Next Article in Journal
First Two-Way Electrochemical Sensor for the Detection of the Pollutant 2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine and Its Metabolite Based on Cu-Containing Tungstophosphate and Graphene Oxide
Next Article in Special Issue
Facile Synthesis of Silicon-Based Materials Modified Using Zinc(Ⅱ) 2-Bromoacetic as Heterogeneous Catalyst for the Fixation of CO2 into Cyclic Carbonates
Previous Article in Journal
Production of Hydrogen from Lignocellulosic Biomass: A Review of Technologies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Petal-like g-C3N4 Enhances the Photocatalyst Removal of Hexavalent Chromium
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Catalysts
Volume 13
Issue 4
10.3390/catal13040767
catalysts-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Au Nanoparticles Supported on Mn- or/and La-Doped CeO2 Nanorods for One-Step Oxidative Esterification of Methacrolein and Methanol to Methyl Methacrylate

by
Haojian Zhang
1,2
1
School of Materials and Chemical Engineering, Ningbo University of Technology, Ningbo 315211, China
2
Zhejiang Institute of Tianjin University, Ningbo 315201, China
Catalysts 2023, 13(4), 767; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13040767
Submission received: 9 March 2023 / Revised: 12 April 2023 / Accepted: 13 April 2023 / Published: 18 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synthesis and In-Depth Characterization of Supported and Highly Dispersed Catalysts)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Mn- or/and La-doped CeO2 nanorods supporting Au catalysts were prepared using the hydrothermal method and deposition precipitation (DP) method and applied to the direct oxidative esterification of methacrolein (MAL) and methanol into methyl methacrylate (MMA). Various characterization techniques such as N2-physical adsorption, X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), H2 temperature programmed reduction (TPR) and CO2 temperature programmed desorption (TPD) were utilized to analyze the structural properties, reducibility and basicity of Au catalysts. The catalyst with Mn doping only showed the best performance, and particularly the highest conversion, while the catalyst with Mn and La doping showed the highest selectivity.

1. Introduction

Methyl methacrylate (MMA) is an important organic chemical intermediate, which is widely used for producing acrylic plastics (e.g., poly methyl methacrylate, PMMA), polymer dispersions for paints and coatings and other important fine chemicals. The industrial production of MMA is mainly through the acetone cyanhydrin method (ACH process), the ethylene carbonylation method and the isobutylene oxidation method [1,2]. However, the former two methods suffer from serious environmental and economic drawbacks, such as the use of highly toxic hydrogen cyanide and the harsh conditions of the transportation and storage of ethylene, which mean an environmentally benign route for the production of MMA is urgently needed [3]. The two-step oxidation process of the isobutylene oxidation method, including the oxidation of isobutylene to methacrolein (MAL) and the oxidative esterification of MAL with methanol in oxygen atmosphere, is one of the most attractive routes for the production of MMA.
Supported Pd-based catalysts have been widely considered because of their mild operating conditions. A wide variety of materials such as CaCO3, ZnO, Al2O3, SiO2-A12O3-MgO, MgO-SBA-15, hydrophobic copolymer and other supports have been exploited for Pd-based catalysts [4,5,6,7,8,9]. Usually, additives such as Pb, Bi, Ag and alkaline earth metals are added to improve the catalytic performance. However, Pb is quite toxic, and an additional alkali is usually required. In most cases, the use of a large excess of methanol may cause high energy consumption in the following separation process. Therefore, the design of a new catalyst with excellent catalytic performance for the oxidative esterification of MAL is an important and urgent task.
Compared with the Pd-based catalysts, Au-based catalysts have attracted extensive attention due to their excellent catalytic properties in terms of selectivity for the oxidative esterification of MAL. Efforts are mainly focused on exploiting suitable supports such as SiO2-Al2O3-MgO, MgO, hydroxyapatite, La2O3 and Ce-based oxides [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20] with aims to adjust the particle size of Au, the interaction between active components (Au nanoparticles) with the support, the reducibility, as well as the acidic–basic properties for obtaining a catalyst with excellent catalytic performance under base-free conditions. A AuNiOX catalyst with a core–shell structure supported on SiO2-A12O3-MgO showed high selectivity (around 98%) of MMA, while the conversion of MAL was only 62%, as reported by Suzuki et al. [10]. Wang et al. found supports with high densities of basic sites, particularly the stronger basic sites, exhibited good catalytic performances [12]. Thus, the Au/MgO catalyst possessed the MAL conversion of 98% and MMA selectivity of 99%. Au nanoparticles dispersed on needle-like hydroxyapatite and La2O3 nanorods exhibited higher catalytic activity and selectivity under mild reaction conditions with strong interaction, abundant in surface defects and acid–base sites [13,15].
CeO2-based oxides have been widely applied as supports or catalysts for different kinds of reactions due to their high oxygen storage/release capacities. Doping transition metal atoms (such as Mn, Zr) into the CeO2 crystal lattice is beneficial for forming oxygen vacancy clusters on CeO2-based oxide surfaces and constructing more defect sites, so as to significantly promote the formation of reactive oxygen species and improve the catalytic performance [17,18,19]. Meanwhile, such a metal-doping strategy has many advantages in improving the potential reducibility, basicity and oxygen storage/release capabilities of supports [16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. Mn has been proved to be an excellent doping element for many reactions such as aldehyde oxidative esterification, CO oxidation and ammonia oxidation [18,22,23]. CeO2-based solid solutions containing rare earth metals have been extensively studied for three-way catalyst (TWC) application and soot oxidation reaction [24,25,26]. Au nanoparticles supported on La-doped CeO2-based oxides for the oxidative esterification of aldehydes have not been demonstrated.
Based on the above analysis, Mn- or/and La-doped CeO2 nanorods supporting Au catalysts were prepared using the hydrothermal method and deposition precipitation (DP) method. The effects of different metal-doped supports on the performance were studied and correlated with the characterization results of catalysts.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Catalysts Characterization

