eV with the absorption edge at 658 nm. Ta₃N₅/CdS and (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS exhibits strong tail absorption after 630 nm. Based on this, it is possible for CdS and Ta₃N₅ to form a heterojunction [22]. Generally speaking, Au shows an absorption peak of 560 nm, which is ascribed to the characteristic localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) effect of Au nanoparticles [23]. However, Ta₃N₅ of catalyst (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS also exhibits a strong absorption peak at 500–600 nm, which may mask the absorption peak of Au.

2.5. PL Spectra and Surface Photovoltage Spectra

The photoluminescence (PL) spectra of CdS, Ta₃N₅/CdS and (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS are shown in Figure 5a. CdS shows the strongest photoluminescence peak at 600 nm, indicating the poorest charges separation of CdS. After loading Ta₃N₅ and (Au/Ta₃N₅) on CdS, the fluorescence intensities at 600 nm are greatly reduced, which means the great inhibitions of the charges recombination. (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS shows the lowest photoluminescence intensities, which means the Au with Ta₃N₅ further inhibits the recombination of the charge recombination of CdS. The peak at 750 nm is caused by Ta₃N₅ [24], and the fluorescence intensity of (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS is also lower than Ta₃N₅/CdS. The surface photovoltage (SPV) spectra of CdS-based photocatalysts are shown in Figure 5b. Obviously, the photovoltage response signal of CdS is lowest, and the Ta₃N₅/CdS is improved relative to CdS. In Figure 5b and Figure S5, the (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS showed the highest photovoltage response signal. The enhanced photovoltage responses indicate the efficient separation of the photoexcited carriers of CdS, further demonstrating the efficient co-catalyst’s characterizations of Ta₃N₅ and (Au/Ta₃N₅).

2.6. XPS Spectra of (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS

XPS analysis could further provide detailed information about the surface state and chemical composition of composite photocatalyst (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS. The gold ratio is magnified to 5.0% to obtain a clear picture. As shown in Figure 6a, the XPS survey of(Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS indicated the existence of Au, Ta, N, Cd and S elements in the sample, which indicates the successful synthesis of (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS composites. The Au 4f spectrum in Figure 6b displayed two peaks at 84.2 and 87.9 eV, attributing to the Au 4f_7/2 and Au 4f_5/2, respectively [25]. The Ta Ta 4f_5/2 and 4f_7/2 components are 27.0, 25.2 eV, may be attributed to Ta⁵⁺. The N 1s spectrum is 405.1 eV, which is shown in Figure 6c [26]. As seen in Figure 6e, the peak of Cd 3d at 411.8 eV was attributed to Cd 3d_5/2. The peak of Cd 3d at 405.0 eV was attributed to Cd 3d_3/2. The S 2p components are 161.6 and 162.8 eV; the two peaks could be attributed to S 2p_3/2 and S 2p_1/2, respectively [27].

2.7. The Photocatalytic H₂ Evolution Structure and Mechanism

Scheme 1a shows the structural diagram of (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS. Rod-shaped CdS were prepared by hydrothermal reduction, while Ta₃N₅ was prepared by nitriding Ta₂O₅ via ammonia treatment. Following this, Au was deposited on the surface of Ta₃N₅ by photodeposition. Ta₃N₅ is closely bound to Au to form (Au/Ta₃N₅) composite catalyst, and then (Au/Ta₃N₅) is loaded on rod CdS to form (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS photocatalysts. Scheme 1b illustrates the mechanism of photocatalytic H₂ evolution on (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS. The conduction band position of CdS and Ta₃N₅ are −0.72 and −0.20 eV, respectively [27,28,29]. Under visible light irradiation, CdS are photoexcited, then photoexcited electrons in their conduction band are transferred to Ta₃N₅ with appropriate capacitance and, subsequently, become trapped because Ta₃N₅ has a lower conduction band than CdS. Then, the trapped electron in Ta₃N₅ rapidly transfers to the Au surface for proton reduction hydrogen evolution. Due to the synergistic effects of co-catalyst Ta₃N₅ and noble metal Au, the composite co-catalyst (Au/Ta₃N₅) shows the optimum property and the (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS shows the largest H₂ evolution activity. The holes in the valence band (VB) of CdS and Ta₃N₅ are consumed by the sacrificial lactic acid. Among the ternary catalyst formed by Au, Ta₃N₅ and CdS, (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS is the optimum catalyst. The electron’s transfer from CdS to Ta₃N₅ and then to Au is the most efficient pathway for the photocatalytic H₂ evolution (Figure S2, Supplementary materials).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals and Materials

All materials were of analytical reagent (AR) and used without further purification. Tantalum oxide (Ta₂O₅), ethylenediamine (C₂H₈N₂), thiourea (CH₄N₂S), cadmium nitrate (CdN₂O₆) and ethanol (CH₃CH₂OH) were obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Chloroauric acid (H₂AuCl₄·3H₂O) was purchased from Aladdin Bio-Chem Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).

