Next Article in Journal
Learning in Networks—An Experimental Study Using Stationary Concepts
Next Article in Special Issue
From Bargaining Solutions to Claims Rules: A Proportional Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Two-Dimensional Effort in Patent-Race Games and Rent-Seeking Contests: The Case of Telephony
Open AccessArticle

The Seawall Bargaining Game

GREThA, Université de Bordeaux, Avenue Léon Duguit, 33608 Pessac Cedex, France
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Games 2014, 5(2), 127-139;
Received: 24 April 2014 / Revised: 9 June 2014 / Accepted: 19 June 2014 / Published: 24 June 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bargaining Games)
PDF [230 KB, uploaded 24 June 2014]


Agents located from downstream to upstream along an estuary and exposed to a flooding risk have to invest in facilities like a seawall (or dike). As the benefits of that local public good increase along the estuary, upstream agents have to bargain for monetary compensation with the most downstream agent in exchange for more protection effort. The paper analyses different bargaining protocols and determines the conditions under which agents are better off. The results show that upstream agents are involved in a chicken game when they have to bargain with the most downstream agent. View Full-Text
Keywords: alternating-offer model; chicken game; public good; sea-flood; seawall alternating-offer model; chicken game; public good; sea-flood; seawall
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Delille, R.; Pereau, J.-C. The Seawall Bargaining Game. Games 2014, 5, 127-139.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Games EISSN 2073-4336 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top