The XRD patterns of the catalysts are shown in Figure 1. CeO2 nanorods without doping and doping Mn or/and La are labeled as R-C, CM, CL and CML, respectively. Correspondingly, the supported Au catalysts are denoted as Au/R-C, Au/CM, Au/CL and Au/CML. Eight peaks at 28.5°, 33.1°, 47.5°, 56.3°, 59.1°, 69.4°, 76.7° and 79.1° are consistent with (111), (200), (220), (311), (222), (400), (331) and (420) of CeO2 (ICDD, NO. 01-081-0792), respectively. Each catalyst has sharp diffraction peaks, indicating that the prepared support has high crystallinity. No diffraction peaks related to the doping Mn or/and La oxides are observed, indicating that the solid solution is formed due to the introduction of smaller M+ (M = Mn or La) into the CeO2 lattice. Except for Au/CM, no Au characteristic diffraction peak of plane (111) is found near 38.2°, indicating that Au nanoparticles are highly dispersed over the supports.
The physical and structural properties of the catalysts are illustrated in Table 1, including the BET surface area, pore volume, average pore size, Au content and Au NP size. As shown in Table 1, Au/R-C possesses the lowest surface area of 90 m2/g. The surface area of Au/CM and Au/CL increases up to 103 m2/g with Mn or La doping, consistent with the decrease in the crystallite size of support. The Au content of each catalyst is around 1.5%, lower than the experimental design value of 2%. This may be related to the washing process of using NH4OH during the preparation of Au catalysts.
The morphology of the catalysts and particle size of Au were investigated by TEM images. As shown in Figure 2, doping with Mn or/and La does not affect the morphology of the support. All the catalysts are rod-like, and the metal particles Au are basically granular. The results of particle size statistics show that the average particle size of the Au/R-C catalyst is 3.13 nm, that of the catalyst doped with Mn is 6.15 nm, that of the catalyst doped with La is 5.61 nm, and that of the catalyst doped with Mn and La is 5.96 nm.
As the size difference between Au particles and support is small in the TEM analysis, Au particles could be easily overlapped by support. Many Au particles are difficult to distinguish. It is not very suitable to determine the size distribution of Au by TEM alone. Therefore, the size of Au particles in the catalyst was characterized by STEM-EDS, and the uniform distribution of Au particles can be clearly seen as shown in Figure 3.
The XPS technology was used to study the valence state of Au and the relative surface atomic ratios of Ce. Figure 4 shows the XPS spectra of Au 4f, and Table 2 lists the binding energies of Au 4f for all catalysts. All of the samples have similar curves with two large peaks around at 83.5 and 87.2 eV, which belong to the binding energy peaks of Au 4f5/2 and Au 4f7/2 of metallic Au, respectively [27]. The metallic Au and the active oxygen species can enhance the oxidative esterification of aldehydes with methanol effectively [28,29].
Figure 5 represents the Ce 3d spectra of all catalysts. As the hybridization between O 2p levels and the partially occupied Ce 4f level [30], the photoelectron spectra of Ce 3d are very complex. The peaks of Ce 3d spectra are divided into two types of v and u, which correspond to Ce 3d5/2 and Ce 3d3/2, respectively [31,32]. Six peaks at the binding energies of 901.9 (u), 907.9 (u2), 917.1 eV (u3), 882.7 (v), 889.4 (v2) and 898.7 eV (v3) are assigned to the Ce4+ oxidation state, while other two peaks at the binding energies of 885.0 (v1) and 903.5 eV (u1) are assigned to the Ce3+ oxidation state [19]. The content of Ce3+ and Ce4+ can be calculated from the integrated peak area with respect to the total area of the spectra. Meanwhile, the ratio of Ce3+ to Ce4+ is obtained. All of these results are presented in Table 2. The content of Ce3+ in Au/CM is 12.72%, while the content of Ce3+ in Au/R-C is the lowest, accounting for 7.97%. Usually, oxygen vacancies in Ce-based materials are generated by electron transfer between Ce3+ and Ce4+. The higher the content of Ce3+, the more oxygen vacancies exist in the material. From the above analysis, it can be concluded that the catalyst doped with Mn possesses the most oxygen vacancies, followed by the catalysts doped with Mn and La, and Au/R-C has the least oxygen vacancies.
The reducibility of the catalysts was investigated by H2-TPR, as shown in Figure 6. There are mainly two well-separated peaks for all catalysts. The broad peak around 200 °C is assigned to the reduction in oxygen vacancies on the catalyst surface and the chemisorption’s active oxygen species around Au particles. The peak after 650 °C corresponds to the bulk reduction in the oxide supports [33,34]. Au/CM and Au/CML present higher intensities of active oxygen species of the broad peak with the H2 consumption of 1.021 and 0.851 mmol/g, respectively, than Au/CL and Au/R-C with H2 consumption values of 0.791 and 0.704 mmol/g. Obviously, the amount of active oxygen species in the catalysts increases after doping with Mn or/and La, and Au/CM obtains the highest amount, which is consistent with the XPS results.
The surface basicity of supported Au catalysts was probed by CO2-TPD. There are mainly three CO2 desorption peaks in Figure 7. Peaks located at 130 °C, 300 °C and 570 °C are ascribed to weak, medium-strength and strong basic sites, respectively [13,16,35,36]. The amounts of basic sites were quantitatively calculated, and the data are summarized in Table 3. Clearly, the total basicity of the catalysts increases with Mn or/and La doping. Au/CML provides the highest amount of total basicity content. Basic sites mainly come from surface oxygen ions [15]. The introduction of Mn could enhance the number of oxygen ions on the surface [18]. Thus, Au/CML and Au/CM have higher total basicity levels, as the surface Mn content is 1.1% and 1.07%.