3.2. Preparation of Photocatalysts

3.2.1. Synthesis of Ta₃N₅

Ta₃N₅ was synthesized by nitriding Ta₂O₅ in a quartz boat under ammonia gas (flow rate: 300 mL/min) at 850 °C for 12 h [28].

3.2.2. Synthesis of Rod-Shaped CdS

Rod-shaped CdS were prepared by the hydrothermal method [29]. In total, 1.85 g of CdN₂O₆·4H₂O was dissolved in 60 mL of C₂H₈N₂. Then, 1.37 g of CH₄N₂S was added to the solution and stirred for 30 min before being transferred into to a 100 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave. The autoclave was sealed and heated at 120 °C for 12 h and then cooled to room temperature naturally. The final products were collected by filtration and dried in an oven at 60 °C for 12 h.

3.2.3. Synthesis of Ta₃N₅/CdS

Ta₃N₅/CdS composites were prepared by the impregnation method with different mass ratios (wt%) of Ta₃N₅ to CdS: 1%, 3%, 5%, 10%, 13%, 15% and 20%. Firstly, a certain amount of CdS powder was dispersed in absolute ethanol by ultrasonication for half an hour. Then, a calculated amount of Ta₃N₅ powder was added to the suspension and stirred for another half an hour. After evaporating the solvent at 60 °C for dryness, the obtained solid was ground into a fine powder. The samples were denoted as xTa₃N₅/CdS, where x represents the mass percentage of Ta₃N₅ and dried at 60 °C for overnight in vacuum drying oven. To prepare (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS, 0.5 g of CdS and a certain amount of (Au/Ta₃N₅) were dissolved in 30 mL of anhydrous ethanol and heated at 60 °C under vigorous stirring until the deionized water had evaporated. Ta₃N₅/CdS is prepared in the same way as (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS, in the case that Ta₃N₅ replaces (Au/Ta₃N₅). Au/(Ta₃N₅/CdS) was prepared by light deposition. A certain amount of Ta₃N₅/CdS was added into 10mL of lactic acid (C₃H₆O₃) sacrificant and 90 mL of deionized water, and put into the photocatalytic reaction tank. Then, the chlorauric acid (HAuCl₄·xH₂O, Au content 1.0 mg/mL) as the precursor of Au was put into the photocatalytic reaction tank, different mass ratios (wt%) of Au was 0.1%, 0.5%, 1% and 2%. The surface of Ta₃N₅/CdS was impregnated with Au at 300 W by the method of photodeposition Xenon lamp as the light source for 1 h, the solution obtained after repeated centrifugation, washing for 3 times with water and ethanol, drying for 12 h and obtain composite catalyst Au/(Ta₃N₅/CdS). The preparation procedure of Ta₃N₅/(Au/CdS) is the same as (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS, only Ta₃N₅ in (Au/Ta₃N₅) needs to be replaced by CdS to get (Au/CdS). A certain amount of Au/CdS and Ta₃N₅ with different mass ratios were added to 60 mL of deionized water and mixed evenly. Ta₃N₅/(Au/CdS) was obtained after ultrasound for 1 h, and was soaked and dried by stirring at 60 °C.