2.2. Catalytic Performance

The effects of doping with Mn or/and La on the activity of the catalysts are shown in Table 4. Mn and La have an apparent effect on the oxidative esterification of MAL to MMA. For the Au/R-C catalyst, the conversion of MAL is at a low level of 71.1%, and the selectivity of MMA is 91.6%. After only doping with Mn, the Au/CM catalyst exhibits the best performance with conversion of 98.6% and selectivity of 97.5%. Meanwhile, after only doping with La, the conversion and the selectivity reaches 91.5% and 98.0%, respectively. The conversion of the catalyst with Mn and La doping is 92.6%, which is slightly higher than that of the catalyst doped with La alone, and the selectivity increases to 98.9%.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Synthesis of Mn- or/and La-Doped CeO2 Nanorods and Supporting Au Catalysts

The Mn- or/and La-doped CeO2 nanorods were prepared by the hydrothermal method. Taking the Mn- or La-doped CeO2 nanorods’ preparation as an example, a mixture containing 0.01 mol Ce(NO3)3·6H2O, 0.000526 mol Mn(NO3)2·4H2O or 0.000526 mol La(NO3)3·6H2O with an M/Ce (M = Mn or La) atomic ratio of 5:95 was introduced into a solution of NaOH (7.5 mol/L, 160 mL) and stirred vigorously for 0.5 h at room temperature. Then, the solution was transferred into a Teflon autoclave for hydrothermal reaction in an oven at 100 °C for 24 h. After centrifugation, washing and drying at 80 °C for 12 h, the obtained yellow powers were finally calcined at 400 °C for 4 h to obtain Mn- or La-doped CeO2 nanorods. The Mn- and La-doped CeO2 nanorods were prepared with the same method, except the Mn/La/Ce atomic ratio was 5:5:90.
The supporting Au catalysts were prepared using the deposition precipitation (DP) method. The HAuCl4 (6.2 mL, 10−3 mol/L) was diluted with deionized water (160 mL). After adding 0.6 g of support, the pH of the solution was adjusted with Na2CO3 (0.1 mol/L) to 9. Then, the suspension was aged under continuous stirring at 70 °C for 4 h. Finally, the solid sample was filtered and washed with NH4OH (4 mol/L) and deionized water to remove the remaining chlorine anion. The as-prepared catalyst was dried at 80 °C in a vacuum oven overnight and subsequently treated with 5%H2-95%Ar at 150 °C for 5 h. The theoretical Au loading was 2%.

3.2. Catalysts Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements of the Au catalysts were made with a Rigaku D/max-2550 X-ray diffractometer (Tokyo, Japan) with a Cu Ka radiation source (λ = 0.154 nm) at 40 kV and 100 mA. The diffraction patterns were obtained between 20° and 80° at a scan rate of 4°/min.
A low-temperature N2 physical adsorption/desorption experiment was performed by Micromerities ASAP 2020M (Norcross, GA, USA). Before the determination, all samples were treated at 150 °C and 1.33 Pa for about 6 h. The specific surface area was calculated using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) equation, and the pore size distribution curve was calculated with the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method.
The hydrogen temperature programmed reduction (H2-TPR) of the catalyst was tested using Micromeritics AutoChem II 2920 (Norcross, GA, USA). A 30 mg sample was loaded in a quartz reactor and treated with a 10% H2-90% Ar (v/v) mixture from 50 °C to 800 °C (10 °C/min) under the flow of 50 mL/min.
The CO2-TPD experiments were performed in the same system as used in H2-TPR. In the CO2-TPD experiment, the catalyst sample (50 mg) was firstly heated from room temperature to 200 °C (10 °C/min) for 60 min under an Ar flow rate of 50 mL/min and then cooled to 50 °C. After that, the sample was purged with CO2 (10 mL/min) for 30 min. Finally, the sample was heated to 800 °C at a ramp of 10 °C/min for CO2-TPD.
The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) test was completed on a Thermo NEXSA spectrometer (Waltham, MA, USA) using a monochromatic Al Kα source. The binding energies were calibrated using C1 speak at BE = 284.6 eV.
The elemental analysis of the Au catalysts was determined by using an Agilent ICP-OES 720 spectrometer (Santa Clara, CA, USA). The sample was dissolved in aqua regia before testing.
The catalyst samples were dispersed in ethanol using ultrasonic wave and deposited in the microscope grid. The TEM diagrams and elemental mapping measurements were analyzed by JEOLTEM 2100F (Tokyo, Japan).

3.3. Catalysts Evaluation

The oxidative esterification of MAL with methanol was performed in a continuous stirred tank reactor with a 50 mL polytetrafluoroethylene inner liner, into which the catalyst (0.2 g), MAL (10 mmol) and methanol (10 mL) were added. The reactor was purged with highly pure O2 with a flow rate of 20 mL/min three times, which was maintained for 2 min each time. After that, the temperature of the reactor was increased to 80 °C. Then, O2 was fed into the reactor under a stirring speed of 1000 rpm, and the relative pressure was kept at 0.3 MPa. After a 2 h reaction, the reactor was cooled rapidly in an ice water bath. Finally, the products were analyzed via a gas chromatograph of Shimadzu 2018 equipped with an AE-FFAP column (30 m × 0.32 mm × 0.5 μm) and an FID detector using ethanol as an internal standard for quantification.

4. Conclusions

Mn and La have significant influences on physico-chemical properties, reducibility and basicity behaviors, as well as the catalytic performances of CeO2-based nanorods supported by Au catalysts. The characterization results indicate that the surface area, oxygen vacancies, amount of active oxygen species and total basicity of the catalysts apparently increased with Mn or/and La doping. The amount of active oxygen species and total basicity are beneficial for improving the conversion and selectivity, respectively. The Au/CM catalyst with the highest amount of active oxygen species showed the best performance, and in particular, had the highest conversion of 98.6%. Au/CML had the highest selectivity of 98.9% as the highest total basicity of the catalyst.