3.3. Characterization

The structures of CdS, Ta₃N₅, Ta₃N₅/CdS and (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS were confirmed by X-ray diffraction (D/MAX2500, Rigaku, Japan) under copper Kα irradiated at a voltage of 40 kV and with a current of 40 mA. The strafing range was 3–85° and scanning frequency was 8° per minute. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), obtained on a Tecnai G2 F20 transmission electron microscope (FEI Co., Ltd., Hillsboro, OR, USA) with an acceleration voltage of 200 kV at room temperature, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images were obtained on a Talos F200 model transmission electron microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific Co., Ltd., Waltham, MA, USA). Digital Micrograph software 1.6.2 was used to measure the lattice fringes in HRTEM images, and then compared with Jade6.5 PDF-2004 standard cards to obtain the distribution of different components and crystal surfaces of catalyst materials. UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (UV-vis DRS), obtained by a UV-vis spectrophotometer Varian Cary 500 (Varian Co., Ltd., Palo Alto, CA, USA), and BaSO₄, was used as the reference standard whiteboard with a measuring range of 200–800 nm. Fluorescence photoluminescence (PL) spectra was measured using FLS1000 (Edinburgh Instruments Co., Ltd., Livingston, Scotland, UK). The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was obtained by the K-Alpha instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific Co., Ltd., Waltham, MA, USA. The binding energy of C 1s was 284.8 eV for charge correction.

3.4. Electrochemical Measurements

Electrochemical measurements were performed in a three-electrode system at the electrochemical station (CHI660E) manufactured by Chenhua Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. Sample-coated FTO film or foam-Ni film was used as the working electrode, while a Pt sheet served as the counter electrode, and a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) was used as the reference electrode [20]. In total, 20 mg of the test sample and 30 µL Nafion D521 solution were added to 500 µL ethanol and 500 µL N,N-dimethylformamide, and ground for 20 min to make a mixed solution. A pipette was then used to drop 20 mL of the mixture onto a tape controlled 5 mm × 5 mm square FTO glass area, which was air-dried and subsequently roasted in a Muffle oven at 250 °C for 0.5 h and cooled to room temperature, resulting in a sample-coated FTO film. The FTO film was used in Linear voltammetry, transient photocurrent and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy in 0.5 M Na₂SO₄ solution. Transient photocurrent testing requires a 300 W xenon lamp with a cut-off filter (down > 420 nm) as a light source. A nickel film as the working electrode was used in the voltammetry cycle curve test and constant current charge and discharge test. A 20 mg sample was tested with 2.5 mg active carbon black, 2.5 mg polyvinylidene fluoride, and 1.0 mL of NMP (N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone) as dispersant grinding for 30 min. The mixture was coated with 100 μL of the solution and dried at 90 °C for 8 h to obtain the nickel-foam film covering the sample. The calculation formula of capacitance in this experiment is to calculate the difference ∆J (A/g) between anode current density (Ja) and cathode current density (Jc), and then draw a graph based on the difference between sweep speed and current density. The slope of the line that was obtained is the calculated capacitance value.

3.5. Photocatalytic Test

The photocatalytic reactions were conducted in a closed vacuum system (Perfect Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) irradiated by a 300 W Xe lamp (PLS-SXE300C, Perfectlight Co., Beijing, China), which was equipped with a 420 nm cut-off filter. The gas produced was tested by GC7900 gas chromatography of Tianmei Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. Specifically, 0.1 g of the photocatalyst was dispersed in 100 mL of aqueous solution containing 90 mL of deionized water and 10 mL of lactic acid. The solution was transferred to the reactor after ultrasound. The reactor was connected with the photolysis water hydrogen production system, and then the condensed water was passed into the reactor. The reaction system was vacuumized for about 30 min, and a 300 W Xe lamp equipped with a 420 nm cut-off filter was used as the visible light source. After 1 h illumination, Ar was used as the carrier gas, and hydrogen production was detected by gas chromatography with a TDX-01 column and TCD detector. Then, recording the peak location and peak area of hydrogen, and calculating the amount of hydrogen produced according to the standard curve of hydrogen was performed.

4. Conclusions

In summary, it has been demonstrated that Ta₃N₅ is a co-catalyst for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. The H₂ evolution activity of Ta₃N₅/CdS shows 3.3 times of that of bare CdS. When the (Au/Ta₃N₅) composite co-catalyst is loaded on CdS, the activity of (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS is significantly enhanced, which shows that (Au/Ta₃N₅) is an efficient composite co-catalyst. With appropriate capacitance, Ta₃N₅ can effectively store photo-excited electrons from CdS, and Au further promotes the release of the photo-excited electrons stored in Ta₃N₅, thus (Au/Ta₃N₅)/CdS shows the optimum activity. The present work enriches the range of non-noble metal nitride co-catalysts and demonstrates the effectiveness of the noble metal/non-noble metal composite co-catalyst model.