Funding

This research was funded by State Key Laboratory of Molecular Engineering of Polymers (Fudan University), grant number K2022-12.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available in the article.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the public testing platform of Ningbo University of Technology. Thanks for the technical support with the XRD, BET, ICP, TPD, TPR, TEM and XPS measurements.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nagai, K. New developments in the production of methyl methacrylate. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2001, 221, 367–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yamamatsu, S.; Yamaguchi, T.; Yokota, K.; Nagano, O.; Chono, M.; Aoshima, A. Development of catalyst technology for producing methyl methacrylate (MMA) by direct methyl esterification. Catal. Surv. Asia 2010, 14, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mahboub, M.J.D.; Dubois, J.L.; Cavani, F.; Rostamizadeh, M.; Patience, G.S. Catalysis for the synthesis of methacrylic acid and methyl methacrylate. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 7703–7738. [Google Scholar]
  4. Yoshida, Y.; Mikami, Y.; Oh-Kita, M. Process for Producing Carboxylic Acid Esters and Catalyst. EP 0972759, 19 March 1998. [Google Scholar]
  5. Diao, Y.Y.; Yan, R.Y.; Zhang, S.J.; Yang, P.; Li, Z.X.; Wang, L.; Dong, H.F. Effects of Pb and Mg doping in Al2O3-supported Pd catalyst on direct oxidative esterification of aldehydes with alcohols to esters. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2009, 303, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jiang, L.; Diao, Y.Y.; Han, J.X.; Yan, R.Y.; Zhang, X.P.; Zhang, S.J. MgO-SBA-15 supported Pd-Pb catalysts for oxidative esterification of methacrolein with methanol to methyl methacrylate. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2014, 22, 1098–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, B.H.; Sun, W.J.; Zhu, J.; Ran, W.L.; Chen, S. Pd-Pb/SDB bimetallic catalysts for the direct oxidative esterification of methacrolein to methyl methacrylate. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 15004–15010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, B.H.; Li, H.; Zhu, J.; Sun, W.J.; Chen, S. Preparation and characterization of mono-/multi-metallic hydrophobic catalysts for the oxidative esterification of methacrolein to methyl methacrylate. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2013, 379, 322–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, B.H.; Ran, W.L.; Sun, W.J.; Wang, K. Direct Oxidative Esterification of Aldehyde with Alcohol to Ester over Pd/Styrene-Divinyl Benzene Copolymer Catalyst. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 3932–3938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Suzuki, K.; Yamaguchi, T.; Matsushita, K.; Iitsuka, C.; Miura, J.; Akaogi, T.; Ishida, H. Aerobic Oxidative Esterification of Aldehydes with Alcohols by Gold-Nickel Oxide Nanoparticle Catalysts with a Core-Shell Structure. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 1845–1849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Costa, V.V.; Estrada, M.; Demidova, Y.; Prosvirin, I.; Kriventsov, V.; Cotta, R.F.; Fuentes, S.; Simakov, A.; Gusevskaya, E.V. Gold Nanoparticles Supported on Magnesium Oxide as Catalysts for the Aerobic Oxidation of Alcohols under Alkali-Free Conditions. J. Catal. 2012, 292, 148–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wan, X.; Deng, W.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y. Magnesia-Supported Gold Nanoparticles as Efficient Catalysts for Oxidative Esterification of Aldehydes or Alcohols with Methanol to Methyl Esters. Catal. Today 2014, 233, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gao, J.; Fan, G.L.; Yang, L.; Cao, X.Z.; Zhang, P.; Li, F. Oxidative esterification of methacrolein to methyl methacrylate over gold nanoparticles on hydroxyapatite. ChemCatChem 2017, 9, 1230–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, J.; Li, H.Y.; Liu, Z.Y.; Akri, M.; Tan, Y.; Kang, L.L.; Chi, J.; Qiao, B.T.; Ding, Y.J. Synergic effect between gold and vanadate substituted hydroxyapatite support for synthesis of methyl methacrylate by one-step oxidative esterification. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 431, 133207–133219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Paul, B.; Khatun, R.; Sharma, S.K.; Adak, S.; Singh, G.; Das, D.; Siddiqui, N.; Bhandari, S.; Joshi, V.; Sasaki, T.; et al. Fabrication of Au nanoparticles supported on one-dimensional (1D) La2O3 nanorods for selective Esterification of Methacrolein to Methyl Methacrylate with Molecular Oxygen. ACS Sustinable Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 3982–3994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, Y.C.; Wang, L.; Yan, R.Y.; Han, J.X.; Zhang, S.J. Promoting effects of MgO, (NH4)2SO4 or MoO3 modification in oxidative esterification of methacrolein over Au/Ce0.6Zr0.4O2-based catalysts. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016, 6, 5453–5463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tian, Y.; Li, Y.C.; Zuo, C.C.; Yin, D.F.; Wang, L.; Zheng, Y.X.; Huang, H.F.; Fu, Z.J.; Wang, M. Ionic-Liquid-Modified Porous Au/CeMnOx Nanorods for Methyl Methacrylate (MMA) Synthesis via Direct Oxidative Esterification. ChemNanoMat 2019, 5, 1361–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tian, Y.; Li, Y.C.; Zheng, Y.X.; Wang, M.; Zuo, C.C.; Huang, H.F.; Yin, D.F.; Fu, Z.J.; Tan, J.; Zhou, Z.C. Nano-Au/MCeOx Catalysts for the Direct Oxidative Esterification of Methylacrolein to Methyl Esters. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 19397–19405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, Y.C.; Tian, Y.X.; Ge, T.T.; Fu, Z.J.; Jiao, T.T.; Wang, M.; Huang, H.F.; Zuo, C.C. Direct oxidation esterification of methacrolein with methanol: Oxygen vacancy promotion of Zr-doped Au/CeO2 nanorods. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2020, 3, 767–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lim, S.; Kwon, S.; Kim, N.; Na, K. A Multifunctional Au/CeO2-Mg(OH)2 Catalyst for One-Pot Aerobic Oxidative Esterification of Aldehydes with Alcohols to Alkyl Esters. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lei, T.Q.; Guo, H.Y.; Miao, C.X.; Hua, W.M.; Yue, Y.H.; Gao, Z. Mn-doped CeO2 Nanorod Supported Au Catalysts for Dehydrogenation of Ethane with CO2. Catalysts 2019, 9, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Venkataswamy, P.; Jampaiah, D.; Mukherjee, D.; Aniz, C.U.; Reddy, B.M. Mn-doped ceria solid solutions for CO oxidation at lower temperatures. Catal. Lett. 2016, 146, 2105–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Qi, G.S.; Yang, R.T.; Chang, R. MnOx-CeO2 mixed oxides prepared by co-precipitation for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 at low temperatures. Appl. Catal. B 2004, 51, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gandhi, H.S.; Graham, G.W.; McCabe, E.W. Automotive exhaust catalysis. J. Catal. 2003, 216, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kašpar, J.; Fornasiero, P.; Grazini, M. Use of CeO2-based oxides in the three-way catalysis. Catal. Today. 1999, 50, 285–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bueno-López, A.; Krishna, K.; Makkee, M.; Moulijn, J.A. Enhanced soot oxidation by lattice oxygen via La3+-doped CeO2. J. Catal. 2005, 230, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xiao, Z.R.; Ji, S.; Li, Y.T.; Hou, F.; Zhang, H.C.; Zhang, X.W.; Wang, L.; Li, G.Z. Tuning oxygen vacancies on mesoporous ceria nanorods by metal doping: Controllable magnetic property. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 455, 1037–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Manzoli, M.; Menegazzo, F.; Signoretto, M.; Cruciani, G.; Pinna, F. Effects of synthetic parameters on the catalytic performance of Au/CeO2 for furfural oxidative esterification. J. Catal. 2015, 330, 465–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xu, B.J.; Liu, X.Y.; Haubrich, J.; Friend, C.M. Vapour-phase gold-surface-mediated coupling of aldehydes with methanol. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 61–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Katta, L.; Sudarsanam, P.; Mallesham, B.; Reddy, B.M. Preparation of silica supported ceria-lanthana solid solutions useful for synthesis of 4-methylpent-1-ene and dehydroacetic acid. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2012, 2, 995–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Burroughs, A.; Hamnett, A.; Orchard, A.F.; Thornton, G. Satellite structure in the X-ray photoelectron spectra of some binary and mixed oxides of lanthanum and cerium. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton. Trans. 1976, 17, 1686–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Guo, M.; Lu, J.Q.; Wu, Y.N.; Wang, Y.J.; Luo, M. UV and Visible Raman Studies of Oxygen Vacancies in Rare-Earth-Doped Ceria. Langmuir 2011, 27, 3872–3877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fu, Q.; Saltsburg, H.; Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M. Active Nonmetallic Au and Pt Species on Ceria-Based Water-Gas Shift Catalysts. Science 2003, 301, 935–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Salvatore, S.; Simona, M.; Carmelo, C.; Cristina, S.; Alessandro, P. Catalytic combustion of volatile organic compounds on gold/cerium oxide catalysts. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2003, 40, 43–49. [Google Scholar]
  35. Jia, L.S.; Gao, J.; Fang, W.P. Carbon dioxide hydrogenation to methanol over the pre-reduced LaCr0.5Cu0.5O3 catalyst. Catal. Commun. 2009, 10, 2000–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Azzouz, A.; Nistor, D.; Miron, D.; Ursu, A.V.; Sajin, T.; Monette, F.; Niquette, P.; Hausler, R. Assessment of acid–base strength distribution of ion-exchanged montmorillonites through NH3 and CO2-TPD measurements. Thermochim. Acta 2006, 449, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Catalysts 13 00767 g001
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the catalysts.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the catalysts.
Catalysts 13 00767 g001
Catalysts 13 00767 g002
Figure 2. TEM micrographs and particle size distributions of the catalysts ((A,E) Au/R-C; (B,F) Au/CM; (C,G) Au/CL; (D,H) Au/CML).
Figure 2. TEM micrographs and particle size distributions of the catalysts ((A,E) Au/R-C; (B,F) Au/CM; (C,G) Au/CL; (D,H) Au/CML).
Catalysts 13 00767 g002
Catalysts 13 00767 g003
Figure 3. STEM-EDS maps of the Au/CML catalyst.
Figure 3. STEM-EDS maps of the Au/CML catalyst.
Catalysts 13 00767 g003
Catalysts 13 00767 g004
Figure 4. XPS spectra of Au 4f.
Figure 4. XPS spectra of Au 4f.
Catalysts 13 00767 g004
Catalysts 13 00767 g005
Figure 5. XPS spectra of Ce 3d.
Figure 5. XPS spectra of Ce 3d.
Catalysts 13 00767 g005
Catalysts 13 00767 g006
Figure 6. H2-TPR profiles of catalysts.
Figure 6. H2-TPR profiles of catalysts.
Catalysts 13 00767 g006
Catalysts 13 00767 g007
Figure 7. CO2-TPD profiles of the prepared catalysts.
Figure 7. CO2-TPD profiles of the prepared catalysts.
Catalysts 13 00767 g007
Table 1. Physical and structural properties of the catalysts.
Table 1. Physical and structural properties of the catalysts.
CatalystsSurface Area
m2/g		Pore Volume
cm3/g		Average
Pore Size
nm		Au
Content a
wt(%)		Crystallite Size of Support b
nm
Au/R-C900.50231.4424.2
Au/CM1030.49191.4721.9
Au/CL1030.45171.4921.4
Au/CML960.39151.4423.8
a Analyzed by ICP-OES. b Calculated from the average of support planes of (111), (220) and (311) using Scherrer’s equation.
Table 2. Binding energies of Au and surface Ce species of the catalysts.
Table 2. Binding energies of Au and surface Ce species of the catalysts.
Catalysts Au/R-CAu/CMAu/CLAu/CML
Au speciesAu 4f5/2 (ev)87.2087.2387.2987.33
Au 4f7/2 (ev)83.5083.5383.6283.65
Ce speciesCe3+ (%)7.9712.729.0412.4
Ce4+ (%)92.0387.2890.9687.6
R(Ce3+:Ce4+) (%)8.6614.579.9414.16
Table 3. Surface basicity of the catalysts.
Table 3. Surface basicity of the catalysts.
CatalystsTotal Basicity
(mmol CO2/g)
Au/R-C0.692
Au/CM0.817
Au/CL0.737
Au/CML0.989
Table 4. Catalytic performance of the catalysts a.
Table 4. Catalytic performance of the catalysts a.
CatalystsMAL Conversion (%)Selectivity b (%)MMA
Yield (%)
MMAOthers
Au/R-C71.191.68.465.1
Au/CM98.697.52.596.1
Au/CL91.598.02.089.7
Au/CML92.698.91.191.6
a Reaction conditions: catalyst 0.2 g, n (CH3OH)/n (MAL) = 25:1, 80 °C, 0.30 MPa, 2 h. b Determined by GC analysis.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, H. Au Nanoparticles Supported on Mn- or/and La-Doped CeO2 Nanorods for One-Step Oxidative Esterification of Methacrolein and Methanol to Methyl Methacrylate. Catalysts 2023, 13, 767. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13040767

AMA Style

Zhang H. Au Nanoparticles Supported on Mn- or/and La-Doped CeO2 Nanorods for One-Step Oxidative Esterification of Methacrolein and Methanol to Methyl Methacrylate. Catalysts. 2023; 13(4):767. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13040767

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Haojian. 2023. "Au Nanoparticles Supported on Mn- or/and La-Doped CeO2 Nanorods for One-Step Oxidative Esterification of Methacrolein and Methanol to Methyl Methacrylate" Catalysts 13, no. 4: 767. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13040767

APA Style

Zhang, H. (2023). Au Nanoparticles Supported on Mn- or/and La-Doped CeO2 Nanorods for One-Step Oxidative Esterification of Methacrolein and Methanol to Methyl Methacrylate. Catalysts, 13(4), 767. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13040767

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop